Daily Stormer The Most Censored Publication in History
BREAKING: In a Monday decision, Fulton Judge Robert McBurney rules Georgia’s roughly six-week abortion ban is unconstitutional and blocks it from being enforced.
More to come. pic.twitter.com/kvGxGIGeyC
— Sam Gringlas (@gringsam) September 30, 2024
Look, I guarantee you, there is an army of “legal experts” who are going to give an explanation as to how this judge is not overruling the Supreme Court. But you are a person with a brain who can absorb information and process it critically.
The Supreme Court overruled Roe v. Wade, which claimed that “privacy” was a reason for women to have abortions. They said this was not accurate. Now, a state judge is saying that actually, that is the case.
This judge is citing the Georgian Constitution, but he’s citing a passage that is the same as the US Constitution.
On the macro scale, America is a nation ruled by (predominately Jewish) special interest groups that control the flow of information. However, on the practical level, it is a Dikastocracy: a country ruled by judges. Contrary to their original purpose in the founding of the country, judges are just able to do whatever. There is no purpose in elected bodies passing laws when judges can just override them whenever they see fit.
A state court judge on Monday blocked a Georgia law banning abortion after about six weeks of pregnancy, finding it violated the rights to privacy and liberty guaranteed by the state constitution.
The order from Fulton County Superior Court Judge Robert McBurney allows abortions to resume for now, though the state can appeal to have the law reinstated.
The law bans almost all abortions after a “human heartbeat” is detected, typically around six weeks, before many women know they are pregnant. It was passed in 2019 but did not take effect until the U.S. Supreme Court in 2022 overturned its longstanding Roe v. Wade precedent, which had guaranteed abortion rights nationwide.
…
In Monday’s decision, McBurney said the Georgia law violated women’s basic rights. He ruled that the state could ban abortion only after fetal viability.
“Women are not some piece of collectively owned community property the disposition of which is decided by majority vote,” he wrote. “Forcing a woman to carry an unwanted not-yet-viable fetus to term violates her constitutional rights to liberty and privacy, even taking into consideration whatever bundle of rights the not-yet-viable fetus may have.”
The “fetus” apparently has fewer rights than a pet guinea pig.
But hey, whatever.
Everyone sort of knew this whole anti-abortion thing wasn’t going anywhere. For many in the pro-life movement, this is an abstract issue, and the fact that these laws are saying “you can kill the baby as long as you do it in a timely manner” shows that it’s not serious.
The bigger lesson here is that the government is a scam. Democracy is retarded in the first place, but when democracy does something that Jews don’t like, all of a sudden it’s not a democracy anymore, and some wigless unelected slob in a robe comes in and tells you how it’s gonna be.
Anti-abortion activists did all of this work, went through the process, could only get a law passed to stop abortions that don’t even really happen (effectively, all abortions are in the first trimester, most before six weeks), and then after all of that, some guy no one elected and who no one has ever heard of is just like “yeah, nah.”
