Daily Stormer

I am Once Again Asking for Your Support, While Also Laying Some Groundwork for My Tucker-Vance-Fuentes Analysis

Andrew Anglin

Editor’s Note: This is an e-begging post. However, it also contains the first segment of my Tucker Carlson-Jim Bowman-Nick Fuentes 2028 analysis preview, which I think you will enjoy. If you are seriously poor, you can skip the e-begging section. The Tucker section is clearly marked. Though I do pray you will help us if you can. 

There comes a time in a man’s life when he must post his Monday memes on a Wednesday. Sometimes then, he falls asleep from exhaustion on his desk as he is trying to upload said memes. Then, sometimes he wakes up, and the uploads are all broken due to poor internet, and it is already late night on Wednesday.

Every man is going to have to deal with that at some point in his life.

For me, that time came yesterday.

I am currently traveling, which is why I am failing at these memes. I am traveling as a part of my podcast project. But I’m headed to better internet.

Also, today I realized the site has nearly run out of money to pay for needed services.

I will deliver the memes early Friday, and again on Saturday, because I have double the memes.

I’ve also got some serious articles relating to Tucker Carlson, Jim “JD Vance” Bowman, Peter Thiel, Nick Fuentes, and the 2028 mega fiasco. We will post teasers for these below, and as introductions to the memes, and come early next week, serious analysis will begin.

But I come to you today once again asking for your support. I’ve been paying for the site for the better part of a year now, with no calls for contributions, because I was not doing much content, and it seemed inappropriate to ask for contributions. However, I am now in a bind, and I am also ready to deliver bigly (see roadmap below).

If you can, please contribute to helping keep us online.

Monero:

Here is the Monero address:

4BHE9T5HUqbRzsAaq5grGq31G3JevBD1RBNbRdWQLg8ESYugNNyyAnt2JL9ZuWA1w72g4LPr25rSHjQJS6MwANT3MMJFA16

Bitcoin, etc.:

If you have already anonymized your crypto, you can use these addresses:

BTC:

bc1qd35kpy3ghxhtg29cg5tl4aud5xr9xqwrkw6ucm

ETH:

0x33BD3683D518C45df6393E2276E724228a834757

Sol:

FG71bjrBSKcp2A9ZenyrHjvEw2ngmxbAebcBA4cnY1jM

ONLY USE THOSE IF YOU UNDERSTAND CRYPTO AND YOU ARE SENDING IT FROM AN ANONYMOUS WALLET.

If you don’t know how to anonymize coins and send them from a private wallet, please contact me and request a unique BTC (or ETH or Sol) address. This will keep your identity anonymous and prevent you from being banned from an app for sending to me.

Contact me on the encrypted Session App:

05572128ee1967255089ef79d7ad652b5c6765665b8299e294e05a37ac96dd0936

Or email me here:

staunchleftist1999@proton.me

I will send you a unique address, unique to you only, and not linked to anything related to this site, or to anything at all. I will lock those addresses and only use them to transfer the coins, without mixing addresses, to the anonymous Monero network, so everything is anonymous.

You can use Coinbase, Binance, Venmo, Cash App, or whatever. No one will know anything other than that you sent coins to a random address, which will sit for a while, and then eventually be run through an anonymous site anonymizing the coins.

There is no risk of getting identified or banned from your service.

I don’t usually check these things, but I will check all of my messages for the next week or so. If you want to send personal messages, that’s fine. But hopefully if you’re sending personal messages, you’re also sending money. When I open up these channels, I get thousands of messages, and it is very difficult to reply to them all. I will do my best, but mostly I will be prioritizing responding to messages from people who send money.

Frankly, it is difficult for me to open the messaging app or the email, because I just start writing long replies to everyone, and then never even make it 5% of the way through. So please understand, I would very much love to talk to all of you. I would call and chat with each of you for hours. But that is not physically possible.

I will, however, try to read the messages and hit you with a “thanks bro, love to hear it.” But if I start replying to every comment and question, I will end up writing thousands of words to a few people and then not replying to anyone else and not sending all the addresses.

