“Epstein Client List” is an Unhelpful Bit of Terminology and Presumably a Misnomer

Andrew Anglin July 20, 2025

A trove of sex tapes has been confirmed by government officials, but the “client list” is a conspiracy theory. You see how they do these games with words?

Eyyyy. Reporting on Epstein again. The Trump implosion and the Tucker Carlson “everyone in Washington knows America is controlled by Israel” speech got me fired up.

Firstly, a slight correction (not really a “retraction,” but a correction): when I said Epstein was prosecuted by the feds in the mid-2000s before being arrested by the feds in 2019 and charged with the same crimes, I was writing from memory, and was slightly (possibly consequentially) wrong. (Maybe my memory has been blown out, but it was six years ago.) In fact, it was a state conviction. However, part of his plea deal included a non-prosecution agreement (NPA) with the feds. I’m not a lawyer, and this is a very specific question, but my robot says that the NPA is not the same as a conviction and was only with the Florida district, and therefore the 2019 arrest in the Southern District of New York (SDNY) might technically have been legal. This would definitely have been the legal battle Epstein would have fought if the case had gone to court: he would say the NPA from Florida covered all federal districts and the SDNY would say it only covered Florida. According again to my robot, there is literally no precedent as to whether an NPA in one federal district covers other federal districts, so the arrest was certainly questionable and highly unorthodox, but maybe not illegal.

The reason this is relevant is that he obviously died in prison. Furthermore, it appears the feds wanted to raid his house and get the blackmail material from his safe. I still do not quite understand what went on there. My original assertion was that the most likely thing was that some people in American intelligence were not happy with the situation of the Mossad running this Epstein operation in the US, and attempted to thwart it, and somehow the Mossad organized the death of Epstein in federal custody. As I say often, a significant part of my job is to look at all of the information and then try to come up with the most likely explanations for things.

Even if the arrest was not technically illegal because there was no precedent and no one knows whether a federal district NPA holds up in all federal districts, someone in the US government organized a very strange arrest and then presumably someone else killed him in prison. Remember that also in 2019, American-based Jews were organizing color revolution style protests in Israel against Bibi Netanyahu. These protests became more extreme the next year, and continued until October 7, 2023. Bibi repeatedly publicly blamed George Soros for the protests.

You would think that arresting a top Mossad agent in the US would be related to attempts by US Jews to oust Netanyahu. It just appears that this would be obvious. Assuming that the reports were true, and the raid in 2019 uncovered a safe containing hard drives and CD-ROMs with videos of men having sex with underage girls, that trove of blackmail is a kind of “ring of power” type thing.

“Epstein Client List”

I wanted to address something related to the widely alleged claims that Epstein filmed all these rich and powerful people having sex with underage girls: at some point, someone came up with the term “Epstein Client List.” I do not understand the meaning of this piece of language and do not think it is helpful and think that in a strict sense, when Pam Bimbo said “there is no Epstein Client List,” she was being truthful. This slogan-type language leads to an ability for the government and others, potentially involved, to deflect.

If we break down this very popular term, which led to the very popular slogan “release the Epstein Client List,” we have no issue with the word “Epstein,” but both the other words – “Client” and “List” – both seem inaccurate and useless.

First, “Client.” What does that mean? It is a person using the services of someone. This suggests that Epstein was a pimp, which is not what I think he was. He was a Mossad agent offering the service of allowing people to give video of themselves having sex with underage girls to the Mossad, which would then allow them to advance in their career, as they would be marked as a trusted person by powerful Jews.

Just a note here: I used the term “voluntary blackmail,” and some people found this concept confusing. It’s actually not confusing. You’ve all watched crime films that feature corrupt cops, right? Serpico is probably the most famous and maybe the best, but any film or TV show featuring corrupt cops has a scene where the cops are keeping a criminal’s money or taking a bribe and one of the cops wants to be “clean” and refuses to take the cash and the other cops freak out and say he has to take his cut. This is because if he takes the cut, they know he can’t rat them out, because he is a co-conspirator.

(I just spent ten minutes looking for the scene in Serpico where he refuses the money or the one where the other cop asks him “why didn’t you take the money, Frank?” and I don’t think either is online. Anyway, you can just watch the whole movie. It’s good. Though for the record, the real Frank Serpico said “Al Pacino did a great job playing Al Pacino but that’s not me.” I think he mostly meant the unhinged personality, rather than the facts. But for the source material, the book Serpico wrote is also very good and recommended.)

