Insight – Daily Stormer https://dailystormer.in The Most Censored Publication in History Sun, 10 Aug 2025 05:37:22 +0000 en-US hourly 1 https://wordpress.org/?v=5.8.4 “Know Thyself” – Stupid Hype of Self-Destructive Insanity? https://dailystormer.in/know-thyself-stupid-hype-of-self-destructive-insanity/ Sun, 10 Aug 2025 05:35:56 +0000 https://dailystormer.in/?p=687402

“Know thyself” is the most famous maxim of all philosophy. Having accomplished this goal, I have found it to be a very bad idea.

Allow me to explain my knowledge of myself: I am a machine with a first layer of programming that goes “seek warmth, seek food, seek sex” and a secondary layer of programming that goes “engage in some balance of conflict and socialization.” Trapped within this machine is a “ghost,” which is the core of the above mentioned “self,” which is tortured every second by the programming of the machine it is trapped within, and by the systems of time and matter that the machine is in turn trapped inside.

The soul-self then seeks what? To overcome the restraints of the machine and the systems which restrain the machine. That means seeking immaterial, metaphysical things that exist outside of the programming of the machine, while only having access to the mechanisms of the machine and the systems it exists in. Attempting to do this leads to more advanced systems of torture than one would face if he were to simply ignore the ghost and simply follow along with the programming of the machine.

Time and matter are designed to destroy the machine and are always victorious. Therefore, the soul-self, if engaged, demands that the machine be overcome, because the soul-self does not want to end with the machine.

It might be easy enough to say “Jesus is the answer,” and I believe this. But if the answer was as simple as that, great Christian men in history would have simply embraced Christ and then lived in total peace. However, none of them (or a very remote few) appear to have done that, and instead were tortured by the machines they inhabited and the systems to which the machine is subject. This implies that although “Jesus is the answer” is a truism, “Jesus” is a complex answer. If Jesus were a simple answer, there would be no need for philosophy or theology or anything else, really. I hope that in the last minutes of my life, when the machine is failing in its battle against time and matter, “Jesus is the answer” is a very simple answer, but until the time of my death, it will be a complex matter, and a struggle to understand. In traditional Christianity, this attempt to understand often comes in the form of “pondering the mysteries.” I encourage this practice. In particular, I encourage an obsession with the nearness of death, of the inevitable failure of the machine. This should allow one to partially avoid the fear of the failure of the machine, which will allow one to act in a bolder and more meaningful way.

It should be noted: the ghost, the soul-self, cannot logically be an illusion, some by-product of “evolution,” given that it does not benefit the machine in any way. Without the ghost, the machine would act on the interests of the machine alone, the primary of which is procreation. Arguing against the existence of the soul appears to me to be stupid and ridiculous, and something that no one actually believes because a being with a soul cannot actually stop believing in the mechanism that provides it with self-awareness in the first place. This is without going into the mechanics of atheism, which claim that creatures evolve based on efficiency, and having self-awareness is extremely inefficient and damaging to the survival/procreation mechanism of the machine. No one without a soul could ever commit suicide. No one without a soul could be a childless incel (they would kidnap women and lock them in their basements). “Morality” in the sense of “social norms” exists in animals without souls, but it is much less complex than human morality. As the arguments against the existence of the soul are stupid, I do not need to spend more time on this.

The question is: how do we allow the soul to accomplish its objectives to the greatest extent within the constraints of the machine and the machine’s constraints? This is where the “know thyself” matter becomes applicable in a practical sense.

The first stage must, quite obviously, be overcoming, as best we can, the base functions of the machine. The saints often went into the wilderness for this purpose. This is extreme. But it is probably ideal. The most important thing to remember is that you are never going to fully accomplish the goal. It is impossible. The saints all died fighting a losing battle against the flesh. You too will die, and very soon. Even though it will feel like a very long time. And when you die, you will not have transcended the flesh, but succumbed to it.

What is clear is that Ted Kaczynski was right about technological society sucking people’s souls out of them, and you’re not going to find anything of any importance in this matrix system of urban doom.

King Solomon said that vanity was the core of the fleshy machine self, and thus vanity was what men should seek to overcome. “Vanity” might be better translated as “fleeting mist” or “vapor.” It describes the wants of the flesh. He concluded that the only joy is to eat, drink, and be merry. It was not an endorsement of hedonism, but rather the opposite: a call to disconnect from the bindings of the flesh and exist without pretense. That is, when we find the bright spots of clarity in the misery of existence, we are closest to God. And as Dostoyevsky said, “The darker the night, the brighter the stars.” If you understand life as misery, then the little twinkles of the stars, those times of eating, drinking, and being merry, can let you touch the divine. Or come close.

In the most famous painting ever, Adam’s finger does not touch God’s. He is reaching. But that space will not close in life.

But few seek. Mostly, we are chasing after a fleeting mist. That is what we get up and do every day when we pour ourselves into the hunt for money, women, or in the case of many readers, some kind of political solution to personal problems. None of that is real. I have had sex with women several times. I don’t really remember much of it. It didn’t make me any better. I hit some meme coins and had some money. I didn’t have anything to spend it on. I fought a political war for nearly 15 years. Nothing much came of it. Ah, but something did come of it. Being exiled and isolated from the system, being forced to disconnect from the destructive and hateful culture I was raised in allowed me to see just how ridiculous it is, then compare it to the rest of the societies. There is no one happier than the poor. Not Western poor, not street junkies or trailer park meth heads, or the blacks, but poor cultures, where people don’t have any great and terrible ambition.

Very often, people say, “I want to travel,” and I say, “Why? To what end?” People will typically say they want to “see things,” to which I respond, “It’s all on YouTube.” “Traveling” is something to look forward to for millennials who don’t say “I want to get rich and really respected” like their baby boomer parents. It’s something to look forward to, to distract from the reality that we are always going to be nowhere other than inside of our own heads. If you’re living in a mansion or if you’re getting your dick sucked in a colorful bungalow in Goa, you’re still in your own head, you’re still alone, as you were born alone and will die alone inside of this fleshy prison.

“Traveling” is only interesting in exile. That is the only way it is going to help you figure anything out. The realization that I am no longer “American” in any meaningful sense, and only understand it as an observer, was very important to me. As an observer, I am able to see just how miserable of a hell that existence is, just what a terrible matrix of dehumanization people inhabit in these prison-like cities, searching for sex, money, politics, travel, or some other things that don’t actually satisfy any need of the soul. The flesh has you on a rat wheel.

Millennials and younger often mock boomers for their obsession with sports, while millennials just do politics as if they are sports. There is no real difference, other than that the political obsession is more extreme. Neither actually leads anywhere. Boomers sat in front of the TV watching sports, people younger than them doom-scroll for political conflict. It’s simulated conflict. Sports and politics are simulations of war, engaged in by people who will not see real war.

A real war would probably be good for you. Not a dumb fake war, like the Middle East wars the Americans did. Or, maybe being on the non-American side of one of those wars, like John Walker Lindh.

The cocksuckers who caught him might as well have been watching sports.

But a real war, that would be good for you. Being in a ditch, seeing people get their limbs blown off. It would push you, at least. It would push the limits of the flesh-machine, it would force you to recognize that your body is just a leaky bag of blood and salt, propped up by sticks, and that if that is the “you, you,” then you aren’t much at all.

Probably, the clarity that comes with war is why people crave simulation of it. I don’t mean to romanticize war, as it is the worst thing imaginable, physically. But the worst thing imaginable physically could be the best thing imaginable for the spirit, if the individual experiencing it is able to avoid going insane. Regardless, there is some reason that people seek these simulated versions of war, and apparently find some deep meaning in them, or rather, believe they will eventually find some deep meaning in them.

Having spent more than enough time thinking about politics, I can confirm you will never find any meaning in politics. “Who will rule the concrete and glass prison complex?” might seem like a meaningful question, but it isn’t really. Were people’s lives better under Obama than under Trump? The answer is obviously “yes.” So what is happening? The system is progressing, becoming less human, more of a rat trap for the flesh boxes.

The simple answer is what the Buddha said: “All suffering comes from desire.” Jesus said several things that mean the same thing, though the clarity of the Buddha’s statement is cutting. So that is the point at which a person should start to attempt to understand the self. It was only less than 200 years ago that the overwhelming majority of the human population, including whites, were living on farms, spending most of their time in fields, or relaxing with their families.

Kaczynski gets all the credit for Jaques Ellul’s ideas. I would recommend the Kaczynski book first, because it’s so much easier to read than any of the Ellul books. But if you are a reader, the Ellul books are worth the effort. In English, they are “The Technological Society” and “The Technological System.” (Those are the most important, though it might be better to start with “Propaganda” if you are not used to reading this kind of dense text, which very few people under the age of 60 are used to doing. But yes, the Kaczynski book is a good summary.) These are arguments that no one can really argue with, as they are just obvious, but there isn’t really any solution for the society.

Look. People complain about consumerism. You hear this a lot. But what else are you going to do in a city, other than consume? There is no answer to that. The city is designed for consumption. It is the flesh prison. It is designed as a place to find hedonistic sensual pleasures, which is all consumerism is. And all of the world economies are driven by consumerism, and if you don’t drive consumerism, you cannot compete with other nations, and therefore there is no real third option, other than some kind of ultra-militarized Marxism or fascism, which is possibly the best option for a state. Though that hasn’t worked great for North Korea, at least the state still exists.

The point that I’m going for here is that you are not going to find meaning in any of these worldly things, and as long as you are stuck inside of the system, you are not going to ever really find any meaning, you are going to chase money and pussy. I know that there are a lot of “trad” memes going around and everyone is saying they want a “wife,” but what they are talking about is sex, and that is natural enough, but it’s not going to happen. You’re not going to get a trad wife in a city that is designed for women to max out their fun time, while forcing men to compete for their attention. That is all stuff I’ve written too much about. Everyone should understand it now.

So the desire for “a wife and family” is still a desire and it will drag you. If you get your wife, what is she going to have you doing? Is she going to hoe the garden on your farm? No. No, she is not. Not if she knows the big world exists. She might say she’ll hoe your garden, if she’s in the throes of passion, but she won’t. You would need some kind of situation like in that film The Village. (It’s from the Sixth Sense guy, who always does the “big shocking twist” thing at the end. I won’t spoil it. You probably saw it.)

There is no meaning in striving for any of these things, and we waste our time, which is very limited. There is an essay by Seneca the Younger called “On the Shortness of Life” where he describes the way men work in the city and say that when they’re fifty or sixty (now it’s probably when you’re seventy or eighty), they’ll retire to some farm in nature and relax, but that by this time, their life is already ending, that they are wasting the best years of their lives, the years that should be used to lay the foundation of understanding life and the coming end of it, wasting time striving meaninglessly. He also notes that the wealthier and more powerful you are, the more of your time you end up wasting, and therefore seeking these things is a vicious cycle.

I’m not in a position to advise you as to how you should go about living your life. I made what are in retrospect very extreme decisions. Tucker Carlson can get up on stage and say the Jews run America and face minimal consequences, others are also making much money saying this now, but when I said it, there were very serious consequences. Maybe I should have been able to figure that out. But I was 25 and didn’t give a fuck. This forced me into something I hadn’t ever really planned on. It was for the best, for sure, but it was very extreme.

My situation was so unique that I can’t really tell anyone else how they should go about seeking to escape the matrix. I suppose I could say “just buy some land outside of the city and try to relax, alone.” Land is incredibly cheap in America. I think Americans don’t really understand how cheap it is, compared to really anywhere else in the world. There is good arable land in Mississippi and Arkansas. You could also try to join the Amish. At least with the Amish, you’d have work. I don’t think it would be good to live without work. My work is writing, so it’s much easier for me. You need work. Seneca the Younger was from a wealthy family, he got patronage for his writing, and he was also doing shady money-lending schemes, so it was easy for him to say “just go live on a farm and relax.”

Regardless, it seems some level of rural isolation, maybe with some family and community, is the only clear path in this satanic world. But I don’t have any idea what you want. I am also not enlightened, and cannot guarantee anyone enlightenment, I’m simply on a path to it, and I think I’m probably further along than anyone trapped in an American rat cage.

What I can tell you is that knowing the self, understanding the nature of the soul that is trapped in this machine with all of these desires, is an extremely painful and arduous process, and it is one that you undertake while knowing you won’t actually ever truly finish it.

For me, I want to write more about these sorts of things, as I work through them. I’ve been writing a lot of different stuff since I mostly stopped with the Stormer site, and trying to figure out how to come at it. What I can say is that I no longer care about how many people read it, as I no longer really have a political agenda, as I have concluded that political agendas are futile. I was the best political writer, and as we can see now, the most influential of the century, but I now view that as akin to being the champion of the hot dog eating contest. I would rather be the best at writing something else.

My strong faith in God is in some ways a curse as much as it is a blessing, as there is a large part of me that would have preferred to simply run around the rat cage looking for dopamine hits. The fleshy encasement seeks to avoid suffering, and in order to actually develop the inner self, one has to, like Christ, embrace suffering as the only way out. And then look for those places where you can eat, drink, and be merry.

For me, writing is the only thing that creates an oblivion in my mind, and brings me to my self. That, I see now, is why I continued with the site every day long after I’d concluded that politics were a waste of time in the same way that working to buy a race car or working to get a woman to sleep with you is a waste of time. What I’ve realized since breaking up with you on Valentine’s Day is that I can write every day without publishing every day. I was already writing for myself, as everything I do is inside of my own head, because that is where we always are, from the day we come screaming into this life until the day we succumb to death’s sweet embrace.

The first thing to do is read the Book of John.

People talk a lot about Christianity. They don’t really seem to understand that the first principle of the religion is to “die to the world,” which refers to the denial of the fleshy desires outlined above.

I always hated my life. It was very nice to hear that Jesus said you’re supposed to, and that this is the path to enlightenment and eternal salvation in the life to come.

Saint Paul is more angry and less mystical than Saint John the Apostle, but this material is also very useful.

The concept of being crucified with Christ and living only through the spirit of Christ is something that should be pondered deeply. The true self inside of you is one with Christ, and was linked to Christ when you were born, and it is the desires of the flesh that separate you from this true self, this oneness with Christ. But as stated, it is only through death that one can ever truly escape the flesh prison and become one with Christ. Until then, we are all simply doing our best to prepare for that.

And then there’s Saint Augustine, who said, “Our hearts are restless until they rest in Thee.”

This is what one should ask of their life actions: “Is this preparing me for death and unification with the divine creator or not?” I don’t think a life in a city, with all of these cellphones and microwaves everywhere, can possibly be the ideal place to make that happen. In the ultimate sense, you are still just in your head, regardless, so anything is possible, but you need a really good excuse to live in one of these cities, as you are not going to have an easy time escaping desire in a rat matrix designed for the sexual satisfaction of women.

Author’s Note: Much of what I am working on right now is this sort of thing, just less stream-of-consciousness, more structured. It’s difficult work, to try to move toward structure, especially in longer work, and I’m doing a lot of reading to try to get good at it. I am also still working on some loser stuff and some fiction. I’m not promising any dates. Anything is going to be released when it’s done and no sooner. Until then, I’ll post whatever I feel like on here, with no clear schedule.

]]> Tucker’s Epstein Statements Prove He is Currently the De Facto Successor to Donald Trump’s Movement https://dailystormer.in/tuckers-epstein-statements-prove-he-is-currently-the-de-facto-successor-to-donald-trumps-movement/ Wed, 06 Aug 2025 17:24:36 +0000 https://dailystormer.in/?p=687874

Author’s Note: I wrote this on July 21 and didn’t publish it because I meant to finish it. I never did finish it. It is being published unfinished so as not to waste it. I am aware of the recent big drama around Tucker, which I might write about. Or not, frankly. But however important that drama might seem to you, or whatever it means to you, it doesn’t affect the reality that Tucker is and will continue to be the natural successor to Donald Trump for the foreseeable future. 

Frankly, friends, today I wanted to write about how the message from Superman’s parents in James Gunn’s Superman, where they tell him to be evil, could have been from General Zod. That would make sense, as he’s the one living Kryptonian who would have the ability to fake that message.

But then I decided to write more about Jeffrey Epstein.

In particular, I wanted to address this “Mossad agent” concept. Obviously, he was a Mossad agent (or “asset,” if you prefer). But what exactly does that mean? What exactly is Israel?

Well. Let me start with Noam Chomsky’s claim that Israel is an outpost of American imperialism. This has been attacked a whole lot, as it appears that Noam Chomsky, who is Jewish, is trying to blame white Americans for the actions of Jews. I think that is obviously what Chomsky was trying to do. But the reality is that “Israel is an outpost of America” is actually true. It’s simply that it is an outpost of American Jews.

A famous German statesman, writing about Zionism in the 1920s, decades before the Zionist state was established, wrote:

When the Zionists try to make the rest of the world believe that the new national consciousness of the Jews will be satisfied by the establishment of a Jewish State in Palestine, the Jews thereby adopt another means to dupe the simple-minded goyim. They have not the slightest intention of building up a Jewish State in Palestine so as to live in it. What they really are aiming at is to establish a central organization for their international swindling and cheating. As a sovereign State, this cannot be controlled by any of the other States. Therefore it can serve as a refuge for swindlers who have been found out and at the same time a high-school for the training of other swindlers

The prescience there is uncanny. It literally describes exactly what the Jewish state is 100 years after it was written. Most Jews do not want to live in Israel. The Ashkenazim, that is the European Jews, make up only 30% of the Jewish population of Israel. The other 70% of Israeli Jews are Sephardic or Mizrahi Jews, what could be called “Arab Jews,” who basically got forced to move to Israel because they were living in Arab countries and after the violence and brutality that came with the establishment of the Zionist state in the 1940s by Ashkenazim, Arabs started doing pogroms of their local Jewish populations, and the Ashkenazim that established the state of Israel paid them to come take refuge in their new Palestinian occupation territory.

There are fewer than 3 million Ashkenazim in Israel. Meanwhile, there are nearly 8 million in the United States. This is because the United States is where the money is. As the famous German statesman predicted, Israel exists not as a “homeland for the Jewish people,” but to give international Jewry a headquarters for their international gangsterism and the ability to act with state powers. Though it is a lesser issue, the man was also correct when he said Israel is a place for them to escape prosecution. Huge numbers of pedophiles have fled there, as have financial criminals. It is totally commonplace in Russia, or it was before Putin got hardcore after the start of this war, for Jews to do massive real estate swindles, collect hundreds of millions or billions of dollars, and then flee to Israel with the money.

Israeli politics are not really controlled by Israeli Jews. This has changed slightly under Bibi Netanyahu, given that he is certainly a “great man of history” in that he is, by his own will, shaping the world in profound ways, and often pushing back against the whims of the American Jews who provide Israel with all of its money. Nonetheless, Israel is a project of American Jews. The Mossad is a state intelligence agency, of the state of Israel, because only a state can operate an intelligence agency. However, in practice, the Mossad is a sovereign secret service for international Jewry as a whole, rather than an organization designed to serve the interests of the state of Israel exclusively or even primarily.

Epstein got his money from American Jewish billionaires. At least the money that we can trace. Les Wexner, the Columbus, Ohio Jew who owns Victoria’s Secret and some other things, gave him an $80 million house in Manhattan and apparently other gifts and cash, and Leon Black gave him over $150 million marked as some kind of extremely unspecific “consulting” thing.

The bottom line here is that while Mossad was almost certainly the point of contact, because Mossad functions as a state entity subject to no one, the operation was really much more about American Jews than it was about Israel as a state. Because again, Israel as a state is effectively a project of American Jews. It’s a kind of “Cobra Terror Drome” for International Jewry.

Hey, there I am talking about GI Joe after having started with General Zod in what is supposed to be a very serious article. You’ll have to bear with me. I have a brain tumor.

There is nothing particularly important going on in Israel. They create spyware, like the zero day one-click iPhone hack that Prince Muhammad used to get Jeff Bezos’ nudes from his iPhone, which would be illegal to produce commercially in literally every other country in the world. They do human experimentation on kidnapped Palestinians. And pretty much the rest of it is just diamonds. The way the diamond industry has been run, particularly in collaboration with South Africa, is another thing that would be illegal in most countries.

At TPUSA last week Tucker Carlson talked about Epstein using blackmail to get people to do the bidding of Israel. This is very true and very brave of him.

It’s a bit like that clip in The Dark Knight.

Now that I watch it, that clip is actually as poorly written and dumb as every other part of those movies. What a strange thing, such beautiful films with such horrible scripts. Anyway, the point still stands: these Jews control the entire world, they run blackmail rings ensnaring all of the most powerful non-Jews, they do assassinations all around the world and have a lot of other less risky ways to completely destroy people’s lives (trust me on that one, lol). So to take a stand like Tucker is doing is incredibly brave, and he is an American hero, and I don’t care about any of the criticisms I’ve had of him. I mean, I’m sure those criticisms still stand, but taking on the Mossad like this, and not just on a podcast or a website, but taking it to the most mainstream conservative conference there is (next to CPAC) is incredibly brave.

I know there are theories about Tucker being “controlled opposition” because of his family connections and so on. But “controlled opposition” wouldn’t do that speech at TPUSA. We see what controlled opposition is doing: they’re talking about the poor innocent professional hookers that Epstein pulled out of the mines, or they’re talking about satanic human sacrifice cults (that are inexplicably not specifically Jewish in nature). Further, “controlled opposition” wouldn’t have done the Putin interview. I think Tucker’s UFO stuff is retarded and I still can’t believe he went along with Biden’s “Chinese spy balloon” hoax, but I think he is just maybe not super smart. Oh and his ads are completely out of control, especially given his existing wealth. (I’m a bit more forgiving with someone like Tim Dillon who never had any money, and also, Tim has fewer ads than Tucker. He’s now only doing one ad break in an hour, which is the correct amount. Also, Tim is much more clear that he’s just doing the ads for the money, whereas Tucker is much too earnest in selling scam products.) Also, as a Sinophile and the world’s biggest white proponent of Sino-friendship, I hate everything he says about China.

But seriously, forget all that. Calling out the Mossad like that and saying Israel controls the government at a venue like that is an incredibly brave action, and he absolutely is an American hero. I think some of his flaws might make him a less than ideal choice as the successor to Trump, but hey – give me a name. I’m not seeing anyone better. Maybe Dana White is better, but we really haven’t seen enough of Dana in political settings to know. We do know that UFC is all jungled up with one of the Emmanuel brothers, which is definitely not ideal.

Anyway, elections are not real in America. I think now everyone can see what I was talking about when I said “elections aren’t real but Trump will win this fake election because that is what is seen as most beneficial for the Jews.” Some people whined when I spent months before the election saying that, and I’ve been totally vindicated. No one has apologized to me. But that’s fine. After all, I’m just an internet personality, not a human being with feelings who would have his heart warmed by an apology. So it’s fine. No problem.

Because elections are fake, we’re talking more about a political figurehead than a presidential candidate, because you’re not going to vote your way out of this situation we’re in. (Plus, if we elected Tucker president, he would pause his inauguration speech every 15 minutes to tell you about a special offer at a crypto gambling website or all natural beef jerky.) Before there is any real change in America, there is going to have to be you know, whatever. Some kind of stuff. But people always need some figure to rally around, and this Epstein thing has pretty much sunk Trump. I’m a crisis management expert, and I know what I would tell him: unless you actually had sex with a girl under the age of 15, just release everything about Epstein and apologize for whatever involvement you had and blame the whole thing on the Mossad. But there is no way he is going to do that. If the girl was under 15, I don’t know what I would tell him to do. Honestly, I’ve thought about it a lot, and I don’t think there is an underage sex tape with Trump at all, and he’s scared of something else. Maybe he did something else illegal with Epstein, maybe involving money. He ran those casinos, you know, there were a lot of opportunities for shady stuff to happen. Or maybe he’s just old and being bullied by Netanyahu. Although, as I’ve said, Netanyahu would be savvy enough to tell him to just kick the can on Epstein rather than sending the Bimbo and the Pajeet Scammer out there to claim “nothing happened.” Even if it’s a prime directive to cover up the Epstein thing, he could easily have said “we’re working on that, the investigation is still ongoing, and we want to make sure we have everything before we start naming names.” Then move on to some other distraction. This is so obvious it’s just completely insane that he had his people out there saying “it’s all a big hoax” and he’s now talking about “the Jeffrey Epstein hoax” and comparing it to Russiagate. Honestly, I can’t even believe it’s real.

Point being, I think Trump has almost certainly lost the base, and someone is going to have to fill that void of being the guy everyone looks to as “the leader,” because that is the way human brains work. We’re hardwired that way, biologically, and it isn’t going to change. “Leaderless resistance” is nonsense. Leaderless people are just sheep. Therefore, an imperfect leader is better than no leader. Trump has been better than no leader. That may sound like a bold statement, but it’s actually not. For all of his flaws, Trump served as a point of organization for a festering white racial consciousness and hatred of immigrants, elite corruption, and weird gay shit. If Hillary Clinton or Jeb Bush would have won in 2016, people would be quietly accepting all of this stuff, complaining on the internet and getting banned and then trying to figure out their personal lives, which are all complete disasters because America is a satanic cesspit.

Therefore, while I will continue to state my criticisms of him, Tucker Carlson is currently the obvious successor to Donald Trump. He’s never going to be president anyway. So he can at least fill the role of the figurehead directing the masses of people until someone much more radical who understands things much better comes along. But I’m not seeing any such person right now.

