I was on a roll with the Epstein articles and I have a really good one that was almost finished. But I was fasting and then stopped and I think I got refeeding syndrome. Terrible runs for days now. It was only a five-day fast, I didn’t think refeeding was an issue, but yeah, it turned into a big mess.

Anyway, I’ll finish the Epstein thing tomorrow or whatever, but now this Thai-Cambodia thing has blown up and I’m going to sloppily post a forum reply I wrote, just so I’m posting something.

A forum poster wrote:

You know, Anglin predicted all this.

What article was it, a few years back, where he said “we are effectively in World War 3. World War means ‘world at war’. We will see more countries acting on settling old grievances unrelated to the ‘main’ war” ?

I think it was a lot of articles. It was sort of one of my main themes the last few years.

This is basically India-Pakistan 2, though less complicated. Thailand is 100% the aggressor here. The UN and the whole world recognizes the disputed area as Cambodia, and there isn’t a moral justification in the way there is with Kashmir (Kashmir is 97% Muslim, whereas Preah Vihar is as far as I know 0% Thai, although Thai/Khmer is less defined since it’s solely a language, with the same genes/religion).

Anyway, you can argue who started the India-Pakistan thing. In this current case, Thailand just all of a sudden started mounting forces on the border then killed a Khmer soldier in May, then the PM of Cambodia leaked a phone call of the party gurl PM of Thailand apologizing and calling him “uncle,” then she had to resign and Thailand got angry about the leak and made moves last week.

Right now, the issue is Cambodia used old BM-21s to respond to Thailand and (presumably accidentally, these are not precise systems) blew up a 7/11 killing like a dozen people. Then Thais who crossed the border got their legs blown off by landmines, which Cambodia claims (at least plausibly) were Pol Pot’s mines, not new mines. So now Thailand is saying that although it is an objective matter that they started the whole thing, they have to take revenge for the 7/11 and landmines by… no one knows what exactly. Are they saying they’re going to occupy the disputed territory?

Anyway, Cambodia for obvious reasons is crawling with Chinese military, but China hates getting involved in anything, and they definitely do not care much if Thailand wants to steal a hundred square kilos of land.

But it is what I predicted, yeah, where there is so much war everywhere, everyone is like “well, we can do that too.” Thailand started this for domestic reasons, they have a lot of problems, but it seems that Cambodia escalated with the release of the call because it’s a lot better for them domestically than it is for Thailand (just basic rally round the flag), and also, they know there can’t be a real war because of the Chinese visiting forces in Cambodia. “Visiting” being sort of a euphemism. I don’t even know if the Chinese use that term, it’s an American term for the occupation of Germany/Korea/Japan/Philippines/etc. Of the American occupations though, Korea is the only one that wants it, while Cambodia wants as many Chinese soldiers and equipment in their country as is possible.

I think this is going to be solved soon, but just like with Pakistan-India, you’re putting a band-aid on a bullet hole. Thailand is going to have to back down and basically tacitly admit this was all their fault and totally unprovoked (or rather, provoked by the French 100 years ago). And at any time the US can go to Thailand and be like “hey we’ve got a bunch of planes and missiles and shit, you want to go to war with the Chinese in Cambodia?” and Thailand will say “we thought you’d never ask.”

Further Information

That was the reply, but since this is an official post on the official site, I should maybe add some background information. Preah Vihar is an ancient Hindu temple which is of course now used as a Buddhist site like all the ancient Hindu sites in Indochina. When the French left Cambodia (which they occupied while not occupying Thailand), they drew a border for Cambodia. Before the late 19th century, there wasn’t really borders in the modern sense in the third world, and a lot of these border drawings were a disaster (look at Africa or many Middle Eastern countries). In Cambodia it was pretty easy, as Khmers were a cohesive group so you weren’t forcing a bunch of different ethnic/religious groups to live under a single government. But there was never a clear border before, and both sides wanted the temple in the border region. The French gave it to Cambodia and then the UN repeatedly said the French border was valid and that Thailand should respect it.

There is a lot of stuff about the fact that the ruling families in Thailand and Cambodia were getting along pretty well until the Khmer PM (technically the old PM, father of the current PM, but still the primary authority in the country) leaked the call which appeared to show that the 38-year-old party gurl Thai PM not only admitted Thailand was at fault, but also admitted she didn’t have control over her own military. It’s hilarious he recorded this call then just immediately posted it online, and it certainly revealed the nature of the situation, but the party gurl’s father, who is arguably the most powerful man in Thailand, viewed this as a personal betrayal, and has actually stated publicly that this whole thing is now personal. Saying “I’m settling a personal score” is a weird thing to say when dozens of people are now dead. Or at least it seems weird to Westerners.

There are 72 million people in Thailand and 17 million in Cambodia, and neither country has nukes, meaning it isn’t exactly like Pakistan-India. (It was so funny when Pakistan said “we don’t have the rocket systems to send these nukes anywhere but at you – they are only for you.”) But the strategic importance of Cambodia to China (not to mention the billions in investment) means that in some sense, Cambodia has the upper hand. Despite the fact that the US frames China as “aggressive,” their last military action was in 1979 – to protect Cambodia from a Vietnamese invasion. (For the record, the US has been in dozens of conflicts since 1979, making it pretty cartoonish for them to accuse China of “aggressiveness.”)

As passive as China is, they’re not going to let Cambodia get actually invaded in a serious way by US-backed Thailand. And the fact that Thailand is the aggressor – having started it unprovoked and then literally gone around saying it’s a personal vendetta – means that China doesn’t really have to worry about optics in the way they do in a lot of other places. It’s unfortunate the 7/11 got blown up, but it’s pretty obviously an accident, and it was done after Thais had already bombed Cambodia. Further, Cambodia is saying Thailand is using cluster bombs, which is probably true (people lie in wars but in this case, Thailand’s actions are so egregious and obvious that no one on the Khmer side needs to lie – they could have said the 7/11 bombing was a false flag and didn’t, just said it was an accident). The UN will presumably investigate the cluster bomb claims as well as the claims that the mines were Pol Pot’s and not new mines. Just based on facts though, it’s really unlikely they are new mines. They were on the Thai side of the border, so the idea that Cambodia is sending special forces to mine the Thai side while the whole (relative small area) is swarming with soldiers and drones is sort of a ridiculous claim. And again, Thailand, by everyone’s admission, started this. So blaming Cambodia for anything is silly.

I mean, I’m the anti-Jew-Faggot Empire guy, so I want to do a full disclosure and say of course I support the Khmer side against the gay marriage, legal weed, US-aligned Thai side. But I’m just giving you facts here. No one, including the Thais themselves, claim that Cambodia started this. Again, there are parallels to Pakistan-India, but in that case, both sides could make claims the other side started it. In this case, Thailand had political problems, and just up and decided to mount their forces on the Khmer border and start talking about retaking territory that has been determined to be a part of Cambodia since 1907.

So, I’ll just repeat: it’s very unlikely that this will spin out of control in the immediate future. Donald Trump has made threats about tariffs, and every country responds to these, but the bitterness is not going to go away when the conflict stops, and it is yet another place on the planet where war could break out in a serious way, and definitely would break out if there was any serious conflict between the US and China.

These simmering and potentially hot areas exist all over the world. No government is really happy with their borders, and in general, the majority of populations of countries will always support their government in a war.

Finally, I just want to point out the obvious: if the US actually believed in a “rules-based order,” they would be sending infinity weapons to Cambodia to defend their sacred border and the CIA would be all over reddit calling for “volunteers” to go fight to defend the sacred border.

In actual reality, borders are not sacred in any way, virtually all of them are completely arbitrary, with the least arbitrary being those that were settled by wars that ended in serious defeat of the country with the counter-claim, such as the US-Mexico border, where the Mexicans got so wrecked that no one can seriously question the validity of the border. But borders are a new thing, historically, and they exist for purely practical reasons. The claims after the Russian invasion that “borders are sacred” was the weirdest nonsense ever, especially from the US, which did Kosovo and was, at the time Russia invaded the Ukraine, trying to do Kurdistan. And, should I even have to say it, is the biggest supporter of Israel, which is the least border-respecting country on earth. When Assad fell last year, Israel annexed a further 400 square kilometers of Syria.

A world order cannot be run by a country with no principles and no attempt at fairness in regulating international disputes. The UN, for all my criticisms of it, is a place where all countries can meet and hash out these kinds of disputes, but the US simply refuses to recognize anything they say as meaning anything. We need a new world order, where conflicts are not solved by slogans and dumb emotional bullshit. There is no logical reason that with the nature of technology and international trade that war should even exist at all anymore (with maybe the exception of really primitive areas of Africa, but even then, third parties should be able to mediate conflicts in a way that is satisfactory to all parties).

The problem is that the US is the current Big Boss and it is run by Jews who like war because they don’t respect anyone’s right to self-determination, believing that they are God’s chosen ones and therefore have a divine right to decide how everyone on earth behaves, and will therefore use both social engineering programs and violence in order to enforce their vision of a world shaped in their own image.

Eyyyy. Reporting on Epstein again. The Trump implosion and the Tucker Carlson “everyone in Washington knows America is controlled by Israel” speech got me fired up.

Firstly, a slight correction (not really a “retraction,” but a correction): when I said Epstein was prosecuted by the feds in the mid-2000s before being arrested by the feds in 2019 and charged with the same crimes, I was writing from memory, and was slightly (possibly consequentially) wrong. (Maybe my memory has been blown out, but it was six years ago.) In fact, it was a state conviction. However, part of his plea deal included a non-prosecution agreement (NPA) with the feds. I’m not a lawyer, and this is a very specific question, but my robot says that the NPA is not the same as a conviction and was only with the Florida district, and therefore the 2019 arrest in the Southern District of New York (SDNY) might technically have been legal. This would definitely have been the legal battle Epstein would have fought if the case had gone to court: he would say the NPA from Florida covered all federal districts and the SDNY would say it only covered Florida. According again to my robot, there is literally no precedent as to whether an NPA in one federal district covers other federal districts, so the arrest was certainly questionable and highly unorthodox, but maybe not illegal.

The reason this is relevant is that he obviously died in prison. Furthermore, it appears the feds wanted to raid his house and get the blackmail material from his safe. I still do not quite understand what went on there. My original assertion was that the most likely thing was that some people in American intelligence were not happy with the situation of the Mossad running this Epstein operation in the US, and attempted to thwart it, and somehow the Mossad organized the death of Epstein in federal custody. As I say often, a significant part of my job is to look at all of the information and then try to come up with the most likely explanations for things.

Even if the arrest was not technically illegal because there was no precedent and no one knows whether a federal district NPA holds up in all federal districts, someone in the US government organized a very strange arrest and then presumably someone else killed him in prison. Remember that also in 2019, American-based Jews were organizing color revolution style protests in Israel against Bibi Netanyahu. These protests became more extreme the next year, and continued until October 7, 2023. Bibi repeatedly publicly blamed George Soros for the protests.

You would think that arresting a top Mossad agent in the US would be related to attempts by US Jews to oust Netanyahu. It just appears that this would be obvious. Assuming that the reports were true, and the raid in 2019 uncovered a safe containing hard drives and CD-ROMs with videos of men having sex with underage girls, that trove of blackmail is a kind of “ring of power” type thing.

“Epstein Client List”

I wanted to address something related to the widely alleged claims that Epstein filmed all these rich and powerful people having sex with underage girls: at some point, someone came up with the term “Epstein Client List.” I do not understand the meaning of this piece of language and do not think it is helpful and think that in a strict sense, when Pam Bimbo said “there is no Epstein Client List,” she was being truthful. This slogan-type language leads to an ability for the government and others, potentially involved, to deflect.

The Epstein client list is real.
So is the Tooth Fairy and Santa Claus.

— Stephen King (@StephenKing) July 15, 2025

If we break down this very popular term, which led to the very popular slogan “release the Epstein Client List,” we have no issue with the word “Epstein,” but both the other words – “Client” and “List” – both seem inaccurate and useless.

First, “Client.” What does that mean? It is a person using the services of someone. This suggests that Epstein was a pimp, which is not what I think he was. He was a Mossad agent offering the service of allowing people to give video of themselves having sex with underage girls to the Mossad, which would then allow them to advance in their career, as they would be marked as a trusted person by powerful Jews.

Just a note here: I used the term “voluntary blackmail,” and some people found this concept confusing. It’s actually not confusing. You’ve all watched crime films that feature corrupt cops, right? Serpico is probably the most famous and maybe the best, but any film or TV show featuring corrupt cops has a scene where the cops are keeping a criminal’s money or taking a bribe and one of the cops wants to be “clean” and refuses to take the cash and the other cops freak out and say he has to take his cut. This is because if he takes the cut, they know he can’t rat them out, because he is a co-conspirator.

(I just spent ten minutes looking for the scene in Serpico where he refuses the money or the one where the other cop asks him “why didn’t you take the money, Frank?” and I don’t think either is online. Anyway, you can just watch the whole movie. It’s good. Though for the record, the real Frank Serpico said “Al Pacino did a great job playing Al Pacino but that’s not me.” I think he mostly meant the unhinged personality, rather than the facts. But for the source material, the book Serpico wrote is also very good and recommended.)

Along with corrupt cops, the old school mafia had the same rule, with members required to commit some crime, often murder, that everyone else in the gang knew about in order to advance in the organization (again, you’ve seen that over and over in movies). And of course the mafia made sure everyone was taking a cut of the criminal money so everyone was implicated in everything, even if they didn’t commit a murder. Meyer Lansky, the Jewish mafia accountant, reportedly said: “The best way to keep a secret is to make sure everyone who knows it is guilty too.”

It’s the exact same concept with Mossad jailbait sex tapes, this “voluntary blackmail.” Obviously, you’re not going to tell politicians and businessmen they have to commit a murder (nb4 “Pizzagate is real”), so you use sexual blackmail, which is very simple and straightforward: you just have the Mossad guy with the cameras in the sex room, you tell people “go see Epstein,” he sends them to the sex room, all of a sudden you’re one of the gang and doors start opening up.

This is just obviously what was going on. No rich person or politician is going to have sex with an underage girl at some obvious spy’s house just because they’re horny. If you’re rich and powerful, and you want to have sex with high school girls, you’ve got a lot of options as to how to accomplish this.

So, with the word “Client,” I suppose he was in a way offering a service, the service of submitting blackmail to the international Jewish cartel. But the word, in this context, obviously implies he was a pimp, which is not what he was. So I don’t think it’s useful.

Then the word “List.” Why would there be a list? He had a safe full of videos. And the claim is that he specifically took the time to write up a list of the names of all the people he had on video? Why would he do that? He would have to keep the list in the safe, because he wouldn’t want someone getting it, and the safe is already full of the tapes themselves.

This slogan “release the Epstein Client List” allows for Pam Bimbo to go out there and say “there is no Epstein Client List,” and have it probably be technically true.

Remember that she had previously said that there were “tens of thousands” of videos of people having sex with “little girls.” James O’Keefe did his spycam thing on her and she told this to some random person at brunch. After O’Keefe emailed her and told her he recorded her saying it, she said it publicly.

AG Pam Bondi Was Covertly Recorded on April 28, Revealing Previously Undisclosed Information About Epstein Regarding ‘Tens of Thousands of Videos of Little Kids’ to a Complete Stranger in a D.C. Restaurant

Yesterday, the AG Made an Almost Identical Statement Publicly After… pic.twitter.com/l1U89U9eji

— James O’Keefe (@JamesOKeefeIII) May 8, 2025

Note that O’Keefe has entered “middle-aged Irish decline,” a syndrome where, in middle age, Irishmen become overweight drunks. No, I’m kidding, you don’t have to note that. I noted it, but my instruction for you to take note of it was a joke. (I like James and I believe in brutal Irish nepotism and so defend him, but he does need to be aware of the drinking. I had to convince myself of that. It’s something we all must consider.)

The “Client List” concept is stupid and irrelevant. People should be saying “release the videos.” Obviously you would blur the girls, because the government can’t distribute child porn, and also fags and Indian scammers like Kash Patel claim that releasing the videos would “victimize the girls all over again.” But just blur them. We have the technology to blur out portions of video.

At the very least, someone at the FBI went through and identified everyone in the videos, so they can release the “list” of the names of the people seen in the videos.

People just need to be careful with these slogans. “Epstein Client List” was never a good slogan. Nor was “black book” a very good term. There’s a trove of sex tapes, we don’t need to be talking about obscure and seemingly abstract concepts for the sake of easy slogans.

I will say that “release the Epstein Files” is a better version. But then you have Michael Tracey saying “which files?” as if he can’t understand the concept that we want to know which specific individuals were on video having sex with underage girls. That is the primary issue of interest here.

Another Direction Here?

Here’s something else I’ve been thinking about and wanted to mention: I would wonder how much of this blackmail material would have been in Epstein’s safe, especially given that someone in the Mossad would have presumably known about the raid, given that US intelligence is crawling with Jews who are effectively double agents for Israel. Also, just generally, Epstein had already been arrested once, and he was not a subtle person, so it seems reasonable to assume that after recording the blackmail material, he would immediately hand it off to someone in Mossad, or some of the Jewish billionaires in America who were involved in this.

Like, think about this: if you raided the houses of Epstein, Les Wexner, and Leon Black, where would you be most likely to find the actual blackmail tapes? At least the majority of them? And even then, after the 2019 arrest, you would think either of those Jew billionaires would have had the tapes buried on some farm they own.

Fun fact: these rich people all have various secret Fallout-style bunkers on rural farms. You’re not going to find too much written about that, though you can find snippets (the biggest being the reports on Zuckerberg’s underground complexes in Hawaii), but I can just tell you it’s a matter of absolute fact. I wouldn’t expect anyone to take my word for that, but just think for a second, and try to imagine a scenario in which that would not be true. If you were a billionaire, would you have an underground shelter in some rural locale or no? Seems pretty obvious.

But you could also just bury it in a field. I mean, hiding a box full of hard drives is not really that hard.

The report that there are CD-ROMs with “young [name] with [name]” written on them implies there was at least some blackmail material in the safe. But if it was Bill Clinton or Bill Gates, is that really where you would keep it? In Epstein’s private residence? Of course, Epstein personally would probably want to keep copies, so it’s probable that at least some of it was on his property.

Regardless, closing the investigation is ridiculous. If the DOJ doesn’t have the blackmail tapes, or doesn’t have most of them, then you would expand the investigation.

Donald Trump’s Claim It’s a Democrat Plot

The thing that Donald Trump is running with is that the Democrats fabricated Epstein documents to attempt to smear him. But this would mean that Biden and the Democrats, in a race against Trump, had these files that were designed to damage Trump, and didn’t release them, and then just hoped that after Trump beat Biden in an election, Trump himself would release the documents without reading them. That does not make any sense.

If it was that simple, and Epstein was not Mossad but just a pimp whose services were procured by Donald Trump at some point, or if the Democrats faked files to make it appear that way, Biden could have just released the doctored files. Of course, Biden couldn’t release the files as Epstein wasn’t a pimp but rather a Mossad agent.