Along with corrupt cops, the old school mafia had the same rule, with members required to commit some crime, often murder, that everyone else in the gang knew about in order to advance in the organization (again, you’ve seen that over and over in movies). And of course the mafia made sure everyone was taking a cut of the criminal money so everyone was implicated in everything, even if they didn’t commit a murder. Meyer Lansky, the Jewish mafia accountant, reportedly said: “The best way to keep a secret is to make sure everyone who knows it is guilty too.”

It’s the exact same concept with Mossad jailbait sex tapes, this “voluntary blackmail.” Obviously, you’re not going to tell politicians and businessmen they have to commit a murder (nb4 “Pizzagate is real”), so you use sexual blackmail, which is very simple and straightforward: you just have the Mossad guy with the cameras in the sex room, you tell people “go see Epstein,” he sends them to the sex room, all of a sudden you’re one of the gang and doors start opening up.

This is just obviously what was going on. No rich person or politician is going to have sex with an underage girl at some obvious spy’s house just because they’re horny. If you’re rich and powerful, and you want to have sex with high school girls, you’ve got a lot of options as to how to accomplish this.

So, with the word “Client,” I suppose he was in a way offering a service, the service of submitting blackmail to the international Jewish cartel. But the word, in this context, obviously implies he was a pimp, which is not what he was. So I don’t think it’s useful.

Then the word “List.” Why would there be a list? He had a safe full of videos. And the claim is that he specifically took the time to write up a list of the names of all the people he had on video? Why would he do that? He would have to keep the list in the safe, because he wouldn’t want someone getting it, and the safe is already full of the tapes themselves.

This slogan “release the Epstein Client List” allows for Pam Bimbo to go out there and say “there is no Epstein Client List,” and have it probably be technically true.

Remember that she had previously said that there were “tens of thousands” of videos of people having sex with “little girls.” James O’Keefe did his spycam thing on her and she told this to some random person at brunch. After O’Keefe emailed her and told her he recorded her saying it, she said it publicly.

Note that O’Keefe has entered “middle-aged Irish decline,” a syndrome where, in middle age, Irishmen become overweight drunks. No, I’m kidding, you don’t have to note that. I noted it, but my instruction for you to take note of it was a joke. (I like James and I believe in brutal Irish nepotism and so defend him, but he does need to be aware of the drinking. I had to convince myself of that. It’s something we all must consider.)

The “Client List” concept is stupid and irrelevant. People should be saying “release the videos.” Obviously you would blur the girls, because the government can’t distribute child porn, and also fags and Indian scammers like Kash Patel claim that releasing the videos would “victimize the girls all over again.” But just blur them. We have the technology to blur out portions of video.

At the very least, someone at the FBI went through and identified everyone in the videos, so they can release the “list” of the names of the people seen in the videos.

People just need to be careful with these slogans. “Epstein Client List” was never a good slogan. Nor was “black book” a very good term. There’s a trove of sex tapes, we don’t need to be talking about obscure and seemingly abstract concepts for the sake of easy slogans.

I will say that “release the Epstein Files” is a better version. But then you have Michael Tracey saying “which files?” as if he can’t understand the concept that we want to know which specific individuals were on video having sex with underage girls. That is the primary issue of interest here.

Another Direction Here?

Here’s something else I’ve been thinking about and wanted to mention: I would wonder how much of this blackmail material would have been in Epstein’s safe, especially given that someone in the Mossad would have presumably known about the raid, given that US intelligence is crawling with Jews who are effectively double agents for Israel. Also, just generally, Epstein had already been arrested once, and he was not a subtle person, so it seems reasonable to assume that after recording the blackmail material, he would immediately hand it off to someone in Mossad, or some of the Jewish billionaires in America who were involved in this.

Like, think about this: if you raided the houses of Epstein, Les Wexner, and Leon Black, where would you be most likely to find the actual blackmail tapes? At least the majority of them? And even then, after the 2019 arrest, you would think either of those Jew billionaires would have had the tapes buried on some farm they own.

Fun fact: these rich people all have various secret Fallout-style bunkers on rural farms. You’re not going to find too much written about that, though you can find snippets (the biggest being the reports on Zuckerberg’s underground complexes in Hawaii), but I can just tell you it’s a matter of absolute fact. I wouldn’t expect anyone to take my word for that, but just think for a second, and try to imagine a scenario in which that would not be true. If you were a billionaire, would you have an underground shelter in some rural locale or no? Seems pretty obvious.

But you could also just bury it in a field. I mean, hiding a box full of hard drives is not really that hard.

