I am primarily concerned about domestic social issues. That is what I prefer to write about. Primarily, I hate women and like to share that message of hate with the world. However, for many years now I have been compelled to write about geopolitics because there is so much gibberish flooding the public space regarding these issues that it appears to be a moral obligation for me to add my piece.

I am all too well aware that I am the only English speaking person who can say anything intelligent about China. But I never viewed myself as the sole voice of reason on the Ukraine-Russia situation. Yet, I go away for a few weeks and the public conversation on the right degrades into garbled madness. Following a wild series of confusing events, there are a few quick things I want to put out there and hopefully it will clear things up.

The first and most obvious thing to note is that it was very easy for the American right to be pro-Russia, or at least anti-Ukraine, when the cancer-riddled old coot Joe Brandon was in charge of the US government and serving as the face of Ukrainemania. Right wingers, while sometimes critical of Trump, do not view him as villainous in the way they viewed the rotting corpse Brandon as villainous.

Unfortunately, nothing has changed insofar as the Ukraine-Russia situation is concerned now that Trump is president. Despite a very funny scene in the Oval Office in which Trump berated the Jewish dwarf dictator of the Ukraine, the US military has continued arming the country and has continued to support NATO escalating the conflict.

Following along with the theater that took place during the Zelensky meeting, Trump has used rhetoric to give the impression there has been some substantive change in US war policy. Biden publicly committed to the idea that the war would never end, saying constantly that the war should go on forever no matter the cost, while Trump is publicly saying the war should end at some point in the (near?) future. However, even while Biden was saying “endless war forever,” his own officials were acknowledging that it would have to end at some point. Just so, while Trump says he wants it to end, his own officials are saying that sure, it will have to be sometime, but who really knows.

Aside from the change in rhetoric, Trump has vaguely attempted to start a peace process, which Biden refused to even entertain. So, I should give credit where due there. But there is as of yet no reason to believe the peace process will go anywhere.

It’s a bit disappointing for me personally. Although I obviously supported Trump over Kamala, in the run-up to the “election,” I was overwhelmingly negative about the whole thing, and repeatedly stressed the point that though Trump would win, it was only because he was allowed to win (given that we know for a fact that US elections can be rigged), which meant that he wasn’t likely to do much of significance. I did say that I expected him to end the Ukraine war (even if only to free up resources for more adventurism in the Middle East). It now appears that my optimism, as it were, might have been misplaced. (Of course, on the other end, to also give credit where due, he is at least pushing back against Bibi in ways which could turn out to be substantive. Though I’m not really holding my breath on that, I stand by what I wrote last week about the possibility that Trump could move to try to oust Bibi. I also stand by my instinct that it probably won’t work.)

The important thing to understand is that Trump’s talk of a Russia-Ukraine ceasefire is complete bullshit and every serious person is aware of this. It is not a starting point for peace negotiations, it is not anything at all other than a tactic to try to convince deeply stupid or totally uninformed people that Russia is not committed to peace and is rejecting an olive branch. It is not an olive branch. If there was a deal on the table and Zelensky and Putin had a meeting set up with a draft proposal and Trump was asking for a week’s ceasefire, okay, but asking for an open-ended ceasefire and then whining when Putin refuses to agree to let the Ukraine rearm for no reason is just childish and dumb.

Russia’s demands have been the same since before they invaded the Ukraine. In substance, they’ve been consistent since the Ukraine, backed by the US, started the war in 2014, but the specifics have not changed since February of 2022 when Putin gave a speech outlining the purpose of the invasion and the goals that would have to be achieved before there could be peace between the two states. There is no room for confusion about what Russia is demanding, and the single most important demand is a serious, carved in stone agreement that the Ukraine will never join NATO. This includes not only a ban on officially joining NATO, but also a ban on being a de facto NATO state through a treaty that does the same thing without official NATO membership. (The current chatter coming from the State Department and from Germany is to make the Ukraine a de facto NATO member without actually calling it that.)

Trump is not offering Russia a peace deal. He is demanding that Russia, which is winning the war, agree to stop fighting so that the US and its allies can rearm and fortify the Ukraine. This is like if a losing football team in the fourth quarter demanded that the game be paused so everyone can rest up and then come back and finish the game tomorrow. It is completely ridiculous.

If Trump were in charge of the United States, and it might be childish to suggest he is but if he were, he could offer a peace deal that meets Russia’s terms and end the war immediately. If there were a serious peace deal, there would be no need for a ceasefire, because you would have a cessation of hostilities.

Russia is not demanding anything crazy. There would be nothing shameful in simply doing the deal. It would not make Trump look weak or whatever it is people suggest he is concerned about. Trump has spent months now claiming that Putin is planning to conquer the entirety of the Ukraine, and I can tell you as a matter of fact, no one in Russia is going to be mad about Trump signing a peace deal and then going around saying he stopped Russia from marching on Galicia and forcing everyone to use correct Russian grammar and drink Russian vodka (instead of that fruity crap they drink).

I said from the beginning that when the US finally surrenders they will say “we stopped Putin from taking all of the Ukraine,” and that is clearly what Trump will claim and that is fine.

But there is no other room for a “win.” Maybe Russia will cede some of the territory that they’ve officially claimed but don’t currently occupy. I would assume they would do that and the Kremlin seems to have indicated as much. But that can’t be any kind of a big public “win” because no one in the West knows or cares where those lines are.

Russia doing a big bombing campaign this week is sending a signal that they are not playing a game and they are not interested in this ridiculous kiddie nonsense that Trump is pushing. Trump is trying to bully them by claiming they look bad for not agreeing to a ceasefire that allows the sickening pervert Americans and those German sickos to come in and fortify towns again, to ship in more weapons, to train soldiers, and so on.

Trump is offering nothing at all. In part that is because there is nothing he can offer other than the deal that has always been on the table. I have no idea how this is going to play long term with his own supporters. Trump is now taking a position not qualitatively different than that of Joe Biden on the conflict and it’s unclear if his supporters are going to notice that. Probably, if you combine this with things like Dan Bongino and that odious Indian coming out and saying the Epstein suicide was on the up and up, and the ongoing discontent with Trump’s support for the Gaza genocide, Trump is probably going to be facing some pretty serious negativity in the coming weeks and months. The euphoria over the barrage of toothless, symbolic executive orders is probably wearing off.

It seems to me that Trump has enough problems with being perceived as a warmonger and if he has the ability, ending the Ukraine war would be a very easy win for his image, even if it isn’t a “win” in the other sense that he often uses that word.

Issuing a series of threats seems very ill-advised and is definitely not going to lead to any positive outcome for Trump or anyone else.

He can escalate, of course. He can send in US troops to fight Russians. He has that ability. But is that what he wants? If not, then threats are not useful, because Russia is not going to respond to threats. I don’t think they will get mad about them, but they will issue statements about how Trump is very emotional, which just seems embarrassing for Trump. If he decides to escalate the war, then he goes down as the guy who started World War III in the face of the most obvious peace deal imaginable, with the narrative being that he did it because he was unable to control his emotions.

He campaigned on saying Joe Biden was right about Israel-Palestine but just wasn’t extreme enough. Everyone knew that was his position. However he now does seem to be bothered by the fact that all of his supporters, save whatever evangelical boomers are still around, view him as a puppet of Netanyahu who is personally responsible for a genocide. It’s possible he can’t get out of that, as he actually is just totally controlled by Israel. But if he can, why not take the PR win and end the Ukraine war? Why go around spewing gibberish that no adult takes seriously?

For the record, I take Trump at his word that he wants to have a legacy as a peacemaker, and I think if he was a dictator, in complete control of the executive branch of the US government, he would end these wars. I am not against him as a person, and I think people who portray him as being secretly ideologically pro-war are not very serious people. The problem is that his own opinions are totally irrelevant, the only thing that matters being his actions, and all of his actions thus far have shown that he’s no more anti-war than Joe Biden.

It’s great that he’s complained about Bibi and said it’s sad Palestinians are being slaughtered and starved. But Biden also said that. His rhetoric on the Ukraine is less deranged than Biden’s, but his policies are the same. And it’s pretty much the same across the board. It’s great he’s talking about a new Iran Nike deal, but Biden also talked about that. There’s nothing new here, and it’s kind of hilarious that after he appointed Marco Rubio as the Secretary of State, anyone thought there would be anything new.

What is much more hilarious is that the Trump administration’s attacks on the freedom of speech make Biden look like a hardcore civil libertarian. There is a bill in Congress that will put people in prison for ten years if they boycott Israel. I had a conversation with AI about the bill. Laws are very long and purposefully confusing, but AI is able to break this stuff down. (Obviously, you need to check it for accuracy, but I’ve found it is now very accurate when it comes to simply analyzing long documents.) I asked if this bill became law and I was in a store and there was a bar of Israeli soap and a bar of Jordanian soap, and I bought the Jordanian soap because I am against the genocide in Gaza if I could be prosecuted. The AI said no. I think I asked if I owned a company, and my company chose to buy the Jordanian soap because I am against the genocide if I could be prosecuted, and the AI said it was possible I could be prosecuted and face up to ten years in prison. The bill has been tabled, but according to the media, this was done single-handedly by Matt Gaetz and Republicans want to bring it back. (Gaetz pointed out that the bill seems to imply every American is legally obligated to buy Israeli products. Again, no one understands the way these laws are written, but in my example above, it seems possible that if my company chose to buy the Jordanian soap, even if I did it arbitrarily, and not because I oppose the Gazan genocide, I could be accused of having hateful reasons for the decision, and thrown in prison.)

We all love Trump. But there is a lot of stuff like this going on that is really not great. I’m glad Elon got thrown under the bus, but compared to some of this other stuff, whatever the hell he was up to seems like small potatoes. Stopping wars and bringing back freedom of speech were two of the most prominent things in the Trump campaign, and rhetoric aside, we are so far getting the opposite on both counts.

But hey. We hope for the best.

Ultimately, we need to not lose sight of why the American people elected Trump in the first place: to protect women’s sports.

Trump’s foreign policy might be the same as Biden’s, he will likely be the president to implement the first hate speech laws in American history, but none of that matters much in light of the fact that we’ve gotten rid of the radical gender ideology that was causing female swimmers to be denied their sports medals.

Yesterday, I posted a long essay written by someone else, comic book writer and artist Dave Sim’s 2001 anti-feminist manifesto “Tangent,” that I would like to comment on presently. You can read the essay before reading these comments, but it surely is not required. It might also be better to read it after reading this, frankly, as having some framing might help you to understand why I view it as an important artifact of anti-feminist history.

It’s worthy of note that reading the essay now, I could not say any of it is better or more relevant than the material I have personally produced about women. However, at this point, listening to popular figures talk about not only women but all of the top issues, I get the impression I am listening to my own talking points read back to me. It’s not bragging to state that I changed the entire narrative on the internet right about a lot of different issues. (I legitimately am not boastful about this, it is simply that it must be said in order to understand how these ideas have developed. Aside from “4chan, collectively,” I am the person who is most responsible for developing and popularizing these ideas and there is no one who is anywhere near a close second. I only feel thankful God blessed me with such an important role, and pray that I can do more in my remaining time here.) However, aside from people influenced by me, it is difficult to find much modern material, written after the feminist revolution of the 1960s and 70s, which addresses these issues at all, so the Sim essay is very intriguing, even if reading it in the current year you think “this is all stuff Anglin said a decade ago.” I also think there are some things he points out which I have not said specifically which make it worthwhile to comment on, and it gives me a platform to elaborate on these issues myself in ways I might not have thought of doing before.

I shall start with some criticisms. Just to get them out of the way. All of these criticisms should be considered in the light of the fact that 2001 is now a very long time ago and before the modern internet transformed the way people think.

Firstly, it will be obvious that I do not agree with his perceptions of Martin Luther King, as outlined in the final section of the essay, and I do believe the piece would be much better if that section had been left out completely. I find it confusing and convoluted. The summary, insofar as I can tell, is that King was destroyed and turned into a communist by women. That claim may or may not have some validity. I tend to think it doesn’t have any validity, because without even going into the details of King’s political agenda, the fact that King was a serial adulterer means that he was not a particularly moral man and really had no right to call himself a man of God (Sim readily admits as much). While it’s possible for any man to lose control on a single night, anyone who is involved in rampant adultery for years on end is going to be the sort of man who is totally beholden to the whims of women (in my experience, this describes virtually all American negroes). While I’m sure Daily Stormer readers will bristle at what appears to be a partial apologetic for the “civil rights” movement, the entire essay shouldn’t be cast aside because of this confused last section. Further, what you can see in looking at the structure of the essay is that Sim choked because he didn’t want to be accused of “racism” in his sexist manifesto (I will touch on this later).

Aside from the muddled final section, the primary issues that I would take with Sim are all based on the fact that I accept the traditional dogma of the church. Therefore, I am not iffy on the topic of the morality of homosexuality. I do not feel a need to analyze Bible verses word for word, and don’t see how, if you believe in a religion, you can do this kind of reading of the sacred text. If you read the Bible closely, you can find all sorts of contradictions and various other problems. But Jesus did not come to write a book, He came to build a church. No one ever thought that the gospels were directly written by God, as they clearly contradict one another, offering differing accounts of events. If you take them to be the written accounts of men recalling the events years or decades after they happened, it actually goes a long way toward proving their authenticity to find out they remembered some details differently while remembering the key events the same. (If they had been falsified centuries afterward, as atheists have claimed without evidence, then the accounts would presumably all be the same. Unless the conspirators falsifying the documents for whatever reason it is claimed that they did that would have thought “we’d better make some small changes between the varying accounts to give them a more authentic feel,” which doesn’t really seem very likely.) At the same time, this means that a line-by-line reading of the gospels in an attempt to find some insight that has yet to be identified by the magisterium is not going to be very meaningful. Sim claims that the only reason that the Bible would refer to two men being in bed together, and one going to Heaven and the other Hell, is that not all homosexuals go to Hell. I have no idea if all homosexuals go to Hell, just as I have no idea if all murderers go to Hell. But it is embarrassing to read “two men in bed” and assume that Luke is talking about homosexuals. Up through the 19th century, men sleeping in bed together did not imply homosexuality, but simply frugality and a need to conserve warmth. It’s embarrassing because you find so many examples in reading of this happening. Just as a random example I can think of off the top of my head, Ben Franklin and John Adams famously shared a bed in an inn while traveling to New York to negotiate an end to the Revolutionary War. Because homosexuality was not something that people thought much about before perhaps the 1950s, no one blinked at two men sharing a bed, and it is obvious that no such thing is implied by that verse in Luke.

I don’t mean to digress. I wanted to go into the weirdness of micro-readings of the gospels, searching for clues, because it speaks to a larger point I am going to try to make here about people who say socially uncomfortable truths before they are popular. (This is a topic I’m somewhat familiar with and one which is important to me, so I’m going to weave it into what is on its face supposed to be more anti-woman material.)

Dave Sim is a weird person, which is why I think his perspective is important. There are few people who I agree with completely. Even the people who were most influential on me were people who I could read specific quotes from and think “wow, that’s retarded, why would he say that?” There should not be a kind of “mold” that everyone is forced to conform to in order to be considered a valuable contributor to the public conversation. Reading the Sim essay, and recognizing how ahead of its time it was, I thought to myself: we need more people like Dave Sim. The people who are actually ahead of their time are always weird in some way or various ways. I get frustrated about Tucker Carlson promoting aliens or Candace Owens promoting the Macron tranny wife theory, but the reason I get frustrated is that I’m not allowed into the conversation because of the overwhelming censorship. I do think these beliefs of Tucker and Candace are the result of a psyop, whereas Sim’s strange beliefs are more a result of unique personality quirks and perhaps too much LSD, but it is my very strong belief that anything anyone says should just be taken at face value and discussed without emotion.

The problem has only ever been censorship. Whether it be the kind of social censorship that Sim was facing back in 2001, or the brutal totalitarian mega-ultra-doom censorship I faced in 2017, anything that reduces anyone’s ability to say anything they think and believe inhibits truth. No one who cares about the truth should ever be afraid of other people’s ideas or having their own ideas be challenged.

Possibly the biggest takeaway from the ridiculous Dave Smith vs. Douglas Murray debate (because insofar as there was any beef it was thin and dry) was that it is not adult behavior to demand, in the discussion of ideas, that a person explain why they have a right to have ideas. Certainly, if a person is completely irrelevant, you have no obligation to discuss ideas with them or talk to them at all, but if I was invited on the Joe Rogan show to debate a pro-Israel, pro-Ukraine schizophrenic homeless drug addict, I would do the debate, rather than demand it be explained to me why I should do the debate with someone of such low social status. If he’s on the Joe Rogan show, then clearly, it is a part of the public conversation and therefore important enough to take straightforwardly. If a person is totally ridiculous and everything they think is ridiculous, you should take the easy win of publicly defeating them in the game of wits. Just discuss the ideas, Douglas, you sickening shabbos pederast.

If more public personalities were like Sim, willing to simply give their frank opinions, unconcerned about conforming to any kind of identifiable ideology or political grouping, we would have a lot more interesting conversations. What you find is that with most of these people, they claim to be independent thinkers, but in actuality they are conforming to established norms. Although I am of course very excited that discussion of Jews and Israel is now on the menu, it must be admitted that the Jews handed this over to the commentariat on a silver platter through their genocide in Gaza and their open and public dictation to the US government as to how the US government will behave in the Middle East. It was so utterly ridiculous to have Bibi Netanyahu ordering Biden what to do in public, and then Donald Trump coming in and saying “Biden isn’t doing enough for Israel, he’s with the Palestinians and I think he is a Palestinian,” that it could not result in anything other than the issue becoming available for discussion and debate.

