Bernie Sanders Condemns Mass Import of Indian Garbage

See, this is what I told you: the left will not support Indians. No one will support them, other than shills and other Indians.

Granted, Bernie Sanders used to be against all immigration, but he completely cracked on that and has supported mass immigration for a decade. Yet he knows no one cares if he comes out against Indians, because literally no one wants them.

This brings up a fascinating issue: white liberals support mass immigration of third worlders, because they are easily able to avoid them. Poor immigrants live in the areas that formerly belonged to the working class or the blacks. They rarely have to see them in their workplaces, unless they are cleaning the toilets or delivering food. Liberals can get a feel-good “I’m so moral” dopamine boost by supporting these immigrants without having to deal with the consequences (at least for a couple decades).

Indians, however, are flooding middle class and upper-middle class jobs and neighborhoods. Therefore, white liberals will not support them. Because no one wants to be around immigrants. It is simply that liberals never had to deal with immigrants before this Indian shit-flood which has taken place over the last decade and a half.

This is the winning issue on which we can sink the entire anti-white ship.

It’s possible or probable that most white liberals will not be as vocal as Bernie Sanders is on this issue (though they might be). But the bigger thing is: they’re not going to protest in support of Indians. If they see right-wingers demanding these people be put out of the country, they are just going to keep quiet.

The entire army of immigrant-lovers is going to at least sit this one out and they might actually come to our aid in saying that this is a billionaire scheme to drive down wages. Obviously, third world immigration is the same thing, but again, that doesn’t affect them, so they don’t care.

People’s political views are always driven by the things that affect them, the things they care about. People weigh these things, and put different values on them. The value of “I’m a good person so I support what the TV says” is much higher for liberals than conservatives (although conservatives do this with Israel and Jews, so the conservative willingness to do this is not zero). But when an issue becomes a reality which invades their personal space, supporting the TV thing is no longer worth it.

You saw this already with “woke,” both the black power agenda and the child tranny thing. Liberals were all-in on “I’ll support this because the TV says I’m very good if I do,” and then after a while the affects of these agendas creeped into their personal lives and though they didn’t start screaming “niggers out!” or “two genders, faggot!”, they stopped making a point of defending these agendas. The “I’m a good person, I got the head-pat and everything” dopamine hit no longer outweighed the real world consequences.

I know everyone hates white liberals, but the reality is that any time we can get them to go along with things we support, it’s objectively a good thing, and helps the overall agenda of moving the zeitgeist of society to where we want it to be.

You cannot prevent the government from doing anything. This is a democracy, meaning it doesn’t matter what you think about anything, the government can just do whatever it wants, because you have no recourse. Therefore, the only thing that matters is accumulating popular sentiment, streamlining it, and creating massive rage among the populace. Eventually that will boil over. Or maybe it won’t. Who knows. But we do know the government won’t do shit, so there is nowhere else to go but to the appeal to popular sentiment.

Anti-Indian activism is an open straightaway, nothing but blue skies.

Pedal to the metal.