Charlie Kirk May Have Lost His Status as “One of the Most Men Alive,” But Will be Remembered as an Evil Villain

Andrew Anglin September 11, 2025

No wonder the shooter missed his face

Apparently, seeing some guy get shot in the neck is traumatizing for many people. I don’t really know why, given the level of desensitization we’ve all experienced. I mean, it really seems kinda nuts, the fact that this is being considered such a big deal.

I really would have preferred if the Yankees would have held a moment of silence for Iryna Zarutska, a brutal murder victim who wasn’t trying to destroy my country for the Jews.

But okay.

The thing here is, Charlie Kirk was playing a game which he apparently didn’t understand the stakes of. When you are involved in politics, and you are out there encouraging wars and celebrating killings, you are voluntarily involving yourself in a game where people die. To imagine that you are able to work to get untold numbers of people killed by promoting the mass murder machine, and yet somehow never have to worry about that coming back on you, is totally confusing and deranged.

He was promoting and celebrating the deaths of people all around the world, mostly Israel’s enemies, but others as well, and the idea that a person can do that without understanding they are making themselves a target is obscene.

Personally, I used to get death threats from Ukrainians all the time. It was not something that offended me, as it just seemed like something that would obviously happen. Obviously, I don’t want to be killed, so I take precautions, but if I ever were killed, I would understand, while bleeding out, that I played the game and knew the stakes and that’s the way the cookie crumbles. I would not expect people to whine about how unfair my death is, because frankly, it wouldn’t really be unfair, would it? If I’m supporting other people dying, which I certainly have been during the Ukraine war, I’ve involved myself and understood the implications. I would hope only that the Russians would vow revenge, which they’ve done for all civilians who have been murdered by Ukrainians.

The crocodile tears over Charlie Kirk’s death from people like washed-up basketball star Barack Obama, Israeli dictator Bibi Netanyahu and bulbous forced meme Nick Fuentes are truly repulsive.

I agree that how we respond to this moment is important. I wouldn’t include “watershed” or “profound” in that sentence. But if you respond like a faggot, you look like a faggot, and people will think you’re a faggot.

People die, bro. Sometimes they get shot in the neck and blood squirts out like a fountain. It’s not really that big of a deal, and if the person is a sickening shill for the Jews, it might actually be sort of hilarious. Not hilarious to me of course because I’m a really good person and I want everyone on the internet to know that I’m a really good person who is really upset when anyone dies. But some other people might find it hilarious.

Charlie Kirk was one of the single most fiendish men working in American cultural manipulation. His evil acts go far beyond being literally the only non-Jew under 50 promoting the super-hardline Zionist narratives like “there are no starving Gazans, it’s a staged hoax” and “Israel has never targeted civilians.” Like, literally no one says that sort of stuff anymore, and hasn’t in like a year, and he was out there just reading Netanyahu press releases as fact every single day.

But let’s go back a bit. Much has been said about Kirk’s advocacy for using sanctions to force people in Africa to have gay sex.

But at the same time, he was aggressively attempting to manipulate the American right-wing young into accepting homosexuality as compatible with Christian values. He brought all kinds of homosexuals into his “Turning Points USA” group and promoted them and would berate people who claimed this was against Christian values.

Bizarrely, while for most Israel shills, the tranny issue is the only thing they really stand hard against, Kirk said that he is fine with trannies, he just doesn’t want non-binaries. “There are two genders, pick one” he said, telling trannies just to stick to classic trannyism instead of believing there is a “gender spectrum.”

That is notably much further than the likes of Bari Weiss or Ben Shapiro have ever gone on the tranny issue. Typically, these Israeli agents decide, “well, we can’t just only talk about Israel all the time, so we need some other issue,” and choose the tranny thing. Kirk couldn’t stick to that.

He was a key proponent of the idea that “America is an idea” and not a real country. Here he is speaking in Israel in 2019 saying that America is just “ideas,” but that Israel is a real country because it is holy.

