Matt Walsh can’t reject an invitation by Tucker Carlson. He also can’t take a legitimate position on the Jews and Israel, because he works for Little Benny the Big Man. It’s a funny situation for Tucker, because he can just call this guy up whenever he wants and straight-up rat hole him.

This week, Walsh got the rat-holing of a lifetime, with Tucker moving to smoke him out, let loose the hounds, tickle him to tears, and finally, stroke the goat while giggling maniacally.

The fink Walsh was due for a heavy-handed rat-holing because he is indeed, my dearest reader, a rat fink. He is a fundamental part of the Ben Shapiro Jew Machine which is as simple as a simple shed person on serious pills and dreaming of a better tomorrow. The Jew rat Shapiro avoids getting chased into a hole and smoked out (hounded, etc.) by simply not engaging with anyone. He literally will not debate anyone who is going to bring up the points on Palestine. He will also hang up on live callers. His entire life is based around avoiding the hole.

The Shapiro Jew Machine works like this:

• Say basic things that conservatives agree with (mostly just about trannies or other people that literally everyone hates)
• Be a bit edgy and act like you’re doing something brave
• Get people to think “oh, I agree with this guy and I support him”
• Bombard them with Jewish propaganda
• The target who, at least before recently, probably hasn’t thought very much about Israel, assumes that they must also support Israel because the anti-tranny guy supports Israel

This is the single most obvious scam in the history of media scams. But it continues to work incredibly well. Or at least it did before Tucker Carlson came through like a whirlwind and started rat-holing people.

With Candace Owens having bullied Shapiro into firing her, Walsh is the last individual anyone even knows about who is aiding Shapiro in his Jew scheme. He babbles on about trannies (still) and says a bunch of racist stuff. But instead of adding the “I love Israel” part, he has an ostensibly “more masculine” bit where he says “I just don’t care, it has nothing to do with America.” That is of course retarded on its face, given that the United States pays for all of it.

I have never in my life heard Matt Walsh say something that was not totally obvious. He’s not even a particularly good talker. (As I prepare for my show, I can always tell myself, “well, umming or no, I’m already better than Matt Walsh.”) But his curmudgeonly old lumberjack fake persona (seriously, find a picture of him without his beard and then tell me this is a “real man”) is apparently a selling point.

“This is on the other side of the world and it’s not my problem” sounds like a valid perspective. But it simply is not, because no one is talking about that, no one views it that way, and it is not that way. What we are talking about is the fact that the United States, with its biggest military ever and its infinity money, is backing this entire thing. Obviously, it wouldn’t be happening without the funding and military backing of the US. Israel is a small country, whereas Moslems are a quarter of the world’s population and could obviously easily wipe these people out in a few minutes. Egypt alone could wipe them out very fast. Frankly, Hamas and Hezbollah alone could probably do it within a few months of the US cutting the funding.

Therefore, there is no conversation about the war outside of the conversation of the US funding it, because if it were not for US funding, Israel would not exist at all, let alone be committing the most extreme genocide in history on a very public stage. Every issue involving Israel, therefore, is first and foremost an American issue, and therefore it is the responsibility of those involved in American politics to take a hard position on the issue.

What’s more, this is the most consequential issue for America and Americans, as it could literally totally destroy our country. This is without even going into the facts about everything else the Jews are doing in this country, but simply looking at Israel: because everyone in the world understands this is an American issue, the US is becoming a pariah state for its genocide. It is a universally hated country now. People used to love the US. Everyone now views it as totally satanic. This goes beyond simply being spat on as a tourist: this threatens the US economy. Objectively, US support for Israel is making Americans poorer, and that goes way beyond simply the tax dollars dumped into this project, and digs into America’s ability to operate on the world stage while causing total internal breakdown. It is infecting the social order, used as a justification for new forms of censorship we’ve never seen. Further, the US being sucked into a gigantic war on behalf of Israel is not at all outside the realm of possibility.

You cannot simply dance around this as an American political commentator. It is not simply a “cowardly” position, it is a position that makes you look retarded, as if you do not understand the most basic dynamics of US politics, which should make a person ask: “Why then are you a US political commentator?”

Obviously, the whole “support Israel, bigot!” thing is not really working very well anymore. These people are trying other strategies. If you listen to Nick Fuentes, he tells you “Israel is the same as Russia” (he claims without evidence that “Russia influences American policy” and therefore it’s the same as Israel). A lot of these people are talking about Moslems constantly now, because it is a lot easier to get people to hate Moslems than it is to get them to love the Jews. Frankly, Walsh’s “I don’t care, it’s not our problem” is not very popular, even though you would think on its face it would be. It’s because basically everyone, even the poorly informed, understand that when you talk about Israel, you are talking about an American issue.

Walsh is totally full of shit when he says that he “never cared about Israel.” He actually made a point to say “you can go back from before I worked at the Daily Wire and look at my old blog and see I never talked about Israel.” Although his old blog is deleted, we have some of the old posts archived, including this one:

This closes with the point:

But I do have a problem with the fools who would call you a Neo-Nazi because you’d rather that three billion a year stay in American households rather than Israeli politicians’ wallets.

…which demonstrates that, just like everyone else, he understands very well that Israel is an American issue, not a far-away foreign issue. Before senility, people do not generally get less informed as they age, so it is an absolute fact that Walsh developed these new views he has on Israel for financial gain.

He can’t argue that this was some youthful folly either. Aside from the fact that people do not typically lose connection to established facts as their views evolve (rather you perceive the facts to mean something different in light of new facts or a new perception, if indeed your views do change as you age), that blog is from 2013.

Oh wait, jeez. I was about to say “he was already in his forties at the time.” I just looked it up and he is thirty-nine (39) as of this date. What the hell, man? How did that happen? I guess that makes sense in terms of his career trajectory. I had generally assumed that he had some other job, took up blogging as a side thing, and then opportunities appeared. So, he was 27 when he published that blog.

Again, the blog is deleted. But according to his Wikipedia page, he was fired from conservative radio in 2013, not long after that blog was published. Who knows how hard he was going against Israel? The next year, he started working for Glenn Beck’s “The Blaze,” and then in 2017 started working for Ben Shapiro’s “Daily Wire.” And his understanding of the basic facts around Israel were forever changed.

(Note: I assume he must have at some point addressed the issue of money to Israel during the hullaballoo, wherein he’s attempted to ride the fence harder than anyone else, literally working for Ben Shapiro while appearing in friendly interviews with Tucker Carlson. However, whatever the mental gymnastics are on that one, the math is not convincing enough to work in prime time on Tucker Carlson, hence the fact that he didn’t bother to present it. My bet is that if pressed, he says “well, I don’t think foreign aid is a good idea in principle,” in which case someone would respond, “so then why don’t you say ‘my only concern is that the US should stop funding Israel,’ instead of ‘I don’t care’?”)

In terms of Tucker rat-holing him in this episode published on Friday, it could be an exaggeration to claim that he was tickled to tears and that the goat was stroked. It’s a bit of a reference to the old Stormer meme from years ago, which I just looked up.

Check the “Tucker Carlson” tag if you want more. I spent 30 minutes looking at them, with long breaks of laughter. This site used to be so funny. No wonder everyone hates me now.

Tucker made a point to not destroy him. He easily could have TIED HIM UP WITH RUSTY WIRES and PLUCKED HIS BEARD WITH PLIERS after Walsh tried to claim it is not an American issue. Instead, Tucker nicely said that he wasn’t talking about whatever Walsh was trying to frame it as but rather the support of the American right for a genocide.

By the way, the show before this, Tucker interviewed some UN woman about the fact that this is a genocide.

It was clear that Tucker wanted to keep the conversation as friendly as possible, and simply demonstrate his power to Ben Shapiro, i.e., “I’m in ur base, goat-stroking ur doodz.” As a more practical matter, it shows Walsh’s audience that Tucker’s views on Israel are acceptable. Shapiro claims they are not acceptable, that they are outside of allowed discourse, that there are not any circumstances under which US support for Israel can be questioned. So it was a power move, a way to prove that he has sway over all conservatives.

For the record, although I like Tucker, I do not truly trust him at all. In fact, I have a series that I have not published about what I see as his agenda. I don’t think it is likely that he is an intelligence agent, but he is playing a game that goes beyond what he is presenting. He’s deeply tied to JD Vance, who is in turn an agent of Silicon Valley. That whole scene is very dirty.

South Park’s newest season (which was for some reason listed as two separate seasons back to back) was unbelievably bad. I hadn’t watched the show in years, because who even thinks about South Park. I say that as someone deeply entrenched in the adult cartoon world, a very sick man who will turn on AI Futurama in the background and then say “this is good enough to sit down and actually watch in the foreground.” But South Park managed to hype themselves with hatred against the show, and I was interested to see where they went with it. It was indeed horrible. It’s all about Trump. Before this season, they’d signed a deal for $1.5 billion for 50 episodes, which averages out to about $1.3 million per minute. Good work if you can get it.

Frankly, I didn’t even mind that they attacked Trump. I think Trump’s attacks on free speech are a good reason to attack Trump with a TV show. They clearly wanted him to say something about it, though I think so few people are even aware of it that it just never crossed Trump’s radar. However, it was a lot of 1990s edginess, with gay sex and whatever. The whole thing felt very draining, even though JD Vance as Tattoo (from Fantasy Island) was somewhat inspired.

But the thing I wanted to mention was that they had Peter Thiel talking about the Antichrist.

This probably speaks to the extent to which this whole thing is currently embedded in the cultural awareness: that these Silicon Valley people are into something very weird, that they are using “JD Vance” (fake name, btw) as a vehicle to seize power.

If you’re thinking “oh he must not be going to even publish those articles he hyped up, if he was he wouldn’t be talking about it now,” you may be right. I went through them earlier today and it was kind of a mess. The sort of thing where typically, instead of editing, I would just rewrite from scratch. There are a handful of interesting facts which I don’t think are getting enough attention. You have just right out in the open this “Vance” character saying that he’s going to be the next president, and it is not in any way a secret that he’s a creature of Silicon Valley, of the gay guy who is talking about the Antichrist and running an AI spy machine clearly intended to establish the total AI nightmare world I’ve spent years describing, where each individual is targeted by their electronics, manipulated as if they’ve all got their own little Jolly West in their pocket. This ability to manipulate perceptions on a grand scale is much scarier than the police state implications of Palantir (which are scary enough).

It’s highly confusing why more people are not talking about this, and my premise is that it has a lot to do with Tucker Carlson. It’s hard to say the extent to which he is aware of what is obviously going on with Vance. The idea that Tucker is swayed by Vance simply writing a good book (which is not political) and then talking in broad platitudes about “working class populism,” and that this sway is so strong that it causes Tucker to deny the obvious, is hard to believe.

The other question is whether Tucker will throw Vance under the bus before the 2028 election cycle. That would certainly make the most logical sense. It would be crazy for Tucker to do all of this work and then step out of the way for Vance, who has done literally nothing but stand there looking fat, speaking aught but the broadest and most hallow platitudes with the gentility of a eunuch.

Jeffrey Epstein’s relationship with Steve Bannon has shocked a lot of people. Not me, sir. I was already aware of how weird all these people were.

Even if Tucker is just spilling the beans about the Jews as part of a broader plan to implant us all with microchips so Peter Thiel can alter our DNA and turn us into human robots to build his infernal Lazarus machines, it’s still nice to have the whole Jew thing out in the open like this.

If I could say one thing to Matt Walsh: “You ain’t no lumberjack, bruv.”

I shouldn’t publish headlines like that. I’m in no way suicidal. And I don’t want to be “suicided.”

Although I will say. This might be too doxy, but I’ll say it because I just asked the robot and this could have happened in any number of places: I got stung by a scorpion last week. And I asked people: “Are these deadly?” The answer, unanimously, was “probably not but it’s possible.” And my answer was “yeah, okay. It doesn’t really matter.”

People tell me not to write about myself but I don’t know what else to write about because all of this other stuff seems so totally meaningless. NB4, “oh, so you’re the only thing that matters???” No, retard, but I’m not going to write about my friends and family. And in general, that is the only thing I think matters. Not me personally, but my personal life. And yours. Everyone’s. Unless it is someone I hate, in which case they don’t matter and I hope they die.

In general, there has been a personal and professional reckoning, where I have concluded that politics are completely without meaning. In short, “meaning” as a concept can only be personal, and personal meaning can exist or not under any political system. The danger we face now of course is an existential danger to humanity itself, where there exists a threat to completely erase humanity as a concept, replacing humans with cyborgs or whatever. Generally, this seems unlikely to actually occur. But it is a thing that people are finally talking about. I’ve been talking about it since before the Daily Stormer existed, before I was ever a “neo-Nazi white supremacist” or whatever stupid meme. I read and watched what these people were saying about transforming into a “post-human” form, and it just seemed obvious that this would be the goal of anyone with money. What else would they do with money, when they do not believe in God and the dream of eternal life is within reach?

Unlike myself, the sort who gets stung by a scorpion and says “yeah it doesn’t really make much difference if it kills me, I’m cool either way,” most people are very attached to life.

Nick Fuentes is out of the media now. People I know who don’t really even care that much about politics were contacting me like, “yo, what’s going on, why are they astroturfing this guy like this, what are they trying to do?” and I was like “um, this is, um, eh, it’s just, you know, kind of a boring story, really.” But the thing got too weird and so the media eventually dropped it. It’s possible he’s gone forever now, at least gone from that level of exposure, because he was just so unprepared to play that role. Being very quick on your feet when talking does not mean you’re able to formulate ideas, and telling him to go out and say everyone is a Russian agent and the FBI is totally telling the truth about Charlie Kirk, without giving it a definite script, turned out to be a complete disaster and basically everyone was disgusted by the whole charade. It’s possible that they will still use him as this kind of official opposition figure, I don’t know. They’re unlikely to find anyone more stable. One of their other guys recently released tapes of him having sex with men from Grindr. (I’m not going to tell that story, I’m sure anyone can look it up. Basically, an FBI antisemite guy released gay sex tapes because I guess he was being blackmailed. He also smokes meth, so maybe he just thought he was being blackmailed.)

But they’re not going to get me. Even all the people who hate me know I be like:

If you find yourself in a situation where antisemitism has become so mainstream that you need a controlled opposition antisemite to be plastered everywhere, Fuentes is the best you’re going to do. I would argue that the mistake was putting him on the Charlie Kirk case. It’s confusing what exactly they were even thinking. It could have been a pressure test, to see how capable he was of forwarding an extremely unpopular narrative, to see how moldable his followers were. But again, they don’t have some list of people lining up to take his place. The fact that you’re going to put yourself in the “public antisemite” space basically means you are insane, either driven by pure antisocial desires or some terrible sense of justice. If it is the former, it’s only a matter of time before you end up burning yourself. Virtually all of these people that I’ve seen have ended up in some kind of homosexual scandal. For Matt Heimbach, it was a sex scandal with his mother-in-law. Kudos to him for keeping it hetero. I guess.

The Fuentes debacle was extremely disheartening. I had known he was working with the feds for some years now, but to see the card played like that was obscene. It should have been heartening that no amount of force was enough to get anyone to take it seriously. I guess.

Whatever. I do feel like most of what I did was a waste. I put so much time and effort into Fuentes. People who know know, I’m not interested in explaining it to people who don’t know. Getting stabbed in the back because he’s a pussy who can’t do a bit of time and a queen who cares about money (for reasons other than “because women like money”) was whatever. It was more just a forced reckoning with how hopeless things actually are.

The good part is, I realized that what I do feel meant something was the extent to which I was able to help boys and young men (or older men, in some situations), and the fact I was able to bring some laughter into people’s lives. So with that understanding, an understanding of what I did that actually meant something (or that I believe meant something – it’s the same thing), I can move forward.

I am working on the TV show. I’m a little bit worried about money. I’ve burned through a lot of money keeping the site online over the last year, while people rightfully weren’t really donating because I wasn’t really posting. I’m concerned that the money won’t really be there for the show. But we’ll see.

Anyway, the main point here was just to confirm I’m not dead.

I am pushing ahead with the TV show. At least then if I do finally have some kind of total psychological breakdown, it will be on the public record, you know?

Looking at my life, it is incredible what I’ve been able to hold together. I think I’ve probably made it past the point where I would fall apart. But if I do, I see no better place to do it than on an internet TV show. At least I can confirm it won’t be anything gay or otherwise deeply sick. It would just be the exhausted collapse of a man ridiculous enough to have imagined that he could do something good.

Wait, no. That’s too heavy, self-congratulatory, masturbatory.

Let me try again.

It would just be the retarded end of a retard.

That fits better.

But yes. I am going to clean myself up. And I’m going to do a TV show. This will occur. Of the things I did that I think may have mattered, it is going to focus on the humor part, rather than the helping young men part. It’s going to be primarily an artistic project, rather than a political one. I really like a lot of stuff that is happening with AI, and I see a way to use it in an interesting way. I will try to make it pay for itself. If it doesn’t, then I’ll just say that it wasn’t meant to be.

The target launch date is probably still about the same: late first, early second quarter.

In terms of those essays I was supposed to publish two weeks ago… I have them. They’re really done. I just haven’t been able to bring myself to care enough to give them a final pass and publish them. But yes, to the extent that I am interested in politics at all at this point, I am interested in the psy-op that is the “alternative media” landscape, and as this will be the topic of my TV show, it makes sense to publish some preliminary written works on the topic.

The Real Issue: My Conversion to Communism

I guess it’s probably more important to explain my conversion to communism.

Of course, I haven’t actually converted to communism. Communism is an ideology. Bertrand Russell actually very casually classified it as a religion. I am against all ideologies. Furthermore, I am a religious Christian, and communism, as an ideology (or a religion) is anti-Christian, even though it does tend to uphold all of the social norms of Christianity (the major exception being abortion; I’m sure there are other exceptions, though none major I can think of).

Ideology is an insane replacement of philosophy. I suppose that what I would say specifically is that my understanding of Christian philosophy has caused me to align more with economic policies supported by socialists, as I have come to realize that it is simply an absolute fact that money corrupts everything it touches. The top leaders in the Gulf States are drinking alcohol, engaged casually in homosexuality, and so on. The new leader in Syria, whatever he’s calling himself now, certainly changed his tune when the option for wealth appeared to him.

It seems like this pretty much always happens. Maybe it didn’t used to happen, before the Industrial Revolution, when the power that wealth gave you was always limited, but now that the power that wealth brings is unlimited, it seems that there is no one too pure to not get sucked into it, which simply means that those with the gold make the rules. And frankly, the Jews control the wealth, due to their control of the banks, and this means they can control everyone.

I hate to say it, but if I hadn’t been forced into exile, it’s probable I would have been myself corrupted. Why wouldn’t I have been? I mean I like to think I wouldn’t have been, because I like to think I am who I believe I am, but everyone believes all sorts of things about themselves, and most of the time these things are not true, so it would seem ridiculous for me to believe that I am the singular exception.

I suppose my exile allows me to believe that I am the exception. So I might as well just take the win. Regardless, even if I and some small percentage of people are willing to stand on moral principle, due to insanity or a fear of God (most likely a mix of both), and perhaps some desire for legacy, the majority are not, and so you can only trust people who are locked into an incentive structure.

Presidents Putin and Xi are good men. They behave as very good men, using their power as leaders to work for the benefit of their people. It is worthy of note however that the incentive structures they operate within are such as they benefit personally from behaving in a way that benefits their people. This is in stark contrast to the incentive system in democracies, where any individual working in the system maximizes personal benefit by acting against the interests of the population, and in the interests of donors.

It is probably true that authoritarian governments attract people who are more driven by principle, whereas democracy governments attract people with no morals at all, along with many actual sadistic sociopaths. I would be shocked to find out that Vladimir Putin and Xi Jinping do not behave in their personal lives, when no one is watching, much better than Joe Biden or Donald Trump. And people like Emmanuel Macron and Friedrich Merz are obviously deeply sick. Then you’ve got women running around trying to get everyone killed for sexual reasons. Everything. The question of the extent to which authoritarianism shapes men into better men and the extent to which it attracts better men is ultimately irrelevant, as it is obvious that better men run authoritarian governments. If I had to guess, I would say that at the highest levels, it is genuinely good (authoritarianism) or bad (democracy) people who seek power, while at middle and lower, people are mainly conforming to the culture.

Also, before anyone says “but there are bad authoritarian leaders and good democracy leaders” – yes, I know. I just mentioned that there are many sickos running Islamic countries. However, if you were to break down those incentive structures, you would obviously find more patterns. Most obviously, the US overthrows any Islamic dictator who doesn’t play ball, and it is impossible to be a good leader while serving the US.

It seems it is much harder to find a good man in a democracy than it is to find a bad man in an autocracy, however. Thomas Massie seems like a good man. It’s basically a canard that he supports immigration. He isn’t a purist, but I’ve seen shills defending Israel make this claim. When Fuentes was everywhere, he brought it up every time Massie was mentioned. The claim is that NumbersUSA gives him an “F.” It’s actually a “C-” now.

If you look at the grade card, however, it is actually retarded. The “F” on “border security” is because he voted against the “Big Beautiful Bill.”

That bill allocated $3.4 trillion in money. Border security, broadly, was less than 5%. “You would have to be for open borders not to support the other 95% of this bill, whatever it may be” is not an adult position to take.

To be clear, he is not an absolutist anti-immigration activist like Trump pretended to be. But no one really is. He’s as good on immigration as anyone in Congress. It was only looking into this that I found out how worthless that NumbersUSA site is. What an absolute sham.

Regardless, he’s the closest thing you have to a good man in the US government, by a lot. But how far is he from the levers of powers? Trump/AIPAC might successfully primary him. They probably won’t, because Trump wants to attack him for remarrying too soon after his wife died instead of his immigration positions. Trump arguably can’t attack his immigration positions, given that Trump’s own immigration positions are much more extreme than Massie’s.

Marjorie seems to be a good person, despite being a woman. But she literally quit the government because everyone was evil. (NB4 “her personal life” – yeah, dude. She’s a woman.)

Liberal democracy is the transmutation of liberal economic policies into a political system, given that it is a system that is purely about money. We all go along with this stupid charade that we “vote in” politicians, but the actual reality is that the candidate for any relevant state or national office is decided during the primary, where whichever candidate with the most money gets the nomination. You then have two bought-and-paid-for candidates running against one another. (And in most districts, it doesn’t even matter as the way the maps are drawn, you already know which party is going to win.)

There is zero reason anyone would get involved in politics in a democracy other than to make money (and gain status, but I repeat myself). Maybe some moron thinks they are going to “change things.” I don’t know what kind of ego you would need to have to think that it’s as simple as “no one ever thought of that before.” You would just lose. Or maybe get offered the money and take it. Though a very rare occurrence, both AOC and MTG basically got elected on pure popular support, surprising the establishment. Then AOC sold out and MTG quit.

All the money is corruption money. The salaries of Congress people are basic middle class salaries. Yet these people are virtually all wealthy.

This is a big topic. It is clearly impossible to be in a democracy government and maintain morality, and it is impossible to become wealthy enough to change society through private sector behaviors and maintain morality. This whole idea of the alchemical equation of turning labor into tokens and then running them through machines that multiply them creates infinite corruption, and the only way to control it is through a state apparatus powerful enough to control it. That’s apparently how communism ends up with “the state as God.”

I don’t know what the solution is or think there is a solution. But it is obvious to me now that it is pointless to do anything and not address the issue that a system based around money is not a viable system for humans to live in. People talk about “wealth redistribution” under communism, but every system redistributes wealth. This system certainly does. When you turn everything into fungible tokens that are just floating around, and then you don’t control the flow of those tokens, you cannot have a meritocracy. Instead you end up with a kind of moralocracy where those with the lowest morals gain the most wealth.

That is not absolutely true. Someone can be clever and work an honest job and live a comfortable life, still. But that opportunity is being drained away, as wealth continues to be centralized more and more.

It’s a big issue and I’m still thinking through how to communicate it. Right now, this is already long. This was intended to be a “proof of life” post. I threw in “I converted to communism” because no one but me would think to say something like that.

I’ll come back to this issue soon.

Happy Thanksgiving, everyone!

First and foremost, I am thankful that I can publish a Thanksgiving article on a Sunday.

Most people do not have the experience of working for 4,244 days straight, without a single day off. The last 288 days have shown what sort of thing happens after that sort of thing.

The Part of This Article That is About Islam (Israel is Indefensible, So They Just Attack Islam Now)

Never forget that Soojin once took a 864-day break. People loved her for it.

https://x.com/idleis6/status/1690295682895392768

She needs to take a permanent break. Not calling for an assassination. But what a harmful individual. This is what she is teaching the female youth of “South Korea,” a terrorist breakaway state similar to “Taiwan” and “Israel”:

Women see in Soojin the thing they want to be: an idol. They actually call these women “idols.” It is what every woman wants: to be worshiped. Men see something they want to provide with resources (tributes, sacrifices, as one would to an idol).

I see this:

When Japan invaded China in the early 20th century, their claim was that they were protecting Asia from Western degeneracy, which they claimed Manchuria was an agent of. This was of course propaganda to justify standard nip expansionism. However, given what I’m seeing on Chinese social media these days, the grotesque hypersexualization, China would be perfectly justified in invading South Korea for spreading this degeneracy throughout the continent. It wouldn’t need to be propaganda to mask militarism, it would be an end in itself. The United States is using South Korea to spread this idol/simp program.

The weird part about my break, probably unbelievable but generally true, is that I haven’t really worked much less during these 288 days than I did during those 4,244 days. It is different. I don’t have to work. Well, I didn’t, then I signed a bunch of ghostwriting contracts, so I have been working like a pig – wait, hold up, AI style em-dash time – pigs do not work. Pigs just eat and roll around. They are actually very happy animals.

I’ve often told the story of when I lived in the jungle with the primitives and bought a pig for some ceremony. It was around for three days before we butchered it. I insisted on butchering it myself. I am thankful beyond words for that experience. I’d killed many chickens, but to stick a pig with whom I’d formed a relationship is something quite different than anything I’ve experienced before or since. I saw this happy creature, rolling around, getting friendly with people, basically acting like a Golden Retriever, and then I opened up his throat as he screamed like a human. If that sounds horrible, it is because it is horrible. But you all eat pork.

Unless you’re one of those kikes reading the site to see what the real antisemites are up to.

Or if you’re one of my Moslems, who I love. I do love you guys now. If you’re in our places, you have to go back, but I was wrong to do all that blasphemy against you all those years ago. For anyone calling me a cuck over this, I will first say: you are either significantly less generous or you have significantly less money than Moslems, and you are probably also less capable of using crypto. I’m not pandering to Moslems for money, but their generosity is not an irrelevant fact. I avoid audience capture because I don’t usually even know where money is coming from. My two biggest ever donors (who I wish would hit me up again, and perhaps will when they smell what I’ve got cooking) I have no knowledge of at all. However, several very significant donors have made it clear that they are Moslems and they are very appreciative of me pushing intellectual antisemitism from the right, which they are intelligent enough to understand I pioneered in the modern era. I never pandered. I stopped insulting Islam many years ago, realizing that it was grotesque, and much more importantly (I’m not terribly concerned about grotesqueries, as a rule), it detracted from my much more important and legitimate criticisms of other groups, first and foremost being the Jews. Aside from theological differences, which are a personal matter and anyway not as large as most imagine, the single issue I have with Islam is immigration. However, the vast majority of this immigration is a result of wars the US-Jew war machine has waged in Islamic countries, as well as the sanctions they’ve put on them. Further, it is Jews that liberalized the immigration laws. That is to say: Jews are much more responsible for Islamic immigration than Moslems are.

Remember that Assad was demanding that Europe send back his people who Europe stole from him. Who knows: if they’d gone back, maybe Assad would have had a better chance at holding onto power? (That is primarily a rhetorical question, given the actual dynamics of how the regime fell. But who knows how things would have been different if instead of fleeing to Europe to live on welfare and commit crimes, the lower ranks of Syrian society had been forced to stay and fight for their country?)

I will never in my life forget seeing Michael Chertoff, the Jewish head of Homeland Security under George W. Bush, on Fox News in perhaps 2006 saying that in order to let Moslems know that we are not at war with Islam, we need to allow many more immigrants from Islamic countries come to America. Sadly, some things that were said on TV were lost in the ether. But he did make this argument, an argument you would only make if you were insane. (Even though I can’t find the precise comment, you can find “outreach to the Islamic community” and “more immigration” everywhere from this Jew, so though I can’t find the clip/transcript, no one would think he didn’t say it at some point.) The US was de facto at war with Islam, in general.

At the time the Iraq war was sold to the world by the US and British governments, the only connection between Al-Qaeda, a “formerly” CIA-backed Saudi revolutionary Islamic group operating out of Afghanistan and Pakistan, and Saddam Hussein, the Ba’athist (secular-nationalist) dictator of Iraq, was that both were Moslem. It was really even more base: they were both brown people who maybe dressed similarly and lived in sandy-looking, brownish Tatooineish places. I mean Saddam was about as Moslem as Joe Biden was Catholic. The whole concept of Ba’athism was to downplay religion in order to formulate an Arabian nationalism that wasn’t held back by sectarian infighting. It certainly didn’t take a communist approach, attacking religion, but rather took the approach of undermining religion by promoting secularism.

There was zero attempt to address the fact that there are vast differences between the third of the world’s population that makes up the greater Islamic ummah. George Bush famously could not explain the difference between Shia and Sunni; while he was famously retarded and on drugs, many other important government officials also failed that test. So no, it was not technically a war against all Moslems, but it was framed that way by Fox News, even whilst Chertoff was saying we needed more immigrants to prove we weren’t at war with Islam.

It was like they were trying to drive people insane, saying Osama bin Laden is Saddam Hussein is the Ayatollah is Muammar Gaddafi, meanwhile, “Islam is a religion of peace” and we need closer cultural ties.

The point being: anti-Islam sentiment is useless tripe. You are seeing more of it now. The defense of Israel has broken down utterly, so we get attacks on Islam instead. As you’re no doubt aware, Elon Musk bought Twitter as a way to shape the public narrative. He will ban you if you’re someone who needs to simply be erased (i.e., yours truly). But his most aggressive form of censorship is flooding the zone. Steve Bannon actually uses this term as part of his strategy. I keep hearing about this Bannon guy, and all I see is this fat drunk just rambling about nothing that matters, but you realize that this is the point.

Elon will technically allow quite a few people with views that do not align with this Silicon Valley new world order that is coming into view, but they are buried.

I just typed “Islam” into Twitter, and these are the first five results:

Today we are a nation UNITED against Islam.

When we stand together we always win. pic.twitter.com/1NmqQRJ8Vk

— Shirion Collective (@ShirionOrg) November 28, 2025

A lady born in a Pakistani family in Britain who converted from Islam to Christianity narratives her story. Her parents threatened to stone her to de@th after they found out.

RELIGION OF PEACE pic.twitter.com/z5cmkoJT7x

— Dr. Kenon (@drkenon2) November 27, 2025

It is going to be up to the people, to put a stop to Islam in Japan.

WAKE UP JAPANESE MEN pic.twitter.com/0gTqch1taV

— Kumashun (@isfjcutebear) November 29, 2025

Allah is a demon, and Islam is a cult of devil worshippers. pic.twitter.com/EWeyxK8ITj

— Catherine (@cat_barnes30) November 28, 2025

She left Islam—and now risks everything to expose the brutal crimes committed in its name against young women and girls.
She knows the cost. She speaks anyway.

Listen to her. Share her voice. The West needs to wake up.pic.twitter.com/aDYRFmwUl6

— Liza Rosen (@LizaRosen0000) November 27, 2025

And it goes on and on.

If you type “Israel,” it is all negative, because that thing Elon was doing with all of those pro-Israel “Indian” bot accounts had gotten out of control and was becoming counterproductive.

Aside from Ben Shapiro and Bari Weiss, who no one gives a shit about, no one is defending Israel. Larry Ellison’s Bari Weiss plan for CBS is confusing. Apparently, some kind of pro-Israel thing has to exist. Her first big event as the new head of CBS was a debate between two pro-Israel Jews about… gun control.

That’s her plan. We’re going to go back to talking about gun control and abortion. Because I guess people forgot that they could just keep rehashing a bunch of cultural war crap from the 1990s instead of unifying against Israeli control of America?

But that is a niche thing. Jordan Peterson, Elon Musk, Steve Bannon, etc. are all now railing against Islam nonstop.

Peterson a few months ago did what was clearly an exploitation of a mentally ill person. He was a Palestinian traitor, who became a traitor after spending most of his childhood being tortured by Jews.

Another reason I cut out my criticism of Islam is that these people are hardcore. Imagine how many kids they kidnap and torture for years on end, and then look at how few turn traitor.

Bannon is going around talking about how Sharia law is taking over.

STEVE BANNON: When I say England's heading to a civil war, I don't say that lightly.  Because what's happening there is a foreshadowing of what happens here. I am not an Islamophobe. — I am against Sharia supremacy, Islamic supremacy, and Islamist politics. pic.twitter.com/9o6qhbRL4Y

— Bannon’s WarRoom (@Bannons_WarRoom) September 6, 2025

He’ll still do the “I worship the kikes because they are the chosen ones” bit.