As brave as Tucker’s statements about the Mossad and Israel controlling the government were, it did not get to the heart of the matter, which is that this is not about the state of Israel. That is a big part of the mechanism of the whole conspiracy, but it is about “Jews, generally.”

It doesn’t mean “every single Jew.” It’s not every single Jew, at least not every single ethnic Jew (the Jew religion literally has as its foundation a rejection and hatred of Jesus Christ, so it is hard to really consider any religious Jew anything other than a self-declared enemy of white, Christian civilization, but Jews are humans with souls, probably, so we can’t necessarily declare someone evil for being born with certain genetics). Maybe people like Jeffrey Sachs, Glenn Greenwald, and Dave Smith are not perfect, but they certainly are not on-board with the collective Jewish agenda. And sure, there are non-Jews involved. Epstein blackmail seems to explain why a lot of those non-Jews are involved. But there is also just general corruption and immorality that doesn’t necessarily need to involve blackmail.

But the underlying reality is that none of this madness in the West would be happening without the Jews, as the Jews are the planners and the primary drivers of all of these agendas. They’re now solely behind the endless wars of aggression against countries that pose no threat. Jews are the primary drivers behind mass immigration, feminism, atheism, basically every financial scam, the normalization of homosexuality, the legalization and spread of pornography, the coronavirus hoax, black radicalism and pro-crime policies, and on and on and on. There is nothing that you are against that isn’t caused by Jews. With the exception of natural disasters, Jews are behind every bad thing happening in the West. And even with the natural disasters, if we include forest fires in that category, I’m sure you could find Jews behind the ridiculous forestry policy of California (because Jews want to use the fires to push their global warming hoax).

Jews are behind everything. And what’s most important (and most incredible, really) is that it is all in public view. You don’t need anyone to release any documents to show that Jews are behind all of this. Jews often brag about it. Truly. Over 1,000 rabbis signed a petition saying “abortion is a part of the Jewish religion and banning it infringes on Jewish religious rights.” Even most normal people will admit that Hollywood, the news media, and the financial system are controlled by Jews. I think at this point most people have come to accept that Jews are the primary drivers of twenty years of war in the Middle East. Warmongering Ukrainian dictator Vladimir Zelensky is a Jew. It was 100% the ADL behind the internet censorship. OnlyFans and PornHub are both owned by Jews. The Hebrew Immigrant Aid Society (HIAS) is the biggest open borders organization, and virtually every ostensibly secular open borders group is run by Jews (yes, for the sake of thoroughness and honesty, the Catholic Church has some people involved in that too, I know, but that is a drop in the bucket and also arguably a result of Jewish manipulation of the Vatican). Feminism as an ideology was invented by the Jews. So was virtually every other ideology, including communism and libertarianism (yes I know that there are a lot of well-meaning Christian libertarians and I agree with many libertarian positions, but as an ideology, it has been used as a weapon to empower massive corporations with deregulation schemes while somehow continuing to fail to stop regulations on normal people).

It’s literally everything and it is right there in everyone’s faces and all you have to do is notice that Jews are a group that is different than the other groups in this country. It’s easy enough for most people to talk about “black crime.” Everyone in this country is aware of it, whether they admit it or not. No matter how “liberal” a person might be, if they’re walking on the sidewalk alone at night and a group of negro youths comes towards them, they will cross the street. And Fox News and so on will just talk openly about “black crime.” Similarly, no one had a problem talking about “the Italian mafia.” And by the way, not everyone involved with the mafia was Italian. To be fair, the ones that weren’t Italian were pretty much all either Irish or Jewish, but that just further goes to prove the point about groups. And even though there were Irish and Jews involved in the mafia, it was still definitively an Italian organization. There is no reason we should not simply be able to recognize that Jews are a group that behaves as a group and their group behavior is overwhelmingly negative. Again, not every single one. No one is saying “every single one.” Not even that famous German statesman said that. That German statesman had a personal friend, his chauffeur, who was Jewish. His name was Emil Maurice. He was in the SS.

Jews would call him “a self-hating Jew.” Normal people would call him “a good person who happened to be born into a Jewish family.” No one can be deemed guilty over immutable traits.

So literally not even the Jews’ big baddie was saying “every single Jew.” What people are saying, what I am saying, is that the character of the ruling elite in the United States, and the power that controls its vassals, is fundamentally and undeniably Jewish, and that this Jewish elite is hostile towards white people and towards non-Jews generally.

It’s good people are talking about Israel. That is a big, big step in the right direction. What needs to happen now is that people need to grasp the fact that what is going on in Gaza, this mass murder of innocent people, a genocide, is not the result of some vague “colonialism,” but rather a representation of the Jewish racial character, a character which ultimately stems from their hatred of Christ and the lack of repentance for murdering God.

Jews do have biological traits that make them more prone to this deviant behavior, because for 2,000 years they’ve bred for these traits. Ashkenazi Jews have only a slight genetic relationship to the people of ancient Israel. The closest people, genetically, to the people who would have lived in the Levant at the time of Christ are Lebanese Christians, who are somewhere around 80% genetically descended from ancient Israelites. The Jewish group with the most genetic relation to ancient Hebrew people are the Mizrahi Jews, and that is about 50%, with the other 50% being Arab and Turkic. Greeks and Armenians share more genetic relation to the people who lived in Palestine at the time of Christ than Ashkenazi Jews. I say this to point out that rabbinical Judaism has functioned not as a system to preserve a bloodline, but as a cult to preserve the hatred of Christ. (Note: I did this research recently. Although I had done it before, my robot has been such a great helper that I was able to source this a lot better. I am now interested in looking into the Mizrahi Jews, who are a relatively small group, and seeing if they are less satanic than the Ashkenazim. Sephardic Jews are less satanic, I’ve researched that before, but they are only slightly less satanic. Sephardim maintained connections with the Ashkenazim, and were involved significantly in the Islamic conquest of Spain as well as the Ottoman conquest of Constantinople.)

This is where I stopped writing on July 21.

I meant to write some other things, but I forget them now. I will just write a follow-up, and explain whatever further thoughts I have on this matter. As I said in the above author’s note, I might write about the recent drama, or I might not, I have not made a decision. In terms of missing memes – I don’t know, man. I do this site as charity. Obviously donations have dropped since I stopped posting every day, and now it’s costing me money, and I’m just sort of wondering what I’m even doing here. I am sort of busy making money, because I’ve lost whatever romantic ideals I had, and now just want to see everyone die. Anyway, I’m not going to do anything I don’t feel like doing. I haven’t really been treated very well and I haven’t benefited from this website. It actually ruined my life completely and very few people could even bother to send me a couple bucks. Meanwhile, people who just copy-pasted all my material are charging $1,200 a year to be in a group chat. I’m actually financially stable now, because it turns out people will pay me to write things.

I don’t care about America anymore. I want to see the death of my enemies, of course. But I am so totally muzzled. And I’m the only one. Everyone else is allowed online now. As mentioned, some people who copied all my ideas, word for word, and admitted it, are charging $1,200 a year to join a group chat, using international processors to collect this abusive amount of cash. Yes, if I had access to money like that, of course I would keep writing this site all the time. But at this point, I’m an adult, with adult responsibilities, and I need to make money, and that isn’t happening here.

That said, I am working on some good projects which you will like. I might try to monetize some of them somehow. But unlike everyone else, I’m permanently banned from banking. So I really have to be offering something huge to get people to deal with crypto. I am writing a personal political book, which I think I will release for free because charging for political content is not something I believe in. I mean, if I could use payment processors, I would charge you $1,200 a year to be in my group chat, because that is obviously just normal ethical business management. But I’ll just post the political book. The fiction though, I might post the first three chapters and then tell you to pay me or pirate it if you want to read the rest.

But in general, I have to get money somewhere else, and that is way more important to me than entertaining people who don’t even have the decency to send me $5. I was not spreading the message. The site cannot spread. It is neutered, completely. It’s just the same people reading it, and it is a farm for people to use the content, edit it for their own purposes, and not pay me. As a random example not intended to represent real or fictional people, if I had thousands of people paying me $1,200 a year to be in a group chat, I would send a few bucks to the guy whose ideas I copy-pasted to build my career. But people don’t think that way.

Basically, I could give a fuck and I could give a fuck less.

I hope the Chinese nuke America and literally everyone dies.

Anyway, whatever.

I do not want to whine. I just don’t know what people want from me. I see the messages. I don’t regret spending 13 years of my life on this project. I had fun. But life is such. Indeed, it is such.

But yeah, I’m doing a rebrand. I think people will like it. I think I’m going to be able to publish 2-3 books a year, while also doing the stuff I do now to make money. Which I can’t ever tell you about, but if you knew about it, you would think it was hilarious and awesome. It’s especially funny that I can only be paid in crypto or cash for these jobs and the people hiring me are like “well…. okay.”

For the people wondering about what music I’m listening to while writing this, there is this band called Drugdealer (one word) that is sort of like a Steely Dan fan project that is really fun.

The guy is on par with The Lemon Twigs in terms of tributes to better times.

Sometimes he has women sing his songs for him and it’s really nice.

The dude sort of looks like a kind of TRT free Sam Hyde too.

Congrats to Sam Hyde on the comeback, by the way. It’s been an inspiration to me. I also support flipping that desk and think anyone who complains about it is a homo. If I was asked to give one piece of advice to young people, I would say: “just flip the desk, you might not get another chance, so just flip that bitch.”

I only listen to retro music. It reminds me that I wish it was the sixties and I wish we could be happy. But really, frankly, I just wish that something would happen.

It won’t happen though. It literally never does. That isn’t just a meme.

But yeah, maybe I’ll weigh in on the drama. I might as well. Everyone else is. I don’t really care much but I had a take I thought of when I was at the farmers’ market which is a lot better than anyone else’s I’ve seen.

The issue is, I just really don’t care enough to be motivated to write really anything on this website because I’m so overcome with boredom and apathy about the current internet right discourse.

]]> Trump is “Crashing Out” Over the “Epstein Files” https://dailystormer.in/trump-is-crashing-out-over-the-epstein-files/ Sat, 19 Jul 2025 01:33:11 +0000 https://dailystormer.in/?p=687850

It’s unclear to me whether Mr. Trump is refusing to release the Epstein files because Bibi Netanyahu told him not to or because he’s implicated in sex, potentially with so-called “minors.” What is clear is that he is “crashing out” over this issue.

These are both from earlier this week.

YIKES.

That does not look good at all. If he is just doing what Bibi told him, it still looks like he’s implicated. I guess it’s possibly both, as the primary reason that Bibi would have this kind of control is that he is implicated. The Jewish lobby has the ability to use political pressure to force Trump to do things like bomb various countries and send money and weapons to Jews for free. But forcing Trump to go out there and say that Epstein didn’t exist, that everyone who is asking about it is no different than the Russia hoaxers, is something on another level, which is much more personal.

Remember that the first time Trump told the media to just shut up about Epstein, he was sitting in front of Netanyahu.

I would not think that’s a coincidence.

Just to be clear, there are “Epstein files.” It’s not a conspiracy theory that there are files. I saw some really bad takes from Michael Tracey about “Epstein mythology,” and he suggested that there was no specific group of “files.” Epstein was investigated and indicted by the feds and federally prosecuted and sentenced to federal prison. He was later arrested by federal cops and then died in prison. The government, it will not surprise you, keeps a lot of records. There would be tens or hundreds of thousands of pages of documentation recorded by the government about this guy Epstein. That is what people want released. Some of them have been released but a lot of them have not been released.

Whether or not there is an official “Epstein list” – a list that Epstein kept of his “clients” – I have no idea. There would be flight lists. Some of those have been released. But we all remember, or at least I remember, that when Epstein was arrested, it was reported in all media that they found a safe full of CD-ROMs labeled with people’s names, with the format “Young [name] with [name].” Those names have not been released. There were a bunch of hard drives in the safe. It was, presumably, a whole bunch of videos of powerful people having sex with underage girls, and the government has all of this stuff. The New York Times reported in 2019 that Epstein kept this material to blackmail people.

So, it’s definitely not a “conspiracy theory.” Let’s make sure we don’t get lost here. The government has a lot of information on what certainly and definitely appears to be a “Mossad blackmail ring,” which involved people, presumably voluntarily, allowing themselves to be recorded having sex with underage girls.

That’s another point to be clear on: you would have to be retarded to do it just because you were horny. Prince Andrew appears to have actually done that, but he also appears to clearly suffer from mental retardation. Normal people who we would be talking about here would knowingly have illicit sex on video for the Mossad to keep so that powerful Jews would know they were loyal and give them promotions.

Obviously, not all blackmail is voluntary. For example, Trump’s son-in-law’s father, Charles Kushner, in 2004, sent a hooker to have sex with his brother-in-law when he was drunk at a bar and secretly filmed it and then threatened to show it to the man’s wife (Kushner’s sister) if he didn’t play along with some scheme relating to some kind of federal indictment Kushner was under. So there is secret blackmail.

However, whenever you’re talking about a “blackmail ring,” you’re talking pretty much exclusively about voluntary blackmail. Any kind of systematic blackmail is necessarily voluntary, as you are not going to set up a system of seducing people and tricking them into having sex on video. It has been a thing since forever that criminal gangs require someone to do some crime, such as murder, and then keep some evidence on them. It’s just common sense that if you have evidence of someone committing a serious crime, or something that would otherwise destroy their life, you’re going to trust them, because no such person is going to betray you.

Michael Tracey’s take, which is on some internet website, is total garbage. I also listened to like an hour of him rambling about it on a Twitter podcast, and it was dumb. He is literally just being contrarian for the sake of it. Pointing out that the “he’s intelligence” quote from the Florida attorney general comes from Vicky Ward alone (I like Vicky Ward and don’t think she lies, but yeah obviously you can’t build an entire case around that), or that Virginia Giuffre had some problems and was definitely trying to get money, or strawmanning with some silly QAnon shit, doesn’t serve to disappear the fact that the government has a bunch of files people want released and Trump is out there saying he won’t release them because they “aren’t credible.” The fact that people said some QAnon-tier stuff about Epstein doing child sacrifices in that temple on his island does not mean that there was not a safe full of hard drives and CD-ROMs with people’s names on them, that the government has those materials and is refusing to say what names were there. We still have the fact that whoever’s names were on there have not been prosecuted, even though the government has video of them having sex with underage girls, pulled from Epstein’s safe.

Okay?

This theory that it’s all a theory is stupid. And the only conceivable reason no one other than Maxwell has been prosecuted, the only conceivable reason the government would refuse to reveal any of this information, is that at least some of the very powerful people that we know Epstein hung out with are featured in these sex tapes.

Ask Michael Tracey why billionaire Jew Les Wexner “gifted” Epstein a $80 million New York house. I guess they were friends? So he gave him an eighty million dollar house? He dismissed the fact that Maxwell was the daughter of a top Mossad agent as “a coincidence.” Was the house also coincidental? If you asked Wexner why he gave him that house, would he say “it’s just a coincidence”? Why did Epstein have all this money? Where did it come from? Just people giving him things? That appears to literally be the answer, as his hedge fund was a complete disaster and did nothing but lose money. Leon Black, another Israel-obsessed Jewish billionaire, gave Epstein $158 million literally for no apparent reason. Literally, it was like “for services rendered.”

Anyway, Virginia Giuffre, Epstein’s most prominent accuser famous for the photo with Prince Andrew and Ghislaine Maxwell, was definitely after money (find me a woman who isn’t, huh?) with the series of lawsuits, and she might have had some problems, but she gets hit by a bus and the police refuse to come to the scene and then she kills herself a few weeks later? Do you guys know about this? It happened since I stopped doing the daily news, and I was going to write about it, then I was like “I don’t feel like doing that.” But she was living in Western Australia (???), which for those who do not know is very rural (the cities are all on the eastern side of the continent/country). Almost like she was hiding out. And I cannot find the method of suicide listed anywhere. Handguns are almost impossible to get in Australia, I would think, especially as a non-citizen. So how did she kill herself? Strangle herself with a soft sheet pressed against a bunkbed like Epstein? Contrary to popular belief, it is actually really hard to kill yourself with pills. A grand total of 8% of suicide attempts using drugs or poison result in death! As it turn out, suicide without a gun is actually pretty hard to pull off. Did you know that 60% of handgun deaths in the US (yes, from the famous “handgun death” statistics) are not black people but suicide? The only other “easy” way to do it is with intravenous opioids, which would require you to know how to tie off your arm to inject them. Also, you can’t prove that’s a suicide, and probably a lot of US opioid deaths are suicide or de facto suicide (subconsciously giving yourself a bigger dose because you can’t take it anymore). But why are we even having this discussion? Why did the Australian police not say how she committed suicide? Is it a privacy issue? Why was the autopsy and toxicology report not released? Privacy? For the single most prominent public individual in the biggest criminal case in the world right now?

Also, fun fact: 80% of suicides are men.

Another fun fact: Giuffre’s dad says she was murdered. He initially said he could believe the suicide then came out and said “someone got to her.”

But this case doesn’t hinge on her, and even if you believe Maxwell being the son of a top Mossad agent and Giuffre’s suicide are coincidences, we have all of these other questions, and if there are no questions, then why is Trump doing a world press tour whining about how he won’t release the government’s files and people should just stop talking about it immediately?

Anyway. That’s enough of that. Maybe I’ll write a full rebuttal to Tracey, but his current article doesn’t really give me much to work with, as it is just an assertion that there is no smoking gun that Epstein was a Mossad agent, but the smoking gun is literally the refusal to release the files. Another smoking gun is that in 2005 he was convicted in federal court of sex crimes including “child prostitution” with girls as young as 14 (there were a total of 36 confirmed underage sex partners), and was sentenced to 13 months in “prison” with “work release,” meaning he could leave all day and just had to sleep at the jail. (I understand he was rich, but that is ridiculous, and the reason that even if Vicky Ward is the only source for the AG saying “he’s intelligence,” it makes very much sense. I looked it up and found that for the same crime in the same state, one guy got 20 years for two girls and another got 15 for one girl. In real prison. With no “work release.” Again, in the Epstein case, there were 36 girls.) It’s also a smoking gun that he was arrested for the same crimes he’d already been federally prosecuted and served his sentence for, and it’s never been explained how the feds were planning to try him again for the same crimes. The smoking gun is that no one on the videos is being prosecuted, that the feds are not demanding why Jewish billionaires Les Wexner and Leon Black explain why they were giving this guy hundreds of millions of dollars for free. There is a lot of smoke here and a lot of guns.

And Tracey’s “what files are we talking about?” is complete horseshit. “The files” are the government’s records. Questioning the validity of the “client list” concept means nothing. The government has a bunch of videos of some group of men having sex with underage girls, and they have files that say the names of these men. We want those files, Michael. The files that say the names of the people in the sex videos.

Obviously, anything that gets this big is going to have a lot of misinformation surrounding it, and there will always be things you can pick apart. It’s easy to be a critic and people feel very clever pointing out small wrong or questionable things and then saying that the other things are a coincidence. But saying “there’s no there there” about Jeffrey Epstein is deranged and Michael Tracey is deranged, and I now see people repeating this. By the way, I like Michael Tracey, and I don’t really think he is doing this maliciously, or because he’s an obsessive Trump defender, I think he just really likes being clever and he’s gone full too clever by half with this one. It just looks dumb. But it’s a narrative that is out there now. So I just want to make sure we all know what we’re talking about here, that there is no confusion surrounding the fact that the government at least has a “list” of the men in the sex videos they confiscated from Epstein’s house in 2019 after his arrest for crimes he’d already been prosecuted for.

Back to Trump then: he knew Epstein when he was like, in his fifties, and already very rich. We see these pictures of them together:

When people used to post those pictures, I would think “yeah that’s whatever, they were two rich guys in New York, of course they knew each other.” Now, with his “stop talking about that or else” press tour, one has to wonder.

But the records show that Trump likely first met Epstein in the late 1980s or early 1990s. By the late 80s, Trump was already a billionaire.

So, would he want the Mossad to have blackmail on him? Well. I don’t know. He’s had a lot of financial problems since the late 1980s. His casinos went bankrupt. He had no personal bankruptcy, but he had six business bankruptcies. Obviously, the people who bailed him out were primarily Jewish. And it is certainly possible that he would say “okay, I’ll do a sex tape with a 15-year-old” in such a situation. This would of course mean that Trump had been a de facto Mossad agent this whole time, which… I mean… I don’t know?

Part of the problem with this whole situation is that if Bibi were to send any supposed Trump jailbait sex tape to the New York Post or whatever, Trump could then just say “yeah, I did that for the Mossad to get bailed out.” As on this timeline the statute of limitations for any jailbait crime would be expired, it seems that this would be a lot more damaging to Israel than to Trump. I mean it would be embarrassing for Trump, but is it really that big of a deal?

Wait. I just looked it up and actually it says “there is no statute of limitations on child sex crimes in the state of New York.” But I don’t know what that means in reality. As far as anyone knows, Epstein never had girls younger than 14. There have never even been allegations of actual children in the classic sense of the word “children.” So… I mean is Trump going to die in prison over that? Would they be able to prove the age of the girl? I don’t know but even if he went down for this, using this blackmail, if it exists, would expose the fact that the US government is run by Mossad blackmail, which I think would be a much bigger revelation than that Trump had sex with a girl who was a couple years under age. Also, Trump can’t be prosecuted while he’s president, and he could just like, flee to Russia or something.

What I am seeing is that Trump is now very old. I’m getting “Joe Biden” vibes with this guy. Remember that Joe Biden was just bullied and pushed around and told to say things. This is why 80-year-old men should not run countries, particularly not big countries, and particularly not in times of crises. If Trump were still in his sixties, as he was when he launched his campaign, you could make things make more sense. But when someone is 80, really anything they do can potentially be explained as “well, he’s really old.”

Old people can be healthy. If you don’t smoke, drink, or do drugs, and you’re not fat, then your mind is going to degrade way before your body. It’s sad, frankly. I’m against euthanasia. But everyone’s faculties start to degrade at 75, particularly if they are a nonsmoker (smoking is not healthy per se, but it does actually slow dementia in old age), and sometimes, people are almost completely gone by their late 70s, and then live for another 10-15 years.

Doing these recent interviews, clearly under the stress of this Epstein thing – regardless of whether he did something or was just ordered by Bibi to seal it up, it’s stressful for him – he sounds very mumbly and angry.

I think this clip is AI. I don’t know, but I think it’s AI. But if it’s not, then wow, what a great example of what I’m talking about here.

He attacks his supporters – calling them “my supporters” – and says that he won’t forget those who are talking about Epstein.

I’m pretty sure that’s AI. We are already at that thing I was talking about happening for several years where you can’t tell if something is AI or not. Remember when I used to say that? Over and over again? That we were coming to a time when you won’t be able to tell if something is AI? Well, we are officially there. And I’m in it myself. I can’t help you.

Okay, wait.

This is apparently a real show and interview?

https://americasvoice.news/video/qSpyIEOB0ecSp25/

That video is embedded in a way that you can’t skip forward, which is a scummy way to force you to watch ads. It’s also not on YouTube or Rumble. Also, that entire site could be fake and everything on it made by AI.

How are you supposed to confirm anything now? Honestly, I have no idea, and I am pretty sure it’s what I said it would be: you have to have seen it yourself or talk to someone you trust who saw it.

I think at this point, if Reuters or AP says “Trump said…”, you can consider the quote real, but I don’t know how much longer that will be true. Furthermore, if you’re working at Reuters or the AP and Trump does an interview with an obscure podcast and you can’t figure out if it’s AI, you might just not report on it. There doesn’t appear to be any report on this.

I’m listening to this alleged interview now, I’m at the Trump part. He is saying all of this stuff. He sounds like he’s about to start crying, saying people should stop talking about Epstein. He brought it up immediately at the beginning of the interview.

“Real America’s Voice” has a Wikipedia page.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Real_America%27s_Voice

But someone could have vandalized Wikipedia with this. No one can really prove this doesn’t exist. It has a website. Who can even say what “real” means at this point? I guess in this specific case, it’s a question of “did Trump, in reality, call this podcast and say all this stuff on this tape I’m listening to?”

I’m about ten minutes in at time of writing. After opening with Epstein he’s on to a bunch of bullshit I don’t care about – tariffs and Jerome Powell and whatever. That makes it seem real. Maybe the clip above is fake. I’ll tell you when I get there. But the whole thing could be fake. AI could not just do his voice, but write a script where he rambles about international trade before saying the wacko Epstein thing.

FIFTEEN MINUTES LATER

Okay, I finished the interview.

In all seriousness, the interview is real. I initially thought that clip had to be fake, because he threatens his own supporters, literally saying:

All my supporters want to talk about is the Jeffrey Epstein hoax. It’s unbelievable … It’s a disgrace and I remember, I’m gonna remember every one of these guys, they’re my supporters and they just, they love it, they love it, and it’s, it’s all induced by the Democrats. The Democrats are the ones who are getting them to say this stuff. And the files are all set up by the people who ran it for the last four years … but I’m gonna remember people that, that took us away from this, instead of talking about this flawless attack on nuclear weapons that took place in Iran … that’s what we ought to be talking about, not nonsense.

He is borderline incoherent, and sounds really, really old. He actually sounds drunk, but I believe his story about how he never drank ever. I don’t think he’s drinking.

