Daily Stormer

Memetic Monday: Tuesday Night Special Irredeemably Tainted Edition (Formerly: PLACEHOLDER: MEMES COMING SOON)

SERIOUS WARNING: THIS HAS NOW BEEN UPDATED WITH REAL MEMES. MY ADVICE IS TO SCROLL THROUGH ALL OF THE TEXT. IT’S TOTAL GARBAGE. ONLY READ IT IF YOU ARE REALLY REALLY INTO MY WRITING PROBLEMS. EVEN THEN I DON’T ACTUALLY RECOMMEND IT. I HAVEN’T READ THIS AND WOULDN’T READ IT MYSELF, BUT HAVING WRITTEN IT, I HAVE SOME INSIGHT. I MEAN, I AM WRITING THIS NOTE SEVERAL HOURS AFTER WRITING THE SECOND SECTION, AND I DON’T REMEMBER MUCH ABOUT WHAT WAS WRITTEN, SIMPLY THAT AS I WATCHED THE WORDS RUNNING ACROSS THE SCREEN, MY PRIMARY THOUGHT WAS: WHAT THE HELL IS THIS GARBAGE? IF THERE WAS A BIGGER AND REDDER (MORE RED?) FONT, I WOULD BE USING IT. BUT FOR REAL, DON’T LET IT DISTRACT FROM THE MEMES. THEY ARE REALLY GOOD THIS TIME. THAT IS ALSO A LIE. ALSO? DOES THAT MEAN I WAS LYING WHEN I SAID THE WRITTEN PART IS ALL GARBAGE? REMEMBER IN LABYRINTH – “ONE OF US ALWAYS LIES, THE OTHER ALWAYS TELLS THE TRUTH?” THAT’S HOW I FEEL ABOUT ME NOW AND THE VERSIONS OF ME THAT WROTE THIS ARTICLE. TO BE CLEAR, I AM NOT ON DRUGS AND NO DRUNKER THAN USUAL. WHICH MUST MEAN… OH NO.

PLACEHOLDER ANNOUNCEMENT (posted before there were any memes):

Well, it turns out it’s Tuesday. As usual, no one bothered to tell me. I had to check the thing.

Anyway, I’ve got all the things happening, but I am doing the thing with the things.

The memes I mean. I’m doing the thing with the memes. I will do it today, perhaps, or tomorrow.

Oh, you’d better believe it, my dear friends, and all you unfriendly cocksuckers as well: the memes are coming.

In terms of the Nick Fuentes content people are demanding: I don’t really want to be “the Nick Fuentes guy.” I wrote my first thing. And I will do a followup thing, replying to the replies, and clarifying the things that mugus claimed confused them (I do believe they were confused, this is a truly dense batch of faggotized retards, and some, I assume, are good people – particularly the teenagers who don’t know any better). But frankly, after my first thing went viral, and the people have sort of started to catch on, it’s not like I’m the only person saying this stuff.

Read the comments on this thing where he says everyone who was born in America is “American”:

Just scroll for a while. Over a thousand comments, virtually none of them positive. So while the kook gibberish was apparently not bothering people, the complete flip-flop on the most basic shit apparently is bothering people.

“Where have I heard this before…?”

He will be popular, because he’s being force-memed. Ben Shapiro is still popular, in terms of total views. But this whole thing of him being unquestioned as some kind of honest, good actor is totally over. I’m taking credit for that. I don’t need the credit. But it’s mine and I’m taking it.

So frankly, it isn’t my job to just pick at him. I know people want that. And when I do my podcast, I am going to attack everyone, including him. Frankly, by the time it is rolling (hopefully mid-Feb, probably late March), he probably will have completely crashed out. But he’ll still be around, spewing this kook gibberish and flip-flopping around like a disgusting Mexican bloatfish. So we’ll break down his gibberish in a fun way, where we can watch the clips and make fun of him together as a community. But he’ll be one of many. I am not going to become “the Nick Fuentes guy.”