Steve Bannon:

“I am proud to be a Christian Zionist. I am proud to be a partner to one of the greatest nations on earth and the foundation of the Judeo-Christian West.”

Changed his tune for clicks and views. Not a leader.
pic.twitter.com/HLjWoq82jS

— Eyal Yakoby (@EYakoby) November 16, 2025

But mostly he sticks to anti-Islam, because this just works better. He’s out there with that rat Taylor Marshall, who like Bannon, claims to be Catholic, but somehow has evangelical Christian views on Jews as the chosenest of all… and the true threat being Islam, even though no one can explain how they are a threat.

"For Islam, All War Is Jihad"

Dr Taylor Marshall on War Room with Steve Bannon pic.twitter.com/mG1YK6FzvB

— Dr Taylor Marshall (@TaylorRMarshall) November 14, 2023

I would think Steve would not want this legacy. Whisky is cheap, Steve. And you like going to prison. So why do this? Was there something with Epstein, Steve?

Wow Steve Bannon and Jeffrey Epstein were good friends and they had an extremely cozy Relationship! Steve Bannon even helped him with damage control due to his alleged underage sex trafficking! pic.twitter.com/H8LHode9BU

— Suzie rizzio (@Suzierizzo1) November 27, 2025

Because frankly, no one cares. I’d rather have “I thought she was 16” on my tombstone than “kill the babies, they’re trying to do Sharia law.”

Hey – raise your hand if you wouldn’t prefer Sharia law to whatever it is we have now?

Anybody?

I didn’t think so.

We’re not getting Sharia law, that is retarded, but anyone with any basic common sense would prefer it.

The Part Where I Circle Back to the Pig

It’s probably time to circle back to the thankfulness I have for having killed that Golden Retrieverish pig. I am thankful that I understand death. I’m thankful I’ve been in war zones, that I’ve had guns to my head. I’m thankful, because without understanding death, you can’t understand life. Every time I eat pork, I remember that happy, friendly pig I killed, I remember his humanlike screams.

That’s an exaggeration.

I eat pork almost daily and I’m not sitting there eating it with the screams in my head like Videodrome. I am simply thankful that I understand that the nature of life is suffering and death, and that this understanding resides in my frontal cortex.

Modern people buy meat in plastic packaging. They don’t understand they are eating the flesh of a living, breathing thing, which had emotions, and that this being died so that you could live. Most people do not really understand that they will some day die, which is why so many people waste their lives. It is why Steve Bannon and Nick Fuentes have no care for the legacies they might leave, let alone the judgement they will face. If death is abstract, life is abstract, everything is simply a symbol of a symbol. Nothing means anything.

The Moslems understand death. Christianity is a religion based on death, just like Islam, and yet most people who identify as Christians view this all as a game. Any inconvenience is a horror, and comfort is holy. It’s the opposite of the teachings of Christ, who described our duty in this life to bear a cross.

I am thankful for this understanding. It is the thing I am most thankful for, as it is from this understanding of life as suffering, as death as the purpose of life, that allows me to understand everything else.

Fuentes in his various attacks on me has talked a lot about money. One of his mugus said I should have a “business model” for my website devoted to telling the truth for the sake of truth.

You can’t make money doing this. The most important criticism I have lodged at Fuentes is that he claims to be running a “for-profit revolution.” That is a profound observation, and really a summation of who this person is. No one who follows him actually believes he’s going to become the Catholic monarch of America. Maybe some of them do.

You fall mugu, he gon chap ya.

The clarity of my understanding of everything is something I am very thankful for, even if it will do me no good in this life.

And before someone says “oh the clarity of understanding everything, huh?” Yeah, that’s what I said. I understand all the things I understand, which are all the things that matter, which is why I am the most censored person ever in human history. To be fair, before the modern era, it would not have been possible to censor someone like this. A government would have killed or imprisoned me, and if I was in exile as I am, I wouldn’t be able to publish in the country I was exiled from. Nonetheless, there is no one who even comes close to me in the level of censorship.

The Money Part

My understanding is also why no one will debate me. I’m not a good debater, at all. I am Mr. Um. (Though I’m working on that.) I think when I type. Thinking when I speak is a very different skill. I’m not good at it. But I have the facts and the understanding and so it doesn’t matter how many times I say “um,” anyone is going to lose a debate against me about:

• Jews
• Women
• Russia
• China
• Islam
• Race
• Electromagnetic pollution
• Sound pollution
• Immigration and this stupid ICE scam
• Silicon Valley’s lunatic schemes
• Pitbulls
• Sex
• Health and fitness
• Death
• Money
• Shills

…Or anything else I know about. To be clear, when I say “money,” I don’t mean “economics.” I don’t understand economics and I don’t even know that “the economy” is really even a thing. I don’t know that Elon Musk actually has more money than the bottom 50% of Americans, but these billionaires have obscene amounts of money, to the point where if it was redistributed, everyone would have a very comfortable life. So what is the economy, when we have a post-scarcity society, and yet people can barely afford to pay rent for apartments while working at multiple soul-crushing jobs?

It feels like the entire thing is just fake. If you strip away all of the language, all of the abstractions, you have a ruling class and a slave class, but unlike a traditional slave or peasant class existing under an elite, the elite has zero responsibility to the lower class.

According to the Federal Reserve, the combined net worth of all Americans is $160 trillion. According to the US Census Bureau, the total US population is 340 million.

Let me get out the napkins here, gotta find a pen… I’m at a Cafe Javas, by the way, doing the breakfast for lunch thing.

Okay, finally found a pen. The waiter was shocked when I started writing with it. He told me “Abi, you a big mind, for me I think this stick is for pok pok da eye of da gay. Aiya! Da gay look me, I pok pok da eye, say him no look me, you look woman, see they bouncing coconuts, may’n you come know da wey.”

160,000,000,000,000 ÷ 340,000,000 = 470,588.235

Obviously, just doing pure communism and leveling all that out is not the solution, but when you are including children and immigrants and you end up with $500,000 mean average, and yet 63% of workers are unable to cover a $500 emergency, that is just completely nonsensical.

Yes, I’m aware of some information about lotto winners going broke. Though a long time ago, I read an article debunking that claim. Here’s one in Forbes.

But obviously the Chappelle reparations sketch is real.

I mean, black people though. Obviously. They don’t really understand money. I don’t think that quite counts.

And regardless: we are post scarcity. And yet we’re arguing about student loans? And Trump wants a 50-year mortgage so people can save a couple hundred a month on payments? This seems fake. I wouldn’t debate the issue. But I am leaning towards becoming some kind of communist.

Finally, Some General Thankfulness

I’m thankful to be alive, I’m thankful to think. I’m thankful for God and for the knowledge I have of the one true faith. I’m thankful for alcohol. I’m thankful I kept it real. I’m thankful I never sold out. I’m thankful my conscience is clean. I’m thankful I never fear going to confession and I’m thankful I have never felt like skipping something that needed to be confessed. Through I loathe not being with them, I’m thankful I have a family. I’m thankful for the strength of my faith. I don’t know how you get faith. I don’t know if it is a choice or a gift or what it is. I assume it is some combination. But I have it and it keeps me alive. (That and the booze.) I am thankful that this faith lets me know, without doubt, that all the good I do is being tallied, and I’m thankful for the understanding I have of what is good.

I’m thankful for the literature. Literature is one of the many things that proves “AGI” is a stupid fantastical hoax. I’m thankful for the Greek playwrights. (I’ve never made it through Homer, to be honest. I will when I’m old, I think.) For Dostoyevsky and the other Russians. Dostoyevsky should be sainted, even if he did do whoring and gambling up through the end. Saint Augustine did the libertine stuff, but repented and stopped, whereas Dostoyevsky repented and repented and repented… and then died.

And for Moby-Dick. And most recently, I am so thankful for A Confederacy of Dunces.

Reading that as one of the first things I did after quitting the news grind in February set for me a standard that I needed to be something better than I am. I will never do something like that book. But I should try.

If AI wrote a novel, it would be Thomas Pynchon tier. “The plot holes and lack of plot and the laziness of not needing to explain why things happen are part of the art, bro, it’s what makes it so intelligent” is perfect for AI. I guarantee right now I could, with less prompting than 25% of the words in this article, get AI to put out a Thomas Pynchon book that 100% of Pynchon fans would think was real (compare that to the 12% of Blink 182 fans who fell for their AI album). I’m 100% serious. If a totally AI written book, using less than 2,000 words of prompting, was published under Pynchon’s name, there would be people saying “this is AI,” but only because my whole “hermeneutics of AI suspicion” thing came true, and there are people who say everything is AI now.

As a definite reality, whatever the average number of people who say something is AI is, a fraction of that would claim an AI Pynchon book was AI.

Self-Aggrandizing Side Note (Skippable)

AI paranoia leading to a reality collapse was not a hard prediction; in fact it was insanely obvious. But it is very interesting that I’m the first one on record to say it. You can figure that out using an AI that indexes my site. I know for a fact I said it first, that AI would create a situation where everything is accused of being AI. The thing is, I don’t know if it was obvious to everyone. So many things that are obvious to me are apparently not obvious to other people. I’m so thankful that my brain works this way. But I end up with a Dunning-Krueger thing, where I just assume people are following along with things I think are obvious, when in reality my writing would have much broader appeal if I explained things to people as I would to a 5-year-old or a woman. To be fair, I started the site doing things that way, writing on a very simple level, then after the August 2017 Holocaust, which was a real Holocaust of my soul, I started just writing for smart people. When people who are not smart read it, they get confused and say I’m stupid.

A couple times a month, when I’ve drank so much I can’t read, I have the AI read me the comments on Unz.com, which reposts my articles. I only otherwise see comments on my work from emails, chats, /pol/, or the Gamer Uprising forum, given that linking the site is illegal on Twitter, Facebook, etc. I don’t know if the average Unz reader is retarded. Ron Unz, the site’s proprietor, is quite a clever chap, if too ideological for my tastes (though he’s recovering from that, one day at a time). He has a very libertarian comments policy, which leads to a retard festival and prevents intelligent people from commenting. Note that I do not have a clear vision of how I would deal with a comments section if I could still have one on the site now. When I did have a comments section, it was before the internet was censored everywhere, so nutjobs could go say whatever they wanted anywhere. Now, with everything censored, if you don’t censor, you end up with all of the nutjobs and freaks who get banned everywhere else (and bots posing as such folks). They take over the space and make it so no one intelligent wants to get involved.

It is deeply hilarious to read stupid people trying to understand my writing. I’m not trying to say all my writing is good. Much of it is not. But there are always at least ideas that are interesting, even if stillborn, and when people completely miss the ideas, and then claim that I am stupid because I have confused them, it is fun and enlightening (if you’ve had so much to drink that you literally can’t read). This is definitely the way society works, and why democracy is ridiculous on its face. As I’m mentioning Unz, I will speak directly to the retards of the commentariat there.

Firstly, according to Unz’s own study, I was getting 40% more views than him before I stopped writing the daily news. And he says I was down 40% from the previous year due to censorship. Obviously now, he probably gets orders of magnitude more views than I, because I have no writing schedule, but it was always funny to see people saying “Anglin gets more views here than on his own site.”

Secondly, I do not “have a column” on Unz. In 2020, I asked to publish an article there responding to the psychopath Brad Griffin who had attacked me on the site. (Side Note Inception: Griffin, a Spencer-linked neo-Nazi, is a primary representative of the ideology of the Trump shooter, Thomas Crooks, based on the Tucker Carlson revelations. He shifted from racist and antisemitic Trump-supporter to lockdown lunatic. TRS, a fed group also linked to Spencer, took part in this project as well, going from having views more or less overlapping with mine to becoming weirdo lockdown liberals who also were big into costumed Nazism and metoo. Having been involved with the right-wing now for 15 years, I think the way these things work is that feds just give people little talking points they are supposed to work into their schtick. Then some people are so stupid they just copy it willingly, Operation Mockingbird style [a wiki worth skimming for those unfamiliar with the program]. This is what we are seeing with Nick Fuentes now. He was told to inject Maddow-style anti-Russian stuff into his material, so he started saying things like “Candace Owens is a Russian agent because she says Macron’s wife is a tranny” and “Jackson Hinkle’s Twitter account is the same thing as AIPAC.” He was later told to support the official story on Charlie Kirk’s killing. The issue is, he is too dumb and Mexican to make anything he says make any sense, unless he is just reverting to my talking points. So he ended up saying that Russia was trying to discredit the FBI by asking whether Israel, the number one country in the world known for doing international political assassinations, could be involved in the killing. Granted, being tasked with actively going out and trying to shut down people questioning the official story of the FBI, which had given no real information about the Kirk shooting, and was fresh off the heels of telling us Epstein only trafficked women to himself and did in fact kill himself and there was nothing to see there, was a tough row to hoe. But his decision to mix the “say Russia influences the US and is basically the same thing as Israel” with “attack anyone who questions the official story of Charlie Kirk” was a really wacky move. I mean, I’m sure it’s stressful to have these feds calling you up and telling you to do stuff like this, but you got your money, bro. You got your fame. Put in a little effort. I will just say what I would have done, because it’s too late for it to be used by him now: I would have kept the Russia thing in a separate box, and I would have said that the people accusing Israel of Charlie Kirk’s murder had no evidence and were making real conspiracies by Israel that we can prove look silly. Instead he mixed it with Russia and then started talking about “low IQ antisemitism,” such as that of John Mearsheimer who said it was valid to ask if Israel was involved, and in opposition to the high IQ Rachel Maddow style theories about Russian meddling. I would not have directly defended the honor of the FBI and I would not have accused Tucker Carlson, who is a centimillionaire, of being an unregistered Russian agent just weeks after spending 12 hours accusing him of being a CIA agent. Then he also crossed wires with his claims that Russia is working for Israel. It was really a debacle.)

I have not had much contact with Ron. I rarely check my email, maybe he’s emailed me before. But whenever I have emailed him, I have signed off with “no need to reply,” which is something I add to most emails I send. I assume the Griffin article did well, and without mentioning it to me, he started republishing many of my articles. I of course encourage everyone to do this, as my goal is to spread my work as far as possible, as this site is not monetized, and I don’t believe in copyright anyway. I still believe information wants to be free. I am old school.

I will die old school.

I know the Chinese Legos are better than the real ones and less than 10% of the cost. I don’t need money. Well, I need it now for all these bastards who are coming home to me like Close Encounters of the Third Kind.

I show up with the steaks and they argue about how to cook them.

Seriously though, fuck money. I literally have to figure out a way to get like $4,000 in Monero to pay staff tomorrow. This is how much I care about money. That’s why I’ve been hard begging; the site’s Monero funds have been drained.

I’ll sell some Bitcoin. I don’t have a great exchange rate right now. But I still have a few bigger donos laying in the private BTC addresses stash. (The issue with those is that I can’t combine any of them so I have to pay the tax on them individually. Whatever. Thankfulness article. Not an e-begging or communist article. Although I am beginning to become thankful for communism, as I begin to realize that there are Christian forms of it.)

I’m thankful this isn’t me (just going to post the whole thing; we’ve done Islam, Bari Weiss, animal butchering, Dostoyevsky, all sorts of things, we’re headed for 7,000 words, without repetitiveness, and so we’ve got room for this):

Note: he added this “do the math in your head thing” at some point since the last time I looked at this page. He’s so fucking retarded he thinks “$350 per minute” sounds better than “$5,250 for 15 minutes.” Rumor has it Bobby Kotick blushed so hard when he saw this he had to go to the hospital for the blushing version of “if you have an erection for more than four hours, contact a doctor.”

To be clear, with the comments I’ve seen saying “why does Unz pay this guy for these articles?”, I am obviously not paid. I have always told people that they can repost anything I write, in part or in full, with or without attribution, and I’ve counted on donations. (Due to some generous people, two specifically and one in particular, this actually would have worked, but due to the persecution, there have been seven figures’ worth of problems.)

However, I do want to note that Unz quite kindly publishes the pieces where I e-beg, and I have gotten donations where people say “I read you on Unz.” But he does not pay me, I do not log in and post on the site, I do not have a relationship with the site, and though I go there to read his articles, and sometimes some of the other writers, I do not read the comments on my own reposts there given that there is nothing to be gained. I have however been reading the comments about Nick Fuentes, because it is so fascinating.

For the Unz readers (assuming this article gets reposted there, not all of them are): I will read your comments on this piece, looking for comments about Fuentes. I have still not finished up my response to the responses to my original article on him, and am looking for more comments, particularly by anyone who wants to take a shot at defending him. Name-calling and psychoanalyzing me for daring to question him has been done to death, but I am compiling a record of the psychoanalysis done against me, as it is fascinating that while not one of the points I have made about Nick has been addressed, huge amounts of effort have been poured into my personal psychology. I also want to hear more about Fuentes’ “successful business model,” as I really love this “for-profit revolution” concept.

After I denounced Fuentes, he obviously stopped promoting my site, and started promoting Unz. Now his fans claim Unz has “betrayed him” for publishing my material against him, and musing himself about the astroturf and Fuentes’ resurrection of Russiagate. Let me tell you retards something: getting “shoutouts” does not bring traffic to a website. I have been on the cover of the New York Times multiple times, my face was on the cover of The Atlantic, I was in the media every day for years on end, and of course I was shouted out by Nick almost every day for years, and I never saw any boost from any of that, nor has anyone ever said to me “I found you through Nick Fuentes” or “I checked you after reading about you in [major news outlet].” Just think to yourself: when was the last time you heard a website shouted out and then decided to go type it into a browser? This doesn’t happen. People click hyperlinks. They don’t follow shoutouts. Further, the idea that Nick Fuentes praising you means you aren’t allowed to question him is nonsensical. Is this supposed to be some kind of Saudi Arabia thing?

“Are You Just Going to Keep Writing About This Odious Capitalist Beanlord and How He Chop Those Who Fall Mugu?”

Well, everyone else is. He’s the only news story. However, being the news story does not mean he is the story. I’m telling his story because I know that story, he stole my identity and then when I turned against him, he attempted to graft his original identity back onto the identity he’d stolen from me.

Because he is the officially-approved figurehead of the right-wing youth movement, being given vast advantages while anyone who would speak against his various deranged positions is buried, there needs to be an organized understanding of where and how to hit him. Because I am bulletproof in terms of my ability to make arguments, and because he spent years training under me, he is able to slip back into my shape when he needs to present himself as a serious person. He is also capable of slipping into another shape, the “optics” shape, which I designed with a friend of mine but never myself used. I had already used the edgy “smash all the golden idols” presentation, so it would be impossible to reframe myself as a born-again All American Boy (who suspiciously has all of the same core views but simply presents them in a less offensive way). David Duke tried to make this type of transformation, and despite appearing very genuinely polite and gentlemanly, decades after having left the Ku Klux Klan, he would still be referred to as the wizard or the cyclops or whatever by all media.

I said that someone needed to go do the optics model, the presentation of a patriotic American Christian who simply feels that Jews have too much power in the West and are using that power to oppress white people. Fuentes started out doing that. At some point, he rejected the optics model, opting instead for a copy of my identity, which relies heavily on edgy humor, dropping n-bombs and name-dropping Adolf Hitler. But he can still switch to the optics model, which he does in these mainstream media interviews, where instead of doing my bit about “the Holocaust didn’t happen but it should have,” he does “as a good Christian boy I can’t be hateful.”

So there are three Fuentes modes:

• Classic Anglin Mode: On point and intelligent, but with n-bombs, Jews should just be killed, it doesn’t matter what she was wearing she deserved it, etc.
• Optics Mode, as invented by Anglin: Refined but mostly on point with the topics, cucking on some shit like “I never denied the Holocaust” and super-heavy on the Christianity-as-shield against bigotry accusations
• Fuentes Mode: Total kook gibberish conspiracy theories, some of which clearly serve FBI purposes, such as the Maddow-style Russia material, Russia works for Israel, Russia is trying to discredit the FBI and Israel, etc., and some of which are just totally dumb nonsense, stuff he makes up thinking that he’s a genius and can explain topics without having browsed a Wikipedia page

I didn’t realize how extreme the gibberish mode had gotten until I started writing against him in response to the astroturf.

This information needs to be out there, so people know how to respond to him, because they’ve decided to make him a supporting actor in this fake reality being manufactured by the “alternative” media. I’m the only real nigga, and it turns out, I always was. And even I am a total piece of shit for promoting all these horrible people, thinking “no this next guy, he’s for sure legit.” I’ve promoted virtually all of these psycho faggots, going back to Matt Heimbach and his White Student Union in 2012, up through Fuentes. I never wanted to be the leader of anything, I wanted to write a website, I wanted others to take the information and do something with it. But one after the other, these people have turned into neo-Nazi cult leaders working with the cops and cashing in big time.

If Fuentes were anything other than exactly what I claim, he would have debated me instead of blackmailing me for years, making threats, name-calling, and psychoanalyzing me like a literal talking vagina.

But no, he’s not the main story. He’s a pawn in the game of much bigger fish:

• The media overlord: Tucker Carlson
• The political overlord: Jim Bowman AKA Wally the Walrus
• The true power center in Silicon Valley: Peter Thiel, Elon Musk, Marc Andreessen, David Sachs, and the rest of the gang

The materials of these people get run through various channels. Go read Thiel’s essay on Strauss. He believes in lying to people because they are too stupid to understand reality. Maybe it’s hard to be against that alone, but when you see him out there getting into Jesus and saying God wants us to perfect our bodies through transhumanism, it’s a bit disconcerting.

So, no, Fuentes is not particularly important. He’s a side character filling a role anyone could theoretically do. I mean, he wasn’t reprimanded for making everyone think he was a fed for going out there and defending the feds in the most ridiculous way imaginable and attacking antisemites as low IQ.

Tucker used Fuentes because he wanted to trigger the war with Ben Shapiro, which he knew he would win. Both JD Vance and Donald Trump came out publicly on the side of Tucker and his new batboy.

Here’s some more previews of the thing I’ve got cooking, which will be done when it’s done: I was deeply confused when Nick Fuentes was going on and on for years on end about Peter Thiel, talking about how important it was that he was funding some Twitter accounts no one had ever heard of. It is now very obvious to me that he was told to attack Thiel in the dumbest way possible. If you are anybody, you are going to get attacked by somebody, so you want control of the narrative of the attacks. Funding random Twitter accounts is not something that anyone cares about, but when people on the far right thought about Peter Thiel before the Palantir thing blew up, they thought of Fuentes spending hours on end whining about some Twitter account conspiracy against him. And he’s done the same thing for JD Vance, which is why Vance wanted to bring him into the fold.

The biggest question is whether or not Tucker will stab Vance in the back.

I guess my point here is: I’m thankful I’m not Nick Fuentes or any of these other weirdos. It feels so great to have a clean conscience and not be involved in all of their weird skullduggery.

I’m thankful that God answered my prayers, and told me where to serve him in the way that would do the most good and be the most fun.

(To be clear, if my TV show fails, I’m not blaming God. But I have a very strong feeling it will not fail.)

The Little Things Modernity Gave Us to Make Life Bearable

Finally, to be real, I’m thankful for the mostly nonsensical stuff that doesn’t seem like it matters much but is collectively playing a big part in keeping me together. These are little gifts that modernity has given us that do a tiny bit to make up for the evil it has brought down on us.

Recently, I’m thankful for Star Wars Expanded Universe novels (I will not call them “Legends,” Kathleen). I’m somehow still thankful for Slay the Spire. I’m thankful for Absolute Batman. I’m thankful for Babylon 5. I’m thankful for all the 1990s sci-fi shows. Yes, including Enterprise.

In fact, probably especially Enterprise. Those scenes of Scott Bakula shirtless getting beat up that are supposed to be like, sexy somehow, are so nuts.

I don’t understand what the thing was intended to be. Was it to appeal to women? Are a lot of Star Trek fans closeted homosexuals? Like if you’re a fat slob and into nerd stuff, you might get into homosexuality? I don’t know. I have always been into this nerd stuff, but I’ve never really been in any of the communities. I used to go to the comic store every Wednesday. Those guys were for sure weirdos, many of them fat, but most were married. This was the 90s when fats could get married (to other fats of course, but now those female fats can get some guy way out of their league who’s drunk on Tinder and they prefer that to marriage). Maybe some of these fat nerds are gay. But Bakula was like in his fifties in the show. I think most gays are into boys? Were women watching this?

The women were so hot too. Honestly, the show was too sexed up. That would be my one complaint.

Other people’s complaints don’t really make sense to me, other than the first season or two being a bit rough. But has anyone ever watched the first two seasons of TNG? You might be a casual Star Trek viewer and not be aware you never saw episodes from seasons 1-2 because I swear they showed them less.

Enterprise first aired on September 26, 2001, so two weeks after some people did a thing. People saw that pilot episode and were like “wew, finally things are back to normal.”

And yes, I realize 2001 is not the 1990s. I’m not that bad at math. You saw my napkin thing above. But Enterprise is a 90s sci-fi show. It was I guess the last one. The first one was TNG, which started in 1987.

Wait, no. The last one would have been Stargate: Atlantis. It ended in 2009.

But the ones in red, I will watch for the rest of my life, and be comforted, and be thankful.

Love Your Family

Friends are good. But they are probably overrated.

Your family is always your family. Always love your family. Be with them as much as you can (or at least as much as you can stand). And try to make your own family. I don’t know how to do it. I’m not going to advise you. I won’t advise you. Often I appear to advise against it. But think of when you are old. Think of how miserable it would be to be old and alone.

Family is the only thing that brings real happiness.

Here’s the deal, my folksy folks: meme articles are the most popular articles. So now I’m slipping stuff I think is important into meme articles. Of course, you can click “page down” a few times if you don’t care about these materials. But I advise at least trying this one. It is a pre thankfulness article. Tomorrow, we will be thankful. (NOTE: actually later today technically. Fell asleep at the desk again. You people have no idea the kind of work I’m putting into this TV show while also finishing my paid projects.)

OFFICIAL AI-RELATED ANNOUNCEMENT (PRE-MEME ARTICLE):

I mess around with a lot of different AIs, constantly. I’m obsessed with them. This announcement should actually be that this is a bigger bubble than the dot com one by a lot, and though I know nothing about economics, I think when it pops it is going to be something significantly worse than the 2008 crisis. I hear different numbers, but a huge percentage of this economy is now dumb AI speculation, all based on this AGI bullshit. I have no idea how that is going to affect crypto, which is the only thing I care about.

I am fully divested from AI. Nb4 “you can’t use a fucking VISA card to buy a theme for your website but you can invest in AI?” – yes, and it isn’t your business. The point is: I am totally out of all of it. This is not financial advice. I am literally just describing my own behavior, which many people are interested in. Nick Fuentes, for instance, is very interested in my impregnation of hookers of various races. (Primarily Asian and Slavic, though I repeat myself, but also allegedly a Libyan chick who claims DNA tests are against Islam and sent me a bizarre translation of a fatwa about how camels have sex. You might be thinking “yeah but isn’t being a hooker against Islam too, how strict can she be?” and actually this is very interesting: at the Islamic brothel, an imam is at the door and performs a wedding and then divorces you on the way out. People ask me if I’ve ever been married, and I say “yeah, a lot” and they give me a crooked glance and say “how many times?” and I say “I don’t know, probably like at least 60 or 7o, less than 100 probably.”)

To be fair to el panzón paranoico que se cree el centro del universo, I am equally interested in his pregnancies, or rather, the lack thereof. I maybe went a bit overboard, from the time I left “child support” soil. “Impregnating as many hookers as possible” is obviously not great behavior. De Oga Fuentes was using this as blackmail. As soon as he made the blackmail threat I demanded he reveal it all, whatever it was, then instead of revealing it, he just acted like I’d said nothing, and kept talking about how he had blackmail, so I started suggesting things it could be, including that thing with the dozens of hooker babies, then he put this in his chat and one of his mugus came at me with it and I was like: “Yeah my dude, I already said that, plus I’d said it here and there since the site started. How do you think I had sex with like at least 2,000 hookers and never had any pregnancies? Do you believe people use condoms if the girl seems clean? Because I have never in my life heard of someone who thinks ‘meh, she seems clean’ using a condom on this clean seeming hooker. Nb4 ‘the girl makes you,’ any man who doesn’t know how to surreptitiously slip off a condom has no right to call himself a man. Furthermore, this could all be a joke. Who knows? You, my poor mugu, get chopped like a thesaurus in a woodchipper, you know less than a rat stuck in a WiFi experiment, and your master appears to know less than most of his mugus, he is simply an expert chopper, hence earning the title ‘El Chopo’ (get it, it’s like ‘El Chapo.’ I had to explain that to you because when a man fall mugu, him brain dey collect palm oil). You would also have to be bordering on braindead to not ask yourself if I was actually purposefully feeding Fuentes disinformation, because as soon as that shit with Big Tech happened [deep lore], I never trusted the Oga Panzón de Mugu.”

It really means nothing. His pregnancies are another question. Why are there none?

Baba Pendejo de Mugu claims he never engaged in any sort of sexual activity, which is very difficult to believe. The “I’m just a really strict Christian” thing simply makes zero sense given the level of ethics we see from this guy. I have very rarely had sex with non-hookers, because I do feel guilty about it. But in terms of Christian ethics, fornication is simply fornication, there is no difference between a sexual financial transaction and “casual sex” (a new type of sex invented by the boomers where the woman doesn’t charge cash and instead charges your soul), assuming neither party is married and the girl is not a virgin.

I have recently made a big push to stop my fornication. The issue is, it is not actually about sex for me. I mean, it’s not about the dopamine from the sexual congress. It is about feeling a human connection. I have very little of this in my life. Because of my line of work, and the consequences a real nigga faces when he does this work, I am separated forever from my family. I have some friends. But you know, friends are… I don’t know really what friends are. It’s a complex issue. I will write about it sometime soon. It is something I’ve changed my views on. I used to believe you could form a truly deep relationship with another man. Although this is possible, technically, it is very rare, and it is generally men you grew up with. That is, men you knew when you were prepubescent. So prostitution gives me a bit of real human connection.

I heard E. Michael Jones say once that he thinks people get into pornography because there is very little beauty in the environments of urban hellscapes, and a woman’s body is something beautiful. I think this is totally wrong. If it was true, you could just watch nature documentaries or that movie where Leo fights the bear, whatever that boring ass shit was called. But pornography is not about sex. It is about dopamine. “Gooning” as they call it, which is masturbating for an extended period of time (potentially for hours, at least much longer than you would have real sex), can release something like fentanyl levels of dopamine. They’ve shown that this method of pornography use forms the same neural pathways as opioids and other drugs. So I do not agree with the “people want to view beauty” theory, especially since we are talking about hardcore porn. But I do agree it is not about sex, and I can relate this “getting something you need spiritually from something real in the wrong way” to my experiences with prostitutes.

Tomorrow is Thanksgiving. Another holiday I will be without my family. I have often joked about the ridiculousness of the concept of paying for an hour with a prostitute, because sex only takes 3-5 minutes. However, I sometimes do take the hour. Her job is to be nice to you. They all tell me I have beautiful eyes and ask me why I am so sad. I tell them life is sad. They disagree and tell me life should be happy and that I should find my happiness. I tell them I think the only happiness is with family and I cannot see my family. They say “awww.” And say “I will be your family” and squeeze their arms around me. This happens virtually every time, or has for several years. Yes, I am that fucked up, and yes, it is even more fucked up that I will tell this kind of deeply personal thing to everyone in the world, leaving it on a permanent record. It liberates me. Secrets weigh on me terribly. Further, I can’t be blackmailed, to the dismay of Oga Bobo. The man who blackmails, tells vulnerable high schoolers asking deeply personal questions for advice to kill themselves. And on and on. But keeps his pecker dry.

“The threat of blackmail” is a kind of misnomer, or perhaps you would say it is redundant, because blackmail is a threat. When Fuentes repeatedly suggested that if I were to go after him, he would release secret information on me, he was engaging in a moral sin. Blackmail is a grave sin, and he did it with full knowledge of the gravity, and he did it deliberately. In terms of the level of offense, the only difference between blackmail and fornication is that blackmail is illegal. Seriously, I could have him criminally charged. And does anyone think he repented? I confess every time I engage in fornication. I confess all sorts of things. My priest rushes me. He says “brother, you don’t have to say every little thing, and some of these are not even sins.” Can you imagine that Fuentes went in the box and confessed for blackmailing me? He blackmailed over and over again, so there was no remorse, and apparently no interest in the fact that this is a sin… but he won’t have sex? He is in a position where he could be pulling ultra super model level girls whenever, and he resists that. This is saint level behavior. But he blackmails people, blackmails me, the man he owes his entire career to. He knowingly lies and misleads people, spreads gibberish, got a bunch of people sent to prison by telling them to “take the Capitol,” but he ain’t getting his dick wet?

I’m interested, because it appears he is indeed a homosexual. I think we should interview Lolisocks. I always thought Lolisocks was a funny guy, but he did fuck trannies, so I mean, I’m not trying to buddy around with him. Fuentes is claiming to be a true Catholic leader of a for-profit revolutionary movement. (Please just think on that term for a bit. Think about Pol Pot in the jungle screaming at men throwing bodies into a mass grave while flipping through a luxury furniture catalog. No wonder the Mugu Carnicero hates Fight Club.)

