Insight – Daily Stormer https://dailystormer.in The Most Censored Publication in History Sat, 20 Sep 2025 22:42:59 +0000 en-US hourly 1 https://wordpress.org/?v=5.8.12 This is Only Beginning to Begin https://dailystormer.in/this-is-only-beginning-to-begin/ Sat, 20 Sep 2025 20:57:47 +0000 https://dailystormer.in/?p=688276

Yesterday’s piece was primarily about the “far right” pushing all of these mainstream narratives, but I am going to, probably on Monday, go through and show that it is the entire right doing all of these things they complained for like, a decade about the left doing. All of the “canceling.” Only with the right, they are going way beyond the left and saying that far from just getting people banned from social media and making it so they cannot ever work again (these crying faggots are literally getting waitresses fired, one waitress was fired for something her husband posted), they are saying they’re going to arrest everyone as well.

To be clear, this isn’t just the people who were posting TikToks of people cheering his death, but just people who said he was a racist. They are telling people to call and get people fired for saying that on their private social media accounts. These are the same precise people who had previously said this was the most evil thing ever.

The government fired Jimmy Kimmel, despite the fact he was probably going to get fired anyway. The government came in and fired him.

I don’t know how retarded all these people are, or which ones are retarded and which ones are malicious feds. But nigga, what I do know is that Trump talked and talked about how he was going to fight “the left” and then when he took office, every single fucking thing was about Israel.

Did you know there is still no federal law against mutilating children in child tranny experiments? Maybe you didn’t know that. You probably did know Trump’s deportation rate is less than Obama’s and that there is no move whatsoever to criminalize hiring or renting to illegal immigrants, or to federally criminalize giving them free healthcare (I guess excluding real emergencies). This would obviously get rid of like 90% of them in a matter of weeks without the need to throw screaming women into vans in the church parking lot. But the federal government did take control of all American universities, and is forcing them to teach that Israel is God’s chosen and is only defending itself by genociding children. The Trump administration has seized extraordinary executive powers, and all of it is either used for the sake of Israel, or is some stupid totalitarian spectacle.

These are the people who the far right and the normal right are begging to protect them from “the far left,” and supposing, or claiming to suppose, these powers will be used to stop the trannies. The fact that Trump didn’t move on day one to ban child mutilations should prove to even the drooliest retard that trannies are not the top concern.

So you’ve already seen what this guy does. We have these clips of “JD Vance” talking about a “de-Baathification” of the universities, then what you get is a “Zionization” of the universities, while they still teach all the tranny and anti-white stuff.

So why would anyone think these new speech regulations would have anything to do with anything other than the Jews? How could any honest person, assuming they have any idea what is going on, think that?

The fact that the “far right” is going along with this is the most shocking, but “JD Vance” hosting Charlie Kirk’s show and encouraging people to hunt down and silence anyone who isn’t sufficiently emotional over Charlie’s death is nearly as bizarre. All of these other freaks – Matt Walsh, Christopher Rufo, all of the rest of the people who screamed “freeze peach” – are now literally doing the mirror world version of everything they said they opposed on principle.

Again, maybe they believe “the left” deserves this, or whatever, but even if you believe that, how can you believe it will actually happen? Trump’s people have shown zero interest in this. Look at the way they covered up Epstein. All of this stuff is only about Jews. The hate speech laws – and I think they are going to change the name, but still push through new speech laws – are only going to be used against enemies of Jews. Maybe some random trannies who literally mean nothing will be arrested (instead of putting them in an insane asylum where they should have already been), but it will all be about Israel.

Before the Kirkocaust, there was that law against burning the American flag, and all of these people said “well if it’s illegal to burn the gay flag, I don’t care if they make it illegal to burn the American flag.” Firstly, it was never illegal to burn the gay flag, but okay, even if you believed that, then why not legalize burning the gay flag? Why take away more freedoms?

People are claiming I’m some kind of libertarian. Actually, I’ve supported Hitler, and I support present day Russia and China. I am not against “statism.” I am against giving these kinds of new powers to a government that we know as a factual matter is completely controlled by Jews, which, demonstrably, uses any and all powers it has for Jewish purposes. How could someone fail to see that them saying “we’re doing hate speech now and canceling everyone who is a leftist” is not a cover for more aggressive measures against people who are against Israel and the Jews? Could anything be more obvious?

It’s maddening.

Anyway, I had the Snitch Fuentes tweets and clips on hand while going through these clips, and gathering the clips of all of these more mainstream freaks is sort of a big project, but I will do it. Maybe on Monday or Tuesday.

For the record, I’m not really using a lot of AI. It is very useful as a research assistant. Much easier than search. I’m not using it for writing (except in the few cases I’ve done it as a joke, which I assume are obvious), and anyway, finding clips on Twitter is still a nightmare. It’s shocking how badly Twitter works, in terms of search or discovery of any kind. It is apparently supposed to be an Insta style “doom scroll” app, but those of us with websites who need specific clips, which are primarily hosted on Twitter, have a helluva time.

But I’ll do it. I want this all on the record.

The Tucker Carlson Show on Kirk Changed My Mind

I have been both ultra critical of Carlson at points as well as supportive of him at other points. I have found that the claims he is a CIA agent amount to “his dad worked for the CIA” and “he says he tried to join the CIA and they rejected him.” I’m not necessarily opposed to being convinced of that theory, I just haven’t seen any serious evidence. What I’ve seen is a person who appears genuine, but who also has a rather low IQ ceiling, saying things that I mostly agree with and pushing the narrative of right-wing criticism of Israel very aggressively. I legit can’t see how that could be considered bad. (Please don’t come at me with “gatekeeper” and “limited hangout.” I don’t think you know what those terms mean. I do know what those terms mean. And thus far, they do not make sense to me with regards to Tucker. This is despite the fact that he’s done some things I’m very against, in particular pushing neocon type rhetoric about China.)

Whatever the case, I liked his show about Charlie a lot. I don’t know how anyone could really complain about it.

What affected me most was his claim that in private conversations he had with Charlie, he was saying he was trying to get out from under the boot of Israel, and was willing to lose all or most of his donors in order to take a moral stand on the Palestine issue.

I don’t think he was doing this much publicly. He was talking about it some, but being a college campus guy, it would have been impossible not to. And he was saying God gave the political state of Zionism to the “chosen ones,” even though Saint Paul explicitly said that the old covenant was obsolete up until he died. But Tucker saying other things were going on in the background was very believable. And he did in fact allow Tucker to say the Epstein-Mossad thing at the conference, and then invited him to the next event, even while he was losing donors left and right and being called an antisemite.

Tucker also had on an Orthodox priest and said that Charlie was very interested in Orthodoxy, which obviously does not support the evangelical kookery that says “Christians were wrong for 2,000 years and actually rabbinical Jews (followers of a religion that didn’t exist when Christ was crucified) are the chosen ones.”

Candace Owens, also a close friend of Charlie’s, is saying similar things.

The Conspiracy

Tucker is promoting the idea that Israel killed Charlie with an “I’m not saying that of course” type of wink-winking. I’m coming around to that point of view. Bibi coming out every day with a new statement about how he didn’t kill him doesn’t necessarily prove that, but it is the most bizarre shit I’ve ever seen.

Initially, the story – “random trans activist with Utah style gun skills kills Charlie because he’s too online” is believable enough.

The thing here is: we now have the government taking all of these insane actions, pushing this entirely new concept of “right wing cancel culture,” the “hate speech” stuff, and murmurings of an Ultra Patriot Act, which would no doubt involve Palantir and this AI police state control grid I’ve been talking about. They needed some event to make this happen.

I don’t think at time of writing there is enough evidence to prove the “lone gunman” theory, and I think the burden of proof is on the people pushing that narrative. They are not releasing much information on the alleged shooter. Trump just declared “Antifa” a terrorist group, though no one has even suggested that the shooter was a member of this group, or of any group. The only thing we know is that he was very online, and apparently had a tranny boyfriend. That’s all.

If I was going to come up with a conspiracy theory, I would not go into multiple shooters or whatever else. Although it is very strange that CNN and others made the stupid claim that the .30-06 rifle could be assembled and disassembled in a matter of seconds. Then this Zinn Jew making the distraction. No one explained what the hell that was. It got memory holed until they reported he was arrested for child porn. There are several other weird things, such as why we only have grainy video when all of those cameras would have been in HD. Many other strange things to consider.

But there is no need to get too kooky.

My theory would be that someone groomed him on Discord. That would be some intelligence agency that found a somewhat unwell individual and manipulated him over a period of months. They do this constantly. They get them in a “group chat” where the group chat is all feds, and they convince them they can be a hero. Then they explain to them how to do all of these necessary actions in order to make the thing happen.

No one is asking “cui bono?” Tranny activists certainly do not bono from this event. The Trump administration does, and as the Trump administration is effectively a proxy for Bibi Netanyahu, Israel does as well. A lot. I don’t think it is going to be called “hate speech,” but there are going to be new speech regulations, and the only people who will benefit from those are the Jews.

Shutting down universities, infiltrating TikTok, and buying CBS news is not enough to shut down criticism of Jews. You have to make it illegal or legally murky enough to create a chilling effect if you want people to really stop talking about the Jewish issue. And Charlie’s death creates that pretext.

It does not make sense to me that, understanding this, the Jews would simply wait around for some random trans activist to create the pretext. You would create your own pretext. And if you create a plausible situation, where even someone like me can say “well, the story kind of does make sense in a cut and dry way,” you can ram it through.

I initially said that if Israel was going to do it, they would set up a Moslem shooter. But that might be too obvious, and anyway, as you are witnessing in real time, this thing right now has the same effect without creating something absurdly obvious.

I’m struggling to believe it could be a cut and dry “lone gunman” situation. It’s just way too convenient and the lack of transparency makes no sense if it is cut and dry.

It feels like Dick Cheney and the Jews calling for “a new Pearl Harbor” months before 9/11. Like, wow, what fantastic luck.

To be clear: I don’t think the reason they would kill Kirk is that he was going to turn on Israel more aggressively. If Tucker is right and he was considering converting to Orthodoxy, then yes, that could be part of it. But the main reason would be to create this entire new social and political climate where all of a sudden, cancel culture is cool, and “hate speech” is on the menu (and in the longer run, the whole AI police state, which will also have elements of “classic police state” with the rollout of ICE and the flagrant violations of Posse Comitatus with the military running around everywhere).

“Most Men Alive” Gate

I suppose I need to address the fact that I have a headline on a relatively popular article that contains the phrase “one of the most men alive.”

Here’s the situation: I make mistakes like that all the time. I have always had some kind of dyslexia and now have a brain tumor. I have a staff member who is tasked with correcting this, as I honestly just can’t really do it. No one is perfect. He is currently still being paid his full salary, even though his workload is like, 4% of what it was. He doesn’t have a contract and I could just fire him, but he’s a good guy and also I have all these future projects I might want him to work on.

But that was. Wow.

I am using normie memes from 15 years ago because apparently that is what the kids are into. I have no idea why the kids are into that. But who am I to judge? I just want to be cool by any means necessary.

By the time I realized it was up there like that, it was much too late to fix it, and I just had to play it off like it was some kind of meme no one but me understood.

I would have said “weaselly.” Which I think is true, even though the Tucker information has led me to believe he could have been planning to become less weaselly (which should be easy to do when you’ve already got $15 million or whatever, frankly). But nonetheless, at the point of death, he was engaged in weaselism.

But the editor is great. The only good employee I’ve ever had, other than my sysop. And all the other good ones. Some of the others were good. But most of them ended up hating me.

I’m an impossible boss. I mostly refuse to even communicate with my employees. I never really wanted to be the manager of a company. I had a vision (actually a 30-year plan), before I was banned from everything and no longer allowed to use banks (just in case anyone doesn’t know this, I’ve not even been allowed to have a personal checking account since 2017, lol). I think I’m the single person never even accused of a crime who is on this type of list. A lot of people have now been “debanked,” but that is usually just their company, and they can usually just open an account at a different bank. I was going to hire a “CEO” to run the business side and deal with employees, because running a company is something I have never really had any interest in.

So, I’m a bad boss, and someone who will tolerate this and work with me and do a consistently good job is not someone I’m willing to let go easily, even if he is costing me money every month and not really doing much work since I stopped writing as much back in February.

Anyway, “Most Men Alive” is now a meme. I am going to start using it.

And in many ways, I think it is accurate to say that Charlie Kirk was indeed one of the most men alive.

RIP.

I’ve Got a Lot to Say

There is a bunch of stuff I need to say about all of this.

I joked that I was going to do a ripoff of Redbar’s podcast, and then a whole bunch of people were like “this is the best idea ever.” So I’m seriously looking into this.

If I’m the only even real nigga in this right wing game, and there be no other nigga even in the semi-real category, I need to do something other than post by-weekly blogs. That could actually be the best possible format.

I need to look into the technical side. I’ve also lived in like, four countries in the last three years, so that is kind of a thing to be considered. I can’t really build a serious set. But I can have mics and cameras that I can travel with, and a couple of monitors and a TV are not especially expensive.

I think I would charge $20 a month, do one show a week, and every other show would be free. So people would be paying $10 a show. But given that I can’t do advertisements, this is sort of just how it needs to be.

It wouldn’t be a complete ripoff of Redbar, by the way. Firstly, it would be political content instead of comedy content. Aside from that, maybe 85% ripped off. It’s obviously going to be different, because I’m not Jewish and I can’t do that Howard Stern bit. Plus I don’t have the fashion skills. But I do think going through and watching all the podcasts with these right-wing people and criticizing them might be the best possible format for me to express my own views. But I don’t really see how this wouldn’t work. I think I would come across well on camera.

I have always said “you know, I spent my whole life building up these writing skills, so switching mediums doesn’t make sense,” but I’ve also built up analytical skills that do translate directly, and I think I could get the “on air” thing down within a year. Not that the first year would be horrible, but I think by the second year, I could really be rolling.

For those uncool people who are not familiar with Redbar, he goes through and investigates comedians, showing that they’re a bunch of weirdos, and pointing out what is weird about them, and it seems that would be an ideal platform for me to demonstrate what is wrong with all of this, and explain what should be different. After making that throwaway joke, it is becoming more serious in my mind.

People have said I’m not good at podcasting, but my podcast with Paul Town was getting like 20,000 downloads and we only made three episodes. So I think I’m not that bad. And I think people would understand me a lot better on camera.

With Bitcoin on Venmo and Cash App, I’m pretty sure anyone can figure out how to send Bitcoin to sub, and I’ve now got a system of using new BTC addresses to receive the money.

As of right now, I have like, no money. Well, I’ve got my own money from other work I do, but most of the donation money has been spent on lawyers and related stuff relating to the fact that this site has ruined my life. I’ve been thinking about a comeback, and settled on “books,” but while I am going to publish some books, this “right wing criticism podcast” seems to be a very good idea, and a way for me to make enough money to keep shit going. And allowing people to clip it, while also putting the free shows (every other show) on Rumble for as long as that lasts could really create a presence that I currently do not have because this website is so totally buried.

This is a big project. I know nothing about audio or video. So I’d have to figure all of that out, or find someone who understands it, and probably find a producer, a Jules figure, who doesn’t have an impenetrable ******* accent.

Let me know what you think in the comments. And don’t forget to like and subscribe and jingle my bells.

]]> Ten Days After the Assassination of Charlie Kirk, A New World Order is Coming Into View https://dailystormer.in/ten-days-after-the-assassination-of-charlie-kirk-a-new-world-order-is-coming-into-view/ Fri, 19 Sep 2025 15:52:07 +0000 https://dailystormer.in/?p=688250

When Charlie Kirk died last Wednesday, I saw people having complete meltdowns, and felt it was my job to be the voice of reason. This came across as crass at the time, as people were really full of emotion. If you were one of the emotional ones, and you go back now and read those articles today, I am certain you will have a different opinion of what I was doing there.

Yes, it was crass, but the crassness was a response to the emotionalism I was seeing everywhere I looked. What I was trying to do, hoping to do without much hope it would work, is ground people by pointing out that this might be emotional for you, but all that means is that the government is going to use this to push an agenda on you.

Here’s some of what I wrote the day after Charlie died (you can skip this, I hate quoting myself, but I need to make this point):

What I have seen, however, is that people are having a really, really serious emotional reaction to Charlie Kirk getting assassinated. Like, I read Twitter, and people are having emotional breakdowns, freaking out, calling for some kind of Super Patriot Act.

…

Right now, the Trump administration is building up this internal army in the form of ICE, and much worse, he is making these deals with Palantir. There were various social media accounts calling for Palantir to be “unleashed” on illegal immigrants. Now it’s calls for the entire power of the federal government, including our militarized law enforcement and Palantir, to be “unleashed” on “the left.”

How did that work out when the full force of the state was unleashed on “international terrorism”? Did that work out good for you? Did it work out good for the country?

…

To all of you having this emotional reaction: I admit, I do not understand what you’re going through. It seems to be very difficult. I don’t understand or respect that, but I can accept that it is what it is. But please. Relax. And think about what it is you are calling for. Look at this massive movement of all of these social media accounts demanding the federal government be unleashed on the public. Does it feel maybe a bit artificial? I mean, even if you’re feeling it, are you able to see how maybe there is something a bit nefarious going on here?

Can we think maybe just one step ahead here, and consider maybe what the consequences of giving intelligence agencies, paramilitary law enforcement, and private military contractors the ability to “hunt down domestic terrorists” might turn out perhaps not so good? Maybe it could in fact be like, the worst possible thing imaginable?

…

Anyway. Whatever. I guess I hope you enjoy your experience with these dark forces you are calling upon. And after all, who knows? Maybe the US federal government are the good guys this time and they’re really going to help you stop trannies or Islamofascism or whatever? Could be. Could be.

Screenshot this I guess so you can come back and mock me after giving over massive new powers to the government results in a great outcome, where your stupid woman emotions are satisfied after Israel and Peter Thiel build you a utopia where no one ever gets shot with a gun again.

And then:

The narrative from the right is daunting, with Trump in his video paying tribute to Kirk using the opportunity to call for some kind of unspecified crackdown, which we can only assume means even more egregious restrictions on speech and more military and militarized cops everywhere. There is a huge astroturf campaign to do the exact same thing the left did to the right when they claimed that “speech causes violence,” and therefore “speech is violence,” and therefore free speech shouldn’t exist.

Then, of course, as I’d said, on Tuesday, Pam Bondi, the perplexing Attorney General, came out with an announcement that we now have new hate speech laws in America, which she is going to enforce against anyone who is saying… whatever it is they might be saying.

That is wild, and really much more extreme than the total doom I was expecting. “Hate speech is not free speech” is an ADL-coined phrase that has been floating around on the left for decades, and was considered anathema to conservatives. Conservatives tend to believe in free speech, and they also tend to be aware that according to the Supreme Court, in multiple rulings, there is no such concept of “hate speech” in the United States.

But she, or rather the people who tell her what to say, apparently believed that the Charlie Kirk assassination video was emotionally distressful enough that the government can now roll this out.

As the day progressed, she partially walked it back, saying she just means “hate speech” as in violent threats. Violent threats, if they are imminent and actionable, are already illegal, and no one ever called that “hate speech.” She also said that people celebrating Charlie’s death was “hate speech” which she classified as illegal – in the clarification!

Again, this is way beyond what I was predicting. But there it is!

Just to be clear, Bondi is not any kind of ringleader here. Just watching her, you can see that this is a person who would struggle to be the manager of a Walmart, and would probably be out of her depth as the shift manager at a gas station. She has no idea what any of this means, and it is all coming from people behind the scenes.

But here’s the thing: The Big Guy is also on board. In an interview where he was asked about Bondi’s rollout of new “hate speech” laws, Trump gave tacit approval, saying that Charlie, who was obviously against hate speech laws, would support these laws now that he’s dead.

The apparent implication there is that if there had been hate speech laws in America, it would have prevented Charlie’s assassination, which obviously makes no sense.

Trump’s other comment so far on the issue was a kind of jokey thing about how the media should be charged with hate speech.

That isn’t really very funny, especially in light of the other clip, where he appears to endorse it.

It should be really easy to just say “no, we’re not doing that, she was misquoted” or whatever. So that is the direction things are going in, at the highest levels. Trump has already established a precedent where he is able to just make up laws out of nothing and no one can stop him, so it seems likely he’s going to try to enforce some kind of hate speech code. It’s certainly what his handlers in Israel want.

It makes no sense how Charlie’s death was even related to previous notions of hate speech, given that all of those related to a protected group. “Hate speech,” the term which Bondi and Trump are using, is an established term which means “criticism of a person based on their race, religion, or sexual orientation.” Multiple countries in Europe have laws which use this term, as defined. If Trump and Bondi want to come up with some new form of illegal speech, which has to do with criticizing people for their political positions (which would be the only thing that would relate to Charlie’s death), why not come up with some new term for their censorship program?

And how do you make it illegal to criticize someone’s political beliefs? That doesn’t even make any sense. That would be like, more or less 100% of political speech. It is difficult to imagine political commentary in America that isn’t in some form a criticism of the other side.

So, I think what you obviously have here is a situation where the Israel lobby wants to push through the “hate speech” laws that we’re all familiar with, the ones that make it illegal to criticize Jews and Israel (as well as blacks, trannies, and immigrants), while claiming it is somehow related to Charlie Kirk.

If We Compare Them to the Power of Government, Trannies on TikTok are Not Really a Very Big Threat to Anyone

I don’t know how many trannies or “far leftists” there actually are. I don’t think there are very many. I think it is possible they can do an assassination, as with Charlie Kirk (though I am coming around to the theory that the Jews did it). They can riot and break some store fronts. But they are not a massive military threat. Most importantly, they present nothing even close to the threat that the US government, which is controlled by Israel and Silicon Valley, present to the American people. Radical trannies present less than 1% of 1% of the threat the government presents.

Trannies present less than 1% of 1% of the threat black people present, frankly. This is seriously not a big issue. It’s been made a big issue by the media, but the idea that you have to beg the government to take your rights to protect you from trannies is absolute lunacy.

Therefore, as an impartial observer, the idea of calling on the government to take away your rights to protect you from the trannies sounds completely insane to me. I can’t process how anyone of good conscience would think that is a good idea, which is why I can only really assume that the people calling for that are bad actors.

Full disclosure: the streamer Nick Fuentes spent the first several years of his career more or less copying everything from me directly. Which is fine, I supported it. I supported him. He then got involved with Richard Spencer, who I believe is an FBI informant and a general rat, and then got jungled up with the confirmed FBI informant Charles Johnson (Johnson bragged about being an FBI informant, you can look all that up on your own time, many of the sordid details have come out in court recently). I’ve always had a red line, saying that I won’t support anyone who is involved with the FBI. The reasons for that should be obvious. But in response, all I did was post on my semi-private chat forum that I would no longer be supporting him, because I don’t support people involved with the feds. He started attacking me on his show and implied he had blackmail material on me, which was utterly bizarre. I demanded he reveal this (it doesn’t exist but even if it did, I’m not being fucking blackmailed, bro) on the semi-secret forum which he was reading to see my comments about him. Instead of releasing the material, he just continually said nasty things about me, and continued to reference blackmail material without acknowledging I said to post it all, despite the fact I never attacked him on the Daily Stormer and basically no one saw my criticism of him on this obscure web forum. I didn’t post about him here because in my experience, no one really cares if someone is an FBI informant, and exposing that doesn’t really do anything. I have no idea why people are not more concerned about that, but I’ve seen again and again that they don’t care.

I just wanted to lay that out for the sake of openness. Full disclosure and all that. It doesn’t relate to anything I’m going to say here. Well, the fact that he’s associated with the feds might relate. But that’s for you to decide, dear reader.

He’s become a kind of centerpiece of the Charlie Kirk assassination situation, and appears to be the heir apparent to the “young influencer” throne of Charlie Kirk. He’s being promoted by all the mainstream influencers, and has gained hundreds of thousands of followers since the event.

When I was telling people this whole spectacle around the Kirk death was a government psy-op, I also pointed to the fact that Fuentes, who is supposed to be “far right,” was aggressively whining and calling for aggressive government action to shut down trannies or whatever.

He was openly calling for some form of “hate speech” laws, demanding people be punished for their speech.

Here’s the first concerning tweet:

It’s obviously impossible for the government to ensure that some random person never murders another random person ever again. That is an insane comment. Complete nonsense. But the implication is obviously some kind of Ultra Patriot Act. It’s the same language used in the wake of 9/11.

Then this:

You’d think anyone would see that and think “whoa, hey, slow down there. What?”

What would “crush left wing terrorism” involve, exactly? What are the potential things that this could imply? It’s a pretty short list, and everything on the list involves giving the government new and expansive powers, both to spy on people and to punish people for things they haven’t done yet.

And then:

At this point, anyone who isn’t in a complete state of total derangement is saying “hey, whoa, hey, hold up there buddy – did you just say you want to arrest people who celebrated Charlie Kirk’s death? Because I don’t understand what that even means.”

Having read his posts and listened to some of his shows, it’s clear that it means exactly what it says it means: he is calling for the arrest of people who celebrated Charlie Kirk’s death. We have never heard anything like that before. I was completely shut down in 2017 for joking about – arguably, celebrating – the death of a fat woman at the Charlottesville rally. Millions of people laughed at this. And then I was totally deplatformed from everything forever. But I don’t remember even the most insane tranny calling for me to be arrested. This is something totally new that we’ve never heard from an “influencer” who now has 900,000 followers on Twitter. It is the most extreme call for government tyranny I’ve seen, ever.

But then look at this suspicious individual’s next tweet, in response to the above Pam Bondi tweet:

How is that not literally exactly what you were calling for?

What did it mean when you were saying people “must be held accountable” for cheering Charlie’s death? It is definitely not currently illegal to do that, so you were calling for some new form of restrictions on speech. But what, you just didn’t want it to be called “hate speech”?

Of course, it doesn’t really mean anything because none of this gibberish means anything, so I suppose it’s best not to think too much about it.

But here, following the timeline, he then tweets @FBI (!!!!!!) calling on them to arrest Jackson Hinkle for legal speech! (Or, at least, for speech that was legal before the death of Charlie Kirk. We don’t really know what speech is legal now.)

Here he is threatening Jackson with prison.

This is snitch level 9000.

Do people like snitches? Do they think they’re hip and edgy? Even when they’re all bloated like that? I mean, if there was like some really sexy snitch, who knows, but a snitch with that bulbous face, looking like it’s about to pop?

“I’m really hip bro, I’m really edgy and ironic and stuff. I’m also an FBI snitch. I do really funny comedy bits.”

I never even imagined anyone could become this much of a public snitch and be celebrated for it. (Please see my premises relating to fake reality overriding classic reality to get an idea how this is possible.)

He went on to make it clear he is against free speech and wants the government, which by the way, as far as I know, he still argues is controlled by Israel and Silicon Valley, to crack down on speech.

The left, for what it’s worth, never actually made a major push to make speech illegal. Not in the way that Trump, Bondi, and Fuentes are doing. This is so very far beyond anything the left did. They just tried to get people banned from everything, and in some cases, sued them. That was very bad, but this push to arrest people, these new “hate speech” laws, newly minted top influencers tagging the FBI to arrest people for legal speech, this is all new. That should be understood.

All that is insane. But it is basic sellout type behavior. People didn’t care he was a fed. But a sellout? A snitch? Is that something people will tolerate? Will they think they are hip and cool for supporting him? I suppose normies will. That is the goal here. He’s being groomed now as the new Charlie Kirk. He’s got an edgy past, where he was copying my shit, and that gives him some kind of street cred, but now he’s the “give the government the power to arrest people for speech” guy.

And here we get to the real meat:

It’s not about Israel! It’s not about Silicon Valley! No, no! Look over here – the trannies are the threat!

This is where it is all going. The government, which is run by Israel and Silicon Valley, is not the real threat. The real threat is trannies. And if we have to give up all our rights to a government controlled by Israel and Silicon Valley to protect us from the trannies, then so be it! It’s a small price to pay to stop this tranny menace!

And here’s where we take the shill train straight to Kook Town: this bloated Mexican individual is promoting Russian bot conspiracies.

Whoooooooaaaaaa! Heeyyyyyyyy!

Russiagate is back, baby, and this time it is the edgy far-right irony guy doing the investigation!

That is some of the most hardcore “yikes” I’ve encountered in my day.

Here he is on video claiming anyone questioning the official story is a RUSSIAN!

Frankly, I thought the story made sense as just a tranny. But the extent to which this is being exploited by the government and shills like Fuentes makes me wonder. I’m being driven to the “Israel did it” side. I’ve been especially moved by Bibi’s daily announcements that he didn’t do it.

He’s doing these daily. Imagine. His assistant is like “sir, it’s time to record your daily video saying you didn’t order the assassination of Charlie Kirk.”

Seriously, regardless if you believe the official story or not, trannies are not some massive threat, and Russia doesn’t have anything to do with anything. Russia, like “hate speech,” is a Democrat talking point that these people apparently think worked for the other side, so they might as well pick up the ball and run with it.

And this Fuentes character isn’t just some random Mexican I have beef with because he works with the feds and did a weird blackmail threat against me. I wanted to get that out of the way at the beginning, reveal a potential conflict of interests in the coverage, but I promise I would be saying this same thing if I had nothing to do with him ever. Just look at it. He’s everywhere. Every major account is praising him.

You’re basically witnessing a coronation.

He is now on all the big shows, he is being defended by Matt Walsh and all of his supposed enemies. He just had a big appearance with Russell Brand. He is going mainstream, and he is saying the things necessary to go mainstream – “don’t worry about Israel and Palantir, the real threat is trans ideology!” and “Russia is behind all of this anti-Israel stuff!”

Here’s Ian Miles Cheong defending him.

That’s frankly the end of the argument. Honestly, I could have just started with that, and it would have explained the whole thing. There is nothing more damning than being defended by that guy.

