Massive lies were told about the events of October 7, 2023, and what Hamas allegedly did to the Jews, and this has led me to wonder how it is possible that people can continue to believe the lies that were told about what the Germans did to the Jews during World War II.

Let’s go through some of the big lies that Jews in the Israeli and US governments, as well as the US media, told about October 7th.

1) “40 Beheaded Babies”

Claim

On the day of the event, reports that appear to have originated from i24 News, as well as direct statements from Bibi Netanyahu’s office, claimed that Hamas “terrorists” beheaded 40 babies. (Note: Hamas does not actually fit the definition of terrorists, as there is such a thing as a legitimate resistance group that uses violence, and simply being Islamic doesn’t mean your group is “terrorist.”)

The claim was repeated not just by tabloids, but the likes of Fox News and CNN.

Debunking

In this case, the Israeli government itself later admitted that there was no evidence of 40 beheaded babies. The White House also walked back Joe Biden’s use of the claim.

There was no evidence, despite the fact that the site of the Hamas attack was filmed as much as any place ever, so there was no need for an official debunking. After reporters kept asking about evidence, the US and Israeli governments just admitted it was fake.

2) Mass Rape and Sexual Violence

Claim

The entire Israeli government organized to claim that during the October 7th raid, Hamas engaged in “systematic rape” and “sexual mutilation.”

This rape claim always seemed ridiculous on its face, as while Hamas was across the border for up to 6-7 hours, the actual operation was between 3-5 hours long. These people were in gun fights with the IDF, they were dodging airstrikes, they were taking hostages, all while navigating unfamiliar terrain (and often getting lost, as is seen in Hamas’ own videos and was admitted during interrogations). “Okay boys, let’s take a quick break for rape” always sounded very silly.

Furthermore, as the Jews and their media constantly repeat, Hamas is a strict Islamic group, and based on that, any soldier caught engaging in rape during a military operation would be executed on the spot. If they were doing “systematic rape,” they are not an Islamic group at all, but an irreligious bandit gang, and that is not a claim anyone is making. The media obviously relied on the lack of information the public has about Islamic law, knowing they would not be aware that rape during war is totally banned.

The Koran bans all rape, including of slave girls. Here are specific Hadith that mention sexual violence during war:

• Hadith (Sunan Abu Dawud 2158): “The Messenger of Allah (ﷺ) prohibited taking women as captives solely for the purpose of sexual relations.”
• Hadith (Sahih Muslim 3371): “Do not kill women, children, or the elderly, and do not commit treachery or rape.”

There is no serious Islamic group that allows rape during war. Even ISIS banned this. You’ll remember that all of the talk about sexual abuse by ISIS was around forced marriage (which is allowed in certain contexts in certain forms of Islam). And Hamas is a much more serious Islamic group than ISIS, which is a CIA- and Israel-backed terror group.

Debunking

An official UN investigation (UN Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights), which was (quite ridiculously) not released until March 2024 even though it could have been completed and released in a couple weeks, found no evidence of “widespread rape.”

Further, forensic experts from various international rights groups found nothing, while independent investigators from The Grayzone and Mondoweiss (both primarily Jewish outlets) found no evidence supporting the rape claims.

Finally, specific claims were later proven false. The Israeli government had claimed there existed a “Hamas rape manual” which was proved to be totally made up out of nothing.

3) Hamas Burned Families Alive, Purposefully Murdered Civilians

Claim

The entire media was claiming that Hamas “burned families alive” by setting their houses on fire. There was no evidence ever presented.

Debunking

An investigation by Israel publications +972 Magazine and Local Call found that most (not all, but most) civilian deaths in homes were due to Israeli helicopter fire.

Israeli helicopters (actually US helicopters supplied to Israel) also gunned down hostages on Hamas motorcycles, the investigation found.

The IDF later admitted to using the “Hannibal Directive,” which involves using heavy fire to prevent hostages from being taken, and allows for the death of Israelis. The preference, in the doctrine, is that a civilian die rather than be taken hostage.

4) Hamas “Targeted” a Music Festival

Claim

It was claimed that the Nova music festival was a specific target of Hamas and that they started mass executing people there.

Debunking

It was later shown that the music festival was coincidentally going on when Hamas attacked. Investigations by Jewish outlets (Yedioth Ahronoth, Haaretz) showed that many of the festival goers who died were not killed by Hamas (at least not on purpose in “executions”), but rather in crossfire in the fighting with the IDF, as well as by Israeli helicopter strikes.

5) Hamas Used Human Shields While Fighting from Civilian Homes

Claim

The Jewish state claimed Hamas fighters were hiding in the Kibbutzim and shooting from behind families, from inside of family homes.

Debunking

Testimonies from survivors published by The Electronic Intifada and Middle East Eye among others showed that the Hamas fighters were directly engaging in shootouts with the IDF, not hiding in civilian homes.

6) The Attack was Part of a Planned Genocide

Claim

Almost unbelievably, the Jews claimed that this small operation on October 7th was a plan to genocide all of the Jews, and that the goal of the attack was random killing.

Debunking

Leaked Israeli intelligence from +972 showed that the Israelis understood that Hamas expected a prisoner swap and had no goal of mass killing civilians.

Before October 7th, Israel was holding over 5,000 Palestinian hostages (since October 7th, that number has more than doubled), so it is pretty rational that Hamas would want to take their own hostages as a way to get back their own people through swaps, and this is in fact what Israeli intelligence said the purpose of the operation was.

When Did Jews Start Lying Like This Then?

Jews lie compulsively in order to make themselves out to be victims. Certainly, there were Jewish innocent victims on October 7th, as there are always victims in war, but the fact is, most of the innocents were killed by the Jews themselves, and the Hamas operation was a legitimate military operation.

It is shocking to me personally that the same people who will say the Jews lied about really everything they could possibly lie about with relation to October 7th are not willing to question the stories Jews tell about what supposedly happened to them during World War II.

My hope is that there is simply a delay on this, and at some point in the future, people will ask: “well, what else have the Jews been lying about?”

There has been, since the October 7 event and the subsequent genocide Israel began committing in Gaza, some interest in understanding the foundation of Israel. For example, the story of the Palestinian model Gigi Hadid’s family has come up a lot. Her father was a child at the time of the establishment of the state of Israel, when, following the war, Jews went to Palestine to claim refugee status. His family invited a family of Jew refugees from Europe into their home, and one day they returned home to find that the locks had been changed and the Jews who they had welcomed into their home yelled out the window that if they didn’t leave the premises, men would come and kill them. So they moved to a refugee camp in Syria.

Here’s a short video of Mohamed Hadid telling this story:

What happened to Hadid’s family happened to millions of Palestinians. It’s called the “Nakba,” and it is the story of the foundation of Israel, and it is great that more and more people are finding out that Israelis didn’t all of a sudden become genocidal barbarians after October 7th, but that in fact, the entire existence of their state is based on genocide and evil.

If we get back to the point where we are talking about the foundations of Israel, then it is just one step back to what happened to the Jews in Europe during World War II. We can learn why the Germans wanted to put them in camps, and what happened in those camps. I am not going to go through the whole “Holohoax” story here today, but a lot of Jews did die during the war, because it is a war that killed 70 million people. Jews died in the camps too, because the Allies bombed the supply lines to the camps which were in rural Poland, which led to disease and starvation. The Red Cross at the time estimated that 280,000 people died in these camps. Not six million. And none of them died in gas chambers or by any of the other Looney Tunes type methods Jews claim the Germans used against them.

Conclusion

It is my sincere hope that as the Jews come under more scrutiny for these lies they’ve told, as we unravel the history of the state of Israel, a state founded on ethnic cleansing, terrorism, banditry, and mass murder, we will continue to go back through the history of the Jews, and specifically to unravel this “Holocaust” myth, which currently serves as the foundation for the entirety of Western secular ideology, which has itself become the framework of what now passes as “Western civilization” itself.

Since I began writing on these issues nearly 15 years ago, I have argued that in order for the liberal order to fall, and for a righteous, Christian society to be restored in the West, the truth about the Jews and their lies must be confronted. The “Holocaust” is the biggest and most powerful lie of all, and if this falls apart, and I truly believe we are witnessing the beginnings of its collapse, everything will change.

Ultimately, the truth will out. In a thousand years, people are not going to be believing in “Nazi gas chambers,” I can promise you that. The real question is how many people have to die, how much human suffering has to take place, before this lie is exposed.

Once again, I am here for a 3,500-word satire about handjobs that would make Jonathan Swift do the Wayne’s World “we are not worthy” bit for me.

No, no.

I won’t do that again today.

Though that piece will be included in Lit 101 readers long after I’m dead. And that is just a fact. Sorry to the haters. But that is just life and you’re going to have to deal with it.

But today, in real life, I want to offer something about Zohran’s supposedly stunning victory in the New York democratic mayoral primary. Firstly, people should know I won money on that. I should have written about this before and said “I’m betting money on this just you watch.”

But here’s the thing. Everyone is talking about how this proves that the Democrat base is really into communism and they want to unleash the blacks and the immigrants like an army of orcs to rob and kill everyone. And they want Venezuela-style communist grocery stores. And they haven’t figured out rent control is a gigantic Jewish scam.

The polls of the views of New Yorkers showed that they don’t want no cash bail and unlimited immigrants or any of the things Zohran is promoting as domestic policy.

Newsweek, June 21, 2021:

A new poll shows seven in 10 Democratic voters in New York City favor an increased police presence throughout the city. The same survey also found 77 percent of Black Democrats said they favor more cops in the subways.

New York Post, March 28, 2022:

An overwhelming majority of New Yorkers say the no-cash bail law has contributed to the spike in crime and should be overhauled, according to a study released Monday.

A total of 56 percent of voters in the Empire State believe the 2019 bail reform has been bad for New York compared to 30 percent who said it was good policy, the Siena College survey found.

Nearly two-thirds of voters — 64 percent — think the law has resulted in an increase in crime, compared to 24 percent who said it hasn’t.

Newsweek, May 20, 2024:

On Friday, the poll, conducted exclusively for Newsweek by Redfield & Wilton Strategies of 974 eligible voters in New York City, asked an array of questions about issues facing the city and the nation overall, including how they feel about the current crime rate and if they feel the influx of migrants is having an impact.

According to the poll, over 70 percent blamed migrants in the city for the current crime rate, with 41 percent saying immigration is having a “significant” impact and 31 percent saying a “fair amount” of impact. The poll found that 18 percent said immigration is having a “small” impact and 10 percent said it is having no impact at all.

And it goes on and on. I don’t think there are any polls on Venezuela-style government grocery stores, because no one was really thinking about that. But none of Zohran’s domestic policies are popular in New York among anything close to a majority. These are all fringe policies.

What is not a fringe policy are Zohran’s views on Palestine and Israel. These policies are overwhelmingly popular on the left and are increasingly popular on the right. In March of this year (obviously, before Israel started a war with Iran and dragged the US into it), in the nation as a whole, 55% disapproved of Israel’s actions in Gaza, while only 36% approved. Democrats are only slightly more supportive of Palestine, with a 59% approval of Palestine.

That was what won Zohran the primary. Period. It is not this commie lunacy. Very few people want that.

(Part of it is also that he’s young, relatively handsome, well-spoken, but mostly it is the Israel thing.)

It’s possible that Zohran will still lose the election, because of this communist stuff, particularly the crime and the immigrants. I’m not betting on it. If Cuomo runs as an independent, I think it’s more likely than not he will win, because people do not want this crime and chaos.

But all of the people who are saying that this is about how people support communism are full of shit. If Cuomo would have been out there supporting Palestine, he would have won by a landslide.

But he wasn’t.

He was being constantly endorsed by the ADL.

Look at the donor list.

In this primary, New York voters put their support for Palestine and their animosity towards Jews above their own personal safety.

Let this be a lesson for Matt Gaetz.

Editor’s Note (update): The above sort of reads like the ADL endorsed him for mayor this time around, and I have not found that they actually officially did that. What I meant by the phrase “constantly endorsed by the ADL” is that throughout his 40+ year political career, he’s been a darling of the ADL, and has constantly been praised by them. I think that given the dynamics of this election, ADL head Jonathan Greenblatt was smart enough to know that an official endorsement of Cuomo’s run would have been a kiss of death. However, above I linked his donors, who are almost all Jewish, and are all linked not just to the ADL, but worse, to AIPAC. 

Earlier this month, a new major study on sexual dynamics in committed long-term relationships conducted by the Pew Research Institute was released and has shone light on just how little interest heterosexual American men have in receiving manual sex, commonly known as a “handjob,” from their significant other, opening up an aggressive new front on the culture wars.

A full 98% of heterosexual American men in committed relationships (either marriage or a civil partnership) polled in the wide-ranging survey said that they would prefer to watch black and white CCTV footage of raccoons raiding a dumpster behind a 7/11 than receive a handjob from their significant other. The results have stirred debate and in some cases outrage, with some claiming that “the handjob question” speaks to a core power dynamic between men and women in relationships, while others claim the opposite.

It was noted by researchers that the 2% who preferred a handjob to CCTV raccoon footage are in relationships with trans women.