Right now, it’s admittedly hard not to, because he is everywhere all the time, like a virulent poisonous gas unleashed on helpless jungle dwellers. And there are things I can say about the nature of this astroturf. But I am going to try to say them all in my followup thing, which I will probably publish this week, and then leave that topic alone until my show, where I will attack everyone.

The show is going to be amazing, I promise you. I am watching all of these right-wing podcasts now. There is so much content. Jordan Peterson is an infinite goldmine, for example. This is such great content. People just need to understand how to watch it. You have to understand that this is an insane person, high on drugs, being paid by Jews to promote the Jewish agenda, and on the verge of a total breakdown. You then see the tension and the drama of it all. There are also so many smaller shows with insane people trying to get money. And we can have so much fun with this. And of course, it will also be educational. I will be explaining the real shit while examining the insane shit and the shill shit.

My soul is willing and my body is nearly prepared. But you know. We need the studio and stuff.

There is a good chance we will do a temporary show, a practice show, once a week, while we are setting up the real show.

Also, we’re going to have more content on the site. I’ve got a guy who is working on articles. He’s a genius. We’re working through some editing stuff. But I think he’ll have some analysis on the top issues, big research stuff, once or twice a week. And I’m doing the memes, plus one article, minimum, from here on out. Maybe I’ll also throw up some lower effort stuff, just some commentary. I still write a lot on forums, and I write these long emails to people, in between working on the TV show, which is definitely my main focus.

With that, I am writing fake shows. I am writing test shows. It’s a bit sad to be writing stuff that can’t ever be published, but it needs to be done.

We’re trickling information out about the show, so here’s a trickle: it won’t be totally scripted. Some of it will be scripted. But the stuff that isn’t strictly scripted will be tightly organized with notes. I listened to Daryl Cooper’s explanation of the way he does the podcast, allegedly writing some goofy amount for every hour of content. Cooper seems like another weird shill, but idk. Who knows. I just assume everyone but me is a shill, and then expect them to prove they’re not, you know? But I am sort of doing this thing he talks about, writing out ideas, then also writing some scripted stuff, then also doing notes, more of a bulletpoint thing I can read from. Every week, the show will be posted with an essay. Basically, I will have everything organized by Thursday, then write up a thing preparing myself for the show, which will also be an essay that will be published with the show. If that makes sense. That is the level of structure I want, so I need to write the essay for myself, because writing helps me think things through. Further, if there is anyone who just really hates AV content, they will be able to read the article, which will include many or most of the links to videos or clips I’m working with. It will be probably 3,000 words, maybe much more, so a good solid piece of content for the readers.

Oh and yes, I have heard the site looks not great on a phone. Needs some font alterations or whatever. I am going to get to that. Trust me, guys. I’m working. I am very much working. I am writing entire fake shows, I’m filming myself doing these shows. I have some weird AI thing that rates my speech quality. I’m not really sure I agree with it, but I have that. I have all the things, I am doing the things.

Anyway, I’m in the woods, the internet is slow. If you were thinking “why doesn’t he just post the memes if he’s going to write a thousand word thing about why he’s not posting the memes yet?”, that is the reason.

But I will post the memes. Oh boy, will I post those memes. I am going to post them like a gang rape.

REAL INTRO

I thought about deleting that fake intro because I just read it right now and it sucks and I hate it and I don’t even agree with it. But it would be against journalistic ethics to do that.

Furthermore, contrary to what the sectional heading says, this is not a real intro. The fake intro was indeed the real intro. These kinds of contradictions were happening everywhere on this site, which is why I quit in February. People are like “bro you don’t write enough” and it’s like “yeah, well, I quit, I said I was quitting and trying to figure out some new thing or multiple new things.” Or, perhaps, I said something completely different than that. Perhaps I had promised some number of articles per week which has not been fulfilled. But see, these are the kind of contradictions I am talking about. It’s a pandemic. A real pandemic, unlike that fake coronavirus hoax, amirite? Let’s talk about that some more. Holy shit. That was the real contradiction, or maybe the primary contradiction: the thesis that I could make the news interesting and then it got so boring no one could possibly ever make it interesting.

