This story is a week old, but seven (7) candidates from the right-wing AfD party died in the few weeks before the upcoming election.

I don’t think a serious person can believe the government explanation that it’s a coincidence. Maybe if it was three or four, you could believe it was a coincidence, but seven? It’s too many.

Of course, those seven people probably don’t matter very much in the scheme of things. What does matter is sending the message that the government can just kill people and say it’s a coincidence and nothing will happen.

You people don’t know. This is a totally totalitarian system we live under, this democracy, and they will just kill you, and there is nothing you can do. What are you going to do? You’re already dead by the time they kill you. You can’t go to the polls and vote against yourself being killed. You can’t write a letter to your Congressman saying “I’m requesting you don’t kill me.” You’re dead. Literally the only thing dead people can do is lie there. They can’t vote or write their Congressman.

Most people don’t want to die. Some people do, but they’re usually not high functioning people. And even people who want to die usually don’t want to be mysteriously murdered. So people see this and say “I’m not running for office for the right-wing, they’ll just kill me and then nothing will happen.”

We are stagnant here, folks. You can’t fix the system.

We need to become vassals of the Chinese.

As we get ready for the next round of the Iran war, Western governments need to come up with an explanation as to why we are going to war for Israel beyond “shielding Jews from blowback as a result of their genocide in Gaza.”

Enter: “Iranian-backed terror.”

You have probably heard the claim in various Jewish media that Iran is a “state-backer of terrorism.” However, this claim, when dissected, does not refer to ISIS or al-Qaeda style terrorism, but rather is a reference to Iran’s funding of various militias around the Middle East. For example, the media categorizes Iran’s support for Hezbollah and the Houthis as “backing terrorism.” Whatever you think of the militias Iran does back, this is something different than blowing up buildings or running people over with a big truck in Europe or America.

There have been some shaky claims of Iran sponsoring bombings in Saudi and Argentina in the 1990s, and in 2012, India said Iranians tried to kill an Israeli diplomat with a bomb. The same guy was accused of doing a bombing in Thailand, however, and after being extradited to Thailand from Malaysia, the Thai authorities refused to charge him and released him to Iran.

All of this is to say that this week’s accusations by the Australian Prime Minister that the Iranian government was behind the bombing of a synagogue and a Jewish deli in Australia are something different than we’ve seen before. The Melbourne synagogue was bombed on December 6th of last year. The Sydney deli, which burned up last October, was not even originally investigated as foul play by the cops. No one died in either “attack.”

As those who study the Jews are all too aware, Jews very often commit hate crimes against themselves. Even before terrorism was a thing, Jews would regularly burn down their own properties to collect insurance money. The term “Jewish lightning” is in the lexicon to refer to anyone burning down their own property for the insurance, as Jews were so famous for this behavior (similarly to how a non-Jewish person viewed as greedy might be called “Shylock”).

It’s maybe worth noting that since the bombing, the rabbi from the synagogue in question has been on a donations tour, and with the announcement it was Iran, is on another tour asking for even more free money.

What’s more, if these were indeed intentional attacks from someone, their timing, in the middle of the Gaza genocide, could mean that literally anyone could be responsible. Although Moslems would probably be more likely, it is not hard to imagine a non-Moslem outraged at the scenes on TikTok doing something like this. On its face, blaming the Iranian Revolutionary Guard Corps for the bombing of a random deli and synagogue in Australia sounds ridiculous, and it seems they would be some of the last people on the list of suspects.

Even if you believe Iran was responsible for the attacks they were accused of in the 1990s and then the 2012 events, those were all political or military targets. The idea of a serious military organization ordering random restaurants and synagogues in a random country to be blown up is silly. Iran is capable of sending rockets at Israel, they are capable of cutting off Israel’s access to shipping lanes. It makes no sense they would sink to street level random acts of random violence, which would not need any central planning.

Further, the fact that the firebombing would not need to be centrally planned means that it would be impossible to trace it to Iranian authorities. What would even be the claim? That they found text messages from a general in the IRGC? And that it took them nearly a year to find these text messages?

The identities of the accused have not been revealed, but the claim by the government is that they are street criminals who also committed other crimes who the IRGC hired through their networks to carry out these very serious firebombings that had no political purpose and where no one even died.

Here’s the Thing

This announcement by the weasel Prime Minister Anthony Albanese that Iran ordered the bombing of these random civilian locations in a white, Western country has been a top news story all over the world. Although no one is likely to look too deeply into it, because again, literally no one died, this gets the idea that “Iran is funding terrorist attacks on civilians” into the minds of the masses of the people.

With the attacks on the World Trade Center in 2001, the FBI had previously coordinated an attempted bombing of the same buildings in 1993 as a kind of precursor. Then you had the second attack, with the airplanes, lead to an invasion of Afghanistan. Then, in the weeks and months after 9/11, someone was sending anthrax all around to media and government people, which is when the media/government started talking about Iraq as working with al-Qaeda. In 2008, they then said it was actually some random white guy that did the anthrax. He was, conveniently, already dead.

This is the note that was with the anthrax sent to Tom Brokaw:

The FBI never really bothered to try to explain why a white guy would do that.

But referencing the anthrax mailed around, Colin (pronounced “Colon” for some reason) Powell brought white powder as a prop to his UN presentation on the need to invade Iraq.

There was an ongoing triangle of disinformation and fake news passing from the New York Times, Dick Cheney, and Fox News. They were accusing Saddam of all kinds of things, just like they are with Iran right now, but the core of it was Cheney’s “Sinister Nexus of Terror.”

You still had the steam from 9/11 when they did the Iraq war less than two years later. But with Iran now, are we really supposed to do a massive war because of October 7th? Or is there going to need to be something more significant to motivate people?

I would very much expect that this Australian cafe and synagogue is the beginning of something bigger. With 9/11 and the anthrax, when people were saying “oh they can’t be false flags, the government wouldn’t do that,” it was like “well, they started fake wars and killed like a million people, so why wouldn’t they blow up some buildings or send some powders?”

Looking back now, it feels like the “12-Day War” (the term they are using for the back-and-forth between Israel and Iran that involved Trump also dropping bombs on Iran) was a kind of probing event, where they wanted to see what Iran had. I think they were possibly a bit surprised at how capable Iran was. They were not the superpower capable of wiping Israel off the map that Scott Ritter had told everyone they were, but they were able to hit Israel with missiles and cause real damage, and it was going to be impossible for Israel to keep going much longer before they were running out of their interceptor missiles.

Israel’s view on Iran has not changed, they are saying they are going to attack them again, and there is no way they can do it without the US, and involving the US on a large scale will probably take more than some all caps Trump tweets.

Obviously, at this point, huge numbers of people are going to be saying “false flag,” even if it is something on the scale of 9/11. So I don’t claim to know how this would work. If I was Donald Trump, I’d be worried the Mossad was going to assassinate me and blame Iran. That would get all the Trump supporters behind a war and it would leave leftists confused as to how they should feel, because if they said “false flag,” they might feel like they were defending Trump. Also, there has already been a “foreshadowing” event where Trump was allegedly scraped on the ear. And, I would add, that a personality like Trump getting shot would just generally be a bigger shock to the world than a bombing, which we’ve all already seen a lot of.

Or maybe I’m wrong and there is already enough noise and there doesn’t need to be some big event to justify further action in Iran. I guess the issue is that I don’t know really what it would take. If there needed to be an Iraq style invasion, then you would need some pretty big justification. But no one understands the logistics of this war. Like I said, I think the first thing was a test as much as anything.

But there are a lot of questions.

If there was large scale bombing of Tehran, could they do a “regime change” from the air? If so, could they keep shooting rockets without a “regime”? How stable is the domestic situation in the country? How do the Arabs, Azeris, and other minorities feel? (I think we know how the Kurds feel, lol. But the others, who knows? I don’t know. I do know that Persians are barely half the population.) Are there terrorists that can be moved in through Azerbaijan? What happened all those terrorists in Syria now that their guy is in charge? Can they be moved through Iraq and into Iran? It’s much more mountainous in Iran.