While the rate of men who prefer raccoon videos to handjobs was shocking to some, perhaps even more disturbing is that a full 9% of men said that they would rather have “demonic cyborgs, like from the DOOM video game series,” shove poison-laced needles into their eyeballs than get a handjob from their partner.

“Many women do not want to have sex with their partner because they have a headache or they had a stressful day, and they will try to use a handjob as a way to satiate their partner without needing to provide him with vaginal sex,” said Harvard science professor and chair of Aboriginal Interactive Art Installations and Native American Escape Room Design Theory Leonard Berkowitz. “The fact is, manual sex can lead to ejaculation in the same way as vaginal sex, the semen will squirt out just the same, and therefore the stated male preference for vaginal or oral intercourse in place of manual sex demonstrates that even with all of the talk of progress, the average American male is still deeply sexist, and believes he should have a right to insert his penis into the vagina of his partner at will, ignoring the headaches and stress his female partner may be experiencing.”

However, many on the American right are framing this handjob issue in terms of the “woke” cultural discourse, with several popular figures on the right, including the president of the United States, claiming that men have a right to “smash the gash.”

During an interview with Rick “The Rattlesnake” O’Henry, the world’s most infamous bear wrestler, controversial podcast host Joe Rogan asked his guest if he’d been following what he called “handjobgate.”

“Have you seen this?” Rogan asked, and before waiting for an answer, continued: “they’re trying to say now that women get headaches all the time and don’t feel like having sex with their husbands so instead of having sex women should be able to just give them handjobs.”

Rogan asked his assistant Jamie to pull up the Pew study, and Jamie confirmed that 98% of men would prefer to watch the raccoon dumpster raid. Jamie then offered that the 2% who preferred the handjob were dating or married to trans women.

“Yeah, so, it’s not just swimming where trans have an advantage,” Rogan, who has been repeatedly accused of transphobia, noted. He went on: “maybe sometimes she does have a headache, and men can understand that, but if every single time the man wants to snuggle, the bitch is saying she’s got a headache and is acting like that pawn shop meme, saying ‘the best I can do is a handy,’ I think a man has a right to be upset about that.”

O’Henry seemed largely disinterested, but replied, “I can see that.”

“These are the same people who locked us down during Covid, then told everyone not to take ivermectin or they were a kook, despite the fact that ivermectin has been proven in clinical studies for decades to be effective against these same types of viruses and other countries prescribe it. And even if it didn’t help with Covid, it wasn’t going to hurt anything, it’s a totally safe drug. But they told people it was horse paste and you were a kook if you wanted to try it and Pfizer was the only one with the solution. That’s what the experts said. They said don’t even try anything else, just do what we tell you. And now we’re supposed to believe these same experts who are telling us that you can have a marriage with no sex, where your wife has a headache 24/7 and just gives you handjobs.”

O’Henry vaguely nodded in response.

“Man, they told us whatever crashed at Roswell was a weather balloon. They’re still saying that. To this day, the CIA will still claim that whatever that was, which every witness said looked like a flying saucer, was a weather balloon. Not even Trump can get all the JFK files released. In the Amazon jungle, there are fungal parasites that can take control of the brains of ants, take control of their entire bodies and force them to walk to a place where they can feed the mycelium’s host, and it’s like the woke media really is this kind of fungal mind virus, and people just go along with it, and no one wants to speak out because they’re afraid they’ll get destroyed. Shane Gillis, one of the funniest people, banned from SNL before he was even hired because of some bullshit throwaway joke on a podcast 15 years ago that some woke Karen decided could hurt someone’s feelings.”

O’Henry said nothing, perhaps hoping that the conversation would at some point steer back to his bear wrestling career.

“Even if a man is on estrogen, he spent his entire life developing his bone density and muscle mass as a male individual. And I don’t have any problem with how anyone wants to live their life. When I was back in LA before I moved here to Austin, greatest city in the world by the way, when I lived in LA I would sometimes run into Caitlyn Jenner. She is a great woman. Totally kind, very engaging, she will ask you questions about what is happening in your life and not just talk about herself, but you know what she says about trans women in women’s sports?” Without waiting for a response from the world’s most famous bear wrestler, Rogan answered his own question: “she says it’s not fair. She says give them their own league if they want to compete, because whatever your ideology is, it’s not right to have their male bodies competing with female bodies. Even Gavin Newsom is saying this now and acting like he was always saying it.”

Rogan then took a long drag off of what appeared to be a marijuana cigar, and continued: “so if it’s these people who are telling us ‘handjob, handjob, handjob,’ I just don’t know how anyone can take them seriously. The whole pro-handjob movement is just more woke nonsense. They are out there claiming people want to exterminate handjobs. Who is saying that?”

O’Henry appeared to struggle to try to force a laugh, clearly uncomfortable and not sure how or if he was supposed to be responding to these statements.

“You think it’s funny,” said Joe, “and I’m sure a lot of these women think it’s funny when their husband is trying to fuck and they’re rubbing his dickskin raw, but pretty soon AI is going to be so advanced that it is the one designing the robots. Have you seen the Optimus that Elon is working on? That guy is a legitimate fucking genius and he says that the AI is now doing the majority of the work on programming and designing, doing the design, for the physical humanoid robots. So AI is building itself, it’s building its own bodies in the form of these robots. So how long until the humanoid robots are going to have better pussies than any of these bitches out here? They will have nano-machines inside of their robot pussies. Just pure dick Heaven. Then men aren’t even going to be asking their wives for sex anymore, they’re just going to go to the laundry room and fuck the robot assistant. Am I right? I mean wouldn’t you rather fuck some magic nano pussy than get your dickskin rubbed raw by a handy?”

O’Henry struggled to answer, “that’s, you know, man, a lot of this stuff is scary, the technology…”

“Damn right it’s scary,” Rogan replied. “It is scary as fuck. Because forget about what is going to happen to your marriage when your wife finds you fucking the robot assistant because she just wanted to give you a handy and you wanted something to smash, but if that robot pussy has nanomachines inside of it, then it could be transferring data into your DNA while you are fucking it.” Joe then paused, apparently for dramatic effect. “I know Elon, he’s a good friend of mine, and he is making these robots, or I should say he’s making the AI that is making the robots because it’s doing most of the work now, and I don’t think he has any bad intentions, but he will tell you that this technology scares the fuck out of him, even though he’s the one making the money off of it, and he’s calling for Congress to regulate it. Because everything gets hacked, man. You look around this room, every piece of electronic equipment in this room is being hacked by someone. There’s some Russian or some Chinese hacking that headset you’re wearing right now, guaranteed. They’re hacking our phones, there was a story a while back where someone hacked a water fountain and made it spill over, flooded the building. So if you’ve got nanobots in a robot pussy, the Chinese can hack them and get into your DNA and make you start wanting to support a Chinese invasion of Taiwan or the social credit system. You go fuck that robot and then all of a sudden you start telling people ‘nothing happened at Tiananmen Square,’ and you don’t even know why you’re saying it, because it’s in your DNA.”

Also this week, Donald Trump took to Truth Social to write in all caps “SMASH THE GASH!”, a newly popular slogan which critics say is an argument in defense of rape.

After CNN’s Jake Tapper did a segment on the Trump “truth,” noting that “smash the gash” is a slogan used by radical campus pro-rape protesters who want all women raped and plan to exterminate handjobs, Trump called for CNN’s entire staff to be fired, which many fear is a direct attack on the Second Amendment.

Congress is now calling for special hearings to interview heads of top universities that are allowing “smash the gash” to be chanted on campuses across America. Defenders of the slogan claim that it is simply a slogan in defense of vaginal intercourse, and not a call to rape or a call to exterminate handjobs, and argue that the fact that pro-rape advocates use the slogan does not mean that everyone who chants “smash the gash” is pro-rape.

During an interview with CNN, a masked campus protester stationed at an encampment on Harvard’s campus supporting the movement said that “smash the gash” is a slogan with a long history that simply means vaginal sex has a right to exist. He also claimed that being pro-vaginal sex does not mean you are anti-handjob or that you are trying to exterminate handjobs. The protester also claimed that another slogan, “globalize gash smashing,” was not a call for a global mass rape or wiping out handjobs, but rather a rallying cry for people all over the world who support vaginal sex to come together in defense of “normal penetrative sex, something that all men have a right to.”

Later in the day, the “smash the gash” encampment was broken up by the National Guard and several students were reported injured. In a tearful statement, Harvard president Alan M. Garber said that while Harvard supports the rights of students to freedom of speech, calls to exterminate handjobs do not fall under the banner of freedom of speech. However, Garber is still being called before Congress to testify as to why it took over 27 minutes for the “smash the gash” protest to be broken up by the National Guard.

Towards the end of part 837 of a 1500-part podcast series about how French President Emmanuel Macron is married to his own father, popular African American female podcast host Candace Owens, who has been accused of “rabid anti-handjobism” by her former boss and male feminist Ben Shapiro, weighed in on the issue.

“Men should smash that gash,” Owens said. “And you know what, as a woman who loves her husband and understands he has sexual needs, even if I do have a headache, I’m not going to try to give him some uncomfortable and unsatisfying handjob. I don’t need to tell men this, but the skin on the penis is very soft and sensitive, and rubbing that with your hand can cause chaffing that can be painful for a man for days. So yes, even if I have a headache, I’m going to let my husband smash that gash, and that does not make me anti-handjob, and at this point, I don’t even care if people call me an anti-handjobite. I have a lot of friends who give their husbands handjobs and they agree with me that he should smash that gash, but if believing in smashing the gash makes me anti-handjob, then you know what, fine. I’m a radical vaginal-sexer who believes in exterminating handjobs. Whatever. I don’t care anymore. I’ll tell you who’s not smashing a gash and that is Emmanuel Macron, because his ‘wife’ doesn’t have a gash to smash and I challenge anyone to prove to me that Brigitte Macron has a gash.”

To pour fuel on the fire, 32-year-old contrarian Tomi Lahren appeared on Piers Morgan to scream about how men should be thankful for handjobs, and that demanding vaginal sex just demonstrates how “manosphere” activists are even more whiny and entitled than the feminists they oppose.

“It’s my body, my choice, and no man has any right to vaginal sex simply because I’m married to him,” Lahren claimed very aggressively. “I was taught to treat myself as a princess, and to insist that men do the same, and if the princess has a headache, you’re lucky to even get the handjob.”

Pushing back on Lahren’s aggressive claims, Morgan noted that he often gets angry responses from viewers when he has her on the show due to what he claims many view as her belligerence. He read what he claimed was a tweet from a user on X, formerly Twitter, about her last appearance on the show: “one viewer writes on X, ‘Tomi is much too old to be doing the entitled 19-year-old party girl bit. She is in her thirties and lives in a fantasy where all men should worship her. I have not masturbated to any of her news segments in over five years. No one who has seen the recent photos of her Christmas ham thighs is interested in smashing that gash in the first place. I also don’t like her feet.’ So, what do you say to that?”

“Piers, I have worked in media for 15 years and this is the most unprofessional thing I have ever seen a supposedly serious news host do. I do not have Christmas ham thighs, I am in very good shape, and all day long I get nothing but dick pics on my Instagram account, and I will tell you, there is no shortage of people asking for feet pics either. I am repulsed that you would say this kind of slander.” Lahren then demanded that the camera be moved to show her thighs and feet.

“No, no,” Piers replied, “we can’t do that with the camera, we’re just having a discussion here. But it’s not me that’s saying this, I’m simply reading something that someone wrote on X, which I think is a legitimate criticism. You seem to think very highly of yourself, and think that a lot of men owe you a lot of things, but you don’t really seem interested in self-reflection, so what I was hoping is that maybe we could get a little bit of self reflection.”

“Piers, if I want to reflect on myself, I can go read the replies on any Instagram post, where I promise you, there are a lot of men who want to smash this gash.”

“Okay, okay, well now, hold on, calm down. A lot of people might note that many or maybe all of those Instagram replies are from India, and not from Westerners where we are really having the debate over whether or not ‘smash the gash’ is really a call to exterminate handjobs.”

Lahren then began accusing Piers of racism, and the conversation degraded much further, proving just how toxic the discussion around gashes and handjobs has become.

Donald Trump apparently viewed the segment on Piers Morgan and commented on it with a “truth” on his Truth Social website.

In a highly surprising and unorthodox move, Ted Cruz agreed to sit down with Tucker Carlson for a two-hour unedited interview defending handjobs. At time of writing, the full interview has not been published, but Carlson released some clips which appear to show Cruz struggling to defend his pro-handjob position, and coming across as though he is opposed to vaginal sex entirely, and understands very little about mammalian reproduction generally.

In one of the clips, Cruz says: “Listen, I got married 25 years ago with the stated intention of getting handjobs. I’ve worked every day to do that. A lot of times I wish handjobs were much more effective. Like sometimes I don’t even ejaculate at all.”

Cruz claims the clip was taken out of context and we will get the full story when the interview is released tomorrow, but many have a hard time imagining what that statement could possibly mean.

This exchange was also released in clip form and is being viewed as equally confusing:

TUCKER CARLSON: Okay, so you get married because you want to have a family. How often do handjobs result in pregnancy by the way?

SENATOR TED CRUZ: I don’t know the specific number. No, I don’t know.

TUCKER CARLSON: You don’t know the number of pregnancies that are the result of handjobs?

