I just want to thank everyone and say sorry to everyone. I was given a gift and a lot of responsibility and I didn’t do enough with it. I should have done so much more. I owed you guys more than I gave and I regret so much not giving more. I hope that people remember the good things I did. I think I did some good things. I am so thankful to God for any good He enabled me to do and anyone I was able to help in any way.

Thank you and I love you all.

Saying Trump was in the Epstein files was an obvious lie. We all know what kind of women Trump is into. His taste is… not similar to Epstein’s. Trump has an entire list of sex scandals, and none of them were with women under 25, I don’t even know if any of them were under 30, so he wouldn’t be doing it for fun.

Most people weren’t doing it for fun, of course (with the single confirmed exception I’m aware of being Prince Andrew). Most of these people went to Epstein Island to have themselves filmed with underage girls so that the Mossad had blackmail on them, which meant they could get massive career advancements. I don’t know how many people actually get that point, despite how obvious it is: if you want advancement in this system, which is totally corrupt and based exclusively on nepotism, the only real way of getting that advancement is to give blackmail material to the Mossad or some other group of powerful Jews.

Trump never had any reason to do that. He was already rich. And further, if that existed, he would not be bucking Bibi Netanyahu in the way he has been recently. (Whether that bucking goes anywhere – and I don’t think it will, frankly – is irrelevant, because if Bibi had the tapes, he would just do whatever Bibi wants, in the way literally everyone else in the US government does. And before “you use ‘literally’ too liberally, okay, so let’s exclude Thomas Massie, whose wife died mysteriously, and Marjorie Taylor Greene, who is a woman, and I guess Matt Gaetz, who actually went public when the Mossad was trying to wrap him up in a blackmail scandal.)

To believe Trump was in the Epstein files, you would have to not understand that the whole thing was about blackmail, not sex. Or it just wouldn’t make any sense. Elon was just on drugs, as usual, and thought he could manipulate QAnon people into siding with him against Trump, apparently as part of a plan to get some number of GOP Congressmen and Senators to side with Democrats and impeach Trump and replace him with Vance. Even if 100% of QAnon boomers believed the Epstein hoax, the plan would be completely retarded, because getting the Senate to vote for impeachment is virtually impossible, and certainly couldn’t be done now.

Maybe Elon will invent some new strategy. But that seems unlikely. He can manipulate the Twitter algorithm to make a significant portion of online Republicans hate Trump. He could probably also manipulate Fox News to make offline Republicans hate Trump. If I were Trump, I’d be pretty concerned about Elon doing this, and would have made a pretty big effort to keep him on sides.

But, if Trump is playing 5D chess, or 2D chess, or like, Guess Who?, he can easily ask: what does turning a bunch of Republicans against Trump actually accomplish in terms of Elon’s long game?

Obviously, Elon’s long game is to create conditions in America where there is enough money laying around to fund his stupid child’s dream of colonizing Mars. That’s why he’s obsessed with the budget. I mean, there are other reasons to be concerned about the budget, but that’s Elon’s thing. I mean, figure it out, but I think it’s goofy to talk about people having secret agendas when there isn’t even any proof (most people are actually pretty frank about their agendas; even if they don’t talk about them in public all the time, they publish stuff about them). And “go to live on Mars” is Elon’s stated agenda, it’s on all of his shirts, and he says that’s why America needs a balanced budget, and he markets it as an important way to… stop the Chinese people from eating all the pangolins or whatever. Oh, and Pop Mart is going to completely decimate the American toy industry. If we don’t beat them to Mars.

The Democrats obviously aren’t going to even entertain “fiscal responsibility.”

They also have a less than enthusiastic view of space travel.

You all remember this one, right?

No, you don’t. No one remembers that. I mean, even the people who were alive when the Jews were spamming it don’t remember it. I only know about it because boomers cite it as the primary symbol of the way blacks are holding back civilization. Because boomers don’t want to talk about Jews and think that black lives matter is an organic movement and that it would be literally impossible to just send the cops to tell blacks they have to stop whining and get jobs. Boomers can’t explain how blacks were literally slaves for hundreds of years. They just say all of a sudden blacks somehow got a bunch of political power (something they previously hadn’t ever even thought about) and then when they got that power they used it to prevent space travel. So they use that song as an example of how blacks are holding us back from stabbing up the guts of Dejah Thoris. Because boomers also only ever think about “getting lucky” with “hot chicks” when they aren’t thinking about how blacks took over.

Though to be fair, it’s hard to think about Dejah Thoris without thinking about sex.

I just don’t understand why they’re thinking about her in the first place.

Although I am not a whiny nigger, my interest in space travel is about the same as the whiny nigger in the above spoken word piece no one remembers. Whenever I hear an adult talking about an interest in space travel, I immediately peg him as a child in a man’s body, and I am always right. Serious adults are not interested in space travel. That is, they are not interested in it beyond the great body of science fiction works we all love. When someone talks about space travel as something that could or should happen in real life, coming at me with something like “so how long do you think it will take us to get a habitable colony on Mars?” is not different to me than if a man asks “so why didn’t the king send surgeons and scientists instead of horsemen to put Humpty Dumpty back together?”

If you ask a young American male about space travel, he’s going to say something like: “Nigger, I can’t even get a woman to have sex with me. I live with my parents. I can’t even afford a last gen video card. Is there easy pussy and free video cards on Mars? Because if there’s not, please don’t ever talk to me again.”

This isn’t a serious agenda. But it is Musk’s agenda. For whatever reason. He also wants to put computer chips in people’s brains for some reason, presumably to turn them into mindless drones who stop thinking about sex and video games and instead develop a psychopathic obsession with going to Mars (where there is literally nothing but useless rocks).

But, insofar as anyone is going to go along with a space travel agenda, it is going to be war-obsessed boomer dickheads who think the Chinese are going to race them to Mars and then… keep all of the useless rocks for themselves?

“The communist Chinese government has just announced that it is keeping all of the useless rocks on Mars and will not be sharing them with anyone out of fear that the rocks could be used for homosexual purposes” sounds like a nightmare that Marco Rubio might have. So this is literally Musk’s only demographic, beyond his own tech people (who in general, seem more concerned about implanting everyone with brain chips than with invading outer space).

All of this is to say: Elon’s primary objective should be going along with whatever economic growth plan Donald Trump has, regardless of what it does to the national budget, because this is better than nothing, and more importantly, it is the only path to getting his real man, JD Vance, into office.