What Trump is saying doesn’t make any sense. Although I went through the possiblity that Trump did submit to blackmail in order to secure bailouts from Jewish financiers during his bankruptcies, my gut feeling is that this is not true, because if it was, why would he jump into the fire of becoming president? I think – again, this is just my impression – that Bibi Netanyahu, who has a stranglehold on Trump and the whole US government, ordered Trump not to release these tapes and documents, and now Trump is forced to go on this “just shut up about it” tour that makes him look guilty of sex crimes.

BREAKING: In a stunning moment, Donald Trump ran from reporters asking about the Epstein files faster than his lies about his uncle teaching the Unabomber were debunked.

You can run, but you can’t hide, Donald.pic.twitter.com/rmwB9aahRe

— Really American (@ReallyAmerican1) July 18, 2025

Here’s the thing: having sex with a “miner” is a much lesser offense than enabling the Israelis to continue to control US politics. If Trump were to say “yeah, I did the sex thing, sorry about that, but this is all a Mossad blackmail ring,” some of the more conservative/evangelical/white knight members of his base might be mad, but I mean, they tolerated the “grab ’em by the pussy” video, and is this worse? Because the girl might have been slightly under this (totally arbitrary) age of consent threshold? I did discover that in the state of New York, there is no statute of limitations on jailbait offenses, but I mean, is he going to go to prison over it? Epstein had 36 girls known by the feds and the Florida AG, and he got 13 months. I don’t really think this is very serious, and surely it would be overshadowed by the revelation that the Israeli government is using underage girls to blackmail the most powerful people in America, including the president.

CNN and NYT would spin it, but the whole issue here is that basically every one of Trump’s supporters is turning against him, the one exception I’ve seen being Charlie Kirk, and if he wanted to get out from under this, even if he is implicated, he could just dump the files, even if he’s in them, and call it out as Mossad. I think you would get a lot of “he’s not a perfect person and this was wrong of him to do, but it was brave of him to come clean.”

One thing is crystal: Trump cannot possibly get out of this situation he’s in without a very serious change in strategy. This is really spiraling further by the hour. I think it’s obvious that Pam Bimbo and that Indian scammer guy are acting on Trump’s orders, but regardless, at this point they need to be fired. This has all just been totally ridiculous. These people could have kicked the can, probably indefinitely. Instead they decided to come out and say it’s all fake? Was that an order from Netanyahu and/or Trump? Because it doesn’t make sense as an order from Netanyahu. He’s a very good politician, and would know better. He would say “just don’t open the files,” and tell Trump to “kick the can and change the subject,” not send his people out to do press conferences saying the whole thing is a hoax. The way this has been handled is very bad for Israel, because everyone is talking about the Mossad now. At least on the right; obviously the Democrat media is just doing retard-tier salacious sex nonsense.

The claim that Jim Comey’s daughter altered the files is not really viable considering the way the government keeps records. There are still physical copies of everything. You can’t just go in and edit an MS Word file. But if she did that, that is a very serious crime that could result in life in prison, or at least multiple decades. She could be charged with sedition. If that happened, or if there is any remote suspicion that that happened, the files should be released and she should be called to testify under oath before Congress, and there should be a massive investigation of the FBI by… well, that’s a conundrum, isn’t it? Who do you call to investigate the FBI?

Personally, I would call the FSB, but I don’t think that would be a very popular solution.

I wrote a way too long thing about the Trump-Epstein drama yesterday. People said it was too long, I thought it was too long. Previously, I would have written that as multiple articles. But I didn’t feel like doing that yesterday.

Anyway, in the article, I mentioned that I didn’t really understand the MAGA obsession with the Jeffrey Epstein scandal, because most of them are not talking about Israel-Mossad. That is the reason that I’m obsessed with Epstein, because I’m obsessed with Jews, so it wasn’t clear to me why people who, at least until the last six months or so, were avoiding the Jew issue would be obsessed with Epstein.

I mentioned that some of it was probably QAnon-related, and that is the total explanation. I got many responses to that article explaining to me that the MAGA obsession is related to the Epstein Island Temple, and the belief it was used for human sacrifice. This is all part of a satanic elite conspiracy that is related to Pizzagate and so on. That is the claim and the reason MAGA people who do not talk about the Jews are fixated on Epstein.

Okay. So, let me comment on that.

Firstly, I attacked Michael Tracey for talking about “Epstein Mythology,” and I think this “child sacrifice in the Moloch temple” is what Tracey had in mind when he was making that claim. So it seems that these claims do turn some people off of looking at the much more documented and obvious Mossad issue.

But what about the child sacrifice allegations? What about the $100,000 in cement that the Daily Mail (that is the primary source) claims Epstein had shipped to his island weeks before the release of a 2018 exposé on him? If it was just about Mossad blackmail, why did people keep going back to the island?

Firstly, there isn’t any solid proof of this human sacrifice thing. The best evidence was from the Pizzagate scandal. That whole Pizzagate thing spun out of control, but some of those Instagram posts, the stuff about the Podestas, the very strange coded language in the Hillary emails… it definitely raises a lot of questions. I’m not going to go through all of that right now, but people can look it up. I covered it at the time pretty extensively.

On the other hand, it obviously sounds fantastical, and a person could dismiss all of this as just a group of weirdos. I guess. I mean, there isn’t any “proof” of these allegations, just a lot of evidence.

Gun to my head, I would probably say that there is some kind of “True Detective” style satanic pedophile child sacrifice thing going on in elite circles. Although I will note that that would, among other things, make more aggressive blackmail than sex with girls slightly under the age of consent. Like I said last time, if Trump agreed to be blackmailed by having sex with a 15-year-old on video to get bailed out when he was going bankrupt, he could in theory just admit that, because it would have been decades ago and pretty hard to prosecute. If you’re on video doing some kind of satanic human sacrifice in an underground temple, well, you can’t really ever admit to that, can you?

Anyway, I’m not against people thinking this. I think QAnon got stupid and out of control, but it was clearly manipulated into getting out of control, presumably to get people to dismiss whatever was going on with Pizzagate. You probably lose me at the adrenochrome thing. But then this went into tunnels under Walmart, literally everyone in government and entertainment being a literal satanist, and then the most extreme of the group was claiming that Trump was still the secret president when Biden was president and that any minute he was going to jump out from behind a curtain and have the military execute everyone in the government, Oprah, Bill Gates, and many others. It got real wacky.

We can’t prove anything about satanic cults and if you thought Trump was going to release documents about an elite satanic human sacrifice cult, you’re retarded. That’s not happening. He’s also not going to release anything about a Mossad spy ring, whether or not he is in the files or not.

The bottom line is that the Mossad issue is much more obvious and much more documented than anything about a satanic human sacrifice cult. It’s a lot easier to talk about the Mossad than “True Detective season 1 was based on a true story.” Also, it is clear that the “satanic cult” stuff has been used to distract from the Mossad thing. If there was a satanic human sacrifice temple on Epstein Island, it was still run by the Mossad, right?

I mean, human sacrifice is a longtime part of the Jew religion. Judaism is a satanic cult that has been documented kidnapping and doing human sacrifice on children for centuries. So it would all be a Jewish thing. In my opinion, the Jewishness is what people should be focusing on here, as it is really on the edge of breaking through into the mainstream consciousness. For the belief that the elite are involved in satanic human sacrifice you’re going to need… some really serious proof. And even if there was proof, I don’t know that most people would actually be able to process that sort of thing, as it is just too weird.

Tucker Carlson just said at Turning Point USA that Epstein was working for the Mossad and his blackmail is the reason the US government is being directed by Israel.

I hope everyone understands what Tucker Carlson just said here

Jeffery Epstein was “running a blackmail operation on behalf of foreign government (Israel) — EVERY SINGLE PERSON in Washington, DC thinks that. I’VE NEVER MET ANYONE WHO DOESN’T THINK THAT”pic.twitter.com/WaDv7aFIoF

— Wall Street Apes (@WallStreetApes) July 12, 2025

This is very hardcore, and it is happening.

Tucker is the biggest personality in the entire right-wing and the biggest in the world as a whole. Maybe Joe Rogan gets more clicks weekly, but Tucker has done all the most watched interviews and Tucker is definitely a lot more beloved than Rogan and he is saying the whole thing, right there, out loud, at the most mainstream possible venue.

It’s happening. The thing I have worked for, sacrificed my life for, is finally happening. The “antisemitism” hoax has collapsed, we are talking about Jews running America in the mainstream, and it is only a matter of time before people ask the most important question, which is: “hey if these Jews did all this, and they lie about everything, what about that thing they said happened in Germany in the 1940s? They made laws that forbade you from asking about it, maybe we should give that whole thing a look.”

So, no.

I’m not going to promote the idea that people should be out there talking about satanic child sacrifice right now. Get America to accept that we are under a Zionist Occupation Government managed through backroom deals, including sexual blackmail. Get them to look at the Jews as a foreign power controlling our entire society. Focus on that. Then, if there is some kind of True Detective thing with the Pizzagate stuff, we can start to look at that. Once people accept the Jewish problem, we’ve already won, and everything else is going to be cleanup. When Jews are out, you can get the documents, you can get a full investigation of Epstein Island, you can investigate Comet Pizza, you can do whatever.

Just let me summarize and stress the bottom line: yes, I agree, it does look like, more likely than not, at least some of the really dark stuff is real. I agree. But if it is real, it’s a Jewish thing, and you’re definitely not going to get the government to go along with investigating satanic human sacrifice cults without exposing the Jews first. And there is no possible way you could ever hope to expose something like a satanic human sacrifice cult without the government doing the investigation. Right? So let’s just focus on what we have right now, which is a total unraveling of the privileged status of the Jews, which is going to lead to demands that Jews give up their stranglehold on the country, which is going to lead to a government run by normal Christian Americans, and that government would be able to do the investigation into what exactly the coded language about pizza and hotdogs in those Clinton WikiLeaks emails was referring to.

Does that make sense?

What I do not want to see right now is a slide away from what Tucker Carlson just said at Turning Point into endless talk about ritual pedophile human sacrifice claims no one can prove. No one has to prove Jews control America, you can literally just point to them. This is very easy and people need to keep their eye on the ball.

Do not get sidetracked. The number one thing the Jews want right now, I assure you, is for the internet right to take this Epstein thing and start talking about secret elite satanic cults, because they know that even if that exists, most people won’t believe it and it discredits people talking about Jewish dominance and it could potentially result in a derailing of the Jewish exposure project.

Look at the way the left media, CNN, New York Times, the whole media establishment, is currently talking about Trump-Epstein. That is also a big distraction. They’re making it a lurid sex thing, which is really totally irrelevant, because all of this sex drama is just slop for goyim. It’s the same thing they did when they made the Epstein thing about “oh these poor innocent hookers, they were only 16 and they were such pure and innocent professional hookers.” They distracted completely from the Mossad blackmail issue, and they’re doing it again by making it about Trump. It is about Trump because Trump is the US president and he is totally obsessed with serving Israel. But whether he’s in the files as a jailbait sex perp or not, it’s about Israel.

Eye on the ball, guys.

It’s unclear to me whether Mr. Trump is refusing to release the Epstein files because Bibi Netanyahu told him not to or because he’s implicated in sex, potentially with so-called “minors.” What is clear is that he is “crashing out” over this issue.

These are both from earlier this week.

MAJOR BREAKING: In a major lie, Trump claimed that Obama and Comey “made up” the Epstein files.
FACT CHECK: The first federal Epstein probe was under George W. Bush. The second? July 2019 – UNDER TRUMP. Obama had ZERO to do with it. Share to expose Trump’s lies! pic.twitter.com/etKTLGiSU9

— CALL TO ACTIVISM (@CalltoActivism) July 15, 2025

BREAKING: Donald Trump says that we are “bad people” for demanding for the Epstein files and list to be released.

Hey Donald, the bad people are the PEDOPHILES !!!!

Have you lost your f**king mind?!pic.twitter.com/VS4uDzQY8b

— Philip Anderson (@ThePanicanKing) July 15, 2025

YIKES.

That does not look good at all. If he is just doing what Bibi told him, it still looks like he’s implicated. I guess it’s possibly both, as the primary reason that Bibi would have this kind of control is that he is implicated. The Jewish lobby has the ability to use political pressure to force Trump to do things like bomb various countries and send money and weapons to Jews for free. But forcing Trump to go out there and say that Epstein didn’t exist, that everyone who is asking about it is no different than the Russia hoaxers, is something on another level, which is much more personal.

Remember that the first time Trump told the media to just shut up about Epstein, he was sitting in front of Netanyahu.

Trump jumps in to shut down a question to Pam Bondi about the Epstein “missing minute.”

Love how they guard that dead sex trafficker’s secrets harder than our national security. pic.twitter.com/EPV4PCS5vE

— The Vivlia (@TVivlia) July 9, 2025

I would not think that’s a coincidence.

Just to be clear, there are “Epstein files.” It’s not a conspiracy theory that there are files. I saw some really bad takes from Michael Tracey about “Epstein mythology,” and he suggested that there was no specific group of “files.” Epstein was investigated and indicted by the feds and federally prosecuted and sentenced to federal prison. He was later arrested by federal cops and then died in prison. The government, it will not surprise you, keeps a lot of records. There would be tens or hundreds of thousands of pages of documentation recorded by the government about this guy Epstein. That is what people want released. Some of them have been released but a lot of them have not been released.

Whether or not there is an official “Epstein list” – a list that Epstein kept of his “clients” – I have no idea. There would be flight lists. Some of those have been released. But we all remember, or at least I remember, that when Epstein was arrested, it was reported in all media that they found a safe full of CD-ROMs labeled with people’s names, with the format “Young [name] with [name].” Those names have not been released. There were a bunch of hard drives in the safe. It was, presumably, a whole bunch of videos of powerful people having sex with underage girls, and the government has all of this stuff. The New York Times reported in 2019 that Epstein kept this material to blackmail people.

So, it’s definitely not a “conspiracy theory.” Let’s make sure we don’t get lost here. The government has a lot of information on what certainly and definitely appears to be a “Mossad blackmail ring,” which involved people, presumably voluntarily, allowing themselves to be recorded having sex with underage girls.

That’s another point to be clear on: you would have to be retarded to do it just because you were horny. Prince Andrew appears to have actually done that, but he also appears to clearly suffer from mental retardation. Normal people who we would be talking about here would knowingly have illicit sex on video for the Mossad to keep so that powerful Jews would know they were loyal and give them promotions.

Obviously, not all blackmail is voluntary. For example, Trump’s son-in-law’s father, Charles Kushner, in 2004, sent a hooker to have sex with his brother-in-law when he was drunk at a bar and secretly filmed it and then threatened to show it to the man’s wife (Kushner’s sister) if he didn’t play along with some scheme relating to some kind of federal indictment Kushner was under. So there is secret blackmail.

However, whenever you’re talking about a “blackmail ring,” you’re talking pretty much exclusively about voluntary blackmail. Any kind of systematic blackmail is necessarily voluntary, as you are not going to set up a system of seducing people and tricking them into having sex on video. It has been a thing since forever that criminal gangs require someone to do some crime, such as murder, and then keep some evidence on them. It’s just common sense that if you have evidence of someone committing a serious crime, or something that would otherwise destroy their life, you’re going to trust them, because no such person is going to betray you.

Michael Tracey’s take, which is on some internet website, is total garbage. I also listened to like an hour of him rambling about it on a Twitter podcast, and it was dumb. He is literally just being contrarian for the sake of it. Pointing out that the “he’s intelligence” quote from the Florida attorney general comes from Vicky Ward alone (I like Vicky Ward and don’t think she lies, but yeah obviously you can’t build an entire case around that), or that Virginia Giuffre had some problems and was definitely trying to get money, or strawmanning with some silly QAnon shit, doesn’t serve to disappear the fact that the government has a bunch of files people want released and Trump is out there saying he won’t release them because they “aren’t credible.” The fact that people said some QAnon-tier stuff about Epstein doing child sacrifices in that temple on his island does not mean that there was not a safe full of hard drives and CD-ROMs with people’s names on them, that the government has those materials and is refusing to say what names were there. We still have the fact that whoever’s names were on there have not been prosecuted, even though the government has video of them having sex with underage girls, pulled from Epstein’s safe.

Okay?

This theory that it’s all a theory is stupid. And the only conceivable reason no one other than Maxwell has been prosecuted, the only conceivable reason the government would refuse to reveal any of this information, is that at least some of the very powerful people that we know Epstein hung out with are featured in these sex tapes.

Ask Michael Tracey why billionaire Jew Les Wexner “gifted” Epstein a $80 million New York house. I guess they were friends? So he gave him an eighty million dollar house? He dismissed the fact that Maxwell was the daughter of a top Mossad agent as “a coincidence.” Was the house also coincidental? If you asked Wexner why he gave him that house, would he say “it’s just a coincidence”? Why did Epstein have all this money? Where did it come from? Just people giving him things? That appears to literally be the answer, as his hedge fund was a complete disaster and did nothing but lose money. Leon Black, another Israel-obsessed Jewish billionaire, gave Epstein $158 million literally for no apparent reason. Literally, it was like “for services rendered.”

Anyway, Virginia Giuffre, Epstein’s most prominent accuser famous for the photo with Prince Andrew and Ghislaine Maxwell, was definitely after money (find me a woman who isn’t, huh?) with the series of lawsuits, and she might have had some problems, but she gets hit by a bus and the police refuse to come to the scene and then she kills herself a few weeks later? Do you guys know about this? It happened since I stopped doing the daily news, and I was going to write about it, then I was like “I don’t feel like doing that.” But she was living in Western Australia (???), which for those who do not know is very rural (the cities are all on the eastern side of the continent/country). Almost like she was hiding out. And I cannot find the method of suicide listed anywhere. Handguns are almost impossible to get in Australia, I would think, especially as a non-citizen. So how did she kill herself? Strangle herself with a soft sheet pressed against a bunkbed like Epstein? Contrary to popular belief, it is actually really hard to kill yourself with pills. A grand total of 8% of suicide attempts using drugs or poison result in death! As it turn out, suicide without a gun is actually pretty hard to pull off. Did you know that 60% of handgun deaths in the US (yes, from the famous “handgun death” statistics) are not black people but suicide? The only other “easy” way to do it is with intravenous opioids, which would require you to know how to tie off your arm to inject them. Also, you can’t prove that’s a suicide, and probably a lot of US opioid deaths are suicide or de facto suicide (subconsciously giving yourself a bigger dose because you can’t take it anymore). But why are we even having this discussion? Why did the Australian police not say how she committed suicide? Is it a privacy issue? Why was the autopsy and toxicology report not released? Privacy? For the single most prominent public individual in the biggest criminal case in the world right now?

Also, fun fact: 80% of suicides are men.

Another fun fact: Giuffre’s dad says she was murdered. He initially said he could believe the suicide then came out and said “someone got to her.”

But this case doesn’t hinge on her, and even if you believe Maxwell being the son of a top Mossad agent and Giuffre’s suicide are coincidences, we have all of these other questions, and if there are no questions, then why is Trump doing a world press tour whining about how he won’t release the government’s files and people should just stop talking about it immediately?

