You probably remember Lauren Chen. She’s an attractive hapa from YouTube who made videos against feminism or whatever. I don’t watch videos made by women, but I was aware of her. She’s popular.

She may be getting indicted by the Department of Justice for being a Russian spy.

An unsealed indictment the DoJ released this week claimed that RT was funding her company, Tenet Media. Allegedly, they gave her $10 million, and the company never registered under the Foreign Agent Registration Act (FARA), which made this an illegal spying operation, according to the feds.

Tenet was not named in the indictment, but it was easy to figure out who they were talking about.

Thus far, only people from RT have been indicted – or rather, only their indictments have been unsealed – but it seems obvious that Chen and her husband are going to also be indicted as Russian spies.

WIRED has an article going through the details that the government is giving.

Here is Jewish Attorney General Merrick “Garland” Garfinkel laying out his case:

AG Merrick Garland unveils a series of targeted actions against Russia’s election interference efforts, saying Putin’s “inner circle” directed companies to “promote disinformation … as part of a program to influence the 2024 U.S. presidential election.” https://t.co/PzYR4zN3vI pic.twitter.com/KTfDB21om8

— ABC News Politics (@ABCPolitics) September 4, 2024

Tenet hired Tim Pool, Benny Johnson, Dave Rubin, and others. Allegedly, 90% of their income was coming from the Russians, and the DoJ has evidence that they knew where the money was coming from, even though there were some attempts to disguise it.

At one point, they were waiting on their money, and they googled “time in Russia,” apparently to see if the Russians were awake yet. That’s a weird piece of proof, but I guess it is proof.

YouTube has now removed the channels of the company. They also deleted Chen’s personal channel, which has videos going back to long before she is accused of being involved with Russia. Mind you, she has yet to be charged, let alone convicted of anything.

Tim Pool is denouncing the whole thing, trying to keep from getting thrown under the bus.

Pool has made tens of millions of dollars, mostly completely unrelated to Chen’s Russian shill operation, but I wouldn’t be surprised if the DoJ freezes all his accounts and moves to shut him down.

Frankly, the stated allegations appear to be true. It’s unlikely that it was all made up whole-cloth. I don’t know that I believe it’s Russians, but someone gave Chen a bunch of money.

If it was actually Russians, I will defend this Russian shilling. There is a really easy basis on which to defend these Russian shills: “But what about Israel??”

Ben Shapiro, Dennis Prager, and virtually the entire US Congress are paid agents of Israel, working on Israel’s behalf, and none of them are registered as foreign agents because there is a narrative that whatever is good for Israel is good for the United States. There is no basis for that narrative, and I could just as easily claim that whatever is good for Russia is good for the United States. In fact, I do claim that, constantly, basically every day.

What’s more, the US is super hypocritical for whining about Russia paying Americans to influence American policy, given that the US does this literally everywhere in the world. They don’t even have to pay people, because they’ve devised a system where their own social media companies – pretending to be “private companies” – go all over the world and influence politics. Further, the US was funding a gay-anal-vaginism website called “Meduza” in Russia, which was very popular, and Russia didn’t shut it down until the war started. They labeled it a “foreign agent” and then let it continue to operate.

You cannot totally stop foreign countries from using the internet. FARA is a law that existed before the internet – it was passed in 1938 – and was not really in use until they started charging people from the Trump Administration with it. Remember that the US has started riots in Georgia against that country’s attempt to pass a FARA of their own.

Here’s an article from the Council on Foreign Relations claiming that forcing foreign agents to register is a Russian conspiracy, and that requiring foreign agents to register destroys democracy.

Furthermore: Tenet Media was founded nearly three years ago, in January of 2022. From the way the reporting on this story sounds, the company was started with Russian money, and that would mean that the DoJ knew about it from the start. You can’t really keep this sort of thing secret. Maybe you could keep the communications sort of secret (though probably not), but you definitely can’t keep ten million dollars going into a US bank account secret. So they knew about this, and are just now announcing it before the election. Apparently, they want to prove, yet again, that Russia supports Donald Trump.

We’re all the way back to 2016, and the “Russian interference” gibberish.

Hilariously – I think this is hilarious – Putin has endorsed Kamala Harris, citing her “infectious laughter.”

Putin never says anything that isn’t sarcastic. That’s his style and certainly, aside from his competence, one of the main reasons he’s so popular in Russia. Russians would rather hear things from the government stated in the form of hardened sarcasm, rather than earnestly.

In reality, even though Donald Trump is more or less useless, Russia probably would prefer him, as there is at least a chance he will end the Ukraine war. There is a chance Kamala would as well, because this has all gotten extremely expensive, and there is no stated goal of the operation. But, all things considered, Trump is more likely to slow or stop the flow of armaments to the Ukraine, if for no other reason than that he wants to send everything to Israel (and maybe the Philippines, we don’t really know what his thinking is on that, because this current election doesn’t have anything to do with issues).

That said, Chen was telling people not to vote for Trump. This is from just a couple weeks ago:

Furthermore, Tenet was not making a lot of videos supporting Russia. Most of these videos were the same slop about “culture war” and “politics” that we are all too familiar with. And they were not even getting significant views.

Most right-wingers are already against the Ukraine war, so there wasn’t really any reason for Russia to pay them to do that.

There is a possibility that this is all some kind of hoax – that feds went to Chen and paid her $10 million while pretending to be Russians.

I can tell you as a matter of fact that I’ve never gotten any money from Russia or (which would probably be more likely) China. It seems like if they were going to offer anyone money, it would be me. I’m the top shill, and I’m also the most influential. That’s a fact. I might only get 25 million views a month, but everyone copies my material. That’s very well-established. All popular right-wing content producers who are not total Israel shills copy my stuff, so I am the prime candidate for an influence operation. I’m also very good with secure communications, and I don’t even live in the United States. And yet, I’ve never once been approached.

This is anecdotal – sort of – but the fact no one has ever asked me to shill for them makes me wonder if this is even a real thing. Russia already has RT, which is very popular globally (even after it was kicked off of YouTube), and again, the fact of the matter is, most right-wingers naturally support the Russian position. Hiring people through some shady scheme in order to promote the idea that the Ukraine war is bad or that Trump is better than Kamala is sort of a ridiculous plot.

So, while the current evidence presented by the DoJ does seem to indicate there was a bunch of money coming from somewhere – which sort of has to be true, given the amounts they were paying people (they paid Dave Rubin $400,000 per month) for content that was not hardly getting any views, it might make more sense that this is some kind of false flag operation.

It ultimately can’t be proven either way. However, media is suggesting that Chen might not actually be charged. If that is the case, I think it’s safe to say the whole thing was completely fake. Right now, they’ve only indicted Russians who are outside of their jurisdiction and who they know they will never arrest, so they can just accuse them of anything. But if they were to take Chen to court, she would have a bunch of lawyers, and they would be able to do discovery and figure out more details about where exactly the money was coming from.

If Chen really was knowingly taking money from Russians in order to “undermine our sacred democracy,” then there is no reason not to charge her, unless the whole thing is fake. Frankly, the fact that they didn’t announce charges against her at the same time they announced the charges against the Russians says a lot.

The feds pretending to be Russians and giving a bunch of money to random YouTubers and then coming out two months before the election and saying there’s a big Russian scam against our democracy, in my opinion, makes more sense than an actual Russian plot to tell YouTubers to talk about things they were already talking about.