I think Elon also wants to become some kind of King of America. Again, I don’t want to chase secret agendas, but there is a lot of circumstantial evidence that he has this kind of dream. Certainly, he’s said he wants to be dictator of Mars, and if America is the engine he wants to use to get to Mars, it would make sense to become dictator of America first. Vance’s centrist populism and clear submissiveness (blackmail driven, we’d have to assume) to Silicon Valley and Elon in particular again implies Vance is the man for Elon’s plan.

Who knows what happens next. I don’t make predictions. But if I had to guess, I’d guess we’re going to see total deescalation and some kind of coming back together on some informal level. I think Trump and his people are clever enough to have gamed this out, which is why Trump hasn’t gone nuclear, as he normally would have. He knew Elon was likely to eventually realize he doesn’t have the cards to win, but at the same time he didn’t want Elon dumping the cards he does have (i.e., using Twitter and his wealth to cause Trump very serious problems).

Note that this is a really unique Trump feud. Trump usually goes totally nuclear on anyone over anything, and this time he let Elon go nuclear while saying “well, I guess he’s doing that, maybe he’s mad about some subsidies, I don’t really know, but okay.” Because Trump knew the only thing Elon could do was make a big mess, and didn’t want to pressure him into that, when he knew that when some of the drugs wore off, Elon would realize making a mess doesn’t help him any more than it hurts Trump.

But, I don’t know. I don’t really care. I don’t really see any good outcomes here.

I don’t even know why I bothered typing this. I’m not even supposed to be working on this site. I have all these books in the pipe. Imagine if I finish them all at once and just release like 12 books on one day. There are about 12 of them that are 85% done.

But here I am.

I just can’t take all the bad takes.

I’d hoped I’d put out enough good takes over the years that I’d trained all the people who copied my takes to do their own takes in my style. Instead, all the people who copied my takes are spouting gibberish, most of which doesn’t even make sense, the rest of which is obviously wrong.

There’s only one guy with takes that matter, and he’s a fat Irish retard who claims to eat gay ass. I forget his name. I think it’s “Charlie O’Hannigan.” But he’s the smartest guy on the internet and he’s got great taste in sunglasses, but he’s also Irish, fat, and gay – in that order.

(I haven’t watched this yet, but I would imagine I agree with it. I denounce anything I don’t agree with.)

Sam Hyde too. But is he really even Irish? He’s definitely not gay.

Gotten pretty fat though, frankly.

I hope Elon Musk dumps videos of Donald Trump having sex with 12-year-old girls and then Trump claims they are AI deepfakes and then nationalizes Tesla, Twitter, SpaceX, etc. and deports Elon to Africa.

Then I hope not enough people believe Trump’s Epstein tapes are AI so he’s forced to resign and when JD Vance is told that he’s now president he has a heart attack and dies because his veins are so filled with seed oils and vaccines that his heart can’t tolerate that kind of excitement.

And then from his base in Africa, Elon organizes a mega rocket fleet of niggers implanted with his cyborg technologies and uses them to invade America and declare himself rightful dictator.

Then I hope there’s a big war and everyone dies.

Fuck Dave Portnoy

— Sam Hyde (@wigger) June 5, 2025

Dave Portnoy has entered a second wave of his total meltdown, and I think that possibly, the Elon crash-out was organized by the Jews to cover up the Portnoy situation.

Because everyone is starting to understand a simple fact: Dave Portnoy is every Jew on earth. They are all hate-filled monsters, who will snap at the drop of a dime and fly into a murderous and worse, sadistic rage whenever they feel someone has hurt their feelings. Some Jews simply do better than Portnoy at hiding this fact. But no matter how well they hide it, they are all Dave Portnoy.

Because of Portnoy’s previous meltdown, where he spent weeks talking about some college kid making a “fuck the Jews” joke, he now can’t go anywhere in public without someone yelling “fuck the Jews.” Who knows if these people even believe this sentiment. They probably do now if they didn’t before, but it’s also just hilarious as a basic rule to have a situation where someone is so emotionally unstable that a random person saying three words to them will cause them to have a complete and total mental breakdown.

So, he was doing one of his ultra-hilarious pizza tasting events in some location, and someone yelled “fuck the Jews.” Because everyone who sees him yells that now.

WATCH: Someone shouts “Fuck the Jews” during Dave Portnoy’s pizza review in Canada pic.twitter.com/k4lkocpwVu

— Breaking911 (@Breaking911) June 3, 2025

This led to a podcast scene where he had his worst break with reality yet, where he attacked and threatened his own staff, saying that they were trying to get his fellow chosen people murdered with jokes. He said that the time for Jewish jokes is over because these jokes are getting so many people killed.

I love this clip so, so much.

JUST IN: Dave Portnoy has a meltdown, tells Barstool’s Kirk Minihane to “shut the f*ck up you bald f*ck” after Minihane criticized Portnoy’s approach to “Jew jokes”

Portnoy: “Shut up!… You work for me!”

Minihane: “Sure. You bet. For now…”

Portnoy: “For now? Quit! I’ll save… pic.twitter.com/AM5Y2InCll

— Collin Rugg (@CollinRugg) June 4, 2025

People are pointing out that Portnoy has made constant jokes about killing Palestinians. He actually makes one in that clip.

Frankly, I’m the number one Palestine shill, and I’ve made jokes about killing Palestinians. For example, when Palestinian children were rushing to food drops and got crushed to death by the boxes full of food, I said “this brings a whole new meaning to the term ‘food as a weapon.'” Maybe that’s insensitive, I don’t really know or care. The point is, I am the most hardcore Palestine supporter in the West, at least publicly, because I not only voice support for Hamas (whereas most pussies say ‘oh no of course I don’t support Hamas I just am against genocide’), but have actually called for a State Department policy of arming Hamas with advanced weapons, including shoulder-fired nukes. But that isn’t going to prevent me from making that joke.

And the reason for making a joke like that is not “just because it’s funny,” which is what these comedians defending “free speech” keep saying. “Any joke is okay as long as it’s funny.” That’s what they keep saying. That might be true, I guess, but it’s not a deep or meaningful take. When I make jokes about dead Palestinian children, I am cracking through the horror of the thing, breaking down the mental barriers that people naturally put up when they see videos of the mass slaughter of children.