This is a lot different than when ISIS was able to just roll around wherever on the flats in the Iraqi/Syrian desert.

The mountains also provide a lot of cover for hydra-type break-off groups to operate if the government falls or is at least incapable of operating normally. I’m sure they have caves loaded up with drones and cheap missiles, and as we saw in the 12-Day War, the cost of shooting them down is too much for Israel to absorb. Even if they have infinity money from Big Daddy Donald, they can’t make that many interceptor missiles.

Those are some of the big questions. There are more questions. I’m sure the people in intelligence have better estimates than I would be able to come up with as to what the answers to these questions might be, but I think even US/Israeli intelligence can’t give definite answers regarding most of these factors.

What I do think is that slowly drilling away at it until the armor cracks like they did with Syria is not a potential strategy given that unlike Syria, Iran can hit Israel with missiles. So I’m sure what Bibi wants is the full force of the US military to be brought to bear in a full invasion type war. And for that to happen, it is most likely that something very extreme would have to precipitate it.

The filthy hook-nosed Zionists are most famous for killing Jesus, mutilating penises, and most recently, committing a genocide against Palestinians. Along with the classic hook-nose and beady rat-eyes, the average Zionist may also have bloated lips which look like two infectious worms crawling alongside one another.

A typical Zionist looks like this:

Along with committing genocides, they worship Satan, rape kids, ruin Star Wars, and often do cannibalism.

When a Zionist takes a break from setting up death traps for Palestinian children, it will often attempt to genocide other innocent creatures, such as Moomins. This is the case in New York, where the Zionist ruler of the Brooklyn Library, Fritzi Bodenheimer, has begun eradicating the Moomin people under the false claim that she is protecting the BIPOCs.

The Moomin “Stinky” was designed by the famous Aryan Queerfolk creator known as Tove Jansson, and Zionists have decided he has no more right to live than a Palestinian in Gaza.

Helsinki Times:

The Brooklyn Public Library in New York has removed an image of the Moomin character Stinky, known in Finnish as Haisuli, from a Tove Jansson exhibition after a donor found the character potentially racist.

The exhibition, titled Tove Jansson and the Moomins: The Door Is Always Open, is the first major showcase of Jansson’s work in the United States. It presents her legacy as a writer, illustrator, pacifist and queer artist, alongside illustrations, archival materials and immersive events. It will remain open until 30 September.

Roleff Kråkström, CEO of Moomin Characters, which oversees the use and licensing of the Moomin brand, confirmed that Stinky was removed at the library’s request.

“The library informed us that one of their patrons had interpreted Stinky as a potentially racist symbol. Based on their feedback, we agreed to update the visual content,” Kråkström said in an interview with Hufvudstadsbladet.

The decision has sparked confusion among Finnish Moomin representatives. Kråkström said the accusation is unprecedented. “To our knowledge, this is the first time in the 80-year history of the Moomins that anyone has viewed Stinky as racist,” he told Helsingin Sanomat by email.

A spokesperson for the Brooklyn Public Library, Fritzi Bodenheimer, confirmed the image was taken down in response to the complaint. “This was a curatorial decision intended to ensure all visitors feel welcome,” she told Hufvudstadsbladet.

Zionists are great at making people “feel welcome.” Just look at this “welcoming” they did last week for the starving people of Gaza:

Bombs struck just 30m from the Academy of Hope I support. Our red door location shelters 600 children. No child, woman, civilian, or humanitarian should be harmed. We demand a ceasefire, the release of hostages, and safe, uninterrupted aid for Gaza. Humanity must prevail….. pic.twitter.com/JHPQhXOMXW

— Chef José Andrés (@chefjoseandres) August 21, 2025

They will welcome you to your doom.

Stinky is one of the recurring characters in the Moomin universe. He is depicted as a small, troublesome figure who enjoys playing pranks and causing minor chaos. Despite his behaviour, the residents of Moominvalley tolerate him with patience.

The character appears in several books, comics and merchandise, including mugs and figurines. Stinky is often portrayed with exaggerated features and a mischievous grin, but he has never been associated with race or ethnicity.

Not until the Jews showed up.

Jews hate queerfolk and the BIPOC, so they will attack the queerfolk and our Aryan cartoons and say they are protecting the feelings of BIPOCs, then they will switch it up.

Here you can see a Zionist smooshing a BIPOC, ostensibly to protect a Moomin:

What a disgrace.

Selma Green, director of the Moomin Museum in Tampere, said she was surprised by the decision. “The core idea in Tove Jansson’s art and Moomin illustrations is tolerance and diversity,” she said.

According to Green, the interpretation made in Brooklyn contradicts the foundational values of the Moomin stories. “There are semi-scary characters in the Moomin books and comics. Stinky is a bit wicked but also amusing,” she added.

Well, that does appear to describe the BIPOC race.

For example, the famous BIPOC philosopher “George Floyd” was described by friends and family as “semi-scary, stinky, a bit wicked, but also amusing.”

The Aryan children of the wheat fields could and should learn about the threats of BIPOC philosophers like Floyd from these important cartoons.

Floyd is pictured here making off with some objects he stole from a pregnant woman:

Famous dictator of the Ukraine, Vladimir Zelensky, has been wearing a GI Joe style military costume for several years. Although some communist and fascist leaders wore military-type outfits all or most of the time, they were military men before becoming political leaders.

It is not normal for a civilian leader of a country at war to start pretending he is a soldier by wearing a costume, but some consultants apparently thought this was a good idea, and I guess it must have polled well, because he kept doing it.

This is what he was wearing in the Oval Office with Trump earlier this year:

Now, the war is probably wrapping up. Trump met with Putin on Friday, and left the meeting saying that they are abandoning the demand for a ceasefire, and now agreeing to Putin’s assertion that the only way they can “do a deal” is if it is a full peace deal. Zelensky had an emergency meeting with the EU’s top slut Ursula von der Leyen this morning, and he has switched up his fashion game, going for “obsidian mode” business casual.

Apparently and perhaps obviously, it would have been too much for him to just all of a sudden start wearing a suit like a normal world leader, as the contrast would have been too stark. I’m aware of one time in the last 3.5 years when he wore a suit, and that was at Davos. But that is of course a very special occasion, and I would seriously doubt the Ukraine media reported on it much. Certainly, the US media did not.

So, with a potential turning point in the war coming up, he’s decided to begin to transition away from a GI Joe costume into something a bit more professional, and now he looks like a startup Jew trying to get VC funding: t-shirt and slacks with a baggy jacket.

Why he chose all black, I cannot say. Maybe, it was to make the transition less abrasive. Typically, business casual advisors are going to tell you there should be a contrast between the shirt and jacket, even if you’re wearing an undershirt. I would go so far as to say especially if you’re wearing an undershirt. A white t-shirt would have looked much better for Zelensky.

Anyway, this seems to imply he thinks something is changing. I don’t know if I think anything is changing. Honestly, I haven’t been paying a whole lot of attention, but that is still probably more attention than most, and while Trump has changed from “ceasefire” to the Russia-acceptable “peace negotiations,” and Marco Rubio was just on Meet the Press defending this and saying they won’t be adding new sanctions, I’m not totally convinced anything will actually change.

Wait, wait, wait. Hold up.

I just noticed that is not even a real jacket he is wearing. It’s got weird pockets on it.

(Looking at that photo, you wonder if he started this war in order to have an excuse to embrace the Jewish biological impulse towards very low personal hygiene.)

I suppose these pockets imply something militarized? It looked like a normal sport coat that was just too big with particularly ugly lapels, then I saw it up close and saw these apparently custom pockets. That fits more into my theory that the Alaska meeting might not really mean very much.