I’m doing the rest of the $500/hr phone calls.

I’ve already begun today.

If you’ve already paid or were trying to pay, I will get to you shortly.

For everyone else: it’s going to be a lot more expensive next time, because this is way too many calls. I love you all and everyone has been very interesting to talk to, but it’s too many calls. I know I seem like an asshole saying “I don’t have time to talk to people for $500/hr.” But it is what it is.

I might change it to $500/20 min.

Anyway, you’re all my good friends and I love you all.

Never forget: parasocial friendships are REAL friendships.

Everyone just relax.

It’s all going to be fine.

By the way, I made this meme like 10 years ago and it’s still going around:

Pretty cool, huh?

I sure think so.

I think a lot of stuff is cool.

There is a narrative that goes: “things were not actually better when you were younger, it was just better because you were young.”

This is a ridiculous narrative.

Firstly, my life was not better when I was young. It’s much better now. So that does not work on me.

“Things” in a general sense, however, were much better when I was younger.

You did not have child trannies when I was a boy. There were many fewer immigrants. You did not have mass internet censorship. You didn’t have cellphone addiction. People were not nearly as fat. The food was better. Buildings were nicer. Films were not all comic book CGI trash. And you could go on forever. These are objective measures. Things were simply better, generally. It’s a factual matter.

I remember when it was illegal to be gay. I remember the movement to legalize it, which was a big boomer cause, because they said “it’s none of the government’s business what people do in their own bedrooms.” That is the way boomers think: everything is some kind of mantra, really a slogan. “A woman has a right to choose,” “I just think they should come here legally,” “we fight them over there so we don’t have to fight them over here.” Everything is an advertisement. Their political, cultural, and religious beliefs are the result of mass-marketing campaigns.

When I was born, it was illegal to be gay, and now at middle age, we are looking at a situation where it will soon be illegal to be normal. There are in fact many ways in which heterosexual male sexuality has already been outlawed, as a result of feminist and homosexual marketing campaigns which the boomers could not resist.

It’s not just millennials that had it better when they were young. The boomers had it better than their millennial children. At the time, the Silent Generation parents of the boomers were talking about how things were better when they were young, before all of the sex and drugs.

But I think that’s as far back as it goes. Before that, in the early 1900s, people expected that their children would have a better life than they did.

Things are not necessarily destined to keep getting worse and worse until the entire universe is just a sadistic homosexual child mutilation festival. Things could get better, just like they got worse. There is no reason to lose hope.

The elections are fake and everything is gay and retarded, but nothing lasts forever.

Just hang in there, friends.

We’re going to make it through this.

Chin up.

Everything is great today.

Thanks for asking.

I hope everything is great for you as well, my dear friend.

I’m going to finish the calls of anyone who wants to talk to me on the app starting Wednesday and then going through next week. Just text me on that app or if you already did and I didn’t reply just wait. I’m going to do all of that.

I’m going to do everything.

Everything is going to be great, my friends.

The new era of SUNSHINE has only just begun.

Editor’s Pick of the Week:

Runner-Up:

The Primo Collection:

The situation in the South China Sea is heating up as the Jews in Washington push to open a new front in their global war.

For those who haven’t been following the story: basically, in April, the Philippines, under direction from the United States, stationed a Philippine Coast Guard ship in Chinese territory and now runs “supply missions” that they use as an opportunity to attack Chinese vessels.

Now, the US is saying that they want to get involved and start attacking Chinese ships in order to “protect Philippine sovereignty.”

The whole thing was obviously set up as a confrontation point between the US and China as the US continues to use the Philippines as a Ukraine-style pawn for their own global war ambitions.

The Philippines has zero chance of winning a war against the Chinese. This is exactly the same thing as the Ukraine, where a third country is being used as a battering ram to start a regional conflict.

It’s a really bizarre move, to just park a ship in the reef and then claim you have to bring them food so you have to keep moving ships and helicopters in and out of the reef. They’re apparently trying to claim the ship has some kind of malfunction and can’t leave.

China Daily:

China is committed to properly managing differences through dialogue and consultations, but its “tolerance does have a limit”, a Chinese Defense Ministry spokesman said on Thursday regarding the Philippines’ recent provocations in China’s Xianbin Reef in the South China Sea.

The spokesman, Senior Colonel Wu Qian, made the remarks at a news conference in Beijing, criticizing the Southeast Asian country’s efforts to seek long-term existence in the uninhabited reef by illegally anchoring a vessel there.

In April, Philippine coast guard ship No 9701 entered the lagoon of Xianbin Reef and has been anchored there since.

Chinese authorities closely monitored and managed an illegal resupply mission by a Philippine H-145 helicopter on Wednesday near the Xianbin Reef, China Coast Guard spokesman Gan Yu said late on Thursday.

Gan said the helicopter had attempted to deliver supplies to a Philippine coast guard vessel unlawfully stationed in the area. He warned that this risky maneuver by the Philippines could result in unforeseen maritime and aerial incidents.

He noted that the Philippines had recently tried and failed to resupply the No 9701 ship using watercraft such as coast guard ships, government vessels and fishing boats.

The spokesman said that the No 9701 ship is operational and capable of leaving independently. But the Philippines has chosen to endanger the crew’s health and safety, using “humanitarianism” as a pretext for reckless rights violations.

A spokesperson for the Armed Forces of the Philippines said that the maneuvers by the Chinese undermined the safety of the Philippine crew members and violated international law, according to media reports.

Wu, the defense ministry spokesman, rebutted the claims, saying that China has indisputable sovereignty over Nansha Islands, including Xianbin Reef, and its adjacent waters.

The Philippine ship’s intrusion has seriously violated China’s sovereignty, breached international law and the stipulations of the Declaration on the Conduct of Parties in the South China Sea, and undermined regional peace and stability, Wu said.

“The Chinese side firmly opposes those activities and has lodged solemn representations multiple times”, said Wu, stressing that the Philippines’ attempt to seek a permanent presence at Xianbin Reef is akin to opening a “Pandora’s box” and has drawn strong opposition from regional countries.

…

The spokesman also responded to recent comments by United States officials claiming that a Mutual Defense Treaty between the Philippines and the US applies to armed attacks on Philippine armed forces, public vessels or aircraft anywhere in the South China Sea.

Wu said that no country is able to surpass the US in stirring up trouble or disrupting peace and stability in the South China Sea.

“It is the US’ support and endorsement that have emboldened the Philippine side in making reckless provocations time and again,” Wu noted.

He said that intimidating China with the Mutual Defense Treaty will never work.

“On the contrary, it will only result in stronger indignation and greater morale among the Chinese people,” he stressed.

This is literally all the US does: they go around the world stirring up trouble.

Seriously, name one place where the US has brought peace in recent memory. The only thing they ever do is make problems. They go around the world making problems for everyone, then they claim to be the victim of the entire world, claiming that they were only trying to help gays and remember the Holocaust.

With the war the US started in the Ukraine, they at least had some kind of narrative, where the Ukraine was a victim. It would be impossible for anyone to believe that narrative unless they were retarded, but they had some kind of narrative. Now, with this war the US is doing in Palestine, there isn’t even a narrative and they are just saying “yeah, well, we’re killing all the babies and if you try to stop us, we’ll kill you.”