Also, if possible, can you please not suggest that I get a PO box or do some other scheme to try to make donations easier? This simply is not possible, and writing me with these ideas, all of which I have spent many, many hours thinking about and looking into, wastes both of our time.

Best Time to Donate

I think Bitcoin has bottomed out for the time being. I seriously doubt it will go much lower. It could, no one can predict the future, but if Trump would simply relax for a couple weeks, we’ll be on the comeback trail, which will mean the money you donate now will likely be worth more soon.

This is Not a Business

I hold deep disgust for mugus. This post was particularly disgusting.

“Legalize drunk driving,” huh? I wonder where oh where he would have gotten that meme. He’s obviously not a drunk driver or any other kind of hardcore baller, based on that whining, capitalistic post.

Look:

Wow. That sucks so bad.

Watch this guy delete his account.

The “envious of success” thing is seriously the funniest thing on the entire earth. Though it is hard to keep track of the site’s numbers, given the lunatic measures we have to go through to keep the site online, all this caching and proxy relaying, even after all of my censorship, before Valentine’s Day when I told readers I needed a break from our relationship, I had 2-3 million monthly uniques by the most conservative estimates, which by my math indicates there were 800,000-1,200,000 people reading the site nearly every day. Meanwhile, before Fuentes was reinstated on Twitter by Elon Musk personally, he had an average of 20,000 views on his Rumble show. Obviously, getting back on Twitter, and then catching a windfall from the most extreme astroturf campaign I’ve ever seen in my life, he now has a significantly wider reach than me, especially considering the censorship I suffered in 2017, which remains the most extreme censorship of any publication ever in American history (you could maybe compare it to pro-Hitler people during World War II, but even then, I think I would win).

No one on earth believes that if I had the same opportunities, Nick Fuentes would be “more successful” than me. There is not a single person on earth who knows the facts that would make that argument. Saying I’m “jealous of his success” is like saying that after he broke his neck falling off a horse, Christopher Reeve was “jealous of the success” of horsemen who had working limbs. I am obviously frustrated that I taught Nick Fuentes everything he says that resonates with people (like, pretty much literally every single thing), and that he is able to say all of this and have absolute access to everything.

This is one of Fuentes’ responses to me since I called him out:

It is the gayest shit imaginable.

This cocksucker isn’t going to respond to anything I’ve said, so he does personal attacks and psychoanalysis like a woman. Just pure emotion. Adult men discuss ideas, women name-call and psychoanalyze.

He won’t debate me.

Remember when he used to say that anyone who can defend their ideas is not afraid of debate? He won’t debate me. I am not a good debater, and he’s spent 9 years honing these skills. But he won’t debate me. Because all of his lies, hoaxes, and bizarre behavior is indefensible.

If you’re on Twitter, ask him why.

This ties into the larger narrative I’m trying to unravel here. Some people can’t process the fact that because I am a key figure in all of this, I have to talk about myself, and instead attack me for talking about myself. It is impossible to understand what is going on with Nick Fuentes without understanding my situation and my connection to Fuentes. So I have to talk about myself. I was permanently banned and totally unpersoned. Fuentes says all of the things I said, given that I am the basis for his entire identity, and yet he is not only unbanned, but promoted everywhere. I have heard both Tucker Carlson and Glenn Greenwald say “he can’t be canceled.” This is patently false. I know both Glenn and Tucker are aware of me, I don’t know if they know the details. But there is no such thing as “uncancelable,” and if it were not for Elon personally deciding to let Fuentes back on Twitter, he would remain on Rumble with 20,000 average views (even while he is in the media as a friend of Kanye who dined with Trump).

Note: Trump defending Fuentes was a big deal, and a big piece of evidence for the narrative I am building.

To be clear: I do not have a fucking “business model.” These people are such freaks. I could not have a business model, because of censorship measures that Fuentes was spared from for reasons we can only imagine (given that he’s said all the same stuff I said and worse.) Further, unlike Fuentes, I never had the goal of making millions of dollars from political activism, and I don’t understand the mindset of anyone who thinks that is an ethical activity. (I do understand the mindset. It’s just a standard Indian-type scammer mindset.) If you care that much about money, how could it be possible that you could ever be trusted? Political activism is a type of charity. It is something you do for moral reasons. It is not a for-profit venture. If Fuentes framed himself as an entertainer, then sure, okay. But he frames himself as a leader of a revolution. Revolutionary leaders live in jungles or in exile, plotting. They do not stack stacks, have multiple homes and sports cars like Fuentes has.