You can go look at what the situation in the “alternative media” was like before the Gaza genocide, and you’re not going to find very much discussion of Israel or the Jews. That is of course based on the 2017 censorship program, of which this writer was the most important and biggest casualty, but a censorship program is based on what the public will tolerate. The Jews who run the media tried to apply the same censorship they applied to me to people complaining about black crime and child trannies, and it did not work. These Jews will censor whatever they can get away with censoring, and if there would have been a strong public reaction to the 2017 censorship, none of the other censorship would have happened. They cannot simply silence 50% or even 20% of the population. Using the standard methods of internet censorship, debanking, personal harassment, and various threats, they can maybe silence 10%. If 25% or more of the public either agrees with you or believes you should have a right to say the thing you want to say, you can say it. This was true even in the Soviet Union. It is presumably true now in North Korea. You can insert whatever other sort of totalitarian system you imagine. There is only so much power that the government and private interests can wield over the masses of people, and deciding that certain ideas are not allowed is very extreme and it requires overwhelming popular support to enact these kinds of measures. (Note: the popular response, whenever you say something like “in communist countries, 97% of the people support the government,” is always to say “but they’re brainwashed.” But that is always going to be true to whatever extent. It doesn’t matter if people are brainwashed to believe something, they still believe it. It is also ridiculous for anyone living in a Western country to accuse anyone else of being brainwashed. The United States and its greater empire is visibly, openly controlled by Jews, and you’re not allowed to say that. Remember the old ADL thing: “Hollywood is run by individuals who happen to be Jewish.” No one in North Korea is banned from saying Kim Jong-Un is the leader of the country.)

This is to say, it is very clear that the current discussion of America’s relationship to Israel and the Israeli control of our government’s policy, and to a somewhat lesser extent a discussion of the Jews and their role in our society, is possible because a majority of people think it should be possible, and therefore no one discussing these things who was not discussing them before this (that would include all of the major figures in right-leaning internet media) is not discussing it because they are a “free thinker” who “makes up their own mind,” but rather that they are jumping on a bandwagon of what are popular and allowed realms of thinking. Again (and I will say again), I like it that this is being discussed. But it’s not brave. It was brave when I did it, frankly. Right now, you would actually have to be brave to side with Ben Shapiro and sickening Dave Portnoy. Siding with them wouldn’t be brave in the same way it was brave (or just retarded, frankly, I’m using “brave” in the sense of a disregard for self-interest) for me to talk about Jews ten years ago, because my life was totally ruined and siding with Shapiro now would not do the same damage, but it would destroy the career of someone like Joe Rogan to go out there and claim that “Israel is defending itself.”

Reading Sim first declare that the Bible is questionable and he thinks the Koran is better and then go pick apart some Bible verse and say “maybe this means homosexuality is not really that bad of a sin?” doesn’t frustrate or anger me, but rather makes me laugh and on another level, confirms that he does not care what anyone thinks about what he is saying, he is simply saying what he believes. All of this is to say: honesty and genuineness are a lot more valuable than trying to be right all the time. If you are honest and genuine, then you are open to criticism, so you don’t have to act like you’re right all the time. Having an open mind is going to lead to the truth, but it might lead you down some weird avenues on the way. There’s nothing wrong with that, as long as the discussion remains open. I will note that when I first heard Tucker Carlson say he was attacked by a demon in his sleep and it scraped him, I laughed and then kept replaying the clip to try to read his facial movements. While I do think this claim is stupid, as I do not believe that demons are scraping people in their sleep, the fact that he went out and said it and by all analysis believes it makes me think he could become a more interesting person in the years to come.

(I must note that saying contrary things simply to appear interesting is actually worse than just going with the flow and agreeing with some existing consensus, but that is a separate topic of discussion which I do not wish to discuss in much detail here. I will say that I think it is more or less obvious when someone is saying something contrarian to seem interesting and when they are saying what they believe in a frank manner even when it doesn’t conform to the norms of belief of any existing faction. Apparently, stupid people do not find it obvious, which is why mediocre right-winger internet commentators who are burning out can gain some attention on a fading star by going out and saying “actually, I support Democrats now.” But I refuse to believe anyone who isn’t stupid falls for that, and we cannot consider stupid people’s opinions as important, because they might believe anything at any moment. We live in a world where the headline “Extremist pro-homelessness advocate Gavin Newsom declares total war on homeless people” is considered good for Gavin Newsom’s career, and likely is very good for his career, so we cannot consider the opinions of stupid people other than to consider the effect that stupid people collectively have on the public discourse not through their opinions but through their seemingly supernatural ability to believe anything.)

Regardless of my particular disagreements about Sim’s comments on homosexuality, I do agree with his conclusions that homosexuality should be suppressed while homosexuals, if they keep their actions secretive, should not be molested. There is no explanation of how homosexuals could be hunted without creating a totalitarian state, so by default, they must be allowed to practice their private acts privately. It is not a good society where the government launches an investigation into two unmarried men living together. It’s also not nice to imagine women calling the cops to report a man who appears to be very unmarried and maybe a bit fruity. Everything about actually prosecuting homosexuals, if they do keep it private, leads to problems bigger than homosexuality, namely, state/police excesses and witch-hunting. This was never really a problem at any point in history. Although the modern “homosexual identity” is somewhat new, there have always been people who engaged in homosexual activities, and there was never a need to do a witch-hunt investigating the bedrooms of unmarried men in order to prevent them from parading through the streets sucking each other off in front of children. Personally, I think buggery should be nominally illegal, in order to prevent it from seeping out into the public realm, but I don’t think laws against it are enforceable unless it is brought into the public realm. If gay clubs were secret, I would not support organizing special “Fag Patrol” police to infiltrate them.

Most of my other critiques would follow from the original thing. For example, Sim does another thing finding a Bible verse to claim marriage isn’t really necessary in the Bible. I obviously think Christianity is pro-marriage, but that modern Western “marriage” is not actually marriage in the Christian sense, but rather a bastardized secular version designed to exclusively benefit women. Further, I do not believe that the people of the Old Testament or the followers of Christ were “Jews” in the modern sense, as Judaism did not exist at that time, but that is an entirely separate issue unrelated to the topic of the day. You can just fill in the blank as to where I would disagree with some of the other statements he makes and includes God. I just believe the Nicene Creed.

Finally, while it might be unfair to frame this as a criticism, in explaining how he’s given up on women completely, Sim says “if you learn to leave your penis alone, your penis will learn to leave you alone.” I’ve discovered this as well, but I discovered it after I was 35. Sim was writing in his forties. Many men come to the conclusion that abstaining from sex and masturbation results in a better life, but they always seem to discover it in middle age. I just want to say that while I agree with celibacy, and I endorse it as a lifestyle brand, I also understand that when I was in my teens and twenties, I was not practicing it, and I understand that it is a bit high and mighty to go around bragging about one’s ability to control his sexual impulses when he is middle-aged after having not had this ability in his youth. I don’t think Sim was doing that, but he also doesn’t directly acknowledge that age might have played a role in his penis deciding to leave him alone. That said, I do encourage young men to seek celibacy as I think it is good for them, as no good can come from engaging with women. But I’m not going to say “when I turned 37 I realized it was really easy to be celibate,” as that appears oblivious.

Now, let’s look at some of what I found enlightening or otherwise useful in the essay. First, in the early paragraphs, he says that one of the first things he learned in his research is that “women want to be raped by rich, muscular, handsome doctors.” It doesn’t seem groundbreaking to make such a statement now, because I’ve spent over a decade making this claim, which was apparently incendiary despite it being self-evidently true. But it was certainly not old hat in 2001. Even though this concept had been expressed by philosophers in the 19th century and before, they did not use such frank language, instead talking of how women wish to “surrender” to a powerful and high status man. But the actual physical form of that surrender being rape is not something many people said frankly until I started spamming it.

Another thing he says early on is that during his research, which he describes as a “series of informal interviews with mothers and daughters,” he concluded that all women are “feminists.” This is something I have said continually, that making a distinction between “women” and “feminists” will lead only to confusion. There is a movement on the internet of women claiming they are “traditional” (they still say “trad,” which seems to me to come across today as very dated slang), and yet they are clearly engaging in all of the behaviors that all women engage in, which is attention mongering, status mongering, resource mongering, and generalized, wide-spectrum whoring.

I think I have said it best when I have also added that just as there are no non-feminists in the West, there are no feminists in Afghanistan. “Feminism” as we currently define it is simply unrestricted female behavior. It is a social paradigm masquerading as an ideology. The Taliban restricts women’s behavior, making it a crime for them to express their natural tendency towards becoming completely out of control. In the West, in order for a woman to be “not a feminist,” she would have to be restricting herself, because any man who tried to restrict her would be killed or thrown in a cage by cops. Women are incapable of restricting themselves, therefore all women in a nation where it is illegal for men to restrict women are an embodiment of the worst forms of female decadence and depravity.

Certainly, some women in the West are worse than others, but the only reason for the differences that remain are the remnants of male restriction on female behavior that still exist in Western society. These are only social restrictions, most prominently the primal tendency of people to look down on women who are public whores. Women and their allies have attempted to organize systematic movements to destroy this lingering instinct to shame women through “slut marches” and various other anti-shaming programs, but some modicum of shame still exists among some women in the West, which, aside from basic personality differences (which are generally overstated as an influence on behavior, though not totally irrelevant, as an “outgoing” woman is likely to be a more aggressive slut than one with an introverted personality), is the sole reason for any distinction in the quality of women’s behavior in feminist countries.

One of the bright things that actually felt new in reading the Sim essay was that he described doing the interviews as the first time he had actually conversed with women he was not attempting to sleep with, and identified the fact that when you are engaging in the kind of conversation that leads to sex, you are taking a very different route than if you are attempting to understand women. This seems quite important: save for their mothers (who men universally view through a very specific and entirely warped lens), most men never engage in conversation with women in any kind of depth outside of attempting to have sex, and in such a conversation, you are in the realm of the woman, and she is completely in charge of the conversation. Certainly, every man understands that if you start talking about serious issues, as you would talk with a man, to a woman you are attempting to have sex with, she will totally shut down and shut you off. So, young men (and apparently also much older men) who are attempting to get laid go along with a woman’s desire to talk about frivolous things, primarily entertainment media, general gossip, and various personal anecdotes, as that is beneficial to their goals. However, if you actually start questioning a woman on her politics, her views on ethics, relationships, society at large, or really anything at all other than trivialities, you find that there is literally nothing there, that women do not process information or use reason in any way, and they view everything that exists purely in terms of how it makes them feel. It is a pure sort of solipsism that is in some ways awe-inspiring, this concept that a human can exist and actually believe they are the center of the universe. If a man could believe such a thing, he would be a serial killer, a terrorist, a communist, or all three, and likely extremely wealthy to boot.

Sim references a character in his comic saying that in order to keep a woman, you simply have to “be happy every minute of your life.” I understand what he is trying to say, given that a woman’s mood is totally resonant to a man’s mood (as Sim says, not at all ground-breakingly as this had been said a lot, the biology of men and women shows that a woman is a void to be filled by a man’s form), and therefore it can feel like you have to be happy all the time in order for the woman to be happy all the time. And maybe that would work in certain cases. But it’s actually much worse and more extreme than that: women feel alive going through emotional rollercoasters, and they enjoy all sorts of different moods that a man might have. While “girls just want to have fun” (with a “fun” man) is probably a safe baseline, women also enjoy being abused by an angry man, they enjoy coddling and comforting a depressive man, they enjoy attempting to stimulate a bored man, and much else. So really, much more than simply being happy all the time to ensure she is resonating with your mood, in order to maintain a long-term relationship in a feminist society you would have to be able to predict whatever mood would entertain her at the moment and shape yourself to that, shifting your mood as necessary to meet her every whimsical whim. When women describe their ideal man, after saying he must be seven feet tall and wealthy, they say he must be strong, but also not afraid to show emotion, and also able to make them laugh, etc. They appear to describe a gargantuan billionaire schizophrenic with a whole lot of free time. (Meanwhile, the man is saying “just please don’t be too fat.”)

While I think Sim is generally cynical enough, on the point of “just be happy all the time,” I had an “if only you knew how bad things really are” moment.

In my analysis, the botched final section of the essay, which described in some confusing detail how Martin Luther King succumbed to the whims of women, was not actually intended to “close with an example,” as it might first appear, but rather to elaborate on the structure of the essay that includes women attempting to equate themselves and their supposed struggles with various other types of living things in order to obfuscate their position in society. He says, rightly, that women are lesser than men, and therefore, women try to confuse the issue of their status below men by bringing in various other groups and saying everyone is equal. He starts with homosexuals, who women promote as being equal, then stretches it to women claiming children are just like adults and that actually, animals are humans. He wanted to say that “they also claim niggers are equal to whites,” but he didn’t want to sound “racist” and may not be a “racist.” Regardless of anyone’s racism, it is simply a fact that women were very supportive of the “civil rights” movement, and are the primary supporters of the idea that “black people are just the same as white people.”

The section on women viewing domestic animals as equals was interesting and not something I’d really thought of. He describes allowing pets into the house as a female agenda against fathers, and though I’d never thought of that before, it is obviously true. I don’t know if it is really a problem to have dogs indoors, and it kind of makes sense in an urban environment where there is not much room for them outdoors, but it does seem obvious after having read it that it would have been women who initially pushed for this status of animals as “members of the family.”

The framing of “feminism is communism” is fine, and the way women align with homosexuals, children, animals, and black people against their betters in a communist fashion is simply an obvious description of what goes on in Western societies. That said, I would say that framing women as unreasoning and then also framing them as consciously organizing in a communist manner is confusing. In my view, women promoting every group as being equal is done instinctively. There is another group of people who does this very same thing.

And this leads us to where Sim’s analysis is really lacking: it doesn’t address the Jewish issue, which is always the elephant in the room. No analysis is really going to be complete without considering the Jews, and in the case of coming at the issues of society from an anti-feminist perspective, it is so obvious to point to the Jews. It is a clear fact that every feminist ideology proponent was Jewish, but more than that, the analysis of Otto Weininger in his book “Sex and Character” is correct: Jews are fundamentally a feminine people, and embody the spirit of the feminine.

You can analyze and explain why it is nonsensical to view women as equal to men, but you cannot ever explain why this is happening in the first place without addressing the Jewish problem, as the Jews were the power that pushed this cancer into the society. It’s not different than analyzing black criminality and so-called “niggerfests.” You can keep saying “jeez, black people are ridiculous, wow, can you believe they act like this?”, but without looking at the Jews who enable and justify the behavior of blacks, you’re not ever going to reach any kind of understanding of why this is an issue now, after blacks lived almost entirely peacefully with whites for hundreds of years.

Without looking at the Jews, you have a lot of nonsensical things occurring, seemingly for no reason. As soon as you look at what Saint Paul said about the Jews, that they are, in a spiritual and even supernatural sense, “in opposition to all mankind” (1 Thessalonians 2:15), all of this clicks into place, and you understand that elevating the people who murdered Jesus Christ to the status of an alien ruling elite in Western societies is going to lead to a destruction of all of the norms of Christian society. It’s deeply sad and also hilarious that this is all there in the Christian Bible for anyone who wants to look at it and yet the masses of people are left in total confusion, looking around and asking “why are things like this?”

The answer is clearly spelled out in the book that was up until recent years in the nightstand of every hotel room in America.

That otherworldly and satanic evil described by Saint Paul, that spirit in opposition to Christ, is also written all over the hateful, rat-faces of Dave Portnoy and Ben Shapiro, and many are beginning to notice this. However, in my experience, a true understanding of the Jewish problem can only come through an understanding of Christ. If someone is looking at Portnoy or Shapiro and asking “why are these people like this?”, they are not going to find a satisfactory answer unless they open up the Bible and find that this is a people who built their identity on the literal murder of God, and this is why they embody the spirit of the Serpent in the Garden of Eden and of his fag-hag girlfriend Eve, the first feminist and the first human to rebel against God and the order of nature.

Post-Script

It would be interesting to see Sim reflect on these issues a quarter century after publishing this essay that I’ve identified as an important historical artifact of anti-feminist thinking. To my knowledge, he’s never recanted anything he said, but hasn’t done any further formal statements like the “Tangent” essay.

Realistically, he doesn’t have any reason to say anything about anything, because the punishment for this sort of thinking is a lot stricter than it used to be. He already has some money, having done well with Cerebus (at least from what I’ve read), but during MeToo, Ethan Van Sciver quite shamefully canceled him over a story about him meeting a girl when she was 14 and then having sex with her when she was 21. There is a rule now that you can’t have met a woman you have sex with before she turned [AGE OF CONSENT]. Every woman who you ever meet who is not yet [AGE OF CONSENT] is permanently removed from your potential romantic partners list or else it’s “grooming” and Ethan Van Sciver will fire you to protect his very serious reputation in the biz. (To be clear, Van Sciver did try to defend him at first before firing him. But it was a complete bitch move. And I promise you, no writer who is even 1% as good as Sim will ever write CyberFrog.)

There is no reward in this world for telling unpopular truths. If you’re Tucker Carlson and you’re telling very popular truths, you can become obscenely wealthy. Tucker Carlson still won’t say the things that Dave Sim said in 2001.

Publishing this essay at a time when his income was in no small part dependent on showing up at comic book conventions where he would be lambasted or cold-shouldered by all of his peers other than Frank Miller was a brave act of conscience and a real standard of creative work worth aspiring to. Probably, “creative work” is an important term here, as I think it is creatives who are willing to take these risks, to make sacrifices for the truth, and too much of the internet right is influenced by journalists, who are human garbage and totally without spines. An Armenian taxi driver in Moscow is more honest than a journalist. It’s very obvious that the people pushing the narrative forward right now are primarily oriented as comedians rather than journalists. The journalistic impulse is to create reality while the artistic impulse is to reflect on and maybe to try to understand reality. Normal people do not tend to fall into either category, but normal people don’t strive to drive the public narrative. A world where the public narrative is driven by journalists rather than artists becomes like the Giver. (I understand that the reverse is also true, and it was art-minded people who drove the society to the left, but this becomes a “the answer to a bad guy with a gun is a good guy with a gun” type situation.)

I hope that the world has not totally run out of interesting people.

