Andrew Anglin
Daily Stormer
July 5, 2015
A Moslem is running a campaign to be Mayor of London (yes, this is somehow legal, apparently), and his greatest argument is that having a Moslem mayor would stop Moslem terrorism.
He has also implied that if we don’t have a Moslem Mayor of London, terrorism will increase. Which really sounds like a threat.
A Muslim mayor of London would send a message to all “the haters in Iraq and in Syria” that the city is a beacon of tolerance and respect, Sadiq Khan, one of Labour candidates for the job, has said.
Khan, the first Muslim MP to be elected in London, set out his case for why it would be helpful for the capital to have a Muslim mayor just days after the terrorist attack on British tourists in Tunisia and ahead of the 10th anniversary of the 7/7 bombings next week.
The former cabinet minister is the only Muslim running to be the Labour candidate. Syed Kamall, an MEP and potential Conservative candidate, is also a Muslim.
Khan, the son of a bus driver from Pakistan, said the extremist bombers who killed 52 people on 7/7 were against British values and the British way of life, so electing a Muslim mayor would send a “phenomenal message and would say something about our confidence as a city”.
“If Londoners decided to do that, the message it would send to the rest of the world would be quite awesome,” he told the Guardian. “The reality is that we are a beacon in all sorts of ways. I think it’s just worth thinking about the impact it could have. It shows the confidence of Londoners – that we don’t simply tolerate but respect each other.
“The idea that the mayor of London could be son of an immigrant, son of a bus driver, ethnic minority – and by the way, of Islamic faith – would speak volumes, particularly when you bear in mind 10 years ago these four men wanted to destroy our way of life.
All Moslems want to Islamize Europe. But there are two strategies. One strategy says “blow things up,” the other says “immigrate en mass and take over the political system through voting.” As you can see here, these two strategies are in no way opposed to one another. This Moslem politician is using terrorism as a reason to forward his political agenda, and ISIS has repeatedly said that they will conquer Europe using immigration.
It’s good cop, bad cop: “we can do this the easy way or we can do it the hard way.” The psychological message, clearly, is that the only way to stop Islamic violence is to willingly submit to Islam.
Something needs to be done. We need to have a conversation as to whether or not full-Islamization is what the people of Europe desire. No longer can they continue to claim “it’s not really happening.” It is obviously happening, and no one can deny it at this point.