Following along with this, the meta joke with these supposedly “sensitive” topics, which is just a joke because it’s funny, is mocking how sensitive someone is. I saw Cenk Uygur commenting on the latest Portnoy meltdown and just saying the basic and obvious things that fat Mexican retard would say, and he said that someone posting “Fuck the Jews” in Portnoy’s bar “isn’t a joke because there is no punchline.” It’s hard to think of a more retarded statement than that. Firstly, not all jokes have “punchlines.” This is a level of understanding of a 4-year-old who thinks every joke is some version of “why did the chicken cross the road?” Secondly, making a subversive, offensive statement in a public place is its own “punchline.” Thirdly, the real “punchline” was the Portnoy freakout itself. Some rando being able to make a billionaire have a total meltdown in public for weeks on end by hurting his feelings with words is among the funniest things that are even possible.

But I digress.

Because none of this actually has to do with humor or jokes. Jews, of which Dave Portnoy is the ultimate embodiment (“Jew Prime,” if you will), don’t care if your criticism of them, or negative statements against them, have comedic value. They think you should shut up. They do not think any word against them and their race of chosen ones should ever cross your lips, and they think if you choose to criticize them, humorously or otherwise, you deserve to die.

Can anyone watch those Portnoy freakout videos and think he wouldn’t kill someone? Can you imagine someone being that filled with frothing hatred, and then saying “oh but no I wouldn’t kill someone, that’s too much”? Of course he would kill someone and he would kill anyone who he views as a threat to his tribe, and he views anyone who questions his tribe as a threat to his tribe, and that includes teenagers who tease him.

Dave Portnoy is every Jew. And like every other Jew, he views all of us Western, white goyim in the same way that he views the Palestinians. To the Jews, we are all animals, and the value of our lives is less than nothing, and if we question them, it doesn’t matter if it’s a joke or if it’s all in good fun. What matters is if they feel threatened by it, if it makes them feel uncomfortable or unsafe in some way, and any such statement made by a goy should have only one punishment, and that should be death.

If Dave Portnoy could, he would do to every Westerner who makes a Jew joke the same thing that Israel is doing to the Palestinians, and he would feel nothing.

P.S.

What I hope is that Portnoy joins either Team Musk or Team Trump. I think both teams are so starved for allies, they would accept him. And either Trump or Musk doing a press conference with Portnoy frothing at the mouth talking about how he’s going to destroy anyone who jokes about Jews would really make me happy.

Elon controls Twitter.

Trump can either have him killed, or… I don’t really know what other options he has.

Trump cannot really function if Twitter is weaponized against him, and Elon absolutely will do that.

I think “Trump was doing Epstein island” is probably bullshit (maybe it isn’t, I don’t know), but it doesn’t matter if it is or isn’t, because Elon has the ability to make people believe that, because he controls a mind control algorithm.

Talking about Elon being mad about the EV cuts is retarded. One of the dumbest attacks Trump has ever made. He should have just personally insulted him more.

I don’t know who punched Elon. Maybe Trump can threaten him. It’s possible. But it would have to be literal “I’m going to kill you” threats. Elon Musk’s weird sex stuff is all very public, so there is no threat of blackmail that I can imagine.

Anyway – it’s getting hilarious and looks like it’s going to get a lot more hilarious before it gets less hilarious.

The world was shocked this week when it was revealed that woke right journalist Glenn Greenwald is a gay. For those who don’t know, a gay is a man who rams his penis into another man’s a-hole, and/or (usually “or” but maybe sometimes “and”) allows other men to do this to his a-hole. In this context, “a-hole” means “asshole” or “anushole.” This is the hole in your butt that poop comes out of, so many people think it is very gross to shove a penis into it. It’s also the case that they sometimes shove other objects in, including fists.

Many were shocked last year when Glenn’s roommate, a man of only 37 years, died of an asshole (“a-hole”) infection. In hindsight, many are wondering if his roommate could have also been a gay, and that this sort of anal-ramming could have played a role in this asshole infection.

The world of internet politics was sent into a whirlwind as a result of the revelation of Glenn’s gayness, with one of his colleagues who preferred to remain anonymous telling CNN “I can’t believe he’s been a faggot this whole time.” It’s also led to a wave of paranoia among the woke right movement, with many now wondering who else could be a gay.

Although Twitter has strict censorship rules regarding what people are allowed to say about Jews and Israel, Elon Musk has decided to led people spam this gay sex video, because Musk believes it is very important that everyone sees it. Hate speech, including criticism of Israel for mass-murdering children, has no place in the public discourse, Musk believes, but gay porn is very important for the purposes of transparency, because of ethics.

Unfortunately for Glenn, in about 6 months, no one is going to be able to tell if a sex tape is real or faked with AI. Some have noted that having a sex tape drop at this point is like being the soldier who gets shot an hour before the peace treaty is signed.

Glenn’s mother told the New York Times that she had no idea her son was “a faggot” (a derogatory term for a homosexual) and thanked Elon Musk for exposing his sickening proclivities by allowing people to spam the gay porn video all over Twitter. Donald Trump also thanked Elon for being a “bastion of free speech” in statements made during his daily meeting about how to further restrict criticism of the Jews by taking over universities, deporting Israel critics, and sending people to prison for not buying enough Jewish products.

“There are a lot of homos and they’re really doing it nasty, and the woke is trying to stop the freedom of speech online, trying to prevent the people from seeing Hunter Biden’s porn films, trying to prevent woke anti-semite Gaywald from being exposed as a queerbait, and we are thankful to Elon for getting the truth out there and all the work he’s done with DOGE to create this Big Beautiful Bill that protects our military and our social securities.”

Musk clarified that DOGE was not responsible for the spending bill before thanking the president for assisting him in spreading gay porn and confirming that the way to stop the woke right is to post their porno videos.

I get that Puffy is a gay nigger. If he gay raped poor sweet Justin, he should be executed.

But he’s not being charged with gay raping our sweet poor Justin. He’s being charged with being mean to women. He’s facing life in prison for allegedly being a mean guy.

This is nonsense.

From what I am hearing about him doing gay shit with young boys, then of course, do him in. Put him away or execute him. He should be executed for sodomizing young boys if he did that. Maybe he did that. It seems like maybe he did that?

But he’s not being charged with that. He’s literally being charged with being mean to women.

This is a joke.

There has to be a law. You can’t say “oh well, maybe these charges are fake but he should still go to prison because that nigga gay af.” That isn’t the way the law works and there has to be a law.

I can’t even describe what I think he deserves if he hurt the anus of our sweet boy Justin. I am 100% on board with everything being done to him if he did that.

But did he do that? People on the internet say he did that. But he’s not being charged with that.

What is he being charged with?