To be fair, I have a skillset that can be monetized outside of my political activism, which Fuentes does not have. Being able to write means people will pay you to do all sorts of things, whereas being able to ramble uninterrupted, repeating something you read and mixing it with kook conspiracy theories, has no application other than podcasting. How a political activist would be expecting a seven-figure annual salary is above my comprehension. If you were actually an activist, you would donate the extra money to the cause. But that is a topic for another time. I simply want to point out that I have never viewed this as a business. That said, I really should have asked for contributions more often. But I didn’t, because I really don’t like it.

Content is Coming

As you know, I am working on a TV show. I have already put money into that, and will need quite a bit more. Before the TV show, in fact as soon as possible, we will be doing a practice podcast, which I am labeling a fake podcast, which will maybe be good but nothing compared to what I have planned. Then, in a few months, when I’ve got this set up and organized and figured out the money for my lights, cameras, and studio, we will be doing a very serious podcast, which will be in large part scripted, and will focus on explaining the news by analyzing how full of shit virtually all of these podcasts are.

As the same time, I will be writing more. I guarantee it.

The Look of the Site

No one wants to hear about this, so I’ll keep it brief. (It is kind of important, as it is the way people interact with the site, and so I want it to be good.) As stated many times since the event, the previous visual theme of the site broke, and my staff was unable to fix it. I was also not able to buy the old theme again, because I am permanently banned from using banks or credit cards. I spent over $500 on buying prepaid visas with crypto, and the site that sells the theme would not accept any of them. (Note: they work elsewhere, so it wasn’t technically a waste of money. Though these cards are really shitty, because they cannot be refilled, meaning if you have a balance of $15, it is hard to find a place to spend it.)

I did not have the money to hire someone to fix it, and further, it is impossible to give someone I don’t have a longstanding relationship with access to the site, which meant that it fell on me to fix it, and I have very little ability to do this.

I think it looks fine now. I understand there are still some issues on some phones. I am working on that. But I have so much going on. I am trying to finish up several for-profit operations unrelated to politics or activism. I have other real life stuff. I’m working on the podcast. And I’m trying to get regular articles up. Fixing the site, which is something I know nothing about, amidst all this other stuff, has been painful. But I like the black, I like the simplified layout, it loads fast, everything is fine now except maybe embeds stretching the width on the phone.

First Tucker Comment (Preview of What is to Come)

The core content of the TV show is to analyze the news by deconstructing the views of all of these “new media” people. One of the main podcasters we will be analyzing is Tucker Carlson. He is really at the center of the podcasting world, and he is also clearly the best. For a long time, the verdict was out on his agenda. That verdict is technically still out, but I believe I understand it much better. It seems quite clear that his goal is to run for president in 2028. Also clear is that he is working for Bowman, and the scheme to mainstream Fuentes is part of this agenda to build a post-Trump coalition. However, it seems very unlikely that Tucker will be satisfied with simply being a helper for the “Vance” creep.

I do believe Tucker believes in this “judge everyone as an individual” thing. Which frankly, I agree with. I simply think that it is the individual decision of someone born to a Jewish family to call himself “a Jew.” Whereas I am suspicious, rightfully so (obviously) of all Jews, I also cross the street if a group of young black males are headed toward me on the sidewalk. In the latter case, I do not argue that every single black is a killer, just that I want to be on the safe side. Due to statistics, I will not risk my wallet or my life by telling myself “I’m not racist, I’m not racist” and crossing paths with a group of black youth. Just so, I agree that not everyone born Jewish is necessarily evil (I generally appreciate Norman Finkelstein, Glenn Greenwald, Dave Smith, Max Blumenthal, and a few others). However, I am suspicious that any Jew is doing something weird and destructive, due to statistics, and will act accordingly.