This is all completely staged. You are witnessing the birth of the new shill of shills. That’s why he got all teary over Charlie. He’s in place to pick up all the Charlie fans. He’s cool with the youth, you know. Just check out his zany sense of humor. I don’t have any specific clips on hand, but just watch one of his four hour streams, and you’re going to see zany like you never thought humanly plausible.

Speaking of teary eyes, Sam Hyde, another “far right” figure, one of the only ones left really, cried on video and called for some kind of Ultra Double Patriot Act to stop the trannies.

I like Sam Hyde, I even love Sam Hyde. That is some of the cringiest tripe I’ve ever seen in my life. This is not the look for your brand, bro. You don’t want to be crying on video, firstly. No one wants to do that. Like, literally no one other than maybe women who are trying to get their boyfriend arrested for DV wants to be crying on video on the internet. And we have this idea, again, that the trannies are the real threat and the government – one more time, the same government which is entirely controlled by Israel and Silicon Valley – is going to save us from the tranny threat. What even is this? How many people have even met a tranny?

You can show these videos of people celebrating Charlie’s death on TikTok, but I think 80% of the people who were celebrating that posted it on social media. I do not think there is any kind of massive tranny threat. People just are led to believe that because trannies are disgusting and the media was talking about it for a decade. No one has actually done a calculation of how many of these people there are, but no one I know has ever met one.

Sam says that if Trump doesn’t like, send the military to arrest everyone against Charlie Kirk in the next two weeks – he keeps saying this two-week deadline – then the world will end or everyone will die or something. It’s wild. It’s almost like parody. I kept wanting to believe it was an over the top comedy bit.

Remember when Reagan was shot by a guy who was in love with Jodie Foster? Can you imagine if there were calls to give the government huge new spying, censorship, and policing powers to crack down on people in love with Jodie Foster? Honestly, that sounds ridiculous, but there were probably more people in love with Jodie Foster then as there are radical trannies now. I mean, she looked great in Taxi Driver.

Wait, hold on. My producer just notified me that Jodie was only 12 in Taxi Driver, and said I should retract that statement. But we’re just going to keep moving.

With Sam, I don’t want to attack him. Everyone shits the bed once in a while. I have. Not like that, ever, or even anything close (can you imagine me crying on camera?). But you know, sometimes you miss, I guess. People are also saying he stopped doing steroids recently and that can definitely make you emotional. So, okay. I’m not putting him in the same category as Fuentes.

But what do we have going on here?

This is at best a mass hysteria like coronavirus being exploited by the same bad actors.

Tucker Carlson as a Voice of Reason

Maybe Tucker Carlson is some kind of secret agent as well, I don’t know. I have no idea. But I can say his response was measured and reasonable.

Unlike Fuentes and a lot of these other creeps, he said we cannot tolerate any form of restrictions on speech as a result of this event, and basically said people should rise up if Trump tries to push this through.

(Note: anyone who wants to stop these speech laws is going to have to go through Fuentes, though somehow I don’t think that will be much of a problem.)

Tucker’s whole show about Charlie was touching (I mean that legitimately) and helped me to understand him better and sympathize with him. He had an Orthodox priest on saying that it’s our belief that the dead should be let to rest for forty days before we start making any kind of judgements about what the death means. And Tucker’s explanation of Charlie’s behind the scenes with him about Israel was convincing. He basically did say Charlie was turning against Israel, which I didn’t believe, but he said it was happening in the last few months, and he had many conversations with him about it.

Tucker is doing a kind of “I’m not saying Israel killed him of course, WINK WINK WINK.” He is definitely on that train, but he’s not just going to say it, because that’s not really his style.

I’m still not totally convinced Israel did it, but I will tell you, the lone shooter theory is looking less and less likely as I look at how aggressively this whole machine is using this event. Of course, they’re going to use any event, but this has become such a big thing that it seems like something you wouldn’t wait for to happen randomly.

I think what is very likely is that the tranny was in Discord channels, and was groomed by someone from some intelligence agency who explained to him how to do all of this. Again, lone gunman is technically possible, but just look at what is happening. It is Kirk Crackdown Mania.

Who’s Left?

What voice of reason exists now? Frankly, I thought Sam was one, then a few weeks ago he interviewed Fuentes, and I was like “ugh.” Then he goes full Kook Train to Bonkersville (please bring your own tissues) with this Charlie thing.

I am not seeing a voice of reason, at all. Tucker is the closest thing. And I’ve certainly aired my complaints about him, which are many, some of which are rather serious.

I think Theo Von is our man. And that is why, through the powers invested in me by being the only remaining member of the original alt-right, I am hereby anointing Theo Von as the absolute leader of the right-wing.

I can’t go out on that joke. Too stupid. Not really funny at all, actually. Though to be honest, I sometimes do feel like Theo is only person on the internet who isn’t completely full of shit. But you know he’s like, close friends with RFK Jr. And what does that even mean? What are they talking about? What would they have to talk about, other than for RFK to send through government talking points? Tim Dillon is having meetings with “JD Vance” (fake name, btw). Joe Rogan is jungled up with all these people, including Thiel himself.

The problem is:

  • People love money
  • People don’t want to go to prison or be murdered

“You can have a bunch of money and we won’t put you in prison or murder you” is the ultimate deal. It’s an offer you can’t refuse.

Unless you’re me, I guess. But I am deranged. Seriously. I’m one of the sickest people I know, and I was even before this brain tumor (which is getting much larger by the way, but it seems totally harmless). I do not consider the fact that I’m the only one among these hundreds of internet people that has actually kept it real to be a sign of integrity but rather a symptom of mental illness. Because I will tell you, from 15 years of experience: this is totally fucking pointless. It is something to suffer for a purpose, there is value in that. Suffering for no purpose at all is just stupid or insane. For me it’s mostly the latter. I would like to think. Being insane is a lot more respectable than being stupid.

I should have started a landscaping company.

Anyway, I hope everything works out.

I’m sure it’s probably all fine.

(More to come. Just getting rolling here. Having written all of this just now I’ve convinced myself of the Jewish conspiracy to murder Charlie Kirk. This is not audience capture. Or maybe it is, but I am captured as an audience of myself. My own writing just convinced me. I will be filling you in on that and many other important aspects of just how totally fucked you truly are.)

]]> The Assassination of Charlie Kirk: A Gay and Retarded Post-Modern Tragedy https://dailystormer.in/the-assassination-of-charlie-kirk-a-gay-and-retarded-post-modern-tragedy/ Tue, 16 Sep 2025 22:13:09 +0000 https://dailystormer.in/?p=688222

Everyone is trying to play the victim after Charlie Kirk’s assassination. But if you really think about it, I’m the biggest victim of this situation. I’m expected to write something meaningful about a completely meaningless tragedy and it’s basically impossible.

People have complained about my commentary. It’s come across as too crass or whatever. I don’t know what website people thought they were on? I can’t take that criticism seriously. However, I can admit: something apparently very impactful happened, and I have not offered any meaningful analysis. I’ve made an inane point about how everyone is taking it too seriously. This is self-evident and not a useful observation. I’ve also said that the government and influencers are exploiting the event as part of a larger program. You’ve got this other guy as the president, but you have to keep the program going, you have to keep manipulating the people, blah blah blah, and so on. That also should be self-evident (though it hardly seems to be).

There was a collective visceral reaction to Charlie’s death and the media was going nuts. People apparently expect from me some type of lighting of the way, some attempt to make sense of the nonsensical event that somehow feels very weighty or historical for inexplicable reasons. As I am “America’s Explicator” (at least that’s what it says on the award), the people expect I should have something more meaningful to say here. Therein lies the issue: how am I supposed to have a meaningful analysis of something that means nothing?

Clearly, Charlie was a person, every person’s life has meaning, and no one should be killing people. But this issue of people being murdered is not new. Assuming the Gaza genocide isn’t making an impression because it’s far away and it’s brown people, then what about the constant school shootings, the endless random black murders? People are being murdered all over the place, and the explanations, if one is given at all, tend to be completely meaningless.

When you hear “radical tranny activist assassinates Zionist shill to fight hate,” it sounds like “Glibdolf Horzet mungles Frinkles Kloplofell to fight jazzlefroth.” It feels like the only reasonable response is to gently close my eyes and massage the bridge of my nose with my thumb and forefinger. “More vile nonsense,” he thinks. “How shocking.”

You will not find anyone offering a satisfactory explanation of the meaning of the event, because there literally is no meaning in this event. Charlie Kirk was promoting grotesque nonsense, taking a check to shill, to confuse people on purpose for the benefit of the people with power. The shooter, as far as we can tell, was into some aberrant sexual behavior, which is something that typically results from an overconsumption of pornography. The sex pervert became obsessed with the idea that the paid political shill was a threat to his feelings. If you can find meaning in that, you’re smarter than me and everyone else.

If I am supposed to try to find any kind of deeper meaning here, the only thing I can really do is analyze why there is no meaning.

Some notable premises involved include:

  • Politics is a game of peek-a-boo for adults. It is all a farce performed by morons, a false reality built up to explain to the public why society is so bad. Meanwhile, anyone still connected to classic reality can easily see that society is so bad because the politicians are simply running cover for elites who act above and beyond politics. This leads to a very dark place. The things politicians and other political actors say and do have no relationship to classic reality.
  • People can accumulate large sums of money by being involved in politics. Simply, you are paid, often extraordinarily well, to lie and trick people.
  • Most humans have become obsessed with wealth as a result of various factors, including (but not limited to) the availability of wealth. Becoming wealthy was not a viable life path through most of history, because there was very little wealth available, and all that existed was centrally controlled by the immovable objects of state and church (one should note that on the full timeline of human existence, church and state are themselves both relatively new). When wealth became plausibly available to peasants, the goal for many became status.
  • Material wants were covered a long time ago, so there is no struggle to meet basic needs, and therefore people struggle for wealth. In the prehistoric era, if you didn’t kill a deer with your spear, you might find some other guy who had better luck and use your spear to kill him and take his deer. You could justify in your own mind that you had to do it to feed your own family, and also, probably the people you killed were somehow evil or whatever, and you were just doing what was right by killing them to take their food. Just so, in the current era, you might take a check to bamboozle people with nonsense. Just so, someone involved with politics may justify his own skullduggery with all manner of mind tricks that are biologically imprinted on people.
  • For humans, at least those of us thinking and speaking in English, “meaning” is both a logically sound, empirical quality of significance as well as an understanding of purpose. “The meaning of a statement” and “the meaning of life” refer to separate concepts, but ones which should be closely linked. This is to say that the philosophical concept of “meaning” should be based on something logically sound, and everything which is logically sound should fit into one’s understanding of the nature and purpose of human existence. In classic reality, all experiential phenomena fit into a comprehensive and coherent understanding of the whole. This whole should be a reference point from which the individual can understand the purpose of experiences, as well as provide context capable of reasonably satisfying any existential questions they may have.
  • The lack of any requirement to work and physically push yourself to satisfy basic needs removes most intrinsic meaning from life. This might seem as though it is philosophical or something, perhaps it even appears esoteric, but it is actually very basic and obvious. “The meaning of life” throughout all but the most recent human history revolved around doing what was necessary to survive. Up through the early stages of the industrial era, most people who didn’t work starved (or watched their elderly and younglings starve).
  • Penicillin did not become widely available until the 1940s. (Note: antibiotics are probably or obviously extremely dysgenic.)
  • People will fill the holes left by a loss of the meaning found in survival with all sorts of things. For the first decades of the post-survivalist age, things were booming (hence the “boomers,” you see). Things degraded rather rapidly, as you would have expected beforehand if you were the expecting sort. Being stripped of the basics of meaning, those survivalist behaviors, people began to lose their sense of higher meaning and purpose, previously embodied in religion.
  • Religion is a system that binds together the people, but also is a system through which they codify a collective understanding of meaning. A religion is a wrapping around the understanding of reality, tying it together and keeping it as a whole that is comprehensible to the individual. Every religion that existed before the modern era was inclusive of the respective culture’s understanding of classic reality.
  • In the absence of classic religion, the impulse that drives religion is funneled into other avenues. Because religion is not logical, the things that fill in the spaces where religion used to be do not have to be logical. Politics have become a religion in the very literal sense of that word. This includes all that it implies it would include. New realities require new religions. Some have framed politics as “tribal,” but this is misleading, as they are in fact cultic. Religious beliefs left over from classic reality have become a subcategory of the larger religion of politics.
  • Post-modern American politickers are able to use la technique to create a situation where instead of a monolithic state apparatus filling that void, a la communism or fascism, you split the populous roughly 50/50 into warring religious cults. This is purposeful: they want people fighting with each other with religious fervor over things that are of no consequence, half of the population blaming the other half for the problems. The people with the actual power can do anything they want while one side blames the other. (You can see both parties make moves to balance the sheets. That is part of what they do with immigration. The last time a president won more than 60% was Nixon in 1972, who won 60.07% of the public for his second term after an extremely popular first term. He was politically assassinated shortly after the “landslide” victory.)
  • Because politics are now a religion, people can go on political crusades. Therefore, people are willing to kill other people for what amounts to nothing more than a nonsensical money scam (see premises 1-4).
  • Sex is a basic animal need, but the individual does not die if it is not met but rather, collectively, a species will die if it is not met. (This almost happened to pandas and is currently happening to Koreans and Japanese and to a slightly lesser extent, white people.) In an environment where this basic need is not sufficiently met for a large percent of the population, deviant sexual behaviors will develop and eventually become endemic.
  • Chronic pornography use is a compulsive behavior that develops out of sexual frustration, as well as loneliness and boredom, and also eventually leads to a very dark place, where the obsessions that develop have nothing to do with the initial issues that started the voyage into porn hell.
  • Human minds are not designed to deal with electronic media. Electronic media allows people to create fake realities which to the individuals engaged are indistinguishable from classic reality. (A further multitude of fake realities are created by no one in particular, but rather are spawned from the void itself and transmitted through electronic media.)
  • Many of these alternative realities involve wealth and sex.
  • Between the development of the printing press and the current moment, classic reality was gradually phased out. At this point, most people in the West have no connection to classic reality, save death.
  • Technology, in general, is making people insane, as a result of both psychological and physiological factors.
  • No one ever thinks he himself is the bad guy.

Thus, with the Kirk assassination, you have two humans, born as innocent babes, who were shoveled into competing false realities bloated by religious fervor. Both were unaware that they were existing in fake realities. If Charlie Kirk was aware he was in a fake reality, he would not have traded his personal integrity and basic human dignity for money in order to bamboozle the public with Jewish propaganda. If the assassin were aware, he would not have murdered a random shill, only to spend life in prison or perhaps get the death penalty. Charlie was certainly driven by wealth, whereas the shooter’s drives appear to have been sexual. (Note: indubitably, a big part of a man’s drive for wealth is sexual in nature.)

These nonsense simulations of realities are all-encompassing and thus very convincing to those operating within them. If a member of one reality kills a member of a competing, hostile reality, the killer is seen as a holy crusader while the deceased is sainted as a martyr. Everyone behaves as though there is some deep meaning to all of this, though no one on either side can explain it without spewing obscene, meaningless gibberish. Because there is no meaning, no one can explain the meaning in a coherent fashion.

Other than to those who knew him personally, “Charlie Kirk” was not a real person inside of these fake realities. He was a symbol for various meaningless things. For some, he was a symbol of goodness, for others a symbol of evil. Within classic reality, human life is sacred, and it is sad someone died, but none of the parties involved in this debacle maintain a connection with classic reality.

In the American cesspit, neither the left nor right sides care much for a “both sides are the same” narrative. However, in classic reality, there is no meaningful difference between the sides, because their respective realities are equally nonsensical, and separated from classic reality by heaps of meaningless nonsense. Because the basic needs are met and there is no survivalism, the assumption is we can easily create a utopia where no one wants for anything. The problem is that the “wants” have vastly expanded as a result of the basic needs being met, and apparently, when the needs are met, the wants can expand to infinity and beyond.

Ostensibly, the “left” side is trying to create a utopia where everyone is brown and children are indoctrinated into homosexuality from birth. All the junkies will stop living on the streets when the government does more housing subsidies. Also, it won’t be complete communism, but the middle class will pay crippling taxes and then eventually they will start taxing rich people to pay for all the programs. Also, they are going to change the weather with solar panels and windmills and electric vehicles that use all of these poisonous rare earth minerals. Russians and Chinese will be forced to do human rights, as will everyone else in the world, because of our values. Maybe we’ll also have sharia law, but there will be free abortions so every woman can pursue her passion. Guns will be made illegal and then no one will ever die. It’s all very easy to do. But these right-wingers are holding us back.

Meanwhile, the “right” side is trying to create a utopia where most people are brown (but you’re still allowed to be white, no one will stop you) and being gay and a tranny is fine (but you have to be in high school or at least middle school before you learn how to do it – remember, the Florida law everyone threw a fit over said you weren’t allowed to teach gender theory in school… before fourth grade!). Furthermore, we stand with Israel and its right to defend itself, because God gave them that land, so we are going to give them infinite military support forever, and anyone who criticizes this arrangement is not welcome in the country. It’s also about peace, but in order to get peace, we have to do a lot of war. Maybe we’re going to back off of this whole “take on China” thing, because that is a bit overly ambitious, but we’re going to kill every Venezuelan cocaine trafficker to stop Mexican fentanyl from China, and then when there is no more fentanyl, no one will do drugs anymore. And also it’s “Judeo-Christian,” but we respect all religions, because it’s in the Constitution. (The Constitution is very sacred and holy because of freedom.) We especially respect Hindus, who are geniuses, and we need to bring them in to build AI. Everyone will be rich because they work in a factory. Because we support Israel, there will be a “rapture” before the “end times” where “Space Jesus” will come down and suck everyone up into Heaven with him. We just need to make the deals and get it done. But these lefties are holding us back.

Surely, most of you, my dear readers and close parasocial friends, are going to lean more towards supporting the right-wing, because their positions overlap with yours more, even though you presumably don’t agree with a lot of the elements of their platform. But you know that this is their platform. These were the beliefs of Charlie and, we can safely assume, the shooter as well. I know Charlie was also talking about families, keeping women out of the workplace, gun rights, and surely at least he was saying “Christianity,” even if it was bizarro Zionist “Bible-believing Christianity” (which stands in stark contrast to all those versions of Christianity that claim the Bible is a bunch of lies). But the overall platform is not great. It’s not great because it is a political cult existing in an alternate reality where all of the associated nonsense is believed with religious fervor. (Note that the elements of Christianity included in Charlie’s doctrine are a subcategory of the larger whole, which is the religion itself; see premises 9-10.)

There is the the third utopia, which is the utopia of the actual ruling elite who control all of the other new realities. Their utopian vision mostly comes from Silicon Valley, and they are focused on building an “AGI” super intelligence which will help them use gene-editing, nanobots, and a computer-brain interface to become “post-human,” which means they will become immortal and invade outer space. Peter Thiel is the closest thing they have to a spokesman at this time, though Elon Musk promotes many of the less offensive aspects of this utopian scheme. You can read the publications of the World Economic Forum (WEF) where they are already planning on how to govern outer space. Yuval Noah Harari, the “ideas man” of the forum, has said that he wants most humans to die off, and his plan is to give them enough drugs and video games to prevent them from breeding as they run out the clock. Alex Karp, the Jewish head of Palantir, the military tech company founded by Peter Thiel which is currently responsible for the AI missile targeting of Palestinians, has revealed a vision which involves every human being on the planet having their every move monitored by AI systems. Though these people are not always straightforward with the details, they are pushing for a “total information awareness” program, which combines all public and private data on individuals, then uses electronic means to track them, including their cellphones and all internet use. They also plan to standardize the camera systems that you see everywhere and use facial recognition to track everyone. It is all very bizarre, but when you look at Trump, and the people he surrounds himself with, it is very clear that this is who is in charge. They wanted Elon to be in the White House basically running everything, and that was happening for a few weeks, but Elon was just too weird and incompetent. Thankfully, James “JD Vance” Bowman is a direct protégé of Thiel, who handpicked him and built his entire political career. He is of course the current favorite to be the next president. Palantir has contracts with the US government right now to combine all of the federal databases with information on people into a single database searchable through AI. Many Republicans were calling for this to be used more aggressively against immigrants somehow.

It’s all quite the mess.

Making an Ass of Us Both

The reason my initial responses may have appeared crass (aside from the aforementioned “check what website you’re on, bro”) is that I often lazily assume everyone is on the same page as me in terms of the existing premises. Within all of this context, when I saw people on social media posting pictures of Charlie with his kids, I did not make the intended jump to putting myself and my family in that position, but rather viewed the people trying to get me to make that jump as emotionally exploitative vampires trying to suck out my emotional and spiritual energy in order to promote their insane political cult. I’m not going to apologize for that. When I saw people spamming these photos of his family, I said “oh come on, fuck you,” not because children losing their father is not universally recognized as a human tragedy, but because the only reason someone would post those images is to promote this stupid political cult.

People are murdered every single day, and with each of those murders, you could go through and show the families of the deceased, and ask people to put themselves in that situation. Obviously, you can’t get all emotional about everyone in the world who is murdered every day. All this would do is drain you of all of your emotional energy, which should be spent on the people in your own life who you can have an impact on, not pissed down the spiritual abyss of social media.

Here’s something to think about: many or most of the people telling you to look at pictures of Charlie Kirk’s kids, to look at the up close video that his wife had filmed of herself crying over his corpse, are the same people who were calling for the ban of TikTok so you couldn’t see videos of Palestinians being murdered by Israel. I do not say that to make the claim that Charlie deserved to be killed for promoting the genocide in Gaza. I don’t even intend to claim that you should care as much about Palestinians as you do about someone from your own country. Rather, I want to point out that these people understand that emotions can be manipulated for political purposes by images of human tragedies.

(Note: I am aware that people are saying that Charlie was planning to turn on Israel, I’m aware he made some comments in that direction. I don’t believe he was going to turn on Israel or that if you went through his entire series of statements over the last two years, or even just over the last few months, that many people would reasonably reach that conclusion. The short story there is that Charlie had a history of making contradictory statements in order to create sound bites to appeal to people with differing opinions. There was obviously no way for him to operate a youth organization without addressing the Gaza situation in some way, but for every clip you see of him saying something about Epstein being Mossad or Israel going too far, you can find a clip, from the same timeframe, of him saying starvation in Gaza is a hoax, that all the hospitals are bases of Kuh-Hamas, and that “God gave this land to the Jewish people.” He did a similar thing with immigration: you can find clips of him saying “great replacement” around the same time as he is promoting unlimited H-1B visas. People try to frame it as “he was a young man who was progressing and changing his thinking,” but I’ve gone through much of it and concluded that he was deliberately saying different things in order to confuse people about his agenda via TikTok clips. The longer analysis of all that, where you would actually have to go through and find the clips and create a timeline showing this, is beyond our scope today. At some point in the future I will go through and find the specific dates of clips. For now, I will simply make it clear that yes, I read Max Blumenthal’s article and listened to several hours of podcasting on the topic.)

To further compare and contrast the death of Charlie Kirk with the ongoing genocide in Gaza: what are the political ends of showing these images? Well, Western journalists are banned from Gaza by the Israeli government, so all of the videos from Gaza are filmed by Gazans. Their motivation for posting the tragedies they are experiencing is very straightforward: they are hoping that people will protest the US government and somehow get them to stop sending Israel all of these bombs and war machines. These images are then shared by people who agree that the US should stop funding this genocide. The people posting the images of Charlie and his family are mostly people who are in the political cult he represented, and actually believe in it. But when you have all of these politicians, and influencers linked to the politicians (and the intelligence agencies in most cases), pushing this “Charlie the martyr” narrative, they are doing it for political purposes. Obviously.

One of the immediate political purposes seems to be onboarding conservatives, who were very recently fighting for “free speech,” with a censorship agenda. Many Republican politicians, as well as influencers, are calling for censorship of “leftists.” Even if you supported that (personally, I do not, but I can understand how someone would), it is absurd to imagine that this censorship will result in what you wanted it to result in. It seems a bit ridiculous to have to explain this, frankly, but after the left called for censorship and got it, Twitter and Facebook engaged in a conspiracy to sabotage Bernie Sanders. Furthermore, it was leftist openness to censorship that led to the entire “coronavirus pandemic” debacle, which was not good for anyone and which the leftists are now just as aghast by as the rightists. Furthermore, you’ve seen what the Trump administration’s censorship goals are with the way they’ve operated so far: their primary objective is to shut down criticism of Israel and Jews more broadly. They would also obviously move to censor things such as people asking what exactly was going on with that boat they blew up off the coast of Venezuela. Again, even if you support censoring trannies or whatever, it is never a good idea to give the government censorship powers. They are not going to do what you want them to do. You’ll get a dopamine hit when some tranny you hate gets censored, and then looking back years later you’ll realize they were censoring all of this other stuff you didn’t know about because it was censored.

In the longer term, there is clearly a bigger project at work to build the AI police state mentioned above. Everything that Joe Biden did was also in service of this agenda. Part of that was encouraging lunatic civil unrest, encouraging crime, opening the border, and so on, creating a situation which could then be responded to with “see, we need law and order, so it’s time for an AI police state.” Trump’s administration is now using every conceivable excuse to get military and militarized federal police out on the streets in America, which is incredibly concerning. And yes, I am aware that many people are cheering this on, because they are against crime and immigrants. But how many times do we have to go through this? If they said “we’re putting military on the streets because we are going to seriously fuck you,” no one would be cheering that. They have created the conditions for you to demand something which would have been unthinkable a few years ago. If you look at it, a lot of the basic premises are also nonsensical.

Following the Kirk assassination, we are seeing politicians and influencers call for the government to “make sure nothing like this happens again.” This is clearly a call not only for censorship, but for mass surveillance and a “pre-crime” profile that monitors everyone all the time and determines “who is a threat.” That is, to do exactly what Palantir is saying they want to do. The idea that you can create a system to prevent a random tranny activist from shooting someone makes no sense on its face. Even if you have a ubiquitous AI monitoring system, reading every private message and compiling it in databases using AI, you cannot prevent a random person from killing another random person. It simply isn’t possible.

The crime problem could be addressed by changing laws and giving strict prison sentences to blacks (something which had bipartisan support until very recently; you’ll recall Joe Biden’s famous “super predators” speech). Illegal immigrants could very easily be removed by simply giving strict prison sentences to anyone who hires them for a job or rents them an apartment. You then just announce that immigrants who find themselves without a place to work or live can call some number and get a free plane ticket back to their country. Using paramilitary forces to go around grabbing random Mexicans off the streets is absurd and it’s very surreal that anyone believes this makes sense. Illegal immigration is a federal crime, so you don’t have to argue with blue state governors in order to make laws giving 15-year minimum prison sentences to any individual who hires or rents to an illegal immigrant. I always said that the wall was sort of a stupid idea, because if you just use strict law to make sure the immigrants don’t have anywhere to work or to live, they will just leave. These militarized ICE raids are at best goofy, but when you understand the bigger picture, they are much more insidious. It appears, to an impartial observer, that the real goal has nothing to do with immigrants, and is rather about acclimating the American people to having military and military-like federal cops on the streets in masks running around and throwing screaming people into vans.

These are Complicated Issues

I understand there is a lot here. But I hope this context gives a clearer picture of why it is I was not impressed by the reaction to the killing of Charlie Kirk. Though I have nothing to retract or apologize for, I should have perhaps been more sympathetic towards what people were feeling after seeing Charlie get shot to death while engaging in a political event. I was not a fan of Kirk, and I am legitimately frustrated by the hagiography that has gone on in the wake of his death, but although my default setting is “edgy millennial cringe,” I am able to understand that there are people who look to me for more than shock therapy in the wake of an event that had an emotional impact in the way this assassination apparently did.

I have no doubt that after things cool down, and people see that the government is indeed using this event to do exactly what I said they would do, those articles will age a lot better than all of these posts and podcasts calling for a brutal crackdown on “the left.”

Sadly, though I think I’ve done a lot here to clear up where I’m coming from on this issue, I do not have a final analysis that is any better than that I put in the more crass articles: the government is going to do what they are going to do, the masses of conservatives will cheer it because of this emotional manipulation, and it will not be for many years later that they reevaluate and say that maybe it wasn’t such a good idea to give the government more censorship powers, or to endorse an AI-backed militarized police state.

]]> Tucker Carlson Releasing Documentary About Mysterious November 9th Attacks https://dailystormer.in/tucker-carlson-releasing-documentary-about-mysterious-november-9th-attacks/ Wed, 10 Sep 2025 11:54:36 +0000 https://dailystormer.in/?p=688143

This September 11th, Tucker Carlson will be releasing a documentary series about the mysterious attacks of November 9, 2001, commonly known as “nine eleven.”

These attacks, you might recall, happened 24 years ago, and involved Jews blowing up buildings in New York City, which is one of the top cities. The Jews flew planes into the so-called “Twin Towers,” which is some kind of creepy reference to the Lord of the Rings book series, just like the satanic “Palantir Group,” which is a Jewish AI terrorism group.

I don’t know why there are so many of these LotR references going on with these Jews, but I would hope the Carlson documentary addresses this ongoing issue. I haven’t really read these books since like maybe 2015. I probably should. Maybe it would help me unravel this mysterious conundrum I’ve identified.

What about this?

Why was the author of these novels working to stop the hero Adolf Hitler, who was a kind of “Aragorn” figure who was trying to destroy the “Mordor” of Jewishness, by stopping the “Morgoth” of Jews by destroying their “one ring” of control over global finance? Does the one ring of power represent usury? Because that is the most powerful thing in the universe upon which the entire Jewish system is built.

This seems like what we should be making documentaries about at this point. I am pretty sure everyone already knows the Jews did 911. I don’t know what kind of retard spent 24 years not figuring that out. So maybe we should move on and talk about this Tolkien issue?

