Daily Stormer https://dailystormer.in The Most Censored Publication in History Sat, 20 Sep 2025 22:42:59 +0000 en-US hourly 1 https://wordpress.org/?v=5.8.12 This is Only Beginning to Begin https://dailystormer.in/this-is-only-beginning-to-begin/ Sat, 20 Sep 2025 20:57:47 +0000 https://dailystormer.in/?p=688276

Yesterday’s piece was primarily about the “far right” pushing all of these mainstream narratives, but I am going to, probably on Monday, go through and show that it is the entire right doing all of these things they complained for like, a decade about the left doing. All of the “canceling.” Only with the right, they are going way beyond the left and saying that far from just getting people banned from social media and making it so they cannot ever work again (these crying faggots are literally getting waitresses fired, one waitress was fired for something her husband posted), they are saying they’re going to arrest everyone as well.

To be clear, this isn’t just the people who were posting TikToks of people cheering his death, but just people who said he was a racist. They are telling people to call and get people fired for saying that on their private social media accounts. These are the same precise people who had previously said this was the most evil thing ever.

The government fired Jimmy Kimmel, despite the fact he was probably going to get fired anyway. The government came in and fired him.

I don’t know how retarded all these people are, or which ones are retarded and which ones are malicious feds. But nigga, what I do know is that Trump talked and talked about how he was going to fight “the left” and then when he took office, every single fucking thing was about Israel.

Did you know there is still no federal law against mutilating children in child tranny experiments? Maybe you didn’t know that. You probably did know Trump’s deportation rate is less than Obama’s and that there is no move whatsoever to criminalize hiring or renting to illegal immigrants, or to federally criminalize giving them free healthcare (I guess excluding real emergencies). This would obviously get rid of like 90% of them in a matter of weeks without the need to throw screaming women into vans in the church parking lot. But the federal government did take control of all American universities, and is forcing them to teach that Israel is God’s chosen and is only defending itself by genociding children. The Trump administration has seized extraordinary executive powers, and all of it is either used for the sake of Israel, or is some stupid totalitarian spectacle.

These are the people who the far right and the normal right are begging to protect them from “the far left,” and supposing, or claiming to suppose, these powers will be used to stop the trannies. The fact that Trump didn’t move on day one to ban child mutilations should prove to even the drooliest retard that trannies are not the top concern.

So you’ve already seen what this guy does. We have these clips of “JD Vance” talking about a “de-Baathification” of the universities, then what you get is a “Zionization” of the universities, while they still teach all the tranny and anti-white stuff.

So why would anyone think these new speech regulations would have anything to do with anything other than the Jews? How could any honest person, assuming they have any idea what is going on, think that?

The fact that the “far right” is going along with this is the most shocking, but “JD Vance” hosting Charlie Kirk’s show and encouraging people to hunt down and silence anyone who isn’t sufficiently emotional over Charlie’s death is nearly as bizarre. All of these other freaks – Matt Walsh, Christopher Rufo, all of the rest of the people who screamed “freeze peach” – are now literally doing the mirror world version of everything they said they opposed on principle.

Again, maybe they believe “the left” deserves this, or whatever, but even if you believe that, how can you believe it will actually happen? Trump’s people have shown zero interest in this. Look at the way they covered up Epstein. All of this stuff is only about Jews. The hate speech laws – and I think they are going to change the name, but still push through new speech laws – are only going to be used against enemies of Jews. Maybe some random trannies who literally mean nothing will be arrested (instead of putting them in an insane asylum where they should have already been), but it will all be about Israel.

Before the Kirkocaust, there was that law against burning the American flag, and all of these people said “well if it’s illegal to burn the gay flag, I don’t care if they make it illegal to burn the American flag.” Firstly, it was never illegal to burn the gay flag, but okay, even if you believed that, then why not legalize burning the gay flag? Why take away more freedoms?

People are claiming I’m some kind of libertarian. Actually, I’ve supported Hitler, and I support present day Russia and China. I am not against “statism.” I am against giving these kinds of new powers to a government that we know as a factual matter is completely controlled by Jews, which, demonstrably, uses any and all powers it has for Jewish purposes. How could someone fail to see that them saying “we’re doing hate speech now and canceling everyone who is a leftist” is not a cover for more aggressive measures against people who are against Israel and the Jews? Could anything be more obvious?

It’s maddening.

Anyway, I had the Snitch Fuentes tweets and clips on hand while going through these clips, and gathering the clips of all of these more mainstream freaks is sort of a big project, but I will do it. Maybe on Monday or Tuesday.

For the record, I’m not really using a lot of AI. It is very useful as a research assistant. Much easier than search. I’m not using it for writing (except in the few cases I’ve done it as a joke, which I assume are obvious), and anyway, finding clips on Twitter is still a nightmare. It’s shocking how badly Twitter works, in terms of search or discovery of any kind. It is apparently supposed to be an Insta style “doom scroll” app, but those of us with websites who need specific clips, which are primarily hosted on Twitter, have a helluva time.

But I’ll do it. I want this all on the record.

The Tucker Carlson Show on Kirk Changed My Mind

I have been both ultra critical of Carlson at points as well as supportive of him at other points. I have found that the claims he is a CIA agent amount to “his dad worked for the CIA” and “he says he tried to join the CIA and they rejected him.” I’m not necessarily opposed to being convinced of that theory, I just haven’t seen any serious evidence. What I’ve seen is a person who appears genuine, but who also has a rather low IQ ceiling, saying things that I mostly agree with and pushing the narrative of right-wing criticism of Israel very aggressively. I legit can’t see how that could be considered bad. (Please don’t come at me with “gatekeeper” and “limited hangout.” I don’t think you know what those terms mean. I do know what those terms mean. And thus far, they do not make sense to me with regards to Tucker. This is despite the fact that he’s done some things I’m very against, in particular pushing neocon type rhetoric about China.)

Whatever the case, I liked his show about Charlie a lot. I don’t know how anyone could really complain about it.

What affected me most was his claim that in private conversations he had with Charlie, he was saying he was trying to get out from under the boot of Israel, and was willing to lose all or most of his donors in order to take a moral stand on the Palestine issue.

I don’t think he was doing this much publicly. He was talking about it some, but being a college campus guy, it would have been impossible not to. And he was saying God gave the political state of Zionism to the “chosen ones,” even though Saint Paul explicitly said that the old covenant was obsolete up until he died. But Tucker saying other things were going on in the background was very believable. And he did in fact allow Tucker to say the Epstein-Mossad thing at the conference, and then invited him to the next event, even while he was losing donors left and right and being called an antisemite.

Tucker also had on an Orthodox priest and said that Charlie was very interested in Orthodoxy, which obviously does not support the evangelical kookery that says “Christians were wrong for 2,000 years and actually rabbinical Jews (followers of a religion that didn’t exist when Christ was crucified) are the chosen ones.”

Candace Owens, also a close friend of Charlie’s, is saying similar things.

The Conspiracy

Tucker is promoting the idea that Israel killed Charlie with an “I’m not saying that of course” type of wink-winking. I’m coming around to that point of view. Bibi coming out every day with a new statement about how he didn’t kill him doesn’t necessarily prove that, but it is the most bizarre shit I’ve ever seen.

Initially, the story – “random trans activist with Utah style gun skills kills Charlie because he’s too online” is believable enough.

The thing here is: we now have the government taking all of these insane actions, pushing this entirely new concept of “right wing cancel culture,” the “hate speech” stuff, and murmurings of an Ultra Patriot Act, which would no doubt involve Palantir and this AI police state control grid I’ve been talking about. They needed some event to make this happen.

I don’t think at time of writing there is enough evidence to prove the “lone gunman” theory, and I think the burden of proof is on the people pushing that narrative. They are not releasing much information on the alleged shooter. Trump just declared “Antifa” a terrorist group, though no one has even suggested that the shooter was a member of this group, or of any group. The only thing we know is that he was very online, and apparently had a tranny boyfriend. That’s all.

If I was going to come up with a conspiracy theory, I would not go into multiple shooters or whatever else. Although it is very strange that CNN and others made the stupid claim that the .30-06 rifle could be assembled and disassembled in a matter of seconds. Then this Zinn Jew making the distraction. No one explained what the hell that was. It got memory holed until they reported he was arrested for child porn. There are several other weird things, such as why we only have grainy video when all of those cameras would have been in HD. Many other strange things to consider.

But there is no need to get too kooky.

My theory would be that someone groomed him on Discord. That would be some intelligence agency that found a somewhat unwell individual and manipulated him over a period of months. They do this constantly. They get them in a “group chat” where the group chat is all feds, and they convince them they can be a hero. Then they explain to them how to do all of these necessary actions in order to make the thing happen.

No one is asking “cui bono?” Tranny activists certainly do not bono from this event. The Trump administration does, and as the Trump administration is effectively a proxy for Bibi Netanyahu, Israel does as well. A lot. I don’t think it is going to be called “hate speech,” but there are going to be new speech regulations, and the only people who will benefit from those are the Jews.

Shutting down universities, infiltrating TikTok, and buying CBS news is not enough to shut down criticism of Jews. You have to make it illegal or legally murky enough to create a chilling effect if you want people to really stop talking about the Jewish issue. And Charlie’s death creates that pretext.

It does not make sense to me that, understanding this, the Jews would simply wait around for some random trans activist to create the pretext. You would create your own pretext. And if you create a plausible situation, where even someone like me can say “well, the story kind of does make sense in a cut and dry way,” you can ram it through.

I initially said that if Israel was going to do it, they would set up a Moslem shooter. But that might be too obvious, and anyway, as you are witnessing in real time, this thing right now has the same effect without creating something absurdly obvious.

I’m struggling to believe it could be a cut and dry “lone gunman” situation. It’s just way too convenient and the lack of transparency makes no sense if it is cut and dry.

It feels like Dick Cheney and the Jews calling for “a new Pearl Harbor” months before 9/11. Like, wow, what fantastic luck.

To be clear: I don’t think the reason they would kill Kirk is that he was going to turn on Israel more aggressively. If Tucker is right and he was considering converting to Orthodoxy, then yes, that could be part of it. But the main reason would be to create this entire new social and political climate where all of a sudden, cancel culture is cool, and “hate speech” is on the menu (and in the longer run, the whole AI police state, which will also have elements of “classic police state” with the rollout of ICE and the flagrant violations of Posse Comitatus with the military running around everywhere).

“Most Men Alive” Gate

I suppose I need to address the fact that I have a headline on a relatively popular article that contains the phrase “one of the most men alive.”

Here’s the situation: I make mistakes like that all the time. I have always had some kind of dyslexia and now have a brain tumor. I have a staff member who is tasked with correcting this, as I honestly just can’t really do it. No one is perfect. He is currently still being paid his full salary, even though his workload is like, 4% of what it was. He doesn’t have a contract and I could just fire him, but he’s a good guy and also I have all these future projects I might want him to work on.

But that was. Wow.

I am using normie memes from 15 years ago because apparently that is what the kids are into. I have no idea why the kids are into that. But who am I to judge? I just want to be cool by any means necessary.

By the time I realized it was up there like that, it was much too late to fix it, and I just had to play it off like it was some kind of meme no one but me understood.

I would have said “weaselly.” Which I think is true, even though the Tucker information has led me to believe he could have been planning to become less weaselly (which should be easy to do when you’ve already got $15 million or whatever, frankly). But nonetheless, at the point of death, he was engaged in weaselism.

But the editor is great. The only good employee I’ve ever had, other than my sysop. And all the other good ones. Some of the others were good. But most of them ended up hating me.

I’m an impossible boss. I mostly refuse to even communicate with my employees. I never really wanted to be the manager of a company. I had a vision (actually a 30-year plan), before I was banned from everything and no longer allowed to use banks (just in case anyone doesn’t know this, I’ve not even been allowed to have a personal checking account since 2017, lol). I think I’m the single person never even accused of a crime who is on this type of list. A lot of people have now been “debanked,” but that is usually just their company, and they can usually just open an account at a different bank. I was going to hire a “CEO” to run the business side and deal with employees, because running a company is something I have never really had any interest in.

So, I’m a bad boss, and someone who will tolerate this and work with me and do a consistently good job is not someone I’m willing to let go easily, even if he is costing me money every month and not really doing much work since I stopped writing as much back in February.

Anyway, “Most Men Alive” is now a meme. I am going to start using it.

And in many ways, I think it is accurate to say that Charlie Kirk was indeed one of the most men alive.

RIP.

I’ve Got a Lot to Say

There is a bunch of stuff I need to say about all of this.

I joked that I was going to do a ripoff of Redbar’s podcast, and then a whole bunch of people were like “this is the best idea ever.” So I’m seriously looking into this.

If I’m the only even real nigga in this right wing game, and there be no other nigga even in the semi-real category, I need to do something other than post by-weekly blogs. That could actually be the best possible format.

I need to look into the technical side. I’ve also lived in like, four countries in the last three years, so that is kind of a thing to be considered. I can’t really build a serious set. But I can have mics and cameras that I can travel with, and a couple of monitors and a TV are not especially expensive.

I think I would charge $20 a month, do one show a week, and every other show would be free. So people would be paying $10 a show. But given that I can’t do advertisements, this is sort of just how it needs to be.

It wouldn’t be a complete ripoff of Redbar, by the way. Firstly, it would be political content instead of comedy content. Aside from that, maybe 85% ripped off. It’s obviously going to be different, because I’m not Jewish and I can’t do that Howard Stern bit. Plus I don’t have the fashion skills. But I do think going through and watching all the podcasts with these right-wing people and criticizing them might be the best possible format for me to express my own views. But I don’t really see how this wouldn’t work. I think I would come across well on camera.

I have always said “you know, I spent my whole life building up these writing skills, so switching mediums doesn’t make sense,” but I’ve also built up analytical skills that do translate directly, and I think I could get the “on air” thing down within a year. Not that the first year would be horrible, but I think by the second year, I could really be rolling.

For those uncool people who are not familiar with Redbar, he goes through and investigates comedians, showing that they’re a bunch of weirdos, and pointing out what is weird about them, and it seems that would be an ideal platform for me to demonstrate what is wrong with all of this, and explain what should be different. After making that throwaway joke, it is becoming more serious in my mind.

People have said I’m not good at podcasting, but my podcast with Paul Town was getting like 20,000 downloads and we only made three episodes. So I think I’m not that bad. And I think people would understand me a lot better on camera.

With Bitcoin on Venmo and Cash App, I’m pretty sure anyone can figure out how to send Bitcoin to sub, and I’ve now got a system of using new BTC addresses to receive the money.

As of right now, I have like, no money. Well, I’ve got my own money from other work I do, but most of the donation money has been spent on lawyers and related stuff relating to the fact that this site has ruined my life. I’ve been thinking about a comeback, and settled on “books,” but while I am going to publish some books, this “right wing criticism podcast” seems to be a very good idea, and a way for me to make enough money to keep shit going. And allowing people to clip it, while also putting the free shows (every other show) on Rumble for as long as that lasts could really create a presence that I currently do not have because this website is so totally buried.

This is a big project. I know nothing about audio or video. So I’d have to figure all of that out, or find someone who understands it, and probably find a producer, a Jules figure, who doesn’t have an impenetrable ******* accent.

Let me know what you think in the comments. And don’t forget to like and subscribe and jingle my bells.

]]> Ten Days After the Assassination of Charlie Kirk, A New World Order is Coming Into View https://dailystormer.in/ten-days-after-the-assassination-of-charlie-kirk-a-new-world-order-is-coming-into-view/ Fri, 19 Sep 2025 15:52:07 +0000 https://dailystormer.in/?p=688250

When Charlie Kirk died last Wednesday, I saw people having complete meltdowns, and felt it was my job to be the voice of reason. This came across as crass at the time, as people were really full of emotion. If you were one of the emotional ones, and you go back now and read those articles today, I am certain you will have a different opinion of what I was doing there.

Yes, it was crass, but the crassness was a response to the emotionalism I was seeing everywhere I looked. What I was trying to do, hoping to do without much hope it would work, is ground people by pointing out that this might be emotional for you, but all that means is that the government is going to use this to push an agenda on you.

Here’s some of what I wrote the day after Charlie died (you can skip this, I hate quoting myself, but I need to make this point):

What I have seen, however, is that people are having a really, really serious emotional reaction to Charlie Kirk getting assassinated. Like, I read Twitter, and people are having emotional breakdowns, freaking out, calling for some kind of Super Patriot Act.

…

Right now, the Trump administration is building up this internal army in the form of ICE, and much worse, he is making these deals with Palantir. There were various social media accounts calling for Palantir to be “unleashed” on illegal immigrants. Now it’s calls for the entire power of the federal government, including our militarized law enforcement and Palantir, to be “unleashed” on “the left.”

How did that work out when the full force of the state was unleashed on “international terrorism”? Did that work out good for you? Did it work out good for the country?

…

To all of you having this emotional reaction: I admit, I do not understand what you’re going through. It seems to be very difficult. I don’t understand or respect that, but I can accept that it is what it is. But please. Relax. And think about what it is you are calling for. Look at this massive movement of all of these social media accounts demanding the federal government be unleashed on the public. Does it feel maybe a bit artificial? I mean, even if you’re feeling it, are you able to see how maybe there is something a bit nefarious going on here?

Can we think maybe just one step ahead here, and consider maybe what the consequences of giving intelligence agencies, paramilitary law enforcement, and private military contractors the ability to “hunt down domestic terrorists” might turn out perhaps not so good? Maybe it could in fact be like, the worst possible thing imaginable?

…

Anyway. Whatever. I guess I hope you enjoy your experience with these dark forces you are calling upon. And after all, who knows? Maybe the US federal government are the good guys this time and they’re really going to help you stop trannies or Islamofascism or whatever? Could be. Could be.

Screenshot this I guess so you can come back and mock me after giving over massive new powers to the government results in a great outcome, where your stupid woman emotions are satisfied after Israel and Peter Thiel build you a utopia where no one ever gets shot with a gun again.

And then:

The narrative from the right is daunting, with Trump in his video paying tribute to Kirk using the opportunity to call for some kind of unspecified crackdown, which we can only assume means even more egregious restrictions on speech and more military and militarized cops everywhere. There is a huge astroturf campaign to do the exact same thing the left did to the right when they claimed that “speech causes violence,” and therefore “speech is violence,” and therefore free speech shouldn’t exist.

Then, of course, as I’d said, on Tuesday, Pam Bondi, the perplexing Attorney General, came out with an announcement that we now have new hate speech laws in America, which she is going to enforce against anyone who is saying… whatever it is they might be saying.

That is wild, and really much more extreme than the total doom I was expecting. “Hate speech is not free speech” is an ADL-coined phrase that has been floating around on the left for decades, and was considered anathema to conservatives. Conservatives tend to believe in free speech, and they also tend to be aware that according to the Supreme Court, in multiple rulings, there is no such concept of “hate speech” in the United States.

But she, or rather the people who tell her what to say, apparently believed that the Charlie Kirk assassination video was emotionally distressful enough that the government can now roll this out.

As the day progressed, she partially walked it back, saying she just means “hate speech” as in violent threats. Violent threats, if they are imminent and actionable, are already illegal, and no one ever called that “hate speech.” She also said that people celebrating Charlie’s death was “hate speech” which she classified as illegal – in the clarification!

Again, this is way beyond what I was predicting. But there it is!

Just to be clear, Bondi is not any kind of ringleader here. Just watching her, you can see that this is a person who would struggle to be the manager of a Walmart, and would probably be out of her depth as the shift manager at a gas station. She has no idea what any of this means, and it is all coming from people behind the scenes.

But here’s the thing: The Big Guy is also on board. In an interview where he was asked about Bondi’s rollout of new “hate speech” laws, Trump gave tacit approval, saying that Charlie, who was obviously against hate speech laws, would support these laws now that he’s dead.

The apparent implication there is that if there had been hate speech laws in America, it would have prevented Charlie’s assassination, which obviously makes no sense.

Trump’s other comment so far on the issue was a kind of jokey thing about how the media should be charged with hate speech.

That isn’t really very funny, especially in light of the other clip, where he appears to endorse it.

It should be really easy to just say “no, we’re not doing that, she was misquoted” or whatever. So that is the direction things are going in, at the highest levels. Trump has already established a precedent where he is able to just make up laws out of nothing and no one can stop him, so it seems likely he’s going to try to enforce some kind of hate speech code. It’s certainly what his handlers in Israel want.

It makes no sense how Charlie’s death was even related to previous notions of hate speech, given that all of those related to a protected group. “Hate speech,” the term which Bondi and Trump are using, is an established term which means “criticism of a person based on their race, religion, or sexual orientation.” Multiple countries in Europe have laws which use this term, as defined. If Trump and Bondi want to come up with some new form of illegal speech, which has to do with criticizing people for their political positions (which would be the only thing that would relate to Charlie’s death), why not come up with some new term for their censorship program?

And how do you make it illegal to criticize someone’s political beliefs? That doesn’t even make any sense. That would be like, more or less 100% of political speech. It is difficult to imagine political commentary in America that isn’t in some form a criticism of the other side.

So, I think what you obviously have here is a situation where the Israel lobby wants to push through the “hate speech” laws that we’re all familiar with, the ones that make it illegal to criticize Jews and Israel (as well as blacks, trannies, and immigrants), while claiming it is somehow related to Charlie Kirk.