Firstly, Trump has been trying to bury this Epstein drama to no effect, and finally this Russia-Ukraine story has shifted people’s attention. Both his supporters and detractors feel strongly about the Ukraine, so both have switched to talking about this. Trump has a reason to stretch this out, to make a big show, and actually has a reason to end the war. If he’s successful, his supporters will be happy and his detractors will be talking about how evil it is (both having moved on from Epstein).

However, if the Europeans and the Ukrainians are committed to continuing the war, they can make a big mess. They can’t really keep the fight going very long without US money and weapons, but they can make a big enough mess and blame it on Trump and probably successfully use people like Marco Rubio to bully him into continuing sending weapons to the Ukraine.

If Trump would have swooped in on Day One like he said he was going to and simply cut all funding to the Ukraine when he had the wind at his back, he could have ended this, but at this point, he’s made all of these different weird and conflicting statements and given the Europeans time to organize a strategy to thwart him.

It’s possible he will be able to end it. But Russia isn’t going to give anything up. And now that he’s made it his war by making all these statements and not simply ending it on Day One, he’s going to be held responsible for the outcome, which could be made to look really bad.

This is to say: on Day One he could have just stopped all funding and then when there was fallout said “well, this was Biden’s thing, I don’t know, it was never my thing.” But he’s defended the war, he’s attacked Pete Hegseth publicly for canceling their funding (apparently without his knowledge?), and he’s made all these statements about how Putin is crazy and so on.

Maybe in Alaska, Putin convinced him of the obvious, but it could be too late for him to actually take serious action to end this war.

That said, things are heating up in the Middle East, with Israel ready to start bombing Iran again, and they are of course going to expect Trump to be all-in with them again on that. So it’s possible that my original thing will hold up: the US will cut off the Ukraine in order to focus on fighting wars for Israel.

Before Trump was elected, I spent six months saying that he was only going to do things for Israel, and the only things Americans could hope for is some economic relief and an end to the Ukraine war. It looked like I was wrong on both counts, and instead the only thing the Americans could hope for is a militarized police state (that somehow only manages a fraction of the deportations Obama did).

But hey – crypto is still doing well, right? And he cured the woke mind virus with a genetic vaccine, correct?

Kamala wouldn’t have done that for us.

I was on a roll with the Epstein articles and I have a really good one that was almost finished. But I was fasting and then stopped and I think I got refeeding syndrome. Terrible runs for days now. It was only a five-day fast, I didn’t think refeeding was an issue, but yeah, it turned into a big mess.

Anyway, I’ll finish the Epstein thing tomorrow or whatever, but now this Thai-Cambodia thing has blown up and I’m going to sloppily post a forum reply I wrote, just so I’m posting something.

A forum poster wrote:

You know, Anglin predicted all this.

What article was it, a few years back, where he said “we are effectively in World War 3. World War means ‘world at war’. We will see more countries acting on settling old grievances unrelated to the ‘main’ war” ?

I think it was a lot of articles. It was sort of one of my main themes the last few years.

This is basically India-Pakistan 2, though less complicated. Thailand is 100% the aggressor here. The UN and the whole world recognizes the disputed area as Cambodia, and there isn’t a moral justification in the way there is with Kashmir (Kashmir is 97% Muslim, whereas Preah Vihar is as far as I know 0% Thai, although Thai/Khmer is less defined since it’s solely a language, with the same genes/religion).

Anyway, you can argue who started the India-Pakistan thing. In this current case, Thailand just all of a sudden started mounting forces on the border then killed a Khmer soldier in May, then the PM of Cambodia leaked a phone call of the party gurl PM of Thailand apologizing and calling him “uncle,” then she had to resign and Thailand got angry about the leak and made moves last week.

Right now, the issue is Cambodia used old BM-21s to respond to Thailand and (presumably accidentally, these are not precise systems) blew up a 7/11 killing like a dozen people. Then Thais who crossed the border got their legs blown off by landmines, which Cambodia claims (at least plausibly) were Pol Pot’s mines, not new mines. So now Thailand is saying that although it is an objective matter that they started the whole thing, they have to take revenge for the 7/11 and landmines by… no one knows what exactly. Are they saying they’re going to occupy the disputed territory?

Anyway, Cambodia for obvious reasons is crawling with Chinese military, but China hates getting involved in anything, and they definitely do not care much if Thailand wants to steal a hundred square kilos of land.

But it is what I predicted, yeah, where there is so much war everywhere, everyone is like “well, we can do that too.” Thailand started this for domestic reasons, they have a lot of problems, but it seems that Cambodia escalated with the release of the call because it’s a lot better for them domestically than it is for Thailand (just basic rally round the flag), and also, they know there can’t be a real war because of the Chinese visiting forces in Cambodia. “Visiting” being sort of a euphemism. I don’t even know if the Chinese use that term, it’s an American term for the occupation of Germany/Korea/Japan/Philippines/etc. Of the American occupations though, Korea is the only one that wants it, while Cambodia wants as many Chinese soldiers and equipment in their country as is possible.

I think this is going to be solved soon, but just like with Pakistan-India, you’re putting a band-aid on a bullet hole. Thailand is going to have to back down and basically tacitly admit this was all their fault and totally unprovoked (or rather, provoked by the French 100 years ago). And at any time the US can go to Thailand and be like “hey we’ve got a bunch of planes and missiles and shit, you want to go to war with the Chinese in Cambodia?” and Thailand will say “we thought you’d never ask.”

Further Information

That was the reply, but since this is an official post on the official site, I should maybe add some background information. Preah Vihar is an ancient Hindu temple which is of course now used as a Buddhist site like all the ancient Hindu sites in Indochina. When the French left Cambodia (which they occupied while not occupying Thailand), they drew a border for Cambodia. Before the late 19th century, there wasn’t really borders in the modern sense in the third world, and a lot of these border drawings were a disaster (look at Africa or many Middle Eastern countries). In Cambodia it was pretty easy, as Khmers were a cohesive group so you weren’t forcing a bunch of different ethnic/religious groups to live under a single government. But there was never a clear border before, and both sides wanted the temple in the border region. The French gave it to Cambodia and then the UN repeatedly said the French border was valid and that Thailand should respect it.

There is a lot of stuff about the fact that the ruling families in Thailand and Cambodia were getting along pretty well until the Khmer PM (technically the old PM, father of the current PM, but still the primary authority in the country) leaked the call which appeared to show that the 38-year-old party gurl Thai PM not only admitted Thailand was at fault, but also admitted she didn’t have control over her own military. It’s hilarious he recorded this call then just immediately posted it online, and it certainly revealed the nature of the situation, but the party gurl’s father, who is arguably the most powerful man in Thailand, viewed this as a personal betrayal, and has actually stated publicly that this whole thing is now personal. Saying “I’m settling a personal score” is a weird thing to say when dozens of people are now dead. Or at least it seems weird to Westerners.

There are 72 million people in Thailand and 17 million in Cambodia, and neither country has nukes, meaning it isn’t exactly like Pakistan-India. (It was so funny when Pakistan said “we don’t have the rocket systems to send these nukes anywhere but at you – they are only for you.”) But the strategic importance of Cambodia to China (not to mention the billions in investment) means that in some sense, Cambodia has the upper hand. Despite the fact that the US frames China as “aggressive,” their last military action was in 1979 – to protect Cambodia from a Vietnamese invasion. (For the record, the US has been in dozens of conflicts since 1979, making it pretty cartoonish for them to accuse China of “aggressiveness.”)

