Can I Rant About the Anal Pope and Such? He’s Going Vaginal Now.

Saint Paul didn’t stutter, you freaks. It means what it says.

I’ve been fixated for years now on a need to join the Catholic Church. And I still will.

But there are questions I still have as to where exactly the line is for the Pope, and what exactly it means if he is totally out of control.

We appear to be entering “totally out of control” territory, frankly. In fact, that point was arguably passed some time ago.

I’ve read the various “trads” and so on. I feel I have the necessary information to understand, and yet, do not understand what it means if the Pope is evidenced to be a homosexual in clear rebellion against God and the Church. I understand, however, that there is an answer to this that is not Sedevacantism.

There is a question how that is actually Catholicism at all, as it would seem to fit the definition of protestantism. Although, given that it is not Sola Scriptura, it doesn’t have the problems of basic incoherence that most Protestantism has.

What is clear to me is that the answer to the question ultimately does not matter that much, because there can only be one Church.

And then…

Well, I could go on and on, of course. Catholics/Sedevacantists rage at me over it when I do go on, but what they are apparently unaware of (or don’t care about) is that something around 90% of white Americans were raised either completely secular or, more likely, in a ridiculous protestant church that should be an absolute embarrassment to any adult male. So, I’m going to write whatever I want about this, because my experience is shared by the majority of the English-as-a-first-language readership.

Further, for me it is an actual experience that I am experiencing, which is not usually what I’m writing about. Usually, I’m applying objective information that I’ve learned to various current events, or otherwise elucidating concepts based on a very stable understanding of the subject matter.

And yes. I understand the irony of a subjective perception of an objective understanding. But I’m right about women, I’m right about the Jews, I’m right about homosexuality, I’m right about race, I’m right about the Dalai Lama being a satanic cannibal, and I’m right about a lot of other things that were not taken for granted a decade ago when I started this website.

I’m that nigga who invented the Napcel, alright? 

At this point in my life, I say with as much conviction as it is possible for a man to say anything that Jesus Christ was the Son of God, born of a virgin, crucified and arisen from the grave, and that the sins we’ve carried on our backs and in our skulls since our whore mother Eve convinced our simp father Adam to go along with the brilliant plan of a talking snake can be taken off of us and we may be permitted to enter paradise with our Father God.

There is nothing I’m more sure of, and therefore, it is very strange, and a sign of an age of bad doom that I am not a member of a church. It may say something about me personally, or rather it must, but it says something much more about the age, and the fact that the Pope has called for the legalization of homosexuality among a very extreme list of other very strange statements is the biggest part of why I am not a confirmed Catholic at time of writing.

My current perception is that the Pope is not the Church, that the Church belongs to Christ and to us, the followers of Christ, and that good men joining the Church makes it better. My current perception is also that it is God’s will that the Eastern and Western Catholic Churches will reunite, and that Protestantism will stop existing as anything other than what it is in most of the world – a CIA cult used like Wahabbist terrorism or neo-Nazism to undermine states not on-board with the Americanist agenda.

It seems to me that if I am Irish-German then my obvious responsibility is to join the Western Catholic Church and do what I can to further the full reunification of the Body of Christ.

But I am learning this. I am working towards understanding. I am praying, primarily the Lord’s Prayer and the Orthodox Jesus Prayer, and I am studying, and I am having conversations, and I am thinking.

I am not ready to accept that referring to Pope Francis as “The Anal Pope” is not a good idea. The Bible says homosexuals deserve the death penalty, and I don’t need to do Sola Scriptura because among others, the Council of Paris (AD 829) explicitly endorsed the death penalty for homosexuality, and this has been standard through most of church (and for that matter, most of pre-Christian Northern European) history.

The Council of Paris gave very interesting reasoning for killing homos: that allowing them to live would bring down the wrath of God and give victories to the enemies of Christendom (Islam was of particular concern at the time).

When I look around, what I see is the wrath of God being brought down on those who tolerate and now actively celebrate homosexuality. As I look at what is happening to my people, and as I pray and ponder, I am willing to entertain not blaming the Jews in the same way I’ve typically been prone to doing. The Romanian (Orthodox) interwar politician and leader of The Legion of the Archangel Michael, Corneliu Zelea Codreanu, said:

“A country has the Jews it deserves. Just as mosquitoes can thrive and settle only in swamps, likewise the former can only thrive in the swamps of our sins.”