If We Compare Them to the Power of Government, Trannies on TikTok are Not Really a Very Big Threat to Anyone

I don’t know how many trannies or “far leftists” there actually are. I don’t think there are very many. I think it is possible they can do an assassination, as with Charlie Kirk (though I am coming around to the theory that the Jews did it). They can riot and break some store fronts. But they are not a massive military threat. Most importantly, they present nothing even close to the threat that the US government, which is controlled by Israel and Silicon Valley, present to the American people. Radical trannies present less than 1% of 1% of the threat the government presents.

Trannies present less than 1% of 1% of the threat black people present, frankly. This is seriously not a big issue. It’s been made a big issue by the media, but the idea that you have to beg the government to take your rights to protect you from trannies is absolute lunacy.

Therefore, as an impartial observer, the idea of calling on the government to take away your rights to protect you from the trannies sounds completely insane to me. I can’t process how anyone of good conscience would think that is a good idea, which is why I can only really assume that the people calling for that are bad actors.

Full disclosure: the streamer Nick Fuentes spent the first several years of his career more or less copying everything from me directly. Which is fine, I supported it. I supported him. He then got involved with Richard Spencer, who I believe is an FBI informant and a general rat, and then got jungled up with the confirmed FBI informant Charles Johnson (Johnson bragged about being an FBI informant, you can look all that up on your own time, many of the sordid details have come out in court recently). I’ve always had a red line, saying that I won’t support anyone who is involved with the FBI. The reasons for that should be obvious. But in response, all I did was post on my semi-private chat forum that I would no longer be supporting him, because I don’t support people involved with the feds. He started attacking me on his show and implied he had blackmail material on me, which was utterly bizarre. I demanded he reveal this (it doesn’t exist but even if it did, I’m not being fucking blackmailed, bro) on the semi-secret forum which he was reading to see my comments about him. Instead of releasing the material, he just continually said nasty things about me, and continued to reference blackmail material without acknowledging I said to post it all, despite the fact I never attacked him on the Daily Stormer and basically no one saw my criticism of him on this obscure web forum. I didn’t post about him here because in my experience, no one really cares if someone is an FBI informant, and exposing that doesn’t really do anything. I have no idea why people are not more concerned about that, but I’ve seen again and again that they don’t care.

I just wanted to lay that out for the sake of openness. Full disclosure and all that. It doesn’t relate to anything I’m going to say here. Well, the fact that he’s associated with the feds might relate. But that’s for you to decide, dear reader.

He’s become a kind of centerpiece of the Charlie Kirk assassination situation, and appears to be the heir apparent to the “young influencer” throne of Charlie Kirk. He’s being promoted by all the mainstream influencers, and has gained hundreds of thousands of followers since the event.

When I was telling people this whole spectacle around the Kirk death was a government psy-op, I also pointed to the fact that Fuentes, who is supposed to be “far right,” was aggressively whining and calling for aggressive government action to shut down trannies or whatever.

He was openly calling for some form of “hate speech” laws, demanding people be punished for their speech.

Here’s the first concerning tweet:

It’s obviously impossible for the government to ensure that some random person never murders another random person ever again. That is an insane comment. Complete nonsense. But the implication is obviously some kind of Ultra Patriot Act. It’s the same language used in the wake of 9/11.

Then this:

You’d think anyone would see that and think “whoa, hey, slow down there. What?”

What would “crush left wing terrorism” involve, exactly? What are the potential things that this could imply? It’s a pretty short list, and everything on the list involves giving the government new and expansive powers, both to spy on people and to punish people for things they haven’t done yet.

And then:

At this point, anyone who isn’t in a complete state of total derangement is saying “hey, whoa, hey, hold up there buddy – did you just say you want to arrest people who celebrated Charlie Kirk’s death? Because I don’t understand what that even means.”

Having read his posts and listened to some of his shows, it’s clear that it means exactly what it says it means: he is calling for the arrest of people who celebrated Charlie Kirk’s death. We have never heard anything like that before. I was completely shut down in 2017 for joking about – arguably, celebrating – the death of a fat woman at the Charlottesville rally. Millions of people laughed at this. And then I was totally deplatformed from everything forever. But I don’t remember even the most insane tranny calling for me to be arrested. This is something totally new that we’ve never heard from an “influencer” who now has 900,000 followers on Twitter. It is the most extreme call for government tyranny I’ve seen, ever.

But then look at this suspicious individual’s next tweet, in response to the above Pam Bondi tweet:

How is that not literally exactly what you were calling for?

What did it mean when you were saying people “must be held accountable” for cheering Charlie’s death? It is definitely not currently illegal to do that, so you were calling for some new form of restrictions on speech. But what, you just didn’t want it to be called “hate speech”?

Of course, it doesn’t really mean anything because none of this gibberish means anything, so I suppose it’s best not to think too much about it.

But here, following the timeline, he then tweets @FBI (!!!!!!) calling on them to arrest Jackson Hinkle for legal speech! (Or, at least, for speech that was legal before the death of Charlie Kirk. We don’t really know what speech is legal now.)

Here he is threatening Jackson with prison.

This is snitch level 9000.

Do people like snitches? Do they think they’re hip and edgy? Even when they’re all bloated like that? I mean, if there was like some really sexy snitch, who knows, but a snitch with that bulbous face, looking like it’s about to pop?

“I’m really hip bro, I’m really edgy and ironic and stuff. I’m also an FBI snitch. I do really funny comedy bits.”

I never even imagined anyone could become this much of a public snitch and be celebrated for it. (Please see my premises relating to fake reality overriding classic reality to get an idea how this is possible.)

He went on to make it clear he is against free speech and wants the government, which by the way, as far as I know, he still argues is controlled by Israel and Silicon Valley, to crack down on speech.

The left, for what it’s worth, never actually made a major push to make speech illegal. Not in the way that Trump, Bondi, and Fuentes are doing. This is so very far beyond anything the left did. They just tried to get people banned from everything, and in some cases, sued them. That was very bad, but this push to arrest people, these new “hate speech” laws, newly minted top influencers tagging the FBI to arrest people for legal speech, this is all new. That should be understood.

All that is insane. But it is basic sellout type behavior. People didn’t care he was a fed. But a sellout? A snitch? Is that something people will tolerate? Will they think they are hip and cool for supporting him? I suppose normies will. That is the goal here. He’s being groomed now as the new Charlie Kirk. He’s got an edgy past, where he was copying my shit, and that gives him some kind of street cred, but now he’s the “give the government the power to arrest people for speech” guy.

And here we get to the real meat:

It’s not about Israel! It’s not about Silicon Valley! No, no! Look over here – the trannies are the threat!

This is where it is all going. The government, which is run by Israel and Silicon Valley, is not the real threat. The real threat is trannies. And if we have to give up all our rights to a government controlled by Israel and Silicon Valley to protect us from the trannies, then so be it! It’s a small price to pay to stop this tranny menace!

And here’s where we take the shill train straight to Kook Town: this bloated Mexican individual is promoting Russian bot conspiracies.

Whoooooooaaaaaa! Heeyyyyyyyy!

Russiagate is back, baby, and this time it is the edgy far-right irony guy doing the investigation!

That is some of the most hardcore “yikes” I’ve encountered in my day.

Here he is on video claiming anyone questioning the official story is a RUSSIAN!

Frankly, I thought the story made sense as just a tranny. But the extent to which this is being exploited by the government and shills like Fuentes makes me wonder. I’m being driven to the “Israel did it” side. I’ve been especially moved by Bibi’s daily announcements that he didn’t do it.

He’s doing these daily. Imagine. His assistant is like “sir, it’s time to record your daily video saying you didn’t order the assassination of Charlie Kirk.”

Seriously, regardless if you believe the official story or not, trannies are not some massive threat, and Russia doesn’t have anything to do with anything. Russia, like “hate speech,” is a Democrat talking point that these people apparently think worked for the other side, so they might as well pick up the ball and run with it.

And this Fuentes character isn’t just some random Mexican I have beef with because he works with the feds and did a weird blackmail threat against me. I wanted to get that out of the way at the beginning, reveal a potential conflict of interests in the coverage, but I promise I would be saying this same thing if I had nothing to do with him ever. Just look at it. He’s everywhere. Every major account is praising him.

You’re basically witnessing a coronation.

He is now on all the big shows, he is being defended by Matt Walsh and all of his supposed enemies. He just had a big appearance with Russell Brand. He is going mainstream, and he is saying the things necessary to go mainstream – “don’t worry about Israel and Palantir, the real threat is trans ideology!” and “Russia is behind all of this anti-Israel stuff!”

Here’s Ian Miles Cheong defending him.

That’s frankly the end of the argument. Honestly, I could have just started with that, and it would have explained the whole thing. There is nothing more damning than being defended by that guy.

This is all completely staged. You are witnessing the birth of the new shill of shills. That’s why he got all teary over Charlie. He’s in place to pick up all the Charlie fans. He’s cool with the youth, you know. Just check out his zany sense of humor. I don’t have any specific clips on hand, but just watch one of his four hour streams, and you’re going to see zany like you never thought humanly plausible.

Speaking of teary eyes, Sam Hyde, another “far right” figure, one of the only ones left really, cried on video and called for some kind of Ultra Double Patriot Act to stop the trannies.

I like Sam Hyde, I even love Sam Hyde. That is some of the cringiest tripe I’ve ever seen in my life. This is not the look for your brand, bro. You don’t want to be crying on video, firstly. No one wants to do that. Like, literally no one other than maybe women who are trying to get their boyfriend arrested for DV wants to be crying on video on the internet. And we have this idea, again, that the trannies are the real threat and the government – one more time, the same government which is entirely controlled by Israel and Silicon Valley – is going to save us from the tranny threat. What even is this? How many people have even met a tranny?

You can show these videos of people celebrating Charlie’s death on TikTok, but I think 80% of the people who were celebrating that posted it on social media. I do not think there is any kind of massive tranny threat. People just are led to believe that because trannies are disgusting and the media was talking about it for a decade. No one has actually done a calculation of how many of these people there are, but no one I know has ever met one.

Sam says that if Trump doesn’t like, send the military to arrest everyone against Charlie Kirk in the next two weeks – he keeps saying this two-week deadline – then the world will end or everyone will die or something. It’s wild. It’s almost like parody. I kept wanting to believe it was an over the top comedy bit.

Remember when Reagan was shot by a guy who was in love with Jodie Foster? Can you imagine if there were calls to give the government huge new spying, censorship, and policing powers to crack down on people in love with Jodie Foster? Honestly, that sounds ridiculous, but there were probably more people in love with Jodie Foster then as there are radical trannies now. I mean, she looked great in Taxi Driver.

Wait, hold on. My producer just notified me that Jodie was only 12 in Taxi Driver, and said I should retract that statement. But we’re just going to keep moving.

With Sam, I don’t want to attack him. Everyone shits the bed once in a while. I have. Not like that, ever, or even anything close (can you imagine me crying on camera?). But you know, sometimes you miss, I guess. People are also saying he stopped doing steroids recently and that can definitely make you emotional. So, okay. I’m not putting him in the same category as Fuentes.

But what do we have going on here?

This is at best a mass hysteria like coronavirus being exploited by the same bad actors.

Tucker Carlson as a Voice of Reason

Maybe Tucker Carlson is some kind of secret agent as well, I don’t know. I have no idea. But I can say his response was measured and reasonable.

Unlike Fuentes and a lot of these other creeps, he said we cannot tolerate any form of restrictions on speech as a result of this event, and basically said people should rise up if Trump tries to push this through.

(Note: anyone who wants to stop these speech laws is going to have to go through Fuentes, though somehow I don’t think that will be much of a problem.)

Tucker’s whole show about Charlie was touching (I mean that legitimately) and helped me to understand him better and sympathize with him. He had an Orthodox priest on saying that it’s our belief that the dead should be let to rest for forty days before we start making any kind of judgements about what the death means. And Tucker’s explanation of Charlie’s behind the scenes with him about Israel was convincing. He basically did say Charlie was turning against Israel, which I didn’t believe, but he said it was happening in the last few months, and he had many conversations with him about it.

Tucker is doing a kind of “I’m not saying Israel killed him of course, WINK WINK WINK.” He is definitely on that train, but he’s not just going to say it, because that’s not really his style.

I’m still not totally convinced Israel did it, but I will tell you, the lone shooter theory is looking less and less likely as I look at how aggressively this whole machine is using this event. Of course, they’re going to use any event, but this has become such a big thing that it seems like something you wouldn’t wait for to happen randomly.

I think what is very likely is that the tranny was in Discord channels, and was groomed by someone from some intelligence agency who explained to him how to do all of this. Again, lone gunman is technically possible, but just look at what is happening. It is Kirk Crackdown Mania.

Who’s Left?

What voice of reason exists now? Frankly, I thought Sam was one, then a few weeks ago he interviewed Fuentes, and I was like “ugh.” Then he goes full Kook Train to Bonkersville (please bring your own tissues) with this Charlie thing.

I am not seeing a voice of reason, at all. Tucker is the closest thing. And I’ve certainly aired my complaints about him, which are many, some of which are rather serious.

I think Theo Von is our man. And that is why, through the powers invested in me by being the only remaining member of the original alt-right, I am hereby anointing Theo Von as the absolute leader of the right-wing.

I can’t go out on that joke. Too stupid. Not really funny at all, actually. Though to be honest, I sometimes do feel like Theo is only person on the internet who isn’t completely full of shit. But you know he’s like, close friends with RFK Jr. And what does that even mean? What are they talking about? What would they have to talk about, other than for RFK to send through government talking points? Tim Dillon is having meetings with “JD Vance” (fake name, btw). Joe Rogan is jungled up with all these people, including Thiel himself.

The problem is:

  • People love money
  • People don’t want to go to prison or be murdered

“You can have a bunch of money and we won’t put you in prison or murder you” is the ultimate deal. It’s an offer you can’t refuse.

Unless you’re me, I guess. But I am deranged. Seriously. I’m one of the sickest people I know, and I was even before this brain tumor (which is getting much larger by the way, but it seems totally harmless). I do not consider the fact that I’m the only one among these hundreds of internet people that has actually kept it real to be a sign of integrity but rather a symptom of mental illness. Because I will tell you, from 15 years of experience: this is totally fucking pointless. It is something to suffer for a purpose, there is value in that. Suffering for no purpose at all is just stupid or insane. For me it’s mostly the latter. I would like to think. Being insane is a lot more respectable than being stupid.

I should have started a landscaping company.

Anyway, I hope everything works out.

I’m sure it’s probably all fine.

(More to come. Just getting rolling here. Having written all of this just now I’ve convinced myself of the Jewish conspiracy to murder Charlie Kirk. This is not audience capture. Or maybe it is, but I am captured as an audience of myself. My own writing just convinced me. I will be filling you in on that and many other important aspects of just how totally fucked you truly are.)

]]> Hold On a Second. https://dailystormer.in/hold-on-a-second/ Thu, 18 Sep 2025 16:17:23 +0000 https://dailystormer.in/?p=688240

I’ve got a lot of material on the new hate speech laws and the fact that these supposed “far right” individuals have cheered it on and then are now pretending they’re not cheering it on while continuing to cheer it on.

I’m going to drop a bomb on all of this. I promise you.

I am working on it. Also, I’m fasting again, and about to hit the euphoria phase where I will be working at a hardcore pace.

Don’t worry. I got you. Trust me. I see all of it.

Shocking, really, how correct I was about this whole thing, no?

Truly.

How could I know?

It’s because I live in classic reality, so everything is obvious to me all the time.

I think this should drop tomorrow.

This is the most insane thing I’ve ever seen. These people are saying the biggest threat to the universe is trannies and women on TikTok so we should give all power to the fucking ZOG.

I am thinking of becoming a Redbar style critic of all of these far right homos. I think it may be the time. I don’t really like to do video, but I look fantastic. I’d have to get some money for that. But I think I can pull it off. You’re all just going to have to pay me with crypto, but I can take bitcoin from Venmo or Cash App now because of my genius plan to produce new addresses for everyone so you can’t get doxed for paying me.

But I’m talking about a subscription podcast with video. I think this is where this is all going. I haven’t concluded that and I would need a studio and the first year would be not great but I could become the master in this world.

There are no voices left other than me. I am the last man standing. I’ve pointed out that people are feds for years and no one really cares. You know what people care about? Selling out. And we are seeing the biggest sellout since… let me think of something extreme… oh, when Kurt died and Dave made the shittiest drooling pop rock tripe career off of Kurt’s corpse. That is the sellout level. You think “oh Anglin use a more current reference, half your audience doesn’t even know what the Foo Fighters are” – but there is no sellout on that level in the years since.

I don’t want to spoil it. But a new era has begun. I used to think it would be wrong to put my information behind a paywall because the public deserves the information, but I’ve realized the public doesn’t deserve the information because they won’t do anything with it and therefore I should just charge.

The Redbar model is my inspiration. I will host my own videos. And you will have to pay for them. People can clip shit and post it wherever, but if you want the whole shows, you’re going to have to pay a lot. I mean big bucks, like $20 a month unless you have a coupon and then the clips will go viral and I will get more and more subs and I will be able to say nigger and everything.

I will need a tech team and a studio so I am going to need to do a donation drive, but the donators will get subs. I’m talking about the full thing. I am going to go through and clip all these people and analyze them under a microscope and it is going to be a menace. Just a complete ripoff of Redbar, zooming on faces, all of it. Except about political cringe and scams and sellouts and obvious crimes.

It looks like this is going to be illegal. But hey, I don’t know man. What am I supposed to do? Just shut up? I’m not doing that. Fucking arrest me, okay? I’m not doing this hate speech shit all these people called for and then when they got it said “whoa whoa whoa.” And then kept supporting it.

I think I have this skillset.

I am doing it. Well, I’m thinking of doing it and leading into it.

But yeah, the next big exposé is coming in, then we’re moving to building the studio and figuring out what all this shit with the mics and cameras is. I’ll do a donation drive for people who want this. Maybe no one wants this, but I’m pretty sure everyone does, and I need the money anyway.

I’m going after everyone. No limits. This is going to be a holocaust of the faggot ass fake right-wing sellout movement, which is literally everyone but me.

This is coming. Six years of Xanax and I am switching to Vyvanse, baby. Max out the hatred as well as the love, we are maxing it all out, we are doing podcasts, we are charging a lot of money, we are exposing them all in the most disgusting ways imaginable.

Oh my God I just heard someone say “pizza.” Holy frigging gut punch.

I am coming.

]]> The Assassination of Charlie Kirk: A Gay and Retarded Post-Modern Tragedy https://dailystormer.in/the-assassination-of-charlie-kirk-a-gay-and-retarded-post-modern-tragedy/ Tue, 16 Sep 2025 22:13:09 +0000 https://dailystormer.in/?p=688222

Everyone is trying to play the victim after Charlie Kirk’s assassination. But if you really think about it, I’m the biggest victim of this situation. I’m expected to write something meaningful about a completely meaningless tragedy and it’s basically impossible.

People have complained about my commentary. It’s come across as too crass or whatever. I don’t know what website people thought they were on? I can’t take that criticism seriously. However, I can admit: something apparently very impactful happened, and I have not offered any meaningful analysis. I’ve made an inane point about how everyone is taking it too seriously. This is self-evident and not a useful observation. I’ve also said that the government and influencers are exploiting the event as part of a larger program. You’ve got this other guy as the president, but you have to keep the program going, you have to keep manipulating the people, blah blah blah, and so on. That also should be self-evident (though it hardly seems to be).

There was a collective visceral reaction to Charlie’s death and the media was going nuts. People apparently expect from me some type of lighting of the way, some attempt to make sense of the nonsensical event that somehow feels very weighty or historical for inexplicable reasons. As I am “America’s Explicator” (at least that’s what it says on the award), the people expect I should have something more meaningful to say here. Therein lies the issue: how am I supposed to have a meaningful analysis of something that means nothing?

Clearly, Charlie was a person, every person’s life has meaning, and no one should be killing people. But this issue of people being murdered is not new. Assuming the Gaza genocide isn’t making an impression because it’s far away and it’s brown people, then what about the constant school shootings, the endless random black murders? People are being murdered all over the place, and the explanations, if one is given at all, tend to be completely meaningless.

When you hear “radical tranny activist assassinates Zionist shill to fight hate,” it sounds like “Glibdolf Horzet mungles Frinkles Kloplofell to fight jazzlefroth.” It feels like the only reasonable response is to gently close my eyes and massage the bridge of my nose with my thumb and forefinger. “More vile nonsense,” he thinks. “How shocking.”

You will not find anyone offering a satisfactory explanation of the meaning of the event, because there literally is no meaning in this event. Charlie Kirk was promoting grotesque nonsense, taking a check to shill, to confuse people on purpose for the benefit of the people with power. The shooter, as far as we can tell, was into some aberrant sexual behavior, which is something that typically results from an overconsumption of pornography. The sex pervert became obsessed with the idea that the paid political shill was a threat to his feelings. If you can find meaning in that, you’re smarter than me and everyone else.

If I am supposed to try to find any kind of deeper meaning here, the only thing I can really do is analyze why there is no meaning.