I have recently seen some really good AI stuff done with really cheap apps, and I thought that was so bad it had to have been fake, but no. It was reported on by the media. That guy interviewing him, John Solomon, I guess works for Steve Bannon or something, I don’t know. But yeah, it’s a real interview and that is how he talks now and he’s completely obsessed with being mad at people who talk about Epstein. Clearly, his feelings are hurt that his supporters are abandoning him over this. But wow, the solution is not to threaten your own supporters, man. That is not good.

Speaking of solutions, Pam Bimbo just announced she is requesting the release of “some” of the Epstein files. Well, we already have some of the files. We specifically want:

  • The files that say the names of the people in the sex videos, and
  • Any information about intelligence connections, foreign and/or domestic

Note that the intelligence “connections” (all of this stuff is backroom and informal; intelligence assets working undercover get paid in cash, or billionaire Jews just give them free money for no specific reason) would likely be both domestic and foreign, i.e., he was working for the Mossad but also given some type of confidential informant status by the FBI.

Along with those two main things, and those are the two main things, it would be nice to know what investigations were done into Wexner and Black for giving this guy tens of millions. I don’t think “helping out a friend” explains it. Maybe if you’re a billionaire, you help out a friend with a few hundred thousand or even a couple million, but between Wexner and Black, Epstein was given over two hundred million dollars.

Further, I want the files on why and legally how he was arrested in 2019 for crimes he’d already been convicted of and served prison time for. I remember when he died, some people in the media talked about this, and claimed that these were separate jurisdictions (Florida and then New York) and that this meant he could be tried for the same crimes twice. That isn’t true. You can’t be charged in different federal courts for the same crimes. There is something called “dual sovereignty” which is really a violation of the Fifth Amendment but that allows both state and federal charges for the same crime, but two federal courts can’t charge you for the same crime as the federal government has a single sovereignty.

Frankly, there is no reason not to simply release all of the files. It is, in fact, insane that this is even an issue while we are being told “there is no there there.” With the Kennedy files, you have all kinds of potential “classified” material that they can claim is too “sensitive” to be released as it could “compromise national security.” There are all sorts of security protocols around the president that are a secret and therefore “sensitive,” and then if the government had investigated Russia or Cuba or whatever, all of that would relate to “national security.” I’m not saying that is a valid reason not to release the files, especially sixty years later, but it is at least a theoretical reason. If Epstein is just some guy who was having sex with young girls and that’s the end of it, there is literally zero reason that all of this information could not be released publicly, with the one exception maybe being some of the stuff about the investigation into his death as that at least happened in a federal government building, meaning “classified stuff.” Everything else should be public. He’s already dead, so he can’t complain about his privacy, and it is obvious that this is a matter of public interest, so what is even the potential reason for keeping any of the government files a secret?

Obviously, we all understand the reason. But why doesn’t Trump have a better excuse? What he said, even before the election, is that Jeffrey Epstein knew a lot of people so a lot of people’s names are in the files and that doesn’t necessarily mean they are actually guilty of anything. But we already know who most or maybe all of these people were. Bill Gates, Alan Dershowitz, Steven Pinker, that guy who made The Simpsons, and on and on, have already been named as having some kind of social connection to Epstein, and it was public knowledge for most of these people. Epstein was holding big social events in New York and Florida with all kinds of people. Along with procuring underage girls for sex, he was a socialite, hence the fact that all of these famous people are photographed with him. I’m sure not all of them had sex with underage girls, so it’s not a reasonable excuse that some innocent man’s name is going to be tarnished because government documents show that they were at one of Epstein’s parties.

Bill Gates did an interview saying that he knew Epstein had been in prison for underage girls and still chose to be friends with him and go to his parties and there were no consequences for him. He did not get “canceled.” Several other people have been questioned about it and just said “yeah, sorry” and nothing happened. Dershowitz admitted to getting multiple massages from girls who “looked over 18.” And he’s a person who has actually written about the age of consent being stupid and was one of Epstein’s lawyers in the Florida case. And he didn’t get “canceled.” He’s still out there doing prominent interviews. Just the other day he was on that show of those guys who took Rush Limbaugh’s timeslot explaining that Epstein was not involved with the Mossad.

So unless the files say “video shows this person having sex with a girl who appears to possibly be under the age of consent,” then nothing is going to happen if someone’s name shows up – including Trump’s, by the way. We already have these pictures of Trump with Epstein and interviews where he’s saying they’re friends. He even implied directly that he knew some of the girls were underage.

In a tape released as an election surprise last year (it got very little media coverage for whatever reason), Epstein, on a 2017 tape, says he was Trump’s “best friend for ten years.”

Given that Epstein was indicted by two different federal jurisdictions, there would be a whole lot of paperwork, including a whole bunch of interviews, so it would actually be more or less impossible that Trump’s name wouldn’t be somewhere in the documents. I don’t see how his name being mentioned in some file would be more harmful to him than the photographs and various statements that are already on the public record. Unless it says “Trump, featured on a video having sex with a teenage girl who may be under the age of consent…”

Yes, Leftists are Talking About This

Trump is correct when he says Democrats are talking about this Epstein thing. It’s all over the Democrat media.

The issue is that that doesn’t mean anything. It would be bizarre if they were not talking about it. Of course they are talking about it. They are obsessed with Trump sex scandals. And of course, the Jews out there talking about it know as a matter of fact that Trump isn’t going to come out and say “Epstein was Mossad,” so there is no reason for them to not talk about it.

In fact, if I were a Jew, I would want to talk constantly about how Trump is stopping the release of the files because he had sex with an underage girl, as that redirects people from pointing out the fact that Trump first told people to “shut up about Epstein” while in a meeting with Bibi Netanyahu, and that the implication of all of this is that Epstein was Mossad. I watched a bunch of clips from CNN and so on talking about Trump-Epstein, and none of them talked about Epstein being a possible Mossad agent. It’s all just sordid sex drama, which is not relevant to anything.

Trump is actually arguing that because Biden didn’t release the files, he shouldn’t be expected to.

Weird argument, but okay.

Ultimately, it doesn’t really matter whether or not Trump did have sex with an underage whore or if he’s just being bullied by Bibi. The effect is the same, which is that the media is covering up the fact that the Mossad was running a blackmail ring in the United States.

This obviously isn’t going anywhere. Apparently, it is going to turn Trump’s people against him much more than bombing Iran did. At least during this lag between the bombing and the inevitable war, that is the case. In general, these wars in the Middle East have been such a feature of America for so long, it’s just background noise. But Epstein, for whatever reason, is something people were really mad about. I guess the reason is probably that people don’t like the idea of a group of elites being above the law. I’m not really sure. Maybe some of it is white knighting for literal hookers. Probably a significant amount of it is more fringe QAnon type reasoning.

Honestly, from the “Trump base,” I don’t see a lot about Mossad. More Israel talk is creeping in now. I recently saw a clip of Matt Gaetz saying Mossad killed Epstein in prison by working with their assets in the US government. But mainstream right-wing criticism of Israel and Jews is something relatively new. I’m not really sure about the original obsession with Epstein from people who don’t think he’s Mossad.

Regardless of the reasons, people are really mad at Trump about this, and with the way he is handling it, things are clearly going to get worse for him in terms of backlash from his supporters. But it doesn’t matter. The US is going to war with Iran and AOC will be the next president and people will get whatever comes with that.

Trump will at least try to pump the economy.

I mean, did you guys see Bitcoin? Shit be flying.

So yeah, it’s fine. Whatever.

Just don’t expect anything to happen, because it’s definitely not going to. Even the war with Iran won’t really feel like it’s “happening.”

I guess the AI thing is going to be something like something happening. As mentioned above, we are already in the world of “there is no possible way to tell if this is real or not.”

A couple weeks ago I ran across this Twitter account and thought for a second the guy was hiring actors for his memes:

I realized it was AI. But that is just a small Twitter account that is just using the raw prompts of what is presumably some $10-a-month software.

He just posted a new one. These are actually really good.

We got another floating microphone there, and he’s not fixing the text (which for various reasons still confuses AI in images). If he would edit, you literally would not be able to tell it is AI. And in six months, the raw prompts will be enough for it to be indistinguishable from real life.

It’s sort of hilarious to think that in a year or so, something like the Superman movie, which they spent $300 million on, will be possible with $10-a-month software. Even more hilarious will be the insanity that ensues in the period where people can’t tell what is real and everyone gets all confused about everything before eventually the human mind begins to understand that video doesn’t reflect real life.

I’m not really sure where it will go in terms of the social impact, but this is a big shift. We’ve gotten used to video representing real life. But people will somehow deal with the fact that it doesn’t. People don’t like to feel stupid, like they’ve been tricked, so people will all get tricked a few times and find out they were tricked and then start assuming everything is AI. If the Jews would have waited a couple years to begin their genocide, they probably could have convinced most people that these insane genocide videos we’re seeing are AI.

I guess what will probably happen is that people will just believe things are real if they agree with them and say they’re fake if they don’t agree with them? That seems most likely. But there will definitely be more fake video than real video, on the whole.

If people want to get into making fake videos, I would recommend that you primarily focus on making outrageous shit that promotes the other side. For example, make videos showing IDF soldiers helping Palestinians in absurd ways. Like, “Israeli military holds carnival in Gaza for Palestinian children, gives everyone free cotton candy and funnel cakes.” Or a news report on Russian soldiers throwing Ukrainians into a cage with an eagle and a bear. “Russian soldiers are seen forcing Ukrainians to take off their shoes and throw them in a big pile.” Whatever ridiculous, unbelievable shit you can think of that in theory supports your enemies but is too ridiculous to be believed rationally. Either fake enemy propaganda, or just total chaos. Total chaos is also good. Just invent events that don’t make any sense or are outrageous and incendiary.

You can also just do fun/funny stuff. But this is going to be complete madness, and it’s really here now, but in six months you will really start to see serious fallout. CNN and the rest of these people are going to do reports saying “you can only trust video from us,” and people will be like “lol.”

But yeah, the fallout from AI video, which will include the total end to all extant professional entertainment media as everyone will just be able to make whatever they want, but also including some kind of massive social crisis, the biggest reality collapse we’ve seen, is the only interesting thing I see on the horizon. Everything else is very predictable and boring.

Sorry.

]]> Superman is Fine (Though Not What I Requested) https://dailystormer.in/superman-is-fine-though-not-what-id-requested/ Wed, 16 Jul 2025 15:08:41 +0000 https://dailystormer.in/?p=687837

I wrote a post a few months back saying that a really positive and pro-America Superman film could be a good thing for American culture. I said it could happen as a part of the “Trump Effect.” A lot of people were saying that no, I was stupid, it was going to be woke as all heck.

Well, the film has been released.

Statistically, most of you didn’t see it, and probably are not really very excited to. It didn’t perform poorly over the weekend, but it certainly was not a blockbuster, and not what Warner Brothers was looking for. That said, after the weekend box office (which was below projections with the film on the path to break even), WB head David Zaslav said this new DC Comics “universe” of films will go ahead and he was happy with the box office.

For some reason, before the release of the film, director James Gunn decided to attack his own film release by announcing that Superman is “an immigrant story.” This caused many people to believe the film was woke, and refuse again to pay $15 for a moral lecture.

If this film was actually woke, it still wouldn’t have made sense for him to say that, but it really isn’t woke. The wokest thing about the film is that they cast a Mexican who looks like a literal satanic ape as the Engineer.

In principle, I am not even against having a Mexican and a black. These big blockbuster CGI fest children’s films are intended for wide audiences and I think there might be some data-backed truth to the fact that people from these races will be more likely to see a film if they feel they are “represented.” (Although the thicc Mexican bitch who played Hawkgirl seems like enough Latina representation?) This was the original idea of having a black character in films. In old slasher films, blacks actually loved the trope that “the black guy always gets killed first” (maybe they related to it, I don’t know, but they certainly always went to see these films and cheered when the black died first). I don’t expect these films to be full-Nazi, or whatever. So a bit of diversity in the casting, if it’s not an overload, isn’t “woke,” as this has always been a thing. I do think it is woke to pick a bitch with that face.

But everything else was fine. The black guy was fine. Literally the only political thing in the film at all was a surprisingly heavy-handed Palestine analogy with the Boravia plot line. The Jews are freaking out about that. I guess woke people do support Palestine, but Israel is so despised by the right, that doesn’t really count. And though Gunn made it way obvious what he was talking about, it wasn’t a huge part of the story. Though getting the actor who looks the most like David Ben-Gurion to play the leader of the racist oppression nation was funny.

That was sort of anti-woke, antisemitic casting, frankly. It made up for the Engineer being purposefully ugly.

So, I don’t know why Gunn decided to sabotage the film this way. It’s a head-scratcher. He can’t possibly have imagined that making the film seem “woke” before the release would be good for it. Maybe it was just an offhanded comment he made, possibly while drunk and on pills. I am sure Gunn’s personal politics are left, but he also seems like he would be willing to do a film that slightly signals to MAGA if it would secure him more money. Also, Zaslav, you’d think, would go along with doing some jingoistic Americanism in the film in the name of getting Americans to sign up and die for wars for his homeland. (Though he sort of did the opposite of that, actually, by allowing Gunn to put the Palestine thing in there, but this sort of indicates he just doesn’t care at all.)

They asked poor Nathan Fillion about the “immigrant” thing, and he said “c’mon, guys. It’s just a movie.” This is exactly what it is: it’s just a movie. (Unless you’re a Jew who doesn’t think anyone should be able to say genociding Arabs is wrong, in which case it is like another Holocaust all over again.)

If you would have thrown in some dogwhistles, shown some more American flags (I was excited by the one in the trailer), and had someone say “truth, justice, and the American Way,” the film could have been a blockbuster despite its mediocre quality.

And that is how I would rate the quality: it is mediocre.

Most of the critiques of the film are right. People are posting that clip of Trey Parker explaining if your story is just a bunch of “and then this happens” scenes strung together, it’s not a good story. That is factually true. That being said, it’s difficult for me, as a “science of literature” expert, to see how you could have shoved that many characters into the film and then stuck to any sort of meaningful storytelling format. Yes, there are good novels with a lot of characters, but these novels would make 10- and 20-hour movies (as was done with the Game of Thrones books). To shove as many characters as were in Superman into a movie and not just have it be a series of events would probably be impossible. The literature on the structure of stories is clear that the characters and plot are inseparable. No one has ever said “I liked the plot, I just didn’t like the characters,” though with Superman, you could say the opposite thing. I did like most of the characters. Superman was my favorite character, however, and he ends up getting pushed out of his own movie by a barrage of different characters, some of whom might be interesting in their own right, but there just isn’t enough time in a film’s runtime to find out.

I think this was the only mandate from Zaslav: you have to include a bunch of different characters we can use for our “universe.” Very stupid thinking. But I don’t think this means James Gunn is a bad writer. Unless it was his idea to have this many characters, which I doubt, then you can’t blame him for not being able to formulate a properly flowing cause-and-effect plot around this directive. It could only really be a series of strung together “oh here’s this person who has this thing going on, that’s fun, right?” scenes.

Frank Grillo as Rick Flag, Fillion as Guy Gardner, and others to various extents, were potentially interesting characters. The film simply didn’t have room for all of them.

In terms of watching the film as a comic book fan, there was nothing offensive. Well, there is one very offensive thing that I expected to get revealed as a Lex Luthor scheme by the end, but it never was, and that was really more confusing than offensive, because I just assumed that it would be revealed it was a hoax. (And maybe it will be later on in the series, check the spoiler at the bottom of this page. I guess I liked Superman enough to think some people will want to go and watch it and have fun and not have it spoiled, so I’ll keep it down there for the majority who do not care.)

Along with liking the characters, I liked the general tone, which drew on Silver Age themes that Gunn has said he came across through Grant Morrison’s All-Star Superman. It’s a very silly and comic-booky tone, which you have to have if you are doing literally any DC comics heroes other than literal Batman. (Yes, if you “nerd out,” there are other DC heroes you can do dark and “realist” takes on, but it works with none of the main Justice League characters. If you want to “nerd out” right this very moment, go look at the current “dark” line of DC comics, the “Absolute” series, and tell me why Absolute Batman is awesome and the others are unbearable.)

DC should have looked at Disney’s success with Marvel’s “universe” and said they were going to go in the opposite direction, and be more comic booky and silly-fun than Marvel. Instead, they let Zack Snyder make all of those nightmarish films and lost I think multiple billions of dollars. I’m sure part of the pitch from Gunn was exactly this: “let’s go in the other direction and just have fun,” and to a not totally insignificant extent, Superman succeeds with this.

It’s almost like there is just a lot of bad market research going on here. Like, as if a bunch of marketing research people are literal criminal fraudsters. Along with the silliness of Gunn saying that immigrant thing before the release of the film, the film was also sabotaged by the trailers, which made Superman look weak and whiny. Releasing the scene with Clark and Lois arguing was really dumb, as in context, you don’t really think much about that. Clark/Superman as a character is totally fine and I liked almost everything about the portrayal. Even the suit that everyone complained about before release looks great.

But yeah, not a great film, not a film I would really recommend anyone watch, and definitely not the “Trump Effect” pro-America film I was hoping for. I don’t know, maybe Warner has marketing research geniuses who did the math and realized the Trump Effect would be mostly gone by mid-July. My original thinking was that if they could have gotten Trump to endorse it as “a great pro-America film,” it would have been a big deal, and I still think it would have been a better strategy, but it wouldn’t carry the weight it would have in April. Faster than I ever could have imagined, the MAGA Spring has given birth to a “Wait, What Did He Just Say? What the Hell is Going on Here?” Summer.

But hey, I don’t want to talk about that in this article, man. I don’t really want to talk about that at all anymore, dude. I just want to do “woke or not?” pop culture reviews, bro.

Just relax.

None of it even matters anyway.

Oh, and I almost forgot: Lois breaks up with Clark when he’s getting attacked by the media then decides she’s in love with him after the media decides he’s good. Literally, there is nothing else driving her relationship decisions other than Superman’s social status. The sort of garbled non-plot might make it not obvious, but if you watch it, you can literally see she does not have any interactions with Superman between giving him a cold “now you’re in the friend zone” hug and jumping all over him telling him she loves him. No interactions. Her decision was completely based on media reports of the man’s social status.

I think what probably happened was that in the frenzy of reshoots and recuts, trying to turn this garbled mess of mostly disconnected things into a coherent whole, they didn’t realize they got a bit too real with how women actually think about men. It could also have been on purpose. Either way, it was very funny to me. And literally true.

When Mel Gibson got condemned as evil by the media for saying those things about the Jews, when he was literally at the lowest point in his life, his wife of many decades with whom he had seven children decided to do the brave thing and file for divorce. I guarantee if there ever comes a day when the media decides “it turns out Mel is the good guy after all,” that ex-wife is going to start calling him and talking “oh, I was just thinking about you, we had so many good times together and a part of me misses it.”

Women are utterly ridiculous, actually buffoonish in nature, and I always love when that is pointed out.

Spoiler Thing:

The thing I expected to be a Lex plot was the video that Superman’s birth parents sent him from Krypton, where they told him to conquer Earth and have a harem of women to produce the maximum number of children with Kryptonian blood to rule as his heirs. That is very offensive if it is an in-universe thing that’s real. The thing is, Supergirl is in this universe, and if she’s Kara, which I assume she is, she was also sent to Earth to escape Krypton’s destruction, and if you were planning on conquering a planet, and you specified how to do so by using the “Spanish dudes in Mexico” method, you would not send a female with a vagina and would instead send two males with penises.

They could say that Kara was sent to be Superman’s pureblooded Kryptonian wife to create a royal line to lead the half-breed earthlings (which was the only reason Spain ever sent women to Mexico), but in this case, they wouldn’t have sent his first cousin, which Kara is, and I’m pretty sure it says “cousin” in the film.

Anyway, it never crossed my mind that this was anything other than another Lex trick, so it didn’t bother me until I’d finished the film and realized it was never resolved. Anyway, if this does turn into a successful “universe,” which seems unlikely because I just don’t think this “blockbuster film that has to make a billion dollars to be profitable” model was ever sustainable (but who knows), they will just retcon that even if it was originally intended by Gunn to be canon. Because no one likes this “Superman’s parents were evil” thing. Superman has been around nearly 100 years, they’ve done every possible storyline with him, including various versions of “evil Superman,” but the only case I know of where Superman was sent to earth to set up a one-man breeding farm and conquer the planet is in Invincible, which is not a Superman book, even whilst Omega Man is obviously a Superman parody. The Invincible cartoon is really popular now (not for no reason, I’d argue), so maybe someone thought it was a good idea to weave that in? That doesn’t make any sense, but nothing about it makes sense. Even on a basic level of the story itself, a people whose planet is being destroyed and who can only send one child to another planet (later two, with Kara) would not be thinking “we command you to conquer this planet in our name.” The reason it works in Invincible is that Omega Man lies about being the last of his race and he’s actually a representative of an alien empire that is planning to conquer Earth.

Although I am on the “it’s definitely mostly nature” side of the nature vs. nurture debate, I am also sympathetic to “you’re not required to be like your parents” stories, which can be real human stories. But this is not the place for that, James Gunn. Literally no one wants “Superman was supposed to be evil but he overcame it,” except in Invincible, where it is a completely different thing and “Superman” actually does do a bunch of evil things before reflecting on whether or not he wants to be like his parents.

]]> Dear MAGA: If You Think Masked ICE Thugs Wouldn’t Do the Same to You, You’re Even Dumber Than You Look https://dailystormer.in/dear-maga-if-you-think-masked-ice-thugs-wouldnt-do-the-same-to-you-youre-dumber-than-you-look/ Fri, 11 Jul 2025 03:38:55 +0000 https://dailystormer.in/?p=687818

It’s NEVER a good idea to resist ICE agents.

Can you say FAFO? pic.twitter.com/3zArK2T25y

— AmericanPapaBear (@AmericaPapaBear) June 29, 2025

A lot of people on the internet are celebrating and cheering on some pretty brutal videos of ICE grabbing Mexicans out of parking lots, out of Walmarts, wherever. It’s understandable. I understand, and my instinct is to celebrate it as well. And I would be celebrating it if I knew less about the situation than I do.

Please, allow me to explain why I’m not celebrating it.

Let’s start with just how uncomfortable I am with the cops. The Big Beautiful Bill is turning ICE into the biggest federal cop group in American history. Their budget is going to go from $10 billion to $100 billion, which surpasses the combined budgets of the FBI, DEA, ATF, Bureau of Prisons, and the Marshals Service.

Note that there has never been a case of a federal cop group shrinking. In theory, ICE should have a temporary mission, correct? They should be rounding up the immigrants, processing them in holding centers near the border, then shipping them back to wherever they came from. (In certain cases, sending them to some third country might make sense, but because they all came through Mexico, that third country should be Mexico. It was Mexico that made the decision to let these people walk through their country into our country, and while I understand that this was under pressure from the Biden administration, all that really means is that the US is capable of asserting enormous pressure on Mexico.)

But there is no “once the mission is complete, ICE’s staffing and funding will be drastically downsized” clause in the BBB or anywhere else. This is a standing army, trained to run around the country throwing people into vans, without warrants. If you think “JD Vance” is going to win the 2028 election, you have no understanding of what is happening in this country. Apparently, the reasons Democrats will take over in 2028 are something that need to be explained in some detail, something that is beyond our scope today. But Democrats will control the federal government in 2028, SCOTUS will not get in their way, and they are not going to disband a massive federal cop organization, but instead use it for their own purposes. If we want to get an idea of what they will do with these cops, perhaps we should recall Waco and Ruby Ridge, then imagine that sort of thing happening everywhere, all the time.

Another fact that is rather important in my view is that most of these people we see being arrested are not being deported at all. The BBB does nothing to address the laws that make it virtually impossible to deport 98% of illegal immigrants. Getting rid of the laws that prevent deportations should and would be the first move of anyone who was even remotely serious about deporting tens of millions of people. Among other things, you would expand expedited removals, end “credible fear” interviews for “asylum seekers,” and defund immigration courts. This could all be done by Congress.

Of course, the idea of tens of millions of people via mass roundups is completely nonsensical on its face. No one knows the actual numbers, but after the 20+ million who likely came in under Biden, we are definitely talking about somewhere in the range of fifty million illegal immigrants we want to remove. You are not going to pick them up one at a time in the Walmart parking lot. You don’t need to be a math genius to understand this, and I don’t need to tell you “how many football stadiums is 50 million people?”

What you would do is start seriously punishing people who hire or rent to illegal immigrants. You would fully implement E-verify, to ensure people who work and rent are legal residents, then you would send ICE to round up the tens of thousands of people who are employing and renting to illegals and charging them with ten years in prison for each instance. You would then set up ICE-run “no questions asked, just sign the form and we’ll give you $1,000 in cash and put you on a bus back to Mexico or on a flight to wherever” voluntary deportation centers in every major American city and provide a hotline for the immigrants to call explaining how they can make their way out.

If they can’t legally work and they can’t legally live anywhere, all of a sudden you have an exodus. What can they do? They have to leave. Then, instead of endless videos of masked men grabbing screaming women in church parking lots and throwing them into vans, you’d have endless videos of immigrants lining up and boarding single-file onto buses bound for Mexico.

Im sure it’s possible to argue that some of the immigrants would refuse to leave even if they could not work and had to live on the streets. But it’s not going to be very many of them, and those ones could be thrown in vans. They’re not going to be hard to find.

Tens of millions of people have been relocated before. The most obvious example to point to is the partitioning of Pakistan. That project used carrots and sticks, but it did not round millions of people up, throwing them in cars one at a time, sending three officers to arrest a single individual.

