The wokesters are on the run and patriots are in control. That’s the theme of this day and the rest of my natural life.

I posted a thing yesterday that was way too long and it should have been edited, but it was okay. It really should have been edited. If I would have edited it, it wouldn’t have been repetitive, but I didn’t edit it because I never edit anything, and therefore it was repetitive because I didn’t edit it. Anyway, you can read it if you want, it’s long, everyone says they want more long article.

You can also just read this summary from DeepSeek AI, the leader of all AI:

Here are the key talking points condensed from the article:

1. **Left-Right Divide in America**:
– The Democrat-Republican divide is shaped by “belief clusters,” where strong beliefs on certain issues lead to adopting other beliefs perceived as shared by one’s “team.”
– This divide is uniquely American, though it influences other Western countries. Countries like France have different left-right definitions.

2. **Illogical Belief Clusters**:
– Leftists supporting both Ukraine and Palestine, or conservatives supporting big corporations, are examples of illogical belief clusters driven by manipulation by special interest groups.
– Donald Trump’s rise shifted conservative views, making them more critical of big business and neoconservative policies, while the left became more emotionally driven.

3. **Masculine vs. Feminine Impulses**:
– The divide aligns with masculine (order, hierarchy, authority) and feminine (fairness, harm reduction, nurturing) impulses.
– Men tend to prioritize order and hierarchy, while women lean toward nurturing and fairness, influencing voting patterns.

4. **Core Left and Right Values**:
– Left: Fairness, harm reduction, equity, and utopianism.
– Right: Order, hierarchy, authority, and traditional values.
– These values are deeply rooted in masculine and feminine instincts, respectively.

5. **In-Group vs. Out-Group Dynamics**:
– The right prioritizes in-group loyalty, leading to nationalism and racism, while the left emphasizes fairness and equality, often advocating for global utopianism.
– Immigration debates highlight these dynamics, with the right opposing mass immigration and the left supporting it.

6. **Crime and Punishment**:
– The right prioritizes justice and order, supporting harsh punishments for criminals.
– The left sympathizes with criminals, advocating for restorative justice and viewing them as victims of systemic issues.

7. **Paternalism**:
– The right opposes state paternalism, emphasizing personal responsibility and freedom.
– The left supports state intervention, viewing the government as a nurturing “mother” figure that should regulate behavior for the collective good.

8. **War and Foreign Policy**:
– Conservatives traditionally support wars framed as protecting the homeland or serving justice (e.g., Middle East wars post-9/11).
– Liberals oppose wars that harm innocents, viewing them as bullying weaker nations.
– The Ukraine war saw a reversal, with liberals supporting it due to framing Russia as a fascist threat, while conservatives opposed it as a waste of resources.

9. **Tyranny of the Nanny State**:
– The left’s push for rules and control, such as mask mandates, lockdowns, and vaccine mandates, reflects a feminine impulse to regulate behavior.
– The right rebelled against these measures, emphasizing personal freedom and opposing government overreach.

10. **Censorship and Free Speech**:
– The left supports censorship to protect people from harmful speech, viewing individuals as incapable of processing information responsibly.
– The right opposes censorship, valuing free speech and individual agency.

11. **Women’s Enfranchisement and Tyranny**:
– The article argues that women’s enfranchisement has led to the rise of leftist tyranny, as women’s nurturing and rule-loving instincts dominate public policy.
– The solution proposed is disenfranchising women to restore masculine values and order.

12. **Conclusion**:
– The left-right divide is fundamentally rooted in masculine and feminine instincts, with the left embodying toxic femininity and the right representing masculine order.
– The article suggests that removing women from public life is necessary to restore balance and prevent further tyranny.

This summary captures the main arguments and themes of the article. Let me know if you’d like further clarification or additional details!

Great summary.

No wonder so many are saying “DeepSeek number one!”

By the way – why is it taking so long for politicians/media to call for this site to be blocked because “China is stealing your data for their evil database”?

Anyway, memes…

Editor’s Pick of the Week:

Official Runner-Up:

Primo Collection:

Is Elon acting purely to win back my support after he was crushed by my reporting of his Path of Exile 2 gamer fraud scandal?

It would seem so.

And it’s working…!

RT:

Tech billionaire Elon Musk has made a surprise address at an Alternative for Germany (AfD) campaign event, telling supporters of the right-wing party that Germans should not “focus on past guilt.”

The AfD kicked off its election campaign with a rally in the city of Halle on Saturday, where party leader Alice Weidel promised to deliver hardline anti-immigration policies and end Berlin’s military and financial aid to Kiev.

However, before Weidel took the stage, Musk addressed the 4,500-strong crowd by video link, urging them to reject multiculturalism and to “be proud of German culture [and] German values.”

“Children should not be guilty of the sins of their parents, let alone their great grandparents,” he said, in an apparent reference to Germany’s Nazi past. “There is too much focus on past guilt, and we need to move beyond that,” he added.

That is pretty hardcore. Seriously.

The Jewish narrative for the last 80 years has been that all Germans are forever responsible for turning all of those woke kikes into lampshades and soap.

I gotta give it to Elon on this one. Nothing will ever erase the shame of his gamer fraud, which was much worse than the Holocaust, but he may yet reclaim some sliver of human dignity if he continues on a path of promoting Nazism.

Musk threw his support behind the AfD in December, calling the right-wingers the only party capable of “saving Germany” and praising its anti-immigration stance, while calling Chancellor Olaf Scholz an “incompetent fool.” The SpaceX CEO hosted a livestream with Weidel earlier this month on his X platform, reiterating that “only AfD can save Germany.”

The tech tycoon drew controversy last week, however, when he performed what his critics said was a Nazi salute while addressing supporters of US President Donald Trump in Washington DC. Scholz responded by declaring that freedom of speech in Germany does not extend to “supporting extreme-right positions.”

After Musk’s address, Weidel called on her supporters to “Make Germany Great Again,” a nod to Trump’s “Make America Great Again” campaign slogan.

This context definitely gives context to the Hitler salute he kept doing at the inauguration.

By the way, he obviously did that on purpose. The people defending him are saying “he touched his heart first,” but you do that when you do a Nazi salute.

I support Nazi salutes, so I’m not attacking him over it, but the defense of it is ridiculous and he should have just said “yes, uh, I did that because I think, uh, this, this, this whole obsession with Nazis being, you know, the bad guys, has gotten, it’s gotten really silly, and I think that like we need, we need to reevaluate these claims.”

Regardless: Heil Hitler.

Oh, I’m so shocked that a soy boy faggot was triggered by Trump releasing the J6 hostages!

This isn’t surprising since Little Lindsey contracted the woke mind virus from a rimjob at the Bohemian Grove.

The only hostages Little Lindsey wants released are the woke Jew hostages being held by Hamas patriots!

RT:

US Senator Lindsey Graham has criticized President Donald Trump’s decision to pardon individuals convicted of violent offenses during the January 6, 2021 Capitol attack, warning that it could have long-term consequences.

Pardoning people who attacked police officers sends “the wrong signal to the public at large,” Graham told CNN on Sunday.

Oh, pity the woke soy-nigger cops!

One of them spilled his pumpkin spice soy latte when a patriot smashed his face!