Some notable premises involved include:

  • Politics is a game of peek-a-boo for adults. It is all a farce performed by morons, a false reality built up to explain to the public why society is so bad. Meanwhile, anyone still connected to classic reality can easily see that society is so bad because the politicians are simply running cover for elites who act above and beyond politics. This leads to a very dark place. The things politicians and other political actors say and do have no relationship to classic reality.
  • People can accumulate large sums of money by being involved in politics. Simply, you are paid, often extraordinarily well, to lie and trick people.
  • Most humans have become obsessed with wealth as a result of various factors, including (but not limited to) the availability of wealth. Becoming wealthy was not a viable life path through most of history, because there was very little wealth available, and all that existed was centrally controlled by the immovable objects of state and church (one should note that on the full timeline of human existence, church and state are themselves both relatively new). When wealth became plausibly available to peasants, the goal for many became status.
  • Material wants were covered a long time ago, so there is no struggle to meet basic needs, and therefore people struggle for wealth. In the prehistoric era, if you didn’t kill a deer with your spear, you might find some other guy who had better luck and use your spear to kill him and take his deer. You could justify in your own mind that you had to do it to feed your own family, and also, probably the people you killed were somehow evil or whatever, and you were just doing what was right by killing them to take their food. Just so, in the current era, you might take a check to bamboozle people with nonsense. Just so, someone involved with politics may justify his own skullduggery with all manner of mind tricks that are biologically imprinted on people.
  • For humans, at least those of us thinking and speaking in English, “meaning” is both a logically sound, empirical quality of significance as well as an understanding of purpose. “The meaning of a statement” and “the meaning of life” refer to separate concepts, but ones which should be closely linked. This is to say that the philosophical concept of “meaning” should be based on something logically sound, and everything which is logically sound should fit into one’s understanding of the nature and purpose of human existence. In classic reality, all experiential phenomena fit into a comprehensive and coherent understanding of the whole. This whole should be a reference point from which the individual can understand the purpose of experiences, as well as provide context capable of reasonably satisfying any existential questions they may have.
  • The lack of any requirement to work and physically push yourself to satisfy basic needs removes most intrinsic meaning from life. This might seem as though it is philosophical or something, perhaps it even appears esoteric, but it is actually very basic and obvious. “The meaning of life” throughout all but the most recent human history revolved around doing what was necessary to survive. Up through the early stages of the industrial era, most people who didn’t work starved (or watched their elderly and younglings starve).
  • Penicillin did not become widely available until the 1940s. (Note: antibiotics are probably or obviously extremely dysgenic.)
  • People will fill the holes left by a loss of the meaning found in survival with all sorts of things. For the first decades of the post-survivalist age, things were booming (hence the “boomers,” you see). Things degraded rather rapidly, as you would have expected beforehand if you were the expecting sort. Being stripped of the basics of meaning, those survivalist behaviors, people began to lose their sense of higher meaning and purpose, previously embodied in religion.
  • Religion is a system that binds together the people, but also is a system through which they codify a collective understanding of meaning. A religion is a wrapping around the understanding of reality, tying it together and keeping it as a whole that is comprehensible to the individual. Every religion that existed before the modern era was inclusive of the respective culture’s understanding of classic reality.
  • In the absence of classic religion, the impulse that drives religion is funneled into other avenues. Because religion is not logical, the things that fill in the spaces where religion used to be do not have to be logical. Politics have become a religion in the very literal sense of that word. This includes all that it implies it would include. New realities require new religions. Some have framed politics as “tribal,” but this is misleading, as they are in fact cultic. Religious beliefs left over from classic reality have become a subcategory of the larger religion of politics.
  • Post-modern American politickers are able to use la technique to create a situation where instead of a monolithic state apparatus filling that void, a la communism or fascism, you split the populous roughly 50/50 into warring religious cults. This is purposeful: they want people fighting with each other with religious fervor over things that are of no consequence, half of the population blaming the other half for the problems. The people with the actual power can do anything they want while one side blames the other. (You can see both parties make moves to balance the sheets. That is part of what they do with immigration. The last time a president won more than 60% was Nixon in 1972, who won 60.07% of the public for his second term after an extremely popular first term. He was politically assassinated shortly after the “landslide” victory.)
  • Because politics are now a religion, people can go on political crusades. Therefore, people are willing to kill other people for what amounts to nothing more than a nonsensical money scam (see premises 1-4).
  • Sex is a basic animal need, but the individual does not die if it is not met but rather, collectively, a species will die if it is not met. (This almost happened to pandas and is currently happening to Koreans and Japanese and to a slightly lesser extent, white people.) In an environment where this basic need is not sufficiently met for a large percent of the population, deviant sexual behaviors will develop and eventually become endemic.
  • Chronic pornography use is a compulsive behavior that develops out of sexual frustration, as well as loneliness and boredom, and also eventually leads to a very dark place, where the obsessions that develop have nothing to do with the initial issues that started the voyage into porn hell.
  • Human minds are not designed to deal with electronic media. Electronic media allows people to create fake realities which to the individuals engaged are indistinguishable from classic reality. (A further multitude of fake realities are created by no one in particular, but rather are spawned from the void itself and transmitted through electronic media.)
  • Many of these alternative realities involve wealth and sex.
  • Between the development of the printing press and the current moment, classic reality was gradually phased out. At this point, most people in the West have no connection to classic reality, save death.
  • Technology, in general, is making people insane, as a result of both psychological and physiological factors.
  • No one ever thinks he himself is the bad guy.

Thus, with the Kirk assassination, you have two humans, born as innocent babes, who were shoveled into competing false realities bloated by religious fervor. Both were unaware that they were existing in fake realities. If Charlie Kirk was aware he was in a fake reality, he would not have traded his personal integrity and basic human dignity for money in order to bamboozle the public with Jewish propaganda. If the assassin were aware, he would not have murdered a random shill, only to spend life in prison or perhaps get the death penalty. Charlie was certainly driven by wealth, whereas the shooter’s drives appear to have been sexual. (Note: indubitably, a big part of a man’s drive for wealth is sexual in nature.)

These nonsense simulations of realities are all-encompassing and thus very convincing to those operating within them. If a member of one reality kills a member of a competing, hostile reality, the killer is seen as a holy crusader while the deceased is sainted as a martyr. Everyone behaves as though there is some deep meaning to all of this, though no one on either side can explain it without spewing obscene, meaningless gibberish. Because there is no meaning, no one can explain the meaning in a coherent fashion.

Other than to those who knew him personally, “Charlie Kirk” was not a real person inside of these fake realities. He was a symbol for various meaningless things. For some, he was a symbol of goodness, for others a symbol of evil. Within classic reality, human life is sacred, and it is sad someone died, but none of the parties involved in this debacle maintain a connection with classic reality.

In the American cesspit, neither the left nor right sides care much for a “both sides are the same” narrative. However, in classic reality, there is no meaningful difference between the sides, because their respective realities are equally nonsensical, and separated from classic reality by heaps of meaningless nonsense. Because the basic needs are met and there is no survivalism, the assumption is we can easily create a utopia where no one wants for anything. The problem is that the “wants” have vastly expanded as a result of the basic needs being met, and apparently, when the needs are met, the wants can expand to infinity and beyond.

Ostensibly, the “left” side is trying to create a utopia where everyone is brown and children are indoctrinated into homosexuality from birth. All the junkies will stop living on the streets when the government does more housing subsidies. Also, it won’t be complete communism, but the middle class will pay crippling taxes and then eventually they will start taxing rich people to pay for all the programs. Also, they are going to change the weather with solar panels and windmills and electric vehicles that use all of these poisonous rare earth minerals. Russians and Chinese will be forced to do human rights, as will everyone else in the world, because of our values. Maybe we’ll also have sharia law, but there will be free abortions so every woman can pursue her passion. Guns will be made illegal and then no one will ever die. It’s all very easy to do. But these right-wingers are holding us back.

Meanwhile, the “right” side is trying to create a utopia where most people are brown (but you’re still allowed to be white, no one will stop you) and being gay and a tranny is fine (but you have to be in high school or at least middle school before you learn how to do it – remember, the Florida law everyone threw a fit over said you weren’t allowed to teach gender theory in school… before fourth grade!). Furthermore, we stand with Israel and its right to defend itself, because God gave them that land, so we are going to give them infinite military support forever, and anyone who criticizes this arrangement is not welcome in the country. It’s also about peace, but in order to get peace, we have to do a lot of war. Maybe we’re going to back off of this whole “take on China” thing, because that is a bit overly ambitious, but we’re going to kill every Venezuelan cocaine trafficker to stop Mexican fentanyl from China, and then when there is no more fentanyl, no one will do drugs anymore. And also it’s “Judeo-Christian,” but we respect all religions, because it’s in the Constitution. (The Constitution is very sacred and holy because of freedom.) We especially respect Hindus, who are geniuses, and we need to bring them in to build AI. Everyone will be rich because they work in a factory. Because we support Israel, there will be a “rapture” before the “end times” where “Space Jesus” will come down and suck everyone up into Heaven with him. We just need to make the deals and get it done. But these lefties are holding us back.

Surely, most of you, my dear readers and close parasocial friends, are going to lean more towards supporting the right-wing, because their positions overlap with yours more, even though you presumably don’t agree with a lot of the elements of their platform. But you know that this is their platform. These were the beliefs of Charlie and, we can safely assume, the shooter as well. I know Charlie was also talking about families, keeping women out of the workplace, gun rights, and surely at least he was saying “Christianity,” even if it was bizarro Zionist “Bible-believing Christianity” (which stands in stark contrast to all those versions of Christianity that claim the Bible is a bunch of lies). But the overall platform is not great. It’s not great because it is a political cult existing in an alternate reality where all of the associated nonsense is believed with religious fervor. (Note that the elements of Christianity included in Charlie’s doctrine are a subcategory of the larger whole, which is the religion itself; see premises 9-10.)

There is the the third utopia, which is the utopia of the actual ruling elite who control all of the other new realities. Their utopian vision mostly comes from Silicon Valley, and they are focused on building an “AGI” super intelligence which will help them use gene-editing, nanobots, and a computer-brain interface to become “post-human,” which means they will become immortal and invade outer space. Peter Thiel is the closest thing they have to a spokesman at this time, though Elon Musk promotes many of the less offensive aspects of this utopian scheme. You can read the publications of the World Economic Forum (WEF) where they are already planning on how to govern outer space. Yuval Noah Harari, the “ideas man” of the forum, has said that he wants most humans to die off, and his plan is to give them enough drugs and video games to prevent them from breeding as they run out the clock. Alex Karp, the Jewish head of Palantir, the military tech company founded by Peter Thiel which is currently responsible for the AI missile targeting of Palestinians, has revealed a vision which involves every human being on the planet having their every move monitored by AI systems. Though these people are not always straightforward with the details, they are pushing for a “total information awareness” program, which combines all public and private data on individuals, then uses electronic means to track them, including their cellphones and all internet use. They also plan to standardize the camera systems that you see everywhere and use facial recognition to track everyone. It is all very bizarre, but when you look at Trump, and the people he surrounds himself with, it is very clear that this is who is in charge. They wanted Elon to be in the White House basically running everything, and that was happening for a few weeks, but Elon was just too weird and incompetent. Thankfully, James “JD Vance” Bowman is a direct protégé of Thiel, who handpicked him and built his entire political career. He is of course the current favorite to be the next president. Palantir has contracts with the US government right now to combine all of the federal databases with information on people into a single database searchable through AI. Many Republicans were calling for this to be used more aggressively against immigrants somehow.

It’s all quite the mess.

Making an Ass of Us Both

The reason my initial responses may have appeared crass (aside from the aforementioned “check what website you’re on, bro”) is that I often lazily assume everyone is on the same page as me in terms of the existing premises. Within all of this context, when I saw people on social media posting pictures of Charlie with his kids, I did not make the intended jump to putting myself and my family in that position, but rather viewed the people trying to get me to make that jump as emotionally exploitative vampires trying to suck out my emotional and spiritual energy in order to promote their insane political cult. I’m not going to apologize for that. When I saw people spamming these photos of his family, I said “oh come on, fuck you,” not because children losing their father is not universally recognized as a human tragedy, but because the only reason someone would post those images is to promote this stupid political cult.

People are murdered every single day, and with each of those murders, you could go through and show the families of the deceased, and ask people to put themselves in that situation. Obviously, you can’t get all emotional about everyone in the world who is murdered every day. All this would do is drain you of all of your emotional energy, which should be spent on the people in your own life who you can have an impact on, not pissed down the spiritual abyss of social media.

Here’s something to think about: many or most of the people telling you to look at pictures of Charlie Kirk’s kids, to look at the up close video that his wife had filmed of herself crying over his corpse, are the same people who were calling for the ban of TikTok so you couldn’t see videos of Palestinians being murdered by Israel. I do not say that to make the claim that Charlie deserved to be killed for promoting the genocide in Gaza. I don’t even intend to claim that you should care as much about Palestinians as you do about someone from your own country. Rather, I want to point out that these people understand that emotions can be manipulated for political purposes by images of human tragedies.

(Note: I am aware that people are saying that Charlie was planning to turn on Israel, I’m aware he made some comments in that direction. I don’t believe he was going to turn on Israel or that if you went through his entire series of statements over the last two years, or even just over the last few months, that many people would reasonably reach that conclusion. The short story there is that Charlie had a history of making contradictory statements in order to create sound bites to appeal to people with differing opinions. There was obviously no way for him to operate a youth organization without addressing the Gaza situation in some way, but for every clip you see of him saying something about Epstein being Mossad or Israel going too far, you can find a clip, from the same timeframe, of him saying starvation in Gaza is a hoax, that all the hospitals are bases of Kuh-Hamas, and that “God gave this land to the Jewish people.” He did a similar thing with immigration: you can find clips of him saying “great replacement” around the same time as he is promoting unlimited H-1B visas. People try to frame it as “he was a young man who was progressing and changing his thinking,” but I’ve gone through much of it and concluded that he was deliberately saying different things in order to confuse people about his agenda via TikTok clips. The longer analysis of all that, where you would actually have to go through and find the clips and create a timeline showing this, is beyond our scope today. At some point in the future I will go through and find the specific dates of clips. For now, I will simply make it clear that yes, I read Max Blumenthal’s article and listened to several hours of podcasting on the topic.)

To further compare and contrast the death of Charlie Kirk with the ongoing genocide in Gaza: what are the political ends of showing these images? Well, Western journalists are banned from Gaza by the Israeli government, so all of the videos from Gaza are filmed by Gazans. Their motivation for posting the tragedies they are experiencing is very straightforward: they are hoping that people will protest the US government and somehow get them to stop sending Israel all of these bombs and war machines. These images are then shared by people who agree that the US should stop funding this genocide. The people posting the images of Charlie and his family are mostly people who are in the political cult he represented, and actually believe in it. But when you have all of these politicians, and influencers linked to the politicians (and the intelligence agencies in most cases), pushing this “Charlie the martyr” narrative, they are doing it for political purposes. Obviously.

One of the immediate political purposes seems to be onboarding conservatives, who were very recently fighting for “free speech,” with a censorship agenda. Many Republican politicians, as well as influencers, are calling for censorship of “leftists.” Even if you supported that (personally, I do not, but I can understand how someone would), it is absurd to imagine that this censorship will result in what you wanted it to result in. It seems a bit ridiculous to have to explain this, frankly, but after the left called for censorship and got it, Twitter and Facebook engaged in a conspiracy to sabotage Bernie Sanders. Furthermore, it was leftist openness to censorship that led to the entire “coronavirus pandemic” debacle, which was not good for anyone and which the leftists are now just as aghast by as the rightists. Furthermore, you’ve seen what the Trump administration’s censorship goals are with the way they’ve operated so far: their primary objective is to shut down criticism of Israel and Jews more broadly. They would also obviously move to censor things such as people asking what exactly was going on with that boat they blew up off the coast of Venezuela. Again, even if you support censoring trannies or whatever, it is never a good idea to give the government censorship powers. They are not going to do what you want them to do. You’ll get a dopamine hit when some tranny you hate gets censored, and then looking back years later you’ll realize they were censoring all of this other stuff you didn’t know about because it was censored.

In the longer term, there is clearly a bigger project at work to build the AI police state mentioned above. Everything that Joe Biden did was also in service of this agenda. Part of that was encouraging lunatic civil unrest, encouraging crime, opening the border, and so on, creating a situation which could then be responded to with “see, we need law and order, so it’s time for an AI police state.” Trump’s administration is now using every conceivable excuse to get military and militarized federal police out on the streets in America, which is incredibly concerning. And yes, I am aware that many people are cheering this on, because they are against crime and immigrants. But how many times do we have to go through this? If they said “we’re putting military on the streets because we are going to seriously fuck you,” no one would be cheering that. They have created the conditions for you to demand something which would have been unthinkable a few years ago. If you look at it, a lot of the basic premises are also nonsensical.

Following the Kirk assassination, we are seeing politicians and influencers call for the government to “make sure nothing like this happens again.” This is clearly a call not only for censorship, but for mass surveillance and a “pre-crime” profile that monitors everyone all the time and determines “who is a threat.” That is, to do exactly what Palantir is saying they want to do. The idea that you can create a system to prevent a random tranny activist from shooting someone makes no sense on its face. Even if you have a ubiquitous AI monitoring system, reading every private message and compiling it in databases using AI, you cannot prevent a random person from killing another random person. It simply isn’t possible.

The crime problem could be addressed by changing laws and giving strict prison sentences to blacks (something which had bipartisan support until very recently; you’ll recall Joe Biden’s famous “super predators” speech). Illegal immigrants could very easily be removed by simply giving strict prison sentences to anyone who hires them for a job or rents them an apartment. You then just announce that immigrants who find themselves without a place to work or live can call some number and get a free plane ticket back to their country. Using paramilitary forces to go around grabbing random Mexicans off the streets is absurd and it’s very surreal that anyone believes this makes sense. Illegal immigration is a federal crime, so you don’t have to argue with blue state governors in order to make laws giving 15-year minimum prison sentences to any individual who hires or rents to an illegal immigrant. I always said that the wall was sort of a stupid idea, because if you just use strict law to make sure the immigrants don’t have anywhere to work or to live, they will just leave. These militarized ICE raids are at best goofy, but when you understand the bigger picture, they are much more insidious. It appears, to an impartial observer, that the real goal has nothing to do with immigrants, and is rather about acclimating the American people to having military and military-like federal cops on the streets in masks running around and throwing screaming people into vans.

These are Complicated Issues

I understand there is a lot here. But I hope this context gives a clearer picture of why it is I was not impressed by the reaction to the killing of Charlie Kirk. Though I have nothing to retract or apologize for, I should have perhaps been more sympathetic towards what people were feeling after seeing Charlie get shot to death while engaging in a political event. I was not a fan of Kirk, and I am legitimately frustrated by the hagiography that has gone on in the wake of his death, but although my default setting is “edgy millennial cringe,” I am able to understand that there are people who look to me for more than shock therapy in the wake of an event that had an emotional impact in the way this assassination apparently did.

I have no doubt that after things cool down, and people see that the government is indeed using this event to do exactly what I said they would do, those articles will age a lot better than all of these posts and podcasts calling for a brutal crackdown on “the left.”

Sadly, though I think I’ve done a lot here to clear up where I’m coming from on this issue, I do not have a final analysis that is any better than that I put in the more crass articles: the government is going to do what they are going to do, the masses of conservatives will cheer it because of this emotional manipulation, and it will not be for many years later that they reevaluate and say that maybe it wasn’t such a good idea to give the government more censorship powers, or to endorse an AI-backed militarized police state.

]]> Definitive Proof Charlie Kirk Assassination was AI Deepfake https://dailystormer.in/definitive-proof-charlie-kirk-assassination-was-ai-deepfake/ Sat, 13 Sep 2025 13:36:54 +0000 https://dailystormer.in/?p=688204 WARNING TO READERS:

Honestly, I’m really bored of this Charlie Kirk situation. I want to watch the Tucker Carlson interview with Sam Altman and write about that. I just read a book about him that says he raped his sister and is a cult leader, and I’m really a lot more interested in that than this ongoing Israel bullshit, of which Charlie Kirk is a part.

I would like to say this will be the final word, but it won’t be, because as you’ll see, our society is going to drastically change as a result of the lunatic emotional hysteria over Kirk’s death.

Hopefully, now that the dust has settled, we can all sit down and have a serious conversation about the voice of a generation of young and upcoming Zionist shills dying tragically. The headline is, unfortunately, not representative of the content herein. A better name for the post would have been “Charlie Kirk: A New Pearl Harbor.”

We just need a sitrep. Or, most people apparently do. I don’t, because this was all obvious to me when it happened, but a lot of people got all flustered by the video of the shooting.

Firstly, we should note that the alleged killer was caught, and it appears to be some kind of “evil twin” type situation:

Anyway, he’s an anarcho-tranny leftist or a fascist Trump supporter groyper furry or whatever. Who knows. Who cares.

It pretty much looks like an acceptable “lone gunman” situation, though he was on Discord with someone, meaning it could have been instigated by someone. I wouldn’t really be totally surprised if the feds set this up, for reasons I’ll get to later.

I saw people accusing Israel of being responsible and kind of laughed. That sounded ridiculous, but it is awesome that now any time anything happens, everyone is just like “well, it must be the Jews again!” Bibi Netanyahu has been going around, doing a full press media tour about how he was Charlie’s best friend and he was the best friend of Israel and this was basically another attack on Israel. So clearly Bibi is exploiting the situation. But I don’t really think that means he did it. Charlie was the only popular pro-Israel young conservative. Apparently Ben Shapiro is saying he’s going to replace Kirk as leader of TPUSA, which really does not help Israel. That is going to be a complete mess: Shapiro, surrounded by Mossad agents, with snipers on the rooftops, doing “prove me wrong” on campus is going to make people hate Jews way more than they do now.