Lent was very good for me. The two-week fast was amazing. To be clear, it was a water fast. Some people were saying “well, Moslems fast for a month!” I don’t know who these people are. Moslems just don’t eat during the sun hours. They don’t even have restrictions on food after dark. And frankly, a lot of these Moslems do a thing where they sleep during the day. Particularly the ones who smoke do that, because not smoking is a lot harder than not eating. But hey, buddy, I do a “not eating during the sunlight” fast more or less every day and have for like, over a decade. They call this “intermittent fasting.” It’s not really fasting. I did nothing but water, Zyn, and coffee for 14 days. This was very hardcore in the worldview on most people. It didn’t really feel very hardcore for me after the first three or four days. You actually get a serious sense of euphoria. Obviously, and I think this is obvious, the biological reason for the euphoria is that your body assumes you are starving and releases endorphins that will give you the motivation to go out and find food. But it’s very good for the spirit. You feel closer to God. A lot closer. The biological reason for the euphoria and mental clarity is not irrelevant, but like anything spiritual, you are using your natural body functions for a higher purpose.

Obviously, Lent is longer than two weeks, but after the first two weeks, I just did the vegetarian Fridays. Frankly, vegetarian Fridays were worse than two weeks of no food. Worse as in more unpleasant. Vegetarianism is horrible. But the horribleness of it is meant to make you remember God.

On the whole, the Lent experience was close to life-changing, though I think “life-changing” is a very extreme piece of terminology, and not useful. When people talk about a “life-changing experience,” they are generally attributing a series of things which occurred over a period of time to a single event. That is, an experience caused them to realize changes that were already happening. I’ve had several experiences involving a “brush with death,” including having a gun to my head, a knife to my throat, witnessing a bombing (no one died, but someone was crippled), and nearly falling off a cliff. None of those I would describe as life-changing. Frankly, I never even thought much about them, other than as funny stories. People who have these experiences and then describe them as “life-changing” are simply consciously realizing something that has been working in their subconscious for a long time. And frankly, they rarely change their lives as a result of brushes with death. From what I’ve personally seen, most people never really change their lives in any meaningful sense, because people don’t change, other than as a result of age, which just tends to mellow people out rather than fundamentally change them.

I had made the decision to stop working on the site in the same way before Lent. Frankly, it had been coming for over a year. What was a life-changing experience for me was the illness I experienced in 2023, which very bizarrely coincided with the October 7 event. Shortly thereafter, a guy I had a lot of respect for was revealed to be a federal informant who flipped because he was too much of a baby to do a 36-month stint in feds. It became clear that what I was doing had become largely pointless, and it was clear I could be doing something better and more important. This wasn’t really due to the illness, I don’t think, but to age, which had led me to a better understanding of God and death. Probably, understanding God is understanding death, and the reverse. It seems improbable that anyone who understands death does not understand God. It wouldn’t even have to be the Christian God, because a lot of people throughout history have had spiritual lives without explicit Christianity. In evangelical Christianity, they teach that anyone who is not a Christian goes to Hell forever. These are of course the same people who do not believe in the Final Judgement. American Protestant Christianity, as it existed when I was a kid and probably, to the great detriment of Jews, doesn’t really exist anymore to any significant extent because boomers failed to pass it on to their children, was the most retarded form of Calvinism, where if you say John 3:16, it’s some sort of magical incantation and you automatically bypass the Final Judgement, whereas people who are of a different religion (all people, in fact, throughout history, including apparently the pre-Christian Greek philosophers who developed the basis of Christian philosophy) go to Hell forever. Having rejected that glyphosate, antibiotic, and hormone riddled version of “Christianity” and returned to a traditional version of the one true faith, I’ve come to understand that everyone will be judged, and some Buddhists and Moslems will fair better at the Final Judgement than evangelicals, who are effectively satanists (insofar as any of them still exist, they are literally celebrating the genocide in Gaza because they claim Jesus wants all those babies dead, which is cartoonishly evil and can only really be described as satanism).

What the fasting and prayer of Lent did for me was clarify and crystallize the various things that had been developing in my mind, as regards God, death, and my work on this website. It had become pointless a long time ago. I understand the readers don’t think it’s pointless. But to the reader, it is just entertainment. Regrettably, it is entertainment they were unwilling to pay for. It’s difficult not to be resentful of that. Obviously, there were some very generous donors throughout, but unfortunately, the consequences of having worked on the website at a time when the censorship regime was a lot more like North Korea than it is now cost me an incredible amount of money. I don’t talk about the details of that, because they are personal and I don’t really owe it to anyone to explain it. But somehow, and it’s still not totally clear how, or at least if I drew the obvious conclusions about how it would lead me to think very highly of myself, I became the most censored person in all of history. While it may be uncut cocaine mainlined into my ego to draw the obvious conclusions about how I became the most censored person in history, it is simply a fact that this happened. The only people in history who were more censored than me were assassinated, if you consider that to be censorship, which I guess I do. But even Snowden and Assange were allowed to appear on very public platforms. There is no one who compares to me. At some point, I will go through this in some detail, outlining just what was done to me (at least the public parts), because I’m sure a lot of people are not aware of the details at this point, or don’t remember them, but I’m literally not allowed anywhere, and even the media has me on a blacklist where they’re not even allowed to mention me, except in very specific contexts (such as claiming, presumably accurately, that Tucker Carlson’s writing staff sourced stories from my website). It’s also not really egotistical to state that I was one of the most influential living writers. It’s surreal to see all of these people who are not censored to the extent I am censored using my material. Stuff that I said ten years ago and was condemned as evil for saying is now widely accepted by a large segment of the Western population. Clearly, the genocide in Gaza was going to create animosity towards the Jews regardless, but so much of what is being said by many internet personalities is lifted directly from my material. It’s also not just stuff I wrote about the Jews and the extermination of white people. All that stuff I said about women is now also very popular. Some of the people saying this stuff have been allowed to make millions of dollars from the material, as long as they either omit specific points and/or work with the feds.

Regarding the issue of people working with the feds, I’ve concluded that there is no real way to live in the United States or one of its vassals and not end up either working with the feds, dead, or imprisoned. I’d personally rather be dead or imprisoned. Not because I’m particularly brave or moral, but rather because I have a vicious and brutal clarity about the existence of God, and simply fear Him more than men. I’m terrified of God, and while I am a sinner, I think that working for the feds, who are a satanic group, would be the most direct path to Hell. Six trillion times more direct than heterosexual sexual immorality or drunkenness.

I believe strongly in work and in telling the truth, but what I was doing with the site had become pathological. There was too much work to be healthy, and it had become charity work. The site has been totally neutered in terms of any ability to reach a new audience. On every social media platform, including the “free speech alternatives” and the “free speech haven” of Twitter, it is illegal to link the site. Even people who write “dailystormer [dot] in” are banned for doing so. I’m totally deranked on Google and other search engines, save the ones no one uses. So what was I doing? I was entertaining a group of people who had been reading the site for years, and doing so for free, while also providing material for people with very profitable careers to copy. I’m not even that bitter about it. I am slightly bitter. I know people would send money if it was easier to do. If I had a PO box, it would be filled with envelopes full of cash. But of course I’m banned from doing that (I don’t live in the United States and anyone who will pick up mail for me will have their bank accounts shut down and be investigated by the feds). I don’t think it is difficult to use crypto. But apparently, readers think it is very difficult. So there was a dancing monkey type situation. Or maybe a monkey with an accordion, if I’m being generous. I think the people who were copying my material and making millions should have let me get my beak wet, but precisely zero of them did that, to my knowledge. Obviously, they would do it in secret, and maybe some of them have sent money in secret without me knowing about it. If any of those people want to hire me to write for them now that the site is no longer giving them their talking points for free, they can contact me.

Some people offered me money after I announced that I was quitting, or downsizing, or whatever this is. But it was like, “I’ll send you $1,000 a month if you keep going,” which I have no real faith in. But I just want to be clear, if there was money, I would probably keep doing this, because it is work and I don’t really mind it and I think there are some positives, but I have responsibilities and I need money. If the site had reach and I could be a part of the conversation, I would also keep doing it for no money. But both things combined make it simply ridiculous to keep working like this.

In terms of telling the truth, spreading the message, there are surely more efficient methods for doing this than spending 60 hours a week typing on this censored website. I’m still figuring out what those are, but they must exist. The first thing I’m going to do is make every article a pdf file, which will be more easily shared. I will only write longer articles, and not about the news, or at least not daily news coverage in the way I’ve been doing for 12 years. I know I said that and then went away for a while, but that was necessary and the plan there has not changed. I’m also aware that most or all of what I’m writing right now I’ve already written, but this also seems necessary. And some of this is new. It’s not over yet. I’m going to keep writing this thing for at least another twenty minutes or so.

Oh, and I should mention that I understand there are a lot of people who would like to contribute to the site, and I could in theory back away a bit and let others work on the site. But I’ve had other writers before, and it didn’t really work. Editing is less enjoyable to me than writing, and it’s not less work. Further, I’m not a great boss. I abuse employees. This is normal for people who have a vision of what they want to do, but I am not able to pay people enough to justify the abuse. Further, and more importantly, everyone who has worked for me who lived within reach of the US authorities has ended up in prison or dead. Working for the site literally killed a guy. A guy I liked a lot. I loved him, insofar as you can love someone who you only know from the internet. He’s dead. Because he worked for the Daily Stormer. I don’t blame myself for that, but rather blame the people responsible, but I am not going to let it happen again.

Aside from money and the inefficiency of the platform, it’s not personally fulfilling for me to do the news. It was when I was allowed to be a part of the conversation. But although I am a very quick typist, doing this work involved a lot of reading, and it was reading of stuff I don’t really care very much about. As I wrote earlier this week, I am really not interested in any of this news stuff anymore, because I don’t think it matters. I’ve almost completely stopped following it in the ten weeks since I stepped back. None of this can be influenced by me or anyone else. That is a Christian understanding, the humility to understand that the world is the domain of Satan and the human is to seek God. Of course, Christian men did politics and changed things, and should do so if they can, but they cannot. Not now. Maybe when I started this website, it was still possible. I don’t know. But it’s not possible now. This is the end of an empire, it’s running on inertia, and it can only stop when it meets an immovable object, which is probably going to be the Chinese. Virtually the only thing I’m interested in at this point is China and what the future will look like when this empire of doom finally crashes against it and breaks apart. I’m certain enough of this that I am almost ready to start talking about the problems we will face in a world dominated by the Chinese. However, those theoretical problems are so minor compared to the problems we face right now that they are hardly worth mentioning. The main problem, really not even a problem but an issue that will need addressed, will be limiting the ability of Chinese to purchase property in white countries. It is reasonable to just allow them to have the ports; I don’t care if San Francisco and New York become Chinese cities, but we shouldn’t allow them to buy up all of the land in America and Europe. I don’t think what is happening in Southeast Asia can be judged as good or bad, but what the Chinese are doing is buying everything, then moving in people, and marrying the women (with women coming in to marry the upper class men) and raising their kids with Chinese as a first language. All of Asia will be Siniofied within 100 years (that probably includes South Korea and Japan, but primarily because they are not breeding, rather than because the Chinese are moving in already and marrying the people). This sort of thing has always happened, and isn’t good or bad. There were like 10 distinct languages in France in the Middle Ages and a lot more than that in what is currently the Russian Federation. Large cultures always absorb smaller cultures. It’s funny that in the Western propaganda machine, they constantly talk about the Chinese government, whereas no one in Asia, other than CIA-run cults in Japan and Korea and the US vassal of the Philippines, has a strong view of the Chinese government and is instead concerned about all the people moving in.

Chinese people have more or less zero interest in white women, only mixing with other Asians, so that issue won’t be a threat in white countries, but they will buy all of the land if they’re allowed to. That is, as far as I can gather, the only potential issue. I mean, the only potential issue that will come from the Chinese. Figuring out how to reestablish a society in the wake of the collapse of the American empire is going to be a very big issue, though I think it will probably happen naturally. There will be poverty, not starvation but relative poverty, and poverty makes people return to a more natural way of living, and it causes a resurgence of religion. But there will be a strange generation as these things are arranging themselves.

The rulers of the empire are aware of the fact that China is going to break them. Or they’re more aware of that then they were. But they didn’t prepare for this at all. The 1990s plan was obviously to move the industry to China, which would raise their quality of life and cause them to become a Western style gay anal democracy. It took a very long time for them to realize that wasn’t happening. In 1996’s “Clash of Civilizations,” Samuel P. Huntington explained that while technological and economic development tends to lead to social liberalism, that wasn’t going to happen in China, where they would maintain a traditional/authoritarian system despite material progress. Other people probably said it too, though he was the most influential and respected person to say it. But the project of moving industry to China was so profitable for the elite, no one wanted to hear it. So the US enabled a massive country with people with higher IQs than whites to become the richest country in the world within three decades. This was probably the most incredible thing that has ever happened. There are people driving Lambos living in high-rise condos in Shanghai whose parents were driving rickshaws through rice fields living in bamboo hunts. The IQ, their racial character, and the exposure to Western technologies was going to result in China developing rapidly regardless, but literally handing them the entire industry of the Western world definitely sped up the process.

They are still moving at this same rate. Part of living in a traditional society means that a young man who works hard and makes money has access to women and social status, which means the young men are hungry. The claims made by various people on YouTube (primarily YouTube, very few people write about this idea because anyone who reads would not fall for it) that China is not really developed and is secretly poor is one of the most bizarre things ever. People can go there. Plane tickets are the biggest cost, because again as a benefit of a traditional/authoritarian culture, the fact that it’s a rich country does not mean that lodgings and food are ridiculously expensive. People can go visit Xinjiang and try to find this secret genocide. You can go there. Anyone can go to Xinjiang and try to find the genocide and the organ-harvesting facilities. You will not be prevented by the cops from wandering around trying to find this secret genocide. I guess you will have to try to find tunnels, because the fact that there is no satellite evidence of the secret genocide means that it has to be happening in some kind of secret tunnel system, maybe something like the facilities under Raccoon City. You can also go the churches, and try to find the evidence of the secret banning of Christianity, which we’ve all heard so much about from US politicians. You can look for any of the other atrocities the US government and CIA people on YouTube claim are happening.

In terms of things that are actually true about China that could be considered negative, it was pretty corrupt before Xi Jinping became the Emperor. But that was all during the weird period where the US still had some significant influence and was trying to turn the country into a democracy. Now that it is well established as a traditionalist/authoritarian state, the corruption is all gone. Another benefit of a traditional society, that is. But yeah, the videos of buildings falling down were real, because corrupt building inspectors would take payoffs to allow builders to use fake cement. That doesn’t happen now though. Anyone who tried it would be executed. During Xi’s corruption purge, the criminals who could escape went to Southeast Asia, so a Chinese built building recently collapsed in Bangkok. But enough well-off Chinese are moving to these Southeast Asian countries now and establishing political influence that they are implementing Xi-like anti-corruption protocols. Malaysia is totally incredible now. Well, Kuala Lumpur is.

What we are seeing now is a move by the United States into a kind of “weapons of mass destruction” mode against the Chinese. People laugh bitterly about the lies of the Bush Administration, and wonder how people went along with that gibberish from Jeffrey Goldberg and Judith Miller. Everyone jokes about the Trump piss tape now. But somehow even right-wingers – even Tucker Carlson – take seriously the idea that there is a Raccoon City base under Xinjiang harvesting organs without anesthetic and that Christianity is banned in China.

This is what the Trump administration is all about. As I’ve written six million times, you would have to be retarded to think the 2020 election was faked and they just decided to not fake the 2024 election. It’s a ridiculous claim. What happened is that it was obvious that the Democrats were not capable of creating the kind of jingoism necessary for a big war and that Trump was. So that’s where all of this is going, and I guess that’s really where I feel I’m able to offer something in terms of commentary at this point in my career, because it’s something no one else is talking about and it’s the most important thing to be talking about. Candace has taken up the task of defending Harvey Weinstein, so I don’t have to do that anymore. You guys think she got that from me? Is there somewhere else she could have gotten it? I am pretty sure I was the only person defending Harvey. Anyway, good on her, because that situation is insane. (I do think that after he gets cleared of the fake rape charges however he should be prosecuted for making Good Will Hunting. Aside from being the worst film ever made, neither Damon nor Affleck are Irish and this film was a blood libel against the Irish.)

I would actually like to go to China and make a documentary where I play a Steven Colbert (Comedy Central version) type character looking for the Raccoon City organ harvesting facility under Xinjiang. China is not really doing anything to defend themselves from any of these libels. If they get asked about the secret genocide by an American journalist, they will say “yeah but why isn’t it visible from satellites and why do none of you people go there and look for it?” But it is a ridiculous situation to have people claiming Christianity is banned in China and the videos of trains running through skyscrapers are faked and the country is secretly poor. The invisible Moslem genocide is something where I don’t even understand how Ben Sasse can say it without cracking up laughing. I think if I was able to interview him and ask how a genocide can be taking place and not be seen on satellites he would say “you ever play Resident Evil?” with a perfectly straight face. The other thing about that is that it remains unsaid that the supposed reason they are committing the genocide is that the Uyghurs are terrorists. This is while every single person talking about this invisible genocide is supporting the wholesale slaughter of terroristic and homophobic toddlers in Gaza.

Speaking of Gaza, the biggest impediment to this planned war with China is, ironically, Israel. Israel wants a war with Iran and it sure looks like they’re going to get it. Assuming the US could sustain that, it would take at least a decade, during which period they would have little ability to molest China, and in a decade, China is going to be so far ahead of the West that it will be like the contrast of the British visiting Africa in the 19th century.

To be clear, I don’t think there is much chance the US can win a war against China, even if they are somehow able to avoid the Iran thing, which they probably will not be able to do. The sanctions regime they want to do is just as dumb, if not dumber, than the one they did against Russia. Some of the biggest tech companies in China are praying for a full ban on all Nvidia GPUs because it will mean massive subsidies from the government for the development of a domestic GPU industry. But I mean, they built DeepSeek, which is a lot better than ChatGPT, with the H800s. And the current sanctions are being bypassed not just through Vietnam and Cambodia, but through Taiwan itself. The US can “secondary sanction” Vietnam and Cambodia for buying chips and running them to China, but they can’t exactly sanction Taiwan for that, can they?