Codreanu was an interesting man and a fun writer. Possibly as I age I would take more issue with his numerous justifications for extreme forms of violence, and I would certainly take issue with his claims to have been given visions from the Archangel, as well as much of the mysticism in general.

(He was actually sort of a standard kind of whacko you found around both communist and fascist movements during this confused period. I don’t think it’s the same thing on any level at all, but it’s the same sort of thing, where people are going to look back and ask why Tucker Carlson was promoting gay marriage and Donald Trump Jr. was promoting trannyism during a time where the mainstream of the youth was promoting Hitler. There was just some really strange stuff happening in that period when man was first coming face to face with the awesome power of the machine. Being born into the era where you saw electricity first be harnessed at scale is going to lead to stuff like “hey, let’s put that terrorist guy who talks to angels in charge of our political movement.”)

But is the statement true?

Do the Jews settle the swamp or are they the swamp?

I am open to considering this further, but I think that probably, the answer has to be “both.” If men were free of sin, we would be free of the Jews, but if we were free of sin, we would not need Christ. So the temptations that the Jews bring are a form of violence, because we are in a fallen state. But at the same time, the more you resist sin, the fewer Jews you’re going to have around bleeding you.

As we return to the previous thread, taking note that the Jews are mere agents of the devil, however, we note: we are in a spiral, where sin is bringing doom and doom is bringing sin.

We should relate the concept that the victim is always the victimizer, a cycle that began with the pain that Cain felt, as his offering pleased not the Lord. This is not to say that Cain was a victim of God, but that his sin in slaying Abel came from a place of shame and hurt, which birthed hatred and violence. Since then, every victimizer has first been a victim.

Without God, there is no forgiveness, there is no repentance, and the sin through which we victimize one another can only continue to intensify. There is no way to clear the cache, as it were. So every man becomes a beast, preying on other beasts, as in the imagery of Inferno.

Both most obvious and most tragic is the boy molested who goes on to molest boys.

The thing that I loath most of all is the molestation of a boy. I have said this many times, and been confronted regarding why it should be different for a prepubescent girl, and it is because it does not break her soul. The molestation of a little girl certainly causes harm, and as much as I dislike women I would not downplay it, but homosexual molestation of boys is designed to take the innocence of a child and make it the incubation vessel for a monster.

The Pope has called, explicitly, for decriminalization of homosexuality. The only reason you would do this is if you wanted to increase the occurrence of homosexuality.

You are turning innocent little boys into monsters, you are bringing the wrath of God down upon us to increase this and all other evil, and with the increase in sin and doom, we develop further distance from God, and sin manifests more and more aggressively, and you now have celebration of mutilating children.

And darker things are still to come if God does not stop it.

For America, we must have passed the point where we are beyond redemption as a nation.

I have said that there is nothing more satanic than taking a vulnerable and innocent child and telling it it is the opposite sex and then injecting it with hormones and mutilating its body. Frankly, this action makes both child rape and human sacrifice look like a Mary Poppins dance routine. So I’m not sure where we go from here exactly, but I suspect it will involve requiring people to participate in it more directly. Although, with the pronouns and such, there is already a high degree of forced participation. You also already have the state taking kids from their parents to mutilate them.

The Pope is, in a way, participating in all of this.

He is now going from anus to vagina, once again assaulting the Christian faith and the order of nature.

Reuters:

Pope Francis, in a historic move that could lead to more inclusiveness in decision-making in the Roman Catholic Church, will allow women to vote for the first time at a global meeting of bishops in October.

In the past, women were allowed to attend the synods, a papal advisory body, as auditors but with no right to vote.

The revolutionary rules, announced on Wednesday, allow for five religious sisters with voting rights.

Additionally, the pope has decided the inclusion of what a Vatican document called “70 non-bishop members who represent various groupings of the faithful of the people of God”.

The 70 priests, religious sisters, deacons and lay Catholics will be chosen by the pope from a list of 140 people recommended by national bishops’ conferences. The conferences were encouraged to include young people. The Vatican has asked that 50% of the 70 be women.

