It’s meme time, friends.

But first, the promised preview of what is to come next week, when you will get some serious analysis, which is going to hold up very well. I am in high confidence mode.

Tucker-Vance Showdown ’28 Preview Section

I promised to start leaking details of my analysis of Tucker Carlson’s 2028 scheme in these meme posts. And this, verily, I shall do. To start with, we need to consider the basic fact that Tucker Carlson is a “friend” of “JD Vance.” He is using Vance and Vance is using him. They both need each other right now.

The thing is, Vance is going to be required to run on Trump’s record, which is going to be a nightmarish thing come 2027. It is already nightmarish. We have no money. We are doing all of these wars. None of the immigrants are getting deported. Nothing that anyone voted for is happening.

MI6 is, at least officially, refusing to help Trump blow up these boats off the coast of Venezuela, given that there is no evidence there are drug dealers on them, and the survivors are saying they are fishermen. Maybe some of them are running drugs, but they’re not running them to America; that is impossible in these boats. Vance says “I don’t give a shit who we kill.” Like that Misfits song. The media is like “but who was that guy you killed?” and Vance is like “It doesn’t matter much to me as long as he’s dead.”

That’s a small issue, apparently, because Americans don’t care about killing random people. But it is goofy. Just like all of the rest of this stuff. The wars are big goofy, the dumb deportation strategy is big goofy, the tariffs are big goofy. None of this stuff is stuff anyone wants to run on. Tucker doesn’t have this baggage. And he’s the anti-Israel guy, who doesn’t have to talk out of seven sides of his fat mouth when trying to explain why the US is joined at the hip with Israel.

Tucker will drive the knife in Vance’s back, for the sake of America (and, incidentally, his own legacy). This is going to be awesome.

I don’t trust Tucker. But I don’t trust anyone but myself. And frankly, the extent to which I trust myself is quite limited. But Tucker is older than Vance, he is about six million times more charismatic, he doesn’t have baggage, he is a viable candidate. Vance is not viable. Tucker might not even have to knife him. Vance, as power hungry as he is, might be willing to step aside and try to get a cabinet position in Tucker’s admin.

Oh, and we’re going to need a very big section on how it is even possible for Tucker to get elected, given election fraud. Of course, Tucker is young enough and clever enough that if he got robbed, he might do January 6 but real. Of course then he could just be assassinated.

But the other thing about Tucker is: unlike Trump, I do not think he has all this weird sex stuff.

Speaking of weird sex stuff, Trump is now supporting Congress releasing the Epstein files, after he tried to go to war with Marjorie and literally called her a traitor. That was very disgusting. He is purposefully burning his brand. It’s just unbelievable. He had the top brand, and then he’s like “lemme go ahead and just light this shit on fire.”

I think Tucker should pick Marjorie as his running mate.

Sure, elections are fake, but this could create massive chaos. It could be awesome.

The Epstein files are just going to be endless black “redacted” lines. Guaranteed.

This is the goofiest of the goofy, when Trump can release this at any time, then he calls up all these congressmen, including Lauren Boebert, and tries to convince them to help him cover it up. Then he fails. Then he says he supports Congress releasing it. And it’s like bro, if you support it, why don’t you just release it, instead of forcing Congress to force you to release it?

What is going on?

Why is this all so goofy and weird?

Anyway, I’m really burned out. I was traveling. Then I tried to work on some shit and fell asleep at the desk. I think my arm might be permanently crippled. I was at a meeting and my eyes kept drooping. They put me in a taxi.

Then I fell asleep in the taxi and the driver had to bonk me. Straight up bonked. This was some Super Smash Brothers shit.

Speaking of goofy, my eyes were droopy like Goofy the rat.

I’m overworked.

I’m getting this money together, so I can pour a year into the TV show, even if it doesn’t make money. If it doesn’t make money after a year, we’ll see. But I think it will. I hate all the people you hate. Everyone hates all of these people, these alternative media people. Even if you don’t hate them all, you would at least like to see them knocked down a peg, would you not?

He’s one droopy sonovabitch, ain’t he?

This is my fav:

It’s my fav because it reminds me of myself. That’s the way I feel most of the time, now that I’m not interested in women. Thankfully I am interested in work again, because of the TV show. Otherwise I would probably just curl up somewhere and sleep until I was dead.

Back to the Sex Thing

Sex is a big part of everything. It is maybe the biggest part. Nick Fuentes being obsessed with money while claiming to have no interest in sex implies some kind of severe mental illness. For most men, if they had no interest in sex, they would spend their lives doing what they wanted to do, not thinking about money much at all. Women want money because they are vapid, soulless creatures. Men want money because women want money. There’s no reason for luxury or status symbols outside of sexual dynamics. Status symbols exist either to impress women or impress men that you work with so they will take you more seriously and give you opportunities that will lead to more money you can impress women with.

Men’s horniness is very fascinating. Mostly, intelligent men view it as an annoyance. But then if you are able to successfully suppress it, you end up in a situation where you say: “Wait, why I am doing anything again? Someone remind me why I don’t just sit around all day and read Star Wars novels? Like, I could play video games I guess, but that requires some effort and can be frustrating when you lose. Star Wars novels are only fun. And you get to use your imagination!”

Sex is so dumb. I mean think about it. Women are totally gross. They are so self-obsessed and lacking in empathy, and they have no interests at all. If you try to talk to a woman about an interesting topic, she will feign interest if she likes you. If she doesn’t like you, forget about it. Women are also ugly and they smell bad. It is only the base biological urge that drives men to have sex.

There is nothing more obscene than Andrew Tate with his nasty hoes saying “look at me, I do my base biology, I’m a slave to it, me and the demiurge are tight bro, I’m demiurged up and down this piece.” And to make it that much worse, or maybe better, these bitches he rolls out are hardened road dogs. Not even once have I seen him with a girl I would rate above a 5, and most of them are straight up 3s.

Note that I do not include fat women on my number scale, as fat means you’re out of the game, an automatic zero. I also don’t include age, which Tate’s harem is benefiting from, since most of his bitches are in their 40s.

And he’s in Romania, dude. One time me and a friend were on the main walking street in Bucharest, and some street hustler called us up to a brothel. The girls were significantly better than the ones Tate’s got in the above pic. They were not spring chickens, all over 25, but not as old as Tate’s chicks. These would have been in the 5-6 range if they didn’t have the tattoos. The guy was saying $100. I said “will you take $50?” and they did a fake huddle and the guy was like “yeah, okay, $50, but 30 minutes only.” I said, “I only need ten minutes, I won’t be singing any poetry.” And then I got up to leave. And he was like “wait, you go?” I nodded in the affirmative. He said “why you ask for $50 then?” “I just wanted to see if you would take it.” He looked confused for a split second, then “okay, my friend, $40 for you, beautiful girl, you choose girl.” I shook my head. By the time I was on the street it was $30.

Point being: $100 an hour girls in Romania look like supermodels. Girls better than Tate’s are $30.

The Andrew Tate situation is weird. And he is a part of Tucker Carlson’s coalition.

The Carlson Coalition

I hope everyone understands that this is what is happening here: Carlson is building a coalition. I am sure I’ve mentioned this, but we need to put that in the front, as we frame these ideas.

He is attempting to bypass the old culture war which was primarily about abortion and gays. Ending Roe v. Wade allows the former to be bypassed, and apparently he is just going all-in on “Fisting, I say to thee lad, is phileo, and verily, sayeth I unto thee, double-fisting is double-phileo.”

When Glenn Greenwald’s sex tape leaked, I said “this really doesn’t have anything to do with what he is saying about Israel or anything else, this is just a way to embarrass a man.” If a politician is a gay or if he drives off a bridge with a hooker in the car and doesn’t even attempt to save the bitch as he doggy paddles his fat ass to safety, that may speak to their character. But a podcaster, I mean – who gives a shit? I thought it was the nuttiest thing ever when Nick Fuentes blackmailed me, threatening to reveal my half breed children. Maybe I have some hardcore Nazi readers who don’t like that, but honestly, I doubt even they care that much. It’s not like I’m polluting the gene pool of the Western world. I’m raising the quality of the gene pool in the Eastern world.

Frankly, Fuentes blackmailing me at all was some of the weirdest shit I’ve seen. I am not joking when I say if things were just a little bit different I would have tried to press criminal charges. It was really cut and dry. What made it so much weirder is that the first time he did it, I demanded he release whatever secret information he has, but then over a year later, he was still pushing this blackmail thing, acting as if he’d never heard me say “release it all.” None of the mugus defended him on that. None of them tried to say he didn’t do that. They just psychoanalyzed me like creepy ass faggots.

But yeah, calling Greenwald’s thing “love”… this is very strange. But that is Tucker’s big tent. Pretty much everyone is in this tent other than the Jews. (Well, some Jews, he is sticking to “everyone is an individual” as I mentioned in my preview during the begging fiesta, but most Jews will not go along with this.)

Sex is a big part of all of this. Sex is a big part of everything. We will break down the big tent Tucker is building, and analyze the fact he’s skipping the sex stuff, while also remaining generally socially conservative. I think the tent is smart. I wouldn’t do this tent he’s doing and I don’t really support it.

Speaking of Jews and sex and Tucker’s big tent, the “lesbian” (not a real thing) who runs “Gays Against Groomers,” a homosexual group that is against trannies, is a Jew and she is now denouncing him. I saw her on this Israeli podcast that is primarily an anti-Tucker podcast.

She looks a lot better in the thumbnail than on the podcast.

If she’s a lesbian, then why is she trying to look attractive in the first place, I wonder? Maybe because “lesbianism” isn’t real?

That podcast is something I will be covering in some detail as I go through all of this. He has very few views, but gets big names. There is more than meets the eye there, for certain.

Anyway, the Jews do not care about Nick Fuentes. No one cares about Nick Fuentes. He can’t ever be popular, he is too repulsive. He can use my material and get some attention, but that’s it. The reason he is the big issue is that they were looking for a reason to attack Tucker, and that seemed like the easiest point of attack. Tucker bringing Fuentes into the tent is a separate issue. He needs a “real antisemite” in the tent, and Fuentes is the most harmless, and due to his obsession with money and fame, as well as the fact he’s got serious federal charges hanging over him, he’s a very easy “antisemite” to bring into the tent.

Anyway, this is all just random out of order commentary. It is a preview of the thing I am going to put together analyzing all of this. It will be a multi-part thing I will start next week. It will be properly organized and very informative and explain to you what is happening next.

Right now, onto the memes.

Oh, but first…

E-Begging Continues

As noted, the site is broke. I stopped soliciting donations when I stopped posting the daily news, and yet kept paying everyone. Now that I am working on the site regularly again, and have all these projects coming up, I am again asking for your support. I did the whole bit yesterday.

Short story is…

Monero:

4BHE9T5HUqbRzsAaq5grGq31G3JevBD1RBNbRdWQLg8ESYugNNyyAnt2JL9ZuWA1w72g4LPr25rSHjQJS6MwANT3MMJFA16

Public addresses for people doing their own security:

BTC:

bc1qd35kpy3ghxhtg29cg5tl4aud5xr9xqwrkw6ucm

ETH:

0x33BD3683D518C45df6393E2276E724228a834757

SOL:

FG71bjrBSKcp2A9ZenyrHjvEw2ngmxbAebcBA4cnY1jM

The way to get a private address so I can handle security:

Session App (download):

05572128ee1967255089ef79d7ad652b5c6765665b8299e294e05a37ac96dd0936

Email:

staunchleftist1999@proton.me

Contact me there, I will give you a clean address. And yes, you can use those addresses again. Or you can request a new one. But the addresses are good forever.

Again: I’m in a tough spot here. So if you feel like you’ve gotten something out of the site, please help me out. There is plenty more to come. You are going to like the new show, I promise. It is going to be very fun. And you are going to like this series I’ve got coming explaining this Tucker-Bowman situation. I am myself very interested in it, and excited to see what I learn about it when I type it up. For me, writing is a big part of the way I process my thoughts. So when I write, I teach myself things.

And of course, you are going to like the memes.

After the Tucker Carlson/Peter Thiel/Jim Bowman Takeover Series, Look Forward To:

• Antisemitism Doesn’t Exist and Can’t Exist
• Why I am Proud to be a Pedophile Activist
• All That Stuff I Said About AI Doing Things is Already Happening
• How to Cure Your Addiction to Monster Nitro with “Dangerous” Amounts of Sleeping Pills
• It Doesn’t Matter If Your Christmas Lights Look Bad, What Matters is That You Put in the Effort (Including Slaves Who Live in “Apartments” [Prison Cells])
• Why It is Unethical to Not Drain the Government of As Much Money as You Possibly Can
• How I Became a Communist
• Seven Foolproof Ways to Kill Your Wife and Make It Look Like an Accident
• Could Thrawn Beat Darth Vader? (Not Including Hand-to-Hand Combat, I Mean If They Both had a Star Destroyer and an Equal-Sized Fleet)

And of course, the fake podcast, which will be followed by a real TV show.

Editor’s Pick of the Week:

Runner-Up:

(The motto of my TV show.)

The Primo Collection:

*Note: except alcohol, nicotine, caffeine, Valium, and taurine

Editor’s Note: This is an e-begging post. However, it also contains the first segment of my Tucker Carlson-Jim Bowman-Nick Fuentes 2028 analysis preview, which I think you will enjoy. If you are seriously poor, you can skip the e-begging section. The Tucker section is clearly marked. Though I do pray you will help us if you can. 

There comes a time in a man’s life when he must post his Monday memes on a Wednesday. Sometimes then, he falls asleep from exhaustion on his desk as he is trying to upload said memes. Then, sometimes he wakes up, and the uploads are all broken due to poor internet, and it is already late night on Wednesday.

Every man is going to have to deal with that at some point in his life.

For me, that time came yesterday.

I am currently traveling, which is why I am failing at these memes. I am traveling as a part of my podcast project. But I’m headed to better internet.

Also, today I realized the site has nearly run out of money to pay for needed services.

I will deliver the memes early Friday, and again on Saturday, because I have double the memes.

I’ve also got some serious articles relating to Tucker Carlson, Jim “JD Vance” Bowman, Peter Thiel, Nick Fuentes, and the 2028 mega fiasco. We will post teasers for these below, and as introductions to the memes, and come early next week, serious analysis will begin.

But I come to you today once again asking for your support. I’ve been paying for the site for the better part of a year now, with no calls for contributions, because I was not doing much content, and it seemed inappropriate to ask for contributions. However, I am now in a bind, and I am also ready to deliver bigly (see the roadmap below).

If you can, please contribute to helping keep us online.

Monero:

Here is the Monero address:

4BHE9T5HUqbRzsAaq5grGq31G3JevBD1RBNbRdWQLg8ESYugNNyyAnt2JL9ZuWA1w72g4LPr25rSHjQJS6MwANT3MMJFA16

Bitcoin, etc.:

If you have already anonymized your crypto, you can use these addresses:

BTC:

bc1qd35kpy3ghxhtg29cg5tl4aud5xr9xqwrkw6ucm

ETH:

0x33BD3683D518C45df6393E2276E724228a834757

SOL:

FG71bjrBSKcp2A9ZenyrHjvEw2ngmxbAebcBA4cnY1jM

ONLY USE THOSE IF YOU UNDERSTAND CRYPTO AND YOU ARE SENDING IT FROM AN ANONYMOUS WALLET.

If you don’t know how to anonymize coins and send them from a private wallet, please contact me and request a unique BTC (or ETH or SOL) address. This will keep your identity anonymous and prevent you from being banned from an app for sending to me.

Contact me on the encrypted Session App:

05572128ee1967255089ef79d7ad652b5c6765665b8299e294e05a37ac96dd0936

Or email me here:

staunchleftist1999@proton.me

I will send you a unique address, unique to you only, and not linked to anything related to this site, or to anything at all. I will lock those addresses and only use them to transfer the coins, without mixing addresses, to the anonymous Monero network, so everything is anonymous.

You can use Coinbase, Binance, Venmo, Cash App, or whatever. No one will know anything other than that you sent coins to a random address, which will sit for a while, and then eventually be run through an anonymous site anonymizing the coins.

There is no risk of getting identified or banned from your service.

I don’t usually check these things, but I will check all of my messages for the next week or so. If you want to send personal messages, that’s fine. But hopefully if you’re sending personal messages, you’re also sending money. When I open up these channels, I get thousands of messages, and it is very difficult to reply to them all. I will do my best, but mostly I will be prioritizing responding to messages from people who send money.

Frankly, it is difficult for me to open the messaging app or the email, because I just start writing long replies to everyone, and then never even make it 5% of the way through. So please understand, I would very much love to talk to all of you. I would call and chat with each of you for hours. But that is not physically possible.

I will, however, try to read the messages and hit you with a “thanks bro, love to hear it.” But if I start replying to every comment and question, I will end up writing thousands of words to a few people and then not replying to anyone else and not sending all the addresses.

Also, if possible, can you please not suggest that I get a PO box or do some other scheme to try to make donations easier? This simply is not possible, and writing me with these ideas, all of which I have spent many, many hours thinking about and looking into, wastes both of our time.

Best Time to Donate

I think Bitcoin has bottomed out for the time being. I seriously doubt it will go much lower. It could, no one can predict the future, but if Trump would simply relax for a couple weeks, we’ll be on the comeback trail, which will mean the money you donate now will likely be worth more soon.

This is Not a Business

I hold deep disgust for mugus. This post was particularly disgusting.

“Legalize drunk driving,” huh? I wonder where oh where he would have gotten that meme. He’s obviously not a drunk driver or any other kind of hardcore baller, based on that whining, capitalistic post.

Look:

Wow. That sucks so bad.

Watch this guy delete his account.

The “envious of success” thing is seriously the funniest thing on the entire earth. Though it is hard to keep track of the site’s numbers, given the lunatic measures we have to go through to keep the site online (all this caching and proxy relaying), even after all of my censorship, before Valentine’s Day when I told readers I needed a break from our relationship, I had 2-3 million monthly uniques by the most conservative estimates, which by my math indicates there were 800,000-1,200,000 people reading the site nearly every day. Meanwhile, before Fuentes was reinstated on Twitter by Elon Musk personally, he had an average of 20,000 views on his Rumble show. Obviously, getting back on Twitter, and then catching a windfall from the most extreme astroturf campaign I’ve ever seen in my life, he now has a significantly wider reach than me, especially considering the censorship I suffered in 2017, which remains the most extreme censorship of any publication ever in American history (you could maybe compare it to pro-Hitler people during World War II, but even then, I think I would win).

No one on earth believes that if I had the same opportunities, Nick Fuentes would be “more successful” than me. There is not a single person on earth who knows the facts that would make that argument. Saying I’m “jealous of his success” is like saying that after he broke his neck falling off a horse, Christopher Reeve was “jealous of the success” of horsemen who had working limbs. I am obviously frustrated that I taught Nick Fuentes everything he says that resonates with people (like, pretty much literally every single thing), and that he is able to say all of this and have absolute access to everything.

This is one of Fuentes’ responses to me since I called him out:

Nick's MO: Always switch up on your day 1s

"They will resent you for being successful." pic.twitter.com/KW0MloEfdE

— Fuentes Updates (@FuentesUpdates) October 25, 2025

It is the gayest shit imaginable.

This cocksucker isn’t going to respond to anything I’ve said, so he does personal attacks and psychoanalysis like a woman. Just pure emotion. Adult men discuss ideas, women name-call and psychoanalyze.

He won’t debate me.

Remember when he used to say that anyone who can defend their ideas is not afraid of debate? He won’t debate me. I am not a good debater, and he’s spent 9 years honing these skills. But he won’t debate me. Because all of his lies, hoaxes, and bizarre behavior is indefensible.

If you’re on Twitter, ask him why.

This ties into the larger narrative I’m trying to unravel here. Some people can’t process the fact that because I am a key figure in all of this, I have to talk about myself, and instead attack me for talking about myself. It is impossible to understand what is going on with Nick Fuentes without understanding my situation and my connection to him. So I have to talk about myself. I was permanently banned and totally unpersoned. Fuentes says all of the things I said, given that I am the basis for his entire identity, and yet he is not only unbanned, but promoted everywhere. I have heard both Tucker Carlson and Glenn Greenwald say “he can’t be canceled.” This is patently false. I know both Glenn and Tucker are aware of me, I don’t know if they know the details. But there is no such thing as “uncancelable,” and if it were not for Elon personally deciding to let Fuentes back on Twitter, he would remain on Rumble with 20,000 average views (even while he is in the media as a friend of Kanye who dined with Trump).

Note: Trump defending Fuentes was a big deal, and a big piece of evidence for the narrative I am building.

I don't think people realize what just happened on live TV.

Donald Trump says that we should allow Nick Fuentes, the world's most influential Nazi, who praises Hitler and called on a "holy war" against Jews, to "get the word out." pic.twitter.com/DfNkfHAIvd

— David Schwartz (@DavidSchwartz70) November 17, 2025

To be clear: I do not have a fucking “business model.” These people are such freaks. I could not have a business model, because of censorship measures that Fuentes was spared from for reasons we can only imagine (given that he’s said all the same stuff I said and worse.) Further, unlike Fuentes, I never had the goal of making millions of dollars from political activism, and I don’t understand the mindset of anyone who thinks that is an ethical activity. (I do understand the mindset. It’s just a standard Indian-type scammer mindset.) If you care that much about money, how could it be possible that you could ever be trusted? Political activism is a type of charity. It is something you do for moral reasons. It is not a for-profit venture. If Fuentes framed himself as an entertainer, then sure, okay. But he frames himself as a leader of a revolution. Revolutionary leaders live in jungles or in exile, plotting. They do not stack stacks and have multiple homes and sports cars like Fuentes has.

To be fair, I have a skillset that can be monetized outside of my political activism, which Fuentes does not have. Being able to write means people will pay you to do all sorts of things, whereas being able to ramble uninterrupted, repeating something you read and mixing it with kook conspiracy theories, has no application other than podcasting. How a political activist would be expecting a seven-figure annual salary is above my comprehension. If you were actually an activist, you would donate the extra money to the cause. But that is a topic for another time. I simply want to point out that I have never viewed this as a business. That said, I really should have asked for contributions more often. But I didn’t, because I really don’t like it.

Content is Coming

As you know, I am working on a TV show. I have already put money into that, and will need quite a bit more. Before the TV show, in fact as soon as possible, we will be doing a practice podcast, which I am labeling a fake podcast, which will maybe be good but nothing compared to what I have planned. Then, in a few months, when I’ve got this set up and organized and figured out the money for my lights, cameras, and studio, we will be doing a very serious podcast, which will be in large part scripted, and will focus on explaining the news by analyzing how full of shit virtually all of these podcasts are.

As the same time, I will be writing more. I guarantee it.

The Look of the Site

No one wants to hear about this, so I’ll keep it brief. (It is kind of important, as it is the way people interact with the site, and so I want it to be good.) As stated many times since the event, the previous visual theme of the site broke, and my staff was unable to fix it. I was also not able to buy the old theme again, because I am permanently banned from using banks or credit cards. I spent over $500 on buying prepaid visas with crypto, and the site that sells the theme would not accept any of them. (Note: they work elsewhere, so it wasn’t technically a waste of money. Though these cards are really shitty, because they cannot be refilled, meaning if you have a balance of $15, it is hard to find a place to spend it.)

I did not have the money to hire someone to fix it, and further, it is impossible to give someone I don’t have a longstanding relationship with access to the site, which meant that it fell on me to fix it, and I have very little ability to do this.

I think it looks fine now. I understand there are still some issues on some phones. I am working on that. But I have so much going on. I am trying to finish up several for-profit operations unrelated to politics or activism. I have other real life stuff. I’m working on the podcast. And I’m trying to get regular articles up. Fixing the site, which is something I know nothing about, amidst all this other stuff, has been painful. But I like the black, I like the simplified layout, it loads fast, everything is fine now except maybe embeds stretching the width on the phone.

First Tucker Comment (A Preview of What is to Come)

The core content of the TV show is to analyze the news by deconstructing the views of all of these “new media” people. One of the main podcasters we will be analyzing is Tucker Carlson. He is really at the center of the podcasting world, and he is also clearly the best. For a long time, the verdict was out on his agenda. That verdict is technically still out, but I believe I understand it much better. It seems quite clear that his goal is to run for president in 2028. What’s also clear is that he is working for Bowman, and the scheme to mainstream Fuentes is part of this agenda to build a post-Trump coalition. However, it seems very unlikely that Tucker will be satisfied with simply being a helper for the “Vance” creep.

I do believe Tucker believes in this “judge everyone as an individual” thing. Which frankly, I agree with. I simply think that it is the individual decision of someone born to a Jewish family to call himself “a Jew.” Whereas I am suspicious, rightfully so (obviously) of all Jews, I also cross the street if a group of young black males are headed toward me on the sidewalk. In the latter case, I do not argue that every single black is a killer, just that I want to be on the safe side. Due to statistics, I will not risk my wallet or my life by telling myself “I’m not racist, I’m not racist” and crossing paths with a group of black youth. Just so, I agree that not everyone born Jewish is necessarily evil (I generally appreciate Norman Finkelstein, Glenn Greenwald, Dave Smith, Max Blumenthal, and a few others). However, I am suspicious that any Jew is doing something weird and destructive, due to statistics, and will act accordingly.

I do not accept this idea that if you are engaging in generalizations, and making decisions based on pattern recognition, that you are “hating people because of their DNA.” I don’t really believe that “antisemitism,” according to the definition of “hating people for no reason other than because they were born Jewish,” is a thing. The only people I’ve seen express hatred for people based on how they were born are the Jews themselves, due to their “chosen people” ideology.

But it is simply a fact that only Jews are awarded this status where you are not allowed to use pattern recognition. People are allowed to talk about “black crime,” they are allowed to talk about the “Italian Mafia.” No one says “oh but you need to be careful because if you say that, it sounds like you mean every black is in a gang or every Italian is in the mafia.” It is taken for granted that you do not mean every single individual black or Italian.

I have had fights with AI about this. AI will be frank with you. I asked “what is the difference between saying Jews control the media and blacks control rap music,” and the robot said “it’s different because of the Holocaust.”

There is no rule that says a Jew is required to say “I am a Jew,” and when a person does say that, they are not simply identifying their ethnic origins, but showing that they identify with Jewishness. The key identity of the Jews is that they murdered Jesus. That is the basis of rabbinical Judaism, which was established after Christ, when the Romans destroyed the second temple. It is an offshoot of Christianity. They use parts of the Christian Bible and then mix it with very strange and satanic texts, and their focus is on their superiority to non-Jews and their hatred of Christ. A person that identifies that way is necessarily suspicious.

I recently said that when a person says “I am gay,” they are saying “I like to have things shoved up my ass.” Just so, when a person says “I am Jewish,” they are saying they hate Jesus and his followers. If a Jew says “my parents were Jewish, but I have rejected the Jewish culture due to its satanic nature,” I am more inclined to trust them. However, I will not completely trust them, given that statistically, when a Jew says this, he is attempting to trick you.

Seth Dillon of the Babylon Bee (which Greenwald has labeled “The Tel Aviv Bee,” despite the fact that “The Babylon Bibi” was staring him directly in his face) has claimed that he is “a Christian,” but continued to say he is also “a Jew.” This is a complicated convoluted situation, given that Jews are a separate ethnic group, which I recently heard an Israeli podcaster who now does the “I Hate Tucker Carlson” show refer to as “white adjacent.”

“It’s a religion and a race” is both nonsense and sort of true. It does refer to a religion, and most people view it as a religion. However, they are genetically different than normal white Christians by some significant margin, and also prefer not to be called “white” unless they are doing their “my fellow whites” bit.

Look at this:

If they’re just white people, and Jewishness is just a religion, then why are atheist Jews also aggressive Zionists pushing for Israel and Jewish domination?

Probably, the best way to describe Jews, and this is a term I heard from a Jew, is as a “tribe.”

This is a fascinating recent clip of a Jew woman at a recent Jew event talking about how Holocaust education was a mistake, because it teaches people that all genocide is bad, when actually, genocide narratives only exist to protect Jews.

Democrat speechwriter says that Holocaust Education might have been a mistake, because now young people are recognizing how Nazi-like the Israelis are.
pic.twitter.com/XDkz8DBPDo

— Harrison H. Smith ✞ (@HarrisonHSmith) November 19, 2025

This is extremely extreme. And it has nothing at all to do with Israel. Well, it is tangentially related, but she says that Holocaust education (brainwashing in elementary schools) was intended to stop antisemitism, and now that the Jews are committing a genocide, the Holocaust narrative is being used against them. She says that the Holocaust narrative was never intended to stop genocide, but was rather intended to shut down criticism of Jews.

You can’t look at a clip like that and say that this is all just about the state of Israel. Frankly, Bibi Netanyahu and the Jews are right when they say that Israel is fundamentally a Jewish state and criticizing Israel is criticism of organized Jewry. The identity of the Jewish state is Jewish, which is why they are engaging in behavior, including the purposeful slaughter of children and the celebration of soldiers who shove things up men’s buttholes, which is fundamentally Jewish. Other groups would not engage in this behavior. Even if you believe in the Holocaust, the official narrative there was that it was done in secret. Israel is doing this in full view of the whole world, and the reason they are doing this is that they do not view non-Jews as human beings. That is a fundamental part of the Jewish religion, but it carries over very much into secular Jewish culture.

Tucker’s obsession with “yeah but not every single one” is ridiculous. Of course it is not every single one. It seems to be the overwhelming majority, not just in Israel but also in the diaspora. Very few Jews are criticizing Israel, and instead are claiming that anyone who criticizes Israel hates all Jews.

Tucker seemed to be getting at this, at least scratching the surface, in his response to Mark Levin and Ben Shapiro.

I disagreed with the liberalism and the defense of multiculturalism in that video, but overall, he is getting much closer to the mark.

Further, his 30-minute report on Thomas Crooks was brilliant.

I am very familiar with this group that was pro-Trump and then turned against him, ostensibly saying he didn’t do enough to stop the coronavirus. I always thought these people were feds. This was the trajectory of the “podcast network” TRS, which I exposed as being an FBI-controlled group. Further, there was a very extreme, obvious FBI asset named Brad Griffin who took this line and was compulsively attacking me for years, as is the case with all of the feds. Unz.com posted one of his articles attacking me, and I wrote a response to that attack on Unz. Griffin is not a relevant person, at all, but that should provide some context. He was associated with TRS and their neo-Nazi goon group, as well as Matt Heimbach’s goon group. All of this neo-Nazi stuff is always feds leading a bunch of morons.

Tucker notes that while Crooks was posting violent comments calling for assassinations, he was contacted by someone who appears to be from the Nordic Resistance Movement. The NRM was associated with the State Department’s project in the Ukraine, sending people to fight against the evil Russians in the name of Jewish neo-Nazism. It’s all circumstantial evidence, but the fact that the FBI is covering it up, while claiming that there is an ongoing trial (there is no trial, Crooks is dead), proves that they are hiding something. Of course it’s just very obvious that the FBI was involved in the shooting. I have my own views as to whether or not the shooting was exactly what it was presented as, but it is ridiculous to suggest that the shooter was not groomed by the feds, just as one obviously assumes the Charlie Kirk shooter was (although I very much doubt the Kirk shooter was actually the shooter).

Point being: I don’t agree with all of Tucker’s stuff. But he does usually seem genuine. There are, however, things he says that appear less than genuine, which I will get into. This includes the mainstreaming of Nick Fuentes. I mean, how bizarre is it that he spent years talking about how Fuentes was not charged for calling for violence on January 6, and then didn’t ask him about it during a two-hour interview?