None of these economic measures make any sense, which is why so many in the government and media are already pushing for like, a real war. There is no Ukraine equivalent to fight it in, so I don’t even know what the idea is here. There are a billion and a half people in China, and they’ve built all of the medium range missile systems to sink American ships, so they would immediately take Taiwan and cut off chips to the US (those would be sanctions the US could not bypass). Further, the entire global economy is based on China already, so everything globally would just stop working in the case of a real war.

All of this Trump tariff bullshit is about China. The goal is to try to get the industry out of China, which is not really possible, and if it is moved to Vietnam, China would just invade the country and seize it in the case of a war. It’s probably also worth mentioning that just like Russia, China would fire nukes before losing a war. The difference is that because Russia made the unfortunate decision to wait until the war actually started to censor US propaganda on the internet, and therefore still has a significant fifth column in the country, China is a unified country where there is really no one who would run it any differently than it is run now.

These people running America are all too stupid to actually figure out a way to defeat China. They are going to try, but it is very unlikely it will succeed.

Trump is doing the biggest military budget in the history of the universe, so there is no real room for doubt about the fact that this is where it is all headed. Military recruitment is at post 9/11 levels. There is no threat to the United States, and there really can’t be a threat to the United States, so the only explanation for this is a planned war of aggression against someone or someones. Again, the most interesting thing is that the biggest impediment to a war with China, which is clearly the only way the US can sustain itself, is the Israeli obsession with a war with Iran. Iran is completely irrelevant to the long term sustainability of the US empire, but the US government is a subsidiary of Israel, so it’s not really capable of acting in its own interest. Israel I’m sure supports a war with China, and hilariously, the Raccoon City underground genocide facility story was originated by the Israeli media. But they are more concerned about Iran.

Probably, things would be better if more Americans were aware of the fact that China is not actually a threat. And I’m probably the only person who can actually explain that. I say that with all humbleness. But who else is saying this? Tucker Carlson literally promoted the spy balloon hoax. Not reading the news, I’ve had time to read so much other stuff I like, and I’ve been trying to get a grip on World War One, and they were using spy balloons then. I still can’t believe Tucker pushed that hoax. He has backed off the “Jesus was an alien” type stuff and is now claiming that the UFOs are demons or something. I think he’s becoming more of a Christian, and I believe that the closer you get to Christ, the more capable you are of recognizing truth (which is why satanic Western civilization is totally based on lies). The problem is that there is no real Christian leadership. We are hearing now that church attendance is rising, at least among young men, and this is logical and to be expected given many factors, most prominently the denial of sex and family to young men. But what church are they supposed to go to? I’m sure they vaguely are aware that they are seeking a return to tradition, after having been so emasculated by this civilization. But if they go to a Protestant church in America, they’re instead going to get a lecture about either the need to genocide Gaza because October 7th was a real Holocaust and Jews are the chosen ones, or a lecture on the joys of anal, or both. And while there are still some good Catholic churches, most of them are not great.

That’s the other thing I want to focus on in the writing. I want to write about Christian themes, to an extent, but I’m not really sure how much I can offer on that which is new. It’s a 2,000 year old religion that is more or less understood. I do intend to go through the Church Fathers and do a series sort of summarizing them, because I think that the early material is not considered enough. But the bigger issue I would like to address is the fact that there aren’t really good options for people seeking a church. That “Pope” is finally burning in Hell, allegedly having OD’d on poppers (RFK was right on the ball again). But every contender for the next Pope is a homosexual, most of them made cardinals by Francis. Years ago, I predicted something that was not very hard to predict, which is that the next Pope would be the real hardcore homo and destroy whatever remains of the legitimacy of the Vatican. However, I also predicted it wouldn’t be until this next pope that the church would implement gay anal marriage, and Francis did that. Yes, “Fiducia Supplicans” is gay marriage, they just call it something different. It is an official church officiation of a homosexual union. Look at the photos.

It’s a gay marriage.

But this next pope will admit that it is a gay marriage and call it that, and also allow female deacons and probably female priests. But that is good, because it is going to lead to a schism, and then there will be an option for a traditional church. Everything tends to work out, you know? I think often of the several times King David said that God turns the plans of evil men to good, and what the homosexuals of the Catholic Church have done is create a situation where there is going to have to be a schism and therefore a real church.

Obviously, the Orthodox Church is also a traditional church, but that is kind of difficult if you don’t live in Eastern Europe or the Middle East, given that they are ethnic churches. People should try it if they are looking for a church. In my experience, the Greek ones in America are the most accessible, as they’ve been here the longest and no one speaks Greek. If you go to a Russian one, I’m sure everyone will be welcoming and friendly, but it would most likely be difficult to integrate. There might be some mixed Orthodox churches in various places in America and Western Europe, probably technically Russian, but attended by different ethnicities and speaking the local language. The Orthodox Church is really just a version of the medieval Catholic Church. They say the traditional Nicene Creed (minus the filioque, obviously), which of course says “one holy Catholic and Apostolic church,” meaning that it is a Catholic church in the basic meaning of the term. The pre-Vatican 2 doctrinal differences are trivial. Filioque itself is something no one would ever even think about unless they were a very serious scholar. (I guess I agree that the Holy Spirit proceeds from the Father, as Christ Himself does, and I don’t think adding “also from the Son” was useful, but it doesn’t seem very important to my life. I’ve thought about it from several different angles, and the fact that the trinity always existed, “consubstantial and eternal,” seems to make the origin of the Holy Spirit a mystery.) Probably the most interesting difference is that the Roman Catholics believe that original sin means that humans are born responsible for Adam’s sin, while Orthodox believe that we are born innocent with a sin nature inherited from Adam that makes us incapable of not sinning. The interesting part is that if you asked most Catholics, they would probably not know that it is official doctrine that we are born responsible for the sin of a dead ancestor. Overall, the differences were all very academic, before Vatican 2. There is none that I think affects my life or spirituality, and the reason for the continued split, before Vatican 2, was political in my view. Of course after Vatican 2, let alone after the Francis faggotization, there are fundamental differences, and the Orthodox are right about every difference. Oh, and before Vatican 2, the real thing that matters is the pope, who over the last few hundred years has been given all of these ridiculous powers. A lot of Catholics were sent into crises of faith when Francis did that gay marriage thing, while if the Patriarch of Moscow were to say there should be gay marriage in churches, he would simply be declared evil and insane and no one would be forced to question their faith. Giving the Bishop of Rome all of these powers that basically turn him into a god was not good and it isn’t even very old. The ability to speak with infallibility was only awarded to him in 1870, for example. Why you would need to add something like that nearly 2,000 years after the founding of the religion is unclear, and it may be that the Church was already being infiltrated by homos. Banning marriage was a very bad idea. Saint Paul did not stutter: “But if they cannot contain, let them marry: for it is better to marry than to burn.” I don’t think anyone has a right to change things laid down by Saint Paul. Yes, celibacy is better for a priest, and maybe it should be required for bishops, but when you ban marriage in a profession where you necessarily have unrestricted access to pubescent boys, you are laying the framework for a homosexual cult, which is obviously what the Vatican is now. This is what destroyed Ireland, and when Conor I takes his throne, he should establish the fact that the Celtic Church was not actually run by Rome for hundreds of years after its founding and shouldn’t be now.

There should be one Church. Christ did not come to make a series of cults. But I support people going to whatever church they can find that actually teaches the religion as it is written in the Bible and expounded on by the saints.

The third topic I want to focus on is what exactly Bruce Springsteen’s health program has been since he suffered vaccine injury. He recently appeared with the Killers and I cannot believe how good he looks.

He looks great for any 75 year old, but after that vax, he looked like a corpse. And he wasn’t looking too good before that. Did he do some kind of genetic engineering on himself? Is he doing stem cells?

Speaking of the Boss, he is still playing songs he wrote in the 70s, even though he’s been recording new music since. None of it ever resonated. Greetings from Ashbury Park is still his best album, by a lot. The only non-70s album worth a shit was Nebraska. The point is, I don’t want to be 75 and “playing the hits,” making nigger and kike jokes for teenagers. I’m not even sure that’s funny anymore. It’s still funny to promote rape. That will be funny as long as women’s rights exist. When I see people doing edgy jokes I did a decade ago, I feel disgusted. I actually thought Taylor Swift’s Midnights was good, not as good as 1989, but okay. But it’s like, if you know this was all copied from 1980s synth pop by an ugly Jew, it just feels cheap. Especially if you compare it to Billie Eilish, who (in fact her brother) is doing something that is actually original. Or was. The industry Jews trying to turn a fat Irish sow pillhead into a sex symbol was totally ridiculous and really we can probably blame Taylor Swift for that. Billie was interesting in large part because she was not marketed as a sex symbol. That last album was just tripe. Poor Finneas is 26 going on 76. Jews should not be allowed to run these industries. They just destroy everything good and pure.

I will write separately about the experience of not drinking alcohol during Lent. I’m still processing the takeaways from that. Primarily, I think not drinking just reminded me what a blessing it is that God invented alcohol. Alcohol is such an important part of life. Remember that one of Christ’s miracles was that when the party ran out of booze, he created more through magic. If you don’t drink, I respect it, and that’s fine for you. But for some of us, life without alcohol is like potatoes without salt.

I can’t get emotional or excited about any of this. Not now. I do still think it is fascinating and hilarious. Among the most fascinating and hilarious aspects is the fact that people think they can change it, which leads to grotesque and potentially demoralizing stupidity. But it’s only demoralizing if you can’t laugh at it. Laughter is the great weapon against demoralization. Suffering, death, and the destruction of the things men spent thousands of years building must also be laughed at, and this shouldn’t be considered morbid or callous. What else can you do? You can’t stop it. So your other option is to cry about it, which does nothing good for you or anyone else. Laughing liberates you from the world.

Everyone is stressing, getting all emotional. This is the height of moronism. You’re not going to starve. No one starved when the Soviet Union collapsed. You can’t really starve in the current year, because of industrial food production techniques. Not even the Africans are starving anymore, unless it’s a warzone and some top nigger is using starvation as a weapon. The only existential threat to you is not getting laid, or getting laid and being soul-raped by a woman. But that is only existential if you let it be. Otherwise it’s more of an annoyance. Oh, and being sent to a war. They are probably going to want to send you to a war. But that’s a bridge you’ll have to burn when you get to it. There are a lot of ways to get out of such a situation, and if you get in it, you can desert. I don’t know if it’s illegal to encourage desertion. I think it probably isn’t right now, because we’re not at war, but if these Jews sent me to a war, I would desert.

It’s exhausting to imagine that there are still people loyal to the idea of America or of the West more broadly. If you let it exhaust you, that is. I don’t allow it. Not now. We all saw Douglas Murray on Joe Rogan, right?

When I was on break, I wasn’t paying attention too much, but I certainly watched that.

When anyone associates their identity with America or “the West,” I look at them exactly the way I look at the pederast Murray in that interview. This is maybe the most ridiculous version, but it is not qualitatively different than any other version of allegiance to this Beast. Murray is absolutely correct in his analysis: the West exists to facilitate the sodomizing of children and put sadistic women in charge of every aspect of your life. They don’t call it “the Great Satan” for nothing.

There are no redeeming qualities about so-called “Western civilization.” Some nigger rapping about Hitler is funny. It is becoming less funny every second. I can’t laugh at it anymore or even summon up a sensible chuckle, but I recognize that it is funny. It’s not actually funny in itself. The funny thing now is that people are paying attention to it. The Jewish meltdown is funny. Jews melting down is something that will be eternally funny. This is due to their lack of any ability for self-reflection. As long as they cannot observe their own behavior, they are stuck on a Möbius strip of circus clownery. If there was a redeeming quality of Western civilization (there is not, but if there was), it would be that Jewish meltdowns are always funny.

These Jewish meltdowns will of course lead to endless suffering and death. And torture. Including homosexual torture. So that must be looked at as a joke as well.

That Australian-Paki woman who YouTube spams you with, you all know her (she talks about how trannies are silly and how the entire purpose of Western civilization is to defend Jews, both of which are very accurate observations), interviewed “Ami Horowitz” a couple weeks ago after he went to Ramallah and asked people what they thought about October 7th and whether the destruction of Gaza was worth it and whether they would be willing to suffer the same in the West Bank, and in the clip, the young men all have a sort of smirk as they answer “of course October 7 was good and yeah we’d suffer like the Gazans suffered in order to take revenge on the Jews.”

The suffering in Gaza is one of the great human tragedies, but what is the purpose of crying about it? The Palestinians themselves don’t cry about it. They cry when their relatives die, but they don’t cry about the fundamental nature of the situation itself, which is perceived with healthy, aloof fatalism.

Jews want to suck you into all of these emotions about everything. This “culture war” gibberish is the most obvious example. But it applies to everything. We all saw the protests against the Jews. What did they accomplish? I support them, of course, but they didn’t do anything. Because no one can have any impact on anything that is happening. It is all going to happen exactly as it is going to happen, and the only thing anyone has any control over is their own life, and even that is limited.

Everything is this fake world created by electronic media is designed to suck the life out of you. No one can suffer the emotional toll of engaging with all of this or any of this and remain sane. The only thing that is actually real is what is in your immediate environment. Political change would only be possible if the peasantry wanted it, and started killing cops and doing targeted assassinations of politicians and other elite operatives, and that isn’t going to happen. I wouldn’t support it if it did happen, of course, as I am a pacifist. But that would be the only way to enact political change, and it isn’t going to happen. There is zero chance of that happening. Have you seen how fat these people are? The ones who aren’t fat are joining the military to fight various wars for the Jews.

This is not meant to encourage apathy, which is what the steelman argument against these musings would be. If you had an ability to change things and I was telling you to stop trying, that would be preaching apathy. But you don’t have the ability to change anything and if you think you do, you are delusional and actually insane. You have the ability, to an extent, to make your own life meaningful, and engaging with this shitshow you see on the internet is crippling your ability to live your own life.

You are going to die. Everything is necessarily headed to inevitable tragedy. No one lays on their death bed and wishes they would have spent more time obsessing over political bullshit they had no control over. The stoics were right, the Christians were right. Everything you need is inside of you and everything outside of you is an illusion at best. The future is a spook. The only thing real is the countdown to death and the things you choose to do during that countdown.

This thing here is totally similar to the thing I wrote yesterday, I realize. I’m attempting to set a frame here. The thesis is obvious and straightforward, but it surely must feel alien and esoteric to anyone imprisoned in this digital demiurge.

I of course hope that Conor McGregor overthrows the government of Ireland. That was actually my idea, frankly. He got it from my website, when I explained the obvious fact that he has the absolute ability to do this and there is literally nothing stopping him. The Americans would try to stop him, but is NATO going to invade Ireland? If they did it would be hilarious. Most likely, the worst they would do is make the country poor, and as long as King Conor can keep the whisky flowing, the Irish will tolerate poverty in exchange for an ethnic cleansing. There could also be a violent uprising in Romania. It’s less likely than in Ireland at this point, probably, but it’s possible.

So I’m not without hope for political happenings. I’m without hope for Donald Trump and America and I think anyone who has hope is a child. Telling people they can say retard and fag now and trannies can’t play sports is like throwing a piece of rotting meat to a starving dog. They had to make this country slightly less gay if they wanted to fight a major war. I saw this fat Irish guy say that when the entertainment companies found out that woke media was not profitable they stopped making it and this is totally wrong. They knew it wouldn’t be profitable when they started doing it. Then they stopped it for some reason. It’s a conspiracy. They are manufacturing a simulacrum of patriotism and excitement because they want a big war and anyone can see no one is going to fight a war for screeching trannies and buckwild niggerfests. Find someone who is obsessed with talking about woke who isn’t also talking about the need to support Israel and the threat of Chinese people. I’m not aware of a single individual who thinks the “culture war” is important who doesn’t also support Israel and claim Chinese people are communists who want to take away our gay rights and women’s liberation. This is all building towards a big war and if you’re caught up in the spectacle of it you’re a pawn in this very obvious scam.

Trump was allowed to win the fake election because he is the perfect figure to reframe the American culture to make it into something that is maybe capable of doing a big war. It’s the biggest war budget in the history of any country. To what end? Where is the threat? America cannot be invaded and insofar as there are interests in the Western hemisphere, any of these countries can be bullied with psychological operations and special forces squads. Trump’s administration is doing a Hitler-style military buildup but Hitler actually had people trying to destroy his country. America’s only possible reason for doing this is offensive. Severely offensive. The background of this back and forth with Putin, with Trump out there whining and claiming Russia should just surrender to his whims, is that Russia is refusing to decouple from China for rather obvious reasons. Maybe Russia has been weakened enough that the Trump people would settle for an end to the war in exchange for an agreement to not support Iran, but that’s less than clear. What the Americans want is for Russia to end their relationship with China, because China is the real threat to American global dominance.

It’s all ridiculous and it’s all very obvious. Find someone celebrating the triumph of women’s sports and the largely symbolic closing of the border who is not also pushing for war with the Chinese over – over what? What did China do? Made better AI and video games? They are going to invade America? What for? Why would they want to invade America? Can you imagine how expensive that would be? And what would the goal be? To force people into communism? What? What does that mean? If China did invade and conquer America and force their system on us, it would be objectively a good thing, but there is simply no way that would happen because it is impossible and there would be no point.

Ignore the hype.

Just relax.

Eat, drink, and be merry, for there is no other good life.

In my personal experience, eating is a lot worse than not eating.

I am not fond of this eating business anymore. It does not bring joy. I don’t feel like doing anything.

In the near future, I’ll review what exactly happens on a 14 day fast, but I can tell you right now the absolute worst part of it is eating again.

Now I know how Lucifer felt when Saint Michael cast him out of Heaven.