Speaking of boring news. Between right now and when I wrote that intro, I’ve been on a train then a bus, and was listening to podcasts, because what can you do? Reading gives me a headache and books on tape are for retards. Or maybe they’re for geniuses? I can’t follow them. I get totally lost. So it’s like most of the time this really slow thing of someone reading to you like you’re a child, then at the point you would normally pause your reading to think about something, to formulate a proper image in your mind of the thing in the words, the person keeps reading to you. Then you’re lost and have to try to rewind, but you rewind too far or not far enough because who knows how long you were thinking. So yeah maybe books on tape are marketed to retards who want someone to read to them like they’re a child but are consumed by geniuses who can somehow actually follow a book on tape. Seriously. Don’t do it, guys. Just learn to read. I’ve made it easy for you. I’ve been able to get you to read these long things I write, because I am that good at the thing. Some say I’m the best. I don’t know if I’m the best, but some people say that, a lot of people say I’m the best. I’m probably the best. I mean, you look around, you’re asking “who’s better?” I don’t know anyone better. Do you know someone better? I got you into reading. Start reading books, don’t listen to books on tape. If you do, don’t tell people you read books. I call people on that shit. People tell me “I read a book…” and I say “did you? Did you read the book, or did you listen to it on tape, having someone else read it aloud to you like you’re a little child in bed with mommy?”

The point is, every podcast was about Nick Fuentes. Even the ones supposed to be about this Venezuelan war were about Nick Fuentes. So I don’t know about not writing more about him. I was happy to see, in the comments of the clip above, real people for once actually calling this shit out, which I do take credit for (my article got insane traffic). So on some level, I’d like to say “my work here is done, or it will be after I write my hate reply to all the mugus who did psychoanalysis against me while not even attempting to respond to a single point I made.”

One guy did make an argument. A Fuentes fan. First he posted multiple comments about the beginning of the article. And I replied that he should read the whole thing before commenting. Then he said that the article was too long and it should have been published in sections. I said “people write books, most books are read in more than one sitting, no one asks authors to publish their books in 500-word pamphlets, you obviously do not read books or we wouldn’t be having this conversation, but many people do read books, and many or even most people now read books on computer screens of some sort, which is what this article is, words on a computer screen, a lot of people who read books choose chapter endings as an opportunity to take a break, you can use my subheadings as chapters and take your time.” [Author’s Note to Editor: That is intended as a run-on sentence. It’s a stylistic choice.] So he agreed with that, and read the whole article before commenting again however many days later, and said something like: “Well, maybe he knows the news is boring, so he makes things up to make it more interesting?” That’s the one defense. A screenshot is in my rebuttal, which is actually a hit piece on mugus, not Fuentes, as I’m not really adding new points about Fuentes. But it is this sprawling mess written in multiple sittings that needs to be chopped.

So it’s good people are pushing back. I keep saying I did that but it was definitely bound to happen. It was sort of like the Charlie Kirk thing itself, where everyone got all emotional at first, I was ahead of the game, and when people calmed down they were like “well yeah all this crying and madness doesn’t make much sense and it does seem like the media is drumming it up.” Fuentes’ old fans were at first really excited about the astroturf, now it’s been going on long enough, and gotten weird enough, that people are seeing the obvious. He’ll have plenty of new fans, of course, because astroturfing works.

Remember how astroturfed Ben Shapiro was? Remember the whole thing where Facebook was helping him run all these fake pages to promote his content, giving them super-rank? And the CEO of YouTube effectively said he couldn’t be banned, while everyone else was banning him? This was ostensibly done under the premise that Shapiro prevented radicalization by remaining in normal bounds and also working directly with the platforms to ensure his content was in line with what they wanted to be at the top. Shapiro is completely talentless. Most of you have probably just seen clips, but I’ve listened to entire shows on multiple occasions. His voice is impossibly grating, almost the diametric opposite of Rush Limbaugh and most other popular conservative talking points people, and all he does is pure talking points. Literally the singular reason anyone would listen to Ben Shapiro is that he is the first thing that comes up, and then because he’s popular and people know him, because he was the first thing that came up.

