Daily Stormer The Most Censored Publication in History
It’s established law in these United States: you do not have to bake a poop cake.
It is a fundamental human right to eat poop, but a baker doesn’t have to assist you.
These are our top freedoms.
Colorado’s top court on Tuesday ducked the question of whether a Christian baker had the right to refuse to create a cake for a customer celebrating a gender transition by dismissing the discrimination case on procedural grounds.
Lower courts in Colorado had concluded that Masterpiece Cakeshop and the bakery’s owner, Jack Phillips, had violated Autumn Scardina’s rights by refusing to make her a pink cake with blue frosting because of her identity as a transgender woman.
“Autumn Scardina”
Phillips, whose prior refusal to make a wedding cake for a gay couple was at the center of a case that went to the U.S. Supreme Court, had on appeal urged the Colorado Supreme Court to conclude that requiring him to make the cake would infringe his free speech rights under the U.S. Constitution’s First Amendment.
Faggots are completely obsessed with this guy.
He beat them at SCOTUS, so apparently there are just faggots lined up outside his shop every day demanding poop cake.
But the state high court on a 4-3 vote avoided that issue entirely by instead concluding that under the Colorado Anti-Discrimination Act, Scardina, a lawyer, was not permitted to sue the baker in 2019 following an earlier administrative process.
Scardina had initially filed a discrimination complaint with the Colorado Civil Rights Division after Phillips refused to make the cake she wanted to order to celebrate her birthday and her identity as a transgender woman. She said he refused her order because of her identity.
The commission reached a confidential settlement with Phillips, without Scardina’s participation. Justice Melissa Hart, writing for the majority, said Scardina should have challenged that decision in an appeals court, rather than file a new lawsuit.
Justice Richard Gabriel, in a dissenting opinion joined by two other justices, called the majority’s ruling “troubling” for how it “throws Scardina completely out of court.”
“I am concerned that Masterpiece and Phillips will construe today’s ruling as a vindication of their refusal to sell non-expressive products with no intrinsic meaning to customers who are members of a protected class (here, the LGBTQ+ community),” he wrote.
Why are homosexuals a “protected class”?
What does it mean that in America we supposedly have “equality” but also have “protected classes”?
How can both things be true?
How can you force a man to bake a cake?
In actual fact, based on the existing law in this stupid faggot country, the baker is legally required to make a poop cake. It’s in the Civil Rights Act that normal people do not have rights to freedom of association, and “protected classes” are allowed to order them to do things. This “protected class” vs. normal people Master-Slave dynamic is supposed to be counterbalanced by “religious freedom,” but you are expressly not allowed to say it is against your religion to bake a cake for niggers, so there is no reason you would be allowed to refuse to bake a poop cake.
American law is totally Jewish and does not make any sense. It is not based on a system.
That’s why the court didn’t want to make a real ruling and simply dismissed the case.
Guy’s been in and out of court for the past 12 years or so