Are the girls going to be rolling on X and selling feet pics as well, Pope?

You can say that is less extreme than his homosexuality promotion, but it’s actually not. It’s just as clearly a violation of the Bible and the history of the Church and it ties into the homosexual agenda, because it is only women who back the homosexual agenda. All men are fundamentally repulsed by it, which is why in the most masculine societies – Islamic and African countries – you have the death penalty, including my favorite “rooftop bowling” – while in the most feminine nations, which are Northern European states, you have the active celebration of child homosexuality and organized attempts by the state to use sexual abuse to turn children into homosexuals.

These women the Vaginal Pope is bringing in to run things will forward all of his various agendas, from the denial of Hell, to the invasion of Europe by the Islamic hordes, to the tolerance of the Jews, up to and very most aggressively, his gay agenda.

I should have started this with a better plan for circling back around.

Give me a second.

Yes, okay.

This is a very strange time in all aspects, and it is only capable of being this strange because the Church is hurting. If the Church were not hurting, there would not be all of these people trying to bring down God’s wrath on us by maximizing homosexual behavior. If the Church was healthy and strong and you had people like Tucker Carlson and Donald Trump Jr. out actively promoting homosexuality, you would have protests or like, a January 6 type situation at the Fox News studios.

The solution can only be to join the Church.

I’ve been wanting to see if I can interview both E. Michael Jones and Roosh V on this topic. It’s just another thing to figure out how to record. Some guy posted a really nasty comment about my audio on WANG TOWN a couple weeks ago and it hit. During my 3 months on Twitter, I’d say there were 3 hits, and that was one of them.

Too personal.

Too personal.

I will say: social media is garbage and I’m not buying a cellphone. And there is some sense of relief in this mysterious Twitter ban (although I still feel like it’s going to be reversed, because of the structure of it, i.e., double jeopardy for a pornographic joke of the kind that was not explicitly banned under pre-Elon Twitter).

I’m just going to have to cut it. This is another disaster, and for that I AM ONCE AGAIN APOLOGIZING.

But I think we got some ideas out there, and I put up 2,700 words in 48 minutes so I can now go focus on thinking about my impending series of very serious essays.

I kept saying I wanted to write another topic focused book, but when it comes down to it, when it comes down to virtually any topic (of a certain level of specificity), the difference between a 6,000-word essay and a 60,000-word book is elaboration that often borders on repetition and indeed, filler.

So, I was saying – the addiction hoax and the ideology hoax are both worthy of book length works, because these are things that like, no one says. Another woman book built on a critique of PUA/manosphere as further mommyism is also called for. But there are all kinds of things in my life, and things rarely get done. I’ve got at least 7 works between 30k-70k words, which have been written when people were whining the site was too low energy, which I don’t have the ability to finish without either an editor or a 10-day break (each work, probably).

But 3,000-6,000 word essays I can pump out in my sleep. The piece of garbage you’re reading now could be a solid 3,000-word essay about the post-protestant longing for Catholicism during the worst crisis in the history of the Church (wherein the Pope is actively promoting homosexuality). But that would take 2.5 hours, and I don’t think it’s worth it. You know. I’ve got like, crypto charts to look at and shit, bro.

People don’t even know I called WOO and made like, almost $600 last week, bruv. I was on the verge of calling myself the Ice Cream Man, and I told one dude at the barber shop and two hours later I had 5 niggas from Zone 6 roll up at my crib and took half my WOO winnings. I got smacked straight upside my head. Smacked that WOO straight out. Then the nigga is like “next time yall start name dropping Zone 6 niggas, we gonna pop your ass so hard your brains’ll be listing themselves on Coin Gecko.”

Plus, if I’m being real – if you can let a nigga just be real with ya – I think that the keyboard slam heavy content/low or no structure, overly personal (I’m not using the term “stream of consciousness” and would appreciate it if you did not either, but it does simulate thought if not stimulate it) – this particular style right here – is a relatively unique style which I am often able to make fun to read. I don’t think this is the best example of the style. But it’s not like this is the only way I write, you know?

But the numbers have always shown that the readership likes this crap. And sometimes, in these types of writings, you end up with gems like:

“I’m not using the term “stream of consciousness” and would appreciate it if you did not either, but it does simulate thought if not stimulate it.”