1 in 3 Americans Think US Government Throwing Too Much Infinity Money Into Zelensky’s Black Hole

Related: “The Black Hole Just Got 10 Feet Deeper!” – Hohols Demand $1 Trillion be Delivered to Them Immediately

Zelensky’s black hole is bigger than a college girl’s vagina.

You can fit infinity money into this black hole – no one debates that.

We all stand in awe of Zelensky’s ability to make money disappear. No one is trying to take that away from him.

We are just asking the same question we ask about a college girl’s vagina: just because you can stuff it to the extreme, does that mean you should do so?

RT:

A third of Americans believe that the US has gone too far in its support for Ukraine in the present conflict, according to a new poll released on Wednesday. This is a sharp increase from late February, days after the conflict broke out, when just 7% said so.

According to a Quinnipiac University national survey, 33% of adult respondents think Washington is doing too much to help Kiev, while 21% say the US is doing too little. 38% believe the amount of American aid is just right.

1,659 adults nationwide were surveyed between January 11 and 15.

By comparison, in a similar poll released on February 28, 2022, four days after large-scale hostilities began, only 7% of Americans said the US was doing too much to help Ukraine, while 45% believed Washington’s aid was inadequate. 37% thought the support being provided to Kiev was sufficient.

Well, dear readers: you were in the 7%.

You might have been the entire 7% – the readership numbers aren’t exactly clear.

It’s something to be proud of.

The new survey also shows a total of 44% of Americans approve of the way US President Joe Biden is handling the Ukraine conflict, with respondents sharply divided along partisan lines. 47% disapprove of Biden’s actions on Ukraine, with 73% of Republicans supporting this view as opposed to just 16% of Democrats.

However, the poll also found that only 3% of Americans think the fighting in Ukraine is “the most urgent issue facing the country today.” The most pressing problems named were inflation (35%), immigration (10%), and gun violence (8%).

The fact that such a large percentage of the population supports this moronic hoax of a war shows definitively that democracy has failed and is totally irredeemable.

“Irredeemable” was also the name of the comic book that was the better version of the “Injustice” story of Superman turning evil. It was written by that cuck Mark Waid. I don’t think he consciously understood the implication of the themes.

Aside from a small percentage of Jews and other Eastern Europeans residing in America, there is zero reason that anyone would support throwing infinity money into Zelensky’s black hole other than because the media told them supporting this would make them a good person.

It’s a simple equation: if the majority of the public will believe literally anything the media tells them to believe, then the public is not in control of a democracy – the media is.

Why even have this extra step of the masses of people voting if we know as a matter of fact that the media holds absolute sway over a majority? Why not just put the people in charge of the media directly in charge of determining policy, instead of endorsing this canard?

This is why the Founding Fathers didn’t want democracy.

We had, in the beginning, a “Democratic Republic” where only landowners (i.e., reasonably competent people with some stake in the society’s prosperity) were allowed to vote. It’s a very big difference between that and what we have now.

People who own land are going to be a lot more intelligent and capable than the average landless peasant. Poor people are poor for the explicit reason that they are stupid, or at least an order of magnitude lower in intelligence than the rich or well-off.

Of course, the situation is slightly different now than it was in the 18th century, given that with the boomers, you had peasants becoming landowners in a way that turned out to be a complete disaster. However, even considering that, if we only allowed landowners to vote, it would absolutely put us over the edge of 51% in support of the policies that are beneficial to the country.