On January 20, Trump signed an executive order granting clemency to around 1,500 individuals connected to the Capitol riot.

…

Graham, a South Carolina Republican and longtime Trump ally, expressed concern over the implications of blanket pardons.

“I don’t like this. I don’t like it on either side. And I think the public doesn’t like it either,” he said.

Graham warned that unrestricted clemency could diminish public trust in presidential powers, adding that “If this continues, if this is the norm, there may be an effort to rein in the pardon power of the president as an institution.”

The public doesn’t like woke faggot boy-rapists.

The public loves bold patriots willing to stand against the triggered soy boy beta cops who are trying to destroy our freedoms in this country.

Real patriots think Lindsey Graham should be the one in prison for engaging in woke gay orgies and supporting the triggered kikes.

Why are there niggers in the German government? Female niggers even?

How can people see this and not think “welp, it looks like Patriot Hitler was right all along about the wokester agenda”?

RT:

A viral song by two Russian schoolgirls, which recently made it into Billboard’s top ten dance hits, has been branded a “Russian trope” used for spreading propaganda on social media by a member of the European Parliament for the Volt Germany party, Nela Riehl.

Riehl, a teacher-turned-politician from Hamburg, addressed the alleged dangers of the song ‘Sigma Boy’ during a session of parliament in December, but her claims did not receive public attention until earlier this week after she posted her speech on Instagram.

“’Sigma Boy’ is a viral Russian trope used on social media, which communicates patriarchal and pro-Russian worldviews,” Riehl claimed, addressing the parliament. She went on to explain that the song is popular with teenagers and is “only one example of Russian infiltration of popular discourse through social media.”

According to Riehl, “Russia has understood how to embed” its ideas into society, and is doing so by targeting young Ukrainians and changing “the stories Ukrainians are telling their own society” through influencers and viral tropes, such as ‘Sigma Boy’, apparently.

“Last week, Ukraine’s minister of culture pointed out to me that cultural heritage does not only include history books and also museums, but Ukrainian language, music and also current Ukrainian influencers. Russia targets this all,” she said, calling on the EU “to stand in strong support and target even these subtle infiltrations and falsifications.”

She’s from Ghana:

Niggers are so woke, the only thing they care about is trying to change the weather. That is, when they’re not robbing you – or dancing.

That is what this wokester is really upset about: patriot Russians being much better dancers than repulsive niggers.

Just compare the girl who sings the song to your average African.

She’s calling for the song to be banned!

The viral Russian song “Sigma Boy” is about to be banned in Europe.

German politician Nela Riehl says that with the help of the song Russia has figured out how to introduce “patriarchal and pro-Russian worldviews” into society pic.twitter.com/WvQghK5x2l

— Anatolij Sharij (@anatoliisharii) January 26, 2025

The nigger was too triggered to explain why this song is a “Russian trope,” but it’s clear that wokesters just hate all Russians and say anything related to Russia is bad.

Wokesters, niggers and Jews alike, are all against Russia because Russians are patriots fighting against the woke mind virus.

Patriot scientists have shown that not even Trump’s warped vaccine can cure the woke mind virus in an infected nigger. This is why niggers must be forced to return to Africa where they can be woke in their precious piles of garbage.

The wokesters are crapping their little lace panties as the patriot Mel Gibson won the top spot at the box office with his film “Flight Risk.”

The film, a thriller starring Mark Wahlberg and that guy who played Venom in the third Sam Raimi Spider-Man film, is also causing patriots to awaken from their slumber, fitting in with patriot president Donald Trump’s slogan “Awake – Not Woke!”

Reviewers are giving the film negative reviews, but that is only because they know it is redpilling people. The “reviewers” are a bunch of woke kikes who are easily triggered by facts and logic.

Mel Gibson was virtually banned from Hollywood after he tried to redpill the cops on woke Jews while drunk at a traffic stop. Flight Risk is the first film he’s directed since 2016’s “Hacksaw Ridge.”

Gibson was recently appointed by President Patriot to root out the woke kikes in Hollywood and make entertainment safe for America once again. He will be working with Sylvester Stallone and that guy who got sodomized in Deliverance to deliver a knuckle sandwich to wokesters.

Mel will need to make a blacklist of woke Jews so they cannot continue to turn everyone into trannies with their bluepilled woke slop.

It’s a big task, but Mel and Sly and that guy who got raped in Deliverance are true fighters, and if anyone can stop the kike wokester agenda, it’s them.

Remember to go see Flight Risk for your daily dose of redpills.

As they say, a redpill a day keeps the Jews away!

HOLY COW! President Trump just gave Democrat Congressman Brad Sherman a verbal beatdown after Sherman tried to defend FEMA.

"They're doing a good job for us here… when you have a disaster this size, you need to be able to deploy thousands of people, which they've been able to… pic.twitter.com/RfwhmsFJWl

— George (@BehizyTweets) January 25, 2025

Patriot President Donald Trump was forced to lay the smack down on a woke kike who got triggered by plans to dismember FEMA like Jeffrey Dahmer dismembered teen boys.

Trump attended a press conference in California to condemn the wokesters in the state for burning the whole place up with their DEI niggermania policies. The Jew California Congressman Brad Sherman got triggered, and started whining like a soy boy beta cuck.

Patriot President explained to the weaselly Jew wokester that FEMA is a terrible waste of money and doesn’t do anything, and he’s cutting it. Sherman, who is a big supporter of the DEI niggermania agenda, simply stood in shock as he got redpilled with facts and logic.

Many compared the event to the Holocaust, when the patriot leader Adolf Hitler turned sixty bazillion Jews into furniture and cleaning products, with one poster saying of Trump’s response: “Oh, snap! That wokester just got lampshaded worse than his grandfather did in Auschwitz. This is what it looks like when patriots are in control, folks.”

Another patriot wrote: “These ratfaced kike terrorists are all a bunch of triggered snowflakes, and they are literally shaking as soon as an alpha male starts redpilling them.”

Sherman won’t forget this, and he will probably try to take revenge on patriots. However, it’s not clear what he can even do, since he’s already flooded California with niggers and woke policies encouraging child faggots to become normal. His website says he wants “vibrant” woke faggots everywhere and he wants them to have free access to small children.

Patriots are in control of America, but Colombia is still run by woke niggers who don’t want their filth returned to them.

Trump will turn Colombia into Gaza.

Colombia thought it was a good strategy to go woke, now they’re going to go broke!

New York Post:

President Trump vowed to launch a trade war with Colombia and impose an “emergency 25% tariff” on Sunday after the South American country turned back two US military deportation flights. 

“I was just informed that two repatriation flights from the United States, with a large number of Illegal Criminals, were not allowed to land in Colombia,” Trump wrote Sunday.

“This order was given by Colombia’s Socialist President Gustavo Petro, who is already very unpopular amongst his people,” he said, adding that Petro’s decision has “jeopardized the National Security and Public Safety of the United States.”

In response, Trump said he would enact the “emergency 25% tariffs on all goods coming into the United States” — and claimed he’d raise it to 50% in a week.

He also called for a travel ban, visa revocations on Colombian government officials, visa sanctions on party members and government supporters, enhanced customs and border protection inspections of any Colombian national and banking and financial sanctions.