But yeah, don’t get mad at me: I’m open to conspiracy theories, if those seem to become more likely as more information comes out, but the “official story” currently seems to provide a sufficient explanation: “young guy who grew up in Utah around guns started getting into leftist stuff on the internet, and like all young men in America, was emotionally unstable, and planned what amounted to a very easy assassination.”

With that out of the way, I guess I need to start with making it clear, again: I’m not “celebrating” Kirk’s death. That would of course be “ghoulish” as many, many, many have noted. What I am not going to do is pretend I feel really sad about this, and that it’s really such a horrible and awful tragedy this guy that everyone hated while he was alive getting assassinated really means a lot to me. I understand you are getting spammed with his photos of his kids.

I was especially moved by his wife telling someone to record her crying over his casket and then post it online.

Very normal, to have someone film a close-up of you crying over your dead husband’s corpse so people can post it with emojis online. “Hey, I’m going in to mourn, come film it and make sure to really get up in there with the closeup, normal people like this and will want to post it with emojis on the internet,” said she. I’m sure this is emotionally moving and very normal to normal people.

But listen, dude. I am also not going to act like all the people screaming and crying about this don’t look like babies, or that the emotionalism and moralizing I’ve seen over the last few days doesn’t disgust me. I think it’s shameful. No one thinks people should get shot or whatever, but come on. Man-up. Saying “ghoulish” is not a magical incantation that means everyone has to throw a fit and moralize over someone no one even liked getting shot. You don’t have permission, as an adult man, to get all whiny about this and moralize people.

I’m against killing people, I didn’t “celebrate” Kirk’s death, and I have respect for his kids and his freak exploitation wife and blah blah blah. I’m not going to accept that I’m a bad person for not really caring because you used the “ghoul” incantation against me.

But come on, look at this:

You’re upset I’m calling these people faggots?

If you’re going to have an emotional breakdown, you should have an emotional breakdown over the implications of this clear plan by the establishment to turn Charlie Kirk into a saint because he got shot. He was not a saint. Whether alive or dead, he was a totally poisonous figure who I doubt any of my readers agreed with on much of anything.

The pedophile journalist and friend of the site Michael Tracey has a good analysis up about who Charlie Kirk actually was, where he also takes the position that telling people “it’s too soon” to talk about who Kirk actually was is childish and dumb and doesn’t serve the public interest but is rather an emotional manipulation campaign by people who aren’t really particularly interested in what Kirk stood for but rather only interested in promoting this new narrative that Trump should use leftist style authoritarianism to blame “the left” as a movement for Kirk’s death. He says that Kirk was a scumbag shill, and getting shot doesn’t change that. Which is true.

The narrative from the right is daunting, with Trump in his video paying tribute to Kirk using the opportunity to call for some kind of unspecified crackdown, which we can only assume means even more egregious restrictions on speech and more military and militarized cops everywhere. There is a huge astroturf campaign to do the exact same thing the left did to the right when they claimed that “speech causes violence,” and therefore “speech is violence,” and therefore free speech shouldn’t exist.

Here’s a Republican Congressman saying he’s going to use government authority to get everyone banned from the internet for life if they don’t like Charlie Kirk:

Anna Paulina Luna, who you may remember masturbating to as she babbled incoherently about “interdimensional creatures” on the Joe Rogan show a few weeks ago, was calling up and threatening every tech company to take down messages critical of Kirk, and she says they all complied.

Although I really enjoyed masturbating to the show, this bitch is literally retarded. She was barely making it through Joe’s softball questioning about the nature of these interdimensional creatures she claims to have evidence exist.

You have retards and women fronting for a huge Jewish agenda to vastly transform America.

You might be fat and stupid enough to think “oh but I want to shut down the left like they shut down us,” but are you really fat and stupid enough to believe that this won’t just mean “silencing criticism of Israel”? If you are that stupid, you should probably just do fentanyl and play video games, because you are not fit to participate in society. Of course any crackdown on “the far left” in America is going to be about shutting down criticism of the Jews. It’s not going to be about stopping trannies. Kirk himself was pro-tranny.

He viewed it as one of his main goals to transform “Christian conservatism” into a virulently pro-homosexual movement, and he was constantly on tour with various “gay conservatives,” including “right-wing trannies.”

The Republicans don’t care about stopping trannies.

It wasn’t that long ago that Trump was saying he was going to make universities stop being woke, then the entire thing – literally, the entire thing – turned out to be about shutting down criticism of Israel. And because conservatives are fat retards, they cheered it on, as the government literally took over the curriculums of universities, outlawing criticism of Israel and Jews.

Post-Kirk is big post-911 energy.

I am not saying it’s going to be as extreme as the post-9/11 crackdowns, but they are going to do a whole bunch more anti-free speech stuff, a whole bunch more stuff with expanding the cops. At some point, there is going to be an announcement that “ICE isn’t just about immigrants.” I can promise you that. This massive army is not being built up in the US to deport immigrants. Trump’s administration is still failing to meet Obama’s numbers, they don’t really have that much interest in deportations, and they’re building an internal military force, to be bigger than all other federal law enforcement organizations combined.

If the government wants to do things you don’t like, they have to make it look like they are doing things you do like. I still don’t really understand how that is complicated to anyone. But when they’re talking about “ideas kill people” and it’s time to crack down on ideas and they’re building a massive internal militarized fed cop force, and releasing the military on the streets – this is not going to go somewhere you will enjoy.

And yet, the government and influencers are demanding the government “do something” to ensure no one ever gets shot again?

What does a world where “no one can ever be killed again” look like, I wonder? Seems like you would really need a lot of spying and cops, no? Some kind of, you know, like, AI control grid? To predict human behavior? Like, an AI Patriot Act, maybe?

I think “wow faggot, a world where no one dies?” should be the normal response here. But we appear to be caught in a storm. A gay storm of baby tears.

It’s all ridiculous and it’s boring. And it’s unstoppable, which makes it that much more boring. The masses of people really are goyim, and all the government has to do is trigger them emotionally, and they will do whatever.

As I said, I don’t really think the Kirk assassination was a conspiracy, but when I see all of these government officials, all of these influencers, all getting on board, saying it’s time to crack down on dangerous ideas, I can understand how someone would think that. And I’m not really dismissive of the idea.

Here’s the thing: the technology exists now to create a total AI control grid. The government is going to do whatever they have to do to get this implemented in America. They will do things to make it happen, and they will exploit whatever happens. But you have all seen that Donald Trump is an old man barely holding it together, and the administration is run by Israel and Silicon Valley, and you can just go look at what these people are saying they want to do.

Anyway. I’m gonna go watch the Altman interview. Because that is more important to me.

To end on a more positive note, I just want to say that I understand a lot of people really experienced an emotional reaction to the Kirk shooting, and I just want you all to know that I think you are gay little babies who need to grow the fuck up. Seriously. It’s embarrassing. If you can’t handle seeing someone get shot without feeling the need to throw a fit and start whining and moralizing and talking about how “it wasn’t just the shooter responsible for the shooting,” you are not an adult and you are always going to do more harm than good. You’re not a revolutionary, bro. You’re not even a man.

On an even more positive note: Whatever. I don’t care.

This one goes out to Charlie:

]]> Jeez, You’d Have Thought They Assassinated Bob Hope https://dailystormer.in/jeez-youd-have-thought-they-assassinated-bob-hope/ Thu, 11 Sep 2025 13:04:51 +0000 https://dailystormer.in/?p=688121

Look, guys.

I’m not going to recant anything about saying Charlie Kirk is a shitbag, and I don’t really care he’s dead. I never said he deserved it, or that killing people is good, or whatever. But I just really don’t understand what the difference is between him dying and Ben Shapiro dying, and the whole thing just really didn’t seem like that big of a deal.

So. No. I’m not apologizing for not caring, and I’m not retracting the statements saying “I don’t know what you people thought was going to happen, of course political violence was going to get worse, what other possible option existed?”

Further, I’m not going to retract the fact that to me, all the people whining about this sort of looked like complete pussies, and that it feels like anyone who has gotten really upset about this didn’t have any real understanding of the stakes, and that this is the epitome of “first world problems.”

Further, I’m not going to go through my own personal experiences with violence, as it doesn’t really matter, and it would sound like I was trying to sound like I’m some kind of badass, which is not really how I view myself. But I guess I can just say that I’ve lived in countries where people get killed, and no one has a freakout.

And even further, I’m not going to retract the statement of fact that if you inject yourself into public narratives where you’re publicly calling for mass death, as Charlie Kirk did when he cheered on and went around publicly promoting the genocide in Gaza, that you aren’t inserting yourself into something that is very serious, and you should really be obligated to understand the gravity of that.

If there is one thing I am willing to concede, it is that people do this all the time in America, go around promoting mass killings, and don’t expect to get shot over it, and I don’t think it is necessarily something they should expect.

But wow. Having read the responses to this. I feel completely and totally out of touch here.

What I have seen, however, is that people are having a really, really serious emotional reaction to Charlie Kirk getting assassinated. Like, I read Twitter, and people are having emotional breakdowns, freaking out, calling for some kind of Super Patriot Act to hunt down supposed enemies of… Zionism? I mean, they’re saying “enemies of America,” but is Charlie Kirk, the “America is an idea but Israel is a real country” guy really representative of America? Because he had a flag in his bio or whatever?

I just can’t believe how emotional people are getting, and it is definitely not proportionate to the amount of love they had for Charlie Kirk when he was alive. I guess it’s a martyr situation, or whatever. But I mean, jeez. Is it really that big of a deal? And were people somehow not expecting this sort of thing?

I don’t have this emotional investment. Maybe I’m a psychopath. I don’t really think I am. I think it’s more just, you know, people die all the time? We’ve all seen a lot of videos of people dying? I don’t know what to say, because I don’t understand where these emotions are coming from.

This is the vibe I’m seeing from these accounts, most of which are ostensibly run by adult men:

Let hey, bro. Chill. It was just Charlie Kirk.

All of this emotion is totally embarrassing.

It’s not great.

At time of writing, there is still no suspect. But people are assuming it is some left-winger. I think most people seem to be assuming it is a tranny. But what they are calling for is giving the government, the cops, new dictatorial powers. It’s a 9/11 type thing, where people are saying “please take my freedoms to protect me.” And it looks very whiny and pathetic to me. I’m looking at these tweets and it’s like, yo, man-up, bro. Relax. Sometimes people get shot in the neck and blood squirts out everywhere. That’s part of the adult world.

Right now, the Trump administration is building up this internal army in the form of ICE, and much worse, he is making these deals with Palantir. There were various social media accounts calling for Palantir to be “unleashed” on illegal immigrants. Now it’s calls for the entire power of the federal government, including our militarized law enforcement and Palantir, to be “unleashed” on “the left.”

How did that work out when the full force of the state was unleashed on “international terrorism”? Did that work out good for you? Did it work out good for the country?

To all of you having this emotional reaction: I admit, I do not understand what you’re going through. It seems to be very difficult. I don’t understand or respect that, but I can accept that it is what it is. But please. Relax. And think about what it is you are calling for. Look at this massive movement of all of these social media accounts demanding the federal government be unleashed on the public. Does it feel maybe a bit artificial? I mean, even if you’re feeling it, are you able to see how maybe there is something a bit nefarious going on here?

Can we think maybe just one step ahead here, and consider maybe what the consequences of giving intelligence agencies, paramilitary law enforcement, and private military contractors the ability to “hunt down domestic terrorists” might turn out perhaps not so good? Maybe it could in fact be like, the worst possible thing imaginable?

There’s also the possibility that they’re going to tell you Iran killed Charlie Kirk. Who knows the likelihood. But whether it is “domestic terrorism” or just a redux of the “Islamic terror” threat, it seems like we should probably all just relax and just allow for the prosecution of the individual or individuals responsible, instead of going into lunatic memes invented by the left about “stochastic terrorism”?

I’m just really not so sure we can trust these Jews that run the US government, quite frankly.

But hey. Honestly, I don’t even know why I’m bothering writing this. I guess just for my own conscience. Because I can already see where this is going. It’s all very clearly laid out. Whether it goes with “domestic terror” or “Islamic terror,” the entire right-wing is begging to surrender their freedom to a brutal Jewish police state apparatus ostensibly run by this White House that is co-owned by Israel and Silicon Valley. That is going to happen, for the same reason the “war on terror” happened, for the same reason “coronavirus” happened. Because the masses of people will just go along with whatever.

For the record, it’s clear now that the shooting was done by some kind of government asset for this exact purpose of whipping everyone into a frenzy. I didn’t realize the kind of frenzy that was going to be whipped up, or I would have called that immediately.

Anyway. Whatever. I guess I hope you enjoy your experience with these dark forces you are calling upon. And after all, who knows? Maybe the US federal government are the good guys this time and they’re really going to help you stop trannies or Islamofascism or whatever? Could be. Could be.

Screenshot this I guess so you can come back and mock me after giving over massive new powers to the government results in a great outcome, where your stupid woman emotions are satisfied after Israel and Peter Thiel build you a utopia where no one ever gets shot with a gun again.

Because that’s the goal, right? You whining fucking faggots? A world where no one can ever get shot with a gun?

]]> Charlie Kirk May Have Lost His Status as “One of the Most Men Alive,” But Will be Remembered as an Evil Villain https://dailystormer.in/charlie-kirk-may-have-lost-his-status-as-one-of-the-most-men-alive-but-will-be-remembered-as-an-evil-villain/ Thu, 11 Sep 2025 05:02:13 +0000 https://dailystormer.in/?p=688187
No wonder the shooter missed his face

Apparently, seeing some guy get shot in the neck is traumatizing for many people. I don’t really know why, given the level of desensitization we’ve all experienced. I mean, it really seems kinda nuts, the fact that this is being considered such a big deal.

I really would have preferred if the Yankees would have held a moment of silence for Iryna Zarutska, a brutal murder victim who wasn’t trying to destroy my country for the Jews.

But okay.

The thing here is, Charlie Kirk was playing a game which he apparently didn’t understand the stakes of. When you are involved in politics, and you are out there encouraging wars and celebrating killings, you are voluntarily involving yourself in a game where people die. To imagine that you are able to work to get untold numbers of people killed by promoting the mass murder machine, and yet somehow never have to worry about that coming back on you, is totally confusing and deranged.

He was promoting and celebrating the deaths of people all around the world, mostly Israel’s enemies, but others as well, and the idea that a person can do that without understanding they are making themselves a target is obscene.

Personally, I used to get death threats from Ukrainians all the time. It was not something that offended me, as it just seemed like something that would obviously happen. Obviously, I don’t want to be killed, so I take precautions, but if I ever were killed, I would understand, while bleeding out, that I played the game and knew the stakes and that’s the way the cookie crumbles. I would not expect people to whine about how unfair my death is, because frankly, it wouldn’t really be unfair, would it? If I’m supporting other people dying, which I certainly have been during the Ukraine war, I’ve involved myself and understood the implications. I would hope only that the Russians would vow revenge, which they’ve done for all civilians who have been murdered by Ukrainians.

The crocodile tears over Charlie Kirk’s death from people like washed-up basketball star Barack Obama, Israeli dictator Bibi Netanyahu and bulbous forced meme Nick Fuentes are truly repulsive.

I agree that how we respond to this moment is important. I wouldn’t include “watershed” or “profound” in that sentence. But if you respond like a faggot, you look like a faggot, and people will think you’re a faggot.

People die, bro. Sometimes they get shot in the neck and blood squirts out like a fountain. It’s not really that big of a deal, and if the person is a sickening shill for the Jews, it might actually be sort of hilarious. Not hilarious to me of course because I’m a really good person and I want everyone on the internet to know that I’m a really good person who is really upset when anyone dies. But some other people might find it hilarious.

Charlie Kirk was one of the single most fiendish men working in American cultural manipulation. His evil acts go far beyond being literally the only non-Jew under 50 promoting the super-hardline Zionist narratives like “there are no starving Gazans, it’s a staged hoax” and “Israel has never targeted civilians.” Like, literally no one says that sort of stuff anymore, and hasn’t in like a year, and he was out there just reading Netanyahu press releases as fact every single day.

But let’s go back a bit. Much has been said about Kirk’s advocacy for using sanctions to force people in Africa to have gay sex.

But at the same time, he was aggressively attempting to manipulate the American right-wing young into accepting homosexuality as compatible with Christian values. He brought all kinds of homosexuals into his “Turning Points USA” group and promoted them and would berate people who claimed this was against Christian values.

Bizarrely, while for most Israel shills, the tranny issue is the only thing they really stand hard against, Kirk said that he is fine with trannies, he just doesn’t want non-binaries. “There are two genders, pick one” he said, telling trannies just to stick to classic trannyism instead of believing there is a “gender spectrum.”

That is notably much further than the likes of Bari Weiss or Ben Shapiro have ever gone on the tranny issue. Typically, these Israeli agents decide, “well, we can’t just only talk about Israel all the time, so we need some other issue,” and choose the tranny thing. Kirk couldn’t stick to that.

He was a key proponent of the idea that “America is an idea” and not a real country. Here he is speaking in Israel in 2019 saying that America is just “ideas,” but that Israel is a real country because it is holy.

At one point, he called for fifty million “legal” immigrants. He also invented the “staple green cards to diplomas” meme.

I believe that was in 2020. I don’t know if he backed down on that, maybe he did, but he never apologized for it.

Literally, this man’s entire career was about manipulating American Christian values, flipping them on their head, coercing people to believe the opposite of what right-wingers have always believed. At least, that was his main goal before October 7th, at which point he pretty much just only talked about Israel and how we have to support them genociding Gazans or we will have Sharia Law in America.

Oh, and he was supporting all of those other wars too. Most recently, he was spamming Twitter about how great it was Trump blew up that boat he said was a drug boat without any evidence, praising the Cuban spy Marco Rubio as a hero for killing these randos as part of a plan for regime change in Venezuela.

And of course he was promoting regime change in Iran.

The one war he was actually against was the Ukraine war. Some people are now saying a Ukrainian could have assassinated him, and that is actually possible. It seems more likely it was a tranny or an intelligence agency who is going to blame it on Iran. It’s possible that it doesn’t matter who it was, they will just blame Iran.

People are calling it “ghoulish” to celebrate Kirk’s death, and I suppose celebrating anyone’s death could be considered “ghoulish.” But getting assassinated doesn’t somehow make you a good person, regardless of what you did in life. We’re all of course against political violence for some reason no one has really explained and have to keep saying that, so of course I too must say “I am so against political violence for some reason,” but America is better off without Charlie Kirk. And he is going to be really, really hard to replace. Again, I cannot think of any non-Jew under the age of fifty who is willing to go around talking about “Israel is our greatest ally, they’re fighting Hamas over there so we don’t have to fight a Hamas invasion of America, there aren’t any war crimes, the food blockades are a hoax, no one is starving, most moral army.” He was on the level of Sean Hannity. You don’t see anyone else doing that.

But no, I don’t feel sad Charlie Kirk died, and I’m not going to post some social signally thing about “oh woe is me, political violence, oh the horror, can’t we just vote for change???”

You can post six million pictures of his wife and kids. I’m not doing the bit with the rest of these people.

A New Era of Political Violence?

I’m not the only one who’s been saying that because democracy is a totalitarian system where the public has no ability to petition grievances – they just tell you to vote for one of two parties that are basically the same – if there are significant grievances that people want petitioned, when they realize these grievances cannot be petitioned, they are going to start shooting and blowing things up. Actually, I think pretty much everyone with any basic comprehension of human realities has been saying that.

Because it is something inevitable, there is no real way to assign any kind of value judgement to it. You can say “violence is bad,” which seems childish and without any intrinsic meaning. You can certainly say “I wish it wouldn’t have come to this,” but again, it was always going to come to this. Democracy can work if people don’t have any real grievances, if you give them a job and a house and a car and a wife and a dog. They will not think very much about the government. But as soon as things get hard for people, when people get frustrated, and they realize that they have literally no ability to use the system to change anything, they are going to become violent.

Now you have the Luigi thing. You have this Charlie Kirk thing. Who knows how bad it is going to get, but it’s obvious that there isn’t going to be less political violence going forward.

It feels a bit like complaining about the weather. It’s hard to really know what else to say.

In terms of the political implications, yes, I think it will lead to more police state type measures, but then more police state type measures will lead to more violence by random individuals. A police state can’t really stop that. Maybe a Palantir pre-crime system can stop some of it, but the more you push on people with these kinds of openly tyrannical measures, the more people are going to feel they’ve no opinions, and the more violent they are going to become.

I’m sure there are a lot of simulations about how this will all work, but the simulations are mostly going to be done by companies that are trying to sell physical and digital police state equipment to the government.

I think it’s safe to say that it’s not going to be a very fun time. Beyond that, predictions are difficult.

]]> Tucker Carlson Releasing Documentary About Mysterious November 9th Attacks https://dailystormer.in/tucker-carlson-releasing-documentary-about-mysterious-november-9th-attacks/ Wed, 10 Sep 2025 11:54:36 +0000 https://dailystormer.in/?p=688143

This September 11th, Tucker Carlson will be releasing a documentary series about the mysterious attacks of November 9, 2001, commonly known as “nine eleven.”