How long does the arrest take, if we include drive time and paperwork? How much are these ICE people being paid per hour? This all starts to become reminiscent of “Holocaust math,” no?

Far from moving to arrest the employers and landlords of illegals, which I suspect many in the Trump administration would view as antisemitic, Trump has not even managed to cut off illegal immigrant access to all of the free social services.

Even if you are not big on math and are a true believer in the “one arrest at a time” strategy, the problem now is that ICE has already cleaned out the “100 miles from the border” immigrants who have been here less than two weeks (those are the only people eligible for expedited removal), and now these people are just being interned indefinitely as the courts prevent deportation. Yes, the Trump administration is making a big show pushing back on the courts, Stephen Miller is saying they don’t have the authority, but whatever the details of that battle might be, most of these people being detained by ICE are no longer being deported and are instead being sent to detainment facilities. Meanwhile, there is not even a discussion of using the Congress to pass laws stripping courts of their ability to prevent deportations. The United States federal court system is still able to enforce international refugee treaties (HIAS and others successfully challenged Trump’s EO on the matter in court), and instead of using the Congress to get rid of these treaties, Trump sends Miller to argue with the courts about what they mean.

Just Send Them to Black Sites, Indefinitely?

This “Alligator Alcatraz,” where MAGA patriots plan to eat delicious bread while watching Mexicans being eaten alive by large lizards, is a “black site.” That is, it is a prison camp where people are held indefinitely without access to due process. Just to be clear, no, it does not have to be secret to be a “black site.” Guantanamo Bay, where Trump is also sending immigrants instead of deporting them (he’s allowed to do this because Gitmo is technically US soil), is the world’s most famous prison and is also, definitionally, a “black site.” That said, it is certainly often a feature of a black site that you do not know where it is, and if you imagine that the federal government is not using this current circus atmosphere to build these sites across the country, you are as innocent as a babe or as stupid as an ox who’s suffered severe head trauma.

If the illegals could simply be deported in an efficient manner, you would not have any reason to build new black sites. So there is one more reason the state has for not successfully deporting illegal immigrants. That’s on top of the fact that all wealthy donors are against mass deportation of illegals.

Along with a brand new army of fully militarized federal cops trained to drive around the country and disappear people into vans in broad daylight, these black sites are another thing that the Trump Administration will be gifting to the AOC administration when James “JD Vance” Bowman loses the 2028 election.

I’m sure the Democrats will campaign on abolishing (or at least restricting) ICE and closing the black sites. And I’m sure people will believe it because of the long established Democrat tradition of telling the truth and never using federal cops for immoral purposes.

The most important gift Trump will give to AOC will be an AI police state control grid run by Palantir, so that the government will be able to keep close tabs on racists, sexists, homophobes, transphobes, and most importantly of all, antisemites.

Will the Democrats use this series of gifts to identify, arrest, and detain all the people viewed as a threat to democracy? Of course, I have no way of predicting such a thing, all I can do is say that it would be very easy to do, given these incredible gifts Trump will be giving them, and could be done legally with a simple emergency declaration which could be declared for more or less any reason.

Here’s an interesting question: how many people would need to be disappeared into some cage in a swamp to crush a meaningful American resistance movement? We know that the Palantir system will be able to identify them, and I would suspect the number is lower than 2,500. It could in fact be much lower than that, given that a fully functioning controlled opposition movement already exists, and most people would prefer to follow a Pied Piper offering them some joyful fantasy than look upon the dark realty of what is actually happening in front of their eyes. A quick perusal of the ridiculous popularity of the QAnon movement should be enough to demonstrate the ability of people to put their faith in nonsense, and most of the controlled opposition movements are nowhere near as ridiculous as QAnon.

Personally, I think these street scenes of ICE agents grabbing people are being created to desensitize people to seeing this sort of thing, and I think it is only a matter of time before these methods are used against those viewed as “dissidents” in America. But, hey – maybe I’m wrong? Maybe I’m just paranoid and it’s just that everyone in the government is really bad at math?

Bonus Trump Gift to Democrats: A Browner America


Along with the “elite police state package,” there are a lot of bonus gifts Trump is giving the Democrats. For example, Trump has decided to make it look like he’s implicated in the Epstein documents by claiming they don’t exist, and Democrats can now claim he destroyed them all. This is fantastic news for a lot of Democrat politicians and donors. You could come up with a big list of all sorts of little presents like this Trump will be giving the Democrats in the 2028 handoff.

But given today’s topic of discussion, the most relevant of the bonus gifts Trump will be giving the Democrats is a browner America. Homeland Security claims that virtually no one is crossing the border illegally currently. That seems unlikely, but okay. DHS also claims that as of June, so in Trump’s first six months, they had deported 207,000 people. The goal the administration had set was to deport a million per year, and it looks like in 2025 they might get close to 500,000, half of their 1 million goal. For reference, the Biden administration was probably allowing about 5 million people a year to enter the country, while in 2024, that administration deported only 270,000.

Given that Trump is going for all of the low-hanging fruit in his first months in office – new arrivals who are near the border – and given that there has been no interest shown in using Congress to change any of the laws, and especially given that there is no interest in putting the onus of responsibility on the people hiring and renting to the illegals, it is unlikely that by their 4th year, they will be deporting more than Biden was in his fourth year.

So just to be clear: Biden allowed in 20 millionish, Trump says the goal is to deport 4 millionish, he will probably end up deporting 1.5 millionish. Even after building and arming the biggest federal police agency in history, there is no way he is going to get near Obama’s deportation numbers.

Again, no need for a math whiz to see that just with white deaths and brown births alone, the 2028 America Trump hands off is going to be significantly browner than the 2024 America Biden handed him. But we haven’t added the legal immigrants. That’s about 1 million new people per year, virtually all of them brown. Further, Trump is at least flirting with the idea of removing caps on H-1B visas for Indians, which could mean multi-millions more per year.

Any way you cut it, 2028 America is going to be significantly browner than 2024 America, and it could be a lot browner.

But hey, I heard on Fox News that brown people are leaving the Democrat plantation because of the woke agenda. So maybe it will all work out? Maybe brown folks will get sick of paying these high taxes to people who want to turn their kids gay, and we’ll have a… multiracial working class uprising against the… the woke mob.

Or whatever.

But Hey, Whatever

Many in the internet will claim that a person has no right to identify a problem unless he has already prepared a solution for it. It is difficult to imagine a more infantile mindset for a grown adult man to embrace. But who am I to judge? I simply do my best to look at the world, to examine the facts, and try to explain what is going on to those interested in listening. I would never want to force anyone to listen. You are an adult, and you have a basic right as a human being to believe whatever it is you feel like believing.

I do not have a solution to the very serious problems I am identifying here, and will not even suggest that any such solution exists. I’m just exhausted by this goofy fantasy bullshit. In 2016, Trump said tens of millions of people needed to be deported. He “lost” in 2020, and tens of millions more were brought in before he “won” in 2024, and now he’s aiming to deport 4 million by 2028, and it seems that number is impossible, but you are going to get a massive police state, both digital and physical, in exchange for removing maybe 1.5-2 million illegal immigrants.

Okay?

That’s what’s happening. Happening alongside the endless wars, the biggest budget ever, the entire Epstein case being thrown into a black hole, and whatever other cute little surprises the Trump administration has up its sleeve over the next 3.5 years. It’s all bad news. So if you want, pretend it’s not happening. No one forced you to read this. At least, I hope they didn’t. If someone did force you to read this, I’m sorry. If it was a Mexican who forced you to read it, you should call ICE, and they will come feed him to an alligator.

When analyzing the American empire, and the evils it is currently in the process of spreading, I’ve determined that a man can either hope that the American empire falls sooner rather than later, or that he dies before things get really bad.

The other thing one can do is pray for incompetence on the part of the evil forces implementing this agenda, but I suppose that falls under the “hoping for collapse” category.

When Trump was allegedly shot in the ear in Butler, I identified this as part of a program to set him up as an overwhelmingly popular leader, who would come into office as a kind of Caesar figure, and be able to do whatever he wanted to do. Unfortunately or fortunately, most of that good will has already been burned through. The Epstein thing was incredible. To actually start yelling about how people need to stop talking about Epstein was beyond my comprehension.

That was just so completely nuts. When I first saw it, I had to confirm it wasn’t AI.

And then this?

As I always note, we live in a democracy. Please don’t say “oh no, we live in a Republic.” Some of you people are just such retards, I really feel like you deserve all of this. Sometimes, I think the Jews are right about the goyim. We do live in a democracy, a representative democratic republic, and this means that you do not have a way to petition grievances. So the government can do whatever they want to you.

However, at some point, any population facing a certain amount of abuse will engage in a violent uprising, so the system is able to move much more smoothly when they have high levels of support. The fact that Trump has burned up so much good will so quickly is confusing and can only really be explained by incompetence on his part and on the part of his cadre. He doesn’t actually have to do anything. He can just pretend he’s trying to do something. But coming out and saying “we must defeat Putin and actually Epstein didn’t even do anything” is really wild.

So sure. Hope their incompetence screws everything up and leads to a collapse. That’s my best advice.

My best advice is actually to leave the United States, and forget the place exists. But most people are not going to do that.

]]> “Political Loyalty” is a Nonsensical Concept https://dailystormer.in/political-loyalty-is-a-nonsensical-concept/ Wed, 09 Jul 2025 11:43:00 +0000 https://dailystormer.in/?p=687799

Since the beginning of Donald Trump’s political career in 2015, “Make America Great Again” (MAGA) has been more than a slogan, and instead a concept that embodies a series of simple and easily understood principles about the problems facing America and the solutions to these problems. MAGA was never a specific series of policy proposals, as it was intended to be something bigger than any specific policy. It was a vision of a new America. While short on specifics, the vision was clear: the current establishment had wasted America’s wealth on foreign wars and domestic social engineering agendas that had hollowed out the nation. Though it was not theocratic or puritanical or otherwise moralizing, it was opposed to “weird stuff” which sought to undermine what were traditionally considered “American values,” and it was anti-immigration and anti-war. Again, it was never specific, but everyone definitely understood those three major cornerstones of the program. (It was also “anti-corruption,” though as no one is publicly “pro-corruption,” that is not a particularly meaningful position to take.)

During his first term, Trump failed to do much MAGA, but it was generally understood that he was trying to, but that the president simply doesn’t really have very much power in America. However, in these early months of his second term, Trump is not simply failing to live up to the ideals of MAGA, but is attempting to completely confuse the meaning of the term, attempting to convince his own followers that “MAGA” was never really what they thought it was.

In a series of statements reminiscent of Anthony Fauci’s infamous pronunciation that “I am The Science,” Trump has recently claimed “I am MAGA,” and that he is the decider of what is or isn’t MAGA, and whatever new policies he decides on do not necessarily need to have any relationship to what was previously understood to be the MAGA political platform.

What he is effectively saying is that his political movement was always just about him as a person, and that anyone who ever supported MAGA was supporting him as a person. Therefore, anyone who disagrees with his totally new series of policies he has developed in recent weeks, most of which are the opposite of how MAGA had previously been defined, is not actually a believer in MAGA, because MAGA was never a series of policies, but instead an expression of loyalty to Donald Trump personally, and a pledge to support whatever it is he decides to do at any moment.

This situation is most brightly highlighted in the way Trump has dealt with Congressman Thomas Massie, who is, I would argue, the standard-bearer of the MAGA platform as it was initially introduced by Trump in 2015. Trump has claimed Massie is a traitor and vowed to destroy him. It is very obvious to everyone that Massie has not changed any of his positions on anything.

In the most recent betrayal of the ideals that were sold as representing MAGA, Donald Trump has decided that he wants to continue the endless war in the Ukraine. While meeting with his handler and earthly master Bibi Netanyahu this week, Trump declared that there is no plan to cut any funding to the Ukraine, and he actually plans to increase weapons shipments.

Although it’s not totally clear what happened, it appears that last week, Pete Hegseth halted shipments of weapons to the Ukraine. During the questioning in front of his boss, Trump claimed he didn’t know who was responsible for canceling these weapons shipments, and asked the media to tell him who did it. (Hegseth was sitting directly to his left.) He then declared a planned increase in weapons.

Following these statements, The Washington Post Editorial Board rushed to support Trump, publishing an op-ed praising his support for the Ukraine.

I would not suppose that anyone who voted for Trump in any of his three elections ever expected that the WaPo Editorial Board would become the standard bearer of MAGA, but that is apparently precisely what has taken place.

Trump had previously claimed that involving the US in Israel’s war with Iran actually was in-line with MAGA policy, which was explicitly anti-war, because he wasn’t really doing a war, he was just doing a bombing.

In another betrayal, Trump’s AG, Pam Bimbo, has claimed that there isn’t actually an Epstein client list. I don’t know what that means and no one has explained it, but the implication apparently is that Epstein did not have any clients, and either no women were trafficked, or they were trafficked to no one.

Though it is perhaps a slightly lesser offense to the MAGA agenda, which has never been particularly focused on fiscal responsibility, Trump has also this week moved to explode the national debt with the biggest spending bill in American history. What is most notable about this is that he vastly expanded military spending to the highest levels ever just weeks after claiming he was going to attempt to halve the military budget.

While “fiscal responsibility” might be slightly beyond the intellectual scope of MAGA, which has never been particularly sophisticated, “we’re going to stop wasting money on foreign wars and spend that money here at home where our country is falling apart” is definitely something we all understood to be core to the MAGA doctrine. Now, because MAGA has been redefined from a series of principles about how America should be run into “whatever Donald Trump says at whichever time he happens to be speaking,” the continuation of the Ukraine war, bombing countries for Israel, and spending the most money ever on war, all fall under the definition of “MAGA.”

A Test of the Limits of “Political Loyalty”

“Loyalty” is a quality that should be explicitly reserved for personal relationships. A man should be loyal to his family. Loyalty to a political figure or a political movement should not be possible, as it serves no purpose.

To be loyal to someone means that you will stick by them whether they are right or wrong. The reason we are loyal to our families is that we need them to be loyal to us, because this is how humans survive. If people abandoned family members because they were wrong about something, we would all be completely alone. We have to take the good and the bad with family members, because we need them.

Loyalty also makes sense in military units. It could make sense in the context of various business relationships. And there are, I’m certain, other examples of where the behavioral quality of loyalty would or could be appropriate.

One place where loyalty is not appropriate is in politics. Being “loyal” to a political figure is nonsensical. The only reason any person would support any political figure is that that political figure is doing political things they agree with and that helps them and their personal agenda. There is no place at all for loyalty to a political figure, as you do not personally know the political figure, and therefore you do not owe personal allegiance. There is no mutuality at all. Either the political figure is promoting an agenda you agree with, and therefore you rally for them and defend them because you benefit, or they are doing something different, which you do not benefit from, in which case you owe them nothing.

What Trump has done with intention is form a kind of personality cult, where people feel that they know him, and therefore owe him some kind of personal loyalty outside of his role as a policy maker. This is something that is only really possible in the age of electronic media. Most people see Donald Trump speaking nearly every day, and their subconscious mind, which is not familiar with the nature of video screens, registers him as someone they know personally, and are regularly hanging out with socially. Such a person would be the kind of person you would owe a personal loyalty to, and whose mistakes you would overlook, at least until the point where they got completely out of control.

We are going to see the limits of the “loyalty” personality cult tested.

Clearly, the personality cult is not considered ironclad, in the way it would be with someone like Jim Jones, as there is understood to be a need for distractions. This week, Trump is covering up the series of betrayals with a Romanesque “cruelty circus,” sending immigrants to cages in an alligator swamp. The media that supports Trump will say “yeah so, I guess there never was an Epstein list, and yeah we’re just going to keep doing that Ukraine war forever apparently – now let’s go back to the scene of the alligator pit, where your tribal enemies, the immigrants, are going to be fed to large, nasty lizards.”

They will keep the circus distractions coming, I’m sure. But ultimately, there is going to be a strict math equation regarding how many people are willing to ignore the fact that Trump is abandoning most of the core of his platform, not only failing to do the things he promised to do, but telling people he never really cared about those things anyway.

It’s worth mentioning that people will continue supporting a political figure that fails if they feel he is trying his best, which is why Trump remained so popular after not doing very much the first time he was president. But this time, it seems he is attempting to completely shift his stated priorities. This week he said “we have to defend the Ukraine.” This is very much the diametric opposite of what he campaigned on when he said “it’s not our responsibility to defend the Ukraine.” That is different than “sorry, I can’t figure out how to get Congress to stop funding the Ukraine” or “I can’t figure out what I’m supposed to do to end this war, this whole thing is really confusing and I don’t know what to do.” What I mean to say is: failure is different than betrayal, and while failure is tolerable, betrayal should not be tolerable.

In the case of “actually, there never was an Epstein client list,” that is just obvious lying, which would fall under the “betrayal” category, unless a person is stupid enough to believe that Ghislaine Maxwell was convicted of sex trafficking underage girls to no one, which some Trump supporters are probably stupid enough to believe, though I can’t say for certain.

Unfortunately: Democracy

Fortunately for Donald Trump and his cadre, and unfortunately for all the people in America, we live in a democracy, and therefore it is possible for zero people to support Donald Trump, and for him to remain president, and continue to do whatever it is he feels like doing at any given time.

There are probably some reasons that political support is important in a democracy, but I can’t think of what they might be. Trump appears to care personally about people supporting him, as it appears he has a rather fragile ego that feeds on popular support, and if people are booing him, it appears to hurt his ego. But ultimately, because this is a democracy and there is therefore no mechanism through which the public can petition grievances, he can do whatever he wants while he remains in office, and no one’s opinion about what he does means anything.

That said, Trump probably will maintain some fanatical base of morons who don’t really know much about what is going on but are very excited by alligators. And of course, the polls published can say whatever.

Then, after he does whatever it is he is going to do, he can turn over the government to Gavin Newsom or AOC, and they can be popular for a while after claiming they are going to do something or other, and then become unpopular after they do something different than what they claimed they would do. And we will just keep going on like that until eventually, something gives out, and the American empire falls into disarray, and something finally happens.

]]> Memetic Monday: The Real Deal https://dailystormer.in/memetic-monday-the-real-deal/ Tue, 08 Jul 2025 05:22:16 +0000 https://dailystormer.in/?p=687692

I wrote something on Sunday about the fact we are now combining renditions and black sites with an AI police state digital control grid in the name of fighting illegal immigration and somehow no one really seems to be getting deported.

I might go more into this, as it’s a pretty important issue that not many people seem to be talking about. People are cheering the PT Barnum meets Wile E. Coyote meets Half-Life 2 show that Trump is putting on completely mindlessly while the Democrats just whine about how it’s sad for the immigrants without pointing out that the groundwork is being laid for something very dark to be used against people other than Mexican field people and Haitian dog-eaters.

If I were the Democrats, I’d be quiet about this too, because I’d really want President AOC to get the reins of the Palantir black site rendition system that Trump is building to hand over to the Democrats when James Bowman inevitably flops like a floppy bird in 2028.

Anyway, I’m thinking about getting deep into it, because I’m not really seeing many people put these pieces together, but I’m also considering switching the focus of the site towards artisanal cheeses, as I really don’t think there are very many intelligent writers in that field either. I mean the people who make it are geniuses, but a lot of them are from places like France and Denmark and are completely illiterate. Most people don’t know this, but the Danish literacy rate is actually lower than that of niggers.

The Danes actually use cartoons to promote anti-white hatred to elderly Danish people at community centers because they know there is an 85% chance a Dane cannot read and can only understand concepts if explained with children’s cartoons:

Danish see those posters and they just crack like eggs.

But they can cheese it up, boy. Damn, son. They’ll cheese you like an mf.

Anyway, I don’t really care about anything anymore other than those two things: a) scaremongering people about how Trump is setting their shit up so president AOC and her gang of kikes can send you to get eaten to death by alligators, and b) elite cheeses.

Oh and this:

Seriously, if he wanted to mock some imaginary stereotype of Central Asians, why didn’t he just invent the name of a country?

Why completely destroy the international reputation of a country of twenty million people, who are some of the most chilled out people you will find anywhere in the world?

I mean, I get that Cohen is a Jew who hates all sorts of different categories of people, as he thinks everyone in the world is trying to gas him in a fake shower room for no reason. But why didn’t he say “Uzbekistan,” where they actually did a pogrom of Jews and where the people are about 1% as sympathetic as Kazakhs?

Or why not just make up a name??? To represent all of the Central Asian Turkic peoples he hates????

After completely destroying the international reputation of an entire country for literally no reason, this Jew went on a media campaign demanding the entire internet be shut down to prevent people from criticizing him. It’s a real shame there is no “Kazakh Defamation League.”

I guarantee this rat would tell you with a straight face Kazakh people hate him for literally no reason.

What’s almost more unbelievable than the seemingly limitless seething hatred of the Jews is their total lack of any self-awareness.

They are actually worse than women.

Oh and actually the fourth thing I cared about was freeing Diddy, but that one solved itself.

Maybe the rest of this shit will too?

Anyway.

Editor’s Pick of the Week:

And the Runner-Up:

Followed by the Artisanal Collection:

]]> Are We Sure We Want Black Sites in America? Alongside the Palantir AI Police State Control Grid? https://dailystormer.in/are-we-sure-we-want-black-sites-in-america-alongside-the-palantir-ai-police-state-control-grid/ Sun, 06 Jul 2025 09:48:06 +0000 https://dailystormer.in/?p=687684

The topic of the day is the fact that Donald Trump and his people have built a half billion dollar detention facility in a nature preserve in Florida. They are calling it “Alligator Alcatraz,” because I guess there are alligators in the swamp and you know, alliteration (the kids love it).

It’s funny to put immigrants in a swamp full of alligators.

But… are we talking about an American black site?

To be clear, a “black site” is defined as “a clandestine detention center operated by a state where prisoners who have not been charged with a crime are incarcerated without due process or court order.”

Is that something we really want to be doing? Building these types of sites in remote and potentially secret locations?

Please note that the Trump administration is also sending immigrants to Gitmo, the infamous black site in Cuba where the US spent decades torturing people it had kidnapped from various countries. Trump says he wants to hold 30,000 people there. Again, no one is explaining why they are not just sent back to their home countries. The US has an absolute ability to exert pressure on countries to accept the return of their people.

What exactly is even the purpose? We have jails. We have all of the leverage to deport people. We can make some concentration camp type holding facilities, just with modular homes and fences, and put them near the border. Wouldn’t that make more sense?

I’m not against putting immigrants in camps or cages or whatever. But another issue with this is that it only holds 5,000 people, which isn’t really a very relevant number when we are talking about at least 50 million people who are eligible for deportation.

Further, the costs of flying people to this remote location, and holding them there – that doesn’t make any sense at all to me. Again, you can quickly construct concentration camps in areas where immigrants can just be bussed in and processed. We can figure out where they’re going and send them there.

I don’t want to sound like a conspiracy theorist, but what this looks like to me is that we are normalizing the idea of black sites in America. Because this place, this Alligator Alcatraz, would make a lot more sense as a secret prison for Americans than as an immigrant detention facility. As an immigrant detention facility, it is incredibly expensive, elaborate, inefficient, and generally confusing.

I’ve written some about the Trump administration’s relationship with Palantir. Thankfully, others are writing and podcasting about this issue as well. Basically, the administration is contracting this intelligence and military tech company to design a control grid in America, and when asked about it, the Trump people just claim it is for immigrants. But no one is even claiming that only immigrants will be included in these AI databases that are going to monitor everyone. Palantir is building and has basically already built and is now just implementing a surveillance grid run by AI that compiles all information on you, both from the government and from private companies (i.e., Google and Facebook, and the banks), which is set up to build a profile on you that knows everything about you. It’s a total science fiction dystopian nightmare plan that few people are even bothering to talk about.

This Glenn Greenwald video is a good overview.

Palantir is a totally Jewish company which is involved heavily in the genocide in Gaza. The company’s Jewish CEO, Alex Karp, makes very edgy jokes about how he wants to kill the families of antisemites.

I don’t personally have very much faith in any speech guarantees provided by the US government. The Biden administration violated the First Amendment by ordering “private” tech companies to censor speech, and the Trump administration has done things much more illegal than that, passing all of these laws against “antisemitism.” Trump arrested and attempted to deport a green card holder for not supporting Israel. He says he’s going to deport anyone who doesn’t support Israel, regardless if they have a green card or not. Thus far, no one has been able to explain to me how a green card holder’s constitutional rights vary from those of a US citizen.

There is a lot of legal precedent for this you can look up. The Supreme Court ruled previously that an Australian communist with a green card couldn’t be deported for being a communist because a green card holder is protected by the Bill of Rights.

Listen, I’m the most anti-immigration person of all. If Trump said “we’re stripping all green card holders of their green cards and deporting them all tomorrow,” I would support that completely. But when you start claiming that you are taking specific rights from people who have rights under the US Constitution, you’re creating a very confusing legal situation.

He has also effectively seized federal control of universities in order to prevent students or faculty from criticizing Jews. He’s attempting to equate protesting against Israel with “material support for terrorism.” It’s all the exact same “safe spaces” and “speech is violence” language that was used by the Democrats in support of BLM and trannies, but Trump is taking it much further than Democrats ever did.