When you ask them why they are killing all the babies in Palestine, they will again start talking about gay rights and the Holocaust.

Normal people are shocked when they hear that the US is slaughtering homophobic toddlers. But it’s such a wild claim that no one can even respond to it. They are left with their jaws open, sputtering.

Third Front

Russia is the first front of the global war for anal sex and the Holocaust. Gaza is the second front. China is the third front, which the US is apparently currently trying to open up.

Jake Sullivan was just in China earlier this week and Xi Jinping greeted him in a hallway from the 1970s. They didn’t even bother to put up flags.

That’s the official published photo. For comparison, here’s the one from when Putin visited a few months ago:

This is what they do with US officials now, and it’s the funniest thing ever: they take their official photos in old hallways. The Chinese sense of humor is subtle and sometimes esoteric, but that is a good example of Chinese humor at its peak.

Based on the readouts from the meetings Sullivan had in Beijing, Taiwan was discussed a lot more than the South China Sea, despite the fact that it is in the latter that the US is currently trying to stir up a whirlwind. They’ve actually sort of backed off of Taiwan, and Sullivan said that Biden was lying about the US now having a policy that Taiwan is an “independent country.”

No one knows if the “stranded Filipino ship” situation in the South China Sea will escalate or if it will clear up and then some other incident will arise, but the fact that the US is pressing the situation, saying they are going to come in and help the Filipinos resupply the ship, proves that the US agenda is continued escalation.

The South China Sea Dispute

The basic dispute in the South China Sea is over the ownership of various islands in the sea, which allow whoever owns them to claim the surrounding waters.

China claims the entire territory, up to the maritime borders of Vietnam and the Philippines.

If you’re looking at the map, you might say “well, it does look like that Chinese claim dips down pretty far under their country.” The response to that is that China has controlled the sea and held it for thousands of years. The other response, which is much more important, is that China is worried about US/NATO attempting to assert control over this territory. The fact that the US is backing the Philippines in their attacks on Chinese ships proves that they are, indeed, attempting to assert military control over the region.

The most important question here is: what the hell does this have to do with the United States? If China controls those islands, what consequence is there for America? Why is America getting involved in this? Do you want your children to die for the fishing rights of Filipinos and Viets? Is that why America exists? To protect Southeast Asian fishing waters, in the same way we protect the settlements of the chosen ones?

It’s sort of cheap to mention that the US border remains open while the US is threatening a war with a superpower country over the fishing rights of a Third World country. It’s cheap, but it’s true. That is what is happening. The US government is telling you that you don’t have any sovereign rights over your own towns, your own neighborhoods, while also telling you that you might have to go die in a war to protect the fishing rights of a country on the opposite side of the planet.

Imagine if the Chinese were helping the Cubans attack US ships in the Gulf of Mexico. That is the analog here. Would anyone be defending the Chinese in such a situation?

Why does the US insist on creating trouble all around the world like this?

On Sunday, I apologized for the site not being great lately. I understand the problems, and I’m glad to hear feedback.

Basically, people want it to be funny and want long, interesting articles. It seems simple enough, as I have this ability.

But it’s been really difficult lately to make the site as good as it has been at other times.

Regardless, there have always been lows and highs here at Daily Stormer. We’ve not hit our peak yet. It’s like the Bitcoin graph, you know?

It will get better the next time there is a great tragedy in my life. These happen about every six months.

So just hang in there.

Thanks for your patience, my dear friend.

Also, I don’t really think it’s that bad.

Anyway, these memes are okay.

Editor’s Pick of the Week:

Runner-Up (Official):

Runner-Up (Illegitimate):

Important Note: Never forget what they took from us.

Primo Collection:

I do not have an article of any importance this Sunday. This is in keeping with my overall poor performance this week, for which I apologize.

For most news websites, the election season is peak season. Personally, I am very bored by it. Everything feels intensely gay and retarded. I am the only person saying the election is fake and people shouldn’t vote because even if it wasn’t fake, this “lesser of two evils in a democracy of values” system is stupid and evil.

The DNC was of no interest. I watched Kamala’s speech, and was going to write about it, but then I didn’t. There wasn’t anything interesting to say about it. I had a thing planned about how she has taken all of Donald Trump’s talking points, basically taken his entire thing, and is acting as though she had nothing at all to do with the last four years (which is true, presumably – the VP is not “second-in-command,” as was perhaps the original intention of the position, but rather someone who waits around in case the president dies).

She is talking about border security and being tough on crime, skipping all of the “woke” gibberish about trannies and feminism, and is differentiating herself from Trump based on abortion. But Trump is really not against abortion anymore, and went on a campaign a few months ago in support of abortion, even denouncing the six week bans.

On the most important issues of the day, which are related to geopolitics and the economic situation of most Americans, the two agree more or less completely. The only relevant argument between them is “who is better for the Jews?” Kamala isn’t really even leaning into the Ukraine thing. But she is all about Israel and the Jews.

The protests at the DNC were kind of lame. I was expecting a fiasco, and there was none. Some people got arrested, there were some clashes with the police, but it was all outside the convention, and the media was able to mostly just ignore it.

The Bobby Kennedy thing was perhaps interesting. I guess. He was talking about real issues in his Trump-endorsement speech. He talked about the Ukraine war, freedom of speech, and chronic disease, all of which are much more important than anything the other two are saying. But you would notice in Bobby’s speech, he didn’t mention the issue of BlackRock dominating the US economy and being poised to take over the entire country, owning everything and running America like a “private communism” country, where instead of the state owning everything, everything is owned by one Jew company, and it’s actually way more extreme than communism.

The reason Bobby in his endorsement of Trump didn’t talk about BlackRock is that Trump doesn’t care about that. Trump is actually getting money from these banker Jews. Maybe Trump would put Bobby in charge of Health and Human Services and nominally do something about like, sugary breakfast cereals for children or something. But he’s not going to have (BlackRock CEO) Larry Fink sanctioned or arrested for a conspiracy to establish a private communist regime in America.

Anyway. It’s hard to talk about the elections. Because I do not believe they are decided by voters. I don’t believe that at all.

Tough Week

Again, I apologize if the writing was garbage this week. I don’t really think it was garbage. But it was perhaps low-effort. I hope to do better next week.

No one can be on all the time, you know?

Dear Donors

I’m still working through the $500/hr calls. I should have asked for more money. If I didn’t respond to your message, please send one again this week, maybe Tuesday. I apologize to everyone who hasn’t gotten on the phone yet. It’s just really a lot of people. I didn’t expect this, or I would have asked for more money. Next time I will ask for more money, I think. This seems like a fair price, and it’s a way to make a living, given that this site makes no money and can’t really even pay for itself. But it’s supply and demand. If I don’t have enough time to do the calls then there is not enough supply to meet the demand.

Finally

I have an article that was supposed to be published today which will instead be published next week, because I have a plan to make these special Sunday pieces very high effort and more refined. I was gonna just post it today, half-cooked, like most of my articles, but I decided to hold off.

In the long run, Sunday should end up being everyone’s favorite day, because the long pieces are people’s favorite, and I’m planning on delivering the best long pieces ever each Sunday.

Things just got away from me this week.

I know I’ve been lax on memes lately. It’s because I didn’t feel like doing it.

This week, I felt like doing it.

Here we go.

Get ready.

We’re going.

