Daily Stormer The Most Censored Publication in History
Why not just sanction Pakistan along with them, Rishi?
RT:
UK Conservative Party leadership candidate Rishi Sunak on Sunday called for a tightening of sanctions against Iran in response to the recent attack on novelist Salman Rushdie.
The Indian-born British-American writer was stabbed on Friday in New York State as he was preparing to give a lecture. A possible cause for the assault could have been his 1988 novel ‘The Satanic Verses’, which was condemned by Muslims for its allegedly blasphemous references to Islam and its holy book, the Koran. In 1989, Iran’s supreme leader, Ayatollah Ruhollah Khomeini, issued a fatwa calling for Rushdie’s death, and while Iran officially retracted this edict, an Iranian religious foundation placed a $3.3 million bounty on the writer’s head in 2012.
According to Sunak, the “brutal stabbing” of Rushdie should serve as “a wake-up call for the West” that should prompt Britain to designate Iran’s Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC), an influential branch of the Iranian Armed Forces, a terrorist organization. The IRGC is already deemed as such by the US and a number of other countries.
Jews invented this concept of foreigners manipulating white governments for their own ethnic purposes, but they seem to now allow others to do it too.
You all remember the meme:
Italians couldn’t get away with it, but Indians can.
Rishi is campaigning on starting a war with China, which is a traditional enemy of India; now he’s defending this Indian novelist who attacked Islam and demanding sanctions.
How far off are we from him demanding an increase in foreign aid to India?
Some Indians are okay, I’m not even against them as a group. But this concept of allowing foreign nationals to run your government is just obviously nothing that anyone would ever want to happen.
Indians complained about the British running their government, but at least the British built buildings and roads and so on. What is the difference between Indians running the British government and British running the Indian government, in a moral sense?
Because Rishi considers himself “British”?
Rudyard Kipling considered India his home.
Kipling wrote of Bombay:
Mother of Cities to me,
For I was born in her gate,
Between the palms and the sea,
Where the world-end steamers wait.
He was born in India. Many or even most people who worked in the colonial government of India were born there. Look at this list on Wikipedia. Kipling loved India and moved back from the UK.
But Western society has agreed, apparently, that colonialism was morally wrong, and India is given as the standard example. So why are Indians allowed to colonize the UK and run the government? What is the actual difference here?
Even if we were to accept this theory that “race doesn’t exist,” the fact that Rishi’s interests line up completely with his ethnicity can’t be some kind of coincidence.
It’s just crazy to me that we’re at the point where we’re talking about an Indian being the prime minister of the UK.
Frankly, I think Indian nationalists would agree with this sentiment in theory (though I assume they also want the global power and influence).