Brutal!

Everyone is going to suffer the same fate if they will not take back their scum.

They can kill them or enslave them when they get home, but we’re not keeping them here.

We have enough wokeness with the women in this country, we can’t be having woke niggers from some other country running around like soy beta cucks.

America’s left-right divide, which would be better described as the Democrat-Republican divide, is somewhat convoluted. People have what are called “belief clusters”; this is a phenomenon where people who feel very strongly about some series of issues will develop other beliefs based on the fact that they perceive that people “on their team” share these beliefs.

The structure of these clusters is fundamentally American. While they are shared in a large part by other Western countries, that is simply due to American influence. Countries with less American influence culturally, such as France, have a rather different definition of the left-right divide, while someone like Nigel Farage in the UK is effectively a carbon copy of an American conservative (Farage is somewhat more liberal on social issues, but we’re going to be doing broad strokes here).

It is clearly illogical that a leftist would root for both the Ukraine and Palestine, given that the Ukraine and Israel are both proxies for a globalist Western hegemony. Just so, it is illogical that a “small government conservative” would support massive corporations partnering with the government to crush the middle class. But Russia and Israel have been packaged together as “white oppressors,” and multinational corporations writing US government regulations has been packaged as “free enterprise.” Positions have shifted some because of the rise of Donald Trump, and this has been generally positive for the right. Conservatives have become more critical of big business and the “Project America” empire-building strategies of the neoconservatives. Meanwhile, in response to Trump, the left has entered into a hysterical tailspin, acting purely on emotion and developing positions that would not make sense to the historical left.

However, despite the seemingly arbitrary clustering (which is in fact not arbitrary but based on manipulation by special interest groups), there is an underlying identity to both left and right. Excluding some strange outliers, you can follow logically why each side believes what it does, and when an issue pops up, it’s not difficult to determine which side of it people will fall on. Clearly, leftists were going to support BLM and coronavirus brutality, while rightists would be against these things.

Simply, the underlying divide between the two sides is based on masculine vs. feminine impulses. Although he doesn’t frame it in those terms, you can find a good analysis of the thinking of right and left in Jonathan Haidt’s book “The Righteous Mind.” Haidt lists six moral concerns that people feel intrinsically, and provides documentation showing that politically liberal people drastically prioritize fairness and harm-reduction over loyalty, authority, sanctity, and liberty. Conversely, conservatives care about these things much more equally, while slightly prioritizing all of them over fairness.

The divide lines up between masculine and feminine impulses rather neatly. Women tend to be nurturing and largely disregard harsh realities (men who have feminine traits tend to follow women on this), while men understand that the world isn’t fair and you need authority based on hierarchy in order to maintain order. Support of stricter social norms is also in line with a prioritization of order. Certainly, voting patterns show this, with women always voting more in favor of socialist and utopian type policies and men endorsing more traditional concepts of social and economic order. Married women tend to vote conservatively, while men raised by single mothers (or weak/absent fathers) tend to lean left.

The entire modern left-right divide is only possible because of the enfranchisement of women. The end of this project is necessarily absolute tyranny.

Natural Left and Right Positions

There are core issues which the left and right will always hold naturally, based on these primary feminine and masculine impulses each side has. All of these issues are ones that do not require any facts to understand, and can be understood purely based on an immediate emotional reaction to the thing. (As we will explain below, if the issue is complicated and requires facts to grasp it, marketing campaigns can be launched to create angles and convince either side to support anything.)

Innate masculine values are embodied in religion. “Justice, Truth, and Beauty” are often listed as the highest moral values in the Christian religion, and this would be the case for all major religions the world over, excluding Hinduism and Judaism (the latter is not really a “major religion,” but rather a small, fringe cult that is only major in the sense of its global influence, which is greater than that of all other religions combined). Note that while Buddhism is often portrayed in the West as a lovey-dovey religion with feminine values, this is plain nonsense drummed up by the likes of the fake philosopher and scam artist Alan Watts as well as other 1960s-era perverts. However, the fetishization of Hinduism by the hippies (the hippies representing peak feminine values) was on-point, as Hinduism is a religion that denies the objectivity of truth and celebrates the ego. Excluding the cult of the Dalai Lama, most Christians would agree with the underlying moral framework of Buddhism. The same would be true of Islam or Confucianism, if the underlying values were to be separated from their cultural contexts.

While the hippies dabbled in “Eastern Mystic” nonsense, atheism became the de facto religion of the left, as atheism is purely a celebration of the self and a denial of all natural order and authority. In the atheist moral framework, higher values are replaced with ostensibly utilitarian notions. Justice is replaced with “equity,” truth is replaced with “lived experience,” and beauty is replaced with “individual preference” and “perception.” It is all just vapid egoism, which is the defining character of the feminine spirit.

We will go through a few simple examples of things that are innate to each orientation.

In-Group Prioritization

The right will always view things in terms of in-group and out-group, which naturally leads to racism and nationalism. Conversely, the left, with their extreme prioritization of fairness, believes that all people on earth are the same, and therefore if one group is more successful, they should be punished for that success in order to level the playing field.

After the Reagan Revolution, it was primarily the Republican Party that was pushing for mass immigration, claiming that this would be good for the economy because it was good for mega-corporations. However, during the Bush years, the immigrants were still ghettoized, and it was rare that suburban whites ever even saw them, so the in-group defense mechanism had not yet triggered. During the Obama years, it became visibly clear that the country was being overwhelmed with foreigners, which led to a massive backlash against immigration by the right. Unfortunately, the right is still afraid of being called “racist,” and most will not say “we don’t want these people here because they’re a different race.” However, the Elon Musk H-1B debacle has really opened up some room for the right to define what it means to be American, and the answer to that is going to have to be: “a European person or I guess an African descendent of slaves, although that second group is different.”

Jews have gotten away with effectively claiming to be part of the in-group of whites by visibly looking similar to whites and by pressing the ridiculous and totally emotionalized falsehood that there is something called “Judeo-Christian.” The opposition of right-wing whites to being called “racist” is simply extended from the fact that while they don’t prioritize “fairness” as the highest value, they do think it is important. Rightists also prioritize personal agency, and therefore want to avoid judging people on immutable characteristics. However, it is not long ago that right-wing whites were aggressive in their declaration that their in-group was a racial category, so I am certain we will get back to this point in the near future.

I am very thankful for Vivek Ramaswamy denouncing whites as pathetic losers. Ramaswamy was viewed by right-wingers as being “us” because although he didn’t look like us, he talked like us and seemed to value the same things we value. When he then claimed that Indians are superior to white people, everyone immediately recognized him as “not us,” and surely made the connection with his visual appearance. This is a huge step in the right direction.

Ben Shapiro as a member of the “Jewish right” and his media corporation “Daily Wire” are really the only remaining relevant forces in political culture still pushing the idea that “America is a series of ideas.” Right-wingers, being supporters of order and the sanctity of natural hierarchy, do not typically have an affinity for abstract notions of identity and are going to default to “blood and soil” nationalism. “Nation of ideas” is a concept without any intrinsic meaning, without any hard reality behind it, and therefore it is something that will appeal to the feminine nature of the left, as they can nihilistically imagine that it means whatever emotions they are feeling at any particular time.