These attacks, you might recall, happened 24 years ago, and involved Jews blowing up buildings in New York City, which is one of the top cities. The Jews flew planes into the so-called “Twin Towers,” which is some kind of creepy reference to the Lord of the Rings book series, just like the satanic “Palantir Group,” which is a Jewish AI terrorism group.

I don’t know why there are so many of these LotR references going on with these Jews, but I would hope the Carlson documentary addresses this ongoing issue. I haven’t really read these books since like maybe 2015. I probably should. Maybe it would help me unravel this mysterious conundrum I’ve identified.

What about this?

Why was the author of these novels working to stop the hero Adolf Hitler, who was a kind of “Aragorn” figure who was trying to destroy the “Mordor” of Jewishness, by stopping the “Morgoth” of Jews by destroying their “one ring” of control over global finance? Does the one ring of power represent usury? Because that is the most powerful thing in the universe upon which the entire Jewish system is built.

This seems like what we should be making documentaries about at this point. I am pretty sure everyone already knows the Jews did 911. I don’t know what kind of retard spent 24 years not figuring that out. So maybe we should move on and talk about this Tolkien issue?

I think it is important to add that Nicolas Maduro is a kind of Theoden figure. Or no, maybe that other guy, Chavez, was like Theoden and Maduro is like Eomer.

Or maybe I am just playing into the game of Jewish wizardry by trying to find LotR analogies in things?

Tucker Carlson did his main interview promoting the documentary with Piers Morgan.

Not sure why they couldn’t be in studio together. Where even is Tucker?

Is that the dome of the rock?

No, no. I think the dome of the rock is yellow. If memory serves me.

That is Griffith Observatory. Which I have always suspected had some sort of satanic purpose.

You want to take this to a whole other level? Fasten your seatbelts. “Griffith” is the character in Berserk that is based on Sauron from LotR. Like he’s a directly copied version of the character.

He was initially a good guy who became corrupted by a lust for power, becoming Femto like Sauron became the Dark Lord. A lot of stuff in Berserk was lifted directly from LotR. But Berserk is actually much better and more interesting and fun and doesn’t have slow boring parts.

You may be interested to know that in 2023, a poll of Americans overwhelmingly concluded that Griffith is actually, in fact, more evil than Sauron.

Maybe it’s a coincidence. Could be. But I find that a lot more interesting than “oh my God it’s 2025 and I just discovered that actually, the November 9 attacks were done by the Jews!”

Like okay, man. Okay. Are you also just learning that there is no evidence of homicidal gas chambers at Auschwitz and in fact the description of them is physically impossible? Are you just learning about the USS Liberty? That Jews killed JFK?

I think we need to move forward here into more interesting conspiracies which relate more to things that interest me, such as Lord of the Rings and Berserk and I guess like John Wick.

I could also do with a conspiracy relating Charles Manson, Roman Polanski, John Lennon, etc. to a CIA satanic conspiracy. Manson was definitely CIA, so he kills Polanski’s wife and then John Lennon is shot in front of the apartment where Polanski filmed a movie about the birth of the Antichrist? By a guy obsessed with The Catcher in the Rye, a Jewish book which seems to have been designed to brainwash people. Months later, some more talented musician who was in love with Jodie Foster from Taxi Driver took a shot at Reagan, because taking shots at people was clearly profitable in terms of attention-generation?

That’s the only part of the story that makes sense. Who wasn’t in love with Jodie in Taxi Driver, and thinking of creative ways to get her attention?

It was literally three months after Lennon that Reagan gets it. The guy who shot Reagan also had a copy of Catcher in the Rye in his hotel room.

What is going on with Catcher in the Rye?

Yes, yes. The photo of the author gives a general idea, but is it a CIA mind control trigger book of some kind? Because it really sucks, and the US government school system forces everyone to read it, like they force them to read “Night.”

My producer has just informed me that Jodie was only 12 when that movie was filmed and I should retract that statement, but instead I’m just going to move on to the next topic, which is that Polanski, after drugging and raping a 13-year-old and fleeing the country (Jewish by the way) and then being allowed to work in Hollywood from Poland and France, made this movie called “The Ninth Gate” with Johnny Depp that was also something about summoning the Antichrist.

So then after being in that film, what happened to Johnny Depp? Also, did you know that River Phoenix, who was from some kind of cult and also half Jewish despite being handsome somehow, died at Johnny Depp’s club, presumably in some kind of sacrifice to Satan or whatever? What day did he die, I wonder? I forget. I should look that up – oh no wait, I just remembered: Halloween.

The name of the club? The Viper Room. Aside from a viper being a snake, which always represents Satan, both John the Baptist and Jesus specifically referred to the Jews as a “brood of vipers.”

And come on, Halloween night???? This is all a coincidence???

What about how Johnny Depp was friends with Hunter S. Thompson and how Thompson was supposedly “suicided” after saying he thought 9/11 was fake? And also what about that thing where they said Hunter Thompson recorded a human sacrifice at Bohemian Grove? That part honestly sounds fake (unlike literally everything else I just said here, which you can look up), but it should still be investigated by someone, instead of doing “hurr durr, did you know Jews did 911???”

Yes, Tucker. We knew that. Please, let’s move on.

Also, Alex Jones interviewed Ralph Steadman, Thompson’s artist, after his mysterious death, and Steadman told Jones he had mentioned being aware of “Eyes Wide Shut” type ritual sex cults. I can’t find that interview now, but I promise you it happened and I remember listening to it live.

Shouldn’t someone be looking into all of this?

I’m sure someone is going to say “read CHAOS” and I will do that at some point, maybe right now since I’m thinking about all of this. I remember I was really excited about the book’s release then started it and then didn’t read very much of it for some reason. I will do it. Though I’m pretty sure all that does is show that Manson was working for the CIA to distribute acid, which is another one of these “oh really? Ya thank?” conspiracies that I think everyone already knows about. Also I think that book implies Manson was guilty, which I don’t really believe, but I actually don’t even know if the book says that because I didn’t read it.

It’s written by one of my kinsmen, though the second name on that book looks sort of Jewish?

I do not think it goes all the way to River Phoenix, the half Jewish member of a weird cult, dying at the Viper Room on HALLOWEEN NIGHT. C’mon. Tell me this is all a coincidence.

We really need to zoom in on this River Phoenix thing I think, because he was most famous for being in a movie by that faggot Gus Van Sant, who is definitely deep in some satanic shit. But more importantly, he was raised in The Family International, which was proved in a British court to be involved in systemic ritual sexual abuse of children. I have read a lot about that, though it was a long time ago, but it was sort of a version of Christian Zionism, a bunch of stuff about the end times and the Antichrist and so on. But it was also a sex cult, run by a Jew named Berg.

These hippy evangelical “Christian” doomsday cults were all run by the CIA. They were all over the place. My parents actually met in one, which is… concerning. Sometimes I think about that and feel somewhat concerned. When I was constantly in the media every week and being used as a part of some weird narrative that I didn’t totally understand, the thought regularly crossed my mind that I was probably some kind of MKULTA victim. Though I try not to think too much about it now, can people just maybe note that and then investigate it if I turn up dead? Kk, thx.

If you go into the LSD-CIA part of the theory though, you get into a lot more than Charles Manson. That connects to basically the entire culture, the 1960s revolution, which paved the way for literally every bad thing. The issue with that is that a lot of the “research” into the topic is dumb. Like there is a lot of goofy, fake stuff surrounding that particular topic, and that, in fact, makes me believe it is all the more important, because if you did have a real conspiracy that was very big and important, the number one thing you would do – certainly the number one thing I would do if I was trying to cover up the conspiracy – is “flood the zone” with disinformation to make it really hard to wade through and find out what is actually going on. I think probably that is what Alex Jones was doing previously. He would promote every conspiracy theory and just bury you with all of this stuff. He’s a totally different person now and basically just covers mainstream politics for the most part.

I mean actually now his main thing seems to be attacking Owen Shroyer for quitting his job at Infowars. Shroyer did a fundraiser for $30,000, which was really sad, because he’s apparently been on salary at Infowars while doing a popular podcast for like a decade, which is totally insane. If you can just get a hundred thousand views a week, you can make seven figures a year on ads. So he was really getting abused at Infowars.

Most of these people lie about how much money they make, or try to downplay it, but there is this fat Irish guy, I forget his name, and he only gets like 300k views a week on YouTube but admits to having a house in the Hamptons and in Beverly Hills and a Bentley and a Rolls Royce. He spends like 20 grand a year on sunglasses.

He openly says he made all that money from nothing in four years.

Oh, and Asmongold has been telling the truth about how much he makes for years. There were leaks during the Covid hoax showing top Twitch streamers all making 7-8 figures and it was this big scandal and I was like “did you think Asmongold was lying? Because he’s been publishing that he has a multimillion dollar annual income for many years now.”

I will say that Jones proved the 911 thing like, within months after it happened. I mean, he proved that the official story was nonsensical, even though he kind of covered up for the Jews and tried to say it was a George Bush conspiracy to sell weapons and destroy traditional Islam, which is one of the roadblocks to a global uniculture. I think that is part of the story for sure, but if you’re not saying “the Jews did it,” it sort of just becomes convoluted and confusing as to what the purpose of it would be.

Ah, but now we have a purpose with the Silicon Valley people and their AGI/”transhumanism” agenda, don’t we? We have a “goyim-based” conspiracy, which is not actually goyim-based, but could be sold as goyim-based, where these tech oligarchs want to live forever by fusing with machines and believe that creating an artificial super-intelligence (which is impossible) will help them to develop the technology to live forever. The idea of doing gene-editing to turn off aging (because aging is programmed into the genes, otherwise your cells would just keep regenerating and you’d stay 27 forever, or until you got shot in the head or fell down an elevator shaft or something), and then injecting nanobots into your bloodstream to repair cells and manipulate other functions, might be possible. I don’t know if that’s possible or not, but it’s more believable than AGI, which is really just nonsensical, because no one can even explain what consciousness is, and you can’t make an artificial version of something you don’t even know exists at all.

I think consciousness does exist, personally, but I believe that because I’m a Christian. I don’t know what I would be if I wasn’t a Christian. I mean I guess I would probably be a Moslem if I wasn’t a Christian, all things being equal, though that religion has the same basic understanding of the nature of the soul and consciousness. So I’m saying if I didn’t believe anything like that at all, and was some kind of atheist or whatever. What I think I would believe in that case is that consciousness is an illusion. That gets a bit complicated, because it doesn’t seem like the perils of consciousness, which include self-doubt, are evolutionarily beneficial. Which is one of my arguments for the existence of the soul: consciousness is not a “beneficial mutation” in the Darwinian sense. Maybe some kind of ego could be, and maybe the ego would eventually lead to introspection, which would lead to a breakdown of the machine. I don’t know. I don’t really care very much about that line of inquiry. But I do know they’re not going to make an artificial super-consciousness… unless they use a human brain as the core of the machine.

Maybe they could take a human brain and then plug it into a machine and have it function as a super-consciousness. That would obviously be illegal, which would make the research complicated, though I don’t think impossible. This idea was explored in Frank Herbert’s “Destination: Void,” which I can recommend (although it is a little bit slow and lacks the energy of the good Dune books as well as some of his other books, including the sequel trilogy to Destination: Void, which also deals with some AI stuff which is probably relevant and which I should probably reread and report back to you on, my dear reader and parasocial BFF).

Anyway, so in this book, they have a human brain as the core of an AI system designed to control the complex systems in these ships designed for interstellar travel. They keep sending these ships with clones of really intelligent scientists, because it’s the future and it’s libertarian or something so you can clone people and they don’t have any rights and you can just kill them. So they keep sending these ships with these clones and this human brain controlling the ship’s computer, and every time the human brain in the computer goes insane and the ship is destroyed. But then this one crew of clones is able to successfully replace the human brain with a real AI (what they would now call AGI) to run the ship. Then in the sequels, one of which is called “The Jesus Incident,” the descendants of the clones start worshiping the AI as a god.

I won’t spoil the whole thing, because people should read these books, and plus I haven’t read then in some time and don’t even totally remember the plot, but there is more genetic engineering. So you have a genetic engineering to AI to more genetic engineering cycle, which is seemingly what the Silicon Valley people are thinking about, and this probably relates to the coronavirus vaccine in some way that I would like to see a documentary about instead of “OMG did you guys know JEWS DID NOVEMBER 9???”

I would say all of Herbert’s books are probably worth reading. I really wish I would have gone with my original plan as a teenager and followed in his footsteps instead of becoming a neo-Nazi leader or whatever the fuck happened with all that (it’s all a bit blurry now, frankly). I will warn you that while you will find a lot of intriguing sexism and anti-homosexual sentiment in Herbert’s books, you need to be on the lookout for anti-Irish sentiment from that German-identifying half-Irishman. That is to say, because he was half-German, he identified with that side, and became something of a self-hating half-Irish, and in reading his works, you need to be on the lookout.

It was actually shocking to me that the new Dune films were allowed to include all of the anti-gay stuff. Watching it, I was like “how is this even possible?”

I guess if you didn’t know it was all written as anti-homosexual propaganda, you might not notice? But the way Feyd-Rautha was done in the second film…

How could you not notice?

Fantastically boring films, but I did appreciate staying true to the anti-homosexual messaging.

But really, Herbert was a top-tier genius, and probably my favorite scifi writer. If you compare him to Jew Asimov, weirdo hippy-fascist Heinlein, or that gay sicko Clark, you find that Herbert is unambiguously much better in every way. Speaking of Clark, how about a documentary on that pervert and his satanic agenda? Can he be linked back to all of that stuff I was saying up there, several paragraphs ago? Oh, yes, actually, he can. Firstly through 2001, which is an occult film, associated with all of this weird stuff and speaking to the nexus of 19th century demonology and 21st century techno-totalitarianism. Directed by Stanley Kubrick, Jew director of Eyes Wide Shut. Did you know that despite being a Jew, he said “Hitler was basically right about everything”? Also, did you know he died between finishing Eyes Wide Shut and its release, and it was then edited by the studio, and his version will never be released and was allegedly destroyed?

Skimming back through all that shit I just typed right now, I see that it is a jumbled mess, and that much of it may seem inane. I assure you, however: it isn’t.

My point here, which I will just reveal plainly for anyone who didn’t find it obvious, is that this new mainstream awareness of some of the stuff that was previously classified as “conspiracy theory” is not really particularly important, even if it might seem that way. Maybe I’m being a bit tongue in cheek with some of this. I honestly don’t know if I am or not. But surely, there are more interesting topics than 911, if we are attempting to uncover the underlying mystery of existence.

Conversely, we could just not uncover anything, and instead just deal with the more obvious facts, such as that Jews control literally everything, and do not appear to have particularly noble intentions. That doesn’t require any form of speculation. You can just look at it on Wikipedia or whatever. And yet we’re not really even having that conversation, and people are attempting to frame Israel’s genocide as the actions of individuals, or a state, but not as the actions of a race-religion cult group. Not connecting the bad actions of the Israeli state to the bad actions of BlackRock or the pharma industry or the trans movement or the porn industry seems bizarre and is very frustrating. Everyone can see all these people are Jewish. But we don’t want to hurt their feelings, because of the Holocaust? Which has already been proved to be a total hoax?

TYT did a positive pre-review of Tucker’s documentary on 911.

Ana Kasparian recently appeared on Tucker Carlson and agreed with him on a bunch of things. Of course she started out by saying “I disagree with you strongly about abortion.” Because that is of course really, really important. But people are excited about left and right populism coming together or whatever.

If you watch the full Piers Morgan interview, Tucker also gets into the topic of white genocide and says it’s the “darkest thing that has happened in 1,000 years” (I guess no pun intended? LOL). Maybe he’s getting more aggressive on that topic, I don’t know. But I just wanted to mention it because TYT doesn’t talk about it while reviewing his interview with Piers Morgan. So maybe the left doesn’t really care about anti-immigration sentiment anymore, they just really only care about abortion. Because leftism is just feminism and feminism can’t exist without abortion.

A lot of people have been saying Tucker is CIA and this is all some kind of psyop. I don’t really go along with this, because the people making the claim don’t really try to make the claim based on what he is saying but rather based on tedious conspiracy elements, such as that his dad was involved with the CIA. I do think it was weird he said he didn’t know his dad was in the CIA until he died, which was apparently a lie, as he’d said it before he died. I think some other things are weird. But when it comes to your dad, especially with a dark revelation like that, I’m sure there are a bunch of weird emotions which can lead to weird statements.

It just seems very obvious that the world would be worse without Tucker Carlson out there talking about Israel and white genocide and all of these other issues. Please don’t start talking about “gatekeeping” and “limited hangout” like I don’t know what those are, because actually, you don’t understand what those things are, or you wouldn’t claim I don’t understand what they are. Saying he’s a “gatekeeper” makes no sense because there is literally no one else out there saying this stuff that is being censored other than me, and he’s not doing anything to prevent people from seeing my materials. “Limited Hangout” is obviously a much better argument, because he could of course be saying a lot more than he is saying. But what is the intelligence purpose of him saying any of this at all? If it wasn’t for Tucker Carlson, opposition to Israel could still be framed as a left-wing issue. He is the right-wing guy out there saying this relationship with Israel is insane. Yes, you have Judge Napolitano and his guests and some people on Rumble or whatever, but Tucker is the biggest figure in right-wing media and he is driving the narrative.

That all having been said, the best argument that Tucker is some kind of intelligence operation is simply that none of this matters. Nothing is going to change based on anything he says. But that would be true regardless. Nothing is going to change based on anything I say, which makes it all the more frustrating that I am still this banned. I guess the difference is, ironically, that I am saying nothing is going to change, and that seems to be what you’re not allowed to say. As long as you present some narrative about how you’re going to right the ship, and keep people engaged with politics, thinking it’s going somewhere, you are harmless and allowed in the game.

Though frankly, I can’t really see how me telling you you’re doomed helps you very much either?

No I mean, actually I can see why that would not be allowed, because if large numbers of people stopped engaging with the system and started engaging more with reality, something different would happen. As long as everyone thinks there is some kind of solution, whatever it is, there is only one thing that can happen which is whatever is going to happen.

Maybe I could make some kind of blood pact with Elon Musk that if I’m allowed back into the conversation I will only talk about satanic CIA conspiracies involving LSD, sex cults, and Hollywood personalities? That is at least more fun than “wow can you believe Jews did 911??? This is blowing my mind, maaaaaan.”

Anyway, whatever.

Who knows? Who cares? I don’t care.

If you enjoyed this content, remember to like and subscribe and jingle my bells. Right now is a great time for bell jingling, as it’s nearly Christmas.

This article was updated to reflect the fact that Chapman shot Lennon and Hinckley shot Reagan. I got them confused because those murders happened weeks apart and they were both linked to Catcher in the Rye. 

]]> Homosexual Rights Activists Panic After Genocide Promoter Charlie Kirk’s Neck Gets Blown Open [UPDATE: Nigga be Dead] https://dailystormer.in/homosexual-rights-activists-panic-after-genocide-promoter-charlie-kirks-neck-gets-blown-open/ Wed, 10 Sep 2025 05:50:38 +0000 https://dailystormer.in/?p=688174 UPDATE:

It was very obvious from the shooting video he was dead, but for whatever reason they took hours to announce it. They’ve confirmed it now.

Bari Weiss, who I’ve been smashing on the side, just text me and told me Bibi wants everyone to post this song in remembrance of Charlie:

Original article follows.

At first I was like:

But then a few hours later, I was just like:

Mass immigration activist, genocide defender, and international homosexual enforcer Charlie Kirk just got his neck blown out in Utah.

He was just like “well there are only two genders so if you’re going to be a tranny just be a tranny not non-binary and we have to really stop these drug cartels because of the narcoterrorism but we need the immigrants from India for the tech sector – prove me wrong” and then it was like “BLEGH!” and his carotid artery just opens up and starts squirting blood like an old-fashioned water pump.

It’s really sad someone would get their neck blown out like that. I feel such sad feelings when I feel these sad feelings in my heart.

Charlie Kirk, known to his friends as “Chucky K,” was a staunch defender of Jews, immigrants, and spreading homosexuality in Africa.

He BOOM’d Botswana with anal sex, then someone BOOM’d his throat open.

This is so scary and terrible, and many homosexual activists are expressing their sentiments of love on social media platforms.

“One of the most horrific things”? Been catching any of those Gaza vids, breh? A war Charlie Kirk supported?

What goes around comes around, ey? That includes bullets, nah?

“We need Jesus to keep people from killing people who force the blacks to do anal on each other” might sound like a confusing sentiment, but only if you’re not American. Americans find this very normal.

I doubt anyone is going to fix that hole in Charlie Kirk’s neck, so probably if people want to help out, they should send cases of tissues to Nick Fuentes, who is so sad because violence is so bad and scary and no behavior should ever have consequences.

No one should shoot anyone and blah blah blah. But hey, cry me a river. No, wait, don’t cry me a river. Nick Fuentes’ tears are already causing global flooding, threatening the crops and eroding our beaches.

I kid, I kid.

But frankly, it really doesn’t seem to me that many people are actually taking seriously the realities we are facing in this country, and the troubles that are coming down the pipe. America has been killing people all over the world for many decades, while creating an utterly poisonous culture at home, and obviously, the only way this could ever end was in blood and fire.

Personally, I don’t care Charlie Kirk got shot.

He’s an evil person, he devoted his life to supporting evil all over the world, and things come back around.