And yes, dear sirs, I did all of the procedures. I drank juice and ate disgusting vegetable soup with bone broth. The bone broth is fine, by the way, but vegetable soup is not cool at all, and it is my enemy. Also, fruit juice: never again. Nothing with sugar ever again ever in my life. Terrible.

I had several important revelations during the fast, but after the juice and vegetables, I think I forgot all of it other than that I do think Macron’s wife is a female.

Also, the only thing that matters to me is that every top podcast now talks about Jews and Israel controlling America all the time and no one is stopping them. I was born 10 years too early, apparently, because I’m not allowed to be involved. Kinda stings, but the joy overwhelms the sting.

I do not feel like going to the gym at all. But I will. I feel like drinking a fifth of vodka. But I won’t.

I don’t know what my posting schedule is going to be. I don’t think I’m posting anything else today or tomorrow.

Here are some old memes.

Previously: Tfw No One Told You Peasants are Peasants

People don’t want to hear the word “peasant,” as if it is some kind of nasty pejorative. What word are you supposed to use for the masses of people who make decisions based on something other than reality-based information?

What do you call people who believe that “trans kids deserve dignity” or that Trump is going to do mass deportations with an app? What word would you prefer I use?

They are peasants. That’s what they’re called. That’s what they’ve always been called. It is a group of people, the mass of people, who have simple drives and are not capable of complex critical or analytical thought.

For the record, I am Irish. I do not have patrician sensibilities. I am into grilled cheese, sex tourism, and jet skis. I listen to AC/DC. I support violence on principle, even if it serves no purpose. If black people are fighting outside a strip club for literally no reason, I start hooting.

I have taken professionally administered IQ tests, so I know where I sit, but I am a very humble man, and I don’t think I’m better than anyone (except Indians). I am not passing judgement. I am not insulting the peasantry, and in fact, I believe more capable people have a duty to protect them and provide them with lives of dignity. People who have an emotional response to the use of the word “peasant” are just emotional peasants.

But the peasantry exists. The majority of people cannot be reached with reality-based information, and must instead be appealed to with emotional materials.

You are not going to somehow convince the 90% of the population that has no interest in facts to look at the facts and make decisions based on the facts, and the people still trying to do that are actually insane. The only thing you could sway them with is an emotional appeal (which was the original goal of the Daily Stormer before the censorship made it impossible for it to reach anyone who wasn’t looking for it).

“Liberté, égalité, fraternité” failed. Actually, it’s the worst failure ever.

If you could have a discussion about the Jews, lay out all of the facts without irate lunatics screaming emotional slogans at you and claiming you are metaphysically evil for examining data, all of those capable of reality-based thinking would say “yeah, you’re right, we’re going to have to do something about these people.” Instead, we have a situation in this country where it is possible for Jews to make the argument that they are both the wealthiest and most powerful group in the world and also the most oppressed, and, from there, that they are being oppressed by Gazan infants and their only recourse is to burn them alive. And people take this seriously. Who takes it seriously? Only the peasants. No one engaged in reality-based thinking would take something like this seriously; it is drooling retard nonsense. But the Jews are able to charge it up with emotion, and the peasants will slurp it down like a delicious chocolate milkshake in the parking lot of UDF.

The issue is genetic. That is a demonstrable fact. Intelligent people have intelligent children and intelligent people tend to marry one another.

We have now had 150 years of democracy, this attempt to raise the peasants out of the dredges and up into the realm of the enlightened, and there has thus far been zero progress. It is less than zero progress. Far from the advent of the middle class raising the peasantry into the ranks of the enlightened patrician, the peasants are getting dumber the more pampered they are.

It’s like the old saying goes: “Give a peasant a fish and he’ll eat it. Give a peasant a boat and he’ll go to some filthy manmade lake and drive it around in circles while wasted on Coors Light.”

I should add that I think social mobility and meritocracy are fundamental goods, especially in comparison to an exclusively blood-based class system. This is something closer to what many of the Founding Fathers were pushing for, which is why they formed a democratic republic, but limited who was allowed to vote, explicitly preventing the enfranchisement of the peasantry while also providing a clear ladder for those born into the peasantry to climb their way out. This is significantly better than the ancient aristocratic system, but the ancient aristocratic system is infinitely better than universal suffrage. Universal suffrage democracy has failed, and maybe the system of the Founding Fathers was always going to devolve into this, which would mean that the historic aristocratic system is the only viable option.

Imagine if you had a 150-year-long program to teach dogs how to talk, and there were still no talking dogs, and the primary issue of discussion in society was how we needed more money to develop more advanced methods for teaching dogs how to talk.

This isn’t reasonable. In fact, it is pathological.

Mitch McConnell, as well as many others among the most powerful in government, often have approval ratings below 20%. Some of these “woke” policies that were forced down everyone’s throats by the government and media had less than 10% popular support. The will of the people is not being represented, because the masses of people are incapable of engaging the system in the way that supporters of democracy imagine they should be able to engage it. What you end up with, in a democracy, is a minority of people controlling the majority of people and enforcing their will on them. That is, the same thing you had in an aristocracy. It’s just that in an aristocracy, the elite typically felt some kind of compassion for the peasantry, and further, everyone knew who was in charge, and if the elite got out of control, the peasantry knew who to riot against, whose heads to put on stakes. So in an authoritarian system, there is an actual, working system of checks and balances.

In a modern universal suffrage democracy, no one has any idea who is responsible for anything. Further, if leaders are so hated that they are forced to resign, they are very easily replaced by people bought and paid for by the exact same interests. New leaders can just be slotted in, while the people behind the scenes, who actually run the mechanism of state, remain unchanged.

Democracy is the worst system imaginable, and it will always devolve into the most aggressive form of tyranny, which is what has happened in the modern West. The peasantry obviously does not like the situation, but they have no recourse, and if they complain, they are told to vote. But the system of voting is completely controlled by emotional appeals, perfected in a laboratory setting by the financial interests that own the politicians.

There is no way to fix the system. At this point, the only plausible solution to the Western empire is for the empire to overextend, to collapse internally, and to be replaced with some form of despotism. That is not ideal, obviously. But there is no other path out of this corner we’ve been boxed into by democracy.

This is all very obvious. I am not saying anything here that is not right in front of everyone’s faces. The problem is that people who should know better – smart people – have a religious devotion to the concept of universal suffrage democracy, because they have a mystical belief in the nobility of the peasantry. Peasants are not nobles. If they were nobles, they would be called “nobles” and not “peasants.”

When I see people who believe in democracy lamenting that the peasants don’t care about the facts, it makes me sick. They appear to be insane. I used Caitlin Johnstone as an example of someone doing this because she came across my feed doing this. I didn’t mean to target her specifically, and I do generally appreciate her work. But I would challenge her or anyone else who believes in democracy to a debate on how exactly you are going to convince the 90ish percent of the population that has no interest in facts to be concerned about facts.

I know Johnstone bans anyone who uses the word “Jew” in her comments section, so I’d be happy to put it in writing that I will only speak of “Zionists” during our debate, and never say the word “Jew.” This issue is only tangentially related to the Jews anyway. It’s a question of human nature, which existed long before Jews took over Western civilization. It just so happens that the situation was very good for the Jews, as they are the ultimate experts at manipulating the peasantry.

Sam Rockwell had a surprise cameo in White Lotus this week. The clip above is one of the funniest things I’ve ever seen, but the funniness was outweighed by how shocked I was at how good this guy looks. I said “he’s gotta be 52, and he looks like that?” I looked it up and that nigga be 56 years old.

I understand of course that movie stars have access to all sorts of health things, but frankly, I’m not really convinced that much of this is out of the reach of a normal middle class person. It’s possible he’s had plastic surgery, but if he did it was just a neck lift, which is not something that carries risk of turning into a monster, and it isn’t very expensive either.

He could also be on TRT, I can’t really tell without seeing him with his shirt off. (He’s wearing a tightish t-shirt and doesn’t have indications that he’s on any kind of serious dose if he is on it.)

But most of the reasons a man is going to look like that at 56 is simply that he’s taken care of himself, primarily through diet and fitness. I’ve really been thinking a lot about this lately, what with my fast. I broke my fast today with some juice and a disgusting overcooked vegetable soup. (I read a whole lot about refeeding syndrome, and I’m following all of the protocols.)

I’ve more or less completely stopped smoking in favor of Zyn. (I’m not quitting nicotine, it’s just not worth it, no matter what the benefits are. I’ve done it before. It’s not worth it. But it’s the smoke that’s the health issue, not the nicotine. Even RFK does Zyn.)

I’m also going to continue an “alcohol fast” for the rest of Lent, and just see how that goes. I might stop drinking so much. I am not joining the AA cult, which I think is evil and just destroys people’s lives, but I might well become a “bottle of wine with dinner a couple times a week” type of guy. I’m not committing to that. Alcohol has been a big part of my life since I was a teenager, and it’s been a big part of my work for the last 12 years. In some ways, it is my best friend, and I don’t think we should abandon our friends. But it’s something I’m seriously considering cutting back on significantly.

I’m also not doing any more bodybuilding at all. A couple years ago, I could have actually competed for squat champ. I was only 73 kilos, so I’m not saying I’d have the highest squat, but my body weight to squat weight was pretty incredible. I obviously lost about .5 kg (1 pound) a day during the fast, so I’m going to gain some weight back, but I think I’m going to seriously analyze what I want my weight to be, and it should probably be lower than 73. I still think strength training is very good, but I’ve decided it’s really unhealthy to increase your weight in order to increase your strength.

A good portion of the readership are millennials, now staring down middle age, and I think we should all be looking at the disgusting bulbous boomers and realizing that we don’t have to become that. We can have dignity and look good well into middle age, if we so choose. People did this all throughout history, so we shouldn’t look at the fact that boomers are the old people we are looking at and assume that we are just going to become disgusting blobs of goo like they did. We can be strong and healthy into our fifties and beyond if we make good and responsible decisions.

White Lotus 3

This might be the worst season of White Lotus, even though it has my favorite actor, Walton Goggins. But even if it is the worst season, it is still so much better than anything else created in the last decade. And it might not be the worst. I need to see how the ending unfolds to really make any kind of judgement on it. I think I reviewed the first two seasons on here, and I will do it again for this season, but not until it’s over.

With shows I want to watch (which is very rare these days), I usually wait until it is over before I start watching it, so I can watch one episode a day or whatever. But I was excited about White Lotus (especially because I know all these locations in Thailand), and started the “episode per week” thing. I don’t think this is the way the show is meant to be watched and it is probably giving me a worse impression than I would have watching it all together. Waiting a week for a setup episode can leave a bad taste in your mouth.

Maybe, it necessarily has to be the worst season, because Tanya is dead. But I don’t think it is bad at all, and I think the fact I don’t really even have an indication of who is going to die is an indicator of quality. Obviously, we all make guesses when watching the show, but I can go through all of the options and I don’t see any as more likely than any of the others.

Anyway, I’ll post a real review when it’s over in a couple weeks.

We’re back full in action. These rambling insane articles I’m writing are fantastic and anyone who doesn’t think so is a gay retard.

This is the last day of my fast. Day 14, nikka.

Next time I’m doing 20 days and I’m not going to talk about it because in the Bible it says you’re not supposed to brag about these things. But although I am bragging, it was important to me also to document the event. I think people should know that this is really not that big of a deal, anyone can do it, and it makes you feel great.

Anyway, these memes are old. We’ve got stuff from Kanye’s most recent antisemitism breakdown which was like, six weeks ago. And ironically flavored cigarettes, which I think is from like, 2011. If people want new memes, they’re going to have to donate. I don’t think there is any reason to donate less just because the site format changed. You’re still getting interesting content, right?

Right?

It will obviously change some when I’m not two weeks without food. Not sure how. We’ll see.

Anyway, memes.

Editor’s Pick of the Week:

Runner-Up:

The Primo collection:

Well, it’s Sunday, and I am on Day 11 of an 8 day complete water fast (with some coffee and Zyn, though minimal). My muscles are atrophying, but it doesn’t matter, that will come back before the fat I’ve lost. I’ve lost all the fat. I didn’t really have a lot. I don’t look like an Auschwitz “victim” yet. I also feel slightly confused and dizzy. I heard this Chinaman who is a pro-faster saying that Vietnam soldiers locked up by the Viet Cong were denied food but for some reason given a bunch of books and they were tearing through them and becoming geniuses, learning new languages in mere days. I haven’t ever looked up the book he cited. But I don’t feel like I could learn anything. I wouldn’t even go for a walk at this point.

But I do feel great. Really. All that stuff above makes it sound like I wouldn’t feel good, but I feel totally fantastic.

I’ve decided to push it until 14 days. Nice even number. So I’m almost through. It’s an accomplishment, if nothing else. But after no bowel action, save for the occasional expulsion of bile (the body keeps producing bile, so it just excretes like a small amount of diarrhea, but it’s just a clear though slightly brownish liquid), I’ve been excreting some kind of black ooze over the last two days. I think all of those new age lunatics might be right, and I’m expelling toxins. So I think these last three days are going to be highly beneficial.

For the record, I’ve seen nothing that looks like worms or any other parasites. Honestly, I think the whole parasite theory went a bit overboard. I think it is real, and I think gays and any heterosexuals engaging in “anal sex” (it’s not sex) probably are crawling with them, and probably a fair amount of people who eat processed food have them, but logically, if you’re healthy (i.e., not eating processed food), a parasite is going to be attacked and killed like any other invader in your body.

The issue with “toxins” is that many are non-organic matter that your body doesn’t know what to do with. Like, there are all kinds of people who were in war or violent incidents who have pieces of shrapnel in their bodies for their whole lives. The body doesn’t try to break that down because it doesn’t recognize it as invasive. There are organic toxins, but heavy metals, PFAS, pesticides/herbicides, VOCs, and various other sorts, mostly petrochemical based, confuse the body. Don’t get me wrong, these will be eliminated naturally without an 11 day fast, to some extent, but they can build up in tissue in ways that organic toxins really can’t (unless you’re constantly consuming them, i.e., if you are a processed food eater).

When you’re fasting at length, you’re literally just eliminating whatever is around, with the body starving, attempting to go through all of the systems and find things that can be broken down and stripped for molecular materials.

I’m not going to church today. I could well be arrested on the train for public drunkenness, the way I’ve been stumbling around. But I am praying and contemplating spiritual issues.

You know, we’re not supposed to be listening to secular music during Lent. I thought about that when I posted that bizarre Jason Isbell review yesterday. He did mention God pulling him out of the grave his whore wife buried him in in the song I wanted to highlight but I don’t think that really counts.

So today I’m just listening to the Doobie Brothers’ Jesus is Just Alright with Me on repeat.

Nb4 “that is still secular music driven by salacious negro voodoo beats.” I know that bro. Please. Please, never say obvious things to me, under any circumstances, ever.

Best I can do is Elvis gospel collection.

I don’t believe Jesus or His Holy Mother could possibly take issue with that.

Unlike the Doobie Brothers, Elvis explicitly excluded vulgar negro jungle rhythms from his gospel music, even whilst he was a master of such rhythms.

I wish Elvis would have been saved by Jesus like he says in these songs. But women, man. They’ll get you. Priscilla was literally the whore Eve, and when she got Elvis kicked out of the Garden all the trees were sprouting delicious narcotic pills. That is the literal analogy.

May Christ have mercy on his soul.

I’ve said it six million times: everything would be perfect in this country if when Richard Nixon resigned he would have simply said: “Under one condition… that Elvis Presley be crowned the Absolute Monarch of America.”

Anyway, I wanted to do a spiritual sermon today, for the enrichment of the reader, and address a core issue of importance. Maybe the most important issue, beyond the nature of Christ’s sacrifice, which is the meaning of prayer.

Why do we pray?

Reddit faggots will often say “so why does an all powerful God need people to worship Him? Huh?” Obviously, the answer is that he does not need that. It’s not a particularly difficult question. The reason we worship is for ourselves, to purify our souls, and to bring us closer to the light of God. We worship Him out of thankfulness for making us in His image and for instilling a piece of his divinity within us, and we worship him to strengthen that piece of His divinity that lives within us.

But prayer is about much more than worship, even while, fundamentally, all prayer is a form of worship. We pray thankfulness, we pray forgiveness, and we pray supplication. Probably, most of it is the latter, because we are only human. And asking for protection for our friends and family, for guidance for our leaders, for protection from our enemies, is not selfish.

But there are selfish prayers. Or, “prayers.” I don’t think they are actually prayers. But they are very popular among Protestants. Many Protestants teach that you can pray and get rich. This is insane and an abomination. Prayers for guidance, prayers for strength, these are supplication, but they are not asking for material things.

You can ask for material blessings, but it must be humble, and framed correctly. Maybe you want a wife. This should be something along the lines of “Lord, if it please thee, send me a wife, and if it doesn’t please thee, give me the strength to live without one.”

There was a phenomenon, primarily among Protestants, of imagining that God is talking to them. George W. Bush used to claim that God was talking to him. Powerful people who make this claim are just cynical charlatans, exploiting the stupidity and gullibility of the peasantry. But if someone actually believes that is happening, they are insane and psychopathic. God is not talking to you. That is not something that happens.

Even in the Bible, when it talks about God talking to the prophets, it doesn’t mean it literally, save for in a very few cases, such as Moses and the burning bush. In general, the prophets were extremely wise and enlightened, and therefore existed in balance with the will of God and therefore understand his purposes. In some cases, they were spoken to in dreams.

But in general, we should understand that although Christianity is a religion that includes miracles, some of them fundamental, in general, it is not a religion of magic, the defiance of the laws of physics. Miracles, as they exist in the world today, generally involve statistical impossibility. But that isn’t really magic, because probability is not a science.

If you’ve ever been to a casino, you’ve seen someone “hot,” just totally violating the understanding we have of random chance. Being hot at the craps table is not a miracle from Heaven, but it is something we can look at and see that probability is not actually random.

It’s actually a scientific mystery, as random number generators prove.