Unearthed footage of Andrew Tate grooming an alleged underage girl in July THIS YEAR.

The source who sent this to me said this very young looking girl remarked that she had lost the fake ID she used to get into clubs. Meaning she was under 18 (legal drinking age in… pic.twitter.com/CvKdaz0rmb

— Gadget (@Gadget44027447) August 21, 2024

Related: After Dan Bilzerian Blitzes the Gates, Kim Dotcom and Andrew Tate Name Jews as the Problem!

I understood that “human trafficking” means either “prostitution” or “sex with a teenage girl under a certain arbitrary age.” (I don’t know what it’s called when you actually lock someone in a van and force them to turn tricks. I guess that’s called “traditional human trafficking” or “human trafficking classic.”)

But I didn’t understand what “grooming” meant until I saw this video of Andrew Tate “grooming an underage girl”: it means being friendly in a public place.

A video was “unearthed” (???) of Andrew Tate being friendly in a very public place to a girl who is allegedly under 18, and the cops raided his house once again.

This had nothing to do with the clip of him talking about the Jews.

Andrew Tate said this about Israel and he was arrested 3 days later.

What do you notice? pic.twitter.com/JIzgb6Y43n

— Tate Media (@cobratatemedia) August 21, 2024

It was the clip of him joking with a girl who lost the fake ID she’d used to get into the club.

The Guardian:

Masked armed police raided the Bucharest home of the misogynist social media influencer Andrew Tate on Wednesday amid fresh claims about trafficking and underage sex.

Police said officers conducted four searches as part of an investigation into alleged crimes including human trafficking and sex with a minor.

On Wednesday Romania’s anti-organised crime prosecuting unit Diicot said its officers conducted four home searches in Ilfov county and the Bucharest municipality.

It said the investigation concerned “a criminal case regarding the commission of the crimes of setting up an organised criminal group, trafficking of minors, human trafficking, sexual intercourse with a minor, influencing statements and money laundering”.

Several armed police wearing black balaclavas were photographed at Tate’s property. Two appeared to be carrying a battering ram to force entry.

Although this is all sort of retarded, and a country like Romania is unlikely to enforce an “age of consent” thing unless the girl actually goes and complains to the police, the age of consent in Romania is 16 anyway. (It was only recently raised from 14 after pressure from the EU.) The girl in the video is obviously not under 16. Further, there is no evidence he had sex with her, just that she sat at his table and joked around with him.

The video is allegedly from after all his legal stuff started, so I seriously doubt he would be sexually involved with anyone under 18. What’s more, the video was not “leaked,” but rather “unearthed,” which means it was already available online.

Remember when certain people didn’t want MILO to speak at the RNC in 2016, so they “unearthed” some video of him describing rampant pederasty in the homosexual community, and it turned out the video had been online for over a year and had more than 100,000 views? This is like that. It’s something Tate uploaded himself.

Tate is already being indicted in Romania at the request of the US State Department for doing camgirls in Romania. I don’t support that, by the way, but it’s not illegal. They just say he was “trafficking” the girls, without explaining what that means. Most (all?) of the girls have defended him and said there was no “trafficking” going on.

Now, Tate mentions the Jews in an unflattering way, and they’re really coming down on him.

Most likely, Tate will walk back the statements about Jews, which came after Dan Bilzerian’s historic interview with Patrick Bet-David, wherein he said all of the facts about the Jews in a kind of red pill speed run.

This is the problem. I don’t support a lot of what Tate and Bilzerian have done in terms of the promoting of sex as the highest masculine virtue. I don’t think that’s good. But the thing is, people who are going to go out there and break the ultimate taboo and talk about the Jews are not going to be straight-laced gentlemen. For the most part, they are going to be men who were already living at the edge of society. That was the case for me; though I was not involved in the promotion of sex, I have certainly never been a “normal person.” Kim Dotcom, who also recently came out against the Jews, was not involved in promoting sex, but he was an overweight hacker who ran an internet company that largely centered around copyright avoidance.

In order to move forward on the Jewish issue, society is going to need men who have lived on the edges, and society is just going to have to cut them some slack regarding whatever they’ve done in the past. But men who have lived on the edges also tend to have things that governments can exploit in order to crack down on them. Again, running camgirl shows is distasteful, but it is not illegal. But it’s close enough to the edges of society that they can frame it as illegal.

This “underage girl” thing is definitely not illegal and I hope it just makes Andrew Tate angry, and makes him more motivated to fight against the Jews.

Remember when boomers were making jokes about “I identify as” and then callous millennials started making jokes about their jokes, saying “‘I identify as an attack helicopter’? okay boomer, that sucks”? Then remember the millennials making fun of the original joke were actually more annoying, because they were smug faggots? Then remember when I made fun of the people making fun of the people making fun of trannies, but I was so cool that I was also making fun of myself for doing it?

The title of this post is a confusing throwback to when that happened. It was a long time ago. I don’t really even remember if it actually happened or if I just thought about it.

Most people take themselves very seriously, you’ll find. And you’ll find that if you don’t take yourself seriously, you will have a great advantage over them in all aspects of life. Well, all social aspects of life. Being less serious won’t make you better at skills, other than maybe professional internet antisemitism.

Here’s the Editor’s Pick of the Week:

And here’s the Runner-Up:

Followed by the primo collection:

Poker player and ultimate pussy magnate Dan Bilzerian blitzed the gates on the Jewish problem, saying the whole thing during an interview with Patrick Bet-David last week. He has now blazed a path for other internet celebrities to say the same thing about the Jews, with both Kim Dotcom and Andrew Tate making statements against Jews following this performance by Dan.

You should really watch the Bilzerian Blitzkrieg interview yourself. Watch the relevant parts. (43:00-1:06:00 is the Jew part. He also talks about how having sex with infinity women is unfulfilling, which is also interesting, but the Jew part is the most important part).

This is the best thing ever.

He says all the things about the Jews. He’s not just talking about Israel. He’s saying the whole thing. No filter.

Kim Dotcom had a bit of a filter, because he bothered to say “I’m not an antisemite.” No one cares, bro. But he posted from the Protocols.

This may be the most important post you’ll ever read because it provides a simple explanation about why our world is being destroyed, by design.

I’m not antisemitic or a Nazi. I’m simply a former hacker with great analytical skills who understands what’s happening in the world.…

— Kim Dotcom (@KimDotcom) August 18, 2024

You can click that to see the whole thing. It’s a solid post, not really pulling any punches.

He also posted this:

Why? pic.twitter.com/feD6g5RsFC

— Kim Dotcom (@KimDotcom) August 18, 2024

I lol’d. It’s an incredible clip. (What are these Jews thinking?)

Further: even Andrew Tate joined the party, finally saying that “Jews are the Matrix.”

Andrew Tate finally said it:

The Matrix is the Jews
pic.twitter.com/BRv0N1PfUY

— Dr. Anastasia Maria Loupis (@DrLoupis) August 18, 2024

We are probably going to be seeing a lot more of this.

I can’t believe the interview with Dan is on YouTube. Elon is allowing antisemitism on Twitter.

Everyone who knows anything already knows about the Jews. They might not be as up on the issue as I am, but they know. Now they’re going to start saying it.