If violence bothers you, and you have an emotional breakdown over a video of some global terrorist supporter getting shot, you should probably go slink away somewhere and keep your head down. Cover your head with a blanky.

There are going to be shootings, there is going to be shit a lot worse than that. America put itself in a position where there was no possible outcome other than violence.

I’m against it! Okay? Yes, I think Charlie Kirk getting shot is sort of hilarious, but I don’t support it and am really against all sorts of violence. But seriously. Grow the fuck up.

What did you think was going to happen?

This isn’t an isolated event, it is the beginning of a new era where feelings of hopelessness and helplessness are maxed out, where all kinds of different people decide that there is no recourse other than violence.

Please note this just happened a couple days ago:

That “Ukraine” woman didn’t devote her life to promoting a genocide in Palestine, pushing for mass immigration into America, starting wars all over the world, or forcing African people to have gay sex. And she got a lot less outpouring of emotion than Charlie Kirk.

In terms of this particular thing: they haven’t announced Kirk is dead yet, though having your carotid opened up like that is something you really have to fix quickly. I would think he’s probably dead. But maybe there was medical staff close by. Who knows? Who cares? I don’t care.

I will say that I am worried that if Charlie doesn’t pull through, Sharia Law will conquer America.

]]> See, This is What I’m Saying – They’ll Just Kill You https://dailystormer.in/see-this-is-what-im-saying-theyll-just-kill-you/ Wed, 10 Sep 2025 03:49:09 +0000 https://dailystormer.in/?p=688163

This story is a week old, but seven (7) candidates from the right-wing AfD party died in the few weeks before the upcoming election.

I don’t think a serious person can believe the government explanation that it’s a coincidence. Maybe if it was three or four, you could believe it was a coincidence, but seven? It’s too many.

Of course, those seven people probably don’t matter very much in the scheme of things. What does matter is sending the message that the government can just kill people and say it’s a coincidence and nothing will happen.

You people don’t know. This is a totally totalitarian system we live under, this democracy, and they will just kill you, and there is nothing you can do. What are you going to do? You’re already dead by the time they kill you. You can’t go to the polls and vote against yourself being killed. You can’t write a letter to your Congressman saying “I’m requesting you don’t kill me.” You’re dead. Literally the only thing dead people can do is lie there. They can’t vote or write their Congressman.

Most people don’t want to die. Some people do, but they’re usually not high functioning people. And even people who want to die usually don’t want to be mysteriously murdered. So people see this and say “I’m not running for office for the right-wing, they’ll just kill me and then nothing will happen.”

We are stagnant here, folks. You can’t fix the system.

We need to become vassals of the Chinese.

]]> Everyone is a Millennial Now https://dailystormer.in/everyone-is-a-millennial-now/ Tue, 09 Sep 2025 06:03:41 +0000 https://dailystormer.in/?p=688136

I don’t think young people are aware of this, but in American history, there used to be generational cultural differences. Young people had music, slang, and esoteric cultural memes that were unique, that older people were not aware of.

This is no longer the case. Because of the internet, and the fact that everyone is on the same platforms, younger generations, including gen Z (these people are like 30 now, by the way) and the generation younger than them, which I believe is called “gen Q,” have cultural and social cues that are just watered down versions of millennialisms.

Everything I see from younger people on the internet is just progressively sanitized versions of stuff I saw on /b/ in 2004. It’s sickening.

Sometimes there is new slang, but it’s not clear where it originates from, and everyone of all age groups starts using it at the same time. Paul Skallas, who I believe is the core philosopher of the 21st century, has said that we are trapped in 2004.

Robot says:

Paul Skallas is a writer and commentator known for his theory that culture became “stuck” around 2004, a concept he popularized through social media.He posits that this period marked a significant shift where the monoculture fractured, leading to a lack of overarching cultural narratives and preventing substantive changes in pop culture. According to Skallas, this stagnation is evident in the entertainment industry, where content often feels recycled, with sequels, remakes, and nostalgic themes dominating the landscape.He has suggested that the mid-2000s, particularly around 2004 or 2006, was a pivotal moment when the cultural landscape shifted toward a state of repetition and diminished innovation. While he acknowledges the decentralization of media and the rise of the internet as potential contributing factors, he admits the exact cause remains unclear.

The cause is sort of unclear, but it is also obvious that it is the internet. We are all in the same space now.

As a millennial, I was a member of the last generation to grow up with a culture that was not internet based. At least as a younger teenager. By the time I was 20, it was all the internet. But before that, there was a difference in culture among young people. I remember my father trying to use youth slang, which is normal enough, and using it in the wrong way. That is now impossible. Everyone on the internet is in the same monoculture.

There is some element of this that isn’t bad. Historically, like as in, a long time ago, people lived the same lives as their grandparents. And their great great great grandparents. This was before the Industrial Revolution. After the Industrial Revolution, you had major technological advancements that caused cultural changes every generation, which left grandparents feeling very alienated by all the alien shit their grandkids were into. It is obviously better to have a consistency of culture.

Well, it’s good to have a consistency of culture if it is medieval culture. If it is 2004 bland and nihilistic horseshit hedonism, it is really not that great to have it as a stagnant culture.

It is assumed that young people added things like “take the L” or “posting the W” to the slang. But when I see that, I think “what is this boomer tripe? What a stupid phrase.” Further, there is no evidence that young people made these phrases. They used it on TikTok and whatever, but no one knows who comes up with these things, and people of all ages, including boomers, will pick up on these language additions and use them.

If there is a change, it is that young people are less edgy and less hip. They are worse than even millennials (who I think are worse than boomers), because there is no room for creativity on the internet, and so all young people do is recycle millennial material and make it gayer and more retarded.

I have no idea what the implications of this are, and unlike I usually do, I am not going to draw some kind of insight or meaningful conclusion about the nature of this phenomenon. I think it probably means nothing good or bad can happen, nothing new at all can happen, youth energy doesn’t really exist in the way it previously did. I don’t think going to punk rock shows and taking acid and jumping around and having sex in the bathroom was a good thing. And maybe it wasn’t that much different than what boomers were doing, just with worse music. But there was a break with the previous generation, which meant that there was at least potential room for something new that was good to emerge. I think it is now impossible for anything new and good to emerge from the youth.

The youth are now against Israel, of course, but so is everyone who isn’t old.

These Gallup numbers don’t separate the age groups meaningfully.

The 35-54 age group is much too wide. Of the 23% of that group that have a positive view of Bibi, I would think the overwhelming majority of the supporters would be between 45 and 54, whereas 35-44 would have the same opinion as 18-34.

There would be some differences in generations, because the younger the generation, the less white it is. So it will be different on some things, when measured by age alone. I don’t know or care what is going on with immigrants or black people. I assume they are against Israel, when it comes to this particular topic, and that’s fine, but in general, their opinions do not matter to me.

One thing I don’t know is how the browning of America will affect culture. I assume it will not be good. But also, I think younger whites, particularly men, are feeling under attack, which will lead to you know, whatever.

I understand this article is not good or important. But I think the basic observations are important, and possibly something that people are not really noticing. But we are stagnant. There is nothing new coming from the youth. Everything is just being recycled and made shittier in the process.

It is boring and disgusting.

To be clear, I do not think the decay is a result of technology, but simply enabled by it. The fact that everyone is on the same level and in the same space together could mean that young people would be bringing older people forward in a positive direction, but instead the opposite is happening, with terms like “take the L” being used by men in their forties, despite the fact that they suck, while teenagers listen to early 00s indie rock, despite the fact that it sucks. Everything just spirals towards the lowest common denominator, with all of the worst traits of millennials being promoted, and millennials adopting the worst traits of the younger generations. Millennials did not have “woke” as youths. We could say “faggot” and “nigger” without people throwing a fit. But then, in their thirties, millennials became the hardest core fighters for wokeism, apparently feeling it was the hip young trend?

Now, teenagers listen to Joe Rogan and get convinced that Peter Thiel, the guy running the AI targeting system for the Israelis, giving lectures on the Antichrist, is somehow not concerning and may in fact be totally normal. Meanwhile, every male of every age is chronically masturbating and no one has connected this to the testosterone plunge, and the last thing on anyone’s mind is ███████ and ███████ ████.

]]> What the Heck is a “Narcoterrorist”? https://dailystormer.in/what-the-heck-is-a-narcoterrorist/ Mon, 08 Sep 2025 07:25:12 +0000 https://dailystormer.in/?p=688122

I’ve been eating massive amounts of cheese lately. And I’ve been dealing with the skin problems that go along with it. I am in fact on the verge of turning into some type of Cronenbergian monstrosity as a result of the amount of cheese I am consuming. And yet, there is no one who is going to threaten to imprison me or blow up my boat because I’m abusing myself with cheese and on the verge of going full Videodrome as a result.

This whole concept of certain drugs being illegal is nonsensical. Where did the government get the right to tell people what they are allowed to put into their bodies? How can a democracy government, which is ostensibly based on the concept of personal human autonomy being a high metaphysical concept, have such a right? Telling people what they are permitted to do with their own bodies in the privacy of their own home is a violation of the most basic principles of human autonomy that are enshrined in the enlightenment philosophy democracy is based on.

Please note: I don’t necessarily support democracy or enlightenment values, and in fact I don’t support them, but I do think if you’re going to have a system based on these things, it needs to live up to its own stated principles, otherwise you just have tyranny.

What makes drug prohibitions extra ridiculous is that you are allowed to consume all sorts of things that will kill you, including sugar and seed oils. To take it one massive step further, the government allows for corporations to put chemicals into your body that you don’t want to be there. There is PFAS in the groundwater anywhere in this country at sea level. I mean, maybe not somewhere out in some forest, but anywhere in the zone of a major metro, there are PFAS in the groundwater. Here’s a map:

So if you have a property, which you “own” – you don’t really own it because property taxes exist meaning all forms of land ownership in the US are actually rentals from the feds, but that’s a digression – you can dig a well, and you will be drinking poisonous chemicals that someone else put into your water against your will. There is no way to produce and distribute PFAS without them ending up in the groundwater, but I never hear libertarians talk about how this is a violation of property rights. It obviously is an extreme violation of property rights. They even have some widely used anecdote about polluting rivers being against the non-aggression principle (NAP). But find one of them saying it should be illegal to produce and distribute PFAS because no matter what they are going to end up in the groundwater of people’s private property.

Further, these chemicals are also in the rain. Almost everywhere in the world has PFAS levels “beyond safe levels” (as if there are safe levels) in their rain. That means they are in all the food you eat. You can’t grow food with PFAS groundwater or rainwater and not end up with PFAS in your vegetables and fruits. It’s also in meat, because the animals drink water contaminated with it.

And PFAS is just the most obvious. Everything is also filled with microplastics that you have no choice but to consume, and which the government has zero interest in protecting you from. No interest, at all. You hardly even hear it talked about. Bobby Kennedy was talking about it, but now he only talks about “the disease of antisemitism.”

Then you have the coronavirus vaccine that the government tried to force you to take. It was an experimental gene therapy. They wanted to force you to take it. They also try to force you and your kids to take all kinds of other strange vaccines.

And yet, they reserve the right to tell you you can’t put chemicals in your body that you, as a sovereign adult person, choose to put into your body, if those chemicals are arbitrarily listed on their “illegal substances” list. This is not reasonable.

Please note: I have in the past been against marijuana legalization and I am now calling for the legalization of all drugs, including fentanyl and whatever other boogieman drug. So let me explain my change of opinion on this matter.

First, I should note that I was against marijuana legalization because I think marijuana is the worst of all the drugs. It was also clear that legalization increased use. However, that seems to be a result of it having been illegal to begin with. People will take much more dangerous substances than marijuana because the government tells them they are good and safe. So when the government says “oh we decided marijuana is safe after previously having said it wasn’t,” the public, conditioned to believe the government is their daddy who will decide what is good for them, decide they should start smoking weed because the government says it’s safe now. If it had never been made illegal in the first place, there wouldn’t have been an increase of users when you made it legal, would there? Because you wouldn’t be making it legal, because you’d never made it illegal.

No one ever heard of a “heroin addict” when every medicine cabinet in the country held a bottle of it.

In terms of the rest of the drugs, I don’t think people think they are safe. Well, maybe people don’t think cocaine is dangerous. People now know ketamine is dangerous because they’ve watched Elon Musk’s behavior and no one on earth has a goal of “acting more like Elon Musk.” Aside from being generally disgusting and weird, Musk thinks he is funny and he is not funny yet he goes around making “jokes” like he is funny and that is the saddest thing of all, and the number one thing no one wants to be, and it’s probable that his use of marijuana and ketamine play a major role in making him like that.

Fentanyl kills all kinds of people, so no one is going to think that is safe.

With marijuana, when they legalized it, they said “oh we decided this is safe, so you, the children of us, the daddy government, are now allowed to safely smoke it.” That is disgusting messaging, and if they are going to legalize all drugs, they should say “look, none of this shit is safe. Most of it is probably safer than the poisons we put in your food or these vaccines we coerce you into taking through threats and manipulation, but these drugs are not safe and we don’t advise anyone to take them, but you’re adults and you can do what you want to do.”

This is the only thing that makes any sense.

The “drug war” has been going on since the 1960s, and there are more people on drugs than ever, and the outlawing of drugs has created a massive, violent industry trafficking these drugs that is a complete nightmare. Now, the peace president is murdering randos and threatening to start a full-on war to protect American citizens from their own choices.

You can’t protect people from their own choices. That is an insane doctrine. And again, all of this other stuff that kills you is already legal. Do you think it is healthier to be morbidly obese because you consume poisoned food that the government refuses to regulate or to do cocaine on the weekends? Obviously, there is nothing less healthy than being morbidly obese. Chronic cocaine use might cause heart problems, and it seems like it does, but not to the degree that obesity does. Obesity causes every negative health outcome.

I would support warning labels. There are warning labels on cigarettes, but none on food products that contain refined sugar/HFCS and/or seed oils (along with the prerequisite doses of PFAS and microplastics), despite those things being much more dangerous than cigarettes. You could put warning labels on OTC fentanyl and the rest of the drugs. That’s fine and fair enough. But beyond telling you these things are unhealthy and not recommended for recreational use, the government should not have a role in telling you what you can and can’t consume.

Conversely, you could also remove the warning labels from cigarettes, so people would stop expecting the government will warn them if something is unhealthy.

Here’s the important part of my legalization plan: along with legalizing the drugs, I would outlaw any and all junkie behavior. I would do a very severe crackdown on homelessness and panhandling and all of the other things associated with abuse of drugs. Vagrancy, loitering, other public nuisance behavior. Like, I’m talking ten-year prison sentences for this sort of thing. Because while you do have a natural right to consume whatever chemicals you want, because you’re an adult and you have a right to make your own decisions, you don’t have a right to infringe on other people with society-destroying behavior like living on the streets and begging. Right now, we have the opposite, where the drugs are illegal but all of the bad behavior associated with drug use is legal and seemingly encouraged in many jurisdictions.

Drugs Never Killed Anyone

Conservatives are pretty clear on the fact that guns are inanimate objects and that a gun never kills anyone, but rather a person who aims a gun at another person and pulled the trigger kills someone. The fact that they are not able to apply this same logic to drugs is baffling. Drugs are inanimate objects. If someone dies from drugs, it is because they made the decision to consume the drug in an irresponsible dose.

The oxycontin debacle is an issue of false advertising. Purdue Pharma told people that oxycontin was “safe” for “pain relief,” and it turned out it was engineered and intended to be extremely habit-forming. I can see that this is a problem. It would be similar to a gun manufacturer saying “you can shoot yourself in the head with this gun and nothing bad will happen.”

But regardless of the Purdue false advertising campaign, the oxycontin cum heroin cum fentanyl “crisis” is still not a supply issue. It is a demand issue. You cannot solve a demand issue by limiting supply. At least, I think that is some kind of economic principle or whatever, I don’t actually know, I’m not an economist. But in this specific case, it is just obvious that the only thing you can do in terms of solving demand by limiting supply is drive up prices of drugs which leads to endless petty crime to pay for the drugs. At this point, it is obvious that the supply can’t be completely cut off, or even meaningfully reduced.

Trump has cracked down on the border. It’s sort of irrelevant at this point, since most of the people who wanted to come to America are already here, but he has closed the border. Have drug prices gone up due to this attempt at strangling the supply?

With fentanyl, you have a whole new reality on the supply side. With heroin, you had to grow the shit in Afghanistan and then traffic it to the West. Fentanyl is just made in a lab, and it is insanely easy to make. It costs almost nothing. Right now, it is cheapest to make it in Mexico and then take it across the border, but it is so cheap to make that you could also make it anywhere and then just mail it to the United States. I’ve read that based on the production costs, if you send it through the mail and 99 out of 100 packages get seized, you still make a profit on the 1% that gets through. And people could be making this in the US. They just don’t, because as of right now, it is cheaper to do it in Mexico or to mail it from wherever.

Here’s the thing: if you can’t stop the supply, and you want people to do less drugs, then you need to address demand. What is the demand? Why are there so many people who want to take these drugs? Well, presumably it is because their lives are miserable, and drugs work to help them escape from that misery.

It’s widely known that soldiers in Vietnam did a lot of heroin. Here’s a fun factoid for you: 95% of the boys who were “addicted” to heroin in Vietnam stopped cold turkey when they came home. This obviously proves the fact that this whole theory of “addiction” is a complete hoax. These are not magical substances that take over your body and remove your free will, forcing you to use them against your will.

Here’s another fun factoid: the whole “addiction theory” had as one of its primary pillars a rat study, where a rat was given one water bottle with normal water and one with morphine or cocaine-laced water, and the rat just kept drinking the drug water until it OD’d. Then, in the late seventies – i.e., a very long time ago – someone called Bruce K. Alexander said that these studies of the rat overdosing on drugs all had a situation where the rat was in a small metal cage, completely alone with nothing to do. He hypothesized that if you created a better environment for the rat, the rat would respond differently to the availability of drugs. He created “Rat Park,” where the rats had a cage 200 times the size of the ones used in the original studies, filled with toys and fun things rats like, as well as other rats to socialize with and have sex with, then added the same options of normal water, morphine water, and cocaine water. Shockingly to drug warriors and probably to no one else, the rats did not become “addicts” and kill themselves with the drugs. They would sometimes use the drugs, just for a bit of fun, but they would use them rarely and none of them OD’d. This proved – or at least went a long way towards proving – that the opposite of the “addiction” theory was true, that drugs are not “addictive” in the sense they are claimed to be addictive, and people do drugs because of life problems.

With the oxycontin thing, no one can deny that giving out very strong opiates because someone has a sore back and telling them it was totally safe was ethical. However, who became “addicted”? It was almost exclusively people in small rural towns that had no jobs due to deindustrialization. Without a job, you probably don’t have a wife and kids either, so why not get high? Seriously, why shouldn’t someone in that situation just get high and relax? Imagine you live in a small shithole town, you have no work, you have no wife, you have nothing at all to do: why is it not totally obvious that you would get high?

The current fentanyl crisis is more urban, while the original oxycontin crisis was much more rural, but what is the same is that it is all people who do not feel they have any future. Taking drugs is a choice, and it is a choice made exclusively by people with bad lives. You do not hear stories of well employed and happily married fathers with good diets and gym routines becoming addicted to opioids or any other hard drugs.

It’s worth mentioning that basically everyone in this country is on some kind of mind-altering drugs. Most of them are legal. You can get amphetamine prescribed in a fifteen minute session with a psychiatrist by telling them you have a hard time concentrating, and hardcore tranquilizers by saying you feel anxious. You can take the amphetamines in the daytime and tranquilizers in the nighttime. SSRIs are also still very popular, with around 15% of Americans on them, despite the huge amount of data on how destructive they are, and the whole “chemical imbalance” theory having been completely debunked to the point where no one has the nerve to cite it anymore. Something like 99% of American men use pornography, which, as I’ve explained elsewhere, is not about sex, but is a drug used to flood the brain with dopamine (up to ten times more than other “pleasurable” activities, including real sex).

The reason there is a drug problem in America is that a lot of people have bad lives. They are bowling alone, they are poor, they do not have good family situations. Drug use is also high among famous people, because despite the fact everyone wants to be famous, actually being famous is the most stressful possible life anyone can have. Or, one of the most stressful possible lives. Being an out-of-work coal miner in a shithole town with no young people where 2/3rds of homes are unoccupied is also very stressful.

If you could stop the supply, that already would have happened. The drug war has been going on for decades now and there are more drug addicts than ever. And attempting to stop the supply is unbelievably destructive, and leads to all of the worst possible outcomes.

What the Heck is a Narcoterrorist?

As you’re no doubt aware, Donald Trump blew up a small gas-powered boat in the Caribbean under the premise that it was carrying drugs to the United States. Or rather, it is claimed that this happened.

I don’t know that I really believe it happened. I think the video might be AI. Nothing about it makes any sense at all.

Most obviously, you could not drive that boat 2,000 miles to America. That is nonsensical on its face, and it was incredibly surreal to me that this claim was made and that people believed it. I guess most people don’t know much about boats. I know a couple things about boats. But it really doesn’t seem like you would need to know much about boats to know that what amounts to a large dingy with outboard gas-powered motors cannot travel thousands of miles through open ocean.

The boat was 40-foot long, reportedly with three outboard motors. Speaking with AI on the topic, the trip from Venezuela to Florida would require between 900 and 2,000 gallons of gas. The AI concluded:

Therefore, a 1,000-nautical-mile range at 90 knots with triple outboards is not feasible with current marine technology due to insurmountable fuel consumption demands.