It is a matter of the public interest if he is indeed a homosexual. Personally, I think it is obvious that he is, but it is also possible or indeed probable that he is non-practicing. And I respect a non-practicing homosexual. He effectively admitted this. People might have misinterpreted that infamous clip. He says you have to have engaged in a sexual act to be gay or straight. Clearly, he is justifying to himself that he is not gay because he has not engaged in gay sex. I believe he probably does find it repulsive, but is driven to it. This is the case with a lot of homosexuals.

But we are really on a tangent here.

I noted that it was not financial advice, but I am 100% out of AI and I have no idea what this bubble pop is going to do to crypto. Or whatever else. I mentioned this because an AI, unprompted, called me “Serious Internet Person.” The full sentence was “Alright, Serious Internet Person, let’s lock this down.” I am thinking of having this printed on my business cards. Currently, my cards say “Chairman Wang, CEO of Pangolin Pie” and have a picture of Charles Bronson from Death Wish saying “Go Ahead, Make My Pie.” I’ve been told that it is confusing, because it implies my business is that people hire me so they can make pies for me.

What if I put Lawnmower Man saying “Alright, Serious Internet Person, let’s lock this down”? That way I am informing the potential customer that I will help him lock something down, which could imply all sorts of different things. I am also complimenting the potential customer on his serious internet behavior, as well as indicating that I have trademarked this term.

That was sort of a dark intro. I’m cutting the rest of this article. I’ll maybe post it later. But I want to do a happy Thanksgiving thing tomorrow [Update: later today. See above. Fell asleep at desk again]. And I think that is enough dark for the darkness before the dawn of Thankfulness.

I have to be the leader of the Fuentes criticism. No one else is going to do it correctly. There is no one real enough to do anything. I like a lot of Tucker’s stuff. But he has a weird agenda. I forgot about Thanksgiving this week, since I don’t have family with me. The last couple years I was in another country staying with some people and cooking. This year I will just go to some American hotel with turkey. Do you know how many hotels are owned by Mormons? People will say “Mormons are like Jews,” but that is really lazy and barely even means anything, because… wait, no, I’m not going into that.

I also like Candy’s stuff. Why does no one call her that? Candace is a nice enough name, but it feels like people she’s close with should call her Candy. If she was my wife, I would call her Candy. Except no I wouldn’t, because if I wouldn’t call her anything, because I wouldn’t speak, because I would be dead, because if I married a nigger, even a lovely one like Candy, I would an hero. Anyway, if anyone is legit, it’s her. But she’s not legit enough to give up the money. That’s the issue. This money thing, man. It just doesn’t work to have a society where all power is money. After the Tucker-Vance 2028 project, which will probably be three articles, I have another big thing planned about the probability (nigh certainty) that it is impossible for a person who acts on morals to have a huge amount of money, meaning that in a capitalist system, it is impossible for a moral person to have serious power. At least, if you do not have an authoritarian state. In an authoritarian state, where the state is above all else (hopefully with a two-headed eagle), you can have a moral power. And… okay again, not going there. 2,000-word opening for a meme post is enough.

Oh. But I’m doing the money thing again.

Monero:

4BHE9T5HUqbRzsAaq5grGq31G3JevBD1RBNbRdWQLg8ESYugNNyyAnt2JL9ZuWA1w72g4LPr25rSHjQJS6MwANT3MMJFA16

Public addresses for people doing their own security:

BTC:

bc1qd35kpy3ghxhtg29cg5tl4aud5xr9xqwrkw6ucm

ETH:

0x33BD3683D518C45df6393E2276E724228a834757

SOL:

FG71bjrBSKcp2A9ZenyrHjvEw2ngmxbAebcBA4cnY1jM

The way to get a private address so I can handle security:

Session App (download), copy this code:

05572128ee1967255089ef79d7ad652b5c6765665b8299e294e05a37ac96dd0936

Or scan this QR:

Email:

staunchleftist1999@proton.me

Contact me there, I will give you a clean address. And yes, you can use those addresses again. Or you can request a new one. But the addresses are good forever.

Also, if you sent a request a while ago and I never replied, please send again. I mean before last week. My box is so full. And I don’t check it. That is how stupid I am with money. People try to send it to me and I don’t even bother to help them do it until I am completely broke. I know this is strange to some. But hey. Whatever.

This donation drive is not really going very well so far. I guess it’s because not that many people are reading the site. I mean, that shouldn’t be totally surprising lol. And I get that I’m asking for money while not doing nearly as much work. But a whole lot of work is coming. I just need to bridge the gap here.

Plus, I mean… I did give you a lot of work. I didn’t ruin my life for you, I did that for me. I don’t really know why. Honestly, I think the Holy Spirit, my Guardian Angel, Saint Michael himself, some force from God, sent me on this mission.

The reality is, someone had to do this. Someone had to leave America. You can’t be in America and do anything that matters. There is opposition, but it is necessarily controlled opposition. Because they can silence you. They can kill you. I think that is a big part of what happened to Charlie Kirk. I don’t think it was “oh he’s starting to go against Israel, kill him.” I think it is more like “let’s make it clear what happens if you go against Israel.” Whatever it is, it’s not what they’re telling you. And there is literally only one guy who is saying it is what they are telling you.

One guy.

And not just saying “oh I think the official story makes sense, but people should be able to ask questions.” He is saying that anyone who questions it is a Russian agent. And he is attacking them. Saying no one can question Israel. And he is fucking everywhere. He will probably hit 8 figures this year. You people don’t understand the kind of money that is involved. What these crypto donations can be.

Tucker is the big boss. He runs the alternative media. And he is partners with Vance. But I think he’s got a lot of good stuff, he’s got that Crooks documentary, but with Vance, I mean, my friends still live in Ohio and one sent me this photo taken while he was taking a shit at Target…

That is the big story I’ve got coming. I am playing this up. I have so much written. Probably over 40,000 words. That 40,000 will need to be cut to about 15,000, and then we will need another 40,000 to get cut to 15,000, making three 10,000-word pieces.

I’m just going to publish it when it’s done. I’m not sure when that will be. I still have the response to the criticisms of the big anti-Fuentes article, which needs a few updates, because so much of what I said has played out. That’s kinda why I waited. Aside from my hatred of editing. But I’ll probably put that out, then start publishing the Tucker-Vance-Silicon Valley series.

This is literally the response from mugus to insults against their master:

“You’ve changed” is the best. I’m like “aside from no longer appreciating your master, how did I change?” They say “you’re not funny anymore.” Then I cry and cut myself and try to call to order balloons but they’re like “sir, you’re going to have to call back when you’re not crying so hard, plus we don’t sell the kinds of balloons you want other than Spongebob and Labubu. Like, sir, Batman wouldn’t marry Wonder Woman, we don’t have that balloon.”

Of course I wanted Batman marrying Catwoman, a balloon they must have.

Here’s another teaser: Fuentes was obsessed with Peter Thiel, but he wasn’t saying anything that mattered at all. He was constantly talking about Bronze Age Pervert, who no one had ever heard of. If you read Thiel’s writings, you find Straussianism. Honestly, that alone might need another 10-10-15,000 words. Thiel would have wanted someone attacking him. And Nick is really not very good at doing these missions. You saw how badly he fucked up that whole “Russia is the real Israel” thing. Just created a completely nonsensical mess no one could possibly follow. He would do endless hours about Peter Thiel and not talk about anything that mattered, simply talk endlessly about these Twitter accounts no one has ever even heard of, talking about how Thiel funds them. This creates anti-Thiel background noise. It would be like if someone pretended to be really short and really sensitive about it in order to control the criticism of them. Someone could even invent some insane story about having dozens of bastard children, and then spread it by manipulating a 104 IQ Mexican into thinking it was a weak point.

It’s… it’s all very big. And… that is the end of that preview.

Editor’s Pick of the Week:

Official Runner-Up:

(I know those are both old. But they feel fresh to me and I am the judge. Memes are not a democracy.)

Also some other notable memes which may inspire relevance…

Friendly reminder that by mid-2027, the single adjective we have left in the English language will be “fucking.”

I used to love a good F-bomb. Now I actively try to avoid them as often as possible. When I use them now, people either think “he’s being funny or he’s mad.” (I’m talking about in real life speech. In writing I still do use it profusely because that is just how people write.)

This is okay:

But it’s not just CVs. What is the most insane is that it is college papers. Students are turning in papers written by AI to teachers who grade them with AI. The AI grader marks down the other AI for hallucinating. But that’s all.

Speaking of broke-ass tech, the internet of things was always a bad idea. Maybe making a single controller that controls your TV and your heating/cooling and your… whaever else, was a good idea, but making new controllers for things and putting them all on the internet was idiotic, and when it’s all programmed by Indians…

Is this one about the Israeli ass-ramming scandal?

They didn’t ass-jam them with a banana. The Amazing Atheist did that. (Imagine that is what everyone thinks of you for the rest of your life? I only think that and that he lost weight. He made money, but this is what I say with De La Oga: at what cost?)

Separately from ass jamming though, I’m sure the IDF did trick Palestinianas into slipping on banana peels. Have you seen those guys in masks yelling about how they are proud they ass-jammed that dude? Imagine if there was a separate team of guys in masks yelling like that to cheering crowds talking about how they were proud of tricking Palestinians into slipping on banana peels like in an Abbot and Costello movie.

By the way, did you know that Costello from that duo was Elvis Costello’s dad?

No I’m joking, I just made that up. But now that I’m thinking of it, I should probably AI it.

Am I now just explaining memes?

Anyway, I’m out of time, this is like, midnight on Thanksgiving, so you are going to read this on the day instead of the day before. I fell asleep at my desk again. But remember: a happier one is coming soon.

The Primo Collection:

It’s meme time, friends.

But first, the promised preview of what is to come next week, when you will get some serious analysis, which is going to hold up very well. I am in high confidence mode.

Tucker-Vance Showdown ’28 Preview Section

I promised to start leaking details of my analysis of Tucker Carlson’s 2028 scheme in these meme posts. And this, verily, I shall do. To start with, we need to consider the basic fact that Tucker Carlson is a “friend” of “JD Vance.” He is using Vance and Vance is using him. They both need each other right now.

The thing is, Vance is going to be required to run on Trump’s record, which is going to be a nightmarish thing come 2027. It is already nightmarish. We have no money. We are doing all of these wars. None of the immigrants are getting deported. Nothing that anyone voted for is happening.

MI6 is, at least officially, refusing to help Trump blow up these boats off the coast of Venezuela, given that there is no evidence there are drug dealers on them, and the survivors are saying they are fishermen. Maybe some of them are running drugs, but they’re not running them to America; that is impossible in these boats. Vance says “I don’t give a shit who we kill.” Like that Misfits song. The media is like “but who was that guy you killed?” and Vance is like “It doesn’t matter much to me as long as he’s dead.”

That’s a small issue, apparently, because Americans don’t care about killing random people. But it is goofy. Just like all of the rest of this stuff. The wars are big goofy, the dumb deportation strategy is big goofy, the tariffs are big goofy. None of this stuff is stuff anyone wants to run on. Tucker doesn’t have this baggage. And he’s the anti-Israel guy, who doesn’t have to talk out of seven sides of his fat mouth when trying to explain why the US is joined at the hip with Israel.

Tucker will drive the knife in Vance’s back, for the sake of America (and, incidentally, his own legacy). This is going to be awesome.

I don’t trust Tucker. But I don’t trust anyone but myself. And frankly, the extent to which I trust myself is quite limited. But Tucker is older than Vance, he is about six million times more charismatic, he doesn’t have baggage, he is a viable candidate. Vance is not viable. Tucker might not even have to knife him. Vance, as power hungry as he is, might be willing to step aside and try to get a cabinet position in Tucker’s admin.

Oh, and we’re going to need a very big section on how it is even possible for Tucker to get elected, given election fraud. Of course, Tucker is young enough and clever enough that if he got robbed, he might do January 6 but real. Of course then he could just be assassinated.

But the other thing about Tucker is: unlike Trump, I do not think he has all this weird sex stuff.

Speaking of weird sex stuff, Trump is now supporting Congress releasing the Epstein files, after he tried to go to war with Marjorie and literally called her a traitor. That was very disgusting. He is purposefully burning his brand. It’s just unbelievable. He had the top brand, and then he’s like “lemme go ahead and just light this shit on fire.”

I think Tucker should pick Marjorie as his running mate.

Sure, elections are fake, but this could create massive chaos. It could be awesome.

The Epstein files are just going to be endless black “redacted” lines. Guaranteed.

This is the goofiest of the goofy, when Trump can release this at any time, then he calls up all these congressmen, including Lauren Boebert, and tries to convince them to help him cover it up. Then he fails. Then he says he supports Congress releasing it. And it’s like bro, if you support it, why don’t you just release it, instead of forcing Congress to force you to release it?

What is going on?

Why is this all so goofy and weird?

Anyway, I’m really burned out. I was traveling. Then I tried to work on some shit and fell asleep at the desk. I think my arm might be permanently crippled. I was at a meeting and my eyes kept drooping. They put me in a taxi.

Then I fell asleep in the taxi and the driver had to bonk me. Straight up bonked. This was some Super Smash Brothers shit.

Speaking of goofy, my eyes were droopy like Goofy the rat.

I’m overworked.

I’m getting this money together, so I can pour a year into the TV show, even if it doesn’t make money. If it doesn’t make money after a year, we’ll see. But I think it will. I hate all the people you hate. Everyone hates all of these people, these alternative media people. Even if you don’t hate them all, you would at least like to see them knocked down a peg, would you not?

He’s one droopy sonovabitch, ain’t he?

This is my fav:

It’s my fav because it reminds me of myself. That’s the way I feel most of the time, now that I’m not interested in women. Thankfully I am interested in work again, because of the TV show. Otherwise I would probably just curl up somewhere and sleep until I was dead.

Back to the Sex Thing

Sex is a big part of everything. It is maybe the biggest part. Nick Fuentes being obsessed with money while claiming to have no interest in sex implies some kind of severe mental illness. For most men, if they had no interest in sex, they would spend their lives doing what they wanted to do, not thinking about money much at all. Women want money because they are vapid, soulless creatures. Men want money because women want money. There’s no reason for luxury or status symbols outside of sexual dynamics. Status symbols exist either to impress women or impress men that you work with so they will take you more seriously and give you opportunities that will lead to more money you can impress women with.

Men’s horniness is very fascinating. Mostly, intelligent men view it as an annoyance. But then if you are able to successfully suppress it, you end up in a situation where you say: “Wait, why I am doing anything again? Someone remind me why I don’t just sit around all day and read Star Wars novels? Like, I could play video games I guess, but that requires some effort and can be frustrating when you lose. Star Wars novels are only fun. And you get to use your imagination!”

Sex is so dumb. I mean think about it. Women are totally gross. They are so self-obsessed and lacking in empathy, and they have no interests at all. If you try to talk to a woman about an interesting topic, she will feign interest if she likes you. If she doesn’t like you, forget about it. Women are also ugly and they smell bad. It is only the base biological urge that drives men to have sex.

There is nothing more obscene than Andrew Tate with his nasty hoes saying “look at me, I do my base biology, I’m a slave to it, me and the demiurge are tight bro, I’m demiurged up and down this piece.” And to make it that much worse, or maybe better, these bitches he rolls out are hardened road dogs. Not even once have I seen him with a girl I would rate above a 5, and most of them are straight up 3s.

Note that I do not include fat women on my number scale, as fat means you’re out of the game, an automatic zero. I also don’t include age, which Tate’s harem is benefiting from, since most of his bitches are in their 40s.

And he’s in Romania, dude. One time me and a friend were on the main walking street in Bucharest, and some street hustler called us up to a brothel. The girls were significantly better than the ones Tate’s got in the above pic. They were not spring chickens, all over 25, but not as old as Tate’s chicks. These would have been in the 5-6 range if they didn’t have the tattoos. The guy was saying $100. I said “will you take $50?” and they did a fake huddle and the guy was like “yeah, okay, $50, but 30 minutes only.” I said, “I only need ten minutes, I won’t be singing any poetry.” And then I got up to leave. And he was like “wait, you go?” I nodded in the affirmative. He said “why you ask for $50 then?” “I just wanted to see if you would take it.” He looked confused for a split second, then “okay, my friend, $40 for you, beautiful girl, you choose girl.” I shook my head. By the time I was on the street it was $30.

Point being: $100 an hour girls in Romania look like supermodels. Girls better than Tate’s are $30.

The Andrew Tate situation is weird. And he is a part of Tucker Carlson’s coalition.

The Carlson Coalition

I hope everyone understands that this is what is happening here: Carlson is building a coalition. I am sure I’ve mentioned this, but we need to put that in the front, as we frame these ideas.

He is attempting to bypass the old culture war which was primarily about abortion and gays. Ending Roe v. Wade allows the former to be bypassed, and apparently he is just going all-in on “Fisting, I say to thee lad, is phileo, and verily, sayeth I unto thee, double-fisting is double-phileo.”

When Glenn Greenwald’s sex tape leaked, I said “this really doesn’t have anything to do with what he is saying about Israel or anything else, this is just a way to embarrass a man.” If a politician is a gay or if he drives off a bridge with a hooker in the car and doesn’t even attempt to save the bitch as he doggy paddles his fat ass to safety, that may speak to their character. But a podcaster, I mean – who gives a shit? I thought it was the nuttiest thing ever when Nick Fuentes blackmailed me, threatening to reveal my half breed children. Maybe I have some hardcore Nazi readers who don’t like that, but honestly, I doubt even they care that much. It’s not like I’m polluting the gene pool of the Western world. I’m raising the quality of the gene pool in the Eastern world.

Frankly, Fuentes blackmailing me at all was some of the weirdest shit I’ve seen. I am not joking when I say if things were just a little bit different I would have tried to press criminal charges. It was really cut and dry. What made it so much weirder is that the first time he did it, I demanded he release whatever secret information he has, but then over a year later, he was still pushing this blackmail thing, acting as if he’d never heard me say “release it all.” None of the mugus defended him on that. None of them tried to say he didn’t do that. They just psychoanalyzed me like creepy ass faggots.

But yeah, calling Greenwald’s thing “love”… this is very strange. But that is Tucker’s big tent. Pretty much everyone is in this tent other than the Jews. (Well, some Jews, he is sticking to “everyone is an individual” as I mentioned in my preview during the begging fiesta, but most Jews will not go along with this.)

Sex is a big part of all of this. Sex is a big part of everything. We will break down the big tent Tucker is building, and analyze the fact he’s skipping the sex stuff, while also remaining generally socially conservative. I think the tent is smart. I wouldn’t do this tent he’s doing and I don’t really support it.

Speaking of Jews and sex and Tucker’s big tent, the “lesbian” (not a real thing) who runs “Gays Against Groomers,” a homosexual group that is against trannies, is a Jew and she is now denouncing him. I saw her on this Israeli podcast that is primarily an anti-Tucker podcast.

She looks a lot better in the thumbnail than on the podcast.

If she’s a lesbian, then why is she trying to look attractive in the first place, I wonder? Maybe because “lesbianism” isn’t real?

That podcast is something I will be covering in some detail as I go through all of this. He has very few views, but gets big names. There is more than meets the eye there, for certain.

Anyway, the Jews do not care about Nick Fuentes. No one cares about Nick Fuentes. He can’t ever be popular, he is too repulsive. He can use my material and get some attention, but that’s it. The reason he is the big issue is that they were looking for a reason to attack Tucker, and that seemed like the easiest point of attack. Tucker bringing Fuentes into the tent is a separate issue. He needs a “real antisemite” in the tent, and Fuentes is the most harmless, and due to his obsession with money and fame, as well as the fact he’s got serious federal charges hanging over him, he’s a very easy “antisemite” to bring into the tent.

Anyway, this is all just random out of order commentary. It is a preview of the thing I am going to put together analyzing all of this. It will be a multi-part thing I will start next week. It will be properly organized and very informative and explain to you what is happening next.

Right now, onto the memes.

Oh, but first…

E-Begging Continues

As noted, the site is broke. I stopped soliciting donations when I stopped posting the daily news, and yet kept paying everyone. Now that I am working on the site regularly again, and have all these projects coming up, I am again asking for your support. I did the whole bit yesterday.

Short story is…

Monero:

4BHE9T5HUqbRzsAaq5grGq31G3JevBD1RBNbRdWQLg8ESYugNNyyAnt2JL9ZuWA1w72g4LPr25rSHjQJS6MwANT3MMJFA16

Public addresses for people doing their own security:

BTC:

bc1qd35kpy3ghxhtg29cg5tl4aud5xr9xqwrkw6ucm

ETH:

0x33BD3683D518C45df6393E2276E724228a834757

SOL:

FG71bjrBSKcp2A9ZenyrHjvEw2ngmxbAebcBA4cnY1jM

The way to get a private address so I can handle security:

Session App (download):

05572128ee1967255089ef79d7ad652b5c6765665b8299e294e05a37ac96dd0936

Email:

staunchleftist1999@proton.me

Contact me there, I will give you a clean address. And yes, you can use those addresses again. Or you can request a new one. But the addresses are good forever.

Again: I’m in a tough spot here. So if you feel like you’ve gotten something out of the site, please help me out. There is plenty more to come. You are going to like the new show, I promise. It is going to be very fun. And you are going to like this series I’ve got coming explaining this Tucker-Bowman situation. I am myself very interested in it, and excited to see what I learn about it when I type it up. For me, writing is a big part of the way I process my thoughts. So when I write, I teach myself things.

And of course, you are going to like the memes.

After the Tucker Carlson/Peter Thiel/Jim Bowman Takeover Series, Look Forward To:

• Antisemitism Doesn’t Exist and Can’t Exist
• Why I am Proud to be a Pedophile Activist
• All That Stuff I Said About AI Doing Things is Already Happening
• How to Cure Your Addiction to Monster Nitro with “Dangerous” Amounts of Sleeping Pills
• It Doesn’t Matter If Your Christmas Lights Look Bad, What Matters is That You Put in the Effort (Including Slaves Who Live in “Apartments” [Prison Cells])
• Why It is Unethical to Not Drain the Government of As Much Money as You Possibly Can
• How I Became a Communist
• Seven Foolproof Ways to Kill Your Wife and Make It Look Like an Accident
• Could Thrawn Beat Darth Vader? (Not Including Hand-to-Hand Combat, I Mean If They Both had a Star Destroyer and an Equal-Sized Fleet)

And of course, the fake podcast, which will be followed by a real TV show.

Editor’s Pick of the Week:

Runner-Up:

(The motto of my TV show.)

The Primo Collection:

*Note: except alcohol, nicotine, caffeine, Valium, and taurine

Editor’s Note: This is an e-begging post. However, it also contains the first segment of my Tucker Carlson-Jim Bowman-Nick Fuentes 2028 analysis preview, which I think you will enjoy. If you are seriously poor, you can skip the e-begging section. The Tucker section is clearly marked. Though I do pray you will help us if you can. 

There comes a time in a man’s life when he must post his Monday memes on a Wednesday. Sometimes then, he falls asleep from exhaustion on his desk as he is trying to upload said memes. Then, sometimes he wakes up, and the uploads are all broken due to poor internet, and it is already late night on Wednesday.

Every man is going to have to deal with that at some point in his life.

For me, that time came yesterday.

I am currently traveling, which is why I am failing at these memes. I am traveling as a part of my podcast project. But I’m headed to better internet.

Also, today I realized the site has nearly run out of money to pay for needed services.

I will deliver the memes early Friday, and again on Saturday, because I have double the memes.

I’ve also got some serious articles relating to Tucker Carlson, Jim “JD Vance” Bowman, Peter Thiel, Nick Fuentes, and the 2028 mega fiasco. We will post teasers for these below, and as introductions to the memes, and come early next week, serious analysis will begin.

But I come to you today once again asking for your support. I’ve been paying for the site for the better part of a year now, with no calls for contributions, because I was not doing much content, and it seemed inappropriate to ask for contributions. However, I am now in a bind, and I am also ready to deliver bigly (see the roadmap below).

If you can, please contribute to helping keep us online.

Monero:

Here is the Monero address:

4BHE9T5HUqbRzsAaq5grGq31G3JevBD1RBNbRdWQLg8ESYugNNyyAnt2JL9ZuWA1w72g4LPr25rSHjQJS6MwANT3MMJFA16

Bitcoin, etc.:

If you have already anonymized your crypto, you can use these addresses:

BTC:

bc1qd35kpy3ghxhtg29cg5tl4aud5xr9xqwrkw6ucm

ETH:

0x33BD3683D518C45df6393E2276E724228a834757

SOL:

FG71bjrBSKcp2A9ZenyrHjvEw2ngmxbAebcBA4cnY1jM

ONLY USE THOSE IF YOU UNDERSTAND CRYPTO AND YOU ARE SENDING IT FROM AN ANONYMOUS WALLET.

If you don’t know how to anonymize coins and send them from a private wallet, please contact me and request a unique BTC (or ETH or SOL) address. This will keep your identity anonymous and prevent you from being banned from an app for sending to me.

Contact me on the encrypted Session App:

05572128ee1967255089ef79d7ad652b5c6765665b8299e294e05a37ac96dd0936

Or email me here:

staunchleftist1999@proton.me

I will send you a unique address, unique to you only, and not linked to anything related to this site, or to anything at all. I will lock those addresses and only use them to transfer the coins, without mixing addresses, to the anonymous Monero network, so everything is anonymous.

You can use Coinbase, Binance, Venmo, Cash App, or whatever. No one will know anything other than that you sent coins to a random address, which will sit for a while, and then eventually be run through an anonymous site anonymizing the coins.

There is no risk of getting identified or banned from your service.

I don’t usually check these things, but I will check all of my messages for the next week or so. If you want to send personal messages, that’s fine. But hopefully if you’re sending personal messages, you’re also sending money. When I open up these channels, I get thousands of messages, and it is very difficult to reply to them all. I will do my best, but mostly I will be prioritizing responding to messages from people who send money.

Frankly, it is difficult for me to open the messaging app or the email, because I just start writing long replies to everyone, and then never even make it 5% of the way through. So please understand, I would very much love to talk to all of you. I would call and chat with each of you for hours. But that is not physically possible.

I will, however, try to read the messages and hit you with a “thanks bro, love to hear it.” But if I start replying to every comment and question, I will end up writing thousands of words to a few people and then not replying to anyone else and not sending all the addresses.

Also, if possible, can you please not suggest that I get a PO box or do some other scheme to try to make donations easier? This simply is not possible, and writing me with these ideas, all of which I have spent many, many hours thinking about and looking into, wastes both of our time.

Best Time to Donate

I think Bitcoin has bottomed out for the time being. I seriously doubt it will go much lower. It could, no one can predict the future, but if Trump would simply relax for a couple weeks, we’ll be on the comeback trail, which will mean the money you donate now will likely be worth more soon.

This is Not a Business

I hold deep disgust for mugus. This post was particularly disgusting.

“Legalize drunk driving,” huh? I wonder where oh where he would have gotten that meme. He’s obviously not a drunk driver or any other kind of hardcore baller, based on that whining, capitalistic post.

Look:

Wow. That sucks so bad.

Watch this guy delete his account.

The “envious of success” thing is seriously the funniest thing on the entire earth. Though it is hard to keep track of the site’s numbers, given the lunatic measures we have to go through to keep the site online (all this caching and proxy relaying), even after all of my censorship, before Valentine’s Day when I told readers I needed a break from our relationship, I had 2-3 million monthly uniques by the most conservative estimates, which by my math indicates there were 800,000-1,200,000 people reading the site nearly every day. Meanwhile, before Fuentes was reinstated on Twitter by Elon Musk personally, he had an average of 20,000 views on his Rumble show. Obviously, getting back on Twitter, and then catching a windfall from the most extreme astroturf campaign I’ve ever seen in my life, he now has a significantly wider reach than me, especially considering the censorship I suffered in 2017, which remains the most extreme censorship of any publication ever in American history (you could maybe compare it to pro-Hitler people during World War II, but even then, I think I would win).

No one on earth believes that if I had the same opportunities, Nick Fuentes would be “more successful” than me. There is not a single person on earth who knows the facts that would make that argument. Saying I’m “jealous of his success” is like saying that after he broke his neck falling off a horse, Christopher Reeve was “jealous of the success” of horsemen who had working limbs. I am obviously frustrated that I taught Nick Fuentes everything he says that resonates with people (like, pretty much literally every single thing), and that he is able to say all of this and have absolute access to everything.

This is one of Fuentes’ responses to me since I called him out:

Nick's MO: Always switch up on your day 1s

"They will resent you for being successful." pic.twitter.com/KW0MloEfdE

— Fuentes Updates (@FuentesUpdates) October 25, 2025

It is the gayest shit imaginable.

This cocksucker isn’t going to respond to anything I’ve said, so he does personal attacks and psychoanalysis like a woman. Just pure emotion. Adult men discuss ideas, women name-call and psychoanalyze.

He won’t debate me.

Remember when he used to say that anyone who can defend their ideas is not afraid of debate? He won’t debate me. I am not a good debater, and he’s spent 9 years honing these skills. But he won’t debate me. Because all of his lies, hoaxes, and bizarre behavior is indefensible.

If you’re on Twitter, ask him why.

This ties into the larger narrative I’m trying to unravel here. Some people can’t process the fact that because I am a key figure in all of this, I have to talk about myself, and instead attack me for talking about myself. It is impossible to understand what is going on with Nick Fuentes without understanding my situation and my connection to him. So I have to talk about myself. I was permanently banned and totally unpersoned. Fuentes says all of the things I said, given that I am the basis for his entire identity, and yet he is not only unbanned, but promoted everywhere. I have heard both Tucker Carlson and Glenn Greenwald say “he can’t be canceled.” This is patently false. I know both Glenn and Tucker are aware of me, I don’t know if they know the details. But there is no such thing as “uncancelable,” and if it were not for Elon personally deciding to let Fuentes back on Twitter, he would remain on Rumble with 20,000 average views (even while he is in the media as a friend of Kanye who dined with Trump).

Note: Trump defending Fuentes was a big deal, and a big piece of evidence for the narrative I am building.

I don't think people realize what just happened on live TV.

Donald Trump says that we should allow Nick Fuentes, the world's most influential Nazi, who praises Hitler and called on a "holy war" against Jews, to "get the word out." pic.twitter.com/DfNkfHAIvd

— David Schwartz (@DavidSchwartz70) November 17, 2025

To be clear: I do not have a fucking “business model.” These people are such freaks. I could not have a business model, because of censorship measures that Fuentes was spared from for reasons we can only imagine (given that he’s said all the same stuff I said and worse.) Further, unlike Fuentes, I never had the goal of making millions of dollars from political activism, and I don’t understand the mindset of anyone who thinks that is an ethical activity. (I do understand the mindset. It’s just a standard Indian-type scammer mindset.) If you care that much about money, how could it be possible that you could ever be trusted? Political activism is a type of charity. It is something you do for moral reasons. It is not a for-profit venture. If Fuentes framed himself as an entertainer, then sure, okay. But he frames himself as a leader of a revolution. Revolutionary leaders live in jungles or in exile, plotting. They do not stack stacks and have multiple homes and sports cars like Fuentes has.

To be fair, I have a skillset that can be monetized outside of my political activism, which Fuentes does not have. Being able to write means people will pay you to do all sorts of things, whereas being able to ramble uninterrupted, repeating something you read and mixing it with kook conspiracy theories, has no application other than podcasting. How a political activist would be expecting a seven-figure annual salary is above my comprehension. If you were actually an activist, you would donate the extra money to the cause. But that is a topic for another time. I simply want to point out that I have never viewed this as a business. That said, I really should have asked for contributions more often. But I didn’t, because I really don’t like it.

Content is Coming

As you know, I am working on a TV show. I have already put money into that, and will need quite a bit more. Before the TV show, in fact as soon as possible, we will be doing a practice podcast, which I am labeling a fake podcast, which will maybe be good but nothing compared to what I have planned. Then, in a few months, when I’ve got this set up and organized and figured out the money for my lights, cameras, and studio, we will be doing a very serious podcast, which will be in large part scripted, and will focus on explaining the news by analyzing how full of shit virtually all of these podcasts are.

As the same time, I will be writing more. I guarantee it.

The Look of the Site

No one wants to hear about this, so I’ll keep it brief. (It is kind of important, as it is the way people interact with the site, and so I want it to be good.) As stated many times since the event, the previous visual theme of the site broke, and my staff was unable to fix it. I was also not able to buy the old theme again, because I am permanently banned from using banks or credit cards. I spent over $500 on buying prepaid visas with crypto, and the site that sells the theme would not accept any of them. (Note: they work elsewhere, so it wasn’t technically a waste of money. Though these cards are really shitty, because they cannot be refilled, meaning if you have a balance of $15, it is hard to find a place to spend it.)

I did not have the money to hire someone to fix it, and further, it is impossible to give someone I don’t have a longstanding relationship with access to the site, which meant that it fell on me to fix it, and I have very little ability to do this.