The left also believes that they are tasked with spreading equality to all people on earth, and building a global utopia that transcends in-groups completely, a world where everyone is exactly equal to everyone else; the purest form of fairness. This utopianist theory posits that everyone will live in peace and never suffer harm. Because whites have tended to have a higher standard of living historically (although that isn’t really true now, it’s a lingering perception), the left does not think it is enough to raise up brown people, and must also drag down whites (and increasingly Asians) in pursuit of this utopia.

The Objectivity of Crime and Punishment

The right-wing or masculine-oriented mind will always prioritize order based on hierarchy, and therefore they will always have a strong sense of justice. This means that they will not have a particular sympathy for criminals.

The leftist agenda to turn criminals into victims has gotten very extreme in recent years, with such concepts as “restorative justice” being put forward (and acted upon) to make the argument that black people should not be punished in the same way as whites. However, this attitude of “sympathy for criminals” goes back to the introduction of the “insanity defense,” which allowed criminals to claim they are not fully responsible for their crimes because they have mental problems. The companion of lessening a punishment because of the criminal’s personal problems is the federal “hate crimes enhancement,” which says you are committing a worse crime if you do it while feeling a certain emotion (this allows whites to be targeted and punished more severely).

For right-minded people, a crime should be punished the same across the board, as creating these modifiers turns justice into something subjective, when it should be objective. This largely bypasses the inane academic debate over whether consequences for crime should be punitive or a deterrent. It should obviously be both, but justice is an end in and of itself.

When the George Floyd fiasco happened, many on the right were doing events in support of the cops. This was natural enough, given that the left was claiming that there shouldn’t be any cops (they’ve memory-holed it now, but that was actually the argument being made at the time). However, the right is not associated purely with cop-worship, and is always prone to supporting vigilantism when it appears that the cops and the larger justice system are not working.

Daniel Penny, the man whole subdued and choked out a violent black on the New York subway, was universally supported by the right, as was Kyle Rittenhouse, who shot several violent antifa members at a BLM protest, while the justice system that attempted to prosecute these two was viewed as acting tyrannically against justice. Luigi Mangione was more controversial on the right, though many viewed his killing of a criminal insurance boss as justified (while Ben Shapiro was out defending insurance companies).

The pro-authority impulse among the right can be twisted into supporting tyrannical behavior, as it was after 9/11, when most conservatives supported giving unnatural and abusive policing powers to the federal government.

Currently, the left is giving large support to the federal cops and intelligence agencies as they view them as working to help oppressed groups and prevent authoritarianism. This is the result of a major campaign by the media to highlight members of the FBI, CIA, NSA and other federal agencies as anti-racists opposed to the patriarchy. Given that the federal cops have never really promoted natural and objective ideas of justice, it is logical enough that they find their support base among the left.

Paternalism (Which Should Really be Called “Maternalism,” Frankly)

While pro-order and therefore pro-authority, the masculine mind has strong inclinations towards personal responsibility and man’s personal agency. The nature of hierarchy demands competition, and therefore individuals must be responsible for themselves. This leads to strong beliefs about the importance of personal freedom, and opposition to state paternalism.

The feminine left on the other hand believes that the government should be a kind of “mommy” figure, taking care of the population as if they are children. When women first got the right to vote, the first three things they did were ban prostitution, child marriage, and alcohol. The alcohol thing didn’t stick (even while it is heavily regulated, including a lunatic age restriction and “drunk driving” tyranny), but prostitution and child marriage remain illegal. Leftists have also pushed for seat belts, motorcycle helmets, forced insurance, smoking restrictions, vaccination mandates, the pension system, and the entire welfare state.

Right-wingers tend to react negatively to any program that seeks to tell individuals what they are allowed to do in their own lives if those choices are not impacting others.

The absurdity of the left’s pro-abortion slogan “my body, my choice” was put on full display a few years ago when they pushed for vaccine mandates. The left has never believed that a person’s body is their own, and the slogan was designed to sell the idea to people based on an appeal to notions of personal liberty. Again, the first thing women did once enfranchised was use the state to regulate what people were allowed to do with their bodies. On a basic level, women do not respect personal autonomy, because they operate on maternal instincts and when politically enfranchised, treat everyone like little children. When a woman “nags” a man, that is fundamentally what she is doing: attempting to correct his behavior as she would correct a child reaching to touch a hot stove. The entirety of women’s political behavior amounts to a state-level nagging operation with the purpose of controlling other people’s bodies.

The rightist instinct to defend personal liberty was bastardized when the government/media pushed for legalizing homosexuality, which should have triggered right-wing notions of sanctity and purity, but was overwritten by the drive for individual freedom. Given that it is now clear that homosexuality is not a “victimless crime,” this is all being reevaluated. It would have been clear that normalizing homosexuality would infringe on children if people had looked at the data, and many Christian groups were spreading that data at the time, but the data is always irrelevant when it comes to public opinion on literally anything. It had to become obvious that homosexuals are predators before anyone would understand it.

The opposite happened with child marriage, where individual liberty was overwritten by a false sense of the sacred and pure. Leftists have successfully argued that child marriage violates the purity of girls, and therefore most right-wingers are opposed to it. The data shows that girls being sent by their fathers into early, often arranged or semi-arranged marriages, leads to happy families, while allowing a girl to go around having sex with whoever she wants leads to suffering for the girl and ultimately a total collapse of society. But that data is not relevant to the political discourse. (While the right has begun to reverse on the homosexuality issue, it might be a while before people are willing to question core feminist doctrines designed to create a sexual utopia for women.)

Arbitrary Left and Right Positions: Opposition and Support for Various Wars

Political instincts are based on the masculine-feminine dichotomy, but the masses are not particularly clued-in on very much, and therefore when the issue is in any way complex and requires facts to understand it, marketing campaigns can be used to sell them various things based on these underlying drives.

Edward Bernays, the nephew of Sigmund Freud, became known as “the father of public relations” after he developed a method to use psychological techniques to appeal to the base drives of humans in order to sell them products. (There is a good documentary series about this called “Century of Self,” which I highly recommend.) All marketing is designed to appeal to various drives, and in theory, anyone can be sold anything if the marketer is good enough at his job.

Let us consider the political divide in relation to the base of support for various wars through the lens of how they were marketed, as this is likely the easiest place to analyze how simple it is for the government/media to convince either side of anything not grounded entirely in an immediate and instinctive reaction by using a framing that appeals to their base orientation.

If we exclude the evangelical-Zionist obsession with Israel (which is a big and largely separate issue, which I will touch on later), the Middle East wars were sold to conservatives on the basis of a need to protect the homeland from strange foreigners who want to hurt our people. They were also sold as revenge for 9/11. Self-defense, hostility towards out-groups, and serving justice to enemies are all concepts you would view as masculine.

Liberals were largely opposed to the Middle East wars, because they viewed them as harming people. Obviously, all war harms people, but they were opposed to the idea of innocents being caught up in the violence. Women and feminine-minded men take a very nurturing view of brown people, who they view as less capable of defending themselves and therefore in need of protection. They viewed the wars in the Middle East as bullying type behavior by a strong force against a much weaker one.