This is exactly what I said when the Jews started the massacre in Gaza: they can’t do that and keep the lid on the “antisemitism” hoax. No one can defend them and they can’t hardly defend themselves. They can kill kids. But they can’t explain why they control the whole Western world, and why they are using that control to run the world into the ground. They are dependent on silencing criticism.

If criticism is allowed, the Jews lose, and we are now seeing the criticism.

We’ve entered the endgame.

It’s time for everyone to back Dan Bilzerian as dictator of America.

Earlier today, I was bragging about how good I am at political and geopolitical analysis, and no one has ever even tried to name someone who is better than me at this. Literally: no one has even tried.

I wasn’t really bragging, exactly. Well, maybe a little bit. But I’m not really particularly ego-driven. I was making the point that people should understand: this is the single best place to get good analysis on world events. (Note: It’s also the best place for distasteful vulgarity, including nigger jokes.) It is useful to know that you can trust this analysis.

Part of why I’m so good is that I’m one of the very few people who talks about the Jews. If you don’t talk about the Jews, and don’t look at America as a Jewish-occupied country, you can’t really do analysis. This is why the Chinese have university courses studying America as a nation controlled by Jews. They want to understand what is actually going on in the world. Most of the other people who talk about Jews are not great. Frankly, you have to be a little bit insane to decide to take on the most powerful people in the world based sheerly on moral principle and commitment to truth. Unless you’re a paid shill inserting nonsense into your narrative on purpose, it completely destroys your life.

Maybe the commentator with the second best analysis is Glenn Greenwald. I don’t think his is as good as mine, but he comes closer than most. Of course, he’s allowed to talk about Jews, because he is Jewish (and also a completely flaming homo, which gives him a boost to his shield stats).

Because I’m so good at analysis, I can tell when there isn’t a clear analysis to be made. I’m going to tell you when I don’t have an analysis, and that is currently the case regarding what the most probable outcome of the 2024 election is at this current juncture.

The analysis obviously changes when new information is added. Before October 7th, I had just taken it for granted that Biden was going to “win” another fake election. That’s what everything pointed to. After October 7th, that became much less likely, as it seemed clear that Israel would prefer Trump for their war against Iran. I then declared that Biden could not win, after he failed to shut down the campus protests and was constantly whining about Israel and faking a ceasefire, while Trump was out there calling for infinity dead babies and war with Iran. However, I noted that if they replaced him, it could be a different story. Now they’ve replaced him with a candidate who is getting ultra aggressive about the Iran thing. Yesterday, Kamala people were calling Trump a cuck, saying he’s not hard enough on Iran.

“We’re going to be friendly to Iran” Trump says AFTER saying he was told Iran hacked him.

Allow me to translate: Trump is scared shitless Iran has something on him AND has changed his position to be soft on them. That my friends is a man who is compromised. https://t.co/05EYdCAfTL

— Rep. Eric Swalwell (@RepSwalwell) August 17, 2024

It hopefully goes without saying that in a real election, Trump would win regardless. Kamala is a horrible candidate and the country went way down south under Biden. People hated pretty much everything he did. Some people were into the coronavirus tyranny, then the Ukraine war was popular for a while, but I can’t think of anything else people did not hate. Trump’s ear scratch played really well, everyone was excited about including gays and face-tattoo abortion hookers at the convention. Trump has sort of gone off the rails now, but in a real election, Trump could be a Nazi extremist or a full-Jew gay-lover abortionist hellbent on putting Israel above all else. It wouldn’t matter; in a real election, he would win no matter what.

But this is not a real election, so the analysis is much different, and I don’t currently have a good insight into which way this is going to go. It might become clearer later, but I think we’re going to be on the edge of our seats until 3 days after the election when they finally announce the results.

I Can Tell You What the Campaign is Going to Look Like

I have a script for the 2024 campaign: Kamala is going to adopt a bunch of Trump’s positions. She’s already doing border security. Trump is going to flail around with no clear message. He’s brought Lewandowski back from Tel Aviv to try and refocus the campaign, and that basically means increasing the name-calling because the moderate tone only worked against Biden and isn’t working against Harris.

Largely, it’s going to be both of them talking about how hard they are going to do Iran. Trump making a sarcastic joke about how he’s going to be “friendly” with Iran, after basically promising war a with them with all of this “they will be stopped” talk, is pretty surreal, but Gaza is the weak point for the Democrats. Iran is not necessarily a weak point (it’s neutral at worst), but Gaza definitely is. At least, it’s the weak point that Kamala can’t just totally disavow like she is in the process of doing with all of Biden’s other agendas. She’s already starting with throwing the open borders thing under the bus, she’s going to talk about fighting crime, cleaning up the homeless camps, fighting the drug epidemic. She might even say something about the country getting too “woke” (that might not happen, but it also might – regardless, she is definitely not going to be campaigning on Biden’s child tranny agenda or saying stuff like “pregnant fathers-to-be”). She’s just going to take Trump’s whole thing. But she has to keep it up with the Israel thing, which means saying “what about Hamas?” over and over, whenever she is asked. She’s now saying anyone who asks about Gaza wants Trump to win. She’ll call them Russians or whatever.

The vote count will not affect the election outcome; if you believe that it will, you are basically a drooling retard. However, it’s possible that public opinion might play a narrow role in the outcome of the election, because the Jews want someone who is going to be able to keep the people on track for a war that will likely be much bigger than the Ukraine war.

Kamala is going to try to separate Iran from Gaza and frame Iran like they framed the Ukraine: it’s about gay sex and women’s rights, it’s a liberal cause that the US is fighting for in Iran. The army of Ukraine war bots on Twitter are promoting war in South America to stop communism, so they can presumably spin some kind of Ukraine-type narrative for Iran about evil patriarchy and so on.

Trump is going to keep pushing that the war with Iran will be a war with Christian values, and doing patriotism rah-rah. He seems to be stumbling on how to formulate a patriotic narrative about why he wants all these wars for Israel, and has become a sort of cartoonish Jew shill, just up there literally saying “we exist to serve the Jews.”

RIGHT NOW: Former President Donald Trump speaking to a group of Jewish supporters right now in New Jersey.

Reporting for @realDailyWire pic.twitter.com/QGZaJHlb33

— Kassy Akiva (@KassyAkiva) August 15, 2024

Probably, even some of the hardcore MAGA cultists are starting to think this is a bit strange. He has to say this stuff, but he could surely figure out a better spin.

Lewandowski (again, a man who worked on Bibi Netanyahu’s last election) is a shrewd man. If he is able to formulate a really good narrative about how it is patriotic to fight a war with Iran, something beyond “they say death to America,” then that could be seen as very powerful. He needs a post-9/11 type of jingoism. Unless some large terrorist attack to blame on Iran conveniently happens, that’s going to be hard to swing, but he is going to fire his current team and try to put together people who can figure this out.

Last week, Trump forwarded a goofy hoax about Iran hacking his emails. Some of the media was claiming that Iran “appeared to take credit,” which was a total lie. This is him trying to say “Iran is attacking me, your leader! How dare they!” This was possibly Lewandowski’s idea.

Regardless of what narrative he works out, Trump would be better at getting fit, young, conservative white men to fight the war, if it comes to needing a big army. It’s not clear that it will need a big army. I think it will, but a lot of think tank people are claiming it won’t. Regardless, that’s a big plus for him, because when the Ukraine supporters tried to get redditors to go fight in the Ukraine, very few went and those that did either fled or died very quickly.

