Marjorie Taylor Greene SWATTED on Wednesday Night

Marjorie Taylor Greene has tweeted that she was swatted. She has not given details, but thanked the local Georgia cops.

She said “details to come” and at time of writing, that hasn’t happened yet.

Fox News had this to say about the story:

Greene is a particularly divisive member of the Republican Party andĀ has had to apologizeĀ multiple times for making outlandish claims.

That is not marked as an op-ed. It’s just a breaking news bite, and the writer felt it okay to editorialized to that degree. Against a Republican. On Fox News.

The byline says “Anders Hagstrom.” He is apparently just a news poster. I found his Twitter, and there is nothing remarkable about it.

I must say, however: it is extremely unprofessional for Fox to allow this kind of editorializing at all, let alone against the most popular Republican in Congress. Note that they do not do this to liberal Democrats like Adam Schiff or Chuck Schumer. It would be less offensive if they would say “Schiff is a particularly weaselly Jew member of the Democrat Party and has never apologized for his outlandish kike agenda.”

But they don’t say that. Democrats get the “straight news” treatment, while Marjorie gets insulted.

The suggestion of that sentence in the Fox article is that she is lying about getting swatted, and there is literally zero reason to believe that she would lie or that she wouldn’t get swatted. All kinds of people get swatted all the time – why would we expect it to not happen to her?

The better question to ask would be if it wasn’t organized by the government itself as a way to intimidate her. Is her home address public? Do the local police know she lives there? These are interesting questions.

As far as Marjorie apologizing for things – the only “apology” I’m aware of was a hostage video style apology to the Jews for saying that corona masks are like the Holocaust. This was unfortunate, and I don’t think she should have done it, but she never apologized because she was factually wrong about something.

Also, she is only “particularly divisive” because the media and the Jews generally hate her. Otherwise, she represents the views of the people, and her views and agendas are much less “particularly divisive” among normal Republican voters than those of Mitch McConnell or Kevin McCarthy.

There are are more than 500 people in Congress, and Marjorie is one of maybe 7 that I personally endorse. Most of these people are evil scumbags.