I think it is important to add that Nicolas Maduro is a kind of Theoden figure. Or no, maybe that other guy, Chavez, was like Theoden and Maduro is like Eomer.

Or maybe I am just playing into the game of Jewish wizardry by trying to find LotR analogies in things?

Tucker Carlson did his main interview promoting the documentary with Piers Morgan.

Not sure why they couldn’t be in studio together. Where even is Tucker?

Is that the dome of the rock?

No, no. I think the dome of the rock is yellow. If memory serves me.

That is Griffith Observatory. Which I have always suspected had some sort of satanic purpose.

You want to take this to a whole other level? Fasten your seatbelts. “Griffith” is the character in Berserk that is based on Sauron from LotR. Like he’s a directly copied version of the character.

He was initially a good guy who became corrupted by a lust for power, becoming Femto like Sauron became the Dark Lord. A lot of stuff in Berserk was lifted directly from LotR. But Berserk is actually much better and more interesting and fun and doesn’t have slow boring parts.

You may be interested to know that in 2023, a poll of Americans overwhelmingly concluded that Griffith is actually, in fact, more evil than Sauron.

Maybe it’s a coincidence. Could be. But I find that a lot more interesting than “oh my God it’s 2025 and I just discovered that actually, the November 9 attacks were done by the Jews!”

Like okay, man. Okay. Are you also just learning that there is no evidence of homicidal gas chambers at Auschwitz and in fact the description of them is physically impossible? Are you just learning about the USS Liberty? That Jews killed JFK?

I think we need to move forward here into more interesting conspiracies which relate more to things that interest me, such as Lord of the Rings and Berserk and I guess like John Wick.

I could also do with a conspiracy relating Charles Manson, Roman Polanski, John Lennon, etc. to a CIA satanic conspiracy. Manson was definitely CIA, so he kills Polanski’s wife and then John Lennon is shot in front of the apartment where Polanski filmed a movie about the birth of the Antichrist? By a guy obsessed with The Catcher in the Rye, a Jewish book which seems to have been designed to brainwash people. Months later, some more talented musician who was in love with Jodie Foster from Taxi Driver took a shot at Reagan, because taking shots at people was clearly profitable in terms of attention-generation?

That’s the only part of the story that makes sense. Who wasn’t in love with Jodie in Taxi Driver, and thinking of creative ways to get her attention?

It was literally three months after Lennon that Reagan gets it. The guy who shot Reagan also had a copy of Catcher in the Rye in his hotel room.

What is going on with Catcher in the Rye?

Yes, yes. The photo of the author gives a general idea, but is it a CIA mind control trigger book of some kind? Because it really sucks, and the US government school system forces everyone to read it, like they force them to read “Night.”

My producer has just informed me that Jodie was only 12 when that movie was filmed and I should retract that statement, but instead I’m just going to move on to the next topic, which is that Polanski, after drugging and raping a 13-year-old and fleeing the country (Jewish by the way) and then being allowed to work in Hollywood from Poland and France, made this movie called “The Ninth Gate” with Johnny Depp that was also something about summoning the Antichrist.

So then after being in that film, what happened to Johnny Depp? Also, did you know that River Phoenix, who was from some kind of cult and also half Jewish despite being handsome somehow, died at Johnny Depp’s club, presumably in some kind of sacrifice to Satan or whatever? What day did he die, I wonder? I forget. I should look that up – oh no wait, I just remembered: Halloween.

The name of the club? The Viper Room. Aside from a viper being a snake, which always represents Satan, both John the Baptist and Jesus specifically referred to the Jews as a “brood of vipers.”

And come on, Halloween night???? This is all a coincidence???

What about how Johnny Depp was friends with Hunter S. Thompson and how Thompson was supposedly “suicided” after saying he thought 9/11 was fake? And also what about that thing where they said Hunter Thompson recorded a human sacrifice at Bohemian Grove? That part honestly sounds fake (unlike literally everything else I just said here, which you can look up), but it should still be investigated by someone, instead of doing “hurr durr, did you know Jews did 911???”

Yes, Tucker. We knew that. Please, let’s move on.

Also, Alex Jones interviewed Ralph Steadman, Thompson’s artist, after his mysterious death, and Steadman told Jones he had mentioned being aware of “Eyes Wide Shut” type ritual sex cults. I can’t find that interview now, but I promise you it happened and I remember listening to it live.

Shouldn’t someone be looking into all of this?

I’m sure someone is going to say “read CHAOS” and I will do that at some point, maybe right now since I’m thinking about all of this. I remember I was really excited about the book’s release then started it and then didn’t read very much of it for some reason. I will do it. Though I’m pretty sure all that does is show that Manson was working for the CIA to distribute acid, which is another one of these “oh really? Ya thank?” conspiracies that I think everyone already knows about. Also I think that book implies Manson was guilty, which I don’t really believe, but I actually don’t even know if the book says that because I didn’t read it.

It’s written by one of my kinsmen, though the second name on that book looks sort of Jewish?

I do not think it goes all the way to River Phoenix, the half Jewish member of a weird cult, dying at the Viper Room on HALLOWEEN NIGHT. C’mon. Tell me this is all a coincidence.

We really need to zoom in on this River Phoenix thing I think, because he was most famous for being in a movie by that faggot Gus Van Sant, who is definitely deep in some satanic shit. But more importantly, he was raised in The Family International, which was proved in a British court to be involved in systemic ritual sexual abuse of children. I have read a lot about that, though it was a long time ago, but it was sort of a version of Christian Zionism, a bunch of stuff about the end times and the Antichrist and so on. But it was also a sex cult, run by a Jew named Berg.

These hippy evangelical “Christian” doomsday cults were all run by the CIA. They were all over the place. My parents actually met in one, which is… concerning. Sometimes I think about that and feel somewhat concerned. When I was constantly in the media every week and being used as a part of some weird narrative that I didn’t totally understand, the thought regularly crossed my mind that I was probably some kind of MKULTA victim. Though I try not to think too much about it now, can people just maybe note that and then investigate it if I turn up dead? Kk, thx.

If you go into the LSD-CIA part of the theory though, you get into a lot more than Charles Manson. That connects to basically the entire culture, the 1960s revolution, which paved the way for literally every bad thing. The issue with that is that a lot of the “research” into the topic is dumb. Like there is a lot of goofy, fake stuff surrounding that particular topic, and that, in fact, makes me believe it is all the more important, because if you did have a real conspiracy that was very big and important, the number one thing you would do – certainly the number one thing I would do if I was trying to cover up the conspiracy – is “flood the zone” with disinformation to make it really hard to wade through and find out what is actually going on. I think probably that is what Alex Jones was doing previously. He would promote every conspiracy theory and just bury you with all of this stuff. He’s a totally different person now and basically just covers mainstream politics for the most part.

I mean actually now his main thing seems to be attacking Owen Shroyer for quitting his job at Infowars. Shroyer did a fundraiser for $30,000, which was really sad, because he’s apparently been on salary at Infowars while doing a popular podcast for like a decade, which is totally insane. If you can just get a hundred thousand views a week, you can make seven figures a year on ads. So he was really getting abused at Infowars.

Most of these people lie about how much money they make, or try to downplay it, but there is this fat Irish guy, I forget his name, and he only gets like 300k views a week on YouTube but admits to having a house in the Hamptons and in Beverly Hills and a Bentley and a Rolls Royce. He spends like 20 grand a year on sunglasses.

He openly says he made all that money from nothing in four years.

Oh, and Asmongold has been telling the truth about how much he makes for years. There were leaks during the Covid hoax showing top Twitch streamers all making 7-8 figures and it was this big scandal and I was like “did you think Asmongold was lying? Because he’s been publishing that he has a multimillion dollar annual income for many years now.”

I will say that Jones proved the 911 thing like, within months after it happened. I mean, he proved that the official story was nonsensical, even though he kind of covered up for the Jews and tried to say it was a George Bush conspiracy to sell weapons and destroy traditional Islam, which is one of the roadblocks to a global uniculture. I think that is part of the story for sure, but if you’re not saying “the Jews did it,” it sort of just becomes convoluted and confusing as to what the purpose of it would be.

Ah, but now we have a purpose with the Silicon Valley people and their AGI/”transhumanism” agenda, don’t we? We have a “goyim-based” conspiracy, which is not actually goyim-based, but could be sold as goyim-based, where these tech oligarchs want to live forever by fusing with machines and believe that creating an artificial super-intelligence (which is impossible) will help them to develop the technology to live forever. The idea of doing gene-editing to turn off aging (because aging is programmed into the genes, otherwise your cells would just keep regenerating and you’d stay 27 forever, or until you got shot in the head or fell down an elevator shaft or something), and then injecting nanobots into your bloodstream to repair cells and manipulate other functions, might be possible. I don’t know if that’s possible or not, but it’s more believable than AGI, which is really just nonsensical, because no one can even explain what consciousness is, and you can’t make an artificial version of something you don’t even know exists at all.

I think consciousness does exist, personally, but I believe that because I’m a Christian. I don’t know what I would be if I wasn’t a Christian. I mean I guess I would probably be a Moslem if I wasn’t a Christian, all things being equal, though that religion has the same basic understanding of the nature of the soul and consciousness. So I’m saying if I didn’t believe anything like that at all, and was some kind of atheist or whatever. What I think I would believe in that case is that consciousness is an illusion. That gets a bit complicated, because it doesn’t seem like the perils of consciousness, which include self-doubt, are evolutionarily beneficial. Which is one of my arguments for the existence of the soul: consciousness is not a “beneficial mutation” in the Darwinian sense. Maybe some kind of ego could be, and maybe the ego would eventually lead to introspection, which would lead to a breakdown of the machine. I don’t know. I don’t really care very much about that line of inquiry. But I do know they’re not going to make an artificial super-consciousness… unless they use a human brain as the core of the machine.

Maybe they could take a human brain and then plug it into a machine and have it function as a super-consciousness. That would obviously be illegal, which would make the research complicated, though I don’t think impossible. This idea was explored in Frank Herbert’s “Destination: Void,” which I can recommend (although it is a little bit slow and lacks the energy of the good Dune books as well as some of his other books, including the sequel trilogy to Destination: Void, which also deals with some AI stuff which is probably relevant and which I should probably reread and report back to you on, my dear reader and parasocial BFF).

Anyway, so in this book, they have a human brain as the core of an AI system designed to control the complex systems in these ships designed for interstellar travel. They keep sending these ships with clones of really intelligent scientists, because it’s the future and it’s libertarian or something so you can clone people and they don’t have any rights and you can just kill them. So they keep sending these ships with these clones and this human brain controlling the ship’s computer, and every time the human brain in the computer goes insane and the ship is destroyed. But then this one crew of clones is able to successfully replace the human brain with a real AI (what they would now call AGI) to run the ship. Then in the sequels, one of which is called “The Jesus Incident,” the descendants of the clones start worshiping the AI as a god.

I won’t spoil the whole thing, because people should read these books, and plus I haven’t read then in some time and don’t even totally remember the plot, but there is more genetic engineering. So you have a genetic engineering to AI to more genetic engineering cycle, which is seemingly what the Silicon Valley people are thinking about, and this probably relates to the coronavirus vaccine in some way that I would like to see a documentary about instead of “OMG did you guys know JEWS DID NOVEMBER 9???”

I would say all of Herbert’s books are probably worth reading. I really wish I would have gone with my original plan as a teenager and followed in his footsteps instead of becoming a neo-Nazi leader or whatever the fuck happened with all that (it’s all a bit blurry now, frankly). I will warn you that while you will find a lot of intriguing sexism and anti-homosexual sentiment in Herbert’s books, you need to be on the lookout for anti-Irish sentiment from that German-identifying half-Irishman. That is to say, because he was half-German, he identified with that side, and became something of a self-hating half-Irish, and in reading his works, you need to be on the lookout.

It was actually shocking to me that the new Dune films were allowed to include all of the anti-gay stuff. Watching it, I was like “how is this even possible?”

I guess if you didn’t know it was all written as anti-homosexual propaganda, you might not notice? But the way Feyd-Rautha was done in the second film…

How could you not notice?

Fantastically boring films, but I did appreciate staying true to the anti-homosexual messaging.

But really, Herbert was a top-tier genius, and probably my favorite scifi writer. If you compare him to Jew Asimov, weirdo hippy-fascist Heinlein, or that gay sicko Clark, you find that Herbert is unambiguously much better in every way. Speaking of Clark, how about a documentary on that pervert and his satanic agenda? Can he be linked back to all of that stuff I was saying up there, several paragraphs ago? Oh, yes, actually, he can. Firstly through 2001, which is an occult film, associated with all of this weird stuff and speaking to the nexus of 19th century demonology and 21st century techno-totalitarianism. Directed by Stanley Kubrick, Jew director of Eyes Wide Shut. Did you know that despite being a Jew, he said “Hitler was basically right about everything”? Also, did you know he died between finishing Eyes Wide Shut and its release, and it was then edited by the studio, and his version will never be released and was allegedly destroyed?

Skimming back through all that shit I just typed right now, I see that it is a jumbled mess, and that much of it may seem inane. I assure you, however: it isn’t.

My point here, which I will just reveal plainly for anyone who didn’t find it obvious, is that this new mainstream awareness of some of the stuff that was previously classified as “conspiracy theory” is not really particularly important, even if it might seem that way. Maybe I’m being a bit tongue in cheek with some of this. I honestly don’t know if I am or not. But surely, there are more interesting topics than 911, if we are attempting to uncover the underlying mystery of existence.

Conversely, we could just not uncover anything, and instead just deal with the more obvious facts, such as that Jews control literally everything, and do not appear to have particularly noble intentions. That doesn’t require any form of speculation. You can just look at it on Wikipedia or whatever. And yet we’re not really even having that conversation, and people are attempting to frame Israel’s genocide as the actions of individuals, or a state, but not as the actions of a race-religion cult group. Not connecting the bad actions of the Israeli state to the bad actions of BlackRock or the pharma industry or the trans movement or the porn industry seems bizarre and is very frustrating. Everyone can see all these people are Jewish. But we don’t want to hurt their feelings, because of the Holocaust? Which has already been proved to be a total hoax?

TYT did a positive pre-review of Tucker’s documentary on 911.

Ana Kasparian recently appeared on Tucker Carlson and agreed with him on a bunch of things. Of course she started out by saying “I disagree with you strongly about abortion.” Because that is of course really, really important. But people are excited about left and right populism coming together or whatever.

If you watch the full Piers Morgan interview, Tucker also gets into the topic of white genocide and says it’s the “darkest thing that has happened in 1,000 years” (I guess no pun intended? LOL). Maybe he’s getting more aggressive on that topic, I don’t know. But I just wanted to mention it because TYT doesn’t talk about it while reviewing his interview with Piers Morgan. So maybe the left doesn’t really care about anti-immigration sentiment anymore, they just really only care about abortion. Because leftism is just feminism and feminism can’t exist without abortion.

A lot of people have been saying Tucker is CIA and this is all some kind of psyop. I don’t really go along with this, because the people making the claim don’t really try to make the claim based on what he is saying but rather based on tedious conspiracy elements, such as that his dad was involved with the CIA. I do think it was weird he said he didn’t know his dad was in the CIA until he died, which was apparently a lie, as he’d said it before he died. I think some other things are weird. But when it comes to your dad, especially with a dark revelation like that, I’m sure there are a bunch of weird emotions which can lead to weird statements.

It just seems very obvious that the world would be worse without Tucker Carlson out there talking about Israel and white genocide and all of these other issues. Please don’t start talking about “gatekeeping” and “limited hangout” like I don’t know what those are, because actually, you don’t understand what those things are, or you wouldn’t claim I don’t understand what they are. Saying he’s a “gatekeeper” makes no sense because there is literally no one else out there saying this stuff that is being censored other than me, and he’s not doing anything to prevent people from seeing my materials. “Limited Hangout” is obviously a much better argument, because he could of course be saying a lot more than he is saying. But what is the intelligence purpose of him saying any of this at all? If it wasn’t for Tucker Carlson, opposition to Israel could still be framed as a left-wing issue. He is the right-wing guy out there saying this relationship with Israel is insane. Yes, you have Judge Napolitano and his guests and some people on Rumble or whatever, but Tucker is the biggest figure in right-wing media and he is driving the narrative.

That all having been said, the best argument that Tucker is some kind of intelligence operation is simply that none of this matters. Nothing is going to change based on anything he says. But that would be true regardless. Nothing is going to change based on anything I say, which makes it all the more frustrating that I am still this banned. I guess the difference is, ironically, that I am saying nothing is going to change, and that seems to be what you’re not allowed to say. As long as you present some narrative about how you’re going to right the ship, and keep people engaged with politics, thinking it’s going somewhere, you are harmless and allowed in the game.

Though frankly, I can’t really see how me telling you you’re doomed helps you very much either?

No I mean, actually I can see why that would not be allowed, because if large numbers of people stopped engaging with the system and started engaging more with reality, something different would happen. As long as everyone thinks there is some kind of solution, whatever it is, there is only one thing that can happen which is whatever is going to happen.

Maybe I could make some kind of blood pact with Elon Musk that if I’m allowed back into the conversation I will only talk about satanic CIA conspiracies involving LSD, sex cults, and Hollywood personalities? That is at least more fun than “wow can you believe Jews did 911??? This is blowing my mind, maaaaaan.”

Anyway, whatever.

Who knows? Who cares? I don’t care.

If you enjoyed this content, remember to like and subscribe and jingle my bells. Right now is a great time for bell jingling, as it’s nearly Christmas.

This article was updated to reflect the fact that Chapman shot Lennon and Hinckley shot Reagan. I got them confused because those murders happened weeks apart and they were both linked to Catcher in the Rye. 

]]> What the Heck is a “Narcoterrorist”? https://dailystormer.in/what-the-heck-is-a-narcoterrorist/ Mon, 08 Sep 2025 07:25:12 +0000 https://dailystormer.in/?p=688122

I’ve been eating massive amounts of cheese lately. And I’ve been dealing with the skin problems that go along with it. I am in fact on the verge of turning into some type of Cronenbergian monstrosity as a result of the amount of cheese I am consuming. And yet, there is no one who is going to threaten to imprison me or blow up my boat because I’m abusing myself with cheese and on the verge of going full Videodrome as a result.

This whole concept of certain drugs being illegal is nonsensical. Where did the government get the right to tell people what they are allowed to put into their bodies? How can a democracy government, which is ostensibly based on the concept of personal human autonomy being a high metaphysical concept, have such a right? Telling people what they are permitted to do with their own bodies in the privacy of their own home is a violation of the most basic principles of human autonomy that are enshrined in the enlightenment philosophy democracy is based on.

Please note: I don’t necessarily support democracy or enlightenment values, and in fact I don’t support them, but I do think if you’re going to have a system based on these things, it needs to live up to its own stated principles, otherwise you just have tyranny.

What makes drug prohibitions extra ridiculous is that you are allowed to consume all sorts of things that will kill you, including sugar and seed oils. To take it one massive step further, the government allows for corporations to put chemicals into your body that you don’t want to be there. There is PFAS in the groundwater anywhere in this country at sea level. I mean, maybe not somewhere out in some forest, but anywhere in the zone of a major metro, there are PFAS in the groundwater. Here’s a map:

So if you have a property, which you “own” – you don’t really own it because property taxes exist meaning all forms of land ownership in the US are actually rentals from the feds, but that’s a digression – you can dig a well, and you will be drinking poisonous chemicals that someone else put into your water against your will. There is no way to produce and distribute PFAS without them ending up in the groundwater, but I never hear libertarians talk about how this is a violation of property rights. It obviously is an extreme violation of property rights. They even have some widely used anecdote about polluting rivers being against the non-aggression principle (NAP). But find one of them saying it should be illegal to produce and distribute PFAS because no matter what they are going to end up in the groundwater of people’s private property.

Further, these chemicals are also in the rain. Almost everywhere in the world has PFAS levels “beyond safe levels” (as if there are safe levels) in their rain. That means they are in all the food you eat. You can’t grow food with PFAS groundwater or rainwater and not end up with PFAS in your vegetables and fruits. It’s also in meat, because the animals drink water contaminated with it.

And PFAS is just the most obvious. Everything is also filled with microplastics that you have no choice but to consume, and which the government has zero interest in protecting you from. No interest, at all. You hardly even hear it talked about. Bobby Kennedy was talking about it, but now he only talks about “the disease of antisemitism.”

Then you have the coronavirus vaccine that the government tried to force you to take. It was an experimental gene therapy. They wanted to force you to take it. They also try to force you and your kids to take all kinds of other strange vaccines.

And yet, they reserve the right to tell you you can’t put chemicals in your body that you, as a sovereign adult person, choose to put into your body, if those chemicals are arbitrarily listed on their “illegal substances” list. This is not reasonable.

Please note: I have in the past been against marijuana legalization and I am now calling for the legalization of all drugs, including fentanyl and whatever other boogieman drug. So let me explain my change of opinion on this matter.

First, I should note that I was against marijuana legalization because I think marijuana is the worst of all the drugs. It was also clear that legalization increased use. However, that seems to be a result of it having been illegal to begin with. People will take much more dangerous substances than marijuana because the government tells them they are good and safe. So when the government says “oh we decided marijuana is safe after previously having said it wasn’t,” the public, conditioned to believe the government is their daddy who will decide what is good for them, decide they should start smoking weed because the government says it’s safe now. If it had never been made illegal in the first place, there wouldn’t have been an increase of users when you made it legal, would there? Because you wouldn’t be making it legal, because you’d never made it illegal.

No one ever heard of a “heroin addict” when every medicine cabinet in the country held a bottle of it.

In terms of the rest of the drugs, I don’t think people think they are safe. Well, maybe people don’t think cocaine is dangerous. People now know ketamine is dangerous because they’ve watched Elon Musk’s behavior and no one on earth has a goal of “acting more like Elon Musk.” Aside from being generally disgusting and weird, Musk thinks he is funny and he is not funny yet he goes around making “jokes” like he is funny and that is the saddest thing of all, and the number one thing no one wants to be, and it’s probable that his use of marijuana and ketamine play a major role in making him like that.

Fentanyl kills all kinds of people, so no one is going to think that is safe.

With marijuana, when they legalized it, they said “oh we decided this is safe, so you, the children of us, the daddy government, are now allowed to safely smoke it.” That is disgusting messaging, and if they are going to legalize all drugs, they should say “look, none of this shit is safe. Most of it is probably safer than the poisons we put in your food or these vaccines we coerce you into taking through threats and manipulation, but these drugs are not safe and we don’t advise anyone to take them, but you’re adults and you can do what you want to do.”

This is the only thing that makes any sense.

The “drug war” has been going on since the 1960s, and there are more people on drugs than ever, and the outlawing of drugs has created a massive, violent industry trafficking these drugs that is a complete nightmare. Now, the peace president is murdering randos and threatening to start a full-on war to protect American citizens from their own choices.

You can’t protect people from their own choices. That is an insane doctrine. And again, all of this other stuff that kills you is already legal. Do you think it is healthier to be morbidly obese because you consume poisoned food that the government refuses to regulate or to do cocaine on the weekends? Obviously, there is nothing less healthy than being morbidly obese. Chronic cocaine use might cause heart problems, and it seems like it does, but not to the degree that obesity does. Obesity causes every negative health outcome.

I would support warning labels. There are warning labels on cigarettes, but none on food products that contain refined sugar/HFCS and/or seed oils (along with the prerequisite doses of PFAS and microplastics), despite those things being much more dangerous than cigarettes. You could put warning labels on OTC fentanyl and the rest of the drugs. That’s fine and fair enough. But beyond telling you these things are unhealthy and not recommended for recreational use, the government should not have a role in telling you what you can and can’t consume.

Conversely, you could also remove the warning labels from cigarettes, so people would stop expecting the government will warn them if something is unhealthy.

Here’s the important part of my legalization plan: along with legalizing the drugs, I would outlaw any and all junkie behavior. I would do a very severe crackdown on homelessness and panhandling and all of the other things associated with abuse of drugs. Vagrancy, loitering, other public nuisance behavior. Like, I’m talking ten-year prison sentences for this sort of thing. Because while you do have a natural right to consume whatever chemicals you want, because you’re an adult and you have a right to make your own decisions, you don’t have a right to infringe on other people with society-destroying behavior like living on the streets and begging. Right now, we have the opposite, where the drugs are illegal but all of the bad behavior associated with drug use is legal and seemingly encouraged in many jurisdictions.

Drugs Never Killed Anyone

Conservatives are pretty clear on the fact that guns are inanimate objects and that a gun never kills anyone, but rather a person who aims a gun at another person and pulled the trigger kills someone. The fact that they are not able to apply this same logic to drugs is baffling. Drugs are inanimate objects. If someone dies from drugs, it is because they made the decision to consume the drug in an irresponsible dose.

The oxycontin debacle is an issue of false advertising. Purdue Pharma told people that oxycontin was “safe” for “pain relief,” and it turned out it was engineered and intended to be extremely habit-forming. I can see that this is a problem. It would be similar to a gun manufacturer saying “you can shoot yourself in the head with this gun and nothing bad will happen.”

But regardless of the Purdue false advertising campaign, the oxycontin cum heroin cum fentanyl “crisis” is still not a supply issue. It is a demand issue. You cannot solve a demand issue by limiting supply. At least, I think that is some kind of economic principle or whatever, I don’t actually know, I’m not an economist. But in this specific case, it is just obvious that the only thing you can do in terms of solving demand by limiting supply is drive up prices of drugs which leads to endless petty crime to pay for the drugs. At this point, it is obvious that the supply can’t be completely cut off, or even meaningfully reduced.

Trump has cracked down on the border. It’s sort of irrelevant at this point, since most of the people who wanted to come to America are already here, but he has closed the border. Have drug prices gone up due to this attempt at strangling the supply?

With fentanyl, you have a whole new reality on the supply side. With heroin, you had to grow the shit in Afghanistan and then traffic it to the West. Fentanyl is just made in a lab, and it is insanely easy to make. It costs almost nothing. Right now, it is cheapest to make it in Mexico and then take it across the border, but it is so cheap to make that you could also make it anywhere and then just mail it to the United States. I’ve read that based on the production costs, if you send it through the mail and 99 out of 100 packages get seized, you still make a profit on the 1% that gets through. And people could be making this in the US. They just don’t, because as of right now, it is cheaper to do it in Mexico or to mail it from wherever.

Here’s the thing: if you can’t stop the supply, and you want people to do less drugs, then you need to address demand. What is the demand? Why are there so many people who want to take these drugs? Well, presumably it is because their lives are miserable, and drugs work to help them escape from that misery.

It’s widely known that soldiers in Vietnam did a lot of heroin. Here’s a fun factoid for you: 95% of the boys who were “addicted” to heroin in Vietnam stopped cold turkey when they came home. This obviously proves the fact that this whole theory of “addiction” is a complete hoax. These are not magical substances that take over your body and remove your free will, forcing you to use them against your will.

Here’s another fun factoid: the whole “addiction theory” had as one of its primary pillars a rat study, where a rat was given one water bottle with normal water and one with morphine or cocaine-laced water, and the rat just kept drinking the drug water until it OD’d. Then, in the late seventies – i.e., a very long time ago – someone called Bruce K. Alexander said that these studies of the rat overdosing on drugs all had a situation where the rat was in a small metal cage, completely alone with nothing to do. He hypothesized that if you created a better environment for the rat, the rat would respond differently to the availability of drugs. He created “Rat Park,” where the rats had a cage 200 times the size of the ones used in the original studies, filled with toys and fun things rats like, as well as other rats to socialize with and have sex with, then added the same options of normal water, morphine water, and cocaine water. Shockingly to drug warriors and probably to no one else, the rats did not become “addicts” and kill themselves with the drugs. They would sometimes use the drugs, just for a bit of fun, but they would use them rarely and none of them OD’d. This proved – or at least went a long way towards proving – that the opposite of the “addiction” theory was true, that drugs are not “addictive” in the sense they are claimed to be addictive, and people do drugs because of life problems.

With the oxycontin thing, no one can deny that giving out very strong opiates because someone has a sore back and telling them it was totally safe was ethical. However, who became “addicted”? It was almost exclusively people in small rural towns that had no jobs due to deindustrialization. Without a job, you probably don’t have a wife and kids either, so why not get high? Seriously, why shouldn’t someone in that situation just get high and relax? Imagine you live in a small shithole town, you have no work, you have no wife, you have nothing at all to do: why is it not totally obvious that you would get high?

The current fentanyl crisis is more urban, while the original oxycontin crisis was much more rural, but what is the same is that it is all people who do not feel they have any future. Taking drugs is a choice, and it is a choice made exclusively by people with bad lives. You do not hear stories of well employed and happily married fathers with good diets and gym routines becoming addicted to opioids or any other hard drugs.

It’s worth mentioning that basically everyone in this country is on some kind of mind-altering drugs. Most of them are legal. You can get amphetamine prescribed in a fifteen minute session with a psychiatrist by telling them you have a hard time concentrating, and hardcore tranquilizers by saying you feel anxious. You can take the amphetamines in the daytime and tranquilizers in the nighttime. SSRIs are also still very popular, with around 15% of Americans on them, despite the huge amount of data on how destructive they are, and the whole “chemical imbalance” theory having been completely debunked to the point where no one has the nerve to cite it anymore. Something like 99% of American men use pornography, which, as I’ve explained elsewhere, is not about sex, but is a drug used to flood the brain with dopamine (up to ten times more than other “pleasurable” activities, including real sex).

The reason there is a drug problem in America is that a lot of people have bad lives. They are bowling alone, they are poor, they do not have good family situations. Drug use is also high among famous people, because despite the fact everyone wants to be famous, actually being famous is the most stressful possible life anyone can have. Or, one of the most stressful possible lives. Being an out-of-work coal miner in a shithole town with no young people where 2/3rds of homes are unoccupied is also very stressful.

