This Pelosi Home Invasion Really Seems Like Some Kind of Hoax

What are the chances that days before the election, the day Elon Musk takes over Twitter, a person with a supposedly white supremacist and anti-Semitic WordPress blog scales the walls of Nancy Pelosi’s compound and hits her husband on the head with a hammer?

It just seems like too much. I don’t really say that all events are fake unless there is a chance to prove it is fake, and with this there is no way to prove it either way. I just generally think it’s not worth talking about if you can’t prove it. Beyond that, there’s a kind of stigma to it. Slower-witted people on 4chan will call you a schizo, and the opinion of people on /pol/ is very important to me so I don’t want them calling me names. They already call me Argon. They call me Dark Child. They call me Night Master. I don’t need them calling me schizo.

But let’s be real: faking events is not really that hard. Look at the Ukraine. Obviously, it’s easier to fake events in the Ukraine. But it wouldn’t be impossible to fake an event in San Fransisco. The cops wouldn’t even have to be in on it. Really, Paul Pelosi doesn’t even have to be in on it. Nancy is a bitch, she surely has all kinds of hate for her husband and probably wouldn’t care if he got hit with a hammer.

This was happening:

Then all of a sudden:

It might be real. I obviously have no way of knowing. I think that’s really what determines the “schizo” label – people claiming they know things that they can’t actually know.

In general, I think you can ask if any event is fake. Ye is asking about George Floyd’s death being staged, and I think that’s probably valid. I asked about that early on, because the whole BLM thing was obviously planned beforehand, and they couldn’t afford to have it not happen. The BLM movement had to happen under coronavirus. I backed down off of asking about it because I was being cyber-bullied with “schizo,” and I think it basically turned out to be real, but I think if there’s evidence there should be more questions.

When you get into the stuff in the 1960s, with the CIA funding massive distribution of LSD and actually manipulating rock music, something like hitting someone with a hammer or killing some black guy seems very easy to stage.

Along with Russia, look back at Syria – they used actual crisis actors to stage fake gas attack events.

And I hate to say it, but look at the way they protect Sandy Hook. It’s illegal to question it now. If you ask whether Sandy Hook was fake, you have to pay one billion dollars. Moreover, that ruling appears to apply to everything – there is a precedent now that it’s “defamation” to ask if an event was faked, so if you ask if something else is faked, you can end up being sued over it.

Also: the State Department is now saying that Russia stages events with crisis actors. At the same time, they’re saying it is impossible for the US to stage events with crisis actors, because they’re too moral. Does that follow? Do you think the CIA is moral?

Here’s the thing: if I was running this society with the goals it has, I would use staged or fake events as the main driver of events. Why wouldn’t you do that? It’s too easy, and no one will believe it. Even if you get caught, no one will believe it, because it just sounds too nuts.

It’s at least worth asking about.

Assuming it is real, blaming white people on the internet and Elon Musk is Jewish.

If you want to talk about who would inspire this kind of thing, well, I’ve got an idea…