From the Algorithm Design Manual:

Unfortunately, generating random numbers looks a lot easier than it really is. Indeed, it is fundamentally impossible to produce truly random numbers on any deterministic device. Von Neumann [Neu63] said it best: “Anyone who considers arithmetical methods of producing random digits is, of course, in a state of sin.” The best we can hope for are pseudo-random numbers, a stream of numbers that appear as if they were generated randomly.

There is a lot of weird information about RNG machines producing patterns constantly, which you can also look into if you’re interested.

So, the type of miracle you will experience, and the type of answer you get to a prayer in the real world, is going to be based on events happening that appear to be statistically impossible. If you are praying for a wife, you get into a car accident that is completely not your fault based on a faulty traffic light, get out to speak to the person you crashed into, and you end up marrying her. Things like this happen all the time, or they used to, when we were a religious society. Because we are not a religious society, we are mostly just floating through a meaningless void of random horrors, like we’re all trapped in an endless Cormac McCarthy novel.

Everything that happens is the Will of God, and anything can happen. So then what is the most important thing we should ask for from God?

It’s what King Solomon asked for: wisdom.

Wisdom gives us the ability to understand the meaning of the events that happen in our lives, and to respond to them in a way that serves God (and therefore ourselves and everyone else on earth).

Of course, we should always do the right and moral thing, which we all know. We should not steal or fornicate, or lie or trick people, and so on. We should not become fat. But most decisions we make in life are not explicitly moral decisions. If we go back to the example of wanting a wife (which seems to be a pretty relevant issue among the Daily Stormer readership), whether or not to pursue a specific woman is not a moral decision. Unless you’re already married (or she is), there is no moral content to the question of whether or not you should be going after her. Answering that question would require wisdom.

Obviously, wisdom is linked to understanding. If the woman has blue hair and piercings and is manic and deranged, you should have an understanding that this is not worth pursuing, regardless of what your dick may be telling you. You’re not going to marry her, so you’re thinking about fornication, and then she will likely ruin your life. And even if she doesn’t, nothing of value will have been gained, and you will have committed a mortal sin you will have to confess and repent of. That is all just obvious.

But wisdom also relates to intuition, which we all have, and which we all know we have. Sometimes, something just feels right or wrong. Sometimes, you can have a sense of certainty that something is right, even though you have no logical reason to believe that, necessarily. Of course, that sense could be coming from your own ego, and be completely meaningless. However, if you pray for wisdom, it is my strong belief – and in fact, I will just say it is a fact – that your sense of intuition is going to become much more fine tuned, as you will be more connected with the spirit of God within you, and guided to make correct decisions, through this intuitive sense.

I have often mentioned Rupert Sheldrake, and I think everyone needs to read him and look at the data he has compiled on human intuition and other “psychic” phenomenon. The masterwork probably (or at least my favorite) is “Dogs That Know When Their Owners are Coming Home.” He has all these studies that demonstrate that psychic phenomena absolutely do exist.

Here he is commenting on the titular dogs:

There are also human studies that are equally scientific and equally impeccable in their methodology and could be repeated by anyone. No one wants to try to repeat them, because science is literally fake. If telepathy exists, it disproves the entire theology of nihilistic atheism that is the reigning doctrine of our Jew-riddled society. People call it a “Jewocracy,” but you could call it an “Atheist Theocracy.”

Because so few scientists want to examine these phenomena, the data is limited, but Sheldrake has put enough out there to make it undeniable that it is real and anyone who says it isn’t is just a lying kike.

What I assert is that this psychic world is the spiritual world, and that we are all fundamentally connected to it, and the strength of our connection to it is based on our connection to God. Sheldrake is an Anglican, but he’s also a bit obsessed with keeping his work in the realm of science. What I would like to see is some of the psychic tests done on highly religious people against atheists, and see how the psychic abilities of the two groups compare. I already know what the answer would be, but I would love to see the studies performed. But he doesn’t want to be dismissed as a religious kook, so he is mostly private about his religious beliefs, at least in relation to his work.

But I will tell you, dear brother, as a matter of fact, if you engage in regular prayer and other spiritual practices, regular church attendance, confession, the Eucharist, and now I’m full-in on fasting (though you don’t have to go two weeks), you will gain wisdom and that will include a more refined ability to intuitively understand situations through these “psychic” abilities that we all have.

Finally, I just want to say: what you want might be the same as what God wants for you, but a lot of times it’s not going to be. Obviously, God is right, and you are wrong. Wisdom should allow you to line these things up, to make it so you want what God wants for you, because you understand He wants what’s best for you, and He is going to guide you to that, and take care of you on the way.

He is Risen.

Note: This is the second article of the day and the first one is better. Probably. We might be doing second articles now. But get used to scrolling for second or – perhaps – even third articles. I was bored and exhausted, but I’m getting a vibe with this new format. As always, if you don’t like it, you are welcome to not read or to kill yourself. But I’m digging it and feel like it’s going somewhere good. 

I would probably just use Spotify like everyone else. But in 2017, I was banned from using Visa/Mastercard for the rest of my life because I made a joke about an obese woman who had a heart attack after a car accident. So I can’t use that type of service.

I use some Russian torrent sites for music for the most part, but Brave‘s adblock works well on YouTube (I’ve literally never seen an ad, and I’ve never installed any extra addons), so I will sometimes use YouTube to check out various things. The sound quality on YouTube for anything uploaded in the last like, ten years, is as good as FLAC.

The Indians are ruining this formerly normal behavior which I had never thought much about, as they are ruining everything on the internet I have done for years without ever thinking much about. Somehow, Indians are going into playlists, and inserting AI marketing propaganda spam.

Jason Isbell got divorce raped, an event approximately as surprising as leaves on a tree, and recorded a solo acoustic album, so naturally I wanted to listen to the whole thing, and it was new and the Russians weren’t seeding it enough, so I go on the YouTube playlist:

This has been happening for months or more. Sometimes I put on a playlist, then I’m doing something, and an Indian AI ad comes on, and I have to walk over and turn it off. They are making the service completely unusable, in the same way they’ve made Twitter’s news feed unusable, the same way that they’ve made the American telephony system unusable. This country is an international terrorist state. This is terrorism. It is a base for spam and scams, and they are spreading it through every electronic means.

The fucking kikes are whining about Russia and China. What did these countries do? Has anyone even said? The worst thing a Russian has ever done to me is overcharge for a blowjob, and a Chinese person has never done anything to me. It’s conceivable they’ve fed me a domestic animal at some point, but I don’t know that, and if it did happen it was delicious, so what difference could it possibly make?

Indians are literally ruining everyone’s lives. Things that you would never even imagine someone ruining are being ruined by Indians. The fact that these people are scamming elderly Americans out of life savings on an industrial scale should be considered an act of war. It is an act of war. What else do you call it?

The other day, I had a guest, and we were drinking coffee and discussing very serious and important matters. I had put on David Crosby’s If I Could Only Remember My Name as a YouTube playlist because it was easier than grabbing the hard drive with the album on it and I was certain this was the correct mood for our discussion. All of a sudden, right in the middle of a thought I was expressing which could have been as important as anything anyone has ever said to someone else, the music stops and some AI voice comes on talking about “what is investment?”

I will say this with 100% truthfulness, not exaggerating in any way whatsoever: I was more angry than if I would have heard someone screaming “Allah Akbar” and looked out the window to see pressure cooker bombs blowing people’s limbs off. I can’t remember anything in my life that has ever made me this angry. I’m against getting angry. I really try not to do it, ever. (I’ve written about my anti-angry views extensively; perhaps we will return to this theme in the near future, we seem to be theming it up these days.) But this Indian AI ad in the middle of my incomprehensibly consequential conversation, interrupting the noble Mr. Crosby, it was such an invasion of my personal life, of my mind, of my space and things that belong to me. It was a soul attack. This is what it must feel like to be forcibly sodomized, though I imagine that is not nearly as bad.

The conversation ended, and I got up to turn off the ad, and started screaming that the entirety of India should be nuked, that every person in the country should be exterminated. I had never had this thought before. My guest asked if this extermination would include the children, and I said that it would necessarily need to because they will just grow up to rip off innocent grandmas, spam Twitter with pro-Israel fake news, and violate the sanctity of David Crosby’s masterpieces. My guest considered and agreed with me that the extermination would indeed have to include the children.

All of them. Every last Indian.

This has gone too far and it is getting worse by the hour.

What is amazing to me is that no one is talking about it. You can’t answer your phone with an unknown number anymore. It used to be that if an unknown number was calling your phone, it could be a business contact, or a social acquaintance, who has gotten your number from someone else. Now, there is a 97% chance it is a fucking Indian scammer. They have literally destroyed the entire telephony infrastructure of the United States.

And these people are talking about China. What did the Chinese do? Can someone tell me? They annexed a remote Filipino fishing zone? What in the fuck does that have to do with me and my life? Please list your personal concerns in order of importance, and tell me when you get to contested fishing waters in the South China Sea. Then list how many times in your week your life is invaded by some kind of Indian behavior.

If these war-obsessed lunatics like Marco Rubio were saying we should exterminate Indians, I would be fully backing whatever mindless jingoism they want to shove down everyone’s throats. Instead they’re talking about theoretical communistic infringement on the vibrancy of gay sex clubs in Taipei.

I can’t take it.

This Jason Isbell Album

This was originally about me trying to listen to the new Jason Isbell album, a solo post-divorce reflective piece.

Poor Jason.

I’ve followed him since I was a teenager, when he was in the Drive-By Truckers. As a goofy fat kid, he first played on Southern Rock Opera, but didn’t sing. Then on Decoration Day, he had the title track. This was a story of a southern Hatfields and McCoys type thing. It’s based on a true story. Decoration Day is of course a day when Southerners honor (or maybe they don’t anymore) the Civil War dead.

He also had Outfit, which was an ode to his weak and simple but loving and earnest father, which he has said was about real things his father told him.

He was only young when he wrote it and though it’s not the best song ever, there is a serious soul to it. I love the imagery of some Alabama painter from Appalachia being told by his son he’s going to become a musician and telling him “don’t tell ’em you’re bigger than Jesus.”

Shoutout to Mark David Chapman, btw. Freaking legend.

Jason was in the Truckers for a while, recording some good stuff, and in 2007 left the band and became a kind of Poet Laureate of Appalachia (I’m sure I’m not the first person to use that line, just to be clear). He was really the only voice talking about the issues of the poverty stricken whites of that region, and doing it a way that was hip enough that people in New York and Seattle were interested in hearing what he had to say. It was a great service. The themes were not limited to Southern/Appalachian issues, but a lot of them addressed the issues of poverty, and the way that the wars those boys were sent off to affected them, the issues they dealt with involving substance abuse and the removal of the jobs.

I’m not going to do a full review of his discography. I think all of the albums recorded between his departure from the Truckers and his marriage are worth listening to. I don’t like love songs, because I’m not 13 years old, and yet that is what most music is now. Jason’s songs are about people and stories, his hero being John Prine. Like all good poetry, they create images in your mind that stay with you. And there is a beautiful hillbillyism to it, which is unique. This combination of intelligence and rural sensibilities.

From “Alabama Pines,” the highlight of the last album before the nightmare wife era and the end of the fat drunk era:

Well, I moved into this room
If you could call it that, a week ago
I never do what I’m supposed to do
Hardly even know my name anymore
When no one calls it out, it kinda vanishes away

I can’t get to sleep at night
The parking lot’s so loud and bright
The A/C hasn’t worked in twenty years
Probably never made a single person cold
But I can’t say the same for me, I’ve done it many times

Somebody take me home
Through those Alabama pines

You can’t drive through Talladega
On a weekend in October
Just head up north to Jacksonville, cut around and over
Watch your speed in Boiling Springs
They ain’t got a thing to do, they’ll get you every time

It’s not a song about him, but about a Southern man, lost.

The same year that was released, a female violinist, Amanda Shires, who had played on the album, staged an alcoholism “intervention” against him, which was in fact a coup to take over his music operation by seducing him by playing a mother type figure saving him from himself.

(To be fair, he did stop drinking and stopped being fat. Though I don’t think we should credit this vampire woman for that.)

She did take over. She married him and then became a permanent fixture of the band and moved them from Alabama to Nashville, where they began making machine music which no longer had much at all to do with Southern issues. To be fair, the albums did get progressively worse. But even the first one, Southeastern, was not great. Not great. The only song that is even really notable to me from the whole era was “Cumberland Gap,” which was a throwback to the pre-Shires era, almost as if even letting him record the song was a little treat given to him, like a mommy gives to a good boy.

He talks about the coal industry shutdown destroying his people’s lives, and it is generally going to assume that mommy Amanda wouldn’t let him say such a thing because of global warming (more important that the lives of everyone in Appalachia, obviously).

The album version is overproduced by Nashville parasites, but here’s a live version.

There were some catchy high-production poppy songs from those albums, where you might say “eh, it’s alright,” but I can’t remember any of them. The whole thing with Jason Isbell was about being the Southern poet. It was vibes. Making him into a machine rock musician producing poppy rock songs that are maybe “cool” enough to get pimped up on KEXP or Tiny Desk killed the entire point of Jason Isbell.

Towards the end, he was not only not doing songs about the South, he was singing about gun control and Black Lives Matter. Literally. This is what women will do to you if you allow it.

So, as every reader of the Daily Stormer would expect (apparently average men do not expect this, though I cannot grasp why), Shires divorce-raped Jason. The divorce was finalized in December 2023, and this month he released his first post-mommy album, which I was naturally excited about (which is why the Indian scam invasion triggered me to write this in the first place – I was peacefully listening when they attacked).

So, “Foxes in the Snow” is not as good as I’d hoped lyrically. But it is definitely and absolutely and completely a return to form after having been mangled by this vile star-fucker trollop. There is nothing political on it. And the music itself is absolutely spitting in the face of the Amanda Shires “let’s be a poppy rock band” thing that was happening. The whole thing is just him and his guitar, and the guitar is excellent. It’s in a lot of ways a John Prine tribute album, and the guitar work is absolutely on par with Prine.

You can see the fingerwork here.

But the live version sounds the same as the album version because some faggot nerd in Nashville isn’t mutilating it with some iMac app.

The above song, as well as many other songs on the album, are about Southern people. Listening, I wondered if he wrote most of these songs during the marriage and his wife wouldn’t let him record them. “Sorry honey, it’s time to sing a song about tranny bathroom rights!”

The songs about the divorce are not really what I would have liked to have heard. I would have appreciated some Slim Shady LP energy. He could write a John Prine style song about bringing his toddler daughter to dump the body of his wife he just murdered, explaining to the kid why he murdered her mother.

Remember when Eminem did that?

He put a photo of a body in a trunk on the cover.

Why was he allowed to do that and become a multimillionaire and I got banned from using banks and social media and .com websites for the rest of my life for a joke about a fat woman having a heart attack?

Eminem also rapped about raping his mother and killing all homosexuals. Also, about causing school shootings. And carrying around a blowup doll with a dildo attached and using it to anally rape women on the streets. That was just in one song.

What’s he doing these days, I wonder?

Huh.

Interesting.

I do wonder about this whole “banned from everything forever because of that joke you made about that dead woman.” I can’t put my finger on it, but it seems like something else is going on, as apparently, some people are actually allowed to make edgy jokes and it’s not really a big deal.

Anyway, Jason’s divorce songs are not full-pussy, but still pretty whiny. But there is one where he talks about how everyone treated him as the bad guy during the divorce, where he drops an f-bomb and lets a bit of anger out.

I’m going to post the full lyrics, because I know 70% of you hate this music but are interested in the concepts (while the other 30% hate the music and are just waiting for me to get back to the topic of my agenda to exterminate the Indian race):

Take your hand off my knee, take your foot off my neck
Why y’all examining me like I’m a murder suspect?
If I got a little loose, I just forgot to be afraid
But I started out a true believer, babe

Lot of dangerous memories, a lot of bars in this town
But oh, to have loved and lost and then still stuck around
But I heard God in the rhyme, I crawled out of the grave
And I guess I’m still a true believer, babe

All your girlfriends say I broke your fucking heart, and I don’t like it
There’s a letter on the nightstand I don’t think I’ll ever read
Well, I finally found a match, and you kept daring me to strike it
And now I have to let it burn to let it be

I can’t remember my dreams, I guess it could be the meds
But the sound of you screaming won’t get out of my head
I still remember the fever ‘fore it started to fade
I really was a true believer, babe

All your girlfriends say I broke your fucking heart, and I don’t like it
There’s a letter on the nightstand I don’t think I’ll ever read
Well, I finally found a match, and you kept daring me to strike it
And now I have to let it burn to let it be

Like the stain on your teeth, I’m as stubborn as wine
Just when you think that I’m beaten, I get up every time
So when we pass on the highway, I’ll smile and I’ll wave
And I’ll always be a true believer, babe

He’s describing a situation that virtually all men go through in a modern divorce: the woman has created a situation where all of “your friends” are really her friends, and then when she decides to dump you and take all your money and children from you, all those “friends” you had turn on you and claim you’re an abuser.

He also talks about God pulling him out of the wreck that the woman created, which is of course very good. He doesn’t appear to have started drinking again. Though I would wonder what kind of pills he’s taking that make him forget his dreams. Xanax does that to me, which is why I don’t take it very often. My dreams are very important to me. If it wasn’t for that, I would be scarfing up Xanax like Waffle House smothered and covered hash browns, because life is extremely stressful, particularly with all of these Indians trying to scam and spam me at every corner.

So, I posted my email and my messenger app like a month ago and I’ve been trying to slowly reply to everyone. More than that, I’ve been trying to read them all, and then at least reply with a “thanks, bro” or whatever.

It’s important to me to do. There are still over a thousand of these left, currently. But if I haven’t responded to you, that’s why. Because it is really a lot of messages.

All of these kind words really mean a lot to me. I can’t even say how much they mean. When someone says “you changed my life,” that reminds me that this has all been worth it, and when it is thousands of people not only feeling this way, but bothering to send me a message saying it, it’s a deep hit.