There was also masculine-oriented opposition to the Middle East conflicts, represented by the Ron Paul movement. The framing there was that America was wasting resources on wars that didn’t benefit Americans and we weren’t even getting revenge against the people who did 9/11. It was also consistently pushed that the government was using the wars as an excuse take away people’s personal liberties. “Neoconservative” was largely understood to mean “Jew,” and it was put forward that we were fighting wars for an out-group. However, all of this required an intellectual analysis of the situation, which meant that it couldn’t ever be a popular position, because in a universal suffrage democracy, everything in the popular mind must necessarily be reduced to base emotions largely disconnected from facts. The masses of people do not have the time or the inclination to understand anything beyond the surface level, and they will generally go along with whatever they hear from the people in the media who they agree with on things they understand better, to wit, “Rush Limbaugh is right about the Democrats and the gays, so he must be right about these Middle East wars.”

Before the Middle East wars, conservatives viewed Russia/communism as a legitimate physical threat, a superpower that had the capacity to take over the world. While this also lines up with masculine impulses, it is fundamentally different than the reasons for supporting the Middle East wars. Russians didn’t look different, which made them less offensive to the in-group prioritizing mind than Middle Easterners, but the fact that Russia could realistically win a war against America made the conflict appealing to conservative Americans.

While leftists might not all have outright supported communism (although many did), they largely opposed the Cold War mentality, and certainly opposed the various proxy wars, most notably Vietnam, which flared up during the Cold War. There was the same pity for the Vietnamese as “weaker,” and the general sentiment about the Cold War was that “we should all just get along,” the schoolmarm type impulse that women have. (Women will always try to prevent competition between boys, while men will typically encourage it, even when it can involve physical harm. Women’s attitude towards war is often based on viewing both sides as little boys who should stop fighting on the playground.)

Fast forward to the Ukraine war, and things had flipped, with the liberals aggressively supporting it and conservatives largely viewing it as a pointless waste. There were various political variables involved, and it simply came down to the powerful people who wanted this war realizing that they should focus the marketing for the war on liberals rather than the conservatives who had traditionally been the war-supporting type.

Though the marketing campaign ultimately did come down to appealing to leftist “fairness and harm reduction” emotional motivations, this was not initially obvious, and it clearly could have gone either way. When Barack Obama was running against Mitt Romney, he mocked the Republicans for claiming Russia was a threat, saying “the 1980s called and they want their foreign policy back” (“X called and wants Y back” was a popular joke template after the turn of the millennium). Baby Boomers remembered the Cold War, and could have at that time been convinced to view Russia as a threat, which Romney tried to do. However, when Trump became popular, and was seen as a real threat to the establishment, the left began pushing the idea that he was in league with the Russians. This whole thing appears to have originated with the neoconservative Bill Kristol, who initially commissioned the “dirty dossier” about Trump, which was later handed off to the Clinton campaign. Obviously, Trump was despised by the left, who viewed his masculine persona as representing all of the things they oppose, and through this marketing campaign, Vladimir Putin and all of Russia were classified by the left as part of a “fascist alliance” that opposed homosexuality, feminism, and other leftist values based on fairness and caring for the weak.

Because of the way things had already been framed since 2015, by 2022, the left was very ready to support a war against Russia, so this is where the bulk of the marketing campaign for the war was focused (note that much of this leftist anti-Russia material was also spread during the State Department-backed revolution in the Ukraine in 2014). The Ukraine was framed, almost entirely falsely, as a bastion of leftist values, including homosexuality, feminism, and multiculturalism, under threat from a very bad masculine culture which sought to enforce draconian Christian authoritarianism on them. Putin and Trump were effectively the same person in the minds of Democrat voters. While the left may tend to oppose violence, the claim by the people marketing the war was that Putin was trying to exterminate everyone in the Ukraine and therefore the only option was for them to “defend themselves.” The fact that it was the Ukraine that started the war all the way back in 2014 was not relevant, because again, facts are never especially relevant to these narratives.

There was (and to some extent still is) an attempt by right-wing politicians and media organs to sell the Ukraine war as an extension of the Cold War, presenting Russia as a real threat to America in the same way the USSR was. However, most people on the right took the masculine view that what happens in the Ukraine is none of our business and we shouldn’t be wasting our national treasure on it while creating unnecessary conflict with a foreign nation that should be an ally. The fact that the marketing for the war had been so focused on the Ukraine being a homosexual and feminist “democracy” country, and Russia being a Christian patriarchy, also effectively made this particular war impossible to sell to conservatives.

Finally, the new wars in the Middle East, started by the Jewish state of Israel, have created a situation where both the right and left are reverting to the positions they held after 9/11. This is a nauseating development, as it seems it could destroy all of the progress that was made with MAGA and the opposition to foreign wars that was created by that movement. Trump’s masculine arguments against wars basically hinged on the fact that America is already the most powerful country in the world and therefore any war is a waste of our time and money, and people in wars all over the world should be expected to deal with their own problems, as none of it has anything to do with us. But the Israel issue has flipped that entire narrative on its head.

What’s more: Ben Shapiro and others on the “Jewish right” in America have taken this opportunity to push leftist-style thinking onto the right. Much of the propaganda involved in the marketing campaign for Israel’s wars has to do with Israel being a helpless victim which needs to be protected. What’s more, the “Jewish right” has successfully called for censorship and “canceling” of people who oppose the war, with feminine-oriented claims about how “speech hurts people.” Senator Josh Hawley, an “AIPAC Republican,” successfully lobbied for the Congressional TikTok ban based on the claim that “China” was allowing Americans to see images of what Israel is doing to people in Palestine.

The reason that the right is endorsing Israel’s war, and calling for the US to do more to help Israel slaughter people, is that the Jews have successfully campaigned to make conservatives believe that Israel is effectively a part of America, that they are members of our in-group and therefore we should consider an attack on Israel as an attack on America. Further, Moslems are always going to be viewed as an extreme “out-group” due to their vastly different culture and physical appearance.

It is certainly frustrating to see the American right sliding back into this neoconservative mindset, but it’s simply obvious that it would be just as difficult to convince them that Israel is no different than the Ukraine as it would be to convince a leftist that the Ukraine is no different than Israel. There is a timeline on which the right would be supporting the Ukraine and the left supporting Israel. The Ukraine war could have been sold as the return of the USSR and a threat to the American homeland, and therefore supported by the right, and Israel’s wars could have been sold as a group of feminists and homosexuals defending against barbarous Islamofascists, and thus supported by the left. The views people develop on these “complex” issues involving facts are based on the nature of the marketing campaigns pushed by the government/media.

Women’s Love for Rules Manifest as Tyranny

Political leftism has become tyrannical, and although Trump might be a bright patch on a dark road, it is clear that we are destined to live under a complete tyranny if things continue on as they have been going.

Another important aspect of feminine nature is that it is geared towards consensus building. This is a function of the way women naturally interact with one another in a community. Anyone who has observed women’s behavior knows that they will constantly compliment one another, and they will reach agreements with a kind of hive mindset. Although women have low respect for masculine notions of establishing order from hierarchy, women are obsessed with control, and obsessed with rules, again as a result of their desire to treat everyone like children. Because women lack an internal moral compass, they do not place a qualitative value on rules, instead simply loving rules for the sake of being able to enforce them. Women will glob onto the established power structure, regardless of what it is.