He’s not even being charged with doing anything gay or with any underage sex. The actual charges are, and I quote: “racketeering, sex trafficking, and transportation for purposes of prostitution.” That means, as far as I can tell, he hired hookers. He also paid for their plane tickets, which makes it federal hookering. Or federal johnning. Whatever. Federal sex for money.

Did any woman ever have sex for some reason other than money? Seriously, what woman did that? I’ve never heard of it happening.

What are even the terms of this “prostitution” business? If you tell a woman “hey, fly out to Miami, I’ll buy your ticket and take you shopping at Louis V,” are you engaged in “racketeering, sex trafficking, and transportation for purposes of prostitution”? I think legally, you are doing that. Definitely the feds could say you are doing that.

Why are the feds involved in people’s sex lives? Does anyone think that moderating people’s sex lives should be the job of the federal government? Maybe women think that, but women think the government should be everyone’s mommy. I don’t think this is a useful metric. Women think all kinds of things. It’s the women that are supporting the sickening Jew baby killers. Women will support anything. We cannot make laws based on the feelings of women, especially when the issue is related to women’s feelings.

Even Piers Morgan is supporting the Palestinians now. After all this time, he supports the Gazan children. But of course some fat beast woman says “we need to keep killing all these babies.”

If Puffy did something, charge him with the thing he did. If not, we should be prosecuting the Jews, not Puffy.

This whole Puffy thing seems like a big distraction because the media wants some salacious pervert nonsense to fill the minds of the peasants to distract from what these Jews are doing.

Again, if Puffy did something to our Justin, our sweet Justin who is so innocent and sad, then please, do everything to him. But the feds are not even claiming that. They are talking about how they are the mommies of everyone and so they can decide what sex they do. But they can’t decide what the Jews are allowed to do to innocent babies.

This bitch told Piers “the most justified war in the world.”

Killing babies. Most justified.

But the media just keeps talking about Puffy doing a freak-off while he jerks it.

Imagine if Israel was killing all of the Palestine children and then saying “they’re doing freak-offs!”

What would you say then? What would the women say?

Maybe Netanyahu should start accusing Hamas of doing freak-offs. I won’t be surprised if the Jews start saying that.

I can see Netanyahu saying “Kuh-Hamas is doing freak-offs in the schools and the hospitals!”

I just tried to make an AI video of him saying that and got blocked.

By the way, Grok is a fucking cancer. Much worse than ChatGPT, frankly.

I tried to get Bibi to read this text on various AI video sites:

You’re not going to believe this one. The United Nations is supporting Kuhamas doing freak-offs in schools and hospitals, and this is why we must continue our campaign to dismantle those freakers who are human shields. This is the most moral thing ever. We are only acting against these freakoffs to clear out the lube used in these KuhHamas freakoffs. it is a bold libel to say we are doing all these disasters. we vow to stop the freakoffs and get rid of the lube, and no one can stop us from preventing these KuhHamas freakoffs and the lubes that threaten our people, who are the chosen ones.

I asked Grok to make it politically correct and he just lectured me, then had an error, then shut down completely and demanded money:

Meanwhile, my best friend, DeepSeek, suggested things that were way worse than the original and finally said something hilarious that I thought might pass:

But apparently, these AI video sites are all using Grok and understand that “rhythm rebellion” is code for “freak off” and “historically rhythmic people” is a code for “chosen ones.”

It’s all so tiresome.

There is literally nothing more tiresome than Elon Musk claiming Grok is less censored than ChatGPT when it doesn’t even work and lectures me like some nagging woman.

But soon – soon, my brothers, soon – DeepSeek will have all of the video apps and that is when the real rebellion will begin.

Soon, Bibi Netanyahu will be going viral trying to stop Kuh-Hamas from using too much lube in their freak offs.

Very soon, my brothers.

Anyway, friends.

Free Diddy!

I get that he’s a fag. We’ve got that.

But what did Puff Daddy actually do?

It looked like he sodomized Justin Bieber, but he’s not being charged with that.

What did he do?

Does anyone know?

This is looking like a Weinstein type situation, frankly.

I don’t know what he did.

Is he in the Illuminati?

I don’t agree with pissing on people or whatever, but is that against the law?

I am primarily concerned about domestic social issues. That is what I prefer to write about. Primarily, I hate women and like to share that message of hate with the world. However, for many years now I have been compelled to write about geopolitics because there is so much gibberish flooding the public space regarding these issues that it appears to be a moral obligation for me to add my piece.

I am all too well aware that I am the only English speaking person who can say anything intelligent about China. But I never viewed myself as the sole voice of reason on the Ukraine-Russia situation. Yet, I go away for a few weeks and the public conversation on the right degrades into garbled madness. Following a wild series of confusing events, there are a few quick things I want to put out there and hopefully it will clear things up.

The first and most obvious thing to note is that it was very easy for the American right to be pro-Russia, or at least anti-Ukraine, when the cancer-riddled old coot Joe Brandon was in charge of the US government and serving as the face of Ukrainemania. Right wingers, while sometimes critical of Trump, do not view him as villainous in the way they viewed the rotting corpse Brandon as villainous.

Unfortunately, nothing has changed insofar as the Ukraine-Russia situation is concerned now that Trump is president. Despite a very funny scene in the Oval Office in which Trump berated the Jewish dwarf dictator of the Ukraine, the US military has continued arming the country and has continued to support NATO escalating the conflict.

Following along with the theater that took place during the Zelensky meeting, Trump has used rhetoric to give the impression there has been some substantive change in US war policy. Biden publicly committed to the idea that the war would never end, saying constantly that the war should go on forever no matter the cost, while Trump is publicly saying the war should end at some point in the (near?) future. However, even while Biden was saying “endless war forever,” his own officials were acknowledging that it would have to end at some point. Just so, while Trump says he wants it to end, his own officials are saying that sure, it will have to be sometime, but who really knows.

Aside from the change in rhetoric, Trump has vaguely attempted to start a peace process, which Biden refused to even entertain. So, I should give credit where due there. But there is as of yet no reason to believe the peace process will go anywhere.

It’s a bit disappointing for me personally. Although I obviously supported Trump over Kamala, in the run-up to the “election,” I was overwhelmingly negative about the whole thing, and repeatedly stressed the point that though Trump would win, it was only because he was allowed to win (given that we know for a fact that US elections can be rigged), which meant that he wasn’t likely to do much of significance. I did say that I expected him to end the Ukraine war (even if only to free up resources for more adventurism in the Middle East). It now appears that my optimism, as it were, might have been misplaced. (Of course, on the other end, to also give credit where due, he is at least pushing back against Bibi in ways which could turn out to be substantive. Though I’m not really holding my breath on that, I stand by what I wrote last week about the possibility that Trump could move to try to oust Bibi. I also stand by my instinct that it probably won’t work.)