SENATOR TED CRUZ: How many handjobs result in pregnancy?

TUCKER CARLSON: Zero.

SENATOR TED CRUZ: Okay, yeah.

TUCKER CARLSON: How could you not know that?

SENATOR TED CRUZ: I don’t sit around memorizing insemination tables.

TUCKER CARLSON: Well, it’s kind of relevant because you’re calling for women to have headaches every day and refuse their husbands vaginal sex.

SENATOR TED CRUZ: Why is it relevant? Whether it’s zero or one or two, why is it relevant?

TUCKER CARLSON: Because  you don’t know anything about insemination and yet your arguing for handjobs over vaginal intercourse.

SENATOR TED CRUZ: I didn’t say I don’t know anything about insemination.

TUCKER CARLSON: Okay. What’s the average size of an ejaculation load in milliliters?

SENATOR TED CRUZ: There are sperms, and it’s got potassium.

TUCKER CARLSON: Okay, you don’t know anything about semen. So…

SENATOR TED CRUZ: Okay. I am not the Tucker Carlson expert on blowing loads.

TUCKER CARLSON: You’re a senator who’s calling to arrest people for chanting “smash the gash.”

SENATOR TED CRUZ: You’re the one who doesn’t know anything about blowing loads. No, you don’t know anything about the semen. You’re the one who claims you should rape your wife if she has a headache.

TUCKER CARLSON: I’m not saying that.

It’s clear that the discussion about handjobs, vaginal sex, and the legality and meaning of the slogan “smash the gash” is far from over, and it appears that this debate may become a permanent fixture in American politics.

There are some in the middle of the road, who are hoping that Americans can come together “in the name of common sense” and find “common ground.” High level scientist and respected cultural commentator Eric Weinstein, for instance, released a statement saying: “There are extremists on the handjobber side and hardliners in the ‘smash the gash’ crowd. But we are all Americans and we all believe in ejaculation, and we need to turn down the temperature and come together to honor the rules of common sense and find consensus in some places and agree to disagree in other places. We cannot let handjobs and gash-smashing tear this country in two when we are facing such heavy threats from China in the AI race.”

Unfortunately for the country, which experts on both sides agree is in an AI race with the Chinese, but perhaps fortunately for the podcasters and social media personalities who make a living off of fomenting cultural tension, there is no reason to believe the temperature is going to be turned down on the handjob debate any time soon.

Donald Trump has turned against Thomas Massie for some reason. Very cleverly, however, he is tweeting opposite messages about him and then using Palantir AI to make sure different parts of the voter base see the tweets.

First, he tweeted – or “truthed” – out this one:

Then, realizing that many in the base would not like that tweet, he posted a second tweet and then used AI to show it to other people who are against the Jews:

Obviously, I agree with the second tweet, but I think it is very cynical to use AI to make sure different groups see different tweets with opposite messages.

I thought we were for transparency in MAGA??

Massie appeared on Theo Von this week (Theo is the realest). You can see his own views.

Personally, I would rather primary Trump than Massie, and I think when Trump fails to primary Massie, and when there is huge support against Trump and for Massie, it will be a big wakeup call as to just how much the base hates Trump’s insane allegiance to the Jews.

I think we’re going to see it long before that, in fact.

The midterms are going to be a complete disaster and probably everyone is just going to vote for Hamas agents like Zohran. I would vote today for any Hamas candidate over Donald Trump.

By the way, just so you understand: that second Trump tweet is a joke I made up for humor purposes. The first tweet is real. Trump is really saying Massie is not America First because he’s not Israel First and according to Trump, it’s the same thing and anyone who questions that is against him.

We’ll see how that goes for him.

I suspect it won’t go great.

I was watching a Theo Von interview with “Indian-American” Ro Khanna. He said some silly leftist nonsense, like that he’s going to teach blacks in the South to program AI. He promoted the “Chinese social credit score” hoax, which is exhaustingly stupid (and when it comes from an Indian, it seems racially motivated). But he said a lot of populist stuff, a lot of pro-internet stuff, and I was thinking, as I imagine most people would think: “this guy is alright.”

As part of my investigation of “alternative media,” I’ve also been watching Breaking Points, which features “Indian-American” Saagar Enjeti. No one is going to say that guy isn’t alright. You could put various caveats on that, I’m sure he says some dumb shit like most of these people do, but he’s totally alright.

So, as I do (most people don’t but I do), I’m thinking about them and I circled back to my long-held belief system that “all these people need to go back,” and asked if that was a nasty thing. Frankly, even if I thought it was nasty, I would continue to support everyone going back, but I wanted to ask myself: is it nasty to want to send back guys who were born here, who seem like alright dudes, on the basis of the fact that they have the incorrect genetics for this country? Or is it bad in some other way?

I’m not emotionally bothered by the ICE videos of children getting grabbed in parking lots, by the way. Just for the record. I think it’s really stupid to be grabbing kids when you don’t have the resources to grab all the adults, or even all of the criminals, because the optics are bad. But my view is that they all need to go back and I’ve seen the Democrats justify a genocide of children in Gaza so they’re not going to emotionally manipulate me with a kid getting thrown in a van because he’s “separated from his mother” for however long it takes to process them before they can go together back to Mexico. If I was running this, I would definitely deport the most sympathetic people (women and kids and non-criminals in general) last. Given that everyone is not being deported, and in fact only a tiny fraction of people are being deported, I think it’s insane to do these optics of screaming kids being thrown in vans, but it doesn’t bother me emotionally because I’m an adult and being separated from your mother for a few hours or a few days before you can meet back up in Mexico is not a big deal. Again, please compare that to bipartisan support for dropping 2,000-pound bombs on refugee camps filled with kids in Gaza. It’s not serious to make this “kids being briefly separated from their parents” thing into a big emotional fit, and it is frankly being done by the same people telling you to ignore the genocide in Gaza (note: specifically, I mean “the Jews”).

Much more than kids (who don’t even know the difference) being sent back, I would be concerned about one of the only Congressmen that is against the Gaza genocide and defends the internet or a guy who does okay podcasts being sent back.

So I ask myself: is this nasty or bad in some other way?

Again, even if it is nasty or bad, my strongly held belief is that America should be an overwhelmingly white country. But in order to understand your own beliefs, you have to be able to interrogate them yourself and allow others to interrogate them. That should be obvious. The core of my problem with the left and the “Ben Shapiro right” is that they won’t allow their beliefs to be interrogated. They just censor people or completely destroy their lives. I think my beliefs should be open to interrogation, and “is it nasty to deport some brown people who seem like cool dudes who aren’t doing anything wrong?” is a totally valid interrogation of my belief system.

But here’s the thing: it really isn’t nasty. All of the cool dudes, who you might think could provide something to America, would do very well in their own countries. Relatively, they will do better than they do here. Intelligent brown people will be more than fine back in their own countries. They’ll get money and pussy and whatever. They will be totally fine.

It’s actually a better argument that we should bring poor people here from all over the world to live on welfare because it’s sad that they’re poor. And that is a completely nonsensical argument. You can’t really even respond to it, it’s so dumb.

And come on. We’ve all seen the marbles video.

Sorry, it was gumballs. Not marbles.

Don’t let the kids eat gumballs, guys. Red 40, titanium dioxide, literal polyethylene. Come on, guys.

Anyway, yeah, solving global poverty through mass immigration is not something I think you could find any man arguing for. It’s a purely emotional argument for women. And yet, I think it actually is better than the argument that it’s wrong to deport middle class people who were born here.

Yes, I get that the ones born here are “legal,” but please go check on how much “the law” has an effect on American society. It’s irrelevant. This is not a society based on an ordered system of laws. We’re not living in China or some Islamic Sharia country. “The law” is just whatever. There is no reason you can’t just say that every person who came here after the (Jewish!) 1965 Hart-Celler Act is no longer a citizen. You can just say “it’s the law now that you’re not a citizen anymore and now you have to go back to India, lol.” You could also just say there’s a law that you have to be white or you’re not a citizen anymore. Laws can say whatever. There isn’t an ordered system here. We do not have a theocracy or some other objective metric to measure the validity of laws. We have “The Constitution,” which doesn’t even mean anything. This is a country where the government can 100% do whatever. So there is no point in babbling about legalisms. Literally no one cares about the Constitution unless they can use it for their own agenda. It’s like that atheism meme.

Except all sides do it to each other.

I’m not even insulting the Constitution in theory. I mean, I probably would insult it in theory. I believe in Jesus and don’t really care about goofy secular government gobbledygook. But I’m not insulting it in theory right now. Right now, I’m simply going to say that “the right to free association” is so fundamental to the Constitution, so deeply hardwired into it, that literally no one can claim the Constitution is in effect after “civil rights” were enacted as “law” in the US.

The only thing that you could say is nasty about any mass deportation program is if it is sadistic or cruel in some way. Unlike Trump’s “just grab whoever out of the parking lot lol” program (which in the absolute best case scenario, won’t even get rid of 2% of illegals, and Trump has endorsed more legals, who are actually much worse), a serious mass deportation program aimed at reestablishing a white America, which would necessarily target both “illegal” and “legal” immigrants (primarily the latter, as there are many more of them and they are a much larger existential threat) would give people timelines, deadlines, a process to apply for extended deadlines, and so on. You’d allow people to sell their property, and if they couldn’t sell it, pay them market value. You’d give them severance checks. You’d use American soft power to ensure their arrival in their home countries was nice. You’d be reasonable and friendly about the whole thing. You’d just make it clear: this isn’t about emotions, it’s not about hate or pity or anything else, this is a matter that we’ve decided on based on the desire to maintain a cohesive society where we preserve our genetic heritage, our racial identity, for future generations.

Some people would get violent, of course, but if you put it on a time frame and say you’re going to pay people and do a bunch of TikTok propaganda showing people loving returning to their home countries, you could avoid a lot of the violence and get a lot of people to leave voluntarily. Then for people who overstayed the deadline, you would have to systematically break down who to target in what order. Few are going to riot on the announcement of a five-year deadline for self-deportation.

Or you could just use Palantir’s government-controlled AI to take control of every electronic device in the country and blast Metallica’s “And Justice for All” while you unleash the police and military to just hunt down and kill anyone who isn’t white.

By the way, Metallica is on tour. Hetfield looks fantastic.

Along with thinking constantly about death and how you are a complete failure and everything you’ve ever done was trite and cheap and how you’re a complete asshole who should have treated people better and how death is just right there, looking at you, the other thing you do when you hit middle age is start looking at guys in their fifties and sixties and asking yourself if you’re going to be a Marlon Brando or a James Hetfield.

With Metallica doing so well in their sunset years, you could actually just pass a law that says they have to keep playing the entire “And Justice for All” album over and over again until every brown person in America is dead.

When Metallica is like “but it could take days for the military to kill all these niggers,” you would just have to be like “yeah, bro, I get it, but it’s the law, because of the Constitution. You just have to keep playing until they’re all dead. Then you actually have to keep playing for seventeen more hours as part of the celebration ceremony.”

So anyway, I was thinking: if ICE showed up at my door and was like “you and your family have to go back to Ireland,” what would I do?

I decided that I would:

• Squint
• Look down at the ground
• Scratch my eyebrow
• And then be like
• “Alright”

Ireland is definitely poorer than America. It’s getting way shittier with the number of niggers from wherever flooding in. But in this scenario I’m forwarding, Ireland would also be deporting people (otherwise I would probably be disappointed about having to go back as in America there is more space and thus for the time being at least, more chance to avoid colorful people). It’s also a scenario in which I’m allowed to live in America, which isn’t the current situation.

Frankly, I’ve been out of America so long, and it’s now become so clear that I won’t ever be allowed back, that it is becoming more and more difficult to care. I don’t think the people who are there care very much. If they did, they would be… you know. They’d be doing something or other. I look at the unwillingness to actually address the Jewish problem, and see that the reason is that people don’t want to seem mean for not caring about a pile of shoes, and I’m like: why did I ever destroy my life to try to help save this country? I know why and I would do it again: I thought people would stand up with me. They didn’t. And they still aren’t. Tucker Carlson (et al.) won’t do an analysis of the Talmud. He knows the Talmud exists, he knows it says Mother Mary was a whore and that Jesus Christ was a wizard who is in hell boiling in a vat of feces, he knows it says all non-Jews are “goyim” animals, he knows there are hundreds of other verses that demonstrate that it is the Jewish tribe as a group that is responsible for the crisis of modernity, not a few bad apples. He knows the Holocaust is a hoax. Yet he says he’s not against Jews, just Israel. I’m sure his reasoning is “the people aren’t ready for it, they are still traumatized by the pile of shoes.” People can rationalize anything. But unlike Joe Rogan, who is a goofy dope who believes inter-dimensional aliens created humans so that humans would create AI, Tucker Carlson I think really does believe in God and Jesus Christ and could blow this whole thing up. But he won’t. He’ll post ExpressVPN ads on Twitter, but he won’t talk about the content of the Talmud. The human mind is a justification machine. It’s a machine that justifies our behavior against the protests of our souls.

