Oregon: School Teaches 10th Graders About Porn, Including Fisting and Double Penetration

Andrew Anglin May 13, 2023

An Oregon school is under fire for a class teaching kids about porno. Brace yourself for a nuanced take from yours truly.

The New York Post, which broke the story, didn’t point it out, but that slide they showed from this class has a “porn emoji” of a fist and says “fisting.” It’s right next to the gimp emoji that says “bondage.”

This is more offensive than the octopus emoji for “Hentai.”

The only thing potentially more of an outrage is that they have a “Japan” emoji. That shit the nips are producing is quite simply beyond the pale.

New York Post:

Parents in Oregon are outraged after tenth-grade students were exposed to sexually explicit language during a health lesson about internet pornography, according to a report.

The Hillsboro School District’s lesson presentation caused concern after a number of slides were posted in the Facebook Group “Oregon Moms Union” last week that revealed a number of sexually explicit terms many parents were not comfortable exposing their children to, according to Fox News.

“I think it would make a lot of grown-ups blush,” Oregon Moms Union co-founder MacKensey Pulliam told the outlet. “The way that they went about teaching it and some of the content that was on the slides was really explicit.”

One slide, titled “Popular Categories” shows a number of emojis and their internet porn term equivalent, including p—y licking, big d–k, and big ass.

Other slides include information on “what porn shows as the norm” as well as the “range of normalcy” around reasons people watch or do not watch porn.

Another shares information about child pornography laws and the risks of sexting and “revenge porn” — or sharing someone’s nude photographs without their consent.

Another slide is titled “Child-Like Porn & Power Dynamics” followed by terms like teen, barely legal, step-brother and “Daddy’s Little Girl” as examples.

Beth Graser, a communications officer for the school district, confirmed to Fox News that the slideshow is part of a state law mandating “students receive age-appropriate instruction to help them recognize and respond to unsafe situations and increase awareness of child sexual abuse.”

The Post had more of the leaked slides.

Again, this is framed as trying to teach kids that porno sex is not necessarily normal. They would tell you “kids are going to watch porn anyway, so we have to teach them it’s not normal.”

Note that on the list of “reasons people don’t watch porn,” they did not list “religion” or even “morality,” let alone the very popular “no fap” movement which correctly identifies the scientific fact that both overstimulation of the brain via erotic imagery and chronic ejaculation have negative health effects.

They did warn stupid teen sluts that they can get charged with child porn for taking nudes of themselves, which is really a valid thing to teach them.

I honestly don’t think even if we had the perfect trad society that teen sluts could be prevented from taking nudes of themselves, given the existence of cellphones. I think some people don’t understand how vain women are by nature, and try to frame this as some modern/feminist problem. A lot of problems with women are modern, but the vanity has always been there (you can check the Bible and Ancient Greek literature).

If you went back to the Middle Ages and gave girls smartphones, a significant portion would be taking nudes of themselves. I mean, the Saudis complain that women are doing this, and there is no feminism in Saudi Arabia.

There is a lot of outrage over this porn class.

I’m not really sure it’s in the same category as some of the sex stuff we see in schools, however. Certainly, it is not on par with the tranny stuff.

Honestly, I’m just gonna go out on a limb here and say that the argument that “kids are going to be seeing porn anyway, and you should tell them that double penetration is not normal behavior” probably has some validity to it. It’s been a long time since I’ve been on a porn site, but what I read and hear is that “attractive man has normal (if overly long) sex with woman” is not the norm, and this stuff that would have been fringe even a few years ago has been normalized.

Assuming that the slides are all that was shown, and they weren’t actually showing the kids porn clips (which has been done in schools a lot lately), the problem here actually is parental consent. I am very critical of the “parental consent” argument when it comes to the tranny stuff, because I don’t care if the parents consent; that should not be happening. But a class on “why porn is not real life” for 14-15 year olds doesn’t in itself seem like an outrage, but it seems sensitive enough that the parents should be informed beforehand and given an overview of the material, and given the option to disallow their children from attending the class.

When I was in high school 20 years ago, parents could opt-out of sex-ed, which included disgusting pictures of diseased genitals.

(I should note that elementary school children were not given the option to opt-out of Holocaust class, where children are shown pictures of piles of nude corpses at the age of 8 or 9. This is the first time most of us saw nude bodies, and I believe this caused us all permanent mental health damage, and was done on purpose by the Jews who create these classes. I think if my parents had been told “we’re going to show your kid piles of nude corpses, is that okay?” they would have said “no, that is not okay.” And this is of course still going on now. But I doubt you’re going to see Libs of TikTok posting about that particular parental consent issue, or Ron DeSantis writing any laws against it.)

© Copyright Daily Stormer 2023, All Rights Reserved -- Join the Daily Stormer site chat for future updates in case of further domain seizure.