Anyway. That’s enough of that. Maybe I’ll write a full rebuttal to Tracey, but his current article doesn’t really give me much to work with, as it is just an assertion that there is no smoking gun that Epstein was a Mossad agent, but the smoking gun is literally the refusal to release the files. Another smoking gun is that in 2005 he was convicted in federal court of sex crimes including “child prostitution” with girls as young as 14 (there were a total of 36 confirmed underage sex partners), and was sentenced to 13 months in “prison” with “work release,” meaning he could leave all day and just had to sleep at the jail. (I understand he was rich, but that is ridiculous, and the reason that even if Vicky Ward is the only source for the AG saying “he’s intelligence,” it makes very much sense. I looked it up and found that for the same crime in the same state, one guy got 20 years for two girls and another got 15 for one girl. In real prison. With no “work release.” Again, in the Epstein case, there were 36 girls.) It’s also a smoking gun that he was arrested for the same crimes he’d already been federally prosecuted and served his sentence for, and it’s never been explained how the feds were planning to try him again for the same crimes. The smoking gun is that no one on the videos is being prosecuted, that the feds are not demanding why Jewish billionaires Les Wexner and Leon Black explain why they were giving this guy hundreds of millions of dollars for free. There is a lot of smoke here and a lot of guns.

And Tracey’s “what files are we talking about?” is complete horseshit. “The files” are the government’s records. Questioning the validity of the “client list” concept means nothing. The government has a bunch of videos of some group of men having sex with underage girls, and they have files that say the names of these men. We want those files, Michael. The files that say the names of the people in the sex videos.

Obviously, anything that gets this big is going to have a lot of misinformation surrounding it, and there will always be things you can pick apart. It’s easy to be a critic and people feel very clever pointing out small wrong or questionable things and then saying that the other things are a coincidence. But saying “there’s no there there” about Jeffrey Epstein is deranged and Michael Tracey is deranged, and I now see people repeating this. By the way, I like Michael Tracey, and I don’t really think he is doing this maliciously, or because he’s an obsessive Trump defender, I think he just really likes being clever and he’s gone full too clever by half with this one. It just looks dumb. But it’s a narrative that is out there now. So I just want to make sure we all know what we’re talking about here, that there is no confusion surrounding the fact that the government at least has a “list” of the men in the sex videos they confiscated from Epstein’s house in 2019 after his arrest for crimes he’d already been prosecuted for.

Back to Trump then: he knew Epstein when he was like, in his fifties, and already very rich. We see these pictures of them together:

When people used to post those pictures, I would think “yeah that’s whatever, they were two rich guys in New York, of course they knew each other.” Now, with his “stop talking about that or else” press tour, one has to wonder.

But the records show that Trump likely first met Epstein in the late 1980s or early 1990s. By the late 80s, Trump was already a billionaire.

So, would he want the Mossad to have blackmail on him? Well. I don’t know. He’s had a lot of financial problems since the late 1980s. His casinos went bankrupt. He had no personal bankruptcy, but he had six business bankruptcies. Obviously, the people who bailed him out were primarily Jewish. And it is certainly possible that he would say “okay, I’ll do a sex tape with a 15-year-old” in such a situation. This would of course mean that Trump had been a de facto Mossad agent this whole time, which… I mean… I don’t know?

Part of the problem with this whole situation is that if Bibi were to send any supposed Trump jailbait sex tape to the New York Post or whatever, Trump could then just say “yeah, I did that for the Mossad to get bailed out.” As on this timeline the statute of limitations for any jailbait crime would be expired, it seems that this would be a lot more damaging to Israel than to Trump. I mean it would be embarrassing for Trump, but is it really that big of a deal?

Wait. I just looked it up and actually it says “there is no statute of limitations on child sex crimes in the state of New York.” But I don’t know what that means in reality. As far as anyone knows, Epstein never had girls younger than 14. There have never even been allegations of actual children in the classic sense of the word “children.” So… I mean is Trump going to die in prison over that? Would they be able to prove the age of the girl? I don’t know but even if he went down for this, using this blackmail, if it exists, would expose the fact that the US government is run by Mossad blackmail, which I think would be a much bigger revelation than that Trump had sex with a girl who was a couple years under age. Also, Trump can’t be prosecuted while he’s president, and he could just like, flee to Russia or something.

What I am seeing is that Trump is now very old. I’m getting “Joe Biden” vibes with this guy. Remember that Joe Biden was just bullied and pushed around and told to say things. This is why 80-year-old men should not run countries, particularly not big countries, and particularly not in times of crises. If Trump were still in his sixties, as he was when he launched his campaign, you could make things make more sense. But when someone is 80, really anything they do can potentially be explained as “well, he’s really old.”

Old people can be healthy. If you don’t smoke, drink, or do drugs, and you’re not fat, then your mind is going to degrade way before your body. It’s sad, frankly. I’m against euthanasia. But everyone’s faculties start to degrade at 75, particularly if they are a nonsmoker (smoking is not healthy per se, but it does actually slow dementia in old age), and sometimes, people are almost completely gone by their late 70s, and then live for another 10-15 years.

Doing these recent interviews, clearly under the stress of this Epstein thing – regardless of whether he did something or was just ordered by Bibi to seal it up, it’s stressful for him – he sounds very mumbly and angry.

I think this clip is AI. I don’t know, but I think it’s AI. But if it’s not, then wow, what a great example of what I’m talking about here.

Whoa…

President Trump says he’s going to remember the people turning their Backs on him

“One year ago, your country was dead, and all my supporters want to talk about is the Jeffrey Epstein Hoax. It’s unbelievable… And I’m gonna REMEMBER every one these guys…

“And it’s… https://t.co/G1YrQczuYH pic.twitter.com/f3EdOyWXXc

— MJTruthUltra (@MJTruthUltra) July 17, 2025

He attacks his supporters – calling them “my supporters” – and says that he won’t forget those who are talking about Epstein.

I’m pretty sure that’s AI. We are already at that thing I was talking about happening for several years where you can’t tell if something is AI or not. Remember when I used to say that? Over and over again? That we were coming to a time when you won’t be able to tell if something is AI? Well, we are officially there. And I’m in it myself. I can’t help you.

Okay, wait.

This is apparently a real show and interview?

https://americasvoice.news/video/qSpyIEOB0ecSp25/

That video is embedded in a way that you can’t skip forward, which is a scummy way to force you to watch ads. It’s also not on YouTube or Rumble. Also, that entire site could be fake and everything on it made by AI.

How are you supposed to confirm anything now? Honestly, I have no idea, and I am pretty sure it’s what I said it would be: you have to have seen it yourself or talk to someone you trust who saw it.

I think at this point, if Reuters or AP says “Trump said…”, you can consider the quote real, but I don’t know how much longer that will be true. Furthermore, if you’re working at Reuters or the AP and Trump does an interview with an obscure podcast and you can’t figure out if it’s AI, you might just not report on it. There doesn’t appear to be any report on this.

I’m listening to this alleged interview now, I’m at the Trump part. He is saying all of this stuff. He sounds like he’s about to start crying, saying people should stop talking about Epstein. He brought it up immediately at the beginning of the interview.

“Real America’s Voice” has a Wikipedia page.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Real_America%27s_Voice

But someone could have vandalized Wikipedia with this. No one can really prove this doesn’t exist. It has a website. Who can even say what “real” means at this point? I guess in this specific case, it’s a question of “did Trump, in reality, call this podcast and say all this stuff on this tape I’m listening to?”

I’m about ten minutes in at time of writing. After opening with Epstein he’s on to a bunch of bullshit I don’t care about – tariffs and Jerome Powell and whatever. That makes it seem real. Maybe the clip above is fake. I’ll tell you when I get there. But the whole thing could be fake. AI could not just do his voice, but write a script where he rambles about international trade before saying the wacko Epstein thing.

FIFTEEN MINUTES LATER

Okay, I finished the interview.

In all seriousness, the interview is real. I initially thought that clip had to be fake, because he threatens his own supporters, literally saying:

All my supporters want to talk about is the Jeffrey Epstein hoax. It’s unbelievable … It’s a disgrace and I remember, I’m gonna remember every one of these guys, they’re my supporters and they just, they love it, they love it, and it’s, it’s all induced by the Democrats. The Democrats are the ones who are getting them to say this stuff. And the files are all set up by the people who ran it for the last four years … but I’m gonna remember people that, that took us away from this, instead of talking about this flawless attack on nuclear weapons that took place in Iran … that’s what we ought to be talking about, not nonsense.

He is borderline incoherent, and sounds really, really old. He actually sounds drunk, but I believe his story about how he never drank ever. I don’t think he’s drinking.

I have recently seen some really good AI stuff done with really cheap apps, and I thought that was so bad it had to have been fake, but no. It was reported on by the media. That guy interviewing him, John Solomon, I guess works for Steve Bannon or something, I don’t know. But yeah, it’s a real interview and that is how he talks now and he’s completely obsessed with being mad at people who talk about Epstein. Clearly, his feelings are hurt that his supporters are abandoning him over this. But wow, the solution is not to threaten your own supporters, man. That is not good.

Speaking of solutions, Pam Bimbo just announced she is requesting the release of “some” of the Epstein files. Well, we already have some of the files. We specifically want:

• The files that say the names of the people in the sex videos, and
• Any information about intelligence connections, foreign and/or domestic

Note that the intelligence “connections” (all of this stuff is backroom and informal; intelligence assets working undercover get paid in cash, or billionaire Jews just give them free money for no specific reason) would likely be both domestic and foreign, i.e., he was working for the Mossad but also given some type of confidential informant status by the FBI.

Along with those two main things, and those are the two main things, it would be nice to know what investigations were done into Wexner and Black for giving this guy tens of millions. I don’t think “helping out a friend” explains it. Maybe if you’re a billionaire, you help out a friend with a few hundred thousand or even a couple million, but between Wexner and Black, Epstein was given over two hundred million dollars.

Further, I want the files on why and legally how he was arrested in 2019 for crimes he’d already been convicted of and served prison time for. I remember when he died, some people in the media talked about this, and claimed that these were separate jurisdictions (Florida and then New York) and that this meant he could be tried for the same crimes twice. That isn’t true. You can’t be charged in different federal courts for the same crimes. There is something called “dual sovereignty” which is really a violation of the Fifth Amendment but that allows both state and federal charges for the same crime, but two federal courts can’t charge you for the same crime as the federal government has a single sovereignty.

Frankly, there is no reason not to simply release all of the files. It is, in fact, insane that this is even an issue while we are being told “there is no there there.” With the Kennedy files, you have all kinds of potential “classified” material that they can claim is too “sensitive” to be released as it could “compromise national security.” There are all sorts of security protocols around the president that are a secret and therefore “sensitive,” and then if the government had investigated Russia or Cuba or whatever, all of that would relate to “national security.” I’m not saying that is a valid reason not to release the files, especially sixty years later, but it is at least a theoretical reason. If Epstein is just some guy who was having sex with young girls and that’s the end of it, there is literally zero reason that all of this information could not be released publicly, with the one exception maybe being some of the stuff about the investigation into his death as that at least happened in a federal government building, meaning “classified stuff.” Everything else should be public. He’s already dead, so he can’t complain about his privacy, and it is obvious that this is a matter of public interest, so what is even the potential reason for keeping any of the government files a secret?

Obviously, we all understand the reason. But why doesn’t Trump have a better excuse? What he said, even before the election, is that Jeffrey Epstein knew a lot of people so a lot of people’s names are in the files and that doesn’t necessarily mean they are actually guilty of anything. But we already know who most or maybe all of these people were. Bill Gates, Alan Dershowitz, Steven Pinker, that guy who made The Simpsons, and on and on, have already been named as having some kind of social connection to Epstein, and it was public knowledge for most of these people. Epstein was holding big social events in New York and Florida with all kinds of people. Along with procuring underage girls for sex, he was a socialite, hence the fact that all of these famous people are photographed with him. I’m sure not all of them had sex with underage girls, so it’s not a reasonable excuse that some innocent man’s name is going to be tarnished because government documents show that they were at one of Epstein’s parties.

Bill Gates did an interview saying that he knew Epstein had been in prison for underage girls and still chose to be friends with him and go to his parties and there were no consequences for him. He did not get “canceled.” Several other people have been questioned about it and just said “yeah, sorry” and nothing happened. Dershowitz admitted to getting multiple massages from girls who “looked over 18.” And he’s a person who has actually written about the age of consent being stupid and was one of Epstein’s lawyers in the Florida case. And he didn’t get “canceled.” He’s still out there doing prominent interviews. Just the other day he was on that show of those guys who took Rush Limbaugh’s timeslot explaining that Epstein was not involved with the Mossad.

So unless the files say “video shows this person having sex with a girl who appears to possibly be under the age of consent,” then nothing is going to happen if someone’s name shows up – including Trump’s, by the way. We already have these pictures of Trump with Epstein and interviews where he’s saying they’re friends. He even implied directly that he knew some of the girls were underage.

In a tape released as an election surprise last year (it got very little media coverage for whatever reason), Epstein, on a 2017 tape, says he was Trump’s “best friend for ten years.”

Given that Epstein was indicted by two different federal jurisdictions, there would be a whole lot of paperwork, including a whole bunch of interviews, so it would actually be more or less impossible that Trump’s name wouldn’t be somewhere in the documents. I don’t see how his name being mentioned in some file would be more harmful to him than the photographs and various statements that are already on the public record. Unless it says “Trump, featured on a video having sex with a teenage girl who may be under the age of consent…”

Yes, Leftists are Talking About This

Trump is correct when he says Democrats are talking about this Epstein thing. It’s all over the Democrat media.

Former President and C.O.O for Trump Plaza Hotel and Casino says that it’s laughable to say that Trump wasn’t close to Epstein. He goes on to say that Epstein was actually Trump’s BEST friend.

Epstein himself said he was Donald’s closest friend for over a decade. pic.twitter.com/LXlBg4Sdcq

— UnfilteredBoss (@Unfilteredboss1) July 18, 2025

The issue is that that doesn’t mean anything. It would be bizarre if they were not talking about it. Of course they are talking about it. They are obsessed with Trump sex scandals. And of course, the Jews out there talking about it know as a matter of fact that Trump isn’t going to come out and say “Epstein was Mossad,” so there is no reason for them to not talk about it.

In fact, if I were a Jew, I would want to talk constantly about how Trump is stopping the release of the files because he had sex with an underage girl, as that redirects people from pointing out the fact that Trump first told people to “shut up about Epstein” while in a meeting with Bibi Netanyahu, and that the implication of all of this is that Epstein was Mossad. I watched a bunch of clips from CNN and so on talking about Trump-Epstein, and none of them talked about Epstein being a possible Mossad agent. It’s all just sordid sex drama, which is not relevant to anything.

Trump is actually arguing that because Biden didn’t release the files, he shouldn’t be expected to.

Weird argument, but okay.

Ultimately, it doesn’t really matter whether or not Trump did have sex with an underage whore or if he’s just being bullied by Bibi. The effect is the same, which is that the media is covering up the fact that the Mossad was running a blackmail ring in the United States.

This obviously isn’t going anywhere. Apparently, it is going to turn Trump’s people against him much more than bombing Iran did. At least during this lag between the bombing and the inevitable war, that is the case. In general, these wars in the Middle East have been such a feature of America for so long, it’s just background noise. But Epstein, for whatever reason, is something people were really mad about. I guess the reason is probably that people don’t like the idea of a group of elites being above the law. I’m not really sure. Maybe some of it is white knighting for literal hookers. Probably a significant amount of it is more fringe QAnon type reasoning.

Honestly, from the “Trump base,” I don’t see a lot about Mossad. More Israel talk is creeping in now. I recently saw a clip of Matt Gaetz saying Mossad killed Epstein in prison by working with their assets in the US government. But mainstream right-wing criticism of Israel and Jews is something relatively new. I’m not really sure about the original obsession with Epstein from people who don’t think he’s Mossad.

Regardless of the reasons, people are really mad at Trump about this, and with the way he is handling it, things are clearly going to get worse for him in terms of backlash from his supporters. But it doesn’t matter. The US is going to war with Iran and AOC will be the next president and people will get whatever comes with that.

Trump will at least try to pump the economy.

I mean, did you guys see Bitcoin? Shit be flying.

So yeah, it’s fine. Whatever.

Just don’t expect anything to happen, because it’s definitely not going to. Even the war with Iran won’t really feel like it’s “happening.”

I guess the AI thing is going to be something like something happening. As mentioned above, we are already in the world of “there is no possible way to tell if this is real or not.”

A couple weeks ago I ran across this Twitter account and thought for a second the guy was hiring actors for his memes:

POV: You try watching the Epstein news after being redpilled pic.twitter.com/NDj71JGvdU

— JAKEGTV (@JakeG_Official) July 9, 2025

I realized it was AI. But that is just a small Twitter account that is just using the raw prompts of what is presumably some $10-a-month software.

He just posted a new one. These are actually really good.

POV: You try watching the news on Epstein after noticing WAY too much pic.twitter.com/cOp0B4gCej

— JAKEGTV (@JakeG_Official) July 17, 2025

We got another floating microphone there, and he’s not fixing the text (which for various reasons still confuses AI in images). If he would edit, you literally would not be able to tell it is AI. And in six months, the raw prompts will be enough for it to be indistinguishable from real life.

It’s sort of hilarious to think that in a year or so, something like the Superman movie, which they spent $300 million on, will be possible with $10-a-month software. Even more hilarious will be the insanity that ensues in the period where people can’t tell what is real and everyone gets all confused about everything before eventually the human mind begins to understand that video doesn’t reflect real life.

I’m not really sure where it will go in terms of the social impact, but this is a big shift. We’ve gotten used to video representing real life. But people will somehow deal with the fact that it doesn’t. People don’t like to feel stupid, like they’ve been tricked, so people will all get tricked a few times and find out they were tricked and then start assuming everything is AI. If the Jews would have waited a couple years to begin their genocide, they probably could have convinced most people that these insane genocide videos we’re seeing are AI.

I guess what will probably happen is that people will just believe things are real if they agree with them and say they’re fake if they don’t agree with them? That seems most likely. But there will definitely be more fake video than real video, on the whole.

If people want to get into making fake videos, I would recommend that you primarily focus on making outrageous shit that promotes the other side. For example, make videos showing IDF soldiers helping Palestinians in absurd ways. Like, “Israeli military holds carnival in Gaza for Palestinian children, gives everyone free cotton candy and funnel cakes.” Or a news report on Russian soldiers throwing Ukrainians into a cage with an eagle and a bear. “Russian soldiers are seen forcing Ukrainians to take off their shoes and throw them in a big pile.” Whatever ridiculous, unbelievable shit you can think of that in theory supports your enemies but is too ridiculous to be believed rationally. Either fake enemy propaganda, or just total chaos. Total chaos is also good. Just invent events that don’t make any sense or are outrageous and incendiary.

You can also just do fun/funny stuff. But this is going to be complete madness, and it’s really here now, but in six months you will really start to see serious fallout. CNN and the rest of these people are going to do reports saying “you can only trust video from us,” and people will be like “lol.”

But yeah, the fallout from AI video, which will include the total end to all extant professional entertainment media as everyone will just be able to make whatever they want, but also including some kind of massive social crisis, the biggest reality collapse we’ve seen, is the only interesting thing I see on the horizon. Everything else is very predictable and boring.

Sorry.