If you could stop the supply, that already would have happened. The drug war has been going on for decades now and there are more drug addicts than ever. And attempting to stop the supply is unbelievably destructive, and leads to all of the worst possible outcomes.

What the Heck is a Narcoterrorist?

As you’re no doubt aware, Donald Trump blew up a small gas-powered boat in the Caribbean under the premise that it was carrying drugs to the United States. Or rather, it is claimed that this happened.

I don’t know that I really believe it happened. I think the video might be AI. Nothing about it makes any sense at all.

Most obviously, you could not drive that boat 2,000 miles to America. That is nonsensical on its face, and it was incredibly surreal to me that this claim was made and that people believed it. I guess most people don’t know much about boats. I know a couple things about boats. But it really doesn’t seem like you would need to know much about boats to know that what amounts to a large dingy with outboard gas-powered motors cannot travel thousands of miles through open ocean.

The boat was 40-foot long, reportedly with three outboard motors. Speaking with AI on the topic, the trip from Venezuela to Florida would require between 900 and 2,000 gallons of gas. The AI concluded:

Therefore, a 1,000-nautical-mile range at 90 knots with triple outboards is not feasible with current marine technology due to insurmountable fuel consumption demands.

Although it was obvious to me on its face that this claim of that boat in the photo making this trip, which is 1,200 miles as the crow flies and closer to 2,000 miles in practice, was not at all possible, I did a lot of research, asking the AI and then reading source material, and I can confirm that there is simply no possible way that boat was driving from Venezuela to Florida.

This type of boat can be used in drug trafficking, though not typically directly from South America. Even on much shorter trips, go-fast boats require refueling. If this boat was making the trip, it could have been tracked to wherever it was going to refuel instead of blown up. This reminds me of the “Chinese spy balloon” situation, where instead of downing the balloon and investigating it, proving it was a “spy balloon,” they blew it up so no one could ever prove it wasn’t a “spy balloon.”

Though we don’t know exactly where the boat was when it was blown up, Marco Rubio initially said the boat was headed for Trinidad, which is literally right off the coast of Venezuela.

So, although we are not being told where the boat was, presumably, the fact that the Secretary of State said this (he presumably had been briefed on the location) means that the boat was somewhere between Venezuela and Trinidad and Tobago when it was blown up. To then say that they knew it was headed for America…

….without providing any evidence or explaining how they know that, is quite remarkable in its absurdity. Like, it is actually unbelievable that they are making this claim, and it is even more unbelievable that people on Twitter are going along with it, and actually using the term “narcoterrorists.”

The other very insane thing about this is that there were 11 people on the boat. Why would you bring 11 people on a drug run? Wouldn’t you want to fill the boat with drugs? I mean, especially given the fact you need to bring thousands of gallons of gas, you would think you would want to keep some room for the drugs.

Finally, it’s worth noting that the president isn’t allowed to just murder people by blowing up their boats in international waters. If they thought they had drugs somehow headed for America, they could have just stopped the boat. There are warships and 4,000 marines and sailors off the coast of Venezuela right now, so there were plenty of people who could have hopped over to this boat and checked out what was going on with it. Just blowing it up with an attack helicopter is fucking insane.

It’s possible that they did just blow up some random boat of people traveling from Venezuela to Trinidad. But I also think it’s possible it is just a fake video they released. Thus far, there are no family members coming out and saying “hey why did you kill my family member on that boat, Donald?” and I think it would be a problem to just blow up a random boat because someone’s family members would complain, and Maduro could bring out the family members to talk about it. So it makes more sense to me it was just an AI video.

You might be saying then: if it was AI, why did they make it so stupid? Why did they show a boat that can’t possibly make that trip, why did they include 11 people on it, which makes no sense? And the obvious explanation is that they want people to go along with something that makes no sense.

People are obliging.

Stephen Crowder says you’re committing treason if you don’t support this.

There are millions more of these tweets. You can go check.

They are all using this new term “narcoterrorist.” No one had heard of this a week ago, now it is just being thrown around like it’s an established thing. This is more face-numbing stupidity. “Terrorism” means using violence against civilians to political ends. The goal of narcotics trafficking is to make money. There is nothing political about it. They are using the word because legally, it gives them more power to act under the Patriot Act. (It also sounds much scarier, I’m sure.) Though it is still definitely illegal to just blow up random boats in international waters.

Was Cocaine Even the Problem?

I thought we had a fentanyl crisis, not a cocaine crisis. I thought the whole thing was that “Mexican cartels” were running fentanyl and also China was somehow responsible. But if it’s now about cocaine, that is in itself confusing, but Venezuela is not a cocaine country. They are now going around claiming Maduro is running a drug gang?

I’ve looked it up, and I can’t even find Venezuela mentioned in anything about cocaine. Government studies and a CSIS report agree that 98% of cocaine in the US comes from Colombia, with the other 2% coming from Bolivia or Peru.

I’m sure some of the Venezuelan gang members that flooded the country under Joe Biden’s open borders policy were dealing cocaine in America. But those were people Maduro let out of prison to come to the US. Biden announced an open borders policy, and as is reasonable enough in my estimation, Maduro opened the prisons and sent all his country’s gang members to America. The US had been threatening him with regime change since he took power, and if you’ll remember, under Trump 1, Macro Rubio and Mike Pompeo were doing this insane thing where they picked some random guy and said he was the real president of Venezuela. It was just as bizarre as the rest of this stuff.

Sometimes it feel like nothing even makes sense, no? Honestly, I don’t blame people for just shutting down and shutting off, because there is just this constant flow of utter nonsense, delivered with total seriousness, and it can truly make one feel like they are going insane. I have a bit less sympathy for the Trump people who are cheering on all of this lunacy. I guess I have some sympathy for the average person who is caught up in it, as they are just dumb and helpless and being abused. But these conservative commentators are the absolute scum of the earth. Stuff like the above Stephen Crowder tweet is truly unforgivable.

Clearly, Trump’s people want some kind of “win,” and someone, presumably Marco Rubio, is claiming that they can pull off a regime change in Venezuela. There are 4,000 marines and sailors off the coast now, in warships. You can’t do a regime change with that army, and you don’t need that army if you’re going to try to do an assassination. If you wanted to do an assassination, presumably you would not want it to be completely obvious that you did it, and if Maduro gets assassinated while there are American warships hovering around, it will be obvious who did it. So, who knows what the plan is. I guess they are just trying to create some kind of panic in the country.

It is infuriating that the declared fight against Sino-Mexican fentanyl is now a fight against cocaine in a country that doesn’t produce any cocaine. Because I follow this stuff close enough to understand it is all just lies, I don’t worry about being driven insane by it, but it is so outrageous it is difficult to maintain composure. The fact that I am one of the only people who is actually going to be able to explain these things in a clear and concise way that people can understand, and I am completely out of the game, makes it all the more frustrating.

It seems that the overwhelming majority of Americans get some kind of sadistic thrill from the government killing people. Everyone clapped seeing that boat blown up, without having any information, without asking why it makes no sense. Apparently some of the liberals didn’t clap, but they clap when random apartment buildings in Moscow get drone attacked. This probably relates back to the drug problem. People’s lives are completely meaningless, so they embrace depravity. Abusing drugs and sadistically cheering people you don’t know being murdered for reasons you don’t understand are both coping behaviors of very unhealthy people.

This Isn’t Going Anywhere Good

Part of why I cut back on my output on the Daily Stormer is that I really just don’t have very much nice stuff to say. I don’t see any solutions to anything, and I’m not willing to go around pretending there are solutions in order to try to get some crypto donations. This Venezuelan boat bombing, the purely nonsensical nature of it, and the even more nonsensical public response, epitomizes just how far gone this country is. The Ukraine war also does that. As does basically everything else that happens.

The one glimmer of hope I can see is the backlash against the genocide in Gaza, and the backlash against the larger Jewish project in the Middle East. But the thing about that is, “at least people are willing to say they are against mass murdering children” is not super encouraging. It doesn’t prove much.

As the reader is aware, I am hopeful about the US empire collapsing and China taking over as the world’s premier superpower. This is inevitable in the long term, but there is a high chance things will get much worse before that happens. The fact that the entire leadership in Washington is insane, and that the emerging competing elite in Silicon Valley are even more insane, is not encouraging. The plan right now appears to be to install James “JD Vance” Bowman as the next president, which will allow for a full merger of the Silicon Valley elite with the Washington elite, given that Bowman was groomed by Peter Thiel for this role.

These Silicon Valley people are insane on a whole other level. The “Christian Zionist” cult, which had its moment in the spotlight after 9/11, is perhaps made to look sane by the religious cult that controls Silicon Valley. These people believe, legitimately, that they are going to make an “artificial general intelligence” computer super mind that will solve every problem and allow them to live forever and conquer the universe. Thiel, who is a homosexual, is now claiming to be a Christian himself and he is obsessed with the antichrist (???). His heretical Christian doctrine is that God wants us to perfect our bodies on Earth. People believed the “God wants us to support the Christ-killing Jews and murder all these Arabs” heresy, so they will presumably believe this one too.

I don’t see any room for any kind of progress here. Probably, that is why I am still banned, even while so many other people have been unbanned. I think the pro-China message has become the third rail. As long as people are talking about American politics as if they matter, there is no actual threat to the system, because you are engaging the system and giving it legitimacy even if you are against it. All of this material, even the strong anti-Israel and sometimes even anti-Jewish sentiment just feeds into this nonsense machine, while also providing much needed data for the AI super-systems that are being built.

As I’ve said, writing books is going to be a better way for me to communicate while I am still under these ultra-extreme censorship sanctions. I am writing multiple books now, and I think once I get one finished and published, I’ll get to rolling, and be able to pump out the same word count I was putting out on the site in book format. Although I’m clearly a well-established writer, moving to book format is something of a leap, and it’s a process I’m going through.

I just want to make it clear that although I am very negative on most things I would normally have been talking about, I’m optimistic in the long run, and I am seeing a lot of good things happening on the world stage. God willing, most of us will live to see a better future.

]]> I Support India Now. I’m All-In. I’ve Started Shitting in the Street to Show Solidarity. https://dailystormer.in/i-support-india-now-im-all-in-ive-started-shitting-in-the-street-to-show-solidarity/ Wed, 03 Sep 2025 22:59:13 +0000 https://dailystormer.in/?p=688090

One time in Thailand, however many years ago, I was listening to a young lady complain about Chinese people. I had some sympathy for her complaints, as Chinese tourists can be overbearing. On the whole, they spend so much money, it is hardly fair to complain. And the thing about this is: China developed so rapidly that the average 30-year-old has parents who grew up in a rice field. So they have a rural mindset, which is different than the more refined culture of Thailand, which prioritizes politeness and a complex system of social decorum. Americans and the British can also be slightly barbaric in the eyes of Thais or other Indochinese peoples, but the whites can sort of get a hold of the concept of Asian decorum, specifically because they are racially different. A Chinese person looking at a Thai sees someone genetically similar to them (Thailand was colonized by Southern Chinese), and feels as though they are in rural China when they are in Thailand.

The Thais complain about Chinese talking too loudly, spitting indoors, and flicking cigarette butts in inappropriate places. It is all just rural behavior. Obviously, everyone loves the Singaporeans, who are some of the nicest and most refined people in the world (if not the single most polite and culturally aware), and Singaporeans are Han Chinese. Further, you will find Singaporean type culturalization in central Shanghai, Hong Kong, Taipei, and other Han metros where people have lived a cultured urban life for generations. So it is definitely not a ethnic issue or even a general ethnic cultural issue, but specifically a rural issue, with people who have not been fully acclimatized to urban Asian social norms having the money to travel to Thailand for vacation.

I am a sinophile, and attempted to explain this to the lass with some degree of success. I further added that most Asian groups hate each other, but they should try to find positives in Chinese culture and be friendly with them, because they are bringing in money that is really helping Thai development.

She bristled at the word “hate,” saying “I don’t hate anyone, I just find some of the behaviors rude and wish they would try to understand our culture more when they are here.”

Referencing an early discussion, I replied: “Well, you said you hate Indians.”

And she said: “And Pakistan. I hate them all and think a big bomb should destroy all of them. You said we were talking about Asians. I don’t hate any Asians, we are all similar, but I hate all Indians and Pakistanis and think they all should die.”

This is not a minority view in Thailand, Laos, Cambodia, Vietnam, Malaysia, or Indonesia. It is most extreme in Burma, where they border Bangladesh and have had ongoing conflict with them for decades. This doesn’t have much to do with tourism or overseas work, given that subcontinental peoples don’t do much of that in Southeast Asia. It is much more influenced by the fact that you’d be very hard-pressed to find a single individual in one of these countries who does not know someone who has been scammed by an Indian.

It would also be hard to find an American who has not been targeted with a scam from India, but aside from the elderly, most Westerners come from a society that is much lower trust, and is therefore much more guarded against scams. But we all hear the horror stories of elderly people having their identity stolen and their bank account cleaned out, or teenagers who commit suicide because a “woman” with an attractive profile picture asked them to masturbate on camera for them and then threatened to spread it to their parents and all their classmates if they didn’t pay up.

One in five elderly people in America have been scammed, adding up to nearly $40 billion per year in profits for the scammers who are virtually all Indian.

The “sextortion” of teen boys is harder to track, because for the same reason boys don’t want the videos released, they don’t want to admit they got scammed like this. (Note: sextortion victims also include some girls, though a much lower percentage, probably both because girls are slightly more discerning about who they send nudes to, and less bothered by the prospect of them leaking.)

Americans are so sensitive to “racism” accusations that we can’t even talk about the fact that the overwhelming majority of these scams come from India. Of course, the media decides what “racism” is and who you’re allowed to be racist towards, and interestingly, the media does not hesitate to point to ethnic Chinese as being the largest group involved in corporate espionage.

Silicon Valley is involved in aggressive screening not just of Chinese nationals, but ethnic Chinese born in America or a third country. This was endorsed by the State Department, officially, though after several lawsuits, it is currently a bit less official. Official or not, if you are visibly Chinese, it is virtually impossible to get hired as a new employee in Silicon Valley in current year (even other East Asians with poor relations to the Chinese get profiled because of their physical features).

In 2023, the then FBI overlord Christopher Wray held a meeting with his “Five Eyes” satraps to warn of the Chinese tech threat, and effectively instructed tech companies and universities not to hire Chinese people. In so many words.

I don’t know about you, but my grandma being scammed out of her social security by Indians bothers me a lot more than Sam Altman getting his AI algorithm (which was promised to be open source in the first place) borrowed by the Chinese. Part of the issue here is that the government cares a lot more about global tech dominance than they do your grandma or your horny teenage son, but it is also an issue of geopolitics, where China is viewed as an enemy and India is not.

While spying is definitely more important to the government than grandma’s retirement money, the US is only bothered by certain spies. While India probably doesn’t do spying or industrial espionage on any scale, simply because their domestic tech industry is not advanced enough for it to be relevant to them, Israelis steal technology and spy on Americans with impunity, and there are never any meetings about it, let alone calls for companies dealing with sensitive technologies to stop hiring Jews. However, twenty years ago, when the Holocaust was not so fresh in everyone’s minds, Israel did make it into an FBI report on industrial espionage, which stated: “Israel has an active program to gather proprietary information within the United States. These collection activities are primarily directed at obtaining information on military systems and advanced computing applications that can be used in Israel’s sizable armaments industry.” But I mean, in 2019, Jews were caught setting up spying devices outside of the White House, and it was a considered by the US “intelligence community” to be a non-issue. There was no summoning of the ambassador. What makes the situation even more outrageous is that the Israeli companies involved in theft of US technology have been caught selling some of it to China (this is despite the fact that China may well in turn sell the tech to Iran). But this is allowed, because of the Holocaust. (Please see “Schindler’s List” for more information on why Jews are permitted to operate with impunity inside of the United States).

India was a “Bulwark Against China”

China is definitely on the enemies list, just like the Russians. And while their status is nowhere near that of the Jews, India has had a privileged status for decades due to claims that they are a “bulwark against China.”

It is worth noting here that there is a pretty large misconception about the history of India and China. Many people believe, for whatever various reasons, that Chinese-Indian conflict is some kind of ancient norm, similar to the hostility between China and Japan. However, there is no truth to this. In fact, going back more than 2,000 years, there had been intense cultural, religious, and economic cooperation between China and India. India played a key role in moving Chinese products to the Middle East and Europe. (In trying to get a grasp on this issue recently, I found “Buddhism, Diplomacy, and Trade: The Realignment of India–China Relations, 600–1400” by Tansen Sen very helpful, though for those uninterested in books, perusing Wikipedia can get you up to speed.)

So then, you might be thinking that there was some fallout during the colonial period, or during the communist revolution in China. You would, in fact, be incorrect. Relations between India and China, which were peaceful for thousands of years, did not deteriorate until 1959, when India made the decision to harbor the satanic cult leader, slaver, cannibal, and terrorist “Dalai Lama.” Due to the extreme vulgarity of harboring such an unbelievable fiend, tensions soured drastically. This led to border conflicts in territories that were never considered contested before, and to the first ever military conflict between the two states in 1962.

It’s unclear why India made the decision to harbor this terrorist. I would personally assume that it was due to back-channeling with the US, though to be clear, this is a personal “hunch,” as I have never found record of this. The US did funnel him and his satanic cannibal bandits a bunch of money.

To be clear, “Dalai Lama” is no more a “Buddhist” than a “Christian Zionist” is a “Christian.” Tibetan Buddhism, like Christian Zionism, is a satanic cult. Late 19th- and early 20th-century European occultists went to Tibet and integrated the information they gathered into their mystical, satanic systems. Even Aleister Crowley was obsessed with Tibet. That is a story for another time, but the evils of the Tibetans were well-documented long before the Chinese revolution, and are definitely not “Chinese communist” propaganda. (Keyu Jin, who is the sexy author of The New China Playbook: Beyond Socialism and Capitalism, a book trying to explain China to Westerners, says when Americans think of China they think of “the 3 Ts – Tibet, Taiwan, and Tiananmen, all of which were hoaxes. And yes, I am showing off the fact that not working on the site for 10 hours a day has given me time to read a lot of books.) The Dalai Lama’s failed uprising was against Beijing’s demands that they end slavery. This is to say a “humanitarian” reason to harbor him is nonsensical. Regardless of the thinking behind the decision to harbor this fiend, it caused a spiraling of relations between India and China that were then rolled up into Cold War politics.

The end of India’s 3,000 years of friendly relations with China was the beginning of their friendly relations with the US. Relations between the US and China softened in the 1970s, the start of which was actually a ping-pong championship, but the most iconic symbol of the softening was Richard Nixon’s 1972 visit, where he met with Chairman Mao.

Mao died four years later, and Deng Xiaoping eventually took over, leading to decades of cooperation, given that neither got along particularly well with the USSR.

However, this cooperation was haunted by the paranoia of the United States, which insisted on maintaining control of Taiwan, despite the fact that they signed the “One China” agreement, recognizing that the PRC is the only government of China, which includes Taiwan. They also continued to thwart relations between China and India throughout this period, putting conditions on “development assistance” foreign aid, for example, and of course spreading anti-China propaganda throughout the Indian media.

Most of the American “top thinkers,” such as Zbigniew Brzezinski, believed that China was going to become a liberal democracy as it got wealthier. The idea, especially after the fall of the Berlin Wall and the disintegration of the USSR, with all of that “end of history” nonsense, was that wealthier nations naturally adopt social liberalism and that social liberalism is incompatible with any political system other than liberal democracy. As late as 1998, Zbig claimed that “within a decade” the CCP would no longer be the sole governing body of China.

Meanwhile, Samuel Huntington, a Harvard professor who served in the Carter Administration alongside Zbig and author of “The Clash of Civilizations and the Remaking of World Order,” argued that some traditional cultures could maintain social conservatism and therefore political conservatism even after technological development and economic liberalization. He listed China as one such civilization. He certainly won that debate, as by the time Obama took office (elected the same year Zbig predicted China would be embracing democracy), the US had accepted that China would not spontaneously become a democracy, and developed a “Pivot to Asia” strategy to use military force to turn China into a liberal democracy.

Part of the plan there was to lean heavily into the relationship with India, along with the Philippines, Japan, and “South Korea,” because they needed as many bulwarks as possible against their former bulwark against the USSR. (US foreign policy is heavily bulwark-oriented, which in simple terms means that they constantly play countries against one another to prevent any alliances that could challenge their hegemony.) Many prominent academics, including John Mearsheimer, were calling for Russia to be a bulwark against China, but the US has always hated Russia. During his 2012 election against Mitt Romney, Obama chastised the nasty old magic underwear-wearing coot over Romney’s antagonism toward Russia. You may remember he said “the 1980s called and they want their foreign policy back.” (Obama was always very tapped into youth culture, you see.) Two years later, Obama’s State Department was running a coup in the Ukraine. (Although to be fair, during his “exit interview” with Jewish terrorist and Atlantic Monthly editor Jeffrey Goldberg, Obama said he didn’t support further escalation with Russia over the Ukraine. Also, to be fair, Goldberg is my favorite Jewish terrorist because he put me on the cover of his magazine and I looked really cool. Also to be clear, he is literally a Jewish terrorist who in his 20s went to Israel to work in a concentration camp and torture hostages.)

India, with a massive population and an economy advanced enough to absorb much of the manufacturing previously done in China, was a key “bulwark” in this current landscape of hostility towards China.

But then Lindsey Graham told Trump he had to be a big tough macho man and stand up against Vladimir Putin for some reason no one has ever bothered to explain, and Trump hit India with a 50% tariff because they refused to stop buying Russian oil.

Obviously, this isn’t a permanent thing. Even if India maintains its refusal to take orders regarding its energy policy from Donald Trump and his pal Lindsey, it is not going to maintain a 50% tariff. However, this has completely soured India on the US, rousing up ultranationalist sentiment. Even if the tariffs are lifted tomorrow, the damage done to the US-India relationship will be permanent.

I watch the Indian news. Firstly, it is in English for whatever reason. Secondly, the talk shows are totally insane. There are no guardrails. It is like Piers Morgan’s YouTube show, but even wilder. They will entertain any and all ideas. They will sometimes bring on Pakistanis and have better shouting matches than anything I’ve ever seen on Piers’ show. Further, I enjoy masturbating to some of the hosts.

Based on 100% of the news I’ve seen, India is now completely united against America. Severely. These people are really, really mad. They are saying “we’ve done everything you wanted us to do for decades, how are you going to do us like this?” It is being viewed, universally, as an attack on Indian sovereignty, and unlike white people, Indians still have a sense of pride and dignity and take very severe offense to being bullied in this way. What they are hearing from Donald Trump is “we decide who you do business with.” Given that the colonial history is such a huge part of the national mythology, it seems like some advisor should have understood that the response to this would be extreme.

I don’t think India is going to become an enemy state tomorrow, but this weird thing Trump did will be remembered for decades to come, and it is already causing the country to move toward China, as we saw this week.

“Tariffs” are Just a New Form of Sanctions

The US had encouraged India to engage in border skirmishes with China, and in 2020 there was a particularly deadly one. Because of this, and the fallout from it, India’s recent relations with China were especially cold, which is exactly what the US wanted. However, Indian Prime Minister Modi is now in China for the first time in seven years. And it is not just any trip, but a trip to meet with the Shanghai Cooperation Organization (SCO), a security partnership that Russia and China envision as a counterbalance to NATO.

India has been a member of the SCO since 2017, but has also maintained military cooperation with the US, which was one of the biggest hurdles preventing the organization from forming a cohesive bloc to resist NATO. Although the mutual defense pact – “an attack on one is an attack on all” – that NATO members agree to is unprecedented, explicitly a relic of the Cold War, and not something the SCO would likely ever commit to, it is possible that agreements could be made to exclusively cooperate militarily with each other, which would mean India ending their cooperation with the US military.

Joe Biden’s administration was seen as completely out of control, with its totally unprecedented actions against Russia, removing them from the global banking system over an insignificant border skirmish, along with their provocations and threats against China, all culminating in their unconditional support for Israel’s genocide in Gaza, which threatens to throw the entire region into a very big war. Countries were waiting to see if Trump would restore some kind of sanity, as he was claiming he would, and instead he maxed everything out, making it even more extreme than it was under Biden.

The Russia sanctions showed that the US could not be trusted to maintain the global financial system, because if they decide they don’t like you, they can just kick you out of international trade. They will steal your dollar reserves. They will attempt to bankrupt your economy, they will engage in piracy, expropriating private property from your citizens without any sort of process. This is a lot more threatening than the prospect of war. If Trump would have came in on day one and simply let Russia back into SWIFT, he could have kept the war going and it would have blunted most of the damage. But instead he is doing “secondary sanctions” through this “tariff” thing.

It’s now clear that the tariffs do not relate to attempting to reshore US manufacturing. That is just a ruse. It is a stupid ruse as well, because the idea that you can just “move” factories as you would move a shipping container, and then somehow train up a staff, is completely absurd.

Note: During Trump 1, when he first started tariffing China ostensibly under the same premise as these current tariffs, China began moving their factories to Vietnam, Cambodia, Thailand, etc. They brought their own teams to build the buildings, and then their own people to train up the local staff. In some situations, they didn’t even bother to train local staff, and just moved the Chinese factory workers to the new factory in the less tariffed country.

“Reshoring” is a pipe dream. It is so much more expensive to manufacture in America. Some of that is wages, but with wages having risen in China and elsewhere while US wages have fallen, it has much more to do with the insane regulatory environment in America that is so anti-business. Surely, if the tariffs are high enough, it is still cheaper to move to America, but who is going to do that when Trump won’t even stick to his own policies for more than a few days or weeks? And even if Trump did set a hard policy, we live in a democracy where there is no political stability and the next guy could and probably will just remove all these tariffs.

The tariffs are usually framed by critics as a tax on Americans. Objectively, they are a tax on Americans, even though they also harm foreign exporters. But I think the real revelation here, made very obvious in the India situation, is that these tariffs are a new type of sanctions. Lindsey Graham was calling for “secondary sanctions” on India for buying Russian oil, and Trump did the “tariffs” for that express purpose. And he is lobbing these tariffs around everywhere. He’s tariffing Brazil explicitly to try to pressure them into making Bolsonaro president again. Whatever you think of the Ukraine or Brazil or whatever else, this is extreme international belligerence, and it shows the world that the US is not a safe guarantor of the global order. Entrusting the US to maintain the global financial or security architecture is like sending your kids to a daycare center that is also a crack house.

Americans might think Trump is better than Biden because he cracked down on trannies and you can say “gay” and “retard” again. But to the rest of the world, Trump 2 is “Biden on Steroids,” and the US is a sinking ship. People are fleeing, trying to grab ahold of anything.

Modi’s India Can’t Work as a Liberal Democracy

Despite having called for a genocide of the entire Indian race as a result of their scamming and generally abhorrent behaviors, I’ve always liked Modi. He is an anti-liberal ethnoreligious nationalist. His project is incompatible with democracy. Most pressingly, he is dealing with an existential demographic issue many decades after the partition of India, which was supposed to solve the problem of multiculturalism by giving Moslems their own country (which later became two countries when East Pakistan became Bangladesh). There are still Moslems in India, and they have a lot more kids than Hindus. India is supposedly only 15% Moslem right now, but no one really knows the demographics of India. In a few decades, the Moslems will start wielding real political power, and in the longer run, there cannot be a democratic Hindu India for the same reason Israel says there can’t be a Jewish democracy if they gave Palestinians citizenship. (This is why everyone talks about a mythical “two-state solution” instead of just doing the obvious thing and giving Palestinians equal rights. Jews will always talk about a “two-state solution.” That’s why there are so many Jews in pro-Palestine activism. The obvious thing is a one-state solution where you just give the Palestinians citizenship.) If India were not a democracy, an Islamic minority would not be so much of a threat. The Hindus wouldn’t have to kill them all, but they would not face the threat of Moslems gaining political power and ultimately taking over the country.

Please note that I am not saying Islam is bad or Hinduism is good or anything else, I am simply describing the situation, and also noting that I respect any leader who is willing to stick up for their own people. I like Modi because he is the kind of leader that every nation should have.

What’s more, unlike many populists, Modi’s support base is the urban middle class, the wealthy, and the industrialists. In the 2024 election, when he lost a significant amount of power in the democracy system, it was in part due to Moslems coming together (which they hadn’t effectively done before), but was in larger part due to poor, rural people disliking him because of something to do with farming problems.

The only reason India is a democracy in the first place is that the West demanded it. No one really wants democracy, other than screeching women who want to have slut freedoms, as well as homosexuals and various minority groups. Democracy is not a natural system. You see this with the Trump movement, where the MAGA support base has no interest at all in democratic processes and just basically wants Trump to be a king. Further, Putin got 88% of the vote in the last election. If Xi were to hold a vote, he would get more than that. Democracy is an unnatural system, it is the most corrupt system, and it is the most tyrannical. No one wants it and they only do it because the US forces it on them. The US wants democracies because they can manipulate and control them through institutions. They have that down to a science.

This is a big reason for Modi to split from the US. If he does, he will no longer have to do this democracy charade. That doesn’t mean he has to abolish parliament or whatever, he just moves into a system that maintains some of the trappings of democracy, but opposition parties are sidelined and safely ignored.

The Trump attack on India via these “tariff” sanctions is giving Modi the support and the excuse to move away from the West and move away from the democracy system. His ability to do that will be based on his ability to form a relationship with China, and so far, that seems to be going very well.

The SCO meeting was more symbolic than anything else. But it’s a big symbol. And it certainly implies that this is going to be moving forward.

Trump is going around whining about how he deserves the Nobel Peace Prize even as he continues to arm the Ukraine and commits the single most brutal genocide in all of human history in Gaza. (The Holocaust is a hoax, but even if it was real, at least it was a secret. Imagine if Nazi camp guards had been posting TikTok videos of them steaming millions of Jews in homicidal steam chambers. And then there was some other country paying for the whole thing and saying it was good.) But frankly, the way Trump has united Russia, China, and India in this new alliance is probably worth giving him a Nobel Peace Prize. I’m serious. He should try applying on that basis, and I don’t really know how it could be denied to him.