But just so everyone knows, I am going through all of these. Several of them are from internet famous people, who I would want to prioritize, and some number of others are literally sending me news articles (please do not send me news articles). Frankly, I wish I had a way to filter these, but I honestly don’t. I could hire a PA to view these, but that would seem like a violation of people’s privacy, and also, some of you (not enough, quite frankly) are asking for private Bitcoin or ETH addresses, and I don’t really have a PA currently who I would want to put that responsibility on.

If Anyway Wants to Donate

You can contact me privately for a private, unique address. I just don’t know how long it is going to take me to respond.

You can also send Monero:

4BHE9T5HUqbRzsAaq5grGq31G3JevBD1RBNbRdWQLg8ESYugNNyyAnt2JL9ZuWA1w72g4LPr25rSHjQJS6MwANT3MMJFA16

Anyone who doesn’t understand Bitcoin privacy measures or who is using an app like Venmo or CashApp or Coinbase needs to get a private address from me, or you will risk your own privacy and also get banned from whatever app. If you do understand Bitcoin privacy, however, here’s a public address:

bc1qgt4l9utmpppawflae0lu2w3dthyam67xmw7en8

Again, only use that if you know what you’re doing, and know your Bitcoin is not linked to your real name.

I’ll do another donation drive after I’ve gotten through more of these messages, when I have time to see who is asking for an address.

Also, if you have an old address I sent you, you can use it again. No one other than you has used it before (and a lot of you didn’t ever use them).

I’m writing less now, though I think it is ultimately going to be a lot better writing, but the site still costs the same amount of money to keep online. So everything is appreciated.

But the love is apparently appreciated more, otherwise I would just automatically delete any message that was not offering to send money instead of reading thousands of them.

Now, for the Important Part: Fasting Updates

So, basically, I’m on day 8 or I guess going into day 9 if we count the hours instead of the days.

Here’s the deal: after the first 7 days, you are not really tired anymore. I went to the gym yesterday. I didn’t do strength training, because that seems ill-advised, but I did a kind of woman’s exercise I guess you would call it, high reps with low weights. I also went for a pretty significant weight, though I don’t use a cellphone so I don’t know how long it was. Thirty minutes at a reasonable pace.

My message to fat people is this: there is no reason you can’t just do this for months on end. I could honestly keep this up for months without any problems. If I was fat. As it is now, I am going to stop on day 12 or 14, depending on what the scale says, because I never had the body fat necessary for this and I’m already losing muscle mass.

However, I guess if fat people could do this, they wouldn’t be fat in the first place. I have never understood fatness, other than as a kind of compulsive behavior. Which maybe I could compare to my own drinking, although most people who are fat also drink, so idk if that really helps explain it, and further I’ve quit or reduced drinking whenever I thought it was a problem. I obviously haven’t drank alcohol during this fast, and I’ve decided to push the alcohol free life out after the fast until the Easter feast, so another month or so. A bit more than a month.

So no, I don’t understand fatness, and I’ve largely decided that offering advice to the fat is a useless endeavor, because there are a billion obvious ways to stop being fat. The only advice I could give is psychological or spiritual, tell people they should have more respect for themselves and for society and God, as they are pissing in the face of the universe by abusing themselves this way. Because it’s not the same thing as being a drunk or a drug addict or whatever other thing, as when you are fat, you make it everyone else’s problem, you wear this sin on you everywhere you go, for all to see.

But yes, just to be clear: if you are fat, there won’t be any negative health effects if you just completely stop eating until you’re not fat anymore, and it’s really not that difficult, especially after the first 3 days and then especially after the first week. It’s just a matter of willpower, and if you are fat and don’t have the willpower to stop being fat, I can’t really think of any reason you should be alive at all. I don’t mean that in a mean way, I’m just stating it as a fact.

Fatness to me is the ultimate surrender, and I think the only reason it is not worse than suicide is that fatness is reversible, while suicide is not. But there is clearly more honor in suicide than in living your life as a fat.

Of course, I’m mostly talking about the irredeemably fat American. Many have an extra 15 or so pounds they’re carrying around, just because work sucks and sleep is hard and you have to eat easy food and various other reasons. It builds up over time and before you notice you’ve got these extra pounds. This is very easily solved by a fast. Honestly, that isn’t really necessary, and can just be solved with basic keto and “intermittent fasting.”

But I think fasting is more than just weight loss. I feel more joyful and at peace than I have in years, and I can feel that when I go for my health checkup, bloodwork and so on, probably a week after I finish the fast, I’m going to get incredible results that show I’m 20 years younger than I should be.

It’s also nice to not think about sex, I would say. Based on the data, I’m going to be thinking about sex more when the fast is over, because of what it does to the endocrine system. But it is a nice break.

Part of male health is that if you are healthy, you think about sex all the time. Nb4 “fat slobs constantly masturbate” – that, my friend, is not about sex. That is just using masturbation to release dopamine. Those fat wankers are not actually interested in sexual intercourse or they would not be fat. And when you are a certain weight, you just don’t have the testosterone to be motivated towards seeking sex.

Have I written about how pornography abuse has nothing to do with sex and is entirely about stimulating a heroin-like dopamine response in the brain? It seems like I would have written about it. It feels like I’ve written about everything. But yeah, if you have healthy testosterone levels, the impulse is to go straight Duran Duran.

Them niggas was so revved out they were running through the streets of Sri Lanka trying to find a piece of ass. They were running up to street kids, like “have you seen any pussy around here?”

What a strange video. The lyrics are straightforward, but when you’re watching the first half, you’re like “maybe the video director misunderstood and thought Stephen Duffy was hunting for some pajeet who scammed his grandma out of his life savings,” but then it turns into a sex thing later on in the video. The dark woman painted in the jungle that he’s trying to rape, but she’s got claws, actually does fit the song I think.

Otherwise though, the video really is baffling. It’s directed by Russell Mulcahy, who later directed Highlander, which is a pretty competent film. I don’t know what exactly he was thinking setting the video for a song about hunting for pussy on the streets of Colombo. He is gay, like Arthur C. Clarke who was roaming the streets of Colombo hungry like the wolf for young boys, so maybe well into production he was like “wait, Duran Duran is a heterosexual music group?”

(Did I write about Arthur C. Clarke? I can’t remember if I did or if I just meant to. Dude was a fucking sicko, and also is the inspiration for much of the current ideology of the WEF/transhumanist/globalist/wtvr, almost like a spiritual father of that whole line of thinking. A Space Odyssey is freaking epic, of course, but we can thank Kubrick for that, who did most of the work. Clarke’s novel was literally published after the film, an adaptation of the film. And the sequels, like all of his other books I’ve ever read, were total tripe. But he did do things like invent the space elevator. He was sort of a serious theorist for all of this transhumanist and space conquest stuff, so it’s not at all surprising he was a homo, calling in 9 year old street boys to play with his pet monkey and then ramming his other monkey into their anuses. Basically, a space elevator is the only way you could actually build a serious space ship, because you would have to build it in space because there would be no way to launch it if you built it on land, and the space elevator would be the only way to get enough materials to build it in space.)

But as regards normal human sexuality…

In real life, you could rape any woman you wanted if it wasn’t for the evil badge niggers. But if course, the whole planet is swarming with badge niggers, inhibiting man’s natural “right to rape.” But the women do have claws, they’re just, you know, metaphorical. I hate all of the old PUA lingo, but “shit test” is the term we must use. Women try to claw you with emotional and psychological attacks. Testosterone levels and a strong sense of self (the former is necessary for the latter) is what allows these attacks to be slapped aside, as if you were slapping aside her attempts to physically strike you. No man should ever be able to be hurt by a woman. Except his mother, because she hurts him when he can’t defend himself. The basic physical reality is that any man should be able to look at a woman and understand that he could grab her throat, flip her around, rip off her clothes and have his penis inside her in a matter of like, 5 seconds. At any point.

Not that you should do that. I mean, it’s fun and hilarious, but it’s illegal and immoral. It’s actually not super immoral if she’s an unmarried virgin and you’re planning on marrying her and have the money for the fine.

But in the days when Biblical morality reigned, we were not being swarmed on by badge niggers. So I’m not encouraging rape. What I am trying to say is that if you’re ever in a situation where you feel like a woman has power over you, you’ve seriously screwed something up, badly, because it is a basic reality of biology and physics that she doesn’t have any power over you. Unless she calls the cops. Because they do have total power over you and they can do whatever they want to you, including kill you or throw you in a cage and torture you.

But the point was… the point I was getting at before the Duran Duran thing… let’s see here…

It’s important to take care of your testosterone. Fasting, in every study, improves it. The other thing is diet, which is an issue that should be covered separately, but I’m very pro beef (grassfed). I’m not really on the dairy train. I know everyone is constantly talking about raw milk, and I’ve never had a regular supply of that to test personally, but the data on that is pretty mixed. I don’t mean the bullshit that you’re going to get like, a tummy ache or something and therefore it should be banned by the government. But just the general data. What I will say is that the fact that the government is so obsessed with preventing people from getting ahold of it does make me assume it is a miracle food, I just can’t vouch for it. I can vouch for beef. I think beef should be at the core of the diet, with some kind of healthy fish (preferably fresh, though that is obviously hard if you don’t live on a coast) at least once a week and probably twice a week.

The other obvious thing is strength training. There is no question that this raises testosterone. However, what I want to really stress about that is that you need to measure your strength against your body weight. That is what matters. Increasing your body weight in order to increase your strength is stupid and pointless and a sign of serious insecurity and mommy issues – or, it’s a situation where a shorter guy thinks it will make him more attractive to women. If you’re under 5’10” or whatever, you can be 350 lbs of solid muscle, and based on your physique, you will have less sexual market value than a lanky skinny-fat guy who is 6’1″. Going into this insane body building is a waste of time and it isn’t even healthy. It gets really unhealthy, actually. It destroys your body. In terms of sexual marketplace value, you would be much, much better off spending that time getting rich, because women actually respond to that. Always measure your strength based on your ideal weight, which is basically whatever weight you are when you have a flat stomach (not necessarily visible lower abs, but your “dick root” level with your belly button) and toned muscles.

I was watching some Game of Thrones episodes for some stupid reason, and saw Ramsay Bolton with his shirt off:

Obviously, his biceps are small (though in that photo he’s not flexing and he’s stretching his arms all the way out), but he’s got good tone throughout his body, the perfect amount of body fat. Good traps. Everything even.

If you watch the fight scene (which is bretty gud), you can see his back and the definition of his muscles when he moves.

I know a bunch of people are going to say he’s too skinny, but he’s actually basically the exact same size as the internet’s holy grail of male forms: Brad Pitt in Fight Club.

Brad’s got slightly bigger biceps, but he’s like ten years older than that kid playing Ramsay Bolton.

Here’s a secret they don’t tell you: everyone is obsessed with Brad Pitt in Fight Club because he’s dehydrated, which created the totally impossible muscle definition. This is just a magic trick. If you watch the film, and look at his arms and neck and even his face, you can see clearly he is not the same as in the shirtless scenes.

What I am saying is the goal of any diet/exercise routine should be fitness, not mass. Strength should be a goal, because strength training is probably the single best way to boost testosterone, but this totally and completely relative to weight and body fat levels. Ramsay Bolton in that picture above, or Brad in Fight Club, are going to likely have better testosterone levels than some lunatic body builder (assuming the lunatic body builder is not on drugs, which most of them are).

Again, women don’t care. Women want Brad Pitt in Fight Club and Ramsay in GoT. They don’t want a bodybuilder. Usually. But let’s refocus: all this talk of women and sex is sort of pointless. I talk about it because I know you’re all interested in it, but none of it has been particularly relevant since like 2008. At least if we’re talking about America or UK/Australia/Canada. Virtually all women are fat now.

What percent of women that you see out and about would you ever be interested in? Assuming we are respecting the totally and completely reasonable age of consent laws enforced by the satanic badge niggers. Ten percent? Maybe fifteen? And what percentage of men are in reasonable shape and/or wealthy or violent criminals or have some edge that you don’t have? The math is not in your favor.

Of course, you can find some woman, if you’re in shape and you’re making some money. But she will probably not marry you. She will “date” you for a while, then get bored, then just dump you like garbage. And if she does marry you, then what? She can divorce you at any point, for any reason or no reason, because there is no longer any such thing as a marriage contract (meaning that there is no such thing as marriage, technically), and you have no recourse. She can take your money, your house, your kids, just on a whim.

So the whole discussion is pointless.

If you want to roll the dice, go ahead. I’m not going to tell you not to. What I’m going to tell you is that the odds are not in your favor.

My advice is this: focus on yourself. Get healthy, get money, go to church and go to confession and take the Eucharist. Spend time with your parents, your siblings, your cousins. Cook your own food. Invite family to eat the food you cook. Do things you enjoy. Get into guns, get into rock climbing, hiking, whatever. Video games are fine, but do things other than video games. In fact, you should really set a timer on how much you play video games. If some new game you’re excited about comes out, I’m not going to judge you for no-lifing it for a weekend, but video games shouldn’t be a huge part of your life, certainly not the center of your life, but rather something you do for fun, to relax, maybe play online with old high school friends you don’t get to spend time with otherwise. (Unless you work in game development, then you’ve got a perfect excuse for being involved with video games full time.)

If you’re living like this, living for yourself, for your family, for God, and you run across a woman who seems viable (in real life not on the internet), get her number, go to lunch with her. Don’t be hungry. Or at least definitely don’t show it. Treat it as totally casual. See how damaged she is. Observe it. Don’t start asking her about how many niggers she’s fucked. Treat it like you’re mostly disinterested, you’re just willing to get to know her. Because it’s not you that needs to impress her, it’s her that needs to impress you. If you handle yourself correctly, she will pick up on that dynamic very quickly and adapt to it. See where it goes.

But if it ends up going somewhere, prepare yourself. Before marriage, hide as many of your assets as you possibly can. If you can’t get a second passport, hide it in crypto. Don’t ever let her know about whatever money you’ve got. Give her an allowance. If she asks about money, tell her “we’re fine babe, don’t worry about it.” Make her go to church and take it seriously. Don’t let her have friends that could potentially be a negative influence, meaning no single or divorced friends, don’t let her do “girls’ night,” do social events together with family and other married couples.

Obviously, there is so much more to say on that, but this thing we have here is already stretching the limits of my own established standards of labyrinthine meandering. Though I feel like we’ve covered a lot here, no? And it all does connect. It’s not really “stream of consciousness,” because at least in my view, that implies a lack of order, and I believe this is very orderly.

One might even go so far as to claim it is too orderly, and the coherence should be dialed down in order to make it more adventurous.

The Daily Stormer has always been staunchly pro-adventure.

In one of my fasting articles – which will continue until the fast is over and beyond, because I think it’s important and I care nothing if you disagree – I mentioned that I have “prostate and liver problems and crippling depression.” I wanted to follow up on that a bit, just to clarify that I am not having some kind of health crisis, as the statements could suggest without context.

It must be understood that this is relative. I have been a health psychopath for my entire life.

You merely adopted health psychopathy. I was born in it, molded by it. I didn’t eat seed oil until I was already a man, by then it was nothing to me but a plasticy taste!

I’m weighing these problems against my baseline, which is so much higher than the average American’s as to be completely sickening. During the coronavirus hoax, my health deteriorated some, due to the general status of the situation, as well as less healthy food and increased alcohol consumption.

I also developed a premature prostate problem, about a decade too early, with an unclear origin, which is a unique problem. It was originally told to me that it was bacterial, not an STD but some kind of bacteria which apparently can just appear, and I took the antibiotics and never tested positive for bacteria again, but had some lingering enlargement and though I never had to urinate more than usual, or had pain during urination, the urine stream was not as strong as it should have been for my age. I did a lot of reading, and developed a dietary and vitamin routine that more or less completely solved the problem, but though I haven’t had it tested again, I have felt my urine stream strength is not what it should be.

As regards the liver, when having my prostate examined with an ultrasound, they said I had slight liver fat, again not especially concerning, but early for my age and certainly irregular for someone with my body fat ratio. So, that was presumably the alcohol, which I’ve cut back on significantly (but refuse to abstain from, because I am not a cocksucking faggot). Any average American would have a much fattier liver than mine, even if they are a teetotaler, just because the average American is so fat they have fat in all of their organs (including their brains, by the way, which inhibits basic cognitive function). It’s likely that I’ve cut back on the drinking enough already that if I went and had another ultrasound it would be gone, but ultrasounds are sort of expensive and it made sense to do this along with bloodwork and other things after completing a serious fast.

In terms of “crippling depression,” that is a bit tongue in cheek.

I assume anyone who reads my work is aware that I’m an atypical personality, and that leads to all sorts of mental processes that are clearly not normal. I hesitate to go into that too much, because I wouldn’t want anyone to get the impression that I am claiming to be special. Though I would never call my grandmother a liar, it is an objective reality that I am categorically not special. I’m significantly more intelligent than the average person, though not a genius. I know my IQ, I’ve been professionally tested four times, I’m not going to post it for hopefully obvious reasons, and I’ve had conversations with a lot of people, and it’s a fact I can say with the greatest modesty that I am significantly smarter than the average person.

I’m unsure how well I’ve used that intelligence, and that will probably be left for others to decide after I’m dead. I will at least be remembered, which is more than can be said for someone on Wall Street with a similar level of intelligence who decided to deploy it more strategically.

The significantly above average intelligence is probably a prerequisite for having an atypical personality type. One would probably assume that. The average man is primarily concerned about sex, food, comfort, and social harmony, with only minimal curiosity about anything beyond these things. I would never want to disparage the quiet honor of the peasantry. Of course, I would and do do that. But it’s not because I want to, but rather because it is necessary to do so in order to understand the nature of reality. But I want to note that while sex, food, and comfort are base drives possessed by any animal, the peasantry has a more complex desire for social harmony than other mammals, and this can, under certain circumstances, lead to behavior which can appear noble, including opposition to injustice and perversion, which, if things are going awesomely, can lead to large scale violence.

