Denmark’s Second-Biggest Party Unveils Rules for Islamic Ghettos

Andrew Anglin
Daily Stormer
January 7, 2018

Your standard European “teen gang.”

Denmark is moving towards becoming Orban-tier in their opposition to Islamics. Only they already have a large population of them, so they must oppress them in their ghettos.

It will be super-fun if they start banning mosques and send in black-clad Combine soldiers to keep them off the streets at night and pick up that can in the day.

RT:

The right-wing populist Danish People’s Party (DPP) has unveiled a radical seven-point plan to tackle social problems in migrant-dominated areas, after the country’s PM said he planned “to physically bulldoze” ghettos.

The most contentious part of the initiative, which has dominated headlines this week, is a curfew on unsupervised under-18 children on the streets of so-called problem areas after 8pm. Martin Henriksen, the DPP immigration spokesman, says there is already legislation that allows local authorities to impose such restrictions, and that it won’t be applied to students or those with jobs, nor at all times. He said the DPP plan would ensure children study rather than rove in teen gangs.

Visible policing will also be intensified in the “ghettos,” which boast some of the highest crime rates in the country. Among other suggestions is a moratorium on the construction of mosques with minarets, as they project a “divisive symbolism,” Henrikson, an MP, told Arab News. Instead, Muslims will be encouraged to pray in unmarked spaces, such as “warehouses and offices.”

Yeah.

This isn’t admitted by really anyone but it is well-known: the criminality of Moslems in Europe is actually part of their religion. That includes drug-dealing and especially robbery and rape. They are involved in a religious war against the continent, so they are encouraged by the religion to do things that harm the native population.

In 2017, Denmark received just 3,500 asylum applications – the lowest number since 2008 – but the Danish People’s Party believe conditions for would-be asylum seekers need to be made stricter to whittle this down further. It further proposes that those with temporary asylum must not be given citizenship, but sent back to their homeland as soon as it is safe.

Last month, Henrikson suggested that rejected applicants should be sequestered on one of Denmark’s 300 uninhabited islands prior to deportation. While most of these ideas would be considered shocking in neighboring Sweden and in Germany, the parties of Denmark’s governing coalition offered no clear official comment – perhaps due to their reliance on the DPP’s 37 parliament seats to secure a parliamentary majority.

Most of the criticism focused on the curfew proposal, which prompted the Minister for Culture Mette Bock to question: “Are we in Denmark?” Several other senior politicians from across the spectrum dismissed the suggestion as “bloody crazy” and “insane.”

The curfew is more controversial than the mosque-ban, which says a lot. It’s possible that their only goal was the mosque-ban, and they added the curfew so they could give something up in negotiations. Honestly, I’m not sure why they wouldn’t be allowed on the streets of their own ghettos at night – it makes more sense to create a police border around the ghetto to keep them in it. The banning of mosques makes sense on the level of the larger society, because it is their religious organization that drives their war against the locals. The structures of their sex and drug gangs would be ungrounded without the mosques, and they would be disheartened.