Daily Stormer The Most Censored Publication in History
I just really can’t even, quite frankly.
Did these people just have no concept of Islam at all?
If they had no concept of it, then why did they support it so aggressively?
There is no other possible reason than “because they hate whites and Christianity.”
In 2015, many liberal residents in Hamtramck, Michigan, celebrated as their city attracted international attention for becoming the first in the United States to elect a Muslim-majority city council.
They viewed the power shift and diversity as a symbolic-but-meaningful rebuke of the Islamophobic rhetoric that was a central theme of then Republican presidential candidate Donald Trump’s campaign.
This week many of those same residents watched in dismay as a now fully Muslim and socially conservative city council passed legislation banning Pride flags from being flown on city property that had – like many others being flown around the country – been intended to celebrate the LGBTQ+ community.
Muslim residents packing city hall erupted in cheers after the council’s unanimous vote, and on Hamtramck’s social media pages, the taunting has been relentless: “Fagless City”, read one post, emphasized with emojis of a bicep flexing.
In a tense monologue before the vote, Councilmember Mohammed Hassan shouted his justification at LGBTQ+ supporters: “I’m working for the people, what the majority of the people like.”
While Hamtramck is still viewed as a bastion of multiculturalism, the difficulties of local governance and living among neighbors with different cultural values quickly set in following the 2015 election. Some leaders and residents are now bitter political enemies engaged in a series of often vicious battles over the city’s direction, and the Pride flag controversy represents a crescendo in tension.
Wait, what in the heck did I just read in the liberal Guardian newspaper?
Did I just read that “living among neighbors with different cultural values” is “difficult” and creates “bitter enemies,” “vicious battles,” and “tension”?
Really?
Did that just happen?
I just read that?
In real life?
“There’s a sense of betrayal,” said the former Hamtramck mayor Karen Majewski, who is Polish American. “We supported you when you were threatened, and now our rights are threatened, and you’re the one doing the threatening.”
For about a century, Polish and Ukrainian Catholics dominated politics in Hamtramck, a city of 28,000 surrounded by Detroit. By 2013, largely Muslim Bangladeshi and Yemeni immigrants supplanted the white eastern Europeans, though the city remains home to significant populations of those groups, as well as African Americans, whites and Bosnian and Albanian Americans. According to the 2020 census some 30% to 38% of Hamtramck’s residents are of Yemeni descent, and 24% are of Asian descent, largely Bangladeshi.
After several years of diversity on the council, some see irony in an all-male, Muslim elected government that doesn’t reflect the city’s makeup.
I just can’t even.
The resolution, which also prohibits the display of flags with ethnic, racist and political views, comes at a time when LGBTQ+ rights are under assault worldwide, and other US cities have passed similar bans, with the vast majority driven by often white politically conservative Americans.
While the situation in Hamtramck largely evolved on its own local dynamics, some outside rightwing agitators connected to national Republican groups have been pushing for the ban on Hamtramck’s social media pages and voiced support for it at Tuesday’s meeting. They are from nearby Dearborn where they were part of an effort last year to ban books with LGBTQ+ themes.
Their talking points mirror those made elsewhere: some Hamtramck Muslims say they simply want to protect children, and gay people should “keep it in their home”.
But that sentiment is “an erasure of the queer community and an attempt to shove queer people back in the closet”, said Gracie Cadieux, a queer Hamtramck resident who is part of the Anti-Transphobic Action group.
Mayor Amer Ghalib, 43, who was elected in 2021 with 67% of the vote to become the nation’s first Yemeni American mayor, told the Guardian on Thursday he tries to govern fairly for everyone, but said LGBTQ+ supporters had stoked tension by “forcing their agendas on others”.
“There is an overreaction to the situation, and some people are not willing to accept the fact that they lost,” he said, referring to Majewski and recent elections that resulted in full control of the council by Muslim politicians.