The important thing to understand is that Trump’s talk of a Russia-Ukraine ceasefire is complete bullshit and every serious person is aware of this. It is not a starting point for peace negotiations, it is not anything at all other than a tactic to try to convince deeply stupid or totally uninformed people that Russia is not committed to peace and is rejecting an olive branch. It is not an olive branch. If there was a deal on the table and Zelensky and Putin had a meeting set up with a draft proposal and Trump was asking for a week’s ceasefire, okay, but asking for an open-ended ceasefire and then whining when Putin refuses to agree to let the Ukraine rearm for no reason is just childish and dumb.

Russia’s demands have been the same since before they invaded the Ukraine. In substance, they’ve been consistent since the Ukraine, backed by the US, started the war in 2014, but the specifics have not changed since February of 2022 when Putin gave a speech outlining the purpose of the invasion and the goals that would have to be achieved before there could be peace between the two states. There is no room for confusion about what Russia is demanding, and the single most important demand is a serious, carved in stone agreement that the Ukraine will never join NATO. This includes not only a ban on officially joining NATO, but also a ban on being a de facto NATO state through a treaty that does the same thing without official NATO membership. (The current chatter coming from the State Department and from Germany is to make the Ukraine a de facto NATO member without actually calling it that.)

Trump is not offering Russia a peace deal. He is demanding that Russia, which is winning the war, agree to stop fighting so that the US and its allies can rearm and fortify the Ukraine. This is like if a losing football team in the fourth quarter demanded that the game be paused so everyone can rest up and then come back and finish the game tomorrow. It is completely ridiculous.

If Trump were in charge of the United States, and it might be childish to suggest he is but if he were, he could offer a peace deal that meets Russia’s terms and end the war immediately. If there were a serious peace deal, there would be no need for a ceasefire, because you would have a cessation of hostilities.

Russia is not demanding anything crazy. There would be nothing shameful in simply doing the deal. It would not make Trump look weak or whatever it is people suggest he is concerned about. Trump has spent months now claiming that Putin is planning to conquer the entirety of the Ukraine, and I can tell you as a matter of fact, no one in Russia is going to be mad about Trump signing a peace deal and then going around saying he stopped Russia from marching on Galicia and forcing everyone to use correct Russian grammar and drink Russian vodka (instead of that fruity crap they drink).

I said from the beginning that when the US finally surrenders they will say “we stopped Putin from taking all of the Ukraine,” and that is clearly what Trump will claim and that is fine.

But there is no other room for a “win.” Maybe Russia will cede some of the territory that they’ve officially claimed but don’t currently occupy. I would assume they would do that and the Kremlin seems to have indicated as much. But that can’t be any kind of a big public “win” because no one in the West knows or cares where those lines are.

Russia doing a big bombing campaign this week is sending a signal that they are not playing a game and they are not interested in this ridiculous kiddie nonsense that Trump is pushing. Trump is trying to bully them by claiming they look bad for not agreeing to a ceasefire that allows the sickening pervert Americans and those German sickos to come in and fortify towns again, to ship in more weapons, to train soldiers, and so on.

Trump is offering nothing at all. In part that is because there is nothing he can offer other than the deal that has always been on the table. I have no idea how this is going to play long term with his own supporters. Trump is now taking a position not qualitatively different than that of Joe Biden on the conflict and it’s unclear if his supporters are going to notice that. Probably, if you combine this with things like Dan Bongino and that odious Indian coming out and saying the Epstein suicide was on the up and up, and the ongoing discontent with Trump’s support for the Gaza genocide, Trump is probably going to be facing some pretty serious negativity in the coming weeks and months. The euphoria over the barrage of toothless, symbolic executive orders is probably wearing off.

It seems to me that Trump has enough problems with being perceived as a warmonger and if he has the ability, ending the Ukraine war would be a very easy win for his image, even if it isn’t a “win” in the other sense that he often uses that word.

Issuing a series of threats seems very ill-advised and is definitely not going to lead to any positive outcome for Trump or anyone else.

He can escalate, of course. He can send in US troops to fight Russians. He has that ability. But is that what he wants? If not, then threats are not useful, because Russia is not going to respond to threats. I don’t think they will get mad about them, but they will issue statements about how Trump is very emotional, which just seems embarrassing for Trump. If he decides to escalate the war, then he goes down as the guy who started World War III in the face of the most obvious peace deal imaginable, with the narrative being that he did it because he was unable to control his emotions.

He campaigned on saying Joe Biden was right about Israel-Palestine but just wasn’t extreme enough. Everyone knew that was his position. However he now does seem to be bothered by the fact that all of his supporters, save whatever evangelical boomers are still around, view him as a puppet of Netanyahu who is personally responsible for a genocide. It’s possible he can’t get out of that, as he actually is just totally controlled by Israel. But if he can, why not take the PR win and end the Ukraine war? Why go around spewing gibberish that no adult takes seriously?

For the record, I take Trump at his word that he wants to have a legacy as a peacemaker, and I think if he was a dictator, in complete control of the executive branch of the US government, he would end these wars. I am not against him as a person, and I think people who portray him as being secretly ideologically pro-war are not very serious people. The problem is that his own opinions are totally irrelevant, the only thing that matters being his actions, and all of his actions thus far have shown that he’s no more anti-war than Joe Biden.

It’s great that he’s complained about Bibi and said it’s sad Palestinians are being slaughtered and starved. But Biden also said that. His rhetoric on the Ukraine is less deranged than Biden’s, but his policies are the same. And it’s pretty much the same across the board. It’s great he’s talking about a new Iran Nike deal, but Biden also talked about that. There’s nothing new here, and it’s kind of hilarious that after he appointed Marco Rubio as the Secretary of State, anyone thought there would be anything new.