At one point, he called for fifty million “legal” immigrants. He also invented the “staple green cards to diplomas” meme.

I believe that was in 2020. I don’t know if he backed down on that, maybe he did, but he never apologized for it.

Literally, this man’s entire career was about manipulating American Christian values, flipping them on their head, coercing people to believe the opposite of what right-wingers have always believed. At least, that was his main goal before October 7th, at which point he pretty much just only talked about Israel and how we have to support them genociding Gazans or we will have Sharia Law in America.

Oh, and he was supporting all of those other wars too. Most recently, he was spamming Twitter about how great it was Trump blew up that boat he said was a drug boat without any evidence, praising the Cuban spy Marco Rubio as a hero for killing these randos as part of a plan for regime change in Venezuela.

And of course he was promoting regime change in Iran.

The one war he was actually against was the Ukraine war. Some people are now saying a Ukrainian could have assassinated him, and that is actually possible. It seems more likely it was a tranny or an intelligence agency who is going to blame it on Iran. It’s possible that it doesn’t matter who it was, they will just blame Iran.

People are calling it “ghoulish” to celebrate Kirk’s death, and I suppose celebrating anyone’s death could be considered “ghoulish.” But getting assassinated doesn’t somehow make you a good person, regardless of what you did in life. We’re all of course against political violence for some reason no one has really explained and have to keep saying that, so of course I too must say “I am so against political violence for some reason,” but America is better off without Charlie Kirk. And he is going to be really, really hard to replace. Again, I cannot think of any non-Jew under the age of fifty who is willing to go around talking about “Israel is our greatest ally, they’re fighting Hamas over there so we don’t have to fight a Hamas invasion of America, there aren’t any war crimes, the food blockades are a hoax, no one is starving, most moral army.” He was on the level of Sean Hannity. You don’t see anyone else doing that.

But no, I don’t feel sad Charlie Kirk died, and I’m not going to post some social signally thing about “oh woe is me, political violence, oh the horror, can’t we just vote for change???”

You can post six million pictures of his wife and kids. I’m not doing the bit with the rest of these people.

A New Era of Political Violence?

I’m not the only one who’s been saying that because democracy is a totalitarian system where the public has no ability to petition grievances – they just tell you to vote for one of two parties that are basically the same – if there are significant grievances that people want petitioned, when they realize these grievances cannot be petitioned, they are going to start shooting and blowing things up. Actually, I think pretty much everyone with any basic comprehension of human realities has been saying that.

Because it is something inevitable, there is no real way to assign any kind of value judgement to it. You can say “violence is bad,” which seems childish and without any intrinsic meaning. You can certainly say “I wish it wouldn’t have come to this,” but again, it was always going to come to this. Democracy can work if people don’t have any real grievances, if you give them a job and a house and a car and a wife and a dog. They will not think very much about the government. But as soon as things get hard for people, when people get frustrated, and they realize that they have literally no ability to use the system to change anything, they are going to become violent.

Now you have the Luigi thing. You have this Charlie Kirk thing. Who knows how bad it is going to get, but it’s obvious that there isn’t going to be less political violence going forward.

It feels a bit like complaining about the weather. It’s hard to really know what else to say.

In terms of the political implications, yes, I think it will lead to more police state type measures, but then more police state type measures will lead to more violence by random individuals. A police state can’t really stop that. Maybe a Palantir pre-crime system can stop some of it, but the more you push on people with these kinds of openly tyrannical measures, the more people are going to feel they’ve no opinions, and the more violent they are going to become.

I’m sure there are a lot of simulations about how this will all work, but the simulations are mostly going to be done by companies that are trying to sell physical and digital police state equipment to the government.

I think it’s safe to say that it’s not going to be a very fun time. Beyond that, predictions are difficult.

© Copyright Daily Stormer 2025, All Rights Reserved -- Join the Daily Stormer site chat for future updates in case of further domain seizure.