The SCO meeting was also attended by Lula, president of Brazil, who is also a victim of Trump’s “tariff” sanctions. Iran’s president was there. As was the Prime Minister of Cambodia, whose country was a victim of a ridiculous assault by the US ally Thailand last month. Mongolia’s president was there (the US has been trying to sway Mongolia to their side, despite the fact it would make no sense). The leaders of every Central and Southeast Asian country, with the exceptions of Thailand and the Philippines, were in attendance.

This photo is just the official members, not including all of the other heads of state who came and are presumably looking to join.

The SCO is a kind of sister organization to BRICS. What exactly the official functions of these organizations technically are is sort of irrelevant at this point. The point is, they represent the coming together of all of the nations being targeted as enemies by the United States. Please note that I hate the term “global south,” and would ask you to kindly not use that term. The correct term is “Russia, China, and the third world” (Russia and China are second world countries, the rest of these are all third world countries. Those terms are not offensive, and what is actually offensive is changing terminology. Referring to the third world as “global south” is no better than referring to niggers as “the negro peoples.”)

What we are seeing with Trump is an extreme escalation of the US agenda to build an Iron Curtain around itself by forcing every country not directly under the control of the US into an alliance explicitly based on not being friends with the US, because the US is a bully country that tries to control everyone’s life.

International liberal democracy thinks it’s Jesus. After all, if everyone has “human rights” (protip: they do not), then every country must accept the perfected universalist system of liberal democracy. It is an evangelical system. This has become like communism. Well, like early communism. “Everyone deserves human rights” is just a different version of “workers of the world, unite!” What China, as the head of this new world order, is saying is that it’s nobody’s business but your own how you want to run your internal affairs. What China is saying is that communists, dictators, theocrats, and yes, even democrats (assuming they are not the liberal Western sort) can all get along and make money together instead of having wars. It is universally appealing and the only reason anyone would not want in is that the US is threatening or bribing them.

No traditional country that is too big to bribe wants to be on-board with the Americans’ gay/feminist/interracial agenda. Access to the US financial infrastructure is a kind of bribe, in that it is coercive. But the world is now seeing that regardless of the money they might be able to make, it is simply not worth it to be under the boot of Creepy Uncle Sam. Further, given the way the country is going off the rails, it’s unlikely there is going to be much money to make with the US in the 21st century. Along with all of his other problems, Trump has no ability to escape Israel’s demand for a war with Iran, and that is really going to damage the country’s financial and military standing.

Further, Modi, like every other leader in the world, knows that at any time the US could do him like they did Russia, and cut India out of their international financial cartel. It is just common sense to preempt that by being prepared. For every country, security is the first and foremost concern, and China can provide security guarantees without the bullying.

What This Means for You

If this plays out the way it looks like it’s going to play out, it is definitely going to mean fewer H-1B visas, I can tell you that. Indians will be less excited to come to a country they view as an enemy nation, and the US will be less likely to let them in if they start classifying them like they classify the Chinese. India’s tech sector is not a complete joke, they are developing, and they could develop faster if they were cooperating with the Chinese, so those people who come on H-1Bs could just stay in their own country and work at their own companies.

Further, if India, the most populous country in the world and the “bulwark against China” that the US has poured so much money and energy into developing switches to the Chinese side, it is a massive hit to the American Empire, and the weakening of the American empire is good for everyone on earth, first and foremost Americans themselves. Well, maybe first and foremost for the Europeans, who are crushed under the heel of the Americans and don’t even get the financial benefits Americans get from the empire, but at least second and secondmost, the Americans benefit from an end of the empire.

As far as what America’s plan is here: I have no idea. This makes zero sense. There is no level on which it makes sense, other than that Trump is senile, and really likes golfing with Lindsey Graham.

It is wild that he had that meeting with Putin and said he was setting everything up to end the war then did the most extreme possible thing that not even Joe Biden was willing to do, these “secondary sanctions.” But way beyond simply escalating the war, which he’d already been doing in various ways, to make an enemy out of India is just so bizarre I can’t even really process how it could have happened beyond the stated theory of “he’s senile and Lindsey Graham is really good at kissing his ass.”

I form my own opinions on things, and then before considering them solid enough to share with you, dear reader, I go see what other smart people are saying. I’ve read and listened to a lot of different smart people since Trump did this attack on India, and everyone has said the same thing: “I have no idea why he would do this.” He is making all of these threats, talking about how America can do anything to anyone, and none of it makes any sense. I don’t think it is some calculated move by any “deep state,” and instead it seems like the opposite; he’d been doing this tariff thing for however many months, and shortly after the India attack, a federal court called him up and said all these tariffs are illegal, he doesn’t have any of this authority. He’s saying he’s going to rush it through the Supreme Court, so we’ll see how that goes, but in terms of India, I think it’s over. I think Modi wanted out for the reasons listed above, and I think the people of the country are angry enough that he can use this as a wedge issue to distance himself from the US.

But hey – whatever.

I don’t know why it’s happening, but I know I like this a lot.

The collapse of the empire is the only news story that really matters. All of this other stuff is really just a distraction, entertainment at best. They’re never going to give you the Epstein files. They’re not going to deport millions of people. Obama is not going to be arrested. Shroud is never going to be prosecuted for cheating at video games. But every day, you can open up your internet device and watch the empire ending.

As I type up the final words of this essay, my laptop is on my knees as I squat in the street taking a shit in a show of solidarity with the Indian people. Looking up at the clear blue autumn sky above this shitting street, I can see the shadow of a new world order, coming into view.

]]> Are We Still Allowed to Burn the Israeli Flag or Nah? https://dailystormer.in/are-we-still-allowed-to-burn-the-israeli-flag-or-nah/ Tue, 26 Aug 2025 11:13:36 +0000 https://dailystormer.in/?p=688061

Actions have consequences.

Burn the American flag, disrespect our nation, incite violence: ONE YEAR IN JAIL. No excuses. pic.twitter.com/mEBgJL6CNn

— The White House (@WhiteHouse) August 25, 2025

Donald Trump this week overrode the Supreme Court, declaring by executive order that it is illegal to burn the American flag.

Then some fat guy with very poor sounding speech went in front of the White House and burned the flag and yelled about White Privilege.

That guy had obviously been planning on doing some kind of social media stunt like this for a while. Why didn’t he go on Ozempic first?

I’ve read some tweets. Most conservatives are talking about how people have been charged with burning gay flags, and so if it’s illegal to burn a gay flag, it should be illegal to burn an American flag. What they aren’t saying is that it’s not actually illegal to buy a gay flag and then burn it, all the people who were charged with doing that grabbed the gay flag from a gay church or some other gay place and burned it, meaning it was theft and vandalism, which are actual crimes. Of course, adding hate crimes enhancements to theft and vandalism is insane. But the argument of “if we can’t burn their flag, they shouldn’t be able to burn ours” is stupid in a lot of different ways. In this case, if Trump is allowed to pass any law with an executive order, why doesn’t he just make a law legalizing burning the gay flag? Why doesn’t he outlaw all “hate crime enhancements”? He’s saying he can make any law by just writing it on a paper, so he could do that.

Wouldn’t we rather have more speech than less speech?

Please note: no one asked you to “work yourself into a state of hysteria,” Christopher. But you’ve set yourself up as a public commentator, an opinion maker, and so I think people expect you to have an opinion.

And then of course… the vets.

Veteran of Iraq and Afghanistan, btw.

I don’t know if he meant to post the Israeli flag and that is some kind of typo.

The question I had was: is it still legal to burn the Israeli flag? Because so far, none of the anti-speech laws Trump has been putting through have had anything to do with America, they are all just about Israel. The feds have seized control of the curriculums of universities and made it illegal to say Israel is genocidal or that Israel is like the Nazis, but you’re still allowed to say that America is genocidal and like the Nazis. So it would be out of character to outlaw burning the American flag while allowing people to legally burn the Jewish flag.

All this Trump police state type stuff is very strange and I think unexpected. It is strange that all of the people you would expect to be against this stuff are the ones supporting it.

The conservative media is ridiculously irresponsible. Obviously, when you start getting into military on the streets and so on, you’re establishing a precedent. This isn’t going to go away. In 2028, either Gavin Newsom or AOC is going to be president (it will probably be a shared ticket, with AOC as VP because she’s younger, but she will compete with him and might win). They are not going to remove the military from the streets or reduce the militarization of other law enforcement organizations. They’re also not going to add more freedom of speech. And if this thing where Trump can just make any law through EO stays in place, they are definitely going to use that.

To be clear, there is no way any Republican will win in 2028. I don’t believe elections are real, and I argued before the election that Trump would be allowed to win because Jews want him doing these wars for Israel. That seems to have played out, or be playing out, exactly as I said it would. But even if you believe elections are real, it is already obvious that Trump has completely burned any chance of any GOP candidate winning in 2028.

I guess if I believed elections were real, I would be telling anyone who wanted to run as a Republican to distance themselves from Trump aggressively right now. JD Vance can’t do that, but he was never going to win even the 2028 nomination regardless. But even if elections are real and someone like Tucker Carlson were to distance himself from Trump aggressively in preparation, no Republican can win, because this is too bad of a disaster and it is only going to get worse.

The next phase of the Iran thing is about to get rolling. Maybe I will have been right and Trump will end the Ukraine thing as that gets started, I don’t know. That seems possible. But yeah, just check the news: Israel is saying the “operation” is still ongoing, they are bombing Yemen again, they are threatening constantly, the Lebanese government is trying to disarm Hezbollah, Australia just accused Iran of burning Jewish restaurants in Australia (???), Iran is doing military drills and saying a new conflict “could erupt at any moment,” China is shipping in weapons, CENTCOM is doing a leadership shift, the US is saying Iran is planning to attack America. And so on.

I am not going to predict a timeframe, but it is undeniable that this is going to blow up again, and much bigger, as all sides are saying “there is no solution.”

The point is: this presidency is going to be one of the worst messes in US history. Some people are still cheering some aspects of it, but especially if you include the Epstein thing, Trump has managed to piss off all of his own supporters in various ways. There is probably more Republican support for a war with Iran than there is for the one with the Ukraine, but even the boomers are starting to look at the Gaza thing like “wow, what is going on here?” And the Israel First agenda is not deniable. I guess the government is just hoping Americans prefer Israel over their own country and are fine with sacrificing benefits so that Israel can get more weapons to murder children.

The conservative influencer defense of the flag burning EO shows that they are really struggling to explain this stuff. “Well, if we can’t burn a gay flag then they shouldn’t be able to burn a US flag” is not a good argument, it is a retarded argument for babies, and these strange acts are not going to get any easier to explain as this continues to spiral.

And I mean. They are aiming for 400,000 deportations per year. So that is 1.6 million in four years, which is not even 20% of the number of people that came in under Biden. And remember: we had a whole lot of illegal immigrants before Biden took office. Also, even if the 400,000 per year target is hit, we will still end up with more people, because they are expanding H-1B.

But the fact that the deportations are so low will not prevent the administration from using immigration as an excuse to implement a Palantir technological control grid.

So, at the end of this, no one is going to be happy with what we’ve got, and Trump is going to hand over a massive police state and a completely new framework for making laws, a new framework for speech and a vast new precedent for censorship of political speech, to his Democrat successor.

I guess the best we can hope for is that now that Trump has set a standard of deporting people with green cards for their speech, Prez Cortez might get rid of Jordan Peterson. Peterson in shackles, crying as he is marched onto a plane by masked thugs is pretty much the only good thing I can imagine having in the next decade or so.

And hey yo, dawg. I’m not trying to “blackpill you” with “black pills.” I’m just weighing in, telling it like it is. But to be clear, I’m reading and watching the materials from the pro-Trump people, and it is all just a bunch of meaningless spin. They are pumping up the Putin meeting of course, and if he does manage to end that war, that will be good. I don’t know that he will end that war, but it could happen, and that would be good. But I can pretty well guarantee you that if that happens, it is going to coincide with a massive escalation in the Middle East.

The Jews moving in to totally occupy Gaza is not something that is just going to go away.

And if you did have a big war, well, I guess having military on the streets, completely new speech laws, a new governance system where laws are just whatever the president writes on a paper, and a Palantir techno control grid would be pretty useful in that situation.

Are any of you old enough to have been around listening to Alex Jones in the late 1990s and early 2000s?

He used to make these documentaries about how there was going to be Martial Law in America with totally militarized police and actual military on the streets and a biometric control grid.

Here’s Police State 3: Total Enslavement:

My favorite was Martial Law 9/11: Rise of the Police State (which was also “Police State 4”):

The first two are pretty good too.

It’s sort of hilarious to me that this now appears to be where we’re going, and all of the people who you would expect to be against it are cheering it on.

It seemed for a while like we were headed for a more “Brave New World” type dystopia, but now the vibe does seem to be straight-up “1984” type militarized police state dystopia.

Aldous Huxley’s Brave New World was written first, in 1932, then George Orwell’s 1984 was published in 1948 (hence the name). In 1958, Huxley published “Brave New World: Revisited,” a nonfiction piece in which he reflected on the original novel’s themes and also discussed 1984. He concluded that though the dystopia would be more like Brave New World, it would also have elements of 1984.

He talked about these issues in a 1958 interview with Mike Wallace.

The “overpopulation” stuff didn’t really age well. But some of the rest of it did. (And I guess it is true that population growth led to urbanization which led to more government control.)

It feels a bit like the coronavirus hoax was an attempt to do Brave New World, and now they’re just going full 1984.

But listen, the good news is…

Ah, wait. I lost my train of thought. I forget what the good thing is, but it’s something, I’m sure.

]]> “Know Thyself” – Stupid Hype of Self-Destructive Insanity? https://dailystormer.in/know-thyself-stupid-hype-of-self-destructive-insanity/ Sun, 10 Aug 2025 05:35:56 +0000 https://dailystormer.in/?p=687402

“Know thyself” is the most famous maxim of all philosophy. Having accomplished this goal, I have found it to be a very bad idea.

Allow me to explain my knowledge of myself: I am a machine with a first layer of programming that goes “seek warmth, seek food, seek sex” and a secondary layer of programming that goes “engage in some balance of conflict and socialization.” Trapped within this machine is a “ghost,” which is the core of the above mentioned “self,” which is tortured every second by the programming of the machine it is trapped within, and by the systems of time and matter that the machine is in turn trapped inside.

The soul-self then seeks what? To overcome the restraints of the machine and the systems which restrain the machine. That means seeking immaterial, metaphysical things that exist outside of the programming of the machine, while only having access to the mechanisms of the machine and the systems it exists in. Attempting to do this leads to more advanced systems of torture than one would face if he were to simply ignore the ghost and simply follow along with the programming of the machine.

Time and matter are designed to destroy the machine and are always victorious. Therefore, the soul-self, if engaged, demands that the machine be overcome, because the soul-self does not want to end with the machine.

It might be easy enough to say “Jesus is the answer,” and I believe this. But if the answer was as simple as that, great Christian men in history would have simply embraced Christ and then lived in total peace. However, none of them (or a very remote few) appear to have done that, and instead were tortured by the machines they inhabited and the systems to which the machine is subject. This implies that although “Jesus is the answer” is a truism, “Jesus” is a complex answer. If Jesus were a simple answer, there would be no need for philosophy or theology or anything else, really. I hope that in the last minutes of my life, when the machine is failing in its battle against time and matter, “Jesus is the answer” is a very simple answer, but until the time of my death, it will be a complex matter, and a struggle to understand. In traditional Christianity, this attempt to understand often comes in the form of “pondering the mysteries.” I encourage this practice. In particular, I encourage an obsession with the nearness of death, of the inevitable failure of the machine. This should allow one to partially avoid the fear of the failure of the machine, which will allow one to act in a bolder and more meaningful way.

It should be noted: the ghost, the soul-self, cannot logically be an illusion, some by-product of “evolution,” given that it does not benefit the machine in any way. Without the ghost, the machine would act on the interests of the machine alone, the primary of which is procreation. Arguing against the existence of the soul appears to me to be stupid and ridiculous, and something that no one actually believes because a being with a soul cannot actually stop believing in the mechanism that provides it with self-awareness in the first place. This is without going into the mechanics of atheism, which claim that creatures evolve based on efficiency, and having self-awareness is extremely inefficient and damaging to the survival/procreation mechanism of the machine. No one without a soul could ever commit suicide. No one without a soul could be a childless incel (they would kidnap women and lock them in their basements). “Morality” in the sense of “social norms” exists in animals without souls, but it is much less complex than human morality. As the arguments against the existence of the soul are stupid, I do not need to spend more time on this.

The question is: how do we allow the soul to accomplish its objectives to the greatest extent within the constraints of the machine and the machine’s constraints? This is where the “know thyself” matter becomes applicable in a practical sense.

The first stage must, quite obviously, be overcoming, as best we can, the base functions of the machine. The saints often went into the wilderness for this purpose. This is extreme. But it is probably ideal. The most important thing to remember is that you are never going to fully accomplish the goal. It is impossible. The saints all died fighting a losing battle against the flesh. You too will die, and very soon. Even though it will feel like a very long time. And when you die, you will not have transcended the flesh, but succumbed to it.

What is clear is that Ted Kaczynski was right about technological society sucking people’s souls out of them, and you’re not going to find anything of any importance in this matrix system of urban doom.

King Solomon said that vanity was the core of the fleshy machine self, and thus vanity was what men should seek to overcome. “Vanity” might be better translated as “fleeting mist” or “vapor.” It describes the wants of the flesh. He concluded that the only joy is to eat, drink, and be merry. It was not an endorsement of hedonism, but rather the opposite: a call to disconnect from the bindings of the flesh and exist without pretense. That is, when we find the bright spots of clarity in the misery of existence, we are closest to God. And as Dostoyevsky said, “The darker the night, the brighter the stars.” If you understand life as misery, then the little twinkles of the stars, those times of eating, drinking, and being merry, can let you touch the divine. Or come close.

In the most famous painting ever, Adam’s finger does not touch God’s. He is reaching. But that space will not close in life.

But few seek. Mostly, we are chasing after a fleeting mist. That is what we get up and do every day when we pour ourselves into the hunt for money, women, or in the case of many readers, some kind of political solution to personal problems. None of that is real. I have had sex with women several times. I don’t really remember much of it. It didn’t make me any better. I hit some meme coins and had some money. I didn’t have anything to spend it on. I fought a political war for nearly 15 years. Nothing much came of it. Ah, but something did come of it. Being exiled and isolated from the system, being forced to disconnect from the destructive and hateful culture I was raised in allowed me to see just how ridiculous it is, then compare it to the rest of the societies. There is no one happier than the poor. Not Western poor, not street junkies or trailer park meth heads, or the blacks, but poor cultures, where people don’t have any great and terrible ambition.

Very often, people say, “I want to travel,” and I say, “Why? To what end?” People will typically say they want to “see things,” to which I respond, “It’s all on YouTube.” “Traveling” is something to look forward to for millennials who don’t say “I want to get rich and really respected” like their baby boomer parents. It’s something to look forward to, to distract from the reality that we are always going to be nowhere other than inside of our own heads. If you’re living in a mansion or if you’re getting your dick sucked in a colorful bungalow in Goa, you’re still in your own head, you’re still alone, as you were born alone and will die alone inside of this fleshy prison.

“Traveling” is only interesting in exile. That is the only way it is going to help you figure anything out. The realization that I am no longer “American” in any meaningful sense, and only understand it as an observer, was very important to me. As an observer, I am able to see just how miserable of a hell that existence is, just what a terrible matrix of dehumanization people inhabit in these prison-like cities, searching for sex, money, politics, travel, or some other things that don’t actually satisfy any need of the soul. The flesh has you on a rat wheel.

Millennials and younger often mock boomers for their obsession with sports, while millennials just do politics as if they are sports. There is no real difference, other than that the political obsession is more extreme. Neither actually leads anywhere. Boomers sat in front of the TV watching sports, people younger than them doom-scroll for political conflict. It’s simulated conflict. Sports and politics are simulations of war, engaged in by people who will not see real war.

A real war would probably be good for you. Not a dumb fake war, like the Middle East wars the Americans did. Or, maybe being on the non-American side of one of those wars, like John Walker Lindh.

The cocksuckers who caught him might as well have been watching sports.

But a real war, that would be good for you. Being in a ditch, seeing people get their limbs blown off. It would push you, at least. It would push the limits of the flesh-machine, it would force you to recognize that your body is just a leaky bag of blood and salt, propped up by sticks, and that if that is the “you, you,” then you aren’t much at all.

Probably, the clarity that comes with war is why people crave simulation of it. I don’t mean to romanticize war, as it is the worst thing imaginable, physically. But the worst thing imaginable physically could be the best thing imaginable for the spirit, if the individual experiencing it is able to avoid going insane. Regardless, there is some reason that people seek these simulated versions of war, and apparently find some deep meaning in them, or rather, believe they will eventually find some deep meaning in them.

Having spent more than enough time thinking about politics, I can confirm you will never find any meaning in politics. “Who will rule the concrete and glass prison complex?” might seem like a meaningful question, but it isn’t really. Were people’s lives better under Obama than under Trump? The answer is obviously “yes.” So what is happening? The system is progressing, becoming less human, more of a rat trap for the flesh boxes.

The simple answer is what the Buddha said: “All suffering comes from desire.” Jesus said several things that mean the same thing, though the clarity of the Buddha’s statement is cutting. So that is the point at which a person should start to attempt to understand the self. It was only less than 200 years ago that the overwhelming majority of the human population, including whites, were living on farms, spending most of their time in fields, or relaxing with their families.

Kaczynski gets all the credit for Jaques Ellul’s ideas. I would recommend the Kaczynski book first, because it’s so much easier to read than any of the Ellul books. But if you are a reader, the Ellul books are worth the effort. In English, they are “The Technological Society” and “The Technological System.” (Those are the most important, though it might be better to start with “Propaganda” if you are not used to reading this kind of dense text, which very few people under the age of 60 are used to doing. But yes, the Kaczynski book is a good summary.) These are arguments that no one can really argue with, as they are just obvious, but there isn’t really any solution for the society.

Look. People complain about consumerism. You hear this a lot. But what else are you going to do in a city, other than consume? There is no answer to that. The city is designed for consumption. It is the flesh prison. It is designed as a place to find hedonistic sensual pleasures, which is all consumerism is. And all of the world economies are driven by consumerism, and if you don’t drive consumerism, you cannot compete with other nations, and therefore there is no real third option, other than some kind of ultra-militarized Marxism or fascism, which is possibly the best option for a state. Though that hasn’t worked great for North Korea, at least the state still exists.

The point that I’m going for here is that you are not going to find meaning in any of these worldly things, and as long as you are stuck inside of the system, you are not going to ever really find any meaning, you are going to chase money and pussy. I know that there are a lot of “trad” memes going around and everyone is saying they want a “wife,” but what they are talking about is sex, and that is natural enough, but it’s not going to happen. You’re not going to get a trad wife in a city that is designed for women to max out their fun time, while forcing men to compete for their attention. That is all stuff I’ve written too much about. Everyone should understand it now.

So the desire for “a wife and family” is still a desire and it will drag you. If you get your wife, what is she going to have you doing? Is she going to hoe the garden on your farm? No. No, she is not. Not if she knows the big world exists. She might say she’ll hoe your garden, if she’s in the throes of passion, but she won’t. You would need some kind of situation like in that film The Village. (It’s from the Sixth Sense guy, who always does the “big shocking twist” thing at the end. I won’t spoil it. You probably saw it.)

There is no meaning in striving for any of these things, and we waste our time, which is very limited. There is an essay by Seneca the Younger called “On the Shortness of Life” where he describes the way men work in the city and say that when they’re fifty or sixty (now it’s probably when you’re seventy or eighty), they’ll retire to some farm in nature and relax, but that by this time, their life is already ending, that they are wasting the best years of their lives, the years that should be used to lay the foundation of understanding life and the coming end of it, wasting time striving meaninglessly. He also notes that the wealthier and more powerful you are, the more of your time you end up wasting, and therefore seeking these things is a vicious cycle.

I’m not in a position to advise you as to how you should go about living your life. I made what are in retrospect very extreme decisions. Tucker Carlson can get up on stage and say the Jews run America and face minimal consequences, others are also making much money saying this now, but when I said it, there were very serious consequences. Maybe I should have been able to figure that out. But I was 25 and didn’t give a fuck. This forced me into something I hadn’t ever really planned on. It was for the best, for sure, but it was very extreme.

My situation was so unique that I can’t really tell anyone else how they should go about seeking to escape the matrix. I suppose I could say “just buy some land outside of the city and try to relax, alone.” Land is incredibly cheap in America. I think Americans don’t really understand how cheap it is, compared to really anywhere else in the world. There is good arable land in Mississippi and Arkansas. You could also try to join the Amish. At least with the Amish, you’d have work. I don’t think it would be good to live without work. My work is writing, so it’s much easier for me. You need work. Seneca the Younger was from a wealthy family, he got patronage for his writing, and he was also doing shady money-lending schemes, so it was easy for him to say “just go live on a farm and relax.”

Regardless, it seems some level of rural isolation, maybe with some family and community, is the only clear path in this satanic world. But I don’t have any idea what you want. I am also not enlightened, and cannot guarantee anyone enlightenment, I’m simply on a path to it, and I think I’m probably further along than anyone trapped in an American rat cage.

What I can tell you is that knowing the self, understanding the nature of the soul that is trapped in this machine with all of these desires, is an extremely painful and arduous process, and it is one that you undertake while knowing you won’t actually ever truly finish it.

For me, I want to write more about these sorts of things, as I work through them. I’ve been writing a lot of different stuff since I mostly stopped with the Stormer site, and trying to figure out how to come at it. What I can say is that I no longer care about how many people read it, as I no longer really have a political agenda, as I have concluded that political agendas are futile. I was the best political writer, and as we can see now, the most influential of the century, but I now view that as akin to being the champion of the hot dog eating contest. I would rather be the best at writing something else.

My strong faith in God is in some ways a curse as much as it is a blessing, as there is a large part of me that would have preferred to simply run around the rat cage looking for dopamine hits. The fleshy encasement seeks to avoid suffering, and in order to actually develop the inner self, one has to, like Christ, embrace suffering as the only way out. And then look for those places where you can eat, drink, and be merry.

For me, writing is the only thing that creates an oblivion in my mind, and brings me to my self. That, I see now, is why I continued with the site every day long after I’d concluded that politics were a waste of time in the same way that working to buy a race car or working to get a woman to sleep with you is a waste of time. What I’ve realized since breaking up with you on Valentine’s Day is that I can write every day without publishing every day. I was already writing for myself, as everything I do is inside of my own head, because that is where we always are, from the day we come screaming into this life until the day we succumb to death’s sweet embrace.

The first thing to do is read the Book of John.

People talk a lot about Christianity. They don’t really seem to understand that the first principle of the religion is to “die to the world,” which refers to the denial of the fleshy desires outlined above.

I always hated my life. It was very nice to hear that Jesus said you’re supposed to, and that this is the path to enlightenment and eternal salvation in the life to come.

Saint Paul is more angry and less mystical than Saint John the Apostle, but this material is also very useful.

The concept of being crucified with Christ and living only through the spirit of Christ is something that should be pondered deeply. The true self inside of you is one with Christ, and was linked to Christ when you were born, and it is the desires of the flesh that separate you from this true self, this oneness with Christ. But as stated, it is only through death that one can ever truly escape the flesh prison and become one with Christ. Until then, we are all simply doing our best to prepare for that.

And then there’s Saint Augustine, who said, “Our hearts are restless until they rest in Thee.”

This is what one should ask of their life actions: “Is this preparing me for death and unification with the divine creator or not?” I don’t think a life in a city, with all of these cellphones and microwaves everywhere, can possibly be the ideal place to make that happen. In the ultimate sense, you are still just in your head, regardless, so anything is possible, but you need a really good excuse to live in one of these cities, as you are not going to have an easy time escaping desire in a rat matrix designed for the sexual satisfaction of women.

Author’s Note: Much of what I am working on right now is this sort of thing, just less stream-of-consciousness, more structured. It’s difficult work, to try to move toward structure, especially in longer work, and I’m doing a lot of reading to try to get good at it. I am also still working on some loser stuff and some fiction. I’m not promising any dates. Anything is going to be released when it’s done and no sooner. Until then, I’ll post whatever I feel like on here, with no clear schedule.

]]> Tucker’s Epstein Statements Prove He is Currently the De Facto Successor to Donald Trump’s Movement https://dailystormer.in/tuckers-epstein-statements-prove-he-is-currently-the-de-facto-successor-to-donald-trumps-movement/ Wed, 06 Aug 2025 17:24:36 +0000 https://dailystormer.in/?p=687874

Author’s Note: I wrote this on July 21 and didn’t publish it because I meant to finish it. I never did finish it. It is being published unfinished so as not to waste it. I am aware of the recent big drama around Tucker, which I might write about. Or not, frankly. But however important that drama might seem to you, or whatever it means to you, it doesn’t affect the reality that Tucker is and will continue to be the natural successor to Donald Trump for the foreseeable future. 

Frankly, friends, today I wanted to write about how the message from Superman’s parents in James Gunn’s Superman, where they tell him to be evil, could have been from General Zod. That would make sense, as he’s the one living Kryptonian who would have the ability to fake that message.

But then I decided to write more about Jeffrey Epstein.

In particular, I wanted to address this “Mossad agent” concept. Obviously, he was a Mossad agent (or “asset,” if you prefer). But what exactly does that mean? What exactly is Israel?