To Tucker, and all of the rest of you (you’re all reading this, I know you all read this, everyone knows you all read this): the people are ready to hear an explanation as to what these Jews are up to. And if you don’t do it, no one else will. I can’t do it. And this is what is actually happening: the Jews are a satanic, alien group that murdered Our Jesus and then proceeded to spend 2,000 years attempting to kill or morally crush all of Christ’s followers. In the 20th century, they faked a genocide of themselves to justify a complete silencing of criticism in order to allow for a total takeover of every institution of power in the Western world in order to sadistically kill or destroy every human soul.

In order to be “against Israel but not the Jews,” you would have to believe the mass murder of children in Gaza is not related to the fact that OnlyFans, Tinder, and PornHub are all run by Jews. They’re not run by Israel.

The genocide in Gaza has pulled back the veil, it’s shown the world what the Jews are. And the people are ready to hear it. It’s now or never. There has never been a better time for saying this aloud, and the time to do it is running out. This whole Palantir thing is real, and it’s not “ten years down the line” you’re going to be locked into a biometric slave grid with every action tracked and individual and society-wide behavior directed by AI. It’s basically tomorrow.

The CEO of Palantir, Alex Karp, is of course the most Jewish person you’ve ever seen.

Millions are shocked he’s not a Chinese communist, given that he’s trying to do a social credit system against people. Right Tucker?

It’s just a coincidence. He’s a random individual, like the inventor of transgenderism and the purveyors of usury and the CEO of Pfizer are random individuals. It’s a funny thing about the Holocaust: in death, six million random individuals became Jews.

Interesting fact: although exactly six million Jews died in the Holocaust, the shoe pile only has 11.8 million shoes. This is due to the fact that some Jews were one-legged, and other Jews had one of their shoes stolen from them by a wily German when they were entering the death camp. Also, when mothers with infants came to Auschwitz, Germans would drown the babies in buckets. Right there in front of everyone. An organized military force, made up of Germans, running a concentration camp, would, right in front of everyone, take Jewish babies and drown them in buckets. True story.

Nearly ten years ago, I made this meme about it to create awareness:

I did that line-work by hand. It took me like twenty minutes. At least. I thought it was that important to bring attention to the fact that German Nazis would grab Jewish babies from their mothers and drown them in buckets. Still, to this day, few know that during the Holocaust, Germans would grab Jewish babies and drown them in buckets in front of their mothers.

Meanwhile, this is a coincidence:

Any religion could claim abortion is a core part of their value system. Only one does. But it’s just a coincidence that it’s Jews. No relationship at all with what is happening in Gaza, which is really just a crime by a government that just happens, by coincidence again, to be Jewish. It could be any state. Many states have gone on 18-month campaigns bombing refugee camps. Well, actually, no state has ever done anything even remotely like that, ever in human history, but any state could have, and it’s just a coincidence it’s the Jewish one.

Sigh.

It’s not just Tucker. Obviously. It’s everyone. It’s everyone but me and you, dearest reader and true parasocial friend. Everyone knows and everyone knows everyone else knows and everyone knows that everyone knows that the peasants don’t know. But the peasants would listen to their leaders. And if you’re the media, you are their leaders. That’s just the way the digital world works. The magic of electricity.

The reason I would do it all again is not that I’m retarded or a masochist, it’s because it was the right thing to do, and I actually believe in God and Judgement Day and all of this stuff. Like, I believe it as much as I believe I am right now sitting here typing on a computer and smoking a cigarette. I’ve done a lot of sinful things. I’ve done many mortal sins and I will probably do many more. And I know I am going to have to answer for those sins. I cry sometimes thinking about how Jesus Christ was tortured to death so I could get a blowjob (it’s a very funny statement but it’s true, I am not saying it as a joke). But I will tell you this: I sure as hell wouldn’t want to be the guy standing there before God trying to explain how I knew all about the Jews and had the ability to tell the entire world and yet somehow decided not to do so.

[Note to Editor: Rather than bothering you with a message, I’m just going to leave this here: keep the bullet points like that. You can delete this note. Or don’t delete it if you think it’s funnier not to. I’ll leave that to your discretion. It’s probably better to delete it when you edit, because this is off schedule, and you’re not going to edit this until like 4 hours after it’s up, so the people who saw it will be in on a public/secret joke that disappears forever. But it’s your call. I give you full authority to act as you see fit in this matter. UDPATE: Wait no, just leave it, because something goofy like this sort of softens the buzzkill ending of the article. Yeah, for sure, I retract your rights to personal choice in the matter. Just leave this entire note to editor here like this.]

‘Tonight I can report to the world that the strikes were a spectacular military success. Iran’s key nuclear enrichment facilities have been completely and totally obliterated’

President Trump addresses the nation following US strikes on Iran.

Latest: https://t.co/je3LeESEFs pic.twitter.com/BFjyiJhk5X

— Sky News (@SkyNews) June 22, 2025

He should have brought the “Mission Accomplished” sign

This is more of an analysis site than a news site these days. Sometimes it’s a self-analysis site. I’m thinking about focusing full-time on psychoanalyzing Jordan Peterson and his whore daughter.

But it’s hard not to post the news that Trump bombed Iran.

I just wrote a long article about like, Ireland or the Jews or something, or whatever. I don’t have much analysis here.

Emmmm…

Seymour Hersh is trending on Twitter. And yeah, serious business to call it. But he said they were planning on bombing more than the nuke sites. He said “all-out bombing campaign.”

Maybe Trump is lying and they bombed more than the three nuke sites? No one seems to know anything right now. I guess we’ll have to wait for an update from Sy.

Meanwhile, Scott Ritter is reporting that his sources say Iran’s nuclear sites were a ruse and they were actually building a Metal Gear at a secret site in a secret location and that they will launch it on Wednesday at 1:34 PM local time and it will level Tel Aviv. “Excuse my language, but Netanyahu and Smotrich and that gang are shitting in their boots because they know they don’t have a weapon to rival Metal Gear,” Ritter reported. “You know when the button on the toaster gets stuck and you don’t notice it until you start to smell the burning and see the smoke and then you pop the Pop-Tart out and it’s pure black with bubbles? Well, excuse my language, but that is what all of Israel is going to look like, daddy-o.”

The True Conservative MAGA originalists are making some fire memes.

That shit is literally Musk-tier.

I don’t really… let me think…

That’s the best I’ve got for that format. Aya-COAL-ah, we can call it.

It’s leftist style too long. Really only needs four panels.

And uh…

I can’t into it. Boring.

But if I was in MAGA world trying to somehow prop it up right now, that’s the sort of shit I would be posting. But you’re not seeing anything like that because no one who isn’t the kind of Elon-tier retard who makes that original meme is trying to prop it up.

Anyway, the argument that it’s a quickie is… who knows. I don’t know. I guess I hope that’s true? Or I would hope that if I cared. I sort of just kinda don’t really even care very much, to be honest with you. Anyone else sort of feeling that?

I guess I do care. It’s just that I can’t really feel outraged, since I’ve been telegraphing this since like, October 10, 2023.

The logic:

• October 7th couldn’t happen unless Israel allowed it
• Israel knew they couldn’t beat Hamas
• Gaza was designed to create a pretext to take out all of Israel’s more important enemies
• Trump would be better at getting Americans to go all-in for Israel
• Trump took all that money from Miriam Adelson
• Trump was praised as a messiah after the ear scratching heard round the world
• Trump was always going to attack Iran after being “elected” in a fake US election

It’s boring and I’m bored.

I guess if Iran backs down now then Israel stops bombing and it’s supposed to be over just like that? That’s clearly what is being sold here. I don’t know if that is possible or not. I think it’s possible Iran would just stand down and take it, but if they do that they’re going to then actually build a bomb or just like, buy one from North Korea (couldn’t they have always done that? Why don’t people ever mention that?). And I think it’s impossible Israel will settle for something less than regime change. And it is impossible that there will be a youth/slut revolution in Iran after the Israeli bombing.

Then regime change is complicated because… well, a lot of reasons, but if you kill the Ayatollah they just appoint a new Ayatollah. There is no path to really anything. Fox News is pushing the son of the Shah being made king. They’re literally calling him “His Royal Highness.”

So I guess he’s um, already the king?

I guess you can send the US military to invade and occupy Tehran for decades and say this guy is the king and then just hope the people eventually accept it? Is that the plan?

I don’t understand what the plan is here like at all.

Trump “standing up to Bibi” and saying he was only in for the nuke sites and not the regime change would just mean Israel false flags a US installation in Iran. But it also doesn’t make sense from Trump’s position that blowing up these sites stopped the development of a bomb. It actually does the opposite?

Anyway, whatever.

Who cares.

I don’t care anymore.

Matt Gaetz hosted a Zero Hedge backed debate between libertarian Dave Smith and (allegedly non-Jewish) neocon global dominationist Robert Spencer this week.

Overall, the debate is mundane and not worth watching. Probably, everyone is familiar with all of the content here, and these debates are sort of just repetitive and tiresome at this point, particularly after the debate between Smith and the pompous pederast Douglas Murray, which kind of put an end to the question of “is America controlled by Jews?”

The topic here is slightly different, given that it is about Iran rather than Palestine, but it’s the same core content, going to the same core question of whether or not America should operate as a proxy of Israel because maybe somehow all of Israel’s goals are good for America. All of Spencer’s talking points are tired, and therefore Smith has no option but to give the same tired responses.

Further, on the specific issue of Iran, the Tucker Carlson debate with Ted Cruz is much better and more fun. I would recommend that to anyone who hasn’t watched it yet. That was just a complete rape and it was hilarious. It also had more interesting content, particularly in relation to Christian Zionism and the direct role that Israel plays in controlling our government.

That interview was like a high stakes MMA fight. It got my heart pounding and I was cheering, jeering, and ooosssshing.

Mainly though, it is just incredible to see an actual top government warmonger subject himself to questioning like this. I think it’s sort of a historic moment, because aside from Trump (who doesn’t really count), no high level politician has ever agreed to a two-hour unedited, unscripted interview with a critical podcaster. (Note: Trump himself is not going to do a podcast interview now on the Iran issue. He did all those podcasts when he was campaigning and could just say anything. So the Tucker-Ted interview is novel, and it’s possible nothing like that will ever happen again after how disastrous it was for Cruz.)

So I don’t recommend the Gaetz hosted debate, unless you’ve got nothing else to watch and you enjoy hearing the same talking points over and over again for some reason. What I would like to recommend is that Matt Gaetz be given another chance. I know he sort of crashed out after Trump set him up by nominating him as AG and then fed him to the sharks. In hindsight, this was clearly a nasty move by Trump to give the impression he was trying to put outsiders in his cabinet but just couldn’t pull it off because outsiders are too into jailbait and blow.

Refresher: After Trump nominated Gaetz, the media brought up old jailbait scandals giving Trump the layup to throw him under the bus, and in this process, he also lost his Congressional seat, having chosen to resign from Congress when he got hit with the AG nomination. Because of Gaetz’ scandals then, Trump’s logic went, he had no choice but to go with the nasty MILF who thinks Epstein killed himself. (Also, nominating Gaetz created problems for Ron DeSantis, who Trump wanted revenge on.) It was a callous play by Trump which destroyed Gaetz’ life.

Though the content was dull, I was impressed with Gaetz’ skills as a host and personality. I think he has potential as a podcaster. He’s also siding with anti-Israel arguments, so what I would really like to see is Gaetz run against Ron DeSantis for Florida governor on a right-wing anti-war, anti-Zionist platform. That would at worst be an awesome shitshow, which would force DeSantis to defend his insane pro-Jewish agenda in a public forum, which will go about as well as it did for Ted Cruz.

Check ’em:

Matt Gaetz exposes Israel’s secret nuclear program and calls for its denuclearization. pic.twitter.com/EgubtOLg8q

— 𝐀𝐍𝐓𝐔𝐍𝐄𝐒 (@Antunes1) June 19, 2025

So far, Gaetz has only “expressed interest” in running in the 2026 Florida gubernatorial election. I think he should just declare now and get out there and start talking about the insanity of these wars. I’m sure he’s hesitant, because he will get attacked by Trump, but look, Trump is over. He has sealed his fate. The way forward is for MAGA loyalists to say “we’re going to defend MAGA even when Trump won’t.” That’s the play.

Ron DeSantis has passed the most aggressive anti-speech laws in American history in defense of Israel. He’s a very easy target. The guy is Ted Cruz on steroids. And there’s no way he can avoid a televised debate with Gaetz and have a hope to beat him.

I think Gaetz is a good candidate for this and I will support him. In fact, I am presently endorsing Matt Gaetz for Florida Governor.

Whatever happens, it will be huge for his brand, and get him off of this “50,000 viewer podcast” trap he’s currently bogged down in. If he goes out there as the total America First anti-war gubernatorial candidate and publicly stands up to DeSantis’ lunatic warmongering, then even if he loses the election, he can come back to the podcast scene with a fury and actually make some real money, then maybe go back into politics again later if he feels like it. It’s a total win-win. No possible bad outcome.

This article was updated to make it clear that Gaetz was not obligated to resign from his seat in Congress after being nominated, as it is generally standard for a cabinet nominee who is serving in the House or Senate to wait until confirmation to resign from their seat. It’s unclear why Gaetz made that choice, but I did want to clarify that he was not obligated to do so, as the original sentence was worded in a way that could have been interpreted to imply he was obligated by law or tradition.