The “coronavirus pandemic” scam and the extremist paternalism that went along with it was the apotheosis of the nanny state, where women succeeded in being able to treat everyone in society like a little child. The government was able to enforce a dress code in the form of the mask mandates, and able to tell people when they were allowed to play outside through the lockdowns. This kind of attack on basic human freedom, the government locking people inside of their houses ostensibly in order to protect people from themselves, was the most extreme tyranny in all of recorded history and it was only possible due to the feminization of our society.

The masks and lockdown movement then led into a forced vaccination movement. (One can argue that they never actually “forced” anyone to take the vaccine, though that was what many were calling for. But they certainly did coerce people, firing them from their jobs if they refused and restricting their movement in public places.) The obsession with forcing the vaccines on people then led to an alliance between the left and the multinational pharma giant Pfizer. Many noted that the left had previously been strictly opposed to large corporations and the medical industrial complex in particular, but this was another situation where the marketing was key to perception.

The flip-side as we know was that the right rebelled against pharma and the medical industrial complex, and this has led to the right embracing Bobby Kennedy and taking positions similar to those of a 1990s health food hippie lady. We should remember that a few years ago, right-wingers would have had a positive view of pharma, believing marketing campaigns about how these are entrepreneurial companies using the free market to cure disease. As something of a health fooder myself, I view this as a very positive move for the right, and it is interesting that it came about as a direct result of the overreach of the left.

Another example of the brutal rules-mongering of the nanny state was the censorship agenda. People may forget that the original claim regarding the necessity of abolishing the free speech rights of Americans was that if you said mean things on the internet, people would read it and kill themselves. They then claimed that if you were racist on the internet, you would trick people into committing mindless acts of violence. The final big push was related to the pandemic scam, when people were told that if they voiced disagreement with government policy regarding lockdowns, masks, or vaccines, people would die as a result.

The stated ideology behind all of this censorship is that individuals do not have the ability to process information, and therefore words that they read on the internet can possess them and cause them to do things. This is a complete denial of human agency and a denial of free will itself, and it certainly brought into question the core premise of democracy, which claims that everyone in society is a fully actualized individual capable of determining how the government is run. The government and media claimed that mass censorship is necessary for democracy to function. The conclusion you would have to draw there would be that if people cannot objectively look at information and they will make decisions purely based on whatever information is put in front of them, then by censoring everything other than the mainstream media, we are creating a situation where the mainstream media dictates the behavior of the people and the direction of society as a whole.

The coronavirus insanity and the crackdown on the freedom of speech demonstrate toxic femininity manifesting as outright tyranny.

Women’s Enfranchisement Must be Revoked

Having a society which is divided into two halves is patently ridiculous and unsustainable, especially given that one of the two sides is made up of people totally disconnected from reality who lack even a basic interest in understanding what makes a healthy environment in which humans can flourish.

The solution to this problem is obvious: women must be disenfranchised and removed from civil society, or at least from public life. There is no real way around that. Leftism as it exists today is the embodiment of toxic femininity. The men who have these views are a small minority of males, and would be irrelevant if they did not have empowered women fighting alongside them. What’s more, the overwhelming majority of leftist men would not have this disposition if it were not for the empowerment of women making these ideas acceptable.

We also have a system where boys are forced to be controlled and viciously abused by women throughout their entire childhood and well into adolescence. These men then go to live their entire lives as servants to women. The mother is the first tyrant. Even if an American boy has a father in the home, which many do not, the father is almost certainly completely subservient to his wife. Further, schools are packed full of women, and most boys have little to no input from adult men. This ends up breaking many men, causing them to develop a kind of Stockholm syndrome where they identify with their abusers.

When confronted with the truth about the nature of women and how it has shaped our dystopian reality, some on the right will revert to blaming all of these problems on the Jews. While I am personally very comfortable with blaming things on the Jews, people who attempt to blame Jews for the behavior of women are simply incapable of emotionally dealing with the reality of what women will become if you incentivize all of their worst instincts in the way Western society has done.

It’s true that virtually every bad idea on the left or the right originates with the Jews, but Jews are a very small part of the population, and they would not be able to wield the influence they wield if it were not for a large part of the population being willing to go along with them. The primary population that goes along with them is white women. We now have all of these nonwhites in our country, and many of them are willing to vote Democrat and support various agendas, but how did they get into our country in the first place? It is a result of the enfranchisement of women.

No country that has maintained masculine values has opened their borders. It is only white countries and all of these countries are feminist countries where the discourse is totally dominated and directed by women. It was Angela Merkel who opened the gates in Europe and flooded the continent with millions upon millions of poor, violent, useless “refugees.” Recently, Giorgia Meloni in Italy ran on a platform of getting rid of the immigrants (a “right-wing woman”), and she ended up more than quadrupling the amount of new arrivals and has yet to deport anyone.

I have often pointed out that if you look at the pictures of pro-immigrant protests, you will notice that if you only look at whites, at least 9 out of 10 protesters are women. The men who are there generally appear to be husbands or boyfriends that were dragged along, or men who showed up to try to meet women because they know these protests have a more favorable sex ratio than anything else in society.

You’ll see the same thing if it’s a BLM protest, a pro-Ukraine protest, a pro-vax protest, or a protest supporting anything else you hate. Meanwhile, recent large scale protests against immigration in the UK and Ireland, and the Canadian anti-lockdown protests a few years ago, are overwhelmingly male.

Obviously, this should not be surprising if we understand leftism as the embodiment of toxic femininity.

It’s fair enough to say that “not all women think this way.” That is clearly true, but it is also irrelevant. Saying “not all women are toxic supporters of the globalist-Jewish agenda and therefore we should allow them to participate in public society” is like saying “not all blacks are criminals, therefore I’m going to walk around in dark alleys on the South Side of Chicago at night.”

The participation of women in public society, and the way that this has created modern political leftism and triggered a cascading wave of more and more extreme tyranny, is the core of what is happening in the West. This is difficult to confront, because there is no obvious solution to this problem, but it is the truth.

Trump administration just suspended all new foreign aid pending review, per State Department cable leaked to me (1/2) pic.twitter.com/MvE8aNo2XZ

— Ken Klippenstein (@kenklippenstein) January 24, 2025

I’m skeptical about this.

We’ll have to wait and see if it actually happens.

If it does happen, it would just end the war. Without free money from American taxpayers, the Ukraine would have to surrender to Russia very quickly.

The wokies in the Ukraine who are fighting for child sodomy against Russian patriots might still have some juice left in them.

RT:

US Secretary of State Marco Rubio has frozen nearly all aid grants to Ukraine for 90 days, Politico reported on Friday. The move comes after President Donald Trump ordered a full review of all foreign assistance.

Rubio instructed diplomatic and consular posts to issue “stop-work orders” on nearly all “existing foreign assistance awards,” Politico said, citing an internal document.

According to Politico, the order has “shocked” State Department officials and appears to apply to funding for military assistance to Ukraine.