I think it looks fine now. I understand there are still some issues on some phones. I am working on that. But I have so much going on. I am trying to finish up several for-profit operations unrelated to politics or activism. I have other real life stuff. I’m working on the podcast. And I’m trying to get regular articles up. Fixing the site, which is something I know nothing about, amidst all this other stuff, has been painful. But I like the black, I like the simplified layout, it loads fast, everything is fine now except maybe embeds stretching the width on the phone.

First Tucker Comment (A Preview of What is to Come)

The core content of the TV show is to analyze the news by deconstructing the views of all of these “new media” people. One of the main podcasters we will be analyzing is Tucker Carlson. He is really at the center of the podcasting world, and he is also clearly the best. For a long time, the verdict was out on his agenda. That verdict is technically still out, but I believe I understand it much better. It seems quite clear that his goal is to run for president in 2028. What’s also clear is that he is working for Bowman, and the scheme to mainstream Fuentes is part of this agenda to build a post-Trump coalition. However, it seems very unlikely that Tucker will be satisfied with simply being a helper for the “Vance” creep.

I do believe Tucker believes in this “judge everyone as an individual” thing. Which frankly, I agree with. I simply think that it is the individual decision of someone born to a Jewish family to call himself “a Jew.” Whereas I am suspicious, rightfully so (obviously) of all Jews, I also cross the street if a group of young black males are headed toward me on the sidewalk. In the latter case, I do not argue that every single black is a killer, just that I want to be on the safe side. Due to statistics, I will not risk my wallet or my life by telling myself “I’m not racist, I’m not racist” and crossing paths with a group of black youth. Just so, I agree that not everyone born Jewish is necessarily evil (I generally appreciate Norman Finkelstein, Glenn Greenwald, Dave Smith, Max Blumenthal, and a few others). However, I am suspicious that any Jew is doing something weird and destructive, due to statistics, and will act accordingly.

I do not accept this idea that if you are engaging in generalizations, and making decisions based on pattern recognition, that you are “hating people because of their DNA.” I don’t really believe that “antisemitism,” according to the definition of “hating people for no reason other than because they were born Jewish,” is a thing. The only people I’ve seen express hatred for people based on how they were born are the Jews themselves, due to their “chosen people” ideology.

But it is simply a fact that only Jews are awarded this status where you are not allowed to use pattern recognition. People are allowed to talk about “black crime,” they are allowed to talk about the “Italian Mafia.” No one says “oh but you need to be careful because if you say that, it sounds like you mean every black is in a gang or every Italian is in the mafia.” It is taken for granted that you do not mean every single individual black or Italian.

I have had fights with AI about this. AI will be frank with you. I asked “what is the difference between saying Jews control the media and blacks control rap music,” and the robot said “it’s different because of the Holocaust.”

There is no rule that says a Jew is required to say “I am a Jew,” and when a person does say that, they are not simply identifying their ethnic origins, but showing that they identify with Jewishness. The key identity of the Jews is that they murdered Jesus. That is the basis of rabbinical Judaism, which was established after Christ, when the Romans destroyed the second temple. It is an offshoot of Christianity. They use parts of the Christian Bible and then mix it with very strange and satanic texts, and their focus is on their superiority to non-Jews and their hatred of Christ. A person that identifies that way is necessarily suspicious.

I recently said that when a person says “I am gay,” they are saying “I like to have things shoved up my ass.” Just so, when a person says “I am Jewish,” they are saying they hate Jesus and his followers. If a Jew says “my parents were Jewish, but I have rejected the Jewish culture due to its satanic nature,” I am more inclined to trust them. However, I will not completely trust them, given that statistically, when a Jew says this, he is attempting to trick you.

Seth Dillon of the Babylon Bee (which Greenwald has labeled “The Tel Aviv Bee,” despite the fact that “The Babylon Bibi” was staring him directly in his face) has claimed that he is “a Christian,” but continued to say he is also “a Jew.” This is a complicated convoluted situation, given that Jews are a separate ethnic group, which I recently heard an Israeli podcaster who now does the “I Hate Tucker Carlson” show refer to as “white adjacent.”

“It’s a religion and a race” is both nonsense and sort of true. It does refer to a religion, and most people view it as a religion. However, they are genetically different than normal white Christians by some significant margin, and also prefer not to be called “white” unless they are doing their “my fellow whites” bit.

Look at this:

If they’re just white people, and Jewishness is just a religion, then why are atheist Jews also aggressive Zionists pushing for Israel and Jewish domination?

Probably, the best way to describe Jews, and this is a term I heard from a Jew, is as a “tribe.”

This is a fascinating recent clip of a Jew woman at a recent Jew event talking about how Holocaust education was a mistake, because it teaches people that all genocide is bad, when actually, genocide narratives only exist to protect Jews.

Democrat speechwriter says that Holocaust Education might have been a mistake, because now young people are recognizing how Nazi-like the Israelis are.
pic.twitter.com/XDkz8DBPDo

— Harrison H. Smith ✞ (@HarrisonHSmith) November 19, 2025

This is extremely extreme. And it has nothing at all to do with Israel. Well, it is tangentially related, but she says that Holocaust education (brainwashing in elementary schools) was intended to stop antisemitism, and now that the Jews are committing a genocide, the Holocaust narrative is being used against them. She says that the Holocaust narrative was never intended to stop genocide, but was rather intended to shut down criticism of Jews.

You can’t look at a clip like that and say that this is all just about the state of Israel. Frankly, Bibi Netanyahu and the Jews are right when they say that Israel is fundamentally a Jewish state and criticizing Israel is criticism of organized Jewry. The identity of the Jewish state is Jewish, which is why they are engaging in behavior, including the purposeful slaughter of children and the celebration of soldiers who shove things up men’s buttholes, which is fundamentally Jewish. Other groups would not engage in this behavior. Even if you believe in the Holocaust, the official narrative there was that it was done in secret. Israel is doing this in full view of the whole world, and the reason they are doing this is that they do not view non-Jews as human beings. That is a fundamental part of the Jewish religion, but it carries over very much into secular Jewish culture.

Tucker’s obsession with “yeah but not every single one” is ridiculous. Of course it is not every single one. It seems to be the overwhelming majority, not just in Israel but also in the diaspora. Very few Jews are criticizing Israel, and instead are claiming that anyone who criticizes Israel hates all Jews.

Tucker seemed to be getting at this, at least scratching the surface, in his response to Mark Levin and Ben Shapiro.

I disagreed with the liberalism and the defense of multiculturalism in that video, but overall, he is getting much closer to the mark.

Further, his 30-minute report on Thomas Crooks was brilliant.

I am very familiar with this group that was pro-Trump and then turned against him, ostensibly saying he didn’t do enough to stop the coronavirus. I always thought these people were feds. This was the trajectory of the “podcast network” TRS, which I exposed as being an FBI-controlled group. Further, there was a very extreme, obvious FBI asset named Brad Griffin who took this line and was compulsively attacking me for years, as is the case with all of the feds. Unz.com posted one of his articles attacking me, and I wrote a response to that attack on Unz. Griffin is not a relevant person, at all, but that should provide some context. He was associated with TRS and their neo-Nazi goon group, as well as Matt Heimbach’s goon group. All of this neo-Nazi stuff is always feds leading a bunch of morons.

Tucker notes that while Crooks was posting violent comments calling for assassinations, he was contacted by someone who appears to be from the Nordic Resistance Movement. The NRM was associated with the State Department’s project in the Ukraine, sending people to fight against the evil Russians in the name of Jewish neo-Nazism. It’s all circumstantial evidence, but the fact that the FBI is covering it up, while claiming that there is an ongoing trial (there is no trial, Crooks is dead), proves that they are hiding something. Of course it’s just very obvious that the FBI was involved in the shooting. I have my own views as to whether or not the shooting was exactly what it was presented as, but it is ridiculous to suggest that the shooter was not groomed by the feds, just as one obviously assumes the Charlie Kirk shooter was (although I very much doubt the Kirk shooter was actually the shooter).

Point being: I don’t agree with all of Tucker’s stuff. But he does usually seem genuine. There are, however, things he says that appear less than genuine, which I will get into. This includes the mainstreaming of Nick Fuentes. I mean, how bizarre is it that he spent years talking about how Fuentes was not charged for calling for violence on January 6, and then didn’t ask him about it during a two-hour interview?

Then you have this very interesting relationship to Bowman, who is Thiel’s man. Very, very interesting.

Everyone is framing the current battle as what things will look like when Trump is out of office, and who will take over the Republican Party. Vance is supposed to be the obvious successor, but Vance is going along with everything Trump does, while Tucker is denouncing virtually all of it. But also, Tucker and Vance have a very close relationship.

I’d Better Cap It There

This is a preview. As I write, it appears this won’t be posted until early Thursday, which means the memes will be on Friday. Then the analysis pieces will be coming soon, as will the new fake podcast.

My co-host says I scapegoated him by saying he doesn’t have internet last time. If this is the case, I apologize. But we will hopefully do this soon. I don’t know that the first episode will be great.

Most of the groundwork for the podcast has been laid.

This is the current roadmap:

• This week: Memes and a good series of articles on these bizarre emerging 2028 political dynamics
• Next week, through the end of the first quarter 2026: A fake podcast once a week along with regular long articles 2-4 times a week
• This week and next week: Checking my email and Session chat for people who want unique Bitcoin or ETH addresses to keep the site alive
• Early second quarter 2026: The launch of the official TV show
• Beyond: A weekly Saturday night TV show and a Wednesday casual chatting show, along with regular long articles

I have not felt this kind of energy in several years. My goal with the show is to bring back the energy of early Daily Stormer. I am extremely confident this will work.

Contribute If You Can

These are pretty dire straits, given that I did not make any point to solicit donations when the content was low. I was still paying five figures to keep the site online, and it has driven up pretty quickly.

I implore you to do what you can. I’ve given my life to this, and I think I’ve helped a lot of people, and the site has not been monetized since 2017. So if this work has meant something to you, please try to help me out. The unique BTC (and other crypto) addresses should provide you with an easy way to contribute.

After two years of unparalleled war and slaughter, during which the Jews have committed the worst crimes ever recorded, they continue to disturb the peace through the spread of pernicious rumors.

Times of Israel:

Mexican authorities, with assistance from the United States and Israeli intelligence agencies, thwarted an alleged plot by Iran to assassinate the Israeli ambassador to Mexico, Israeli and US officials said Friday.

A US official said that the elite Quds Force of Iran’s Revolutionary Guard Corps initiated the plot to kill Ambassador Einat Kranz Neiger in late 2024 and that it was disrupted this year. The plot allegedly included recruiting operatives out of Iran’s embassy in Venezuela, whose authoritarian left-wing president, Nicolas Maduro, has a tactical alliance with Tehran.

“The plot was contained and does not pose a current threat,” the US official said in a statement to reporters on condition of anonymity. “This is just the latest in a long history of Iran’s global lethal targeting of diplomats, journalists, dissidents and anyone who disagrees with them, something that should deeply worry every country where there is an Iranian presence.”

The US official did not provide detailed evidence or say how the plot was contained.

…

The thwarted assassination attempt in Mexico showed Iran has a large-scale terror network in the region used for carrying out attacks on Israeli and US targets, the source said, adding that American officials believe many of the planned terror attacks are directed from Tehran’s embassy in Venezuela. Last month, Israel revealed that the IRGC was responsible for a string of attacks on Jewish sites in Western countries.

And then, everyone clapped.

First of all, it is never acceptable to make some ugly fat woman your ambassador to another country. Second, her name is “Crayons Nigger.” Forcing Mexico to accredit this woman is an act of aggression which could only have been conceived of by a sick Zionist mind.

The good people of Mexico refused to accept this heinous act, attempting to burn her palace down last May. Sadly, Israel refused to take the hint, and Mrs. Einat Kranz Neiger continues to occupy the embassy.

Iran has denied any plot to kill Crayons Nigger.

Al Jazeera:

Iran has branded accusations from the United States and Israel that it was hatching a plot to assassinate the latter’s ambassador to Mexico as “ridiculous”.

Ministry of Foreign Affairs Spokesman Esmaeil Baghaei told reporters on Monday that Tehran believes Israel is trying to damage its “friendly relations” with other countries through an “absurd allegation”.

…

Iran’s embassy in Mexico on Monday called the accusation “a media intervention and a great lie” and said it considers “betraying Mexico’s interests to be betraying our own”.

Baghaei said: “Our embassy stated that we found this allegation so absurd and ridiculous that we did not even think it required an official response from the spokesperson.”

You may remember a similar “lmao, wait what?” situation having happened in Australia a few months back. (Probably, you don’t remember it. These things are designed to be forgettable. If people didn’t forget them, they might start keeping track.) But Iran remembers.

Baghaei was quick to point out that Israel has previously made similar accusations against Iran, citing attacks on Jewish synagogues in Australia in late 2024.

That appeared to be a reference to a testimony given by the New South Wales Police Force to the upper house of the Australian parliament in early October, which presented the result of an investigation into suspected Iranian links to 14 incidents of attacks on synagogues, graffiti, firebombings, and attacks on cars and homes.

“The NSW Police Force has nil holdings in relation to foreign agents perpetrating these incidents,” a police representative told lawmakers at the time.

“Despite official statements by Australian police rejecting any connection to Iran, Israel has continued to insist on Tehran’s involvement,” Baghaei said.

However, in late August, Australia accused Iran of directing two “anti-Semitic” arson attacks in the cities of Sydney and Melbourne and gave Tehran’s ambassador seven days to leave the country, the first such expulsion since World War II.

Canberra also designated the IRGC a “terrorist organisation” and withdrew its diplomats from Tehran.

At the time, Australian Prime Minister Anthony Albanese said the Australian Security Intelligence Organisation had gathered credible evidence that Iran “orchestrated” last year’s attacks on a kosher restaurant and a synagogue, but did not release the evidence.

The Jews take great joy in portraying their enemies as cartoon villains fixated on ridiculously contrived plots to do nefarious but pointless things, like spray-painting a misdrawn swastika on a kosher restaurant several continents away, calling in hundreds of fake bomb threats, or killing some odious fat woman who will probably just die on her own from a heart attack.

This is ironic, given Israel’s own proclivity for slaughtering children, blowing people’s eyes out with rigged electronic devices, shoving things into peoples asses, burying living people in pits with air tubes and then cutting off the air, and an endless list of other acts of cartoonish villainy.

Of course, no discussion of this issue could be complete without examining the role of Claudia Sheinbaum, the Jew who was elected president of Mexico because she was the most beautiful woman in Mexico.

Claudia Sheinbaum is so beautiful that men are completely overcome with lust, flinging themselves upon her like wild beasts wherever she goes.

Sheinbaum is Jewish, but she didn’t have the nerve to try to pull an Australia and simply agree with whatever it is Israel says is happening.

The Cradle:

Mexican authorities rejected on 8 November US and Israeli claims of an Iranian plot to assassinate the Israeli ambassador to the Latin American nation. Mexico’s foreign relations and security ministries issued a brief joint statement saying that “they have no report with respect to a supposed attempt against the ambassador of Israel in Mexico.”

The statement said the foreign ministry “reiterates its willingness to maintain fluid communication with all accredited diplomatic representations in our country.” The security ministry “reaffirms its respectful and coordinated collaboration, always within the framework of national sovereignty, with all security agencies that request it.”

Israel is undeterred, of course, and will continue to sow lies and deceit as it prepares for its next round of war against Iran.

Editor’s Note: Due to a steep decline in the popularity of memes, and the consistently rising popularity of Megyn [sic] Kelly, this publication is being forced to change “Memetic Monday” to “Megyno Monday.” This is a sad day for the Stormer, but we simply cannot continue to fight the future, as memes just are not registering with the youth anymore. Every hour, 37 American millennial men die. Soon, the “Meme Men” will all be gone. This new generation, they don’t want the Happy Merchant and Wojak. They want Megyn. This is really no different than when the horse store had to murder all of the horses it had for sale, ship them off to the hot dog factory, and roll in the automobiles. I’m sure the horseman was like “these kids today are a bunch of gay retards, holy fuck, horses are so awesome and cars are the transport mode of true faggots.” But he had to keep his business alive. As the CEO of this company, I have a duty to this company. -Andrew Anglin, CEO

Megyn [sic] Kelly was previously mostly famous for going on TV while experiencing menstrual emotional feelings and verbally assaulting Donald Trump AKA “Overlord of the Talentless, Master of Those Without Skill” AKA “The Baby Bomber Straight Outta Bombay” AKA “Donnie Darko” AKA “We are Going to Shit in Your Street and We are Going to Make You Clean It Up.” That last nickname for Trump is I guess supposed to be a reference to the thing about the Wall and Mexico paying for it. I don’t know who comes up with these names. I know what I’m gonna tell these retards if I ever run into them:

Recently, as a result of scientific advancements, Kelly became famous for pulling a Benjamin Button and getting younger as she ages. Many are also fixated on her breasts (often called a “sweet rack”).

As one user wrote, “Grandma Meg looks better than those hoes on the college campus, those hoes over there are getting fatter and fatter so they have extra skin to fit more tattoos.” Another user wrote, “I want to fuck Megyn Kelly,” adding, “I want to suck on her tits, even though I’m sure she has aureolas the size of pepperonis.” Another user replied to that user, saying, “Have you ever heard of scale? I doubt her aureolas are above average size, but you have to consider the size of her breasts.” Then I replied, “she should do Slave Leia cosplay as part of her world tour.”

I then went into some detail about this plan, suggesting that Steve Bannon play Jabba, Tucker play Bib Fortuna, and Candace Owens play Lando. I was then banned for “stoking fear.” This is a classic case. People say graphic sexual things, I come in and offer some constructive ideas as to how we can help bring attention to Jeffrey Epstein or Charlie Kirk or whatever, and I’m the one who gets punished.

I do think Megyn looks great. What can we say? Irish people simply have superior genetics to non-Irish people.

People say the Irish drink too much. It’s like saying black people play too much basketball. Why do black people play more basketball than non-black people? Because they’re better at it.

Irish people use alcohol like Bane uses venom.

I have actually done research into potentially having a surgical procedure to install tubes to pump vodka directly into my bloodstream. People who claim Irish people are drunks, or that our women are slags, are simply jealous of our success.

I’m not going to say graphic things about Megyn’s breasts, even if the clothes she wears clearly indicate that causing men to say these things is her goal. She actually makes this more extreme, using the “fat friend effect,” pulling puffy-faced and swollen sloppy drunk Irish slags off the streets to sit next to her.

You can easily imagine in the back room, Megyn is feeding her pet slag boxes of donuts. Probably also pouring partially-hydrogenated seed oil in her whisky. Megyn is admiring herself in the mirror, pushing up her breasts and doing duck-face, saying “eat up my little piggy-wiggy” while the fatty cries about how she eats to kill the pain of the memories of her drunken Irish father beating her in the sheep-riddled field hovel she grew up in.

Anyway, the Jews of the Babylon Bee issued a threat to murder Megyn.

Last night @TheBabylonBee — which should just re-name itself The Tel Aviv Bee — threatened Megyn Kelly that she’d be murdered by Israel for refusing to de-platform all Israel critics.

As Israel loyalists often do, they used the pager image to pretend it was all just a joke. https://t.co/VGzbFdv6l4 pic.twitter.com/uoUqOc12bi

— Glenn Greenwald (@ggreenwald) November 14, 2025

“The Tel Aviv Bee” is a bit on the nose there, Glenn. (Remember the bit about the ADL fighting discrimination against Jews in Hollywood? When you played it totally straight? Do that kind of humor, Glenn.)

But he’s right. Posting an image of a pager is a reference to the murder of many random Lebanese people with exploding pagers. Israel has celebrated this terrorist attack as a grand achievement, saying how clever they were to give “Hezbollah” pagers with plastic explosives in them. Obviously, a bunch of children and random people were maimed. There is no evidence any important Hezbollah people were harmed. Israel can only kill important Hezbollah people by pushing buttons to send US bombs. But Bibi has gone around the world giving people golden pagers and giggling to himself about doing a weird terrorist attack.

He gave one to Trump and it looked like a death threat.

That event was framed as very clever even though it had no tactical or strategic purpose, and simply reinforced the idea that Jews are evil monsters who celebrate murdering and mutilating random people. Bibi called the prison ass-ramming incident “the biggest PR disaster in Israeli history,” but it is really part of the same PR disaster that Bibi has been promoting. Further, people in Israel are celebrating the men who rammed objects up a random Palestinian man’s asshole as heroes. It would follow logically for Bibi to go around giving people golden asshole-rammers. Ethically, they are in the same category, though obviously blinding and blowing the fingers off of hundreds of random people and killing several is worse than ramming an object in a single man’s ass. He had to have multiple ass surgeries, but he survived and presumably he will have full use of his asshole.

Seriously, someone explain to me the difference between:

• Hehe, isn’t it really cute and clever and cool that we tricked people into buying pagers with bombs in them and blew the fingers and eyes out of random people including kids, and
• Hehe, isn’t it really cute and clever and cool that we rammed something up some random guy’s asshole

Instead of “Megyn throws out old pager just to be safe,” you could say “Megyn throws old asshole rammer out the window of her car while driving past synagogue just to be safe.” Except that the asshole ramming didn’t result in death. No one wants things shoved in their ass. Wait, actually, there are millions of gays in America, and when you say “I’m gay,” what you are actually saying is “I enjoy having things rammed up my ass.” But regardless, death is worse than an asshole ramming. (That’s a quote.)

The Babylon Bee is run by one “Seth Dillon.” Please do not believe he is Irish. Apparently, his paternal grandfather is Irish, but his mother is Jewish. He claims to be a “Christian,” but he also says he is Jewish. There is no way to be a Christian and also identify as a Jew. It’s no different than being a Christian-Satanist. If a person is born in a Jewish family, and they are baptized as a Christian, they can say “my ancestors were Jewish but I denounce that satanic cult.” Jews killed Jesus and then proceeded to spend 2,000 years trying to destroy Jesus’ followers. But some of these Jews will pretend to be Christians and then claim that their “fellow Christians” should do everything for the Jews. Dillon is experiencing a psychological breakdown even worse than Ben Shapiro over the Tucker Carlson situation. Though hanging by a thread, Shapiro is actually managing to hold it together, not threatening to murder people. Dillon is on the level of Mark Levin, who is also going around threatening to kill people.

Levin is in fact the individual who triggered this whole situation where we have this supposedly funny joke which is a very thinly veiled death threat against America’s top hoe (sorry, Tay, you’re too fat, we hate that Pfizer guy, the new album is trash, we support the Eagles, you’ve been pushed out by a woman twice your age).

Mark Levin “urges” Megyn Kelly to “Change Course” because she’s in a dark place.

Babylon Bee posted, then deleted, what appears to be a veiled threat referencing Israeli Pagers.

All of this after she defended Tucker Carlson and called for Levin to debate Tucker “like a man”… pic.twitter.com/IqnvFtYlwB

— MJTruthUltra (@MJTruthUltra) November 14, 2025

Levin is on a rampage against Tucker Carlson for questioning Israel. Megyn has never said any of that stuff Tucker says about the Jews, but she is of course not going to distance herself from the most popular man in the right-wing (the clear front-runner for the Republican nominee for president who would presumably staff his administration with podcasters like Trump did, only using actually successful podcasters instead of failed ones). She also obviously wants attention. Who would have thought, you put women on the internet and you end up with stuff like that. So, after Levin called for Tucker to be shut down, vaguely insinuating some kind of violence against him, she said he should instead debate Tucker on the issues. Who knows if she thought Levin would do that (he definitely will not, no Israel supporters will debate the merits of Israel or its relationship to the United States, they always just call you a hater and demand you be silenced), and was trying to position herself to host it, or if she was just doing the obvious thing and backing up the most popular guy (who she might think will be president, though that probably won’t happen either).

The rule currently is that you’re not allowed to defend Tucker Carlson, and if you do, Jews will threaten to murder you. This is supposedly related to Tucker interviewing Nick Fuentes, but it really isn’t about that at all. It is simply that they view his interview with Fuentes as the best time to launch the attack they’ve wanted to do ever since he started talking about Israel (and really before that, when he was talking about the Ukraine AKA Israel 2).

Obviously, Tucker is doing something very bizarre with Fuentes. I have an article responding to the attacks I received after publishing the anti-Fuentes article that I haven’t published yet. It should probably be published soon, and then a followup about what Tucker is doing. Now Trump has defended Fuentes.

It’s unclear what the purpose of this article is at this point. The first half was written late last night when I was in my cups, an apology for the fact I didn’t have good enough internet to do memes today. Then I was like “wait, is this even funny?” But then I was like “ah, whatever, I’ll just wrap it up.” It’s unclear now how to wrap it up, because with that intro, this is clearly not the place to do a deep dive into the Trump-Vance-Tucker-Fuentes scandal.

Briefly: it is pretty obvious that JD Vance is behind this. They need a young “antisemite,” and who better than a totally compromised one who says that Russia is influencing America and is as bad as Israel (that is to say, someone who is edgy enough to fill the slot of “young antisemite, but is completely neutered and useless and no threat to power”)? The dumbest thing is people saying to me “if Fuentes was controlled opposition he wouldn’t talk about the Jews” and it’s like “oh, so if he was controlled opposition, he wouldn’t be opposition? Meaning the very concept of ‘controlled opposition’ cannot exist?”

In terms of what that means, it’s very obvious he’s compromised by feds. In his fawning interview, Tucker didn’t ask him about not getting charged on January 6th, which he had talked about for years and accused Fuentes of being a fed over. But it’s not even important. Tucker is offering to turn what is probably a high six figure or low seven figure annual income into a mid seven figure income. You would have to be ultra principled to say “no just ban me again on Twitter I’ll go back to my 20,000 viewers on Rumble that I had before Elon personally gave me my Twitter account back.” The fact Fuentes does cat fights with people, posts private DMs constantly, tried to blackmail me, tells his young impressionable viewers to kill themselves (for like an hour every day), lies and just makes things up constantly, and so on, demonstrates he’s not remotely principled, and is in fact simply obsessed with fame and money.

Vance and Tucker are both power mad. When a man sees a potentially clear path to seize control of a country, he always takes it. I would. It’s going to be interesting. I’m the only person saying that Tucker is working with Vance now and is planning to stab him in the back come 2027. Vance must have thought about that. If he hasn’t, someone who reads this site will tell him. He probably reads this site. So many relevant people did when I was posting regularly, which was the reason I kept going a lot longer than I should have. I would assume being around Tucker, he’s like he is on TV, and it’s hard to imagine him stabbing you in the back. But Vance needs Tucker more than Tucker needs Vance right now. Tucker’s whole thing is simply to not attack Trump directly, but he attacks all of the people around him, and could go after Vance. Trump is doing the same for Tucker.

Well. I have a whole lot about this. I have a fake podcast launching soon, which will be a placeholder for my incoming real podcast. I will be breaking down this sort of thing. And I will publish the Fuentes response, and then publish a long article addressing the issues of the three paragraphs above this one. We will need to ask about election meddling. Honestly, I don’t know if an election can be rigged in favor of a Republican. In 2024, they simply stood down. Trump was the elite favored candidate (specifically Israeli-aligned Jew and Silicon Valley elite; obviously there is still some kind of Democrat-aligned elite led by Jews who prioritize Israel’s hardline genocide policies less than other Jews), but he was also favored by the population, so all they had to do was not rig the election. But if Vance is able to get the nomination, he will have to run on Trump’s record, which will make it impossible to win, unless Democrats completely stand down like they did in 2024. (Hopefully at this point we can all admit I was right about all that, specifically when I said the hardcore Zionist Jew Ron Klain sent Biden out to get murdered at the debate and then Jews overrode Obama and his people, who wanted a real candidate, and went with the ringer Kamala, a woman who literally could not figure out how her own first name was pronounced, but knew for a fact you were a racist if you pronounced it wrong.) Tucker could win naturally, but although he is engaging in all of these dirty tricks, and in some ways reinforcing the system, I can’t imagine the Jews would allow him to become president. But it could be a funny election cycle, I guess.

I’m just glad I don’t live in America. I do sympathize with people who do, of course, and realize some of this might be less funny to you.

Anyway, I gotta cut it. I’ll circle back. Remember that phrase? Loved it. We will circle back, because I’m not doing a full analysis with that whole thing about pagers and ass-ramming up at the top. I’m a very serious person, and would not open a serious article with such puerile material.

Oh, and before I forget, do you guys know about this movie “One Battle After Another”? Wow just wow. Hopefully I get time to write about that this week. And I’ll try to have the memes up on Wednesday. Potentially tomorrow. Though probably not.

Peace out, bro.

Introduction (Unrelated to Main Article Content)

The development of my TV show is at a bit of a standstill as I await my dear partner to acquire better internet access. We will begin doing a fake podcast soon, as I practice my ability to speak without constantly saying “um.” It’s a complex developmental journey for me personally. Regrettably or not, some of my oratorial eccentricities are simply going to have to be incorporated into my professional presentation. Speaking has never been my strong suit, but as Master Yoda said, “weakness can be a strength if you shamelessly embrace it.” A challenge is always good, particularly a challenge such as this, where there is actually no objective bar by which to measure success. Even the standard internet bar of popularity does not apply to me given the censorship.

We should always push ourselves. I could have moved into a different format of writing, or I could have just quit the internet and worked at well-paying writing jobs. But I like being creative, and I like creative challenges.

Point being: I have some time to write now, and I think with most of the groundwork having been laid for the show, even once the fake podcast gets going, I should be able to keep a writing schedule that keeps people happy and keeps people visiting the site. I also think the article by Tony went over well, and he may start contributing more. I’m also open to other contributors in the future, if they are good enough.

Beginning of Main Article Content

Yesterday, I sat down with a plan to write about Trump’s fifty-year mortgage scheme. However, that quickly went in another direction, as I decided that the ridiculousness of the failed tariff scheme and its theoretical connection with the Silicon Valley transhumanist utopianist agenda was a topic worth covering in some detail. (To be clear: that was indeed a theory I was presenting. However, it is not a theory that the Silicon Valley people gave Trump more money than the Israel people, and it is not a theory that the Silicon Valley people have an agenda to create chaos in order to establish a new world order. Given that the tariffs made no logical sense on any level, it seems to be the simplest possible explanation that that whole mess was part of a larger program to create a new order in America. The fact that we now see it leading into a potential UBI type program further goes to bolster that theory. But although I think it was clear enough from the context, I will state now that the conclusion I drew was necessarily a theory, as without someone leaking documentation of insiders saying it was the goal, it couldn’t ever be proved. However, I have not seen anyone explain what the purposes of those taxes were.)

The fifty-year mortgage thing is much less important than the Silicon Valley conspiracy, particularly given that it is unlikely to ever happen and is just one of these things that Trump throws out there. Still, thinking about this has caused me to think various thoughts I find worth sharing.

Needless to say, a fifty-year mortgage is a kind of lunatic concept. However, after:

• The tariff lunacy (see yesterday’s article)
• Claiming the Epstein files don’t exist and if they do exist they are fake, then attacking his own supporters and vowing revenge on them for talking about the Epstein files
• Refusing to end the Ukraine war despite no one being able to explain why it should keep going if you don’t believe, as the liberals did, that “hurting Russia” is valuable for its own sake because Russians are white Christians
• Attempting to do a regime change in Venezuela in the weirdest way possible
• Blowing up random boats that can’t possibly cross the ocean and claiming they are drug boats headed for America (instead of just easily interdicting them, and then sending out Tubs McGee AKA Jim Bowman to pretend to be a badass talking about murdering random people)
• Inventing the term “narcoterrorism” (are they distributing drugs for political purposes? If not, how is that a word?)
• Attempting to deal with tens of millions of illegal immigrants by rounding them up one by one
• Everything Pam Bondi has said since she took office (including when she told Stephen Miller’s wife that “hate speech” was illegal and she was going to start arresting people for it, and when she appeared before Congress and acted like she was a panelist on Piers Morgan)
• Everything that Kash Patel has said since he took office (including that his girlfriend, an alleged Israeli spy, has done more for the country than most Americans will do in ten lifetimes by singing very terrible songs, which remind you just how good Toby Keith’s “Courtesy of the Red, White, and Blue” actually was)
• Taking full control of the curriculum of colleges and forcing them to teach that everything Israel does is good
• Using the FCC to threaten to remove Jimmy Kimmel from the air
• Deporting people for not supporting Israel hard enough
• Threatening to invade Nigeria (“with guns blazing,” mind you, like in a cartoon such as Quick Draw McGraw)
• Attacking healthcare while expanding the military budget to $1 trillion and refusing to make any serious attempt at actually deporting people (as well as a refusal to shut down H-1B, instead “reforming” it in a way that allows new regulations to be easily bypassed in like six different ways)
• etc.

no one should be surprised by lunatic concepts coming out of this administration.

The first thing to understand about this is that the mortgage system itself is a huge part of what has driven up the cost of homes. Mortgages allow people who can’t afford homes to buy them, and because there is a limited supply of homes, it raises the price. The difference between the cost of the wood, concrete, and plastic that homes are made out of (plus the labor), and the cost of the home, is in large part a result of the mortgage system. If people were required to save up to buy a home in cash, homes would be much cheaper across the board.