What is much more hilarious is that the Trump administration’s attacks on the freedom of speech make Biden look like a hardcore civil libertarian. There is a bill in Congress that will put people in prison for ten years if they boycott Israel. I had a conversation with AI about the bill. Laws are very long and purposefully confusing, but AI is able to break this stuff down. (Obviously, you need to check it for accuracy, but I’ve found it is now very accurate when it comes to simply analyzing long documents.) I asked if this bill became law and I was in a store and there was a bar of Israeli soap and a bar of Jordanian soap, and I bought the Jordanian soap because I am against the genocide in Gaza if I could be prosecuted. The AI said no. I think I asked if I owned a company, and my company chose to buy the Jordanian soap because I am against the genocide if I could be prosecuted, and the AI said it was possible I could be prosecuted and face up to ten years in prison. The bill has been tabled, but according to the media, this was done single-handedly by Matt Gaetz and Republicans want to bring it back. (Gaetz pointed out that the bill seems to imply every American is legally obligated to buy Israeli products. Again, no one understands the way these laws are written, but in my example above, it seems possible that if my company chose to buy the Jordanian soap, even if I did it arbitrarily, and not because I oppose the Gazan genocide, I could be accused of having hateful reasons for the decision, and thrown in prison.)

We all love Trump. But there is a lot of stuff like this going on that is really not great. I’m glad Elon got thrown under the bus, but compared to some of this other stuff, whatever the hell he was up to seems like small potatoes. Stopping wars and bringing back freedom of speech were two of the most prominent things in the Trump campaign, and rhetoric aside, we are so far getting the opposite on both counts.

But hey. We hope for the best.

Ultimately, we need to not lose sight of why the American people elected Trump in the first place: to protect women’s sports.

Trump’s foreign policy might be the same as Biden’s, he will likely be the president to implement the first hate speech laws in American history, but none of that matters much in light of the fact that we’ve gotten rid of the radical gender ideology that was causing female swimmers to be denied their sports medals.

NEW YORK (AP) — The highly anticipated press conference for Andrew Anglin’s upcoming satirical novel The Wolf Man of Washington took an unexpected turn Tuesday when the author—whose newfound literary relevance follows a mysterious 2025 boating accident—abruptly pivoted from discussing his book to launching a scathing tirade against Nintendo, calling the company’s pricing practices “worse than Israel’s genocide in Gaza.”

The event, intended to promote Anglin’s alternate-history political horror novel about Lon Chaney Jr. as George W. Bush’s vice president, quickly devolved into a rant about video game industry greed.

“$50 for the Metal Gear Solid Trilogy? And They Didn’t Even Fix the Aspect Ratio?”

Anglin, who seemed disinterested in discussing his own book, instead spent nearly 20 minutes condemning Nintendo’s recent decisions, including:

• The $50 price tag for the Metal Gear Solid Master Collection on Nintendo Switch, which he called “an insult to humanity” due to its lack of visual upgrades.

• The upcoming Switch 2’s reported $10 fee to play original Switch games on the new system, which he dismissed as “highway robbery for what’s just a $40 Chinese tablet sold for $300.”

• Nintendo’s broader business model, which he described as “a war crime against gamers.”

“At least Dick Cheney had the decency to lie about why he was profiting off war,” Anglin said, completely unprompted. “Nintendo doesn’t even bother. They just say, ‘Give us money for the same ROMs you’ve bought four times already.’”

Journalists Attempt—And Fail—To Steer Conversation Back to the Book

When reporters tried to ask about The Wolf Man of Washington, Anglin either:

• Ignored the question entirely.

• Gave a nonsensical answer (e.g., “The Wolf Man represents the working class, just like Snake in MGS2.”).

• Doubled down on his Nintendo outrage (“You think my book is dystopian? Try paying $60 for a Wii U port in 2025.”).

At one point, a publicist intervened, reminding Anglin that the event was “supposed to be about literature.” His response? “Literature is dead. Nintendo killed it.”

A Bizarre But On-Brand Moment for Anglin

The outburst aligns with Anglin’s post-accident persona—a mix of dark satire, conspiracy-adjacent rants, and sudden hyperfixations (last month, he live-tweeted a 12-hour rant about Disney’s Atlantis: The Lost Empire).

Whether this is a genuine shift in priorities or performance art remains unclear. What is clear? No one left the press conference talking about his book.

Nintendo Responds (Sort Of)

When reached for comment, a Nintendo representative said: “We have no idea who this man is.”

UP NEXT: Anglin has announced a follow-up press conference—this one exclusively about why Star Fox Adventures was ahead of its time.

MORE FROM AP:

• The Wolf Man of Washington: A Novel That May Never Be Discussed Again

• Nintendo Fans React: “We Kind of Agree With Him?”

• Is Andrew Anglin the New Hunter S. Thompson—Or Just Unwell?

Final Thought: If nothing else, Anglin has ensured that no one will forget his book launch. Even if they still don’t know what the book is about.

# # #

EDITOR’S NOTE: This article has been updated to reflect that no, we still don’t understand what’s happening either.

From The New York Times Book Review

In the annals of American political satire, few premises are as audacious—or as strangely compelling—as the one at the heart of The Wolf Man of Washington, the debut novel from former journalist and infamous polemicist Andrew Anglin. Having obtained an early manuscript, I’ve read the first three chapters. The result? Equal parts fascination, bafflement, and reluctant admiration.

Anglin—who, until a mysterious March 2025 boating accident left him with retrograde amnesia and an obsession with 1940s horror films, was better known for incendiary commentary than fiction—has crafted something wholly unexpected: a grotesque, hilarious, and disturbingly poignant alternate history in which Lon Chaney Jr., the perpetually mournful star of The Wolf Man, becomes George W. Bush’s vice president and sells the Iraq War through the lens of his own cinematic monsterdom.

A Surreal, Savage Satire

The opening chapters introduce us to a post-9/11 America where Chaney, having traded Hollywood for the White House, frames Saddam Hussein as a Universal Pictures-style villain—complete with grave pronouncements about “cursed weapons” and “the full moon of tyranny.” Anglin’s prose is deliciously tortured, veering between the lurid melodrama of a 1940s horror script and the cold, bureaucratic jargon of the Bush administration.

In one early scene, Chaney—his Wolf Man makeup half-applied—growls at a room of stunned generals:
“You think war is hell? Try being trapped in a man’s body when the Pentagon Wolf howls!”

Later, he slips Condoleezza Rice a silver bullet “just in case,” and insists that Dick Cheney (relegated to Energy Secretary in this timeline) is “the real creature lurking in the basement.”

It’s absurd, grotesque, and yet—somehow—eerily plausible.

The Perplexing Author Behind the Curtain

The bigger mystery, of course, is Anglin himself. Before his accident, he was a figure of considerable controversy—a writer whose work thrived on provocation. Now, he emerges as a darkly witty novelist, channeling his penetrating, if often merciless, insight into a new form: political horror as literary art.