Well. Let me start with Noam Chomsky’s claim that Israel is an outpost of American imperialism. This has been attacked a whole lot, as it appears that Noam Chomsky, who is Jewish, is trying to blame white Americans for the actions of Jews. I think that is obviously what Chomsky was trying to do. But the reality is that “Israel is an outpost of America” is actually true. It’s simply that it is an outpost of American Jews.

A famous German statesman, writing about Zionism in the 1920s, decades before the Zionist state was established, wrote:

When the Zionists try to make the rest of the world believe that the new national consciousness of the Jews will be satisfied by the establishment of a Jewish State in Palestine, the Jews thereby adopt another means to dupe the simple-minded goyim. They have not the slightest intention of building up a Jewish State in Palestine so as to live in it. What they really are aiming at is to establish a central organization for their international swindling and cheating. As a sovereign State, this cannot be controlled by any of the other States. Therefore it can serve as a refuge for swindlers who have been found out and at the same time a high-school for the training of other swindlers

The prescience there is uncanny. It literally describes exactly what the Jewish state is 100 years after it was written. Most Jews do not want to live in Israel. The Ashkenazim, that is the European Jews, make up only 30% of the Jewish population of Israel. The other 70% of Israeli Jews are Sephardic or Mizrahi Jews, what could be called “Arab Jews,” who basically got forced to move to Israel because they were living in Arab countries and after the violence and brutality that came with the establishment of the Zionist state in the 1940s by Ashkenazim, Arabs started doing pogroms of their local Jewish populations, and the Ashkenazim that established the state of Israel paid them to come take refuge in their new Palestinian occupation territory.

There are fewer than 3 million Ashkenazim in Israel. Meanwhile, there are nearly 8 million in the United States. This is because the United States is where the money is. As the famous German statesman predicted, Israel exists not as a “homeland for the Jewish people,” but to give international Jewry a headquarters for their international gangsterism and the ability to act with state powers. Though it is a lesser issue, the man was also correct when he said Israel is a place for them to escape prosecution. Huge numbers of pedophiles have fled there, as have financial criminals. It is totally commonplace in Russia, or it was before Putin got hardcore after the start of this war, for Jews to do massive real estate swindles, collect hundreds of millions or billions of dollars, and then flee to Israel with the money.

Israeli politics are not really controlled by Israeli Jews. This has changed slightly under Bibi Netanyahu, given that he is certainly a “great man of history” in that he is, by his own will, shaping the world in profound ways, and often pushing back against the whims of the American Jews who provide Israel with all of its money. Nonetheless, Israel is a project of American Jews. The Mossad is a state intelligence agency, of the state of Israel, because only a state can operate an intelligence agency. However, in practice, the Mossad is a sovereign secret service for international Jewry as a whole, rather than an organization designed to serve the interests of the state of Israel exclusively or even primarily.

Epstein got his money from American Jewish billionaires. At least the money that we can trace. Les Wexner, the Columbus, Ohio Jew who owns Victoria’s Secret and some other things, gave him an $80 million house in Manhattan and apparently other gifts and cash, and Leon Black gave him over $150 million marked as some kind of extremely unspecific “consulting” thing.

The bottom line here is that while Mossad was almost certainly the point of contact, because Mossad functions as a state entity subject to no one, the operation was really much more about American Jews than it was about Israel as a state. Because again, Israel as a state is effectively a project of American Jews. It’s a kind of “Cobra Terror Drome” for International Jewry.

Hey, there I am talking about GI Joe after having started with General Zod in what is supposed to be a very serious article. You’ll have to bear with me. I have a brain tumor.

There is nothing particularly important going on in Israel. They create spyware, like the zero day one-click iPhone hack that Prince Muhammad used to get Jeff Bezos’ nudes from his iPhone, which would be illegal to produce commercially in literally every other country in the world. They do human experimentation on kidnapped Palestinians. And pretty much the rest of it is just diamonds. The way the diamond industry has been run, particularly in collaboration with South Africa, is another thing that would be illegal in most countries.

At TPUSA last week Tucker Carlson talked about Epstein using blackmail to get people to do the bidding of Israel. This is very true and very brave of him.

It’s a bit like that clip in The Dark Knight.

Now that I watch it, that clip is actually as poorly written and dumb as every other part of those movies. What a strange thing, such beautiful films with such horrible scripts. Anyway, the point still stands: these Jews control the entire world, they run blackmail rings ensnaring all of the most powerful non-Jews, they do assassinations all around the world and have a lot of other less risky ways to completely destroy people’s lives (trust me on that one, lol). So to take a stand like Tucker is doing is incredibly brave, and he is an American hero, and I don’t care about any of the criticisms I’ve had of him. I mean, I’m sure those criticisms still stand, but taking on the Mossad like this, and not just on a podcast or a website, but taking it to the most mainstream conservative conference there is (next to CPAC) is incredibly brave.

I know there are theories about Tucker being “controlled opposition” because of his family connections and so on. But “controlled opposition” wouldn’t do that speech at TPUSA. We see what controlled opposition is doing: they’re talking about the poor innocent professional hookers that Epstein pulled out of the mines, or they’re talking about satanic human sacrifice cults (that are inexplicably not specifically Jewish in nature). Further, “controlled opposition” wouldn’t have done the Putin interview. I think Tucker’s UFO stuff is retarded and I still can’t believe he went along with Biden’s “Chinese spy balloon” hoax, but I think he is just maybe not super smart. Oh and his ads are completely out of control, especially given his existing wealth. (I’m a bit more forgiving with someone like Tim Dillon who never had any money, and also, Tim has fewer ads than Tucker. He’s now only doing one ad break in an hour, which is the correct amount. Also, Tim is much more clear that he’s just doing the ads for the money, whereas Tucker is much too earnest in selling scam products.) Also, as a Sinophile and the world’s biggest white proponent of Sino-friendship, I hate everything he says about China.

But seriously, forget all that. Calling out the Mossad like that and saying Israel controls the government at a venue like that is an incredibly brave action, and he absolutely is an American hero. I think some of his flaws might make him a less than ideal choice as the successor to Trump, but hey – give me a name. I’m not seeing anyone better. Maybe Dana White is better, but we really haven’t seen enough of Dana in political settings to know. We do know that UFC is all jungled up with one of the Emmanuel brothers, which is definitely not ideal.

Anyway, elections are not real in America. I think now everyone can see what I was talking about when I said “elections aren’t real but Trump will win this fake election because that is what is seen as most beneficial for the Jews.” Some people whined when I spent months before the election saying that, and I’ve been totally vindicated. No one has apologized to me. But that’s fine. After all, I’m just an internet personality, not a human being with feelings who would have his heart warmed by an apology. So it’s fine. No problem.

Because elections are fake, we’re talking more about a political figurehead than a presidential candidate, because you’re not going to vote your way out of this situation we’re in. (Plus, if we elected Tucker president, he would pause his inauguration speech every 15 minutes to tell you about a special offer at a crypto gambling website or all natural beef jerky.) Before there is any real change in America, there is going to have to be you know, whatever. Some kind of stuff. But people always need some figure to rally around, and this Epstein thing has pretty much sunk Trump. I’m a crisis management expert, and I know what I would tell him: unless you actually had sex with a girl under the age of 15, just release everything about Epstein and apologize for whatever involvement you had and blame the whole thing on the Mossad. But there is no way he is going to do that. If the girl was under 15, I don’t know what I would tell him to do. Honestly, I’ve thought about it a lot, and I don’t think there is an underage sex tape with Trump at all, and he’s scared of something else. Maybe he did something else illegal with Epstein, maybe involving money. He ran those casinos, you know, there were a lot of opportunities for shady stuff to happen. Or maybe he’s just old and being bullied by Netanyahu. Although, as I’ve said, Netanyahu would be savvy enough to tell him to just kick the can on Epstein rather than sending the Bimbo and the Pajeet Scammer out there to claim “nothing happened.” Even if it’s a prime directive to cover up the Epstein thing, he could easily have said “we’re working on that, the investigation is still ongoing, and we want to make sure we have everything before we start naming names.” Then move on to some other distraction. This is so obvious it’s just completely insane that he had his people out there saying “it’s all a big hoax” and he’s now talking about “the Jeffrey Epstein hoax” and comparing it to Russiagate. Honestly, I can’t even believe it’s real.

Point being, I think Trump has almost certainly lost the base, and someone is going to have to fill that void of being the guy everyone looks to as “the leader,” because that is the way human brains work. We’re hardwired that way, biologically, and it isn’t going to change. “Leaderless resistance” is nonsense. Leaderless people are just sheep. Therefore, an imperfect leader is better than no leader. Trump has been better than no leader. That may sound like a bold statement, but it’s actually not. For all of his flaws, Trump served as a point of organization for a festering white racial consciousness and hatred of immigrants, elite corruption, and weird gay shit. If Hillary Clinton or Jeb Bush would have won in 2016, people would be quietly accepting all of this stuff, complaining on the internet and getting banned and then trying to figure out their personal lives, which are all complete disasters because America is a satanic cesspit.

Therefore, while I will continue to state my criticisms of him, Tucker Carlson is currently the obvious successor to Donald Trump. He’s never going to be president anyway. So he can at least fill the role of the figurehead directing the masses of people until someone much more radical who understands things much better comes along. But I’m not seeing any such person right now.

As brave as Tucker’s statements about the Mossad and Israel controlling the government were, it did not get to the heart of the matter, which is that this is not about the state of Israel. That is a big part of the mechanism of the whole conspiracy, but it is about “Jews, generally.”

It doesn’t mean “every single Jew.” It’s not every single Jew, at least not every single ethnic Jew (the Jew religion literally has as its foundation a rejection and hatred of Jesus Christ, so it is hard to really consider any religious Jew anything other than a self-declared enemy of white, Christian civilization, but Jews are humans with souls, probably, so we can’t necessarily declare someone evil for being born with certain genetics). Maybe people like Jeffrey Sachs, Glenn Greenwald, and Dave Smith are not perfect, but they certainly are not on-board with the collective Jewish agenda. And sure, there are non-Jews involved. Epstein blackmail seems to explain why a lot of those non-Jews are involved. But there is also just general corruption and immorality that doesn’t necessarily need to involve blackmail.

But the underlying reality is that none of this madness in the West would be happening without the Jews, as the Jews are the planners and the primary drivers of all of these agendas. They’re now solely behind the endless wars of aggression against countries that pose no threat. Jews are the primary drivers behind mass immigration, feminism, atheism, basically every financial scam, the normalization of homosexuality, the legalization and spread of pornography, the coronavirus hoax, black radicalism and pro-crime policies, and on and on and on. There is nothing that you are against that isn’t caused by Jews. With the exception of natural disasters, Jews are behind every bad thing happening in the West. And even with the natural disasters, if we include forest fires in that category, I’m sure you could find Jews behind the ridiculous forestry policy of California (because Jews want to use the fires to push their global warming hoax).

Jews are behind everything. And what’s most important (and most incredible, really) is that it is all in public view. You don’t need anyone to release any documents to show that Jews are behind all of this. Jews often brag about it. Truly. Over 1,000 rabbis signed a petition saying “abortion is a part of the Jewish religion and banning it infringes on Jewish religious rights.” Even most normal people will admit that Hollywood, the news media, and the financial system are controlled by Jews. I think at this point most people have come to accept that Jews are the primary drivers of twenty years of war in the Middle East. Warmongering Ukrainian dictator Vladimir Zelensky is a Jew. It was 100% the ADL behind the internet censorship. OnlyFans and PornHub are both owned by Jews. The Hebrew Immigrant Aid Society (HIAS) is the biggest open borders organization, and virtually every ostensibly secular open borders group is run by Jews (yes, for the sake of thoroughness and honesty, the Catholic Church has some people involved in that too, I know, but that is a drop in the bucket and also arguably a result of Jewish manipulation of the Vatican). Feminism as an ideology was invented by the Jews. So was virtually every other ideology, including communism and libertarianism (yes I know that there are a lot of well-meaning Christian libertarians and I agree with many libertarian positions, but as an ideology, it has been used as a weapon to empower massive corporations with deregulation schemes while somehow continuing to fail to stop regulations on normal people).

It’s literally everything and it is right there in everyone’s faces and all you have to do is notice that Jews are a group that is different than the other groups in this country. It’s easy enough for most people to talk about “black crime.” Everyone in this country is aware of it, whether they admit it or not. No matter how “liberal” a person might be, if they’re walking on the sidewalk alone at night and a group of negro youths comes towards them, they will cross the street. And Fox News and so on will just talk openly about “black crime.” Similarly, no one had a problem talking about “the Italian mafia.” And by the way, not everyone involved with the mafia was Italian. To be fair, the ones that weren’t Italian were pretty much all either Irish or Jewish, but that just further goes to prove the point about groups. And even though there were Irish and Jews involved in the mafia, it was still definitively an Italian organization. There is no reason we should not simply be able to recognize that Jews are a group that behaves as a group and their group behavior is overwhelmingly negative. Again, not every single one. No one is saying “every single one.” Not even that famous German statesman said that. That German statesman had a personal friend, his chauffeur, who was Jewish. His name was Emil Maurice. He was in the SS.

Jews would call him “a self-hating Jew.” Normal people would call him “a good person who happened to be born into a Jewish family.” No one can be deemed guilty over immutable traits.

So literally not even the Jews’ big baddie was saying “every single Jew.” What people are saying, what I am saying, is that the character of the ruling elite in the United States, and the power that controls its vassals, is fundamentally and undeniably Jewish, and that this Jewish elite is hostile towards white people and towards non-Jews generally.

It’s good people are talking about Israel. That is a big, big step in the right direction. What needs to happen now is that people need to grasp the fact that what is going on in Gaza, this mass murder of innocent people, a genocide, is not the result of some vague “colonialism,” but rather a representation of the Jewish racial character, a character which ultimately stems from their hatred of Christ and the lack of repentance for murdering God.

Jews do have biological traits that make them more prone to this deviant behavior, because for 2,000 years they’ve bred for these traits. Ashkenazi Jews have only a slight genetic relationship to the people of ancient Israel. The closest people, genetically, to the people who would have lived in the Levant at the time of Christ are Lebanese Christians, who are somewhere around 80% genetically descended from ancient Israelites. The Jewish group with the most genetic relation to ancient Hebrew people are the Mizrahi Jews, and that is about 50%, with the other 50% being Arab and Turkic. Greeks and Armenians share more genetic relation to the people who lived in Palestine at the time of Christ than Ashkenazi Jews. I say this to point out that rabbinical Judaism has functioned not as a system to preserve a bloodline, but as a cult to preserve the hatred of Christ. (Note: I did this research recently. Although I had done it before, my robot has been such a great helper that I was able to source this a lot better. I am now interested in looking into the Mizrahi Jews, who are a relatively small group, and seeing if they are less satanic than the Ashkenazim. Sephardic Jews are less satanic, I’ve researched that before, but they are only slightly less satanic. Sephardim maintained connections with the Ashkenazim, and were involved significantly in the Islamic conquest of Spain as well as the Ottoman conquest of Constantinople.)

This is where I stopped writing on July 21.

I meant to write some other things, but I forget them now. I will just write a follow-up, and explain whatever further thoughts I have on this matter. As I said in the above author’s note, I might write about the recent drama, or I might not, I have not made a decision. In terms of missing memes – I don’t know, man. I do this site as charity. Obviously donations have dropped since I stopped posting every day, and now it’s costing me money, and I’m just sort of wondering what I’m even doing here. I am sort of busy making money, because I’ve lost whatever romantic ideals I had, and now just want to see everyone die. Anyway, I’m not going to do anything I don’t feel like doing. I haven’t really been treated very well and I haven’t benefited from this website. It actually ruined my life completely and very few people could even bother to send me a couple bucks. Meanwhile, people who just copy-pasted all my material are charging $1,200 a year to be in a group chat. I’m actually financially stable now, because it turns out people will pay me to write things.

I don’t care about America anymore. I want to see the death of my enemies, of course. But I am so totally muzzled. And I’m the only one. Everyone else is allowed online now. As mentioned, some people who copied all my ideas, word for word, and admitted it, are charging $1,200 a year to join a group chat, using international processors to collect this abusive amount of cash. Yes, if I had access to money like that, of course I would keep writing this site all the time. But at this point, I’m an adult, with adult responsibilities, and I need to make money, and that isn’t happening here.

That said, I am working on some good projects which you will like. I might try to monetize some of them somehow. But unlike everyone else, I’m permanently banned from banking. So I really have to be offering something huge to get people to deal with crypto. I am writing a personal political book, which I think I will release for free because charging for political content is not something I believe in. I mean, if I could use payment processors, I would charge you $1,200 a year to be in my group chat, because that is obviously just normal ethical business management. But I’ll just post the political book. The fiction though, I might post the first three chapters and then tell you to pay me or pirate it if you want to read the rest.

But in general, I have to get money somewhere else, and that is way more important to me than entertaining people who don’t even have the decency to send me $5. I was not spreading the message. The site cannot spread. It is neutered, completely. It’s just the same people reading it, and it is a farm for people to use the content, edit it for their own purposes, and not pay me. As a random example not intended to represent real or fictional people, if I had thousands of people paying me $1,200 a year to be in a group chat, I would send a few bucks to the guy whose ideas I copy-pasted to build my career. But people don’t think that way.

Basically, I could give a fuck and I could give a fuck less.

I hope the Chinese nuke America and literally everyone dies.

Anyway, whatever.

I do not want to whine. I just don’t know what people want from me. I see the messages. I don’t regret spending 13 years of my life on this project. I had fun. But life is such. Indeed, it is such.

But yeah, I’m doing a rebrand. I think people will like it. I think I’m going to be able to publish 2-3 books a year, while also doing the stuff I do now to make money. Which I can’t ever tell you about, but if you knew about it, you would think it was hilarious and awesome. It’s especially funny that I can only be paid in crypto or cash for these jobs and the people hiring me are like “well…. okay.”

For the people wondering about what music I’m listening to while writing this, there is this band called Drugdealer (one word) that is sort of like a Steely Dan fan project that is really fun.

The guy is on par with The Lemon Twigs in terms of tributes to better times.

Sometimes he has women sing his songs for him and it’s really nice.

The dude sort of looks like a kind of TRT free Sam Hyde too.

Congrats to Sam Hyde on the comeback, by the way. It’s been an inspiration to me. I also support flipping that desk and think anyone who complains about it is a homo. If I was asked to give one piece of advice to young people, I would say: “just flip the desk, you might not get another chance, so just flip that bitch.”

I only listen to retro music. It reminds me that I wish it was the sixties and I wish we could be happy. But really, frankly, I just wish that something would happen.

It won’t happen though. It literally never does. That isn’t just a meme.

But yeah, maybe I’ll weigh in on the drama. I might as well. Everyone else is. I don’t really care much but I had a take I thought of when I was at the farmers’ market which is a lot better than anyone else’s I’ve seen.

The issue is, I just really don’t care enough to be motivated to write really anything on this website because I’m so overcome with boredom and apathy about the current internet right discourse.

]]> Trump is “Crashing Out” Over the “Epstein Files” https://dailystormer.in/trump-is-crashing-out-over-the-epstein-files/ Sat, 19 Jul 2025 01:33:11 +0000 https://dailystormer.in/?p=687850

It’s unclear to me whether Mr. Trump is refusing to release the Epstein files because Bibi Netanyahu told him not to or because he’s implicated in sex, potentially with so-called “minors.” What is clear is that he is “crashing out” over this issue.

These are both from earlier this week.

YIKES.

That does not look good at all. If he is just doing what Bibi told him, it still looks like he’s implicated. I guess it’s possibly both, as the primary reason that Bibi would have this kind of control is that he is implicated. The Jewish lobby has the ability to use political pressure to force Trump to do things like bomb various countries and send money and weapons to Jews for free. But forcing Trump to go out there and say that Epstein didn’t exist, that everyone who is asking about it is no different than the Russia hoaxers, is something on another level, which is much more personal.

Remember that the first time Trump told the media to just shut up about Epstein, he was sitting in front of Netanyahu.

I would not think that’s a coincidence.

Just to be clear, there are “Epstein files.” It’s not a conspiracy theory that there are files. I saw some really bad takes from Michael Tracey about “Epstein mythology,” and he suggested that there was no specific group of “files.” Epstein was investigated and indicted by the feds and federally prosecuted and sentenced to federal prison. He was later arrested by federal cops and then died in prison. The government, it will not surprise you, keeps a lot of records. There would be tens or hundreds of thousands of pages of documentation recorded by the government about this guy Epstein. That is what people want released. Some of them have been released but a lot of them have not been released.

Whether or not there is an official “Epstein list” – a list that Epstein kept of his “clients” – I have no idea. There would be flight lists. Some of those have been released. But we all remember, or at least I remember, that when Epstein was arrested, it was reported in all media that they found a safe full of CD-ROMs labeled with people’s names, with the format “Young [name] with [name].” Those names have not been released. There were a bunch of hard drives in the safe. It was, presumably, a whole bunch of videos of powerful people having sex with underage girls, and the government has all of this stuff. The New York Times reported in 2019 that Epstein kept this material to blackmail people.

So, it’s definitely not a “conspiracy theory.” Let’s make sure we don’t get lost here. The government has a lot of information on what certainly and definitely appears to be a “Mossad blackmail ring,” which involved people, presumably voluntarily, allowing themselves to be recorded having sex with underage girls.

That’s another point to be clear on: you would have to be retarded to do it just because you were horny. Prince Andrew appears to have actually done that, but he also appears to clearly suffer from mental retardation. Normal people who we would be talking about here would knowingly have illicit sex on video for the Mossad to keep so that powerful Jews would know they were loyal and give them promotions.

Obviously, not all blackmail is voluntary. For example, Trump’s son-in-law’s father, Charles Kushner, in 2004, sent a hooker to have sex with his brother-in-law when he was drunk at a bar and secretly filmed it and then threatened to show it to the man’s wife (Kushner’s sister) if he didn’t play along with some scheme relating to some kind of federal indictment Kushner was under. So there is secret blackmail.

However, whenever you’re talking about a “blackmail ring,” you’re talking pretty much exclusively about voluntary blackmail. Any kind of systematic blackmail is necessarily voluntary, as you are not going to set up a system of seducing people and tricking them into having sex on video. It has been a thing since forever that criminal gangs require someone to do some crime, such as murder, and then keep some evidence on them. It’s just common sense that if you have evidence of someone committing a serious crime, or something that would otherwise destroy their life, you’re going to trust them, because no such person is going to betray you.

Michael Tracey’s take, which is on some internet website, is total garbage. I also listened to like an hour of him rambling about it on a Twitter podcast, and it was dumb. He is literally just being contrarian for the sake of it. Pointing out that the “he’s intelligence” quote from the Florida attorney general comes from Vicky Ward alone (I like Vicky Ward and don’t think she lies, but yeah obviously you can’t build an entire case around that), or that Virginia Giuffre had some problems and was definitely trying to get money, or strawmanning with some silly QAnon shit, doesn’t serve to disappear the fact that the government has a bunch of files people want released and Trump is out there saying he won’t release them because they “aren’t credible.” The fact that people said some QAnon-tier stuff about Epstein doing child sacrifices in that temple on his island does not mean that there was not a safe full of hard drives and CD-ROMs with people’s names on them, that the government has those materials and is refusing to say what names were there. We still have the fact that whoever’s names were on there have not been prosecuted, even though the government has video of them having sex with underage girls, pulled from Epstein’s safe.

Okay?

This theory that it’s all a theory is stupid. And the only conceivable reason no one other than Maxwell has been prosecuted, the only conceivable reason the government would refuse to reveal any of this information, is that at least some of the very powerful people that we know Epstein hung out with are featured in these sex tapes.

Ask Michael Tracey why billionaire Jew Les Wexner “gifted” Epstein a $80 million New York house. I guess they were friends? So he gave him an eighty million dollar house? He dismissed the fact that Maxwell was the daughter of a top Mossad agent as “a coincidence.” Was the house also coincidental? If you asked Wexner why he gave him that house, would he say “it’s just a coincidence”? Why did Epstein have all this money? Where did it come from? Just people giving him things? That appears to literally be the answer, as his hedge fund was a complete disaster and did nothing but lose money. Leon Black, another Israel-obsessed Jewish billionaire, gave Epstein $158 million literally for no apparent reason. Literally, it was like “for services rendered.”

Anyway, Virginia Giuffre, Epstein’s most prominent accuser famous for the photo with Prince Andrew and Ghislaine Maxwell, was definitely after money (find me a woman who isn’t, huh?) with the series of lawsuits, and she might have had some problems, but she gets hit by a bus and the police refuse to come to the scene and then she kills herself a few weeks later? Do you guys know about this? It happened since I stopped doing the daily news, and I was going to write about it, then I was like “I don’t feel like doing that.” But she was living in Western Australia (???), which for those who do not know is very rural (the cities are all on the eastern side of the continent/country). Almost like she was hiding out. And I cannot find the method of suicide listed anywhere. Handguns are almost impossible to get in Australia, I would think, especially as a non-citizen. So how did she kill herself? Strangle herself with a soft sheet pressed against a bunkbed like Epstein? Contrary to popular belief, it is actually really hard to kill yourself with pills. A grand total of 8% of suicide attempts using drugs or poison result in death! As it turn out, suicide without a gun is actually pretty hard to pull off. Did you know that 60% of handgun deaths in the US (yes, from the famous “handgun death” statistics) are not black people but suicide? The only other “easy” way to do it is with intravenous opioids, which would require you to know how to tie off your arm to inject them. Also, you can’t prove that’s a suicide, and probably a lot of US opioid deaths are suicide or de facto suicide (subconsciously giving yourself a bigger dose because you can’t take it anymore). But why are we even having this discussion? Why did the Australian police not say how she committed suicide? Is it a privacy issue? Why was the autopsy and toxicology report not released? Privacy? For the single most prominent public individual in the biggest criminal case in the world right now?

Also, fun fact: 80% of suicides are men.

Another fun fact: Giuffre’s dad says she was murdered. He initially said he could believe the suicide then came out and said “someone got to her.”

But this case doesn’t hinge on her, and even if you believe Maxwell being the son of a top Mossad agent and Giuffre’s suicide are coincidences, we have all of these other questions, and if there are no questions, then why is Trump doing a world press tour whining about how he won’t release the government’s files and people should just stop talking about it immediately?

Anyway. That’s enough of that. Maybe I’ll write a full rebuttal to Tracey, but his current article doesn’t really give me much to work with, as it is just an assertion that there is no smoking gun that Epstein was a Mossad agent, but the smoking gun is literally the refusal to release the files. Another smoking gun is that in 2005 he was convicted in federal court of sex crimes including “child prostitution” with girls as young as 14 (there were a total of 36 confirmed underage sex partners), and was sentenced to 13 months in “prison” with “work release,” meaning he could leave all day and just had to sleep at the jail. (I understand he was rich, but that is ridiculous, and the reason that even if Vicky Ward is the only source for the AG saying “he’s intelligence,” it makes very much sense. I looked it up and found that for the same crime in the same state, one guy got 20 years for two girls and another got 15 for one girl. In real prison. With no “work release.” Again, in the Epstein case, there were 36 girls.) It’s also a smoking gun that he was arrested for the same crimes he’d already been federally prosecuted and served his sentence for, and it’s never been explained how the feds were planning to try him again for the same crimes. The smoking gun is that no one on the videos is being prosecuted, that the feds are not demanding why Jewish billionaires Les Wexner and Leon Black explain why they were giving this guy hundreds of millions of dollars for free. There is a lot of smoke here and a lot of guns.

And Tracey’s “what files are we talking about?” is complete horseshit. “The files” are the government’s records. Questioning the validity of the “client list” concept means nothing. The government has a bunch of videos of some group of men having sex with underage girls, and they have files that say the names of these men. We want those files, Michael. The files that say the names of the people in the sex videos.

Obviously, anything that gets this big is going to have a lot of misinformation surrounding it, and there will always be things you can pick apart. It’s easy to be a critic and people feel very clever pointing out small wrong or questionable things and then saying that the other things are a coincidence. But saying “there’s no there there” about Jeffrey Epstein is deranged and Michael Tracey is deranged, and I now see people repeating this. By the way, I like Michael Tracey, and I don’t really think he is doing this maliciously, or because he’s an obsessive Trump defender, I think he just really likes being clever and he’s gone full too clever by half with this one. It just looks dumb. But it’s a narrative that is out there now. So I just want to make sure we all know what we’re talking about here, that there is no confusion surrounding the fact that the government at least has a “list” of the men in the sex videos they confiscated from Epstein’s house in 2019 after his arrest for crimes he’d already been prosecuted for.

Back to Trump then: he knew Epstein when he was like, in his fifties, and already very rich. We see these pictures of them together:

When people used to post those pictures, I would think “yeah that’s whatever, they were two rich guys in New York, of course they knew each other.” Now, with his “stop talking about that or else” press tour, one has to wonder.

But the records show that Trump likely first met Epstein in the late 1980s or early 1990s. By the late 80s, Trump was already a billionaire.

So, would he want the Mossad to have blackmail on him? Well. I don’t know. He’s had a lot of financial problems since the late 1980s. His casinos went bankrupt. He had no personal bankruptcy, but he had six business bankruptcies. Obviously, the people who bailed him out were primarily Jewish. And it is certainly possible that he would say “okay, I’ll do a sex tape with a 15-year-old” in such a situation. This would of course mean that Trump had been a de facto Mossad agent this whole time, which… I mean… I don’t know?

Part of the problem with this whole situation is that if Bibi were to send any supposed Trump jailbait sex tape to the New York Post or whatever, Trump could then just say “yeah, I did that for the Mossad to get bailed out.” As on this timeline the statute of limitations for any jailbait crime would be expired, it seems that this would be a lot more damaging to Israel than to Trump. I mean it would be embarrassing for Trump, but is it really that big of a deal?