Here’s a bit of math:

That is with the current 6.25% interest you will currently get on a fixed rate mortgage.

Here is the same equation as above on a 50-year mortgage:

The bank makes all that money.

It appears very similar to a kind of debt slavery, to spend your time working to pay the bank.

Is a House Even Something You Want?

There is a bigger question here with all of this “can’t afford homes” hysteria, and that is the question of whether you even want or need a home, or if it is just something you assume you should do as part of your adult life trajectory.

Mortgages may make sense for someone investing in real estate. If we take the example of the $400,000 home, that should rent for an average of $3,500 a month. So, you might go for a slightly shorter mortgage, but as long as the rent is paying the mortgage, you’re effectively getting the house for free, then after that, you’ve got cashflow from rent. This makes sense, particularly given that as long as the rate is fixed, you are going to benefit from inflation. (The primary residence homeowner is also benefiting from inflation, but because they are living there and not collecting rent, they are tying up money that could be invested elsewhere making profit.)

Following from that, if you do want to own a home, it makes more sense to buy it and rent it out until it is paid off. If you structure the mortgage strategically, you can both make the payment with the rent money and pay your own rent in a small apartment. (This is all a single man really needs – virtually my entire adult life I’ve lived in studio apartments. I don’t even like having a separate bedroom. I like the kitchen/table/desk/bed all in the same space.)

If you are young, and trying to make money, there is a good argument against buying a house. Unless you’re married and you have kids, tying up that money just doesn’t make any sense. If you’re unmarried, I don’t think a man should buy a house unless he can buy it in cash, and even then, it should be less than a third, probably less than a quarter, of his net worth.

This is not the 1950s. You don’t have a path laid out for you where you get a job, get married, have kids, work, retire to go fishing and spend time with the grandkids. You can’t really get married. I mean you can, people do it all the time. But it is generally a horrible idea because women are horrible and in the West, women have all the power in a marriage. As we’ve been over a trillion times, if she gets bored at any moment, she can leave you and take half your money and go on a cocaine party spree with the blacks. When you get married, you are betting your entire life on the hope that this bitch will never get bored.

There are various ways to mitigate risk. If you can find a girl with a father you are sure will side with you if she tries to divorce you, that mitigates a lot. However, a girl’s father is going to be in his forties, and just as controlled by his wife as you will be, meaning in most or virtually all cases, he won’t be able to side with you even if he wants to, for fear he himself will get divorce raped. Mothers and daughters are doing porn together. This is a popular genre of porn. Poor Charlie Sheen, who is currently in the media on some kind of “losing” tour, has a daughter who does porn with her mother. I think it is softcore, but mommy-daughter hardcore is a thing. Do you think women won’t do divorce together? This is what women do. They egg each other on, justifying each other’s behaviors. That was the only notable bit of insight in the third season of White Lotus (which was a steep drop-off in quality, quite frankly).

If the girl is a virgin, she’s like 15 times less likely to divorce you. Virginity is the single biggest determiner of divorce. A virgin forms a psychic bond with the man. It becomes strange for a woman to think about sex with another man, as she associates the act itself with the only man she has done it with. If a woman has had sex with other men already, the fact that you did a marriage doesn’t have an effect on the fact that her brain is imprinted for multiple partners. But where are you going to find a virgin, given these age of consent laws? There aren’t any 18-year-old virgins. And even if the age of consent is 16, it’s hardly even plausible in the West to find a 16-year-old to marry.

I am a millennial. I know a lot of people who got married. All of them are either divorced or on the edge of it. I’ve seen different strategies. I’ve seen “just do everything she says, try not to make her mad.” I’ve seen “act alpha and try to be the boss.” I’ve seen crying and begging and I’ve seen yelling and threatening. And everything in between. None of the relationships have worked. It’s possible that younger girls will be less extreme, given that there seems to be a cultural rejection of the “trade having everything for free and a man who works all the time to take care of you for a vague and fleeting abstract notion of ’empowerment'” among girls under 25. But even if that is their thinking, it does not imply any sense of duty.

Also, the “find a religious girl” is a ridiculous strategy. Firstly, there aren’t very many religious girls. Secondly, all Protestants and most American Catholics now tolerate divorce. Protestant churches have “counselors” who will advise women to divorce over even very mild physical discipline by a man. They will say a slap or a push are universal cause for divorce.

Furthermore, and this should be obvious but apparently it isn’t: a religious virgin, even of middling attractiveness, is like one of those crystal skulls from that Indiana Jones movie about crystal skulls. I think it was called “Indiana Jones and the Crystal Skulls.” Really a sickening movie. First they attacked the Nazis as evil, then they attack the communists as evil. What’s next, Indiana Jones vs. Metallica? “Everything cool is evil, so sayeth George Lucas, avatar of the Jews.” Point being: there are few things rarer or more valuable in the United States than a religious virgin. What that means is that she has her pick of the litter. She has the ability to marry an extremely high value man. Given that you are a Daily Stormer reader, you are presumably an above average specimen of masculinity (and/or a schizophrenic teetering on the edge). But even at “above average,” you are not “elite.” If you were elite, you would formulate some scheme, marry a girl in Eastern Europe or South America, keep her in a house guarded by neo-Nazi thugs on steroids with neck tattoos, and just go see her in your private jet. You would actually probably have many such setups around the world. Imagining that you are capable of swinging the top prize of women is delusional. Further, I won’t go into my whole thing about how even the most attractive, rich, and powerful men in the world have been divorce-raped. But you all know that bit.

Marriage is not something you should think about until you have the money and power to make it at least theoretically feasible. These are the times we live in. Therefore: unless your house is also a really good investment for some reason (i.e., it’s in a neighborhood that is in the process of being gentrified or you have studied maps showing that it will be gentrified – a difficult proposition given the old Obama-era “burying them in niggers” rules about flooding majority white neighborhoods with “multifamily” public housing), there is no reason to buy a house. Only buy it as an investment and you have to know something to know if it is an investment.

This clip of billionaire Charlie Munger saying “I don’t care if single people ever get a house” is old but recently went viral.

People got mad. But what he is saying, that a house is not really an investment and you should only buy it if you need to live there, is a rather popular sentiment among financial people. They cite the cost of maintaining a house and the appreciation being related primarily to inflation.

I’m not an investment advisor. A lot of people view real estate as by far the best investment, given that land is necessarily a conservative investment, given that it will always be worth something. Of course, in most places, the house is worth more than the land it is built on. Which seems counterintuitive.

But financial advisors do often advise against viewing a personal home as an investment. Again, in my experience, as far as single family homes go, the best investment is in a place that has a lot of blacks but where, in some period of time, the blacks will be priced out. Obviously, if you have kids, you don’t want that, but if you’re single and you’ve got a gun, it might be fine.

Here is Gary Cardone, a real estate investor, telling you not to buy a house.

A real estate investor’s take on the 50 year mortgage pic.twitter.com/9lsP1dpeGA

— Grant Cardone (@GrantCardone) November 11, 2025

He says when you are building your wealth, it is better to invest in business, instead of tying up a significant percentage of your net worth in a home. As he says, the fifty-year mortgage makes it dumber, but regardless, the house is a liability, not an asset. I have heard RFK’s bit about how young people should own homes, because it builds equity, and it is just total boomerism. Is equity in a home you’re paying a mortgage on worth more than you would make simply investing in the stock market conservatively, or gambling on crypto?

And then there’s this:

If I was forced to give advice on all of this, I would tell people to buy a cheap rural house with a lot of land. Not really though. At this point, my actual advice is to simply leave America.

Regardless, This is Definitely Not a Solution

What Trump is ostensibly attempting to address is the fact that the average age of first time homeowners is now 40. This is ridiculous, and a much worse situation than in most third world countries. The merits of a 30-year mortgage can be weighed. It is a banking scam, but it has certainly worked out for some people who have bought homes that drastically increased in value at a fixed rate while inflation was going wild.

Fifty years only slightly lowers your monthly payment, and nearly doubles the amount you end up paying in the end. Boomers bought homes in cash or with short mortgages. The country is supposedly richer than ever, so why can’t people buy houses?

There are various issues. But the biggest issue is immigration. That is what is creating this “affordability crisis.” The second biggest issue is out-of-control government spending. No one voted for America to become an empire. It doesn’t benefit Americans in any way. The average age of a first time homebuyer in Norway is 28. Basically everyone in Norway is rich. Norway also has all kinds of government benefits. And so on. They’re not filled with immigrants, they are not running an empire, people can lead good, normal, middle class type lives, which is really what most people want.

Some people dream of being rich. Probably Americans dream of that more than people in most other countries, because America has such a vapid, soulless, materialistic culture. But humans in general want to live in a relatively comfortable house, be able to afford to have a family and send their kids to good schools, have some nice consumer electronics, buy high quality groceries, eat out a few times a month at a nice restaurant, go on a nice vacation once a year. That is the basic framework for normal humans, which is what we generally call “middle class.”

The middle class has been systematically crushed in the United States. A fifty-year mortgage, where you pay 3 times the cost of the home, is a dumb gimmick in a long line of dumb gimmicks that never even pretend to attempt to address the root causes of income inequality in America. It’s like blowing up random boats to address the fentanyl crisis. The root cause of the fentanyl crisis is the fact that a bunch of people want to do fentanyl. Frankly, if we just do basic game theory, becoming a fentanyl addict might be a valid choice, given the other choices people have. So you need to ask “why is becoming a fentanyl addict considered a reasonable life path in this country?” The answer would go to the dissolution of the family, the end of religion, the fragmenting of social bonds, and several other things no one wants to talk about because the solutions would not benefit the agendas of the ruling elite class.

The problems this country has are now all so bad that it appears as though any attempt at a solution can only make things worse. If fifty-year mortgages were to become a widespread thing (it’s unlikely they will, but if), the new people who would become eligible to enter the housing market would drive up demand to the point that the fifty-year mortgage would be the same price as a thirty-year mortgage is now. That would be very profitable for banks, but not to anyone else.

Fixing Society

The only way to fix society would be to fundamentally restructure it. Ironically, this is the plan of the Silicon Valley people I talked about on Tuesday. And I think a lot of people will go along with their plan, because the current situation is so ridiculous. The idea of sacrificing certain freedoms in exchange for a livable apartment and a monthly cash allowance from the government would currently appeal to quite a high percentage of the American population.

A lot of New Yorkers who voted for Trump also voted for Mamdani. This is the situation. People are just supporting anything that seems different. They’re not voting for ideology, except on the basis that maybe some ideology will fix their situation. These ideological concepts are a luxury for people without serious problems. Americans, at least young Americans, have serious problems and do not have the luxury of ideology, so they will just support whoever and whatever.

In order to fix society, you would need some kind of cultural revolution that unified people. Interestingly, opposition to Israel and Israeli influence in America is serving as a uniting factor for young people.

I’ve always thought opposition to Jews was a great place to start.

Unfortunately, this week I don’t have the sort of interesting commentary I had last week. Go read that one if you didn’t. Someone hacked my mainframe and put up a fake warning saying the text wasn’t worth reading, but it was actually very inciteful. In… sightful… I didn’t mean to imply it would incite something. That was a genuine homonym error. Many such cases.

In terms of what’s up with me? You ask? Things are going great. Feeling good, drinking various shakes made of grass for the antioxidants. Just joking, I’m not drinking shakes and I’m not doing great either for that matter. No, I’m fine. Great, really. Having a lot of fun working on the project.

Just pounding it out. Grinding.

The new writer is good, right? The Venezuela piece?

Oh and yes, I know some things about the site still look messed up on the phone. I’m slowly working through that with AI. You know, I can’t really hire IT people. I mean someone runs the server. But it’s difficult to give people access to the main site because everyone is out to get me. I am not a programmer, so I left the site looking the same for like 15 years or whatever, then it broke for some reason, and I couldn’t update the thing. I spent like $300 on prepaid cards to try to rebuy the thing, no luck. I still can’t use a VISA card. I’m banned for the rest of my life because of a fat joke in 2017. Did I already tell this story? Anyway, if I did, a lot of people apparently missed it, because people keep whining about the site looking bad. I think it looks good now. Except on a phone if there are embeds. I will fix that at some point this week. Right now, probably 30 hours of my life have been dumped into trying to fix this. And yes, that is part of why there have been fewer articles. It just is what it is. Anyway, I removed that white line people hated. I liked the white line. But most did not.

I like it better black. White light from the screen literally makes you gay. I hope you know that. It makes you gay.

If you’re not gay already, you are probably against that. If you are gay, it’s possible you want to become even more gay, but you can go elsewhere for that.

Editor’s Pick of the Week:

Runner-Up:

Special mention for this one:

Fact-checkers proved that this meme I made was the number one reason Mamdani won the election in New York. Just joking. I didn’t make that meme. It’s probably AI. But it is indeed believed to be the number one reason Mamdani won.

Don’t tell Mamdani, he thinks I made it and sinched him the win. Don’t worry about him reading this. He’s from Africa so he can’t read. I know you’re thinking “yes, but he’s not black, his family were Indian colonizers in Africa.” That’s true but it’s discredited pseudoscience that being black makes it so you can’t read. It’s actually that if you or any of your ancestors ever lived in Africa, you can’t read. It’s because of an ancient voodoo curse. That’s the real science.

I called Mamdani to thank him for winning and demanded he immediately impose Sharia law and communism and he said “roger that, comrade” and hung up the phone. Then later he texted me.

So according to my information, the plan is going forward: he is combining communism with Sharia law to completely crush the infidels/capitalists.

Even after the killing starts, remember to keep calling his office and demanding he kill more and more people. Also make sure he nationalizes all the Jew diamond shows and gives free diamonds to the workers.

The Primo Collection:

Firstly, this is apparently real:

President Trump was booed by the crowd at the Lions-Commanders NFL game.

Follow: @AFpost pic.twitter.com/ouXVfwpz4T

— AF Post (@AFpost) November 10, 2025

I saw that posted on Twitter, and thought it was edited. I mean, that is a long, long boo. But at least according to the AP, it is real. Maybe the AP will start posting AI slop at some point. But I don’t think they have yet.

That is a Redskins game. I won’t call them their new name, ever, just as I will never call Twitter its new name. I don’t agree with changing things. I believe in Lindyism. So, the Redskins don’t play in Washington anymore, because their stadium was sacked by niggers. They play somewhere in Maryland. Regardless, most people in attendance would be government workers. Everyone in that entire region works for the federal government. And Trump was doing this shutdown thing.

Trump was looking completely Palpatinian during the boos.

He is definitely not nearly as good as Emperor Palpatine. I’ve been obsessively reading Star Wars Expanded Universe novels (which Disney retitled “Legends” when they nuked the canon). Do you know how it never really made sense that the Empire would build the Death Star just to intimidate guerrilla warfare fighters? Well, the novels explain that they actually built that to fight the Yuuzhan Vong, a threat from outside the galaxy. Thrawn had joined the Empire to fight against the Vong, and Palpatine built the Death Star (twice) to defend against the Vong.

Trump, by comparison, is building an empire for purely cartoonish evil purposes, as far as anyone can tell. It is all of course about Israel on its face, but then you see this whole Silicon Valley globalist transhumanist thing behind that, where these people want to create a post-human reality where they can live forever and conquer outer space. I have been talking about this since before I even launched the Daily Stormer. I was reading about this in the early 2000s.

I remember watching the documentary TechnoCalyps when it was released in 2006.

Everyone thought I was insane when I talked about it, and now it has just become a common discussion point.

The logic then behind the Trump Administration is to create as much chaos as is humanly possible in order to discredit the existing system. This actually lines up nicely with the Israeli-Jewish agenda to create mass death all over the world.

The “endless war everywhere forever” thing has been discussed a lot, and everyone at this point understands that this creates terrible chaos. It’s probably worth talking about some of the other chaos.

On top of the endless war, Trump is creating severe economic chaos.

Tariff Idiocy

People are saying “the tariffs didn’t work,” but it’s like dude, what does that mean? Do you think Trump thought that simply adding these lunatic taxes was going to make factories spontaneously spring up in America?

There are so many different problems with the “factories will spontaneously start popping up everywhere and give Americans really great jobs” theory.

To list just a few of those problems:

• No one is going to build a factory in the US based on the promises of Donald Trump when he is switching everything back and forth constantly. Furthermore, even if they had faith in Trump sticking to what he says (which no one has), because of the way our system works, in 2028 a different administration could abolish the tariffs, making your factory in the US worthless.
• The regulatory environment doesn’t exist in the US to make factories viable. One of the primary reasons it made sense to move everything to China was that China did not have all of these regulations. They also have lower taxes and so on. The only reason anyone would ever make a factory in the US is if literally every other country was effectively banned from exporting to the US. Otherwise, even if you had faith that the tariffs would last, you would wait to see whichever country didn’t have brutal tariffs, and build the factory there. That is: unless you permanently applied crippling tariffs to every country on earth, it would never make sense to build a factory in the US.
• The US does not have a workforce educated on working in factories or a manager class capable of building them. The manufacturing was exported to China before the invention of the iPhone and most modern computer parts. It was the Chinese who figured out how to build and operate these factories to make electronics. And we must be talking about electronic factories. We can’t be talking about like, textile factories. There is no possible way making t-shirts and sneakers in the US would make sense economically.
• The supply chains do not exist. This one thing in itself makes the whole concept impossible on its face. China has deals with countries all over the world to import everything necessary for making all the things they make. China also has the ability to redirect these resources to other locations. (When in Trump’s first term he tariffed/sanctioned China, China just moved factories to Southeast Asia, and it took just a matter of months. They control the flow of the supply chains, so it was nothing to redirect raw resources to Vietnam or Thailand or wherever. They also of course had the ability to build the factories and train the workers.)
• If things were made in the US, they would cost a lot more. Even if you overhauled the entire regulatory framework, which Trump has never even talked about doing, the increased labor costs, the increased taxes, and so on would make things way more expensive. The claim is that people would be paid more and therefore capable of affording more expensive products, but think that through: you’re talking about a complete overhaul of the entire US economy, basically restructuring it from the ground up. This isn’t something that happens on its own. When all of a sudden consumer electronics are 2-3 times the price, people working in most jobs have not gotten the wage increases to pay for that premium. (In theory, you would combine the reshoring with removing the immigrants, but Trump is doing nothing on that front either, as we will touch on later.)
• Automation makes “high-paying factory jobs” a spook. This is maybe the most important point. When the jobs were moved to China in the 1990s, it meant that money was not put into automating these factories, because China had cheap labor. As China has gotten rich, and labor has gotten more expensive, they have begun developing the technologies to automate factories.

Here are some videos of Chinese automated factories:

“Dark Factory”: Production wholly automated. No worker involved. So lights off.
This is the goal of developing AI and robots for optimal efficiency. China has entered the era of “Dark Factory”. pic.twitter.com/vGg1LPi2vB

— Li Zexin 李泽欣 (@XH_Lee23) February 23, 2025

More than 1000 robots work in the electric car factory in Chongqing. It is said that this is the version of Industry 4.0, and the key procedures are 100% automated. pic.twitter.com/xyG5M9NGjw

— Sharing Travel (@TripInChina) April 12, 2024

Chinese robots have proven that, one day, easy repetitive labor will be replaced.

3 hours, 0 errors. China’s self-developed humanoid robots moved 800 boxes in an auto factory, with the entire process livestreamed. pic.twitter.com/YBsS7ohx2W

— Li Zexin 李泽欣 (@XH_Lee23) July 11, 2025

It’s happening. China now has completely dark factories which require near 0 human labor.

They have 7x more industrial robots than any other country, like this car factory in this video.

Humans will not have to do most manual labor jobs ever again. pic.twitter.com/wyhsKfHeet

— Deedy (@deedydas) July 21, 2025

Automated factory of EFORT robotics in China, where robots makes more robots.

I often get replies claiming automation means manufacturing moving back to mature markets.

This view disregards the complexity in the industrial robot supply chain.

1/4 pic.twitter.com/fWcGzAAVnM

— Zhao DaShuai 东北进修 (@zhao_dashuai) August 20, 2023

There aren’t really any “high-paying factory jobs” left at any kind of scale. There are some engineer jobs in electronic factories in China. These are skilled workers who would have to go through months or years of training after already having the educational framework, and so if you were going to move these factories to the US, it would be much, much cheaper to simply pay the Chinese to come work in the factories as engineers, and maybe have them run a program over a course of years to educate Americans in this field.

If you really wanted these factories in America, which I think serves no real purpose at this point, you would make a deal with China to help you move the factories. All you would have to do is surrender Taiwan. They will do anything to get Taiwan. So you trade that for them helping you build the factories in the US and then helping you train the engineers to run these largely automated factories.

You sometimes see clothing that says “made in Bangladesh” or whatever. These are not high-skilled workers, they are just working on sewing machines. But if you move those jobs to the US, you quadruple the cost of clothes, and still, the people working in them don’t get much more than they would make at an Amazon warehouse.

So the grand plan of reshoring manufacturing was not ever a serious plan. Trump seems to be suffering from age-related cognitive decline, but even so, none of this ever made any basic sense at all, and someone had to have told him this.

As far as using it as leverage to renegotiate trade deals, suggesting that he was lying to everyone about reshoring factories and it was really about better trade deals… well, that also never made any sense. Everyone knew China could cut off the US in hundreds of different ways, and everyone knew they would do that if the US tried to play hardball on trade. That’s what they did. They just had to hold rare earths and magnets, which among other things, are needed for the US war machine. Trump immediately folded, meeting with Xi late last month and offering an unconditional surrender.

Back to the question: did the tariffs “fail”? Well, if you believed Trump was going to bring back factories, or force China into a significantly different trade arrangement, then sure, they failed. But as explained, that could not possibly have been the goal, as any bright high schooler could have spent a week going over the data and reached the conclusion that neither of those things were even vaguely feasible. Therefore, it seems that the goal had to have been creating mass chaos, in which case, the tariff scheme was a grand success.

Every chaotic outcome was achieved. Everything is more expensive, the stock market is all messed up. Everyone had to pay these new taxes while they were in effect and no one is getting their money back. It cost every individual more than $1,000. That might not seem huge, but it is to a lot of Trump voters, who are poor. More importantly, it ravaged small businesses. By July, there was a 30% increase in small businesses declaring bankruptcy from the previous year, and the Biden economy surely was not great for small businesses, many or most of which were already put out of business by the coronavirus mania. Even though the tariff thing is probably going to be completely abandoned, many more businesses are likely to fail as a result of these strange actions.

Furthermore, it solidified the view of the world that the US is a totally unstable, erratic, rogue state which has no place being in charge of the world order.

Retarded Immigration Policy

Trump has abandoned virtually all of his core policy agendas he campaigned on, including:

• Fixing the economy (see above)
• Ending wars (see any news site any day)
• Stopping trannies (he still has not even picked up Marjorie’s bill to ban child sexual mutilations or cancer-causing, brain-shrinking injections)
• Bringing back freedom of speech (he has been even more aggressive than Joe Biden in using the government to shut down freedom of speech, and his people have threatened to start enforcing nonexistent “hate speech” laws)
• Shrinking the government (DOGE failed to do anything but annoy some people and then was shut down, Trump did the largest military budget in history, the only thing he is doing is taking away people’s Medicaid, which literally no one wanted – protecting entitlements was actually another one of his promises, haha)

So the only thing left is his promise to do something about immigration.

But the immigration enforcement he is doing now is just a big show. You cannot remove tens of millions of people by grabbing them off the street one at a time. This is insanely expensive and it is cruel. Sorry, but I am not ashamed to admit this: I do not like seeing masked steroid guys with tattoos throwing screaming women into vans. Of course, if it was working and that was the only way, I would ignore my emotions, but it isn’t working, and most people will not ignore their emotions. Most people think this is grotesque, and it is going to be used by the Democrats as a reason to not do anything with immigration.

As I’ve said six trillion times: you could remove the overwhelming majority of immigrants by simply making it illegal to employ or rent to illegal immigrants. Give a few landlords ten-year prison sentences, and all of a sudden, no illegal immigrant has a place to live. Throw a couple guys in prison for hiring illegals to help them do roofing from outside Home Depot, and it is impossible to get jobs. They will all just leave. It’s very simple.

Of course, Trump would never do this because his donors use illegal labor. But it is what people should be calling for. No one is calling for it. I watch these shows and these people are just saying “we need even more ICE!” Why are these people saying this? It isn’t a complicated issue: banning renting/hiring would remove a minimum of 70% of illegals in a matter of months, without the government taking any other action.

Instead, Trump’s goal is to deport 600,000 illegals per year. He won’t make anywhere close to that number. But that would be 2.4 million during his term, which is 25% or less of the immigrants that entered under Joe Biden. Imagine that in 2016 he was saying we need to deport millions of people, then you add 10-15 million to that, and his goal is now to deport a small chunk of the new ones. This is a joke.

The government is building the biggest federal police force in history, bigger than every other federal law enforcement agency combined. It is very expensive. People say I’m going too far when I say that it is going to be used on Americans, but what else would it be used for? Just like the tariffs can’t be about reshoring manufacturing, ICE can’t be about immigration. They’re also building camps. What are the camps for?

Look, I am not saying they are going to start rounding people up tomorrow. But it sure as hell looks like they are preparing for some kind of very serious unrest in this country.

Palantir Techno Police State

Palantir was founded by Peter Thiel and is run by an extremist Zionist Jew. They are the number one company involved in the AI targeting of people in Gaza by Israel. They are currently working on putting together a unified federal database, which will include all information about you that the government possesses across all agencies. This will then be combined with data they buy from Facebook and Google about your personal activities. Then the whole thing will be made searchable with AI.

This will be a database with everything about you. With the Google Maps data, this will include everywhere you’ve ever traveled. (Remember how the J6 protesters were identified using Google Maps data?) Then of course it has all of your contacts, and presumably most of your communications as well.

That is a complete science fiction nightmare.

They are already using this type of AI-driven data analysis to target pro-Palestinian activists in the US.

The company is named after a magic device in The Lord of the Rings that allows for the surveillance of people by evil wizards.

If you wanted to create a technological dystopia, where a small minority of ultra-wealthy people with the technology to live forever rule over a large group of peasants, you would first totally collapse the existing order. Collapsing the existing order allows for the formation of a new order.

That is what you are witnessing right now: a purposeful collapse of the existing order, which will cause people to demand some kind of new order. And probably, in this new order, people will be materially better off than they are now.

Remember that Yuval Noah Harari, the Israeli Jew who is one of the ideological drivers behind the World Economic Forum, has said that humans are obsolete and the goal is now to get them to die off by giving them drugs and video games so they just sit at home and rot.

Yuval Noah Harari, an Israeli homosexual and outspoken member of the WEF, has stated that these useless, worthless people will need to be controlled with video games, porn, and drugs.

That’s his “best guess”. He’s stated it multiple times.

In Christ we can all find purpose, to… https://t.co/MvBcShg4MG pic.twitter.com/p2PeAWJiUo

— Michael Rivera (@MichaelWRivera) December 24, 2024

You can find many more extreme statements from him. Because of his bad optics, the WEF has downplayed his role, but he has appeared on multiple panels with WEF head Klaus Schwab himself, and Schwab quotes him extensively in his “Great Reset” book.

Nothing Harari says is qualitatively different than anything any of these other WEF people say, it’s simply more outrageously worded. This is the basic idea the elite have for the future, and it is not a secret, and these sorts of changes could only be implemented through some kind of chaos and organized collapse.

Furthermore, one should understand: virtually all Western world leaders and captains of industry attend these WEF meetings. And no one comes out of them and says “these people are a bunch of freaks, talking about how they’re going to build a police state, depopulate the earth, live forever and conquer outer space.” People go to these meetings and then praise the Forum. Barack Obama has personally praised Harari specifically.

The fact that none among the elite are speaking out against this, and that includes Elon Musk by the way, certainly indicates that they are not bothered by it. These extreme, weird ideas are taken for granted as normal by all of the Western global elite, and it is only ever the Russians or the Chinese who speak up about how bizarre and anti-human it all is.

A New and Even Shittier American Experience

In my view, the best way to view the chaos we are seeing in the government now, and the cartoonish way things are being run, is through the lens of a purposeful collapse.

The standard lens to view it has become that of a government completely controlled by Israel. This is of course also correct. But again, the chaos that is created as a result of the relationship to Israel is part of a larger chaos that is being created. Behind that, you should look for the establishment of a police state, which will be used to deal with the people who take issue with this new system.

You can read however much you want about this new system. None of it is really a secret. I’ve written about it a lot here. Probably, the easiest way to make a connection between the Silicon Valley worldview and Donald Trump’s supporters is via Curtis Yarvin, a blogger who spent years calling for the establishment of oligarchical rule in America and became an ideological figurehead for the people in Silicon Valley who want to establish this kind of system. Yarvin does podcasts and tries to sell this to right-wing thinkers as something that is in line with their values.

It would be easy to get confused, if you didn’t know what was going on. Obviously, most right-wing people are pretty fed up with democracy, and on its face, replacing democracy with a more authoritarian system sounds like a fine enough idea. However, the kind of authoritarianism matters, and if you look to the World Economic Forum, you see the type of authoritarianism Silicon Valley people are pushing for. It is not a “fascist” or “communist” type system where state power is used to enforce some brand of populism. It is also not a theocratic type system. Given that those are the only types of authoritarian systems we are familiar with in history, we have to imagine a new form. Technology and the theory of emerging super-technology is fundamental to the worldview of these people who are positioning themselves to take over.

It is logical enough from their perspective. They have all the money. They are building technologies which they think will allow them to live forever and to conquer outer space. Whether that sort of thing ever happens is up in the air, but the fact that most people’s jobs will be replaced with AI or robots is simply a fact. So you will have an excess population. And it is logical enough that these people with the power would view that excess population as a drain on the limited resources they have on the earth, which they want to use for their various projects they are planning to do in their eternal lives.

Their documents and their meetings leave very little to the imagination in terms of what they are planning. And we know that these people all played a major role in funding Trump’s campaign. Again, Yarvin is playing the role as ideological intermediary between them and the Trump base. Bigger than Yarvin, of course, is James “JD Vance” Bowman, who worked for Peter Thiel and then had his entire political career funded by Thiel. Vance was “never Trump” until he ran for Senate in Ohio, when it was clear that his backers wanted him to be aligned with Trump. And then of course he was chosen as VP as part of some negotiation for funding from Silicon Valley. Musk was a bigger backer than even Miriam Adelson, and he’d lobbied for Vance.

It’s worth noting that Tucker Carlson also lobbied for Vance and appears to currently be working with Vance. Tucker also brought Thiel’s ideological figurehead into mainstream discourse, being the first “MAGA” individual to interview Yarvin.

I’ve gone back and forth on whether or not Tucker is malicious or simply stupid. It ultimately doesn’t matter. He is very much an operator for these Silicon Valley people and their agenda, despite the fact that this has no real connection whatsoever to the agenda he ostensibly represents.

It’s hard to believe that stupidity could explain a play to position the Silicon Valley Trojan Horse transhumanist guy to become president. But I have also mused that I suspect Tucker may stab Vance in the back and try to become president himself in 2028, in which case, his relationship with and advocacy for Vance would have been part of a long game.

What is clear regardless is that the agenda of Silicon Valley (which again, is itself very clear, you don’t have to rely on conspiracy theories or speculation to discover it) does not in any way align with what the MAGA base wanted from Donald Trump. Further, it is clear that during Trump’s second time in office, he’s shown virtually no interest in doing anything for the masses of people who supported him, and is only concerned with the donors. Weird things like the tariff war can be explained and make sense if viewed as part of an agenda to create chaos and unrest in America (and also likely cannot be explained any other way).

It is interesting to consider all of this. These talks about politics are not interesting at all, and increasingly, talk about Israel and antisemitism is becoming very boring. If nothing else, an evil science fiction scheme at least spices things up a bit.

After taking a short break from slaughtering the peoples of the Near East, the peace-loving US Ultra-Zionist War Regime has turned its sights upon Venezuela, for the crime of violating the democratic principles of who we are. As is well known, human rights democracy is a system of principles under the rule of law, which means everyone has to vote and America gets to kill them and steal their stuff if they vote wrong.

In order to fully understand Venezuela, we must go back to the year 1902, when President Cipriano Castro repudiated the country’s foreign debts, leading the European powers to join together and impose a blockade on…

Uh, hang on. I don’t think Trump or Rubio read any of this stuff. We can probably fast forward a bit.

In the year 1998, Hugo Chávez was elected to his first term as President and began to enact the Bolivarian Revolution, nationalizing Venezuela’s oil industry…

No wait, Trump probably slept through this part of the briefing too. Skip.

In November of 2020, the history of Venezuela began when the illustrious Rudy Giuliani went out to the Four Seasons parking lot after dyeing his hair with molasses and declared that Nicolás Maduro had stolen the US presidential election. With the help of Hugo Chavez’s ghost, he had hacked the Dominion voting machines and taken away all of Trump’s votes, in an act of pure Grinch-like evil.

Giuliani’s revelations were backed by Sidney Powell, the renowned woman lawyer genius, making the case ironclad.