I wrote a post a few months back saying that a really positive and pro-America Superman film could be a good thing for American culture. I said it could happen as a part of the “Trump Effect.” A lot of people were saying that no, I was stupid, it was going to be woke as all heck.

Well, the film has been released.

Statistically, most of you didn’t see it, and probably are not really very excited to. It didn’t perform poorly over the weekend, but it certainly was not a blockbuster, and not what Warner Brothers was looking for. That said, after the weekend box office (which was below projections with the film on the path to break even), WB head David Zaslav said this new DC Comics “universe” of films will go ahead and he was happy with the box office.

For some reason, before the release of the film, director James Gunn decided to attack his own film release by announcing that Superman is “an immigrant story.” This caused many people to believe the film was woke, and refuse again to pay $15 for a moral lecture.

I think it’s HILARIOUS trumpers are bitching about Superman now because he’s an immigrant.

He’s from fucking KRYPTON, you dopes.

Of course, you’d have trouble relating to him, as he stands for “truth, justice, and the American way.”

And he’s woke AF.pic.twitter.com/usp1rRAyo5

— BrooklynDad_Defiant! (@mmpadellan) July 8, 2025

The new Superman movie is about “an immigrant and kindness”, says Director James Gunn.

I won’t be watching this woke trash.

What about you? pic.twitter.com/VuVFiVEZx5

— Mr. Star Spangled MAGA (@4thOfJuly365) July 8, 2025

If this film was actually woke, it still wouldn’t have made sense for him to say that, but it really isn’t woke. The wokest thing about the film is that they cast a Mexican who looks like a literal satanic ape as the Engineer.

In principle, I am not even against having a Mexican and a black. These big blockbuster CGI fest children’s films are intended for wide audiences and I think there might be some data-backed truth to the fact that people from these races will be more likely to see a film if they feel they are “represented.” (Although the thicc Mexican bitch who played Hawkgirl seems like enough Latina representation?) This was the original idea of having a black character in films. In old slasher films, blacks actually loved the trope that “the black guy always gets killed first” (maybe they related to it, I don’t know, but they certainly always went to see these films and cheered when the black died first). I don’t expect these films to be full-Nazi, or whatever. So a bit of diversity in the casting, if it’s not an overload, isn’t “woke,” as this has always been a thing. I do think it is woke to pick a bitch with that face.

But everything else was fine. The black guy was fine. Literally the only political thing in the film at all was a surprisingly heavy-handed Palestine analogy with the Boravia plot line. The Jews are freaking out about that. I guess woke people do support Palestine, but Israel is so despised by the right, that doesn’t really count. And though Gunn made it way obvious what he was talking about, it wasn’t a huge part of the story. Though getting the actor who looks the most like David Ben-Gurion to play the leader of the racist oppression nation was funny.

That was sort of anti-woke, antisemitic casting, frankly. It made up for the Engineer being purposefully ugly.

So, I don’t know why Gunn decided to sabotage the film this way. It’s a head-scratcher. He can’t possibly have imagined that making the film seem “woke” before the release would be good for it. Maybe it was just an offhanded comment he made, possibly while drunk and on pills. I am sure Gunn’s personal politics are left, but he also seems like he would be willing to do a film that slightly signals to MAGA if it would secure him more money. Also, Zaslav, you’d think, would go along with doing some jingoistic Americanism in the film in the name of getting Americans to sign up and die for wars for his homeland. (Though he sort of did the opposite of that, actually, by allowing Gunn to put the Palestine thing in there, but this sort of indicates he just doesn’t care at all.)

They asked poor Nathan Fillion about the “immigrant” thing, and he said “c’mon, guys. It’s just a movie.” This is exactly what it is: it’s just a movie. (Unless you’re a Jew who doesn’t think anyone should be able to say genociding Arabs is wrong, in which case it is like another Holocaust all over again.)

If you would have thrown in some dogwhistles, shown some more American flags (I was excited by the one in the trailer), and had someone say “truth, justice, and the American Way,” the film could have been a blockbuster despite its mediocre quality.

And that is how I would rate the quality: it is mediocre.

Most of the critiques of the film are right. People are posting that clip of Trey Parker explaining if your story is just a bunch of “and then this happens” scenes strung together, it’s not a good story. That is factually true. That being said, it’s difficult for me, as a “science of literature” expert, to see how you could have shoved that many characters into the film and then stuck to any sort of meaningful storytelling format. Yes, there are good novels with a lot of characters, but these novels would make 10- and 20-hour movies (as was done with the Game of Thrones books). To shove as many characters as were in Superman into a movie and not just have it be a series of events would probably be impossible. The literature on the structure of stories is clear that the characters and plot are inseparable. No one has ever said “I liked the plot, I just didn’t like the characters,” though with Superman, you could say the opposite thing. I did like most of the characters. Superman was my favorite character, however, and he ends up getting pushed out of his own movie by a barrage of different characters, some of whom might be interesting in their own right, but there just isn’t enough time in a film’s runtime to find out.

I think this was the only mandate from Zaslav: you have to include a bunch of different characters we can use for our “universe.” Very stupid thinking. But I don’t think this means James Gunn is a bad writer. Unless it was his idea to have this many characters, which I doubt, then you can’t blame him for not being able to formulate a properly flowing cause-and-effect plot around this directive. It could only really be a series of strung together “oh here’s this person who has this thing going on, that’s fun, right?” scenes.

Frank Grillo as Rick Flag, Fillion as Guy Gardner, and others to various extents, were potentially interesting characters. The film simply didn’t have room for all of them.

In terms of watching the film as a comic book fan, there was nothing offensive. Well, there is one very offensive thing that I expected to get revealed as a Lex Luthor scheme by the end, but it never was, and that was really more confusing than offensive, because I just assumed that it would be revealed it was a hoax. (And maybe it will be later on in the series, check the spoiler at the bottom of this page. I guess I liked Superman enough to think some people will want to go and watch it and have fun and not have it spoiled, so I’ll keep it down there for the majority who do not care.)

Along with liking the characters, I liked the general tone, which drew on Silver Age themes that Gunn has said he came across through Grant Morrison’s All-Star Superman. It’s a very silly and comic-booky tone, which you have to have if you are doing literally any DC comics heroes other than literal Batman. (Yes, if you “nerd out,” there are other DC heroes you can do dark and “realist” takes on, but it works with none of the main Justice League characters. If you want to “nerd out” right this very moment, go look at the current “dark” line of DC comics, the “Absolute” series, and tell me why Absolute Batman is awesome and the others are unbearable.)

DC should have looked at Disney’s success with Marvel’s “universe” and said they were going to go in the opposite direction, and be more comic booky and silly-fun than Marvel. Instead, they let Zack Snyder make all of those nightmarish films and lost I think multiple billions of dollars. I’m sure part of the pitch from Gunn was exactly this: “let’s go in the other direction and just have fun,” and to a not totally insignificant extent, Superman succeeds with this.

It’s almost like there is just a lot of bad market research going on here. Like, as if a bunch of marketing research people are literal criminal fraudsters. Along with the silliness of Gunn saying that immigrant thing before the release of the film, the film was also sabotaged by the trailers, which made Superman look weak and whiny. Releasing the scene with Clark and Lois arguing was really dumb, as in context, you don’t really think much about that. Clark/Superman as a character is totally fine and I liked almost everything about the portrayal. Even the suit that everyone complained about before release looks great.

But yeah, not a great film, not a film I would really recommend anyone watch, and definitely not the “Trump Effect” pro-America film I was hoping for. I don’t know, maybe Warner has marketing research geniuses who did the math and realized the Trump Effect would be mostly gone by mid-July. My original thinking was that if they could have gotten Trump to endorse it as “a great pro-America film,” it would have been a big deal, and I still think it would have been a better strategy, but it wouldn’t carry the weight it would have in April. Faster than I ever could have imagined, the MAGA Spring has given birth to a “Wait, What Did He Just Say? What the Hell is Going on Here?” Summer.

But hey, I don’t want to talk about that in this article, man. I don’t really want to talk about that at all anymore, dude. I just want to do “woke or not?” pop culture reviews, bro.

Just relax.

None of it even matters anyway.

Oh, and I almost forgot: Lois breaks up with Clark when he’s getting attacked by the media then decides she’s in love with him after the media decides he’s good. Literally, there is nothing else driving her relationship decisions other than Superman’s social status. The sort of garbled non-plot might make it not obvious, but if you watch it, you can literally see she does not have any interactions with Superman between giving him a cold “now you’re in the friend zone” hug and jumping all over him telling him she loves him. No interactions. Her decision was completely based on media reports of the man’s social status.

I think what probably happened was that in the frenzy of reshoots and recuts, trying to turn this garbled mess of mostly disconnected things into a coherent whole, they didn’t realize they got a bit too real with how women actually think about men. It could also have been on purpose. Either way, it was very funny to me. And literally true.

When Mel Gibson got condemned as evil by the media for saying those things about the Jews, when he was literally at the lowest point in his life, his wife of many decades with whom he had seven children decided to do the brave thing and file for divorce. I guarantee if there ever comes a day when the media decides “it turns out Mel is the good guy after all,” that ex-wife is going to start calling him and talking “oh, I was just thinking about you, we had so many good times together and a part of me misses it.”

Women are utterly ridiculous, actually buffoonish in nature, and I always love when that is pointed out.

Spoiler Thing:

The thing I expected to be a Lex plot was the video that Superman’s birth parents sent him from Krypton, where they told him to conquer Earth and have a harem of women to produce the maximum number of children with Kryptonian blood to rule as his heirs. That is very offensive if it is an in-universe thing that’s real. The thing is, Supergirl is in this universe, and if she’s Kara, which I assume she is, she was also sent to Earth to escape Krypton’s destruction, and if you were planning on conquering a planet, and you specified how to do so by using the “Spanish dudes in Mexico” method, you would not send a female with a vagina and would instead send two males with penises.

They could say that Kara was sent to be Superman’s pureblooded Kryptonian wife to create a royal line to lead the half-breed earthlings (which was the only reason Spain ever sent women to Mexico), but in this case, they wouldn’t have sent his first cousin, which Kara is, and I’m pretty sure it says “cousin” in the film.

Anyway, it never crossed my mind that this was anything other than another Lex trick, so it didn’t bother me until I’d finished the film and realized it was never resolved. Anyway, if this does turn into a successful “universe,” which seems unlikely because I just don’t think this “blockbuster film that has to make a billion dollars to be profitable” model was ever sustainable (but who knows), they will just retcon that even if it was originally intended by Gunn to be canon. Because no one likes this “Superman’s parents were evil” thing. Superman has been around nearly 100 years, they’ve done every possible storyline with him, including various versions of “evil Superman,” but the only case I know of where Superman was sent to earth to set up a one-man breeding farm and conquer the planet is in Invincible, which is not a Superman book, even whilst Omega Man is obviously a Superman parody. The Invincible cartoon is really popular now (not for no reason, I’d argue), so maybe someone thought it was a good idea to weave that in? That doesn’t make any sense, but nothing about it makes sense. Even on a basic level of the story itself, a people whose planet is being destroyed and who can only send one child to another planet (later two, with Kara) would not be thinking “we command you to conquer this planet in our name.” The reason it works in Invincible is that Omega Man lies about being the last of his race and he’s actually a representative of an alien empire that is planning to conquer Earth.

Although I am on the “it’s definitely mostly nature” side of the nature vs. nurture debate, I am also sympathetic to “you’re not required to be like your parents” stories, which can be real human stories. But this is not the place for that, James Gunn. Literally no one wants “Superman was supposed to be evil but he overcame it,” except in Invincible, where it is a completely different thing and “Superman” actually does do a bunch of evil things before reflecting on whether or not he wants to be like his parents.

It’s NEVER a good idea to resist ICE agents.

Can you say FAFO? pic.twitter.com/3zArK2T25y

— AmericanPapaBear (@AmericaPapaBear) June 29, 2025

Illegal gets arrested for deportation by ICE in Los Angeles at 6th and Broadway on Friday.

The female street vendor resists arrest. An agent then gets physical to detain her.

During the arrest, a bystander repeatedly chants, “ICE outta LA.”

How about illegals outta LA? pic.twitter.com/RZlJaXEtv5

— Paul A. Szypula (@Bubblebathgirl) June 28, 2025

Illegal arrested for deportation on June 30 at the Cypress Park Home Depot in Los Angeles.

Many bystanders harass ICE, the man resists, the agents tackle him to the ground and detain him.

The animosity towards ICE is sadly getting worse due to Democrat politicians. pic.twitter.com/eCWXaE9nTb

— Paul A. Szypula (@Bubblebathgirl) July 2, 2025

Female ICE officer shows her value to the team effort while an illegal invader is arrested…#women #ice #BossBitch #cops #females #19th #illegals #walmart #dhs pic.twitter.com/DvEwD4Y8zH

— Mrgunsngear (@Mrgunsngear) July 10, 2025

VIDEO: ICE ARRESTS A WOMAN HAVING A SEIZURE.

pic.twitter.com/zE0cK9gO5t

— Maine (@TheMaineWonk) July 8, 2025

A lot of people on the internet are celebrating and cheering on some pretty brutal videos of ICE grabbing Mexicans out of parking lots, out of Walmarts, wherever. It’s understandable. I understand, and my instinct is to celebrate it as well. And I would be celebrating it if I knew less about the situation than I do.

Please, allow me to explain why I’m not celebrating it.

Let’s start with just how uncomfortable I am with the cops. The Big Beautiful Bill is turning ICE into the biggest federal cop group in American history. Their budget is going to go from $10 billion to $100 billion, which surpasses the combined budgets of the FBI, DEA, ATF, Bureau of Prisons, and the Marshals Service.

Note that there has never been a case of a federal cop group shrinking. In theory, ICE should have a temporary mission, correct? They should be rounding up the immigrants, processing them in holding centers near the border, then shipping them back to wherever they came from. (In certain cases, sending them to some third country might make sense, but because they all came through Mexico, that third country should be Mexico. It was Mexico that made the decision to let these people walk through their country into our country, and while I understand that this was under pressure from the Biden administration, all that really means is that the US is capable of asserting enormous pressure on Mexico.)

But there is no “once the mission is complete, ICE’s staffing and funding will be drastically downsized” clause in the BBB or anywhere else. This is a standing army, trained to run around the country throwing people into vans, without warrants. If you think “JD Vance” is going to win the 2028 election, you have no understanding of what is happening in this country. Apparently, the reasons Democrats will take over in 2028 are something that need to be explained in some detail, something that is beyond our scope today. But Democrats will control the federal government in 2028, SCOTUS will not get in their way, and they are not going to disband a massive federal cop organization, but instead use it for their own purposes. If we want to get an idea of what they will do with these cops, perhaps we should recall Waco and Ruby Ridge, then imagine that sort of thing happening everywhere, all the time.

Another fact that is rather important in my view is that most of these people we see being arrested are not being deported at all. The BBB does nothing to address the laws that make it virtually impossible to deport 98% of illegal immigrants. Getting rid of the laws that prevent deportations should and would be the first move of anyone who was even remotely serious about deporting tens of millions of people. Among other things, you would expand expedited removals, end “credible fear” interviews for “asylum seekers,” and defund immigration courts. This could all be done by Congress.

Of course, the idea of tens of millions of people via mass roundups is completely nonsensical on its face. No one knows the actual numbers, but after the 20+ million who likely came in under Biden, we are definitely talking about somewhere in the range of fifty million illegal immigrants we want to remove. You are not going to pick them up one at a time in the Walmart parking lot. You don’t need to be a math genius to understand this, and I don’t need to tell you “how many football stadiums is 50 million people?”

What you would do is start seriously punishing people who hire or rent to illegal immigrants. You would fully implement E-verify, to ensure people who work and rent are legal residents, then you would send ICE to round up the tens of thousands of people who are employing and renting to illegals and charging them with ten years in prison for each instance. You would then set up ICE-run “no questions asked, just sign the form and we’ll give you $1,000 in cash and put you on a bus back to Mexico or on a flight to wherever” voluntary deportation centers in every major American city and provide a hotline for the immigrants to call explaining how they can make their way out.

If they can’t legally work and they can’t legally live anywhere, all of a sudden you have an exodus. What can they do? They have to leave. Then, instead of endless videos of masked men grabbing screaming women in church parking lots and throwing them into vans, you’d have endless videos of immigrants lining up and boarding single-file onto buses bound for Mexico.

Im sure it’s possible to argue that some of the immigrants would refuse to leave even if they could not work and had to live on the streets. But it’s not going to be very many of them, and those ones could be thrown in vans. They’re not going to be hard to find.

Tens of millions of people have been relocated before. The most obvious example to point to is the partitioning of Pakistan. That project used carrots and sticks, but it did not round millions of people up, throwing them in cars one at a time, sending three officers to arrest a single individual.

How long does the arrest take, if we include drive time and paperwork? How much are these ICE people being paid per hour? This all starts to become reminiscent of “Holocaust math,” no?

Far from moving to arrest the employers and landlords of illegals, which I suspect many in the Trump administration would view as antisemitic, Trump has not even managed to cut off illegal immigrant access to all of the free social services.

Even if you are not big on math and are a true believer in the “one arrest at a time” strategy, the problem now is that ICE has already cleaned out the “100 miles from the border” immigrants who have been here less than two weeks (those are the only people eligible for expedited removal), and now these people are just being interned indefinitely as the courts prevent deportation. Yes, the Trump administration is making a big show pushing back on the courts, Stephen Miller is saying they don’t have the authority, but whatever the details of that battle might be, most of these people being detained by ICE are no longer being deported and are instead being sent to detainment facilities. Meanwhile, there is not even a discussion of using the Congress to pass laws stripping courts of their ability to prevent deportations. The United States federal court system is still able to enforce international refugee treaties (HIAS and others successfully challenged Trump’s EO on the matter in court), and instead of using the Congress to get rid of these treaties, Trump sends Miller to argue with the courts about what they mean.

Just Send Them to Black Sites, Indefinitely?

This “Alligator Alcatraz,” where MAGA patriots plan to eat delicious bread while watching Mexicans being eaten alive by large lizards, is a “black site.” That is, it is a prison camp where people are held indefinitely without access to due process. Just to be clear, no, it does not have to be secret to be a “black site.” Guantanamo Bay, where Trump is also sending immigrants instead of deporting them (he’s allowed to do this because Gitmo is technically US soil), is the world’s most famous prison and is also, definitionally, a “black site.” That said, it is certainly often a feature of a black site that you do not know where it is, and if you imagine that the federal government is not using this current circus atmosphere to build these sites across the country, you are as innocent as a babe or as stupid as an ox who’s suffered severe head trauma.

If the illegals could simply be deported in an efficient manner, you would not have any reason to build new black sites. So there is one more reason the state has for not successfully deporting illegal immigrants. That’s on top of the fact that all wealthy donors are against mass deportation of illegals.

Along with a brand new army of fully militarized federal cops trained to drive around the country and disappear people into vans in broad daylight, these black sites are another thing that the Trump Administration will be gifting to the AOC administration when James “JD Vance” Bowman loses the 2028 election.

I’m sure the Democrats will campaign on abolishing (or at least restricting) ICE and closing the black sites. And I’m sure people will believe it because of the long established Democrat tradition of telling the truth and never using federal cops for immoral purposes.