Though the city’s Muslims are not a monolith and some privately told the Guardian they were “frustrated” with council, the only leader to publicly question it was the former city council member Amanda Jaczkowski, a Polish American who converted to Islam.
Haha.
Stupid bitch!
Go back to Poland!
Go die in Bakhmut, slut!
This is a Yemeni city now, and we do not tolerate anal faggots or whores who won’t keep their face holes shut!
The memes have literally come to life once again.
The way these people are attacking Moslems as a group just shows they never actually liked them in the first place.
No one thought Moslems love gay anal. Seriously. No one thought that.
White women supported the Islamic invasion agenda because they hate white men.
Or maybe it is some kind of civilizational scale “shit test.” I’ve put forward those theories before – that white women act out in support of all of these Jew agendas because they want their men to stand up and put them back in line, and white Western men are too big of faggots and mommy-sniffers to assert themselves, ever.
Or, to dial the analysis back a bit, white women just do whatever they are told by the state, because they are married to the state, whereas women from countries with less powerful states, that intrude into people’s private lives much less, support the men in their families instead of the state.
It is probably a combination of these factors.
It doesn’t really matter.
What matters is that white women are the army of the Jews, and they support whatever, without considering what they claim are their own interests.
Subversive Con Inc. Retards BTFO
Whenever we talk about gays and Moslems, we have to remember that the media personalities who seized the narrative before and after the election of Trump were pushing the narrative that conservatives would protect gays from Islam.
Time has proved that gays were the real threat, while Moslems are actually helpful in some ways.
Let’s remember that these same people were supposedly opposed to gay marriage, then all of a sudden they started pushing the gay agenda. It was really in large part due to conservative support for “Gay Agenda 1.0” that they were able to start pushing “Gay Agenda 2.0: Seize the Children.”
I have been watching some of these Rumble shows. I think Rumble is a good website, actually. I’ve watched a couple episodes of gay Jew Dave Rubin’s show, and his entire schtick is “we already solved the gay marriage issue, we can get married and no one is against it, these gays that are coming for the kids are betraying the gay agenda.”
Glenn Greenwald, another gay Jew (one I like a lot better than Rubin, frankly), is pushing a similar narrative during “pride month,” given that there is now a huge anti-gay backlash because these people are coming for the children.
Both Rubin and Greenwald have “adopted” (read: kidnapped) children. So, they already came for the kids.
Conservatives are completely worthless. They are now conserving the gay agenda by supporting a “traditional gay agenda.”
Here’s the thing: it does not make sense to say “I support gays and gay marriage – but stay away from the kids.” If you accept that homosexuality is fine, then why should you not have gay children? You have heterosexual children. If it’s the same thing, why should kids be off limits? That is the argument that the gays and women who support them are making, and it really just follows logically.
Conservatives do not have any principles. They have no basic framework for their positions, and try to say “just be reasonable.” Why was allowing homosexuality in the first place “reasonable”? No one ever thought that before, other than at certain short periods in Rome and Greece, which also featured man-boy love. (Really, they were defined by man-boy love, which is the “natural” form of homosexuality. All throughout history, when you talk about “gay,” you are talking about an older man with an adolescent boy.)
The framework that conservatives should be using is the Bible and a belief in Jesus Christ. If you follow Jesus Christ, these questions are very easy to answer:
- No approval of gays at all
- No mass immigration
- No women in public life, let alone in positions of power
- No Jews or other non-Christians allowed in power
- No wars of aggression/intervention (see: “just war”)
- etc.
That all just works.
There are no mental gymnastics required. Every moral dilemma has a quick and easy answer.
Obviously, if you have a Christian state, you still have disagreements and debates and so on, but not on questions of morality (which have become the central questions of the age). You can debate economics and some foreign policy. You can debate various laws relating to public order. Or whatever.
Two genuine Christians could, in theory, disagree about the tax code or whether or not bars should be forced to close at 2AM. But even then, if you are following Christian philosophy, and putting it in the context of Christian history, you are ultimately going to come to some kind of consensus.