Shocked!

The woke kikes at the State Department were shocked to find out Trump won’t fund their woke tranny war!

The magazine cited three current and two former officials familiar with the matter as saying that Rubio’s guidance means that “no further actions will be taken to disperse aid funding to programs already approved by the US government.”

The BBC, which also reviewed the State Department memo, reported that it appears to “affect everything from development assistance to military aid.”

Although the Pentagon previously told Voice of America that the aid freeze would not affect “security assistance to Ukraine,” Rubio’s memo reportedly only granted exceptions for military aid to Israel and Egypt, without mentioning any other country.

Journalist Ken Klippenstein posted what he said was a copy of Rubio’s guidance, which “pauses all new obligations of funding, pending a review, for foreign assistance programs” funded through the State Department and the US Agency for International Development (USAID).

This has not been officially confirmed.

Foreign aid cuts were originally supposed to exempt the woke Ukraine Jews along with the woke Israeli child murderers (who they claim they are murdering to stop homophobia).

But we shall see.

Trump, who recently tried to vaccinate the world against the woke mind virus, also allegedly said that he won’t help the Ukraine rebuild their gay bathhouses and woke vegan cafes.

RT:

US President Donald Trump’s administration is not interested in taking part in the reconstruction of Ukraine after the conflict is resolved, Bloomberg reported on Friday.

Trump’s team has signaled that it doesn’t intend to engage directly in rebuilding the country, suggesting that this responsibility would be handled by the private sector, the outlet said, citing a senior diplomat.

The stance marks a significant shift from the policies of Joe Biden’s administration, which has spent around $100 billion on financial aid and military assistance to Kiev since the escalation of the Ukraine conflict in 2022, and pledged support with the post-conflict reconstruction.

Kiev has ramped up its privatization efforts to draw in foreign capital as it seeks private investors to support the country’s reconstruction. Aleksey Sobolev, Ukraine’s first deputy economy minister, outlined a $500 billion reconstruction initiative aimed at bringing both strategic and financial benefits to Western investors.

“It’s the private sector that’s going to be doing these investments,” Sobolev said on the sidelines of the World Economic Forum in Davos on Thursday, according to Reuters.

“We’re looking at privatizing more. It’s the right time right now to open the bigger companies,” he added.

That means the woke kikes from BlackRock are just going to absorb all of the country’s remaining natural resources.

When these woke tranny neo-Nazis in the Ukraine end up sucked dry, they’re going to wish they would have allowed the Russian patriots to take control of the whole country.

Wow, these are big statements from the patriot president of Russia about the patriot president of America.

It’s looking like patriots are in control, as the woke mind virus goes into recession.

RT:

Russian president Vladimir Putin has said the 2020 US presidential election was “stolen” from Donald Trump, and that had the outcome been declared fairly, the Ukraine conflict might have been avoided. 

“I cannot disagree with him that if he had been president, if his victory hadn’t been stolen in 2020, perhaps the crisis in Ukraine that arose in 2022 wouldn’t have happened,” Putin has said in an interview published by Russia 1 TV journalist Pavel Zarubin on Telegram on Friday.

In 2023 Trump claimed to American radio host Hugh Hewitt that the Ukraine conflict would never have begun if the 2020 US elections hadn’t been “rigged” and Joe Biden hadn’t replaced him in there Oval Office.

“[Putin] would have never done it if the election weren’t rigged, our election. It was rigged and stolen. If that election wasn’t rigged, if I were president, you would right now have millions of people living that are dead,” according to an interview transcript.

Trump would have fixed the woke Jewish rats in Kiev using patriotic exterminationist methods against them.

There was no reason for this war other than Joe Biden’s woke policies, supporting a sickening woke kike and tranny neo-Nazi agenda in the Ukraine, which is actually a part of Russia that had gone rogue.

Patriots would have cleansed the Ukraine, and now they will do that.

Now that Donald Trump has vaccinated the public against the woke mind virus, there are once again a statute of limitations on sexual abuse hoaxes!

Harvey Weinstein didn’t get any statute of limitations, because of the woke mind virus.

Harvey tried to fight the woke mind virus and the court showed everyone pictures of his deformed penis.

Now the woke mind virus has been vaccinated against by Donald Trump’s new Operation Warp Speed.

The Guardian:

Prosecutors said on Friday that they will not file charges against Marilyn Manson after a years-long investigation of allegations of sexual assault and domestic violence.

The Los Angeles county district attorney, Nathan Hochman, said the allegations were too old under the law and the evidence was not sufficient to charge the 56-year-old shock rocker whose legal name is Brian Warner.

“We have determined that allegations of domestic violence fall outside of the statute of limitations, and we cannot prove charges of sexual assault beyond a reasonable doubt,” Hochman said. “We recognize and applaud the courage and resilience of the women who came forward to make reports and share their experiences, and we thank them for their cooperation and patience with the investigation.”

Nearly four years after the investigation began, the then district attorney, George Gascón, said on 9 October that his office was pursuing new leads that added to the “already extensive” file that authorities had amassed.

LA county sheriff’s detectives said early in 2021 that they were investigating Manson for incidents between 2009 and 2011 in West Hollywood, where Manson lived at the time. The investigation included a search warrant that was served on his West Hollywood home. The case was initially turned over to prosecutors in September 2021, but the Los Angeles county district attorney’s office requested more evidence-gathering and the investigation resumed.

The identities of the women police and prosecutors spoke to were not revealed, but the Game of Thrones actor Esmé Bianco – who sued Manson in a case that has been settled – said she was part of the criminal investigation. Before the decision not to prosecute, she criticized how long the process was taking at a rally for Hochman, who was elected soon after.

This bitch played one of the whores in Game of Thrones, then she dated the BDSM shock rocker guy and gets really surprised he is abusive!

Who cares about that bitch? I wish he would have abused her much worsely!

In 2021 his former fiancee, the Westworld actor Evan Rachel Wood, named him as her abuser for the first time in an Instagram post.

Wood and Manson’s relationship became public in 2007 when he was 38 and she was 19, and they were briefly engaged in 2010 before breaking up.

Oh yes, an age gap, such abuse!

How could she know the extremist was extreme, when she was a mere child of 19 years young?

We need to put these sluts in jail for these hoaxes if we truly want to eradicate the remaining infected cells of the woke mind virus.

They cause all these problems, waste police resources, waste how much money from the people they accuse, then they just walk free with many accolades from the woke establishment?

We have to smash the wokies and we need to start by smashing the sluts who do these rape hoaxes.

I thought the wokie John Bolton was big time on CNN, but instead he’s on a Rumble show it took me some minutes to even locate.

Woke has really gone broke if Bolton can only appear with some Indian leftist no one has ever heard of.

RT:

US President Donald Trump does not want the Ukraine conflict complicating his agenda and may well end up offering Vladimir Putin a peace deal that would make the Russian leader “very happy,” former US national security adviser John Bolton has claimed in an interview with Afshin Rattansi’s show ‘Going Underground’.

Bolton worked for Trump during his first term, but ended up being fired in September 2019 after only 18 months on the job. The US president later described the Republican as a “nutjob” and called his appointment one of his “biggest mistakes.” One of the first things Trump did after his inauguration on Monday was terminate his former adviser’s security detail provided due to alleged threats from Iran.