Further, the Biden administration was mocked relentlessly for their “Disinformation Governance Board,” a government board designed to monitor supposed “disinformation” on the internet, run by Nina Jankowicz. They ended up abolishing the organization after a couple months. Yet “monitoring disinformation online” is six million times less scary than “monitoring literally everything you do or say all the time for your entire life,” which is what Trump has contracted Palantir to do.

If you ask any questions about any of this, you’re either called an antisemite, a far-left open borders supporter, or both.

We should be deporting immigrants, but we should be doing so without threatening the freedom of speech or creating AI police state control grids. We should also do so, I think, without creating remote black sites, which really adds a whole other layer to this which I hadn’t really thought much about until the announcement of this “Alligator Alcatraz.”

I suppose it is obvious that if you’re going to create a total control grid and monitor everyone’s speech and behavior, and use AI to modify behavior on a society-wide scale, the social engineering won’t work on everyone so some people are going to have to disappear. And immigrants are so unpopular that the government has a chance to normalize – and get people to celebrate – this idea of people just disappearing and being hauled off to some secret prison. Doing a big fun publicity push with alligators is exactly what I would do if I wanted to normalize the idea of American black sites.

It’s all looking kinda dark, frankly.

The most frustrating part is just how well the social engineering campaigns already work. Granted, they are running into some issues getting people to go along with the whole antisemitism thing. Even a lot of right-wingers are very uncomfortable with the Trump administration’s push for these “hate speech” laws. But with Palantir AI surveillance grids or remote prisons with no due process, if you start asking really any right-winger about it, they’re going to call you an immigrant lover and start telling you that they don’t care if alligators eat the immigrants. If you follow-up with “okay, but can’t we just deport them instead of spending hundreds of millions of dollars to try to feed them to alligators?”, they will just get confused.

The answer as to “why not just deport them immediately?” is some garbled gibberish about courts. But with the way the Trump administration is steamrolling the complaints of judges about the way immigrants are being handled, the idea that they are really concerned about “asylum claims” and an infinite appeals process is not really believable. “We will feed them to alligators but if they survive they can live in this cage for decades and keep filing asylum appeals.” Further, all of those laws about asylum could just be changed. Trump is ramming the most expensive and unpopular bill in history through Congress, so the idea he can’t get rid of these idiotic asylum laws is dumb.

For the record, though I did not read the whole “Big Beautiful Bill,” my AI did, and the only change to asylum law the current version makes is that you have to pay $100 to apply for asylum. The fee, of course, can be waived if a judge says so. It appears very much like the goal here is to create a gigantic federal standing army in the form of ICE, that is able to round up immigrants and keep some fraction of a percentage of them in various cages rather than actually deport anyone back to their home country.

This is at the same time we are normalizing deploying the military onto the streets of American cities. I’m not pro-riot, and I’m not against sending the National Guard to deal with riots, but sending in the Marines? Does that really seem like something we want to be normalizing?

Sadly, like with everything else in a democracy, there isn’t anything you can do to change anything. But you should be aware that we are really not that far away from Palantir AI identifying you as an antisemite, and a private paramilitary group with no insignias on their gear throwing you in a van and flying you off to some secret prison. The Palantir control grid is really already here, they are in the process of combining all of these databases on you and using the AI to build profiles. So it’s just a matter of when they decide to start using it and for what purposes.

The way the deportation thing is currently being handled, which is by grabbing random people and doing so in a kind of public way (while also not doing any kind of relevant numbers, just to be clear), very much looks to me like it is designed to normalize scenes of people being randomly grabbed off the streets. If/when they start doing it to white Americans, “hey wait, isn’t that a white guy?” might go through someone’s head, but it isn’t going to matter. And most people won’t register that it is no longer just brown people who are getting picked up, after they’ve witnessed enough of these scenes.

You don’t have to be particularly creative to imagine a situation where ICE becomes Palantir’s NKVD.

I know this might sound a bit far-fetched. But all I’m doing is the only thing I ever do: I’m looking at the data, and doing my best to draw conclusions about what it means.

It’s also probably worth reminding people that if you simply made it a serious felony to hire or rent homes to illegal immigrants, and started putting the people who do that in prison (just normal prison, no need for alligators or any Looney Tunes shit), virtually all of the illegal immigrants would just leave.

It might also be worth reminding people that “illegal” immigrants have never caused even a fraction of the social, economic, and cultural damage that “legal” immigrants cause, and Trump is currently supporting moves to allow basically infinite numbers of “legal” immigrants.

It is very reasonable to suspect that maybe things are not exactly as they appear, and that maybe the government and media are not being perfectly frank with us about where all of this is headed.

]]> Memetic Monday: You Can Thank the Man Who Invented Memes for This https://dailystormer.in/memetic-monday-you-can-thank-the-man-who-invented-memes-for-this/ Tue, 01 Jul 2025 03:51:51 +0000 https://dailystormer.in/?p=687488

NOTE: DO NOT COMPLAIN ABOUT ME WRITING A SEMI-COHERENT RAMBLING ESSAY BEFORE THE MEMES. IF YOU DON’T WANT TO READ THE ESSAY, NIGGA, SCROLL DOWN. I’M NOT ASKING YOU TO READ THIS SHIT. I’M JUST PUTTING IT HERE IN CASE YOU WANT TO READ IT. THE MEMES ARE DOWN THERE AND IT WILL TAKE YOU LESS THAN ONE SECOND TO PUSH THE “PAGE DOWN” BUTTON TWICE OR I GUESS MAYBE THRICE.

I’m doing Memetic Monday. It’s probably going to be posted late. I was collecting the memes earlier, then I fell asleep at the desk, then I rolled onto the floor and the tile was really nice and cool so I slept there for some unclear number of hours.

As you know, I had stopped doing Memetic Monday. I’ve stopped doing most things related to the Daily Stormer. I still get up and work on my computer for six or ten hours a day most of the time. Some of the stuff you’ll never read. Maybe some of it you’ll read it and won’t know you read it. A lot of it no one will ever read because I think it sucks. I hope some of it you do read.

It seems important you should know this. I didn’t play Oblivion and I definitely didn’t play Expedition 33. I’m not like, hanging out. My work day is the same really as it always was. I’m just typing and trying to figure out the best way forward here.

As I’ve said, it is really fucked up to still be locked out. They let everyone else back in. I’m the only one still locked out. If you’re allowed on Twitter, you’re allowed in, that’s the way this works now. Like, if I was allowed on Twitter, I’d be able to have a Substack and publish more serious types of stuff there. And I’d be able to link this site. And I would be overwhelmingly influential, like I always am whenever I’m allowed in anywhere, allowed to be involved in anything on the internet.

I had never watched Once Upon a Time in Hollywood before. I don’t really know how I feel about the alternate history ending. I really didn’t see it coming. If Tex never killed Tate, would John Lennon still be alive? He’d only be 84. And I’d bet a whole lot of money he’d be talking about Jews. Not just “Zionists,” but “Jews, in general.” Anyway, the Leo midlife crisis arc was interesting, and kind of resonated in some way. But it really isn’t a parallel. I am at the top of my game. My game hasn’t even gotten started yet. I’m not passed my prime, I’m not becoming more useless.

I think if that was my situation, I’d be kinda okay with it. As long as I wasn’t broke (he wasn’t broke). I would just like, you know, chill. If I was passed my prime. But I could be writing shit better than anything I ever wrote before. Someone is going to say “well, quality on DS had dropped a lot before you partially retired,” and yeah, obviously I know that, but that’s because I’d stopped putting the effort in. I was doing other shit for money. Sometimes only working on the site for like an hour and a half a day. Because there was no growth model, no way to get back into the conversation where I can say something and people are compelled to respond.

Sorry, I just ate some weird Mexican rice and it feels like I’m having a heart attack. Sorry. Just hold on please.

Okay I think I’m good now.

Anyway, yeah, the midlife crisis thing could have been a ruse this whole time. It’s being out of the game that is killing me. For a minute there, when they were letting everyone back on, I had a little bit of hope. But kinda not really. Please boomer, don’t shake your head at the incomplete sentence before this one. I wrote it that way on purpose, you subhuman filth. They aren’t going to let me back on, ever, for the same reason that I was nuked off of the internet in a way that to this day, they’ve not come close to doing to a single other individual: it’s because if I have access, I can blow the whole fucking thing up. In 2017, before they shut me off, Daily Stormer traffic was almost doubling every month. I barely had a staff, and I was on a trajectory to being a top 20 global news site. These are facts anyone can go look up. I invented modern antisemitism and I made it very popular very quickly and if they would not have nuked me from orbit, everything in the world would be different right now. I’m the man. Go look at the current alternative media landscape, and try to come up with an estimate of how much of it was taken from me. When it comes to the things that matter, it’s basically all of it. Not just the antisemitism, but the misogyny, the racism, the nationalism, all of it.

NB4 “yes, Anglin, you’ve said this same thing like six million times in the last six months.” Yeah. I know. I know I’ve done that and I’m saying it again. I’m going to skip the part where I whine about money, because honestly, I did good with some meme coins, and I’ve got some ghostwriting jobs that pay pretty well right now. Don’t get me wrong, I’m still mad people don’t donate, and yeah probably if people were donating I would write a lot more. But I’m not whining about that again. Instead, I’m going to whine about what it seems to imply: I’m the only guy who actually even gives a shit. The people who copy my stuff make millions of dollars. And I look at the right-wing movement, and I don’t see anyone who is actually risking anything at all. People are cooperating with feds. I’m just going to tell you, basically everyone is cooperating with the feds. Some of them don’t even know it, which obviously makes them better than the ones who do know it. Then some of them are not stupid enough to get tied up in the fed shit, but will keep their talking points away from the most important things so the money keeps rolling in, and then they will justify their behavior.

I wrote something the other day like: “the human mind is a machine that creates justifications to protect the soul from being forced to look upon the immorality of the human’s behavior.” I think I maybe said it better last time. But the point is: there is no difference between Tucker Carlson refusing to talk about the Holocaust or the Talmud “because people aren’t ready to hear it” and a mother who drowns her children “because she loves them and wanted to protect them.” No one views himself as a bad person. Everyone has to be the hero of their own story or they’re just going to be depressed and useless and probably suicidal.

Every soul is good. Everyone was a baby at some point. And nothing about the soul changes. You have the same soul you had when you were conceived, and it is fundamentally good, so to protect that fundamentally good soul, the mind has to cover up the evil nature of evil behavior. Is it evil for Tucker Carlson (because he is our example) to not figure out a way to talk about the Holocaust and the Talmud? I actually think the answer is yes. Tucker is not an evil person, and he does a lot of good things, but he could be the man to really remind the masses of people what they knew for over a thousand years about the Jews, and forgot a hundred or so years ago, and choosing not to do that is an evil action.

Note: I know a lot of you are going to be asking if Jews are born with good souls, as I say all people are, and I have to confess that I honestly do not know. There is definitely a part of me that believes that Jews are actually not humans, but some kind of demonic race masquerading as humans. But then you have examples of Jews abandoning Jewishness, becoming Christians, and becoming good people. There aren’t that many examples of that. But there are examples. You also have the fact that a Jew can have reproductive sex with a non-Jew, and half-Jews are less prone to evil, while quarter Jews are (usually) just like normal people. I think it is possible that Jews do just have normal souls, but that they are so abused as children, systematically by their culture, that they become much more capable of evil. And this is combined with two thousand years of breeding for genetic character traits that make this process easier. Further, the Jewish religion is satanic, and Jews appear to engage in various practices designed to invite demonic possession. Anyway, “are Jews humans with souls or are they some kind of satanic demon creatures descended from angels who rebelled with Lucifer or something like that?” is an interesting question. The Bible, in Genesis 6, talks about “sons of God” (often interpreted to mean fallen angels) impregnating the “daughters of men” (normal human women) and creating some kind of new evil race of creatures, and it could be that’s what the Jews are. I would not be surprised.

But I also wouldn’t be surprised if they are humans who simply have genetics and traditions that make them more prone to being evil.

By the way, let me just put this one here:

Judaism is not “people who practice the religion of the Israelites in the way they did before Jesus came.” That is a lie and a stupid lie. That religion can’t be practiced anymore because the Romans – shoutout to my Romans – burned the Jew temple in the first century. Also, even if you didn’t know that, because you’re a boomer and you basically don’t know shit, why would you believe people were special for rejecting Christ? But it isn’t even about the religion for the Christian Zionists, it’s a bloodline thing, and that has all kinds of problems, because most of the decedents of the Abrahamic tribes became Christians (and later some of them Moslems). If it’s about a bloodline thing, we should really be sending infinity money and weapons to the Lebanese Christians, who, due to high levels of endogamy, have something like over a 90% genetic overlap with the people of the Old Testament.

Aside from the Mizrahi Jews (who are nowhere near as genetically similar to ancient Levantine peoples as Lebanese and Syrian Christians, having well over 50% Arab/Turkic DNA), the Jews of the state of Israel have only minor trace DNA connections to the people of the Old Testament.

This is without even mentioning the fact that Saint Paul said, explicitly, that the “Old Covenant” doesn’t exist anymore, and that the Jews are the enemies of all mankind, meaning that any form of Christian support for the State of Israel is a heresy.

During the Ted Cruz vs. Tucker Carlson debate, Ted didn’t know the verse, but knew that the Bible said that we should “bless Israel.” Tucker asked what he believed was meant by Israel, and he said that it’s the current political state of Israel. He explained it was because it’s the same word. But that would be like if I went down to the court and legally changed my name to “Jesus Christ” and then told Christians they have to worship me “because I am Jesus Christ.” And when people protested, I pulled out my driver’s license that said “Jesus Christ” on it.

I think if I did this then sent Ted Cruz like, $150,000, he would go on Fox News and talk about me and say “as a Christian, I was taught in Sunday school to worship Jesus Christ, and this man, a gentleman from Columbus, Ohio, is Jesus Christ. I have seen it on his driver’s license. Printed right there in black and white, as clear as day, that driver’s license says ‘Jesus Christ.’ And when I call him up on WhatsApp to worship him, he speaks to me, and guides me on the true path that he’s laid out for me, and that is why I’ve introduced this bill to abolish the age of consent.”

But wait.

This isn’t the topic today.

I mean, there probably should be a big article about this, going through:

  • It’s not the religion of the OT
  • It’s not the blood of the OT
  • The Old Covenant was literally abolished, explicitly, in the NT, so it doesn’t even matter anyway

Since we’re apparently back in Christian Zionism world with Donald Trump talking about how God is sending him messages to murder people, I guess we need to go through and explain this in some more detail? I guess? Is it even worth it? Can anyone dumb enough to believe this bullshit be convinced by Jewish religious history (as documented by the rabbis themselves along with the Romans), DNA records, and very plainly stated verses from the New Testament?

It feels sort of like writing an essay for my dog about why he shouldn’t eat his own shit. I don’t think the dog will read the essay, and if he does he won’t accept the conclusions, regardless of the sources I cite.

And basically, if you’ve seen these videos from Gaza and you can say with a straight face “this is what Jesus would want” you are so evil and retarded that there really isn’t anything I can do for you.

And anyway, in terms of “you know, I should write X thing…” – a lot of stuff doesn’t get done around here, frankly. You should see the schedule now that I don’t have the Stormer schedule. I’ve written between 20% and 85% of approximately 22 books.

What is the topic today? Wait, isn’t it supposed to be memes? Is this Meme Monday? What?

Just hold your horses.

What I was attempting to communicate was that while communicating what comes across as whining about how everyone copied my material and made millions and I can’t hardly make enough from donations to pay for the monthly website bills, what I’m really wanting to communicate is how difficult it is is to deal with the fact that no one gives a shit. Despite the poor finances of the site, I’m not personally broke, I’m good at gambling and I’ve got a decent side gig. What causes me to glitch out is that there is no one out there willing to actually take risks. When they unpersoned me, they said “let that serve as a warning to you,” and everyone heeded the warning. Not literally everyone, of course. There are some good guys on the internet, and I know a lot of you readers are good guys who would be willing to take the risk, you’re just not in a position to do so. But what it looks like is if you make someone comfortable, get them a couple milly so they can live it up, doing the right thing just doesn’t matter to them anymore.

I guess it’s like that thing Jesus said.

Everyone’s gotta get paid and I’ve never begrudged someone for it. I have begrudged Tucker Carlson for doing ad reads, even like, during that Ted Cruz interview. I think that was one of the most important interviews in modern American history, and I think Tucker has enough money.

He tweeted out an ad for a crypto gambling site underneath the interview and I also don’t think he should have done that.

Now he’s advertising a documentary about the Chinese mafia running drugs in America (which is true, Chinese criminals entered under Biden’s open borders policy). But the ad claims that the drug gangs are linked to “Chinese communism,” which is just a dirty fucking lie.

There is no Chinese mafia in China because crime is illegal in China and if Trump deported these drug dealers to China, and presented evidence of their crimes, they’d be executed by the “communist” government of China. Malaysia had a problem with Chinese drug gangs, and they requested China come deal with it. The Chinese sent special police and arrested all of the leaders then sent them back to China to face execution. The idea that the Chinese government is working with ethnic Chinese criminals in America is absolute bullshit, and I guarantee you that there will not be a single piece of evidence connecting any Chinese criminal operating in America to the Chinese government.

But hey, you know what? There is an ethnic mafia operating in this country which is doing a lot worse things than dealing drugs, and they are doing so with 100% backing of their home country. I don’t want to say the name of this ethnic group or their country, because that would be politically incorrect and could hurt someone’s feelings. However, this other ethnic group and their crimes, and the connection of criminals from this ethnic group operating in the United States with the full knowledge and with the cooperation of their country of origin, is who I would want to make a documentary about. I would think that would be a lot more helpful than more propaganda pushing for war with the Chinese.

I’ve singled out Tucker. I did it several times. I do it because I think he’s the one that might actually listen. And he’s the biggest. Joe Rogan might technically be bigger, but Tucker is more influential.

By the way, does anyone else think Joe Rogan looks like shit? That’s the real red pill, let me tell you. He is always talking about all of this health stuff, and a lot of it or most of it I agree with, but he just really does not look very good. I think a big part of it is the steroids, which I don’t totally understand the reasoning behind. I guess we’re supposed to believe that this “look” he has is in some way related to martial arts, but no martial artist takes that amount of steroids to get big useless arms. Honestly, I think with Joe you’ve got yet another sad case of a short guy thinking muscles will make him taller. It doesn’t work that way, guys. I wish it did. I might well be all geared up myself if it did. But it doesn’t. A woman will pick the 6’2″ skinny fat guy over the 5’5″ max roided guy every time, despite whatever redpill logic about how women are attracted to strength. Women aren’t and never were attracted to strength for its own sake, they were attracted to status, and women are hardwired to believe height is the ultimate male status marker. But Joe Rogan is rich and famous and has basically the highest possible status and even if he really is 5’3″ or whatever, he can have sex with any woman he wants. I’m pretty sure he’s also married with kids and makes a thing of his fidelity? He’s definitely never been accused of a sex scandal, and you’d definitely think he would have been.

The roids are doing something horrible to his face, I think. Making him look all puffy and leathery like. It’s really not a good look he’s got going. He doesn’t look healthy.

But I wouldn’t expect Joe Rogan to put anything on the line. He’s not a Christian, he believes humans are invented by aliens or we’re in a simulation or some other retarded weed shit. If I didn’t believe in God, I wouldn’t risk anything to do the right thing. Frankly, if I didn’t believe in God, I would act like Lenin or Pol Pot, and I don’t think there is anything wackier than “Jew atheists” like Sam Harris and the “Weinstein brothers” saying “even though God doesn’t exist we should all act like he does.” If I didn’t believe in God, there would be rape and murder and a lot worse, because it is just basic common sense that if you don’t believe in God, the only thing that matters is power. Full stop. Instead, every atheist is like, obsessed with signaling how moral they are because they love niggers so much. Weird, huh? Doesn’t make sense!

But just as I can’t imagine not believing in God and not going full Pol Pot, I can’t imagine believing in God and putting money and comfort before doing the right thing.

I could not imagine standing in front of Christ on his throne, with all of the Saints behind him, and being asked: “So, while the Jews were running America into the ground, doing abortion and trannies, financially looting the entire place, the whole thing, while also committing a genocide in Gaza and dragging Christians into wars for them, you had a couple mill to make a documentary, and you decided to do one about the Chinese? Instead of the Jews? And this is while you were well aware of various State Department plans to drum up a war with China. Can you go ahead and walk me through exactly what your thinking there was?”

I loath the reality I’m going to have to answer for all my sex sins. But I also know that like, pretty much all of us are going to be having to answer for those sorts of things. I’ll be answering for sex sins next to some very great men of God. And I’m going to be able to say “My Lord, I put it all on the line to try to stop these Jews, and you know what it cost me.”

Tucker Carlson is going to be a man who had a unique power to do immense good in the world, and while doing some good (he does do quite a bit of good), decided to push for a war with the Chinese instead of taking the Jews head-on, because one thing made a lot of money and the other could result in losing everything.

“There’s no reward without risk” is an eternal rule of the universe, and it will be true at the Final Judgement as well. Those who risked are going to be rewarded. Those who took the path of least resistance, which was also the path lined with gold, are not going to be rewarded.

The only thing I think about anymore is death and the life to come.

I don’t know what Tucker is thinking. I guess it just goes back to the whole thing about how the mind creates all of these justifications for you. I guess that’s all it is. But we do have free will and we do have choices and obviously, Tucker Carlson is reading this right now. The New York Times reported (with a named source) that he used me as a source for stories, and he never denied it.

Anyway, the reason I am writing all of this is that I promised to do memes today, and then I thought “I’d better write something with the memes.” I’m sorry if it was not much new. But I think I’m moving forward. And I think I’m gonna have a comeback. It might be another year or two. But assuming this one little health issue I have doesn’t become a bigger problem, I’m going to be around for a while, and I’m going to make a comeback. It’s what I pray for. When people ask me if there is anything they can pray for me, I tell them to ask God to let me serve Him by doing what I am best at.

All of the credit for the fact we are doing memes today goes, fittingly, to the man who invented memes, A. Wyatt Mann. He’s been a friend and a supporter for well over a decade, and recently he started posting stuff like this:

So I promised him I’d bring the memes back today.

For those who don’t recognize the name A. Wyatt Mann, he’s the guy who drew this:

Among many, many other important and influential characters. So it is literally not any kind of exaggeration to describe him as “the man who invented memes.”

There is still no more important meme than Le Happy Merchant (a name given by 4chan, by the way, not by Mr. Mann himself), and there is nothing I can think of that is more relevant, as we stand on the edge of war with Iran, than this:

He still makes memes and pretty much every week they would pop up in our Memetic Mondays. So that is the reference above to him fleeing the wreckage of Memetic Monday with his dank memes. Just in case someone somehow didn’t get that.

A few years ago, he did a now-classic digital collection of new merchant memes (many of which were based on edits of his original). For example:

One of the great honors of this life God has blessed me with has been being featured in some of his memes.

Also, I love the Merchant Anglin meme.

By the way, I think I’m the only non-politician to have been featured in art by both A. Wyatt Mann and Ben Garrison, the latter having produced art to help me promote my pro-pedophile activism.

Wait, no, Ben Garrison didn’t draw that. That is signed by someone named “Lewis C. Anon,” and, unfortunately, like most pro-pedophile memes, is not particularly good. I mean, for one thing, I’m as against thong flip-flops as I am against age of consent laws. I’m a slides man, til the day I die. I want that on my tombstone: “slides man.”

Ben did several memes to help me promote hate, bullying, Hitler, copyright infringement, impersonation, and killing.

It’s still technically Monday as I write, so I hope these memes upload fast, and it will be Monday when it’s posted.

Wait, wait, wait. I have to do something not funny. I need to say that Ben is – no, no, wait, that’s not the not funny thing. The not funny thing is that although I do identify as a pedophile activist, and support forced child marriage, I have not actually ever violated an age of consent law. Given my personal situation, I don’t violate any laws, ever. I don’t even do cocaine. I mean, not now that I’m scared to go to Brazil because they’ve gone insane with the hate speech stuff.

Can I post another scene from “Once Upon a Time…”? Is that allowed? Two scenes from the same “sort of kinda fun” film in one article?

(Honestly, the film is probably better than “sort of kinda fun,” I just frankly didn’t think it had enough feet in it to be considered “great.”)

He says to that bitch: “Prison tried to get me all my life, ain’t got me yet and the day it does, it won’t be because of you.” That’s what I’ve always said to any hooker that couldn’t show me an ID. Those exact words.

It’s funny prison has been trying to get me all my life for… jokes I made on the internet. So I guess that is going back to funniness, after having had to take this time to say something totally unfunny?

But I say it for the bros: they destroyed Cody Wilson, hero inventor of the 3D printed gun, on some trumped-up age of consent bullshit. This is like, the easiest way to get screwed by the feds. Most of us at this point know that if some neighbor comes over and asks you to saw the barrel of his shotgun because he lost his shotgun-shortening saw that you don’t do it, but young men are often powerless when it comes to pussy, so please, bros, be careful.

Anyway, to let the unfunny continue to flow, when they did up Cody, he actually did ask for an ID and she produced a fake one that the feds made for her (like, they used a real ID making machine to make a fake ID). So, seriously. If you’re out there doing activism type stuff (even if it’s an anon Twitter account that you kinda think or at least hope the feds don’t know is you), you really gotta assume that any girl who shows up in your orbit is part of some kind of plot against you.