Then you have this very interesting relationship to Bowman, who is Thiel’s man. Very, very interesting.

Everyone is framing the current battle as what things will look like when Trump is out of office, and who will take over the Republican Party. Vance is supposed to be the obvious successor, but Vance is going along with everything Trump does, while Tucker is denouncing virtually all of it. But also, Tucker and Vance have a very close relationship.

I’d Better Cap It There

This is a preview. As I write, it appears this won’t be posted until early Thursday, which means the memes will be on Friday. Then the analysis pieces will be coming soon, as will the new fake podcast.

My co-host says I scapegoated him by saying he doesn’t have internet last time. If this is the case, I apologize. But we will hopefully do this soon. I don’t know that the first episode will be great.

Most of the groundwork for the podcast has been laid.

This is the current roadmap:

• This week: Memes and a good series of articles on these bizarre emerging 2028 political dynamics
• Next week, through the end of the first quarter 2026: A fake podcast once a week along with regular long articles 2-4 times a week
• This week and next week: Checking my email and Session chat for people who want unique Bitcoin or ETH addresses to keep the site alive
• Early second quarter 2026: The launch of the official TV show
• Beyond: A weekly Saturday night TV show and a Wednesday casual chatting show, along with regular long articles

I have not felt this kind of energy in several years. My goal with the show is to bring back the energy of early Daily Stormer. I am extremely confident this will work.

Contribute If You Can

These are pretty dire straits, given that I did not make any point to solicit donations when the content was low. I was still paying five figures to keep the site online, and it has driven up pretty quickly.

I implore you to do what you can. I’ve given my life to this, and I think I’ve helped a lot of people, and the site has not been monetized since 2017. So if this work has meant something to you, please try to help me out. The unique BTC (and other crypto) addresses should provide you with an easy way to contribute.

After two years of unparalleled war and slaughter, during which the Jews have committed the worst crimes ever recorded, they continue to disturb the peace through the spread of pernicious rumors.

Times of Israel:

Mexican authorities, with assistance from the United States and Israeli intelligence agencies, thwarted an alleged plot by Iran to assassinate the Israeli ambassador to Mexico, Israeli and US officials said Friday.

A US official said that the elite Quds Force of Iran’s Revolutionary Guard Corps initiated the plot to kill Ambassador Einat Kranz Neiger in late 2024 and that it was disrupted this year. The plot allegedly included recruiting operatives out of Iran’s embassy in Venezuela, whose authoritarian left-wing president, Nicolas Maduro, has a tactical alliance with Tehran.

“The plot was contained and does not pose a current threat,” the US official said in a statement to reporters on condition of anonymity. “This is just the latest in a long history of Iran’s global lethal targeting of diplomats, journalists, dissidents and anyone who disagrees with them, something that should deeply worry every country where there is an Iranian presence.”

The US official did not provide detailed evidence or say how the plot was contained.

…

The thwarted assassination attempt in Mexico showed Iran has a large-scale terror network in the region used for carrying out attacks on Israeli and US targets, the source said, adding that American officials believe many of the planned terror attacks are directed from Tehran’s embassy in Venezuela. Last month, Israel revealed that the IRGC was responsible for a string of attacks on Jewish sites in Western countries.

And then, everyone clapped.

First of all, it is never acceptable to make some ugly fat woman your ambassador to another country. Second, her name is “Crayons Nigger.” Forcing Mexico to accredit this woman is an act of aggression which could only have been conceived of by a sick Zionist mind.

The good people of Mexico refused to accept this heinous act, attempting to burn her palace down last May. Sadly, Israel refused to take the hint, and Mrs. Einat Kranz Neiger continues to occupy the embassy.

Iran has denied any plot to kill Crayons Nigger.

Al Jazeera:

Iran has branded accusations from the United States and Israel that it was hatching a plot to assassinate the latter’s ambassador to Mexico as “ridiculous”.

Ministry of Foreign Affairs Spokesman Esmaeil Baghaei told reporters on Monday that Tehran believes Israel is trying to damage its “friendly relations” with other countries through an “absurd allegation”.

…

Iran’s embassy in Mexico on Monday called the accusation “a media intervention and a great lie” and said it considers “betraying Mexico’s interests to be betraying our own”.

Baghaei said: “Our embassy stated that we found this allegation so absurd and ridiculous that we did not even think it required an official response from the spokesperson.”

You may remember a similar “lmao, wait what?” situation having happened in Australia a few months back. (Probably, you don’t remember it. These things are designed to be forgettable. If people didn’t forget them, they might start keeping track.) But Iran remembers.

Baghaei was quick to point out that Israel has previously made similar accusations against Iran, citing attacks on Jewish synagogues in Australia in late 2024.

That appeared to be a reference to a testimony given by the New South Wales Police Force to the upper house of the Australian parliament in early October, which presented the result of an investigation into suspected Iranian links to 14 incidents of attacks on synagogues, graffiti, firebombings, and attacks on cars and homes.

“The NSW Police Force has nil holdings in relation to foreign agents perpetrating these incidents,” a police representative told lawmakers at the time.

“Despite official statements by Australian police rejecting any connection to Iran, Israel has continued to insist on Tehran’s involvement,” Baghaei said.

However, in late August, Australia accused Iran of directing two “anti-Semitic” arson attacks in the cities of Sydney and Melbourne and gave Tehran’s ambassador seven days to leave the country, the first such expulsion since World War II.

Canberra also designated the IRGC a “terrorist organisation” and withdrew its diplomats from Tehran.

At the time, Australian Prime Minister Anthony Albanese said the Australian Security Intelligence Organisation had gathered credible evidence that Iran “orchestrated” last year’s attacks on a kosher restaurant and a synagogue, but did not release the evidence.

The Jews take great joy in portraying their enemies as cartoon villains fixated on ridiculously contrived plots to do nefarious but pointless things, like spray-painting a misdrawn swastika on a kosher restaurant several continents away, calling in hundreds of fake bomb threats, or killing some odious fat woman who will probably just die on her own from a heart attack.

This is ironic, given Israel’s own proclivity for slaughtering children, blowing people’s eyes out with rigged electronic devices, shoving things into peoples asses, burying living people in pits with air tubes and then cutting off the air, and an endless list of other acts of cartoonish villainy.

Of course, no discussion of this issue could be complete without examining the role of Claudia Sheinbaum, the Jew who was elected president of Mexico because she was the most beautiful woman in Mexico.

Claudia Sheinbaum is so beautiful that men are completely overcome with lust, flinging themselves upon her like wild beasts wherever she goes.

Sheinbaum is Jewish, but she didn’t have the nerve to try to pull an Australia and simply agree with whatever it is Israel says is happening.

The Cradle:

Mexican authorities rejected on 8 November US and Israeli claims of an Iranian plot to assassinate the Israeli ambassador to the Latin American nation. Mexico’s foreign relations and security ministries issued a brief joint statement saying that “they have no report with respect to a supposed attempt against the ambassador of Israel in Mexico.”

The statement said the foreign ministry “reiterates its willingness to maintain fluid communication with all accredited diplomatic representations in our country.” The security ministry “reaffirms its respectful and coordinated collaboration, always within the framework of national sovereignty, with all security agencies that request it.”

Israel is undeterred, of course, and will continue to sow lies and deceit as it prepares for its next round of war against Iran.

Editor’s Note: Due to a steep decline in the popularity of memes, and the consistently rising popularity of Megyn [sic] Kelly, this publication is being forced to change “Memetic Monday” to “Megyno Monday.” This is a sad day for the Stormer, but we simply cannot continue to fight the future, as memes just are not registering with the youth anymore. Every hour, 37 American millennial men die. Soon, the “Meme Men” will all be gone. This new generation, they don’t want the Happy Merchant and Wojak. They want Megyn. This is really no different than when the horse store had to murder all of the horses it had for sale, ship them off to the hot dog factory, and roll in the automobiles. I’m sure the horseman was like “these kids today are a bunch of gay retards, holy fuck, horses are so awesome and cars are the transport mode of true faggots.” But he had to keep his business alive. As the CEO of this company, I have a duty to this company. -Andrew Anglin, CEO

Megyn [sic] Kelly was previously mostly famous for going on TV while experiencing menstrual emotional feelings and verbally assaulting Donald Trump AKA “Overlord of the Talentless, Master of Those Without Skill” AKA “The Baby Bomber Straight Outta Bombay” AKA “Donnie Darko” AKA “We are Going to Shit in Your Street and We are Going to Make You Clean It Up.” That last nickname for Trump is I guess supposed to be a reference to the thing about the Wall and Mexico paying for it. I don’t know who comes up with these names. I know what I’m gonna tell these retards if I ever run into them:

Recently, as a result of scientific advancements, Kelly became famous for pulling a Benjamin Button and getting younger as she ages. Many are also fixated on her breasts (often called a “sweet rack”).

As one user wrote, “Grandma Meg looks better than those hoes on the college campus, those hoes over there are getting fatter and fatter so they have extra skin to fit more tattoos.” Another user wrote, “I want to fuck Megyn Kelly,” adding, “I want to suck on her tits, even though I’m sure she has aureolas the size of pepperonis.” Another user replied to that user, saying, “Have you ever heard of scale? I doubt her aureolas are above average size, but you have to consider the size of her breasts.” Then I replied, “she should do Slave Leia cosplay as part of her world tour.”

I then went into some detail about this plan, suggesting that Steve Bannon play Jabba, Tucker play Bib Fortuna, and Candace Owens play Lando. I was then banned for “stoking fear.” This is a classic case. People say graphic sexual things, I come in and offer some constructive ideas as to how we can help bring attention to Jeffrey Epstein or Charlie Kirk or whatever, and I’m the one who gets punished.

I do think Megyn looks great. What can we say? Irish people simply have superior genetics to non-Irish people.

People say the Irish drink too much. It’s like saying black people play too much basketball. Why do black people play more basketball than non-black people? Because they’re better at it.

Irish people use alcohol like Bane uses venom.

I have actually done research into potentially having a surgical procedure to install tubes to pump vodka directly into my bloodstream. People who claim Irish people are drunks, or that our women are slags, are simply jealous of our success.

I’m not going to say graphic things about Megyn’s breasts, even if the clothes she wears clearly indicate that causing men to say these things is her goal. She actually makes this more extreme, using the “fat friend effect,” pulling puffy-faced and swollen sloppy drunk Irish slags off the streets to sit next to her.

You can easily imagine in the back room, Megyn is feeding her pet slag boxes of donuts. Probably also pouring partially-hydrogenated seed oil in her whisky. Megyn is admiring herself in the mirror, pushing up her breasts and doing duck-face, saying “eat up my little piggy-wiggy” while the fatty cries about how she eats to kill the pain of the memories of her drunken Irish father beating her in the sheep-riddled field hovel she grew up in.

Anyway, the Jews of the Babylon Bee issued a threat to murder Megyn.

Last night @TheBabylonBee — which should just re-name itself The Tel Aviv Bee — threatened Megyn Kelly that she’d be murdered by Israel for refusing to de-platform all Israel critics.

As Israel loyalists often do, they used the pager image to pretend it was all just a joke. https://t.co/VGzbFdv6l4 pic.twitter.com/uoUqOc12bi

— Glenn Greenwald (@ggreenwald) November 14, 2025

“The Tel Aviv Bee” is a bit on the nose there, Glenn. (Remember the bit about the ADL fighting discrimination against Jews in Hollywood? When you played it totally straight? Do that kind of humor, Glenn.)

But he’s right. Posting an image of a pager is a reference to the murder of many random Lebanese people with exploding pagers. Israel has celebrated this terrorist attack as a grand achievement, saying how clever they were to give “Hezbollah” pagers with plastic explosives in them. Obviously, a bunch of children and random people were maimed. There is no evidence any important Hezbollah people were harmed. Israel can only kill important Hezbollah people by pushing buttons to send US bombs. But Bibi has gone around the world giving people golden pagers and giggling to himself about doing a weird terrorist attack.

He gave one to Trump and it looked like a death threat.

That event was framed as very clever even though it had no tactical or strategic purpose, and simply reinforced the idea that Jews are evil monsters who celebrate murdering and mutilating random people. Bibi called the prison ass-ramming incident “the biggest PR disaster in Israeli history,” but it is really part of the same PR disaster that Bibi has been promoting. Further, people in Israel are celebrating the men who rammed objects up a random Palestinian man’s asshole as heroes. It would follow logically for Bibi to go around giving people golden asshole-rammers. Ethically, they are in the same category, though obviously blinding and blowing the fingers off of hundreds of random people and killing several is worse than ramming an object in a single man’s ass. He had to have multiple ass surgeries, but he survived and presumably he will have full use of his asshole.

Seriously, someone explain to me the difference between:

• Hehe, isn’t it really cute and clever and cool that we tricked people into buying pagers with bombs in them and blew the fingers and eyes out of random people including kids, and
• Hehe, isn’t it really cute and clever and cool that we rammed something up some random guy’s asshole

Instead of “Megyn throws out old pager just to be safe,” you could say “Megyn throws old asshole rammer out the window of her car while driving past synagogue just to be safe.” Except that the asshole ramming didn’t result in death. No one wants things shoved in their ass. Wait, actually, there are millions of gays in America, and when you say “I’m gay,” what you are actually saying is “I enjoy having things rammed up my ass.” But regardless, death is worse than an asshole ramming. (That’s a quote.)

The Babylon Bee is run by one “Seth Dillon.” Please do not believe he is Irish. Apparently, his paternal grandfather is Irish, but his mother is Jewish. He claims to be a “Christian,” but he also says he is Jewish. There is no way to be a Christian and also identify as a Jew. It’s no different than being a Christian-Satanist. If a person is born in a Jewish family, and they are baptized as a Christian, they can say “my ancestors were Jewish but I denounce that satanic cult.” Jews killed Jesus and then proceeded to spend 2,000 years trying to destroy Jesus’ followers. But some of these Jews will pretend to be Christians and then claim that their “fellow Christians” should do everything for the Jews. Dillon is experiencing a psychological breakdown even worse than Ben Shapiro over the Tucker Carlson situation. Though hanging by a thread, Shapiro is actually managing to hold it together, not threatening to murder people. Dillon is on the level of Mark Levin, who is also going around threatening to kill people.

Levin is in fact the individual who triggered this whole situation where we have this supposedly funny joke which is a very thinly veiled death threat against America’s top hoe (sorry, Tay, you’re too fat, we hate that Pfizer guy, the new album is trash, we support the Eagles, you’ve been pushed out by a woman twice your age).

Mark Levin “urges” Megyn Kelly to “Change Course” because she’s in a dark place.

Babylon Bee posted, then deleted, what appears to be a veiled threat referencing Israeli Pagers.

All of this after she defended Tucker Carlson and called for Levin to debate Tucker “like a man”… pic.twitter.com/IqnvFtYlwB

— MJTruthUltra (@MJTruthUltra) November 14, 2025

Levin is on a rampage against Tucker Carlson for questioning Israel. Megyn has never said any of that stuff Tucker says about the Jews, but she is of course not going to distance herself from the most popular man in the right-wing (the clear front-runner for the Republican nominee for president who would presumably staff his administration with podcasters like Trump did, only using actually successful podcasters instead of failed ones). She also obviously wants attention. Who would have thought, you put women on the internet and you end up with stuff like that. So, after Levin called for Tucker to be shut down, vaguely insinuating some kind of violence against him, she said he should instead debate Tucker on the issues. Who knows if she thought Levin would do that (he definitely will not, no Israel supporters will debate the merits of Israel or its relationship to the United States, they always just call you a hater and demand you be silenced), and was trying to position herself to host it, or if she was just doing the obvious thing and backing up the most popular guy (who she might think will be president, though that probably won’t happen either).

The rule currently is that you’re not allowed to defend Tucker Carlson, and if you do, Jews will threaten to murder you. This is supposedly related to Tucker interviewing Nick Fuentes, but it really isn’t about that at all. It is simply that they view his interview with Fuentes as the best time to launch the attack they’ve wanted to do ever since he started talking about Israel (and really before that, when he was talking about the Ukraine AKA Israel 2).

Obviously, Tucker is doing something very bizarre with Fuentes. I have an article responding to the attacks I received after publishing the anti-Fuentes article that I haven’t published yet. It should probably be published soon, and then a followup about what Tucker is doing. Now Trump has defended Fuentes.

It’s unclear what the purpose of this article is at this point. The first half was written late last night when I was in my cups, an apology for the fact I didn’t have good enough internet to do memes today. Then I was like “wait, is this even funny?” But then I was like “ah, whatever, I’ll just wrap it up.” It’s unclear now how to wrap it up, because with that intro, this is clearly not the place to do a deep dive into the Trump-Vance-Tucker-Fuentes scandal.

Briefly: it is pretty obvious that JD Vance is behind this. They need a young “antisemite,” and who better than a totally compromised one who says that Russia is influencing America and is as bad as Israel (that is to say, someone who is edgy enough to fill the slot of “young antisemite, but is completely neutered and useless and no threat to power”)? The dumbest thing is people saying to me “if Fuentes was controlled opposition he wouldn’t talk about the Jews” and it’s like “oh, so if he was controlled opposition, he wouldn’t be opposition? Meaning the very concept of ‘controlled opposition’ cannot exist?”

In terms of what that means, it’s very obvious he’s compromised by feds. In his fawning interview, Tucker didn’t ask him about not getting charged on January 6th, which he had talked about for years and accused Fuentes of being a fed over. But it’s not even important. Tucker is offering to turn what is probably a high six figure or low seven figure annual income into a mid seven figure income. You would have to be ultra principled to say “no just ban me again on Twitter I’ll go back to my 20,000 viewers on Rumble that I had before Elon personally gave me my Twitter account back.” The fact Fuentes does cat fights with people, posts private DMs constantly, tried to blackmail me, tells his young impressionable viewers to kill themselves (for like an hour every day), lies and just makes things up constantly, and so on, demonstrates he’s not remotely principled, and is in fact simply obsessed with fame and money.

Vance and Tucker are both power mad. When a man sees a potentially clear path to seize control of a country, he always takes it. I would. It’s going to be interesting. I’m the only person saying that Tucker is working with Vance now and is planning to stab him in the back come 2027. Vance must have thought about that. If he hasn’t, someone who reads this site will tell him. He probably reads this site. So many relevant people did when I was posting regularly, which was the reason I kept going a lot longer than I should have. I would assume being around Tucker, he’s like he is on TV, and it’s hard to imagine him stabbing you in the back. But Vance needs Tucker more than Tucker needs Vance right now. Tucker’s whole thing is simply to not attack Trump directly, but he attacks all of the people around him, and could go after Vance. Trump is doing the same for Tucker.

Well. I have a whole lot about this. I have a fake podcast launching soon, which will be a placeholder for my incoming real podcast. I will be breaking down this sort of thing. And I will publish the Fuentes response, and then publish a long article addressing the issues of the three paragraphs above this one. We will need to ask about election meddling. Honestly, I don’t know if an election can be rigged in favor of a Republican. In 2024, they simply stood down. Trump was the elite favored candidate (specifically Israeli-aligned Jew and Silicon Valley elite; obviously there is still some kind of Democrat-aligned elite led by Jews who prioritize Israel’s hardline genocide policies less than other Jews), but he was also favored by the population, so all they had to do was not rig the election. But if Vance is able to get the nomination, he will have to run on Trump’s record, which will make it impossible to win, unless Democrats completely stand down like they did in 2024. (Hopefully at this point we can all admit I was right about all that, specifically when I said the hardcore Zionist Jew Ron Klain sent Biden out to get murdered at the debate and then Jews overrode Obama and his people, who wanted a real candidate, and went with the ringer Kamala, a woman who literally could not figure out how her own first name was pronounced, but knew for a fact you were a racist if you pronounced it wrong.) Tucker could win naturally, but although he is engaging in all of these dirty tricks, and in some ways reinforcing the system, I can’t imagine the Jews would allow him to become president. But it could be a funny election cycle, I guess.

I’m just glad I don’t live in America. I do sympathize with people who do, of course, and realize some of this might be less funny to you.

Anyway, I gotta cut it. I’ll circle back. Remember that phrase? Loved it. We will circle back, because I’m not doing a full analysis with that whole thing about pagers and ass-ramming up at the top. I’m a very serious person, and would not open a serious article with such puerile material.

Oh, and before I forget, do you guys know about this movie “One Battle After Another”? Wow just wow. Hopefully I get time to write about that this week. And I’ll try to have the memes up on Wednesday. Potentially tomorrow. Though probably not.

Peace out, bro.

Introduction (Unrelated to Main Article Content)

The development of my TV show is at a bit of a standstill as I await my dear partner to acquire better internet access. We will begin doing a fake podcast soon, as I practice my ability to speak without constantly saying “um.” It’s a complex developmental journey for me personally. Regrettably or not, some of my oratorial eccentricities are simply going to have to be incorporated into my professional presentation. Speaking has never been my strong suit, but as Master Yoda said, “weakness can be a strength if you shamelessly embrace it.” A challenge is always good, particularly a challenge such as this, where there is actually no objective bar by which to measure success. Even the standard internet bar of popularity does not apply to me given the censorship.

We should always push ourselves. I could have moved into a different format of writing, or I could have just quit the internet and worked at well-paying writing jobs. But I like being creative, and I like creative challenges.

Point being: I have some time to write now, and I think with most of the groundwork having been laid for the show, even once the fake podcast gets going, I should be able to keep a writing schedule that keeps people happy and keeps people visiting the site. I also think the article by Tony went over well, and he may start contributing more. I’m also open to other contributors in the future, if they are good enough.

Beginning of Main Article Content

Yesterday, I sat down with a plan to write about Trump’s fifty-year mortgage scheme. However, that quickly went in another direction, as I decided that the ridiculousness of the failed tariff scheme and its theoretical connection with the Silicon Valley transhumanist utopianist agenda was a topic worth covering in some detail. (To be clear: that was indeed a theory I was presenting. However, it is not a theory that the Silicon Valley people gave Trump more money than the Israel people, and it is not a theory that the Silicon Valley people have an agenda to create chaos in order to establish a new world order. Given that the tariffs made no logical sense on any level, it seems to be the simplest possible explanation that that whole mess was part of a larger program to create a new order in America. The fact that we now see it leading into a potential UBI type program further goes to bolster that theory. But although I think it was clear enough from the context, I will state now that the conclusion I drew was necessarily a theory, as without someone leaking documentation of insiders saying it was the goal, it couldn’t ever be proved. However, I have not seen anyone explain what the purposes of those taxes were.)

The fifty-year mortgage thing is much less important than the Silicon Valley conspiracy, particularly given that it is unlikely to ever happen and is just one of these things that Trump throws out there. Still, thinking about this has caused me to think various thoughts I find worth sharing.

Needless to say, a fifty-year mortgage is a kind of lunatic concept. However, after:

• The tariff lunacy (see yesterday’s article)
• Claiming the Epstein files don’t exist and if they do exist they are fake, then attacking his own supporters and vowing revenge on them for talking about the Epstein files
• Refusing to end the Ukraine war despite no one being able to explain why it should keep going if you don’t believe, as the liberals did, that “hurting Russia” is valuable for its own sake because Russians are white Christians
• Attempting to do a regime change in Venezuela in the weirdest way possible
• Blowing up random boats that can’t possibly cross the ocean and claiming they are drug boats headed for America (instead of just easily interdicting them, and then sending out Tubs McGee AKA Jim Bowman to pretend to be a badass talking about murdering random people)
• Inventing the term “narcoterrorism” (are they distributing drugs for political purposes? If not, how is that a word?)
• Attempting to deal with tens of millions of illegal immigrants by rounding them up one by one
• Everything Pam Bondi has said since she took office (including when she told Stephen Miller’s wife that “hate speech” was illegal and she was going to start arresting people for it, and when she appeared before Congress and acted like she was a panelist on Piers Morgan)
• Everything that Kash Patel has said since he took office (including that his girlfriend, an alleged Israeli spy, has done more for the country than most Americans will do in ten lifetimes by singing very terrible songs, which remind you just how good Toby Keith’s “Courtesy of the Red, White, and Blue” actually was)
• Taking full control of the curriculum of colleges and forcing them to teach that everything Israel does is good
• Using the FCC to threaten to remove Jimmy Kimmel from the air
• Deporting people for not supporting Israel hard enough
• Threatening to invade Nigeria (“with guns blazing,” mind you, like in a cartoon such as Quick Draw McGraw)
• Attacking healthcare while expanding the military budget to $1 trillion and refusing to make any serious attempt at actually deporting people (as well as a refusal to shut down H-1B, instead “reforming” it in a way that allows new regulations to be easily bypassed in like six different ways)
• etc.

no one should be surprised by lunatic concepts coming out of this administration.

The first thing to understand about this is that the mortgage system itself is a huge part of what has driven up the cost of homes. Mortgages allow people who can’t afford homes to buy them, and because there is a limited supply of homes, it raises the price. The difference between the cost of the wood, concrete, and plastic that homes are made out of (plus the labor), and the cost of the home, is in large part a result of the mortgage system. If people were required to save up to buy a home in cash, homes would be much cheaper across the board.

Here’s a bit of math:

That is with the current 6.25% interest you will currently get on a fixed rate mortgage.

Here is the same equation as above on a 50-year mortgage:

The bank makes all that money.

It appears very similar to a kind of debt slavery, to spend your time working to pay the bank.

Is a House Even Something You Want?

There is a bigger question here with all of this “can’t afford homes” hysteria, and that is the question of whether you even want or need a home, or if it is just something you assume you should do as part of your adult life trajectory.

Mortgages may make sense for someone investing in real estate. If we take the example of the $400,000 home, that should rent for an average of $3,500 a month. So, you might go for a slightly shorter mortgage, but as long as the rent is paying the mortgage, you’re effectively getting the house for free, then after that, you’ve got cashflow from rent. This makes sense, particularly given that as long as the rate is fixed, you are going to benefit from inflation. (The primary residence homeowner is also benefiting from inflation, but because they are living there and not collecting rent, they are tying up money that could be invested elsewhere making profit.)

Following from that, if you do want to own a home, it makes more sense to buy it and rent it out until it is paid off. If you structure the mortgage strategically, you can both make the payment with the rent money and pay your own rent in a small apartment. (This is all a single man really needs – virtually my entire adult life I’ve lived in studio apartments. I don’t even like having a separate bedroom. I like the kitchen/table/desk/bed all in the same space.)

If you are young, and trying to make money, there is a good argument against buying a house. Unless you’re married and you have kids, tying up that money just doesn’t make any sense. If you’re unmarried, I don’t think a man should buy a house unless he can buy it in cash, and even then, it should be less than a third, probably less than a quarter, of his net worth.

This is not the 1950s. You don’t have a path laid out for you where you get a job, get married, have kids, work, retire to go fishing and spend time with the grandkids. You can’t really get married. I mean you can, people do it all the time. But it is generally a horrible idea because women are horrible and in the West, women have all the power in a marriage. As we’ve been over a trillion times, if she gets bored at any moment, she can leave you and take half your money and go on a cocaine party spree with the blacks. When you get married, you are betting your entire life on the hope that this bitch will never get bored.

There are various ways to mitigate risk. If you can find a girl with a father you are sure will side with you if she tries to divorce you, that mitigates a lot. However, a girl’s father is going to be in his forties, and just as controlled by his wife as you will be, meaning in most or virtually all cases, he won’t be able to side with you even if he wants to, for fear he himself will get divorce raped. Mothers and daughters are doing porn together. This is a popular genre of porn. Poor Charlie Sheen, who is currently in the media on some kind of “losing” tour, has a daughter who does porn with her mother. I think it is softcore, but mommy-daughter hardcore is a thing. Do you think women won’t do divorce together? This is what women do. They egg each other on, justifying each other’s behaviors. That was the only notable bit of insight in the third season of White Lotus (which was a steep drop-off in quality, quite frankly).

If the girl is a virgin, she’s like 15 times less likely to divorce you. Virginity is the single biggest determiner of divorce. A virgin forms a psychic bond with the man. It becomes strange for a woman to think about sex with another man, as she associates the act itself with the only man she has done it with. If a woman has had sex with other men already, the fact that you did a marriage doesn’t have an effect on the fact that her brain is imprinted for multiple partners. But where are you going to find a virgin, given these age of consent laws? There aren’t any 18-year-old virgins. And even if the age of consent is 16, it’s hardly even plausible in the West to find a 16-year-old to marry.

I am a millennial. I know a lot of people who got married. All of them are either divorced or on the edge of it. I’ve seen different strategies. I’ve seen “just do everything she says, try not to make her mad.” I’ve seen “act alpha and try to be the boss.” I’ve seen crying and begging and I’ve seen yelling and threatening. And everything in between. None of the relationships have worked. It’s possible that younger girls will be less extreme, given that there seems to be a cultural rejection of the “trade having everything for free and a man who works all the time to take care of you for a vague and fleeting abstract notion of ’empowerment'” among girls under 25. But even if that is their thinking, it does not imply any sense of duty.

Also, the “find a religious girl” is a ridiculous strategy. Firstly, there aren’t very many religious girls. Secondly, all Protestants and most American Catholics now tolerate divorce. Protestant churches have “counselors” who will advise women to divorce over even very mild physical discipline by a man. They will say a slap or a push are universal cause for divorce.

Furthermore, and this should be obvious but apparently it isn’t: a religious virgin, even of middling attractiveness, is like one of those crystal skulls from that Indiana Jones movie about crystal skulls. I think it was called “Indiana Jones and the Crystal Skulls.” Really a sickening movie. First they attacked the Nazis as evil, then they attack the communists as evil. What’s next, Indiana Jones vs. Metallica? “Everything cool is evil, so sayeth George Lucas, avatar of the Jews.” Point being: there are few things rarer or more valuable in the United States than a religious virgin. What that means is that she has her pick of the litter. She has the ability to marry an extremely high value man. Given that you are a Daily Stormer reader, you are presumably an above average specimen of masculinity (and/or a schizophrenic teetering on the edge). But even at “above average,” you are not “elite.” If you were elite, you would formulate some scheme, marry a girl in Eastern Europe or South America, keep her in a house guarded by neo-Nazi thugs on steroids with neck tattoos, and just go see her in your private jet. You would actually probably have many such setups around the world. Imagining that you are capable of swinging the top prize of women is delusional. Further, I won’t go into my whole thing about how even the most attractive, rich, and powerful men in the world have been divorce-raped. But you all know that bit.

Marriage is not something you should think about until you have the money and power to make it at least theoretically feasible. These are the times we live in. Therefore: unless your house is also a really good investment for some reason (i.e., it’s in a neighborhood that is in the process of being gentrified or you have studied maps showing that it will be gentrified – a difficult proposition given the old Obama-era “burying them in niggers” rules about flooding majority white neighborhoods with “multifamily” public housing), there is no reason to buy a house. Only buy it as an investment and you have to know something to know if it is an investment.

This clip of billionaire Charlie Munger saying “I don’t care if single people ever get a house” is old but recently went viral.

People got mad. But what he is saying, that a house is not really an investment and you should only buy it if you need to live there, is a rather popular sentiment among financial people. They cite the cost of maintaining a house and the appreciation being related primarily to inflation.

I’m not an investment advisor. A lot of people view real estate as by far the best investment, given that land is necessarily a conservative investment, given that it will always be worth something. Of course, in most places, the house is worth more than the land it is built on. Which seems counterintuitive.