The report that there are CD-ROMs with “young [name] with [name]” written on them implies there was at least some blackmail material in the safe. But if it was Bill Clinton or Bill Gates, is that really where you would keep it? In Epstein’s private residence? Of course, Epstein personally would probably want to keep copies, so it’s probable that at least some of it was on his property.

Regardless, closing the investigation is ridiculous. If the DOJ doesn’t have the blackmail tapes, or doesn’t have most of them, then you would expand the investigation.

Donald Trump’s Claim It’s a Democrat Plot

The thing that Donald Trump is running with is that the Democrats fabricated Epstein documents to attempt to smear him. But this would mean that Biden and the Democrats, in a race against Trump, had these files that were designed to damage Trump, and didn’t release them, and then just hoped that after Trump beat Biden in an election, Trump himself would release the documents without reading them. That does not make any sense.

If it was that simple, and Epstein was not Mossad but just a pimp whose services were procured by Donald Trump at some point, or if the Democrats faked files to make it appear that way, Biden could have just released the doctored files. Of course, Biden couldn’t release the files as Epstein wasn’t a pimp but rather a Mossad agent.

What Trump is saying doesn’t make any sense. Although I went through the possiblity that Trump did submit to blackmail in order to secure bailouts from Jewish financiers during his bankruptcies, my gut feeling is that this is not true, because if it was, why would he jump into the fire of becoming president? I think – again, this is just my impression – that Bibi Netanyahu, who has a stranglehold on Trump and the whole US government, ordered Trump not to release these tapes and documents, and now Trump is forced to go on this “just shut up about it” tour that makes him look guilty of sex crimes.

Here’s the thing: having sex with a “miner” is a much lesser offense than enabling the Israelis to continue to control US politics. If Trump were to say “yeah, I did the sex thing, sorry about that, but this is all a Mossad blackmail ring,” some of the more conservative/evangelical/white knight members of his base might be mad, but I mean, they tolerated the “grab ’em by the pussy” video, and is this worse? Because the girl might have been slightly under this (totally arbitrary) age of consent threshold? I did discover that in the state of New York, there is no statute of limitations on jailbait offenses, but I mean, is he going to go to prison over it? Epstein had 36 girls known by the feds and the Florida AG, and he got 13 months. I don’t really think this is very serious, and surely it would be overshadowed by the revelation that the Israeli government is using underage girls to blackmail the most powerful people in America, including the president.

CNN and NYT would spin it, but the whole issue here is that basically every one of Trump’s supporters is turning against him, the one exception I’ve seen being Charlie Kirk, and if he wanted to get out from under this, even if he is implicated, he could just dump the files, even if he’s in them, and call it out as Mossad. I think you would get a lot of “he’s not a perfect person and this was wrong of him to do, but it was brave of him to come clean.”

One thing is crystal: Trump cannot possibly get out of this situation he’s in without a very serious change in strategy. This is really spiraling further by the hour. I think it’s obvious that Pam Bimbo and that Indian scammer guy are acting on Trump’s orders, but regardless, at this point they need to be fired. This has all just been totally ridiculous. These people could have kicked the can, probably indefinitely. Instead they decided to come out and say it’s all fake? Was that an order from Netanyahu and/or Trump? Because it doesn’t make sense as an order from Netanyahu. He’s a very good politician, and would know better. He would say “just don’t open the files,” and tell Trump to “kick the can and change the subject,” not send his people out to do press conferences saying the whole thing is a hoax. The way this has been handled is very bad for Israel, because everyone is talking about the Mossad now. At least on the right; obviously the Democrat media is just doing retard-tier salacious sex nonsense.

The claim that Jim Comey’s daughter altered the files is not really viable considering the way the government keeps records. There are still physical copies of everything. You can’t just go in and edit an MS Word file. But if she did that, that is a very serious crime that could result in life in prison, or at least multiple decades. She could be charged with sedition. If that happened, or if there is any remote suspicion that that happened, the files should be released and she should be called to testify under oath before Congress, and there should be a massive investigation of the FBI by… well, that’s a conundrum, isn’t it? Who do you call to investigate the FBI?

Personally, I would call the FSB, but I don’t think that would be a very popular solution.

[Note to editor: “miner” is a purposeful homonym joke, an ongoing bit about how out-of-work coal miners in Appalachia are being sex trafficked. I understand correcting it as I constantly accidentally do botched homonyms, but this one is done on purpose. Because for some reason alluding to the idea that these discussions are all about downtrodden coal miners getting sexually abused is really funny to me, probably because I’m retarded. Just leave this note.]
© Copyright Daily Stormer 2025, All Rights Reserved -- Join the Daily Stormer site chat for future updates in case of further domain seizure.