As passive as China is, they’re not going to let Cambodia get actually invaded in a serious way by US-backed Thailand. And the fact that Thailand is the aggressor – having started it unprovoked and then literally gone around saying it’s a personal vendetta – means that China doesn’t really have to worry about optics in the way they do in a lot of other places. It’s unfortunate the 7/11 got blown up, but it’s pretty obviously an accident, and it was done after Thais had already bombed Cambodia. Further, Cambodia is saying Thailand is using cluster bombs, which is probably true (people lie in wars but in this case, Thailand’s actions are so egregious and obvious that no one on the Khmer side needs to lie – they could have said the 7/11 bombing was a false flag and didn’t, just said it was an accident). The UN will presumably investigate the cluster bomb claims as well as the claims that the mines were Pol Pot’s and not new mines. Just based on facts though, it’s really unlikely they are new mines. They were on the Thai side of the border, so the idea that Cambodia is sending special forces to mine the Thai side while the whole (relative small area) is swarming with soldiers and drones is sort of a ridiculous claim. And again, Thailand, by everyone’s admission, started this. So blaming Cambodia for anything is silly.

I mean, I’m the anti-Jew-Faggot Empire guy, so I want to do a full disclosure and say of course I support the Khmer side against the gay marriage, legal weed, US-aligned Thai side. But I’m just giving you facts here. No one, including the Thais themselves, claim that Cambodia started this. Again, there are parallels to Pakistan-India, but in that case, both sides could make claims the other side started it. In this case, Thailand had political problems, and just up and decided to mount their forces on the Khmer border and start talking about retaking territory that has been determined to be a part of Cambodia since 1907.

So, I’ll just repeat: it’s very unlikely that this will spin out of control in the immediate future. Donald Trump has made threats about tariffs, and every country responds to these, but the bitterness is not going to go away when the conflict stops, and it is yet another place on the planet where war could break out in a serious way, and definitely would break out if there was any serious conflict between the US and China.

These simmering and potentially hot areas exist all over the world. No government is really happy with their borders, and in general, the majority of populations of countries will always support their government in a war.

Finally, I just want to point out the obvious: if the US actually believed in a “rules-based order,” they would be sending infinity weapons to Cambodia to defend their sacred border and the CIA would be all over reddit calling for “volunteers” to go fight to defend the sacred border.

In actual reality, borders are not sacred in any way, virtually all of them are completely arbitrary, with the least arbitrary being those that were settled by wars that ended in serious defeat of the country with the counter-claim, such as the US-Mexico border, where the Mexicans got so wrecked that no one can seriously question the validity of the border. But borders are a new thing, historically, and they exist for purely practical reasons. The claims after the Russian invasion that “borders are sacred” was the weirdest nonsense ever, especially from the US, which did Kosovo and was, at the time Russia invaded the Ukraine, trying to do Kurdistan. And, should I even have to say it, is the biggest supporter of Israel, which is the least border-respecting country on earth. When Assad fell last year, Israel annexed a further 400 square kilometers of Syria.

A world order cannot be run by a country with no principles and no attempt at fairness in regulating international disputes. The UN, for all my criticisms of it, is a place where all countries can meet and hash out these kinds of disputes, but the US simply refuses to recognize anything they say as meaning anything. We need a new world order, where conflicts are not solved by slogans and dumb emotional bullshit. There is no logical reason that with the nature of technology and international trade that war should even exist at all anymore (with maybe the exception of really primitive areas of Africa, but even then, third parties should be able to mediate conflicts in a way that is satisfactory to all parties).

The problem is that the US is the current Big Boss and it is run by Jews who like war because they don’t respect anyone’s right to self-determination, believing that they are God’s chosen ones and therefore have a divine right to decide how everyone on earth behaves, and will therefore use both social engineering programs and violence in order to enforce their vision of a world shaped in their own image.

There is a supposedly edgy take on the whole Middle East conflict that goes something like: “it doesn’t involve me and so I don’t care.”

Here’s the problem: if you are living in a Western country, it does involve you, because it is your tax money that is paying for the Jews to kill all these people.

I am personally sympathetic to the “it doesn’t involve me” perspective, if it’s in a vacuum. I don’t think people should care about conflicts that don’t involve them. Most people on the internet seem to care a lot about every conflict, so it’s a bit suspect that the one where people say “it’s not my problem” is the one with the Jews. But sure, if there was no connection to the West in the Middle Eastern conflict, then okay.

Here’s the thing: Israel would not even exist at all without the support of the West and the tax dollars of the very edgy and clever people who claim they don’t need to pick a side. If you don’t stand against Israel, you are standing with Israel, because it is only through huge numbers of Westerners standing against Israel that there is ever going to be a possibility for the West to stop funding this terrorist state.

Anyone claiming “it doesn’t involve me so I’m not picking a side” is either simply dumb, or is a Jewish shill. Obviously, anyone who looks at the situation at all is going to side against the Jews, so saying “just don’t look, don’t think about it at all,” is a pro-Jewish position.

Cut all Western support for Israel. Once that’s done, I won’t be interested in picking a side either. I will just sit back and watch the clips of jihadists Zerg-rushing a defenseless Israel, and smirk smugly about how glad I am not to be involved in that situation.

Donald Trump, the Israeli-owned “American President,” has posted some weird Satan shit from Mike Huckabee.

The fact that Mike Huckabee thinks he’s the prophet Nathan advising King David is perhaps to be expected. He is a deeply confused, satanic individual, which has been understood for decades. He literally believes in exterminating children for “God,” and it doesn’t really take a theologian to suss out which “god” would be asking for the mass murder of children. Everyone knows what to expect from this guy.

There are obviously different forms of Christianity, and there are genuine followers of these different forms of Christianity, and I think there are good people in most of the forms of Christianity. There are no good people in the “bless those that bless Israel” form of Christianity. At least not after they’ve seen what that looks like in Gaza. It is impossible to have a form of Christianity that supports the mass murder of children. Outside of any theology, it is just stupid on its face that Jesus Christ would want people to mass murder children. There are people who believe in this religion, but it isn’t Christianity, it is Satanism with a (very thin Puritan/Calvinist materialist) veneer of Christianity.

What you would hope not to expect is that Donald Trump would post this text on his Truth Social site as if he thinks people like this sort of thing. I’m sure there are people who like this sort of thing. But it’s a really small number at this point. Most of the people who were into this sort of “blood for the blood god” kind of “Satanism masquerading as Christianity” stuff are already dead. They were old twenty years ago when George W. Bush claimed God was telling him to kill, kill, kill for Israel. Of the ones that are still alive, most of them are not going to be on the internet.

I understand that a lot of politicians profess this satanic form of “Christianity,” but they do that because AIPAC tells them to. It’s very profitable to have this belief system. Lee Fang went to Washington in 2023, shortly after October 7th, and talked to these freaks.

And of course, we just saw Ted Cruz tell Tucker Carlson that the core of his belief is that we have to “bless the political state of Israel” by helping them murder innocent people. But he couldn’t cite any Bible verses and couldn’t elaborate on the belief system. So it is just something he says.

JUST IN: SENATOR TED CRUZ FAILS TO USE THE BIBLE TO JUSTIFY HIS SUPPORT OF ISRAELpic.twitter.com/gJqPl4Jgyw

— Sulaiman Ahmed (@ShaykhSulaiman) June 18, 2025

Mike Huckabee probably really does believe this. He is a dark and satanic figure, much more so than Ted Cruz, who is clearly just a cheap conman.

But what percentage of normal people believe this? Not many. I did not expect Trump to crash out this hard, this fast. When you are at the point where you are talking about God sending you messages by literally speaking to you, it’s pretty difficult to imagine going any lower.

What a mess.

I am really starting to feel bad for Trump.

This is obviously not what he wanted. But here he is, a helpless little creature in the hands of the Beast without the will or strength of character to stand up and risk anything to push back on this.

Instead he’s clinging to the idea that he can maintain some kind of support by going full-Satan weirdo.

Support among the base has mostly already collapsed, and will fully collapse as soon as he officially enters the war. Seymour Hersh (who is a “my sources are telling me” guy who is actually serious) said the strikes could come as soon as this weekend. I personally have no idea, but if I had to guess, Trump would want Mossad to strike some American installation in Iraq so he could go around talking about dead Americans before he entered the war. But he might not need that. I have no idea and it really doesn’t matter.

