Penarddun
Daily Stormer
December 15, 2016
Did you know that in Australian Cricket doctors are not guaranteed to be on standby for women but are always there for the male matches?
If an female cricket player wanted to wage a war against that, I’d understand. It makes little sense as to why one would be supplied medical help and the other wouldn’t. But these female cricket player aren’t worried or concerned about that, they’re concerned about the issue Cricket Australia have with their players being pregnant.
Female cricket players have to prove they are not pregnant before they can sign a professional contract.
Women on Australia’s cricket team are also denied maternity leave while men are allowed to fly home for the birth of their children.
The Australian Cricketers Association has slammed the sexist double standard, with Test captain Steve Smith signing a campaign for gender equality in cricket.
How can anybody with a brain compare a man briefly flying home for the birth of his child to being pregnant?
Pregnancy lasts nine months, on top of that you have the recovery period after birth which can go up to six weeks, and finally you have the months at home, which the mother spends looking after and nursing the baby.
Our female members find it outdated at best and rather condescending that they can only sign one-year contracts, making life planning very difficult while men can sign multi-year contracts,’ it said in a pay submission published in The Australian.
It also criticised the practice of making women players prove they are not pregnant, describing it as discrimination that is ‘contrary to acceptable employer behaviour in any other Australian workplace‘.
They have not made it clear why they can only sign one year contracts, but one would assume it’s because no woman can fully confirm that they won’t get pregnant within the next few years.
Cricket is a business, not a babysitting club. No employer wants to waste time and money on someone who isn’t going to hang around for very long, and this is usually why men are preferred to women in the workforce.
Notice how it’s always about what the adult wants?
Sport is something you have to be dedicated to as it consists of constant training. I’m surprised this is even an issue as I wouldn’t think women who want to have children would even bother with the sport industry.
If anything it further proves why women shouldn’t be in the workforce, because with men the only gamble is a health related one.
Don’t forget Shiksa- not having kids solves all of your problems!
What happens if they allow a woman to play cricket whilst pregnant and then something goes wrong with the pregnancy? From week thirteen of being pregnant I’d hope a woman isn’t putting her baby in danger by running around a field. And what happens if her stomach gets struck by a ball that’s going at 100mph?
Their leaked submission on collective bargaining for female players also criticised Cricket Australia for denying female cricket players maternity leave even thought this entitlement is given to women who work in administrative roles, who get four to 12 weeks of paid leave.
The thought of a baby not having it’s mother around after only four weeks of being born is absolutely sickening. The first three years of a child’s life are the most important developmental wise, and it’s been proven that it’s not good for a child to not have their mother around.
And if feminists still can’t get their head around the apparently sexist narrative that a woman should be with her child, then look to nature to confirm that fact. Breastfeeding lasts for six months, how can you breastfeed while you’re at work and you’re newborn is at daycare? I guess that shows you that a mother is supposed to be at home and not off ‘developing a career.’
No woman should feel comfortable with the idea of dumping their baby off at childcare. It deserves the feeling of security that only a mother can offer it.