The most important gift Trump will give to AOC will be an AI police state control grid run by Palantir, so that the government will be able to keep close tabs on racists, sexists, homophobes, transphobes, and most importantly of all, antisemites.

Will the Democrats use this series of gifts to identify, arrest, and detain all the people viewed as a threat to democracy? Of course, I have no way of predicting such a thing, all I can do is say that it would be very easy to do, given these incredible gifts Trump will be giving them, and could be done legally with a simple emergency declaration which could be declared for more or less any reason.

Here’s an interesting question: how many people would need to be disappeared into some cage in a swamp to crush a meaningful American resistance movement? We know that the Palantir system will be able to identify them, and I would suspect the number is lower than 2,500. It could in fact be much lower than that, given that a fully functioning controlled opposition movement already exists, and most people would prefer to follow a Pied Piper offering them some joyful fantasy than look upon the dark realty of what is actually happening in front of their eyes. A quick perusal of the ridiculous popularity of the QAnon movement should be enough to demonstrate the ability of people to put their faith in nonsense, and most of the controlled opposition movements are nowhere near as ridiculous as QAnon.

Personally, I think these street scenes of ICE agents grabbing people are being created to desensitize people to seeing this sort of thing, and I think it is only a matter of time before these methods are used against those viewed as “dissidents” in America. But, hey – maybe I’m wrong? Maybe I’m just paranoid and it’s just that everyone in the government is really bad at math?

Bonus Trump Gift to Democrats: A Browner America

THE SYMBOL OF HOPE.

TRUTH. JUSTICE. THE AMERICAN WAY.

SUPERMAN TRUMP. pic.twitter.com/fwFWeYonAq

— The White House (@WhiteHouse) July 11, 2025

Along with the “elite police state package,” there are a lot of bonus gifts Trump is giving the Democrats. For example, Trump has decided to make it look like he’s implicated in the Epstein documents by claiming they don’t exist, and Democrats can now claim he destroyed them all. This is fantastic news for a lot of Democrat politicians and donors. You could come up with a big list of all sorts of little presents like this Trump will be giving the Democrats in the 2028 handoff.

But given today’s topic of discussion, the most relevant of the bonus gifts Trump will be giving the Democrats is a browner America. Homeland Security claims that virtually no one is crossing the border illegally currently. That seems unlikely, but okay. DHS also claims that as of June, so in Trump’s first six months, they had deported 207,000 people. The goal the administration had set was to deport a million per year, and it looks like in 2025 they might get close to 500,000, half of their 1 million goal. For reference, the Biden administration was probably allowing about 5 million people a year to enter the country, while in 2024, that administration deported only 270,000.

Given that Trump is going for all of the low-hanging fruit in his first months in office – new arrivals who are near the border – and given that there has been no interest shown in using Congress to change any of the laws, and especially given that there is no interest in putting the onus of responsibility on the people hiring and renting to the illegals, it is unlikely that by their 4th year, they will be deporting more than Biden was in his fourth year.

So just to be clear: Biden allowed in 20 millionish, Trump says the goal is to deport 4 millionish, he will probably end up deporting 1.5 millionish. Even after building and arming the biggest federal police agency in history, there is no way he is going to get near Obama’s deportation numbers.

Again, no need for a math whiz to see that just with white deaths and brown births alone, the 2028 America Trump hands off is going to be significantly browner than the 2024 America Biden handed him. But we haven’t added the legal immigrants. That’s about 1 million new people per year, virtually all of them brown. Further, Trump is at least flirting with the idea of removing caps on H-1B visas for Indians, which could mean multi-millions more per year.

This is what happens when you hire the Amway salesman that tells you what you want to hear.

Donald Trump’s shifting positions on H-1B visas.pic.twitter.com/S7LFVJGAo4

— Robbi Fahey (@robbi_fahey) July 10, 2025

Trump wants infinity H-1B’s to work as waiters plus LEGALISING illegal farm/hotel workers. pic.twitter.com/7FGZLj9fcF

— Samantha Thompson (@SamLovesEngland) July 8, 2025

Any way you cut it, 2028 America is going to be significantly browner than 2024 America, and it could be a lot browner.

But hey, I heard on Fox News that brown people are leaving the Democrat plantation because of the woke agenda. So maybe it will all work out? Maybe brown folks will get sick of paying these high taxes to people who want to turn their kids gay, and we’ll have a… multiracial working class uprising against the… the woke mob.

Or whatever.

But Hey, Whatever

Many in the internet will claim that a person has no right to identify a problem unless he has already prepared a solution for it. It is difficult to imagine a more infantile mindset for a grown adult man to embrace. But who am I to judge? I simply do my best to look at the world, to examine the facts, and try to explain what is going on to those interested in listening. I would never want to force anyone to listen. You are an adult, and you have a basic right as a human being to believe whatever it is you feel like believing.

I do not have a solution to the very serious problems I am identifying here, and will not even suggest that any such solution exists. I’m just exhausted by this goofy fantasy bullshit. In 2016, Trump said tens of millions of people needed to be deported. He “lost” in 2020, and tens of millions more were brought in before he “won” in 2024, and now he’s aiming to deport 4 million by 2028, and it seems that number is impossible, but you are going to get a massive police state, both digital and physical, in exchange for removing maybe 1.5-2 million illegal immigrants.

Okay?

That’s what’s happening. Happening alongside the endless wars, the biggest budget ever, the entire Epstein case being thrown into a black hole, and whatever other cute little surprises the Trump administration has up its sleeve over the next 3.5 years. It’s all bad news. So if you want, pretend it’s not happening. No one forced you to read this. At least, I hope they didn’t. If someone did force you to read this, I’m sorry. If it was a Mexican who forced you to read it, you should call ICE, and they will come feed him to an alligator.

When analyzing the American empire, and the evils it is currently in the process of spreading, I’ve determined that a man can either hope that the American empire falls sooner rather than later, or that he dies before things get really bad.

The other thing one can do is pray for incompetence on the part of the evil forces implementing this agenda, but I suppose that falls under the “hoping for collapse” category.

When Trump was allegedly shot in the ear in Butler, I identified this as part of a program to set him up as an overwhelmingly popular leader, who would come into office as a kind of Caesar figure, and be able to do whatever he wanted to do. Unfortunately or fortunately, most of that good will has already been burned through. The Epstein thing was incredible. To actually start yelling about how people need to stop talking about Epstein was beyond my comprehension.

Pam Bondi embarrasses herself with this bullshit excuse and Trump acts like the Epstein case ain’t a big deal

This is a terrible look for the Trump admin pic.twitter.com/4BSgnNPWjL

— Hodgetwins (@hodgetwins) July 8, 2025

That was just so completely nuts. When I first saw it, I had to confirm it wasn’t AI.

And then this?

‘We’ve been & remain Ukraine’s biggest supporters’ — US State Dept

Spox stresses halt of arms shipments ‘one situation…NOT new policy or position’

No details on weapons but says Trump ‘very passionate regarding ability of Ukraine to defend itself’ pic.twitter.com/duTlP5uTmR

— RT (@RT_com) July 9, 2025

As I always note, we live in a democracy. Please don’t say “oh no, we live in a Republic.” Some of you people are just such retards, I really feel like you deserve all of this. Sometimes, I think the Jews are right about the goyim. We do live in a democracy, a representative democratic republic, and this means that you do not have a way to petition grievances. So the government can do whatever they want to you.

However, at some point, any population facing a certain amount of abuse will engage in a violent uprising, so the system is able to move much more smoothly when they have high levels of support. The fact that Trump has burned up so much good will so quickly is confusing and can only really be explained by incompetence on his part and on the part of his cadre. He doesn’t actually have to do anything. He can just pretend he’s trying to do something. But coming out and saying “we must defeat Putin and actually Epstein didn’t even do anything” is really wild.

So sure. Hope their incompetence screws everything up and leads to a collapse. That’s my best advice.

My best advice is actually to leave the United States, and forget the place exists. But most people are not going to do that.

Since the beginning of Donald Trump’s political career in 2015, “Make America Great Again” (MAGA) has been more than a slogan, and instead a concept that embodies a series of simple and easily understood principles about the problems facing America and the solutions to these problems. MAGA was never a specific series of policy proposals, as it was intended to be something bigger than any specific policy. It was a vision of a new America. While short on specifics, the vision was clear: the current establishment had wasted America’s wealth on foreign wars and domestic social engineering agendas that had hollowed out the nation. Though it was not theocratic or puritanical or otherwise moralizing, it was opposed to “weird stuff” which sought to undermine what were traditionally considered “American values,” and it was anti-immigration and anti-war. Again, it was never specific, but everyone definitely understood those three major cornerstones of the program. (It was also “anti-corruption,” though as no one is publicly “pro-corruption,” that is not a particularly meaningful position to take.)

During his first term, Trump failed to do much MAGA, but it was generally understood that he was trying to, but that the president simply doesn’t really have very much power in America. However, in these early months of his second term, Trump is not simply failing to live up to the ideals of MAGA, but is attempting to completely confuse the meaning of the term, attempting to convince his own followers that “MAGA” was never really what they thought it was.

In a series of statements reminiscent of Anthony Fauci’s infamous pronunciation that “I am The Science,” Trump has recently claimed “I am MAGA,” and that he is the decider of what is or isn’t MAGA, and whatever new policies he decides on do not necessarily need to have any relationship to what was previously understood to be the MAGA political platform.

What he is effectively saying is that his political movement was always just about him as a person, and that anyone who ever supported MAGA was supporting him as a person. Therefore, anyone who disagrees with his totally new series of policies he has developed in recent weeks, most of which are the opposite of how MAGA had previously been defined, is not actually a believer in MAGA, because MAGA was never a series of policies, but instead an expression of loyalty to Donald Trump personally, and a pledge to support whatever it is he decides to do at any moment.

This situation is most brightly highlighted in the way Trump has dealt with Congressman Thomas Massie, who is, I would argue, the standard-bearer of the MAGA platform as it was initially introduced by Trump in 2015. Trump has claimed Massie is a traitor and vowed to destroy him. It is very obvious to everyone that Massie has not changed any of his positions on anything.

In the most recent betrayal of the ideals that were sold as representing MAGA, Donald Trump has decided that he wants to continue the endless war in the Ukraine. While meeting with his handler and earthly master Bibi Netanyahu this week, Trump declared that there is no plan to cut any funding to the Ukraine, and he actually plans to increase weapons shipments.

Although it’s not totally clear what happened, it appears that last week, Pete Hegseth halted shipments of weapons to the Ukraine. During the questioning in front of his boss, Trump claimed he didn’t know who was responsible for canceling these weapons shipments, and asked the media to tell him who did it. (Hegseth was sitting directly to his left.) He then declared a planned increase in weapons.

Reporter: Who ordered the pause in weapons shipments to Ukraine?

Trump: “I don’t know. Why don’t you tell me?”

If Trump doesn’t know, who is running the country? pic.twitter.com/astMRRtVil

— Republicans against Trump (@RpsAgainstTrump) July 8, 2025

Following these statements, The Washington Post Editorial Board rushed to support Trump, publishing an op-ed praising his support for the Ukraine.

I would not suppose that anyone who voted for Trump in any of his three elections ever expected that the WaPo Editorial Board would become the standard bearer of MAGA, but that is apparently precisely what has taken place.

Trump had previously claimed that involving the US in Israel’s war with Iran actually was in-line with MAGA policy, which was explicitly anti-war, because he wasn’t really doing a war, he was just doing a bombing.

In another betrayal, Trump’s AG, Pam Bimbo, has claimed that there isn’t actually an Epstein client list. I don’t know what that means and no one has explained it, but the implication apparently is that Epstein did not have any clients, and either no women were trafficked, or they were trafficked to no one.

Remember when the Trump admin kept promising to release the Epstein files? No? We’ve got you. Watch this supercut.

And make sure to subscribe to Zeteo for more: https://t.co/X3GkKbDl2z pic.twitter.com/qdnIZsTLLP

— Zeteo (@zeteo_news) July 8, 2025

Though it is perhaps a slightly lesser offense to the MAGA agenda, which has never been particularly focused on fiscal responsibility, Trump has also this week moved to explode the national debt with the biggest spending bill in American history. What is most notable about this is that he vastly expanded military spending to the highest levels ever just weeks after claiming he was going to attempt to halve the military budget.

Trump said he would slash military spending, but just a few months into his second term, he proudly announced a one trillion dollar Pentagon budget.@ggreenwald on the Trump admin’s gift to the defense industry: pic.twitter.com/1lFMErnARb

— System Update (@SystemUpdate_) July 1, 2025

While “fiscal responsibility” might be slightly beyond the intellectual scope of MAGA, which has never been particularly sophisticated, “we’re going to stop wasting money on foreign wars and spend that money here at home where our country is falling apart” is definitely something we all understood to be core to the MAGA doctrine. Now, because MAGA has been redefined from a series of principles about how America should be run into “whatever Donald Trump says at whichever time he happens to be speaking,” the continuation of the Ukraine war, bombing countries for Israel, and spending the most money ever on war, all fall under the definition of “MAGA.”

A Test of the Limits of “Political Loyalty”

“Loyalty” is a quality that should be explicitly reserved for personal relationships. A man should be loyal to his family. Loyalty to a political figure or a political movement should not be possible, as it serves no purpose.

To be loyal to someone means that you will stick by them whether they are right or wrong. The reason we are loyal to our families is that we need them to be loyal to us, because this is how humans survive. If people abandoned family members because they were wrong about something, we would all be completely alone. We have to take the good and the bad with family members, because we need them.

Loyalty also makes sense in military units. It could make sense in the context of various business relationships. And there are, I’m certain, other examples of where the behavioral quality of loyalty would or could be appropriate.

One place where loyalty is not appropriate is in politics. Being “loyal” to a political figure is nonsensical. The only reason any person would support any political figure is that that political figure is doing political things they agree with and that helps them and their personal agenda. There is no place at all for loyalty to a political figure, as you do not personally know the political figure, and therefore you do not owe personal allegiance. There is no mutuality at all. Either the political figure is promoting an agenda you agree with, and therefore you rally for them and defend them because you benefit, or they are doing something different, which you do not benefit from, in which case you owe them nothing.

What Trump has done with intention is form a kind of personality cult, where people feel that they know him, and therefore owe him some kind of personal loyalty outside of his role as a policy maker. This is something that is only really possible in the age of electronic media. Most people see Donald Trump speaking nearly every day, and their subconscious mind, which is not familiar with the nature of video screens, registers him as someone they know personally, and are regularly hanging out with socially. Such a person would be the kind of person you would owe a personal loyalty to, and whose mistakes you would overlook, at least until the point where they got completely out of control.

We are going to see the limits of the “loyalty” personality cult tested.

Clearly, the personality cult is not considered ironclad, in the way it would be with someone like Jim Jones, as there is understood to be a need for distractions. This week, Trump is covering up the series of betrayals with a Romanesque “cruelty circus,” sending immigrants to cages in an alligator swamp. The media that supports Trump will say “yeah so, I guess there never was an Epstein list, and yeah we’re just going to keep doing that Ukraine war forever apparently – now let’s go back to the scene of the alligator pit, where your tribal enemies, the immigrants, are going to be fed to large, nasty lizards.”

They will keep the circus distractions coming, I’m sure. But ultimately, there is going to be a strict math equation regarding how many people are willing to ignore the fact that Trump is abandoning most of the core of his platform, not only failing to do the things he promised to do, but telling people he never really cared about those things anyway.

It’s worth mentioning that people will continue supporting a political figure that fails if they feel he is trying his best, which is why Trump remained so popular after not doing very much the first time he was president. But this time, it seems he is attempting to completely shift his stated priorities. This week he said “we have to defend the Ukraine.” This is very much the diametric opposite of what he campaigned on when he said “it’s not our responsibility to defend the Ukraine.” That is different than “sorry, I can’t figure out how to get Congress to stop funding the Ukraine” or “I can’t figure out what I’m supposed to do to end this war, this whole thing is really confusing and I don’t know what to do.” What I mean to say is: failure is different than betrayal, and while failure is tolerable, betrayal should not be tolerable.

In the case of “actually, there never was an Epstein client list,” that is just obvious lying, which would fall under the “betrayal” category, unless a person is stupid enough to believe that Ghislaine Maxwell was convicted of sex trafficking underage girls to no one, which some Trump supporters are probably stupid enough to believe, though I can’t say for certain.

Unfortunately: Democracy

Fortunately for Donald Trump and his cadre, and unfortunately for all the people in America, we live in a democracy, and therefore it is possible for zero people to support Donald Trump, and for him to remain president, and continue to do whatever it is he feels like doing at any given time.

There are probably some reasons that political support is important in a democracy, but I can’t think of what they might be. Trump appears to care personally about people supporting him, as it appears he has a rather fragile ego that feeds on popular support, and if people are booing him, it appears to hurt his ego. But ultimately, because this is a democracy and there is therefore no mechanism through which the public can petition grievances, he can do whatever he wants while he remains in office, and no one’s opinion about what he does means anything.

That said, Trump probably will maintain some fanatical base of morons who don’t really know much about what is going on but are very excited by alligators. And of course, the polls published can say whatever.

Then, after he does whatever it is he is going to do, he can turn over the government to Gavin Newsom or AOC, and they can be popular for a while after claiming they are going to do something or other, and then become unpopular after they do something different than what they claimed they would do. And we will just keep going on like that until eventually, something gives out, and the American empire falls into disarray, and something finally happens.

There is a supposedly edgy take on the whole Middle East conflict that goes something like: “it doesn’t involve me and so I don’t care.”

Here’s the problem: if you are living in a Western country, it does involve you, because it is your tax money that is paying for the Jews to kill all these people.

I am personally sympathetic to the “it doesn’t involve me” perspective, if it’s in a vacuum. I don’t think people should care about conflicts that don’t involve them. Most people on the internet seem to care a lot about every conflict, so it’s a bit suspect that the one where people say “it’s not my problem” is the one with the Jews. But sure, if there was no connection to the West in the Middle Eastern conflict, then okay.

Here’s the thing: Israel would not even exist at all without the support of the West and the tax dollars of the very edgy and clever people who claim they don’t need to pick a side. If you don’t stand against Israel, you are standing with Israel, because it is only through huge numbers of Westerners standing against Israel that there is ever going to be a possibility for the West to stop funding this terrorist state.

Anyone claiming “it doesn’t involve me so I’m not picking a side” is either simply dumb, or is a Jewish shill. Obviously, anyone who looks at the situation at all is going to side against the Jews, so saying “just don’t look, don’t think about it at all,” is a pro-Jewish position.

Cut all Western support for Israel. Once that’s done, I won’t be interested in picking a side either. I will just sit back and watch the clips of jihadists Zerg-rushing a defenseless Israel, and smirk smugly about how glad I am not to be involved in that situation.

I wrote something on Sunday about the fact we are now combining renditions and black sites with an AI police state digital control grid in the name of fighting illegal immigration and somehow no one really seems to be getting deported.

I might go more into this, as it’s a pretty important issue that not many people seem to be talking about. People are cheering the PT Barnum meets Wile E. Coyote meets Half-Life 2 show that Trump is putting on completely mindlessly while the Democrats just whine about how it’s sad for the immigrants without pointing out that the groundwork is being laid for something very dark to be used against people other than Mexican field people and Haitian dog-eaters.