Donald Trump, the Israeli-owned “American President,” has posted some weird Satan shit from Mike Huckabee.

The fact that Mike Huckabee thinks he’s the prophet Nathan advising King David is perhaps to be expected. He is a deeply confused, satanic individual, which has been understood for decades. He literally believes in exterminating children for “God,” and it doesn’t really take a theologian to suss out which “god” would be asking for the mass murder of children. Everyone knows what to expect from this guy.

There are obviously different forms of Christianity, and there are genuine followers of these different forms of Christianity, and I think there are good people in most of the forms of Christianity. There are no good people in the “bless those that bless Israel” form of Christianity. At least not after they’ve seen what that looks like in Gaza. It is impossible to have a form of Christianity that supports the mass murder of children. Outside of any theology, it is just stupid on its face that Jesus Christ would want people to mass murder children. There are people who believe in this religion, but it isn’t Christianity, it is Satanism with a (very thin Puritan/Calvinist materialist) veneer of Christianity.

What you would hope not to expect is that Donald Trump would post this text on his Truth Social site as if he thinks people like this sort of thing. I’m sure there are people who like this sort of thing. But it’s a really small number at this point. Most of the people who were into this sort of “blood for the blood god” kind of “Satanism masquerading as Christianity” stuff are already dead. They were old twenty years ago when George W. Bush claimed God was telling him to kill, kill, kill for Israel. Of the ones that are still alive, most of them are not going to be on the internet.

I understand that a lot of politicians profess this satanic form of “Christianity,” but they do that because AIPAC tells them to. It’s very profitable to have this belief system. Lee Fang went to Washington in 2023, shortly after October 7th, and talked to these freaks.

And of course, we just saw Ted Cruz tell Tucker Carlson that the core of his belief is that we have to “bless the political state of Israel” by helping them murder innocent people. But he couldn’t cite any Bible verses and couldn’t elaborate on the belief system. So it is just something he says.

JUST IN: SENATOR TED CRUZ FAILS TO USE THE BIBLE TO JUSTIFY HIS SUPPORT OF ISRAELpic.twitter.com/gJqPl4Jgyw

— Sulaiman Ahmed (@ShaykhSulaiman) June 18, 2025

Mike Huckabee probably really does believe this. He is a dark and satanic figure, much more so than Ted Cruz, who is clearly just a cheap conman.

But what percentage of normal people believe this? Not many. I did not expect Trump to crash out this hard, this fast. When you are at the point where you are talking about God sending you messages by literally speaking to you, it’s pretty difficult to imagine going any lower.

What a mess.

I am really starting to feel bad for Trump.

This is obviously not what he wanted. But here he is, a helpless little creature in the hands of the Beast without the will or strength of character to stand up and risk anything to push back on this.

Instead he’s clinging to the idea that he can maintain some kind of support by going full-Satan weirdo.

Support among the base has mostly already collapsed, and will fully collapse as soon as he officially enters the war. Seymour Hersh (who is a “my sources are telling me” guy who is actually serious) said the strikes could come as soon as this weekend. I personally have no idea, but if I had to guess, Trump would want Mossad to strike some American installation in Iraq so he could go around talking about dead Americans before he entered the war. But he might not need that. I have no idea and it really doesn’t matter.

What matters is that it’s over. Whatever hopes and dreams you had for Trump 2.0 are officially crushed. And with that, any hopes for a future for America as it is currently composed.

Sad.

I guess it’s sad. Sure, it’s obviously sad. It’s also sort of darkly hilarious, I think. I mean, if you take just two steps back, endless piles of corpses aside, this is all very funny.

Just like Trump can’t come back from this, neither can Israel. They are never again going to have any kind of major support from the American people, and instead, there is going to be massive hostility, and mobs of people following around pro-Israel politicians and jeering at them.

The timing on the Palantir AI total control grid and the US entry into full scale war in the Middle East didn’t quite line up correctly. Again, kinda funny.

Anyway.

I guess no Daily Stormer reader had very high hopes about any of this. It’s all stuff I was saying well over a year ago. As soon as Trump’s ear got scratched and they started saying he was the messiah, I called all of this, pretty well down to the detail.

Not bragging. Just saying.

President Trump responds to Tucker Carlson’s comments that he is complicit in the war.

Trump: “I don’t know what Tucker Carlson is saying. Let him go get a television network and say it so that people listen.” pic.twitter.com/l5rXVSYVfY

— Yashar Ali (@yashar) June 16, 2025

Donald Trump’s off-hand denouncement of Tucker Carlson was funny. He’s usually funny. In response to a question about Tucker Carlson denouncing him for supporting Israel’s murder-mania in Iran, Trump said: “I don’t know what Tucker Carlson is saying. Let him go get a television network and say it so that people listen.”

As ridiculous as it seems, it appears that Donald Trump actually thinks that Fox News has more viewers than the internet, and as long as Sean Hannity and Mark Levin are backing his “eternal war for the Jews and their pile of shoes” play, he’s going to be fine in terms of his public support. This definitely goes counter to his campaign strategy, which relied heavily on the internet and podcasts.

I don’t think we can calculate the numbers, but “the internet, generally” has thousands of times the views by Americans that Fox News has. Tucker Carlson specifically, who was the most popular host on Fox News before being fired (apparently for opposing the Ukraine war), got 3-4 million views a night on the network. Currently, across YouTube, Twitter, Spotify, etc., he gets 10-20 million views. (His interview with Putin, with over a quarter billion views, is the most watched interview in history, even though it was sort of really boring.) This isn’t really complicated math, and it seems like something Trump should be aware of.

Trump is now mocking Tucker for not being on tv.

“I don’t know what Tucker Carlson is saying. Let him go get a television network and say it so that people listen” he says.

Completely out of touch and ironic given the fact that podcasters won Trump the election. pic.twitter.com/XwDv80cuJu

— Candace Owens (@RealCandaceO) June 17, 2025

Meanwhile, the arrogant and smug faggot Jesse Watters (who is either a homosexual or a PUA, no one can tell the difference anymore), who replaced Tucker on Fox News, gets 1.5-2 million views. Half. Meaning people generally were watching Tucker, not just “Fox News prime time.” And get this: Sean Hannity, the ultimate Israel cheerleader, whose show airs in the former Tucker spot (now occupied by Watters) had an audience drop of 3.5 million to 2.5 million after Tucker was fired, because Tucker was propping up his show that much.

Then you can obviously go into the numbers of Candace Owens, Joe Rogan, Theo Von, Tim Dillon, and virtually every other top podcaster on the internet, all getting multi-million view counts, and find that all of them are extremely hostile to Trump over his support for Israel, both their genocide in Gaza and their war with Iran.

It would be hard to work out the numbers, but if we include the pro-Israel Fox News, and then stuff like Ben Shapiro and a few other neocons on the internet, and then compare it to the amount of media against this Jewish mania, you would probably find that about 85% of total views/listens of right-wing media content are anti-Israel. If you only included people under the age of 45, that number would end up being close to 100% (realistically, it would be 97-98%).

Trump later attacked Tucker on “Truth Social,” calling him a kook for questioning this “eternal war for Jews” narrative and reiterating the dumb claim that this is about Iran being 10 minutes away from launching a nuke.

Here’s something interesting: I don’t doubt that there are many millions of Trump personality cultists in America who will support whatever Trump does – they’d support full boots on the ground war with Iran and if he called for it, war with Israel. But I don’t think there is any media like that. I’m sure there is some somewhere, but for the overwhelming majority, they will support Trump (or not) based on his position on Israel (and war more broadly, but Israel is clearly the big one). The likes of Hannity and Shapiro, as we saw recently, will attack Trump if he appears to be opposing Israel, and when it comes to the (much more popular and relevant) podcast/streaming crowd, there doesn’t appear to be anyone who will support Trump going full-Israel.

It’s worth noting that OAN, which is not getting huge numbers of views but represents a kind of halfway point between Fox News and podcasts, has a show hosted by Matt Gaetz that recently had on Marjorie Taylor Greene denouncing Trump for pushing for war with Iran.

The United States of America should prioritize its own people! We deserve a vote on funding and military support for Israel. It’s time to focus on OUR nation’s needs first. Let’s back Trump’s America First vision! pic.twitter.com/J89CXJaRc6

— Kate (@katee_K1) June 17, 2025

Charlie Kirk is another kind of point between old TV media and the internet, and uh…

Trump is literally saying that “America First” is about fighting a war with Iran for Israel.

Trump is very good at self-parody, but that does not appear to be self-aware self-parody. Those appear to be the words of a man who is bought and paid for by a foreign country, and is going to act in the interests of that country while claiming without evidence that these interests somehow line up with the interests of the country he’s supposed to be running.

Tucker’s latest episode, released 12 hours ago, is an interview with Steve Bannon which appears to be focused on the Iran issue. I haven’t watched it yet, but it seems prudent to include it here.

Former Trump chief strategist Steve Bannon on how the president’s enemies are working to destroy MAGA with the war on Iran.

(0:00) Will the Iran War Be the Downfall of MAGA?
(6:55) Fox News’ Pro-War Propaganda
(12:42) The Never-Trumpers Pretending to Be On Trump’s Team
(15:30)… pic.twitter.com/PdUZFiUNNZ

— Tucker Carlson (@TuckerCarlson) June 16, 2025

If Trump is in the process of declaring war not only on Iran, but on all of his main supporters, this is going to go… well, it’s going to go exactly how I said it would go a year ago.

Not great.

It’s, uh… it’s not looking great here, guys.

Stormy statements of former US intelligence officer about Israel’s irreparable failure; Is it time to end the threat of Israel?

Scott Ritter, former US intelligence officer: Israel’s ground entry into Gaza means more casualties and damage than Yom Kippur; Hezbollah’s missiles… pic.twitter.com/L3JKhcvaq2

— Sprinter Observer (@SprinterObserve) October 12, 2023

“Tel Aviv will be destroyed, their military headquarters will be flattened, the prime minister’s residence will be flattened, Israel will be flattened, its airfields flattened, that’s the future of Israel and there is nothing they can do to stop it.” -Scott Ritter on October 11th, 2023, explaining what his sources say would happen if Israel invaded Gaza. 

I wrote a thing yesterday noting that there is an entire group of internet commentators who have been making a lot of wrong predictions since the start of the Ukraine war. It is a group of people, and I said I wouldn’t name them, then I did name Scott Ritter (and Pepe Escobar).

I said “people probably associate me with these people,” and it is obvious why: in theory, I agree with them about every geopolitical issue. I have listened to Scott and read Pepe significantly, and I can’t think of any single matter of principle I have disagreed with them on. (I’m sure they are not quite as “racist” as I am, but that isn’t a geopolitical issue, and I don’t think it has ever even come up in anything I’ve read/listened to from either of them.)

If we went to the broader “movement” of these sorts of activists against the American empire, there would be varying levels of disagreement, perhaps. I completely disagree with John Mearsheimer’s views on China, and I’ve read every book that mentions China (frankly, his books do not really mention China very much) and tried to listen to most of his lectures on the topic. Although in general I agree with his worldview, on China, I completely disagree, and if you want to see where I disagree, you can watch one of several debates he’s had on the issue with Jeffrey Sachs. Sachs is another person I would put in the “agree with him on everything” category, for the record. But regardless of potential agreement or disagreement, Mearsheimer and Sachs, as counter examples to Ritter and Escobar, do not make constant predictions citing secret “sources.” People from various governments definitely talk to John and Jeff, but these men don’t ever use whatever discussions they have with government officials as sources for predictions (Sachs will mention discussions he’s had with world leaders, but he does so in the form of anecdote). There are many others I have read or listened to in both categories, “source user predictors” and analysts, but I think these four men provide a good picture of the different “wings” of the current alternative media commentary ecosystem, and they are also probably the most prominent from each group.

This current iteration of a movement of alternative geopolitical commentators emerged after the Russian invasion of the Ukraine. (Surely, the four mentioned, as well as several I am not mentioning, were around doing commentary before February of 2022, but I think it’s fair to say that that was the starting point of a new popular movement of alternative commentary focused on analyzing the “World War III” battle between the US-Jewish global order and those states intent on maintaining sovereignty in the face of an evil empire hellbent on solidifying global control.) Since this has started, I’ve done huge amounts of reading and podcast listening, and I have come to be very leery of anyone who talks about “my sources are telling me…” I recognize that “anonymous inside sources” is something that has been used in journalism for a long time with a varying, but certainly not great track record. Obviously during the Trump era, “insider sources say” has become a way for the New York Times to just make things up, totally shamelessly. That was also the case in the lead-up to the Iraq war. (To Ritter’s great credit, when he was working as a UN weapons inspector he was one of the loudest voices calling out the WMD scam. Though he knew that from inspecting, not from “his sources.”)

I don’t want to accuse Ritter or any of this crowd of consistently wrong “my sources are telling me…” people of lying. What is clear is that within this movement of anti-empire commentators, “my sources are telling me…” tends to almost always mean that whatever comes next is going to be wrong. It is possible that Ritter and the others are being fed disinformation from actual sources that are lying to them to make the anti-empire movement look ridiculous. But at some point, if your sources have been wrong this many times, you really have a responsibility to stop publishing things from these sources, whoever they are (and whether or not they actually exist), because it is unethical.