But financial advisors do often advise against viewing a personal home as an investment. Again, in my experience, as far as single family homes go, the best investment is in a place that has a lot of blacks but where, in some period of time, the blacks will be priced out. Obviously, if you have kids, you don’t want that, but if you’re single and you’ve got a gun, it might be fine.

Here is Gary Cardone, a real estate investor, telling you not to buy a house.

A real estate investor’s take on the 50 year mortgage pic.twitter.com/9lsP1dpeGA

— Grant Cardone (@GrantCardone) November 11, 2025

He says when you are building your wealth, it is better to invest in business, instead of tying up a significant percentage of your net worth in a home. As he says, the fifty-year mortgage makes it dumber, but regardless, the house is a liability, not an asset. I have heard RFK’s bit about how young people should own homes, because it builds equity, and it is just total boomerism. Is equity in a home you’re paying a mortgage on worth more than you would make simply investing in the stock market conservatively, or gambling on crypto?

And then there’s this:

If I was forced to give advice on all of this, I would tell people to buy a cheap rural house with a lot of land. Not really though. At this point, my actual advice is to simply leave America.

Regardless, This is Definitely Not a Solution

What Trump is ostensibly attempting to address is the fact that the average age of first time homeowners is now 40. This is ridiculous, and a much worse situation than in most third world countries. The merits of a 30-year mortgage can be weighed. It is a banking scam, but it has certainly worked out for some people who have bought homes that drastically increased in value at a fixed rate while inflation was going wild.

Fifty years only slightly lowers your monthly payment, and nearly doubles the amount you end up paying in the end. Boomers bought homes in cash or with short mortgages. The country is supposedly richer than ever, so why can’t people buy houses?

There are various issues. But the biggest issue is immigration. That is what is creating this “affordability crisis.” The second biggest issue is out-of-control government spending. No one voted for America to become an empire. It doesn’t benefit Americans in any way. The average age of a first time homebuyer in Norway is 28. Basically everyone in Norway is rich. Norway also has all kinds of government benefits. And so on. They’re not filled with immigrants, they are not running an empire, people can lead good, normal, middle class type lives, which is really what most people want.

Some people dream of being rich. Probably Americans dream of that more than people in most other countries, because America has such a vapid, soulless, materialistic culture. But humans in general want to live in a relatively comfortable house, be able to afford to have a family and send their kids to good schools, have some nice consumer electronics, buy high quality groceries, eat out a few times a month at a nice restaurant, go on a nice vacation once a year. That is the basic framework for normal humans, which is what we generally call “middle class.”

The middle class has been systematically crushed in the United States. A fifty-year mortgage, where you pay 3 times the cost of the home, is a dumb gimmick in a long line of dumb gimmicks that never even pretend to attempt to address the root causes of income inequality in America. It’s like blowing up random boats to address the fentanyl crisis. The root cause of the fentanyl crisis is the fact that a bunch of people want to do fentanyl. Frankly, if we just do basic game theory, becoming a fentanyl addict might be a valid choice, given the other choices people have. So you need to ask “why is becoming a fentanyl addict considered a reasonable life path in this country?” The answer would go to the dissolution of the family, the end of religion, the fragmenting of social bonds, and several other things no one wants to talk about because the solutions would not benefit the agendas of the ruling elite class.

The problems this country has are now all so bad that it appears as though any attempt at a solution can only make things worse. If fifty-year mortgages were to become a widespread thing (it’s unlikely they will, but if), the new people who would become eligible to enter the housing market would drive up demand to the point that the fifty-year mortgage would be the same price as a thirty-year mortgage is now. That would be very profitable for banks, but not to anyone else.

Fixing Society

The only way to fix society would be to fundamentally restructure it. Ironically, this is the plan of the Silicon Valley people I talked about on Tuesday. And I think a lot of people will go along with their plan, because the current situation is so ridiculous. The idea of sacrificing certain freedoms in exchange for a livable apartment and a monthly cash allowance from the government would currently appeal to quite a high percentage of the American population.

A lot of New Yorkers who voted for Trump also voted for Mamdani. This is the situation. People are just supporting anything that seems different. They’re not voting for ideology, except on the basis that maybe some ideology will fix their situation. These ideological concepts are a luxury for people without serious problems. Americans, at least young Americans, have serious problems and do not have the luxury of ideology, so they will just support whoever and whatever.

In order to fix society, you would need some kind of cultural revolution that unified people. Interestingly, opposition to Israel and Israeli influence in America is serving as a uniting factor for young people.

I’ve always thought opposition to Jews was a great place to start.

Unfortunately, this week I don’t have the sort of interesting commentary I had last week. Go read that one if you didn’t. Someone hacked my mainframe and put up a fake warning saying the text wasn’t worth reading, but it was actually very inciteful. In… sightful… I didn’t mean to imply it would incite something. That was a genuine homonym error. Many such cases.

In terms of what’s up with me? You ask? Things are going great. Feeling good, drinking various shakes made of grass for the antioxidants. Just joking, I’m not drinking shakes and I’m not doing great either for that matter. No, I’m fine. Great, really. Having a lot of fun working on the project.

Just pounding it out. Grinding.

The new writer is good, right? The Venezuela piece?

Oh and yes, I know some things about the site still look messed up on the phone. I’m slowly working through that with AI. You know, I can’t really hire IT people. I mean someone runs the server. But it’s difficult to give people access to the main site because everyone is out to get me. I am not a programmer, so I left the site looking the same for like 15 years or whatever, then it broke for some reason, and I couldn’t update the thing. I spent like $300 on prepaid cards to try to rebuy the thing, no luck. I still can’t use a VISA card. I’m banned for the rest of my life because of a fat joke in 2017. Did I already tell this story? Anyway, if I did, a lot of people apparently missed it, because people keep whining about the site looking bad. I think it looks good now. Except on a phone if there are embeds. I will fix that at some point this week. Right now, probably 30 hours of my life have been dumped into trying to fix this. And yes, that is part of why there have been fewer articles. It just is what it is. Anyway, I removed that white line people hated. I liked the white line. But most did not.

I like it better black. White light from the screen literally makes you gay. I hope you know that. It makes you gay.

If you’re not gay already, you are probably against that. If you are gay, it’s possible you want to become even more gay, but you can go elsewhere for that.

Editor’s Pick of the Week:

Runner-Up:

Special mention for this one:

Fact-checkers proved that this meme I made was the number one reason Mamdani won the election in New York. Just joking. I didn’t make that meme. It’s probably AI. But it is indeed believed to be the number one reason Mamdani won.

Don’t tell Mamdani, he thinks I made it and sinched him the win. Don’t worry about him reading this. He’s from Africa so he can’t read. I know you’re thinking “yes, but he’s not black, his family were Indian colonizers in Africa.” That’s true but it’s discredited pseudoscience that being black makes it so you can’t read. It’s actually that if you or any of your ancestors ever lived in Africa, you can’t read. It’s because of an ancient voodoo curse. That’s the real science.

I called Mamdani to thank him for winning and demanded he immediately impose Sharia law and communism and he said “roger that, comrade” and hung up the phone. Then later he texted me.

So according to my information, the plan is going forward: he is combining communism with Sharia law to completely crush the infidels/capitalists.

Even after the killing starts, remember to keep calling his office and demanding he kill more and more people. Also make sure he nationalizes all the Jew diamond shows and gives free diamonds to the workers.

The Primo Collection:

Firstly, this is apparently real:

President Trump was booed by the crowd at the Lions-Commanders NFL game.

Follow: @AFpost pic.twitter.com/ouXVfwpz4T

— AF Post (@AFpost) November 10, 2025

I saw that posted on Twitter, and thought it was edited. I mean, that is a long, long boo. But at least according to the AP, it is real. Maybe the AP will start posting AI slop at some point. But I don’t think they have yet.

That is a Redskins game. I won’t call them their new name, ever, just as I will never call Twitter its new name. I don’t agree with changing things. I believe in Lindyism. So, the Redskins don’t play in Washington anymore, because their stadium was sacked by niggers. They play somewhere in Maryland. Regardless, most people in attendance would be government workers. Everyone in that entire region works for the federal government. And Trump was doing this shutdown thing.

Trump was looking completely Palpatinian during the boos.

He is definitely not nearly as good as Emperor Palpatine. I’ve been obsessively reading Star Wars Expanded Universe novels (which Disney retitled “Legends” when they nuked the canon). Do you know how it never really made sense that the Empire would build the Death Star just to intimidate guerrilla warfare fighters? Well, the novels explain that they actually built that to fight the Yuuzhan Vong, a threat from outside the galaxy. Thrawn had joined the Empire to fight against the Vong, and Palpatine built the Death Star (twice) to defend against the Vong.

Trump, by comparison, is building an empire for purely cartoonish evil purposes, as far as anyone can tell. It is all of course about Israel on its face, but then you see this whole Silicon Valley globalist transhumanist thing behind that, where these people want to create a post-human reality where they can live forever and conquer outer space. I have been talking about this since before I even launched the Daily Stormer. I was reading about this in the early 2000s.

I remember watching the documentary TechnoCalyps when it was released in 2006.

Everyone thought I was insane when I talked about it, and now it has just become a common discussion point.

The logic then behind the Trump Administration is to create as much chaos as is humanly possible in order to discredit the existing system. This actually lines up nicely with the Israeli-Jewish agenda to create mass death all over the world.

The “endless war everywhere forever” thing has been discussed a lot, and everyone at this point understands that this creates terrible chaos. It’s probably worth talking about some of the other chaos.

On top of the endless war, Trump is creating severe economic chaos.

Tariff Idiocy

People are saying “the tariffs didn’t work,” but it’s like dude, what does that mean? Do you think Trump thought that simply adding these lunatic taxes was going to make factories spontaneously spring up in America?

There are so many different problems with the “factories will spontaneously start popping up everywhere and give Americans really great jobs” theory.

To list just a few of those problems:

• No one is going to build a factory in the US based on the promises of Donald Trump when he is switching everything back and forth constantly. Furthermore, even if they had faith in Trump sticking to what he says (which no one has), because of the way our system works, in 2028 a different administration could abolish the tariffs, making your factory in the US worthless.
• The regulatory environment doesn’t exist in the US to make factories viable. One of the primary reasons it made sense to move everything to China was that China did not have all of these regulations. They also have lower taxes and so on. The only reason anyone would ever make a factory in the US is if literally every other country was effectively banned from exporting to the US. Otherwise, even if you had faith that the tariffs would last, you would wait to see whichever country didn’t have brutal tariffs, and build the factory there. That is: unless you permanently applied crippling tariffs to every country on earth, it would never make sense to build a factory in the US.
• The US does not have a workforce educated on working in factories or a manager class capable of building them. The manufacturing was exported to China before the invention of the iPhone and most modern computer parts. It was the Chinese who figured out how to build and operate these factories to make electronics. And we must be talking about electronic factories. We can’t be talking about like, textile factories. There is no possible way making t-shirts and sneakers in the US would make sense economically.
• The supply chains do not exist. This one thing in itself makes the whole concept impossible on its face. China has deals with countries all over the world to import everything necessary for making all the things they make. China also has the ability to redirect these resources to other locations. (When in Trump’s first term he tariffed/sanctioned China, China just moved factories to Southeast Asia, and it took just a matter of months. They control the flow of the supply chains, so it was nothing to redirect raw resources to Vietnam or Thailand or wherever. They also of course had the ability to build the factories and train the workers.)
• If things were made in the US, they would cost a lot more. Even if you overhauled the entire regulatory framework, which Trump has never even talked about doing, the increased labor costs, the increased taxes, and so on would make things way more expensive. The claim is that people would be paid more and therefore capable of affording more expensive products, but think that through: you’re talking about a complete overhaul of the entire US economy, basically restructuring it from the ground up. This isn’t something that happens on its own. When all of a sudden consumer electronics are 2-3 times the price, people working in most jobs have not gotten the wage increases to pay for that premium. (In theory, you would combine the reshoring with removing the immigrants, but Trump is doing nothing on that front either, as we will touch on later.)
• Automation makes “high-paying factory jobs” a spook. This is maybe the most important point. When the jobs were moved to China in the 1990s, it meant that money was not put into automating these factories, because China had cheap labor. As China has gotten rich, and labor has gotten more expensive, they have begun developing the technologies to automate factories.

Here are some videos of Chinese automated factories:

“Dark Factory”: Production wholly automated. No worker involved. So lights off.
This is the goal of developing AI and robots for optimal efficiency. China has entered the era of “Dark Factory”. pic.twitter.com/vGg1LPi2vB

— Li Zexin 李泽欣 (@XH_Lee23) February 23, 2025

More than 1000 robots work in the electric car factory in Chongqing. It is said that this is the version of Industry 4.0, and the key procedures are 100% automated. pic.twitter.com/xyG5M9NGjw

— Sharing Travel (@TripInChina) April 12, 2024

Chinese robots have proven that, one day, easy repetitive labor will be replaced.

3 hours, 0 errors. China’s self-developed humanoid robots moved 800 boxes in an auto factory, with the entire process livestreamed. pic.twitter.com/YBsS7ohx2W

— Li Zexin 李泽欣 (@XH_Lee23) July 11, 2025

It’s happening. China now has completely dark factories which require near 0 human labor.

They have 7x more industrial robots than any other country, like this car factory in this video.

Humans will not have to do most manual labor jobs ever again. pic.twitter.com/wyhsKfHeet

— Deedy (@deedydas) July 21, 2025

Automated factory of EFORT robotics in China, where robots makes more robots.

I often get replies claiming automation means manufacturing moving back to mature markets.

This view disregards the complexity in the industrial robot supply chain.

1/4 pic.twitter.com/fWcGzAAVnM

— Zhao DaShuai 东北进修 (@zhao_dashuai) August 20, 2023

There aren’t really any “high-paying factory jobs” left at any kind of scale. There are some engineer jobs in electronic factories in China. These are skilled workers who would have to go through months or years of training after already having the educational framework, and so if you were going to move these factories to the US, it would be much, much cheaper to simply pay the Chinese to come work in the factories as engineers, and maybe have them run a program over a course of years to educate Americans in this field.

If you really wanted these factories in America, which I think serves no real purpose at this point, you would make a deal with China to help you move the factories. All you would have to do is surrender Taiwan. They will do anything to get Taiwan. So you trade that for them helping you build the factories in the US and then helping you train the engineers to run these largely automated factories.

You sometimes see clothing that says “made in Bangladesh” or whatever. These are not high-skilled workers, they are just working on sewing machines. But if you move those jobs to the US, you quadruple the cost of clothes, and still, the people working in them don’t get much more than they would make at an Amazon warehouse.

So the grand plan of reshoring manufacturing was not ever a serious plan. Trump seems to be suffering from age-related cognitive decline, but even so, none of this ever made any basic sense at all, and someone had to have told him this.

As far as using it as leverage to renegotiate trade deals, suggesting that he was lying to everyone about reshoring factories and it was really about better trade deals… well, that also never made any sense. Everyone knew China could cut off the US in hundreds of different ways, and everyone knew they would do that if the US tried to play hardball on trade. That’s what they did. They just had to hold rare earths and magnets, which among other things, are needed for the US war machine. Trump immediately folded, meeting with Xi late last month and offering an unconditional surrender.

Back to the question: did the tariffs “fail”? Well, if you believed Trump was going to bring back factories, or force China into a significantly different trade arrangement, then sure, they failed. But as explained, that could not possibly have been the goal, as any bright high schooler could have spent a week going over the data and reached the conclusion that neither of those things were even vaguely feasible. Therefore, it seems that the goal had to have been creating mass chaos, in which case, the tariff scheme was a grand success.

Every chaotic outcome was achieved. Everything is more expensive, the stock market is all messed up. Everyone had to pay these new taxes while they were in effect and no one is getting their money back. It cost every individual more than $1,000. That might not seem huge, but it is to a lot of Trump voters, who are poor. More importantly, it ravaged small businesses. By July, there was a 30% increase in small businesses declaring bankruptcy from the previous year, and the Biden economy surely was not great for small businesses, many or most of which were already put out of business by the coronavirus mania. Even though the tariff thing is probably going to be completely abandoned, many more businesses are likely to fail as a result of these strange actions.

Furthermore, it solidified the view of the world that the US is a totally unstable, erratic, rogue state which has no place being in charge of the world order.

Retarded Immigration Policy

Trump has abandoned virtually all of his core policy agendas he campaigned on, including:

• Fixing the economy (see above)
• Ending wars (see any news site any day)
• Stopping trannies (he still has not even picked up Marjorie’s bill to ban child sexual mutilations or cancer-causing, brain-shrinking injections)
• Bringing back freedom of speech (he has been even more aggressive than Joe Biden in using the government to shut down freedom of speech, and his people have threatened to start enforcing nonexistent “hate speech” laws)
• Shrinking the government (DOGE failed to do anything but annoy some people and then was shut down, Trump did the largest military budget in history, the only thing he is doing is taking away people’s Medicaid, which literally no one wanted – protecting entitlements was actually another one of his promises, haha)

So the only thing left is his promise to do something about immigration.

But the immigration enforcement he is doing now is just a big show. You cannot remove tens of millions of people by grabbing them off the street one at a time. This is insanely expensive and it is cruel. Sorry, but I am not ashamed to admit this: I do not like seeing masked steroid guys with tattoos throwing screaming women into vans. Of course, if it was working and that was the only way, I would ignore my emotions, but it isn’t working, and most people will not ignore their emotions. Most people think this is grotesque, and it is going to be used by the Democrats as a reason to not do anything with immigration.

As I’ve said six trillion times: you could remove the overwhelming majority of immigrants by simply making it illegal to employ or rent to illegal immigrants. Give a few landlords ten-year prison sentences, and all of a sudden, no illegal immigrant has a place to live. Throw a couple guys in prison for hiring illegals to help them do roofing from outside Home Depot, and it is impossible to get jobs. They will all just leave. It’s very simple.

Of course, Trump would never do this because his donors use illegal labor. But it is what people should be calling for. No one is calling for it. I watch these shows and these people are just saying “we need even more ICE!” Why are these people saying this? It isn’t a complicated issue: banning renting/hiring would remove a minimum of 70% of illegals in a matter of months, without the government taking any other action.

Instead, Trump’s goal is to deport 600,000 illegals per year. He won’t make anywhere close to that number. But that would be 2.4 million during his term, which is 25% or less of the immigrants that entered under Joe Biden. Imagine that in 2016 he was saying we need to deport millions of people, then you add 10-15 million to that, and his goal is now to deport a small chunk of the new ones. This is a joke.

The government is building the biggest federal police force in history, bigger than every other federal law enforcement agency combined. It is very expensive. People say I’m going too far when I say that it is going to be used on Americans, but what else would it be used for? Just like the tariffs can’t be about reshoring manufacturing, ICE can’t be about immigration. They’re also building camps. What are the camps for?

Look, I am not saying they are going to start rounding people up tomorrow. But it sure as hell looks like they are preparing for some kind of very serious unrest in this country.

Palantir Techno Police State

Palantir was founded by Peter Thiel and is run by an extremist Zionist Jew. They are the number one company involved in the AI targeting of people in Gaza by Israel. They are currently working on putting together a unified federal database, which will include all information about you that the government possesses across all agencies. This will then be combined with data they buy from Facebook and Google about your personal activities. Then the whole thing will be made searchable with AI.

This will be a database with everything about you. With the Google Maps data, this will include everywhere you’ve ever traveled. (Remember how the J6 protesters were identified using Google Maps data?) Then of course it has all of your contacts, and presumably most of your communications as well.

That is a complete science fiction nightmare.

They are already using this type of AI-driven data analysis to target pro-Palestinian activists in the US.

The company is named after a magic device in The Lord of the Rings that allows for the surveillance of people by evil wizards.

If you wanted to create a technological dystopia, where a small minority of ultra-wealthy people with the technology to live forever rule over a large group of peasants, you would first totally collapse the existing order. Collapsing the existing order allows for the formation of a new order.

That is what you are witnessing right now: a purposeful collapse of the existing order, which will cause people to demand some kind of new order. And probably, in this new order, people will be materially better off than they are now.

Remember that Yuval Noah Harari, the Israeli Jew who is one of the ideological drivers behind the World Economic Forum, has said that humans are obsolete and the goal is now to get them to die off by giving them drugs and video games so they just sit at home and rot.

Yuval Noah Harari, an Israeli homosexual and outspoken member of the WEF, has stated that these useless, worthless people will need to be controlled with video games, porn, and drugs.

That’s his “best guess”. He’s stated it multiple times.

In Christ we can all find purpose, to… https://t.co/MvBcShg4MG pic.twitter.com/p2PeAWJiUo

— Michael Rivera (@MichaelWRivera) December 24, 2024

You can find many more extreme statements from him. Because of his bad optics, the WEF has downplayed his role, but he has appeared on multiple panels with WEF head Klaus Schwab himself, and Schwab quotes him extensively in his “Great Reset” book.

Nothing Harari says is qualitatively different than anything any of these other WEF people say, it’s simply more outrageously worded. This is the basic idea the elite have for the future, and it is not a secret, and these sorts of changes could only be implemented through some kind of chaos and organized collapse.

Furthermore, one should understand: virtually all Western world leaders and captains of industry attend these WEF meetings. And no one comes out of them and says “these people are a bunch of freaks, talking about how they’re going to build a police state, depopulate the earth, live forever and conquer outer space.” People go to these meetings and then praise the Forum. Barack Obama has personally praised Harari specifically.

The fact that none among the elite are speaking out against this, and that includes Elon Musk by the way, certainly indicates that they are not bothered by it. These extreme, weird ideas are taken for granted as normal by all of the Western global elite, and it is only ever the Russians or the Chinese who speak up about how bizarre and anti-human it all is.

A New and Even Shittier American Experience

In my view, the best way to view the chaos we are seeing in the government now, and the cartoonish way things are being run, is through the lens of a purposeful collapse.

The standard lens to view it has become that of a government completely controlled by Israel. This is of course also correct. But again, the chaos that is created as a result of the relationship to Israel is part of a larger chaos that is being created. Behind that, you should look for the establishment of a police state, which will be used to deal with the people who take issue with this new system.

You can read however much you want about this new system. None of it is really a secret. I’ve written about it a lot here. Probably, the easiest way to make a connection between the Silicon Valley worldview and Donald Trump’s supporters is via Curtis Yarvin, a blogger who spent years calling for the establishment of oligarchical rule in America and became an ideological figurehead for the people in Silicon Valley who want to establish this kind of system. Yarvin does podcasts and tries to sell this to right-wing thinkers as something that is in line with their values.

It would be easy to get confused, if you didn’t know what was going on. Obviously, most right-wing people are pretty fed up with democracy, and on its face, replacing democracy with a more authoritarian system sounds like a fine enough idea. However, the kind of authoritarianism matters, and if you look to the World Economic Forum, you see the type of authoritarianism Silicon Valley people are pushing for. It is not a “fascist” or “communist” type system where state power is used to enforce some brand of populism. It is also not a theocratic type system. Given that those are the only types of authoritarian systems we are familiar with in history, we have to imagine a new form. Technology and the theory of emerging super-technology is fundamental to the worldview of these people who are positioning themselves to take over.

It is logical enough from their perspective. They have all the money. They are building technologies which they think will allow them to live forever and to conquer outer space. Whether that sort of thing ever happens is up in the air, but the fact that most people’s jobs will be replaced with AI or robots is simply a fact. So you will have an excess population. And it is logical enough that these people with the power would view that excess population as a drain on the limited resources they have on the earth, which they want to use for their various projects they are planning to do in their eternal lives.

Their documents and their meetings leave very little to the imagination in terms of what they are planning. And we know that these people all played a major role in funding Trump’s campaign. Again, Yarvin is playing the role as ideological intermediary between them and the Trump base. Bigger than Yarvin, of course, is James “JD Vance” Bowman, who worked for Peter Thiel and then had his entire political career funded by Thiel. Vance was “never Trump” until he ran for Senate in Ohio, when it was clear that his backers wanted him to be aligned with Trump. And then of course he was chosen as VP as part of some negotiation for funding from Silicon Valley. Musk was a bigger backer than even Miriam Adelson, and he’d lobbied for Vance.

It’s worth noting that Tucker Carlson also lobbied for Vance and appears to currently be working with Vance. Tucker also brought Thiel’s ideological figurehead into mainstream discourse, being the first “MAGA” individual to interview Yarvin.

I’ve gone back and forth on whether or not Tucker is malicious or simply stupid. It ultimately doesn’t matter. He is very much an operator for these Silicon Valley people and their agenda, despite the fact that this has no real connection whatsoever to the agenda he ostensibly represents.

It’s hard to believe that stupidity could explain a play to position the Silicon Valley Trojan Horse transhumanist guy to become president. But I have also mused that I suspect Tucker may stab Vance in the back and try to become president himself in 2028, in which case, his relationship with and advocacy for Vance would have been part of a long game.

What is clear regardless is that the agenda of Silicon Valley (which again, is itself very clear, you don’t have to rely on conspiracy theories or speculation to discover it) does not in any way align with what the MAGA base wanted from Donald Trump. Further, it is clear that during Trump’s second time in office, he’s shown virtually no interest in doing anything for the masses of people who supported him, and is only concerned with the donors. Weird things like the tariff war can be explained and make sense if viewed as part of an agenda to create chaos and unrest in America (and also likely cannot be explained any other way).

It is interesting to consider all of this. These talks about politics are not interesting at all, and increasingly, talk about Israel and antisemitism is becoming very boring. If nothing else, an evil science fiction scheme at least spices things up a bit.

After taking a short break from slaughtering the peoples of the Near East, the peace-loving US Ultra-Zionist War Regime has turned its sights upon Venezuela, for the crime of violating the democratic principles of who we are. As is well known, human rights democracy is a system of principles under the rule of law, which means everyone has to vote and America gets to kill them and steal their stuff if they vote wrong.

In order to fully understand Venezuela, we must go back to the year 1902, when President Cipriano Castro repudiated the country’s foreign debts, leading the European powers to join together and impose a blockade on…

Uh, hang on. I don’t think Trump or Rubio read any of this stuff. We can probably fast forward a bit.

In the year 1998, Hugo Chávez was elected to his first term as President and began to enact the Bolivarian Revolution, nationalizing Venezuela’s oil industry…

No wait, Trump probably slept through this part of the briefing too. Skip.

In November of 2020, the history of Venezuela began when the illustrious Rudy Giuliani went out to the Four Seasons parking lot after dyeing his hair with molasses and declared that Nicolás Maduro had stolen the US presidential election. With the help of Hugo Chavez’s ghost, he had hacked the Dominion voting machines and taken away all of Trump’s votes, in an act of pure Grinch-like evil.

Giuliani’s revelations were backed by Sidney Powell, the renowned woman lawyer genius, making the case ironclad.

With that irrefutable evidence, it was now clear that Maduro had forgotten the rules of our principles, and therefore, in the words of esteemed Judeo-Anal mouthpiece Lindsey Graham, it was time for him to go.

So, will it happen, or won’t it? After analyzing all of the possible diplomatic and military contingencies, I have come to the conclusion that all of this is gay, and also retarded.

I mean, I don’t really have to explain to you that the US government is always lying about everything, right? We’re all adults here. That’s just basic common sense stuff I shouldn’t have to keep on proving over and over again.

Anyway, the official story is that when he’s not busy running an entire country, Maduro is actually the secret leader of an evil drug cartel. Secretly, even though all the drugs are actually coming from other countries, Maduro is still the mastermind behind it.

Scary stuff. I was asking myself, “why didn’t they do something about this years ago?” Then my assistant, who heard me talking to myself, told me to look up Operation Gideon. As it turns out, in 1948, the Jewish Haganah stormed a bunch of defenseless Palestinian villages and expelled all the Christians and Moslems. I was confused about what this had to do with Venezuela, but then my assistant clarified that Operation Gideon is also the name of a thing that happened in 2020, when US mercenaries tried to lead an invasion of Venezuela.

That’s an interesting coincidence. Though one must suppose there are only so many names for things, eventually leading to things being repeated. (Like, you go to a state fair, and you get scammed by carnies, and say “hey, this doesn’t seem very fair, why do they call it that?” Then you realize they ran out of words and had to start reusing them.)

I’d been thinking, “wouldn’t it be hilarious if Trump tried to invade Venezuela and ended up having a big Bay of Pigs disaster?” But it turns out that already happened, and they somehow managed to mess it up even worse. With the Bay of Pigs, the CIA’s troops at least made it onto the beach and fought a battle before they got wiped out. In Operation Gideon, the Venezuelans knew they were coming, and started shooting them before they even got off the boats. The entire army surrendered without putting up a fight at all.

This makes Trump the first leader to lose a war to Venezuela (literally the single war they won was against Spain to establish the country 200 years ago, then lost every other war they engaged in before effortlessly defeating Donald Trump). The US responded to this fiasco by pretending they didn’t know these guys and had nothing to do with it, and then never talking about it again so everyone would forget that it ever happened.

Jordan Goudreau, the leader of this failed invasion, has since admitted that the “Cartel of the Suns,” which Trump claims Maduro is the leader of, was just a CIA hoax.

LA Times, October 20:

Jordan Goudreau, a former U.S. Green Beret involved in a failed 2020 armed incursion into Venezuela, has alleged that the CIA created the so-called “Cartel de los Soles” in the 1990s and later used it to justify U.S. policies against successive Venezuelan governments.

In an interview with journalist Max Blumenthal for The Grayzone, the ex–special operations contractor said the network attributed to Venezuelan military figures was “a CIA construction” that predates the presidency of Hugo Chávez.

“As far back as the 1990s, the Cartel de los Soles was created by the CIA,” said Goudreau “This isn’t a secret; it’s the truth,” he said. When asked to confirm whether U.S. intelligence was responsible for forming the group, he replied, “Oh, absolutely. That’s not new.”

“We think your president is in charge of the fake drug group that we started ourselves, so now we’re putting up a $50 million bounty to murder him.” That’s really the story they went with. They used to put a little more effort into the lies they told us about countries they were getting ready to invade. Nukes, chemical weapons, baby beheadings, people being turned into upholstery and cleaning products, etc. Now they don’t even care whether anyone believes it, because in a democracy, public opinion does not matter. The people have no representation in the system, and no way to demand redress for their grievances. Things will just happen regardless of what anyone wants. And most of the people are too busy being fat, homosexual, and stoned to pay attention to it anyway.

Also, the CIA admitted this whole story was fake.

NPR:

The U.S. intelligence community says it does not believe Venezuelan President Nicolas Maduro directs Tren de Aragua (TDA), a criminal gang that operates in the U.S., in a newly declassified, redacted memo. The memo contradicts claims by President Trump, who has accused Maduro of controlling the gang, which Trump says is invading the U.S. The government has relied on this argument to justify the deportation of alleged gang members under the Alien Enemies Act.

The April 7 memo obtained by the Freedom of the Press Foundation on May 5 and shared with NPR, shows that the Office of the Director of National Intelligence concluded that while some members of the Maduro regime may tolerate or work with Tren de Aragua, there’s no evidence of widespread, organized cooperation. “The Maduro regime probably does not have a policy of cooperating with TDA and is not directing TDA movement to and operations in the United States.” In fact, the memo states, Maduro and top Venezuelan officials view the gang as a threat. The memo states that the intelligence council, “has not observed the regime directing TDA, including to push migrants to the United States, which probably would require extensive coordination and funding between regime entities and TDA leaders …”

But everyone loves a fireworks show, so that’s what Trump’s been giving them, sending the US Air Force to blow up random fishing boats, which he claims are both Venezuelan and full of drugs. Of course, if they were smuggling drugs on these boats, Trump could send in the Navy SEALs to board them and seize the cargo as proof.