Someday, the revolution will happen, and we will have forced child marriages to be consummated after first menstruation as God intended. But that day is not today. And while the “get the hell away from anyone who starts talking about violence” rule is well understood, the old-fashioned honey pot probably doesn’t get discussed enough. I think it’s likely, given the current dynamics, the feds are about to start a wave of shenanigans against right-wingers. I’ve published several guides on how to avoid such shenanigans in the past, though it might be time for an updated version. Although I’m somehow in an even worse position than I was in 2017 in terms of censorship, the landscape in general does include a lot more of the kind of speech Jews do not like, and it doesn’t really seem possible that this is going to be allowed to go on indefinitely without some kind of pushback.

It could be that there actually will be a serious war with Iran and they will just pass laws restricting speech. The US has done that during every major war in the past. This time, Palantir might just drone bomb you for posting a meme that hurts a Jew’s feelings (as you hear the drone screeching through the sky headed for your residence, that illegal “bald JD Vance” meme appears on all your devices). Or maybe there will be a big false flag. I don’t know. Regardless, they will be seeking to make examples of people. Speaking of making examples, Candace needs to be careful with her Harvey Weinstein thing, because if she accuses women who won in court of lying, that is a dream defamation lawsuit for Jew lawyers that they could turn into some kind of Alex Jones type situation.

Anyway, serious stuff is garbage and I hate it.

Hopefully the memes bring us back to Fun Land.

Re: Fun Land, here’s the Editor’s Pick of the Week:

And the Official Runner-Up:

Followed by: the primo collection.

Final Message/Warning:

I’m pushing “Publish” at 23:49. Monday.

Memetic Monday is back, and it is never late.

]]> How Can You Believe the “Nazi Holocaust” After Having Seen the Jewish Lies About October 7th? https://dailystormer.in/how-can-you-believe-the-nazi-holocaust-after-having-seen-the-jewish-lies-about-october-7th/ Sun, 29 Jun 2025 12:37:05 +0000 https://dailystormer.in/?p=687482
If you can’t trust his honest face, trust him because Hitler put his shoes in a big pile. And also, he’s god’s chosen, so why would he lie?

Massive lies were told about the events of October 7, 2023, and what Hamas allegedly did to the Jews, and this has led me to wonder how it is possible that people can continue to believe the lies that were told about what the Germans did to the Jews during World War II.

Let’s go through some of the big lies that Jews in the Israeli and US governments, as well as the US media, told about October 7th.

1) “40 Beheaded Babies”

Claim

On the day of the event, reports that appear to have originated from i24 News, as well as direct statements from Bibi Netanyahu’s office, claimed that Hamas “terrorists” beheaded 40 babies. (Note: Hamas does not actually fit the definition of terrorists, as there is such a thing as a legitimate resistance group that uses violence, and simply being Islamic doesn’t mean your group is “terrorist.”)

The claim was repeated not just by tabloids, but the likes of Fox News and CNN.

Debunking

In this case, the Israeli government itself later admitted that there was no evidence of 40 beheaded babies. The White House also walked back Joe Biden’s use of the claim.

There was no evidence, despite the fact that the site of the Hamas attack was filmed as much as any place ever, so there was no need for an official debunking. After reporters kept asking about evidence, the US and Israeli governments just admitted it was fake.

2) Mass Rape and Sexual Violence

Claim

The entire Israeli government organized to claim that during the October 7th raid, Hamas engaged in “systematic rape” and “sexual mutilation.”

This rape claim always seemed ridiculous on its face, as while Hamas was across the border for up to 6-7 hours, the actual operation was between 3-5 hours long. These people were in gun fights with the IDF, they were dodging airstrikes, they were taking hostages, all while navigating unfamiliar terrain (and often getting lost, as is seen in Hamas’ own videos and was admitted during interrogations). “Okay boys, let’s take a quick break for rape” always sounded very silly.

Furthermore, as the Jews and their media constantly repeat, Hamas is a strict Islamic group, and based on that, any soldier caught engaging in rape during a military operation would be executed on the spot. If they were doing “systematic rape,” they are not an Islamic group at all, but an irreligious bandit gang, and that is not a claim anyone is making. The media obviously relied on the lack of information the public has about Islamic law, knowing they would not be aware that rape during war is totally banned.

The Koran bans all rape, including of slave girls. Here are specific Hadith that mention sexual violence during war:

  • Hadith (Sunan Abu Dawud 2158): “The Messenger of Allah (ﷺ) prohibited taking women as captives solely for the purpose of sexual relations.”
  • Hadith (Sahih Muslim 3371): “Do not kill women, children, or the elderly, and do not commit treachery or rape.”

There is no serious Islamic group that allows rape during war. Even ISIS banned this. You’ll remember that all of the talk about sexual abuse by ISIS was around forced marriage (which is allowed in certain contexts in certain forms of Islam). And Hamas is a much more serious Islamic group than ISIS, which is a CIA- and Israel-backed terror group.

Debunking

An official UN investigation (UN Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights), which was (quite ridiculously) not released until March 2024 even though it could have been completed and released in a couple weeks, found no evidence of “widespread rape.”

Further, forensic experts from various international rights groups found nothing, while independent investigators from The Grayzone and Mondoweiss (both primarily Jewish outlets) found no evidence supporting the rape claims.

Finally, specific claims were later proven false. The Israeli government had claimed there existed a “Hamas rape manual” which was proved to be totally made up out of nothing.

3) Hamas Burned Families Alive, Purposefully Murdered Civilians

Claim

The entire media was claiming that Hamas “burned families alive” by setting their houses on fire. There was no evidence ever presented.

Debunking

An investigation by Israel publications +972 Magazine and Local Call found that most (not all, but most) civilian deaths in homes were due to Israeli helicopter fire.

Israeli helicopters (actually US helicopters supplied to Israel) also gunned down hostages on Hamas motorcycles, the investigation found.

The IDF later admitted to using the “Hannibal Directive,” which involves using heavy fire to prevent hostages from being taken, and allows for the death of Israelis. The preference, in the doctrine, is that a civilian die rather than be taken hostage.

4) Hamas “Targeted” a Music Festival

Claim

It was claimed that the Nova music festival was a specific target of Hamas and that they started mass executing people there.

Debunking

It was later shown that the music festival was coincidentally going on when Hamas attacked. Investigations by Jewish outlets (Yedioth Ahronoth, Haaretz) showed that many of the festival goers who died were not killed by Hamas (at least not on purpose in “executions”), but rather in crossfire in the fighting with the IDF, as well as by Israeli helicopter strikes.

5) Hamas Used Human Shields While Fighting from Civilian Homes

Claim

The Jewish state claimed Hamas fighters were hiding in the Kibbutzim and shooting from behind families, from inside of family homes.

Debunking

Testimonies from survivors published by The Electronic Intifada and Middle East Eye among others showed that the Hamas fighters were directly engaging in shootouts with the IDF, not hiding in civilian homes.

6) The Attack was Part of a Planned Genocide

Claim

Almost unbelievably, the Jews claimed that this small operation on October 7th was a plan to genocide all of the Jews, and that the goal of the attack was random killing.

Debunking

Leaked Israeli intelligence from +972 showed that the Israelis understood that Hamas expected a prisoner swap and had no goal of mass killing civilians.

Before October 7th, Israel was holding over 5,000 Palestinian hostages (since October 7th, that number has more than doubled), so it is pretty rational that Hamas would want to take their own hostages as a way to get back their own people through swaps, and this is in fact what Israeli intelligence said the purpose of the operation was.

When Did Jews Start Lying Like This Then?

Jews lie compulsively in order to make themselves out to be victims. Certainly, there were Jewish innocent victims on October 7th, as there are always victims in war, but the fact is, most of the innocents were killed by the Jews themselves, and the Hamas operation was a legitimate military operation.

It is shocking to me personally that the same people who will say the Jews lied about really everything they could possibly lie about with relation to October 7th are not willing to question the stories Jews tell about what supposedly happened to them during World War II.

My hope is that there is simply a delay on this, and at some point in the future, people will ask: “well, what else have the Jews been lying about?”

There has been, since the October 7 event and the subsequent genocide Israel began committing in Gaza, some interest in understanding the foundation of Israel. For example, the story of the Palestinian model Gigi Hadid’s family has come up a lot. Her father was a child at the time of the establishment of the state of Israel, when, following the war, Jews went to Palestine to claim refugee status. His family invited a family of Jew refugees from Europe into their home, and one day they returned home to find that the locks had been changed and the Jews who they had welcomed into their home yelled out the window that if they didn’t leave the premises, men would come and kill them. So they moved to a refugee camp in Syria.

Here’s a short video of Mohamed Hadid telling this story:

What happened to Hadid’s family happened to millions of Palestinians. It’s called the “Nakba,” and it is the story of the foundation of Israel, and it is great that more and more people are finding out that Israelis didn’t all of a sudden become genocidal barbarians after October 7th, but that in fact, the entire existence of their state is based on genocide and evil.

If we get back to the point where we are talking about the foundations of Israel, then it is just one step back to what happened to the Jews in Europe during World War II. We can learn why the Germans wanted to put them in camps, and what happened in those camps. I am not going to go through the whole “Holohoax” story here today, but a lot of Jews did die during the war, because it is a war that killed 70 million people. Jews died in the camps too, because the Allies bombed the supply lines to the camps which were in rural Poland, which led to disease and starvation. The Red Cross at the time estimated that 280,000 people died in these camps. Not six million. And none of them died in gas chambers or by any of the other Looney Tunes type methods Jews claim the Germans used against them.

Conclusion

It is my sincere hope that as the Jews come under more scrutiny for these lies they’ve told, as we unravel the history of the state of Israel, a state founded on ethnic cleansing, terrorism, banditry, and mass murder, we will continue to go back through the history of the Jews, and specifically to unravel this “Holocaust” myth, which currently serves as the foundation for the entirety of Western secular ideology, which has itself become the framework of what now passes as “Western civilization” itself.

Since I began writing on these issues nearly 15 years ago, I have argued that in order for the liberal order to fall, and for a righteous, Christian society to be restored in the West, the truth about the Jews and their lies must be confronted. The “Holocaust” is the biggest and most powerful lie of all, and if this falls apart, and I truly believe we are witnessing the beginnings of its collapse, everything will change.

Ultimately, the truth will out. In a thousand years, people are not going to be believing in “Nazi gas chambers,” I can promise you that. The real question is how many people have to die, how much human suffering has to take place, before this lie is exposed.

]]> New Culture War Front Erupts Over Handjobs https://dailystormer.in/new-culture-war-front-erupts-over-handjobs/ Thu, 26 Jun 2025 18:20:19 +0000 https://dailystormer.in/?p=687439

Earlier this month, a new major study on sexual dynamics in committed long-term relationships conducted by the Pew Research Institute was released and has shone light on just how little interest heterosexual American men have in receiving manual sex, commonly known as a “handjob,” from their significant other, opening up an aggressive new front on the culture wars.

A full 98% of heterosexual American men in committed relationships (either marriage or a civil partnership) polled in the wide-ranging survey said that they would prefer to watch black and white CCTV footage of raccoons raiding a dumpster behind a 7/11 than receive a handjob from their significant other. The results have stirred debate and in some cases outrage, with some claiming that “the handjob question” speaks to a core power dynamic between men and women in relationships, while others claim the opposite.

It was noted by researchers that the 2% who preferred a handjob to CCTV raccoon footage are in relationships with trans women.

While the rate of men who prefer raccoon videos to handjobs was shocking to some, perhaps even more disturbing is that a full 9% of men said that they would rather have “demonic cyborgs, like from the DOOM video game series,” shove poison-laced needles into their eyeballs than get a handjob from their partner.

“Many women do not want to have sex with their partner because they have a headache or they had a stressful day, and they will try to use a handjob as a way to satiate their partner without needing to provide him with vaginal sex,” said Harvard science professor and chair of Aboriginal Interactive Art Installations and Native American Escape Room Design Theory Leonard Berkowitz. “The fact is, manual sex can lead to ejaculation in the same way as vaginal sex, the semen will squirt out just the same, and therefore the stated male preference for vaginal or oral intercourse in place of manual sex demonstrates that even with all of the talk of progress, the average American male is still deeply sexist, and believes he should have a right to insert his penis into the vagina of his partner at will, ignoring the headaches and stress his female partner may be experiencing.”

However, many on the American right are framing this handjob issue in terms of the “woke” cultural discourse, with several popular figures on the right, including the president of the United States, claiming that men have a right to “smash the gash.”

During an interview with Rick “The Rattlesnake” O’Henry, the world’s most infamous bear wrestler, controversial podcast host Joe Rogan asked his guest if he’d been following what he called “handjobgate.”

“Have you seen this?” Rogan asked, and before waiting for an answer, continued: “they’re trying to say now that women get headaches all the time and don’t feel like having sex with their husbands so instead of having sex women should be able to just give them handjobs.”

Rogan asked his assistant Jamie to pull up the Pew study, and Jamie confirmed that 98% of men would prefer to watch the raccoon dumpster raid. Jamie then offered that the 2% who preferred the handjob were dating or married to trans women.

“Yeah, so, it’s not just swimming where trans have an advantage,” Rogan, who has been repeatedly accused of transphobia, noted. He went on: “maybe sometimes she does have a headache, and men can understand that, but if every single time the man wants to snuggle, the bitch is saying she’s got a headache and is acting like that pawn shop meme, saying ‘the best I can do is a handy,’ I think a man has a right to be upset about that.”

O’Henry seemed largely disinterested, but replied, “I can see that.”

“These are the same people who locked us down during Covid, then told everyone not to take ivermectin or they were a kook, despite the fact that ivermectin has been proven in clinical studies for decades to be effective against these same types of viruses and other countries prescribe it. And even if it didn’t help with Covid, it wasn’t going to hurt anything, it’s a totally safe drug. But they told people it was horse paste and you were a kook if you wanted to try it and Pfizer was the only one with the solution. That’s what the experts said. They said don’t even try anything else, just do what we tell you. And now we’re supposed to believe these same experts who are telling us that you can have a marriage with no sex, where your wife has a headache 24/7 and just gives you handjobs.”

O’Henry vaguely nodded in response.

“Man, they told us whatever crashed at Roswell was a weather balloon. They’re still saying that. To this day, the CIA will still claim that whatever that was, which every witness said looked like a flying saucer, was a weather balloon. Not even Trump can get all the JFK files released. In the Amazon jungle, there are fungal parasites that can take control of the brains of ants, take control of their entire bodies and force them to walk to a place where they can feed the mycelium’s host, and it’s like the woke media really is this kind of fungal mind virus, and people just go along with it, and no one wants to speak out because they’re afraid they’ll get destroyed. Shane Gillis, one of the funniest people, banned from SNL before he was even hired because of some bullshit throwaway joke on a podcast 15 years ago that some woke Karen decided could hurt someone’s feelings.”

O’Henry said nothing, perhaps hoping that the conversation would at some point steer back to his bear wrestling career.

“Even if a man is on estrogen, he spent his entire life developing his bone density and muscle mass as a male individual. And I don’t have any problem with how anyone wants to live their life. When I was back in LA before I moved here to Austin, greatest city in the world by the way, when I lived in LA I would sometimes run into Caitlyn Jenner. She is a great woman. Totally kind, very engaging, she will ask you questions about what is happening in your life and not just talk about herself, but you know what she says about trans women in women’s sports?” Without waiting for a response from the world’s most famous bear wrestler, Rogan answered his own question: “she says it’s not fair. She says give them their own league if they want to compete, because whatever your ideology is, it’s not right to have their male bodies competing with female bodies. Even Gavin Newsom is saying this now and acting like he was always saying it.”

Rogan then took a long drag off of what appeared to be a marijuana cigar, and continued: “so if it’s these people who are telling us ‘handjob, handjob, handjob,’ I just don’t know how anyone can take them seriously. The whole pro-handjob movement is just more woke nonsense. They are out there claiming people want to exterminate handjobs. Who is saying that?”

O’Henry appeared to struggle to try to force a laugh, clearly uncomfortable and not sure how or if he was supposed to be responding to these statements.

“You think it’s funny,” said Joe, “and I’m sure a lot of these women think it’s funny when their husband is trying to fuck and they’re rubbing his dickskin raw, but pretty soon AI is going to be so advanced that it is the one designing the robots. Have you seen the Optimus that Elon is working on? That guy is a legitimate fucking genius and he says that the AI is now doing the majority of the work on programming and designing, doing the design, for the physical humanoid robots. So AI is building itself, it’s building its own bodies in the form of these robots. So how long until the humanoid robots are going to have better pussies than any of these bitches out here? They will have nano-machines inside of their robot pussies. Just pure dick Heaven. Then men aren’t even going to be asking their wives for sex anymore, they’re just going to go to the laundry room and fuck the robot assistant. Am I right? I mean wouldn’t you rather fuck some magic nano pussy than get your dickskin rubbed raw by a handy?”

O’Henry struggled to answer, “that’s, you know, man, a lot of this stuff is scary, the technology…”

“Damn right it’s scary,” Rogan replied. “It is scary as fuck. Because forget about what is going to happen to your marriage when your wife finds you fucking the robot assistant because she just wanted to give you a handy and you wanted something to smash, but if that robot pussy has nanomachines inside of it, then it could be transferring data into your DNA while you are fucking it.” Joe then paused, apparently for dramatic effect. “I know Elon, he’s a good friend of mine, and he is making these robots, or I should say he’s making the AI that is making the robots because it’s doing most of the work now, and I don’t think he has any bad intentions, but he will tell you that this technology scares the fuck out of him, even though he’s the one making the money off of it, and he’s calling for Congress to regulate it. Because everything gets hacked, man. You look around this room, every piece of electronic equipment in this room is being hacked by someone. There’s some Russian or some Chinese hacking that headset you’re wearing right now, guaranteed. They’re hacking our phones, there was a story a while back where someone hacked a water fountain and made it spill over, flooded the building. So if you’ve got nanobots in a robot pussy, the Chinese can hack them and get into your DNA and make you start wanting to support a Chinese invasion of Taiwan or the social credit system. You go fuck that robot and then all of a sudden you start telling people ‘nothing happened at Tiananmen Square,’ and you don’t even know why you’re saying it, because it’s in your DNA.”

Also this week, Donald Trump took to Truth Social to write in all caps “SMASH THE GASH!”, a newly popular slogan which critics say is an argument in defense of rape.

After CNN’s Jake Tapper did a segment on the Trump “truth,” noting that “smash the gash” is a slogan used by radical campus pro-rape protesters who want all women raped and plan to exterminate handjobs, Trump called for CNN’s entire staff to be fired, which many fear is a direct attack on the Second Amendment.

Congress is now calling for special hearings to interview heads of top universities that are allowing “smash the gash” to be chanted on campuses across America. Defenders of the slogan claim that it is simply a slogan in defense of vaginal intercourse, and not a call to rape or a call to exterminate handjobs, and argue that the fact that pro-rape advocates use the slogan does not mean that everyone who chants “smash the gash” is pro-rape.

During an interview with CNN, a masked campus protester stationed at an encampment on Harvard’s campus supporting the movement said that “smash the gash” is a slogan with a long history that simply means vaginal sex has a right to exist. He also claimed that being pro-vaginal sex does not mean you are anti-handjob or that you are trying to exterminate handjobs. The protester also claimed that another slogan, “globalize gash smashing,” was not a call for a global mass rape or wiping out handjobs, but rather a rallying cry for people all over the world who support vaginal sex to come together in defense of “normal penetrative sex, something that all men have a right to.”

Later in the day, the “smash the gash” encampment was broken up by the National Guard and several students were reported injured. In a tearful statement, Harvard president Alan M. Garber said that while Harvard supports the rights of students to freedom of speech, calls to exterminate handjobs do not fall under the banner of freedom of speech. However, Garber is still being called before Congress to testify as to why it took over 27 minutes for the “smash the gash” protest to be broken up by the National Guard.

Towards the end of part 837 of a 1500-part podcast series about how French President Emmanuel Macron is married to his own father, popular African American female podcast host Candace Owens, who has been accused of “rabid anti-handjobism” by her former boss and male feminist Ben Shapiro, weighed in on the issue.

“Men should smash that gash,” Owens said. “And you know what, as a woman who loves her husband and understands he has sexual needs, even if I do have a headache, I’m not going to try to give him some uncomfortable and unsatisfying handjob. I don’t need to tell men this, but the skin on the penis is very soft and sensitive, and rubbing that with your hand can cause chaffing that can be painful for a man for days. So yes, even if I have a headache, I’m going to let my husband smash that gash, and that does not make me anti-handjob, and at this point, I don’t even care if people call me an anti-handjobite. I have a lot of friends who give their husbands handjobs and they agree with me that he should smash that gash, but if believing in smashing the gash makes me anti-handjob, then you know what, fine. I’m a radical vaginal-sexer who believes in exterminating handjobs. Whatever. I don’t care anymore. I’ll tell you who’s not smashing a gash and that is Emmanuel Macron, because his ‘wife’ doesn’t have a gash to smash and I challenge anyone to prove to me that Brigitte Macron has a gash.”

To pour fuel on the fire, 32-year-old contrarian Tomi Lahren appeared on Piers Morgan to scream about how men should be thankful for handjobs, and that demanding vaginal sex just demonstrates how “manosphere” activists are even more whiny and entitled than the feminists they oppose.

“It’s my body, my choice, and no man has any right to vaginal sex simply because I’m married to him,” Lahren claimed very aggressively. “I was taught to treat myself as a princess, and to insist that men do the same, and if the princess has a headache, you’re lucky to even get the handjob.”

Pushing back on Lahren’s aggressive claims, Morgan noted that he often gets angry responses from viewers when he has her on the show due to what he claims many view as her belligerence. He read what he claimed was a tweet from a user on X, formerly Twitter, about her last appearance on the show: “one viewer writes on X, ‘Tomi is much too old to be doing the entitled 19-year-old party girl bit. She is in her thirties and lives in a fantasy where all men should worship her. I have not masturbated to any of her news segments in over five years. No one who has seen the recent photos of her Christmas ham thighs is interested in smashing that gash in the first place. I also don’t like her feet.’ So, what do you say to that?”

“Piers, I have worked in media for 15 years and this is the most unprofessional thing I have ever seen a supposedly serious news host do. I do not have Christmas ham thighs, I am in very good shape, and all day long I get nothing but dick pics on my Instagram account, and I will tell you, there is no shortage of people asking for feet pics either. I am repulsed that you would say this kind of slander.” Lahren then demanded that the camera be moved to show her thighs and feet.

“No, no,” Piers replied, “we can’t do that with the camera, we’re just having a discussion here. But it’s not me that’s saying this, I’m simply reading something that someone wrote on X, which I think is a legitimate criticism. You seem to think very highly of yourself, and think that a lot of men owe you a lot of things, but you don’t really seem interested in self-reflection, so what I was hoping is that maybe we could get a little bit of self reflection.”

“Piers, if I want to reflect on myself, I can go read the replies on any Instagram post, where I promise you, there are a lot of men who want to smash this gash.”

“Okay, okay, well now, hold on, calm down. A lot of people might note that many or maybe all of those Instagram replies are from India, and not from Westerners where we are really having the debate over whether or not ‘smash the gash’ is really a call to exterminate handjobs.”

Lahren then began accusing Piers of racism, and the conversation degraded much further, proving just how toxic the discussion around gashes and handjobs has become.

Donald Trump apparently viewed the segment on Piers Morgan and commented on it with a “truth” on his Truth Social website.

In a highly surprising and unorthodox move, Ted Cruz agreed to sit down with Tucker Carlson for a two-hour unedited interview defending handjobs. At time of writing, the full interview has not been published, but Carlson released some clips which appear to show Cruz struggling to defend his pro-handjob position, and coming across as though he is opposed to vaginal sex entirely, and understands very little about mammalian reproduction generally.

In one of the clips, Cruz says: “Listen, I got married 25 years ago with the stated intention of getting handjobs. I’ve worked every day to do that. A lot of times I wish handjobs were much more effective. Like sometimes I don’t even ejaculate at all.”

Cruz claims the clip was taken out of context and we will get the full story when the interview is released tomorrow, but many have a hard time imagining what that statement could possibly mean.

This exchange was also released in clip form and is being viewed as equally confusing:

TUCKER CARLSON: Okay, so you get married because you want to have a family. How often do handjobs result in pregnancy by the way?

SENATOR TED CRUZ: I don’t know the specific number. No, I don’t know.

TUCKER CARLSON: You don’t know the number of pregnancies that are the result of handjobs?

SENATOR TED CRUZ: How many handjobs result in pregnancy?

TUCKER CARLSON: Zero.

SENATOR TED CRUZ: Okay, yeah.

TUCKER CARLSON: How could you not know that?

SENATOR TED CRUZ: I don’t sit around memorizing insemination tables.

TUCKER CARLSON: Well, it’s kind of relevant because you’re calling for women to have headaches every day and refuse their husbands vaginal sex.

SENATOR TED CRUZ: Why is it relevant? Whether it’s zero or one or two, why is it relevant?

TUCKER CARLSON: Because  you don’t know anything about insemination and yet your arguing for handjobs over vaginal intercourse.

SENATOR TED CRUZ: I didn’t say I don’t know anything about insemination.

TUCKER CARLSON: Okay. What’s the average size of an ejaculation load in milliliters?

SENATOR TED CRUZ: There are sperms, and it’s got potassium.

TUCKER CARLSON: Okay, you don’t know anything about semen. So…

SENATOR TED CRUZ: Okay. I am not the Tucker Carlson expert on blowing loads.