Some people were upset that I pointed out Ritter being wrong. And I understand the sentiment, because – one more time – I agree with him on all of the issues of principle. And it isn’t nice to look like you’re attacking people who are “on your own team.” Further, no one is right all the time. I have often stated “I’m right about everything,” and apparently some people don’t understand that there is a bit of self-deprecating humor there. I have been wrong, like everyone is sometimes, but I’m a whole lot more right than most people, and part of that is that as a rule, I don’t make bold, specific “predictions.” I don’t claim to have “insider sources” and I’m not a wizard, so all I can do is look at the available information, put it together, and come up with options for the most likely possible outcomes. Someone could make a list of the things I’ve analyzed and I’m 100% certain I can stand up to any other commentator and be shown to have a much better track record than virtually anyone. I actually can’t think of anyone with a better track record. Sometimes people will point out where I’ve been wrong, for example in suggesting Trump would likely end the Ukraine war in order to focus on helping Israel (which might still happen, I guess, though I didn’t expect him to escalate like he has, so I was definitely wrong on that). Of course I’m not right about everything. But I say: “point to anyone else in this political analysis game who is right more often than me,” and I’ve yet to be given a single name. (I think everyone is aware that many very prominent commentators have made careers off of copying my material while I’m locked in this censorship dungeon, and they didn’t do that because I’m wrong often wrong.)

Talking about myself is not a matter of pomposity nor a total digression. I want to explain what I view as the ethical way to comment on politics, which is to do your best to analyze based on data and theories about the way various actors act (both game theory and pattern recognition), and then say “this is what seems most likely.” While always hedging (because again – not a wizard, no crystal ball), I will very often insert caveats in my analyses. For example, I said that Trump would go to war with Iran in some form, that this was virtually a certainty, but then also added that the only way I can see this not happening is if Bibi is removed from power. I made that analysis based on the data and the way the actors involved behave. That is: “Trump is clearly beholden to Israel, but in terms of his view of himself and his legacy, he would prefer not to have a war with Iran. Bibi is obsessed with dragging the US into a war with Iran but has lost huge amounts of popularity in Israel and in the Jewish diaspora due primarily to his failure to defeat Hamas and/or get the hostages back. The US is committed to joining any war Israel starts, meaning as long as he is in power, Bibi is able to dictate whether or not Trump is forced to go to war with Iran, but if Bibi were removed from power, it’s very possible that whoever replaced him would be significantly less extreme and therefore would not drag the US into a war with Iran.”

That’s the analysis I did probably 14 months ago, as soon as it became clear Trump was going to win (which I was also right about and won significant money betting on), and I think the analysis has held up pretty well. We saw the Bibi-Trump rift spill into the public, and now we’ve seen Bibi move to start the war, to force Iran to strike back and cause the US to enter the war. At time of writing, the US hasn’t entered the war, but all it would take would be for the Israelis to blow up some random US military installation in Iraq (or even do some more extreme “false flag” in the West itself) and say Iran did it and all of a sudden, the US is joining Israel in the bombing, and moving even more troops to the region. I think trying to analyze how the war will play out is very difficult, so I don’t really want to speculate too strongly (this is another thing I do, which is responsible: recognize the limits of the ability to analyze a dynamic situation – both due to limitations in my own abilities and due to the fact that some situations are simply too complex for anyone to untangle). But allow me to say what I feel comfortable saying on the matter, which will primarily just be an organization of various facts I find relevant.

We have already passed the point of no return with Israel attacking Iran’s oil fields. So, there will be some kind of “regime change,” and that might be impossible from the air. However, I would note that what Israel’s war in Gaza has shown is that the American people and Westerners in general will tolerate infinite slaughter of civilian populations, which is something that wouldn’t have been tolerated by anyone 20 years ago. (Also remember Colon [sic] Powell had to go to the UN and explain that they had an actual reason for attacking Iraq? Though it was a scam, there was an actual process, whereas now everything is just “gahhhhhahahahahahaha, die, die, die!” Further, compare the reaction to the Abu Gharib torture photos to the reaction or lack thereof to many videos of Israelis torturing Palestinians, which have included sodomy. Western ethics have changed a lot in the last 20 years.) Because of the “absolute tolerance of mass civilian slaughter because we don’t have a choice because Jews are the chosen ones and Hitler put their shoes in a pile” attitude of the West in the current year, a lot of damage is possible from the air. Iran is a big country, but the US has a lot of bombs. Meanwhile, it is difficult to imagine a full-on Iraq style US invasion, but this model of using social media to recruit Sunni jihadis from all over the world and then enabling their entry to the country, and arming them to the teeth, worked pretty well in Syria. There is still an army of terrorists in Syria and parts of Iraq that they can just roll over to Iran. Further, Azerbaijan will allow terrorists from the various Stans to fly into Baku and cross into Iran. Remember, during the Syrian war, Turkey was just letting these people come in on commercial flights and then helping them across the border.

Then, of course, there are also the minority ethnic groups in Iran, which include some Kurds, which are as a race (this is literally true) another separate US-backed terrorist group already armed to the teeth. Only 60% of Iran is Persian. I don’t know the ins and outs of how well these various groups get along, but it’s been pretty well demonstrated that any time there is a war in the Middle East, more or less every ethnic minority group has members that will accept weapons from the US and commit terrorism and atrocities against the majority ethnic group.

So while I wouldn’t say US “boots on the ground” is impossible, and it could even be inevitable depending on how prepared Iran is for the post-state phase of the war, it is certainly unlikely in the short term. This is going to be a long war, and the Iranian government is probably going to hang around for a bit. It’s really after the Iranian state is destroyed that things get complicated. Militias are a lot harder to fight than governments.

The wildcard, which is something I find interesting, is that the Iranians have been expecting a US invasion for 20 years. The Persians are a relatively high IQ population, and so they appear to have acted rationally, setting up groups of militias which are designed to act without direction from a central government. And of course, we’ve seen that the drones can do a lot of damage, and one would expect that China and Russia would be providing support in terms of drones. What is unlikely and borders on impossible (though is not technically impossible) is that Russia will send troops like they did to the Syrian war. Probably, any deal that Trump might or might not make with the Russians to end the Ukraine war would include an agreement that they not send troops to Iran. And I don’t think they would do it anyway after what happened in Syria (a debacle that apparently happened in part due to ridiculous mismanagement of the Syrian warlords by the Iranians).

So, that’s how I analyze things. (See what I did there? I gave an analysis of a current event while demonstrating the methodology of the analysis at the same time. See that? It was exceedingly clever. It’s not quite noon, but I think I might just pour myself a drink in honor of my own cleverness.)

Needless to say, Iran is not going to destroy Israel, as was consistently claimed by Scott Ritter.

I suppose we should go back to Scott Ritter. I feel a little bit bad about this, because I don’t have anything personal against the guy and I don’t like to be viewed as “attacking” others on the woke right (unless I know or strongly suspect they’re working with the Jews/feds, which unfortunately includes half of the internet right-wing). It’s especially sad given that there are so many others online doing the same “my sources are telling me…” thing, and Scott actually was raided by the FBI for like, supporting Russia or whatever, and also hit with some trumped-up jailbait swindles that actually got him thrown in prison. No wonder he joined up with Russia, where tourism advertisements say “Come to Russia, where jailbait is sort of a legal gray area, but we’re not actually going to prosecute you unless you’re a pervert.”

But Scott is probably the most popular, so I’ve gone ahead and run the transcripts of a bunch of his podcast interviews through an AI, and here’s an abridged list of predictions he’s made (it was too hard to figure out how to note which ones included “my sources are telling me…” and which ones he just said without any claim of a basis).

Highly Abridged List of Scott Ritter’s Wrong Predictions (2021–2024)

Russia-Ukraine War

• Feb 2022: “Russia will take Kiev in 72 hours.”
• March 2022: “Odessa will fall within a week.”
• April 2022: “Ukraine’s military will collapse by summer.”
• Sept 2022: “Ukraine’s Kharkov counteroffensive is a trap—Russia will encircle them.”
• Nov 2022: “Kherson will never be retaken by Ukraine.”
• June 2023: “Ukraine’s counteroffensive will cause their military to collapse.”
• Dec 2023: “Russia will win the war by early 2024.”

NATO & Nuclear Threats

• 2022: “NATO will fracture over Ukraine aid.” (Finland and Sweden joined after he said this)
• 2023: “Poland will leave NATO due to Ukraine tensions.”
• 2024: “The U.S. will cut all military aid to Ukraine by mid-2024.”

Israel-Iran & Middle East

• Oct 2023: “Israel won’t invade Gaza—they don’t have the capability.”
• April 2024: “If Israel strikes Iran, Iran will destroy Israeli military bases and decapitate its leadership.”
• June 2024: “Iran’s air defenses will shut down Israeli airstrikes.”

China

• 2023: “China will invade Taiwan by 2024.”

Bonus: Miscellaneous Nonsense

• 2022: “The West will abandon Ukraine by winter.”
• 2023: “Russia will nuke Kiev if NATO sends tanks.”
• 2024: “Ukraine’s government will flee to Lvov by summer.”

In the spirit of fairness, I went through the things he was right about, and it made him look even worse. Every time he was right, it was either late (ten wrong timelines on the liberation of Bakmut), exaggerated (Iran responding to Israeli attack), or just coincidental (just like Alex Jones, he makes so many predictions, some of them are eventually bound to be right just by the nature of chance).

Why We Shouldn’t be Goofy and Ridiculous

There is some question about whether it could actually be helpful to the anti-empire agenda for Ritter and his compatriots to just go around making all these wild predictions, “fighting lies with lies,” as it builds up momentum. What’s more, he keeps getting invited onto RT and is actually a paid contributor to RT, so at first glance, that implies “The Kremlin” likes what he’s doing. But “The Kremlin” doesn’t really run RT, Margarita Simonyan does, and her instinct is towards BuzzFeed type clickbait-mongering. Frankly, though RT does some great stuff, I don’t think there is enough oversight when it comes to some of the silly people they bring on. So I don’t think that Ritter being on RT necessarily means his “my sources are telling me…” bit is viewed positively by the Russian state. I think they just like pro-Russian Westerners, and many of us (like myself) are a bit too hot, and Ritter has the credential of having been the UN weapons inspector who tried to stop the Iraq war.

To be clear, I am not against “cheerleading.” I think we should cheerlead Russia, Palestine, all of the people fighting against the global gay Jewish-American empire. I am one such cheerleader. I always support anyone fighting against these people. Remember my Niger banners? Real ones remember.

Click to enlarge (these were kind of funny, though the context is lost to time.)

But I wasn’t saying “my sources are telling me Niger is going to invade New York and tear down that feminist statue on Wall Street.”

What the “my sources are telling me…” predictor crowd does is give people hopium dopamine hits. We all like imagining things like Tel Aviv being bombed into oblivion. I like imagining fighting the White Walkers with Jon Snow as well. Fantasy is fun and it has its place, but that place is not in geopolitical commentary, and it is especially not alongside people like John Mearsheimer and Jeffrey Sachs who are doing broad-spectrum adult analysis of these situations and actually helping people understand how the system works. Yet, on virtually every single podcast that John and Jeff appear on, you’ve also got Scott (and, increasingly, Pepe Escobar) saying this really silly stuff, Valuable information and serious voices are being tainted by unseriousness.

There are ways to be sensationalistic without promoting disinformation. I did it for a long time. I used facts and serious analysis and wrapped it around outrageous vulgarity and max lulz. I get that this model doesn’t really work in most contexts. But it was obviously effective, as I am the most banned person ever. Point being: you can find other ways to draw attention to yourself and create hype and interest that don’t totally discredit you and everyone around you. I think this is what the comedy podcasters are doing. I listen to this fat Irish slob, I think his name is Finn O’Shaughnessy, and he does an excellent job of creating hype and dopamine while keeping it real.

Fake predictions are a cheap way to gain clicks, it discredits legitimate criticism of US/NATO/Israel, and it makes everyone dumber. I am against it.

I understand things are tough out there and Scott Ritter needs to get paid. There are not many jobs available to men who have been done up twice for jailbait. I really am not doing this out of mean-spiritedness, but rather a genuine concern for the alternative media ecosystem and something that I see as kind of a big problem. Many people actually believe this stuff and it must be totally demoralizing at this point

P.S.

I also think this “Axis of Resistance” thing is really gay. These countries should be called “Brick Squad” or “Council of Doom” or something else cool like that.

P.P.S.

Let’s just hope Scott Ritter doesn’t drop a diss track on me.

It’s important to remember that a lot of these people are full of shit.

A lot of people on the internet, who are probably at least vaguely associated with me in people’s minds, were making some very kooky claims about how Iran was going to be able to destroy Israel. I don’t want to name any names. But most of you probably know the names.

Israel is now bombing Iranian oil fields, which pretty much means a point of no return, and Iran is definitely not responding by destroying Tel Aviv. Scott Ritter. That isn’t happening, is it? Pepe Escobar. Instead, it looks very much like the entirety of the Iranian military was so deeply riddled with Mossad that all of their defenses were taken offline before Israel even started bombing, and their little drone show was a joke. That’s what it looks like, Scott.

