David Cameron Says Israel Denying Food and Water to Gaza is Against International Law

Oh wow, four months later, the UK realized this is a human rights abuse.

I guess they had to spend some time calculating the variables in their supercomputers to really figure out the truth of the matter.

The Guardian:

Israel is in breach of international law as the occupying power if it fails to provide food and water to the people of Gaza, the UK foreign secretary, Lord Cameron, told peers on Tuesday in his clearest warning yet over Israel’s conduct.

He also said it was simply not possible for people in Rafah to leave as proposed by the Israeli Defense Forces, remarks that suggest the UK would not endorse any Israeli plan to mount a full-scale attack on the area containing more than 1 million people in crowded refugee camps. He also argued the US was beginning to shift on when Palestine might be recognised so Israel was no longer given a veto.

He said: “The people who are in Rafah on many occasions have already moved three, four or five times. And it’s not possible to move again, they can’t go north because they’d be going back to homes that have been destroyed. They can’t go south, because that would involve going into Egypt, which none of us want to see and the Egyptians do not want to see.

That is why it’s so important, the Israelis stop and think before going ahead with any operations and wrap up.”

But he sidestepped a request by one peer for the UK to halt arms supplies to Israel, adding Hamas could stop the fight immediately.

See: EU’s Borrell Says America Should Stop Arming Israel Instead of Begging Jews to Stop Killing Civilians

He said the US was reviewing the point at which it was willing to recognise a Palestinian state, since recognition that came only after an agreement between Palestine and Israel would provide Israel with a veto.

He said just because recognition of Palestine did not happen at the beginning, “it doesn’t mean it has to wait right till the end. One of the things that is beginning to change, which I think is hopeful, is the American posture. Up to now that has been that recognition can only come when Israel and Palestine agree on the creation of a Palestinian state, but if you do that you do, effectively, give Israel a veto over a Palestinian state. That’s the opposite of creating the sort of unstoppable momentum towards a two-state solution that we all want to see”.

They’ve been talking about a “two-state solution” for 70 years.

It’s meaningless gibberish, and I’m not surprised to hear this big news item on the topic coming from Lord Gibberish himself.

All of these people are staunchly on the side of the Jewish murder machine, because they are all paid by Jews, and they only give lip service to Palestine to prevent an uprising.