Is this the best they could come up with?
The biggest problem with the Harry Potter series is that they were written by a feminist woman who hates trannies with virulent hatred for the type of the genitals.
The Jews recently joined the fight against JK Rowling after they realized (it took them decades, for some reason) that the fictional goblin bankers are caricatures of evil Jew bankers.
The simplest solution is to remove her from… her own books.
A new advertising campaign by the New York Times is embracing the transgender community’s ongoing attacks on author J.K. Rowling by spotlighting a subscriber named “Lianna” who would like to see Rowling erased from the Harry Potter canon.
The ad campaign, which launched this week, promotes the newspaper’s so-called “independent journalism” while also promoting the Gray Lady as a lifestyle brand. The ads profile four different subscribers from different demographics, each of whom has apparently made the newspaper an integral part of their lives.
In one of the ads, “Lianna” — who appears to be transgender or gender non-binary — engages in a free association of thoughts and ideas, which include “breaking the [gender] binary,” spending a “week in crossword land,” and “imagining Harry Potter without its creator.”
The Times is reportedly running the ads in major cities, including Washington, D.C., Chicago, and Atlanta. A version of the “Lianna” ad appeared in the D.C. Metro system, including the attack on Rowling.
There was a video ad in the DC subway today. I am going to post some stills from this ad, and you will try to guess what company is advertising. Fourth photo is the reveal.
— T. Greer (@Scholars_Stage) February 17, 2022
Rowling has come under vicious attack by transgender activists who object to her belief that gender is biological. The author has also expressed her concern that women are being degraded by terms like “people who menstruate.”
“I know and love trans people, but erasing the concept of sex removes the ability of many to meaningfully discuss their lives. It isn’t hate to speak the truth,” she tweeted.
Well, if she’s got Joyce Carol Oates for her, then who could be against her?
shocking condescension. we are trying to imagine the
N Y Times without its marketing dept., without its editors, without its owners, without its Op-Ed columnists & without its loyal subscriber base. https://t.co/r7oTAkafSe— Joyce Carol Oates (@JoyceCarolOates) February 18, 2022
Next on the list of authors to remove from their own books: Joyce Carol Oates.
Black Water definitely would have been better if it had been written by a tranny, i.e., a man. I assume this is the case for all her books, but that’s the only one I ever got stuck reading from a hostel shelf. So I can’t comment on the rest.
She’s actually Jewish, by the way.
But she’s also like, 260 years old. So you can’t really blame her for still being stuck in 1960s feminism.
Rowling, on the other hand, is only in her 50s, and she should know better than to falsely claim that a tranny isn’t a woman.
You know who would probably benefit a lot from being removed from his own writing?
Andrew Anglin.
He still gets called a “neo-Nazi” (whatever that is) every time he is mentioned, even though he has no relationship to Hitler, save for one single time that he had lunch with him in Argentina.
Hitler kept complaining about the food, and since neither of them could speak the other’s language, their only option was to try to use Spanish as a “lingua franca.”
This led to confusion and anger from both parties, and at some point one or the other – no one is certain which, as tales are conflicting – got up and angrily stormed out of the bakery cursing.
To this day, Anglin claims that it was Hitler who did the storming out, and that he was left to pay Hitler’s bill. Anglin claims that Hitler “appeared to have purposefully ordered all of the most expensive pastries on the menu” and has cryptically suggested that Hitler planned to storm out and leave him with the bill.
However, Anglin has also said that he understands how Hitler would have been upset, as he does not speak Spanish really at all, and was only pretending to understand Hitler’s Spanish.
“I would listen to him and try to estimate the tone of his voice, and then either reply ‘si, si’ or ‘¿Por qué?'” He also admitted that he kept referring to Hitler as “ese,” even though he could tell it bothered him.
“Still, I just don’t understand why a man would order $17 worth of pastries,” Anglin has stated.
Anyway – it’s hardly enough to gain him the title of “neo-Nazi,” and a lot of his writing about virus hoaxes, Chinamen, vaccines, health and fitness, women, and the ongoing Jewish problem are really important, and would probably be more widely read if they were separated from him as the author.
He has previously mused: “perhaps I could write under other names.”
He then decided it would be an insult to his ancestors, and he doesn’t really even care how many people read him anyway, because nothing he writes is going to make any difference, given that we’re all doomed.