Andrew Anglin
Daily Stormer
September 5, 2016
Is this the face of pure evil?
In Germany, certain opinions about historical events are illegal.
The reasoning behind this is that if you hold these opinions about historical events, Jews have their feelings hurt. And there is nothing more evil than hurting the feelings of Jews, according to the German state.
However, some people claim that the laws against holding these opinions are not primarily based on a desire to protect the feelings of Jews, but instead designed to protect an historic lie of monumental proportions from any form of scrutiny.
A prominent German neo-Nazi dubbed the ‘Nazi grandma’ by German media has again been convicted of Holocaust denial and sentenced to eight months in prison.
The Detmold state court in Germany announced on Friday that 87-year-old Ursula Haverbeck plans to appeal the decision.
Haverbeck wrote a letter in February to the mayor of Detmold when a former Auschwitz guard was going on trial there, claiming the notorious Nazi death camp was only a labour camp and called survivors ‘alleged witnesses.’
Haverbeck was most recently convicted of Holocaust denial in 2015 for a similar statement in an interview outside the trial of a former Auschwitz guard in Lueneburg.
She was sentenced to 10 months imprisonment in that case but remains free as her appeal is heard.
Both guards were convicted of multiple counts of accessory to murder and are appealing.
Haverbeck, who is a friend of Gudrun Burwitz – elderly daughter of Nazi S.S. chief Heinrich Himmler – was sentenced for sedition over the interview she gave to a TV station denying that Jews were murdered in extermination camps.
In the interview with the ARD network she claimed the death camp of Auschwitz in Nazi occupied Poland, where at least 1.1 million people were murdered, was ‘nothing more than a labour camp.’
Please note here that there exists no physical evidence of homicidal gas chambers having existed at Auschwitz. This is a point which is not debated by the Holocaust-believers. No one claims that there is physical evidence for the Holocaust having happened.
The disagreement surrounds whether or not it was possible for the Jews to lie about the existence of homicidal gas chambers at Auschwitz. The Holocaust-believers argue that it is impossible that Jews lied about the existence of these homicidal gas chambers, which they claim were disguised as shower rooms, and thus the claims of Jews about these fake shower room gas chambers must be taken as fact.
Holocaust-deniers argue that without physical evidence, the existence of fake shower room gas chamber should not be taken as fact.