Conservatives Whine After FBI Director Says Shrapnel Could Have Caused Trump Ear Scratch

Andrew Anglin July 26, 2024

Here we go.

Finally.

The velocity of the bullet passing that close to Trump’s skull would have caused a shockwave and brain bleeding. There is kinetic energy surrounding the bullet. People are asking about this. CNN published an article about it.

“It could have actually been shrapnel, which is why he only received a small cut and was out making campaign calls – including to RFK Jr. – immediately afterward” bypasses the question of how he would not have had some kind of brain damage from a bullet passing that close to his skull.

The Guardian:

Christopher Wray, the FBI director, has raised questions about whether Donald Trump was actually shot by a bullet during the assassination attempt against the former president earlier this month or whether he was instead struck by shrapnel.

During a hearing on Wednesday in Washington, before the House judiciary committee, Wray told lawmakers that it was not clear what precisely caused the injury to Trump’s ear during the shooting at his campaign rally in Butler, Pennsylvania, earlier this month.

The burst of gunfire from a shooter on a roof with a sightline to the stage and crowd killed one rally-goer and left others wounded.

“There’s some question about whether or not it’s a bullet or shrapnel that hit his ear,” Wray testified. “As I sit here right now, I don’t know whether that bullet, in addition to causing the grazing, could have also landed somewhere else.”

Well, that’s some more very serious and very convenient incompetence.

Wouldn’t the FBI close the entire grounds of the shooting until they found all of the bullets?

Newsweek published an article about Wray’s statements, and conservative retards flipped their lids.

It doesn’t make any sense, but they started attacking Newsweek for just reporting on Wray’s statements.

I don’t think they read the article.

Apparently their issue was with the headline itself. They claimed that shrapnel is a part of a bullet, so you are “shot” if you get hit by shrapnel. Firstly, that’s a stupid semantics argument, and secondly, there is a term “hit by shrapnel,” which is distinguished from “getting shot.”

They should support this, however, because it is an explanation that is at least viable, whereas “grazed the ear” is just totally dumb.

Interestingly, if they did claim shrapnel hit Trump’s ear, they would also have to admit that stupid “photo of a bullet” is fake.

They never should have released that fake photo. It proves the whole thing is fake.

Did you catch that Doug Mills, the person who supposedly took that photo, is the same guy who allegedly took the photo of George W. Bush being informed about 9/11?

Pretty wild coincidence, huh?

This whole Trump shooting thing is such an obvious scam.

No one will ever know what happened exactly, but the FBI director doing damage control and explaining why it looks so much like a cut, rather than a bullet would, goes a massive way towards vindicating me.

The doctor who examined Trump would have been able to tell if it was a bullet or shrapnel, and he decided to say it was a bullet, because that was the narrative. Now there are all these people saying “that doesn’t really make sense,” so they come out with this.

But if it was shrapnel, where did it come from? A ricochet off of something presumably, but what? I guess people can look at the photos from the site of the shooting and make their own conclusions.

The most likely options for what actually happened is:

  • Trump had a doctor cut his ear before the event, and he reached up to pull off a bandage, causing blood to come out. This would be very easy, given that the ears bleed so much.

Other options include:

  • A blood capsule being popped on Trump’s ear by him or a Secret Service agent
  • A blade being used by Trump or a Secret Service agent

Whatever the case, the CIA was clearly involved, setting up the patsy. The CIA would have the ability to force the SS to stand down, which they obviously did (no one even denies that part).

It’s most likely that the patsy was shooting blanks, or not shooting anything at all (the SS apparently moved the body and messed with the alleged spent cartridges), because otherwise he likely would have hit Trump. No one can miss that shot, hence the theory that it is a “miracle.” But none of the people claiming it is a miracle will explain why God would miraculously intervene to save a guy who supports abortion, anal marriage, and endless wars for the Christ-killing Jews.

A second shooter would have been there to shoot into the crowd and kill that fireman. And before you ask: no, I don’t think they would have told Trump people were going to die. There would be no reason to tell him that. I don’t know that I think he is moral enough to not go along with that even if they did tell him, but he would probably be a bit squeamish about it, and again, there is just no reason to tell him. (Note: They could even tell him afterwards that it was an accident that real people got hurt, which would also make him believe he had been in real danger, which would make his acting when talking about the event better.)

I’m Not Backing Down on This and I Will Continue to be Vindicated

I know a lot of people who generally follow along with everything I write are skeptical of me on this issue. I get that. But I do not pander.

This Wray “shrapnel theory” is a massive vindication of what I said from day 1. I will continue to be vindicated.

This was a fake assassination attempt.

There is no way that retardo MK Ultra guy (both his parents are psychiatrists, by the way) getting on the roof was a result of Secret Service incompetence. It’s not possible. I don’t care about DEI; the snipers choose their own perches, and they are not retards, they had to have been ordered not to protect that perch and they had to have been ordered not to shoot the patsy until after the shooting.

I am telling you: I know I am right about this, and you are going to see that I am right when Trump wins and goes full-Israel like no president in US history.

© Copyright Daily Stormer 2024, All Rights Reserved -- Join the Daily Stormer site chat for future updates in case of further domain seizure.