What matters is that it’s over. Whatever hopes and dreams you had for Trump 2.0 are officially crushed. And with that, any hopes for a future for America as it is currently composed.

Sad.

I guess it’s sad. Sure, it’s obviously sad. It’s also sort of darkly hilarious, I think. I mean, if you take just two steps back, endless piles of corpses aside, this is all very funny.

Just like Trump can’t come back from this, neither can Israel. They are never again going to have any kind of major support from the American people, and instead, there is going to be massive hostility, and mobs of people following around pro-Israel politicians and jeering at them.

The timing on the Palantir AI total control grid and the US entry into full scale war in the Middle East didn’t quite line up correctly. Again, kinda funny.

Anyway.

I guess no Daily Stormer reader had very high hopes about any of this. It’s all stuff I was saying well over a year ago. As soon as Trump’s ear got scratched and they started saying he was the messiah, I called all of this, pretty well down to the detail.

Not bragging. Just saying.

It’s important to remember that a lot of these people are full of shit.

A lot of people on the internet, who are probably at least vaguely associated with me in people’s minds, were making some very kooky claims about how Iran was going to be able to destroy Israel. I don’t want to name any names. But most of you probably know the names.

Israel is now bombing Iranian oil fields, which pretty much means a point of no return, and Iran is definitely not responding by destroying Tel Aviv. Scott Ritter. That isn’t happening, is it? Pepe Escobar. Instead, it looks very much like the entirety of the Iranian military was so deeply riddled with Mossad that all of their defenses were taken offline before Israel even started bombing, and their little drone show was a joke. That’s what it looks like, Scott.

It’s not just Scott Ritter. I’m not trying to single him out. Though if I were to single someone out as saying the most outrageous possible things about the alleged capacity of Iran, it would definitely probably be Scott Ritter.

I am going to repeat what I said: Israel could always destroy the “regime” in Iran. They could always destroy their oil fields. That was always completely within their capacity. Saying it wasn’t was ridiculous and based on totally nothing. What the issue is, I think and have said from the beginning, is that ever since the US invasion of Iraq, when the government was decapitated in like five minutes, Iran has tried to set up a situation where they can fight a long war after the decapitation of the government. Whether they can actually do that, or whether that whole program is also run by the Mossad, I have no idea. But that was always the only possible option for Iran in the case of this war that started this week: to accept the decapitation of the government and to go guerrilla and try to set the whole Middle East on fire and deplete the US military in a decades-long conflict where they don’t have a government but they have organized militias which are capable of keeping the drones flying.

I’ve also said that after a violent decapitation of the Iranian government, setting up a “democracy” in Iran is going to go about as well as it did in Afghanistan. So the US is going to have to occupy Tehran and keep bases there and try to prop up some puppet government that everyone is constantly droning and suicide bombing.

You’re also going to of course have the ISIS model of US-backed terrorists invading Iran, but at the same time, Iran has their own foreign groups that will come in. And probably, presumably (one would have to presume), Russia and China will also be sending aid.

But no, the Iranian regime, which literally has no air defense at all apparently (they had Russian stuff but I guess their Mossad agents took it all offline), cannot survive weeks or even days of continued Israeli bombing. But of course, that in no way ends the war. The Iraq war lasted ten years after the government was decapitated, and only ended when the US agreed to basically hand the country over to Iran.

So, the US will have to go in. Like I said they would. Like I bet a bunch of money they would.

Why am I even typing this? Just go back and read the shit I wrote in hundreds of articles before the election.

It’s not a confusing situation. You do not have to be an “analyst” to see how this is going to go.

My question is whether Trump will end the Ukraine war so he can focus on the Middle East. That is one thing I predicted was likely and I still think it seems likely. Of course, Trump hasn’t committed anything to the Israelis at time of writing. He keeps saying he wants to negotiate with whoever is still alive. But Israel is going to make sure there is no one alive to negotiate with, which means that the US is obligated to go fight this war.

That was always the problem. Israel had the ability to start a war that the US had no choice in whether or not they joined, which meant that Bibi Netanyahu was in charge of US war policy. And, as expected, he exercised that ability.

Now we’ve got the thing.

I do think it’s going to take some time before things get really hot and the people who are freaking out are sort of emotional babies. But I could be wrong. Trump has already moved a lot of troops to the Middle East. Not enough, and it will take time to move more. I don’t know how much time. I’m not an expert.

Sorry my happening loving friends, but nothing ever happens.

The Israel and Iran strikes are a nothing burger.

Speaking of processed meats, the Jews keep claiming they “destroyed all the mullahs’ salami,” as if the goyim are too stupid to know that Moslems don’t eat pork.

If I had to guess, it appears that Bibi was just trying to sabotage the Trump peace process, and that Iran is aware that’s what Bibi was trying to do. So both things are just reverse bluffs being pre-called by the other side.

Maybe I’m wrong and I should believe the hype. They hype has never been real before, but maybe it is this time. Famously, I do not make predictions, because unlike most internet commentators, I do not believe I am a wizard. All I can do is look at what is happening and process the information through the information and the logic mechanism that is already in my brain, and every indication is that this is a whole lot of nothing.

Jews are vastly exaggerating the damage they’ve done. This is a Ukraine-style “just bomb random apartment buildings lol” style attack. I don’t know if they hit nuclear sites or other important military sites, but there isn’t any evidence of that right now.

The ramifications of this event are going to be – of course – more Jewish whining about the Iranian response. These kikes will literally “preemptively” (“preemptive” of what?) bomb you and murder random people and then cry out in pain when you do some weak drone response.

I guess “tensions will rise” in the Middle East, but tensions were not really doing very well recently anyway, and I’m not even sure what “tensions rising” means when everyone has already reached their point of any willingness to push further. It’s worth noting that destroying the “regime” in Iran doesn’t make a major war less likely and probably actually makes it more likely (the Iraqi “regime” fell about 10 days into the 1o-year Iraq War, and Iraq didn’t spend 25 years planning to fight a war with the US after a decapitation of their government).

Another point worth mentioning is that before the attack the US was mass-moving equipment from the Ukraine to the Middle East. There’s different ways to read that, but I haven’t been able to find any meaningful numbers about how much of what was moved. But one of the points I was pushing before the election was that if Trump pivoted to the Middle East he’d be more likely to downsize the war on Russia, because despite the beliefs of prominent and highly respected yentas like Victoria Nuland and Janet Yellen, the US doesn’t actually have “unlimited resources.” (It just has unlimited money, which is not the same thing, but try explaining that to any woman. Seriously, ask any single woman you know “why don’t you think the government doesn’t just print money and give it to everyone so that everyone can be rich?” I’m really serious, ask any woman that question. Just see what happens.)

But if there was any upshot that was actually meaningful, it would be more animosity between Trump/Witkoff and Bibi, which in itself doesn’t really mean anything and probably won’t result in anything because Bibi is too good and too embedded in the US legislative branch (even if Trump has done his best to root him out of the executive, which is a questionable claim, it doesn’t mean anything when he’s in a group chat with every member of the US Congress).

The only thing that actually interests me about this event is the media narrative. I am watching CNN and Fox and reading the Times and the rest, and they are all saying “Trump tried to stop Bibi from doing this but he did it anyway because he knows that if he starts a war, using American weapons he got for free, the US has no choice but to join the war.” Every single news outlet is just admitting outright that Israel has full control of American policy and that the prime minister of Israel has an absolute ability to declare war in the name of the US in direct opposition to the demands of the US president.

All over the place, on both left and right, this claim coming from the government that the US has a moral obligation to be a slave of Israel because of a pile of shoes is wearing real thin. This event and the unavoidable media admission that Bibi has a right to overrule Trump when it comes to US declarations of war is not going to be good for the polls showing that Americans of all ages (yes, even the boomers) are becoming exhausted with the claim that we are evil if we even ask why it is America doesn’t have a right to control her own foreign policy.