If I were the Democrats, I’d be quiet about this too, because I’d really want President AOC to get the reins of the Palantir black site rendition system that Trump is building to hand over to the Democrats when James Bowman inevitably flops like a floppy bird in 2028.

Anyway, I’m thinking about getting deep into it, because I’m not really seeing many people put these pieces together, but I’m also considering switching the focus of the site towards artisanal cheeses, as I really don’t think there are very many intelligent writers in that field either. I mean the people who make it are geniuses, but a lot of them are from places like France and Denmark and are completely illiterate. Most people don’t know this, but the Danish literacy rate is actually lower than that of niggers.

The Danes actually use cartoons to promote anti-white hatred to elderly Danish people at community centers because they know there is an 85% chance a Dane cannot read and can only understand concepts if explained with children’s cartoons:

Danish see those posters and they just crack like eggs.

But they can cheese it up, boy. Damn, son. They’ll cheese you like an mf.

Anyway, I don’t really care about anything anymore other than those two things: a) scaremongering people about how Trump is setting their shit up so president AOC and her gang of kikes can send you to get eaten to death by alligators, and b) elite cheeses.

Oh and this:

Seriously, if he wanted to mock some imaginary stereotype of Central Asians, why didn’t he just invent the name of a country?

Why completely destroy the international reputation of a country of twenty million people, who are some of the most chilled out people you will find anywhere in the world?

I mean, I get that Cohen is a Jew who hates all sorts of different categories of people, as he thinks everyone in the world is trying to gas him in a fake shower room for no reason. But why didn’t he say “Uzbekistan,” where they actually did a pogrom of Jews and where the people are about 1% as sympathetic as Kazakhs?

Or why not just make up a name??? To represent all of the Central Asian Turkic peoples he hates????

I guarantee this rat would tell you with a straight face Kazakh people hate him for literally no reason.

What’s almost more unbelievable than the seemingly limitless seething hatred of the Jews is their total lack of any self-awareness.

They are actually worse than women.

Oh and actually the fourth thing I cared about was freeing Diddy, but that one solved itself.

Maybe the rest of this shit will too?

Anyway.

Editor’s Pick of the Week:

And the Runner-Up:

Followed by the Artisanal Collection:

The topic of the day is the fact that Donald Trump and his people have built a half billion dollar detention facility in a nature preserve in Florida. They are calling it “Alligator Alcatraz,” because I guess there are alligators in the swamp and you know, alliteration (the kids love it).

It’s funny to put immigrants in a swamp full of alligators.

But… are we talking about an American black site?

To be clear, a “black site” is defined as “a clandestine detention center operated by a state where prisoners who have not been charged with a crime are incarcerated without due process or court order.”

This so-called “Alligator Alcatraz” is disgusting, and is born of hatred

The majority of people “detained” by ICE don’t even have a criminal record. But hatred of Brown people makes MAGA think this shit is OK. It’s not.

This is un-American. pic.twitter.com/SNwVwKUax6

— BrooklynDad_Defiant! (@mmpadellan) July 1, 2025

Is that something we really want to be doing? Building these types of sites in remote and potentially secret locations?

Please note that the Trump administration is also sending immigrants to Gitmo, the infamous black site in Cuba where the US spent decades torturing people it had kidnapped from various countries. Trump says he wants to hold 30,000 people there. Again, no one is explaining why they are not just sent back to their home countries. The US has an absolute ability to exert pressure on countries to accept the return of their people.

Toured the #GTMO detention facilities and spoke with @ICEgov agents and @USMC Marines from 1stBattalion, 6th Marine Regiment operating the Migrant Operations Center. This is a critical temporary stop in processing these dangerous illegal aliens for eventual removal from our… pic.twitter.com/EVZ9yS2IqV

— Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth (@SecDef) February 25, 2025

What exactly is even the purpose? We have jails. We have all of the leverage to deport people. We can make some concentration camp type holding facilities, just with modular homes and fences, and put them near the border. Wouldn’t that make more sense?

I’m not against putting immigrants in camps or cages or whatever. But another issue with this is that it only holds 5,000 people, which isn’t really a very relevant number when we are talking about at least 50 million people who are eligible for deportation.

Further, the costs of flying people to this remote location, and holding them there – that doesn’t make any sense at all to me. Again, you can quickly construct concentration camps in areas where immigrants can just be bussed in and processed. We can figure out where they’re going and send them there.

I don’t want to sound like a conspiracy theorist, but what this looks like to me is that we are normalizing the idea of black sites in America. Because this place, this Alligator Alcatraz, would make a lot more sense as a secret prison for Americans than as an immigrant detention facility. As an immigrant detention facility, it is incredibly expensive, elaborate, inefficient, and generally confusing.

I’ve written some about the Trump administration’s relationship with Palantir. Thankfully, others are writing and podcasting about this issue as well. Basically, the administration is contracting this intelligence and military tech company to design a control grid in America, and when asked about it, the Trump people just claim it is for immigrants. But no one is even claiming that only immigrants will be included in these AI databases that are going to monitor everyone. Palantir is building and has basically already built and is now just implementing a surveillance grid run by AI that compiles all information on you, both from the government and from private companies (i.e., Google and Facebook, and the banks), which is set up to build a profile on you that knows everything about you. It’s a total science fiction dystopian nightmare plan that few people are even bothering to talk about.

This Glenn Greenwald video is a good overview.

Palantir is a totally Jewish company which is involved heavily in the genocide in Gaza. The company’s Jewish CEO, Alex Karp, makes very edgy jokes about how he wants to kill the families of antisemites.

I don’t personally have very much faith in any speech guarantees provided by the US government. The Biden administration violated the First Amendment by ordering “private” tech companies to censor speech, and the Trump administration has done things much more illegal than that, passing all of these laws against “antisemitism.” Trump arrested and attempted to deport a green card holder for not supporting Israel. He says he’s going to deport anyone who doesn’t support Israel, regardless if they have a green card or not. Thus far, no one has been able to explain to me how a green card holder’s constitutional rights vary from those of a US citizen.

There is a lot of legal precedent for this you can look up. The Supreme Court ruled previously that an Australian communist with a green card couldn’t be deported for being a communist because a green card holder is protected by the Bill of Rights.

Listen, I’m the most anti-immigration person of all. If Trump said “we’re stripping all green card holders of their green cards and deporting them all tomorrow,” I would support that completely. But when you start claiming that you are taking specific rights from people who have rights under the US Constitution, you’re creating a very confusing legal situation.

He has also effectively seized federal control of universities in order to prevent students or faculty from criticizing Jews. He’s attempting to equate protesting against Israel with “material support for terrorism.” It’s all the exact same “safe spaces” and “speech is violence” language that was used by the Democrats in support of BLM and trannies, but Trump is taking it much further than Democrats ever did.

Further, the Biden administration was mocked relentlessly for their “Disinformation Governance Board,” a government board designed to monitor supposed “disinformation” on the internet, run by Nina Jankowicz. They ended up abolishing the organization after a couple months. Yet “monitoring disinformation online” is six million times less scary than “monitoring literally everything you do or say all the time for your entire life,” which is what Trump has contracted Palantir to do.

If you ask any questions about any of this, you’re either called an antisemite, a far-left open borders supporter, or both.

We should be deporting immigrants, but we should be doing so without threatening the freedom of speech or creating AI police state control grids. We should also do so, I think, without creating remote black sites, which really adds a whole other layer to this which I hadn’t really thought much about until the announcement of this “Alligator Alcatraz.”

I suppose it is obvious that if you’re going to create a total control grid and monitor everyone’s speech and behavior, and use AI to modify behavior on a society-wide scale, the social engineering won’t work on everyone so some people are going to have to disappear. And immigrants are so unpopular that the government has a chance to normalize – and get people to celebrate – this idea of people just disappearing and being hauled off to some secret prison. Doing a big fun publicity push with alligators is exactly what I would do if I wanted to normalize the idea of American black sites.

It’s all looking kinda dark, frankly.

The most frustrating part is just how well the social engineering campaigns already work. Granted, they are running into some issues getting people to go along with the whole antisemitism thing. Even a lot of right-wingers are very uncomfortable with the Trump administration’s push for these “hate speech” laws. But with Palantir AI surveillance grids or remote prisons with no due process, if you start asking really any right-winger about it, they’re going to call you an immigrant lover and start telling you that they don’t care if alligators eat the immigrants. If you follow-up with “okay, but can’t we just deport them instead of spending hundreds of millions of dollars to try to feed them to alligators?”, they will just get confused.

The answer as to “why not just deport them immediately?” is some garbled gibberish about courts. But with the way the Trump administration is steamrolling the complaints of judges about the way immigrants are being handled, the idea that they are really concerned about “asylum claims” and an infinite appeals process is not really believable. “We will feed them to alligators but if they survive they can live in this cage for decades and keep filing asylum appeals.” Further, all of those laws about asylum could just be changed. Trump is ramming the most expensive and unpopular bill in history through Congress, so the idea he can’t get rid of these idiotic asylum laws is dumb.

For the record, though I did not read the whole “Big Beautiful Bill,” my AI did, and the only change to asylum law the current version makes is that you have to pay $100 to apply for asylum. The fee, of course, can be waived if a judge says so. It appears very much like the goal here is to create a gigantic federal standing army in the form of ICE, that is able to round up immigrants and keep some fraction of a percentage of them in various cages rather than actually deport anyone back to their home country.

This is at the same time we are normalizing deploying the military onto the streets of American cities. I’m not pro-riot, and I’m not against sending the National Guard to deal with riots, but sending in the Marines? Does that really seem like something we want to be normalizing?

Sadly, like with everything else in a democracy, there isn’t anything you can do to change anything. But you should be aware that we are really not that far away from Palantir AI identifying you as an antisemite, and a private paramilitary group with no insignias on their gear throwing you in a van and flying you off to some secret prison. The Palantir control grid is really already here, they are in the process of combining all of these databases on you and using the AI to build profiles. So it’s just a matter of when they decide to start using it and for what purposes.

The way the deportation thing is currently being handled, which is by grabbing random people and doing so in a kind of public way (while also not doing any kind of relevant numbers, just to be clear), very much looks to me like it is designed to normalize scenes of people being randomly grabbed off the streets. If/when they start doing it to white Americans, “hey wait, isn’t that a white guy?” might go through someone’s head, but it isn’t going to matter. And most people won’t register that it is no longer just brown people who are getting picked up, after they’ve witnessed enough of these scenes.

You don’t have to be particularly creative to imagine a situation where ICE becomes Palantir’s NKVD.

I know this might sound a bit far-fetched. But all I’m doing is the only thing I ever do: I’m looking at the data, and doing my best to draw conclusions about what it means.

It’s also probably worth reminding people that if you simply made it a serious felony to hire or rent homes to illegal immigrants, and started putting the people who do that in prison (just normal prison, no need for alligators or any Looney Tunes shit), virtually all of the illegal immigrants would just leave.

It might also be worth reminding people that “illegal” immigrants have never caused even a fraction of the social, economic, and cultural damage that “legal” immigrants cause, and Trump is currently supporting moves to allow basically infinite numbers of “legal” immigrants.

It is very reasonable to suspect that maybe things are not exactly as they appear, and that maybe the government and media are not being perfectly frank with us about where all of this is headed.

The Big Man Donald might be going to fuck us worse than anyone has ever been fucked. It’s not totally clear yet. I don’t really see a way it won’t happen. I mean he’s got us on third base on the Iran war. The Big Bad Best Country on Earth is about to pull that bitch’s panties off and operate an insertion.

I don’t think Trump wants to. Honestly, I think he actually thought just dropping a few bombs would be the end of it. But… there is no chance the nuclear material was in any of these sites, and now Iran is definitely going to start working to build a bomb, which they weren’t doing before, so like, from Israel’s perspective – and the perspective of anyone else who doesn’t think Iran should have a nuclear bomb (I personally don’t care and actually support it as it would stabilize the Middle East) – the situation was made way worse by the Israeli and US bombings.

And there is no chance Iran is negotiating after this shit.

So unless something… I don’t know, honestly, I can’t picture any situation here where this doesn’t escalate. I’ve listened to all of the experts, and none of them know what escalation will look like. So I’m in no position to speculate. Israel thinks carpet bombing can work, but Iran has too many missiles and drones and it takes so many of these very expensive “Iron Dome” missiles to stop these cheap Iranian missiles.

Let’s just look at a bit of this math.

Iran’s stuff:

Short-range ballistic missiles (e.g., Fateh-110):

• $10,000–$50,000 per missile

Cruise missiles (e.g., Ya Ali or Paveh):

• $100,000–$500,000 per missile

Drones (e.g., Shahed-136 “kamikaze” drones):

• $20,000–$50,000 per drone

Israel’s stuff:

Tamir interceptor missile (Iron Dome):

• $40,000–$50,000 per interceptor

David’s Sling (for medium-range threats, more advanced missiles):

• $1 million+ per interceptor

So, for example, if Iran fires 100 drones for $2 million, and Israel needs 2 interceptors per, they’re spending $4-10 million.

That’s without considering the hundreds of millions in maintenance on the Iron Dome, and the fact that Israel simply doesn’t have infinite interceptor missiles, whereas Iran in the long run can just keep sending these cheap drones to deplete their stocks and then sending more serious missiles. (Of course, the more expensive launching systems are being effectively destroyed by Israel.)

It ends up being a minimum of 5 times more expensive for Israel to defend than for Iran to launch, and up to 20 times or more. That is of course not nearly as bad as what Hezbollah and Hamas were doing, where Israel was spending 100 times the cost of the militias.

What’s more, although Israel has a total media lockdown, it does appear that Iran is hitting some high value targets. I am not going to pretend to see through the fog of war. But there are people more serious than Scott Ritter saying that some serious military shit has been hit.

But it doesn’t matter what’s getting hit, because Israel is going to run out of missiles. They can’t be produced fast enough.

And even if that wasn’t true, Israel is going to say that, and say that the US has to stop it, and the US will do it.

So… I just don’t see any way out of this. Frankly, I didn’t see a way out of it after the middle of October of 2023. You people who don’t remember can all go back and look at where I said that this whole thing, starting with allowing October 7th to happen, was about getting the US into a real war with Iran.

If Israel was willing to do the Art of the Deal, they would have done it decades ago. I just really don’t see anything anyone can do to stop this now. Obviously it would have happened the same under Kamala, and worse, and at least Trump is pumping our bags.

But you know what else he’s doing?

Dropping antisemitic slurs for the Daily Stormer anniversary (our 12th anniversary was yesterday).

He called Jew bankers “shylocks.”

The ADL and other Jewish advocacy groups are going after President Trump after he referred to certain bankers as “shylocks.”

The term comes from Shakespeare’s The Merchant of Venice, where Shylock is portrayed as a greedy Jewish moneylender.

Trump claimed these bankers “took… pic.twitter.com/yp7aHThj2g

— Shadow of Ezra (@ShadowofEzra) July 4, 2025

He later said, without apologizing, that he didn’t know it was a slur. Then he just described Jews.

Trump says he wasn’t familiar with the word “Shylock” being a Jewish slur, says he thought it meant someone who lent money at exorbitant rates.

“You view it differently than me, I’ve never heard that.”

Follow: @AFpost

pic.twitter.com/0MwXoIvQ3a

— AF Post (@AFpost) July 4, 2025

For those of you not big on literature, “Shylock Holmes” was a character created by Edgar Rice Burroughs and appeared in many of his “Land Before Time” novels. He was a sneaky Jewish investigator who would say he was investigating missing toys so he could get into orphanages to molest children.

Yids are flipping their lids.

So, hey dude.

Say what you want.

He couldn’t ever have overpowered Israel. And at least he’s going to send us a signal that he knows what’s up.

It doesn’t really mean much. In fact, it doesn’t mean anything.

But it is funny.

I don’t know man, I find the whole “BUT WHAT ARE TRUMP’S REAL VIEWS PERSONALLY THO???” discussions to be so stupid and tedious. I’m so sick of it. Whenever I see someone saying “TRUMP LOVES THE JEWS HE’S BEEN A JEW SHILL FROM THE BEGINNING” I immediately peg them as being in the same IQ category as the QAnon people.

Seriously.

Why do you even care? It has literally no effect on your life whether he’s a big time real Jew-lover or if he’s playing 5-D chess in his mind to stop the pedophile tunnels.

It doesn’t matter what his personal views are, the only thing that matters are his actions, and his actions are going to be the same no matter what his views are. He never really had any choice.

The one time he had a choice was during the 2020 election theft, he could have declared martial law and told his supporters to you know. Do the thing.

But I mean it’s not like you’re going to vote your way out of being controlled by the Jews. Even if the elections were totally on the up and up, Palantir would just drone strike you and then James Bowman would say “well, the thing about that is, what I’m really worried about is the increasing fees on DoorDash.”

But hey, the wink-wink from Trump about being sick of these kikes made me laugh. It doesn’t do anything and I’m not going to say some stupid shit like “he’s gonna turn against Israel.” But yeah, at this point, a wink is a wink and I’ll take it.

It’s sort of like… a cigarette with your blindfold.

You know?

Just… try to look on the bright side sometimes, okay guys?

Like, I just realized yesterday that I haven’t seen Paul Joseph Watson in like, two years. I danced a little jig.

Also, the Big Beautiful Bill is going to cut medicaid for poor people, and they might just start dying. If we could do something that would result in the death of large numbers of poor people, we’d have a lot fewer problems. If all poor people and boomers died, democracy might start working? I guess you’d also have to get rid of women as well though, which wouldn’t really work, because, you know, the birthing thing.

So yeah, I mean, forget about the democracy thing, and just focus on the image of fat poor people dying because Donald Trump took their money for their fat pills and gave it to Shylock.

Ronald Reagan on why immigrants make America great: “You can go to live in France, but you cannot become a Frenchman. You can go to live in Germany or Turkey or Japan, but you cannot become a German, a Turk, or a Japanese. But anyone, from any corner of the Earth, can come to… pic.twitter.com/sp4TlvHvsp

— Republicans against Trump (@RpsAgainstTrump) December 26, 2024

It doesn’t surprise me, but I hadn’t seen it. Ronald Reagan gave a speech about how diversity is our greatest strength and how anyone in the world can become an American.

Reagan is seen as the avatar of conservatism. Every single one of these people references Reagan. He was actually a horrible persona and a horrible president.

So I’m not surprised he did the “anyone can be an American” thing.

The requirement to become an American?

To believe in freedom.

Have you ever heard of a person who is “against freedom”?

Even in North Korea, Kim gives speeches about the importance of freedom.

Everyone on earth is pro-freedom, in the same way everyone on earth is pro-food.

If believing in freedom means you’re an American in waiting, then everyone on earth is already an American, they are just waiting to get their papers.

That means America is not actually a country. I don’t think it’s right to say it’s “an idea” either, because that doesn’t even make sense. It’s not an idea, it’s a place. Ideas are not physical objects in the way a mass of land is. But if everyone on earth has a right to become an American, and therefore de facto already is an American, there is no such thing as an American.