That said, even though Trump is doing gays and abortion and whatever other sickening things, he is also still despised by many of the domestic Jews, who appear to actually believe he is literally Hitler. That’s a big handicap.

One other thing to consider is how the timeline will factor into this. We are 78 days from the election, so I really doubt the Iran war will kick off before then. Probably, Israel will have escalated with Hezbollah, and there will be Iranian involvement, and then they will start saying they are going to bomb Iran “with or without the United States.” But if Iran retaliates for the Hamas leader’s assassination in Tehran, it’s possible Israel could just put Lebanon on hold, attack Iran, then demand the US come in to save them. I don’t really know how this will affect things, but it would pressure the candidates into becoming more aggressive.

The bottom line is that I don’t think the Jews have decided yet. I’m sure they have all the fake ballots for Kamala ready to go, but if Israel picks Trump and decides to go all-in on that, they almost certainly have enough influence over the US media to force the Democrats to back down with threats of independent audits of the votes. The media is also claiming that Iran is hacking against Trump, because they prefer Kamala.

It’s Just a Race to be the Most Jewish

The Israel Jews don’t care if the war on Iran is a Ukraine style thing, where leftists support it for gay rights and feminism, or a post-9/11 Afghanistan-Iraq style thing, where jingoism drives people to believe that they are defending America by fighting wars for Israel. But those are the two basic possibilities, and the Jews are going to be doing heavy analysis of which way the winds are blowing.

I think it’s a lot of fun to analyze anything, but I should remind everyone: it doesn’t really matter that much who wins. I think Trump would be less anti-white, he might do a little bit (probably not very much) to clean up the border. Though he’s also saying he wants to increase “legal” immigration, which is mostly worse than illegal immigration. Maybe he’d clean up some stuff. Maybe he could even cool off some of this economic disaster.

So, while these are both horrible and really anti-American candidates, I don’t have a problem going along with the idea that Trump would be slightly less bad. Things could start to really go sideways in America if the war in the Middle East goes sideways, but again, both candidates are devoted to that, so that isn’t a factor when considering which is the better overlord.

I will note that Trump is just as extreme on censorship as the Democrats, actually calling for people who don’t support Israel to be physically removed from the country.

Donald Trump: “If you hate America, if you want to eliminate Israel, then we don’t want you in our country.”

That’s enough for me. Will Kamala Harris ever say something like that? pic.twitter.com/PIRecESlaZ

— Vivid. (@VividProwess) August 16, 2024

The important thing to remember is that you don’t have any influence on this. Your vote doesn’t count and neither does anyone else’s. It’s a fake election. In 2016, we were all out there memeing it up, trying to convince as many people as possible to vote for Trump, and he won, largely as a result of the internet campaign. (The ADL tried to blame me personally, but while no man is ego free, I certainly would not take credit for that. I did my part. But I didn’t singlehandedly win the election with my racist memes. This was a wide spectrum of forces coming together like Voltron.)

What I want to tell you is that if this stresses you out, and makes you feel helpless, you should be trying to focus on things you can control. You will be a lot better off outside of the cities, whatever happens. These cities are not getting any safer or more fun, I can tell you that. You can work on preparing for what is definitely going to be a rough ride. That is not only good on the basic, real world level, but it is also good for your spirit and soul.

You know the prayer: control the things you can and have the serenity to accept the things you can’t. You don’t need much wisdom to know the difference in this particular case.

Classic 1990s SNL cast member and Deuce Bigalow (Male Gigolo) Rob Schneider appeared on Tucker Carlson a couple days ago.

I really liked the opening segment, where he was talking about his daughter attacking him, and he said he’s a recent convert to Catholicism, and he seems like a good person.

Do you know that people used to tell me I looked like this guy? I remember in high school, hot girls that liked me would say “you’re so cute but you look like Deuce Bigalow, I don’t mean that as offensive, you’re better looking than him but you look like him.”

He’s like, Irish, Filipino, and Jew.

Yikes.

Tough break for him and for me for people saying I look like him. By the way, I am not Filipino or Jewish, I am 3/4ths Irish and 1/4th German. Just so you understand. That is my personal situation. I don’t know why I look like that guy and I don’t believe I do actually look like that guy. (When it comes to celebrity comparisons, many people say I look like a young Brad Pitt, in fact. Specifically, they say I look like Brad Pitt in Fight Club. Others have claimed I am more of a Denzel Washington type.)

But Rob seems like a pretty good guy.

He appears to really care about his daughter and new younger kids and his wife and ex-wife and he says first and foremost he cares about God. It seems good.

He hits basically all of the big right-wing issues, excluding the Jew thing. I don’t even think he skips that because he’s part Jewish (I think he’s only a quarter). He’s just following the current narrative that has been pushed by so much of the right-wing media, including Alex Jones and Tucker Carlson: “just avoid the Jew thing.”

He promotes anti-vax and all kinds of kook conspiracies, all of which I believe in personally. Some of them I would probably not promote on my website. (For the record, I believe all conspiracy theories, even the really stupid ones. But I have to be serious on this website.)

Schneider doesn’t really have any reason to fake this. I think he’s being honest. He seems honest. You might say “well, he’s got nothing going on, so he might as well do this right-wing extremist thing,” but he actually started his anti-vax and various other “far right” activism a decade ago, when he was still getting supporting roles in Adam Sandler’s films and various other legitimately profitable Hollywood roles. If he had started this stuff last week, then yes I would agree it looks like he’s just doing whatever to get attention, but he actually blew up his own career by taking extremist positions, way before this sort of thing was popular. (You can say what you want about the stuff he was doing. It’s not really my thing. But in the 00s and 10s, Adam Sandler and Sandler-adjacent comedy was a big business.)

He says at the outset that he went on the show to get a big audience to apologize to his daughter. She goes by the name “Elle King,” and is a pretty unremarkable pop singer.

In terms of “pilled-out fat white girls,” I’m all-in for Billie Eilish. Though I also believe in brutal Irish nepotism, and will always shill for Billie, even over women who are physically attractive.

King’s minor hits were all a decade or so ago. But she made news recently when she came out and denounced her father for being “toxic” – that is to say, telling her she was fat and needed to lose weight. She literally whined that he didn’t let her shove Cheetos into her face and instead made her eat healthy food. She also says he sent her to fat camp.

If you think she looks like a low-riding road dog in that video, you should see her now.

That bitch puts the “ruff ruff ruff” in “ruff rider.” If she would have followed her father’s instructions and lost weight when she was a kid, it’s unlikely she would have ended up like this. Being that overweight will take a decade off her life, at least, and obviously means a seriously diminished quality of life generally, including all types of health complications before you even get old.

But frankly, the fact that she is so repulsive makes his decision to give an apology on the largest platform he could find all the more meaningful.

I was touched by it.

I don’t think he needs to apologize for getting her to try and lose weight, obviously, but on some level, I think all parents should say to their kids at some point “I’m sorry for my failings.” No one is perfect, and seemingly small mistakes can have a big impact on kids, so I think it’s a natural thing for parents to tell their kids they never meant to do anything to hurt them.

Aside from a callous way for a burned-out pop singer to get in the headlines by insulting her once-famous father, the blobess’ attacks clearly related to how vocal her father has been about issues such as vaccines and Christian values.

