Daily Stormer The Most Censored Publication in History
Andrew Anglin
Daily Stormer
November 20, 2017
Not so rosey now, are you Charlie?
There is something oh-so-sweet about all these people I hate being destroyed by something I was opposed to them for creating (feminism).
It is like Jews dying of some kind of anal sex disease.
Charlie Rose is old as shit and this is going to completely destroy his legacy.
Good job serving Jews, Charlie. I’m sure you’d do it all again.
Eight women have told The Washington Post that longtime television host Charlie Rose made unwanted sexual advances toward them, including lewd phone calls, walking around naked in their presence, or groping their breasts, buttocks or genital areas.
The women were employees or aspired to work for Rose at the “Charlie Rose” show from the late 1990s to as recently as 2011. They ranged in age from 21 to 37 at the time of the alleged encounters. Rose, 75, whose show airs on PBS, also co-hosts “CBS This Morning” and is a contributing correspondent for “60 Minutes.”
There are striking commonalities in the accounts of the women, each of whom described their interactions with Rose in multiple interviews with The Post. For all of the women, reporters interviewed friends, colleagues or family members who said the women had confided in them about aspects of the incidents. Three of the eight spoke on the record.
Five of the women spoke on the condition of anonymity out of fear of Rose’s stature in the industry, his power over their careers or what they described as his volatile temper.
“In my 45 years in journalism, I have prided myself on being an advocate for the careers of the women with whom I have worked,” Rose said in a statement provided to The Post. “Nevertheless, in the past few days, claims have been made about my behavior toward some former female colleagues.
“It is essential that these women know I hear them and that I deeply apologize for my inappropriate behavior. I am greatly embarrassed. I have behaved insensitively at times, and I accept responsibility for that, though I do not believe that all of these allegations are accurate. I always felt that I was pursuing shared feelings, even though I now realize I was mistaken.
“I have learned a great deal as a result of these events, and I hope others will too. All of us, including me, are coming to a newer and deeper recognition of the pain caused by conduct in the past, and have come to a profound new respect for women and their lives.”
Most of the women said Rose alternated between fury and flattery in his interactions with them. Five described Rose putting his hand on their legs, sometimes their upper thigh, in what they perceived as a test to gauge their reactions. Two said that while they were working for Rose at his residences or were traveling with him on business, he emerged from the shower and walked naked in front of them. One said he groped her buttocks at a staff party.
And it goes on. You can go read the porno details, but that’s the basics of it.
I will say that it is a lot less outrageous than anything the Jews did. Just normal, to-be-expected type stuff.
I don’t feel bad for him because I am driven by hate, and I hate all of these people.
But the thing here is: if literally all women are at least FEELING as though they are being abused all the time, maybe they shouldn’t be in the male workplace?
Did anyone imagine that something other than this would happen, when you put women in a position where they were doing something at which they are completely incompetent, and they have men over them with the ability to promote them?
How could you look at this equation and not see that all sorts of illicit sexual behavior would be going on?
Why not send these whores home?