It’s not just Scott Ritter. I’m not trying to single him out. Though if I were to single someone out as saying the most outrageous possible things about the alleged capacity of Iran, it would definitely probably be Scott Ritter.

I am going to repeat what I said: Israel could always destroy the “regime” in Iran. They could always destroy their oil fields. That was always completely within their capacity. Saying it wasn’t was ridiculous and based on totally nothing. What the issue is, I think and have said from the beginning, is that ever since the US invasion of Iraq, when the government was decapitated in like five minutes, Iran has tried to set up a situation where they can fight a long war after the decapitation of the government. Whether they can actually do that, or whether that whole program is also run by the Mossad, I have no idea. But that was always the only possible option for Iran in the case of this war that started this week: to accept the decapitation of the government and to go guerrilla and try to set the whole Middle East on fire and deplete the US military in a decades-long conflict where they don’t have a government but they have organized militias which are capable of keeping the drones flying.

I’ve also said that after a violent decapitation of the Iranian government, setting up a “democracy” in Iran is going to go about as well as it did in Afghanistan. So the US is going to have to occupy Tehran and keep bases there and try to prop up some puppet government that everyone is constantly droning and suicide bombing.

You’re also going to of course have the ISIS model of US-backed terrorists invading Iran, but at the same time, Iran has their own foreign groups that will come in. And probably, presumably (one would have to presume), Russia and China will also be sending aid.

But no, the Iranian regime, which literally has no air defense at all apparently (they had Russian stuff but I guess their Mossad agents took it all offline), cannot survive weeks or even days of continued Israeli bombing. But of course, that in no way ends the war. The Iraq war lasted ten years after the government was decapitated, and only ended when the US agreed to basically hand the country over to Iran.

So, the US will have to go in. Like I said they would. Like I bet a bunch of money they would.

Why am I even typing this? Just go back and read the shit I wrote in hundreds of articles before the election.

It’s not a confusing situation. You do not have to be an “analyst” to see how this is going to go.

My question is whether Trump will end the Ukraine war so he can focus on the Middle East. That is one thing I predicted was likely and I still think it seems likely. Of course, Trump hasn’t committed anything to the Israelis at time of writing. He keeps saying he wants to negotiate with whoever is still alive. But Israel is going to make sure there is no one alive to negotiate with, which means that the US is obligated to go fight this war.

That was always the problem. Israel had the ability to start a war that the US had no choice in whether or not they joined, which meant that Bibi Netanyahu was in charge of US war policy. And, as expected, he exercised that ability.

Now we’ve got the thing.

I do think it’s going to take some time before things get really hot and the people who are freaking out are sort of emotional babies. But I could be wrong. Trump has already moved a lot of troops to the Middle East. Not enough, and it will take time to move more. I don’t know how much time. I’m not an expert.

Sorry my happening loving friends, but nothing ever happens.

The Israel and Iran strikes are a nothing burger.

Speaking of processed meats, the Jews keep claiming they “destroyed all the mullahs’ salami,” as if the goyim are too stupid to know that Moslems don’t eat pork.

If I had to guess, it appears that Bibi was just trying to sabotage the Trump peace process, and that Iran is aware that’s what Bibi was trying to do. So both things are just reverse bluffs being pre-called by the other side.

Maybe I’m wrong and I should believe the hype. They hype has never been real before, but maybe it is this time. Famously, I do not make predictions, because unlike most internet commentators, I do not believe I am a wizard. All I can do is look at what is happening and process the information through the information and the logic mechanism that is already in my brain, and every indication is that this is a whole lot of nothing.

Jews are vastly exaggerating the damage they’ve done. This is a Ukraine-style “just bomb random apartment buildings lol” style attack. I don’t know if they hit nuclear sites or other important military sites, but there isn’t any evidence of that right now.

The ramifications of this event are going to be – of course – more Jewish whining about the Iranian response. These kikes will literally “preemptively” (“preemptive” of what?) bomb you and murder random people and then cry out in pain when you do some weak drone response.

I guess “tensions will rise” in the Middle East, but tensions were not really doing very well recently anyway, and I’m not even sure what “tensions rising” means when everyone has already reached their point of any willingness to push further. It’s worth noting that destroying the “regime” in Iran doesn’t make a major war less likely and probably actually makes it more likely (the Iraqi “regime” fell about 10 days into the 1o-year Iraq War, and Iraq didn’t spend 25 years planning to fight a war with the US after a decapitation of their government).

Another point worth mentioning is that before the attack the US was mass-moving equipment from the Ukraine to the Middle East. There’s different ways to read that, but I haven’t been able to find any meaningful numbers about how much of what was moved. But one of the points I was pushing before the election was that if Trump pivoted to the Middle East he’d be more likely to downsize the war on Russia, because despite the beliefs of prominent and highly respected yentas like Victoria Nuland and Janet Yellen, the US doesn’t actually have “unlimited resources.” (It just has unlimited money, which is not the same thing, but try explaining that to any woman. Seriously, ask any single woman you know “why don’t you think the government doesn’t just print money and give it to everyone so that everyone can be rich?” I’m really serious, ask any woman that question. Just see what happens.)

But if there was any upshot that was actually meaningful, it would be more animosity between Trump/Witkoff and Bibi, which in itself doesn’t really mean anything and probably won’t result in anything because Bibi is too good and too embedded in the US legislative branch (even if Trump has done his best to root him out of the executive, which is a questionable claim, it doesn’t mean anything when he’s in a group chat with every member of the US Congress).

The only thing that actually interests me about this event is the media narrative. I am watching CNN and Fox and reading the Times and the rest, and they are all saying “Trump tried to stop Bibi from doing this but he did it anyway because he knows that if he starts a war, using American weapons he got for free, the US has no choice but to join the war.” Every single news outlet is just admitting outright that Israel has full control of American policy and that the prime minister of Israel has an absolute ability to declare war in the name of the US in direct opposition to the demands of the US president.

All over the place, on both left and right, this claim coming from the government that the US has a moral obligation to be a slave of Israel because of a pile of shoes is wearing real thin. This event and the unavoidable media admission that Bibi has a right to overrule Trump when it comes to US declarations of war is not going to be good for the polls showing that Americans of all ages (yes, even the boomers) are becoming exhausted with the claim that we are evil if we even ask why it is America doesn’t have a right to control her own foreign policy.

These polls are of course one of the big reasons Bibi is in a rush to get this Iran thing going. I am sure the polls are not totally honest, but they show a post-10/7 Building 7 like collapse in support for Israel – and for Jews in general, frankly, given that Jews made the decision to fully fortify the idea that there is zero difference between the state of Israel and the American Jewish population (which is obviously true, please see Dave Portnoy and every other American Jew, but it’s still slightly confusing to me why they are obsessed with forcing this fact on the population). Despite appearances to the contrary, the boomers can’t actually live forever, and so with every passing day, the “greatest ally because they’re God’s chosen baby-killers who once had their shoes thrown in a big pile” narrative is fading. Unless Palantir’s AI Panopticon Skinner Box actually works like Alex Karp says it does (and it doesn’t actually work like that, as scary as it is), this entire system of an extremely wealthy and powerful minority group ruling every aspect of our lives, determining every policy of our country, micromanaging the behavior of individuals even, while claiming they are the ultimate victims and that any criticism of them is metaphysically evil is not sustainable for very much longer.

Here’s the issue: the other side of Bibi’s “we have to drag the US into a massive war before we lose all support from the Americans” is the now quite popular American Jewish view that Bibi is personally responsible for destroying Jewish power in America, and so he must be stopped. The anti-Bibi narrative has been building among American Jews for at least a year, and it is now the standard narrative in the Jewish media, with the exception of Fox News (and the like), and among academics and basically most American Jews. But again, the Congress is still totally under the control of Bibi, and I don’t think anyone has a way of parsing out how those power dynamics actually work in real life, because they’ve never really been tested on this scale.

There’s no way to know which way this will go, but I can pretty much guarantee it will be disgustingly boring.

Statistically, at some point, it is going to have to happen that happeningfags are going to be right and I’m going to be wrong. But I do not think that day is today.

I was supporting Israel because of all of the work our brave white women have done to support women sports, and how they are being destroyed by the radical trans gender movement. I was also big on Israel because of Mexicans burning American flags, and because AOC is trying to do socialism.

But then I open my digital currency game application and find a very bad red line and they say Israel makes the red line go like that.

Don’t get me wrong, folks. I love women’s sports and I want the death penalty for burning American flags and I hope Palantir can save our values in our country by going against the Mexicans and making them pay more taxes so we can support Israel more and more.

But I see this red line in my crypto digital app, and I think, “maybe we should just kill all of the Jews?”

It’s a conflicted issue for me, because stopping radical gender ideology and wokeness on our college campuses is so important. It’s really the most important thing for me and I think all true Americans believe we have to destroy Iran to protect our women’s progress in sports.

Back in the times of the Targaryens, women didn’t even have any sports, and they were oppressed, and we worked so hard for this, and then the mullahs tried to take us back to ancient times with their woke ideologies on our campuses.

But a 7% BTC drop and dropping?

Even JPROOF is down, and that was one of the most promising and ambitious coins in my portfolio.

I’m sorry, but although Jews are the chosen ones and their lives are the most important thing in the world, I just don’t think they are worth that much money.

So because of this, I’ve decided to officially endorse Team Iran in this championship match.

It is also better if all the Jews die so they can’t have remainders hanging around whining.

If that means we have to lose our women’s sports and go back to the times of Game of Thrones, then so be it.

I’d love to hear the opinions of the readers, so drop a like and a follow and ring my bells and let us know what team you’re supporting and if you think it’s worth it to risk our women’s sports by supporting the mullahs and their woke agenda on campuses.

But I think we can all agree that we hope both teams have fun.

Stew Peters is a famous media personality who created the Solana token “JPROOF” to stop the Rothschild bankers. However, some do not know that before he took on this role, he was a successful rapper. As the JPROOF token has created some drama, Stew Peters has returned to his rap personality as “Fokiss” to drop a diss track against Lucas Gage who has accused him of doing a rug pull.

I do not have any interest in dipping into this drama. As far as I am aware, this “JPROOF” Sol token is in fact stopping the Rothschild bankers and will save America by ending the fed. Peters has given me no reason to doubt this, and a 70% drop is not proof of a rug pull, and could be a random event. It is also feasible that someone could do a rug pull against the Rothschild banksters. I’m not saying that’s what happened, but a scheme to stop the international banking cartel with a meme coin rug pull could be the black swan power play we’ve all been waiting for.

I also have no reason to judge Lucas Gage, who is a genuine guy I’ve known for like 15 years, and it is definitely frustrating to sell a meme coin at a $9,000 loss. I was rug pulled by Donald Trump and his rapidly aging pro-abortion wife. Though I pulled profits before getting rug pulled, it still did not feel great to lose a bunch of money, so if Lucas Gage and his wife (who is also involved in this situation for some reason) feel they got rug pulled by the Stew Crew, I feel for them.

So please, let’s be clear: I do not want to be involved in this drama. As far as I’m concerned, Peters and Gage are both upstanding members of the woke right movement, and whatever beef they’ve got is between them. Period. I want no involvement at all.

All I want to do is share Stew “Fokiss” Peters’ diss track, because it is being censored on Twitter, and I believe in free speech. (No matter how offensive to my gentle sensibilities your diss track is, I will die for your right to drop it.) It keeps being banned by Elon Musk, who has also accused both Stew Peters and Lucas Gage of being in the Epstein files. He has since deleted those tweets, but continues to suppress the Fokiss diss track. I don’t think he’s siding with Gage (though I have seen photos of Gage and Ian Miles Cheong having cocktails in Dubai), but he just wants to shut down the debate on the woke right so he can push his own narrative.

Regardless of which side of the hill you choose to drown on, the song is decent and even if it isn’t, the people have a right to make up their own mind about Fokiss and his disses.

The track is titled “Goomba” (you’ll see why).

I claim no rights to this song, with any copyright held by Fokiss and Stew Peters. Stew has said you can feel free to try to upload it again on Twitter. Because for real, this drama is just silly, but we need to honor freedom of speech and free expression.

I want to say that as far as I know, Lucas has a great wife and a happy family. Stew shouldn’t be saying these things about his wife, but to be honest, Gage shouldn’t be doing anti-Stew videos with his wife if he doesn’t want her involved. But this is just the rap game, you know? People say mean things, then sometimes they show love after they get their emotions out. I hope after the heat dies down, Gage and Peters get together and launch another Sol token to do more damage to the Rothschilds and end the fed once and for all.

We’re taking odds on whether or not Lucas Gage will try to match Fokiss’ flow. By releasing this diss track, Stew has pretty much killed the beef, because everyone is now talking about the song rather than whatever the drama is (which I honestly still don’t really understand beyond a few tweets I saw and what I gleaned from the lyrics of this diss track).

If Gage drops a counter-diss, things could get real interesting, and it’s possible we could set up a real life rap battle, maybe in Abu Dhabi where the Jews won’t shut us down.

If all drama took the form of music, we’d be in a lot better place in the woke right movement. If I had Stew’s rhyming skills, I’d have saved myself the trouble of writing tens of thousands of words against my many enemies on the woke right. Sadly, as shameful as it is for me to admit as a proud white man, I can’t write a rap to save my life.