Although it was obvious to me on its face that this claim of that boat in the photo making this trip, which is 1,200 miles as the crow flies and closer to 2,000 miles in practice, was not at all possible, I did a lot of research, asking the AI and then reading source material, and I can confirm that there is simply no possible way that boat was driving from Venezuela to Florida.

This type of boat can be used in drug trafficking, though not typically directly from South America. Even on much shorter trips, go-fast boats require refueling. If this boat was making the trip, it could have been tracked to wherever it was going to refuel instead of blown up. This reminds me of the “Chinese spy balloon” situation, where instead of downing the balloon and investigating it, proving it was a “spy balloon,” they blew it up so no one could ever prove it wasn’t a “spy balloon.”

Though we don’t know exactly where the boat was when it was blown up, Marco Rubio initially said the boat was headed for Trinidad, which is literally right off the coast of Venezuela.

So, although we are not being told where the boat was, presumably, the fact that the Secretary of State said this (he presumably had been briefed on the location) means that the boat was somewhere between Venezuela and Trinidad and Tobago when it was blown up. To then say that they knew it was headed for America…

….without providing any evidence or explaining how they know that, is quite remarkable in its absurdity. Like, it is actually unbelievable that they are making this claim, and it is even more unbelievable that people on Twitter are going along with it, and actually using the term “narcoterrorists.”

The other very insane thing about this is that there were 11 people on the boat. Why would you bring 11 people on a drug run? Wouldn’t you want to fill the boat with drugs? I mean, especially given the fact you need to bring thousands of gallons of gas, you would think you would want to keep some room for the drugs.

Finally, it’s worth noting that the president isn’t allowed to just murder people by blowing up their boats in international waters. If they thought they had drugs somehow headed for America, they could have just stopped the boat. There are warships and 4,000 marines and sailors off the coast of Venezuela right now, so there were plenty of people who could have hopped over to this boat and checked out what was going on with it. Just blowing it up with an attack helicopter is fucking insane.

It’s possible that they did just blow up some random boat of people traveling from Venezuela to Trinidad. But I also think it’s possible it is just a fake video they released. Thus far, there are no family members coming out and saying “hey why did you kill my family member on that boat, Donald?” and I think it would be a problem to just blow up a random boat because someone’s family members would complain, and Maduro could bring out the family members to talk about it. So it makes more sense to me it was just an AI video.

You might be saying then: if it was AI, why did they make it so stupid? Why did they show a boat that can’t possibly make that trip, why did they include 11 people on it, which makes no sense? And the obvious explanation is that they want people to go along with something that makes no sense.

People are obliging.

Stephen Crowder says you’re committing treason if you don’t support this.

There are millions more of these tweets. You can go check.

They are all using this new term “narcoterrorist.” No one had heard of this a week ago, now it is just being thrown around like it’s an established thing. This is more face-numbing stupidity. “Terrorism” means using violence against civilians to political ends. The goal of narcotics trafficking is to make money. There is nothing political about it. They are using the word because legally, it gives them more power to act under the Patriot Act. (It also sounds much scarier, I’m sure.) Though it is still definitely illegal to just blow up random boats in international waters.

Was Cocaine Even the Problem?

I thought we had a fentanyl crisis, not a cocaine crisis. I thought the whole thing was that “Mexican cartels” were running fentanyl and also China was somehow responsible. But if it’s now about cocaine, that is in itself confusing, but Venezuela is not a cocaine country. They are now going around claiming Maduro is running a drug gang?

I’ve looked it up, and I can’t even find Venezuela mentioned in anything about cocaine. Government studies and a CSIS report agree that 98% of cocaine in the US comes from Colombia, with the other 2% coming from Bolivia or Peru.

I’m sure some of the Venezuelan gang members that flooded the country under Joe Biden’s open borders policy were dealing cocaine in America. But those were people Maduro let out of prison to come to the US. Biden announced an open borders policy, and as is reasonable enough in my estimation, Maduro opened the prisons and sent all his country’s gang members to America. The US had been threatening him with regime change since he took power, and if you’ll remember, under Trump 1, Macro Rubio and Mike Pompeo were doing this insane thing where they picked some random guy and said he was the real president of Venezuela. It was just as bizarre as the rest of this stuff.

Sometimes it feel like nothing even makes sense, no? Honestly, I don’t blame people for just shutting down and shutting off, because there is just this constant flow of utter nonsense, delivered with total seriousness, and it can truly make one feel like they are going insane. I have a bit less sympathy for the Trump people who are cheering on all of this lunacy. I guess I have some sympathy for the average person who is caught up in it, as they are just dumb and helpless and being abused. But these conservative commentators are the absolute scum of the earth. Stuff like the above Stephen Crowder tweet is truly unforgivable.

Clearly, Trump’s people want some kind of “win,” and someone, presumably Marco Rubio, is claiming that they can pull off a regime change in Venezuela. There are 4,000 marines and sailors off the coast now, in warships. You can’t do a regime change with that army, and you don’t need that army if you’re going to try to do an assassination. If you wanted to do an assassination, presumably you would not want it to be completely obvious that you did it, and if Maduro gets assassinated while there are American warships hovering around, it will be obvious who did it. So, who knows what the plan is. I guess they are just trying to create some kind of panic in the country.

It is infuriating that the declared fight against Sino-Mexican fentanyl is now a fight against cocaine in a country that doesn’t produce any cocaine. Because I follow this stuff close enough to understand it is all just lies, I don’t worry about being driven insane by it, but it is so outrageous it is difficult to maintain composure. The fact that I am one of the only people who is actually going to be able to explain these things in a clear and concise way that people can understand, and I am completely out of the game, makes it all the more frustrating.

It seems that the overwhelming majority of Americans get some kind of sadistic thrill from the government killing people. Everyone clapped seeing that boat blown up, without having any information, without asking why it makes no sense. Apparently some of the liberals didn’t clap, but they clap when random apartment buildings in Moscow get drone attacked. This probably relates back to the drug problem. People’s lives are completely meaningless, so they embrace depravity. Abusing drugs and sadistically cheering people you don’t know being murdered for reasons you don’t understand are both coping behaviors of very unhealthy people.

This Isn’t Going Anywhere Good

Part of why I cut back on my output on the Daily Stormer is that I really just don’t have very much nice stuff to say. I don’t see any solutions to anything, and I’m not willing to go around pretending there are solutions in order to try to get some crypto donations. This Venezuelan boat bombing, the purely nonsensical nature of it, and the even more nonsensical public response, epitomizes just how far gone this country is. The Ukraine war also does that. As does basically everything else that happens.

The one glimmer of hope I can see is the backlash against the genocide in Gaza, and the backlash against the larger Jewish project in the Middle East. But the thing about that is, “at least people are willing to say they are against mass murdering children” is not super encouraging. It doesn’t prove much.

As the reader is aware, I am hopeful about the US empire collapsing and China taking over as the world’s premier superpower. This is inevitable in the long term, but there is a high chance things will get much worse before that happens. The fact that the entire leadership in Washington is insane, and that the emerging competing elite in Silicon Valley are even more insane, is not encouraging. The plan right now appears to be to install James “JD Vance” Bowman as the next president, which will allow for a full merger of the Silicon Valley elite with the Washington elite, given that Bowman was groomed by Peter Thiel for this role.

These Silicon Valley people are insane on a whole other level. The “Christian Zionist” cult, which had its moment in the spotlight after 9/11, is perhaps made to look sane by the religious cult that controls Silicon Valley. These people believe, legitimately, that they are going to make an “artificial general intelligence” computer super mind that will solve every problem and allow them to live forever and conquer the universe. Thiel, who is a homosexual, is now claiming to be a Christian himself and he is obsessed with the antichrist (???). His heretical Christian doctrine is that God wants us to perfect our bodies on Earth. People believed the “God wants us to support the Christ-killing Jews and murder all these Arabs” heresy, so they will presumably believe this one too.

I don’t see any room for any kind of progress here. Probably, that is why I am still banned, even while so many other people have been unbanned. I think the pro-China message has become the third rail. As long as people are talking about American politics as if they matter, there is no actual threat to the system, because you are engaging the system and giving it legitimacy even if you are against it. All of this material, even the strong anti-Israel and sometimes even anti-Jewish sentiment just feeds into this nonsense machine, while also providing much needed data for the AI super-systems that are being built.

As I’ve said, writing books is going to be a better way for me to communicate while I am still under these ultra-extreme censorship sanctions. I am writing multiple books now, and I think once I get one finished and published, I’ll get to rolling, and be able to pump out the same word count I was putting out on the site in book format. Although I’m clearly a well-established writer, moving to book format is something of a leap, and it’s a process I’m going through.

I just want to make it clear that although I am very negative on most things I would normally have been talking about, I’m optimistic in the long run, and I am seeing a lot of good things happening on the world stage. God willing, most of us will live to see a better future.

]]> I Support India Now. I’m All-In. I’ve Started Shitting in the Street to Show Solidarity. https://dailystormer.in/i-support-india-now-im-all-in-ive-started-shitting-in-the-street-to-show-solidarity/ Wed, 03 Sep 2025 22:59:13 +0000 https://dailystormer.in/?p=688090

One time in Thailand, however many years ago, I was listening to a young lady complain about Chinese people. I had some sympathy for her complaints, as Chinese tourists can be overbearing. On the whole, they spend so much money, it is hardly fair to complain. And the thing about this is: China developed so rapidly that the average 30-year-old has parents who grew up in a rice field. So they have a rural mindset, which is different than the more refined culture of Thailand, which prioritizes politeness and a complex system of social decorum. Americans and the British can also be slightly barbaric in the eyes of Thais or other Indochinese peoples, but the whites can sort of get a hold of the concept of Asian decorum, specifically because they are racially different. A Chinese person looking at a Thai sees someone genetically similar to them (Thailand was colonized by Southern Chinese), and feels as though they are in rural China when they are in Thailand.

The Thais complain about Chinese talking too loudly, spitting indoors, and flicking cigarette butts in inappropriate places. It is all just rural behavior. Obviously, everyone loves the Singaporeans, who are some of the nicest and most refined people in the world (if not the single most polite and culturally aware), and Singaporeans are Han Chinese. Further, you will find Singaporean type culturalization in central Shanghai, Hong Kong, Taipei, and other Han metros where people have lived a cultured urban life for generations. So it is definitely not a ethnic issue or even a general ethnic cultural issue, but specifically a rural issue, with people who have not been fully acclimatized to urban Asian social norms having the money to travel to Thailand for vacation.

I am a sinophile, and attempted to explain this to the lass with some degree of success. I further added that most Asian groups hate each other, but they should try to find positives in Chinese culture and be friendly with them, because they are bringing in money that is really helping Thai development.

She bristled at the word “hate,” saying “I don’t hate anyone, I just find some of the behaviors rude and wish they would try to understand our culture more when they are here.”

Referencing an early discussion, I replied: “Well, you said you hate Indians.”

And she said: “And Pakistan. I hate them all and think a big bomb should destroy all of them. You said we were talking about Asians. I don’t hate any Asians, we are all similar, but I hate all Indians and Pakistanis and think they all should die.”

This is not a minority view in Thailand, Laos, Cambodia, Vietnam, Malaysia, or Indonesia. It is most extreme in Burma, where they border Bangladesh and have had ongoing conflict with them for decades. This doesn’t have much to do with tourism or overseas work, given that subcontinental peoples don’t do much of that in Southeast Asia. It is much more influenced by the fact that you’d be very hard-pressed to find a single individual in one of these countries who does not know someone who has been scammed by an Indian.

It would also be hard to find an American who has not been targeted with a scam from India, but aside from the elderly, most Westerners come from a society that is much lower trust, and is therefore much more guarded against scams. But we all hear the horror stories of elderly people having their identity stolen and their bank account cleaned out, or teenagers who commit suicide because a “woman” with an attractive profile picture asked them to masturbate on camera for them and then threatened to spread it to their parents and all their classmates if they didn’t pay up.

One in five elderly people in America have been scammed, adding up to nearly $40 billion per year in profits for the scammers who are virtually all Indian.

The “sextortion” of teen boys is harder to track, because for the same reason boys don’t want the videos released, they don’t want to admit they got scammed like this. (Note: sextortion victims also include some girls, though a much lower percentage, probably both because girls are slightly more discerning about who they send nudes to, and less bothered by the prospect of them leaking.)

Americans are so sensitive to “racism” accusations that we can’t even talk about the fact that the overwhelming majority of these scams come from India. Of course, the media decides what “racism” is and who you’re allowed to be racist towards, and interestingly, the media does not hesitate to point to ethnic Chinese as being the largest group involved in corporate espionage.

Silicon Valley is involved in aggressive screening not just of Chinese nationals, but ethnic Chinese born in America or a third country. This was endorsed by the State Department, officially, though after several lawsuits, it is currently a bit less official. Official or not, if you are visibly Chinese, it is virtually impossible to get hired as a new employee in Silicon Valley in current year (even other East Asians with poor relations to the Chinese get profiled because of their physical features).

In 2023, the then FBI overlord Christopher Wray held a meeting with his “Five Eyes” satraps to warn of the Chinese tech threat, and effectively instructed tech companies and universities not to hire Chinese people. In so many words.

I don’t know about you, but my grandma being scammed out of her social security by Indians bothers me a lot more than Sam Altman getting his AI algorithm (which was promised to be open source in the first place) borrowed by the Chinese. Part of the issue here is that the government cares a lot more about global tech dominance than they do your grandma or your horny teenage son, but it is also an issue of geopolitics, where China is viewed as an enemy and India is not.

While spying is definitely more important to the government than grandma’s retirement money, the US is only bothered by certain spies. While India probably doesn’t do spying or industrial espionage on any scale, simply because their domestic tech industry is not advanced enough for it to be relevant to them, Israelis steal technology and spy on Americans with impunity, and there are never any meetings about it, let alone calls for companies dealing with sensitive technologies to stop hiring Jews. However, twenty years ago, when the Holocaust was not so fresh in everyone’s minds, Israel did make it into an FBI report on industrial espionage, which stated: “Israel has an active program to gather proprietary information within the United States. These collection activities are primarily directed at obtaining information on military systems and advanced computing applications that can be used in Israel’s sizable armaments industry.” But I mean, in 2019, Jews were caught setting up spying devices outside of the White House, and it was a considered by the US “intelligence community” to be a non-issue. There was no summoning of the ambassador. What makes the situation even more outrageous is that the Israeli companies involved in theft of US technology have been caught selling some of it to China (this is despite the fact that China may well in turn sell the tech to Iran). But this is allowed, because of the Holocaust. (Please see “Schindler’s List” for more information on why Jews are permitted to operate with impunity inside of the United States).

India was a “Bulwark Against China”

China is definitely on the enemies list, just like the Russians. And while their status is nowhere near that of the Jews, India has had a privileged status for decades due to claims that they are a “bulwark against China.”

It is worth noting here that there is a pretty large misconception about the history of India and China. Many people believe, for whatever various reasons, that Chinese-Indian conflict is some kind of ancient norm, similar to the hostility between China and Japan. However, there is no truth to this. In fact, going back more than 2,000 years, there had been intense cultural, religious, and economic cooperation between China and India. India played a key role in moving Chinese products to the Middle East and Europe. (In trying to get a grasp on this issue recently, I found “Buddhism, Diplomacy, and Trade: The Realignment of India–China Relations, 600–1400” by Tansen Sen very helpful, though for those uninterested in books, perusing Wikipedia can get you up to speed.)

So then, you might be thinking that there was some fallout during the colonial period, or during the communist revolution in China. You would, in fact, be incorrect. Relations between India and China, which were peaceful for thousands of years, did not deteriorate until 1959, when India made the decision to harbor the satanic cult leader, slaver, cannibal, and terrorist “Dalai Lama.” Due to the extreme vulgarity of harboring such an unbelievable fiend, tensions soured drastically. This led to border conflicts in territories that were never considered contested before, and to the first ever military conflict between the two states in 1962.

It’s unclear why India made the decision to harbor this terrorist. I would personally assume that it was due to back-channeling with the US, though to be clear, this is a personal “hunch,” as I have never found record of this. The US did funnel him and his satanic cannibal bandits a bunch of money.

To be clear, “Dalai Lama” is no more a “Buddhist” than a “Christian Zionist” is a “Christian.” Tibetan Buddhism, like Christian Zionism, is a satanic cult. Late 19th- and early 20th-century European occultists went to Tibet and integrated the information they gathered into their mystical, satanic systems. Even Aleister Crowley was obsessed with Tibet. That is a story for another time, but the evils of the Tibetans were well-documented long before the Chinese revolution, and are definitely not “Chinese communist” propaganda. (Keyu Jin, who is the sexy author of The New China Playbook: Beyond Socialism and Capitalism, a book trying to explain China to Westerners, says when Americans think of China they think of “the 3 Ts – Tibet, Taiwan, and Tiananmen, all of which were hoaxes. And yes, I am showing off the fact that not working on the site for 10 hours a day has given me time to read a lot of books.) The Dalai Lama’s failed uprising was against Beijing’s demands that they end slavery. This is to say a “humanitarian” reason to harbor him is nonsensical. Regardless of the thinking behind the decision to harbor this fiend, it caused a spiraling of relations between India and China that were then rolled up into Cold War politics.

The end of India’s 3,000 years of friendly relations with China was the beginning of their friendly relations with the US. Relations between the US and China softened in the 1970s, the start of which was actually a ping-pong championship, but the most iconic symbol of the softening was Richard Nixon’s 1972 visit, where he met with Chairman Mao.

Mao died four years later, and Deng Xiaoping eventually took over, leading to decades of cooperation, given that neither got along particularly well with the USSR.

However, this cooperation was haunted by the paranoia of the United States, which insisted on maintaining control of Taiwan, despite the fact that they signed the “One China” agreement, recognizing that the PRC is the only government of China, which includes Taiwan. They also continued to thwart relations between China and India throughout this period, putting conditions on “development assistance” foreign aid, for example, and of course spreading anti-China propaganda throughout the Indian media.

Most of the American “top thinkers,” such as Zbigniew Brzezinski, believed that China was going to become a liberal democracy as it got wealthier. The idea, especially after the fall of the Berlin Wall and the disintegration of the USSR, with all of that “end of history” nonsense, was that wealthier nations naturally adopt social liberalism and that social liberalism is incompatible with any political system other than liberal democracy. As late as 1998, Zbig claimed that “within a decade” the CCP would no longer be the sole governing body of China.

Meanwhile, Samuel Huntington, a Harvard professor who served in the Carter Administration alongside Zbig and author of “The Clash of Civilizations and the Remaking of World Order,” argued that some traditional cultures could maintain social conservatism and therefore political conservatism even after technological development and economic liberalization. He listed China as one such civilization. He certainly won that debate, as by the time Obama took office (elected the same year Zbig predicted China would be embracing democracy), the US had accepted that China would not spontaneously become a democracy, and developed a “Pivot to Asia” strategy to use military force to turn China into a liberal democracy.

Part of the plan there was to lean heavily into the relationship with India, along with the Philippines, Japan, and “South Korea,” because they needed as many bulwarks as possible against their former bulwark against the USSR. (US foreign policy is heavily bulwark-oriented, which in simple terms means that they constantly play countries against one another to prevent any alliances that could challenge their hegemony.) Many prominent academics, including John Mearsheimer, were calling for Russia to be a bulwark against China, but the US has always hated Russia. During his 2012 election against Mitt Romney, Obama chastised the nasty old magic underwear-wearing coot over Romney’s antagonism toward Russia. You may remember he said “the 1980s called and they want their foreign policy back.” (Obama was always very tapped into youth culture, you see.) Two years later, Obama’s State Department was running a coup in the Ukraine. (Although to be fair, during his “exit interview” with Jewish terrorist and Atlantic Monthly editor Jeffrey Goldberg, Obama said he didn’t support further escalation with Russia over the Ukraine. Also, to be fair, Goldberg is my favorite Jewish terrorist because he put me on the cover of his magazine and I looked really cool. Also to be clear, he is literally a Jewish terrorist who in his 20s went to Israel to work in a concentration camp and torture hostages.)

India, with a massive population and an economy advanced enough to absorb much of the manufacturing previously done in China, was a key “bulwark” in this current landscape of hostility towards China.

But then Lindsey Graham told Trump he had to be a big tough macho man and stand up against Vladimir Putin for some reason no one has ever bothered to explain, and Trump hit India with a 50% tariff because they refused to stop buying Russian oil.

Obviously, this isn’t a permanent thing. Even if India maintains its refusal to take orders regarding its energy policy from Donald Trump and his pal Lindsey, it is not going to maintain a 50% tariff. However, this has completely soured India on the US, rousing up ultranationalist sentiment. Even if the tariffs are lifted tomorrow, the damage done to the US-India relationship will be permanent.

I watch the Indian news. Firstly, it is in English for whatever reason. Secondly, the talk shows are totally insane. There are no guardrails. It is like Piers Morgan’s YouTube show, but even wilder. They will entertain any and all ideas. They will sometimes bring on Pakistanis and have better shouting matches than anything I’ve ever seen on Piers’ show. Further, I enjoy masturbating to some of the hosts.