I do not accept this idea that if you are engaging in generalizations, and making decisions based on pattern recognition, that you are “hating people because of their DNA.” I don’t really believe that “antisemitism,” according to the definition of “hating people for no reason other than because they were born Jewish,” is a thing. The only people I’ve seen express hatred for people based on how they were born are the Jews themselves, due to their “chosen people” ideology.

But it is simply a fact that only Jews are awarded this status where you are not allowed to use pattern recognition. People are allowed to talk about “black crime,” they are allowed to talk about the “Italian Mafia.” No one says “oh but you need to be careful because if you say that, it sounds like you mean every black is in a gang or every Italian is in the mafia.” It is taken for granted that you do not mean every single individual black or Italian.

I have had fights with AI about this. AI will be frank with you. I asked “what is the difference between saying Jews control the media and blacks control rap music,” and the robot said “it’s different because of the Holocaust.”

There is no rule that says a Jew is required to say “I am a Jew,” and when a person does say that, they are not simply identifying their ethnic origins, but showing that they identify with Jewishness. The key identity of the Jews is that they murdered Jesus. That is the basis of rabbinical Judaism, which was established after Christ, when the Romans destroyed the second temple. It is an offshoot of Christianity. They use parts of the Christian Bible and then mix it with very strange and satanic texts, and their focus is on their superiority to non-Jews and their hatred of Christ. A person that identifies that way is necessarily suspicious.

I recently said that when a person says “I am gay,” they are saying “I like to have things shoved up my ass.” Just so, when a person says “I am Jewish,” they are saying they hate Jesus and his followers. If a Jew says “my parents were Jewish, but I have rejected the Jewish culture due to its satanic nature,” I am more inclined to trust them. However, I will not completely trust them, given that statistically, when a Jew says this, he is attempting to trick you.

Seth Dillon of the Babylon Bee (which Greenwald has labeled “The Tel Aviv Bee,” despite the fact that “The Babylon Bibi” was staring him directly in his face) has claimed that he is “a Christian,” but continued to say he is also “a Jew.” This is a complicated convoluted situation, given that Jews are a separate ethnic group, which I recently heard an Israel podcaster who now does the “I Hate Tucker Carlson” show refer to as “white adjacent.”

“It’s a religion and a race” is both nonsense and sort of true. It does refer to a religion, and most people view it as a religion. However, they are genetically different than normal white Christians by some significant margin, and also prefer not to be called “white” unless they are doing their “my fellow whites” bit.

Look at this:

If they’re just white people, and Jewishness is just a religion, then why are atheist Jews also aggressive Zionists pushing for Israel and Jewish domination?

Probably, the best way to describe Jews, and this is a term I heard from a Jew, is as a “tribe.”

This is a fascinating recent clip of a Jew woman at a recent Jew event talking about how Holocaust education was a mistake, because it teaches people that all genocide is bad, when actually, genocide narratives only exist to protect Jews.

This is extremely extreme. And it has nothing at all to do with Israel. Well, it is tangentially related, but she says that Holocaust education (brainwashing in elementary schools) was intended to stop antisemitism, but now that the Jews are committing a genocide, the Holocaust narrative is being used against them. She says that the Holocaust narrative was never intended to stop genocide, but was rather intended to shut down criticism of Jews.

You can’t look at a clip like that and say that this is all just about the state of Israel. Frankly, Bibi Netanyahu and the Jews are right when they say that Israel is fundamentally a Jewish state and criticizing Israel is criticism of organized Jewry. The identity of the Jewish state is Jewish, which is why they are engaging in behavior, including the purposeful slaughter of children and the celebration of soldiers who shove things up men’s buttholes, which is fundamentally Jewish. Other groups would not engage in this behavior. Even if you believe in the Holocaust, the official narrative there was that it was done in secret. Israel is doing this in full view of the whole world, and the reason they are doing this is that they do not view non-Jews as human beings. That is a fundamental part of the Jewish religion, but it carries over very much into secular Jewish culture.