I’m alright with beats though, and I can definitely proof read some rhymes that Lucas draws up. Even though I have no cat in this fight, I might step in and try to help Lucas put out a counter-diss, because although the song is fire, Fokiss went too hard, and I tend to always root for the underdog. Lucas is the underdog now that this track is out there, and he needs to get his feelings about the rug pull out there in rap format, and there is a lot of material to work with, especially since Fokiss’ early work is not great, and Gage can easily accuse him of using autotune.

Part of the problem is that Fokiss preempted Gage’s diss material by talking about crashing 4 quads and beating his wife. It was a smart move as a rapper to be like “yeah, I did that shit.” Now Gage is going to have to look for other angles to hit him on. Also frankly, Gage is on the back foot since he is doing videos with his wife, which is maybe a sort of weird optics choice. But I can help spin that.

I’m talking myself into it now. I’m willing to get together with Gage to do a response to Goomba. I know all’s fair in war and rap battles, but Fokiss got real nasty about Gage and his financial situation and his wife’s opinions. Again, if I was Gage, I wouldn’t have put my wife’s opinions in my internet beef, but what’s done is done and we’re just gonna have to spin that.

“Fokiss you a bitch so I send my bitch to nag you because she on your level, neither of you is useful with a shovel because it takes a real man to dig a hole, like the hole you dug with your rug pull.” Or maybe “my wife is a knife, I sent her at your jugular, cuz she did that thug life while you was bounty hunting innocent whites.” Maybe something like that. I’m just spitballing here. Again, I’m not a rap master, but I want to help to defend Gage, even though I don’t have a possum in this cockpit, because I support the underdog.

But then again if Fokiss hit me with some of that JPROOF coin, I might join his team because I need the cash to pay for my seizure medication. And it’s nice to have principles and support the underdog until you’re flopping on the floor and foaming at the mouth and your stupid wife thinks a metal spoon is just as good as a wooden spoon and now your teeth look like Shane MacGowan’s.

But seriously, I’m not going to choose sides in this fight, I’m staying out of it, I love both these guys who are truly honorable members of the Aryan race who have done so much to save our people from the Jews by fighting tooth and nail against the banksters and helping the Palestinians.

I just try to be a good guy and help everyone, but I’m just honest, if Stew Crew pays for my seizure medication I’ll help him with his rug pull against the Rothschilds so we can liberate the white race from the slavery of the banksters and end the fed once and for all using Sol token meme coins.

I just gotta keep it real and tell you that my wife thinks “wooden spoon” means “stainless steel egg beater,” and I’m trying to write this book about Palantir and there is foam all over my keyboard and I have to drink enough whisky to make it cool that my teeth look like Shane MacGowan’s (and that is a lot of whisky).

I just truly hope Gage and Stew can work together to bring down the Rothschilds once and for all using Sol meme token rug pulls.

Firstly, if I was going to kill myself, I would do it in some epic style that no one would ever forget. Probably, I would use a gun in a famous place. If I didn’t have a gun, I’d do like, a quadruple backflip from the 99th floor cocktail bar. Something along those lines.

Nextly, I wouldn’t kill myself, for a number of reasons. I’ve become psychopathically religious, for one. For another, it would be giving a win to Dave Portnoy. The fact that Dave Portnoy (and every other Jew, each of which is exactly like Dave Portnoy) exists actually makes me want to become involved in the transhumanist movement and live forever so no Jew can ever celebrate my death.

Nextly, I honestly wouldn’t want to hurt anyone’s feelings. People shouldn’t give a shit about me, but I understand that people do. And I’ve never wanted to hurt anyone’s feelings, and faking a suicide is a really nasty thing to do.

As a side, I once had a very funny joke about how I had a brain tumor. This was very hilarious. In fact, it might have been a little bit too hilarious, if you catch my drift. It’s so hilarious that there could be times when I need to take time off writing just to laugh about it.

Frankly, I did not expect that one somberish post would lead to widespread rumors of my demise. I didn’t realize everyone was expecting me to kill myself.

I used to be really worried about giving any impression of being depressed or whatever because the Jews could assassinate me and make it look like a suicide. I don’t really care about that anymore, given that, due to AI, it would be so easy to kill me and make it look like I was still alive. So at this point, it doesn’t really bother me to say that no, I’m not having a great time. Again, I wouldn’t ever kill myself regardless, but in terms of posting whiny emo bullshit, yes, that could happen again.

Of course, it’s stupid to talk about not having a good time, because things are tough all over, and everyone has a responsibility to keep their shit together, while no one is ever going to be able to understand what anyone else is going through. So in general, I have a “chin up” philosophy about these things, and think everyone else should have the same. You don’t have any idea what is going on in my head, I don’t have any idea what is going on in your head, the same is true for all of the people on the earth, and we all have the same responsibility to be normal and take responsibility for our own lives. Some people appear to have easier lives than others, but I don’t have any evidence of that. Rich, famous, attractive people kill themselves regularly, probably at a higher rate than ugly poor randos. I’m also not even sure that killing yourself proves anything about your mental state other than that you were sick of whatever it is was going on and didn’t want to deal with it anymore, which could mean a lot of different things.

So I don’t want to whine about my feelings. At the same time, I have been so open about myself and what is going on in my head for so long, I might as well just say what I’ve got going on in my head, especially in light of large numbers of people thinking I killed myself. It’s also worth talking about as it is almost entirely professional in nature. I have my personal and family problems like everyone has, I suppose, but I’ve largely relied on a technique to just block that all out (or at least “black it out,” if you catch my drift), and monomaniacally focus on my agenda.

The agenda is stagnant. As I’ve said, all of this politics stuff bores me. The Donald Trump news situation just feels like endless torture. Like, I already wrote all of this stuff. Now he’s literally going to Palantir you all like a bunch of Palestinians and James Bowman is going to tell Theo Von (with a highly askew face) that it’s about like, illegal immigrants not paying enough taxes.

Asked about Palantir compiling government data, JD Vance says he is more concerned about surveillance via commercial ad data brokers. I don’t know if that will satisfy concerns about Palantir, but he’s right about the data brokers.

The National Geospatial Intelligence Agency… pic.twitter.com/pYlGAlhTDo

— Emily Kopp (@emilyakopp) June 7, 2025

I’m like, “yo, Bowman – on my list of concerns, ‘a biometric control grid where every action every person takes is entered into a database that is funneled into an AI system used to program society and its individual members like a video game’ is a lot higher than ‘wetbacks not giving enough money to the “defense of Israel and free things for niggers and fat people” fund’.”

Apparently, opinions differ on this issue. The thing is, illegal immigrants are not actually going to be paying more taxes because you submitted to an AI control grid designed to micro-manage every aspect of society. So even if you were willing to give up not only all of your freedoms, but your basic ability to exist as a human being in a society in order to get Mexicans to give more money to the Big Beautiful Bill, you still shouldn’t make that deal, because the people trying to make that deal with you are not honest people and they don’t actually care if Mexicans pay taxes.

I suppose I should have started by explaining what Palantir is doing with the Trump administration? But why should I start with that? Shouldn’t people already know that? And if they don’t know it, or if they do, does it really matter? Anyway, basically all of that shit I spent two years writing about – how they were going to use Covid to create a system of biometric monitoring that uses all of the CCTV cameras, your phone, and everything else designed to track you, to monitor all of your behavior, and put it into a massive AI simulation that then allows them to program the behavior of society – turned out to not occur at that time because the selfsame AI simulation system showed that people were going to revolt against it. Now, they’re doing the same thing, and saying it’s about illegal immigrants and Mexican rioters in LA and Islamic extremists and whatever other thing right-wing people supposedly care about. Left-wing people would for the most part support a biometric control grid run by AI because left-wing people will support literally anything if you tell them it is going to create a utopia. But now they have this angle to get right-wing people on-board.

But hey, it’s all just whatever. Because no one really gives a shit. Honestly, I don’t even give a shit. No one else does, so why should I?

Anyway, most retards are not aware of this fact, but all of that “social credit” stuff that the Chinese started to do 15 years ago was totally rolled back and most of it was made illegal under new privacy laws that Xi’s government put through. You can look that up, or not, I don’t really care. You can believe whatever stupid bullshit you want, it’s not my fucking problem. But the reason China decided that using extreme surveillance and combining it with social engineering was a bad idea was not that they are just really moral or whatever, it’s that it was determined to be cancerous for society, and given that the Chinese government is the one running the surveillance and the law enforcement and the prisons, there was no incentive to create social chaos by implementing a dystopian control grid. In America, it’s not just Palantir that has an incentive to implement a control grid, but the private police contractors and weapons suppliers for the police, the private prisons, the NGO groups that support nonwhite crime, and on and on and on forever. Everyone gets rich off of a dystopian control grid.

The claim with China was apparently “they just want to control everyone for no specific reason or maybe they are evil (after all, just look at the shape of their eyes).” This is obviously retarded, and as soon as it became clear that these types of social engineering programs don’t work and will ultimately collapse society, the Chinese stopped virtually all of it. The “social credit system” as it exists now is almost exclusively related to corporations committing various crimes (pollution or scams or whatever). For individuals, it is totally related to financial ratings, similar (though frankly much less extreme and abusive) than the American “credit score.” The only place where there is anything like a Western-style social control grid in China is among the Uyghurs, and you can go read and see if you think that’s reasonable or not. (Virtually all of what the US says China does to the Uyghurs is a lie, of course, but yeah, they are pretty heavily monitored by the government. Again, just go read about it and see if you think that makes sense or if it is done for reasons of pure evil and communism.)

But whereas “China just wants to control everyone to be nasty” is clearly ridiculous to any adult person, the reasons the US and the West generally want to do it are obvious by simply looking at the profit motive. It’s not complicated. Not confusing. It’s not “transparent” in the sense that the media covers it, but it is definitely “transparent” in the general sense of the word. You can just go look up the amount of money all of these companies (Palantir probably now the biggest but by no means the only one) can make off of a control grid.

But here’s what’s scarier than the financial incentive: they also want to control what you think and feel, and they are talking openly about using this biometric AI monitoring and behavior modification grid to modify beliefs. If we go back to China, the government’s goal in terms of social engineering is simply social harmony. In terms of beliefs, they want pro-social beliefs generally, but the only belief they are actually going to try to modify is your belief about the government itself. In general, they try to do that by having the government be a positive entity that people naturally have good views of. But maybe they try to get people to think different things using whatever methods, I don’t know, you can believe that if you want, I certainly can’t prove they don’t do that, I can just say there isn’t any evidence of it. Whatever. I don’t care what you think about China. I’m bringing this up to make the point: how many beliefs do the ruling elite of the United States want to modify and control? It’s a list too long to list, but just look at the Jewish issue.

Now, look at the distance between the current public beliefs on Jews and Israel and the goals for public beliefs on Jews and Israel that a company like Palantir would have.

Now, watch that James Bowman clip again where he’s sweating like Ganesh in a hot spring explaining that he doesn’t really even know much about Palantir or the Trump Administration’s plan for a biometric control grid that uses AI to record and modify all human behavior.

Now, imagine me trying to explain this to people and thinking that me trying to explain this to people is going to do anything good for me or anyone else.

We are so, so far gone.

The only solution to the American situation is a total societal collapse, similar to that of the USSR. Period. There is no other angle here.

The upside is that the more people who think like us that we have in positions of power when the collapse comes, the better. But that’s pretty much the only positive message I’m able to think of.

I might publish a long essay/short book about “freedom” and use the comparison of China and the United States as a means to elaborate on what exactly it is we have going on here. The issue is this control grid and the ability that AI is going to have to manipulate the behavior of hundreds of millions of people. That is the primary issue. And it feels generally ridiculous to talk about it, because most people are incapable of understanding it and if they are capable of understanding it they don’t want to understand it because it is so unpleasant to think about and if they are both capable of and willing to understand it, there is nothing they can do about it, because we live in a democracy where you have no ability to influence government policy and your freedom of speech is dependent on the same corporations building the control grid giving you a right to speak.

So it’s all frustrating.

And I do really thank you all for reading my site and I especially thank those who have donated (which you can still do, by the way). And I am genuinely sorry I didn’t do more and I really feel like I could have done more.

That’s all I meant by the thing.

Suicide note?

Bro, if I write a suicide note, you’re going to know it. And it’s going to say a lot of things which will be very angry and hilarious.

But I’m not going to write a suicide note because I’m not going to kill myself. Well, I might write an “If I was Going to Write a Suicide Note” fake suicide note, like that time OJ Simpson wrote a book about how he would have killed his wife if he had done it.

OJ was totally innocent of course, but he should have killed that nigger-fucking whore Nicole and her Jew. Just so, I’m totally innocent of suicide, but I should kill myself because this shit is all so gay and retarded.

P.S.

See something? Say something.

Please help me to take a stand against fed trolls who are claiming this picture was Photoshopped:

That picture is 100% real and unedited, and that is my bedroom.

Feds are all over the internet trying to discredit me by claiming that is Photoshopped, and I would really appreciate it if when you see a fed making this claim, you fight back against him by telling the TRUTH.

I understand you can’t all afford to donate, but it costs nothing to tell a fed kike troll that this photo is 100% real and that is my bedroom where I live and work.