No, they’d probably just smoke it all themselves. Or plant the evidence. Every US special forces soldier is a raging drug fiend. That’s a well-known fact throughout the military. They’re not crack shots, they’re crack addicts.

Destroying random boats that may or may not have drugs on them is just empty spectacle to allow hopeful but gullible peasants to believe that some sort of action is being taken to stop the total decimation of their country by opioids, when in reality no meaningful action has been taken. Go for a walk down any city street. Everyone is still miserable, everything is dirty and disgusting, and fentanyl is everywhere. Nothing is being done about it, and nothing has changed.

The cartoon villain plots against Venezuela have continued to escalate, with the latest failed scheme being an attempt to bribe Maduro’s airplane pilot into kidnapping him.

AP:

The federal agent had a daring pitch for Nicolás Maduro’s chief pilot: All he had to do was surreptitiously divert the Venezuelan president’s plane to a place where U.S. authorities could nab the strongman.

In exchange, the agent told the pilot in a clandestine meeting, the aviator would be made a very rich man.

The conversation was tense, and the pilot left noncommittal, though he provided the agent, Edwin Lopez, with his cell number — a sign he might be interested in helping the U.S. government.

Over the next 16 months, even after retiring from his government job in July, Lopez kept at it, chatting with the pilot over an encrypted messaging app.

The pair texted on WhatsApp and Telegram about a dozen times. But the conversations seemed to go nowhere.

After the August text about the $50 million reward, Lopez sent another saying there was “still time left to be Venezuela’s hero and be on the right side of history.” But he did not hear back.

On Sept. 18, Lopez was watching the news of Trump’s buildup in the Caribbean when he saw a post on X by an anonymous plane spotter who had closely tracked the comings and goings of Maduro’s jetliners over the years, according to three of the people familiar with the matter. The user, @Arr3ch0, a play on Venezuelan slang for “furious,” posted a screenshot of a flight tracking map that showed a presidential Airbus making an odd loop after taking off from Caracas.

“Where are you heading?” wrote Lopez, using a new number.

“Who is this?” responded Villegas, either not recognizing the number or feigning ignorance.

When Lopez pressed about what they discussed in the Dominican Republic, Villegas grew combative, calling Lopez a “coward.”

“We Venezuelans are cut from a different cloth,” Villegas wrote. “The last thing we are is traitors.”

Lopez sent him a photo of them talking to each other on a red leather couch at the airplane hangar the previous year.

“Are you crazy?” Villegas replied.

“A little…,” wrote Lopez.

Two hours later, Lopez tried one last time, mentioning Villegas’ three children by name and a better future he said awaited them in the U.S.

“The window for a decision is closing,” Lopez wrote, shortly before Villegas blocked his number. “Soon it will be too late.”

Realizing that Villegas wasn’t going to join the plan, Lopez and others in the anti-Maduro movement decided to try to unnerve the Venezuelan leader, according to three of the people familiar with the operation.

The day after the testy WhatsApp exchange between Lopez and Villegas, Marshall Billingslea – a close ally of Venezuela’s opposition – took action. A former national security official in Republican administrations, Billingslea had for weeks been trolling Maduro. Now he brought Villegas into his cyberbullying.

“Feliz cumpleanos ‘General’ Bitner!” he wrote in a mocking birthday wish on X the day Villegas turned 48.

Billingslea included side-by-side photographs that would be sure to raise eyebrows. One was the same one that Lopez had shared with Villegas the day before over WhatsApp, except the agent had been cropped out of it. The other was an official air force photo with a gold star denoting his new rank affixed to the shoulder epaulet.

The X post was published at 3:01 p.m. — a minute before another sanctioned Airbus that Maduro has been known to fly took off from Caracas’ airport. Twenty minutes later, the plane unexpectedly returned to the airport.

The birthday wish, seen by almost 3 million people, sent shockwaves across Venezuelan social media, as Maduro’s opponents speculated the pilot had been ordered to return to face interrogation. Others wondered if he would be jailed. Nobody saw or heard from Villegas for days. Then, on Sept. 24, the pilot resurfaced, in an air force flight suit, on a widely followed TV show hosted by Interior Minister Diosdado Cabello.

Cabello laughed off any suggestion that Venezuela’s military could be bought. As he praised Villegas’ loyalty, calling him an “unfailing, kick-ass patriot, ” the pilot stood by silently, raising a clenched fist in a display of his loyalty.

So their Bay of Pigs redux failed, then they said “can’t we just text someone to pick him up for us?” It’s a DoorDash kidnapping plot!

I thought these CIA people were supposed to be ultra competent mega spies, like in all those movies I watched. Getting outwitted by the Chinese is understandable. But getting rolled over and over by Venezuela? It’s like the US national women’s team losing to 13-year-old boys. Anyway, all these gay ops keep on failing, so Trump has escalated the military pressure instead, parking a US aircraft carrier off the coast and flying bombers around to make it look like he might attack at any minute.

- Map of the American military buildup in the Caribbean Sea arround Venezuela. pic.twitter.com/zuEIQnzVuO

— Monitor𝕏 (@MonitorX99800) November 3, 2025

Will he actually start a war with Venezuela? Maybe. I’m guessing probably not. Trump likes to fight people who can’t shoot back at all. Trump went in to fight the Houthis for the Jews, then surrendered weeks later. At the time, we wondered if there was a sort of deeper breach growing between Trump and Netanyahu. Nah. Trump just got spooked because the Houthis were shooting missiles at US ships, and decided to pull out before one of them got hit.

Trump likes to proclaim himself to be the great peacemaker. What he actually does is go around the world starting pointless fights with other countries, then asks to be congratulated when he backs out of the fights that he started.

Venezuela might just be the latest stop on Trump’s endless tour of driving up to the edge of a cliff and then slamming the brakes. Or maybe this time Trump will think he’s finally found an opponent weak enough to be beaten. Militarily, Venezuela is much weaker than Iran or North Korea. If it came to outright war, the US could destroy their navy and air force in a few days, and start bombing wherever it wanted.

But who would actually be the boots on the ground and conquer Venezuela? This fleet Trump is assembling off the coast has enough firepower to do a bombing campaign, but it doesn’t have anywhere close to the number of Marines that would be needed to conquer the country. Colombia was run by pro-US regimes for decades before their last election. Brazil was a close ally under Bolsonaro and his predecessor. If this had happened back then, they might have sent in the troops while the US bombed everything for them. But neither of these neighboring countries is on-board with a US invasion today. Lula is back in Brazil, and Colombia is led by Gustavo Petro, a righteous socialist who hates the baby-killing Jews.

So the US has no neighboring countries to use as bases (Guyana barely counts as a country), and these Venezuelan exiles the CIA has been training are a total joke, who just surrender as soon as any shots are fired. There is no rebel army in Venezuela waiting to rise up and take over. There’s a lot of people who are mad that the US sanctions have destroyed their economy, but none of those people (or very few of them) want the US to come in and start blowing everything up. As with pro-US Cubans, most pro-US Venezuelans live in Miami. If the objective is stealing the oil, the US needs to occupy and control the country, or establish some sort of puppet government. They would need to establish secure zones for the US oil companies to bring in their people without getting shot at or car bombed.

Probably, the US is hoping they can get Venezuela’s army to do a coup against Maduro through a combination of threats and bribery, similarly to how they took down Assad. Maybe that will end up working. It’s been done countless times before in South America. Amidst this kerfuffle, there have been many stories in Western media about Maduro offering deals where he’ll step down.

AP:

Venezuelan government officials have floated a plan in which President Nicolás Maduro would eventually leave office, a bid aimed at easing mounting U.S. pressure on the government in Caracas, according to a former Trump administration official.

The proposal, which was rejected by the White House, calls for Maduro to step down from power in three years and hand over authority to his vice president, Delcy Rodriguez, who would complete Maduro’s current six-year term that runs until January 2031, according to the official who was briefed on the plan but was not authorized to comment publicly on the matter and spoke on the condition of anonymity.

Rodriguez would not run for reelection under the plan, the official said, adding that the White House had rejected the proposal because it continues to question the legitimacy of Maduro’s rule and accuse him of overseeing a narco-terrorist state.

The revelation of Maduro’s attempts to offer a plan to slowly ease himself out of power comes amid growing unease in the Venezuelan leader’s government that President Donald Trump could order military action to try to oust him.

Speaking at a televised event Thursday, Maduro ridiculed reports that Rodríguez would be part of a plan to replace him as an attempt “to divide our people.”

He also mocked Trump’s confirmation Wednesday that the U.S. president had authorized the CIA to operate in Venezuela.

“Can anyone believe the CIA hasn’t been operating in Venezuela for the past 60 years?” Maduro said.

Rodríguez described the alleged plan for Maduro to step down as fake news Thursday.

“FAKE!!” Rodríguez wrote in English on her Telegram account. “More media that add to the garbage dump of the psychological war against the Venezuelan people.”

She added that Venezuela’s leadership is united.

These are fake stories, of course. It’s a textbook psychological warfare tactic. You tell the Venezuelans your leader is already trying to sell you out, so why should you fight for him? Why don’t you stab him in the back first?

And of course, we have the usual shenanigans going on.

AFP:

Venezuela claimed Monday to have dismantled a CIA-financed cell plotting a false-flag attack on a US warship deployed to the southern Caribbean, as Washington stepped up pressure on Caracas by flying bombers nearby.

Venezuelan authorities said they uncovered an operation targeting the USS Gravely, a guided-missile destroyer that docked Sunday in Trinidad and Tobago — within firing distance of the Venezuelan mainland.

The ship’s arrival sparked outrage in Caracas, which called it a “provocation” and claimed it was “aimed at provoking a war in the Caribbean.”

It also deepened tensions with Trinidad and Tobago, whose Prime Minister Kamla Persad-Bissessar is a strong critic of Venezuela’s Nicolas Maduro, and a supporter of US President Donald Trump’s military campaign against drug traffickers in the Caribbean.

Maduro on Monday evening announced he had suspended a gas agreement with Trinidad and Tobago, accusing Persad-Bissessar of transforming her nation “into an aircraft carrier of the American empire against Venezuela.”

As part of Trump’s campaign, the Pentagon has so far deployed seven warships to the Caribbean and one to the Gulf of Mexico.

The United States has also announced the imminent arrival of the USS Gerald R. Ford, the world’s largest aircraft carrier, and its accompanying fleet.

Venezuela and some observers believe Trump’s administration is using the military deployments to build pressure on the government and depose Maduro, whom Washington does not recognize as the legitimate president.

Venezuelan Interior Minister Diosdado Cabello said Monday that a cell “financed by the CIA” planned to attack the USS Gravely and frame Caracas.

Four people were arrested, Cabello said, without providing details of the alleged suspects. Venezuela regularly claims to have arrested US-backed mercenaries working to destabilize Maduro’s administration.

Alongside his naval buildup, Trump recently confirmed authorizing CIA operations in Venezuela and considering ground strikes.

If the bluff fails though, and Venezuela’s army stands by Maduro, I don’t think Trump is going to be able to follow through on his threats. Maybe he’ll bomb some random huts in the jungle and say those were Maduro’s secret drug labs, and now the crisis is over. That seems like his style. Or maybe they’ll try to seize some of the offshore drilling platforms? It seems like he’s going to have to do something, having pushed things this far.

Maduro, of course, has never threatened the US at all, and would be happy to just sit down and talk things out with Trump. In fact, that would probably work if it happened. But Trump is a fool who has surrounded himself with evil councilors, who will always endeavor to prevent anything good from happening.

Venezuela’s Maduro says he almost met with Donald Trump but it was SABOTAGED by John Bolton and Mike Pompeo

MADURO: “If we had met, Trump and I would have understood each other – we would even have become friends… [Bolton & Pompeo] led Trump to a failure. False advisors!” pic.twitter.com/Fwam4aG8ys

— COMBATE | (@upholdreality) February 7, 2024

By the way, that Jordan Goudreau guy who led the failed coup and blew the whistle on the cartel hoax is going to jail now.

CBS News:

A federal judge in Tampa has ordered the arrest of a former Green Beret accused of plotting to invade Venezuela in 2020 after he failed to show up to court for a hearing on whether he should be taken back into custody for violating the conditions of his pre-trial release.

Jordan Goudreau, 49, was arrested last year on weapons smuggling charges tied to the failed coup attempt undertaken during the first Trump administration.

He was released after a few weeks in jail when filmmaker Jen Gatien pledged her $2 million Manhattan apartment where the combat veteran was living as collateral for a bond. In testimony this week, Gatien detailed how the three-time Bronze Star recipient turned abusive, alleging he threatened to harm her and others and sent text messages saying he wouldn’t go back to jail.

“I believe he intends one day to leave this country,” Gatien said, noting that Goudreau previously lived on a sailboat in Mexico.

Judge Christopher Tuite issued an arrest warrant Friday after waiting 30 minutes for Goudreau to show up for the third day of the bond hearing. A probation officer said the ankle monitor Goudreau was supposed to wear was still located in the Tampa area, where Goudreau was living while undergoing equine-assisted therapy supervised by the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs.

Equine-assisted therapy?

You would think this whole thing couldn’t get any dumber, but you should sit down and listen, because a woman is talking.

Venezuelan opposition leader Maria Corina Machado tells Bloomberg that the Palestinian armed resistance group, Hamas, is now located in Venezuela. She welcomes Trump’s recent military escalation and blames all extrajudicial killings on Maduro.

Note: A senior Hamas delegation… https://t.co/tNnX26JW2c

— Drop Site (@DropSiteNews) November 1, 2025

Who knew that Hamas had tunnels extending all the way across the Atlantic Ocean? No wonder Israel can’t defeat them.

I am also aware of certain notable figures out there, particularly those popular among the mugu community, who argue that attacking Venezuela would actually be “based.” They seem to believe that they will somehow benefit personally from this war, in ways that are completely unexplained.

Venezuela, ahhh interesting.

That’s why they push Nick Fuentes everywhere. The world is bigger than the Middle East and he is for regime change in Venezuela!

Just another American who wants chaos for the benefit of their big empire. https://t.co/4SmViOO6QE pic.twitter.com/2B1Ou9PPtl

— Srpski Inat (@SerbianInat) August 14, 2025

To them, I can only say that you are so stupid that it hurts my soul, and in fact it so enrages me that I am about to hurl my own furniture out the window while bellowing like an ape.

PLACEHOLDER ANNOUNCEMENT (posted before there were any memes):

Well, it turns out it’s Tuesday. As usual, no one bothered to tell me. I had to check the thing.

Anyway, I’ve got all the things happening, but I am doing the thing with the things.

The memes I mean. I’m doing the thing with the memes. I will do it today, perhaps, or tomorrow.

Oh, you’d better believe it, my dear friends, and all you unfriendly cocksuckers as well: the memes are coming.

In terms of the Nick Fuentes content people are demanding: I don’t really want to be “the Nick Fuentes guy.” I wrote my first thing. And I will do a followup thing, replying to the replies, and clarifying the things that mugus claimed confused them (I do believe they were confused, this is a truly dense batch of faggotized retards, and some, I assume, are good people – particularly the teenagers who don’t know any better). But frankly, after my first thing went viral, and the people have sort of started to catch on, it’s not like I’m the only person saying this stuff.

Read the comments on this thing where he says everyone who was born in America is “American”:

Nick Fuentes says he will unite with anybody who proclaims America First.

“I don’t care what color you are. If you are born in this country, this is your Birthright. This is our Country, this is our Empire.” pic.twitter.com/xvaqQI2BVb

— KaizerRev (@Kaizerrev) October 31, 2025

Just scroll for a while. Over a thousand comments, virtually none of them positive. So while the kook gibberish was apparently not bothering people, the complete flip-flop on the most basic shit apparently is bothering people.

He will be popular, because he’s being force-memed. Ben Shapiro is still popular, in terms of total views. But this whole thing of him being unquestioned as some kind of honest, good actor is totally over. I’m taking credit for that. I don’t need the credit. But it’s mine and I’m taking it.

So frankly, it isn’t my job to just pick at him. I know people want that. And when I do my podcast, I am going to attack everyone, including him. Frankly, by the time it is rolling (hopefully mid-Feb, probably late March), he probably will have completely crashed out. But he’ll still be around, spewing this kook gibberish and flip-flopping around like a disgusting Mexican bloatfish. So we’ll break down his gibberish in a fun way, where we can watch the clips and make fun of him together as a community. But he’ll be one of many. I am not going to become “the Nick Fuentes guy.”

Right now, it’s admittedly hard not to, because he is everywhere all the time, like a virulent poisonous gas unleashed on helpless jungle dwellers. And there are things I can say about the nature of this astroturf. But I am going to try to say them all in my followup thing, which I will probably publish this week, and then leave that topic alone until my show, where I will attack everyone.

The show is going to be amazing, I promise you. I am watching all of these right-wing podcasts now. There is so much content. Jordan Peterson is an infinite goldmine, for example. This is such great content. People just need to understand how to watch it. You have to understand that this is an insane person, high on drugs, being paid by Jews to promote the Jewish agenda, and on the verge of a total breakdown. You then see the tension and the drama of it all. There are also so many smaller shows with insane people trying to get money. And we can have so much fun with this. And of course, it will also be educational. I will be explaining the real shit while examining the insane shit and the shill shit.

My soul is willing and my body is nearly prepared. But you know. We need the studio and stuff.

There is a good chance we will do a temporary show, a practice show, once a week, while we are setting up the real show.

Also, we’re going to have more content on the site. I’ve got a guy who is working on articles. He’s a genius. We’re working through some editing stuff. But I think he’ll have some analysis on the top issues, big research stuff, once or twice a week. And I’m doing the memes, plus one article, minimum, from here on out. Maybe I’ll also throw up some lower effort stuff, just some commentary. I still write a lot on forums, and I write these long emails to people, in between working on the TV show, which is definitely my main focus.

With that, I am writing fake shows. I am writing test shows. It’s a bit sad to be writing stuff that can’t ever be published, but it needs to be done.

We’re trickling information out about the show, so here’s a trickle: it won’t be totally scripted. Some of it will be scripted. But the stuff that isn’t strictly scripted will be tightly organized with notes. I listened to Daryl Cooper’s explanation of the way he does the podcast, allegedly writing some goofy amount for every hour of content. Cooper seems like another weird shill, but idk. Who knows. I just assume everyone but me is a shill, and then expect them to prove they’re not, you know? But I am sort of doing this thing he talks about, writing out ideas, then also writing some scripted stuff, then also doing notes, more of a bulletpoint thing I can read from. Every week, the show will be posted with an essay. Basically, I will have everything organized by Thursday, then write up a thing preparing myself for the show, which will also be an essay that will be published with the show. If that makes sense. That is the level of structure I want, so I need to write the essay for myself, because writing helps me think things through. Further, if there is anyone who just really hates AV content, they will be able to read the article, which will include many or most of the links to videos or clips I’m working with. It will be probably 3,000 words, maybe much more, so a good solid piece of content for the readers.

Oh and yes, I have heard the site looks not great on a phone. Needs some font alterations or whatever. I am going to get to that. Trust me, guys. I’m working. I am very much working. I am writing entire fake shows, I’m filming myself doing these shows. I have some weird AI thing that rates my speech quality. I’m not really sure I agree with it, but I have that. I have all the things, I am doing the things.

Anyway, I’m in the woods, the internet is slow. If you were thinking “why doesn’t he just post the memes if he’s going to write a thousand word thing about why he’s not posting the memes yet?”, that is the reason.

But I will post the memes. Oh boy, will I post those memes. I am going to post them like a gang rape.

REAL INTRO

I thought about deleting that fake intro because I just read it right now and it sucks and I hate it and I don’t even agree with it. But it would be against journalistic ethics to do that.

Furthermore, contrary to what the sectional heading says, this is not a real intro. The fake intro was indeed the real intro. These kinds of contradictions were happening everywhere on this site, which is why I quit in February. People are like “bro you don’t write enough” and it’s like “yeah, well, I quit, I said I was quitting and trying to figure out some new thing or multiple new things.” Or, perhaps, I said something completely different than that. Perhaps I had promised some number of articles per week which has not been fulfilled. But see, these are the kind of contradictions I am talking about. It’s a pandemic. A real pandemic, unlike that fake coronavirus hoax, amirite? Let’s talk about that some more. Holy shit. That was the real contradiction, or maybe the primary contradiction: the thesis that I could make the news interesting and then it got so boring no one could possibly ever make it interesting.

Speaking of boring news. Between right now and when I wrote that intro, I’ve been on a train then a bus, and was listening to podcasts, because what can you do? Reading gives me a headache and books on tape are for retards. Or maybe they’re for geniuses? I can’t follow them. I get totally lost. So it’s like most of the time this really slow thing of someone reading to you like you’re a child, then at the point you would normally pause your reading to think about something, to formulate a proper image in your mind of the thing in the words, the person keeps reading to you. Then you’re lost and have to try to rewind, but you rewind too far or not far enough because who knows how long you were thinking. So yeah maybe books on tape are marketed to retards who want someone to read to them like they’re a child but are consumed by geniuses who can somehow actually follow a book on tape. Seriously. Don’t do it, guys. Just learn to read. I’ve made it easy for you. I’ve been able to get you to read these long things I write, because I am that good at the thing. Some say I’m the best. I don’t know if I’m the best, but some people say that, a lot of people say I’m the best. I’m probably the best. I mean, you look around, you’re asking “who’s better?” I don’t know anyone better. Do you know someone better? I got you into reading. Start reading books, don’t listen to books on tape. If you do, don’t tell people you read books. I call people on that shit. People tell me “I read a book…” and I say “did you? Did you read the book, or did you listen to it on tape, having someone else read it aloud to you like you’re a little child in bed with mommy?”

The point is, every podcast was about Nick Fuentes. Even the ones supposed to be about this Venezuelan war were about Nick Fuentes. So I don’t know about not writing more about him. I was happy to see, in the comments of the clip above, real people for once actually calling this shit out, which I do take credit for (my article got insane traffic). So on some level, I’d like to say “my work here is done, or it will be after I write my hate reply to all the mugus who did psychoanalysis against me while not even attempting to respond to a single point I made.”

One guy did make an argument. A Fuentes fan. First he posted multiple comments about the beginning of the article. And I replied that he should read the whole thing before commenting. Then he said that the article was too long and it should have been published in sections. I said “people write books, most books are read in more than one sitting, no one asks authors to publish their books in 500-word pamphlets, you obviously do not read books or we wouldn’t be having this conversation, but many people do read books, and many or even most people now read books on computer screens of some sort, which is what this article is, words on a computer screen, a lot of people who read books choose chapter endings as an opportunity to take a break, you can use my subheadings as chapters and take your time.” [Author’s Note to Editor: That is intended as a run-on sentence. It’s a stylistic choice.] So he agreed with that, and read the whole article before commenting again however many days later, and said something like: “Well, maybe he knows the news is boring, so he makes things up to make it more interesting?” That’s the one defense. A screenshot is in my rebuttal, which is actually a hit piece on mugus, not Fuentes, as I’m not really adding new points about Fuentes. But it is this sprawling mess written in multiple sittings that needs to be chopped.

So it’s good people are pushing back. I keep saying I did that but it was definitely bound to happen. It was sort of like the Charlie Kirk thing itself, where everyone got all emotional at first, I was ahead of the game, and when people calmed down they were like “well yeah all this crying and madness doesn’t make much sense and it does seem like the media is drumming it up.” Fuentes’ old fans were at first really excited about the astroturf, now it’s been going on long enough, and gotten weird enough, that people are seeing the obvious. He’ll have plenty of new fans, of course, because astroturfing works.

Remember how astroturfed Ben Shapiro was? Remember the whole thing where Facebook was helping him run all these fake pages to promote his content, giving them super-rank? And the CEO of YouTube effectively said he couldn’t be banned, while everyone else was banning him? This was ostensibly done under the premise that Shapiro prevented radicalization by remaining in normal bounds and also working directly with the platforms to ensure his content was in line with what they wanted to be at the top. Shapiro is completely talentless. Most of you have probably just seen clips, but I’ve listened to entire shows on multiple occasions. His voice is impossibly grating, almost the diametric opposite of Rush Limbaugh and most other popular conservative talking points people, and all he does is pure talking points. Literally the singular reason anyone would listen to Ben Shapiro is that he is the first thing that comes up, and then because he’s popular and people know him, because he was the first thing that came up.

I was just going to post the Spotify numbers to show that despite having fallen, he’s still a major figure. Like, right now, today, two years and one month after Israel began a genocide.

…

But I want to note that on Apple he is closer to Tucker.

And on YouTube, they are both in the 500k-1m average range, but Tucker regularly cracks 1m, while the only video Ben has done in the last month or two or however far I scrolled that cracked a million was an attack on… Tucker Carlson.

Spotify was more reluctant to ban when everyone was getting banned everywhere, so their audience is more right-wing, so that is what people always cite. In reality “Tucker is number 2 and Ben is 41” is a bit misleading. Tucker does get insane numbers on Twitter, but all video numbers are insane on Twitter because if you scroll past a video and it starts autoplaying it counts as a view.

Regarding views, we also need to talk about the fact that it is extremely cheap to buy views, so none of these numbers really mean anything at all. I have a part in the anti-mugu hit piece about that, but I think I am going to cut it and make a separate article showing where you can buy these views and making it clear that none of this means anything. Although it seems like it would be against the law or something, it actually isn’t, and the way these companies do it, it is virtually impossible for the companies to detect, and I don’t think the companies care much anyway. That’s a bigger issue than Fuentes, all these people are doing it.

By far the weakest point I made in my Fuentes hit piece was the claim of fake engagement. With every other point I was literally just saying: “Look at this thing he said and this other thing and what the fuck is this post what is even going on here seriously what.” [Author’s Note to Editor: In general, a sentence behaving in this manner is always going to be a stylistic choice. I understand I have many a typo. Typos galore. Out the wazoo. But as you know, purposefully ignoring grammar and punctuation at scale in a single sentence is generally always purposeful. My style is leaning into this bit today and may do so for some time or maybe not but you’ll be able to tell.]

Strangely, no one really came at me on that even. I think they were too overwhelmed by the amount of shit I dumped on them about the master that they were unable to pull themselves together to do the thing where you identify the weakest bit and then attack it to try to discredit the whole thing. I stand by what I said about the astroturf, but aside from the overwhelming number of bots in his Twitter comments (which seem to be turned off now btw), my evidence was just “how is it possible this many new people are following him and there is apparently no discussion anywhere, as there is with literally every other internet figure, including ones with a fraction of his supposed following?”

Jeez now I’m doing a whole thing. There was something I wanted to get at, because whatever, this is a free space to rant without consequence, given that at any point people can stop reading and scroll down to the memes and not feel like they were ripped off by a meandering rant with no point laced with punctuation abuse. Some people actually claim to like this style and tell me to do more of it. Those people are probably trying to sabotage me, however.

Oh, the point was, Fuentes is the entire news cycle. Tomorrow or maybe immediately after I post this I’m going to get up our new friend’s piece about Venezuela, which is the other current news issue. I’m not worried about being accused of being obsessed. Firstly, I am obsessed. Secondly, it’s like when Ted Cruz accused Tucker of being obsessed with Jews and Tucker was like “you just said four minutes ago you joined the Congress to serve the Jews.”

I guess it was Israel. That was the biggest takeaway of the Nick Fuentes interview: Tucker is fully into this “Israel not Jews,” but if we are talking about Jews, we definitely have to always make sure to say we don’t mean every single Jew. There is no such rule with “the Italian Mafia” or “black crime,” but when you talk about “organized Jewry,” you have to say, every time, that you don’t mean every single Jew, because otherwise, even though it doesn’t make any sense and doesn’t apply to any other group, people will assume you mean every single Jew. Tucker and so many others literally want it to be like whenever Islamic people mention their prophet they say “PBUH.” You can’t ever not say “but I don’t mean all Jews,” and also you have to list off names of Jews who are okay, such as Jeffrey Sachs and Dave Smith. And then you have to explain why you are doing that (spoiler: it’s because everyone is an individual).

