Daily Stormer The Most Censored Publication in History
If you thought that sluts had so much power that they couldn’t possibly demand more, then you are a dumb retard.
Sluts could have you locked in a medieval dungeon being tortured with an iron maiden, and they would still claim you are oppressing them and that you have to make more concessions.
The standard female technique of using their sexuality to oppress and exploit men and then claiming that mentioning that they are doing that is oppression against them is still an active tactic used aggressively.
Thirty Oklahoma high school students were suspended Friday after protesting the dress code, claiming it is sexist.
Dozens of Mustang High School students held signs reading ‘Dress codes are sexist,’ ‘My body is not a distraction,’ and ‘If teens midriffs distract you, you should not be working with teens’ at the protest.
The students complained that teachers – especially male teachers – were hyperaware of female students bodies and often ignored when their male counterparts violated the same rules in the school code.
That would imply that those male teachers are heterosexual.
TikTok user @777Jade, a student at the school, shared a video that became viral and earned more than 400,000 likes in the platform. The clip shows students holding the signs and taping them to the school’s walls.
‘Our school had a protest against the dress code discrimination and the sexual harassments from the male teachers,’ she wrote in the video.
She also accused school officials of taking and ripping their posters after having told students they would return them.
‘You know what, Paige? Shame on you. You know how many times I tried to help you. My mistake,’ a school worker can be heard saying in the video to a student in the principal’s office.
Mustang’s dress code prohibits students from showing their cleavage and midriff. Tube tops, halter tops, off the shoulder tops, spaghetti straps or backless tops are also prohibited.
The school’s handbook states that the purpose of the dress code is ‘to permit students to dress according to current fashions, and at the same time reinforce district guidelines and restrict disruptions to the learning environment.’
Kirk Wilson, director of communicators at the school, confirmed that ‘a handful of students’ had been sent home with a suspension to The Independent.
‘There was a small protest before school at Mustang High School on Friday, September 10, 2021. When class began, the protest ended and most of the students attended class as normal,’ said the statement from Wilson.
‘There were a handful of students who violated the student code of conduct after class began and those situations were addressed…we remain committed to supporting our students and providing a safe and nurturing learning environment,’ he added.
Dumb.
The male teachers should have raped these sluts.
“If teens midriffs distract you, you should not be working with teens” is the most retarded statement possibly ever made.
A 16-year-old girl is fully sexually developed. Any heterosexual male is going to be distracted by a teenage girl showing off her body. This is literally sexual harassment of men.
This “age of consent” gibberish is now reaching into mythological realms. The male teacher’s inherent biological drives are supposed to recognize that she hasn’t had her 18th birthday yet, and then stop being distracted by her body based on that?
(Also, I think the age of consent is actually 16, but okay – whatever. It doesn’t matter. The point is, if a woman’s body is sexually developed, it is not possible for a man’s sexual system to not be distracted by her partially nude body.)
Consent theory is now entering into total voodoo realms. “Age of consent” was sold as a way to protect the chastity of teenage girls after the sexual revolution established that any woman could “consent” to have sex with any man without consequences. To say that the age of consent now determines whether or not a man can be distracted by a half-naked teenager just reveals how stupid this all was to begin with.
We NEVER should have allowed the sexual liberation of women. It was STUPID and JEWISH.
Related: An Intellectual Argument for Abolishing Age of Consent Laws
But hey, here’s a question: if the woman doesn’t desire to purposefully manipulate men, then why is she showing off her body in the first place? Surely, maybe it was an accident the first time and she didn’t think about it, but when men say “you coming to school half-naked is distracting me, because I’m a man and my biology reacts to visuals of women in states of undress,” a polite girl would say “oh, okay – sorry about that, I’ll cover my body in the future.”
But no – they demand the right to show off their bodies. What reason could they have for wanting to do this, other than to manipulate men?
This is where we get into the total retardation of modern Christian/conservative conceptions of women and sexuality. She is not innocent. She knows what she’s doing. She is able to see that men’s eyes are drawn to her body, she is able to see that it makes them uncomfortable, she is able to see that if she shows off her body, she gets completely different reactions from men. She understands all of that. Female sexual innocence is a stupid myth. There is no such thing as female sexual innocence, because as soon as she goes outside half naked, she immediately understands the reactions she is getting.
Women use their sexuality to control and manipulate men. That IS sexual harassment. A woman who refuses to clothe herself in an appropriate way IS engaging in industrial-scale sexual harassment of men.
There is one solution to this problem, and it begins with “gang” and ends with “rape.”
The other solution is simply to enact strict laws about women’s dress, and then beat them when they start claiming that their victims are actually predators.
And yes – there is a difference between a man’s body and a woman’s body. Women’s bodies cause sexual arousal in men. Men’s bodies do not really cause sexual arousal in women, because women have tiny levels of testosterone. This is basic science.
Also, men rarely walk around showing off their midriffs in the first place, so the argument doesn’t even reflect the practical reality any more than it reflects the scientific reality.
Getting half naked and then saying “stop sexualizing our bodies” is no different than grabbing someone’s arm and slapping them with it and saying “stop hitting yourself!”
This is what women do with “liberation.” They use it to sexually harass and exploit men. If you tell a woman “you can be whatever you want to be,” they reply with “I want to dress up like a slut and get all the men to stare at me and then accuse them of being perverts – except for the really handsome ones, who I will then manipulate into thinking I will have sex with them.”
If we do not control these sluts then we are utterly doomed. They can use their bodies to accomplish any goal by manipulating weak men. The only men who can resist them are those whose spirits are hardened by the Holy Spirit.