I’m not saying Rob Schneider is important. I do not recommend the above interview. It’s fine, I listened to it in the background while I was doing something else, but I don’t recommend it when you’ve got stuff like the new episode of Tim Dillon and the Patrick Bet-David interview with Dan Bilzerian out this week.

But I respect anyone who sacrifices money for what they believe in, and Schneider has clearly done that, and I think it’s great to see more and more people doing this.

This movement of various people with nothing to gain coming out and saying real shit definitely proves the whole anti-boomer narrative. Boomers were the only people who would never sacrifice money for anything, ever, and they really did destroy the country with their heinous self-righteousness, and now that the boomers are on their way out, more and more people are popping up and saying “I don’t care if this ruins my career, I’m standing up against this shit.”

You’re seeing it all over and you’re going to be seeing more of it. It’s snowballing.

But Then He Says…

I was following along with Schneider, really thinking it was a nice thing, then he says: “I’m all for immigration, it just has to be legal.”

Why do people keep saying this? I do not understand how anyone buys it.

It’s like: “I’m all for my family members committing suicide, I just think they should OD on pills so they don’t make a mess.”

We don’t need any more immigrants.

Look around.

We’ve had enough.

We actually need to remove tens of millions of people. At least.

Why do we need more immigrants? There are too many people here.

Any immigrants can be legalized. Seriously, what? Any immigrant can be legalized. The same government bringing in the immigrants decides who is legal. They have legalized all kinds of immigrants.

I grew up in Columbus, Ohio, which was ground zero for the Somalian invasion (second only to Minnesota). My grandmother, God rest her soul, listened to Rush Limbaugh 4 hours per day. She believed that the Somalians were illegal immigrants. She would refer to them as “illegals.” This was 20 years ago. This scam has been running for as long as immigration has been a problem.

“Legal” or “illegal” is basically an arbitrary distinction at this point. Somalians are objectively the worst possible immigrants, by a lot – way worse than Venezuelans – and they are all here “legally.” Most of them are US citizens. If someone is a “lawful permanent resident (LPR)” for ten years, they are given citizenship. Their kids are all citizens. There is a suburb of Columbus called Westerville that is literally Mogadishu 2: Bulbhead Bonanza. All “legal.”

No one who has a problem with Venezuelan illegals can support legal Somalians. “Legal” does not somehow mean “righteous and just” in any sense, and definitely not in respect to immigration.

Right now, when you say “legal immigrants,” you are no better than the fat slob Donald Trump, who promotes infinity Indians to work in “AI” and “on farms.”

Trump, a former game show host who is running for president while swearing to turn the entire US government over to the Jews, says that the only qualification for entering the country legally should be that you’re not a murderer, killer, or drug dealer.

So, following the Trump worldview, you would have everything you have now in terms of the genocide of white people through civilizational scale forced integration, but with less crime. Which is sort of ridiculous, given that regardless of who you bring in, the most crime will always be committed by American Africans. One of the pro-immigration narratives is “immigrants actually commit less crime than Americans (i.e., black people) do.” So: think about that one.

The crime is really just a symptom of the problem. It’s a stupid narrative for the Republicans, especially since the Democrats are now saying the exact same thing as Trump: “We want to racially displace whites in their own country, but there is a crime problem.” Kamala is running ads saying she’s going to “secure the border.”

Meanwhile, Trump is talking about stapling green cards to diplomas. He’s saying we need to import immigrants to work on farms – bringing back the old “immigrants work jobs Americans don’t want to do” from George W. Bush.

We have how many niggers in this country?

Wait, I’m going to ask my robot. He’ll probably lecture me, but he’ll answer the question.

Not too much of a lecture. He just told me it’s deeply problematic, which I already knew. But at least he answered the question: 40 million niggers.

Put them on the farms! Cut the welfare, send them to the farms. I’m serious. Organize a “good jobs” program for the blacks and tell them the welfare train is over. Carrot and stick. More like watermelon and whip (amirite?). Get them into the fields.

Niggers are good at this!

It’s the only thing they are good at, besides basketball!

Why did Trump say we need Indians to work on farms???

I’ve had enough of it.

But Rob seems like a nice guy. I’m sure he doesn’t know. He hasn’t thought through it.

But here’s the deal:

• Niggers on the farms
• Whites in the AI

We do not need more Indians.

The difference between “legal” and “illegal” is nothing but a government stamp.

Trump is full of shit.

Speaking of shit, Tucker Carlson has a disgusting number of ads. How much fucking money do you need, bro? Seriously? Give a number. How much? Enough to have more ads than the TV on a fucking podcast, apparently. Infinity money, Tucker?

Disgusting.

I’m hereby calling on Tucker Carlson to issue a specific number of how much money he needs to make every year, and then when he hits the number, remove the ads. I have never seen this many ads in my life.

Enough is enough.

It’s time for a new leader.

A real leader.

A serious leader.

A man that we can all get behind.

It’s time.

Let’s see if Tucker Carlson has the balls to interview a true American hero, who doesn’t believe “Nazis were so evil.”

Nazis were not evil. Nazis were very good people.

It’s time to kick things up a notch. It’s time to really start doing real shit.

It’s time for a Blitzkrieg.

A Dan Blitzkrieg, if you will.

The ultimate agenda has already begun.

It doesn’t matter if you’re ready for this, because it’s already happening.

This is the final phase of our revolution.

Absolute Blitzkrieg.

A troubled young lad was at the hospital, and put an interesting question to me.

I believe many of you probably don’t know the answer to this question, so I should explain.

The reader writes:

In the hospital and a pretty girl is finally here and she offered on her own to wipe me down and clean me but when my mom showed up to see me and the girl mentioned that she said “No! He can clean himself”

She didn’t mind in other hospitals when old black ladies or even dudes wiped me down when I didn’t want it

I would have been okay with this girl and she’s got a pretty name

Are all women like this or is my mother unique in that way?

Great question, friend. Sorry to hear you’re in the hospital, and sorry to hear about missing out on the wipe-down. I think I can help you understand what is going on.

All mothers are sexually jealous of their sons and don’t want them to be wiped down by hot nurses. 100%.

The Freud thing of people secretly wanting to do incest is an obviously ridiculous and grotesque Jew lie. I’m not implying anything like that. But all mothers (no, not just single mothers, though they are much more extreme) view their son’s sexuality as fundamentally a threat, and think women are trying to steal him.

Sometimes, mothers won’t care if their son is fucking rando sluts/hookers and just getting it out of their system. It’s not actually sexual jealousy, like with a girlfriend/wife who is sexually jealous. The mother just fears women taking the son away. It’s in the Bible that the man should “leave his mother and cling to his wife.” Think that one through. “Leave.” The mother doesn’t want him to leave.

This is why mothers love gay sons and sometimes actively encourage it, if they are single mothers or there is a weak father. The gay son never leaves the mother. I don’t know how much you people know about faggots, but in basically every case, their mother is the main woman in their life and they spend a lot of time with her.

Glenn Greenwald as sort of a side thing in a recent show mentioned that he flew home to see his mother, which he does several times a year, and she took him to work because she wanted to “show him off.” He’s pushing 60 years old. Imagine being a heterosexual man of sixty, with a wife and kids and probably grandkids, and your mother saying “come to my work I want to show you off.” But for gays, it’s totally normal. He didn’t say it like it was anything strange at all, or give the context of “it’s a thing with gay sons.” He is probably totally oblivious to it.