But there are many different issues that have come up here in this bonanza that do not directly relate to Nick Fuentes but have simply been brought to light by his astroturfing. Like, off the top of my head:

• Israel realizes it can’t do the Ben Shapiro thing, so it is going with controlled anti-Jewish figures (or if you don’t think Fuentes is controlled, at the very least people who are kooky and repulsive, angry and whiny, with terrible posture)
• Who will replace Nick Fuentes? Totally sick of arguing about the fed thing. Yeah sure dude, maybe he just hangs out with CIs and CI recruiters, does shows with them, gets secret tips about sting operations from the Bureau from them, but isn’t a fed himself. This mf leaked a text of MILO telling him his FBI contacts told him J6 was a setup. He of course showed up knowing this, without telling his followers, who he then ordered to breach the Capitol. But maybe that’s just a coincidence. Whatever. Regardless, Fuentes is being offered a situation with a seven figure salary. He’s going to do what he’s supposed to do, and you’re going to see a shift. That is what the “Jackson Hinkle’s pro-Russia Twitter account is really the same thing as AIPAC if you think about it” and the above seen “anchor baby nationalism” is obviously about: he’s mainstreaming. This will leave an opening for the role of “CEO of Antisemitism,” and it is mildly interesting to imagine who will fill the role. I’m sure they’ve got someone lined up for you, so just get ready to follow him and do everything he says, including and especially showing up at rallies that are very legit. Maybe this time around, people, including my own retarded self, will understand that political dissidence is no more viable in America than it is in North Korea. I, the exile who lives in the backwaters of the internet, am the closest thing you’re going to get to legit dissidence. And this is all just words. The value of the site, at least when it isn’t complete shit like it is right now, is in affirming to people that no, they are not insane, everyone else is. But yeah there will be some new “white nationalist” leader guy. I’ve seen several being prepped on Twitter. They’re testing out candidates, seeing who gets bites and who gets ripped apart for having made porno or been the leader of a satanic cult or whatever.
• What is Antisemitism? Everyone has to keep saying “but I’m not an antisemite,” and I don’t know what that is. Obviously you have these crazy definitions, where any criticism of Israel and like, 40% of the New Testament is “antisemitic.” (Most notably the IHRA definition, though there are several of these lists of things that make you an antisemite, some less extreme than IHRA but still nonsensical.) But the people saying “but I’m not an antisemite” obviously reject those definitions. The only definition I can understand is: “people who hate every single Jew on earth for no reason.” But I simply do not think this is a real person. I don’t think there is even one person who meets this definition. I am definitely a lot more “antisemitic” than Fuentes, who says his best friend and his assistant (maybe the same person) are Jewish. But I do not hate every single Jew, let alone for no reason. However, Judaism is first and foremost a cult based on hatred of Christ, and this cult includes many “atheist Jews” who eat pork and whatever. So it is reasonable, as a Christian, to be opposed to people who identify that way. Not because of how they were born, but beca – hey now I’m writing this article, this is supposed to be a list of potential articles, what the heck? Okay next.
• The Republican Party is attempting to integrate people who are openly hostile toward Jews into their coalition in some semi-official manner. This one is fascinating. People opposed to Jews have always been a part of the coalition. I think I was the first big internet person to endorse him. I paused his escalator speech at “and some, I assume, are good people,” and wrote an official endorsement. (I’ll find that link for the article, interesting historical relic I’m sure.) But with Fuentes as the point man, they are attempting to bring these people in. Tucker’s sitrep with Dave Smith on the backlash over the Fuentes interview, one of the ones I listened to between the parts of this thing you are reading, made this crystal clear. There is really a lot to say about that. I would assume it was JD Vance’s idea, leading us to…
• Tucker is currently working with and supporting JD Vance, but I am personally 100% sure he is planning to drive a knife into his back come 2027. See, that has basically nothing to do with Fuentes, except that I can basically guarantee Vance is the one working with Tucker on this Fuentes project. Vance could be running the whole thing, in fact. The problem, obviously, is that Vance is going to have to start distancing himself from Trump’s Israel policies while he is still VP. Along with most of his other policies. I don’t think Vance can run on Trump’s legacy of endless war and kikesucking. Or any of these economic policies. (Did you niggas see what just happened to dem coins?) Or really anything other than anti-immigrant stuff, which is the only thing Trump has left as a rallying point. He’s jettisoned the entire 2024 campaign platform like shedding off the stages of a rocket (the rocket is Israel in this slightly strained metaphor, as he actually did campaign on Israel as well). The immigration shit is a joke, zero talk of simply imprisoning anyone who hires or rents to illegals which according to several different chatbots would necessarily mean 60-90% of illegals would self-deport. And I guarantee if one landlord gets a ten-year federal prison sentence, no illegal immigrant has a place to sleep 24 hours later. Easiest thing in the world. But of course there is no goal to actually remove these people, so you just get this weird cruelty theater of the ICE raids, with the Trump administration claiming that at most this will lead to 4% of illegals being deported under his term. But seriously, this nigga hasn’t even done a law banning child tranny mutilations. 100% of Republican voters support that, as do a fair amount of Democrats at this point (Democrats have seen the suicides and insanity and so on, the repulsive freak shows, so even if they won’t say they’re against it, few of them still talk of supporting it). But yeah, Tucker is hungry like the wolf, stalking his prey in the dead of the night, lurking in the shadows, waiting for the right moment to strike. And I don’t think he wants to be Vance’s VP. Although I assume that is what he is telling him. He will likely keep telling him this after he announces he’s running, and they will make a deal not to go after each other too hard, then Tucker will spring the trap. Which brings us to…
• Something even further from Fuentes directly, but coming to the surface surrounding these dynamics that are being revealed: The real question regarding 2028 is what the Democrats are able to come up with, because voting is fake and Jews just pick a candidate. I mean obviously Trump got the most votes, but they could have rigged it. Nothing would have happened. No one was going to try another January 6th, I can tell you that much. With Trump’s current and increasing levels of executive power, he could do some federal thing to mandate real voting on a national scale, maybe. I have no idea. It’s not really clear how laws work in this country anymore. He’s now going after the filibuster, which is a flip-flop that I don’t give a shit about, but he could probably ram through a law federalizing voting. I don’t know if he would need to change the Constitution (which gives states full control of elections), or if it would be possible to create regulations which amount to federal oversight but with Jewed-up language that makes it legal. I don’t know if Bibi would tell him he’s not allowed to do that or not. Bibi has always been more opposed to leftist antisemitism than rightist, and come election time, there’s going to be equal amounts in both parties, which brings us to…
• The possibility of a new party centered on the issue of not being controlled by Israel. At this point, the Israel thing has gotten so extreme that I simply do not think you can divide people with abortion, gay stuff, taxes, or whatever other thing. The US is going to be in a weakened and completely messy state by 2027. Trying to make these shorter. But basically, there is a level of incompetence in this administration that is somehow higher than the level of corruption. Watch some of Pam Bondi’s Congressional testimony if you haven’t seen it. At an hour and twenty minutes, the supercut is a quarter of the length of the entire hearing. Just flip through. Everything she said was surreal. Like it doesn’t seem real. Then imagine that this is the level everyone at the White House is operating on, unless they are direct Israel agents. Which obviously makes perfect sense. It’s not as though intelligent people would be likely to get in the way of whatever Israel was doing, but it’s possible that they could. As Israel has full control, and no concern at all about the future of the US, they enacted some kind of “retards only (plus guys reporting directly to us)” policy. Frankly, although the police state stuff is scary in theory, with Palantir and the normalization of military on the streets doing warrantless arrests, the reality is that it is unlikely to come to fruition in the extreme nightmare form. So a third party that is literally just only about the issue of Israeli influence in the US would win an election tomorrow against Trump, Vance, or any Democrat, all things being equal. And…
• There are clearly factions struggling in the background, in a real power struggle, because this is all so chaotic and corrupt after four years of Biden and then this mess. I think it’s safe to say that some of these people legitimately do not like Israel controlling everything and sucking the country dry. I mean really any random person would want to seize control of a government, so the idea that there aren’t organized groups trying to do this is silly. Obviously, the Silicon Valley people want control, and are currently tied to Israel in a lot of different ways, but that doesn’t necessarily mean they agree with torching the entire wealth of this country and shoving it into the mouth of the beast that is Israel. People are forging alliances and there will be betrayals and new alliances and all the sorts of things you read about during the decline and fall of the Roman Empire. I mean I never read the book by that title. I had it and read parts. I think everyone has it on their list but probably more people have made it through Gravity’s Rainbow (which has been off my list forever for over a decade). Maybe I’ll get the book on tape.

MEMES:

Now, Back to This Nick Fuentes Thing…

Firstly, or eleventhly or whatever this is, during the Dave Smith interview, Tucker claimed “Nick Fuentes can’t be canceled.” This is obviously bullshit, because I was canceled. And before Fuentes was allowed back on Twitter, he had fewer than 20k average viewers. That is a successful canceling. Note that being seen with Kanye West and meeting with Trump, being a big media story, his “sex with women is gay” clip getting spammed on liberal “comedy” shows, etc. did not result in improved numbers. This was while he was able to host websites, to use CloudFlare, to have bank accounts, to appear on search engines, to process and ship objects, and on and on (things that were taken from me).

It’s not about me being me. Okay? Mugus get confused. Yes, I am me, and I am the one writing about this. But if I were someone else, or if someone else were me, me or him would still be writing about me. Surely people can understand that. I have to talk about myself when talking about cancelation because I am canceled. I am working on a new project now, of course, but my basic hope is that it can pay for itself, and maybe give me a $30k a year salary. That’s all. I just want to be able to do something fun that maybe educates some people. I have accepted my fate as the canceled man. But Glenn Greenwald also said Fuentes was most canceled. This is just a lie. And I am not a random person. In 2017, I was neck-in-neck with Breitbart in terms of traffic. I was on the cover of The Atlantic for an article I refused to do an interview for. I’d been on the front page of the New York Times multiple times. If the thing would not have happened, I would be the size of the New York Times by now. I had not reached a plateau. I was still experiencing exponential growth.  This is not me whining. I have whined before, I’m sure. We are going on ten years of me being in this hole. Of course I don’t like it. But this is not about that. This is about the fact that you can most assuredly cancel people, and Tucker and all of these other people are getting away with the absolute lie that some people can’t be canceled in order to promote this myth of Nick Fuentes.

If there was some other person as canceled as me, trust me, I would use them as the example. The only sites ever in the same range of cancelation were 8chan and Kiwi Farms. Why are these people lying about that? The New York Times quoted a Fox producer saying Tucker’s writing staff was using me as a source, and it’s not breaking any confidence to just say “yes, I can confirm that is true.” He was asked about me repeatedly after that article, he knows who I am. Further, Darren Beattie has said on multiple platforms that I am the most canceled. Tucker is friends with him, everyone knows him, everyone knows about me, no one will say it, they make these fake narratives. Remember when Alex Jones was “most canceled” while making $50 million a year on snake oil? So this is a lie and it is not an insignificant lie and it is a lie designed to promote a myth of Nick Fuentes.

Now, let us get back to my list. Many of the items on my list did not relate to Nick Fuentes at all. In fact, they floated further from him. The more I think about that list, the more it troubles me. The list lost its luster, and with that dimming a queer conviction crept upon me — I began to believe the list was bullet‑pointing me, each terse clause a little spear aimed at my being; each new item seemed to draw me deeper into the darkest pit of lists, that abyss where order becomes accusation and neatness a tribunal. Memory, regret, a child’s laugh, the hollow echo of all unfinished sentences — names set down as if upon a surgeon’s slate. 記憶、悔恨、孩童的笑聲、所有未竟句子的空洞迴響——名字像在外科醫生的書寫板上一樣被記下。 The items in my mind took wing and became like birds, disparate species: some small and harmless as sparrows, some brilliant as kingfishers, but many circling like vultures over my soul, patient, precise, their shadows counting me even as they deferred the final descent. I watched them catalogue me with beaks and ledger, noting faults and favours, folding my days into margins, and the more I observed the more the cataloguing observed me 我目睹它們用喙與帳簿為我編目，記下過失與恩惠，將我的日子摺入頁邊，而我越是觀察，編目越是觀察我。 Yet in that terrible taxonomy there was a ghastly, seductive clarity — a clarity that shone coldly, as moonlight on a tomb, and compelled me to continue, pen trembling, to itemize the very hand that wrote. 筆顫抖，將書寫之手逐項列出。

A teenager from West Philadelphia grew up on sun-baked streets and amidst the turbulent environment of his neighborhood. One afternoon, while sitting on his porch, a children’s quarrel unexpectedly drew him into a conflict, attracting the attention of the town’s police. Concerned for her son’s safety and anxious about his future, his mother carefully wrote a letter to a wealthy distant relative living in Bel-Air, pleading with them to take her son in and remove him from the endless conflict. He then left his home by carriage and other means of transportation, and soon, the boy found himself transported from a grimy, bustling environment to the manicured lawns and stately marble steps of a quiet suburb, observing his new home with keen curiosity. He was welcomed into an elegant and expectant family. With his straightforward personality and youthful wit, he navigated various social situations, learning different customs and manners, his natural sense of humor adding an unexpected lightness to these formal occasions. Between the roughness of the old world and the refined elegance of the new, he moved like a comet between two worlds—both out of place and dazzling—and it was this sense of being out of place that created a vibrant comedy, as he and his adoptive parents learned from each other through jokes and occasional awkwardness, experiencing the unique etiquette of family life.

After all that, this:

I was thinking this can’t possibly get worse — wait for the surprise pic.twitter.com/DmHnDqNIP3

— Jon Levine (@LevineJonathan) October 27, 2025

People kept saying “Islamic communist” and I was thinking of some kind of cross between Mao Zedong and Hamas, and instead I get this?

I was thinking this can’t possibly get worse — wait for the surprise pic.twitter.com/DmHnDqNIP3

— Jon Levine (@LevineJonathan) October 27, 2025

After Charlottesville and all those fat people in costumes, I had to quickly distance myself from the “neo-Nazi” bit. People were like, “so if you’re not a neo-Nazi, then what are you?” and I would say “basically, picture a cross between Mao Zedong and Hamas” and they would say “I’m having a hard time picturing that” and I would say “basically, picture the diametric opposite of a tranny rabbi.”

But this is what I get.

Every single fricking time.

But yeah, I have the memes. I was a bit rushed. Needed time to write all that worthless bullshit up there.

In future, I’m going to seriously try for Monday, not late Tuesday, but maybe… check Wednesday if it’s really that big of a deal. Also there’s an RSS feed, you know. That should actually be more prominent given the irregular output. Not really sure anyone knows how to use it anyway. We’re banned from all email lists of course, roflmao.

Editor’s Pick of the Week:

Runner-Up:

Special Separate Award:

That one is A. Wyatt Mann, the guy who invented internet memes, using AI. He’s never done absurdist humor before that I’ve ever seen. It’s a fun meme in itself, but the guy who made Le Happy Merchant branching out into a totally new form of meme humor as a result of AI makes it worth the Special Separate Award, which has only been granted once before for a meme Ben Garrison made about me making memes of him.

I’m big on absurdism these days. I mean in humor, not the nihilistic philosophical concept. We’ll see how it plays on my upcoming TV show.

The Primo Collection:

≈

And we end on a classic Fuentes.

He’s taken over the universe but I swore he wouldn’t take over this website. So much for that. He is literally like the coronavirus now. Everyone in the world is required to think about him all day, every day.

At first everyone probably thought it was just their feeds. But it’s not. He’s everywhere all the time.

Why is the NYT using AI to make him look like a Calvin Klein model when in reality he is the worst skinny-fat with a disgusting Mexiface and advanced scoliosis?

You tell me, friend.

Maybe make a list of possible reasons, then choose the one most likely.

Anyway, I’ll be back on Wednesday. No, sorry. I’ll be back on Friday for Wednesday memes.

I’ve got extra memes. I know these pages can load slow. Plus we need more regular posts. Check back tomorrow to see if you like this other guy we’ve got. He’s sort of an autistic genius with the research stuff. Mind like a steel vice grip. I think you’ll dig it.

If not then fuck off, I don’t care.

I don’t care about anything anymore except Star Wars Legends. I’m reading like four of these novels a week. Well, that makes it sound like a pattern. I did read the first five in ten days. Kinda had a sort of break thing happening because of a thing with the thing and bad internet.

Trying to get a new e-reader. I love my Kobo 7″, but it’s about shot after three years of daily use (buttons all clingy, have to use touch screen which is annoying and not the way it’s designed), and they only sell the “color” version now, which means there is blue light, which defeats the purpose of a device that looks like a Texas Instruments screen in the first place.

This is what robots and alleged humans are recommending:

It’s expensive but it’s sold out on Amazon so it must be good, right? Trying to find one. I don’t need any of those features. Well, I guess scratch protection is good. But it’s supposedly got much crisper text than my current piece, and I think I’ll get used to the extra 0.8 inches.

The hilarious thing is I lost most of my sight during my illness two years ago. But because I haven’t used a real book (or a cellphone) in many, many years, I can just blow up text instead of getting glasses. That’s what killed the buttons on my Kobo. I’m only putting one paragraph on a page. Funny right? I have a brain tumor.

These memes today might not be the cream of the crops. But I have never thought crops should really be very creamy anyway. Whenever I heard that phrase, I imagined like, a Dairy Queen Blizzard flavored by wheat.

Does that sound delicious to you, my dearest parasocial friend?

The point here is: I have a lot going on right now. When I had little going on, it was very easy to fill this page with stuff. Now that my cup runneth over with stuff to do, it’s more difficult. But I’m doing it for you. You will like the thing. You might not like it at first, actually. Many of you might be confused by the thing. You might be like “what the fuck is going on what is this what is happening right now oh my God what.”

Give it a year.

I hear your calls, my brethren.

And while I take issue with items 4-5, as a matter of factual reality, 1-3 and 6 are valid.

Items 1-3 are covered under “doing the thing.”

In terms of item 6. In terms of the site. In terms of that thing with the theme. I wish you knew. So I’ll tell you, so you will know. I did nothing. All of a sudden something updated or something or whatever. The site broke. For no reason or for some reason I am unaware of. So then, I tried to update the theme and it didn’t work. Then, I tried to buy the theme, spending $300 on three separate prepaid credit cards for 4 separate websites. And I was unsuccessful, probably due to not having a US phone number. So then I spent who knows how much crypto on US phone numbers. And none of it worked. This was now approaching 12ish hours of my life wasted. So then I tried a bunch of different free themes.

I think the current one is fine. Someone said it looks a bit off on a phone. I don’t have a phone but I can simulate that, and I will work on it (at some point).

If you want the old site back, buy the Sahifa theme, then post it on gameruprising. I think this can be done anonymously. But either way, I want it black, and I’m also going to rearrange it to have fewer items with bigger images.

When I started writing less, simplifying the site was actually a goal. Yes, it was fine for 10+ years, but I used to post a lot more, and I don’t think there were enough new items to fill the thing.

I plan to write more than I have been, but “more” as in 1-3 longish items per week, with a maximum of 5-7 items per week, which is not enough to fill that space that was designed for 70+ items per week. I’m not doing the news again. I don’t want to do that. I’m not going to do it. It had become a cruel grind with no reward for anyone but an insular group. It was probably over a million people, granted. At least close to that (I wasn’t tracking IPs obviously, I’m too ethical, and also the way the site is set up, it’s impossible). But this was not growing, it had shrank over time, and was certainly not close to what was happening in 2017. If I had been paid well, or if I’d enjoyed it a lot, maybe something would have been different, but those two things combined (no significant money or enjoyment) made it totally unfeasible to keep doing it.

I took some time off and a new thing struck me. Basically, the eureka moment was the realization that the “alternative media,” designed to push back against the “mainstream media,” has become as big as the thing it was pushing back against, and has somehow become even more ridiculous and unaccountable than the thing it was seeking to replace on the grounds that the previous thing was ridiculous and unaccountable. “Who watches the watchers,” you know? That’s the core concept here: a watching of the watchers. The fact that I hate most or perhaps all of the watchers helps quite a bit.

The written alternative media is very minor, most of it is video, so it makes sense for me to do video, and that is also a new challenge for me. I understand that I am a much better writer than speaker, so this decision may seem counterintuitive. However, if I’m actually struggling to do the thing, challenging myself, the product will be better. At least eventually. I’m certain it will take some time. I understand I still say “um” a lot. We are working on the ums. I like a bit of ums. But this is the way AI does me:

That is truly a lot of umming. Many or perhaps most would say it is too much umming.

If the new thing doesn’t work, it doesn’t work. Okay. I’ll go back to writing, or think of some other thing, or whatever.

But I’m pretty sure it is definitely going to work. Obviously, I will still have the censorship problems. But maybe a smaller AV project will make more money than a written word project. It’s also possible there will be some new audience that prefers video. Probably not nearly enough to compensate for the people who would rather read daily news coverage. But whatever. It’s whatever. It’s the thing I want to do and therefore I shall do it and if it doesn’t work then that is what it is.

The goal is to have the thing done by Valentine’s Day, which is the day I stopped daily news updates. It probably won’t be done by then. More likely, mid to late March. I probably shouldn’t even mention “Valentine’s Day,” because then people will think that’s the starting date, and hold me to it, but here’s the deal: hold me to mid-April.

Editor’s Pick of the Week:

Runner-Up:

And the Primo Collection:

Following the death of Charlie Kirk, all sorts of weird things are going on.

It has “rallied the MAGA base” in a depraved manner, similar to the way the nation was rallied after 9/11. Clearly, this was intended by the administration, which has worked with all of these “alternative media influencers,” to stoke the hysteria. We are hearing from Trump that there is an “enemy within,” and he appears to be describing more than the immigrants. There is some kind of Antifa narrative, apparently.

This is all very convenient. I’m not saying that someone in the White House said “they won’t quit talking about the Epstein Files and they’re still upset about these wars? The podcasters are all talking about Palantir and this Peter Thiel antichrist thing? Well, I don’t know – murder Charlie Kirk, I guess.” But it is not hard to imagine that someone at the White House said precisely those words before the shooting.

Basically, every MAGA person is now calling for a police state. Further, they demand much more extreme censorship than Democrats ever called for. Whereas Joe Biden secretly communicated with social media companies, ordering them to censor things he did not like, the Trump Administration is openly threatening to use the power of government to silence people. Pam Bondi, who is a really dumb bitch, is saying she is going to start arresting people “on both sides” for “hate speech,” something which is not only not illegal, but which the Supreme Court has repeatedly said does not exist and cannot exist in America.

In 2017, during Matal v. Tam, the most recent instance of hate speech being brought before the court, Judge Alito wrote in the unanimous opinion:

Speech that demeans on the basis of race, ethnicity, gender, religion, age, disability, or any other similar ground is hateful; but the proudest boast of our free speech jurisprudence is that we protect the freedom to express ‘the thought that we hate.’

Last month, as a response to Charlie’s death, Bondi, who is currently operating in the position of the highest office of any lawyer on the planet, announced that without any law, she will begin targeting and arresting people for legal speech.

AG Pam Bondi: “There’s free speech, and then there’s hate speech. And there is no place, especially now, especially after what happened to Charlie, in our society. We will absolutely target you, go after you, if you are targeting anyone with hate speech.” pic.twitter.com/IBvf6amwUT

— TheBlaze (@theblaze) September 16, 2025

Meanwhile, Trump has taken to using comic book villain rhetoric about “an invasion from within” as he releases the military onto the streets for unclear purposes.

Trump to generals: “America is under invasion from within. We’re under invasion from within. No different than a foreign enemy, but more difficult in any ways because they don’t wear uniforms. At least when they’re wearing a uniform you can take them out.” pic.twitter.com/LZw4W73LdQ

— Aaron Rupar (@atrupar) September 30, 2025

Citing Kirk’s death, James “JD Vance” Bowman is talking about retraining law enforcement to focus on political enemies of the president.

Vance: “Because we have such a big problem with left-wing political violence… we really have to re-train the entire government to focus on the left-wing violence problem.” pic.twitter.com/Ur966FZyvW

— The Bulwark (@BulwarkOnline) October 15, 2025

Within the context of this new war against political “enemies within,” Trump is talking about using American cities as training grounds for the US military.

Trump: “I told Pete we should use some of these dangerous cities as training grounds for our military.”

pic.twitter.com/WY4aod0faU

— Spencer Hakimian (@SpencerHakimian) September 30, 2025

The initial explanation for the deployment of military forces and paramilitary forces onto the streets of the country was immigration. This involved masked ICE agents randomly grabbing people off of the streets, out of church parking lots, and throwing them into vans.

ICE set up a raid outside Catholic church—priest has to give special warning during mass.

“I think they’ve been casing the church… the mass times are down,” said a neighbor.

“Right now, nobody wants to come out, because they don’t want to be deported,” one parishioner said.… pic.twitter.com/kvWkFi5zB9

— LongTimeFirstTime (@LongTimeHistory) October 14, 2025

It was my assertion that this would expand to political enemies, and we are now seeing this happening. It was clearly ridiculous to any adult that ICE was going to round up tens of millions of people one at a time and deport them. It was further never explained why the feds were building concentration camps inside of the United States for immigrants (who would presumably be deported).

What I pointed out repeatedly was that you could get rid of upwards of 95% of illegal immigrants by simply making it a serious felony to employ or rent housing to them. With nowhere to work and nowhere to live, they would just leave. You would not need to send military men in masks to throw them into vans. You can go ahead and research why it is that the feds are not targeting the employers and landlords of illegal immigrants. Ask the AI, maybe. There is of course no explanation, despite the fact that this would cost virtually nothing.

The only explanation as to why they would choose these terror raids, choose to release the military, I asserted, is that they are not actually trying to remove every immigrant one by one, but rather trying to get people used to the idea of military and militarized police on the streets throwing random people into vans. I asserted that this military force, along with the system of camps they are building, would be used against non-immigrants. And after Charlie’s murder, we saw the building of the narrative about political enemies, setting up this precise framework.

Meanwhile, the FBI is refusing to answer any of the nagging questions surrounding the murder of Charlie Kirk, and is treating it effectively as a closed case. It’s a good thing no one in the media is pressing them on any of their claims.

There are many, many questions about this murder, but the most obvious is probably how it is that Charlie Kirk’s neck was stronger than a 3/8-inch-thick piece of steel.

Again, there are a whole lot of questions. This one is just the most obvious, which alone is more than enough to prove that the FBI’s story of Charlie Kirk’s murder is a lie.

While the FBI refuses to comment, the media has claimed this was a “miracle.”

‘MAN OF STEEL’: Charlie Kirk’s body stopped a bullet that would typically “just go through everything” and it was an “absolute miracle” nobody else was killed, his surgeon told TPUSA. pic.twitter.com/1Ubx519ax6

— Fox News (@FoxNews) September 21, 2025

TPUSA’s spokesman, Andrew Kolvet, has also claimed it was a “miracle.”

I want to address some of the discussion about the lack of an exit wound with Charlie. I’m usually not interested in delving into most of this kind of online chatter, and I apologize this is somewhat graphic, but in this case, the fact that there wasn’t an exit wound is probably…

— Andrew Kolvet (@AndrewKolvet) September 20, 2025

It is all very surreal.

It’s happening alongside a whole load of other surreal happenings. Trump is declaring he’s established peace in Israel while Bibi is publicly assuring his supporters no such thing has occurred. He’s made a complete reversal on the Ukraine war. He is blowing up random boats off the coast of Venezuela claiming that they are cocaine traffickers responsible for Chinese fentanyl from Mexico.

It feels like a kind of “shock and awe” campaign to overwhelm the public. But the public is very excited about it, after having been whipped into a frenzy over Charlie Kirk’s assassination.

Standing on Charlie’s Corpse, Nick Fuentes has Been Astroturfed as the Most Important Right-Wing Voice on the Internet

Something that is personally very surreal to me is the fact that Nick Fuentes is clearly being positioned by very powerful people to be a new “voice for the youth.” For those who don’t know, and for the sake of full disclosure, Fuentes spent years as my Padawan, basing his show on my materials. Two years ago, I disavowed him due to his decision to associate with and promote Richard Spencer, and then to openly tie himself to documented FBI informant Chuck Johnson. I am a really cool guy, I’m totally super edgy and doesn’t afraid of anything. But I have a hard rule that I do not associate with anyone who associates with FBI informants.

Before I denounced him, Fuentes spent years citing me as his biggest influence, and would use my articles as the basis of virtually every show he did. Now that he has become this alleged superstar, it’s worth analyzing in some detail just what the hell is going on here.

For basic context: he supported Trump until some point before the election. Then he became anti-Trump. However, his current “anti-Trump” stance is that Trump is not doing enough censorship, not doing the police state hard enough, and so on. It’s actually hard to follow, which is sort of the underlying point I want to try to highlight today: it’s all very garbled.

For unclear reasons, Charlie Kirk dying meant that Nick Fuentes became very important, and was all of a sudden everywhere. No one has explained why, and I think I am the only person asking why. But it is clearly astroturf.

When Charlie died, Fuentes said he was too distraught to do a show. Then the next day, he did this really emotional show where the ideas being communicated were confusing to say the least. He started campaigning for mass censorship, and for some kind of domestic terrorism operation or something. (I covered his early post-assassination campaign here.)

He was clearly calling for some kind of police state involving precrime, a la the program being pushed by Palantir:

He actually went so far as to imply that some unspecific left-wing violence group was more of a threat than Israel and Palantir.

I have no idea who these “millions of Americans” he is referring to are. “Antifa” is the only violent leftist political group I’m aware of, and there are not millions of them. In fact, I would be surprised if there were thousands. In all likelihood, Antifa was more or less entirely organized by the FBI itself, as the group existed almost exclusively as a way to shut down right-wing political activism. (Note that whenever you saw arrest photos, they appeared to be standard junkies, who were likely paid to engage in these activities.) Their disappearance after Biden took office, and their failure to reemerge during a second Trump Administration which has much more institutional backing than the first time around, certainly indicates they were operated by the state. Regardless, the implication that Antifa is a bigger threat than Palantir or Israel is obscene. Despite Fuentes’ stated opposition to Trump, downplaying the two biggest influences on the Trump government while calling for a focus on “the enemy within” fits very neatly into Trump’s current agenda of establishing a domestic police state.

In the days following Charlie’s death, Fuentes also appeared to go along with various calls for people to be arrested for “celebrating” the event:

He called in the FBI and demanded Jackson Hinkle be sent to prison for suggesting Israel was involved in the Kirk assassination:

He later walked most of that back, with a “pay no attention to your lying eyes” explanation that he was “misunderstood.” He said he didn’t want people to go to prison, even though he said to Jackson “you are going to prison.” He said he wasn’t calling for “hate speech laws” but rather for the government to pressure businesses into firing and silencing people who weren’t sufficiently sad about Charlie’s death and/or questioned the official story.

As we will see, he regularly says things and then says the opposite thing without acknowledging he is doing this. “The internet is forever” and so on, but he has now apparently created an audience that is too stupid to notice these sorts of things. (I also have questions as to how big of an audience he actually has, given that this “rise” is such a classic astroturf campaign, which I will get into below.)

The Conspiracy Theory That Went Too Far for the Mega-Kook

Fuentes tried to distance himself from me and my content following my denunciation of him. He continued reading my site and using some of my material, but whereas he’d been proud of my support for him previously, he was clearly ashamed to be using me as his main source after I’d denounced him. To make it less obvious that all of the good ideas he ever had were from my website, he went out and tried to make up some of his own conspiracy theories about various things, which became increasingly bizarre. It was stuff I would never say, and I think that was part of the point. It is also possible that he actually believes he is some kind of genius who is able to formulate genius theories no one else can think of. He was called a genius when copying my material, and I think this caused him some confusion about his own ability to do analysis.

I have not watched his show regularly in years, but people have sent me clips of some very wild theories. Just as an example, he told people that the Taylor Swift Dance Club stabbing that took place in England on July 29, 2024, was a false flag attack by Israel. Three girls between the ages of six and nine were killed by one Axel Rudakubana, the son of Christian immigrants from Rwanda. There wasn’t any evidence for the theory and it didn’t make any sense, but he said Israel did it to stop the pro-Palestine protests that were happening in the country. He claimed Netanyahu ordered the alleged Trump assassination attempt so the GOP would install Nikki Haley as president. There are many such cases, with very extreme assertions often relying on a single datapoint, and regularly presented as established fact. You will learn about quite a few of his theories below.

Given that he was so aggressive in promoting often totally nonsensical theories, it is very strange then that Fuentes is now claiming that there is nothing at all suspicious about the killing of Charlie Kirk, and going so far as to promote a conspiracy theory that anyone who says the assassination is suspicious and that the government may not be telling the whole truth is a Russian agent. Specifically, he has listed Tucker Carlson, Candace Owens, Jackson Hinkle, and Max Blumenthal as secret agents of Russia.

After years of supporting Russia when he was using my material as the basis of his show, he has pivoted to Democrat-style theories about Russians trying to undermine faith in our institutions. Many people would consider this theory of Russian agents secretly paying some of the most popular right-wing pundits in America to discredit the FBI to be a much wilder conspiracy theory than the suggestion that the FBI could be lying about what is apparently the biggest act of political violence since 9/11.

It is notably unclear where exactly Fuentes is going with this theory. The most obvious explanation would be that he is involved with the FBI and they are telling him to promote anti-Russian materials while defending their official narrative about Charlie Kirk. This would certainly go a long way towards explaining why, after Kirk’s death, he has been pulled from obscurity into the mainstream of the right-wing internet media. He has appeared on podcasts or shows with Patrick Bet-David, the Nelk Boys, Red Scare, Glenn Greenwald, Hodgetwins, Russell Brand, Dave Smith, and others. Given that there is no hard evidence of an organic increase in interest in Fuentes or his “back the FBI or you’re a Russian” claims after Kirk’s death, this is the definition of “astroturf.” (Note: though it’s beyond the scope of this piece, these “alternative media” people all have agents who communicate through backchannels, just like “mainstream media” personalities, so the logistics of an astroturf campaign in this space are not complex.)

One may wish to give the benefit of the doubt, to try to steelman a position where he is innocently spreading “Russian meddling” theories. It is unclear how this would be done. It’s not believable that anyone actually believes Charlie had a “neck of steel.” And it is incomprehensible that someone who has spent so many years framing himself as an opponent of the US empire would all of a sudden start defending the FBI and claiming Russians are attempting to discredit it.

It is particularly strange that he is going so hard in attacking people for claiming Israel may have assassinated Charlie Kirk, given that he has framed himself as some kind of extreme opponent of Israel and the Jews. Again, no serious adult believes the official story, given that it is physically impossible and relies on a “steel neck miracle.” Given that Israel is infamous for doing political assassinations all over the planet, and given that it aligns with Israel’s interests, it is certainly well within the bounds of rational discourse to consider that Israel may have been behind Kirk’s death.