With that irrefutable evidence, it was now clear that Maduro had forgotten the rules of our principles, and therefore, in the words of esteemed Judeo-Anal mouthpiece Lindsey Graham, it was time for him to go.

So, will it happen, or won’t it? After analyzing all of the possible diplomatic and military contingencies, I have come to the conclusion that all of this is gay, and also retarded.

I mean, I don’t really have to explain to you that the US government is always lying about everything, right? We’re all adults here. That’s just basic common sense stuff I shouldn’t have to keep on proving over and over again.

Anyway, the official story is that when he’s not busy running an entire country, Maduro is actually the secret leader of an evil drug cartel. Secretly, even though all the drugs are actually coming from other countries, Maduro is still the mastermind behind it.

Scary stuff. I was asking myself, “why didn’t they do something about this years ago?” Then my assistant, who heard me talking to myself, told me to look up Operation Gideon. As it turns out, in 1948, the Jewish Haganah stormed a bunch of defenseless Palestinian villages and expelled all the Christians and Moslems. I was confused about what this had to do with Venezuela, but then my assistant clarified that Operation Gideon is also the name of a thing that happened in 2020, when US mercenaries tried to lead an invasion of Venezuela.

That’s an interesting coincidence. Though one must suppose there are only so many names for things, eventually leading to things being repeated. (Like, you go to a state fair, and you get scammed by carnies, and say “hey, this doesn’t seem very fair, why do they call it that?” Then you realize they ran out of words and had to start reusing them.)

I’d been thinking, “wouldn’t it be hilarious if Trump tried to invade Venezuela and ended up having a big Bay of Pigs disaster?” But it turns out that already happened, and they somehow managed to mess it up even worse. With the Bay of Pigs, the CIA’s troops at least made it onto the beach and fought a battle before they got wiped out. In Operation Gideon, the Venezuelans knew they were coming, and started shooting them before they even got off the boats. The entire army surrendered without putting up a fight at all.

This makes Trump the first leader to lose a war to Venezuela (literally the single war they won was against Spain to establish the country 200 years ago, then lost every other war they engaged in before effortlessly defeating Donald Trump). The US responded to this fiasco by pretending they didn’t know these guys and had nothing to do with it, and then never talking about it again so everyone would forget that it ever happened.

Jordan Goudreau, the leader of this failed invasion, has since admitted that the “Cartel of the Suns,” which Trump claims Maduro is the leader of, was just a CIA hoax.

LA Times, October 20:

Jordan Goudreau, a former U.S. Green Beret involved in a failed 2020 armed incursion into Venezuela, has alleged that the CIA created the so-called “Cartel de los Soles” in the 1990s and later used it to justify U.S. policies against successive Venezuelan governments.

In an interview with journalist Max Blumenthal for The Grayzone, the ex–special operations contractor said the network attributed to Venezuelan military figures was “a CIA construction” that predates the presidency of Hugo Chávez.

“As far back as the 1990s, the Cartel de los Soles was created by the CIA,” said Goudreau “This isn’t a secret; it’s the truth,” he said. When asked to confirm whether U.S. intelligence was responsible for forming the group, he replied, “Oh, absolutely. That’s not new.”

“We think your president is in charge of the fake drug group that we started ourselves, so now we’re putting up a $50 million bounty to murder him.” That’s really the story they went with. They used to put a little more effort into the lies they told us about countries they were getting ready to invade. Nukes, chemical weapons, baby beheadings, people being turned into upholstery and cleaning products, etc. Now they don’t even care whether anyone believes it, because in a democracy, public opinion does not matter. The people have no representation in the system, and no way to demand redress for their grievances. Things will just happen regardless of what anyone wants. And most of the people are too busy being fat, homosexual, and stoned to pay attention to it anyway.

Also, the CIA admitted this whole story was fake.

NPR:

The U.S. intelligence community says it does not believe Venezuelan President Nicolas Maduro directs Tren de Aragua (TDA), a criminal gang that operates in the U.S., in a newly declassified, redacted memo. The memo contradicts claims by President Trump, who has accused Maduro of controlling the gang, which Trump says is invading the U.S. The government has relied on this argument to justify the deportation of alleged gang members under the Alien Enemies Act.

The April 7 memo obtained by the Freedom of the Press Foundation on May 5 and shared with NPR, shows that the Office of the Director of National Intelligence concluded that while some members of the Maduro regime may tolerate or work with Tren de Aragua, there’s no evidence of widespread, organized cooperation. “The Maduro regime probably does not have a policy of cooperating with TDA and is not directing TDA movement to and operations in the United States.” In fact, the memo states, Maduro and top Venezuelan officials view the gang as a threat. The memo states that the intelligence council, “has not observed the regime directing TDA, including to push migrants to the United States, which probably would require extensive coordination and funding between regime entities and TDA leaders …”

But everyone loves a fireworks show, so that’s what Trump’s been giving them, sending the US Air Force to blow up random fishing boats, which he claims are both Venezuelan and full of drugs. Of course, if they were smuggling drugs on these boats, Trump could send in the Navy SEALs to board them and seize the cargo as proof.

No, they’d probably just smoke it all themselves. Or plant the evidence. Every US special forces soldier is a raging drug fiend. That’s a well-known fact throughout the military. They’re not crack shots, they’re crack addicts.

Destroying random boats that may or may not have drugs on them is just empty spectacle to allow hopeful but gullible peasants to believe that some sort of action is being taken to stop the total decimation of their country by opioids, when in reality no meaningful action has been taken. Go for a walk down any city street. Everyone is still miserable, everything is dirty and disgusting, and fentanyl is everywhere. Nothing is being done about it, and nothing has changed.

The cartoon villain plots against Venezuela have continued to escalate, with the latest failed scheme being an attempt to bribe Maduro’s airplane pilot into kidnapping him.

AP:

The federal agent had a daring pitch for Nicolás Maduro’s chief pilot: All he had to do was surreptitiously divert the Venezuelan president’s plane to a place where U.S. authorities could nab the strongman.

In exchange, the agent told the pilot in a clandestine meeting, the aviator would be made a very rich man.

The conversation was tense, and the pilot left noncommittal, though he provided the agent, Edwin Lopez, with his cell number — a sign he might be interested in helping the U.S. government.

Over the next 16 months, even after retiring from his government job in July, Lopez kept at it, chatting with the pilot over an encrypted messaging app.

The pair texted on WhatsApp and Telegram about a dozen times. But the conversations seemed to go nowhere.

After the August text about the $50 million reward, Lopez sent another saying there was “still time left to be Venezuela’s hero and be on the right side of history.” But he did not hear back.

On Sept. 18, Lopez was watching the news of Trump’s buildup in the Caribbean when he saw a post on X by an anonymous plane spotter who had closely tracked the comings and goings of Maduro’s jetliners over the years, according to three of the people familiar with the matter. The user, @Arr3ch0, a play on Venezuelan slang for “furious,” posted a screenshot of a flight tracking map that showed a presidential Airbus making an odd loop after taking off from Caracas.

“Where are you heading?” wrote Lopez, using a new number.

“Who is this?” responded Villegas, either not recognizing the number or feigning ignorance.

When Lopez pressed about what they discussed in the Dominican Republic, Villegas grew combative, calling Lopez a “coward.”

“We Venezuelans are cut from a different cloth,” Villegas wrote. “The last thing we are is traitors.”

Lopez sent him a photo of them talking to each other on a red leather couch at the airplane hangar the previous year.

“Are you crazy?” Villegas replied.

“A little…,” wrote Lopez.

Two hours later, Lopez tried one last time, mentioning Villegas’ three children by name and a better future he said awaited them in the U.S.

“The window for a decision is closing,” Lopez wrote, shortly before Villegas blocked his number. “Soon it will be too late.”

Realizing that Villegas wasn’t going to join the plan, Lopez and others in the anti-Maduro movement decided to try to unnerve the Venezuelan leader, according to three of the people familiar with the operation.

The day after the testy WhatsApp exchange between Lopez and Villegas, Marshall Billingslea – a close ally of Venezuela’s opposition – took action. A former national security official in Republican administrations, Billingslea had for weeks been trolling Maduro. Now he brought Villegas into his cyberbullying.

“Feliz cumpleanos ‘General’ Bitner!” he wrote in a mocking birthday wish on X the day Villegas turned 48.

Billingslea included side-by-side photographs that would be sure to raise eyebrows. One was the same one that Lopez had shared with Villegas the day before over WhatsApp, except the agent had been cropped out of it. The other was an official air force photo with a gold star denoting his new rank affixed to the shoulder epaulet.

The X post was published at 3:01 p.m. — a minute before another sanctioned Airbus that Maduro has been known to fly took off from Caracas’ airport. Twenty minutes later, the plane unexpectedly returned to the airport.

The birthday wish, seen by almost 3 million people, sent shockwaves across Venezuelan social media, as Maduro’s opponents speculated the pilot had been ordered to return to face interrogation. Others wondered if he would be jailed. Nobody saw or heard from Villegas for days. Then, on Sept. 24, the pilot resurfaced, in an air force flight suit, on a widely followed TV show hosted by Interior Minister Diosdado Cabello.

Cabello laughed off any suggestion that Venezuela’s military could be bought. As he praised Villegas’ loyalty, calling him an “unfailing, kick-ass patriot, ” the pilot stood by silently, raising a clenched fist in a display of his loyalty.

So their Bay of Pigs redux failed, then they said “can’t we just text someone to pick him up for us?” It’s a DoorDash kidnapping plot!

I thought these CIA people were supposed to be ultra competent mega spies, like in all those movies I watched. Getting outwitted by the Chinese is understandable. But getting rolled over and over by Venezuela? It’s like the US national women’s team losing to 13-year-old boys. Anyway, all these gay ops keep on failing, so Trump has escalated the military pressure instead, parking a US aircraft carrier off the coast and flying bombers around to make it look like he might attack at any minute.

- Map of the American military buildup in the Caribbean Sea arround Venezuela. pic.twitter.com/zuEIQnzVuO

— Monitor𝕏 (@MonitorX99800) November 3, 2025

Will he actually start a war with Venezuela? Maybe. I’m guessing probably not. Trump likes to fight people who can’t shoot back at all. Trump went in to fight the Houthis for the Jews, then surrendered weeks later. At the time, we wondered if there was a sort of deeper breach growing between Trump and Netanyahu. Nah. Trump just got spooked because the Houthis were shooting missiles at US ships, and decided to pull out before one of them got hit.

Trump likes to proclaim himself to be the great peacemaker. What he actually does is go around the world starting pointless fights with other countries, then asks to be congratulated when he backs out of the fights that he started.

Venezuela might just be the latest stop on Trump’s endless tour of driving up to the edge of a cliff and then slamming the brakes. Or maybe this time Trump will think he’s finally found an opponent weak enough to be beaten. Militarily, Venezuela is much weaker than Iran or North Korea. If it came to outright war, the US could destroy their navy and air force in a few days, and start bombing wherever it wanted.

But who would actually be the boots on the ground and conquer Venezuela? This fleet Trump is assembling off the coast has enough firepower to do a bombing campaign, but it doesn’t have anywhere close to the number of Marines that would be needed to conquer the country. Colombia was run by pro-US regimes for decades before their last election. Brazil was a close ally under Bolsonaro and his predecessor. If this had happened back then, they might have sent in the troops while the US bombed everything for them. But neither of these neighboring countries is on-board with a US invasion today. Lula is back in Brazil, and Colombia is led by Gustavo Petro, a righteous socialist who hates the baby-killing Jews.

So the US has no neighboring countries to use as bases (Guyana barely counts as a country), and these Venezuelan exiles the CIA has been training are a total joke, who just surrender as soon as any shots are fired. There is no rebel army in Venezuela waiting to rise up and take over. There’s a lot of people who are mad that the US sanctions have destroyed their economy, but none of those people (or very few of them) want the US to come in and start blowing everything up. As with pro-US Cubans, most pro-US Venezuelans live in Miami. If the objective is stealing the oil, the US needs to occupy and control the country, or establish some sort of puppet government. They would need to establish secure zones for the US oil companies to bring in their people without getting shot at or car bombed.

Probably, the US is hoping they can get Venezuela’s army to do a coup against Maduro through a combination of threats and bribery, similarly to how they took down Assad. Maybe that will end up working. It’s been done countless times before in South America. Amidst this kerfuffle, there have been many stories in Western media about Maduro offering deals where he’ll step down.

AP:

Venezuelan government officials have floated a plan in which President Nicolás Maduro would eventually leave office, a bid aimed at easing mounting U.S. pressure on the government in Caracas, according to a former Trump administration official.

The proposal, which was rejected by the White House, calls for Maduro to step down from power in three years and hand over authority to his vice president, Delcy Rodriguez, who would complete Maduro’s current six-year term that runs until January 2031, according to the official who was briefed on the plan but was not authorized to comment publicly on the matter and spoke on the condition of anonymity.

Rodriguez would not run for reelection under the plan, the official said, adding that the White House had rejected the proposal because it continues to question the legitimacy of Maduro’s rule and accuse him of overseeing a narco-terrorist state.

The revelation of Maduro’s attempts to offer a plan to slowly ease himself out of power comes amid growing unease in the Venezuelan leader’s government that President Donald Trump could order military action to try to oust him.

Speaking at a televised event Thursday, Maduro ridiculed reports that Rodríguez would be part of a plan to replace him as an attempt “to divide our people.”

He also mocked Trump’s confirmation Wednesday that the U.S. president had authorized the CIA to operate in Venezuela.

“Can anyone believe the CIA hasn’t been operating in Venezuela for the past 60 years?” Maduro said.

Rodríguez described the alleged plan for Maduro to step down as fake news Thursday.

“FAKE!!” Rodríguez wrote in English on her Telegram account. “More media that add to the garbage dump of the psychological war against the Venezuelan people.”

She added that Venezuela’s leadership is united.

These are fake stories, of course. It’s a textbook psychological warfare tactic. You tell the Venezuelans your leader is already trying to sell you out, so why should you fight for him? Why don’t you stab him in the back first?

And of course, we have the usual shenanigans going on.

AFP:

Venezuela claimed Monday to have dismantled a CIA-financed cell plotting a false-flag attack on a US warship deployed to the southern Caribbean, as Washington stepped up pressure on Caracas by flying bombers nearby.

Venezuelan authorities said they uncovered an operation targeting the USS Gravely, a guided-missile destroyer that docked Sunday in Trinidad and Tobago — within firing distance of the Venezuelan mainland.

The ship’s arrival sparked outrage in Caracas, which called it a “provocation” and claimed it was “aimed at provoking a war in the Caribbean.”

It also deepened tensions with Trinidad and Tobago, whose Prime Minister Kamla Persad-Bissessar is a strong critic of Venezuela’s Nicolas Maduro, and a supporter of US President Donald Trump’s military campaign against drug traffickers in the Caribbean.

Maduro on Monday evening announced he had suspended a gas agreement with Trinidad and Tobago, accusing Persad-Bissessar of transforming her nation “into an aircraft carrier of the American empire against Venezuela.”

As part of Trump’s campaign, the Pentagon has so far deployed seven warships to the Caribbean and one to the Gulf of Mexico.

The United States has also announced the imminent arrival of the USS Gerald R. Ford, the world’s largest aircraft carrier, and its accompanying fleet.

Venezuela and some observers believe Trump’s administration is using the military deployments to build pressure on the government and depose Maduro, whom Washington does not recognize as the legitimate president.

Venezuelan Interior Minister Diosdado Cabello said Monday that a cell “financed by the CIA” planned to attack the USS Gravely and frame Caracas.

Four people were arrested, Cabello said, without providing details of the alleged suspects. Venezuela regularly claims to have arrested US-backed mercenaries working to destabilize Maduro’s administration.

Alongside his naval buildup, Trump recently confirmed authorizing CIA operations in Venezuela and considering ground strikes.

If the bluff fails though, and Venezuela’s army stands by Maduro, I don’t think Trump is going to be able to follow through on his threats. Maybe he’ll bomb some random huts in the jungle and say those were Maduro’s secret drug labs, and now the crisis is over. That seems like his style. Or maybe they’ll try to seize some of the offshore drilling platforms? It seems like he’s going to have to do something, having pushed things this far.

Maduro, of course, has never threatened the US at all, and would be happy to just sit down and talk things out with Trump. In fact, that would probably work if it happened. But Trump is a fool who has surrounded himself with evil councilors, who will always endeavor to prevent anything good from happening.

Venezuela’s Maduro says he almost met with Donald Trump but it was SABOTAGED by John Bolton and Mike Pompeo

MADURO: “If we had met, Trump and I would have understood each other – we would even have become friends… [Bolton & Pompeo] led Trump to a failure. False advisors!” pic.twitter.com/Fwam4aG8ys

— COMBATE | (@upholdreality) February 7, 2024

By the way, that Jordan Goudreau guy who led the failed coup and blew the whistle on the cartel hoax is going to jail now.

CBS News:

A federal judge in Tampa has ordered the arrest of a former Green Beret accused of plotting to invade Venezuela in 2020 after he failed to show up to court for a hearing on whether he should be taken back into custody for violating the conditions of his pre-trial release.

Jordan Goudreau, 49, was arrested last year on weapons smuggling charges tied to the failed coup attempt undertaken during the first Trump administration.

He was released after a few weeks in jail when filmmaker Jen Gatien pledged her $2 million Manhattan apartment where the combat veteran was living as collateral for a bond. In testimony this week, Gatien detailed how the three-time Bronze Star recipient turned abusive, alleging he threatened to harm her and others and sent text messages saying he wouldn’t go back to jail.

“I believe he intends one day to leave this country,” Gatien said, noting that Goudreau previously lived on a sailboat in Mexico.

Judge Christopher Tuite issued an arrest warrant Friday after waiting 30 minutes for Goudreau to show up for the third day of the bond hearing. A probation officer said the ankle monitor Goudreau was supposed to wear was still located in the Tampa area, where Goudreau was living while undergoing equine-assisted therapy supervised by the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs.

Equine-assisted therapy?

You would think this whole thing couldn’t get any dumber, but you should sit down and listen, because a woman is talking.

Venezuelan opposition leader Maria Corina Machado tells Bloomberg that the Palestinian armed resistance group, Hamas, is now located in Venezuela. She welcomes Trump’s recent military escalation and blames all extrajudicial killings on Maduro.

Note: A senior Hamas delegation… https://t.co/tNnX26JW2c

— Drop Site (@DropSiteNews) November 1, 2025

Who knew that Hamas had tunnels extending all the way across the Atlantic Ocean? No wonder Israel can’t defeat them.

I am also aware of certain notable figures out there, particularly those popular among the mugu community, who argue that attacking Venezuela would actually be “based.” They seem to believe that they will somehow benefit personally from this war, in ways that are completely unexplained.

Venezuela, ahhh interesting.

That’s why they push Nick Fuentes everywhere. The world is bigger than the Middle East and he is for regime change in Venezuela!

Just another American who wants chaos for the benefit of their big empire. https://t.co/4SmViOO6QE pic.twitter.com/2B1Ou9PPtl

— Srpski Inat (@SerbianInat) August 14, 2025

To them, I can only say that you are so stupid that it hurts my soul, and in fact it so enrages me that I am about to hurl my own furniture out the window while bellowing like an ape.

PLACEHOLDER ANNOUNCEMENT (posted before there were any memes):

Well, it turns out it’s Tuesday. As usual, no one bothered to tell me. I had to check the thing.

Anyway, I’ve got all the things happening, but I am doing the thing with the things.

The memes I mean. I’m doing the thing with the memes. I will do it today, perhaps, or tomorrow.

Oh, you’d better believe it, my dear friends, and all you unfriendly cocksuckers as well: the memes are coming.

In terms of the Nick Fuentes content people are demanding: I don’t really want to be “the Nick Fuentes guy.” I wrote my first thing. And I will do a followup thing, replying to the replies, and clarifying the things that mugus claimed confused them (I do believe they were confused, this is a truly dense batch of faggotized retards, and some, I assume, are good people – particularly the teenagers who don’t know any better). But frankly, after my first thing went viral, and the people have sort of started to catch on, it’s not like I’m the only person saying this stuff.

Read the comments on this thing where he says everyone who was born in America is “American”:

Nick Fuentes says he will unite with anybody who proclaims America First.

“I don’t care what color you are. If you are born in this country, this is your Birthright. This is our Country, this is our Empire.” pic.twitter.com/xvaqQI2BVb

— KaizerRev (@Kaizerrev) October 31, 2025

Just scroll for a while. Over a thousand comments, virtually none of them positive. So while the kook gibberish was apparently not bothering people, the complete flip-flop on the most basic shit apparently is bothering people.

He will be popular, because he’s being force-memed. Ben Shapiro is still popular, in terms of total views. But this whole thing of him being unquestioned as some kind of honest, good actor is totally over. I’m taking credit for that. I don’t need the credit. But it’s mine and I’m taking it.

So frankly, it isn’t my job to just pick at him. I know people want that. And when I do my podcast, I am going to attack everyone, including him. Frankly, by the time it is rolling (hopefully mid-Feb, probably late March), he probably will have completely crashed out. But he’ll still be around, spewing this kook gibberish and flip-flopping around like a disgusting Mexican bloatfish. So we’ll break down his gibberish in a fun way, where we can watch the clips and make fun of him together as a community. But he’ll be one of many. I am not going to become “the Nick Fuentes guy.”

Right now, it’s admittedly hard not to, because he is everywhere all the time, like a virulent poisonous gas unleashed on helpless jungle dwellers. And there are things I can say about the nature of this astroturf. But I am going to try to say them all in my followup thing, which I will probably publish this week, and then leave that topic alone until my show, where I will attack everyone.

The show is going to be amazing, I promise you. I am watching all of these right-wing podcasts now. There is so much content. Jordan Peterson is an infinite goldmine, for example. This is such great content. People just need to understand how to watch it. You have to understand that this is an insane person, high on drugs, being paid by Jews to promote the Jewish agenda, and on the verge of a total breakdown. You then see the tension and the drama of it all. There are also so many smaller shows with insane people trying to get money. And we can have so much fun with this. And of course, it will also be educational. I will be explaining the real shit while examining the insane shit and the shill shit.

My soul is willing and my body is nearly prepared. But you know. We need the studio and stuff.

There is a good chance we will do a temporary show, a practice show, once a week, while we are setting up the real show.

Also, we’re going to have more content on the site. I’ve got a guy who is working on articles. He’s a genius. We’re working through some editing stuff. But I think he’ll have some analysis on the top issues, big research stuff, once or twice a week. And I’m doing the memes, plus one article, minimum, from here on out. Maybe I’ll also throw up some lower effort stuff, just some commentary. I still write a lot on forums, and I write these long emails to people, in between working on the TV show, which is definitely my main focus.

With that, I am writing fake shows. I am writing test shows. It’s a bit sad to be writing stuff that can’t ever be published, but it needs to be done.

We’re trickling information out about the show, so here’s a trickle: it won’t be totally scripted. Some of it will be scripted. But the stuff that isn’t strictly scripted will be tightly organized with notes. I listened to Daryl Cooper’s explanation of the way he does the podcast, allegedly writing some goofy amount for every hour of content. Cooper seems like another weird shill, but idk. Who knows. I just assume everyone but me is a shill, and then expect them to prove they’re not, you know? But I am sort of doing this thing he talks about, writing out ideas, then also writing some scripted stuff, then also doing notes, more of a bulletpoint thing I can read from. Every week, the show will be posted with an essay. Basically, I will have everything organized by Thursday, then write up a thing preparing myself for the show, which will also be an essay that will be published with the show. If that makes sense. That is the level of structure I want, so I need to write the essay for myself, because writing helps me think things through. Further, if there is anyone who just really hates AV content, they will be able to read the article, which will include many or most of the links to videos or clips I’m working with. It will be probably 3,000 words, maybe much more, so a good solid piece of content for the readers.

Oh and yes, I have heard the site looks not great on a phone. Needs some font alterations or whatever. I am going to get to that. Trust me, guys. I’m working. I am very much working. I am writing entire fake shows, I’m filming myself doing these shows. I have some weird AI thing that rates my speech quality. I’m not really sure I agree with it, but I have that. I have all the things, I am doing the things.

Anyway, I’m in the woods, the internet is slow. If you were thinking “why doesn’t he just post the memes if he’s going to write a thousand word thing about why he’s not posting the memes yet?”, that is the reason.

But I will post the memes. Oh boy, will I post those memes. I am going to post them like a gang rape.

REAL INTRO

I thought about deleting that fake intro because I just read it right now and it sucks and I hate it and I don’t even agree with it. But it would be against journalistic ethics to do that.

Furthermore, contrary to what the sectional heading says, this is not a real intro. The fake intro was indeed the real intro. These kinds of contradictions were happening everywhere on this site, which is why I quit in February. People are like “bro you don’t write enough” and it’s like “yeah, well, I quit, I said I was quitting and trying to figure out some new thing or multiple new things.” Or, perhaps, I said something completely different than that. Perhaps I had promised some number of articles per week which has not been fulfilled. But see, these are the kind of contradictions I am talking about. It’s a pandemic. A real pandemic, unlike that fake coronavirus hoax, amirite? Let’s talk about that some more. Holy shit. That was the real contradiction, or maybe the primary contradiction: the thesis that I could make the news interesting and then it got so boring no one could possibly ever make it interesting.

Speaking of boring news. Between right now and when I wrote that intro, I’ve been on a train then a bus, and was listening to podcasts, because what can you do? Reading gives me a headache and books on tape are for retards. Or maybe they’re for geniuses? I can’t follow them. I get totally lost. So it’s like most of the time this really slow thing of someone reading to you like you’re a child, then at the point you would normally pause your reading to think about something, to formulate a proper image in your mind of the thing in the words, the person keeps reading to you. Then you’re lost and have to try to rewind, but you rewind too far or not far enough because who knows how long you were thinking. So yeah maybe books on tape are marketed to retards who want someone to read to them like they’re a child but are consumed by geniuses who can somehow actually follow a book on tape. Seriously. Don’t do it, guys. Just learn to read. I’ve made it easy for you. I’ve been able to get you to read these long things I write, because I am that good at the thing. Some say I’m the best. I don’t know if I’m the best, but some people say that, a lot of people say I’m the best. I’m probably the best. I mean, you look around, you’re asking “who’s better?” I don’t know anyone better. Do you know someone better? I got you into reading. Start reading books, don’t listen to books on tape. If you do, don’t tell people you read books. I call people on that shit. People tell me “I read a book…” and I say “did you? Did you read the book, or did you listen to it on tape, having someone else read it aloud to you like you’re a little child in bed with mommy?”

The point is, every podcast was about Nick Fuentes. Even the ones supposed to be about this Venezuelan war were about Nick Fuentes. So I don’t know about not writing more about him. I was happy to see, in the comments of the clip above, real people for once actually calling this shit out, which I do take credit for (my article got insane traffic). So on some level, I’d like to say “my work here is done, or it will be after I write my hate reply to all the mugus who did psychoanalysis against me while not even attempting to respond to a single point I made.”

One guy did make an argument. A Fuentes fan. First he posted multiple comments about the beginning of the article. And I replied that he should read the whole thing before commenting. Then he said that the article was too long and it should have been published in sections. I said “people write books, most books are read in more than one sitting, no one asks authors to publish their books in 500-word pamphlets, you obviously do not read books or we wouldn’t be having this conversation, but many people do read books, and many or even most people now read books on computer screens of some sort, which is what this article is, words on a computer screen, a lot of people who read books choose chapter endings as an opportunity to take a break, you can use my subheadings as chapters and take your time.” [Author’s Note to Editor: That is intended as a run-on sentence. It’s a stylistic choice.] So he agreed with that, and read the whole article before commenting again however many days later, and said something like: “Well, maybe he knows the news is boring, so he makes things up to make it more interesting?” That’s the one defense. A screenshot is in my rebuttal, which is actually a hit piece on mugus, not Fuentes, as I’m not really adding new points about Fuentes. But it is this sprawling mess written in multiple sittings that needs to be chopped.

So it’s good people are pushing back. I keep saying I did that but it was definitely bound to happen. It was sort of like the Charlie Kirk thing itself, where everyone got all emotional at first, I was ahead of the game, and when people calmed down they were like “well yeah all this crying and madness doesn’t make much sense and it does seem like the media is drumming it up.” Fuentes’ old fans were at first really excited about the astroturf, now it’s been going on long enough, and gotten weird enough, that people are seeing the obvious. He’ll have plenty of new fans, of course, because astroturfing works.

Remember how astroturfed Ben Shapiro was? Remember the whole thing where Facebook was helping him run all these fake pages to promote his content, giving them super-rank? And the CEO of YouTube effectively said he couldn’t be banned, while everyone else was banning him? This was ostensibly done under the premise that Shapiro prevented radicalization by remaining in normal bounds and also working directly with the platforms to ensure his content was in line with what they wanted to be at the top. Shapiro is completely talentless. Most of you have probably just seen clips, but I’ve listened to entire shows on multiple occasions. His voice is impossibly grating, almost the diametric opposite of Rush Limbaugh and most other popular conservative talking points people, and all he does is pure talking points. Literally the singular reason anyone would listen to Ben Shapiro is that he is the first thing that comes up, and then because he’s popular and people know him, because he was the first thing that came up.

I was just going to post the Spotify numbers to show that despite having fallen, he’s still a major figure. Like, right now, today, two years and one month after Israel began a genocide.

…

But I want to note that on Apple he is closer to Tucker.

And on YouTube, they are both in the 500k-1m average range, but Tucker regularly cracks 1m, while the only video Ben has done in the last month or two or however far I scrolled that cracked a million was an attack on… Tucker Carlson.

Spotify was more reluctant to ban when everyone was getting banned everywhere, so their audience is more right-wing, so that is what people always cite. In reality “Tucker is number 2 and Ben is 41” is a bit misleading. Tucker does get insane numbers on Twitter, but all video numbers are insane on Twitter because if you scroll past a video and it starts autoplaying it counts as a view.

Regarding views, we also need to talk about the fact that it is extremely cheap to buy views, so none of these numbers really mean anything at all. I have a part in the anti-mugu hit piece about that, but I think I am going to cut it and make a separate article showing where you can buy these views and making it clear that none of this means anything. Although it seems like it would be against the law or something, it actually isn’t, and the way these companies do it, it is virtually impossible for the companies to detect, and I don’t think the companies care much anyway. That’s a bigger issue than Fuentes, all these people are doing it.

By far the weakest point I made in my Fuentes hit piece was the claim of fake engagement. With every other point I was literally just saying: “Look at this thing he said and this other thing and what the fuck is this post what is even going on here seriously what.” [Author’s Note to Editor: In general, a sentence behaving in this manner is always going to be a stylistic choice. I understand I have many a typo. Typos galore. Out the wazoo. But as you know, purposefully ignoring grammar and punctuation at scale in a single sentence is generally always purposeful. My style is leaning into this bit today and may do so for some time or maybe not but you’ll be able to tell.]

Strangely, no one really came at me on that even. I think they were too overwhelmed by the amount of shit I dumped on them about the master that they were unable to pull themselves together to do the thing where you identify the weakest bit and then attack it to try to discredit the whole thing. I stand by what I said about the astroturf, but aside from the overwhelming number of bots in his Twitter comments (which seem to be turned off now btw), my evidence was just “how is it possible this many new people are following him and there is apparently no discussion anywhere, as there is with literally every other internet figure, including ones with a fraction of his supposed following?”

Jeez now I’m doing a whole thing. There was something I wanted to get at, because whatever, this is a free space to rant without consequence, given that at any point people can stop reading and scroll down to the memes and not feel like they were ripped off by a meandering rant with no point laced with punctuation abuse. Some people actually claim to like this style and tell me to do more of it. Those people are probably trying to sabotage me, however.

Oh, the point was, Fuentes is the entire news cycle. Tomorrow or maybe immediately after I post this I’m going to get up our new friend’s piece about Venezuela, which is the other current news issue. I’m not worried about being accused of being obsessed. Firstly, I am obsessed. Secondly, it’s like when Ted Cruz accused Tucker of being obsessed with Jews and Tucker was like “you just said four minutes ago you joined the Congress to serve the Jews.”

I guess it was Israel. That was the biggest takeaway of the Nick Fuentes interview: Tucker is fully into this “Israel not Jews,” but if we are talking about Jews, we definitely have to always make sure to say we don’t mean every single Jew. There is no such rule with “the Italian Mafia” or “black crime,” but when you talk about “organized Jewry,” you have to say, every time, that you don’t mean every single Jew, because otherwise, even though it doesn’t make any sense and doesn’t apply to any other group, people will assume you mean every single Jew. Tucker and so many others literally want it to be like whenever Islamic people mention their prophet they say “PBUH.” You can’t ever not say “but I don’t mean all Jews,” and also you have to list off names of Jews who are okay, such as Jeffrey Sachs and Dave Smith. And then you have to explain why you are doing that (spoiler: it’s because everyone is an individual).

