BREAKING: Greta Thunberg Tells Andrew Tate He has a Small Penis! OWNED!

Andrew Anglin December 29, 2022

Internet personality Andrew Tate tweeted that he has a lot of very expensive cars.

To everyone’s shock and amazement, Greta Thunberg, a retarded girl with no breasts, responded by telling him he has a small dick.

With 2.5 million likes in under 24 hours, this is the top viral tweet of the week.

Various people on Twitter are going on about how Thunberg (pronounced “Toon Barge”) defeated Tate by telling him his dick is small.

There are many things you could say about this, but the most obvious (and presumably most important) piece of commentary would be about the fact that women are only capable of perceiving anything in terms of sex. That is to say, they only perceive men in terms of sex, and they only perceive the universe in terms of their relationship to men.

It’s all very primitive. The entire orientation of women is out of prehistoric times. Their view of reality has not changed at all.

What has changed is that men have adopted feminine values, and now engage in this sort of sexual orientation to the world. Men were seen celebrating this tweet.

In times past, every man on earth would have seen that tweet and said “ugh, women are so repulsive and primitive.”

Women only relate to men through sex, and they only relate to women in terms of their pecking order in the sexual hierarchy, because the only reason they exist is to serve men and to get pregnant (this is literally why God invented women). They can’t break out of that. But men are naturally much more complex and interesting, and are capable of relating in a myriad of different ways to each other and to the world.

Ultimately, men have the ability to touch the metaphysical, which puts them above primitive animal drives.

The men who relate to reality exclusively through sex are the kind of men who identify with retarded teenage girls. It’s an increasingly large group.

Andrew Tate responded to Thunberg in a way that I thought was rather weak.

Criticizing the syntax comes across as a bit whiny. He’s not really giving his followers a high energy buzz off of the celebrity conflict, which should be the point.

I would have said something like “my dick’s bigger than your tits and has the right number of chromosomes, you mopey faced little mutant.”

Greta would have been like:

Nah, I wouldn’t have said that. I’m a very nice person.

But I also wouldn’t have been bragging about having 33 supercars. By the way, this is obviously not true. With the kinds of cars he’s driving in his materials, that is at least like $10 million in cars. Unless you’re really irresponsible with money (which isn’t possible if you’re super rich), to have $10 million in cars, you would have to have $100+ million. Even then, it simply would not make sense to buy a bunch of cars. I guess he is half black, but still.

I don’t really like to criticize Tate, because I basically think he is a good influence given the current state of influences on men. But some people do seem to look at what is really a comedy routine he is doing and think it’s serious.

From what I’ve read of his material, he doesn’t really understand masculinity all that well, and his self-help advice is sub-par. I think he’s better than Jordan Peterson, of course. But I would say he should at best be viewed as “inspirational entertainment.”

On some level, I would say that his entire orientation, being based on Pick-Up Artistry, is really a feminine orientation, being that it is based around becoming the kind of man who is most desirable to women. I’ve actually driven more than one Italian supercar, and though it is fun as a novelty, it’s really not something that you would want to do on a daily basis unless you were specifically trying to impress women. Much of his material is along those lines.

I can’t imagine being 40 years old and basing your life around having sex with as many women as possible. But again, it’s a performance, so I’m not sure he actually does that in his personal life, but I can only judge him on the image he presents.

The bad material is really bad.

He just retweeted this tweet he posted three weeks ago:

Can you identify what is wrong with that message?

I will probably do a Twitter thread about it later today (@WorldWarWang).

Anyway – I know we have a lot of diehard Tate fans in the audience, so I want to be clear that I’m not against him at all. I just think his presentation needs to be consumed in context.

© Copyright Daily Stormer 2023, All Rights Reserved -- Join the Daily Stormer site chat for future updates in case of further domain seizure.