To attempt to silence discussion of possible Israeli involvement in the killing with claims of Russian disinformation makes this shilling almost cartoonish. You see him being rewarded for this shilling all over the place with this massive astroturf.

“Russian Meddling” Narrative Glitch

Claiming that people questioning the FBI’s narrative on Kirk are Russian agents necessarily creates a whole series of narrative problems.

To wit, one would have to assume that anyone who believes that Owens, Carlson, Blumenthal, and Hinkle are being paid by Russia to discredit the FBI’s claims about Charlie’s assassination are also working for Russia to discredit the FBI’s claims about Epstein, the State Department’s claims about the Ukraine war, and so on and on. It simply would not make sense if these individuals were Russian agents only on the issue of Charlie Kirk’s death. Right? I mean, that’s crazy obvious, is it not? I mean, did they just start working for Russia, sometime between the FBI’s Epstein scandal and the assassination of Charlie Kirk? So like, they were being real when they questioned the FBI about Epstein, but then they got hired by Israel to discredit the FBI, so they’re doing a Russian op questioning them about Charlie? I guess it would have to be either that, or that Fuentes actually supports the FBI’s claims about Epstein.

Wait, here he is in July saying Candace works for Russia. In one of his very interesting and brilliant original theories, he says Candace believing Macron’s wife is a tranny is proof she works for Russia. And she interviewed Andrew Tate. Also, working for Ben Shapiro indicates a Russian angle. (That’s the theory. This is this person’s content.)

Candace Owens is most likely paid by Russia pic.twitter.com/QpUskLcO01

— Fuentes Updates (@FuentesUpdates) July 17, 2025

“Candace is definitely Russian,” he says. Here’s another clip of him saying the same thing a week later, just so you’re clear this wasn’t just some random comment. (In the context of an interview, he backs down from “definitely” and says “speculative.” It’s worth watching if you want a bit more information on how he just pulls theories out of nothing at all. Fantastically, he says “maybe two years ago, I didn’t believe any of this.” It’s a great compliment to me.)

Just you wait. It gets dumber before it gets even dumber.

Before he was astroturfed all over the place, he could make a stupid claim, then just delete his posts and move on. But with this new attention on him, these tactics are not working. He is clearly not “ready for prime time.”

Just for the record, I am not only banned from Twitter, but linking this site on Twitter is also prohibited. It is listed as “dangerous.” Despite having the great privilege to be on Twitter and having his account boosted at every turn, Fuentes regularly posts on Telegram instead so that people cannot respond to him and question his claims. During his attacks on Candace Owens for questioning the official story of Kirk’s death, he attacked her on Telegram for claiming Netanyahu offered Kirk $150 million.

When I saw that, I said “hold on a second, he was promoting that himself!” Various fellows on my forum told me “oh no dude, he might not usually be consistent, but he’s been consistent on this for sure.” My bro said this to me:

I just about snapped.

After smashing everything in my room, it then took me an hour to find the clip:

Candace Owens, Max Blumenthal, and some of Nick’s sources claim Israel attempted to bribe Charlie Kirk $150M to support Israel even harder than he already did.

Charlie refused. pic.twitter.com/4ViOhe3DY6

— Fuentes Updates (@FuentesUpdates) September 16, 2025

On the Bibi offer of $150 million, he says: “I have independently confirmed that by the way, I’ve heard that from four [handsign, FOUR] people. Four people that I trust, that are in the know. So this is coming from Candace Owens, a friend of Charlie Kirk, this is coming from Max Blumenthal, who purports to have a source, and I have heard, from a handful of people independently of those sources, that this offer was real.”

Here’s the face he makes after saying that:

(The original video on Nick’s Rumble is here. It starts at 1:06:00.)

He holds up four (4) fingers to stress that four (4) of his sources have confirmed this thing that he now claims was a Candace Owens hoax.

So why did it take me an hour to find it? Well, because the main tweet which spread this claim, a tweet by @ImperiumFirst which had millions of views, was deleted.

I then found a deleted reddit post:

I also came across this in my searching:

That link leads to this:

But wait: there is a reupload of that video.

“Where did we get this $150 million figure? We got it from Candace Owens and Max Blumenthal.” He then goes on to say that Candace and Blumenthal claim they never said that. (I don’t know if they said that. They are also under investigation by me, but not in this article.) He also says in this clip “my credibility is now on the line.” Yeah, no shit. What happened to your four very reliable sources???

He does not mention those four sources he claimed to have, putting the entire thing on Candace and Max.

(I found the original video on Nick’s Rumble, here. It starts at 2:04:00.)

Just a side note here: Fuentes refers to his “groypers” as “Elite Human Capital.”

Here’s the one who’s talking in that clip:

Going through these clips, I also found this one:

Just, I mean. If anyone is keeping track of the physiognomy patterns found among these EHCs, you might want to note those two.

So what about the deleted tweet from @ImperiumFirst? The one that had millions of views? Well, that’s a totally pro-Fuentes account (Imperium First instead of Fuentes’ America First. It’s a Warhammer gag, you see. These EHCs are very clever with stuff like that). One wouldn’t have to be a kook conspiracy theorist to imagine Fuentes DM’d him and asked him to delete that tweet. I mean. Why else would he have deleted it? He knew the statements had been clipped and didn’t want it reposted in the comments section, so he posted his claim that Candace was responsible for the $150 million theory on Telegram.

This is how he is used to operating. It works when you’re an obscure streamer. When you’re the next big thing, it probably doesn’t work as well. This is the definition of “not ready for prime time.”

You might be thinking “oh, so he lied about having sources for a claim, then he decided to completely change his own narrative, and then he covered his tracks so he didn’t look like a stupid liar, wow, is that such a big deal?” Firstly, yes. How the hell can you have a person you trust for information lying to you and covering it up? Like, sure, give him the benefit of the doubt that he believes the “steel neck miracle theory” and all of the rest of it. He definitely knew that he claimed he had four sources, and his viral clip (later deleted) was most responsible for spreading this $150 million theory. Then he lied and said the claim came exclusively from Candace and Max. As he is building a narrative that anyone who claims the FBI is dishonest is a Russian agent.

Oh, and lest we forget: he is also now promoting the idea that Russia is working with Israel.

Nick Fuentes DESTROYS third worldists by dropping the redpill that Putin is totally in bed with Israel and that there’s no le based Russia and China alliance against Jewry. pic.twitter.com/1S2xQTmxe7

— KyotoZoomer (@KyotoZoomerKZ) August 9, 2025

I’m sure there is some zany kookspiracy theory explaining how Russia’s nearly century-long alliances with all of Israel’s enemies, including their current support and arming of Iran, is all somehow fake or whatever. But yes, while Fuentes is claiming that Russia is paying Candace, Tucker, etc. to blame Israel, he also claims Russia is secretly best friends with Israel. So, you know. Don’t really know what to say about that, but it certainly adds yet another layer of “wait, what?” to this layer cake of confounding gibberish.

But wait.

Can it get dumber? 

People Can Have Opinions

To be clear, I do not know what happened to Charlie Kirk. At first, the official story, that he was killed by a radical trans supporter, made sense to me. The story started to make less and less sense the more I heard about it. There is a lot you can go into. There is a lot of disinformation mixed in with legitimate theories. But the “steel neck miracle” thing is something you can zoom in on that cannot be true. What I had initially assumed is that the bullet went through his neck and into some concrete or brick behind him. Now that it has been established that the official story is that the bullet was stuck in his neck, “just under the skin,” it is impossible for anyone to genuinely believe the official story. However, let’s say we give Fuentes all the benefits of all the doubts, assume he is very unfamiliar with guns, and maybe hasn’t taken the 1-2 minutes it would take to research how a .30-06 round could be stopped by a human neck at that range. Lashing out at people who question the FBI is very strange, a conspiracy kook saying this monumental event should be accepted at face value is very out of character, and when you add this “Russian meddling” gibberish, it becomes too much.

What is the big deal? Why go so hard trying to defame people who are asking questions? And are we really supposed to believe that his defense of Israel and his attacks on Russia are completely unrelated to a spontaneous astroturf campaign? Does anyone believe that?

Also, to further clarify my own position here, I am not a defender of Owens, Carlson, or Blumenthal, all of whom I have issues with, and may even be suspicious of. Carlson definitely needs to explain what he was doing in Nicaragua in the 1980s, for example. However, I do not take issue with them questioning the FBI’s narrative of the Kirk shooting, just like I don’t take issue with them questioning the FBI’s narrative about Epstein, or really anything else. (Note: I do take some issue with Candace’s theories about Macron’s wife being a tranny. Though I also think it is hilarious.)

Just as an example here, if I was going to accuse Carlson of something, I would accuse him of purposefully mixing a lot of good information with some very bad information, which is a very basic disinformation tactic. He is very hawkish on China, he promotes the UFO and aliens hoax, and he has appeared at points to support gay marriage and other liberal sexual norms I do not think belong in a Christian society. “Limited hangout” is a piece of CIA jargon describing a situation where the official story no longer holds up, so you admit the truth in part while withholding other truths, which is how a lot of the “alternative media” seems to function. However, the only entity that would be running this kind of operation would be the US government. And indeed, just months ago, Fuentes was accusing Carlson of being a CIA operative. Now he’s accusing him of being a Russian agent trying to discredit US intelligence. So, is it both? He is working with the Kremlin and the CIA to discredit the FBI?

Note: I understand I am belaboring the point here. But as I have seen no one else with any kind of large platform questioning the “Astonishing Rise of Nick Fuentes,” I feel it is necessary to be thorough, and to make it fully clear just how bizarre this all is. We need all of this on the record.

Who are the Fans of Nick Fuentes?

Along with all of these shows, there has been a barrage of mainstream media articles about Fuentes. It’s actually overwhelming, constant press. Type his name into any news aggregator.

What’s highly notable is that much of this coverage is neutral, if not bordering on positive. Whenever he made the media during his time under my tutelage, he was referred to in any headline as a “neo-Nazi” or a “white supremacist,” and these terms have been replaced with “far right” or “white nationalist.” I’ve read a lot of these articles, and none of them note any of the weird theories, which as far as I can tell, are his core content at this point. By not pointing out things like “he says Tucker Carlson works for both Russia and the CIA,” they are effectively running cover for him. No one who is prone to supporting right-wing politics is going to be turned off by any of this. Six weeks out from Charlie’s death, there are daily articles from the likes of Mediate and Raw Story just reporting on things he said.

Last week, GQ called him a sex symbol.

In an almost unbelievable alleged coincidence, literally the day before Charlie’s death, the New York Times published a piece about him that was as close to a puff piece as the Times has ever given anyone who spent years denying the Holocaust and praising Hitler. In a case of eerie precision or you know, something else, the Times writers predicted “rising influence.”

What is interesting is that aside from Ron Unz and myself, I don’t really see anyone critically questioning what is going on here. There isn’t any discussion of really anything about him, anywhere. There are these media articles, which present a boilerplate narrative about how he was on the fringe and now he’s mainstream. They don’t attempt to offer any insight into it, other than that “young people are turning to the far right.”

Note: I haven’t seen any of them mention me. There is a hard blackout in the media of my name (that’s what happens when the establishment is actually afraid of what you’re doing). I am mentioned only in very specific contexts. But it is quite a thing to talk about Nick Fuentes’ rise and not mention me. Long time readers, who also followed Fuentes, know that I’m not exaggerating this: his entire show, for over five years, was based on my website. And it isn’t simply that he would copy the material, but he would credit me on the show, call me his hero and his biggest influence. It’s actually sad to think about. I guess I can just say that. This whole thing is still a bit emotional for me. I don’t think that makes me a pussy. I believed he was copying me because he believed in my material. Certainly, without having used my material for all those years, he never would have been notable. He is charismatic enough, and has oratory skills, but if he had come out of the gates with this kookspiracy stuff, there never would have been any real traction.

Here’s the question though: who are all these people following him? Where is the evidence that they exist? If he has all of these hundreds of thousands of followers, why is there no critical discussion of him anywhere?

In what was clearly a stunt and part of the astroturf campaign, he had a Spotify account for a few days, and it is claimed that it became the number one podcast in the world.

JUST IN: Spotify bans Nick Fuentes podcast after it hits #1 on the charts just days after being allowed on the platform. pic.twitter.com/WNqzdfHMCs

— Remarks (@remarks) October 15, 2025

He said he didn’t make the account, that some random person just started uploading the shows, and that resulted in it becoming number one.

Nick Fuentes reveals the America First podcast that was banned by Spotify was uploaded by a fan; he had no affiliation with it. https://t.co/c6Q7X3iwoE pic.twitter.com/XKm2SygcHZ

— 𝐆𝐫𝐢𝐦𝐚𝐥𝐝𝐮𝐬 (@ImperiumFirst) October 16, 2025

That does not even seem possible. How would the podcast be promoted in the first place if he didn’t tell people about it? Assuming it got caught in an algorithm, are we to believe that no one is monitoring the charts at all?

Based on his YouTube followers, and the pictures of his followers we’ve seen in public since his split with me, his followers we can prove exist are a bunch of grotesque Mexican gargoyles. Is it possible that Hispanics didn’t know about him, and he is just really appealing to them? That is possible. Hispanics do this with their stars. But it can’t explain the numbers.

All of the material you see posted as comments anywhere looks like bots. On Twitter, for example, you don’t find the kind of back-and-forth between posters that you would see on really any other person’s Twitter comments. There is nothing negative. It is just a bunch of slogans and cringe memes.

Here are some top memes posted on a recent Fuentes tweet:

What is going on there? Those are humans? Bots? Boomers? Indians?

Note: It may seem trite, but as a founding member and former leader of the Alt-Right, the fact that our people were always funny was very important to me, as it was evidence of high intelligence and good socialization. If I was running a movement and my followers were just posting “GOAT” and “cope and seethe” and GIFs from Office Space, I might have considered pulling a Fuentes and selling them out to the feds. No, I joke. But only because I hate the feds so much. In all seriousness though, I definitely would have considered selling them into slavery to build skyscrapers in Dubai.

Just go look yourself. I just clicked the top post and found this at the top:

Here’s the account:

It’s a bunch of similar memes, and replies to known botted-out accounts.

Elon Musk:

End Wokeness:

No joke, that was the first one I clicked.

The second one I clicked was this:

And the account is a bunch of reposts of viral dog videos.

Go through and investigate yourself. @NickJFuentes. Scroll through the comments on any tweet and see what you see. Click through randomly on the commenters. See what you see.

I’m obviously not saying he has no followers. He had followers before the media and the “influencer network” started pushing him like this. I don’t know whether Rumble has a good record for accurate viewer numbers, but after Elon Musk personally decided to give Fuentes his account back, his numbers on Rumble, where he primarily streams, went from an average of 20,000 views to nearly ten times that. But there is clearly a concerted campaign by both establishment and “alternative” media to present him as a phenomenon, and there simply is no evidence that the interest matches the hype.

Insofar as these groypers (often called “mugus” by those critical of Fuentes) are real people, they do not engage in any form of critical analysis of his materials. If you ever come across one, ask them to name one thing Fuentes was ever wrong about. They will become very uncomfortable, and simply begin calling you names.

They are now repeating his narrative about how everyone who questions the integrity of the FBI or anything else Nick Fuentes supports is a Russian agent. Last month, Ron Unz of Unz.com, where my articles are often reposted, cited me when questioning exactly what was going on with Fuentes, and many of the allegedly human followers of Fuentes attacked Unz without even attempting to address or defend Fuentes’ new position on “Russian meddling.”

Note that after Fuentes stopped promoting the Daily Stormer as his primary influence, he began citing Unz as his favorite website.

He somehow pissed the russian shills off, because the whole network has been activated.

— Sam Wing 翅膀西蒙 (@SamWing69268580) September 23, 2025

holy shit, the shills really out themselves lmao.

— BLINDERPEAKSS (@BlinderPeaks) September 24, 2025

Russraeli interesting https://t.co/d7rmluJ2jS

— YungPut1n (@YungPutin1) September 24, 2025

How it feels to be a right winger in 2025: pic.twitter.com/fDRdbutGth

— KyotoZoomer (@KyotoZoomerKZ) September 26, 2025

gee I wonder why pro-russia ron unz is suddenly taking open shots at Nick Fuentes…

the israel-russia abomination on full display pic.twitter.com/Y7VAA4tRmy

— Kazé (@NeoNicker) September 23, 2025

They Call Him “NATO Nick”

It’s impossible to go through all the weird shit this guy is saying. But it’s worth noting that there is more State Department type material, and it’s worth contrasting it with his previous materials.

Along with pushing this “Russian agents” theory, “NATO Nick” as they are calling him is now all of a sudden talking about “Russian aggression” against NATO.

Russian aggression against NATO…!

Here he is doing his zany conspiracy theory bit against Jackson Hinkle, who he says is a Russian agent because he has a Russian girlfriend.

Nick Fuentes criticizes Jackson Hinkle and his ties to Russia as well as asking how this is different than taking money from Israel pic.twitter.com/3gWqVQJoBT

— Liberty Crusader (@BdawgAF) October 11, 2025

The most notable thing about that is that he says there is “no difference” between Russia influencing our politics and Israel doing so. That is a truly incredible statement for a number of reasons, but surely, putting everything else aside (such as the fact Russia is not engaged in an organized influence campaign in America, and comparing Jackson Hinkle’s Twitter account to AIPAC and the $200 billion Miriam Adelson gave to Donald Trump is utterly nonsensical), the intent and effect of Russian influence would be much different than that of Israeli influence.

In that clip, he also claims Russian Foreign Affairs Minister Sergey Lavrov personally “tipped off” Hinkle to “investment opportunities.” As far as I can tell, there is literally no source for that anywhere. I used multiple AIs to attempt to find even a rumor of this posted on reddit or some other obscure forum, and none of them could find anything, with one noting: “Even in spaces like r/Destiny, r/NAFO, and r/KnowledgeFight, where Hinkle is frequently mocked or analyzed, there is no mention of a Lavrov-provided investment tip.” Fuentes seems to have made it up out of thin air, which is another one of his strategies. He usually cites “his sources” when inserting a completely fabricated claim. (It would be shocking to me if he had any sources at all, given that aside from being a ridiculous and totally unserious person, he is virtually impossible to deal with on a personal level due to a lack of a basic understanding of human social norms. Further, he constantly posts private messages from people he’d previously been cordial with or even worked with directly. I have documented that he publicly tried to blackmail me, threatening to reveal private information. [This is a felony, by the way. And for the record, the first time I heard this I demanded he release whatever this blackmail was, and instead he simply continued to make the threat. More very odd behavior.] He suggests many of these “sources” he claims to have are inside of the government, meaning statements to him would be “leaking,” which though a common practice, is in many contexts a felony that can carry up to a ten-year prison sentence.)

Note: I assume Fuentes is getting some of these weird talking points from handlers, and he just inserts them randomly without coherent structure. However, he also seems to get confused about what his handlers are telling him to say. Further, separately from whatever handlers are feeding him this disinformation, he appears to be a pathological liar. And then separate from that, it also appears that he creates conspiracy theories in his own mind, and the lack of pushback from his “mugu” followers reinforces the idea that he can keep creating goofier and goofier theories. You can see above that on his own show, he said Candace is “definitely Russian,” stating it as a fact, but then when sitting across from someone looking a bit skeptical, he adds “it’s speculation” at the end. I’m including this as a side note because it really doesn’t matter why he spews out all of this convoluted and confounding nonsense, but it is obviously natural for people to try and understand how something like this happens. Further, it is worth noting that schizophrenia typically manifests in the early to mid-twenties. Fuentes is 27 now, whereas when he began using my material, he was in his early twenties. I am not asserting that he has clinical schizophrenia, as there are obviously other possible explanations for this (primarily, being fed disinformation by handlers and being too stupid to effectively communicate it), but a lot of the lines of thought he presents do line up with schizoid disorder. I also just want to take this opportunity to note that the idea that people take this man seriously, and I am now “debunking” something that could at least be confused for schizophrenic ramblings, is incredibly exhausting.

This anti-Russia narrative he is pushing is very new. He maintained a positive view of Russia, left over from when he was getting his entire script from me, up until earlier this year.

Here is Fuentes in June of this year talking about how, in the wake of the Ukraine drone striking Russia’s nuclear-capable bombers in Siberia, Russia would be justified in nuking the Ukraine.

Nick Fuentes on how Russia will respond to Ukraine’s drone attack

“They would be within their rights to nuclear bomb Ukraine”@NickJFuentes pic.twitter.com/dwQlE52ZCZ

— GoyaBeanGroyper (@goyabeangroyper) June 7, 2025

That is definitely not exactly an anti-Russia take, three months before Kirk’s death. (Please enjoy his explanation of the way nuclear deterrence works. He has a lesser understanding of this issue than anyone who has taken International Relations 101 or like, read the Wikipedia page about Deterrence Theory. Again, he seems to believe he is a genius and he can just intuitively understand how everything in the world works. Of course, he is playing for an audience which, if he says something with enough confidence, will just accept it, so I guess it works out for everyone.)

Here’s Fuentes in March of this year, calling for the US to surrender the Ukraine to Russia:

Nick Fuentes says the US will have to let Ukraine surrender to Russia’s demands

“America has ran out of options” pic.twitter.com/lSfQAvDb4s

— Ye Fandom (@YeFandom) March 1, 2025

Going back a bit, in January of last year, just going through all my talking points about how the US caused the war:

Nick Fuentes lays out the reasons for Russia’s invasion of Ukraine and why its the fault of America.

“They should have committed in 2008 that Ukraine wouldn’t join NATO, they should have never overthrown the regime in 2014, that’s what started this whole thing.” pic.twitter.com/Y4Ecyb0pUV

— Hark (@Hark240) January 24, 2024

More basic, obvious stuff from early 2024:

SPOT ON

NICK FUENTES: UKRAINE WAS OUR DOWNFALL.
@NickJFuentes
Putin asked for a compromise, but we ignored it. Now we’re in a war we can’t win.

Russia is stronger than ever, and we’re weaker than ever.https://t.co/E5nr17ibSX pic.twitter.com/lLw1o3KD3A

— Ignorance, the root and stem of all evil (@ivan_8848) May 30, 2024

Also worth noting is that he supports the US doing regime change in Venezuela to take their resources.

Venezuela, ahhh interesting.

That’s why they push Nick Fuentes everywhere. The world is bigger than the Middle East and he is for regime change in Venezuela!

Just another American who wants chaos for the benefit of their big empire. https://t.co/4SmViOO6QE pic.twitter.com/2B1Ou9PPtl

— Srpski Inat (@SerbianInat) August 14, 2025

But don’t let that bother you, because while he supports regime change, he is also against it.

I think he said he supports it because the US should steal their resources, but he is also against it, because Marco Rubio is Cuban? Honestly, it is absurd to try to make sense of any of it. It’s whatever. But note that there is a definite pattern not only of changing his views back and forth, but of presenting multiple conflicting views in a very short timeframe, without explanation, indicating that he actually holds conflicting positions in his mind. (Again, one would certainly be inclined to consider mental illness in analyzing that behavior, with the other possible explanation, probably the only other possible explanation, being that he is too stupid to coherently convey narratives that his handlers have given him.) You saw an example of this above, where he said to Jackson Hinkle “you are going to prison” for saying Israel killed Charlie Kirk, tagged the FBI in a call to arrest Hinkle for his posts, called for the government to act against people who engaged in anti-Charlie speech after his death, then later claimed he didn’t want arrests or hate speech laws and never implied that, saying he was actually talking about mass censorship. Further, as noted above, he has claimed that Tucker Carlson is both a CIA agent and a Russian agent, claiming to hold both beliefs at the same time.

To be clear, everyone has a right to change their position on anything. I have very rarely changed my position on anything, but most people have. Sargon of Akkad comes to mind as an example of someone who has gone through a pretty significant transformation in his way of thinking about things over the years. However, whenever he would make a change in his mode of thought, in his presentation of his ideas, Sargon would spend many hours explaining why and how he changed his view.

Fuentes has made no attempt to explain how he went from cheering on Russia’s invasion of the Ukraine, from praising Russia as a Christian country fighting against the satanic Western empire, to arguing that Russia is engaged in a campaign of disinformation to discredit the FBI and that they are actually the aggressors in the conflict with NATO. So it is certainly a fair question to ask how many of these people who are going along with this, following Nick and changing their views to match his without any explanation, are even real people.

Note that mainstream MAGA has been very critical of Trump when he’s changed his position on H-1B visas, on the Epstein Files, on the Ukraine war, and so on. And Trump has done more than Fuentes to try to explain why he changed his positions.

Other Gobbledygook (Of a More Dangerous Sort)

Fuentes recently stirred controversy among morons after telling his followers to infiltrate the CIA. This clip went viral and actually did stir some discussion from real people, given the bizarre nature of the statements.

Nick Fuentes says young men should infiltrate top institutions like Stanford and Yale and take over the government.

Follow: @AFpost

pic.twitter.com/Zu9G5aUtNA

— AF Post (@AFpost) October 12, 2025

A recent article in WIRED described the Fuentes plan to “conquer America.”

There’s a lot you could say about this. Some of it would be very funny, I’m sure. I mean, like, you could point to the examples we have of his Elite Human Capital.

(Yes, posting that photo does feel a bit cruel. I understand that and feel bad about it.)

But there is a pretty obvious “bottom line” about the “we’re going to infiltrate the CIA” gibberish.

Here is his response to criticism of his plan:

That’s a Telegram post. He uses Telegram as his primary writing platform and encourages all his followers to follow him there. Telegram requires a phone number, and you have to install it on your phone so the app operator gets access to a unique device ID. The owner of Telegram, Pavel Durov, cooperates with the feds (from the US and many other governments) without publicly disclosed warrants. The CIA and really any intelligence agency could obviously get the list of Fuentes’ Telegram followers without that benefit, but they have that benefit.

Fuentes doesn’t even encourage his followers to somehow use op-sec when signing up to follow him on Telegram. It would be virtually impossible to do anyway. You could in theory buy an internet phone number with anonymous cryptocurrency, but you would still have to install the app on your phone, which would mean you could be identified even without the phone number.

Do you see where I’m going with this? Smell what I’m cooking?

Fuentes has created a situation where every federal law enforcement agency has a full list of all of his followers. He encourages people to sign up to multiple TG channels on all his socials. He also sells merch and takes donations with Visa cards.

He holds events at public venues, where people register with their real names. He holds these events at random hotels, which will almost certainly turn over video to the FBI without warrants, and use facial recognition to identify people (your facial recognition data is logged by the federal government when you get your driver’s license).

At an event last year, the venue he’d booked canceled on him, and so, after promising attendees anonymity, he took them all to a public rooftop bar where dozens of people filmed them and posted video on social media.

JUST IN: Streamer Sneako gets his teeth broken after getting punched by a security guard in a Detroit bar

Sneako was in Detroit for AFPAC, a conference organized by Nick Fuentes

Sources say it was the same security guard who shut down AFPAC pic.twitter.com/TjGUQkhhMS

— Unlimited L’s (@unlimited_ls) June 16, 2024

Serious political leader, by the way. Ready to infiltrate and take over the CIA.

There are dozens of different ways he’s made it possible for the FBI and literally every other intelligence agency on earth to collect full lists of all of his followers.

So obviously, none of his followers are ever going to get anywhere close to state power. They are all on FBI lists as “followers of a right-wing extremist telling his followers to infiltrate institutions of state power.”

What’s more, because Fuentes has framed himself as a “political dissident” with the goal of “reshaping America,” and formed a group based around this idea, if someone from that group attempted to join the CIA for the stated purpose of undermining and reshaping the organization and America, it’s not exactly difficult to imagine that they could be charged with sedition, a very serious felony potentially carrying a 20-year prison term. A lot of this stuff he says is goofy and potentially harmless, but setting up young men to completely destroy their lives is not a joke.

So, do you see how that is just like, retarded? And that only a retarded person would take that seriously, or consider the person saying it a serious person? He has talked about this “infiltration” stuff for years. It would have been very easy, if this was actually your plan, to encourage people to use operational security (op-sec) and ensure that the government doesn’t know who they are. Instead, it’s “show up to this IRL event, follow me on that app where you register with your phone number, and please send me money with your Visa card.”

He is saying “infiltrate the CIA.” Do you believe that he believes that the CIA doesn’t do background checks? Or does he believe the FBI doesn’t create lists of “extremists”? He would have to be very stupid to believe those things. But if he knows those things, and yet he is still saying “get on my right-wing Telegram channel to learn more about how to infiltrate the CIA,” then what exactly is going on?

There is a Lot More to Say (And Say It I Shall)

I mentioned in my last article that the reason I have been publishing less is that I have been working on a new project which will be a podcast, or perhaps more of a TV show. What I have realized is that my role should be analyzing this alternative media that has become the mainstream media. That is where I belong now. The best way I can communicate the truth of things is by showing you where these people are lying. Fuentes is the man of the hour, but all of these alternative media people are rats. I watch these shows, and the amount of lies is simply incredible. It’s virtually all video media, so I need to be on video, so I can show you these videos and break it all down.

I want to do this right. So I’m taking my time. The goal is to have the show put together on or before Valentine’s Day, which marks a year since I quit the daily news. I’m putting together a team. I don’t want to reveal too much, but it will be a weekly show, primarily focused on deconstructing media narratives. We will probably also do some kind of donation drive to help with the costs of the equipment. I’m not going to do that until everything else is ready to go, and we’ve worked out all the staffing details and so on.

What I plan to do is bring back the energy of the best days of the Daily Stormer, which were those years before Charlottesville, when it was fun. I’m really feeling this energy. I’ll have to learn to be on camera and so on. I’ve started filming myself, started working on my oration.

I don’t intend to stop writing. I will write less than I did, but more than I have been in the last few months. For the last few months, I’ve been focused on this project, and until it’s done, you can assume that the less I’m writing, the better it’s going. After we get going, I plan to write a long piece based on the show’s notes before we do the weekly stream, so there is a written accompaniment when I post the show that will include all of the sources I am using, and comments on the topics. Writing is a big part of how I think, so preparing for the show, I will write a kind of outline for the show, published alongside it.

Along with that, I will no doubt publish various other articles during the week.

Right now, I am writing a lot about the show, as I try to work out exactly what I want it to be. But aside from being classic Stormer type anti-media media, I know I want it to be fun. I know I want it to be a Saturday Night Parasocial Spectacular, where I get together with all of my parasocial friends and we drink and vape and talk shit together. But it’s also going to be very structured, and not a “live stream” or a “podcast” but a real show, with significant planning, not some “just chatting” slop with superchats.

I’ve been going in all different directions over the last nine months, working through what I want to do on the next leg of my career, and this is definitely it. And I am going to be very surprised if anyone is disappointed. Well. Without giving too much away, some people will be shocked and confused, particularly those who were not around for the pre-August, 2017 Stormer.

I know most of you are not checking the site very often anymore, because there hasn’t been much content. I am going to set up on Nostr, which is a new (or rather, newly working) uncensorable Twitter clone. We might try some other socials. But I think Nostr is going to be big, and it’s a good place to make our basecamp.

I keep getting frustrated that I didn’t think of this months ago so I could be up and running now for all this weird shit that is going on with these podcasts. Clearly, this article you have just read would have been a lot better as a video. But I needed the time. And I think it is very safe to assume that the weird shit is not going to stop, and we are going to have endless “alternative media” content to analyze.

The Troll Army will be reconstituted and it will be bigger and better and funnier than ever before.