These polls are of course one of the big reasons Bibi is in a rush to get this Iran thing going. I am sure the polls are not totally honest, but they show a post-10/7 Building 7 like collapse in support for Israel – and for Jews in general, frankly, given that Jews made the decision to fully fortify the idea that there is zero difference between the state of Israel and the American Jewish population (which is obviously true, please see Dave Portnoy and every other American Jew, but it’s still slightly confusing to me why they are obsessed with forcing this fact on the population). Despite appearances to the contrary, the boomers can’t actually live forever, and so with every passing day, the “greatest ally because they’re God’s chosen baby-killers who once had their shoes thrown in a big pile” narrative is fading. Unless Palantir’s AI Panopticon Skinner Box actually works like Alex Karp says it does (and it doesn’t actually work like that, as scary as it is), this entire system of an extremely wealthy and powerful minority group ruling every aspect of our lives, determining every policy of our country, micromanaging the behavior of individuals even, while claiming they are the ultimate victims and that any criticism of them is metaphysically evil is not sustainable for very much longer.

Here’s the issue: the other side of Bibi’s “we have to drag the US into a massive war before we lose all support from the Americans” is the now quite popular American Jewish view that Bibi is personally responsible for destroying Jewish power in America, and so he must be stopped. The anti-Bibi narrative has been building among American Jews for at least a year, and it is now the standard narrative in the Jewish media, with the exception of Fox News (and the like), and among academics and basically most American Jews. But again, the Congress is still totally under the control of Bibi, and I don’t think anyone has a way of parsing out how those power dynamics actually work in real life, because they’ve never really been tested on this scale.

There’s no way to know which way this will go, but I can pretty much guarantee it will be disgustingly boring.

Statistically, at some point, it is going to have to happen that happeningfags are going to be right and I’m going to be wrong. But I do not think that day is today.

I was supporting Israel because of all of the work our brave white women have done to support women sports, and how they are being destroyed by the radical trans gender movement. I was also big on Israel because of Mexicans burning American flags, and because AOC is trying to do socialism.

But then I open my digital currency game application and find a very bad red line and they say Israel makes the red line go like that.

Don’t get me wrong, folks. I love women’s sports and I want the death penalty for burning American flags and I hope Palantir can save our values in our country by going against the Mexicans and making them pay more taxes so we can support Israel more and more.

But I see this red line in my crypto digital app, and I think, “maybe we should just kill all of the Jews?”

It’s a conflicted issue for me, because stopping radical gender ideology and wokeness on our college campuses is so important. It’s really the most important thing for me and I think all true Americans believe we have to destroy Iran to protect our women’s progress in sports.

Back in the times of the Targaryens, women didn’t even have any sports, and they were oppressed, and we worked so hard for this, and then the mullahs tried to take us back to ancient times with their woke ideologies on our campuses.

But a 7% BTC drop and dropping?

Even JPROOF is down, and that was one of the most promising and ambitious coins in my portfolio.

I’m sorry, but although Jews are the chosen ones and their lives are the most important thing in the world, I just don’t think they are worth that much money.

So because of this, I’ve decided to officially endorse Team Iran in this championship match.

It is also better if all the Jews die so they can’t have remainders hanging around whining.

If that means we have to lose our women’s sports and go back to the times of Game of Thrones, then so be it.

I’d love to hear the opinions of the readers, so drop a like and a follow and ring my bells and let us know what team you’re supporting and if you think it’s worth it to risk our women’s sports by supporting the mullahs and their woke agenda on campuses.

But I think we can all agree that we hope both teams have fun.

Fuck Dave Portnoy

— Sam Hyde (@wigger) June 5, 2025

Dave Portnoy has entered a second wave of his total meltdown, and I think that possibly, the Elon crash-out was organized by the Jews to cover up the Portnoy situation.

Because everyone is starting to understand a simple fact: Dave Portnoy is every Jew on earth. They are all hate-filled monsters, who will snap at the drop of a dime and fly into a murderous and worse, sadistic rage whenever they feel someone has hurt their feelings. Some Jews simply do better than Portnoy at hiding this fact. But no matter how well they hide it, they are all Dave Portnoy.

Because of Portnoy’s previous meltdown, where he spent weeks talking about some college kid making a “fuck the Jews” joke, he now can’t go anywhere in public without someone yelling “fuck the Jews.” Who knows if these people even believe this sentiment. They probably do now if they didn’t before, but it’s also just hilarious as a basic rule to have a situation where someone is so emotionally unstable that a random person saying three words to them will cause them to have a complete and total mental breakdown.

So, he was doing one of his ultra-hilarious pizza tasting events in some location, and someone yelled “fuck the Jews.” Because everyone who sees him yells that now.

WATCH: Someone shouts “Fuck the Jews” during Dave Portnoy’s pizza review in Canada pic.twitter.com/k4lkocpwVu

— Breaking911 (@Breaking911) June 3, 2025

This led to a podcast scene where he had his worst break with reality yet, where he attacked and threatened his own staff, saying that they were trying to get his fellow chosen people murdered with jokes. He said that the time for Jewish jokes is over because these jokes are getting so many people killed.

I love this clip so, so much.

JUST IN: Dave Portnoy has a meltdown, tells Barstool’s Kirk Minihane to “shut the f*ck up you bald f*ck” after Minihane criticized Portnoy’s approach to “Jew jokes”

Portnoy: “Shut up!… You work for me!”

Minihane: “Sure. You bet. For now…”

Portnoy: “For now? Quit! I’ll save… pic.twitter.com/AM5Y2InCll

— Collin Rugg (@CollinRugg) June 4, 2025

People are pointing out that Portnoy has made constant jokes about killing Palestinians. He actually makes one in that clip.

Frankly, I’m the number one Palestine shill, and I’ve made jokes about killing Palestinians. For example, when Palestinian children were rushing to food drops and got crushed to death by the boxes full of food, I said “this brings a whole new meaning to the term ‘food as a weapon.'” Maybe that’s insensitive, I don’t really know or care. The point is, I am the most hardcore Palestine supporter in the West, at least publicly, because I not only voice support for Hamas (whereas most pussies say ‘oh no of course I don’t support Hamas I just am against genocide’), but have actually called for a State Department policy of arming Hamas with advanced weapons, including shoulder-fired nukes. But that isn’t going to prevent me from making that joke.

And the reason for making a joke like that is not “just because it’s funny,” which is what these comedians defending “free speech” keep saying. “Any joke is okay as long as it’s funny.” That’s what they keep saying. That might be true, I guess, but it’s not a deep or meaningful take. When I make jokes about dead Palestinian children, I am cracking through the horror of the thing, breaking down the mental barriers that people naturally put up when they see videos of the mass slaughter of children.

Following along with this, the meta joke with these supposedly “sensitive” topics, which is just a joke because it’s funny, is mocking how sensitive someone is. I saw Cenk Uygur commenting on the latest Portnoy meltdown and just saying the basic and obvious things that fat Mexican retard would say, and he said that someone posting “Fuck the Jews” in Portnoy’s bar “isn’t a joke because there is no punchline.” It’s hard to think of a more retarded statement than that. Firstly, not all jokes have “punchlines.” This is a level of understanding of a 4-year-old who thinks every joke is some version of “why did the chicken cross the road?” Secondly, making a subversive, offensive statement in a public place is its own “punchline.” Thirdly, the real “punchline” was the Portnoy freakout itself. Some rando being able to make a billionaire have a total meltdown in public for weeks on end by hurting his feelings with words is among the funniest things that are even possible.

But I digress.

Because none of this actually has to do with humor or jokes. Jews, of which Dave Portnoy is the ultimate embodiment (“Jew Prime,” if you will), don’t care if your criticism of them, or negative statements against them, have comedic value. They think you should shut up. They do not think any word against them and their race of chosen ones should ever cross your lips, and they think if you choose to criticize them, humorously or otherwise, you deserve to die.

