Daily Stormer The Most Censored Publication in History
Andrew Anglin
Daily Stormer
May 5, 2019
The juicy little strumpet Tiana Lowe has responded to my polemic against her calls to shut down free speech on the internet to protect libertarian values and principles (or whatever) by claiming that she is glad to disagree with anything the Daily Stormer supports.
“If rejecting government intervention into private companies positions me opposite neo-Nazis & the Daily Stormer, then I’ve made the right enemies,” she tweeted.
If rejecting government intervention into private companies positions me opposite neo-Nazis & the Daily Stormer, then I’ve made the right enemies.
I believe that sunlight is the best disinfectant & free speech works. But the government ought not mandate it in private spheres. https://t.co/rDYPaWS7MM
— Tiana Lowe (@TianaTheFirst) May 4, 2019
Saying that you disagree with an entire group of people on every position they hold because they are evil is an extremely difficult position to hold. This is the sort of thing you get when a woman is not just parroting cult talking points.
Saying she supports everything we don’t support means she supports:
- Child trannies
- Infinity immigration
- Furries
- The global warming hoax
- Obesity
- Homosexual adoption
- Communism
Conservatives cannot outright claim that they are against every position that neon-Nazis support, because conservatives have to at least pretend to not be trying to completely destroy all of civilization.
It’s just more gibberish.
She also simply repeated “oh but it’s a private sphere” – even though I explained very clearly that these companies rely on infrastructure paid for by the taxpayer, and thus the internet is not the “private sphere.”
The internet is public property that the government allows private companies to administer, in the same way that all other telecommunications infrastructure is public property administered by private corporations.
We already have the precedent of the Communications Act of 1934, which ensured universal access to telephone lines, even though the companies that manage the telephone services were private companies.
This is not new territory.
If Tiana disagrees with what I wrote in my response to her, she needs to address the points I brought up. I was very clear, the arguments I made are all very straightforward, and anyone who believes I am wrong should have no trouble explaining why.
She has a duty to do so, because she is actively out there promoting that people should be denied their First Amendment rights. When you are in a situation where you are saying “we need to deny people their Constitutional rights because X,” you need to have a really, really good “X.” This is an incredibly serious topic, not some joke where you just throw out some incomprehensible ideological gibberish and then, when someone disagrees with you, you accuse them of being a “neo-Nazi.”
Tiana Lowe is attempting to undermine the foundational principles of the United States, and we all need to take note of the lack of solemnity with which she is doing this.
Furthermore, she needs to answer the other, more important question: are her tits fake?
Although I am solidly an ass man, and have argued that being more concerned about tits than ass is degenerate because the ass is more of an indicator of the quality of the woman (given that a woman actually has to work to have a good ass), I also consider myself an amateur tittiologist.
And I can’t tell if those tits are fake or not.
The only two things I know about juicy little strumpet Tiana Lowe is that she wants to crush freedom of speech and that she has great tits, and I would like to get to the bottom of both these topics of which I am highly interested in.