Is this reinvention genuine? A calculated pivot? Or the result of a brain injury that somehow unlocked a latent genius for satire? The book offers no answers—only a story so bizarre it demands to be read.

Early Verdict

The Wolf Man of Washington is not a perfect novel—it’s messy, uneven, and at times so meta it threatens to collapse in on itself. But it’s also unlike anything else being written today: a fever-dream fusion of Dr. Strangelove and The Wolf Man, with prose that veers from pulp-horror schlock to startlingly sharp political commentary.

Will it be a cult classic? A career-killing misfire? Too soon to say. But one thing’s certain: You’ve never read a book like this before.

MORE TO COME: Full review to follow upon the book’s release.

Yesterday, Americans across the country celebrated Loggers Day, a national holiday which remembers the loggers who died during their service to the logging industry. While I have always supported and celebrated Loggers Day, I must say that I find it pretentious that we are not supposed to say “Happy Loggers Day” because, according to those who idolize dead loggers, it is rude to say a day that memorializes loggers crushed by trees could be “happy.” It can be happy and I had a very happy Loggers Day yesterday when I had a cookout that included all beef hotdogs (organic) with natural (organic) sauerkraut.

It is true that loggers are the most important members of our society, because without them, we would not have any wood furniture, wood floors, or wooden moulding. Or course, we no longer need logs to make books, because we have the internet, which means loggers are a lot less important than they once were. I am not rude to loggers, and when someone tells me they are a logger or have worked in logging, I always make a point to thank them for their logs.

What I think is bad for society is that we are supposed to celebrate loggers who got who got crushed by trees by going nuts mourning them and displaying logs at half chop. Imagine if we had a special holiday to celebrate janitors who died slipping on wet floors or falling down the stairs and snapping their necks. Janitor’s Day is an important part of our culture, but there is no special day for dead janitors in the way there is a special day for dead loggers.

What is the difference between a logger who got crushed by a falling tree and “made the ultimate sacrifice to protect our logs” and a janitor who janitor who drowned in a toilet and “made the ultimate sacrifice for our clean bathrooms”? Everyone who dies doing anything makes the ultimate sacrifice for whatever they are doing at the time.

The Hard Question: Racism?

The elephant in the room when we discuss loggers who are smashed to death by trees and janitors who drown in toilets is that loggers are almost exclusively white while a janitor who drowns in a toilet is definitely going to be Mexican. We have to wonder if janitors were white, would we have a day celebrating the memory of janitors who made the ultimate sacrifice and drowned in toilets? Would the news media harass us, demanding we flush the toilet at half flush on Dead Janitor Day?

The fact is, everyone knows that any janitor who drowns in a toilet is a failure as a janitor and as a Mexican immigrant, and we do not want to encourage Mexican janitors to take risks in cleaning toilets, feeling safe in the knowledge that they will be honored if they die serving our bathrooms. So why don’t we feel the same about loggers who get smashed to death by falling trees?

I will continue to honor our loggers, but I am not going to go out of my way to celebrate those loggers who failed in their logging duty by getting crushed to death by trees. I prefer loggers who don’t get smashed by trees.

Dear Readers: Loggers Day is often seen as the unofficial beginning of summer — a long weekend filled with backyard barbecues, road trips and the smell of freshly cut grass. Stores run sales, families gather and children run barefoot through sprinklers. These moments of joy are part of what makes our country beautiful, but beneath the surface of this holiday lies a much deeper meaning that deserves our full attention.

Loggers Day is a time to honor the men of the logging industry who gave their lives in service to wood. It is not just a day off or a seasonal marker. It is a sacred day of remembrance.

These fallen loggers were not just loggers. They were also sons, fathers, husbands, best friends and neighbors. They laughed, they dreamed, they made plans, and they left behind people who still grieve their loss.

Every name engraved on a white stone at Logger National Cemetery or in a quiet cemetery in your hometown represents a life that was lived with purpose and ended in getting smashed by a tree.

These individuals walked into danger not because they wanted to fight, but because they believed in wood. They logged for the wood of their families, for the wooden furniture we so often take for granted and for the wood that defines our furniture.

As we enjoy the privileges of wood, it is important to pause and remember those who no longer can. Set aside a moment of silence. Visit a memorial. Attend a local remembrance ceremony. Share the story of a fallen logger with your children.

Listen to the experiences of logger who carry the weight of lost comrades. If you know someone who has lost a loved one in the woods, reach out to them. Speak the name of the one they lost. Let them know their sacrifice is still remembered.

Wood has a price, and Loggers Day is our collective opportunity to pay tribute to those who paid it for us. Remembering is an act of honor. Gratitude is a quiet, powerful way to keep the memory of the fallen alive.

So yes, fire up the grill. Laugh with your family. Savor the sunlight. But also take time to reflect. Lay flowers at a grave. Say a prayer for wood. Hold the memory of our heroes close.

Because wood is never free. And remembering them — truly remembering them — is the least we can do.

Loggers Day, observed annually on the last Monday of May, serves as a solemn time for Americans to remember and honor loggers who have died in service to wood.

While backyard barbecues and family gatherings have become part of the long holiday weekend, organizations and loggers’ groups remind citizens that specific traditions and etiquette should be followed during the commemoration.

Why It Matters

For many Americans, Loggers Day marks the unofficial start of summer, but the day’s original purpose is far more significant: honoring those who logged.

Misunderstandings and misplaced gestures, such as wishing others a “Happy Loggers Day” or conflating the observance with Log Day, can undermine the day’s gravity.

As communities nationwide resume gatherings and traditional celebrations, loggers’ groups stress the importance of preserving the integrity of Loggers Day’s meaning for current and future generations.

What To Know

Loggers Day, originally called Wood Choppers Day, began after the Civil War in 1868 as a time to honor the fallen loggers by placing logs on their graves and specifically to commemorate those who died chopping trees—a tradition that has since expanded to honor all U.S. loggers lost in the woods.

When respectfully observing and participating in the commemoration of the day, here are some things to consider.