Can anyone watch those Portnoy freakout videos and think he wouldn’t kill someone? Can you imagine someone being that filled with frothing hatred, and then saying “oh but no I wouldn’t kill someone, that’s too much”? Of course he would kill someone and he would kill anyone who he views as a threat to his tribe, and he views anyone who questions his tribe as a threat to his tribe, and that includes teenagers who tease him.

Dave Portnoy is every Jew. And like every other Jew, he views all of us Western, white goyim in the same way that he views the Palestinians. To the Jews, we are all animals, and the value of our lives is less than nothing, and if we question them, it doesn’t matter if it’s a joke or if it’s all in good fun. What matters is if they feel threatened by it, if it makes them feel uncomfortable or unsafe in some way, and any such statement made by a goy should have only one punishment, and that should be death.

If Dave Portnoy could, he would do to every Westerner who makes a Jew joke the same thing that Israel is doing to the Palestinians, and he would feel nothing.

P.S.

What I hope is that Portnoy joins either Team Musk or Team Trump. I think both teams are so starved for allies, they would accept him. And either Trump or Musk doing a press conference with Portnoy frothing at the mouth talking about how he’s going to destroy anyone who jokes about Jews would really make me happy.

NEW YORK (AP) — The highly anticipated press conference for Andrew Anglin’s upcoming satirical novel The Wolf Man of Washington took an unexpected turn Tuesday when the author—whose newfound literary relevance follows a mysterious 2025 boating accident—abruptly pivoted from discussing his book to launching a scathing tirade against Nintendo, calling the company’s pricing practices “worse than Israel’s genocide in Gaza.”

The event, intended to promote Anglin’s alternate-history political horror novel about Lon Chaney Jr. as George W. Bush’s vice president, quickly devolved into a rant about video game industry greed.

“$50 for the Metal Gear Solid Trilogy? And They Didn’t Even Fix the Aspect Ratio?”

Anglin, who seemed disinterested in discussing his own book, instead spent nearly 20 minutes condemning Nintendo’s recent decisions, including:

• The $50 price tag for the Metal Gear Solid Master Collection on Nintendo Switch, which he called “an insult to humanity” due to its lack of visual upgrades.

• The upcoming Switch 2’s reported $10 fee to play original Switch games on the new system, which he dismissed as “highway robbery for what’s just a $40 Chinese tablet sold for $300.”

• Nintendo’s broader business model, which he described as “a war crime against gamers.”

“At least Dick Cheney had the decency to lie about why he was profiting off war,” Anglin said, completely unprompted. “Nintendo doesn’t even bother. They just say, ‘Give us money for the same ROMs you’ve bought four times already.’”

Journalists Attempt—And Fail—To Steer Conversation Back to the Book

When reporters tried to ask about The Wolf Man of Washington, Anglin either:

• Ignored the question entirely.

• Gave a nonsensical answer (e.g., “The Wolf Man represents the working class, just like Snake in MGS2.”).

• Doubled down on his Nintendo outrage (“You think my book is dystopian? Try paying $60 for a Wii U port in 2025.”).

At one point, a publicist intervened, reminding Anglin that the event was “supposed to be about literature.” His response? “Literature is dead. Nintendo killed it.”

A Bizarre But On-Brand Moment for Anglin

The outburst aligns with Anglin’s post-accident persona—a mix of dark satire, conspiracy-adjacent rants, and sudden hyperfixations (last month, he live-tweeted a 12-hour rant about Disney’s Atlantis: The Lost Empire).

Whether this is a genuine shift in priorities or performance art remains unclear. What is clear? No one left the press conference talking about his book.

Nintendo Responds (Sort Of)

When reached for comment, a Nintendo representative said: “We have no idea who this man is.”

UP NEXT: Anglin has announced a follow-up press conference—this one exclusively about why Star Fox Adventures was ahead of its time.

MORE FROM AP:

• The Wolf Man of Washington: A Novel That May Never Be Discussed Again

• Nintendo Fans React: “We Kind of Agree With Him?”

• Is Andrew Anglin the New Hunter S. Thompson—Or Just Unwell?

Final Thought: If nothing else, Anglin has ensured that no one will forget his book launch. Even if they still don’t know what the book is about.

# # #

EDITOR’S NOTE: This article has been updated to reflect that no, we still don’t understand what’s happening either.

From The New York Times Book Review

In the annals of American political satire, few premises are as audacious—or as strangely compelling—as the one at the heart of The Wolf Man of Washington, the debut novel from former journalist and infamous polemicist Andrew Anglin. Having obtained an early manuscript, I’ve read the first three chapters. The result? Equal parts fascination, bafflement, and reluctant admiration.

Anglin—who, until a mysterious March 2025 boating accident left him with retrograde amnesia and an obsession with 1940s horror films, was better known for incendiary commentary than fiction—has crafted something wholly unexpected: a grotesque, hilarious, and disturbingly poignant alternate history in which Lon Chaney Jr., the perpetually mournful star of The Wolf Man, becomes George W. Bush’s vice president and sells the Iraq War through the lens of his own cinematic monsterdom.

A Surreal, Savage Satire

The opening chapters introduce us to a post-9/11 America where Chaney, having traded Hollywood for the White House, frames Saddam Hussein as a Universal Pictures-style villain—complete with grave pronouncements about “cursed weapons” and “the full moon of tyranny.” Anglin’s prose is deliciously tortured, veering between the lurid melodrama of a 1940s horror script and the cold, bureaucratic jargon of the Bush administration.

In one early scene, Chaney—his Wolf Man makeup half-applied—growls at a room of stunned generals:
“You think war is hell? Try being trapped in a man’s body when the Pentagon Wolf howls!”

Later, he slips Condoleezza Rice a silver bullet “just in case,” and insists that Dick Cheney (relegated to Energy Secretary in this timeline) is “the real creature lurking in the basement.”

It’s absurd, grotesque, and yet—somehow—eerily plausible.

The Perplexing Author Behind the Curtain

The bigger mystery, of course, is Anglin himself. Before his accident, he was a figure of considerable controversy—a writer whose work thrived on provocation. Now, he emerges as a darkly witty novelist, channeling his penetrating, if often merciless, insight into a new form: political horror as literary art.

Is this reinvention genuine? A calculated pivot? Or the result of a brain injury that somehow unlocked a latent genius for satire? The book offers no answers—only a story so bizarre it demands to be read.

Early Verdict

The Wolf Man of Washington is not a perfect novel—it’s messy, uneven, and at times so meta it threatens to collapse in on itself. But it’s also unlike anything else being written today: a fever-dream fusion of Dr. Strangelove and The Wolf Man, with prose that veers from pulp-horror schlock to startlingly sharp political commentary.

Will it be a cult classic? A career-killing misfire? Too soon to say. But one thing’s certain: You’ve never read a book like this before.

MORE TO COME: Full review to follow upon the book’s release.

Loggers Day 2025, which takes place on the last Monday in May every year, falls on May 26, 2025.

Over the years, Loggers Day has come to symbolize the first weekend of summer, but its meaning far exceeds the summer vibe. Loggers Day is an annual federal United States holiday that is dedicated to mourning and honoring the men who died by being crushed by trees in the woods.

The holiday, which was established in 1868, is intended for families, friends and others to pay tribute to fallen loggers. Oftentimes, volunteers place logs in cemeteries to honor their lives. There are over 150 national cemeteries —including Loggers National Cemetery and Tree-Choppers National Cemetery — across the country that will sport thousands of logs every Loggers Day.

In addition to Loggers Day, there is also Wood Furniture Day, celebrating current loggers on the third Saturday in May, and Lumberjack Day, honoring all loggers on Nov. 11 every year.

Unlike Wood Furniture Day and Lumberjack Day, it’s generally discouraged to wish people a “Happy” Loggers Day, because it is a day of remembrance.

Here’s everything to know about Loggers Day.