TUCKER CARLSON: You’re a senator who’s calling to arrest people for chanting “smash the gash.”

SENATOR TED CRUZ: You’re the one who doesn’t know anything about blowing loads. No, you don’t know anything about the semen. You’re the one who claims you should rape your wife if she has a headache.

TUCKER CARLSON: I’m not saying that.

It’s clear that the discussion about handjobs, vaginal sex, and the legality and meaning of the slogan “smash the gash” is far from over, and it appears that this debate may become a permanent fixture in American politics.

There are some in the middle of the road, who are hoping that Americans can come together “in the name of common sense” and find “common ground.” High level scientist and respected cultural commentator Eric Weinstein, for instance, released a statement saying: “There are extremists on the handjobber side and hardliners in the ‘smash the gash’ crowd. But we are all Americans and we all believe in ejaculation, and we need to turn down the temperature and come together to honor the rules of common sense and find consensus in some places and agree to disagree in other places. We cannot let handjobs and gash-smashing tear this country in two when we are facing such heavy threats from China in the AI race.”

Unfortunately for the country, which experts on both sides agree is in an AI race with the Chinese, but perhaps fortunately for the podcasters and social media personalities who make a living off of fomenting cultural tension, there is no reason to believe the temperature is going to be turned down on the handjob debate any time soon.

]]> Frankly, I’d be Fine If ICE Deported Me to Ireland https://dailystormer.in/frankly-id-be-fine-if-ice-deported-me-to-ireland/ Sun, 22 Jun 2025 09:16:08 +0000 https://dailystormer.in/?p=687408
The pipes are calling

I was watching a Theo Von interview with “Indian-American” Ro Khanna. He said some silly leftist nonsense, like that he’s going to teach blacks in the South to program AI. He promoted the “Chinese social credit score” hoax, which is exhaustingly stupid (and when it comes from an Indian, it seems racially motivated). But he said a lot of populist stuff, a lot of pro-internet stuff, and I was thinking, as I imagine most people would think: “this guy is alright.”

As part of my investigation of “alternative media,” I’ve also been watching Breaking Points, which features “Indian-American” Saagar Enjeti. No one is going to say that guy isn’t alright. You could put various caveats on that, I’m sure he says some dumb shit like most of these people do, but he’s totally alright.

So, as I do (most people don’t but I do), I’m thinking about them and I circled back to my long-held belief system that “all these people need to go back,” and asked if that was a nasty thing. Frankly, even if I thought it was nasty, I would continue to support everyone going back, but I wanted to ask myself: is it nasty to want to send back guys who were born here, who seem like alright dudes, on the basis of the fact that they have the incorrect genetics for this country? Or is it bad in some other way?

I’m not emotionally bothered by the ICE videos of children getting grabbed in parking lots, by the way. Just for the record. I think it’s really stupid to be grabbing kids when you don’t have the resources to grab all the adults, or even all of the criminals, because the optics are bad. But my view is that they all need to go back and I’ve seen the Democrats justify a genocide of children in Gaza so they’re not going to emotionally manipulate me with a kid getting thrown in a van because he’s “separated from his mother” for however long it takes to process them before they can go together back to Mexico. If I was running this, I would definitely deport the most sympathetic people (women and kids and non-criminals in general) last. Given that everyone is not being deported, and in fact only a tiny fraction of people are being deported, I think it’s insane to do these optics of screaming kids being thrown in vans, but it doesn’t bother me emotionally because I’m an adult and being separated from your mother for a few hours or a few days before you can meet back up in Mexico is not a big deal. Again, please compare that to bipartisan support for dropping 2,000-pound bombs on refugee camps filled with kids in Gaza. It’s not serious to make this “kids being briefly separated from their parents” thing into a big emotional fit, and it is frankly being done by the same people telling you to ignore the genocide in Gaza (note: specifically, I mean “the Jews”).

Much more than kids (who don’t even know the difference) being sent back, I would be concerned about one of the only Congressmen that is against the Gaza genocide and defends the internet or a guy who does okay podcasts being sent back.

So I ask myself: is this nasty or bad in some other way?

Again, even if it is nasty or bad, my strongly held belief is that America should be an overwhelmingly white country. But in order to understand your own beliefs, you have to be able to interrogate them yourself and allow others to interrogate them. That should be obvious. The core of my problem with the left and the “Ben Shapiro right” is that they won’t allow their beliefs to be interrogated. They just censor people or completely destroy their lives. I think my beliefs should be open to interrogation, and “is it nasty to deport some brown people who seem like cool dudes who aren’t doing anything wrong?” is a totally valid interrogation of my belief system.

But here’s the thing: it really isn’t nasty. All of the cool dudes, who you might think could provide something to America, would do very well in their own countries. Relatively, they will do better than they do here. Intelligent brown people will be more than fine back in their own countries. They’ll get money and pussy and whatever. They will be totally fine.

It’s actually a better argument that we should bring poor people here from all over the world to live on welfare because it’s sad that they’re poor. And that is a completely nonsensical argument. You can’t really even respond to it, it’s so dumb.

And come on. We’ve all seen the marbles video.

Sorry, it was gumballs. Not marbles.

Don’t let the kids eat gumballs, guys. Red 40, titanium dioxide, literal polyethylene. Come on, guys.

Anyway, yeah, solving global poverty through mass immigration is not something I think you could find any man arguing for. It’s a purely emotional argument for women. And yet, I think it actually is better than the argument that it’s wrong to deport middle class people who were born here.

Yes, I get that the ones born here are “legal,” but please go check on how much “the law” has an effect on American society. It’s irrelevant. This is not a society based on an ordered system of laws. We’re not living in China or some Islamic Sharia country. “The law” is just whatever. There is no reason you can’t just say that every person who came here after the (Jewish!) 1965 Hart-Celler Act is no longer a citizen. You can just say “it’s the law now that you’re not a citizen anymore and now you have to go back to India, lol.” You could also just say there’s a law that you have to be white or you’re not a citizen anymore. Laws can say whatever. There isn’t an ordered system here. We do not have a theocracy or some other objective metric to measure the validity of laws. We have “The Constitution,” which doesn’t even mean anything. This is a country where the government can 100% do whatever. So there is no point in babbling about legalisms. Literally no one cares about the Constitution unless they can use it for their own agenda. It’s like that atheism meme.

Except all sides do it to each other.

I’m not even insulting the Constitution in theory. I mean, I probably would insult it in theory. I believe in Jesus and don’t really care about goofy secular government gobbledygook. But I’m not insulting it in theory right now. Right now, I’m simply going to say that “the right to free association” is so fundamental to the Constitution, so deeply hardwired into it, that literally no one can claim the Constitution is in effect after “civil rights” were enacted as “law” in the US.

The only thing that you could say is nasty about any mass deportation program is if it is sadistic or cruel in some way. Unlike Trump’s “just grab whoever out of the parking lot lol” program (which in the absolute best case scenario, won’t even get rid of 2% of illegals, and Trump has endorsed more legals, who are actually much worse), a serious mass deportation program aimed at reestablishing a white America, which would necessarily target both “illegal” and “legal” immigrants (primarily the latter, as there are many more of them and they are a much larger existential threat) would give people timelines, deadlines, a process to apply for extended deadlines, and so on. You’d allow people to sell their property, and if they couldn’t sell it, pay them market value. You’d give them severance checks. You’d use American soft power to ensure their arrival in their home countries was nice. You’d be reasonable and friendly about the whole thing. You’d just make it clear: this isn’t about emotions, it’s not about hate or pity or anything else, this is a matter that we’ve decided on based on the desire to maintain a cohesive society where we preserve our genetic heritage, our racial identity, for future generations.

Some people would get violent, of course, but if you put it on a time frame and say you’re going to pay people and do a bunch of TikTok propaganda showing people loving returning to their home countries, you could avoid a lot of the violence and get a lot of people to leave voluntarily. Then for people who overstayed the deadline, you would have to systematically break down who to target in what order. Few are going to riot on the announcement of a five-year deadline for self-deportation.

Or you could just use Palantir’s government-controlled AI to take control of every electronic device in the country and blast Metallica’s “And Justice for All” while you unleash the police and military to just hunt down and kill anyone who isn’t white.

By the way, Metallica is on tour. Hetfield looks fantastic.

Along with thinking constantly about death and how you are a complete failure and everything you’ve ever done was trite and cheap and how you’re a complete asshole who should have treated people better and how death is just right there, looking at you, the other thing you do when you hit middle age is start looking at guys in their fifties and sixties and asking yourself if you’re going to be a Marlon Brando or a James Hetfield.

With Metallica doing so well in their sunset years, you could actually just pass a law that says they have to keep playing the entire “And Justice for All” album over and over again until every brown person in America is dead.

When Metallica is like “but it could take days for the military to kill all these niggers,” you would just have to be like “yeah, bro, I get it, but it’s the law, because of the Constitution. You just have to keep playing until they’re all dead. Then you actually have to keep playing for seventeen more hours as part of the celebration ceremony.”

So anyway, I was thinking: if ICE showed up at my door and was like “you and your family have to go back to Ireland,” what would I do?

I decided that I would:

  • Squint
  • Look down at the ground
  • Scratch my eyebrow
  • And then be like
  • “Alright”

Ireland is definitely poorer than America. It’s getting way shittier with the number of niggers from wherever flooding in. But in this scenario I’m forwarding, Ireland would also be deporting people (otherwise I would probably be disappointed about having to go back as in America there is more space and thus for the time being at least, more chance to avoid colorful people). It’s also a scenario in which I’m allowed to live in America, which isn’t the current situation.

Frankly, I’ve been out of America so long, and it’s now become so clear that I won’t ever be allowed back, that it is becoming more and more difficult to care. I don’t think the people who are there care very much. If they did, they would be… you know. They’d be doing something or other. I look at the unwillingness to actually address the Jewish problem, and see that the reason is that people don’t want to seem mean for not caring about a pile of shoes, and I’m like: why did I ever destroy my life to try to help save this country? I know why and I would do it again: I thought people would stand up with me. They didn’t. And they still aren’t. Tucker Carlson (et al.) won’t do an analysis of the Talmud. He knows the Talmud exists, he knows it says Mother Mary was a whore and that Jesus Christ was a wizard who is in hell boiling in a vat of feces, he knows it says all non-Jews are “goyim” animals, he knows there are hundreds of other verses that demonstrate that it is the Jewish tribe as a group that is responsible for the crisis of modernity, not a few bad apples. He knows the Holocaust is a hoax. Yet he says he’s not against Jews, just Israel. I’m sure his reasoning is “the people aren’t ready for it, they are still traumatized by the pile of shoes.” People can rationalize anything. But unlike Joe Rogan, who is a goofy dope who believes inter-dimensional aliens created humans so that humans would create AI, Tucker Carlson I think really does believe in God and Jesus Christ and could blow this whole thing up. But he won’t. He’ll post ExpressVPN ads on Twitter, but he won’t talk about the content of the Talmud. The human mind is a justification machine. It’s a machine that justifies our behavior against the protests of our souls.

To Tucker, and all of the rest of you (you’re all reading this, I know you all read this, everyone knows you all read this): the people are ready to hear an explanation as to what these Jews are up to. And if you don’t do it, no one else will. I can’t do it. And this is what is actually happening: the Jews are a satanic, alien group that murdered Our Jesus and then proceeded to spend 2,000 years attempting to kill or morally crush all of Christ’s followers. In the 20th century, they faked a genocide of themselves to justify a complete silencing of criticism in order to allow for a total takeover of every institution of power in the Western world in order to sadistically kill or destroy every human soul.

In order to be “against Israel but not the Jews,” you would have to believe the mass murder of children in Gaza is not related to the fact that OnlyFans, Tinder, and PornHub are all run by Jews. They’re not run by Israel.

The genocide in Gaza has pulled back the veil, it’s shown the world what the Jews are. And the people are ready to hear it. It’s now or never. There has never been a better time for saying this aloud, and the time to do it is running out. This whole Palantir thing is real, and it’s not “ten years down the line” you’re going to be locked into a biometric slave grid with every action tracked and individual and society-wide behavior directed by AI. It’s basically tomorrow.

The CEO of Palantir, Alex Karp, is of course the most Jewish person you’ve ever seen.

Millions are shocked he’s not a Chinese communist, given that he’s trying to do a social credit system against people. Right Tucker?

It’s just a coincidence. He’s a random individual, like the inventor of transgenderism and the purveyors of usury and the CEO of Pfizer are random individuals. It’s a funny thing about the Holocaust: in death, six million random individuals became Jews.

Interesting fact: although exactly six million Jews died in the Holocaust, the shoe pile only has 11.8 million shoes. This is due to the fact that some Jews were one-legged, and other Jews had one of their shoes stolen from them by a wily German when they were entering the death camp. Also, when mothers with infants came to Auschwitz, Germans would drown the babies in buckets. Right there in front of everyone. An organized military force, made up of Germans, running a concentration camp, would, right in front of everyone, take Jewish babies and drown them in buckets. True story.

Nearly ten years ago, I made this meme about it to create awareness:

I did that line-work by hand. It took me like twenty minutes. At least. I thought it was that important to bring attention to the fact that German Nazis would grab Jewish babies from their mothers and drown them in buckets. Still, to this day, few know that during the Holocaust, Germans would grab Jewish babies and drown them in buckets in front of their mothers.

Meanwhile, this is a coincidence:

Any religion could claim abortion is a core part of their value system. Only one does. But it’s just a coincidence that it’s Jews. No relationship at all with what is happening in Gaza, which is really just a crime by a government that just happens, by coincidence again, to be Jewish. It could be any state. Many states have gone on 18-month campaigns bombing refugee camps. Well, actually, no state has ever done anything even remotely like that, ever in human history, but any state could have, and it’s just a coincidence it’s the Jewish one.

Sigh.

It’s not just Tucker. Obviously. It’s everyone. It’s everyone but me and you, dearest reader and true parasocial friend. Everyone knows and everyone knows everyone else knows and everyone knows that everyone knows that the peasants don’t know. But the peasants would listen to their leaders. And if you’re the media, you are their leaders. That’s just the way the digital world works. The magic of electricity.

The reason I would do it all again is not that I’m retarded or a masochist, it’s because it was the right thing to do, and I actually believe in God and Judgement Day and all of this stuff. Like, I believe it as much as I believe I am right now sitting here typing on a computer and smoking a cigarette. I’ve done a lot of sinful things. I’ve done many mortal sins and I will probably do many more. And I know I am going to have to answer for those sins. I cry sometimes thinking about how Jesus Christ was tortured to death so I could get a blowjob (it’s a very funny statement but it’s true, I am not saying it as a joke). But I will tell you this: I sure as hell wouldn’t want to be the guy standing there before God trying to explain how I knew all about the Jews and had the ability to tell the entire world and yet somehow decided not to do so.

[Note to Editor: Rather than bothering you with a message, I’m just going to leave this here: keep the bullet points like that. You can delete this note. Or don’t delete it if you think it’s funnier not to. I’ll leave that to your discretion. It’s probably better to delete it when you edit, because this is off schedule, and you’re not going to edit this until like 4 hours after it’s up, so the people who saw it will be in on a public/secret joke that disappears forever. But it’s your call. I give you full authority to act as you see fit in this matter. UDPATE: Wait no, just leave it, because something goofy like this sort of softens the buzzkill ending of the article. Yeah, for sure, I retract your rights to personal choice in the matter. Just leave this entire note to editor here like this.]

]]> Global War is a Serious Matter and It Should be Discussed with Some Gravity https://dailystormer.in/global-war-is-a-serious-matter-and-it-should-be-discussed-with-some-gravity/ Mon, 16 Jun 2025 17:40:07 +0000 https://dailystormer.in/?p=687347

Stormy statements of former US intelligence officer about Israel’s irreparable failure; Is it time to end the threat of Israel?

Scott Ritter, former US intelligence officer: Israel’s ground entry into Gaza means more casualties and damage than Yom Kippur; Hezbollah’s missiles… pic.twitter.com/L3JKhcvaq2

— Sprinter Observer (@SprinterObserve) October 12, 2023

“Tel Aviv will be destroyed, their military headquarters will be flattened, the prime minister’s residence will be flattened, Israel will be flattened, its airfields flattened, that’s the future of Israel and there is nothing they can do to stop it.” -Scott Ritter on October 11th, 2023, explaining what his sources say would happen if Israel invaded Gaza. 

I wrote a thing yesterday noting that there is an entire group of internet commentators who have been making a lot of wrong predictions since the start of the Ukraine war. It is a group of people, and I said I wouldn’t name them, then I did name Scott Ritter (and Pepe Escobar).

I said “people probably associate me with these people,” and it is obvious why: in theory, I agree with them about every geopolitical issue. I have listened to Scott and read Pepe significantly, and I can’t think of any single matter of principle I have disagreed with them on. (I’m sure they are not quite as “racist” as I am, but that isn’t a geopolitical issue, and I don’t think it has ever even come up in anything I’ve read/listened to from either of them.)

If we went to the broader “movement” of these sorts of activists against the American empire, there would be varying levels of disagreement, perhaps. I completely disagree with John Mearsheimer’s views on China, and I’ve read every book that mentions China (frankly, his books do not really mention China very much) and tried to listen to most of his lectures on the topic. Although in general I agree with his worldview, on China, I completely disagree, and if you want to see where I disagree, you can watch one of several debates he’s had on the issue with Jeffrey Sachs. Sachs is another person I would put in the “agree with him on everything” category, for the record. But regardless of potential agreement or disagreement, Mearsheimer and Sachs, as counter examples to Ritter and Escobar, do not make constant predictions citing secret “sources.” People from various governments definitely talk to John and Jeff, but these men don’t ever use whatever discussions they have with government officials as sources for predictions (Sachs will mention discussions he’s had with world leaders, but he does so in the form of anecdote). There are many others I have read or listened to in both categories, “source user predictors” and analysts, but I think these four men provide a good picture of the different “wings” of the current alternative media commentary ecosystem, and they are also probably the most prominent from each group.

This current iteration of a movement of alternative geopolitical commentators emerged after the Russian invasion of the Ukraine. (Surely, the four mentioned, as well as several I am not mentioning, were around doing commentary before February of 2022, but I think it’s fair to say that that was the starting point of a new popular movement of alternative commentary focused on analyzing the “World War III” battle between the US-Jewish global order and those states intent on maintaining sovereignty in the face of an evil empire hellbent on solidifying global control.) Since this has started, I’ve done huge amounts of reading and podcast listening, and I have come to be very leery of anyone who talks about “my sources are telling me…” I recognize that “anonymous inside sources” is something that has been used in journalism for a long time with a varying, but certainly not great track record. Obviously during the Trump era, “insider sources say” has become a way for the New York Times to just make things up, totally shamelessly. That was also the case in the lead-up to the Iraq war. (To Ritter’s great credit, when he was working as a UN weapons inspector he was one of the loudest voices calling out the WMD scam. Though he knew that from inspecting, not from “his sources.”)

I don’t want to accuse Ritter or any of this crowd of consistently wrong “my sources are telling me…” people of lying. What is clear is that within this movement of anti-empire commentators, “my sources are telling me…” tends to almost always mean that whatever comes next is going to be wrong. It is possible that Ritter and the others are being fed disinformation from actual sources that are lying to them to make the anti-empire movement look ridiculous. But at some point, if your sources have been wrong this many times, you really have a responsibility to stop publishing things from these sources, whoever they are (and whether or not they actually exist), because it is unethical.

Some people were upset that I pointed out Ritter being wrong. And I understand the sentiment, because – one more time – I agree with him on all of the issues of principle. And it isn’t nice to look like you’re attacking people who are “on your own team.” Further, no one is right all the time. I have often stated “I’m right about everything,” and apparently some people don’t understand that there is a bit of self-deprecating humor there. I have been wrong, like everyone is sometimes, but I’m a whole lot more right than most people, and part of that is that as a rule, I don’t make bold, specific “predictions.” I don’t claim to have “insider sources” and I’m not a wizard, so all I can do is look at the available information, put it together, and come up with options for the most likely possible outcomes. Someone could make a list of the things I’ve analyzed and I’m 100% certain I can stand up to any other commentator and be shown to have a much better track record than virtually anyone. I actually can’t think of anyone with a better track record. Sometimes people will point out where I’ve been wrong, for example in suggesting Trump would likely end the Ukraine war in order to focus on helping Israel (which might still happen, I guess, though I didn’t expect him to escalate like he has, so I was definitely wrong on that). Of course I’m not right about everything. But I say: “point to anyone else in this political analysis game who is right more often than me,” and I’ve yet to be given a single name. (I think everyone is aware that many very prominent commentators have made careers off of copying my material while I’m locked in this censorship dungeon, and they didn’t do that because I’m wrong often wrong.)

Talking about myself is not a matter of pomposity nor a total digression. I want to explain what I view as the ethical way to comment on politics, which is to do your best to analyze based on data and theories about the way various actors act (both game theory and pattern recognition), and then say “this is what seems most likely.” While always hedging (because again – not a wizard, no crystal ball), I will very often insert caveats in my analyses. For example, I said that Trump would go to war with Iran in some form, that this was virtually a certainty, but then also added that the only way I can see this not happening is if Bibi is removed from power. I made that analysis based on the data and the way the actors involved behave. That is: “Trump is clearly beholden to Israel, but in terms of his view of himself and his legacy, he would prefer not to have a war with Iran. Bibi is obsessed with dragging the US into a war with Iran but has lost huge amounts of popularity in Israel and in the Jewish diaspora due primarily to his failure to defeat Hamas and/or get the hostages back. The US is committed to joining any war Israel starts, meaning as long as he is in power, Bibi is able to dictate whether or not Trump is forced to go to war with Iran, but if Bibi were removed from power, it’s very possible that whoever replaced him would be significantly less extreme and therefore would not drag the US into a war with Iran.”

That’s the analysis I did probably 14 months ago, as soon as it became clear Trump was going to win (which I was also right about and won significant money betting on), and I think the analysis has held up pretty well. We saw the Bibi-Trump rift spill into the public, and now we’ve seen Bibi move to start the war, to force Iran to strike back and cause the US to enter the war. At time of writing, the US hasn’t entered the war, but all it would take would be for the Israelis to blow up some random US military installation in Iraq (or even do some more extreme “false flag” in the West itself) and say Iran did it and all of a sudden, the US is joining Israel in the bombing, and moving even more troops to the region. I think trying to analyze how the war will play out is very difficult, so I don’t really want to speculate too strongly (this is another thing I do, which is responsible: recognize the limits of the ability to analyze a dynamic situation – both due to limitations in my own abilities and due to the fact that some situations are simply too complex for anyone to untangle). But allow me to say what I feel comfortable saying on the matter, which will primarily just be an organization of various facts I find relevant.

We have already passed the point of no return with Israel attacking Iran’s oil fields. So, there will be some kind of “regime change,” and that might be impossible from the air. However, I would note that what Israel’s war in Gaza has shown is that the American people and Westerners in general will tolerate infinite slaughter of civilian populations, which is something that wouldn’t have been tolerated by anyone 20 years ago. (Also remember Colon [sic] Powell had to go to the UN and explain that they had an actual reason for attacking Iraq? Though it was a scam, there was an actual process, whereas now everything is just “gahhhhhahahahahahaha, die, die, die!” Further, compare the reaction to the Abu Gharib torture photos to the reaction or lack thereof to many videos of Israelis torturing Palestinians, which have included sodomy. Western ethics have changed a lot in the last 20 years.) Because of the “absolute tolerance of mass civilian slaughter because we don’t have a choice because Jews are the chosen ones and Hitler put their shoes in a pile” attitude of the West in the current year, a lot of damage is possible from the air. Iran is a big country, but the US has a lot of bombs. Meanwhile, it is difficult to imagine a full-on Iraq style US invasion, but this model of using social media to recruit Sunni jihadis from all over the world and then enabling their entry to the country, and arming them to the teeth, worked pretty well in Syria. There is still an army of terrorists in Syria and parts of Iraq that they can just roll over to Iran. Further, Azerbaijan will allow terrorists from the various Stans to fly into Baku and cross into Iran. Remember, during the Syrian war, Turkey was just letting these people come in on commercial flights and then helping them across the border.

Then, of course, there are also the minority ethnic groups in Iran, which include some Kurds, which are as a race (this is literally true) another separate US-backed terrorist group already armed to the teeth. Only 60% of Iran is Persian. I don’t know the ins and outs of how well these various groups get along, but it’s been pretty well demonstrated that any time there is a war in the Middle East, more or less every ethnic minority group has members that will accept weapons from the US and commit terrorism and atrocities against the majority ethnic group.

So while I wouldn’t say US “boots on the ground” is impossible, and it could even be inevitable depending on how prepared Iran is for the post-state phase of the war, it is certainly unlikely in the short term. This is going to be a long war, and the Iranian government is probably going to hang around for a bit. It’s really after the Iranian state is destroyed that things get complicated. Militias are a lot harder to fight than governments.

The wildcard, which is something I find interesting, is that the Iranians have been expecting a US invasion for 20 years. The Persians are a relatively high IQ population, and so they appear to have acted rationally, setting up groups of militias which are designed to act without direction from a central government. And of course, we’ve seen that the drones can do a lot of damage, and one would expect that China and Russia would be providing support in terms of drones. What is unlikely and borders on impossible (though is not technically impossible) is that Russia will send troops like they did to the Syrian war. Probably, any deal that Trump might or might not make with the Russians to end the Ukraine war would include an agreement that they not send troops to Iran. And I don’t think they would do it anyway after what happened in Syria (a debacle that apparently happened in part due to ridiculous mismanagement of the Syrian warlords by the Iranians).