I have a lot of comments on the way the left romanticizes the peasants while having zero understanding of them. I would actually say that beyond romanticizing them, they actually fetishize them. It’s an interesting psychological disorder. Now that brown people are the global proletariat, you have “queers for Islamic immigration,” which is more facially absurd, but frankly, it was not less ridiculous in the 18th century when wealthy lawyers were calling for Liberté, égalité, fraternité. The sad reality is that peasants deserve human dignity, justice, and nothing much else. But if you can incite them to mass violence, it is hilarious and highly profitable.

If you have curiosity about the nature of the universe, and specifically the nature, origin, and purpose of human existence, there is nowhere that can go other than into the darkness. I think that’s a pretty important observation that deserves some amount of reflection, and I would challenge anyone to challenge it.

I would actually go much further, or at least somewhat further (it’s also possible that this is just an observation that follows naturally) and say that the academy’s obsession with this cartoonish atheistic materialist framework is a psychological defense mechanism, which allows people with the intelligence needed to be curious to avoid confronting the darkness. Ironically, it’s exactly what they accuse religious people of doing, and this seems as though it should be painfully obvious to anyone.

“Well, you see, it’s all very simple. First, nothing existed. Then for some reason there was a gigantic explosion which created all matter. And then, there was an ooze, and for some reason single-celled organisms created themselves in the ooze, and then for some reason they transformed into fish, and then into monkeys, and finally into humans. We die and then just stop existing because consciousness is a function of matter somehow. There is no need to ask any further questions.”

This is so clearly a fairy tale created by men who are scared, like children, to actually start peeling back the layers of what exactly is going on here in so-called reality. Because if you start to peel that back, you are necessarily going to enter into a darkness, and it is a Herculean task to keep that darkness from swallowing you whole. This is why all men with anything interesting to say either died of alcoholism/drug abuse or suicide or became mystics.

I would like to become a mystic. I would like to be able to see the light better than I can right now. And I want to work to be able to do that. I do believe in a God of light, who is pure and good, but down here in this pit of the material world, a world of darkness, we are so very, very far away from His light. And the fact is, while alive, we are only ever going to see glimpses of this light, in the woods, in art, in our children and dogs. And, hopefully, somewhere inside of ourselves.

I have only slightly more respect for Jean-Paul Sartre than I have for William Faulkner, but No Exit is worth reading.

So, no, generally, things have not been particularly cheery for me. It’s been that way since I was a little kid, however. It’s been more acute at various points; probably, it is relatively acute these days. (Though it should be noted, this could be partially or entirely due to reducing my alcohol intake. Perhaps “midlife crisis” simply means “facing the impossible decision of drinking less alcohol or allowing your health to deteriorate.”) This is another thing that is difficult to state, because it sounds whiny (I did write about it quite a bit during the 2023 Illness Revelations and published some significant parts of those particular materials). But I think it’s relevant here, as it relates to the issue of fasting and spiritual development in general. That said, just to be clear, I do not have “clinical depression,” nor do I believe in the concept. Further, whatever war is going on inside my own head, it is by definition not “crippling,” as I am fully capable of carrying out all requisite life functions.

These are just some things I wanted to clarify to the reader. If you would prefer pointless political commentary, I would advise you to either stop reading, or kill yourself. This is my website, and I’m going to write whatever I want to write. And I think probably, reflections on health and spirituality provide much more of a service to society than informing you about the 327,892nd Gaza child the Jews killed or the latest tranny debacle.

We are alive, for some reason, and we are conscious of this life, and of ourselves, and it seems to me that it is of primary importance to attempt to understand the meaning of this. Prayer and fasting appear quite clearly to be requisite aspects of this process.

Every day you need to remind yourself that you are going to die. I would recommend doing it more than once per day, frankly.

It’s in the rosary: “Holy Mary, Mother of God, pray for us sinners, now and at the hour of our death.”

Something is going to happen when you die.

Journalist Lee Fang was a guest host for Glenn Greenwald’s System Update show on Rumble last week. Glenn needs to go on many vacations, I’m sure to, you know, experience cultures and so on. I’m sure that’s his main priority on all these vacations he’s constantly on.

Lee is one of the last real journalists. At least at the Intercept he was doing work that was really beyond what most all journalists are doing. He’s fine on podcasts, although he’s got that Chinese autism-like thing that 90% of Chinamen have. He’s not gay, by the way. With dapper East Asians it’s sometimes a bit ambiguous, especially when they’ve got his sort of interior design sense.

But he’s married and I think has kids. Hosting the show, he was really having problems monologuing, but I think he was mostly nervous and relying on a teleprompter. I don’t think he’s ever hosted a video show solo like that, so I won’t judge, but the shows were a bit dull.

I listened to most of the shows he did. He made a comment on Friday I wanted to comment on. Talking about the conflict between Russia and America, he noted that Russia’s media propaganda is all about how they are defending traditional Christian values against the satanic West, while America’s propaganda is all about how they are protecting democracy (which is basically a codeword for “satanism” at this point, though Lee didn’t mention that). His analysis is that both of these narratives are just propaganda, and this is actually just a power struggle between two large states. This is sort of too obvious and literal to be actually useful analysis. It’s like claiming that a gunfight is really about bullets flying in different directions propelled by the rapid expansion of gases generated when the gunpowder inside the cartridge is ignited by the primer. The actual question of interest when analyzing a gunfight is why the two parties involved are firing guns at one another, not the ballistics.

When we consider why the US and Russia are involved in this struggle, the propaganda of the two states is basically the straightforward explanation. There is nuance, because Russia is not really an ideal Christian state (though I think it is trying to be one, putting the standard amount of Russian effort into the project), and US-style democracy is not actually “freedom” but rather the opposite. But the basic narrative that this is a conflict rooted in differences in first principles is fundamentally true, and should be obvious.

Many or most former communist states, including former Russian states, have been fully or partially integrated into the Western system. None of those countries were anywhere near as powerful as Russia, but Russia spent the first decade and a half following the fall of communism making overtures to the West, pushing for collaborative ties, and they were successful in this endeavor with their energy relationship with Europe. But the US was intent on dominating Russia. But what does this domination entail? It is entirely about bullying Russia into accepting “Western democracy values,” which would mean abandoning the traditional values that Russia is striving to maintain.

When the United States claims that democracy countries do not have wars with each other, this is true. The reason is that the democracy ideology is fundamentally international and multicultural, and it is always dominated by the United States through the cultural manipulation that the US is so good at. If you allow democracy, that means you allow the Western media establishment (which they cartoonishly label a “free press”), which causes the population to adopt the American value system of materialism, consumerism, atheism, and the destruction of the family through normalization of decadent and deviant sexual norms. Meanwhile, the electoral system of democracy ensures that the power structure, controlled by the United States, can never actually be challenged. Even if you follow the rules the rules can be changed arbitrarily, as Romania’s Calin Georgescu recently discovered when he, as the election frontrunner, was banned from standing in the presidential election. If you are a democracy, you are under a full lockdown by the internationalist system that operates out of the United States, so there can’t be conflict.

Just so, Russia’s own mass media propaganda is absolutely correct that the United States is trying to force these values on Russia. Through the National Endowment for Democracy, USAID, a plethora of Soros-backed NGOs, the entire social media apparatus, and many other outlets, the US was actively spreading anti-Christian values in Russia, before these organizations were all banned by the Kremlin following the outbreak of the war.

So, while the propaganda might be an oversimplification, as all mass propaganda necessarily is, this is a pedantic argument. Defining it as a power struggle between states is technically true, but means nothing. The important issue is why the power struggle exists, and if Russia was a Western-style democracy, there would be no power struggle.

An important note is that the Russian elite do not have more wealth or power because the Russian state is resisting the Western system. Although Putin personally would have a problem if Western democracy were to triumph in Russia, the rich of Russia would end up with more money and not have to give up any power. When Romania went in on democracy, Nicolae Ceaușescu did not do well, but the elite made out like bandits, as the Western democracy system allowed for much more aggressive looting than the former communist system did. It was the political elite of Romania that sold Ceaușescu down the river, as they had made deals with the West that would allow them to privatize state assets.

One could claim that it is overly romantic to portray Vladimir Putin as a crusader fighting in defense of historical Christendom against the Western hordes of satanic perverts, but even the most cynical analysis would have to frame Putin as fighting for a personal legacy as a great man of history, and that legacy of greatness can only be based on the defense of traditional Russian identity. (No one is going to remember Mikhail Gorbachev or Boris Yeltsin as great men of history.) Therefore, the romantic and cynical interpretations of the personal motivations of Putin and his inner circle mean the same thing, and therefore any pontification of his personal motivations is a pointless distraction.

America is a satanic entity entirely controlled by Jews who hate Jesus Christ and all human normalcy. As Saint Paul said, the Jews are the enemies of all mankind. That is the core of the struggle between America and its enemies, and therefore, the simplistic narratives of the media apparatuses of both America and Russia reach a fundamental truth that Mearsheimerian power theory completely fails to address.

It’s quite possible that the ultimate agenda of James Bowman is to drive me over the edge.

He’s gone completely off the res, and has hired a team to spam 4chan with hardcore memes of himself.

This is the same thing that Kamala Harris did with coconuts and brat. It’s the precise strategy being copied by Bowman, but he is taking it to the ultimate extreme. This astroturf campaign must be costing tens of millions of dollars.

Where is the money coming from? The mysterious and elusive Thiel Network, which I’ve heard on good authority (reliable and serious people) is at the center of many important conspiracies? Or is the funding coming from some even darker and more perplexing network?

Why would he do this? What is he trying to achieve by astroturfing these memes of himself?

What is his end game?

I feel personally targeted. I hate these memes.

Here’s the Editor’s Pick of the Week:

And the Runner-Up:

Followed by the primo collection.

I’m still technically on day 4 of a complete fast, but I’m almost at the end.

At this point, I’ve begun wondering: is 8 days really a good goal? Or should I try to push it further?

I guess that will depend on how I feel on day 8, but I’m thinking right now that there is no reason to not just keep pushing this to 10 or more days.

There is no real problem here. I don’t have high energy. I think if I was trying to write it would be difficult. But there is no suffering, and in fact, there is a kind of euphoria, which is a nice feeling.

When my mind wanders, I start to say “wow, I better go eat something,” and then I remember. But that’s all. It’s not really difficult for me. Though I’ve always been good at suffering and at self-discipline, so maybe I’m unique.

But if I’m going to 8 days, and I am definitely going to do that because I already told myself I was going to do that, then why not go further? I’m not going all the way to Easter, because I’m losing 0.5 kilos (1 pound) per day, and so that would not be viable.

But I feel great. Everyone should do this. I think most people could do this while working, if they used coffee (black, obviously, although I shouldn’t have to say that – black coffee has zero calories). How hard actually is your job? But to be fair, I quit my job because it sucked and it was boring and everyone just complained and I didn’t make any money, so now I can sit around and discover for the third time in my life just how shitty William Faulkner actually is. Man, is he shitty. He’s actually somehow worse than James Joyce. I thought maybe with my head in a bit of a different space, I’d be able to “get” what I was apparently “missing” in Faulkner, but there is nothing to get. It’s just complete garbage.

Most literature, in fact, is garbage. At least 90% of celebrated literature is an “emperor has no clothes” situation where people are supposed to believe it is good because someone who convinced them they are smart told them it is good. Some of the aesthetics are interesting, but if there is no commentary beyond “life is shitty and people are sad and also look at how clever I am,” then what is actually the point of wasting your time?

I do think there are a lot of good books, however. Because there are just so many books. But I have always felt I needed to go through and read the “celebrated literary classics,” and though I’ve done many of them, so many of them I end up just saying “what the hell am I doing here? Why is this worth my time?” Faulkner is especially painful because it is just so much work. I would rather dig a ditch. Maybe it’s not worse than Infinite Jest, and it’s just that Infinite Jest doesn’t have so many words that I do not recognize. But I would rather read Infinite Jest than Absalom, Absalom!, and I would rather dig a trench in the Donbass than read Infinite Jest.

Show me a man who would rather read Absalom, Absalom! than watch Inferno with Jean-Claude Van Damme, and I’ll show you a yellow bastard who deserves to die in the most humiliating way imaginable.

I have been rereading the bibliography of Ed Brubaker. I’m almost done with the Criminal omnibus and I’m not sure what I have to say about this just yet, other than that it is better than everything anyone ever won a Pulitzer for, combined.

Check the list. I’d say maybe Sinclair Lewis, I guess Steinbeck just because I mean, okay. Upton Sinclair, maybe. And yea, The Old Man and the Sea is good. Norman Mailer should have been hanged right alongside John Updike. Some of these are black women (????). They literally put Michael Chabon on there. I’m serious. Empire Falls is fine I guess. Cormac McCarthy should have been exiled to a toxic waste zone like in Stalker. Then after 2007, it’s just DEI and standard Jewish nepotism. Except for maybe the Sympathizer, which I guess is DEI because it’s anti-American and written by a Viet traitor.

Honestly, I haven’t read all those books. Obviously I haven’t. It would take forever. But I’m familiar with most of them, and I did a project a few years ago where I tried to read parts of all of them. Maybe there is some gem in there I’m missing. But actual good stories are not on the list. How is it possible you don’t give the prize to books people actually enjoy reading? What are these literature people trying to prove?

Why did Fear and Loathing in Las Vegas not win in 1971? Um…

How did Kurt Vonnegut never win anything? Elmore Leonard? Philip K. Dick? Tom Clancy?

You want to tell me “To Kill a Mockingbird” is better than “Clear and Present Danger”? This is like some straight-up tranny-tier gaslighting.

How is it possible that The Bonfire of the Vanities, possibly the greatest American novel this side of Moby-Dick, lost in 1987 to… some book I’ve literally never even heard of?

How did neither Aldous Huxley nor Anthony Burgess ever win for anything?

Here’s the real question: how in the actual fuck does Michel Houellebecq not win every single year he publishes a novel?

He is the master of the universe. No living writer begins to compare, and very few of the dead ones do. And people actually admit that, probably because much of the material is just as vulgar as anything Cormac that old coot put out and the people reading it don’t understand that they’re the ones being targeted. Well, maybe since he published that Islam book, people do sort of understand who is being targeted here.

I don’t know. Maybe I’ll read more of these Pulitzer books and try to gain some further understanding of what is going on. They are not all anywhere near as torturous as Faulkner, which is literal ditch-digging labor to read. I’m not reading any of those books by niggers though, I can tell you that much.

Anyway, yeah, I started with Ed Brubaker, and specifically Criminal, which is the best of his comics work. The character studies are as good as anything you’re going to find in pulp crime fiction for sure, but sometimes the plots are pretty strained, and feel a bit rushed. And the women are written poorly. And the way men, who are supposed to be very hard, deal with women, is not realistic. But the reflections on male emotional motivations and the complexity of identity are pretty good, and it’s fun, even when the plots sort of collapse in on themselves.

Part of the issue with comics is that they are first a visual medium before a literary medium, and Brubaker uses Sean Phillips, who is one of the single best comic artists of all time, and the books would be worth looking at even if you didn’t bother reading the words. It can become hard to separate the art from the writing.

Criminal is largely a tribute/homage/rip-off of Sin City, and it is not as good. It’s much different. But Sin City was always tight as a noose. It also didn’t have leftist bullshit or stupid woman behavior or ridiculous reactions of hardened men to ridiculous women behavior, because Frank Miller is a fascist and he’s Irish and he doesn’t fuck around with pansy nonsense.

But then you have the “visual medium” issue, and is Miller, who drew the books himself, as good of an artist as Phillips? It’s too different to really make a fair comparison.

In some perfect universe, Frank Miller would write a new Sin City story and let Phillips draw it. Miller is only 68, but he might be too wasted to actually do anything of value at this point. Those last Dark Knight stories he did were complete trash. Like, straight irredeemable garbage. To the point where I don’t even know if he wrote it. It was about like, Trump being a fascist? Controlled by the Joker and Darkseid? I guess he was trying to get back into good graces after making a bunch of comments he wasn’t supposed to make. But it was like he told someone else “just write an apology book about Trump or whatever.” It was goofy and the satire wasn’t really even satire so much as just a cartoon. A total waste of Rafael Grampá’s art.

If that is what he is up to now, he couldn’t write a Sin City story. Or rather, he shouldn’t try. Time to do the proper and honorable Irish thing and die of liver failure alone in some dark room to be discovered days or weeks later, all bloated and stinking.

And that brings me back to the point about fasting.

When you fast, you can’t drink alcohol. I think this is necessary if you are prone to alcohol abuse. It’s much easier to stop drinking while stopping eating at the same time, because the drive for food definitely overpowers the drive for alcohol. My dreams are now all about food, not liquor. It also removes the sex drive, which also offers clarity.

Basically, everything you experience while fasting informs you as to why it is such a big thing in the Bible. Clarity of thought and purpose, calm, lack of sensuous desires, and various other things I’m not sure I can totally put into words yet.

Also, fasting cures cancer. Dr. Joseph Sun, who is not Jewish, is proving that chemo therapy is a gigantic big pharma scam that just poisons people and has a success rate somewhere in the range of Alcoholics Anonymous, while cancer cells are very hungry all the time, much more so than healthy cells, so when you cut off the food, the cancer cells are the ones to get eaten by the body first.

Also, you lose a pound a day. So if you’re twenty pounds overweight, fast for twenty days.

It also boosts testosterone and increases sexual health generally, which will help you keep the weight off.

This will solve every problem.

Of course, you have to have eat good food, but one would think that should be obvious. The government is poisoning us. All of this gluten free shit – go eat pasta every day in Italy and see if you still have “gluten sensitivity.” They are poisoning the food. Maybe it’s not a conspiracy, and it’s just that they use the cheapest ingredients possible and there are no regulations because America is so cartoonishly corrupt that lobbyists write laws, but it has the same effect: you are being poisoned by food. Not even third world countries allow this shit, other than Mexico, for obvious reasons (it’s right next to America so there is much overlap).

I used to fight the Jews but I’ve now come to the transcendental understanding that Jews are only possible because everyone is so pathetic. If men were not so pathetic, the extent of the Jewish problem would be exclusively based on the supply of firewood.