If you are reading this, consider yourself conscripted.

This is the dawn of a new era. My blood is pumping like a machine gun just thinking about it.

Article updated to correct the publication date of the NYT piece on Fuentes.

Look.

I know I need to post more.

Here’s the deal: I’ve become as monomaniacal about my new project as I was with the Daily Stormer during the best times of the Daily Stormer.

I am writing a lot. A lot lot. I am figuring out how cameras work and crap like that. I’m doing the things.

This makes it hard to focus on the site. I have several articles that are partially done following up on the Kirk stuff. I could also write about the Russia-Ukraine stuff, the Israel-Palestine stuff. But it’s all really obvious. Nothing good is happening. It’s boring. I don’t really care about it. I mean I care but it’s boring.

If you think Donald Trump solved the Israel war issue, well. There are a lot of other people who can explain to you that this isn’t true.

You can also find out about the Charlie Kirk Iron Neck Miracle Theory from many sources. The official story is impossible, he has to have been shot by a different gun. I think some people are getting too much into the weeds. The goal was to create a martyr for Donald Trump’s war against the “enemy within,” which is about to get way weird.

That is one place I can offer something others are not really focusing on: the fact that this anti-immigration thing has turned into some kind of war against “leftists” after the martyrdom of Charlie Kirk. And we have already seen this anti-immigration thing turn into an anti-antisemitism thing. We’ve seen the anti-leftist stuff turn into anti-antisemitism. Look at the takeover of the universities. It was all about Israel and Jews. Maybe there was something tacked on about trannies in sports.

On the tranny front, there is still no federal law banning tranny mutilation of miners. You go down to the mines, and it’s nothing but a bunch of trannies. The government paid for their surgery.

Full stop.

Seriously though, Marjorie has a federal law banning these treatments for under 18s and Trump will not act to push it through. I heard “Israel and stopping the trans,” and we’ve only gotten one of those things. He signed an executive order banning federal funding for trans surgeries for under-18s and was sued and then we stopped hearing about it.

I mean, it’s a very minor issue (get it?). There are not that many trans, everyone hates them, this should be something that can get done, but instead we get nonstop Israel and then military and paramilitary forces on the streets. Thus far, everything has somehow tied back to Israel, so this whole police state thing – do you think they won’t throw you in a van and send you to some camp because you’re against the Jews? What would prevent that, if we are going to remove all of these limits on executive power? Good will?

Remember when he tied the tariff thing to Israel?

Frankly, I would not be shocked if the trans thing was somehow tied to Israel. “The government won’t pay for your trans surgery if you posted in support of Palestine on social media.”

100% of everything is somehow about Israel.

Except I guess the planned war with Venezuela? Or perhaps I just missed the Israel angle on there. Of course all these wars have an Israel angle, because Israel wants the US to be the world police. And if America is just supporting Israel’s war, it could look worse. But when it’s the Ukraine and South America too, they can say “well, America just does all the wars.”

This “narcoterrorist” thing is retarded, by the way. Terrorism has to be political. Also, Venezuela is responsible for like, 1% of cocaine, according to the government. What percentage of “Chinese fentanyl from Mexico” are they responsible for? Has anyone asked? I see these fats cheering blowing up random fishing boats like “now THIS is what I voted for!”

It’s all just this appeal to the dumbest kinds of racism. Remember the whole “these brown skinned niggers in Gaza don’t even have gay sex”?

Everyone is against the fentanyl addicts. Personally, I think it’s a demand issue rather than a supply issue. Also, I mean, when you’re refusing to arrest people for doing it, you have to ask what is even going on. But was anyone even talking about cocaine? And if they were (I never heard people talking about “the cocaine epidemic,” but if they were), what does that have to do with Venezuela? We should be invading Colombia, no? According to a 2023 report from CSIS – a neocon think tank that would lie about this if they had known the gameplan – 98% of cocaine in the US is from Colombia.

Fentanyl can literally be made anywhere. The whole “from China” thing was a total hoax. They always talk about “the precursor chemicals come from China,” but China has banned the production of the easiest fentanyl “precursors” since 2019. The current “precursors” are just totally normal chemicals that can be bought from anywhere that makes chemicals. In particular, they can be bought from India, and because of regulations in China, some estimates say a majority of the precursors coming into Mexico are from India now.

I am an India supporter now I think, because they are turning against the US, but blaming Chinese people for the fact that Americans see no future and just want to live in tents on the streets injecting drugs is insane, particularly given that the US police now refuse to arrest users.

Anyway, the US is beginning to back off of China (though still harassing them some, like with the Thai attacks on Cambodia, and some shenanigans with the Filipinos, they are calming down on the Taiwan thing). So they are shifting the narrative to something about Venezuela.

But that’s something you can read about elsewhere. Although I’m seeing a lot of “this is what I voted for” when rando fishermen get murdered.

Whatever.

I am interested in the propaganda machine that is promoting all of this stuff. The “alternative media” is now the mainstream media, it has way more viewers, and it is all some kind of right-wing thing. And all these people are full of some manner of shit. Completely.

But Yeah, For Sure

I’m not out. I’m all in.

This coming new era will disappoint no one, except people who hate things that are awesome.

I’m planning to keep you updated. Hopefully I can post some new details soon, and present some kind of roadmap with a loose timeframe.

But yeah, I’ll post more, even if it is just dumb shit like this, so you don’t forget about me.

At this point, you probably think “oh jeez it’s been a long time since Anglin published something, why isn’t he doing the thing about the Charlie Kirk neck thing proving the whole thing was fake? He must be going through it to miss out on gloating about that, oh jeez.”

I assure you, my dearest friends, I am not going through it. I am going in it.

“He was really into that Charlie Kirk thing, so him not posting about it daily with all this new stuff coming out and the FBI introducing this new magic bullet theory, and this sickening stuff with his nappy ass hoe widow going off the charts, this must mean he’s getting all Irish again, full into it,” is the perfectly logical conclusion to come to based on the current evidence.

However, what has actually happened is that in the process of getting all excited about the Charlie Kirk thing, I have stumbled into an entire new plan for the Stormer. I have become maniacal regarding this plan. I have notes for some Charlie stuff, which I will hopefully publish in the next couple days. Some of it might be a bit behind, but there are things I want to talk about that others have missed. I’ll get it out.

But there is a new project coming. And it is going to be big. It is going to be quite possibly – and I do not say this lightly – the biggest thing in the history of the internet.

What I speak of is the Dawn of a New Age. My Daily Stormer daily articles ran for 12 years straight. Ten years were uninterrupted, literally not a day off. (I used to say “except Christmas,” but I don’t say that anymore because it isn’t true, because I would still publish an article every Christmas day. So aside from days the site was down because of censorship reasons, I was here every single day.) I would say it was probably 9 good years. Maybe 8. I started to kind of lose some of my enthusiasm somewhere between coronavirus and the Ukraine. Probably. That is probably what history will remember.

But what were the best years? Many of you were not even born yet. But many of you remember. The best years were 2014-2017.  Specifically, the good times ended in August of 2017, with the Charlottesville debacle. And it wasn’t just the censorship and all the hounding. It was all of the fun sucked out of the air. Among other things, “Neo-Nazism” went from being the funnest internet meme ever to being “oh, wow, holy shit, there are these fat slobs in these costumes? Fuck my life.” No disrespect to any good guys who went there, which was most of you, but the feds sent these fats in these costumes, and it just really ruined my fun, I’ll tell ya.

Everything got all depressing, I was depressed, things got too serious, I got too serious, got too religious. I am religious now and I’m glad for that, but the religious content, my doomsday vibes (which seemed to come and go in these strange waves), didn’t really ever belong here. This site was always supposed to be fun. That was the original point. It is educational too, but the fun comes first, because the whole idea was the thing I learned from that black guy from Star Trek: learning is fun.

It’s like that song from that band. It was a 1990s pop grunge band. Total scum of the earth, milking Kurt’s corpse like it was Abby Shapiro, Erika Kirk tier, but they are one of my favorite bands. I don’t remember the name right now. Bands at that time had names that were a random word like “shirt” or “chair” or “plug.” How could anyone remember? But they had this song “there’s no sex in your violence.” Although those were the only words in the song that were intelligible, and we didn’t have the internet to just look up lyrics back in those days, I don’t know what the context of that was, but from the tone, it was clear that sexless violence was not good. It was an accusation or maybe even indictment: “you are hereby accused of sexless violence.” And I think we all get that, right? If you have sex in your violence, you get something cool and fun, like “The Warriors.”

And sexless violence? Well, that’s Gaza, folks. That is what violence with no sex looks like. Just families being burned alive, children blown to pieces, everyone starving to death, buried under rubble, all of that. Not cool.

Speaking of classic 1970s acts of cinema, Zardoz, my favorite film, is actually a lesson about how sexless violence is a real drag.

And I know you must be sitting there thinking: “where the hell is Anglin going with this sexy violence thing? I mean, I get his point and it is clearly true, and really an enlightening thought, but what does it have to do with that other thing??”

Well, friend, violence that you don’t sex up is like education that isn’t fun. Education that isn’t fun is just Ferris Bueller’s Jew teacher droning at you.

Face like an Easter Island statue, that Jew.

That Jew from that movie was so boring, he never even got metooed. Working in Hollywood AND academia for decades, as Jewish as they come, never even groped a bitch or whipped out his pecker and dipped it in some slut’s coffee sitting on her desk and said “oohhh, that’s warm, yeah.” That’s the kind of thing you can get out of: “my doctor told me I needed to heat up my balls every 4 hours and I didn’t notice she was sitting at the desk because my glasses were the wrong prescription due to a mixup at LensCrafters. I apologize and will spend my time listening more.”

You know that “no sex in your violence” song could have been “there’s no bizarre pervert actions in your Jews” and it would have been just as damning.

You have to keep the fun in the education, and I am bringing back the fun. I have a plan. And it is going to work. I am laser focused. I don’t really like the word “laser” anymore, because I think of that laser eyes thing people did that I hated so much. I will never be able to separate the word laser from that horrible time in my life when everyone I hated was doing that. Except Steve Sailer. No, wait, I actually do hate Steve Sailer. He’s the world’s most boring race scientist (seriously, bro, spice it up a bit). What is that Bitcoin psychopath’s name. I like that guy. One of the only white guys you see and think “this guy probably rapes women, not in the ‘date rape’ or ‘statutory rape’ way, but in the real negro way.” (“Classic rape,” we call that. I tried to put “rape classic” to give it a kind of sophisticated French allure but it never really caught on.) However, he’s never going to get metoo’d because every woman he raped has zero doubt he will kill them and their whole family – without the use of a gun. There is nothing I love more than a white guy who gives off that vibe. You can’t fake it, you have to be born that way. (Jake Paul’s spiritual guru has it.) But isn’t his name also Steve Sailer? Whatever, I don’t care, but yeah so there was one guy I didn’t hate who did that eye laster thing, so I can still use the word on very rare occasions, but you’ll notice I have cut more use of the word laser back by well over 95%.

But “laser focus” is the only term that fits here, I promise you. I have a vision in a way I have never had since the original vision for the Stormer. We have moved on from midlife crisis to midlife crisis management. It was one of the key revelations that slid into place since I broke up with you all on Valentine’s Day. I said “I’m in a midlife crisis, but I’m the world’s number one crisis management expert, so hey, pal, get it together. Put those two things together. Get to midlife solutions, get to midlife renaissance. Get this fucking show on the road because I am so bored trying to write books that I’m going to fucking kill myself.”

Hey, look, I’m sorry. I have like a million words of “book material.” No joke. I mean do the math. All those words I was writing for the site, I’m now writing for my own projects. I’m also focused on this mantra of “just get the first draft finished, it doesn’t matter how sloppy it is,” so it’s even sloppier than the stuff I publish on this website which is often just like a situation where someone vomits in a mosh pit, like that level of sloppiness. So imagine that turned up to ten, then imagine my word count.

Of course I haven’t been spending all that time writing, there has been a lot of time thinking and scheming and plotting and brooding like some kind of ancient man who was cursed to never be able to die, like at the time of the dinosaurs he got cursed like that, imagine the kind of brooding such an individual would be doing and that’s been me a lot of the time since February.

And I’ve come up with the thing. I’ve come up with a way to bring back the energy, to bring back the sense of community, where we’re all working together to really fuck people that we hate, and really forming a sense of internet brotherhood based on a shared sense of existential purpose in bringing the people we hate to their knees. If you were there, you know. You know what that felt like and you know you’ve never felt anything like that in your life. It is the greatest feeling in the world, to be a part of that kind of operation.

You may be aware of this gay Mexican who claims Russian disinformation agents are trying to discredit the totally truthful FBI story that a miracle (they’re calling it “a miracle”) caused a .30-06 round to get caught in Charlie Kirk’s neck. Nick Fuentes. We’re talking about this guy now because since the Charlie Kirk assassination (preempted by a glowing profile in the New York Times – figure that out), he’s become like this main character in the shill right. After I broke up with him after effectively writing all his material for like four years due to this decision to work with FBI informants, this guy starts saying that he has blackmail on me, and I was like “what is this?” As soon as he started with this blackmail threat shit, which is so catty and creepy and most of all gay, I demanded he reveal whatever the secret thing was. I said “publish all the texts I know you saved, tell whatever story you didn’t save, put everything out there, I demand it.” Instead of revealing it, he just kept threatening it, as if he hadn’t seen me say every time he threatened me “publish that shit you fucking queerback.” (“Queerback” is a portmanteau of “queer” and “wetback,” which I am still, you know, working on. That’s still in the workshop.) I will tell you there is no reason to even hit on the fact that he’s a public associate and collaborator with FBI informants, which I don’t know why anyone would be doing unless they themselves were FBI informants, especially when it’s like, Chuck Johnson, who is a bottom of the barrel schizo who was apparently so mentally ill that the feds won’t even work with him anymore and are embarrassed that he keeps claiming to be working with them. But yeah people don’t care if their internet daddies are feds, but they do care if they are gay and Mexican. I mean now that he’s doing Rachel Maddow talking points about Russians trying to undermine faith in our intelligence agencies, maybe people are going to start to take interest in the fed thing, but that’s beyond our scope. This isn’t even the topic, I’m just working up to explaining that I can guarantee that being in the game during the halcyon days of the Stormer was the best feeling any man will every experience in their life.

And this was sooooooo fucking gay. I am actually starting to think this guy is retarded. He was reading Stormer then doing his show just based entirely on my material and I’m thinking “this guy is a genius,” but I realized this was like if I hade a tape recording of myself and played it back and was like “this tape recorder is a genius.” We have retard radar on. He is saying “I don’t trust him because of something he told me in private but I won’t say it.” And it’s like okay how retarded do you have to be to not say “well if you’re not going to say it then why bring it up? If you want to threaten someone with blackmail, just do it, don’t do this little feminine te-he-he bullshit.” Normal heterosexual men find that creepy. Collecting blackmail on people you are friends with is John Wayne Gacy tier to begin with. But then he knows, ever since the first thinly veiled blackmail threat like two years ago now, at least 18 months ago, I said as soon as I saw it “publish it all now.” Instead he just kept doing the weaselly (fat now by the way, which makes it about 78 times grosser) “oh he don’t want the smoke of what I got on him.” But without fail, every time a superchatter brings me up, it’s “oh I’ve got this stuff on him, you wouldn’t believe it.”

My assumption, because I’m the master of these little games, is that he was just hoping I have some dark secret that I fear will be exposed, and if he just hints he knows something, this will keep me from coming after him. This is like something you read in like, The 48 Laws of Power, Robert Greene books, “Dark Triad” stuff. I guarantee he is listening to books on tape of this shit. Look up what that is if you don’t know. Then look at Fuentes. I promise you, you will never be able to unsee it. And you will watch his show, and see him doing this thing like he thinks no one sees it, and you will lose your shit like you just watched a morbidly obese woman fall down a set of concrete stairs.

Finally, I thought “it is actually possible I told him I have bastard children with hookers, some of which are possibly half Asian or perhaps quadroon Asian (which would make them whiter than Fuentes), though others are Slavic, and sometimes I tell people this in private?” I didn’t think I told him that, but then some mugu from his private chat made some comment about it and I was like “oh yeah maybe, definitely possible in a two-hour phone conversations where I’ve had a few I would mention that (I mean I’ve said it on the site repeatedly over the years, granted people probably thought I was joking, but it’s not like, a super secret). All things being equal, I didn’t really want that out there, not because I give a fuck about someone who thinks like, my internet personality suffers because I got some hookers pregnant a few or maybe more than a few times, but because I care about my children, obviously. Even if they are racially impaired. That means nothing to me, in terms of the love I have for them. I don’t want them getting sucked into some shit and trolled or whatever. But I’m in a better situation now, I’m getting my custodies, one bastard at a time I am getting my custodies and bringing all my family together, as it should be. So it’s like, okay, I’ll spill those beans. I spilled them on my secret forum he reads obsessively.

Take a minute to imagine this Robert Greene Mexican homo scheming to go after my kids, which could involve real world harm, even physical, let alone their socials and so on (these kids are mostly teenagers now, all the Asian ones are) because I said I didn’t want to be friends with him anymore on a semi-private forum. This is a serial killer type personality, and like the dumbest type of serial killer personality who reads pop nonfiction “advice for psychopaths” books. And by “reads” I mean “listens to audio books.” This fellow is definitely not a reader.

But the point of that whole story is this: all of these faggots who say that seeing your child for the first time is the most magical experience are just complete faggots. Sorry! Hey, sorry! And no, you racist, it’s not because they’re Asian, one of these bastards is from a totally fresh 18-year-old Slavic girl who literally just showed up from the village and looks like a Hitler advertisement. I’d say the experience is better than Weapons, better than Peacemaker Season 2 (which is woke btw but the anti-Nazi shit if you’re watching it in the reverse is fun), but not as good as like, Ace Ventura.

I think the experiences of like teaching the kid to ride the bike or the motorcycle or whatever, maybe those are magical, I was denied those. I have teenagers I’ve never met showing up. Insane the connection we feel immediately though. And that they feel together. Very wholesome stuff, wish we could do reality TV, but we won’t and they’ll never be on camera. But the fun part is that they are all like, “dad can you help me, I’m trying to fuck with these people on the internet.” Which circles around to where this is all going. (Oh except my hapa quadroon daughter, who is more like “I’m trying to fuck these people from the internet.” This is just. Man, I do not know. I’m like feeding her alcohol starting at 3PM on Fridays so she is too drunk to go out. What am I supposed to do about this? I didn’t raise her. She shows up at the airport as a full grown woman.)

Anyway, the lucky upshot of this is that I can explain why I had to “get a real job” to get money a few years back. When it was just me, it was fine using donation money to pay for my like, $800 a month lifestyle (plus all the other shit in my life caused by the site), but I wasn’t comfortable using donation money to pay for my kids. I respect Peter Brimelow. I don’t really know why I respect him, I never found his writing impressive at all, and the one clip I have of him talking about me can best be described as “damning with faint praise.” But I guess I’m supposed to respect him because he ran a low traffic boomer white nationalism website for 30 years or whatever and because he has an upper class British accent. Anyway, V-Dare was the opposite of me, super low with the energy, super aggressive with the fundraising, and in these hardcore interstitial begging ads, Brimelow would post a picture of his wife and kids! Like “hey, can you guys pay for my wife and kids for me because I edit a blog”??? WHAT? To make it ten trillion times worse, this is his second family!

He is like 80 with a 30-year-old wife. Which you know, hey, I am never going to judge that, but I will judge you for expecting others to pay for it! What percentage of young people can even afford one family? And he is going to use aggressive interstitials. This is the most offensive e-begging campaign I’ve ever seen in my life. I would have told him to say “the libs and the dem media are doing me up because I stabbed a guy at Taco Bell, but it was a black, this was completely in self-defense, the libs are out to get me.” I’d drop a 5-spot if Brimmy shanked a nog at the Bell at 3AM. I’m not paying for your second family, bro. This is like posting a picture of a yacht and saying you need donations to make payments – “we’re asking for your support once again, as I am working my best to save the white race by editing a blog with 25,000 monthly uniques, the libs and the dem media cancel culture warriors are trying to repossess my yacht.”

Anyway. Hey. I’m not trying to diss Brimelow. I suspect he hates niggers even more than I do, and I trust a general consensus (though I have no idea what the basis for it is) that he deserves respect like Jared Taylor and Anthony Cumia. And I don’t deserve any respect because boomers get confused by satire like 18th century British elites discussing the suggestion of eating Irish children.

I understand that I haven’t revealed what the project is. I have shot off in all kind of different directions. Of course, the reason is – wait for it – the project is still a secret and I don’t want to drop any spoilers yet. It’s not ultra secret, and you can find me dropping bits here and there, but things are constantly evolving.

I will tell you what I think you can know about the project:

• This is an AV project. That means it will have both audio and video.
• I already revealed that it will be fun. That will be the main thing. It is going to be political, but I am going through everything that made the halcyon days of the Stormer great, and figuring out how to bring back all of those key elements that made it great.
• Heavy community vibe, sense of common purpose, people having fun together.
• Even some longtime fans are going to be confused by it, potentially for months. Though not so confused that they won’t get laughs. But I know that some people are not going to immediately pick up on the deeper thing that is happening. And there is no shame in that. This is very high concept. And that sentence is entirely serious.
• There will be a paywall, because I have no other way to monetize, and this is going to be extremely expensive to operate. I am not doing superchats. This is tacky and grotesque, and no one serious does superchats. Can you imagine Tucker Carlson reading superchats? They are garbage content. (That said, we are toying with the idea of bonus “casual” shows with superchats and interactions with non-superchats. But no superchats on the real show. This is going to be very serious business.) Obviously there will be free shows as well, but some of them are going to have to be paywalled, because that is just the reality of the situation.
• I can’t reveal a first date yet. I will say that I want it to be before Valentine’s Day. That is, before a year after I stopped regular Stormer Daily. I think it’s unlikely I’ll meet that date unless the stars really align for us, but it will be in that range. I can’t make any promises at all, but the closest thing to a promise I am willing to make is: “I’m pretty darn sure it will be up and running before summer.”
• After a potential period of confusion, I promise that every Daily Stormer fan is going to love this. Unless I just totally suck. People have said I suck on podcasts, and I know that, but I am very good at content, and I am already filming myself and critiquing myself and working on a voice that is less mumbly. Oh and the other thing, just to be real, a lot of these podcasts people say I suck on were very late at night for me and I was usually “in the cups” as they say. Maybe also “in the xans” as they might also say. I’m going to arrange my schedule so when I’m streaming, I’m bright eyed and bushy tailed and on coffee alone. I mean I will probably drink on the show some, because it will be a party show where I drink with the audience, though I will not be getting “drunk” on the show. I am committed to giving the best performance possible, at any cost. And yes, it will get better over time, obviously, as I learn the new medium, but that is all this is: a new medium. The content will be the same, and I am very good at the content, so I just have to learn a new delivery mechanism.

As we get closer, I will be revealing more information, and also probably doing a donation drive, for the cameras and so on. The real cost is going to be the servers, which are going to be obscenely expensive. I might only have the archives of the free shows on torrent. We shall see. And even with the paywalled shows, I am going to beg anyone with the ability to use torrent (we’ll have a private tracker thingie where you have to have a sub to get the torrent). But we will have to provide downloads from servers for people who can’t use torrent, at least for the paid shows, and we will have to have the streams live on our servers. So it is going to be brutal, and there is no way I don’t lose money the first year (short of generous donations, which I am trying to figure out perks for that do not involve reading superchats on my show, which I will not do – unless there is a second casual show, which I am leaning towards, both because it is an added bonus for subs, it will allow superchats, and most importantly, it will allow more audience interaction and a chance for the audience to give us ideas about things we should be doing. And when you know the theme, you will be wanting to give ideas.)

We will be setting up a Telegram soon, so people can follow the happenings. I will also post photos on here.

Oh, and just to be clear: I am still going to write some stuff on the site. Right now, I am maniacal about the show, and it is hard to focus on anything else. But at the very least, every show will have a good long article attached to it when it is posted, talking about the topics. I’m still figuring out how that will be written, because if it is written before the stream, we may miss key elements, but I want to get the shows up fast with an article. So I will probably write an article based on the show notes, then edit it to add any spontaneous things that happened. Or, perhaps, it will not really be a summary of the show, but a written commentary on the themes of the show, and therefore can be written the day before it airs.

There is a very, very long list of details like this to work out.

But here’s the guarantee: if you like this website’s content, especially if you like classic Stormer and funny Stormer, you are going to love this show. Or your money back. No jk, I can’t give money back, everyone has to pay with crypto (which is now VERY EASY with Bitcoin on Venmo and Cash App and my system of individual addresses for every user, but it will not be possible to issue refunds, and even if it was, I wouldn’t do it.) But watch the free shows, and then you will know if you want to pay.

Also, I’m very interested in Nostr right now, and we may be doing the official chat on there. Both the free chat and the paid chat. Obviously, people who pay will get a separate chat. That’s another thing we’re figuring out, but check out Nostr. @jack actually delivered. No one thought it was going to happen, except for me. I always believed in him. And it is definitely the future.

Hopefully, some minor fraction of my excitement is coming across here. My true level of excitement is impossible to communicate, and you will not understand it until you see the show.

Get excited. This is real. Nothing but bullets can stop me at this point.

This is happening.

I love you all, and it is my love for you that drives me to do this. Also my midlife crisis. But mostly my love for you.

Yesterday’s piece was primarily about the “far right” pushing all of these mainstream narratives, but I am going to, probably on Monday, go through and show that it is the entire right doing all of these things they complained for like, a decade about the left doing. All of the “canceling.” Only with the right, they are going way beyond the left and saying that far from just getting people banned from social media and making it so they cannot ever work again (these crying faggots are literally getting waitresses fired, one waitress was fired for something her husband posted), they are saying they’re going to arrest everyone as well.

To be clear, this isn’t just the people who were posting TikToks of people cheering his death, but just people who said he was a racist. They are telling people to call and get people fired for saying that on their private social media accounts. These are the same precise people who had previously said this was the most evil thing ever.

The government fired Jimmy Kimmel, despite the fact he was probably going to get fired anyway. The government came in and fired him.

I don’t know how retarded all these people are, or which ones are retarded and which ones are malicious feds. But nigga, what I do know is that Trump talked and talked about how he was going to fight “the left” and then when he took office, every single fucking thing was about Israel.

Did you know there is still no federal law against mutilating children in child tranny experiments? Maybe you didn’t know that. You probably did know Trump’s deportation rate is less than Obama’s and that there is no move whatsoever to criminalize hiring or renting to illegal immigrants, or to federally criminalize giving them free healthcare (I guess excluding real emergencies). This would obviously get rid of like 90% of them in a matter of weeks without the need to throw screaming women into vans in the church parking lot. But the federal government did take control of all American universities, and is forcing them to teach that Israel is God’s chosen and is only defending itself by genociding children. The Trump administration has seized extraordinary executive powers, and all of it is either used for the sake of Israel, or is some stupid totalitarian spectacle.

These are the people who the far right and the normal right are begging to protect them from “the far left,” and supposing, or claiming to suppose, these powers will be used to stop the trannies. The fact that Trump didn’t move on day one to ban child mutilations should prove to even the drooliest retard that trannies are not the top concern.

So you’ve already seen what this guy does. We have these clips of “JD Vance” talking about a “de-Baathification” of the universities, then what you get is a “Zionization” of the universities, while they still teach all the tranny and anti-white stuff.

So why would anyone think these new speech regulations would have anything to do with anything other than the Jews? How could any honest person, assuming they have any idea what is going on, think that?

The fact that the “far right” is going along with this is the most shocking, but “JD Vance” hosting Charlie Kirk’s show and encouraging people to hunt down and silence anyone who isn’t sufficiently emotional over Charlie’s death is nearly as bizarre. All of these other freaks – Matt Walsh, Christopher Rufo, all of the rest of the people who screamed “freeze peach” – are now literally doing the mirror world version of everything they said they opposed on principle.

Again, maybe they believe “the left” deserves this, or whatever, but even if you believe that, how can you believe it will actually happen? Trump’s people have shown zero interest in this. Look at the way they covered up Epstein. All of this stuff is only about Jews. The hate speech laws – and I think they are going to change the name, but still push through new speech laws – are only going to be used against enemies of Jews. Maybe some random trannies who literally mean nothing will be arrested (instead of putting them in an insane asylum where they should have already been), but it will all be about Israel.

Before the Kirkocaust, there was that law against burning the American flag, and all of these people said “well if it’s illegal to burn the gay flag, I don’t care if they make it illegal to burn the American flag.” Firstly, it was never illegal to burn the gay flag, but okay, even if you believed that, then why not legalize burning the gay flag? Why take away more freedoms?

People are claiming I’m some kind of libertarian. Actually, I’ve supported Hitler, and I support present day Russia and China. I am not against “statism.” I am against giving these kinds of new powers to a government that we know as a factual matter is completely controlled by Jews, which, demonstrably, uses any and all powers it has for Jewish purposes. How could someone fail to see that them saying “we’re doing hate speech now and canceling everyone who is a leftist” is not a cover for more aggressive measures against people who are against Israel and the Jews? Could anything be more obvious?

It’s maddening.

Anyway, I had the Snitch Fuentes tweets and clips on hand while going through these clips, and gathering the clips of all of these more mainstream freaks is sort of a big project, but I will do it. Maybe on Monday or Tuesday.

For the record, I’m not really using a lot of AI. It is very useful as a research assistant. Much easier than search. I’m not using it for writing (except in the few cases I’ve done it as a joke, which I assume are obvious), and anyway, finding clips on Twitter is still a nightmare. It’s shocking how badly Twitter works, in terms of search or discovery of any kind. It is apparently supposed to be an Insta style “doom scroll” app, but those of us with websites who need specific clips, which are primarily hosted on Twitter, have a helluva time.

But I’ll do it. I want this all on the record.

The Tucker Carlson Show on Kirk Changed My Mind

I have been both ultra critical of Carlson at points as well as supportive of him at other points. I have found that the claims he is a CIA agent amount to “his dad worked for the CIA” and “he says he tried to join the CIA and they rejected him.” I’m not necessarily opposed to being convinced of that theory, I just haven’t seen any serious evidence. What I’ve seen is a person who appears genuine, but who also has a rather low IQ ceiling, saying things that I mostly agree with and pushing the narrative of right-wing criticism of Israel very aggressively. I legit can’t see how that could be considered bad. (Please don’t come at me with “gatekeeper” and “limited hangout.” I don’t think you know what those terms mean. I do know what those terms mean. And thus far, they do not make sense to me with regards to Tucker. This is despite the fact that he’s done some things I’m very against, in particular pushing neocon type rhetoric about China.)

Whatever the case, I liked his show about Charlie a lot. I don’t know how anyone could really complain about it.

What affected me most was his claim that in private conversations he had with Charlie, he was saying he was trying to get out from under the boot of Israel, and was willing to lose all or most of his donors in order to take a moral stand on the Palestine issue.

I don’t think he was doing this much publicly. He was talking about it some, but being a college campus guy, it would have been impossible not to. And he was saying God gave the political state of Zionism to the “chosen ones,” even though Saint Paul explicitly said that the old covenant was obsolete up until he died. But Tucker saying other things were going on in the background was very believable. And he did in fact allow Tucker to say the Epstein-Mossad thing at the conference, and then invited him to the next event, even while he was losing donors left and right and being called an antisemite.