Wait. I just looked it up and actually it says “there is no statute of limitations on child sex crimes in the state of New York.” But I don’t know what that means in reality. As far as anyone knows, Epstein never had girls younger than 14. There have never even been allegations of actual children in the classic sense of the word “children.” So… I mean is Trump going to die in prison over that? Would they be able to prove the age of the girl? I don’t know but even if he went down for this, using this blackmail, if it exists, would expose the fact that the US government is run by Mossad blackmail, which I think would be a much bigger revelation than that Trump had sex with a girl who was a couple years under age. Also, Trump can’t be prosecuted while he’s president, and he could just like, flee to Russia or something.

What I am seeing is that Trump is now very old. I’m getting “Joe Biden” vibes with this guy. Remember that Joe Biden was just bullied and pushed around and told to say things. This is why 80-year-old men should not run countries, particularly not big countries, and particularly not in times of crises. If Trump were still in his sixties, as he was when he launched his campaign, you could make things make more sense. But when someone is 80, really anything they do can potentially be explained as “well, he’s really old.”

Old people can be healthy. If you don’t smoke, drink, or do drugs, and you’re not fat, then your mind is going to degrade way before your body. It’s sad, frankly. I’m against euthanasia. But everyone’s faculties start to degrade at 75, particularly if they are a nonsmoker (smoking is not healthy per se, but it does actually slow dementia in old age), and sometimes, people are almost completely gone by their late 70s, and then live for another 10-15 years.

Doing these recent interviews, clearly under the stress of this Epstein thing – regardless of whether he did something or was just ordered by Bibi to seal it up, it’s stressful for him – he sounds very mumbly and angry.

I think this clip is AI. I don’t know, but I think it’s AI. But if it’s not, then wow, what a great example of what I’m talking about here.

He attacks his supporters – calling them “my supporters” – and says that he won’t forget those who are talking about Epstein.

I’m pretty sure that’s AI. We are already at that thing I was talking about happening for several years where you can’t tell if something is AI or not. Remember when I used to say that? Over and over again? That we were coming to a time when you won’t be able to tell if something is AI? Well, we are officially there. And I’m in it myself. I can’t help you.

Okay, wait.

This is apparently a real show and interview?

https://americasvoice.news/video/qSpyIEOB0ecSp25/

That video is embedded in a way that you can’t skip forward, which is a scummy way to force you to watch ads. It’s also not on YouTube or Rumble. Also, that entire site could be fake and everything on it made by AI.

How are you supposed to confirm anything now? Honestly, I have no idea, and I am pretty sure it’s what I said it would be: you have to have seen it yourself or talk to someone you trust who saw it.

I think at this point, if Reuters or AP says “Trump said…”, you can consider the quote real, but I don’t know how much longer that will be true. Furthermore, if you’re working at Reuters or the AP and Trump does an interview with an obscure podcast and you can’t figure out if it’s AI, you might just not report on it. There doesn’t appear to be any report on this.

I’m listening to this alleged interview now, I’m at the Trump part. He is saying all of this stuff. He sounds like he’s about to start crying, saying people should stop talking about Epstein. He brought it up immediately at the beginning of the interview.

“Real America’s Voice” has a Wikipedia page.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Real_America%27s_Voice

But someone could have vandalized Wikipedia with this. No one can really prove this doesn’t exist. It has a website. Who can even say what “real” means at this point? I guess in this specific case, it’s a question of “did Trump, in reality, call this podcast and say all this stuff on this tape I’m listening to?”

I’m about ten minutes in at time of writing. After opening with Epstein he’s on to a bunch of bullshit I don’t care about – tariffs and Jerome Powell and whatever. That makes it seem real. Maybe the clip above is fake. I’ll tell you when I get there. But the whole thing could be fake. AI could not just do his voice, but write a script where he rambles about international trade before saying the wacko Epstein thing.

FIFTEEN MINUTES LATER

Okay, I finished the interview.

In all seriousness, the interview is real. I initially thought that clip had to be fake, because he threatens his own supporters, literally saying:

All my supporters want to talk about is the Jeffrey Epstein hoax. It’s unbelievable … It’s a disgrace and I remember, I’m gonna remember every one of these guys, they’re my supporters and they just, they love it, they love it, and it’s, it’s all induced by the Democrats. The Democrats are the ones who are getting them to say this stuff. And the files are all set up by the people who ran it for the last four years … but I’m gonna remember people that, that took us away from this, instead of talking about this flawless attack on nuclear weapons that took place in Iran … that’s what we ought to be talking about, not nonsense.

He is borderline incoherent, and sounds really, really old. He actually sounds drunk, but I believe his story about how he never drank ever. I don’t think he’s drinking.

I have recently seen some really good AI stuff done with really cheap apps, and I thought that was so bad it had to have been fake, but no. It was reported on by the media. That guy interviewing him, John Solomon, I guess works for Steve Bannon or something, I don’t know. But yeah, it’s a real interview and that is how he talks now and he’s completely obsessed with being mad at people who talk about Epstein. Clearly, his feelings are hurt that his supporters are abandoning him over this. But wow, the solution is not to threaten your own supporters, man. That is not good.

Speaking of solutions, Pam Bimbo just announced she is requesting the release of “some” of the Epstein files. Well, we already have some of the files. We specifically want:

  • The files that say the names of the people in the sex videos, and
  • Any information about intelligence connections, foreign and/or domestic

Note that the intelligence “connections” (all of this stuff is backroom and informal; intelligence assets working undercover get paid in cash, or billionaire Jews just give them free money for no specific reason) would likely be both domestic and foreign, i.e., he was working for the Mossad but also given some type of confidential informant status by the FBI.

Along with those two main things, and those are the two main things, it would be nice to know what investigations were done into Wexner and Black for giving this guy tens of millions. I don’t think “helping out a friend” explains it. Maybe if you’re a billionaire, you help out a friend with a few hundred thousand or even a couple million, but between Wexner and Black, Epstein was given over two hundred million dollars.

Further, I want the files on why and legally how he was arrested in 2019 for crimes he’d already been convicted of and served prison time for. I remember when he died, some people in the media talked about this, and claimed that these were separate jurisdictions (Florida and then New York) and that this meant he could be tried for the same crimes twice. That isn’t true. You can’t be charged in different federal courts for the same crimes. There is something called “dual sovereignty” which is really a violation of the Fifth Amendment but that allows both state and federal charges for the same crime, but two federal courts can’t charge you for the same crime as the federal government has a single sovereignty.

Frankly, there is no reason not to simply release all of the files. It is, in fact, insane that this is even an issue while we are being told “there is no there there.” With the Kennedy files, you have all kinds of potential “classified” material that they can claim is too “sensitive” to be released as it could “compromise national security.” There are all sorts of security protocols around the president that are a secret and therefore “sensitive,” and then if the government had investigated Russia or Cuba or whatever, all of that would relate to “national security.” I’m not saying that is a valid reason not to release the files, especially sixty years later, but it is at least a theoretical reason. If Epstein is just some guy who was having sex with young girls and that’s the end of it, there is literally zero reason that all of this information could not be released publicly, with the one exception maybe being some of the stuff about the investigation into his death as that at least happened in a federal government building, meaning “classified stuff.” Everything else should be public. He’s already dead, so he can’t complain about his privacy, and it is obvious that this is a matter of public interest, so what is even the potential reason for keeping any of the government files a secret?

Obviously, we all understand the reason. But why doesn’t Trump have a better excuse? What he said, even before the election, is that Jeffrey Epstein knew a lot of people so a lot of people’s names are in the files and that doesn’t necessarily mean they are actually guilty of anything. But we already know who most or maybe all of these people were. Bill Gates, Alan Dershowitz, Steven Pinker, that guy who made The Simpsons, and on and on, have already been named as having some kind of social connection to Epstein, and it was public knowledge for most of these people. Epstein was holding big social events in New York and Florida with all kinds of people. Along with procuring underage girls for sex, he was a socialite, hence the fact that all of these famous people are photographed with him. I’m sure not all of them had sex with underage girls, so it’s not a reasonable excuse that some innocent man’s name is going to be tarnished because government documents show that they were at one of Epstein’s parties.

Bill Gates did an interview saying that he knew Epstein had been in prison for underage girls and still chose to be friends with him and go to his parties and there were no consequences for him. He did not get “canceled.” Several other people have been questioned about it and just said “yeah, sorry” and nothing happened. Dershowitz admitted to getting multiple massages from girls who “looked over 18.” And he’s a person who has actually written about the age of consent being stupid and was one of Epstein’s lawyers in the Florida case. And he didn’t get “canceled.” He’s still out there doing prominent interviews. Just the other day he was on that show of those guys who took Rush Limbaugh’s timeslot explaining that Epstein was not involved with the Mossad.

So unless the files say “video shows this person having sex with a girl who appears to possibly be under the age of consent,” then nothing is going to happen if someone’s name shows up – including Trump’s, by the way. We already have these pictures of Trump with Epstein and interviews where he’s saying they’re friends. He even implied directly that he knew some of the girls were underage.

In a tape released as an election surprise last year (it got very little media coverage for whatever reason), Epstein, on a 2017 tape, says he was Trump’s “best friend for ten years.”

Given that Epstein was indicted by two different federal jurisdictions, there would be a whole lot of paperwork, including a whole bunch of interviews, so it would actually be more or less impossible that Trump’s name wouldn’t be somewhere in the documents. I don’t see how his name being mentioned in some file would be more harmful to him than the photographs and various statements that are already on the public record. Unless it says “Trump, featured on a video having sex with a teenage girl who may be under the age of consent…”

Yes, Leftists are Talking About This

Trump is correct when he says Democrats are talking about this Epstein thing. It’s all over the Democrat media.

The issue is that that doesn’t mean anything. It would be bizarre if they were not talking about it. Of course they are talking about it. They are obsessed with Trump sex scandals. And of course, the Jews out there talking about it know as a matter of fact that Trump isn’t going to come out and say “Epstein was Mossad,” so there is no reason for them to not talk about it.

In fact, if I were a Jew, I would want to talk constantly about how Trump is stopping the release of the files because he had sex with an underage girl, as that redirects people from pointing out the fact that Trump first told people to “shut up about Epstein” while in a meeting with Bibi Netanyahu, and that the implication of all of this is that Epstein was Mossad. I watched a bunch of clips from CNN and so on talking about Trump-Epstein, and none of them talked about Epstein being a possible Mossad agent. It’s all just sordid sex drama, which is not relevant to anything.

Trump is actually arguing that because Biden didn’t release the files, he shouldn’t be expected to.

Weird argument, but okay.

Ultimately, it doesn’t really matter whether or not Trump did have sex with an underage whore or if he’s just being bullied by Bibi. The effect is the same, which is that the media is covering up the fact that the Mossad was running a blackmail ring in the United States.

This obviously isn’t going anywhere. Apparently, it is going to turn Trump’s people against him much more than bombing Iran did. At least during this lag between the bombing and the inevitable war, that is the case. In general, these wars in the Middle East have been such a feature of America for so long, it’s just background noise. But Epstein, for whatever reason, is something people were really mad about. I guess the reason is probably that people don’t like the idea of a group of elites being above the law. I’m not really sure. Maybe some of it is white knighting for literal hookers. Probably a significant amount of it is more fringe QAnon type reasoning.

Honestly, from the “Trump base,” I don’t see a lot about Mossad. More Israel talk is creeping in now. I recently saw a clip of Matt Gaetz saying Mossad killed Epstein in prison by working with their assets in the US government. But mainstream right-wing criticism of Israel and Jews is something relatively new. I’m not really sure about the original obsession with Epstein from people who don’t think he’s Mossad.

Regardless of the reasons, people are really mad at Trump about this, and with the way he is handling it, things are clearly going to get worse for him in terms of backlash from his supporters. But it doesn’t matter. The US is going to war with Iran and AOC will be the next president and people will get whatever comes with that.

Trump will at least try to pump the economy.

I mean, did you guys see Bitcoin? Shit be flying.

So yeah, it’s fine. Whatever.

Just don’t expect anything to happen, because it’s definitely not going to. Even the war with Iran won’t really feel like it’s “happening.”

I guess the AI thing is going to be something like something happening. As mentioned above, we are already in the world of “there is no possible way to tell if this is real or not.”

A couple weeks ago I ran across this Twitter account and thought for a second the guy was hiring actors for his memes:

I realized it was AI. But that is just a small Twitter account that is just using the raw prompts of what is presumably some $10-a-month software.

He just posted a new one. These are actually really good.

We got another floating microphone there, and he’s not fixing the text (which for various reasons still confuses AI in images). If he would edit, you literally would not be able to tell it is AI. And in six months, the raw prompts will be enough for it to be indistinguishable from real life.

It’s sort of hilarious to think that in a year or so, something like the Superman movie, which they spent $300 million on, will be possible with $10-a-month software. Even more hilarious will be the insanity that ensues in the period where people can’t tell what is real and everyone gets all confused about everything before eventually the human mind begins to understand that video doesn’t reflect real life.

I’m not really sure where it will go in terms of the social impact, but this is a big shift. We’ve gotten used to video representing real life. But people will somehow deal with the fact that it doesn’t. People don’t like to feel stupid, like they’ve been tricked, so people will all get tricked a few times and find out they were tricked and then start assuming everything is AI. If the Jews would have waited a couple years to begin their genocide, they probably could have convinced most people that these insane genocide videos we’re seeing are AI.

I guess what will probably happen is that people will just believe things are real if they agree with them and say they’re fake if they don’t agree with them? That seems most likely. But there will definitely be more fake video than real video, on the whole.

If people want to get into making fake videos, I would recommend that you primarily focus on making outrageous shit that promotes the other side. For example, make videos showing IDF soldiers helping Palestinians in absurd ways. Like, “Israeli military holds carnival in Gaza for Palestinian children, gives everyone free cotton candy and funnel cakes.” Or a news report on Russian soldiers throwing Ukrainians into a cage with an eagle and a bear. “Russian soldiers are seen forcing Ukrainians to take off their shoes and throw them in a big pile.” Whatever ridiculous, unbelievable shit you can think of that in theory supports your enemies but is too ridiculous to be believed rationally. Either fake enemy propaganda, or just total chaos. Total chaos is also good. Just invent events that don’t make any sense or are outrageous and incendiary.

You can also just do fun/funny stuff. But this is going to be complete madness, and it’s really here now, but in six months you will really start to see serious fallout. CNN and the rest of these people are going to do reports saying “you can only trust video from us,” and people will be like “lol.”

But yeah, the fallout from AI video, which will include the total end to all extant professional entertainment media as everyone will just be able to make whatever they want, but also including some kind of massive social crisis, the biggest reality collapse we’ve seen, is the only interesting thing I see on the horizon. Everything else is very predictable and boring.

Sorry.

]]> Superman is Fine (Though Not What I Requested) https://dailystormer.in/superman-is-fine-though-not-what-id-requested/ Wed, 16 Jul 2025 15:08:41 +0000 https://dailystormer.in/?p=687837

I wrote a post a few months back saying that a really positive and pro-America Superman film could be a good thing for American culture. I said it could happen as a part of the “Trump Effect.” A lot of people were saying that no, I was stupid, it was going to be woke as all heck.

Well, the film has been released.

Statistically, most of you didn’t see it, and probably are not really very excited to. It didn’t perform poorly over the weekend, but it certainly was not a blockbuster, and not what Warner Brothers was looking for. That said, after the weekend box office (which was below projections with the film on the path to break even), WB head David Zaslav said this new DC Comics “universe” of films will go ahead and he was happy with the box office.

For some reason, before the release of the film, director James Gunn decided to attack his own film release by announcing that Superman is “an immigrant story.” This caused many people to believe the film was woke, and refuse again to pay $15 for a moral lecture.

If this film was actually woke, it still wouldn’t have made sense for him to say that, but it really isn’t woke. The wokest thing about the film is that they cast a Mexican who looks like a literal satanic ape as the Engineer.

In principle, I am not even against having a Mexican and a black. These big blockbuster CGI fest children’s films are intended for wide audiences and I think there might be some data-backed truth to the fact that people from these races will be more likely to see a film if they feel they are “represented.” (Although the thicc Mexican bitch who played Hawkgirl seems like enough Latina representation?) This was the original idea of having a black character in films. In old slasher films, blacks actually loved the trope that “the black guy always gets killed first” (maybe they related to it, I don’t know, but they certainly always went to see these films and cheered when the black died first). I don’t expect these films to be full-Nazi, or whatever. So a bit of diversity in the casting, if it’s not an overload, isn’t “woke,” as this has always been a thing. I do think it is woke to pick a bitch with that face.

But everything else was fine. The black guy was fine. Literally the only political thing in the film at all was a surprisingly heavy-handed Palestine analogy with the Boravia plot line. The Jews are freaking out about that. I guess woke people do support Palestine, but Israel is so despised by the right, that doesn’t really count. And though Gunn made it way obvious what he was talking about, it wasn’t a huge part of the story. Though getting the actor who looks the most like David Ben-Gurion to play the leader of the racist oppression nation was funny.

That was sort of anti-woke, antisemitic casting, frankly. It made up for the Engineer being purposefully ugly.

So, I don’t know why Gunn decided to sabotage the film this way. It’s a head-scratcher. He can’t possibly have imagined that making the film seem “woke” before the release would be good for it. Maybe it was just an offhanded comment he made, possibly while drunk and on pills. I am sure Gunn’s personal politics are left, but he also seems like he would be willing to do a film that slightly signals to MAGA if it would secure him more money. Also, Zaslav, you’d think, would go along with doing some jingoistic Americanism in the film in the name of getting Americans to sign up and die for wars for his homeland. (Though he sort of did the opposite of that, actually, by allowing Gunn to put the Palestine thing in there, but this sort of indicates he just doesn’t care at all.)

They asked poor Nathan Fillion about the “immigrant” thing, and he said “c’mon, guys. It’s just a movie.” This is exactly what it is: it’s just a movie. (Unless you’re a Jew who doesn’t think anyone should be able to say genociding Arabs is wrong, in which case it is like another Holocaust all over again.)

If you would have thrown in some dogwhistles, shown some more American flags (I was excited by the one in the trailer), and had someone say “truth, justice, and the American Way,” the film could have been a blockbuster despite its mediocre quality.

And that is how I would rate the quality: it is mediocre.

Most of the critiques of the film are right. People are posting that clip of Trey Parker explaining if your story is just a bunch of “and then this happens” scenes strung together, it’s not a good story. That is factually true. That being said, it’s difficult for me, as a “science of literature” expert, to see how you could have shoved that many characters into the film and then stuck to any sort of meaningful storytelling format. Yes, there are good novels with a lot of characters, but these novels would make 10- and 20-hour movies (as was done with the Game of Thrones books). To shove as many characters as were in Superman into a movie and not just have it be a series of events would probably be impossible. The literature on the structure of stories is clear that the characters and plot are inseparable. No one has ever said “I liked the plot, I just didn’t like the characters,” though with Superman, you could say the opposite thing. I did like most of the characters. Superman was my favorite character, however, and he ends up getting pushed out of his own movie by a barrage of different characters, some of whom might be interesting in their own right, but there just isn’t enough time in a film’s runtime to find out.

I think this was the only mandate from Zaslav: you have to include a bunch of different characters we can use for our “universe.” Very stupid thinking. But I don’t think this means James Gunn is a bad writer. Unless it was his idea to have this many characters, which I doubt, then you can’t blame him for not being able to formulate a properly flowing cause-and-effect plot around this directive. It could only really be a series of strung together “oh here’s this person who has this thing going on, that’s fun, right?” scenes.

Frank Grillo as Rick Flag, Fillion as Guy Gardner, and others to various extents, were potentially interesting characters. The film simply didn’t have room for all of them.

In terms of watching the film as a comic book fan, there was nothing offensive. Well, there is one very offensive thing that I expected to get revealed as a Lex Luthor scheme by the end, but it never was, and that was really more confusing than offensive, because I just assumed that it would be revealed it was a hoax. (And maybe it will be later on in the series, check the spoiler at the bottom of this page. I guess I liked Superman enough to think some people will want to go and watch it and have fun and not have it spoiled, so I’ll keep it down there for the majority who do not care.)

Along with liking the characters, I liked the general tone, which drew on Silver Age themes that Gunn has said he came across through Grant Morrison’s All-Star Superman. It’s a very silly and comic-booky tone, which you have to have if you are doing literally any DC comics heroes other than literal Batman. (Yes, if you “nerd out,” there are other DC heroes you can do dark and “realist” takes on, but it works with none of the main Justice League characters. If you want to “nerd out” right this very moment, go look at the current “dark” line of DC comics, the “Absolute” series, and tell me why Absolute Batman is awesome and the others are unbearable.)

DC should have looked at Disney’s success with Marvel’s “universe” and said they were going to go in the opposite direction, and be more comic booky and silly-fun than Marvel. Instead, they let Zack Snyder make all of those nightmarish films and lost I think multiple billions of dollars. I’m sure part of the pitch from Gunn was exactly this: “let’s go in the other direction and just have fun,” and to a not totally insignificant extent, Superman succeeds with this.

It’s almost like there is just a lot of bad market research going on here. Like, as if a bunch of marketing research people are literal criminal fraudsters. Along with the silliness of Gunn saying that immigrant thing before the release of the film, the film was also sabotaged by the trailers, which made Superman look weak and whiny. Releasing the scene with Clark and Lois arguing was really dumb, as in context, you don’t really think much about that. Clark/Superman as a character is totally fine and I liked almost everything about the portrayal. Even the suit that everyone complained about before release looks great.

But yeah, not a great film, not a film I would really recommend anyone watch, and definitely not the “Trump Effect” pro-America film I was hoping for. I don’t know, maybe Warner has marketing research geniuses who did the math and realized the Trump Effect would be mostly gone by mid-July. My original thinking was that if they could have gotten Trump to endorse it as “a great pro-America film,” it would have been a big deal, and I still think it would have been a better strategy, but it wouldn’t carry the weight it would have in April. Faster than I ever could have imagined, the MAGA Spring has given birth to a “Wait, What Did He Just Say? What the Hell is Going on Here?” Summer.

But hey, I don’t want to talk about that in this article, man. I don’t really want to talk about that at all anymore, dude. I just want to do “woke or not?” pop culture reviews, bro.

Just relax.

None of it even matters anyway.

Oh, and I almost forgot: Lois breaks up with Clark when he’s getting attacked by the media then decides she’s in love with him after the media decides he’s good. Literally, there is nothing else driving her relationship decisions other than Superman’s social status. The sort of garbled non-plot might make it not obvious, but if you watch it, you can literally see she does not have any interactions with Superman between giving him a cold “now you’re in the friend zone” hug and jumping all over him telling him she loves him. No interactions. Her decision was completely based on media reports of the man’s social status.

I think what probably happened was that in the frenzy of reshoots and recuts, trying to turn this garbled mess of mostly disconnected things into a coherent whole, they didn’t realize they got a bit too real with how women actually think about men. It could also have been on purpose. Either way, it was very funny to me. And literally true.

When Mel Gibson got condemned as evil by the media for saying those things about the Jews, when he was literally at the lowest point in his life, his wife of many decades with whom he had seven children decided to do the brave thing and file for divorce. I guarantee if there ever comes a day when the media decides “it turns out Mel is the good guy after all,” that ex-wife is going to start calling him and talking “oh, I was just thinking about you, we had so many good times together and a part of me misses it.”

Women are utterly ridiculous, actually buffoonish in nature, and I always love when that is pointed out.

Spoiler Thing:

The thing I expected to be a Lex plot was the video that Superman’s birth parents sent him from Krypton, where they told him to conquer Earth and have a harem of women to produce the maximum number of children with Kryptonian blood to rule as his heirs. That is very offensive if it is an in-universe thing that’s real. The thing is, Supergirl is in this universe, and if she’s Kara, which I assume she is, she was also sent to Earth to escape Krypton’s destruction, and if you were planning on conquering a planet, and you specified how to do so by using the “Spanish dudes in Mexico” method, you would not send a female with a vagina and would instead send two males with penises.

They could say that Kara was sent to be Superman’s pureblooded Kryptonian wife to create a royal line to lead the half-breed earthlings (which was the only reason Spain ever sent women to Mexico), but in this case, they wouldn’t have sent his first cousin, which Kara is, and I’m pretty sure it says “cousin” in the film.

Anyway, it never crossed my mind that this was anything other than another Lex trick, so it didn’t bother me until I’d finished the film and realized it was never resolved. Anyway, if this does turn into a successful “universe,” which seems unlikely because I just don’t think this “blockbuster film that has to make a billion dollars to be profitable” model was ever sustainable (but who knows), they will just retcon that even if it was originally intended by Gunn to be canon. Because no one likes this “Superman’s parents were evil” thing. Superman has been around nearly 100 years, they’ve done every possible storyline with him, including various versions of “evil Superman,” but the only case I know of where Superman was sent to earth to set up a one-man breeding farm and conquer the planet is in Invincible, which is not a Superman book, even whilst Omega Man is obviously a Superman parody. The Invincible cartoon is really popular now (not for no reason, I’d argue), so maybe someone thought it was a good idea to weave that in? That doesn’t make any sense, but nothing about it makes sense. Even on a basic level of the story itself, a people whose planet is being destroyed and who can only send one child to another planet (later two, with Kara) would not be thinking “we command you to conquer this planet in our name.” The reason it works in Invincible is that Omega Man lies about being the last of his race and he’s actually a representative of an alien empire that is planning to conquer Earth.

Although I am on the “it’s definitely mostly nature” side of the nature vs. nurture debate, I am also sympathetic to “you’re not required to be like your parents” stories, which can be real human stories. But this is not the place for that, James Gunn. Literally no one wants “Superman was supposed to be evil but he overcame it,” except in Invincible, where it is a completely different thing and “Superman” actually does do a bunch of evil things before reflecting on whether or not he wants to be like his parents.

]]> Dear MAGA: If You Think Masked ICE Thugs Wouldn’t Do the Same to You, You’re Even Dumber Than You Look https://dailystormer.in/dear-maga-if-you-think-masked-ice-thugs-wouldnt-do-the-same-to-you-youre-dumber-than-you-look/ Fri, 11 Jul 2025 03:38:55 +0000 https://dailystormer.in/?p=687818

It’s NEVER a good idea to resist ICE agents.

Can you say FAFO? pic.twitter.com/3zArK2T25y

— AmericanPapaBear (@AmericaPapaBear) June 29, 2025

A lot of people on the internet are celebrating and cheering on some pretty brutal videos of ICE grabbing Mexicans out of parking lots, out of Walmarts, wherever. It’s understandable. I understand, and my instinct is to celebrate it as well. And I would be celebrating it if I knew less about the situation than I do.

Please, allow me to explain why I’m not celebrating it.

Let’s start with just how uncomfortable I am with the cops. The Big Beautiful Bill is turning ICE into the biggest federal cop group in American history. Their budget is going to go from $10 billion to $100 billion, which surpasses the combined budgets of the FBI, DEA, ATF, Bureau of Prisons, and the Marshals Service.

Note that there has never been a case of a federal cop group shrinking. In theory, ICE should have a temporary mission, correct? They should be rounding up the immigrants, processing them in holding centers near the border, then shipping them back to wherever they came from. (In certain cases, sending them to some third country might make sense, but because they all came through Mexico, that third country should be Mexico. It was Mexico that made the decision to let these people walk through their country into our country, and while I understand that this was under pressure from the Biden administration, all that really means is that the US is capable of asserting enormous pressure on Mexico.)

But there is no “once the mission is complete, ICE’s staffing and funding will be drastically downsized” clause in the BBB or anywhere else. This is a standing army, trained to run around the country throwing people into vans, without warrants. If you think “JD Vance” is going to win the 2028 election, you have no understanding of what is happening in this country. Apparently, the reasons Democrats will take over in 2028 are something that need to be explained in some detail, something that is beyond our scope today. But Democrats will control the federal government in 2028, SCOTUS will not get in their way, and they are not going to disband a massive federal cop organization, but instead use it for their own purposes. If we want to get an idea of what they will do with these cops, perhaps we should recall Waco and Ruby Ridge, then imagine that sort of thing happening everywhere, all the time.

Another fact that is rather important in my view is that most of these people we see being arrested are not being deported at all. The BBB does nothing to address the laws that make it virtually impossible to deport 98% of illegal immigrants. Getting rid of the laws that prevent deportations should and would be the first move of anyone who was even remotely serious about deporting tens of millions of people. Among other things, you would expand expedited removals, end “credible fear” interviews for “asylum seekers,” and defund immigration courts. This could all be done by Congress.

Of course, the idea of tens of millions of people via mass roundups is completely nonsensical on its face. No one knows the actual numbers, but after the 20+ million who likely came in under Biden, we are definitely talking about somewhere in the range of fifty million illegal immigrants we want to remove. You are not going to pick them up one at a time in the Walmart parking lot. You don’t need to be a math genius to understand this, and I don’t need to tell you “how many football stadiums is 50 million people?”

What you would do is start seriously punishing people who hire or rent to illegal immigrants. You would fully implement E-verify, to ensure people who work and rent are legal residents, then you would send ICE to round up the tens of thousands of people who are employing and renting to illegals and charging them with ten years in prison for each instance. You would then set up ICE-run “no questions asked, just sign the form and we’ll give you $1,000 in cash and put you on a bus back to Mexico or on a flight to wherever” voluntary deportation centers in every major American city and provide a hotline for the immigrants to call explaining how they can make their way out.

If they can’t legally work and they can’t legally live anywhere, all of a sudden you have an exodus. What can they do? They have to leave. Then, instead of endless videos of masked men grabbing screaming women in church parking lots and throwing them into vans, you’d have endless videos of immigrants lining up and boarding single-file onto buses bound for Mexico.

Im sure it’s possible to argue that some of the immigrants would refuse to leave even if they could not work and had to live on the streets. But it’s not going to be very many of them, and those ones could be thrown in vans. They’re not going to be hard to find.

