Daily Stormer The Most Censored Publication in History
Valerie, 50
Peasants need to learn to keep their mouths shut.
They have one job: to work to enrich immigrants and Jew bankers.
This is a democracy, and we do not tolerate insolence.
A woman in northern France is to be put on trial on charges of insulting President Emmanuel Macron after describing him as ‘filth’ in a Facebook post, a prosecutor said on Wednesday. The woman risks a fine of 12,000 euros but not prison if convicted at the trial due to be held in June.
She was arrested on Friday and held in custody for questioning after the state’s local administrative office filed a complaint over her Facebook post, the prosecutor in the northern town of Saint Omer, Mehdi Benbouzid, told AFP.
The complaint focused on a post on her Facebook page made on March 21, the day before Macron gave a lunchtime interview to TF1 television to defend his controversial pension reforms that have sparked nationwide protests.
“This piece of filth is going to address you at 1:00 pm… it’s always on television that we see this filth,” she wrote.
The woman, in her 50s, had been a supporter of the 2018-2019 “Yellow Vest” protests that shook Macron during his first mandate.
She stands accused of “insulting the president of the republic” and will stand trial on June 20 in Saint Omer, the prosecutor said.
“They want to make an example of me,” the woman told La Voix du Nord regional newspaper which first reported the accusations.
The woman, named by the paper as Valerie, said she was astonished when she answered the knock on the door on Friday morning to find police had come to arrest her.
“I asked them if it was a joke, I had never been arrested,” she said. “I am not public enemy number one.”
They used to say that the notable difference between a dictatorship and a democracy is that you’re allowed to insult the leaders. Many regularly pointed out that this is a dumb distinction, given that the leaders in a democracy are not actually “leaders” but puppet figureheads for financial powers and special interests.
But I guess they can’t even say that now. They can just say “oh well, at least you can vote in a democracy, even though it can’t effect change.”
Oh, yeah.
Right.
So it looks like democracy has all of the negatives and none of the positives and there isn’t really a single thing they can point to to support this being a valid system in any way.
This is a regular thing in France