But there are many different issues that have come up here in this bonanza that do not directly relate to Nick Fuentes but have simply been brought to light by his astroturfing. Like, off the top of my head:

• Israel realizes it can’t do the Ben Shapiro thing, so it is going with controlled anti-Jewish figures (or if you don’t think Fuentes is controlled, at the very least people who are kooky and repulsive, angry and whiny, with terrible posture)
• Who will replace Nick Fuentes? Totally sick of arguing about the fed thing. Yeah sure dude, maybe he just hangs out with CIs and CI recruiters, does shows with them, gets secret tips about sting operations from the Bureau from them, but isn’t a fed himself. This mf leaked a text of MILO telling him his FBI contacts told him J6 was a setup. He of course showed up knowing this, without telling his followers, who he then ordered to breach the Capitol. But maybe that’s just a coincidence. Whatever. Regardless, Fuentes is being offered a situation with a seven figure salary. He’s going to do what he’s supposed to do, and you’re going to see a shift. That is what the “Jackson Hinkle’s pro-Russia Twitter account is really the same thing as AIPAC if you think about it” and the above seen “anchor baby nationalism” is obviously about: he’s mainstreaming. This will leave an opening for the role of “CEO of Antisemitism,” and it is mildly interesting to imagine who will fill the role. I’m sure they’ve got someone lined up for you, so just get ready to follow him and do everything he says, including and especially showing up at rallies that are very legit. Maybe this time around, people, including my own retarded self, will understand that political dissidence is no more viable in America than it is in North Korea. I, the exile who lives in the backwaters of the internet, am the closest thing you’re going to get to legit dissidence. And this is all just words. The value of the site, at least when it isn’t complete shit like it is right now, is in affirming to people that no, they are not insane, everyone else is. But yeah there will be some new “white nationalist” leader guy. I’ve seen several being prepped on Twitter. They’re testing out candidates, seeing who gets bites and who gets ripped apart for having made porno or been the leader of a satanic cult or whatever.
• What is Antisemitism? Everyone has to keep saying “but I’m not an antisemite,” and I don’t know what that is. Obviously you have these crazy definitions, where any criticism of Israel and like, 40% of the New Testament is “antisemitic.” (Most notably the IHRA definition, though there are several of these lists of things that make you an antisemite, some less extreme than IHRA but still nonsensical.) But the people saying “but I’m not an antisemite” obviously reject those definitions. The only definition I can understand is: “people who hate every single Jew on earth for no reason.” But I simply do not think this is a real person. I don’t think there is even one person who meets this definition. I am definitely a lot more “antisemitic” than Fuentes, who says his best friend and his assistant (maybe the same person) are Jewish. But I do not hate every single Jew, let alone for no reason. However, Judaism is first and foremost a cult based on hatred of Christ, and this cult includes many “atheist Jews” who eat pork and whatever. So it is reasonable, as a Christian, to be opposed to people who identify that way. Not because of how they were born, but beca – hey now I’m writing this article, this is supposed to be a list of potential articles, what the heck? Okay next.
• The Republican Party is attempting to integrate people who are openly hostile toward Jews into their coalition in some semi-official manner. This one is fascinating. People opposed to Jews have always been a part of the coalition. I think I was the first big internet person to endorse him. I paused his escalator speech at “and some, I assume, are good people,” and wrote an official endorsement. (I’ll find that link for the article, interesting historical relic I’m sure.) But with Fuentes as the point man, they are attempting to bring these people in. Tucker’s sitrep with Dave Smith on the backlash over the Fuentes interview, one of the ones I listened to between the parts of this thing you are reading, made this crystal clear. There is really a lot to say about that. I would assume it was JD Vance’s idea, leading us to…
• Tucker is currently working with and supporting JD Vance, but I am personally 100% sure he is planning to drive a knife into his back come 2027. See, that has basically nothing to do with Fuentes, except that I can basically guarantee Vance is the one working with Tucker on this Fuentes project. Vance could be running the whole thing, in fact. The problem, obviously, is that Vance is going to have to start distancing himself from Trump’s Israel policies while he is still VP. Along with most of his other policies. I don’t think Vance can run on Trump’s legacy of endless war and kikesucking. Or any of these economic policies. (Did you niggas see what just happened to dem coins?) Or really anything other than anti-immigrant stuff, which is the only thing Trump has left as a rallying point. He’s jettisoned the entire 2024 campaign platform like shedding off the stages of a rocket (the rocket is Israel in this slightly strained metaphor, as he actually did campaign on Israel as well). The immigration shit is a joke, zero talk of simply imprisoning anyone who hires or rents to illegals which according to several different chatbots would necessarily mean 60-90% of illegals would self-deport. And I guarantee if one landlord gets a ten-year federal prison sentence, no illegal immigrant has a place to sleep 24 hours later. Easiest thing in the world. But of course there is no goal to actually remove these people, so you just get this weird cruelty theater of the ICE raids, with the Trump administration claiming that at most this will lead to 4% of illegals being deported under his term. But seriously, this nigga hasn’t even done a law banning child tranny mutilations. 100% of Republican voters support that, as do a fair amount of Democrats at this point (Democrats have seen the suicides and insanity and so on, the repulsive freak shows, so even if they won’t say they’re against it, few of them still talk of supporting it). But yeah, Tucker is hungry like the wolf, stalking his prey in the dead of the night, lurking in the shadows, waiting for the right moment to strike. And I don’t think he wants to be Vance’s VP. Although I assume that is what he is telling him. He will likely keep telling him this after he announces he’s running, and they will make a deal not to go after each other too hard, then Tucker will spring the trap. Which brings us to…
• Something even further from Fuentes directly, but coming to the surface surrounding these dynamics that are being revealed: The real question regarding 2028 is what the Democrats are able to come up with, because voting is fake and Jews just pick a candidate. I mean obviously Trump got the most votes, but they could have rigged it. Nothing would have happened. No one was going to try another January 6th, I can tell you that much. With Trump’s current and increasing levels of executive power, he could do some federal thing to mandate real voting on a national scale, maybe. I have no idea. It’s not really clear how laws work in this country anymore. He’s now going after the filibuster, which is a flip-flop that I don’t give a shit about, but he could probably ram through a law federalizing voting. I don’t know if he would need to change the Constitution (which gives states full control of elections), or if it would be possible to create regulations which amount to federal oversight but with Jewed-up language that makes it legal. I don’t know if Bibi would tell him he’s not allowed to do that or not. Bibi has always been more opposed to leftist antisemitism than rightist, and come election time, there’s going to be equal amounts in both parties, which brings us to…
• The possibility of a new party centered on the issue of not being controlled by Israel. At this point, the Israel thing has gotten so extreme that I simply do not think you can divide people with abortion, gay stuff, taxes, or whatever other thing. The US is going to be in a weakened and completely messy state by 2027. Trying to make these shorter. But basically, there is a level of incompetence in this administration that is somehow higher than the level of corruption. Watch some of Pam Bondi’s Congressional testimony if you haven’t seen it. At an hour and twenty minutes, the supercut is a quarter of the length of the entire hearing. Just flip through. Everything she said was surreal. Like it doesn’t seem real. Then imagine that this is the level everyone at the White House is operating on, unless they are direct Israel agents. Which obviously makes perfect sense. It’s not as though intelligent people would be likely to get in the way of whatever Israel was doing, but it’s possible that they could. As Israel has full control, and no concern at all about the future of the US, they enacted some kind of “retards only (plus guys reporting directly to us)” policy. Frankly, although the police state stuff is scary in theory, with Palantir and the normalization of military on the streets doing warrantless arrests, the reality is that it is unlikely to come to fruition in the extreme nightmare form. So a third party that is literally just only about the issue of Israeli influence in the US would win an election tomorrow against Trump, Vance, or any Democrat, all things being equal. And…
• There are clearly factions struggling in the background, in a real power struggle, because this is all so chaotic and corrupt after four years of Biden and then this mess. I think it’s safe to say that some of these people legitimately do not like Israel controlling everything and sucking the country dry. I mean really any random person would want to seize control of a government, so the idea that there aren’t organized groups trying to do this is silly. Obviously, the Silicon Valley people want control, and are currently tied to Israel in a lot of different ways, but that doesn’t necessarily mean they agree with torching the entire wealth of this country and shoving it into the mouth of the beast that is Israel. People are forging alliances and there will be betrayals and new alliances and all the sorts of things you read about during the decline and fall of the Roman Empire. I mean I never read the book by that title. I had it and read parts. I think everyone has it on their list but probably more people have made it through Gravity’s Rainbow (which has been off my list forever for over a decade). Maybe I’ll get the book on tape.

MEMES:

Now, Back to This Nick Fuentes Thing…

Firstly, or eleventhly or whatever this is, during the Dave Smith interview, Tucker claimed “Nick Fuentes can’t be canceled.” This is obviously bullshit, because I was canceled. And before Fuentes was allowed back on Twitter, he had fewer than 20k average viewers. That is a successful canceling. Note that being seen with Kanye West and meeting with Trump, being a big media story, his “sex with women is gay” clip getting spammed on liberal “comedy” shows, etc. did not result in improved numbers. This was while he was able to host websites, to use CloudFlare, to have bank accounts, to appear on search engines, to process and ship objects, and on and on (things that were taken from me).

It’s not about me being me. Okay? Mugus get confused. Yes, I am me, and I am the one writing about this. But if I were someone else, or if someone else were me, me or him would still be writing about me. Surely people can understand that. I have to talk about myself when talking about cancelation because I am canceled. I am working on a new project now, of course, but my basic hope is that it can pay for itself, and maybe give me a $30k a year salary. That’s all. I just want to be able to do something fun that maybe educates some people. I have accepted my fate as the canceled man. But Glenn Greenwald also said Fuentes was most canceled. This is just a lie. And I am not a random person. In 2017, I was neck-in-neck with Breitbart in terms of traffic. I was on the cover of The Atlantic for an article I refused to do an interview for. I’d been on the front page of the New York Times multiple times. If the thing would not have happened, I would be the size of the New York Times by now. I had not reached a plateau. I was still experiencing exponential growth.  This is not me whining. I have whined before, I’m sure. We are going on ten years of me being in this hole. Of course I don’t like it. But this is not about that. This is about the fact that you can most assuredly cancel people, and Tucker and all of these other people are getting away with the absolute lie that some people can’t be canceled in order to promote this myth of Nick Fuentes.

If there was some other person as canceled as me, trust me, I would use them as the example. The only sites ever in the same range of cancelation were 8chan and Kiwi Farms. Why are these people lying about that? The New York Times quoted a Fox producer saying Tucker’s writing staff was using me as a source, and it’s not breaking any confidence to just say “yes, I can confirm that is true.” He was asked about me repeatedly after that article, he knows who I am. Further, Darren Beattie has said on multiple platforms that I am the most canceled. Tucker is friends with him, everyone knows him, everyone knows about me, no one will say it, they make these fake narratives. Remember when Alex Jones was “most canceled” while making $50 million a year on snake oil? So this is a lie and it is not an insignificant lie and it is a lie designed to promote a myth of Nick Fuentes.

Now, let us get back to my list. Many of the items on my list did not relate to Nick Fuentes at all. In fact, they floated further from him. The more I think about that list, the more it troubles me. The list lost its luster, and with that dimming a queer conviction crept upon me — I began to believe the list was bullet‑pointing me, each terse clause a little spear aimed at my being; each new item seemed to draw me deeper into the darkest pit of lists, that abyss where order becomes accusation and neatness a tribunal. Memory, regret, a child’s laugh, the hollow echo of all unfinished sentences — names set down as if upon a surgeon’s slate. 記憶、悔恨、孩童的笑聲、所有未竟句子的空洞迴響——名字像在外科醫生的書寫板上一樣被記下。 The items in my mind took wing and became like birds, disparate species: some small and harmless as sparrows, some brilliant as kingfishers, but many circling like vultures over my soul, patient, precise, their shadows counting me even as they deferred the final descent. I watched them catalogue me with beaks and ledger, noting faults and favours, folding my days into margins, and the more I observed the more the cataloguing observed me 我目睹它們用喙與帳簿為我編目，記下過失與恩惠，將我的日子摺入頁邊，而我越是觀察，編目越是觀察我。 Yet in that terrible taxonomy there was a ghastly, seductive clarity — a clarity that shone coldly, as moonlight on a tomb, and compelled me to continue, pen trembling, to itemize the very hand that wrote. 筆顫抖，將書寫之手逐項列出。

A teenager from West Philadelphia grew up on sun-baked streets and amidst the turbulent environment of his neighborhood. One afternoon, while sitting on his porch, a children’s quarrel unexpectedly drew him into a conflict, attracting the attention of the town’s police. Concerned for her son’s safety and anxious about his future, his mother carefully wrote a letter to a wealthy distant relative living in Bel-Air, pleading with them to take her son in and remove him from the endless conflict. He then left his home by carriage and other means of transportation, and soon, the boy found himself transported from a grimy, bustling environment to the manicured lawns and stately marble steps of a quiet suburb, observing his new home with keen curiosity. He was welcomed into an elegant and expectant family. With his straightforward personality and youthful wit, he navigated various social situations, learning different customs and manners, his natural sense of humor adding an unexpected lightness to these formal occasions. Between the roughness of the old world and the refined elegance of the new, he moved like a comet between two worlds—both out of place and dazzling—and it was this sense of being out of place that created a vibrant comedy, as he and his adoptive parents learned from each other through jokes and occasional awkwardness, experiencing the unique etiquette of family life.

After all that, this:

I was thinking this can’t possibly get worse — wait for the surprise pic.twitter.com/DmHnDqNIP3

— Jon Levine (@LevineJonathan) October 27, 2025

People kept saying “Islamic communist” and I was thinking of some kind of cross between Mao Zedong and Hamas, and instead I get this?

I was thinking this can’t possibly get worse — wait for the surprise pic.twitter.com/DmHnDqNIP3

— Jon Levine (@LevineJonathan) October 27, 2025

After Charlottesville and all those fat people in costumes, I had to quickly distance myself from the “neo-Nazi” bit. People were like, “so if you’re not a neo-Nazi, then what are you?” and I would say “basically, picture a cross between Mao Zedong and Hamas” and they would say “I’m having a hard time picturing that” and I would say “basically, picture the diametric opposite of a tranny rabbi.”

But this is what I get.

Every single fricking time.

But yeah, I have the memes. I was a bit rushed. Needed time to write all that worthless bullshit up there.

In future, I’m going to seriously try for Monday, not late Tuesday, but maybe… check Wednesday if it’s really that big of a deal. Also there’s an RSS feed, you know. That should actually be more prominent given the irregular output. Not really sure anyone knows how to use it anyway. We’re banned from all email lists of course, roflmao.

Editor’s Pick of the Week:

Runner-Up:

Special Separate Award:

That one is A. Wyatt Mann, the guy who invented internet memes, using AI. He’s never done absurdist humor before that I’ve ever seen. It’s a fun meme in itself, but the guy who made Le Happy Merchant branching out into a totally new form of meme humor as a result of AI makes it worth the Special Separate Award, which has only been granted once before for a meme Ben Garrison made about me making memes of him.

I’m big on absurdism these days. I mean in humor, not the nihilistic philosophical concept. We’ll see how it plays on my upcoming TV show.

The Primo Collection:

≈

And we end on a classic Fuentes.

He’s taken over the universe but I swore he wouldn’t take over this website. So much for that. He is literally like the coronavirus now. Everyone in the world is required to think about him all day, every day.

At first everyone probably thought it was just their feeds. But it’s not. He’s everywhere all the time.

Why is the NYT using AI to make him look like a Calvin Klein model when in reality he is the worst skinny-fat with a disgusting Mexiface and advanced scoliosis?

You tell me, friend.

Maybe make a list of possible reasons, then choose the one most likely.

Anyway, I’ll be back on Wednesday. No, sorry. I’ll be back on Friday for Wednesday memes.

I’ve got extra memes. I know these pages can load slow. Plus we need more regular posts. Check back tomorrow to see if you like this other guy we’ve got. He’s sort of an autistic genius with the research stuff. Mind like a steel vice grip. I think you’ll dig it.

If not then fuck off, I don’t care.

I don’t care about anything anymore except Star Wars Legends. I’m reading like four of these novels a week. Well, that makes it sound like a pattern. I did read the first five in ten days. Kinda had a sort of break thing happening because of a thing with the thing and bad internet.

Trying to get a new e-reader. I love my Kobo 7″, but it’s about shot after three years of daily use (buttons all clingy, have to use touch screen which is annoying and not the way it’s designed), and they only sell the “color” version now, which means there is blue light, which defeats the purpose of a device that looks like a Texas Instruments screen in the first place.

This is what robots and alleged humans are recommending:

It’s expensive but it’s sold out on Amazon so it must be good, right? Trying to find one. I don’t need any of those features. Well, I guess scratch protection is good. But it’s supposedly got much crisper text than my current piece, and I think I’ll get used to the extra 0.8 inches.

The hilarious thing is I lost most of my sight during my illness two years ago. But because I haven’t used a real book (or a cellphone) in many, many years, I can just blow up text instead of getting glasses. That’s what killed the buttons on my Kobo. I’m only putting one paragraph on a page. Funny right? I have a brain tumor.

These memes today might not be the cream of the crops. But I have never thought crops should really be very creamy anyway. Whenever I heard that phrase, I imagined like, a Dairy Queen Blizzard flavored by wheat.

Does that sound delicious to you, my dearest parasocial friend?

The point here is: I have a lot going on right now. When I had little going on, it was very easy to fill this page with stuff. Now that my cup runneth over with stuff to do, it’s more difficult. But I’m doing it for you. You will like the thing. You might not like it at first, actually. Many of you might be confused by the thing. You might be like “what the fuck is going on what is this what is happening right now oh my God what.”

Give it a year.

I hear your calls, my brethren.

And while I take issue with items 4-5, as a matter of factual reality, 1-3 and 6 are valid.

Items 1-3 are covered under “doing the thing.”

In terms of item 6. In terms of the site. In terms of that thing with the theme. I wish you knew. So I’ll tell you, so you will know. I did nothing. All of a sudden something updated or something or whatever. The site broke. For no reason or for some reason I am unaware of. So then, I tried to update the theme and it didn’t work. Then, I tried to buy the theme, spending $300 on three separate prepaid credit cards for 4 separate websites. And I was unsuccessful, probably due to not having a US phone number. So then I spent who knows how much crypto on US phone numbers. And none of it worked. This was now approaching 12ish hours of my life wasted. So then I tried a bunch of different free themes.

I think the current one is fine. Someone said it looks a bit off on a phone. I don’t have a phone but I can simulate that, and I will work on it (at some point).

If you want the old site back, buy the Sahifa theme, then post it on gameruprising. I think this can be done anonymously. But either way, I want it black, and I’m also going to rearrange it to have fewer items with bigger images.

When I started writing less, simplifying the site was actually a goal. Yes, it was fine for 10+ years, but I used to post a lot more, and I don’t think there were enough new items to fill the thing.

I plan to write more than I have been, but “more” as in 1-3 longish items per week, with a maximum of 5-7 items per week, which is not enough to fill that space that was designed for 70+ items per week. I’m not doing the news again. I don’t want to do that. I’m not going to do it. It had become a cruel grind with no reward for anyone but an insular group. It was probably over a million people, granted. At least close to that (I wasn’t tracking IPs obviously, I’m too ethical, and also the way the site is set up, it’s impossible). But this was not growing, it had shrank over time, and was certainly not close to what was happening in 2017. If I had been paid well, or if I’d enjoyed it a lot, maybe something would have been different, but those two things combined (no significant money or enjoyment) made it totally unfeasible to keep doing it.

I took some time off and a new thing struck me. Basically, the eureka moment was the realization that the “alternative media,” designed to push back against the “mainstream media,” has become as big as the thing it was pushing back against, and has somehow become even more ridiculous and unaccountable than the thing it was seeking to replace on the grounds that the previous thing was ridiculous and unaccountable. “Who watches the watchers,” you know? That’s the core concept here: a watching of the watchers. The fact that I hate most or perhaps all of the watchers helps quite a bit.

The written alternative media is very minor, most of it is video, so it makes sense for me to do video, and that is also a new challenge for me. I understand that I am a much better writer than speaker, so this decision may seem counterintuitive. However, if I’m actually struggling to do the thing, challenging myself, the product will be better. At least eventually. I’m certain it will take some time. I understand I still say “um” a lot. We are working on the ums. I like a bit of ums. But this is the way AI does me:

That is truly a lot of umming. Many or perhaps most would say it is too much umming.

If the new thing doesn’t work, it doesn’t work. Okay. I’ll go back to writing, or think of some other thing, or whatever.

But I’m pretty sure it is definitely going to work. Obviously, I will still have the censorship problems. But maybe a smaller AV project will make more money than a written word project. It’s also possible there will be some new audience that prefers video. Probably not nearly enough to compensate for the people who would rather read daily news coverage. But whatever. It’s whatever. It’s the thing I want to do and therefore I shall do it and if it doesn’t work then that is what it is.

The goal is to have the thing done by Valentine’s Day, which is the day I stopped daily news updates. It probably won’t be done by then. More likely, mid to late March. I probably shouldn’t even mention “Valentine’s Day,” because then people will think that’s the starting date, and hold me to it, but here’s the deal: hold me to mid-April.

Editor’s Pick of the Week:

Runner-Up:

And the Primo Collection:

Following the death of Charlie Kirk, all sorts of weird things are going on.

It has “rallied the MAGA base” in a depraved manner, similar to the way the nation was rallied after 9/11. Clearly, this was intended by the administration, which has worked with all of these “alternative media influencers,” to stoke the hysteria. We are hearing from Trump that there is an “enemy within,” and he appears to be describing more than the immigrants. There is some kind of Antifa narrative, apparently.

This is all very convenient. I’m not saying that someone in the White House said “they won’t quit talking about the Epstein Files and they’re still upset about these wars? The podcasters are all talking about Palantir and this Peter Thiel antichrist thing? Well, I don’t know – murder Charlie Kirk, I guess.” But it is not hard to imagine that someone at the White House said precisely those words before the shooting.

Basically, every MAGA person is now calling for a police state. Further, they demand much more extreme censorship than Democrats ever called for. Whereas Joe Biden secretly communicated with social media companies, ordering them to censor things he did not like, the Trump Administration is openly threatening to use the power of government to silence people. Pam Bondi, who is a really dumb bitch, is saying she is going to start arresting people “on both sides” for “hate speech,” something which is not only not illegal, but which the Supreme Court has repeatedly said does not exist and cannot exist in America.

In 2017, during Matal v. Tam, the most recent instance of hate speech being brought before the court, Judge Alito wrote in the unanimous opinion:

Speech that demeans on the basis of race, ethnicity, gender, religion, age, disability, or any other similar ground is hateful; but the proudest boast of our free speech jurisprudence is that we protect the freedom to express ‘the thought that we hate.’

Last month, as a response to Charlie’s death, Bondi, who is currently operating in the position of the highest office of any lawyer on the planet, announced that without any law, she will begin targeting and arresting people for legal speech.

AG Pam Bondi: “There’s free speech, and then there’s hate speech. And there is no place, especially now, especially after what happened to Charlie, in our society. We will absolutely target you, go after you, if you are targeting anyone with hate speech.” pic.twitter.com/IBvf6amwUT

— TheBlaze (@theblaze) September 16, 2025

Meanwhile, Trump has taken to using comic book villain rhetoric about “an invasion from within” as he releases the military onto the streets for unclear purposes.

Trump to generals: “America is under invasion from within. We’re under invasion from within. No different than a foreign enemy, but more difficult in any ways because they don’t wear uniforms. At least when they’re wearing a uniform you can take them out.” pic.twitter.com/LZw4W73LdQ

— Aaron Rupar (@atrupar) September 30, 2025

Citing Kirk’s death, James “JD Vance” Bowman is talking about retraining law enforcement to focus on political enemies of the president.

Vance: “Because we have such a big problem with left-wing political violence… we really have to re-train the entire government to focus on the left-wing violence problem.” pic.twitter.com/Ur966FZyvW

— The Bulwark (@BulwarkOnline) October 15, 2025

Within the context of this new war against political “enemies within,” Trump is talking about using American cities as training grounds for the US military.

Trump: “I told Pete we should use some of these dangerous cities as training grounds for our military.”

pic.twitter.com/WY4aod0faU

— Spencer Hakimian (@SpencerHakimian) September 30, 2025

The initial explanation for the deployment of military forces and paramilitary forces onto the streets of the country was immigration. This involved masked ICE agents randomly grabbing people off of the streets, out of church parking lots, and throwing them into vans.

ICE set up a raid outside Catholic church—priest has to give special warning during mass.

“I think they’ve been casing the church… the mass times are down,” said a neighbor.

“Right now, nobody wants to come out, because they don’t want to be deported,” one parishioner said.… pic.twitter.com/kvWkFi5zB9

— LongTimeFirstTime (@LongTimeHistory) October 14, 2025

It was my assertion that this would expand to political enemies, and we are now seeing this happening. It was clearly ridiculous to any adult that ICE was going to round up tens of millions of people one at a time and deport them. It was further never explained why the feds were building concentration camps inside of the United States for immigrants (who would presumably be deported).

What I pointed out repeatedly was that you could get rid of upwards of 95% of illegal immigrants by simply making it a serious felony to employ or rent housing to them. With nowhere to work and nowhere to live, they would just leave. You would not need to send military men in masks to throw them into vans. You can go ahead and research why it is that the feds are not targeting the employers and landlords of illegal immigrants. Ask the AI, maybe. There is of course no explanation, despite the fact that this would cost virtually nothing.

The only explanation as to why they would choose these terror raids, choose to release the military, I asserted, is that they are not actually trying to remove every immigrant one by one, but rather trying to get people used to the idea of military and militarized police on the streets throwing random people into vans. I asserted that this military force, along with the system of camps they are building, would be used against non-immigrants. And after Charlie’s murder, we saw the building of the narrative about political enemies, setting up this precise framework.

Meanwhile, the FBI is refusing to answer any of the nagging questions surrounding the murder of Charlie Kirk, and is treating it effectively as a closed case. It’s a good thing no one in the media is pressing them on any of their claims.

There are many, many questions about this murder, but the most obvious is probably how it is that Charlie Kirk’s neck was stronger than a 3/8-inch-thick piece of steel.

Again, there are a whole lot of questions. This one is just the most obvious, which alone is more than enough to prove that the FBI’s story of Charlie Kirk’s murder is a lie.

While the FBI refuses to comment, the media has claimed this was a “miracle.”

‘MAN OF STEEL’: Charlie Kirk’s body stopped a bullet that would typically “just go through everything” and it was an “absolute miracle” nobody else was killed, his surgeon told TPUSA. pic.twitter.com/1Ubx519ax6

— Fox News (@FoxNews) September 21, 2025

TPUSA’s spokesman, Andrew Kolvet, has also claimed it was a “miracle.”

I want to address some of the discussion about the lack of an exit wound with Charlie. I’m usually not interested in delving into most of this kind of online chatter, and I apologize this is somewhat graphic, but in this case, the fact that there wasn’t an exit wound is probably…

— Andrew Kolvet (@AndrewKolvet) September 20, 2025

It is all very surreal.

It’s happening alongside a whole load of other surreal happenings. Trump is declaring he’s established peace in Israel while Bibi is publicly assuring his supporters no such thing has occurred. He’s made a complete reversal on the Ukraine war. He is blowing up random boats off the coast of Venezuela claiming that they are cocaine traffickers responsible for Chinese fentanyl from Mexico.

It feels like a kind of “shock and awe” campaign to overwhelm the public. But the public is very excited about it, after having been whipped into a frenzy over Charlie Kirk’s assassination.

Standing on Charlie’s Corpse, Nick Fuentes has Been Astroturfed as the Most Important Right-Wing Voice on the Internet

Something that is personally very surreal to me is the fact that Nick Fuentes is clearly being positioned by very powerful people to be a new “voice for the youth.” For those who don’t know, and for the sake of full disclosure, Fuentes spent years as my Padawan, basing his show on my materials. Two years ago, I disavowed him due to his decision to associate with and promote Richard Spencer, and then to openly tie himself to documented FBI informant Chuck Johnson. I am a really cool guy, I’m totally super edgy and doesn’t afraid of anything. But I have a hard rule that I do not associate with anyone who associates with FBI informants.

Before I denounced him, Fuentes spent years citing me as his biggest influence, and would use my articles as the basis of virtually every show he did. Now that he has become this alleged superstar, it’s worth analyzing in some detail just what the hell is going on here.

For basic context: he supported Trump until some point before the election. Then he became anti-Trump. However, his current “anti-Trump” stance is that Trump is not doing enough censorship, not doing the police state hard enough, and so on. It’s actually hard to follow, which is sort of the underlying point I want to try to highlight today: it’s all very garbled.

For unclear reasons, Charlie Kirk dying meant that Nick Fuentes became very important, and was all of a sudden everywhere. No one has explained why, and I think I am the only person asking why. But it is clearly astroturf.

When Charlie died, Fuentes said he was too distraught to do a show. Then the next day, he did this really emotional show where the ideas being communicated were confusing to say the least. He started campaigning for mass censorship, and for some kind of domestic terrorism operation or something. (I covered his early post-assassination campaign here.)

He was clearly calling for some kind of police state involving precrime, a la the program being pushed by Palantir:

He actually went so far as to imply that some unspecific left-wing violence group was more of a threat than Israel and Palantir.

I have no idea who these “millions of Americans” he is referring to are. “Antifa” is the only violent leftist political group I’m aware of, and there are not millions of them. In fact, I would be surprised if there were thousands. In all likelihood, Antifa was more or less entirely organized by the FBI itself, as the group existed almost exclusively as a way to shut down right-wing political activism. (Note that whenever you saw arrest photos, they appeared to be standard junkies, who were likely paid to engage in these activities.) Their disappearance after Biden took office, and their failure to reemerge during a second Trump Administration which has much more institutional backing than the first time around, certainly indicates they were operated by the state. Regardless, the implication that Antifa is a bigger threat than Palantir or Israel is obscene. Despite Fuentes’ stated opposition to Trump, downplaying the two biggest influences on the Trump government while calling for a focus on “the enemy within” fits very neatly into Trump’s current agenda of establishing a domestic police state.

In the days following Charlie’s death, Fuentes also appeared to go along with various calls for people to be arrested for “celebrating” the event:

He called in the FBI and demanded Jackson Hinkle be sent to prison for suggesting Israel was involved in the Kirk assassination:

He later walked most of that back, with a “pay no attention to your lying eyes” explanation that he was “misunderstood.” He said he didn’t want people to go to prison, even though he said to Jackson “you are going to prison.” He said he wasn’t calling for “hate speech laws” but rather for the government to pressure businesses into firing and silencing people who weren’t sufficiently sad about Charlie’s death and/or questioned the official story.

As we will see, he regularly says things and then says the opposite thing without acknowledging he is doing this. “The internet is forever” and so on, but he has now apparently created an audience that is too stupid to notice these sorts of things. (I also have questions as to how big of an audience he actually has, given that this “rise” is such a classic astroturf campaign, which I will get into below.)

The Conspiracy Theory That Went Too Far for the Mega-Kook

Fuentes tried to distance himself from me and my content following my denunciation of him. He continued reading my site and using some of my material, but whereas he’d been proud of my support for him previously, he was clearly ashamed to be using me as his main source after I’d denounced him. To make it less obvious that all of the good ideas he ever had were from my website, he went out and tried to make up some of his own conspiracy theories about various things, which became increasingly bizarre. It was stuff I would never say, and I think that was part of the point. It is also possible that he actually believes he is some kind of genius who is able to formulate genius theories no one else can think of. He was called a genius when copying my material, and I think this caused him some confusion about his own ability to do analysis.

I have not watched his show regularly in years, but people have sent me clips of some very wild theories. Just as an example, he told people that the Taylor Swift Dance Club stabbing that took place in England on July 29, 2024, was a false flag attack by Israel. Three girls between the ages of six and nine were killed by one Axel Rudakubana, the son of Christian immigrants from Rwanda. There wasn’t any evidence for the theory and it didn’t make any sense, but he said Israel did it to stop the pro-Palestine protests that were happening in the country. He claimed Netanyahu ordered the alleged Trump assassination attempt so the GOP would install Nikki Haley as president. There are many such cases, with very extreme assertions often relying on a single datapoint, and regularly presented as established fact. You will learn about quite a few of his theories below.

Given that he was so aggressive in promoting often totally nonsensical theories, it is very strange then that Fuentes is now claiming that there is nothing at all suspicious about the killing of Charlie Kirk, and going so far as to promote a conspiracy theory that anyone who says the assassination is suspicious and that the government may not be telling the whole truth is a Russian agent. Specifically, he has listed Tucker Carlson, Candace Owens, Jackson Hinkle, and Max Blumenthal as secret agents of Russia.

After years of supporting Russia when he was using my material as the basis of his show, he has pivoted to Democrat-style theories about Russians trying to undermine faith in our institutions. Many people would consider this theory of Russian agents secretly paying some of the most popular right-wing pundits in America to discredit the FBI to be a much wilder conspiracy theory than the suggestion that the FBI could be lying about what is apparently the biggest act of political violence since 9/11.