Tucker’s obsession with “yeah but not every single one” is ridiculous. Of course it is not every single one. It seems to be the overwhelming majority, not just in Israel but also in the diaspora. Very few Jews are criticizing Israel, and instead are claiming that anyone who criticizes Israel hates all Jews.

Tucker seemed to be getting at this, at least scratching the surface, in his response to Mark Levin and Ben Shapiro.

I disagreed with the liberalism and the defense of multiculturalism in that video, but overall, he is getting much closer to the mark.

Further, his 30-minute report on Thomas Crooks was brilliant.

I am very familiar with this group that was pro-Trump and then turned against him, ostensibly saying he didn’t do enough to stop the coronavirus. I always thought these people were feds. This was the trajectory of the “podcast network” TRS, which I exposed as being an FBI-controlled group. Further, there was a very extreme, obvious FBI asset named Brad Griffin who took this line and was compulsively attacking me for years, as is the case with all of the feds. Unz.com posted one of his articles attacking me, and I wrote a response to that attack on Unz. Griffin is not a relevant person, at all, but that should provide some context. He was associated with TRS and their neo-Nazi goon group, as well as Matt Heimbach’s goon group. All of this neo-Nazi stuff is always feds leading a bunch of morons.

Tucker notes that while Crooks was posting violent comments calling for assassinations, he was contacted by someone who appears to be from the Nordic Resistance Movement. The NRM was associated with the State Department’s project in the Ukraine, sending people to fight against the evil Russians in the name of Jewish neo-Nazism. It’s all circumstantial evidence, but the fact that the FBI is covering it up, while claiming that there is an ongoing trial (there is no trial, Crooks is dead), proves that they are hiding something. Of course it’s just very obvious that the FBI was involved in the shooting. I have my own views as to whether or not the shooting was exactly what it was presented as, but it is ridiculous to suggest that the shooter was not groomed by the feds, just as one obviously assumes the Charlie Kirk shooter was (although I very much doubt the Kirk shooter was actually the shooter).

Point being: I don’t agree with all of Tucker’s stuff. But he does usually seem genuine. There are, however, things he says that appear less than genuine, which I will get into. This includes the mainstreaming of Nick Fuentes. I mean, how bizarre is it that he spent years talking about how Fuentes was not charged for calling for violence on January 6, and then didn’t ask him about it during a two-hour interview?

Then you have this very interesting relationship to Bowman, who is Thiel’s man. Very, very interesting.

Everyone is framing the current battle as what things will look like when Trump is out of office, and who will take over the Republican Party. Vance is supposed to be the obvious successor, but Vance is going along with everything Trump does, while Tucker is denouncing virtually all of it. But also, Tucker and Vance have a very close relationship.

I’d Better Cap It There

This is a preview. As I write, it appears this won’t be posted until early Thursday, which means the memes will be on Friday. Then the analysis pieces will be coming soon, as will the new fake podcast.

My co-host says I scapegoated him by saying he doesn’t have internet last time. If this is the case, I apologize. But we will hopefully do this soon. I don’t know that the first episode will be great.

Most of the groundwork for the podcast has been laid.

This is the current roadmap:

  • This week: Memes and a good series of articles on these bizarre emerging 2028 political dynamics
  • Next week, through the end of the first quarter 2026: A fake podcast once a week along with regular long articles 2-4 times a week
  • This week and next week: Checking my email and Session chat for people who want unique Bitcoin or ETH addresses to keep the site alive
  • Early second quarter 2026: The launch of the official TV show
  • Beyond: A weekly Saturday night TV show and a Wednesday casual chatting show, along with regular long articles

I have not felt this kind of energy in several years. My goal with the show is to bring back the energy of early Daily Stormer. I am extremely confident this will work.

Contribute If You Can

These are pretty dire straits, given that I did not make any point to solicit donations when the content was low. I was still paying five figures to keep the site online, and it has driven up pretty quickly.

I implore you to do what you can. I’ve given my life to this, and I think I’ve helped a lot of people, and the site has not been monetized since 2017. So if this work has meant something to you, please try to help me out. The unique BTC (and other crypto) addresses should provide you with an easy way to contribute.