Tucker also had on an Orthodox priest and said that Charlie was very interested in Orthodoxy, which obviously does not support the evangelical kookery that says “Christians were wrong for 2,000 years and actually rabbinical Jews (followers of a religion that didn’t exist when Christ was crucified) are the chosen ones.”

Candace Owens, also a close friend of Charlie’s, is saying similar things.

The Conspiracy

Tucker is promoting the idea that Israel killed Charlie with an “I’m not saying that of course” type of wink-winking. I’m coming around to that point of view. Bibi coming out every day with a new statement about how he didn’t kill him doesn’t necessarily prove that, but it is the most bizarre shit I’ve ever seen.

Initially, the story – “random trans activist with Utah style gun skills kills Charlie because he’s too online” is believable enough.

The thing here is: we now have the government taking all of these insane actions, pushing this entirely new concept of “right wing cancel culture,” the “hate speech” stuff, and murmurings of an Ultra Patriot Act, which would no doubt involve Palantir and this AI police state control grid I’ve been talking about. They needed some event to make this happen.

I don’t think at time of writing there is enough evidence to prove the “lone gunman” theory, and I think the burden of proof is on the people pushing that narrative. They are not releasing much information on the alleged shooter. Trump just declared “Antifa” a terrorist group, though no one has even suggested that the shooter was a member of this group, or of any group. The only thing we know is that he was very online, and apparently had a tranny boyfriend. That’s all.

If I was going to come up with a conspiracy theory, I would not go into multiple shooters or whatever else. Although it is very strange that CNN and others made the stupid claim that the .30-06 rifle could be assembled and disassembled in a matter of seconds. Then this Zinn Jew making the distraction. No one explained what the hell that was. It got memory holed until they reported he was arrested for child porn. There are several other weird things, such as why we only have grainy video when all of those cameras would have been in HD. Many other strange things to consider.

But there is no need to get too kooky.

My theory would be that someone groomed him on Discord. That would be some intelligence agency that found a somewhat unwell individual and manipulated him over a period of months. They do this constantly. They get them in a “group chat” where the group chat is all feds, and they convince them they can be a hero. Then they explain to them how to do all of these necessary actions in order to make the thing happen.

No one is asking “cui bono?” Tranny activists certainly do not bono from this event. The Trump administration does, and as the Trump administration is effectively a proxy for Bibi Netanyahu, Israel does as well. A lot. I don’t think it is going to be called “hate speech,” but there are going to be new speech regulations, and the only people who will benefit from those are the Jews.

Shutting down universities, infiltrating TikTok, and buying CBS news is not enough to shut down criticism of Jews. You have to make it illegal or legally murky enough to create a chilling effect if you want people to really stop talking about the Jewish issue. And Charlie’s death creates that pretext.

It does not make sense to me that, understanding this, the Jews would simply wait around for some random trans activist to create the pretext. You would create your own pretext. And if you create a plausible situation, where even someone like me can say “well, the story kind of does make sense in a cut and dry way,” you can ram it through.

I initially said that if Israel was going to do it, they would set up a Moslem shooter. But that might be too obvious, and anyway, as you are witnessing in real time, this thing right now has the same effect without creating something absurdly obvious.

I’m struggling to believe it could be a cut and dry “lone gunman” situation. It’s just way too convenient and the lack of transparency makes no sense if it is cut and dry.

It feels like Dick Cheney and the Jews calling for “a new Pearl Harbor” months before 9/11. Like, wow, what fantastic luck.

To be clear: I don’t think the reason they would kill Kirk is that he was going to turn on Israel more aggressively. If Tucker is right and he was considering converting to Orthodoxy, then yes, that could be part of it. But the main reason would be to create this entire new social and political climate where all of a sudden, cancel culture is cool, and “hate speech” is on the menu (and in the longer run, the whole AI police state, which will also have elements of “classic police state” with the rollout of ICE and the flagrant violations of Posse Comitatus with the military running around everywhere).

“Most Men Alive” Gate

I suppose I need to address the fact that I have a headline on a relatively popular article that contains the phrase “one of the most men alive.”

Here’s the situation: I make mistakes like that all the time. I have always had some kind of dyslexia and now have a brain tumor. I have a staff member who is tasked with correcting this, as I honestly just can’t really do it. No one is perfect. He is currently still being paid his full salary, even though his workload is like, 4% of what it was. He doesn’t have a contract and I could just fire him, but he’s a good guy and also I have all these future projects I might want him to work on.

But that was. Wow.

By the time I realized it was up there like that, it was much too late to fix it, and I just had to play it off like it was some kind of meme no one but me understood.

I would have said “weaselly.” Which I think is true, even though the Tucker information has led me to believe he could have been planning to become less weaselly (which should be easy to do when you’ve already got $15 million or whatever, frankly). But nonetheless, at the point of death, he was engaged in weaselism.

But the editor is great. The only good employee I’ve ever had, other than my sysop. And all the other good ones. Some of the others were good. But most of them ended up hating me.

I’m an impossible boss. I mostly refuse to even communicate with my employees. I never really wanted to be the manager of a company. I had a vision (actually a 30-year plan), before I was banned from everything and no longer allowed to use banks (just in case anyone doesn’t know this, I’ve not even been allowed to have a personal checking account since 2017, lol). I think I’m the single person never even accused of a crime who is on this type of list. A lot of people have now been “debanked,” but that is usually just their company, and they can usually just open an account at a different bank. I was going to hire a “CEO” to run the business side and deal with employees, because running a company is something I have never really had any interest in.

So, I’m a bad boss, and someone who will tolerate this and work with me and do a consistently good job is not someone I’m willing to let go easily, even if he is costing me money every month and not really doing much work since I stopped writing as much back in February.

Anyway, “Most Men Alive” is now a meme. I am going to start using it.

And in many ways, I think it is accurate to say that Charlie Kirk was indeed one of the most men alive.

RIP.

I’ve Got a Lot to Say

There is a bunch of stuff I need to say about all of this.

I joked that I was going to do a ripoff of Redbar’s podcast, and then a whole bunch of people were like “this is the best idea ever.” So I’m seriously looking into this.

If I’m the only even real nigga in this right wing game, and there be no other nigga even in the semi-real category, I need to do something other than post by-weekly blogs. That could actually be the best possible format.

I need to look into the technical side. I’ve also lived in like, four countries in the last three years, so that is kind of a thing to be considered. I can’t really build a serious set. But I can have mics and cameras that I can travel with, and a couple of monitors and a TV are not especially expensive.

I think I would charge $20 a month, do one show a week, and every other show would be free. So people would be paying $10 a show. But given that I can’t do advertisements, this is sort of just how it needs to be.

It wouldn’t be a complete ripoff of Redbar, by the way. Firstly, it would be political content instead of comedy content. Aside from that, maybe 85% ripped off. It’s obviously going to be different, because I’m not Jewish and I can’t do that Howard Stern bit. Plus I don’t have the fashion skills. But I do think going through and watching all the podcasts with these right-wing people and criticizing them might be the best possible format for me to express my own views. But I don’t really see how this wouldn’t work. I think I would come across well on camera.

I have always said “you know, I spent my whole life building up these writing skills, so switching mediums doesn’t make sense,” but I’ve also built up analytical skills that do translate directly, and I think I could get the “on air” thing down within a year. Not that the first year would be horrible, but I think by the second year, I could really be rolling.

For those uncool people who are not familiar with Redbar, he goes through and investigates comedians, showing that they’re a bunch of weirdos, and pointing out what is weird about them, and it seems that would be an ideal platform for me to demonstrate what is wrong with all of this, and explain what should be different. After making that throwaway joke, it is becoming more serious in my mind.

People have said I’m not good at podcasting, but my podcast with Paul Town was getting like 20,000 downloads and we only made three episodes. So I think I’m not that bad. And I think people would understand me a lot better on camera.

With Bitcoin on Venmo and Cash App, I’m pretty sure anyone can figure out how to send Bitcoin to sub, and I’ve now got a system of using new BTC addresses to receive the money.

As of right now, I have like, no money. Well, I’ve got my own money from other work I do, but most of the donation money has been spent on lawyers and related stuff relating to the fact that this site has ruined my life. I’ve been thinking about a comeback, and settled on “books,” but while I am going to publish some books, this “right wing criticism podcast” seems to be a very good idea, and a way for me to make enough money to keep shit going. And allowing people to clip it, while also putting the free shows (every other show) on Rumble for as long as that lasts could really create a presence that I currently do not have because this website is so totally buried.

This is a big project. I know nothing about audio or video. So I’d have to figure all of that out, or find someone who understands it, and probably find a producer, a Jules figure, who doesn’t have an impenetrable ******* accent.

Let me know what you think in the comments. And don’t forget to like and subscribe and jingle my bells.

When Charlie Kirk died last Wednesday, I saw people having complete meltdowns, and felt it was my job to be the voice of reason. This came across as crass at the time, as people were really full of emotion. If you were one of the emotional ones, and you go back now and read those articles today, I am certain you will have a different opinion of what I was doing there.

Yes, it was crass, but the crassness was a response to the emotionalism I was seeing everywhere I looked. What I was trying to do, hoping to do without much hope it would work, is ground people by pointing out that this might be emotional for you, but all that means is that the government is going to use this to push an agenda on you.

Here’s some of what I wrote the day after Charlie died (you can skip this, I hate quoting myself, but I need to make this point):

What I have seen, however, is that people are having a really, really serious emotional reaction to Charlie Kirk getting assassinated. Like, I read Twitter, and people are having emotional breakdowns, freaking out, calling for some kind of Super Patriot Act.

…

Right now, the Trump administration is building up this internal army in the form of ICE, and much worse, he is making these deals with Palantir. There were various social media accounts calling for Palantir to be “unleashed” on illegal immigrants. Now it’s calls for the entire power of the federal government, including our militarized law enforcement and Palantir, to be “unleashed” on “the left.”

How did that work out when the full force of the state was unleashed on “international terrorism”? Did that work out good for you? Did it work out good for the country?

…

To all of you having this emotional reaction: I admit, I do not understand what you’re going through. It seems to be very difficult. I don’t understand or respect that, but I can accept that it is what it is. But please. Relax. And think about what it is you are calling for. Look at this massive movement of all of these social media accounts demanding the federal government be unleashed on the public. Does it feel maybe a bit artificial? I mean, even if you’re feeling it, are you able to see how maybe there is something a bit nefarious going on here?

Can we think maybe just one step ahead here, and consider maybe what the consequences of giving intelligence agencies, paramilitary law enforcement, and private military contractors the ability to “hunt down domestic terrorists” might turn out perhaps not so good? Maybe it could in fact be like, the worst possible thing imaginable?

…

Anyway. Whatever. I guess I hope you enjoy your experience with these dark forces you are calling upon. And after all, who knows? Maybe the US federal government are the good guys this time and they’re really going to help you stop trannies or Islamofascism or whatever? Could be. Could be.

Screenshot this I guess so you can come back and mock me after giving over massive new powers to the government results in a great outcome, where your stupid woman emotions are satisfied after Israel and Peter Thiel build you a utopia where no one ever gets shot with a gun again.

And then:

The narrative from the right is daunting, with Trump in his video paying tribute to Kirk using the opportunity to call for some kind of unspecified crackdown, which we can only assume means even more egregious restrictions on speech and more military and militarized cops everywhere. There is a huge astroturf campaign to do the exact same thing the left did to the right when they claimed that “speech causes violence,” and therefore “speech is violence,” and therefore free speech shouldn’t exist.

Then, of course, as I’d said, on Tuesday, Pam Bondi, the perplexing Attorney General, came out with an announcement that we now have new hate speech laws in America, which she is going to enforce against anyone who is saying… whatever it is they might be saying.

Bondi: If you want to go and print posters with Charlie’s picture for a vigil, you have to let them do that. We can prosecute you for that. We have right now our civil rights unit looking at that. pic.twitter.com/GugF4PsGwZ

— Acyn (@Acyn) September 16, 2025

That is wild, and really much more extreme than the total doom I was expecting. “Hate speech is not free speech” is an ADL-coined phrase that has been floating around on the left for decades, and was considered anathema to conservatives. Conservatives tend to believe in free speech, and they also tend to be aware that according to the Supreme Court, in multiple rulings, there is no such concept of “hate speech” in the United States.

But she, or rather the people who tell her what to say, apparently believed that the Charlie Kirk assassination video was emotionally distressful enough that the government can now roll this out.

As the day progressed, she partially walked it back, saying she just means “hate speech” as in violent threats. Violent threats, if they are imminent and actionable, are already illegal, and no one ever called that “hate speech.” She also said that people celebrating Charlie’s death was “hate speech” which she classified as illegal – in the clarification!

Hate speech that crosses the line into threats of violence is NOT protected by the First Amendment. It’s a crime. For far too long, we’ve watched the radical left normalize threats, call for assassinations, and cheer on political violence. That era is over.

Under 18 U.S.C. §…

— Attorney General Pamela Bondi (@AGPamBondi) September 16, 2025

Again, this is way beyond what I was predicting. But there it is!

Just to be clear, Bondi is not any kind of ringleader here. Just watching her, you can see that this is a person who would struggle to be the manager of a Walmart, and would probably be out of her depth as the shift manager at a gas station. She has no idea what any of this means, and it is all coming from people behind the scenes.

But here’s the thing: The Big Guy is also on board. In an interview where he was asked about Bondi’s rollout of new “hate speech” laws, Trump gave tacit approval, saying that Charlie, who was obviously against hate speech laws, would support these laws now that he’s dead.

MacCallum: “Charlie said, ‘There is no such thing as hate speech.'”

Trump: “He might not be saying that now.” pic.twitter.com/THAtebvIRD

— The Bulwark (@BulwarkOnline) September 18, 2025

The apparent implication there is that if there had been hate speech laws in America, it would have prevented Charlie’s assassination, which obviously makes no sense.

Trump’s other comment so far on the issue was a kind of jokey thing about how the media should be charged with hate speech.

Trump made this ABC “reporter” question his existence

On hate speech:

“Maybe they should go after people like you. You treat me so unfairly. It’s hate. You have hate in your heart. ABC paid me $16 million dollars. Maybe they’ll go after you” pic.twitter.com/6h5irHAz4V

— Sara Rose (@saras76) September 16, 2025

That isn’t really very funny, especially in light of the other clip, where he appears to endorse it.

It should be really easy to just say “no, we’re not doing that, she was misquoted” or whatever. So that is the direction things are going in, at the highest levels. Trump has already established a precedent where he is able to just make up laws out of nothing and no one can stop him, so it seems likely he’s going to try to enforce some kind of hate speech code. It’s certainly what his handlers in Israel want.

It makes no sense how Charlie’s death was even related to previous notions of hate speech, given that all of those related to a protected group. “Hate speech,” the term which Bondi and Trump are using, is an established term which means “criticism of a person based on their race, religion, or sexual orientation.” Multiple countries in Europe have laws which use this term, as defined. If Trump and Bondi want to come up with some new form of illegal speech, which has to do with criticizing people for their political positions (which would be the only thing that would relate to Charlie’s death), why not come up with some new term for their censorship program?

And how do you make it illegal to criticize someone’s political beliefs? That doesn’t even make any sense. That would be like, more or less 100% of political speech. It is difficult to imagine political commentary in America that isn’t in some form a criticism of the other side.

So, I think what you obviously have here is a situation where the Israel lobby wants to push through the “hate speech” laws that we’re all familiar with, the ones that make it illegal to criticize Jews and Israel (as well as blacks, trannies, and immigrants), while claiming it is somehow related to Charlie Kirk.

If We Compare Them to the Power of Government, Trannies on TikTok are Not Really a Very Big Threat to Anyone

I don’t know how many trannies or “far leftists” there actually are. I don’t think there are very many. I think it is possible they can do an assassination, as with Charlie Kirk (though I am coming around to the theory that the Jews did it). They can riot and break some store fronts. But they are not a massive military threat. Most importantly, they present nothing even close to the threat that the US government, which is controlled by Israel and Silicon Valley, present to the American people. Radical trannies present less than 1% of 1% of the threat the government presents.

Trannies present less than 1% of 1% of the threat black people present, frankly. This is seriously not a big issue. It’s been made a big issue by the media, but the idea that you have to beg the government to take your rights to protect you from trannies is absolute lunacy.

Therefore, as an impartial observer, the idea of calling on the government to take away your rights to protect you from the trannies sounds completely insane to me. I can’t process how anyone of good conscience would think that is a good idea, which is why I can only really assume that the people calling for that are bad actors.

Full disclosure: the streamer Nick Fuentes spent the first several years of his career more or less copying everything from me directly. Which is fine, I supported it. I supported him. He then got involved with Richard Spencer, who I believe is an FBI informant and a general rat, and then got jungled up with the confirmed FBI informant Charles Johnson (Johnson bragged about being an FBI informant, you can look all that up on your own time, many of the sordid details have come out in court recently). I’ve always had a red line, saying that I won’t support anyone who is involved with the FBI. The reasons for that should be obvious. But in response, all I did was post on my semi-private chat forum that I would no longer be supporting him, because I don’t support people involved with the feds. He started attacking me on his show and implied he had blackmail material on me, which was utterly bizarre. I demanded he reveal this (it doesn’t exist but even if it did, I’m not being fucking blackmailed, bro) on the semi-secret forum which he was reading to see my comments about him. Instead of releasing the material, he just continually said nasty things about me, and continued to reference blackmail material without acknowledging I said to post it all, despite the fact I never attacked him on the Daily Stormer and basically no one saw my criticism of him on this obscure web forum. I didn’t post about him here because in my experience, no one really cares if someone is an FBI informant, and exposing that doesn’t really do anything. I have no idea why people are not more concerned about that, but I’ve seen again and again that they don’t care.

I just wanted to lay that out for the sake of openness. Full disclosure and all that. It doesn’t relate to anything I’m going to say here. Well, the fact that he’s associated with the feds might relate. But that’s for you to decide, dear reader.

He’s become a kind of centerpiece of the Charlie Kirk assassination situation, and appears to be the heir apparent to the “young influencer” throne of Charlie Kirk. He’s being promoted by all the mainstream influencers, and has gained hundreds of thousands of followers since the event.

When I was telling people this whole spectacle around the Kirk death was a government psy-op, I also pointed to the fact that Fuentes, who is supposed to be “far right,” was aggressively whining and calling for aggressive government action to shut down trannies or whatever.

He was openly calling for some form of “hate speech” laws, demanding people be punished for their speech.

Here’s the first concerning tweet:

It’s obviously impossible for the government to ensure that some random person never murders another random person ever again. That is an insane comment. Complete nonsense. But the implication is obviously some kind of Ultra Patriot Act. It’s the same language used in the wake of 9/11.

Then this:

You’d think anyone would see that and think “whoa, hey, slow down there. What?”

What would “crush left wing terrorism” involve, exactly? What are the potential things that this could imply? It’s a pretty short list, and everything on the list involves giving the government new and expansive powers, both to spy on people and to punish people for things they haven’t done yet.

And then:

At this point, anyone who isn’t in a complete state of total derangement is saying “hey, whoa, hey, hold up there buddy – did you just say you want to arrest people who celebrated Charlie Kirk’s death? Because I don’t understand what that even means.”

Having read his posts and listened to some of his shows, it’s clear that it means exactly what it says it means: he is calling for the arrest of people who celebrated Charlie Kirk’s death. We have never heard anything like that before. I was completely shut down in 2017 for joking about – arguably, celebrating – the death of a fat woman at the Charlottesville rally. Millions of people laughed at this. And then I was totally deplatformed from everything forever. But I don’t remember even the most insane tranny calling for me to be arrested. This is something totally new that we’ve never heard from an “influencer” who now has 900,000 followers on Twitter. It is the most extreme call for government tyranny I’ve seen, ever.

But then look at this suspicious individual’s next tweet, in response to the above Pam Bondi tweet:

How is that not literally exactly what you were calling for?

You asked for this 2 days ago actually.

“We must censor them on social media.” pic.twitter.com/InDA39GZZK

— Jackson Hinkle (@jacksonhinklle) September 16, 2025

What did it mean when you were saying people “must be held accountable” for cheering Charlie’s death? It is definitely not currently illegal to do that, so you were calling for some new form of restrictions on speech. But what, you just didn’t want it to be called “hate speech”?

Of course, it doesn’t really mean anything because none of this gibberish means anything, so I suppose it’s best not to think too much about it.

But here, following the timeline, he then tweets @FBI (!!!!!!) calling on them to arrest Jackson Hinkle for legal speech! (Or, at least, for speech that was legal before the death of Charlie Kirk. We don’t really know what speech is legal now.)

Here he is threatening Jackson with prison.

This is snitch level 9000.

Do people like snitches? Do they think they’re hip and edgy? Even when they’re all bloated like that? I mean, if there was like some really sexy snitch, who knows, but a snitch with that bulbous face, looking like it’s about to pop?

“I’m really hip bro, I’m really edgy and ironic and stuff. I’m also an FBI snitch. I do really funny comedy bits.”

I never even imagined anyone could become this much of a public snitch and be celebrated for it. (Please see my premises relating to fake reality overriding classic reality to get an idea how this is possible.)

He went on to make it clear he is against free speech and wants the government, which by the way, as far as I know, he still argues is controlled by Israel and Silicon Valley, to crack down on speech.

The left, for what it’s worth, never actually made a major push to make speech illegal. Not in the way that Trump, Bondi, and Fuentes are doing. This is so very far beyond anything the left did. They just tried to get people banned from everything, and in some cases, sued them. That was very bad, but this push to arrest people, these new “hate speech” laws, newly minted top influencers tagging the FBI to arrest people for legal speech, this is all new. That should be understood.

All that is insane. But it is basic sellout type behavior. People didn’t care he was a fed. But a sellout? A snitch? Is that something people will tolerate? Will they think they are hip and cool for supporting him? I suppose normies will. That is the goal here. He’s being groomed now as the new Charlie Kirk. He’s got an edgy past, where he was copying my shit, and that gives him some kind of street cred, but now he’s the “give the government the power to arrest people for speech” guy.

And here we get to the real meat:

It’s not about Israel! It’s not about Silicon Valley! No, no! Look over here – the trannies are the threat!

This is where it is all going. The government, which is run by Israel and Silicon Valley, is not the real threat. The real threat is trannies. And if we have to give up all our rights to a government controlled by Israel and Silicon Valley to protect us from the trannies, then so be it! It’s a small price to pay to stop this tranny menace!

And here’s where we take the shill train straight to Kook Town: this bloated Mexican individual is promoting Russian bot conspiracies.

Whoooooooaaaaaa! Heeyyyyyyyy!

Russiagate is back, baby, and this time it is the edgy far-right irony guy doing the investigation!

That is some of the most hardcore “yikes” I’ve encountered in my day.

Here he is on video claiming anyone questioning the official story is a RUSSIAN!

Nick Fuentes KEEPS running cover for ISRAEL!

Nick Fuentes calls ANYONE a “Russian Shill” and “conspiracy theorist” if you suggest that Israel killed Charlie Kirk.

Nick Fuentes is fully compromised. pic.twitter.com/AB0chpjbWS

— RTSG (@RTSG_Main) September 18, 2025

Frankly, I thought the story made sense as just a tranny. But the extent to which this is being exploited by the government and shills like Fuentes makes me wonder. I’m being driven to the “Israel did it” side. I’ve been especially moved by Bibi’s daily announcements that he didn’t do it.

Charlie Kirk was a great man. He deserves honor – not lies. pic.twitter.com/NwEN4B2q7w

— Prime Minister of Israel (@IsraeliPM) September 18, 2025

He’s doing these daily. Imagine. His assistant is like “sir, it’s time to record your daily video saying you didn’t order the assassination of Charlie Kirk.”

Seriously, regardless if you believe the official story or not, trannies are not some massive threat, and Russia doesn’t have anything to do with anything. Russia, like “hate speech,” is a Democrat talking point that these people apparently think worked for the other side, so they might as well pick up the ball and run with it.

And this Fuentes character isn’t just some random Mexican I have beef with because he works with the feds and did a weird blackmail threat against me. I wanted to get that out of the way at the beginning, reveal a potential conflict of interests in the coverage, but I promise I would be saying this same thing if I had nothing to do with him ever. Just look at it. He’s everywhere. Every major account is praising him.

You’re basically witnessing a coronation.

He is now on all the big shows, he is being defended by Matt Walsh and all of his supposed enemies. He just had a big appearance with Russell Brand. He is going mainstream, and he is saying the things necessary to go mainstream – “don’t worry about Israel and Palantir, the real threat is trans ideology!” and “Russia is behind all of this anti-Israel stuff!”

Here’s Ian Miles Cheong defending him.

Nick Fuentes has completely had it with the “conspiratard-schizos” like Candace Owens who are pushing a far left conspiracy about how Charlie Kirk was killed at the orders of Netanyahu. She, and others, claim that he was converting to Catholicism and that angered Israel.

This is… pic.twitter.com/6JgPxLblRk

— Ian Miles Cheong (@stillgray) September 17, 2025

That’s frankly the end of the argument. Honestly, I could have just started with that, and it would have explained the whole thing. There is nothing more damning than being defended by that guy.

This is all completely staged. You are witnessing the birth of the new shill of shills. That’s why he got all teary over Charlie. He’s in place to pick up all the Charlie fans. He’s cool with the youth, you know. Just check out his zany sense of humor. I don’t have any specific clips on hand, but just watch one of his four hour streams, and you’re going to see zany like you never thought humanly plausible.

Speaking of teary eyes, Sam Hyde, another “far right” figure, one of the only ones left really, cried on video and called for some kind of Ultra Double Patriot Act to stop the trannies.

I like Sam Hyde, I even love Sam Hyde. That is some of the cringiest tripe I’ve ever seen in my life. This is not the look for your brand, bro. You don’t want to be crying on video, firstly. No one wants to do that. Like, literally no one other than maybe women who are trying to get their boyfriend arrested for DV wants to be crying on video on the internet. And we have this idea, again, that the trannies are the real threat and the government – one more time, the same government which is entirely controlled by Israel and Silicon Valley – is going to save us from the tranny threat. What even is this? How many people have even met a tranny?

You can show these videos of people celebrating Charlie’s death on TikTok, but I think 80% of the people who were celebrating that posted it on social media. I do not think there is any kind of massive tranny threat. People just are led to believe that because trannies are disgusting and the media was talking about it for a decade. No one has actually done a calculation of how many of these people there are, but no one I know has ever met one.

Sam says that if Trump doesn’t like, send the military to arrest everyone against Charlie Kirk in the next two weeks – he keeps saying this two-week deadline – then the world will end or everyone will die or something. It’s wild. It’s almost like parody. I kept wanting to believe it was an over the top comedy bit.

Remember when Reagan was shot by a guy who was in love with Jodie Foster? Can you imagine if there were calls to give the government huge new spying, censorship, and policing powers to crack down on people in love with Jodie Foster? Honestly, that sounds ridiculous, but there were probably more people in love with Jodie Foster then as there are radical trannies now. I mean, she looked great in Taxi Driver.

Wait, hold on. My producer just notified me that Jodie was only 12 in Taxi Driver, and said I should retract that statement. But we’re just going to keep moving.

With Sam, I don’t want to attack him. Everyone shits the bed once in a while. I have. Not like that, ever, or even anything close (can you imagine me crying on camera?). But you know, sometimes you miss, I guess. People are also saying he stopped doing steroids recently and that can definitely make you emotional. So, okay. I’m not putting him in the same category as Fuentes.

But what do we have going on here?

This is at best a mass hysteria like coronavirus being exploited by the same bad actors.

Tucker Carlson as a Voice of Reason

Maybe Tucker Carlson is some kind of secret agent as well, I don’t know. I have no idea. But I can say his response was measured and reasonable.

Unlike Fuentes and a lot of these other creeps, he said we cannot tolerate any form of restrictions on speech as a result of this event, and basically said people should rise up if Trump tries to push this through.

The Earth just tilted off its axis.

Tucker Carlson is now calling out Trump’s own regime, accusing it of using Charlie Kirk’s assassination as a pretext to abolish the First Amendment, round up Americans, and Nazify the country.

Yes. He said that. And he’s not wrong. pic.twitter.com/cy5oYXbJb4

— Brian Allen (@allenanalysis) September 17, 2025

(Note: anyone who wants to stop these speech laws is going to have to go through Fuentes, though somehow I don’t think that will be much of a problem.)

Tucker’s whole show about Charlie was touching (I mean that legitimately) and helped me to understand him better and sympathize with him. He had an Orthodox priest on saying that it’s our belief that the dead should be let to rest for forty days before we start making any kind of judgements about what the death means. And Tucker’s explanation of Charlie’s behind the scenes with him about Israel was convincing. He basically did say Charlie was turning against Israel, which I didn’t believe, but he said it was happening in the last few months, and he had many conversations with him about it.

Tucker is doing a kind of “I’m not saying Israel killed him of course, WINK WINK WINK.” He is definitely on that train, but he’s not just going to say it, because that’s not really his style.

I’m still not totally convinced Israel did it, but I will tell you, the lone shooter theory is looking less and less likely as I look at how aggressively this whole machine is using this event. Of course, they’re going to use any event, but this has become such a big thing that it seems like something you wouldn’t wait for to happen randomly.

I think what is very likely is that the tranny was in Discord channels, and was groomed by someone from some intelligence agency who explained to him how to do all of this. Again, lone gunman is technically possible, but just look at what is happening. It is Kirk Crackdown Mania.

Who’s Left?

What voice of reason exists now? Frankly, I thought Sam was one, then a few weeks ago he interviewed Fuentes, and I was like “ugh.” Then he goes full Kook Train to Bonkersville (please bring your own tissues) with this Charlie thing.

I am not seeing a voice of reason, at all. Tucker is the closest thing. And I’ve certainly aired my complaints about him, which are many, some of which are rather serious.

I think Theo Von is our man. And that is why, through the powers invested in me by being the only remaining member of the original alt-right, I am hereby anointing Theo Von as the absolute leader of the right-wing.

I can’t go out on that joke. Too stupid. Not really funny at all, actually. Though to be honest, I sometimes do feel like Theo is only person on the internet who isn’t completely full of shit. But you know he’s like, close friends with RFK Jr. And what does that even mean? What are they talking about? What would they have to talk about, other than for RFK to send through government talking points? Tim Dillon is having meetings with “JD Vance” (fake name, btw). Joe Rogan is jungled up with all these people, including Thiel himself.

The problem is:

• People love money
• People don’t want to go to prison or be murdered

“You can have a bunch of money and we won’t put you in prison or murder you” is the ultimate deal. It’s an offer you can’t refuse.

Unless you’re me, I guess. But I am deranged. Seriously. I’m one of the sickest people I know, and I was even before this brain tumor (which is getting much larger by the way, but it seems totally harmless). I do not consider the fact that I’m the only one among these hundreds of internet people that has actually kept it real to be a sign of integrity but rather a symptom of mental illness. Because I will tell you, from 15 years of experience: this is totally fucking pointless. It is something to suffer for a purpose, there is value in that. Suffering for no purpose at all is just stupid or insane. For me it’s mostly the latter. I would like to think. Being insane is a lot more respectable than being stupid.

I should have started a landscaping company.

Anyway, I hope everything works out.

I’m sure it’s probably all fine.

(More to come. Just getting rolling here. Having written all of this just now I’ve convinced myself of the Jewish conspiracy to murder Charlie Kirk. This is not audience capture. Or maybe it is, but I am captured as an audience of myself. My own writing just convinced me. I will be filling you in on that and many other important aspects of just how totally fucked you truly are.)