Tens of millions of people have been relocated before. The most obvious example to point to is the partitioning of Pakistan. That project used carrots and sticks, but it did not round millions of people up, throwing them in cars one at a time, sending three officers to arrest a single individual.

How long does the arrest take, if we include drive time and paperwork? How much are these ICE people being paid per hour? This all starts to become reminiscent of “Holocaust math,” no?

Far from moving to arrest the employers and landlords of illegals, which I suspect many in the Trump administration would view as antisemitic, Trump has not even managed to cut off illegal immigrant access to all of the free social services.

Even if you are not big on math and are a true believer in the “one arrest at a time” strategy, the problem now is that ICE has already cleaned out the “100 miles from the border” immigrants who have been here less than two weeks (those are the only people eligible for expedited removal), and now these people are just being interned indefinitely as the courts prevent deportation. Yes, the Trump administration is making a big show pushing back on the courts, Stephen Miller is saying they don’t have the authority, but whatever the details of that battle might be, most of these people being detained by ICE are no longer being deported and are instead being sent to detainment facilities. Meanwhile, there is not even a discussion of using the Congress to pass laws stripping courts of their ability to prevent deportations. The United States federal court system is still able to enforce international refugee treaties (HIAS and others successfully challenged Trump’s EO on the matter in court), and instead of using the Congress to get rid of these treaties, Trump sends Miller to argue with the courts about what they mean.

Just Send Them to Black Sites, Indefinitely?

This “Alligator Alcatraz,” where MAGA patriots plan to eat delicious bread while watching Mexicans being eaten alive by large lizards, is a “black site.” That is, it is a prison camp where people are held indefinitely without access to due process. Just to be clear, no, it does not have to be secret to be a “black site.” Guantanamo Bay, where Trump is also sending immigrants instead of deporting them (he’s allowed to do this because Gitmo is technically US soil), is the world’s most famous prison and is also, definitionally, a “black site.” That said, it is certainly often a feature of a black site that you do not know where it is, and if you imagine that the federal government is not using this current circus atmosphere to build these sites across the country, you are as innocent as a babe or as stupid as an ox who’s suffered severe head trauma.

If the illegals could simply be deported in an efficient manner, you would not have any reason to build new black sites. So there is one more reason the state has for not successfully deporting illegal immigrants. That’s on top of the fact that all wealthy donors are against mass deportation of illegals.

Along with a brand new army of fully militarized federal cops trained to drive around the country and disappear people into vans in broad daylight, these black sites are another thing that the Trump Administration will be gifting to the AOC administration when James “JD Vance” Bowman loses the 2028 election.

I’m sure the Democrats will campaign on abolishing (or at least restricting) ICE and closing the black sites. And I’m sure people will believe it because of the long established Democrat tradition of telling the truth and never using federal cops for immoral purposes.

The most important gift Trump will give to AOC will be an AI police state control grid run by Palantir, so that the government will be able to keep close tabs on racists, sexists, homophobes, transphobes, and most importantly of all, antisemites.

Will the Democrats use this series of gifts to identify, arrest, and detain all the people viewed as a threat to democracy? Of course, I have no way of predicting such a thing, all I can do is say that it would be very easy to do, given these incredible gifts Trump will be giving them, and could be done legally with a simple emergency declaration which could be declared for more or less any reason.

Here’s an interesting question: how many people would need to be disappeared into some cage in a swamp to crush a meaningful American resistance movement? We know that the Palantir system will be able to identify them, and I would suspect the number is lower than 2,500. It could in fact be much lower than that, given that a fully functioning controlled opposition movement already exists, and most people would prefer to follow a Pied Piper offering them some joyful fantasy than look upon the dark realty of what is actually happening in front of their eyes. A quick perusal of the ridiculous popularity of the QAnon movement should be enough to demonstrate the ability of people to put their faith in nonsense, and most of the controlled opposition movements are nowhere near as ridiculous as QAnon.

Personally, I think these street scenes of ICE agents grabbing people are being created to desensitize people to seeing this sort of thing, and I think it is only a matter of time before these methods are used against those viewed as “dissidents” in America. But, hey – maybe I’m wrong? Maybe I’m just paranoid and it’s just that everyone in the government is really bad at math?

Bonus Trump Gift to Democrats: A Browner America


Along with the “elite police state package,” there are a lot of bonus gifts Trump is giving the Democrats. For example, Trump has decided to make it look like he’s implicated in the Epstein documents by claiming they don’t exist, and Democrats can now claim he destroyed them all. This is fantastic news for a lot of Democrat politicians and donors. You could come up with a big list of all sorts of little presents like this Trump will be giving the Democrats in the 2028 handoff.

But given today’s topic of discussion, the most relevant of the bonus gifts Trump will be giving the Democrats is a browner America. Homeland Security claims that virtually no one is crossing the border illegally currently. That seems unlikely, but okay. DHS also claims that as of June, so in Trump’s first six months, they had deported 207,000 people. The goal the administration had set was to deport a million per year, and it looks like in 2025 they might get close to 500,000, half of their 1 million goal. For reference, the Biden administration was probably allowing about 5 million people a year to enter the country, while in 2024, that administration deported only 270,000.

Given that Trump is going for all of the low-hanging fruit in his first months in office – new arrivals who are near the border – and given that there has been no interest shown in using Congress to change any of the laws, and especially given that there is no interest in putting the onus of responsibility on the people hiring and renting to the illegals, it is unlikely that by their 4th year, they will be deporting more than Biden was in his fourth year.

So just to be clear: Biden allowed in 20 millionish, Trump says the goal is to deport 4 millionish, he will probably end up deporting 1.5 millionish. Even after building and arming the biggest federal police agency in history, there is no way he is going to get near Obama’s deportation numbers.

Again, no need for a math whiz to see that just with white deaths and brown births alone, the 2028 America Trump hands off is going to be significantly browner than the 2024 America Biden handed him. But we haven’t added the legal immigrants. That’s about 1 million new people per year, virtually all of them brown. Further, Trump is at least flirting with the idea of removing caps on H-1B visas for Indians, which could mean multi-millions more per year.

Any way you cut it, 2028 America is going to be significantly browner than 2024 America, and it could be a lot browner.

But hey, I heard on Fox News that brown people are leaving the Democrat plantation because of the woke agenda. So maybe it will all work out? Maybe brown folks will get sick of paying these high taxes to people who want to turn their kids gay, and we’ll have a… multiracial working class uprising against the… the woke mob.

Or whatever.

But Hey, Whatever

Many in the internet will claim that a person has no right to identify a problem unless he has already prepared a solution for it. It is difficult to imagine a more infantile mindset for a grown adult man to embrace. But who am I to judge? I simply do my best to look at the world, to examine the facts, and try to explain what is going on to those interested in listening. I would never want to force anyone to listen. You are an adult, and you have a basic right as a human being to believe whatever it is you feel like believing.

I do not have a solution to the very serious problems I am identifying here, and will not even suggest that any such solution exists. I’m just exhausted by this goofy fantasy bullshit. In 2016, Trump said tens of millions of people needed to be deported. He “lost” in 2020, and tens of millions more were brought in before he “won” in 2024, and now he’s aiming to deport 4 million by 2028, and it seems that number is impossible, but you are going to get a massive police state, both digital and physical, in exchange for removing maybe 1.5-2 million illegal immigrants.

Okay?

That’s what’s happening. Happening alongside the endless wars, the biggest budget ever, the entire Epstein case being thrown into a black hole, and whatever other cute little surprises the Trump administration has up its sleeve over the next 3.5 years. It’s all bad news. So if you want, pretend it’s not happening. No one forced you to read this. At least, I hope they didn’t. If someone did force you to read this, I’m sorry. If it was a Mexican who forced you to read it, you should call ICE, and they will come feed him to an alligator.

When analyzing the American empire, and the evils it is currently in the process of spreading, I’ve determined that a man can either hope that the American empire falls sooner rather than later, or that he dies before things get really bad.

The other thing one can do is pray for incompetence on the part of the evil forces implementing this agenda, but I suppose that falls under the “hoping for collapse” category.

When Trump was allegedly shot in the ear in Butler, I identified this as part of a program to set him up as an overwhelmingly popular leader, who would come into office as a kind of Caesar figure, and be able to do whatever he wanted to do. Unfortunately or fortunately, most of that good will has already been burned through. The Epstein thing was incredible. To actually start yelling about how people need to stop talking about Epstein was beyond my comprehension.

That was just so completely nuts. When I first saw it, I had to confirm it wasn’t AI.

And then this?

As I always note, we live in a democracy. Please don’t say “oh no, we live in a Republic.” Some of you people are just such retards, I really feel like you deserve all of this. Sometimes, I think the Jews are right about the goyim. We do live in a democracy, a representative democratic republic, and this means that you do not have a way to petition grievances. So the government can do whatever they want to you.

However, at some point, any population facing a certain amount of abuse will engage in a violent uprising, so the system is able to move much more smoothly when they have high levels of support. The fact that Trump has burned up so much good will so quickly is confusing and can only really be explained by incompetence on his part and on the part of his cadre. He doesn’t actually have to do anything. He can just pretend he’s trying to do something. But coming out and saying “we must defeat Putin and actually Epstein didn’t even do anything” is really wild.

So sure. Hope their incompetence screws everything up and leads to a collapse. That’s my best advice.

My best advice is actually to leave the United States, and forget the place exists. But most people are not going to do that.

]]> “Political Loyalty” is a Nonsensical Concept https://dailystormer.in/political-loyalty-is-a-nonsensical-concept/ Wed, 09 Jul 2025 11:43:00 +0000 https://dailystormer.in/?p=687799

Since the beginning of Donald Trump’s political career in 2015, “Make America Great Again” (MAGA) has been more than a slogan, and instead a concept that embodies a series of simple and easily understood principles about the problems facing America and the solutions to these problems. MAGA was never a specific series of policy proposals, as it was intended to be something bigger than any specific policy. It was a vision of a new America. While short on specifics, the vision was clear: the current establishment had wasted America’s wealth on foreign wars and domestic social engineering agendas that had hollowed out the nation. Though it was not theocratic or puritanical or otherwise moralizing, it was opposed to “weird stuff” which sought to undermine what were traditionally considered “American values,” and it was anti-immigration and anti-war. Again, it was never specific, but everyone definitely understood those three major cornerstones of the program. (It was also “anti-corruption,” though as no one is publicly “pro-corruption,” that is not a particularly meaningful position to take.)

During his first term, Trump failed to do much MAGA, but it was generally understood that he was trying to, but that the president simply doesn’t really have very much power in America. However, in these early months of his second term, Trump is not simply failing to live up to the ideals of MAGA, but is attempting to completely confuse the meaning of the term, attempting to convince his own followers that “MAGA” was never really what they thought it was.

In a series of statements reminiscent of Anthony Fauci’s infamous pronunciation that “I am The Science,” Trump has recently claimed “I am MAGA,” and that he is the decider of what is or isn’t MAGA, and whatever new policies he decides on do not necessarily need to have any relationship to what was previously understood to be the MAGA political platform.

What he is effectively saying is that his political movement was always just about him as a person, and that anyone who ever supported MAGA was supporting him as a person. Therefore, anyone who disagrees with his totally new series of policies he has developed in recent weeks, most of which are the opposite of how MAGA had previously been defined, is not actually a believer in MAGA, because MAGA was never a series of policies, but instead an expression of loyalty to Donald Trump personally, and a pledge to support whatever it is he decides to do at any moment.

This situation is most brightly highlighted in the way Trump has dealt with Congressman Thomas Massie, who is, I would argue, the standard-bearer of the MAGA platform as it was initially introduced by Trump in 2015. Trump has claimed Massie is a traitor and vowed to destroy him. It is very obvious to everyone that Massie has not changed any of his positions on anything.

In the most recent betrayal of the ideals that were sold as representing MAGA, Donald Trump has decided that he wants to continue the endless war in the Ukraine. While meeting with his handler and earthly master Bibi Netanyahu this week, Trump declared that there is no plan to cut any funding to the Ukraine, and he actually plans to increase weapons shipments.

Although it’s not totally clear what happened, it appears that last week, Pete Hegseth halted shipments of weapons to the Ukraine. During the questioning in front of his boss, Trump claimed he didn’t know who was responsible for canceling these weapons shipments, and asked the media to tell him who did it. (Hegseth was sitting directly to his left.) He then declared a planned increase in weapons.

Following these statements, The Washington Post Editorial Board rushed to support Trump, publishing an op-ed praising his support for the Ukraine.

I would not suppose that anyone who voted for Trump in any of his three elections ever expected that the WaPo Editorial Board would become the standard bearer of MAGA, but that is apparently precisely what has taken place.

Trump had previously claimed that involving the US in Israel’s war with Iran actually was in-line with MAGA policy, which was explicitly anti-war, because he wasn’t really doing a war, he was just doing a bombing.

In another betrayal, Trump’s AG, Pam Bimbo, has claimed that there isn’t actually an Epstein client list. I don’t know what that means and no one has explained it, but the implication apparently is that Epstein did not have any clients, and either no women were trafficked, or they were trafficked to no one.

Though it is perhaps a slightly lesser offense to the MAGA agenda, which has never been particularly focused on fiscal responsibility, Trump has also this week moved to explode the national debt with the biggest spending bill in American history. What is most notable about this is that he vastly expanded military spending to the highest levels ever just weeks after claiming he was going to attempt to halve the military budget.

While “fiscal responsibility” might be slightly beyond the intellectual scope of MAGA, which has never been particularly sophisticated, “we’re going to stop wasting money on foreign wars and spend that money here at home where our country is falling apart” is definitely something we all understood to be core to the MAGA doctrine. Now, because MAGA has been redefined from a series of principles about how America should be run into “whatever Donald Trump says at whichever time he happens to be speaking,” the continuation of the Ukraine war, bombing countries for Israel, and spending the most money ever on war, all fall under the definition of “MAGA.”

A Test of the Limits of “Political Loyalty”

“Loyalty” is a quality that should be explicitly reserved for personal relationships. A man should be loyal to his family. Loyalty to a political figure or a political movement should not be possible, as it serves no purpose.

To be loyal to someone means that you will stick by them whether they are right or wrong. The reason we are loyal to our families is that we need them to be loyal to us, because this is how humans survive. If people abandoned family members because they were wrong about something, we would all be completely alone. We have to take the good and the bad with family members, because we need them.

Loyalty also makes sense in military units. It could make sense in the context of various business relationships. And there are, I’m certain, other examples of where the behavioral quality of loyalty would or could be appropriate.

One place where loyalty is not appropriate is in politics. Being “loyal” to a political figure is nonsensical. The only reason any person would support any political figure is that that political figure is doing political things they agree with and that helps them and their personal agenda. There is no place at all for loyalty to a political figure, as you do not personally know the political figure, and therefore you do not owe personal allegiance. There is no mutuality at all. Either the political figure is promoting an agenda you agree with, and therefore you rally for them and defend them because you benefit, or they are doing something different, which you do not benefit from, in which case you owe them nothing.

What Trump has done with intention is form a kind of personality cult, where people feel that they know him, and therefore owe him some kind of personal loyalty outside of his role as a policy maker. This is something that is only really possible in the age of electronic media. Most people see Donald Trump speaking nearly every day, and their subconscious mind, which is not familiar with the nature of video screens, registers him as someone they know personally, and are regularly hanging out with socially. Such a person would be the kind of person you would owe a personal loyalty to, and whose mistakes you would overlook, at least until the point where they got completely out of control.

We are going to see the limits of the “loyalty” personality cult tested.

Clearly, the personality cult is not considered ironclad, in the way it would be with someone like Jim Jones, as there is understood to be a need for distractions. This week, Trump is covering up the series of betrayals with a Romanesque “cruelty circus,” sending immigrants to cages in an alligator swamp. The media that supports Trump will say “yeah so, I guess there never was an Epstein list, and yeah we’re just going to keep doing that Ukraine war forever apparently – now let’s go back to the scene of the alligator pit, where your tribal enemies, the immigrants, are going to be fed to large, nasty lizards.”

They will keep the circus distractions coming, I’m sure. But ultimately, there is going to be a strict math equation regarding how many people are willing to ignore the fact that Trump is abandoning most of the core of his platform, not only failing to do the things he promised to do, but telling people he never really cared about those things anyway.

It’s worth mentioning that people will continue supporting a political figure that fails if they feel he is trying his best, which is why Trump remained so popular after not doing very much the first time he was president. But this time, it seems he is attempting to completely shift his stated priorities. This week he said “we have to defend the Ukraine.” This is very much the diametric opposite of what he campaigned on when he said “it’s not our responsibility to defend the Ukraine.” That is different than “sorry, I can’t figure out how to get Congress to stop funding the Ukraine” or “I can’t figure out what I’m supposed to do to end this war, this whole thing is really confusing and I don’t know what to do.” What I mean to say is: failure is different than betrayal, and while failure is tolerable, betrayal should not be tolerable.

In the case of “actually, there never was an Epstein client list,” that is just obvious lying, which would fall under the “betrayal” category, unless a person is stupid enough to believe that Ghislaine Maxwell was convicted of sex trafficking underage girls to no one, which some Trump supporters are probably stupid enough to believe, though I can’t say for certain.

Unfortunately: Democracy

Fortunately for Donald Trump and his cadre, and unfortunately for all the people in America, we live in a democracy, and therefore it is possible for zero people to support Donald Trump, and for him to remain president, and continue to do whatever it is he feels like doing at any given time.

There are probably some reasons that political support is important in a democracy, but I can’t think of what they might be. Trump appears to care personally about people supporting him, as it appears he has a rather fragile ego that feeds on popular support, and if people are booing him, it appears to hurt his ego. But ultimately, because this is a democracy and there is therefore no mechanism through which the public can petition grievances, he can do whatever he wants while he remains in office, and no one’s opinion about what he does means anything.

That said, Trump probably will maintain some fanatical base of morons who don’t really know much about what is going on but are very excited by alligators. And of course, the polls published can say whatever.

Then, after he does whatever it is he is going to do, he can turn over the government to Gavin Newsom or AOC, and they can be popular for a while after claiming they are going to do something or other, and then become unpopular after they do something different than what they claimed they would do. And we will just keep going on like that until eventually, something gives out, and the American empire falls into disarray, and something finally happens.

]]> Memetic Monday: The Real Deal https://dailystormer.in/memetic-monday-the-real-deal/ Tue, 08 Jul 2025 05:22:16 +0000 https://dailystormer.in/?p=687692

I wrote something on Sunday about the fact we are now combining renditions and black sites with an AI police state digital control grid in the name of fighting illegal immigration and somehow no one really seems to be getting deported.

I might go more into this, as it’s a pretty important issue that not many people seem to be talking about. People are cheering the PT Barnum meets Wile E. Coyote meets Half-Life 2 show that Trump is putting on completely mindlessly while the Democrats just whine about how it’s sad for the immigrants without pointing out that the groundwork is being laid for something very dark to be used against people other than Mexican field people and Haitian dog-eaters.

If I were the Democrats, I’d be quiet about this too, because I’d really want President AOC to get the reins of the Palantir black site rendition system that Trump is building to hand over to the Democrats when James Bowman inevitably flops like a floppy bird in 2028.

Anyway, I’m thinking about getting deep into it, because I’m not really seeing many people put these pieces together, but I’m also considering switching the focus of the site towards artisanal cheeses, as I really don’t think there are very many intelligent writers in that field either. I mean the people who make it are geniuses, but a lot of them are from places like France and Denmark and are completely illiterate. Most people don’t know this, but the Danish literacy rate is actually lower than that of niggers.

The Danes actually use cartoons to promote anti-white hatred to elderly Danish people at community centers because they know there is an 85% chance a Dane cannot read and can only understand concepts if explained with children’s cartoons:

Danish see those posters and they just crack like eggs.

But they can cheese it up, boy. Damn, son. They’ll cheese you like an mf.

Anyway, I don’t really care about anything anymore other than those two things: a) scaremongering people about how Trump is setting their shit up so president AOC and her gang of kikes can send you to get eaten to death by alligators, and b) elite cheeses.

Oh and this:

Seriously, if he wanted to mock some imaginary stereotype of Central Asians, why didn’t he just invent the name of a country?

Why completely destroy the international reputation of a country of twenty million people, who are some of the most chilled out people you will find anywhere in the world?

I mean, I get that Cohen is a Jew who hates all sorts of different categories of people, as he thinks everyone in the world is trying to gas him in a fake shower room for no reason. But why didn’t he say “Uzbekistan,” where they actually did a pogrom of Jews and where the people are about 1% as sympathetic as Kazakhs?

Or why not just make up a name??? To represent all of the Central Asian Turkic peoples he hates????

After completely destroying the international reputation of an entire country for literally no reason, this Jew went on a media campaign demanding the entire internet be shut down to prevent people from criticizing him. It’s a real shame there is no “Kazakh Defamation League.”

I guarantee this rat would tell you with a straight face Kazakh people hate him for literally no reason.

What’s almost more unbelievable than the seemingly limitless seething hatred of the Jews is their total lack of any self-awareness.

They are actually worse than women.

Oh and actually the fourth thing I cared about was freeing Diddy, but that one solved itself.

Maybe the rest of this shit will too?

Anyway.

Editor’s Pick of the Week:

And the Runner-Up:

Followed by the Artisanal Collection:

]]> Are We Sure We Want Black Sites in America? Alongside the Palantir AI Police State Control Grid? https://dailystormer.in/are-we-sure-we-want-black-sites-in-america-alongside-the-palantir-ai-police-state-control-grid/ Sun, 06 Jul 2025 09:48:06 +0000 https://dailystormer.in/?p=687684

The topic of the day is the fact that Donald Trump and his people have built a half billion dollar detention facility in a nature preserve in Florida. They are calling it “Alligator Alcatraz,” because I guess there are alligators in the swamp and you know, alliteration (the kids love it).

It’s funny to put immigrants in a swamp full of alligators.

But… are we talking about an American black site?

To be clear, a “black site” is defined as “a clandestine detention center operated by a state where prisoners who have not been charged with a crime are incarcerated without due process or court order.”

Is that something we really want to be doing? Building these types of sites in remote and potentially secret locations?

Please note that the Trump administration is also sending immigrants to Gitmo, the infamous black site in Cuba where the US spent decades torturing people it had kidnapped from various countries. Trump says he wants to hold 30,000 people there. Again, no one is explaining why they are not just sent back to their home countries. The US has an absolute ability to exert pressure on countries to accept the return of their people.

What exactly is even the purpose? We have jails. We have all of the leverage to deport people. We can make some concentration camp type holding facilities, just with modular homes and fences, and put them near the border. Wouldn’t that make more sense?

I’m not against putting immigrants in camps or cages or whatever. But another issue with this is that it only holds 5,000 people, which isn’t really a very relevant number when we are talking about at least 50 million people who are eligible for deportation.

Further, the costs of flying people to this remote location, and holding them there – that doesn’t make any sense at all to me. Again, you can quickly construct concentration camps in areas where immigrants can just be bussed in and processed. We can figure out where they’re going and send them there.

I don’t want to sound like a conspiracy theorist, but what this looks like to me is that we are normalizing the idea of black sites in America. Because this place, this Alligator Alcatraz, would make a lot more sense as a secret prison for Americans than as an immigrant detention facility. As an immigrant detention facility, it is incredibly expensive, elaborate, inefficient, and generally confusing.

I’ve written some about the Trump administration’s relationship with Palantir. Thankfully, others are writing and podcasting about this issue as well. Basically, the administration is contracting this intelligence and military tech company to design a control grid in America, and when asked about it, the Trump people just claim it is for immigrants. But no one is even claiming that only immigrants will be included in these AI databases that are going to monitor everyone. Palantir is building and has basically already built and is now just implementing a surveillance grid run by AI that compiles all information on you, both from the government and from private companies (i.e., Google and Facebook, and the banks), which is set up to build a profile on you that knows everything about you. It’s a total science fiction dystopian nightmare plan that few people are even bothering to talk about.

This Glenn Greenwald video is a good overview.

Palantir is a totally Jewish company which is involved heavily in the genocide in Gaza. The company’s Jewish CEO, Alex Karp, makes very edgy jokes about how he wants to kill the families of antisemites.

I don’t personally have very much faith in any speech guarantees provided by the US government. The Biden administration violated the First Amendment by ordering “private” tech companies to censor speech, and the Trump administration has done things much more illegal than that, passing all of these laws against “antisemitism.” Trump arrested and attempted to deport a green card holder for not supporting Israel. He says he’s going to deport anyone who doesn’t support Israel, regardless if they have a green card or not. Thus far, no one has been able to explain to me how a green card holder’s constitutional rights vary from those of a US citizen.

There is a lot of legal precedent for this you can look up. The Supreme Court ruled previously that an Australian communist with a green card couldn’t be deported for being a communist because a green card holder is protected by the Bill of Rights.

Listen, I’m the most anti-immigration person of all. If Trump said “we’re stripping all green card holders of their green cards and deporting them all tomorrow,” I would support that completely. But when you start claiming that you are taking specific rights from people who have rights under the US Constitution, you’re creating a very confusing legal situation.

He has also effectively seized federal control of universities in order to prevent students or faculty from criticizing Jews. He’s attempting to equate protesting against Israel with “material support for terrorism.” It’s all the exact same “safe spaces” and “speech is violence” language that was used by the Democrats in support of BLM and trannies, but Trump is taking it much further than Democrats ever did.

Further, the Biden administration was mocked relentlessly for their “Disinformation Governance Board,” a government board designed to monitor supposed “disinformation” on the internet, run by Nina Jankowicz. They ended up abolishing the organization after a couple months. Yet “monitoring disinformation online” is six million times less scary than “monitoring literally everything you do or say all the time for your entire life,” which is what Trump has contracted Palantir to do.

If you ask any questions about any of this, you’re either called an antisemite, a far-left open borders supporter, or both.

We should be deporting immigrants, but we should be doing so without threatening the freedom of speech or creating AI police state control grids. We should also do so, I think, without creating remote black sites, which really adds a whole other layer to this which I hadn’t really thought much about until the announcement of this “Alligator Alcatraz.”

I suppose it is obvious that if you’re going to create a total control grid and monitor everyone’s speech and behavior, and use AI to modify behavior on a society-wide scale, the social engineering won’t work on everyone so some people are going to have to disappear. And immigrants are so unpopular that the government has a chance to normalize – and get people to celebrate – this idea of people just disappearing and being hauled off to some secret prison. Doing a big fun publicity push with alligators is exactly what I would do if I wanted to normalize the idea of American black sites.

It’s all looking kinda dark, frankly.

The most frustrating part is just how well the social engineering campaigns already work. Granted, they are running into some issues getting people to go along with the whole antisemitism thing. Even a lot of right-wingers are very uncomfortable with the Trump administration’s push for these “hate speech” laws. But with Palantir AI surveillance grids or remote prisons with no due process, if you start asking really any right-winger about it, they’re going to call you an immigrant lover and start telling you that they don’t care if alligators eat the immigrants. If you follow-up with “okay, but can’t we just deport them instead of spending hundreds of millions of dollars to try to feed them to alligators?”, they will just get confused.

The answer as to “why not just deport them immediately?” is some garbled gibberish about courts. But with the way the Trump administration is steamrolling the complaints of judges about the way immigrants are being handled, the idea that they are really concerned about “asylum claims” and an infinite appeals process is not really believable. “We will feed them to alligators but if they survive they can live in this cage for decades and keep filing asylum appeals.” Further, all of those laws about asylum could just be changed. Trump is ramming the most expensive and unpopular bill in history through Congress, so the idea he can’t get rid of these idiotic asylum laws is dumb.

For the record, though I did not read the whole “Big Beautiful Bill,” my AI did, and the only change to asylum law the current version makes is that you have to pay $100 to apply for asylum. The fee, of course, can be waived if a judge says so. It appears very much like the goal here is to create a gigantic federal standing army in the form of ICE, that is able to round up immigrants and keep some fraction of a percentage of them in various cages rather than actually deport anyone back to their home country.

This is at the same time we are normalizing deploying the military onto the streets of American cities. I’m not pro-riot, and I’m not against sending the National Guard to deal with riots, but sending in the Marines? Does that really seem like something we want to be normalizing?

Sadly, like with everything else in a democracy, there isn’t anything you can do to change anything. But you should be aware that we are really not that far away from Palantir AI identifying you as an antisemite, and a private paramilitary group with no insignias on their gear throwing you in a van and flying you off to some secret prison. The Palantir control grid is really already here, they are in the process of combining all of these databases on you and using the AI to build profiles. So it’s just a matter of when they decide to start using it and for what purposes.

The way the deportation thing is currently being handled, which is by grabbing random people and doing so in a kind of public way (while also not doing any kind of relevant numbers, just to be clear), very much looks to me like it is designed to normalize scenes of people being randomly grabbed off the streets. If/when they start doing it to white Americans, “hey wait, isn’t that a white guy?” might go through someone’s head, but it isn’t going to matter. And most people won’t register that it is no longer just brown people who are getting picked up, after they’ve witnessed enough of these scenes.

You don’t have to be particularly creative to imagine a situation where ICE becomes Palantir’s NKVD.

I know this might sound a bit far-fetched. But all I’m doing is the only thing I ever do: I’m looking at the data, and doing my best to draw conclusions about what it means.

It’s also probably worth reminding people that if you simply made it a serious felony to hire or rent homes to illegal immigrants, and started putting the people who do that in prison (just normal prison, no need for alligators or any Looney Tunes shit), virtually all of the illegal immigrants would just leave.

It might also be worth reminding people that “illegal” immigrants have never caused even a fraction of the social, economic, and cultural damage that “legal” immigrants cause, and Trump is currently supporting moves to allow basically infinite numbers of “legal” immigrants.

It is very reasonable to suspect that maybe things are not exactly as they appear, and that maybe the government and media are not being perfectly frank with us about where all of this is headed.

]]>