Syrian “refugees” in Denmark heading to Sweden.
The Demarkians must be confused.
The Syrian civil war never ended, just like the coronavirus pandemic never ended, and the QAnon paramilitary threat never ended.
There has always been a Syrian civil war.
Denmark has become the first European nation to tell Syrian refugees to return home after deciding that regions of the war-torn country are now safe.
The Scandinavian nation has stripped 94 refugees of their residency permits – and claims that Damascus and its surrounding regions are no longer dangerous enough to give grounds for protection.
Migrants will be sent to deportation camps, but the government will not force them to leave.
Mattias Tesfaye, Denmark’s immigration minister, said last month that the country had been “open and honest from the start” with refugees entering the country from Syria.
Mattias Tesfaye, Denmark’s immigration minister.
He said: “We have made it clear to the Syrian refugees that their residence permit is temporary.
“It can be withdrawn if protection is no longer needed.”
Mr Tesfaye added: “We must give people protection for as long as it is needed.
“But when conditions in the home country improve, a former refugee should return home and re-establish a life there.”
His remarks came as the Danish government extended the regions of Syria deemed ‘safe’ for the return of refugees to include the southern Rif Dimashq Governorate.
It means that 350 Syrians will have their temporary protection permits reassessed, on top of the 900 from the Damascus area whose cases were reopened last year.
The Danes are too scared to say this themselves. Because all white people are too scared to say anything about anything. So they put the BASED Moor up there to say it.
The brown immigration minister making the statement that some of the brown people have to leave speaks to an interesting phenomenon. As far as I know, the Daily Stormer has never argued for a 100% pure white racial population of white countries, and has instead argued that there should be a defined white super-majority, and made comparisons to Japan and other nonwhite countries, where foreigners are allowed to go and live, as long as they follow the rules and recognize it’s not their country.
So having an intelligent brown person around is not the problem. It’s not even necessarily an absolute fact that you would never allow one of these people to serve in public office. That generally is always bad, but you can imagine some unique situations where it could be possible. Particularly, in a situation where that person is managing other foreigners. Just as a small example, Thailand, which is (technically was, in coronavirus world) a tourism capital of the world and also has a fair number of white people living there permanently, has a “Tourist Police” department that is run by white people, because if there is conflict between two white people, Asians don’t understand what is going on and don’t know what to do. (Tourist Police also serve as a form of makeshift defense lawyer for whites if they get caught with drugs, some girl who lied about her age and is under 18, or commit some other crime against the state.)
So, in some other universe, we could see a situation where there was a brown person who was effectively the head of Brown Person Affairs, and the Danes had a press conference with some white authority figure and also the head of Brown Person Affairs, and the white man made the announcement and the brown person then spoke and said that he was going to enforce the statement. But we all know that isn’t what is going on here.
White people are not allowed to say: “this is our country and we make the rules here, and we’ve decided you have to leave.” Instead, they ultimately imply, by putting this brown man in this position, that only he has the moral authority in nonwhite issues. They have effectively made a symbolic brown person the gatekeeper of their sovereignty.
We can never win this battle if we are unwilling to stand up and say “we have our own moral authority, that authority comes from God, and we do not need the permission of any brown person in order to make decisions about who is allowed in our country.”
I’m just gonna go ahead and make a prediction: the refugees aren’t going home. For one thing, the EU won’t allow the Danish to make that decision, and for another thing, they are admitting, by sending a brown person to say it, that they don’t have the moral authority anyway, and thus it is effectively just a suggestion or a protip.