Aside from trying to make their sons gay, women will also try to make them unattractive to women, making them socially awkward or fat or whatever else. Mothers will even dress their sons up in stupid clothes.

But here’s the other thing, which I will also tell in story form.

I knew a girl a few years ago who was in her early thirties, still holding it together but had signs of an approaching hard wall, and I was pressing her to get married. She found a guy who was young and a good-hearted beta male who loved her, and she finally agreed to move toward marriage, but when she went to meet the parents the mom was ultra-nasty and just about wanted to rip her throat out with her teeth. She told me about it and I was like “what did the dad say?” and she says “oh, he was nice and seemed to like me.”

I told her it was normal. Don’t worry about it. She will be like that until you have a baby, then everything will change completely. I went to see her after the baby was born and asked about the mother-in-law, and she said “after the baby, she loves me so much, and she treats me like I’m her real daughter.”

The other thing is: the female love-interest will also be hostile to the mother, and actively engage in communication techniques that only women understand and gloat about how she is taking the son to cling to her.

If you ever get into a relationship with a woman, you need to know that you have to generally keep her away from your mother until you are married and there is nothing she can do about it.

In a natural situation, it is probably good for the mother to have some kind of incredulousness about a son’s potential wife. If the mother’s hostility makes the woman flee or the man give her up, there is something wrong. But this is not a natural situation and it’s totally out of control, mothers manipulating their sons into becoming fat, socially retarded homosexuals.

I’m sorry to hear you missed out on the wipe-down, but at least you learned an important life lesson.

Editor’s Sunday Note:

This is my pre-written Sunday article. I was going to write a long thing about the Chinese birthrate and family situation and the recent roastie egg-freezing ruling, then I was going to write about Dan Bilzerian’s hardcore interview with Patrick Bet-David (relevant parts start at 43:00), but then I remembered I was trying to write about non-political things on Sundays, such as men’s health and self-help issues. Maybe I will start making “Ask Anglin” a regular Sunday feature. I also have some very long religious and self-help articles I need to edit and post. 

Also, just a show note: anyone who I still haven’t talked to who sent me money to talk on the app, please start nagging me. I am getting through these, one day at a time. If anyone else wants to donate $500 an hour to talk on the phone, please wait for me to post about it again. I didn’t know there would be this many people, and I don’t like leaving people waiting. But yeah, if you already sent something, just nag me, we’ll try to do it this week. The week after this week I will have even more free time. Also, if the site has been shitty lately, it’s because I’m balling on the phone. I’ve enjoyed every call – except one. You know who you are (jk bro you’re cool). 

Trump says legal immigration is needed to replace the native population:

“We’re going to let a lot of people come in because we need more people, especially with AI coming…”

Follow: @AFpost pic.twitter.com/yq3fUGOgTu

— AF Post (@AFpost) August 16, 2024

The day after vowing to devote his entire presidency to doing whatever Israel and Jews want him to do, literally telling Jews “you’ll have the presidency,” tragic game show host and presidential candidate Donald Trump told audiences that he wants to flood the United States with all kinds of people, as long as they are not murderers.

The bulbous old man, a grotesque caricature of humanness, cited AI and farming as reasons he would fill our country up with foreigners.

“We’re going to get the bad ones out, and we’re going to get more people, because we’re going to need more people, especially with AI coming and all of the different things, and the farmers need, everybody needs,” the seditious figure falsely claimed.

He further added that he would allow anyone in as long as they are not a “murderer, killer, or drug dealer.”

This is hardly the message Americans want to hear. I think at this point, even Democrats do not want this message, and it is quite possible that Kamala Harris will have a plan that involves less immigration than Trump’s plan.

Frankly, although there are a fair amount of “murderers, killers, and drug dealers” coming into the United States, one would imagine that this is probably less than 1% and definitely less than 2% of the total immigrant population that has flooded our country in recent years. The overwhelming majority of immigrants are not even criminals, explicitly, but rather parasites who want to live off the American people.

What most of us would be calling for, if we were right-wing politicians, would be a total moratorium on immigration: “We’re full, no one is coming in, we’re going to remove 30-60 million people before we even talk about anyone coming in at all.”

If you need people to work in AI or farming, then you need to train American people to do that. Real American people. That is, heritage white Americans and that nagging portion of heritage black Americans. I complain about the blacks a lot, and I am mostly against them, but they are at least actual Americans who have some kind of right to be here. I’m also told they are very capable at farm work.

Indians are not better than white people at IT. Silicon Valley billionaires want more Indians because they are cheaper than white people. I don’t blame them for pushing their own financial agenda. I am much less offended by a financial agenda than I am by most of these other agendas. But if we had programs to educate our own white male youth, it would only take 5 years or maybe even less to educate an army of young white American men who are much more capable than the Indians at working in IT. And if there was a program to educate millions of them, well, their wages would be lower. Not as low as Indians, but Silicon Valley is just going to have to deal with that, because no one in this country has consented to replacing our middle class with Indians, and no one wants that.

Trump’s message of endless war for the Jews, mass immigration, gay sex, abortion, and all of the rest of it, is not similar to his 2016 message. It’s more similar to what he actually did when he got elected in 2016, which was basically nothing.

This is all completely ridiculous.

Kamala Harris and Donald Trump are both “Jews first” nightmare candidates. It’s possible Trump is better than Kamala, I don’t know. It’s a long story, you’d have to go through the details. But there is nothing that stands out about Trump to make him better than Kamala, in terms of messaging.

Kamala is going to distance herself from the mass immigration, mass homelessness, legalized crime, and endless war of the Biden years. She will be lying, but all politicians ever do is lie. Trump and Kamala will ultimately say similar things, overall, but Trump is actively saying that he wants a war with Iran. Kamala will clearly go to war with Iran if the Jews say so, there’s no doubt about that. But she’s not campaigning on it in the way Trump is.

Here’s the thing: it doesn’t even matter at all, because voting isn’t real.

Seriously. Remember that.

It’s fine to follow the drama of politics and have fun with it. In some ways, guessing who the Jews will pick to rule over us is just as fun as guessing who a bunch of stupid peasants will vote in as leader. You never had any control when voting was technically real, everything was decided by donors and the media. Now voting is definitely not real, and we all know that as a matter of fact, but your personal situation is not much different.

I advise everyone to refuse to vote in this fake election. It’s personally and spiritually humiliating to vote in an election between two shills for the Jews, especially when you know for a fact it is rigged.

Instead of voting, buy a Toyota diesel, buy some land outside of the city, focus on yourself and your family, try to have some kids, focus on the things you enjoy doing, learn to shoot and to hunt, stockpile ammo and food.

And hey – this is important – if the politics stresses you out, or agitates you in any way, don’t pay attention to it. I know I write about politics, so I’m basically saying “don’t read my material,” but if it’s stressful then don’t read it. Only read it if you think it’s fun. Because it’s not real. It’s pro wrestling. The only things you can control are your own decisions, and that should be your primary focus.

America has really bad problems, and you’re not going to vote your way out of these problems. That was true even before election rigging was baked into the system through the mail-in ballot system. You’re going to have to deal with these problems, in your own life, in the real world, and you need to make sure you’re ready for whatever weird thing comes next. You need to be ready to protect yourself and your family. You don’t need to know a lot about politics to do that.