Based on 100% of the news I’ve seen, India is now completely united against America. Severely. These people are really, really mad. They are saying “we’ve done everything you wanted us to do for decades, how are you going to do us like this?” It is being viewed, universally, as an attack on Indian sovereignty, and unlike white people, Indians still have a sense of pride and dignity and take very severe offense to being bullied in this way. What they are hearing from Donald Trump is “we decide who you do business with.” Given that the colonial history is such a huge part of the national mythology, it seems like some advisor should have understood that the response to this would be extreme.

I don’t think India is going to become an enemy state tomorrow, but this weird thing Trump did will be remembered for decades to come, and it is already causing the country to move toward China, as we saw this week.

“Tariffs” are Just a New Form of Sanctions

The US had encouraged India to engage in border skirmishes with China, and in 2020 there was a particularly deadly one. Because of this, and the fallout from it, India’s recent relations with China were especially cold, which is exactly what the US wanted. However, Indian Prime Minister Modi is now in China for the first time in seven years. And it is not just any trip, but a trip to meet with the Shanghai Cooperation Organization (SCO), a security partnership that Russia and China envision as a counterbalance to NATO.

India has been a member of the SCO since 2017, but has also maintained military cooperation with the US, which was one of the biggest hurdles preventing the organization from forming a cohesive bloc to resist NATO. Although the mutual defense pact – “an attack on one is an attack on all” – that NATO members agree to is unprecedented, explicitly a relic of the Cold War, and not something the SCO would likely ever commit to, it is possible that agreements could be made to exclusively cooperate militarily with each other, which would mean India ending their cooperation with the US military.

Joe Biden’s administration was seen as completely out of control, with its totally unprecedented actions against Russia, removing them from the global banking system over an insignificant border skirmish, along with their provocations and threats against China, all culminating in their unconditional support for Israel’s genocide in Gaza, which threatens to throw the entire region into a very big war. Countries were waiting to see if Trump would restore some kind of sanity, as he was claiming he would, and instead he maxed everything out, making it even more extreme than it was under Biden.

The Russia sanctions showed that the US could not be trusted to maintain the global financial system, because if they decide they don’t like you, they can just kick you out of international trade. They will steal your dollar reserves. They will attempt to bankrupt your economy, they will engage in piracy, expropriating private property from your citizens without any sort of process. This is a lot more threatening than the prospect of war. If Trump would have came in on day one and simply let Russia back into SWIFT, he could have kept the war going and it would have blunted most of the damage. But instead he is doing “secondary sanctions” through this “tariff” thing.

It’s now clear that the tariffs do not relate to attempting to reshore US manufacturing. That is just a ruse. It is a stupid ruse as well, because the idea that you can just “move” factories as you would move a shipping container, and then somehow train up a staff, is completely absurd.

Note: During Trump 1, when he first started tariffing China ostensibly under the same premise as these current tariffs, China began moving their factories to Vietnam, Cambodia, Thailand, etc. They brought their own teams to build the buildings, and then their own people to train up the local staff. In some situations, they didn’t even bother to train local staff, and just moved the Chinese factory workers to the new factory in the less tariffed country.

“Reshoring” is a pipe dream. It is so much more expensive to manufacture in America. Some of that is wages, but with wages having risen in China and elsewhere while US wages have fallen, it has much more to do with the insane regulatory environment in America that is so anti-business. Surely, if the tariffs are high enough, it is still cheaper to move to America, but who is going to do that when Trump won’t even stick to his own policies for more than a few days or weeks? And even if Trump did set a hard policy, we live in a democracy where there is no political stability and the next guy could and probably will just remove all these tariffs.

The tariffs are usually framed by critics as a tax on Americans. Objectively, they are a tax on Americans, even though they also harm foreign exporters. But I think the real revelation here, made very obvious in the India situation, is that these tariffs are a new type of sanctions. Lindsey Graham was calling for “secondary sanctions” on India for buying Russian oil, and Trump did the “tariffs” for that express purpose. And he is lobbing these tariffs around everywhere. He’s tariffing Brazil explicitly to try to pressure them into making Bolsonaro president again. Whatever you think of the Ukraine or Brazil or whatever else, this is extreme international belligerence, and it shows the world that the US is not a safe guarantor of the global order. Entrusting the US to maintain the global financial or security architecture is like sending your kids to a daycare center that is also a crack house.

Americans might think Trump is better than Biden because he cracked down on trannies and you can say “gay” and “retard” again. But to the rest of the world, Trump 2 is “Biden on Steroids,” and the US is a sinking ship. People are fleeing, trying to grab ahold of anything.

Modi’s India Can’t Work as a Liberal Democracy

Despite having called for a genocide of the entire Indian race as a result of their scamming and generally abhorrent behaviors, I’ve always liked Modi. He is an anti-liberal ethnoreligious nationalist. His project is incompatible with democracy. Most pressingly, he is dealing with an existential demographic issue many decades after the partition of India, which was supposed to solve the problem of multiculturalism by giving Moslems their own country (which later became two countries when East Pakistan became Bangladesh). There are still Moslems in India, and they have a lot more kids than Hindus. India is supposedly only 15% Moslem right now, but no one really knows the demographics of India. In a few decades, the Moslems will start wielding real political power, and in the longer run, there cannot be a democratic Hindu India for the same reason Israel says there can’t be a Jewish democracy if they gave Palestinians citizenship. (This is why everyone talks about a mythical “two-state solution” instead of just doing the obvious thing and giving Palestinians equal rights. Jews will always talk about a “two-state solution.” That’s why there are so many Jews in pro-Palestine activism. The obvious thing is a one-state solution where you just give the Palestinians citizenship.) If India were not a democracy, an Islamic minority would not be so much of a threat. The Hindus wouldn’t have to kill them all, but they would not face the threat of Moslems gaining political power and ultimately taking over the country.

Please note that I am not saying Islam is bad or Hinduism is good or anything else, I am simply describing the situation, and also noting that I respect any leader who is willing to stick up for their own people. I like Modi because he is the kind of leader that every nation should have.

What’s more, unlike many populists, Modi’s support base is the urban middle class, the wealthy, and the industrialists. In the 2024 election, when he lost a significant amount of power in the democracy system, it was in part due to Moslems coming together (which they hadn’t effectively done before), but was in larger part due to poor, rural people disliking him because of something to do with farming problems.

The only reason India is a democracy in the first place is that the West demanded it. No one really wants democracy, other than screeching women who want to have slut freedoms, as well as homosexuals and various minority groups. Democracy is not a natural system. You see this with the Trump movement, where the MAGA support base has no interest at all in democratic processes and just basically wants Trump to be a king. Further, Putin got 88% of the vote in the last election. If Xi were to hold a vote, he would get more than that. Democracy is an unnatural system, it is the most corrupt system, and it is the most tyrannical. No one wants it and they only do it because the US forces it on them. The US wants democracies because they can manipulate and control them through institutions. They have that down to a science.

This is a big reason for Modi to split from the US. If he does, he will no longer have to do this democracy charade. That doesn’t mean he has to abolish parliament or whatever, he just moves into a system that maintains some of the trappings of democracy, but opposition parties are sidelined and safely ignored.

The Trump attack on India via these “tariff” sanctions is giving Modi the support and the excuse to move away from the West and move away from the democracy system. His ability to do that will be based on his ability to form a relationship with China, and so far, that seems to be going very well.

The SCO meeting was more symbolic than anything else. But it’s a big symbol. And it certainly implies that this is going to be moving forward.

Trump is going around whining about how he deserves the Nobel Peace Prize even as he continues to arm the Ukraine and commits the single most brutal genocide in all of human history in Gaza. (The Holocaust is a hoax, but even if it was real, at least it was a secret. Imagine if Nazi camp guards had been posting TikTok videos of them steaming millions of Jews in homicidal steam chambers. And then there was some other country paying for the whole thing and saying it was good.) But frankly, the way Trump has united Russia, China, and India in this new alliance is probably worth giving him a Nobel Peace Prize. I’m serious. He should try applying on that basis, and I don’t really know how it could be denied to him.

The SCO meeting was also attended by Lula, president of Brazil, who is also a victim of Trump’s “tariff” sanctions. Iran’s president was there. As was the Prime Minister of Cambodia, whose country was a victim of a ridiculous assault by the US ally Thailand last month. Mongolia’s president was there (the US has been trying to sway Mongolia to their side, despite the fact it would make no sense). The leaders of every Central and Southeast Asian country, with the exceptions of Thailand and the Philippines, were in attendance.

This photo is just the official members, not including all of the other heads of state who came and are presumably looking to join.

The SCO is a kind of sister organization to BRICS. What exactly the official functions of these organizations technically are is sort of irrelevant at this point. The point is, they represent the coming together of all of the nations being targeted as enemies by the United States. Please note that I hate the term “global south,” and would ask you to kindly not use that term. The correct term is “Russia, China, and the third world” (Russia and China are second world countries, the rest of these are all third world countries. Those terms are not offensive, and what is actually offensive is changing terminology. Referring to the third world as “global south” is no better than referring to niggers as “the negro peoples.”)

What we are seeing with Trump is an extreme escalation of the US agenda to build an Iron Curtain around itself by forcing every country not directly under the control of the US into an alliance explicitly based on not being friends with the US, because the US is a bully country that tries to control everyone’s life.

International liberal democracy thinks it’s Jesus. After all, if everyone has “human rights” (protip: they do not), then every country must accept the perfected universalist system of liberal democracy. It is an evangelical system. This has become like communism. Well, like early communism. “Everyone deserves human rights” is just a different version of “workers of the world, unite!” What China, as the head of this new world order, is saying is that it’s nobody’s business but your own how you want to run your internal affairs. What China is saying is that communists, dictators, theocrats, and yes, even democrats (assuming they are not the liberal Western sort) can all get along and make money together instead of having wars. It is universally appealing and the only reason anyone would not want in is that the US is threatening or bribing them.

No traditional country that is too big to bribe wants to be on-board with the Americans’ gay/feminist/interracial agenda. Access to the US financial infrastructure is a kind of bribe, in that it is coercive. But the world is now seeing that regardless of the money they might be able to make, it is simply not worth it to be under the boot of Creepy Uncle Sam. Further, given the way the country is going off the rails, it’s unlikely there is going to be much money to make with the US in the 21st century. Along with all of his other problems, Trump has no ability to escape Israel’s demand for a war with Iran, and that is really going to damage the country’s financial and military standing.

Further, Modi, like every other leader in the world, knows that at any time the US could do him like they did Russia, and cut India out of their international financial cartel. It is just common sense to preempt that by being prepared. For every country, security is the first and foremost concern, and China can provide security guarantees without the bullying.

What This Means for You

If this plays out the way it looks like it’s going to play out, it is definitely going to mean fewer H-1B visas, I can tell you that. Indians will be less excited to come to a country they view as an enemy nation, and the US will be less likely to let them in if they start classifying them like they classify the Chinese. India’s tech sector is not a complete joke, they are developing, and they could develop faster if they were cooperating with the Chinese, so those people who come on H-1Bs could just stay in their own country and work at their own companies.

Further, if India, the most populous country in the world and the “bulwark against China” that the US has poured so much money and energy into developing switches to the Chinese side, it is a massive hit to the American Empire, and the weakening of the American empire is good for everyone on earth, first and foremost Americans themselves. Well, maybe first and foremost for the Europeans, who are crushed under the heel of the Americans and don’t even get the financial benefits Americans get from the empire, but at least second and secondmost, the Americans benefit from an end of the empire.

As far as what America’s plan is here: I have no idea. This makes zero sense. There is no level on which it makes sense, other than that Trump is senile, and really likes golfing with Lindsey Graham.

It is wild that he had that meeting with Putin and said he was setting everything up to end the war then did the most extreme possible thing that not even Joe Biden was willing to do, these “secondary sanctions.” But way beyond simply escalating the war, which he’d already been doing in various ways, to make an enemy out of India is just so bizarre I can’t even really process how it could have happened beyond the stated theory of “he’s senile and Lindsey Graham is really good at kissing his ass.”

I form my own opinions on things, and then before considering them solid enough to share with you, dear reader, I go see what other smart people are saying. I’ve read and listened to a lot of different smart people since Trump did this attack on India, and everyone has said the same thing: “I have no idea why he would do this.” He is making all of these threats, talking about how America can do anything to anyone, and none of it makes any sense. I don’t think it is some calculated move by any “deep state,” and instead it seems like the opposite; he’d been doing this tariff thing for however many months, and shortly after the India attack, a federal court called him up and said all these tariffs are illegal, he doesn’t have any of this authority. He’s saying he’s going to rush it through the Supreme Court, so we’ll see how that goes, but in terms of India, I think it’s over. I think Modi wanted out for the reasons listed above, and I think the people of the country are angry enough that he can use this as a wedge issue to distance himself from the US.

But hey – whatever.

I don’t know why it’s happening, but I know I like this a lot.

The collapse of the empire is the only news story that really matters. All of this other stuff is really just a distraction, entertainment at best. They’re never going to give you the Epstein files. They’re not going to deport millions of people. Obama is not going to be arrested. Shroud is never going to be prosecuted for cheating at video games. But every day, you can open up your internet device and watch the empire ending.

As I type up the final words of this essay, my laptop is on my knees as I squat in the street taking a shit in a show of solidarity with the Indian people. Looking up at the clear blue autumn sky above this shitting street, I can see the shadow of a new world order, coming into view.

]]> BREAKING: Epstein was Walking on the Wild Side, Went Full Jungle Mode https://dailystormer.in/breaking-epstein-was-walking-on-the-wild-side-went-full-jungle-mode/ Wed, 03 Sep 2025 22:00:27 +0000 https://dailystormer.in/?p=688111
Jeffrey Epstein pictured in 2003, recruiting hoes for his Mossad sex ring

So-called “survivors” of Jeffrey Epstein’s prostitution ring, AKA former professional hookers who are looking for a payday because their sugar daddy turned out to be a Mossad agent and it was a big news story, gave a press conference demanding more and more and more money.

Their claim is that although they were professional prostitutes, it was abuse to hire them for their services, because… I’m not really clear on the reasoning, frankly. Some of them are claiming that they were “miners,” but none of these women look like they’ve worked a day in their lives, let alone hard labor in the mines. I think these skanks would probably have a panic attack playing Minecraft as it is too close to actual work.

Hookers are the laziest people on earth. As a global rule, an hour with a hooker is approximately the cost of one week of minimum wage (after taxes). So in most of the third world (excluding black countries), that’s somewhere between $40 and $100 USD. In America, it’s about $250. It’s good money. In fact, it’s insane money for a woman with no skills at all. Obviously, due to the nature of the work, they don’t work 40 hour weeks at that rate, but if they’ve got three or four clients a day, in America that would be $5,000 a week, $240,000 a year. That’s without all the scams they run on their customers, getting extra money, gifts, college tuition, free cocaine, and on and on. A talented hooker can make a clean mil a year in the US, literally for laying on her back and pretending to be friendly. This is not what I would classify as a “victim.”

Of course, Epstein’s girls were in a whole other league, working for a shady Mossad billionaire, making ungodly amounts of money. But if there’s one thing I’ve learned about women, they will spend all the money they have, then do anything (and I mean anything) to get more money. So these hoes are now organizing to demand more money from Epstein’s estate, saying they were “victims” of their generous employer.

That’s all to be expected. Women gonna wom.

What was not expected is that the leader of these hoes is a straight-up jungle-ass negress. She is the leader of the “disgruntled money-seeking retired hooker cartel” going around the media demanding the money.

I’m not surprised they put a black woman in charge. They’re aggressive and especially good at making demands. This is effectively an “I need to speak to the manager” type situation, and certainly that white bitch to her left giggling about the whole thing can’t go out there and act all angry that she didn’t get paid enough for her pussy. The road dog on the far right would likely be the second best demander-in-chief.

Anyway, I’m not saying that black bitch is bad. Honestly, I’d hit it – if she was 14! Not now, obviously. Black might not crack, but it does droop, if you know what I’m saying. I think you know what I’m saying.

Anyway, this is a really big revelation, that Epstein was taking a walk on the wild side and going jungle mode. I actually have even more respect for him now, and I already respected the shit out of the guy. He was a top boss. A real high roller. I’m not saying I agree with blackmailing everyone for the Mossad, but game recognize game, and Jeff was maxing it out. He was running guns and doing all kinds of other shit too, you know. He was a top boss.

I can picture me, Jeff, and DMX on a pimped out private plane running hookers to a secret location in the south of France. Me and X think it’s just a regular hoe job, and then I overhear Jeff on the phone talking with the Mossad and I alert X and he goes full Dog Mode when he realizes the Jews are running the whole thing. He pulls out his Glock and cocks it and then looks at me and I just nod and he throws me the Glock then pulls out another one and it’s just like:

We take over the plane and throw Jeff out, CIA style. X asks me: “Dawg, I’m just wondering why you shoot a man fore you throwed him out da plane?” and I just give him a hard look and he just nods, as if to say: “Yeah. I feel ya, dawg. That’s some hardcore IRA type shit.”

Then we land with the hoes and tell the billionaire clients “we takin’ over this turf now, these hoes be run by the hood niggas and da Irish now. Y’all got a problem with dat?”

Then all those French pussies would just shake their heads nervously. Then me and X would run Epstein’s entire prostitution ring and turn his mansion in Manhattan into a legit trap house, and use the blackmail ring to control the US in the name of the blacks and the Irish.

]]> Burning Gay Flags is Not Illegal, These People are Just Lying https://dailystormer.in/burning-gay-flags-is-not-illegal-these-people-are-just-lying/ Wed, 27 Aug 2025 09:42:18 +0000 https://dailystormer.in/?p=688066
Personally, I’m on team “Burn them all.”

I mentioned it yesterday, but I didn’t realize the extent to which conservatives are claiming that it is illegal to burn the gay flag. It is definitely not illegal to burn a gay flag. All these cases they are linking of people being charged for defacing a gay flag involved real crimes, specifically theft and vandalism.

Some of these cases have been “enhanced” as hate crimes, with people getting worse charges than they would for stealing a non-gay object and burning it. That is obviously bad. But these people are purposefully trying to deceive people and make them think it is against the law to burn a gay flag.

There are thousands more of these tweets. It’s impossible to find anything on Twitter, I think by design.

This is total scum behavior. Lying on purpose to confuse people in order to push a censorship agenda.

And even if Democrats had made it illegal to burn the gay flag, why would Trump not just write a law legalizing burning gay flags? Why would your argument be “we need to do censorship to match their censorship”? That is a terrible argument and a terrible way of thinking about politics.

Burning the US flag is not really very important in itself. Obviously, I support it, but it might seem too abstract to be relevant. But that isn’t the point. What we saw under Biden and are now seeing under Trump is the government getting more and more involved in censorship of speech. Of course, it was all the way back in 2017 that I was banned from everything. That was, however, “private companies” banning me. I said at the time that if the government was not going to protect my speech, which is what the Constitution says it’s supposed to do, then it wasn’t really any different than the government censoring me. I pointed out that I would have much preferred to pay a fine or do a few months in jail – i.e., receive a government punishment for my speech – than be banned from all internet and financial services for the rest of my life.

Saying “it’s only the government that is allowed to strip you of your freedom of speech” would be like saying “it’s only the government that’s not allowed to murder you.”

There is an entire underlying issue around freedom of speech here, and it is very concerning how conservative commentators are dealing with it.

Matt Walsh is literally saying “I want to take away their freedoms because they took away mine.”

If Trump has all this power, why doesn’t he just restore the banned freedoms?

Switching presidents every 4-8 years and then having them each take away more freedoms, while no one even calls on any of them to restore lost freedoms, is a path to a tyranny where literally everything is illegal.

Matt Walsh is a disgusting worm.

Dare him to shave his face. I dare you to dare him to shave his face.

We all know what is going on under there, and it is not a jawline.

He is a worm pretending to be a human.

Conservative commentators are all worthless garbage. I can understand that they wanted to support Trump because they believe in elections and thought he was better than Joe Brandon. When a candidate is out of power, they can’t do anything anyway, so there is nothing to criticize them over. But after the election is over, your job should then be to criticize Trump when he is doing bad things.

Also, for everyone saying that fat guy got arrested because of Trump’s executive order – that is not how executive orders work and you’re retarded if you think that. He was arrested for starting a fire in a federal park in front of the White House. He could have been burning McDonald’s trash and yelling like that and would have been arrested.

If you thought that every time Trump signs an EO, every single police officer gets an immediate text message like “go look for anyone doing this immediately,” you are just a dumb person. Sorry. You should just be able to work through logically that it doesn’t work that way.

Look. I don’t even live in America and I am not planning to ever go there again. God willing. I’m not worried about being arrested. But I do run an internet website which is accessible in the US. With the way right-wingers are currently hopping on board the censorship train, this site is going to end up being blocked by law in America.

Why is this even a thing? Oh, because you hate gays and blacks and immigrants. Okay, fine. But if they were going to get you to go along with censorship, they would first have to find people you hate, right? Right? They wouldn’t get you to support censorship against people you don’t hate, would they? So they would have to find people you hate and then start agitating you that the censorship was against them, if they wanted you to support censorship.

This isn’t really very confusing or complicated.

As far as Trump’s plan to change the name of the “Department of Defense” back to the “Department of War,” I support it.

I would actually take it a step further, and say it should be changed to “Department of Blowing Up Hospitals and Bombing, Shooting, and Starving Babies for Jews.” If that name, DOBUHABSASBFJ, is too cumbersome, they could also just call it “Department of Jewish Services.”

]]>