It is notably unclear where exactly Fuentes is going with this theory. The most obvious explanation would be that he is involved with the FBI and they are telling him to promote anti-Russian materials while defending their official narrative about Charlie Kirk. This would certainly go a long way towards explaining why, after Kirk’s death, he has been pulled from obscurity into the mainstream of the right-wing internet media. He has appeared on podcasts or shows with Patrick Bet-David, the Nelk Boys, Red Scare, Glenn Greenwald, Hodgetwins, Russell Brand, Dave Smith, and others. Given that there is no hard evidence of an organic increase in interest in Fuentes or his “back the FBI or you’re a Russian” claims after Kirk’s death, this is the definition of “astroturf.” (Note: though it’s beyond the scope of this piece, these “alternative media” people all have agents who communicate through backchannels, just like “mainstream media” personalities, so the logistics of an astroturf campaign in this space are not complex.)

One may wish to give the benefit of the doubt, to try to steelman a position where he is innocently spreading “Russian meddling” theories. It is unclear how this would be done. It’s not believable that anyone actually believes Charlie had a “neck of steel.” And it is incomprehensible that someone who has spent so many years framing himself as an opponent of the US empire would all of a sudden start defending the FBI and claiming Russians are attempting to discredit it.

It is particularly strange that he is going so hard in attacking people for claiming Israel may have assassinated Charlie Kirk, given that he has framed himself as some kind of extreme opponent of Israel and the Jews. Again, no serious adult believes the official story, given that it is physically impossible and relies on a “steel neck miracle.” Given that Israel is infamous for doing political assassinations all over the planet, and given that it aligns with Israel’s interests, it is certainly well within the bounds of rational discourse to consider that Israel may have been behind Kirk’s death.

To attempt to silence discussion of possible Israeli involvement in the killing with claims of Russian disinformation makes this shilling almost cartoonish. You see him being rewarded for this shilling all over the place with this massive astroturf.

“Russian Meddling” Narrative Glitch

Claiming that people questioning the FBI’s narrative on Kirk are Russian agents necessarily creates a whole series of narrative problems.

To wit, one would have to assume that anyone who believes that Owens, Carlson, Blumenthal, and Hinkle are being paid by Russia to discredit the FBI’s claims about Charlie’s assassination are also working for Russia to discredit the FBI’s claims about Epstein, the State Department’s claims about the Ukraine war, and so on and on. It simply would not make sense if these individuals were Russian agents only on the issue of Charlie Kirk’s death. Right? I mean, that’s crazy obvious, is it not? I mean, did they just start working for Russia, sometime between the FBI’s Epstein scandal and the assassination of Charlie Kirk? So like, they were being real when they questioned the FBI about Epstein, but then they got hired by Israel to discredit the FBI, so they’re doing a Russian op questioning them about Charlie? I guess it would have to be either that, or that Fuentes actually supports the FBI’s claims about Epstein.

Wait, here he is in July saying Candace works for Russia. In one of his very interesting and brilliant original theories, he says Candace believing Macron’s wife is a tranny is proof she works for Russia. And she interviewed Andrew Tate. Also, working for Ben Shapiro indicates a Russian angle. (That’s the theory. This is this person’s content.)

Candace Owens is most likely paid by Russia pic.twitter.com/QpUskLcO01

— Fuentes Updates (@FuentesUpdates) July 17, 2025

“Candace is definitely Russian,” he says. Here’s another clip of him saying the same thing a week later, just so you’re clear this wasn’t just some random comment. (In the context of an interview, he backs down from “definitely” and says “speculative.” It’s worth watching if you want a bit more information on how he just pulls theories out of nothing at all. Fantastically, he says “maybe two years ago, I didn’t believe any of this.” It’s a great compliment to me.)

Just you wait. It gets dumber before it gets even dumber.

Before he was astroturfed all over the place, he could make a stupid claim, then just delete his posts and move on. But with this new attention on him, these tactics are not working. He is clearly not “ready for prime time.”

Just for the record, I am not only banned from Twitter, but linking this site on Twitter is also prohibited. It is listed as “dangerous.” Despite having the great privilege to be on Twitter and having his account boosted at every turn, Fuentes regularly posts on Telegram instead so that people cannot respond to him and question his claims. During his attacks on Candace Owens for questioning the official story of Kirk’s death, he attacked her on Telegram for claiming Netanyahu offered Kirk $150 million.

When I saw that, I said “hold on a second, he was promoting that himself!” Various fellows on my forum told me “oh no dude, he might not usually be consistent, but he’s been consistent on this for sure.” My bro said this to me:

I just about snapped.

After smashing everything in my room, it then took me an hour to find the clip:

Candace Owens, Max Blumenthal, and some of Nick’s sources claim Israel attempted to bribe Charlie Kirk $150M to support Israel even harder than he already did.

Charlie refused. pic.twitter.com/4ViOhe3DY6

— Fuentes Updates (@FuentesUpdates) September 16, 2025

On the Bibi offer of $150 million, he says: “I have independently confirmed that by the way, I’ve heard that from four [handsign, FOUR] people. Four people that I trust, that are in the know. So this is coming from Candace Owens, a friend of Charlie Kirk, this is coming from Max Blumenthal, who purports to have a source, and I have heard, from a handful of people independently of those sources, that this offer was real.”

Here’s the face he makes after saying that:

(The original video on Nick’s Rumble is here. It starts at 1:06:00.)

He holds up four (4) fingers to stress that four (4) of his sources have confirmed this thing that he now claims was a Candace Owens hoax.

So why did it take me an hour to find it? Well, because the main tweet which spread this claim, a tweet by @ImperiumFirst which had millions of views, was deleted.

I then found a deleted reddit post:

I also came across this in my searching:

That link leads to this:

But wait: there is a reupload of that video.

“Where did we get this $150 million figure? We got it from Candace Owens and Max Blumenthal.” He then goes on to say that Candace and Blumenthal claim they never said that. (I don’t know if they said that. They are also under investigation by me, but not in this article.) He also says in this clip “my credibility is now on the line.” Yeah, no shit. What happened to your four very reliable sources???

He does not mention those four sources he claimed to have, putting the entire thing on Candace and Max.

(I found the original video on Nick’s Rumble, here. It starts at 2:04:00.)

Just a side note here: Fuentes refers to his “groypers” as “Elite Human Capital.”

Here’s the one who’s talking in that clip:

Going through these clips, I also found this one:

Just, I mean. If anyone is keeping track of the physiognomy patterns found among these EHCs, you might want to note those two.

So what about the deleted tweet from @ImperiumFirst? The one that had millions of views? Well, that’s a totally pro-Fuentes account (Imperium First instead of Fuentes’ America First. It’s a Warhammer gag, you see. These EHCs are very clever with stuff like that). One wouldn’t have to be a kook conspiracy theorist to imagine Fuentes DM’d him and asked him to delete that tweet. I mean. Why else would he have deleted it? He knew the statements had been clipped and didn’t want it reposted in the comments section, so he posted his claim that Candace was responsible for the $150 million theory on Telegram.

This is how he is used to operating. It works when you’re an obscure streamer. When you’re the next big thing, it probably doesn’t work as well. This is the definition of “not ready for prime time.”

You might be thinking “oh, so he lied about having sources for a claim, then he decided to completely change his own narrative, and then he covered his tracks so he didn’t look like a stupid liar, wow, is that such a big deal?” Firstly, yes. How the hell can you have a person you trust for information lying to you and covering it up? Like, sure, give him the benefit of the doubt that he believes the “steel neck miracle theory” and all of the rest of it. He definitely knew that he claimed he had four sources, and his viral clip (later deleted) was most responsible for spreading this $150 million theory. Then he lied and said the claim came exclusively from Candace and Max. As he is building a narrative that anyone who claims the FBI is dishonest is a Russian agent.

Oh, and lest we forget: he is also now promoting the idea that Russia is working with Israel.

Nick Fuentes DESTROYS third worldists by dropping the redpill that Putin is totally in bed with Israel and that there’s no le based Russia and China alliance against Jewry. pic.twitter.com/1S2xQTmxe7

— KyotoZoomer (@KyotoZoomerKZ) August 9, 2025

I’m sure there is some zany kookspiracy theory explaining how Russia’s nearly century-long alliances with all of Israel’s enemies, including their current support and arming of Iran, is all somehow fake or whatever. But yes, while Fuentes is claiming that Russia is paying Candace, Tucker, etc. to blame Israel, he also claims Russia is secretly best friends with Israel. So, you know. Don’t really know what to say about that, but it certainly adds yet another layer of “wait, what?” to this layer cake of confounding gibberish.

But wait.

Can it get dumber? 

People Can Have Opinions

To be clear, I do not know what happened to Charlie Kirk. At first, the official story, that he was killed by a radical trans supporter, made sense to me. The story started to make less and less sense the more I heard about it. There is a lot you can go into. There is a lot of disinformation mixed in with legitimate theories. But the “steel neck miracle” thing is something you can zoom in on that cannot be true. What I had initially assumed is that the bullet went through his neck and into some concrete or brick behind him. Now that it has been established that the official story is that the bullet was stuck in his neck, “just under the skin,” it is impossible for anyone to genuinely believe the official story. However, let’s say we give Fuentes all the benefits of all the doubts, assume he is very unfamiliar with guns, and maybe hasn’t taken the 1-2 minutes it would take to research how a .30-06 round could be stopped by a human neck at that range. Lashing out at people who question the FBI is very strange, a conspiracy kook saying this monumental event should be accepted at face value is very out of character, and when you add this “Russian meddling” gibberish, it becomes too much.

What is the big deal? Why go so hard trying to defame people who are asking questions? And are we really supposed to believe that his defense of Israel and his attacks on Russia are completely unrelated to a spontaneous astroturf campaign? Does anyone believe that?

Also, to further clarify my own position here, I am not a defender of Owens, Carlson, or Blumenthal, all of whom I have issues with, and may even be suspicious of. Carlson definitely needs to explain what he was doing in Nicaragua in the 1980s, for example. However, I do not take issue with them questioning the FBI’s narrative of the Kirk shooting, just like I don’t take issue with them questioning the FBI’s narrative about Epstein, or really anything else. (Note: I do take some issue with Candace’s theories about Macron’s wife being a tranny. Though I also think it is hilarious.)

Just as an example here, if I was going to accuse Carlson of something, I would accuse him of purposefully mixing a lot of good information with some very bad information, which is a very basic disinformation tactic. He is very hawkish on China, he promotes the UFO and aliens hoax, and he has appeared at points to support gay marriage and other liberal sexual norms I do not think belong in a Christian society. “Limited hangout” is a piece of CIA jargon describing a situation where the official story no longer holds up, so you admit the truth in part while withholding other truths, which is how a lot of the “alternative media” seems to function. However, the only entity that would be running this kind of operation would be the US government. And indeed, just months ago, Fuentes was accusing Carlson of being a CIA operative. Now he’s accusing him of being a Russian agent trying to discredit US intelligence. So, is it both? He is working with the Kremlin and the CIA to discredit the FBI?

Note: I understand I am belaboring the point here. But as I have seen no one else with any kind of large platform questioning the “Astonishing Rise of Nick Fuentes,” I feel it is necessary to be thorough, and to make it fully clear just how bizarre this all is. We need all of this on the record.

Who are the Fans of Nick Fuentes?

Along with all of these shows, there has been a barrage of mainstream media articles about Fuentes. It’s actually overwhelming, constant press. Type his name into any news aggregator.

What’s highly notable is that much of this coverage is neutral, if not bordering on positive. Whenever he made the media during his time under my tutelage, he was referred to in any headline as a “neo-Nazi” or a “white supremacist,” and these terms have been replaced with “far right” or “white nationalist.” I’ve read a lot of these articles, and none of them note any of the weird theories, which as far as I can tell, are his core content at this point. By not pointing out things like “he says Tucker Carlson works for both Russia and the CIA,” they are effectively running cover for him. No one who is prone to supporting right-wing politics is going to be turned off by any of this. Six weeks out from Charlie’s death, there are daily articles from the likes of Mediate and Raw Story just reporting on things he said.

Last week, GQ called him a sex symbol.

In an almost unbelievable alleged coincidence, literally the day before Charlie’s death, the New York Times published a piece about him that was as close to a puff piece as the Times has ever given anyone who spent years denying the Holocaust and praising Hitler. In a case of eerie precision or you know, something else, the Times writers predicted “rising influence.”

What is interesting is that aside from Ron Unz and myself, I don’t really see anyone critically questioning what is going on here. There isn’t any discussion of really anything about him, anywhere. There are these media articles, which present a boilerplate narrative about how he was on the fringe and now he’s mainstream. They don’t attempt to offer any insight into it, other than that “young people are turning to the far right.”

Note: I haven’t seen any of them mention me. There is a hard blackout in the media of my name (that’s what happens when the establishment is actually afraid of what you’re doing). I am mentioned only in very specific contexts. But it is quite a thing to talk about Nick Fuentes’ rise and not mention me. Long time readers, who also followed Fuentes, know that I’m not exaggerating this: his entire show, for over five years, was based on my website. And it isn’t simply that he would copy the material, but he would credit me on the show, call me his hero and his biggest influence. It’s actually sad to think about. I guess I can just say that. This whole thing is still a bit emotional for me. I don’t think that makes me a pussy. I believed he was copying me because he believed in my material. Certainly, without having used my material for all those years, he never would have been notable. He is charismatic enough, and has oratory skills, but if he had come out of the gates with this kookspiracy stuff, there never would have been any real traction.

Here’s the question though: who are all these people following him? Where is the evidence that they exist? If he has all of these hundreds of thousands of followers, why is there no critical discussion of him anywhere?

In what was clearly a stunt and part of the astroturf campaign, he had a Spotify account for a few days, and it is claimed that it became the number one podcast in the world.

JUST IN: Spotify bans Nick Fuentes podcast after it hits #1 on the charts just days after being allowed on the platform. pic.twitter.com/WNqzdfHMCs

— Remarks (@remarks) October 15, 2025

He said he didn’t make the account, that some random person just started uploading the shows, and that resulted in it becoming number one.

Nick Fuentes reveals the America First podcast that was banned by Spotify was uploaded by a fan; he had no affiliation with it. https://t.co/c6Q7X3iwoE pic.twitter.com/XKm2SygcHZ

— 𝐆𝐫𝐢𝐦𝐚𝐥𝐝𝐮𝐬 (@ImperiumFirst) October 16, 2025

That does not even seem possible. How would the podcast be promoted in the first place if he didn’t tell people about it? Assuming it got caught in an algorithm, are we to believe that no one is monitoring the charts at all?

Based on his YouTube followers, and the pictures of his followers we’ve seen in public since his split with me, his followers we can prove exist are a bunch of grotesque Mexican gargoyles. Is it possible that Hispanics didn’t know about him, and he is just really appealing to them? That is possible. Hispanics do this with their stars. But it can’t explain the numbers.

All of the material you see posted as comments anywhere looks like bots. On Twitter, for example, you don’t find the kind of back-and-forth between posters that you would see on really any other person’s Twitter comments. There is nothing negative. It is just a bunch of slogans and cringe memes.

Here are some top memes posted on a recent Fuentes tweet:

What is going on there? Those are humans? Bots? Boomers? Indians?

Note: It may seem trite, but as a founding member and former leader of the Alt-Right, the fact that our people were always funny was very important to me, as it was evidence of high intelligence and good socialization. If I was running a movement and my followers were just posting “GOAT” and “cope and seethe” and GIFs from Office Space, I might have considered pulling a Fuentes and selling them out to the feds. No, I joke. But only because I hate the feds so much. In all seriousness though, I definitely would have considered selling them into slavery to build skyscrapers in Dubai.

Just go look yourself. I just clicked the top post and found this at the top:

Here’s the account:

It’s a bunch of similar memes, and replies to known botted-out accounts.

Elon Musk:

End Wokeness:

No joke, that was the first one I clicked.

The second one I clicked was this:

And the account is a bunch of reposts of viral dog videos.

Go through and investigate yourself. @NickJFuentes. Scroll through the comments on any tweet and see what you see. Click through randomly on the commenters. See what you see.

I’m obviously not saying he has no followers. He had followers before the media and the “influencer network” started pushing him like this. I don’t know whether Rumble has a good record for accurate viewer numbers, but after Elon Musk personally decided to give Fuentes his account back, his numbers on Rumble, where he primarily streams, went from an average of 20,000 views to nearly ten times that. But there is clearly a concerted campaign by both establishment and “alternative” media to present him as a phenomenon, and there simply is no evidence that the interest matches the hype.

Insofar as these groypers (often called “mugus” by those critical of Fuentes) are real people, they do not engage in any form of critical analysis of his materials. If you ever come across one, ask them to name one thing Fuentes was ever wrong about. They will become very uncomfortable, and simply begin calling you names.

They are now repeating his narrative about how everyone who questions the integrity of the FBI or anything else Nick Fuentes supports is a Russian agent. Last month, Ron Unz of Unz.com, where my articles are often reposted, cited me when questioning exactly what was going on with Fuentes, and many of the allegedly human followers of Fuentes attacked Unz without even attempting to address or defend Fuentes’ new position on “Russian meddling.”

Note that after Fuentes stopped promoting the Daily Stormer as his primary influence, he began citing Unz as his favorite website.

He somehow pissed the russian shills off, because the whole network has been activated.

— Sam Wing 翅膀西蒙 (@SamWing69268580) September 23, 2025

holy shit, the shills really out themselves lmao.

— BLINDERPEAKSS (@BlinderPeaks) September 24, 2025

Russraeli interesting https://t.co/d7rmluJ2jS

— YungPut1n (@YungPutin1) September 24, 2025

How it feels to be a right winger in 2025: pic.twitter.com/fDRdbutGth

— KyotoZoomer (@KyotoZoomerKZ) September 26, 2025

gee I wonder why pro-russia ron unz is suddenly taking open shots at Nick Fuentes…

the israel-russia abomination on full display pic.twitter.com/Y7VAA4tRmy

— Kazé (@NeoNicker) September 23, 2025

They Call Him “NATO Nick”

It’s impossible to go through all the weird shit this guy is saying. But it’s worth noting that there is more State Department type material, and it’s worth contrasting it with his previous materials.

Along with pushing this “Russian agents” theory, “NATO Nick” as they are calling him is now all of a sudden talking about “Russian aggression” against NATO.

Russian aggression against NATO…!

Here he is doing his zany conspiracy theory bit against Jackson Hinkle, who he says is a Russian agent because he has a Russian girlfriend.

Nick Fuentes criticizes Jackson Hinkle and his ties to Russia as well as asking how this is different than taking money from Israel pic.twitter.com/3gWqVQJoBT

— Liberty Crusader (@BdawgAF) October 11, 2025

The most notable thing about that is that he says there is “no difference” between Russia influencing our politics and Israel doing so. That is a truly incredible statement for a number of reasons, but surely, putting everything else aside (such as the fact Russia is not engaged in an organized influence campaign in America, and comparing Jackson Hinkle’s Twitter account to AIPAC and the $200 billion Miriam Adelson gave to Donald Trump is utterly nonsensical), the intent and effect of Russian influence would be much different than that of Israeli influence.

In that clip, he also claims Russian Foreign Affairs Minister Sergey Lavrov personally “tipped off” Hinkle to “investment opportunities.” As far as I can tell, there is literally no source for that anywhere. I used multiple AIs to attempt to find even a rumor of this posted on reddit or some other obscure forum, and none of them could find anything, with one noting: “Even in spaces like r/Destiny, r/NAFO, and r/KnowledgeFight, where Hinkle is frequently mocked or analyzed, there is no mention of a Lavrov-provided investment tip.” Fuentes seems to have made it up out of thin air, which is another one of his strategies. He usually cites “his sources” when inserting a completely fabricated claim. (It would be shocking to me if he had any sources at all, given that aside from being a ridiculous and totally unserious person, he is virtually impossible to deal with on a personal level due to a lack of a basic understanding of human social norms. Further, he constantly posts private messages from people he’d previously been cordial with or even worked with directly. I have documented that he publicly tried to blackmail me, threatening to reveal private information. [This is a felony, by the way. And for the record, the first time I heard this I demanded he release whatever this blackmail was, and instead he simply continued to make the threat. More very odd behavior.] He suggests many of these “sources” he claims to have are inside of the government, meaning statements to him would be “leaking,” which though a common practice, is in many contexts a felony that can carry up to a ten-year prison sentence.)

Note: I assume Fuentes is getting some of these weird talking points from handlers, and he just inserts them randomly without coherent structure. However, he also seems to get confused about what his handlers are telling him to say. Further, separately from whatever handlers are feeding him this disinformation, he appears to be a pathological liar. And then separate from that, it also appears that he creates conspiracy theories in his own mind, and the lack of pushback from his “mugu” followers reinforces the idea that he can keep creating goofier and goofier theories. You can see above that on his own show, he said Candace is “definitely Russian,” stating it as a fact, but then when sitting across from someone looking a bit skeptical, he adds “it’s speculation” at the end. I’m including this as a side note because it really doesn’t matter why he spews out all of this convoluted and confounding nonsense, but it is obviously natural for people to try and understand how something like this happens. Further, it is worth noting that schizophrenia typically manifests in the early to mid-twenties. Fuentes is 27 now, whereas when he began using my material, he was in his early twenties. I am not asserting that he has clinical schizophrenia, as there are obviously other possible explanations for this (primarily, being fed disinformation by handlers and being too stupid to effectively communicate it), but a lot of the lines of thought he presents do line up with schizoid disorder. I also just want to take this opportunity to note that the idea that people take this man seriously, and I am now “debunking” something that could at least be confused for schizophrenic ramblings, is incredibly exhausting.

This anti-Russia narrative he is pushing is very new. He maintained a positive view of Russia, left over from when he was getting his entire script from me, up until earlier this year.

Here is Fuentes in June of this year talking about how, in the wake of the Ukraine drone striking Russia’s nuclear-capable bombers in Siberia, Russia would be justified in nuking the Ukraine.

Nick Fuentes on how Russia will respond to Ukraine’s drone attack

“They would be within their rights to nuclear bomb Ukraine”@NickJFuentes pic.twitter.com/dwQlE52ZCZ

— GoyaBeanGroyper (@goyabeangroyper) June 7, 2025

That is definitely not exactly an anti-Russia take, three months before Kirk’s death. (Please enjoy his explanation of the way nuclear deterrence works. He has a lesser understanding of this issue than anyone who has taken International Relations 101 or like, read the Wikipedia page about Deterrence Theory. Again, he seems to believe he is a genius and he can just intuitively understand how everything in the world works. Of course, he is playing for an audience which, if he says something with enough confidence, will just accept it, so I guess it works out for everyone.)

Here’s Fuentes in March of this year, calling for the US to surrender the Ukraine to Russia:

Nick Fuentes says the US will have to let Ukraine surrender to Russia’s demands

“America has ran out of options” pic.twitter.com/lSfQAvDb4s

— Ye Fandom (@YeFandom) March 1, 2025

Going back a bit, in January of last year, just going through all my talking points about how the US caused the war:

Nick Fuentes lays out the reasons for Russia’s invasion of Ukraine and why its the fault of America.

“They should have committed in 2008 that Ukraine wouldn’t join NATO, they should have never overthrown the regime in 2014, that’s what started this whole thing.” pic.twitter.com/Y4Ecyb0pUV

— Hark (@Hark240) January 24, 2024

More basic, obvious stuff from early 2024:

SPOT ON

NICK FUENTES: UKRAINE WAS OUR DOWNFALL.
@NickJFuentes
Putin asked for a compromise, but we ignored it. Now we’re in a war we can’t win.

Russia is stronger than ever, and we’re weaker than ever.https://t.co/E5nr17ibSX pic.twitter.com/lLw1o3KD3A

— Ignorance, the root and stem of all evil (@ivan_8848) May 30, 2024

Also worth noting is that he supports the US doing regime change in Venezuela to take their resources.

Venezuela, ahhh interesting.

That’s why they push Nick Fuentes everywhere. The world is bigger than the Middle East and he is for regime change in Venezuela!

Just another American who wants chaos for the benefit of their big empire. https://t.co/4SmViOO6QE pic.twitter.com/2B1Ou9PPtl

— Srpski Inat (@SerbianInat) August 14, 2025

But don’t let that bother you, because while he supports regime change, he is also against it.

I think he said he supports it because the US should steal their resources, but he is also against it, because Marco Rubio is Cuban? Honestly, it is absurd to try to make sense of any of it. It’s whatever. But note that there is a definite pattern not only of changing his views back and forth, but of presenting multiple conflicting views in a very short timeframe, without explanation, indicating that he actually holds conflicting positions in his mind. (Again, one would certainly be inclined to consider mental illness in analyzing that behavior, with the other possible explanation, probably the only other possible explanation, being that he is too stupid to coherently convey narratives that his handlers have given him.) You saw an example of this above, where he said to Jackson Hinkle “you are going to prison” for saying Israel killed Charlie Kirk, tagged the FBI in a call to arrest Hinkle for his posts, called for the government to act against people who engaged in anti-Charlie speech after his death, then later claimed he didn’t want arrests or hate speech laws and never implied that, saying he was actually talking about mass censorship. Further, as noted above, he has claimed that Tucker Carlson is both a CIA agent and a Russian agent, claiming to hold both beliefs at the same time.

To be clear, everyone has a right to change their position on anything. I have very rarely changed my position on anything, but most people have. Sargon of Akkad comes to mind as an example of someone who has gone through a pretty significant transformation in his way of thinking about things over the years. However, whenever he would make a change in his mode of thought, in his presentation of his ideas, Sargon would spend many hours explaining why and how he changed his view.

Fuentes has made no attempt to explain how he went from cheering on Russia’s invasion of the Ukraine, from praising Russia as a Christian country fighting against the satanic Western empire, to arguing that Russia is engaged in a campaign of disinformation to discredit the FBI and that they are actually the aggressors in the conflict with NATO. So it is certainly a fair question to ask how many of these people who are going along with this, following Nick and changing their views to match his without any explanation, are even real people.

Note that mainstream MAGA has been very critical of Trump when he’s changed his position on H-1B visas, on the Epstein Files, on the Ukraine war, and so on. And Trump has done more than Fuentes to try to explain why he changed his positions.

Other Gobbledygook (Of a More Dangerous Sort)

Fuentes recently stirred controversy among morons after telling his followers to infiltrate the CIA. This clip went viral and actually did stir some discussion from real people, given the bizarre nature of the statements.

Nick Fuentes says young men should infiltrate top institutions like Stanford and Yale and take over the government.

Follow: @AFpost

pic.twitter.com/Zu9G5aUtNA

— AF Post (@AFpost) October 12, 2025

A recent article in WIRED described the Fuentes plan to “conquer America.”

There’s a lot you could say about this. Some of it would be very funny, I’m sure. I mean, like, you could point to the examples we have of his Elite Human Capital.

(Yes, posting that photo does feel a bit cruel. I understand that and feel bad about it.)

But there is a pretty obvious “bottom line” about the “we’re going to infiltrate the CIA” gibberish.

Here is his response to criticism of his plan:

That’s a Telegram post. He uses Telegram as his primary writing platform and encourages all his followers to follow him there. Telegram requires a phone number, and you have to install it on your phone so the app operator gets access to a unique device ID. The owner of Telegram, Pavel Durov, cooperates with the feds (from the US and many other governments) without publicly disclosed warrants. The CIA and really any intelligence agency could obviously get the list of Fuentes’ Telegram followers without that benefit, but they have that benefit.

Fuentes doesn’t even encourage his followers to somehow use op-sec when signing up to follow him on Telegram. It would be virtually impossible to do anyway. You could in theory buy an internet phone number with anonymous cryptocurrency, but you would still have to install the app on your phone, which would mean you could be identified even without the phone number.

Do you see where I’m going with this? Smell what I’m cooking?

Fuentes has created a situation where every federal law enforcement agency has a full list of all of his followers. He encourages people to sign up to multiple TG channels on all his socials. He also sells merch and takes donations with Visa cards.

He holds events at public venues, where people register with their real names. He holds these events at random hotels, which will almost certainly turn over video to the FBI without warrants, and use facial recognition to identify people (your facial recognition data is logged by the federal government when you get your driver’s license).

At an event last year, the venue he’d booked canceled on him, and so, after promising attendees anonymity, he took them all to a public rooftop bar where dozens of people filmed them and posted video on social media.

JUST IN: Streamer Sneako gets his teeth broken after getting punched by a security guard in a Detroit bar

Sneako was in Detroit for AFPAC, a conference organized by Nick Fuentes

Sources say it was the same security guard who shut down AFPAC pic.twitter.com/TjGUQkhhMS

— Unlimited L’s (@unlimited_ls) June 16, 2024

Serious political leader, by the way. Ready to infiltrate and take over the CIA.

There are dozens of different ways he’s made it possible for the FBI and literally every other intelligence agency on earth to collect full lists of all of his followers.

So obviously, none of his followers are ever going to get anywhere close to state power. They are all on FBI lists as “followers of a right-wing extremist telling his followers to infiltrate institutions of state power.”

What’s more, because Fuentes has framed himself as a “political dissident” with the goal of “reshaping America,” and formed a group based around this idea, if someone from that group attempted to join the CIA for the stated purpose of undermining and reshaping the organization and America, it’s not exactly difficult to imagine that they could be charged with sedition, a very serious felony potentially carrying a 20-year prison term. A lot of this stuff he says is goofy and potentially harmless, but setting up young men to completely destroy their lives is not a joke.

So, do you see how that is just like, retarded? And that only a retarded person would take that seriously, or consider the person saying it a serious person? He has talked about this “infiltration” stuff for years. It would have been very easy, if this was actually your plan, to encourage people to use operational security (op-sec) and ensure that the government doesn’t know who they are. Instead, it’s “show up to this IRL event, follow me on that app where you register with your phone number, and please send me money with your Visa card.”

He is saying “infiltrate the CIA.” Do you believe that he believes that the CIA doesn’t do background checks? Or does he believe the FBI doesn’t create lists of “extremists”? He would have to be very stupid to believe those things. But if he knows those things, and yet he is still saying “get on my right-wing Telegram channel to learn more about how to infiltrate the CIA,” then what exactly is going on?

There is a Lot More to Say (And Say It I Shall)

I mentioned in my last article that the reason I have been publishing less is that I have been working on a new project which will be a podcast, or perhaps more of a TV show. What I have realized is that my role should be analyzing this alternative media that has become the mainstream media. That is where I belong now. The best way I can communicate the truth of things is by showing you where these people are lying. Fuentes is the man of the hour, but all of these alternative media people are rats. I watch these shows, and the amount of lies is simply incredible. It’s virtually all video media, so I need to be on video, so I can show you these videos and break it all down.

I want to do this right. So I’m taking my time. The goal is to have the show put together on or before Valentine’s Day, which marks a year since I quit the daily news. I’m putting together a team. I don’t want to reveal too much, but it will be a weekly show, primarily focused on deconstructing media narratives. We will probably also do some kind of donation drive to help with the costs of the equipment. I’m not going to do that until everything else is ready to go, and we’ve worked out all the staffing details and so on.

What I plan to do is bring back the energy of the best days of the Daily Stormer, which were those years before Charlottesville, when it was fun. I’m really feeling this energy. I’ll have to learn to be on camera and so on. I’ve started filming myself, started working on my oration.

I don’t intend to stop writing. I will write less than I did, but more than I have been in the last few months. For the last few months, I’ve been focused on this project, and until it’s done, you can assume that the less I’m writing, the better it’s going. After we get going, I plan to write a long piece based on the show’s notes before we do the weekly stream, so there is a written accompaniment when I post the show that will include all of the sources I am using, and comments on the topics. Writing is a big part of how I think, so preparing for the show, I will write a kind of outline for the show, published alongside it.

Along with that, I will no doubt publish various other articles during the week.

Right now, I am writing a lot about the show, as I try to work out exactly what I want it to be. But aside from being classic Stormer type anti-media media, I know I want it to be fun. I know I want it to be a Saturday Night Parasocial Spectacular, where I get together with all of my parasocial friends and we drink and vape and talk shit together. But it’s also going to be very structured, and not a “live stream” or a “podcast” but a real show, with significant planning, not some “just chatting” slop with superchats.

I’ve been going in all different directions over the last nine months, working through what I want to do on the next leg of my career, and this is definitely it. And I am going to be very surprised if anyone is disappointed. Well. Without giving too much away, some people will be shocked and confused, particularly those who were not around for the pre-August, 2017 Stormer.

I know most of you are not checking the site very often anymore, because there hasn’t been much content. I am going to set up on Nostr, which is a new (or rather, newly working) uncensorable Twitter clone. We might try some other socials. But I think Nostr is going to be big, and it’s a good place to make our basecamp.

I keep getting frustrated that I didn’t think of this months ago so I could be up and running now for all this weird shit that is going on with these podcasts. Clearly, this article you have just read would have been a lot better as a video. But I needed the time. And I think it is very safe to assume that the weird shit is not going to stop, and we are going to have endless “alternative media” content to analyze.

The Troll Army will be reconstituted and it will be bigger and better and funnier than ever before.

If you are reading this, consider yourself conscripted.

This is the dawn of a new era. My blood is pumping like a machine gun just thinking about it.

Article updated to correct the publication date of the NYT piece on Fuentes.