The new administration in the White House is “bad news” for Kiev, Bolton told Rattansi on Saturday, pointing out that Trump recently “threatened Ukraine with a cutoff of military assistance” if it refuses to talk peace with Russia.

The US president and his team “want a negotiation because as with everything with Trump the world is just a long line of deals. He wants a deal to take this word ‘Ukraine’ off his table. He views it as [former US President Joe] Biden’s war… He wants it over with. He does not want it complicating his agenda,” he said.

Well, that would certainly seem reasonable enough.

If you’re a patriot.

For a wokester, nothing is reasonable.

The possible terms for settling the Ukraine conflict voiced by Vice President J.D. Vance during the campaign look like “a peace plan that could be written in the Kremlin,” the former national security adviser argued.

“I think Putin and the Kremlin would be very happy with the deal where they keep the territory in Ukraine; there is a ceasefire; NATO does not accept Ukraine as a member,” he said.

According to Bolton, Putin “sees Trump as an easy mark, somebody who is susceptible to flattery” and will try to take advantage of the US president’s conviction that “US relations with foreign countries depend on his personal relationship with the head of state.”

Who cares, dickhead?

None of that has shit to do with anything!

These wokesters are so wacky you might as well call them “wacksters.”

Bolton himself went woke because he hates patriots and has the woke mind virus. He wants everyone to be gay and flooded with niggers. He wants to kill all the whites for DEI.

If he wasn’t so woke he would see that woke is a mind virus, and no one likes niggers or gays.

Maybe I should send Bolton a copy of my new shirt.

You can get your own copy of that shirt at http://www.killallniggers.com/merch or pick up one at your local Barnes and Noble.

These woke embassies have been flying wokie “child sodomy” flags and wokie “niggers matter” flags at the embassies, trying to infect the whole world with the woke mind virus.

Now that Trump has vaccinated the world against the woke mind virus, woke child rape and nigger flags will not be flown at these embassies, and we will only have the anti-woke American flag, which stands for white supremacy and the suppression of child homosexuals and all niggers.

The Guardian:

The US Department of State has banned consular posts from flying any flags other than that of the US as part of the Trump administration’s pledge to crack down on diversity efforts in government institutions.

A cable seen by the Guardian titled “One flag policy” appears to target several instances during the Biden administration when gay pride and Black Lives Matters flags were flown at embassies abroad.

Gay pride flags were also on display at the White House during a 2023 Pride month celebration held on the south lawn, sparking a backlash from conservatives.

“Starting immediately, only the United States of America flag is authorized to be flown or displayed at US facilities, both domestic and abroad, and featured in US government content,” the memo read.

We’re not flying child rape flags at the White House anymore.

If people want to sodomize children, they can move to Canada!

We won’t be doing it here anymore because we cured the woke mind virus and now we are going to begin eradicating gays and niggers with rapid brutality.

The woke mind virus turned trannyism into a children’s fashion because woke homosexuals want to rape kids freely by normalizing woke child homosexuals.

There are only TWO genders! Count them – TWO!

The British are now living in Donald Trump’s America and they need to stop molesting children like a bunch of woke triggered snowflakes.

We need to cleanse the woke mind virus from the homosexuals so they stop raping children.

The Guardian:

The number of children and young people in England with a diagnosis of gender dysphoria recorded by a GP has risen fiftyfold over 10 years, researchers have found, though numbers are still relatively small.

The growing number of birth-registered females seeking referrals to gender clinics has raised concerns in recent years, with tensions over how best to tackle gender dysphoria in children resulting in the Cass review last year.

However, much of the previous work was based on referrals to specialist services rather than capturing the situation in primary care – the first port of call for many seeking help.

Now a study by a team that carried out research informing the Cass review has looked at GP records to shed light on trends in the community.

“What we have is the number of children who’ve ever had a diagnosis of something related to gender dysphoria,” said Prof Tim Doran, co-author of the work from the University of York.

Writing in the journal Archives of Disease in Childhood, Doran and colleagues describe how they examined data relating to children and young people aged 18 and under attending GP practices in England between 2011 and 2021, encompassing 3,782 individuals with gender dysphoria or similar diagnoses.

The results, based on data from about 20% of GP practices, show both the rates of incidence – the number of new cases each year – and the prevalence of such diagnoses rose over the decade.

Let’s just hope the doctors kept all the titties they cut off of these teenage girls and can sew them back on now that Donald Trump cured the woke mind virus.

The prevalence increased from about one in 60,000 in 2011 (equating to 192 children and young people nationally) to about one in 1,200 in 2021 (equating to 10,291 nationally) – more than a fiftyfold increase.

The team said that from 2015, prevalence rose more quickly among children recorded as female on their health records, ending up about twice as high as for recorded males by 2021.

Doran said among 17- and 18-year-olds, the prevalence of gender dysphoria was about one in 238 in 2021.

…

The study showed that over the entire 10-year period, under 5% of children and young people with gender dysphoria also had a record of a prescription for puberty suppressing hormones while 8% had a record of a prescription for masculinising or feminising hormones.

Is anyone going to go to prison for this?

Apparently, no.

Donald Trump should sign an executive order sending these British doctors to prison for doing all of this woke child homosexual abuse.

We don’t need this in our schools.

Donald Trump is trying to vaccinate the world against the woke mind virus, but the Europeans are having a negative reaction to the vaccine and having woke myocarditis from the DNA changes caused by this Warp Speed vaccine against wokeness.

Now these wokies in Europe are claiming that women don’t have to have sex with their husbands.

Do women have to do anything in the woke world?

The Guardian:

A woman who refuses to have sex with her husband should not be considered “at fault” by courts in the event of divorce, Europe’s highest human rights court has said, condemning France.

The European court of human rights (ECHR) sided on Thursday with a 69-year-old French woman whose husband had obtained a divorce on the grounds that she was the only person at fault because she had stopped having sexual relations with him.

The ECHR held, unanimously, that there had been a violation of the woman’s right to respect for private and family life as part of the European convention on human rights.

What about the human rights of men to have sex?

What wokie wookie wrote this law?

The woke kikes?

It ruled against France, saying a woman who refuses to have sex with her husband should not be considered “at fault” by courts in the event of divorce.

The court identified the woman only by the initials HW, saying she lived in Le Chesnay in the western suburbs of Paris. The woman did not contest the divorce, which she had also sought, but rather complained about the grounds on which it had been granted by a French court.

The Strasbourg-based ECHR said any concept of marital duties needed to take into account “consent” as the basis for sexual relations.

“The court concluded that the very existence of such a marital obligation ran counter to sexual freedom, [and] the right to bodily autonomy,” a court statement said. “The applicant’s husband could have petitioned for divorce, submitting the irretrievable breakdown of the marriage as the principal ground, and not, as he had done, as an alternative ground.”

Woke women are refusing to have children, and the governments are complaining about that and offering them endless bribes and meanwhile they are so woke they won’t enforce men’s right to sex!

The woke mind virus is going to obliterate Europe and then people will realize that woke was wrong and they will realize patriots were right for forcing women to have sex.