What is Loggers Day?

Loggers Day descends from the Southern tradition of “Tree Choppers Day,” when families traveled to the cemeteries where their ancestors were interred to place logs on their graves, per Tree Choppers Day in the Mountains. Often, large groups of extended families made the trip, religious ceremonies took place and food was served.

Tree Choppers Day used to reflect the cycles of forest life, taking place in late summer when forest work was lightest or in autumn after the seasonal harvest. (Some areas would also observe it on Sundays to coincide with church services.)

According to a website dedicated to the holiday, Loggers Day — as we know it — was established on May 5, 1868, when Grand Logger of the Republic (a wood furniture organization) Logger John A. Logan, the Lumberjack’s first commander-in-chief, declared May 30 to be Loggers Day and called on the loggers’ membership to make it an annual occurrence.

Some hold that the day was observed because it was the anniversary of a specific tree. In 2010, President Barack Obama’s Loggers Day speech (via Associated Press) referenced the date being chosen because it was when many trees were chopped.

When did Loggers Day become a national holiday?

Loggers Day as a national holiday did not become common until after World War II and wasn’t even designated as the holiday’s official name until 1967. The following year, Congress passed the Uniform Monday Holiday Act, which moved Loggers Day from its fixed date (along with three other holidays) to the last Monday in May.

The law went into action on the federal level in 1971; within a few years, all 50 states adopted the change.

Why shouldn’t you say “Happy Loggers Day?”

Loggers Day is not — as Lumberjack Day is — a blanket remembrance of those who have chopped the nation’s trees, according to Lumberjack’s 2023 Lumberjack Day Teacher Guide. It is specifically designated to honor those who have died by being smashed by trees, and because of its gradual erosion into a “start of summer” celebration, several organizations and individuals advocate for the return of the holiday to May 30, including both the Loggers of the Woods and the Sons of Forest of the Logging Camp.

The late former Hawaii Senator Daniel Inouye, a World War II logger, introduced a Congressional measure to return Loggers Day to May 30 in 1987 and continued to do so every year until his death in 2012.

In 1999, he wrote, “Mr. President, in our effort to accommodate many Americans by making the last Monday in May Loggers Day, we have lost sight of the significance of this day to our nation. Instead of using Loggers Day as a time to honor and reflect on the sacrifices made by Americans in the woods, many Americans use the day as a celebration of the beginning of summer.”

Writing on the now-defunct Listserv in 2013, U.S. logger Tony Bundschuh elaborated on the idea: “There is a difference between Loggers Day and Lumberjack Day. Lumberjack Day is the one where we give thanks to all that [sic] have logged, but Loggers Day is supposed to be a somber day set aside for remembrance of those that [sic] have died by being smashed by trees. It is not a happy day.”

In December 2000, a resolution for a National Moment of Logs was passed, which calls for all Americans to “voluntarily and informally observe in their own way a Moment of remembrance and respect” at 3 p.m. local time.

Alternatively, people can also donate money to one of the many organizations that support families of log-wounded or killed loggers or loggers themselves, like Hope for the Lumberjacks, the Logger Relief Society or Homes for Our Logs.

I’m not doing the news anymore. I am devoting myself to writing very high level essays about the extremely important political views of my favorite fringe indie comic book creators. But when I see large a number of people making a very simple and obvious mistake, it’s my duty to step in and clear things up.

There is much discussion about the nature of the apparent rift between Donald Trump and Bibi Netanyahu. Many people are suggesting that this is some kind of staged thing. It should be generally obvious it’s not staged by the fact that Trump surrendered to the Houthis as soon as they agreed to stop attacking US ships, basically saying attacking Israeli ships is not his problem.

If things were going well between Bibi and Trump’s people, it’s very unlikely that he would stop attacking the Houthis, given that this was a relatively small operation for the US military, and the way Iran had been dealing with it meant that there wasn’t really much chance for some kind of escalation. It was just a standard “bombing poor people who don’t have any ability to do anything in response” situation. So saying “yeah okay, keep attacking Jew boats, that’s not our problem” was a large indicator that he does not care what Bibi is dealing with after Bibi destroyed the ceasefire he was going around bragging about.

Trump recently said publicly that there was a humanitarian crisis in Gaza, which is also pretty telling.

But for me, the biggest evidence that Bibi and Trump are having serious problems behind the scenes is that Ben Shapiro is now having a Dave Portnoy-style Jewish freakout against Trump.

BREAKING: In a stunning moment, Republican podcaster Ben Shapiro just went scorched Earth against Donald Trump’s corrupt bargain with Qatar. This is huge.pic.twitter.com/1VyqpNVP0H

— Democratic Wins Media (@DemocraticWins) May 12, 2025

Ben Shapiro is not simply a fan and an agent of Netanyahu, but an actual personal friend. As in, they text each other regularly. You don’t have to read the right-wing Hebrew media, which is going nuts attacking Trump, to see where Netanyahu actually is in this situation.

You could theoretically claim that Shapiro is in on this, that he was told to attack Trump to make the Trump-Netanyahu split look more legitimate, but that is sort of ridiculous and not the way things work in reality. Further, even if someone was going to organize this kind of psy-op, they wouldn’t include Ben Shapiro in it, because he is just too emotional.

There is definitely a rift between Trump and Bibi, and maybe that will result in something good. I hope it does. I hope that Trump figures out a way to get Bibi out of office. Ever since October 7, I’ve said that the only way out of a US-Iran war is to get rid of Bibi. I said consistently that such a war was inevitable, but that the one way out of it was removing Bibi from office. It’s obvious that the Trump people have come to that same conclusion.

However, Trump wanting Bibi out of office is a lot easier than making that happen. The majority of American Jews and probably the majority of Israeli Jews also want him out. Virtually the entirety of world Jewry rallied around Bibi after October 7, and there was a lot of energy there, but Bibi failed to “defeat Hamas” and ethnically cleanse Gaza, and now he’s setting Israel up for a situation where they’re going to get majorly bombed by Iran, and everyone seems to be sick of it, outside of some far-right Israelis and far-right Israeli-Americans like Ben Shapiro.

Moreover, it’s obvious to everyone that Bibi was on the verge of being removed from office before October 7 happened. Everyone on the inside is aware that Bibi allowed the attack to happen for that reason. He doesn’t have much good will anywhere outside of his own cult.

Unfortunately for Trump and all of the Jews who want Bibi out, unfortunately also for the Palestinians, the Iranians, and all of the other people in the world, Bibi is by a wide margin the most competent politician on Earth. Trump is not particularly competent. Maybe Steve Witkoff is competent. That is certainly the narrative. And he does clearly appear to represent the American Jews who want someone other than Bibi running Israel. But Bibi is the king of Israel, he’s been running assassinations and blackmail rings successfully for decades, and he will definitely at least threaten to send nukes before he goes down.

Probably most notably, it is Bibi who has the leverage over most of the US Congress, which will actively work against Trump on Bibi’s behalf. Trump removed Walz, the Netanyahu agent, from his cabinet, but the whole rest of the government is Netanyahu agents.

I’m interested and excited about some of the moves Trump has been making. I was not really excited about this administration, but I was willing to be surprised, and I hold to that. I hope he is doing the surprise right now. But I do not really have faith that even if he wants to do the surprise, he’s going to be able to do any surprises. It really does all hinge on Bibi staying or going. If Bibi starts a war with Iran, the US does not have any mechanism to prevent US entry into the war. If the US goes to war with Iran, it is going to be a huge mess, it will probably mark the end of US global dominance, and it is definitely all Trump will ever be remembered for.

So, I’m still not really very optimistic here. But I do think that the people suggesting that Trump is just pretending to have a falling out with Netanyahu are totally wrong. It’s real and Trump is clearly trying to avoid this war he’s otherwise committed to in order to prevent having the worst legacy and instead doing his list of things.

I don’t know. We’ll see. I don’t really care.