What they will try to say when you say a country can’t be an idea is that members of the nation hold a set of ideas and that’s what defines them as part of the same nation. It’s nothing to do with race. And it’s not ideas around religion. Or any kind of politics.

These same people will say “Americans can disagree with one another.”

You just have to believe in freedom, and you can define that freedom however you want.

I don’t know why Reagan was a saint to the boomers. I read a short book about him years ago, but it was written by a leftist. I know he deregulated everything and there were some good things about that along with all of the overwhelmingly negative things about that. Like, sometimes when I’m depressed, I watch 1980s cartoons, and before Reagan, most of these cartoons were illegal because they were advertisements for toys and advertising to kids was regulated.

I think mainly it was just an incredibly wealthy period in American history which happened to coincide with the collapse of communism. It was the beginning of the boomers lighting everything on fire and just burning it all down.

And the poison ideology that “everyone on earth is an American in waiting” is really at the core of boomerism. The boomers were a very selfish people, and they really liked goofy, saccharine feel-good gibberish like “America is the greatest country on earth.”

I’ve been seeing some chitter-chatter about how “maybe we shouldn’t celebrate Independence Day anymore because the US is a gay country run by Jews.” I am totally opposed to this thinking, and think anyone following through on this kind of threat is a complete fag.

Firstly, you’re celebrating the nation as it was, not as it is now. And it was once a great nation. I’m a bit allergic to this “greatest country on earth” business, because it sounds insane and I don’t really see any basis for it, but it is the country of my ancestors and they celebrated it and I will celebrate it for the same reasons they did. Well, sort of. When they were celebrating it, the nation actually was great, and now it really is just a completely Jewed up shithole filled with niggers, homos, and junkies. But we celebrate the great men who made this country great before the boomers burned it down.

And we can celebrate the great things that remain: our families, cheeseburgers, hotdogs… umm… I don’t think RimWorld is American, and John Wick is pretty much Russian… Legos are Danish… but I’m sure there are still some other good things about America. Hey – there are some great vape shops and some great American made juice. I think all the good mods are made in China, but America has great high quality juice. And with the cheeseburgers, we are talking about the cows too. We’ve got some great cows.

One of the things about my job is rich people want to take me to fancy places, and I’ve had $400 Japanese steaks, and I still prefer US Angus. On July 4th, I want it ground up and grilled and I want a toasty bun and AMERICAN melty cheese and pickles and onions and ketchup and FRENCH’S mustard (which I’m pretty sure is American, despite the name which perhaps implies something different).

Here’s the thing: not celebrating traditional national holidays because of political things is gay. I’m still out there celebrating James Earl Ray Day, despite the fact he failed to stop the nigger uprising.

I’m thinking about burning a US flag at the BBQ. Just because that big Israel guy on TV is trying to tell me I can’t.

It seems like what Thomas Jefferson would have done, you know?

You know:

Although this is the great nation of my birth, the nation I love, with a flag intended to symbolize the freedoms that men died for, the current tyranny is burning the freedoms the flag once represented, and so with a heavy heart, I will set flame to the symbol of freedom so that I might light a fire of freedom in the hearts of my countrymen. If the freedoms the flag stands for no longer stand, than the flag no longer means anything, so it is in effigy that we allow the wind to scatter the ashes of the memory of a once free people.

But I don’t have any flags that aren’t polyester, and I’m not trying to burn plastic.

This nightmerica situation has me just as down as anyone. Maybe more so. But long after America burns down, I’m going to celebrate Independence Day, in remembrance of greater men and better days. And because I like grilling. And everyone is very happy with my grilling. People are coming back for seconds. I hardly even get to eat one, but what I enjoy is making other people happy.

I live in Nigeria, where people don’t really know much about American history, so I tell people that George Washington killed the King of England in a Japanese sword fight because the King of England tried to ban burgers.

I think we can probably alter our stories in the future in this way. I don’t really see any reason not to. I mean it doesn’t have to be that silly, but it could be sort of silly like that. I don’t really think these stories about the foundations of America that we hear now are really that good, the whole democracy thing is pretty gay, and I also don’t think they’re really very good, so George Washington being a kind of John Wick figure on a mission to stop the British from banning burgers is something I think is a real option for future history books.

But seriously man, have fun.

Everything isn’t political.

I mean, sort of everything is political, but a holiday with your family isn’t, and burgers and fireworks are not.

I should have posted a few days ago and instructed on how to make real charcoal. Real niggas know that it’s a whole lot different than that shit you buy in the bag. But it’s a little late for that now. It’s the norm here in my neck of the woods, of course, ain’t nobody buying bagged charcoal, but I did learn how to make it, my own special brew, and it really makes a world of difference. You get that real wood charcoal and then you just smoke them bitches out. Smoke up them buns too.

(Hilarious, considering that since the end of the Transatlantic slave trade, charcoal is like, one of the only profitable exports from Nigeria.)

But buddy, you’ll do fine with the bagged charcoal. You made it this far in your life with that. But next year, we’ll do a “how to make real charcoal” class in June, and all your people will be like “bro, what the hell did you do, this is amazing!”

I’ve also got a 15% pork mix, which prevents that faggot Zorhan from showing up at your BBQ and doing his friendly smily schtick and wooing everyone with his Islamo-communism. I spice the meat up pretty good too. Not too much, because you’ve gotta hold the shape, but pig fat helps with that. I also grind all my meat. I mean the butcher does, I unfortunately don’t have a grinder. But when that shit has been sitting there ground up and in the cold for days… not ideal.

Here’s the biggest thing though: do not cheap out on the buns. Get the good buns. Cut them and then flash the inner (cut) part in some melted butter, then put them on the grill for just a wee bit. Just to brown them up, and get it a bit crispy on the inside.

I’ll try to post some pics of my burgers.

And hey – throw some dogs on there too. Same protocol with the bun, slice the hotdog down the middle, and when it opens up, it’s done. Have some chopped onions and some chopped pickles with the mustard. None of that weird stuff that comes in cans. And these are hotdogs, not sausages, so no sauerkraut, okay? Let’s not get weird. Tell people if they want weird shit, bring it themselves.

By the way, I have the lettuce there, but I never recommend lettuce on burgers. It’s not my thing, and I’m the grill master, and though I’m not completely outraged by lettuce, I don’t believe in it, and I only discourage people from using it because my burgers are designed to not have lettuce. And there is no mayonnaise available at all in my BBQ, and if someone asks for it, I punch them in the stomach (and yes, before you ask, that rule does apply to pregnant women).

But have fun, boys.

Think of the good things for a day.

This is not a celebration of modern America, it’s a celebration of American mythology, it’s a celebration of our homeland and the homeland of our fathers, and this land that belongs to us and them, not to any of the others.

And most importantly of all: if you get blackout drunk, DO NOT grab your sister-in-law’s tits. Cousin’s? Not as bad, but avoid that as well. This is the one day of the year I drink beer, and I’d advise you to do the same. I’m thinking of applying this rule to all holidays, because a few Christmases ago, Santa maybe had a bit too much Grey Goose and was maybe a bit meaner to the African children than Santa should be. Beer is poison, total liquid estrogen, but it does prevent things from getting out of hand.

I mean, I’m a pro. I haven’t been blackout drunk in like, over 15 years. I was at a party a few weeks ago and people kept telling me to do shots after I knew I was at my limit and I watched these people vomiting and passing out while I was sitting there shaking my damn head and could have passed any DUI test (other than the breathalyzer, which is unconstitutional and a Jewish conspiracy literally supported by Palantir and James Bowman). But you know, I am a lot more likely to get a bit more… socially inappropriate with celebratory levels of liquor, whereas with beer that is totally impossible, and I think that goes for everyone, even us big time pros.

Especially if you’re the cook, bro, you gotta keep your shit tight. You start flipping out shitty burgers and it will make grabbing your sister-in-law’s tits look like an innocent foible.

NOTE: DO NOT COMPLAIN ABOUT ME WRITING A SEMI-COHERENT RAMBLING ESSAY BEFORE THE MEMES. IF YOU DON’T WANT TO READ THE ESSAY, NIGGA, SCROLL DOWN. I’M NOT ASKING YOU TO READ THIS SHIT. I’M JUST PUTTING IT HERE IN CASE YOU WANT TO READ IT. THE MEMES ARE DOWN THERE AND IT WILL TAKE YOU LESS THAN ONE SECOND TO PUSH THE “PAGE DOWN” BUTTON TWICE OR I GUESS MAYBE THRICE.

I’m doing Memetic Monday. It’s probably going to be posted late. I was collecting the memes earlier, then I fell asleep at the desk, then I rolled onto the floor and the tile was really nice and cool so I slept there for some unclear number of hours.

As you know, I had stopped doing Memetic Monday. I’ve stopped doing most things related to the Daily Stormer. I still get up and work on my computer for six or ten hours a day most of the time. Some of the stuff you’ll never read. Maybe some of it you’ll read it and won’t know you read it. A lot of it no one will ever read because I think it sucks. I hope some of it you do read.

It seems important you should know this. I didn’t play Oblivion and I definitely didn’t play Expedition 33. I’m not like, hanging out. My work day is the same really as it always was. I’m just typing and trying to figure out the best way forward here.

As I’ve said, it is really fucked up to still be locked out. They let everyone else back in. I’m the only one still locked out. If you’re allowed on Twitter, you’re allowed in, that’s the way this works now. Like, if I was allowed on Twitter, I’d be able to have a Substack and publish more serious types of stuff there. And I’d be able to link this site. And I would be overwhelmingly influential, like I always am whenever I’m allowed in anywhere, allowed to be involved in anything on the internet.

I had never watched Once Upon a Time in Hollywood before. I don’t really know how I feel about the alternate history ending. I really didn’t see it coming. If Tex never killed Tate, would John Lennon still be alive? He’d only be 84. And I’d bet a whole lot of money he’d be talking about Jews. Not just “Zionists,” but “Jews, in general.” Anyway, the Leo midlife crisis arc was interesting, and kind of resonated in some way. But it really isn’t a parallel. I am at the top of my game. My game hasn’t even gotten started yet. I’m not passed my prime, I’m not becoming more useless.

I think if that was my situation, I’d be kinda okay with it. As long as I wasn’t broke (he wasn’t broke). I would just like, you know, chill. If I was passed my prime. But I could be writing shit better than anything I ever wrote before. Someone is going to say “well, quality on DS had dropped a lot before you partially retired,” and yeah, obviously I know that, but that’s because I’d stopped putting the effort in. I was doing other shit for money. Sometimes only working on the site for like an hour and a half a day. Because there was no growth model, no way to get back into the conversation where I can say something and people are compelled to respond.

Sorry, I just ate some weird Mexican rice and it feels like I’m having a heart attack. Sorry. Just hold on please.

Okay I think I’m good now.

Anyway, yeah, the midlife crisis thing could have been a ruse this whole time. It’s being out of the game that is killing me. For a minute there, when they were letting everyone back on, I had a little bit of hope. But kinda not really. Please boomer, don’t shake your head at the incomplete sentence before this one. I wrote it that way on purpose, you subhuman filth. They aren’t going to let me back on, ever, for the same reason that I was nuked off of the internet in a way that to this day, they’ve not come close to doing to a single other individual: it’s because if I have access, I can blow the whole fucking thing up. In 2017, before they shut me off, Daily Stormer traffic was almost doubling every month. I barely had a staff, and I was on a trajectory to being a top 20 global news site. These are facts anyone can go look up. I invented modern antisemitism and I made it very popular very quickly and if they would not have nuked me from orbit, everything in the world would be different right now. I’m the man. Go look at the current alternative media landscape, and try to come up with an estimate of how much of it was taken from me. When it comes to the things that matter, it’s basically all of it. Not just the antisemitism, but the misogyny, the racism, the nationalism, all of it.

NB4 “yes, Anglin, you’ve said this same thing like six million times in the last six months.” Yeah. I know. I know I’ve done that and I’m saying it again. I’m going to skip the part where I whine about money, because honestly, I did good with some meme coins, and I’ve got some ghostwriting jobs that pay pretty well right now. Don’t get me wrong, I’m still mad people don’t donate, and yeah probably if people were donating I would write a lot more. But I’m not whining about that again. Instead, I’m going to whine about what it seems to imply: I’m the only guy who actually even gives a shit. The people who copy my stuff make millions of dollars. And I look at the right-wing movement, and I don’t see anyone who is actually risking anything at all. People are cooperating with feds. I’m just going to tell you, basically everyone is cooperating with the feds. Some of them don’t even know it, which obviously makes them better than the ones who do know it. Then some of them are not stupid enough to get tied up in the fed shit, but will keep their talking points away from the most important things so the money keeps rolling in, and then they will justify their behavior.

I wrote something the other day like: “the human mind is a machine that creates justifications to protect the soul from being forced to look upon the immorality of the human’s behavior.” I think I maybe said it better last time. But the point is: there is no difference between Tucker Carlson refusing to talk about the Holocaust or the Talmud “because people aren’t ready to hear it” and a mother who drowns her children “because she loves them and wanted to protect them.” No one views himself as a bad person. Everyone has to be the hero of their own story or they’re just going to be depressed and useless and probably suicidal.

Every soul is good. Everyone was a baby at some point. And nothing about the soul changes. You have the same soul you had when you were conceived, and it is fundamentally good, so to protect that fundamentally good soul, the mind has to cover up the evil nature of evil behavior. Is it evil for Tucker Carlson (because he is our example) to not figure out a way to talk about the Holocaust and the Talmud? I actually think the answer is yes. Tucker is not an evil person, and he does a lot of good things, but he could be the man to really remind the masses of people what they knew for over a thousand years about the Jews, and forgot a hundred or so years ago, and choosing not to do that is an evil action.

Note: I know a lot of you are going to be asking if Jews are born with good souls, as I say all people are, and I have to confess that I honestly do not know. There is definitely a part of me that believes that Jews are actually not humans, but some kind of demonic race masquerading as humans. But then you have examples of Jews abandoning Jewishness, becoming Christians, and becoming good people. There aren’t that many examples of that. But there are examples. You also have the fact that a Jew can have reproductive sex with a non-Jew, and half-Jews are less prone to evil, while quarter Jews are (usually) just like normal people. I think it is possible that Jews do just have normal souls, but that they are so abused as children, systematically by their culture, that they become much more capable of evil. And this is combined with two thousand years of breeding for genetic character traits that make this process easier. Further, the Jewish religion is satanic, and Jews appear to engage in various practices designed to invite demonic possession. Anyway, “are Jews humans with souls or are they some kind of satanic demon creatures descended from angels who rebelled with Lucifer or something like that?” is an interesting question. The Bible, in Genesis 6, talks about “sons of God” (often interpreted to mean fallen angels) impregnating the “daughters of men” (normal human women) and creating some kind of new evil race of creatures, and it could be that’s what the Jews are. I would not be surprised.

But I also wouldn’t be surprised if they are humans who simply have genetics and traditions that make them more prone to being evil.

By the way, let me just put this one here:

Judaism is not “people who practice the religion of the Israelites in the way they did before Jesus came.” That is a lie and a stupid lie. That religion can’t be practiced anymore because the Romans – shoutout to my Romans – burned the Jew temple in the first century. Also, even if you didn’t know that, because you’re a boomer and you basically don’t know shit, why would you believe people were special for rejecting Christ? But it isn’t even about the religion for the Christian Zionists, it’s a bloodline thing, and that has all kinds of problems, because most of the decedents of the Abrahamic tribes became Christians (and later some of them Moslems). If it’s about a bloodline thing, we should really be sending infinity money and weapons to the Lebanese Christians, who, due to high levels of endogamy, have something like over a 90% genetic overlap with the people of the Old Testament.

Aside from the Mizrahi Jews (who are nowhere near as genetically similar to ancient Levantine peoples as Lebanese and Syrian Christians, having well over 50% Arab/Turkic DNA), the Jews of the state of Israel have only minor trace DNA connections to the people of the Old Testament.

This is without even mentioning the fact that Saint Paul said, explicitly, that the “Old Covenant” doesn’t exist anymore, and that the Jews are the enemies of all mankind, meaning that any form of Christian support for the State of Israel is a heresy.

During the Ted Cruz vs. Tucker Carlson debate, Ted didn’t know the verse, but knew that the Bible said that we should “bless Israel.” Tucker asked what he believed was meant by Israel, and he said that it’s the current political state of Israel. He explained it was because it’s the same word. But that would be like if I went down to the court and legally changed my name to “Jesus Christ” and then told Christians they have to worship me “because I am Jesus Christ.” And when people protested, I pulled out my driver’s license that said “Jesus Christ” on it.

I think if I did this then sent Ted Cruz like, $150,000, he would go on Fox News and talk about me and say “as a Christian, I was taught in Sunday school to worship Jesus Christ, and this man, a gentleman from Columbus, Ohio, is Jesus Christ. I have seen it on his driver’s license. Printed right there in black and white, as clear as day, that driver’s license says ‘Jesus Christ.’ And when I call him up on WhatsApp to worship him, he speaks to me, and guides me on the true path that he’s laid out for me, and that is why I’ve introduced this bill to abolish the age of consent.”

But wait.

This isn’t the topic today.

I mean, there probably should be a big article about this, going through:

• It’s not the religion of the OT
• It’s not the blood of the OT
• The Old Covenant was literally abolished, explicitly, in the NT, so it doesn’t even matter anyway

Since we’re apparently back in Christian Zionism world with Donald Trump talking about how God is sending him messages to murder people, I guess we need to go through and explain this in some more detail? I guess? Is it even worth it? Can anyone dumb enough to believe this bullshit be convinced by Jewish religious history (as documented by the rabbis themselves along with the Romans), DNA records, and very plainly stated verses from the New Testament?

It feels sort of like writing an essay for my dog about why he shouldn’t eat his own shit. I don’t think the dog will read the essay, and if he does he won’t accept the conclusions, regardless of the sources I cite.

And basically, if you’ve seen these videos from Gaza and you can say with a straight face “this is what Jesus would want” you are so evil and retarded that there really isn’t anything I can do for you.

And anyway, in terms of “you know, I should write X thing…” – a lot of stuff doesn’t get done around here, frankly. You should see the schedule now that I don’t have the Stormer schedule. I’ve written between 20% and 85% of approximately 22 books.

What is the topic today? Wait, isn’t it supposed to be memes? Is this Meme Monday? What?

Just hold your horses.

What I was attempting to communicate was that while communicating what comes across as whining about how everyone copied my material and made millions and I can’t hardly make enough from donations to pay for the monthly website bills, what I’m really wanting to communicate is how difficult it is is to deal with the fact that no one gives a shit. Despite the poor finances of the site, I’m not personally broke, I’m good at gambling and I’ve got a decent side gig. What causes me to glitch out is that there is no one out there willing to actually take risks. When they unpersoned me, they said “let that serve as a warning to you,” and everyone heeded the warning. Not literally everyone, of course. There are some good guys on the internet, and I know a lot of you readers are good guys who would be willing to take the risk, you’re just not in a position to do so. But what it looks like is if you make someone comfortable, get them a couple milly so they can live it up, doing the right thing just doesn’t matter to them anymore.

I guess it’s like that thing Jesus said.