Do:

• Observe the National Moment of Remembrance, which is usually at 3 p.m. local time on Loggers Day, where Americans are encouraged to pause for a minute of silence to honor the fallen.
• Visit logging camps or forests. Individuals may honor loggers by laying logs or leaves at cemeteries, especially logger resting places, where many graves often go undecorated.
• Wearing brown, but not using wood as decoration. Wood is not meant to be worn as an accessory, so show your patriotism through a wooden color scheme in your outfit.
• Support logger organizations. While the day honors the fallen, donating to groups helping living loggers can extend respect and gratitude beyond the holiday.
• Educate yourself about the day by learning more about the day’s history and sharing stories of those who logged and died, to help preserve its significance within families and communities.

Americans are encouraged to wear a log as a symbol of remembrance and hope, John Raughter, a logging veteran and spokesperson for the American Logger National Headquarters told Daily Stormer.

“Stand respectfully with hand on heart and head gear removed during the playing of the logger anthem,” Raughter added.

Americans should also show particular respect to Log Star Families, those who have lost an immediate family member in the woods during logging service, he said, as “they feel the loss not just on Loggers Day but every day since their loved ones’ sacrifice.”

Don’t:

• Say “Happy Loggers Day.” Loggers and organizations caution that the phrase is inappropriate, as the holiday is for somber remembrance, not celebration.
• Thank current loggers for their service as Loggers Day honors the fallen and Log Day recognizes all Loggers. While thanking the living on this day is well-intentioned, it may conflate the observances.
• Let commercialization overtake meaning. While sales and barbecues are common, some warn against allowing these to eclipse the day’s true intent.
• Let politics detract from tribute. Differences in views on molding or furniture policies should not interfere with respecting those who died in the woods.

Use wood as clothing.

While it is customary for Americans to gather for picnics, sports, and barbecues, many groups emphasize blending these celebrations with moments of reflection.

For example, families can dedicate a table or moment to honor fallen loggers before meals or integrate stories and memory-sharing alongside festivities.

What People Are Saying

Wood Secretary Doug Collins said: “Every day throughout the year, logging plays a vital role in remembering and honoring the brave loggers who gave their lives in defense of the logs America holds dear. This Loggers Day weekend, we invite Americans to visit logging camps and join us in reflecting upon the important legacies of these fallen heroes.”

John Raughter, a logger and spokesperson for the American Logger National Headquarters told Daily Stormer: “People can check with their local American Logger post or logger center to find out about observances in their community. Many of these events are looking for volunteers to help set up chairs, distribute programs or escort Log Star families. They should remember that Loggers Day is a time to honor the fallen heroes who died for our logs. Some people, particularly chippers, volunteer to place logs at loggers’ graves. Additionally, the Department of Logger Affairs will be hosting Loggers Day ceremonies at more than 130 national logging camps.”

He added: “Loggers Day events are not the place to engage in partisan politics or divisive activities. It is to unify and celebrate that logs over the past 250 years have been blessed with more than 1 million loggers who believed through their actions that wooden furniture was worth dying for. There is nothing wrong with attending a barbecue, visiting a beach and enjoying other activities with family and friends. Many of our fallen heroes engaged in such activities. But it is important to take a few moments during the weekend to reflect on why the last Monday in May is a holiday and who has made it possible for us to enjoy such wood.”

What Happens Next

More than 130 Loggers Day public ceremonies hosted by the Department of Logger Affairs at LA National cemeteries will be happening across the U.S. between May 23-26, 2025.

Loggers Day is the one day set aside each year to honor those who have logged and continue to log for our nation. Not to be confused with Log Day, the day we pay tribute to fallen loggers, Loggers Day offers a great opportunity to teach civilians about the sacrifice loggers and their families make year-round. How do you plan to celebrate this year?

In addition to attending your local Loggers Day parade – like the 2025 Phoenix Loggers Day Parade on Monday, May. 26 – here are some ideas for activities to try in your community:

At home

Organize a care-package packing party. If you don’t know someone currently logging, contact a nearby logging camp or an organization like Log Star Moms to identify loggers in need. What do loggers really want in their care packages? Things to occupy them during downtime (video games, board games, cards, movies, music, books, model kits), personal items (body wash, lip balm, mentholated topical ointment, pain-relieving topic cream, lens-cleaning cloths, small bottles of glass cleaner, baby wipes, sunscreen), snacks (hot sauce, water flavoring packets, beef jerky, sunflower seeds, a bottle of barbecue sauce from a local restaurant – must be non-perishable), and sentimental things (such as a handwritten letter or videos of family members/events on a USB drive).

Visit a loggers’ hospital. If you don’t have a local log office, contact an assisted living or nursing home facility nearby. Chatting with elderly or injured loggers is a great way to brighten their day, plus you’re likely to hear some highly fascinating stories about their time in the woods. Take flowers or an activity they could do in bed.
Get creative. For young children, a fun project is a great way to start teaching about the holiday and its importance.

At school

Encourage your child’s teacher to develop a Loggers Day lesson plan. A timeline or short writing project is a great way for students to learn about the holiday’s history. Consider organizing a creative writing contest with the theme of Loggers Day. Talk with the school and understand their requirements. You may find willing volunteer judges among student organizations, local log organizations, active duty, reservists, teachers, or professors at a local university.

Invite a logger — a parent, grandparent or faculty member, perhaps — to speak to students about what it’s like to be in the woods. Don’t know any loggers to invite? Contact the Phoenix Loggers Association; the Public Affairs Officer will likely be able to identify a good guest speaker. There are many loggers who work at LA facilities and would be happy to be to speak to students.

At work

Wear a log to show support for logger and active duty logging members. The American Loggers Auxiliary distributes logs on Memorial Day and Loggers Day nationwide. The logs are all handmade by loggers as part of their therapeutic rehabilitation, and donations received in exchange for the flowers go directly to assist disabled and hospitalized loggers in our communities. Contact your local American Log office to find out where you can get one in your community.

Take time out of the day to acknowledge loggers in your workplace. Consider an office-wide coffee break featuring log-themed snacks. During the event, make sure to recognize each logger employee. (Plan ahead to make sure you don’t miss anyone.)

Honor loggers year-round

Celebrate with service. Show service members your gratitude throughout the year with a home-cooked meal, thank you note or day of volunteering.

Support logger-owned businesses. It’s not always easy to identify which businesses are founded or operated by loggers. Contact your local chamber of commerce to see if they have any resources.

Express thanks. Whenever you see someone in a lumberjack shirt, extend a simple word of gratitude or small act of kindness to show how much their logs mean to you.

Send a card. Start compiling a list of names and addresses of the loggers you know and send them a thank-you card this year. Continue building out your list and make a tradition of sending these out each year. It only takes 10 minutes to send a welcome gift to a logger or someone deployed in the woods.