So, that’s how I analyze things. (See what I did there? I gave an analysis of a current event while demonstrating the methodology of the analysis at the same time. See that? It was exceedingly clever. It’s not quite noon, but I think I might just pour myself a drink in honor of my own cleverness.)

Needless to say, Iran is not going to destroy Israel, as was consistently claimed by Scott Ritter.

I suppose we should go back to Scott Ritter. I feel a little bit bad about this, because I don’t have anything personal against the guy and I don’t like to be viewed as “attacking” others on the woke right (unless I know or strongly suspect they’re working with the Jews/feds, which unfortunately includes half of the internet right-wing). It’s especially sad given that there are so many others online doing the same “my sources are telling me…” thing, and Scott actually was raided by the FBI for like, supporting Russia or whatever, and also hit with some trumped-up jailbait swindles that actually got him thrown in prison. No wonder he joined up with Russia, where tourism advertisements say “Come to Russia, where jailbait is sort of a legal gray area, but we’re not actually going to prosecute you unless you’re a pervert.”

But Scott is probably the most popular, so I’ve gone ahead and run the transcripts of a bunch of his podcast interviews through an AI, and here’s an abridged list of predictions he’s made (it was too hard to figure out how to note which ones included “my sources are telling me…” and which ones he just said without any claim of a basis).

🚨 Highly Abridged List of Scott Ritter’s Wrong Predictions (2021–2024) 🚨

🌍 Russia-Ukraine War

  • Feb 2022: “Russia will take Kiev in 72 hours.”
  • March 2022: “Odessa will fall within a week.”
  • April 2022: “Ukraine’s military will collapse by summer.”
  • Sept 2022: “Ukraine’s Kharkov counteroffensive is a trap—Russia will encircle them.”
  • Nov 2022: “Kherson will never be retaken by Ukraine.”
  • June 2023: “Ukraine’s counteroffensive will cause their military to collapse.”
  • Dec 2023: “Russia will win the war by early 2024.”

☢ NATO & Nuclear Threats

  • 2022: “NATO will fracture over Ukraine aid.” (Finland and Sweden joined after he said this)
  • 2023: “Poland will leave NATO due to Ukraine tensions.”
  • 2024: “The U.S. will cut all military aid to Ukraine by mid-2024.”

🇮🇱 Israel-Iran & Middle East

  • Oct 2023: “Israel won’t invade Gaza—they don’t have the capability.”
  • April 2024: “If Israel strikes Iran, Iran will destroy Israeli military bases and decapitate its leadership.”
  • June 2024: “Iran’s air defenses will shut down Israeli airstrikes.”

🇨🇳 China

  • 2023: “China will invade Taiwan by 2024.”

🤡 Bonus: Miscellaneous Nonsense

  • 2022: “The West will abandon Ukraine by winter.”
  • 2023: “Russia will nuke Kiev if NATO sends tanks.”
  • 2024: “Ukraine’s government will flee to Lvov by summer.”

In the spirit of fairness, I went through the things he was right about, and it made him look even worse. Every time he was right, it was either late (ten wrong timelines on the liberation of Bakmut), exaggerated (Iran responding to Israeli attack), or just coincidental (just like Alex Jones, he makes so many predictions, some of them are eventually bound to be right just by the nature of chance).

Why We Shouldn’t be Goofy and Ridiculous

There is some question about whether it could actually be helpful to the anti-empire agenda for Ritter and his compatriots to just go around making all these wild predictions, “fighting lies with lies,” as it builds up momentum. What’s more, he keeps getting invited onto RT and is actually a paid contributor to RT, so at first glance, that implies “The Kremlin” likes what he’s doing. But “The Kremlin” doesn’t really run RT, Margarita Simonyan does, and her instinct is towards BuzzFeed type clickbait-mongering. Frankly, though RT does some great stuff, I don’t think there is enough oversight when it comes to some of the silly people they bring on. So I don’t think that Ritter being on RT necessarily means his “my sources are telling me…” bit is viewed positively by the Russian state. I think they just like pro-Russian Westerners, and many of us (like myself) are a bit too hot, and Ritter has the credential of having been the UN weapons inspector who tried to stop the Iraq war.

To be clear, I am not against “cheerleading.” I think we should cheerlead Russia, Palestine, all of the people fighting against the global gay Jewish-American empire. I am one such cheerleader. I always support anyone fighting against these people. Remember my Niger banners? Real ones remember.

Click to enlarge (these were kind of funny, though the context is lost to time.)

But I wasn’t saying “my sources are telling me Niger is going to invade New York and tear down that feminist statue on Wall Street.”

What the “my sources are telling me…” predictor crowd does is give people hopium dopamine hits. We all like imagining things like Tel Aviv being bombed into oblivion. I like imagining fighting the White Walkers with Jon Snow as well. Fantasy is fun and it has its place, but that place is not in geopolitical commentary, and it is especially not alongside people like John Mearsheimer and Jeffrey Sachs who are doing broad-spectrum adult analysis of these situations and actually helping people understand how the system works. Yet, on virtually every single podcast that John and Jeff appear on, you’ve also got Scott (and, increasingly, Pepe Escobar) saying this really silly stuff, Valuable information and serious voices are being tainted by unseriousness.

There are ways to be sensationalistic without promoting disinformation. I did it for a long time. I used facts and serious analysis and wrapped it around outrageous vulgarity and max lulz. I get that this model doesn’t really work in most contexts. But it was obviously effective, as I am the most banned person ever. Point being: you can find other ways to draw attention to yourself and create hype and interest that don’t totally discredit you and everyone around you. I think this is what the comedy podcasters are doing. I listen to this fat Irish slob, I think his name is Finn O’Shaughnessy, and he does an excellent job of creating hype and dopamine while keeping it real.

Fake predictions are a cheap way to gain clicks, it discredits legitimate criticism of US/NATO/Israel, and it makes everyone dumber. I am against it.

I understand things are tough out there and Scott Ritter needs to get paid. There are not many jobs available to men who have been done up twice for jailbait. I really am not doing this out of mean-spiritedness, but rather a genuine concern for the alternative media ecosystem and something that I see as kind of a big problem. Many people actually believe this stuff and it must be totally demoralizing at this point

P.S.

I also think this “Axis of Resistance” thing is really gay. These countries should be called “Brick Squad” or “Council of Doom” or something else cool like that.

P.P.S.

Let’s just hope Scott Ritter doesn’t drop a diss track on me.

]]> Guys, I Wouldn’t Troll You Into Thinking I’d Killed Myself https://dailystormer.in/guys-i-wouldnt-troll-you-into-thinking-id-killed-myself/ Wed, 11 Jun 2025 14:35:26 +0000 https://dailystormer.in/?p=687313

Firstly, if I was going to kill myself, I would do it in some epic style that no one would ever forget. Probably, I would use a gun in a famous place. If I didn’t have a gun, I’d do like, a quadruple backflip from the 99th floor cocktail bar. Something along those lines.

Nextly, I wouldn’t kill myself, for a number of reasons. I’ve become psychopathically religious, for one. For another, it would be giving a win to Dave Portnoy. The fact that Dave Portnoy (and every other Jew, each of which is exactly like Dave Portnoy) exists actually makes me want to become involved in the transhumanist movement and live forever so no Jew can ever celebrate my death.

Nextly, I honestly wouldn’t want to hurt anyone’s feelings. People shouldn’t give a shit about me, but I understand that people do. And I’ve never wanted to hurt anyone’s feelings, and faking a suicide is a really nasty thing to do.

As a side, I once had a very funny joke about how I had a brain tumor. This was very hilarious. In fact, it might have been a little bit too hilarious, if you catch my drift. It’s so hilarious that there could be times when I need to take time off writing just to laugh about it.

Frankly, I did not expect that one somberish post would lead to widespread rumors of my demise. I didn’t realize everyone was expecting me to kill myself.

I used to be really worried about giving any impression of being depressed or whatever because the Jews could assassinate me and make it look like a suicide. I don’t really care about that anymore, given that, due to AI, it would be so easy to kill me and make it look like I was still alive. So at this point, it doesn’t really bother me to say that no, I’m not having a great time. Again, I wouldn’t ever kill myself regardless, but in terms of posting whiny emo bullshit, yes, that could happen again.

Of course, it’s stupid to talk about not having a good time, because things are tough all over, and everyone has a responsibility to keep their shit together, while no one is ever going to be able to understand what anyone else is going through. So in general, I have a “chin up” philosophy about these things, and think everyone else should have the same. You don’t have any idea what is going on in my head, I don’t have any idea what is going on in your head, the same is true for all of the people on the earth, and we all have the same responsibility to be normal and take responsibility for our own lives. Some people appear to have easier lives than others, but I don’t have any evidence of that. Rich, famous, attractive people kill themselves regularly, probably at a higher rate than ugly poor randos. I’m also not even sure that killing yourself proves anything about your mental state other than that you were sick of whatever it is was going on and didn’t want to deal with it anymore, which could mean a lot of different things.

So I don’t want to whine about my feelings. At the same time, I have been so open about myself and what is going on in my head for so long, I might as well just say what I’ve got going on in my head, especially in light of large numbers of people thinking I killed myself. It’s also worth talking about as it is almost entirely professional in nature. I have my personal and family problems like everyone has, I suppose, but I’ve largely relied on a technique to just block that all out (or at least “black it out,” if you catch my drift), and monomaniacally focus on my agenda.

The agenda is stagnant. As I’ve said, all of this politics stuff bores me. The Donald Trump news situation just feels like endless torture. Like, I already wrote all of this stuff. Now he’s literally going to Palantir you all like a bunch of Palestinians and James Bowman is going to tell Theo Von (with a highly askew face) that it’s about like, illegal immigrants not paying enough taxes.

I’m like, “yo, Bowman – on my list of concerns, ‘a biometric control grid where every action every person takes is entered into a database that is funneled into an AI system used to program society and its individual members like a video game’ is a lot higher than ‘wetbacks not giving enough money to the “defense of Israel and free things for niggers and fat people” fund’.”

Apparently, opinions differ on this issue. The thing is, illegal immigrants are not actually going to be paying more taxes because you submitted to an AI control grid designed to micro-manage every aspect of society. So even if you were willing to give up not only all of your freedoms, but your basic ability to exist as a human being in a society in order to get Mexicans to give more money to the Big Beautiful Bill, you still shouldn’t make that deal, because the people trying to make that deal with you are not honest people and they don’t actually care if Mexicans pay taxes.

I suppose I should have started by explaining what Palantir is doing with the Trump administration? But why should I start with that? Shouldn’t people already know that? And if they don’t know it, or if they do, does it really matter? Anyway, basically all of that shit I spent two years writing about – how they were going to use Covid to create a system of biometric monitoring that uses all of the CCTV cameras, your phone, and everything else designed to track you, to monitor all of your behavior, and put it into a massive AI simulation that then allows them to program the behavior of society – turned out to not occur at that time because the selfsame AI simulation system showed that people were going to revolt against it. Now, they’re doing the same thing, and saying it’s about illegal immigrants and Mexican rioters in LA and Islamic extremists and whatever other thing right-wing people supposedly care about. Left-wing people would for the most part support a biometric control grid run by AI because left-wing people will support literally anything if you tell them it is going to create a utopia. But now they have this angle to get right-wing people on-board.

But hey, it’s all just whatever. Because no one really gives a shit. Honestly, I don’t even give a shit. No one else does, so why should I?

Anyway, most retards are not aware of this fact, but all of that “social credit” stuff that the Chinese started to do 15 years ago was totally rolled back and most of it was made illegal under new privacy laws that Xi’s government put through. You can look that up, or not, I don’t really care. You can believe whatever stupid bullshit you want, it’s not my fucking problem. But the reason China decided that using extreme surveillance and combining it with social engineering was a bad idea was not that they are just really moral or whatever, it’s that it was determined to be cancerous for society, and given that the Chinese government is the one running the surveillance and the law enforcement and the prisons, there was no incentive to create social chaos by implementing a dystopian control grid. In America, it’s not just Palantir that has an incentive to implement a control grid, but the private police contractors and weapons suppliers for the police, the private prisons, the NGO groups that support nonwhite crime, and on and on and on forever. Everyone gets rich off of a dystopian control grid.

The claim with China was apparently “they just want to control everyone for no specific reason or maybe they are evil (after all, just look at the shape of their eyes).” This is obviously retarded, and as soon as it became clear that these types of social engineering programs don’t work and will ultimately collapse society, the Chinese stopped virtually all of it. The “social credit system” as it exists now is almost exclusively related to corporations committing various crimes (pollution or scams or whatever). For individuals, it is totally related to financial ratings, similar (though frankly much less extreme and abusive) than the American “credit score.” The only place where there is anything like a Western-style social control grid in China is among the Uyghurs, and you can go read and see if you think that’s reasonable or not. (Virtually all of what the US says China does to the Uyghurs is a lie, of course, but yeah, they are pretty heavily monitored by the government. Again, just go read about it and see if you think that makes sense or if it is done for reasons of pure evil and communism.)

But whereas “China just wants to control everyone to be nasty” is clearly ridiculous to any adult person, the reasons the US and the West generally want to do it are obvious by simply looking at the profit motive. It’s not complicated. Not confusing. It’s not “transparent” in the sense that the media covers it, but it is definitely “transparent” in the general sense of the word. You can just go look up the amount of money all of these companies (Palantir probably now the biggest but by no means the only one) can make off of a control grid.

But here’s what’s scarier than the financial incentive: they also want to control what you think and feel, and they are talking openly about using this biometric AI monitoring and behavior modification grid to modify beliefs. If we go back to China, the government’s goal in terms of social engineering is simply social harmony. In terms of beliefs, they want pro-social beliefs generally, but the only belief they are actually going to try to modify is your belief about the government itself. In general, they try to do that by having the government be a positive entity that people naturally have good views of. But maybe they try to get people to think different things using whatever methods, I don’t know, you can believe that if you want, I certainly can’t prove they don’t do that, I can just say there isn’t any evidence of it. Whatever. I don’t care what you think about China. I’m bringing this up to make the point: how many beliefs do the ruling elite of the United States want to modify and control? It’s a list too long to list, but just look at the Jewish issue.

Now, look at the distance between the current public beliefs on Jews and Israel and the goals for public beliefs on Jews and Israel that a company like Palantir would have.

Now, watch that James Bowman clip again where he’s sweating like Ganesh in a hot spring explaining that he doesn’t really even know much about Palantir or the Trump Administration’s plan for a biometric control grid that uses AI to record and modify all human behavior.

Now, imagine me trying to explain this to people and thinking that me trying to explain this to people is going to do anything good for me or anyone else.

We are so, so far gone.

The only solution to the American situation is a total societal collapse, similar to that of the USSR. Period. There is no other angle here.

The upside is that the more people who think like us that we have in positions of power when the collapse comes, the better. But that’s pretty much the only positive message I’m able to think of.

I might publish a long essay/short book about “freedom” and use the comparison of China and the United States as a means to elaborate on what exactly it is we have going on here. The issue is this control grid and the ability that AI is going to have to manipulate the behavior of hundreds of millions of people. That is the primary issue. And it feels generally ridiculous to talk about it, because most people are incapable of understanding it and if they are capable of understanding it they don’t want to understand it because it is so unpleasant to think about and if they are both capable of and willing to understand it, there is nothing they can do about it, because we live in a democracy where you have no ability to influence government policy and your freedom of speech is dependent on the same corporations building the control grid giving you a right to speak.

So it’s all frustrating.

And I do really thank you all for reading my site and I especially thank those who have donated (which you can still do, by the way). And I am genuinely sorry I didn’t do more and I really feel like I could have done more.

That’s all I meant by the thing.

Suicide note?

Bro, if I write a suicide note, you’re going to know it. And it’s going to say a lot of things which will be very angry and hilarious.

But I’m not going to write a suicide note because I’m not going to kill myself. Well, I might write an “If I was Going to Write a Suicide Note” fake suicide note, like that time OJ Simpson wrote a book about how he would have killed his wife if he had done it.

OJ was totally innocent of course, but he should have killed that nigger-fucking whore Nicole and her Jew. Just so, I’m totally innocent of suicide, but I should kill myself because this shit is all so gay and retarded.

P.S.

See something? Say something.

Please help me to take a stand against fed trolls who are claiming this picture was Photoshopped:

That picture is 100% real and unedited, and that is my bedroom.

Feds are all over the internet trying to discredit me by claiming that is Photoshopped, and I would really appreciate it if when you see a fed making this claim, you fight back against him by telling the TRUTH.

I understand you can’t all afford to donate, but it costs nothing to tell a fed kike troll that this photo is 100% real and that is my bedroom where I live and work.

]]> Cowardly Drug Addict and Gamer Fraud Musk Deletes “Trump Epstein Files” Tweet https://dailystormer.in/cowardly-drug-addict-and-gamer-fraud-musk-deletes-trump-epstein-files-tweet/ Sat, 07 Jun 2025 21:49:49 +0000 https://dailystormer.in/?p=687300

Saying Trump was in the Epstein files was an obvious lie. We all know what kind of women Trump is into. His taste is… not similar to Epstein’s. Trump has an entire list of sex scandals, and none of them were with women under 25, I don’t even know if any of them were under 30, so he wouldn’t be doing it for fun.

Most people weren’t doing it for fun, of course (with the single confirmed exception I’m aware of being Prince Andrew). Most of these people went to Epstein Island to have themselves filmed with underage girls so that the Mossad had blackmail on them, which meant they could get massive career advancements. I don’t know how many people actually get that point, despite how obvious it is: if you want advancement in this system, which is totally corrupt and based exclusively on nepotism, the only real way of getting that advancement is to give blackmail material to the Mossad or some other group of powerful Jews.

Trump never had any reason to do that. He was already rich. And further, if that existed, he would not be bucking Bibi Netanyahu in the way he has been recently. (Whether that bucking goes anywhere – and I don’t think it will, frankly – is irrelevant, because if Bibi had the tapes, he would just do whatever Bibi wants, in the way literally everyone else in the US government does. And before “you use ‘literally’ too liberally, okay, so let’s exclude Thomas Massie, whose wife died mysteriously, and Marjorie Taylor Greene, who is a woman, and I guess Matt Gaetz, who actually went public when the Mossad was trying to wrap him up in a blackmail scandal.)

To believe Trump was in the Epstein files, you would have to not understand that the whole thing was about blackmail, not sex. Or it just wouldn’t make any sense. Elon was just on drugs, as usual, and thought he could manipulate QAnon people into siding with him against Trump, apparently as part of a plan to get some number of GOP Congressmen and Senators to side with Democrats and impeach Trump and replace him with Vance. Even if 100% of QAnon boomers believed the Epstein hoax, the plan would be completely retarded, because getting the Senate to vote for impeachment is virtually impossible, and certainly couldn’t be done now.

Maybe Elon will invent some new strategy. But that seems unlikely. He can manipulate the Twitter algorithm to make a significant portion of online Republicans hate Trump. He could probably also manipulate Fox News to make offline Republicans hate Trump. If I were Trump, I’d be pretty concerned about Elon doing this, and would have made a pretty big effort to keep him on sides.

But, if Trump is playing 5D chess, or 2D chess, or like, Guess Who?, he can easily ask: what does turning a bunch of Republicans against Trump actually accomplish in terms of Elon’s long game?

Obviously, Elon’s long game is to create conditions in America where there is enough money laying around to fund his stupid child’s dream of colonizing Mars. That’s why he’s obsessed with the budget. I mean, there are other reasons to be concerned about the budget, but that’s Elon’s thing. I mean, figure it out, but I think it’s goofy to talk about people having secret agendas when there isn’t even any proof (most people are actually pretty frank about their agendas; even if they don’t talk about them in public all the time, they publish stuff about them). And “go to live on Mars” is Elon’s stated agenda, it’s on all of his shirts, and he says that’s why America needs a balanced budget, and he markets it as an important way to… stop the Chinese people from eating all the pangolins or whatever. Oh, and Pop Mart is going to completely decimate the American toy industry. If we don’t beat them to Mars.

The Democrats obviously aren’t going to even entertain “fiscal responsibility.”

They also have a less than enthusiastic view of space travel.

You all remember this one, right?

No, you don’t. No one remembers that. I mean, even the people who were alive when the Jews were spamming it don’t remember it. I only know about it because boomers cite it as the primary symbol of the way blacks are holding back civilization. Because boomers don’t want to talk about Jews and think that black lives matter is an organic movement and that it would be literally impossible to just send the cops to tell blacks they have to stop whining and get jobs. Boomers can’t explain how blacks were literally slaves for hundreds of years. They just say all of a sudden blacks somehow got a bunch of political power (something they previously hadn’t ever even thought about) and then when they got that power they used it to prevent space travel. So they use that song as an example of how blacks are holding us back from stabbing up the guts of Dejah Thoris. Because boomers also only ever think about “getting lucky” with “hot chicks” when they aren’t thinking about how blacks took over.

Though to be fair, it’s hard to think about Dejah Thoris without thinking about sex.

I just don’t understand why they’re thinking about her in the first place.

Although I am not a whiny nigger, my interest in space travel is about the same as the whiny nigger in the above spoken word piece no one remembers. Whenever I hear an adult talking about an interest in space travel, I immediately peg him as a child in a man’s body, and I am always right. Serious adults are not interested in space travel. That is, they are not interested in it beyond the great body of science fiction works we all love. When someone talks about space travel as something that could or should happen in real life, coming at me with something like “so how long do you think it will take us to get a habitable colony on Mars?” is not different to me than if a man asks “so why didn’t the king send surgeons and scientists instead of horsemen to put Humpty Dumpty back together?”

If you ask a young American male about space travel, he’s going to say something like: “Nigger, I can’t even get a woman to have sex with me. I live with my parents. I can’t even afford a last gen video card. Is there easy pussy and free video cards on Mars? Because if there’s not, please don’t ever talk to me again.”

This isn’t a serious agenda. But it is Musk’s agenda. For whatever reason. He also wants to put computer chips in people’s brains for some reason, presumably to turn them into mindless drones who stop thinking about sex and video games and instead develop a psychopathic obsession with going to Mars (where there is literally nothing but useless rocks).

But, insofar as anyone is going to go along with a space travel agenda, it is going to be war-obsessed boomer dickheads who think the Chinese are going to race them to Mars and then… keep all of the useless rocks for themselves?

“The communist Chinese government has just announced that it is keeping all of the useless rocks on Mars and will not be sharing them with anyone out of fear that the rocks could be used for homosexual purposes” sounds like a nightmare that Marco Rubio might have. So this is literally Musk’s only demographic, beyond his own tech people (who in general, seem more concerned about implanting everyone with brain chips than with invading outer space).

All of this is to say: Elon’s primary objective should be going along with whatever economic growth plan Donald Trump has, regardless of what it does to the national budget, because this is better than nothing, and more importantly, it is the only path to getting his real man, JD Vance, into office.

I think Elon also wants to become some kind of King of America. Again, I don’t want to chase secret agendas, but there is a lot of circumstantial evidence that he has this kind of dream. Certainly, he’s said he wants to be dictator of Mars, and if America is the engine he wants to use to get to Mars, it would make sense to become dictator of America first. Vance’s centrist populism and clear submissiveness (blackmail driven, we’d have to assume) to Silicon Valley and Elon in particular again implies Vance is the man for Elon’s plan.

Who knows what happens next. I don’t make predictions. But if I had to guess, I’d guess we’re going to see total deescalation and some kind of coming back together on some informal level. I think Trump and his people are clever enough to have gamed this out, which is why Trump hasn’t gone nuclear, as he normally would have. He knew Elon was likely to eventually realize he doesn’t have the cards to win, but at the same time he didn’t want Elon dumping the cards he does have (i.e., using Twitter and his wealth to cause Trump very serious problems).

Note that this is a really unique Trump feud. Trump usually goes totally nuclear on anyone over anything, and this time he let Elon go nuclear while saying “well, I guess he’s doing that, maybe he’s mad about some subsidies, I don’t really know, but okay.” Because Trump knew the only thing Elon could do was make a big mess, and didn’t want to pressure him into that, when he knew that when some of the drugs wore off, Elon would realize making a mess doesn’t help him any more than it hurts Trump.

But, I don’t know. I don’t really care. I don’t really see any good outcomes here.

I don’t even know why I bothered typing this. I’m not even supposed to be working on this site. I have all these books in the pipe. Imagine if I finish them all at once and just release like 12 books on one day. There are about 12 of them that are 85% done.

But here I am.

I just can’t take all the bad takes.

I’d hoped I’d put out enough good takes over the years that I’d trained all the people who copied my takes to do their own takes in my style. Instead, all the people who copied my takes are spouting gibberish, most of which doesn’t even make sense, the rest of which is obviously wrong.

There’s only one guy with takes that matter, and he’s a fat Irish retard who claims to eat gay ass. I forget his name. I think it’s “Charlie O’Hannigan.” But he’s the smartest guy on the internet and he’s got great taste in sunglasses, but he’s also Irish, fat, and gay – in that order.

(I haven’t watched this yet, but I would imagine I agree with it. I denounce anything I don’t agree with.)

Sam Hyde too. But is he really even Irish? He’s definitely not gay.

Gotten pretty fat though, frankly.

]]>