Everyone’s gotta get paid and I’ve never begrudged someone for it. I have begrudged Tucker Carlson for doing ad reads, even like, during that Ted Cruz interview. I think that was one of the most important interviews in modern American history, and I think Tucker has enough money.

He tweeted out an ad for a crypto gambling site underneath the interview and I also don’t think he should have done that.

Now he’s advertising a documentary about the Chinese mafia running drugs in America (which is true, Chinese criminals entered under Biden’s open borders policy). But the ad claims that the drug gangs are linked to “Chinese communism,” which is just a dirty fucking lie.

There is no Chinese mafia in China because crime is illegal in China and if Trump deported these drug dealers to China, and presented evidence of their crimes, they’d be executed by the “communist” government of China. Malaysia had a problem with Chinese drug gangs, and they requested China come deal with it. The Chinese sent special police and arrested all of the leaders then sent them back to China to face execution. The idea that the Chinese government is working with ethnic Chinese criminals in America is absolute bullshit, and I guarantee you that there will not be a single piece of evidence connecting any Chinese criminal operating in America to the Chinese government.

But hey, you know what? There is an ethnic mafia operating in this country which is doing a lot worse things than dealing drugs, and they are doing so with 100% backing of their home country. I don’t want to say the name of this ethnic group or their country, because that would be politically incorrect and could hurt someone’s feelings. However, this other ethnic group and their crimes, and the connection of criminals from this ethnic group operating in the United States with the full knowledge and with the cooperation of their country of origin, is who I would want to make a documentary about. I would think that would be a lot more helpful than more propaganda pushing for war with the Chinese.

I’ve singled out Tucker. I did it several times. I do it because I think he’s the one that might actually listen. And he’s the biggest. Joe Rogan might technically be bigger, but Tucker is more influential.

By the way, does anyone else think Joe Rogan looks like shit? That’s the real red pill, let me tell you. He is always talking about all of this health stuff, and a lot of it or most of it I agree with, but he just really does not look very good. I think a big part of it is the steroids, which I don’t totally understand the reasoning behind. I guess we’re supposed to believe that this “look” he has is in some way related to martial arts, but no martial artist takes that amount of steroids to get big useless arms. Honestly, I think with Joe you’ve got yet another sad case of a short guy thinking muscles will make him taller. It doesn’t work that way, guys. I wish it did. I might well be all geared up myself if it did. But it doesn’t. A woman will pick the 6’2″ skinny fat guy over the 5’5″ max roided guy every time, despite whatever redpill logic about how women are attracted to strength. Women aren’t and never were attracted to strength for its own sake, they were attracted to status, and women are hardwired to believe height is the ultimate male status marker. But Joe Rogan is rich and famous and has basically the highest possible status and even if he really is 5’3″ or whatever, he can have sex with any woman he wants. I’m pretty sure he’s also married with kids and makes a thing of his fidelity? He’s definitely never been accused of a sex scandal, and you’d definitely think he would have been.

The roids are doing something horrible to his face, I think. Making him look all puffy and leathery like. It’s really not a good look he’s got going. He doesn’t look healthy.

But I wouldn’t expect Joe Rogan to put anything on the line. He’s not a Christian, he believes humans are invented by aliens or we’re in a simulation or some other retarded weed shit. If I didn’t believe in God, I wouldn’t risk anything to do the right thing. Frankly, if I didn’t believe in God, I would act like Lenin or Pol Pot, and I don’t think there is anything wackier than “Jew atheists” like Sam Harris and the “Weinstein brothers” saying “even though God doesn’t exist we should all act like he does.” If I didn’t believe in God, there would be rape and murder and a lot worse, because it is just basic common sense that if you don’t believe in God, the only thing that matters is power. Full stop. Instead, every atheist is like, obsessed with signaling how moral they are because they love niggers so much. Weird, huh? Doesn’t make sense!

But just as I can’t imagine not believing in God and not going full Pol Pot, I can’t imagine believing in God and putting money and comfort before doing the right thing.

I could not imagine standing in front of Christ on his throne, with all of the Saints behind him, and being asked: “So, while the Jews were running America into the ground, doing abortion and trannies, financially looting the entire place, the whole thing, while also committing a genocide in Gaza and dragging Christians into wars for them, you had a couple mill to make a documentary, and you decided to do one about the Chinese? Instead of the Jews? And this is while you were well aware of various State Department plans to drum up a war with China. Can you go ahead and walk me through exactly what your thinking there was?”

I loath the reality I’m going to have to answer for all my sex sins. But I also know that like, pretty much all of us are going to be having to answer for those sorts of things. I’ll be answering for sex sins next to some very great men of God. And I’m going to be able to say “My Lord, I put it all on the line to try to stop these Jews, and you know what it cost me.”

Tucker Carlson is going to be a man who had a unique power to do immense good in the world, and while doing some good (he does do quite a bit of good), decided to push for a war with the Chinese instead of taking the Jews head-on, because one thing made a lot of money and the other could result in losing everything.

“There’s no reward without risk” is an eternal rule of the universe, and it will be true at the Final Judgement as well. Those who risked are going to be rewarded. Those who took the path of least resistance, which was also the path lined with gold, are not going to be rewarded.

The only thing I think about anymore is death and the life to come.

I don’t know what Tucker is thinking. I guess it just goes back to the whole thing about how the mind creates all of these justifications for you. I guess that’s all it is. But we do have free will and we do have choices and obviously, Tucker Carlson is reading this right now. The New York Times reported (with a named source) that he used me as a source for stories, and he never denied it.

Anyway, the reason I am writing all of this is that I promised to do memes today, and then I thought “I’d better write something with the memes.” I’m sorry if it was not much new. But I think I’m moving forward. And I think I’m gonna have a comeback. It might be another year or two. But assuming this one little health issue I have doesn’t become a bigger problem, I’m going to be around for a while, and I’m going to make a comeback. It’s what I pray for. When people ask me if there is anything they can pray for me, I tell them to ask God to let me serve Him by doing what I am best at.

All of the credit for the fact we are doing memes today goes, fittingly, to the man who invented memes, A. Wyatt Mann. He’s been a friend and a supporter for well over a decade, and recently he started posting stuff like this:

So I promised him I’d bring the memes back today.

For those who don’t recognize the name A. Wyatt Mann, he’s the guy who drew this:

Among many, many other important and influential characters. So it is literally not any kind of exaggeration to describe him as “the man who invented memes.”

There is still no more important meme than Le Happy Merchant (a name given by 4chan, by the way, not by Mr. Mann himself), and there is nothing I can think of that is more relevant, as we stand on the edge of war with Iran, than this:

He still makes memes and pretty much every week they would pop up in our Memetic Mondays. So that is the reference above to him fleeing the wreckage of Memetic Monday with his dank memes. Just in case someone somehow didn’t get that.

A few years ago, he did a now-classic digital collection of new merchant memes (many of which were based on edits of his original). For example:

One of the great honors of this life God has blessed me with has been being featured in some of his memes.

Also, I love the Merchant Anglin meme.

By the way, I think I’m the only non-politician to have been featured in art by both A. Wyatt Mann and Ben Garrison, the latter having produced art to help me promote my pro-pedophile activism.

Wait, no, Ben Garrison didn’t draw that. That is signed by someone named “Lewis C. Anon,” and, unfortunately, like most pro-pedophile memes, is not particularly good. I mean, for one thing, I’m as against thong flip-flops as I am against age of consent laws. I’m a slides man, til the day I die. I want that on my tombstone: “slides man.”

Ben did several memes to help me promote hate, bullying, Hitler, copyright infringement, impersonation, and killing.

It’s still technically Monday as I write, so I hope these memes upload fast, and it will be Monday when it’s posted.

Wait, wait, wait. I have to do something not funny. I need to say that Ben is – no, no, wait, that’s not the not funny thing. The not funny thing is that although I do identify as a pedophile activist, and support forced child marriage, I have not actually ever violated an age of consent law. Given my personal situation, I don’t violate any laws, ever. I don’t even do cocaine. I mean, not now that I’m scared to go to Brazil because they’ve gone insane with the hate speech stuff.

Can I post another scene from “Once Upon a Time…”? Is that allowed? Two scenes from the same “sort of kinda fun” film in one article?

(Honestly, the film is probably better than “sort of kinda fun,” I just frankly didn’t think it had enough feet in it to be considered “great.”)

He says to that bitch: “Prison tried to get me all my life, ain’t got me yet and the day it does, it won’t be because of you.” That’s what I’ve always said to any hooker that couldn’t show me an ID. Those exact words.

It’s funny prison has been trying to get me all my life for… jokes I made on the internet. So I guess that is going back to funniness, after having had to take this time to say something totally unfunny?

But I say it for the bros: they destroyed Cody Wilson, hero inventor of the 3D printed gun, on some trumped-up age of consent bullshit. This is like, the easiest way to get screwed by the feds. Most of us at this point know that if some neighbor comes over and asks you to saw the barrel of his shotgun because he lost his shotgun-shortening saw that you don’t do it, but young men are often powerless when it comes to pussy, so please, bros, be careful.

Anyway, to let the unfunny continue to flow, when they did up Cody, he actually did ask for an ID and she produced a fake one that the feds made for her (like, they used a real ID making machine to make a fake ID). So, seriously. If you’re out there doing activism type stuff (even if it’s an anon Twitter account that you kinda think or at least hope the feds don’t know is you), you really gotta assume that any girl who shows up in your orbit is part of some kind of plot against you.

Someday, the revolution will happen, and we will have forced child marriages to be consummated after first menstruation as God intended. But that day is not today. And while the “get the hell away from anyone who starts talking about violence” rule is well understood, the old-fashioned honey pot probably doesn’t get discussed enough. I think it’s likely, given the current dynamics, the feds are about to start a wave of shenanigans against right-wingers. I’ve published several guides on how to avoid such shenanigans in the past, though it might be time for an updated version. Although I’m somehow in an even worse position than I was in 2017 in terms of censorship, the landscape in general does include a lot more of the kind of speech Jews do not like, and it doesn’t really seem possible that this is going to be allowed to go on indefinitely without some kind of pushback.

It could be that there actually will be a serious war with Iran and they will just pass laws restricting speech. The US has done that during every major war in the past. This time, Palantir might just drone bomb you for posting a meme that hurts a Jew’s feelings (as you hear the drone screeching through the sky headed for your residence, that illegal “bald JD Vance” meme appears on all your devices). Or maybe there will be a big false flag. I don’t know. Regardless, they will be seeking to make examples of people. Speaking of making examples, Candace needs to be careful with her Harvey Weinstein thing, because if she accuses women who won in court of lying, that is a dream defamation lawsuit for Jew lawyers that they could turn into some kind of Alex Jones type situation.

Anyway, serious stuff is garbage and I hate it.

Hopefully the memes bring us back to Fun Land.

Re: Fun Land, here’s the Editor’s Pick of the Week:

And the Official Runner-Up:

Followed by: the primo collection.

Final Message/Warning:

I’m pushing “Publish” at 23:49. Monday.

Memetic Monday is back, and it is never late.

Massive lies were told about the events of October 7, 2023, and what Hamas allegedly did to the Jews, and this has led me to wonder how it is possible that people can continue to believe the lies that were told about what the Germans did to the Jews during World War II.

Let’s go through some of the big lies that Jews in the Israeli and US governments, as well as the US media, told about October 7th.

1) “40 Beheaded Babies”

Claim

On the day of the event, reports that appear to have originated from i24 News, as well as direct statements from Bibi Netanyahu’s office, claimed that Hamas “terrorists” beheaded 40 babies. (Note: Hamas does not actually fit the definition of terrorists, as there is such a thing as a legitimate resistance group that uses violence, and simply being Islamic doesn’t mean your group is “terrorist.”)

The claim was repeated not just by tabloids, but the likes of Fox News and CNN.

Debunking

In this case, the Israeli government itself later admitted that there was no evidence of 40 beheaded babies. The White House also walked back Joe Biden’s use of the claim.

There was no evidence, despite the fact that the site of the Hamas attack was filmed as much as any place ever, so there was no need for an official debunking. After reporters kept asking about evidence, the US and Israeli governments just admitted it was fake.

2) Mass Rape and Sexual Violence

Claim

The entire Israeli government organized to claim that during the October 7th raid, Hamas engaged in “systematic rape” and “sexual mutilation.”

This rape claim always seemed ridiculous on its face, as while Hamas was across the border for up to 6-7 hours, the actual operation was between 3-5 hours long. These people were in gun fights with the IDF, they were dodging airstrikes, they were taking hostages, all while navigating unfamiliar terrain (and often getting lost, as is seen in Hamas’ own videos and was admitted during interrogations). “Okay boys, let’s take a quick break for rape” always sounded very silly.

Furthermore, as the Jews and their media constantly repeat, Hamas is a strict Islamic group, and based on that, any soldier caught engaging in rape during a military operation would be executed on the spot. If they were doing “systematic rape,” they are not an Islamic group at all, but an irreligious bandit gang, and that is not a claim anyone is making. The media obviously relied on the lack of information the public has about Islamic law, knowing they would not be aware that rape during war is totally banned.

The Koran bans all rape, including of slave girls. Here are specific Hadith that mention sexual violence during war:

• Hadith (Sunan Abu Dawud 2158): “The Messenger of Allah (ﷺ) prohibited taking women as captives solely for the purpose of sexual relations.”
• Hadith (Sahih Muslim 3371): “Do not kill women, children, or the elderly, and do not commit treachery or rape.”

There is no serious Islamic group that allows rape during war. Even ISIS banned this. You’ll remember that all of the talk about sexual abuse by ISIS was around forced marriage (which is allowed in certain contexts in certain forms of Islam). And Hamas is a much more serious Islamic group than ISIS, which is a CIA- and Israel-backed terror group.

Debunking

An official UN investigation (UN Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights), which was (quite ridiculously) not released until March 2024 even though it could have been completed and released in a couple weeks, found no evidence of “widespread rape.”

Further, forensic experts from various international rights groups found nothing, while independent investigators from The Grayzone and Mondoweiss (both primarily Jewish outlets) found no evidence supporting the rape claims.

Finally, specific claims were later proven false. The Israeli government had claimed there existed a “Hamas rape manual” which was proved to be totally made up out of nothing.

3) Hamas Burned Families Alive, Purposefully Murdered Civilians

Claim

The entire media was claiming that Hamas “burned families alive” by setting their houses on fire. There was no evidence ever presented.

Debunking

An investigation by Israel publications +972 Magazine and Local Call found that most (not all, but most) civilian deaths in homes were due to Israeli helicopter fire.

Israeli helicopters (actually US helicopters supplied to Israel) also gunned down hostages on Hamas motorcycles, the investigation found.

The IDF later admitted to using the “Hannibal Directive,” which involves using heavy fire to prevent hostages from being taken, and allows for the death of Israelis. The preference, in the doctrine, is that a civilian die rather than be taken hostage.

4) Hamas “Targeted” a Music Festival

Claim

It was claimed that the Nova music festival was a specific target of Hamas and that they started mass executing people there.

Debunking

It was later shown that the music festival was coincidentally going on when Hamas attacked. Investigations by Jewish outlets (Yedioth Ahronoth, Haaretz) showed that many of the festival goers who died were not killed by Hamas (at least not on purpose in “executions”), but rather in crossfire in the fighting with the IDF, as well as by Israeli helicopter strikes.

5) Hamas Used Human Shields While Fighting from Civilian Homes

Claim

The Jewish state claimed Hamas fighters were hiding in the Kibbutzim and shooting from behind families, from inside of family homes.

Debunking

Testimonies from survivors published by The Electronic Intifada and Middle East Eye among others showed that the Hamas fighters were directly engaging in shootouts with the IDF, not hiding in civilian homes.

6) The Attack was Part of a Planned Genocide

Claim

Almost unbelievably, the Jews claimed that this small operation on October 7th was a plan to genocide all of the Jews, and that the goal of the attack was random killing.

Debunking

Leaked Israeli intelligence from +972 showed that the Israelis understood that Hamas expected a prisoner swap and had no goal of mass killing civilians.

Before October 7th, Israel was holding over 5,000 Palestinian hostages (since October 7th, that number has more than doubled), so it is pretty rational that Hamas would want to take their own hostages as a way to get back their own people through swaps, and this is in fact what Israeli intelligence said the purpose of the operation was.

When Did Jews Start Lying Like This Then?

Jews lie compulsively in order to make themselves out to be victims. Certainly, there were Jewish innocent victims on October 7th, as there are always victims in war, but the fact is, most of the innocents were killed by the Jews themselves, and the Hamas operation was a legitimate military operation.

It is shocking to me personally that the same people who will say the Jews lied about really everything they could possibly lie about with relation to October 7th are not willing to question the stories Jews tell about what supposedly happened to them during World War II.

My hope is that there is simply a delay on this, and at some point in the future, people will ask: “well, what else have the Jews been lying about?”

There has been, since the October 7 event and the subsequent genocide Israel began committing in Gaza, some interest in understanding the foundation of Israel. For example, the story of the Palestinian model Gigi Hadid’s family has come up a lot. Her father was a child at the time of the establishment of the state of Israel, when, following the war, Jews went to Palestine to claim refugee status. His family invited a family of Jew refugees from Europe into their home, and one day they returned home to find that the locks had been changed and the Jews who they had welcomed into their home yelled out the window that if they didn’t leave the premises, men would come and kill them. So they moved to a refugee camp in Syria.

Here’s a short video of Mohamed Hadid telling this story:

What happened to Hadid’s family happened to millions of Palestinians. It’s called the “Nakba,” and it is the story of the foundation of Israel, and it is great that more and more people are finding out that Israelis didn’t all of a sudden become genocidal barbarians after October 7th, but that in fact, the entire existence of their state is based on genocide and evil.

If we get back to the point where we are talking about the foundations of Israel, then it is just one step back to what happened to the Jews in Europe during World War II. We can learn why the Germans wanted to put them in camps, and what happened in those camps. I am not going to go through the whole “Holohoax” story here today, but a lot of Jews did die during the war, because it is a war that killed 70 million people. Jews died in the camps too, because the Allies bombed the supply lines to the camps which were in rural Poland, which led to disease and starvation. The Red Cross at the time estimated that 280,000 people died in these camps. Not six million. And none of them died in gas chambers or by any of the other Looney Tunes type methods Jews claim the Germans used against them.

Conclusion

It is my sincere hope that as the Jews come under more scrutiny for these lies they’ve told, as we unravel the history of the state of Israel, a state founded on ethnic cleansing, terrorism, banditry, and mass murder, we will continue to go back through the history of the Jews, and specifically to unravel this “Holocaust” myth, which currently serves as the foundation for the entirety of Western secular ideology, which has itself become the framework of what now passes as “Western civilization” itself.

Since I began writing on these issues nearly 15 years ago, I have argued that in order for the liberal order to fall, and for a righteous, Christian society to be restored in the West, the truth about the Jews and their lies must be confronted. The “Holocaust” is the biggest and most powerful lie of all, and if this falls apart, and I truly believe we are witnessing the beginnings of its collapse, everything will change.

Ultimately, the truth will out. In a thousand years, people are not going to be believing in “Nazi gas chambers,” I can promise you that. The real question is how many people have to die, how much human suffering has to take place, before this lie is exposed.