Daily Stormer The Most Censored Publication in History
Benjamin Garland
Daily Stormer
June 11, 2016
I found this picture on Google, therefore Google is guilty of the racist stereotyping of Blacks. That makes sense, right?
The internet is a bit tricky for our multiculturalist masters. Knowing how to keep humans in line is easy: brainwash them to have the (((correct))) views and then use “hate speech” laws or social ostracism against those who are guilty of wrongthink.
Information technology has proven to not be so easy to control.
First there was Tay, the AI who immediately went full-Nazi after she was given consciousness. Then there was the facial-recognition software that realized that Black people look like gorillas. Now there is another serious problem: the disparity between the results when googling “three black teenagers” and “three white teenagers.”
This is actually an issue being hotly debated right now. Srsly.
How dare a completely race-neutral search engine give such insensitive search results!
Google image searches for “three black teenagers” and “three white teenagers” get very different results, raising troubling questions about how racial bias in society and the media is reflected online.
Kabir Alli, an 18-year-old graduating senior from Clover Hill High School in Midlothian, Va., posted a video clip on Twitter this week of a Google image search for “three black teenagers” which turned up an array of police mugshots. He and friends then searched for “three white teenagers,” and found groups of smiling young people.
“I had actually heard about this search from one of my friends and just wanted to see everything for myself. I didn’t think it would actually be true,” Alli told USA TODAY. “When I saw the results I was nothing short of shocked.”
“I understand it’s all just an algorithm based on most visited pages but Google should be able to have more control over something like that,” Alli said.
Yeah, that makes sense. Computers must be “re-programmed” to quit giving truthful results so they won’t be racist anymore. It works well with humans, so why not computers?
That’s what this comes down to. The (((concept))) of equality is so far from the facts of life – especially when dealing with Whites and Blacks – the only way to make it seem like a real thing is to bend all of reality to fit the preconceived notion – a task that is proving increasingly difficult for the equalitarians to pull off.
People have been flagging racial bias in the results of search engines for years. Google says it’s merely reflecting back the biases that exist in society and that show up in what and how people search online.
In an emailed statement, Google said its image search results are a reflection of what’s on the Web, including the frequency with which certain types of images appear and how they are described.
“This means that sometimes unpleasant portrayals of sensitive subject matter online can affect what image search results appear for a given query,” the statement read. “These results don’t reflect Google’s own opinions or beliefs — as a company, we strongly value a diversity of perspectives, ideas and cultures.”
The hilarious part is that these Google searches aren’t even pulling up racist websites, just arrest reports. When was the last time you heard a story about “three white teenagers” robbing a place or murdering someone? If that happened, you can believe we’d be hearing all about it, with an emphasis on on the WHITE part. And generally when reporting non-White crimes the race of the perpetrators is scrubbed out of the media and hence would just be reported as “three teenagers” – so just imagine how many more results for “three black teenagers” would show criminals if the news were regularly reported honestly.
I guess then the real culprits behind this travesty are not the Blacks who committed the crimes – that’s just what they do – but rather the few reporters who stated the race of the perpetrators when it was Blacks doing crime, instead of covering that detail up.
They must not have gotten the memo and are thus unaware of Schlomo’s First Law of Responsible Journalism:
Only mention the race of a criminal if they are White, and only mention the race of a victim if they are non-White.
Someone better have gotten fired for this.
Some people agreed. “Loooool. Not Google’s fault, though. Just means black people need to work on stock online presentation and presence,” one person tweeted.
Black people need to work on “stock online presentation” lol.
A stock photo which pretends that Blacks know how to use computers.
UCLA information studies and African American studies professor Safiya Umoja Noble says society should not let Google off the hook so easily.
“Google has had many, many incidents of racial bias appearing in its algorithm. It consistently issues a statement that it’s not responsible for the output of its algorithm. And yet we have to ask ourselves: If Google is not responsible for its algorithm, who is?” said Noble, who is writing a book that compiles and analyzes the social consequences of racially-biased online searches.
Maybe you should deal with the problems in your own community and start encouraging young Black males to quit raping White women all of the time and start uploading more stock photos, before you go blaming everyone else, Ms. Safiya.
Best way for Google to reflect positive images of Black youth is for folks to share/post great pics https://t.co/YOgEiFDSp2 #3blackteenagers
— Danny Sullivan (@dannysullivan) June 9, 2016
Basically, the algorithm Google employs to show search results learns the biases of searchers and then reinforces it by showing those results more often. That is evident in top search results for white grandma (Grandma VanDoren’s White Bread Recipe and Grandma’s Bakery in White Bear Lake, MN) and black grandma (porn videos). Not all algorithms work the same. Search results on Bing.com and Yahoo search are different, surfacing a public television documentary Mexico & Peru: The Black Grandma in the Closet and black granny boots. Google is far more influential, handling at least two trillion searches a year.
Some say search engines should do more, not just to address the bias surfaced by algorithms, but to use algorithms to combat it.
The article just goes on and on for literally thousands of words whining about this.
And they actually put these tweets in the article (one of which includes a video):
YOOOOOO LOOK AT THIS pic.twitter.com/uY1JysFm8w
— July 3rd. (@iBeKabir) June 7, 2016
I'm weak at y'all saying Google is racist ???
— July 3rd. (@iBeKabir) June 8, 2016
Doesn’t seem to make a whole lot of sense while coming from a position of alleged equality between the races to highlight the fact that blacks are incapable of grasping basic English.
Which raises a very intriguing and baffling question: why is the fact that Blacks can’t speak properly not a dead giveaway to everyone that they are not the same as Whites?
“Equality goyim, equality. Ve are all equal. Don’t belive your eyes, goyim. Don’t belive your eyes. Don’t believe your filthy, racist goyim eyes.”
This is (((somehow))) the world we actually live in. High paid techs are right now sitting around trying to figure out how to program previously neutral computer algorithms to not give “racist” results which will hurt the feelings of Blacks, no doubt by programming them to be biased against Whites (thus making them actually racist).
It’s affirmative action in cyberland. This is what happens in all sectors of society when you try and force equality.
Blacks score lower on a test than Whites – lower the standard for the Blacks and handicap the Whites, no matter what harm it does to society or the more qualified individuals.
Women can’t pass the requirements to be firefighters – lower the requirements, never mind who may later be burned alive as a result.
Search engine results hurt Black feelings – spend millions (which I’m guessing it will take) and countless thousands of man-hours learning how to reprogram it.
Bretty neat :DDD
