Daily Stormer The Most Censored Publication in History
Goy Orbison
Daily Stormer
June 23, 2017
No reason to include this. Just thought it was funny.
Over the past few years, the term “cultural appropriation” has started popping up everywhere. It’s a passive-aggressive way for uppity nonwhites like to take digs at white people, with the full endorsement of the establishment, Pajama Boy professors and snarky rootless-cosmopolitan Judenpresse outlets like Vice Magazine.
So what does this convoluted Jewspeak term mean, exactly?
Cultural appropriation is the adoption or use of the elements of one culture by members of another culture. Cultural appropriation, often framed as cultural misappropriation, is sometimes portrayed as harmful and is claimed to be a violation of the collective intellectual property rights of the originating culture.
So like when blacks mangle the English language or Moslems get behind the wheel of a large automobile.
Cultural appropriation by blacks. smdh
This Mohammedan appropriated a vehicle which, unlike a camel or a large goat, was not from his native culture. Still think cultural appropriation is all fun and games???
Or like when these invaders (referred to as “identity shoppers”) tell us they’re Irish/English/etc. because their passport says so.
Dunno about you, but I’m tired of seeing just white faces in our ads, our broadcasters and tourism material #WeAreIrish
— Úna-Minh Caomhánach (@unakavanagh) April 18, 2017
The definition sounds good so far, right? We all hate when nonwhites appropriate our culture by living in the countries our ancestors founded, butchering our languages, using our technology to make World Star Hip Hop and twerking videos, shooting our guns sideways, etc.
Well not so fast, goyim. This is where the academic weasel definition comes in.
Here’s the wind-up
Often unavoidable when multiple cultures come together, cultural appropriation can include using other cultures’ traditions, food, fashion, symbols, technology, language, and cultural songs without permission.
And the pitch.
According to critics of the practice, cultural (mis)appropriation differs from acculturation, assimilation, or cultural exchange in that the “appropriation” or “misappropriation” refers to the adoption of these cultural elements in a colonial manner: elements are copied from a minority culture by members of a dominant culture, and these elements are used outside of their original cultural context—sometimes even against the expressly stated wishes of representatives of the originating culture.
OF COURSE that’s how it works. See it’s bad when whites do it, but “minorities” get a free pass. And of course the only reason nonwhites (the global majority) are even considered minorities is because they’re in OUR countries for some reason. And of course this is something that we never voted on and is not up for debate.
We’re only considered the majority because no one wants to live in their shithole, majority nonwhite countries.
By the way, the term cultural appropriation was coined by a Jew, George Lipsitz, a particularly odious Christ-killer and racial agitator that masquerades as a professor and is cited as a “leading scholar in social movements, urban culture, inequality, the politics of popular culture, and Whiteness Studies.” If reading that definition made you wonder where such a slimy, underhanded Jewy manipulation of words came from, look no further than Lipsitz, the author of The Possessive Investment in Whiteness: How White People Profit from Identity Politics. (Nothing ironic about that title at all.)
Look at it – this creepy kike can barely hold back his laughter. “Can you believe they actually pay me to write this bullshit?”
Since then, this petty method of attacking whites has gained traction, so much so that it’s even found its way to the UN.
The World Intellectual Property Organisation (WIPO), a United Nations agency, is being asked to bring in “effective criminal and civil enforcement procedures” to prevent people profiting from cultural appropriation.
A specialised committee made up of delegates from 189 countries has for some time been working on legislation that would protect indigenous designs, dances, words, medicines and more.
James Anaya, dean of law at the University of Colorado cited Urban Outfitters’ “Navajo hipster panties”, “Navajo print flask” and “peace treaty feather necklaces” as examples of products falsely advertised as Indigenous-made or endorsed.
LOL
Yeah Tonto, we’ve got humanitarian crises and WW3 about to break out, but you’re right. Hipster panties violating Navajo copyright is a real pressing issue. We’ll get right on it.
Nice suit by the way. Without a trace of irony, Chief WearsMensWearhouse presented his case to the UN. And apparently he wasn’t the only prairie nigger whining about this.
Anaya is one of several Indigenous leaders at this round of negotiations who are questioning just how seriously some member states are taking the negotiations.
“We are only halfway through 2017 and yet the number of occurrences of misappropriation happening to Indigenous Peoples in all regions of the world seems relentless with no relief in sight,” said Aroha Te Pareake Mead, a member of the Ngati Awa and Ngati Porou tribes in Wellington, New Zealand.
“We asked the international community to help deal with a problem that traverses international boundaries and are still waiting.”
This is just pathetic.
However you feel about the red savages, at least you can say their ancestors were ruthless, brutal warriors.
Niggas was hardcore. We had to wipe most of them out and put the rest on big crappy farms, but still: reespek for redman with the featherhead ripping people’s scalps off.
Now that they’ve been sufficiently owned by the white man and sent to live on their piddly little reservations, their only way to lash out is to tattle-tale like little kids. “He’s copying me! I’m telling!”
Chief LittleBitch (right) reports a case of cultural appropriation to Mommy UN.
Of course, like the noise they make every now and then about sports team logos, mascots and other petty grievances, this is all just a ploy to get more money for alcohol. Just like their casino racket, these drunken injuns probably learned this habit of parlaying victimhood into money from the masters of the technique – Jews. And also like the ungrateful Jews, they should thank their lucky stars for the kindness and restraint of the white man.
Most other populations are much less charitable to their opponents.