I was just going to post the Spotify numbers to show that despite having fallen, he’s still a major figure. Like, right now, today, two years and one month after Israel began a genocide.

…

But I want to note that on Apple he is closer to Tucker.

And on YouTube, they are both in the 500k-1m average range, but Tucker regularly cracks 1m, while the only video Ben has done in the last month or two or however far I scrolled that cracked a million was an attack on… Tucker Carlson.

Spotify was more reluctant to ban when everyone was getting banned everywhere, so their audience is more right-wing, so that is what people always cite. In reality “Tucker is number 2 and Ben is 41” is a bit misleading. Tucker does get insane numbers on Twitter, but all video numbers are insane on Twitter because if you scroll past a video and it starts autoplaying it counts as a view.

Regarding views, we also need to talk about the fact that it is extremely cheap to buy views, so none of these numbers really mean anything at all. I have a part in the anti-mugu hit piece about that, but I think I am going to cut it and make a separate article showing where you can buy these views and making it clear that none of this means anything. Although it seems like it would be against the law or something, it actually isn’t, and the way these companies do it, it is virtually impossible for the companies to detect, and I don’t think the companies care much anyway. That’s a bigger issue than Fuentes, all these people are doing it.

By far the weakest point I made in my Fuentes hit piece was the claim of fake engagement. With every other point I was literally just saying: “Look at this thing he said and this other thing and what the fuck is this post what is even going on here seriously what.” [Author’s Note to Editor: In general, a sentence behaving in this manner is always going to be a stylistic choice. I understand I have many a typo. Typos galore. Out the wazoo. But as you know, purposefully ignoring grammar and punctuation at scale in a single sentence is generally always purposeful. My style is leaning into this bit today and may do so for some time or maybe not but you’ll be able to tell.]

Strangely, no one really came at me on that even. I think they were too overwhelmed by the amount of shit I dumped on them about the master that they were unable to pull themselves together to do the thing where you identify the weakest bit and then attack it to try to discredit the whole thing. I stand by what I said about the astroturf, but aside from the overwhelming number of bots in his Twitter comments (which seem to be turned off now btw), my evidence was just “how is it possible this many new people are following him and there is apparently no discussion anywhere, as there is with literally every other internet figure, including ones with a fraction of his supposed following?”

Jeez now I’m doing a whole thing. There was something I wanted to get at, because whatever, this is a free space to rant without consequence, given that at any point people can stop reading and scroll down to the memes and not feel like they were ripped off by a meandering rant with no point laced with punctuation abuse. Some people actually claim to like this style and tell me to do more of it. Those people are probably trying to sabotage me, however.

Oh, the point was, Fuentes is the entire news cycle. Tomorrow or maybe immediately after I post this I’m going to get up our new friend’s piece about Venezuela, which is the other current news issue. I’m not worried about being accused of being obsessed. Firstly, I am obsessed. Secondly, it’s like when Ted Cruz accused Tucker of being obsessed with Jews and Tucker was like “you just said four minutes ago you joined the Congress to serve the Jews.”

I guess it was Israel. That was the biggest takeaway of the Nick Fuentes interview: Tucker is fully into this “Israel not Jews,” but if we are talking about Jews, we definitely have to always make sure to say we don’t mean every single Jew. There is no such rule with “the Italian Mafia” or “black crime,” but when you talk about “organized Jewry,” you have to say, every time, that you don’t mean every single Jew, because otherwise, even though it doesn’t make any sense and doesn’t apply to any other group, people will assume you mean every single Jew. Tucker and so many others literally want it to be like whenever Islamic people mention their prophet they say “PBUH.” You can’t ever not say “but I don’t mean all Jews,” and also you have to list off names of Jews who are okay, such as Jeffrey Sachs and Dave Smith. And then you have to explain why you are doing that (spoiler: it’s because everyone is an individual).

But there are many different issues that have come up here in this bonanza that do not directly relate to Nick Fuentes but have simply been brought to light by his astroturfing. Like, off the top of my head:

  • Israel realizes it can’t do the Ben Shapiro thing, so it is going with controlled anti-Jewish figures (or if you don’t think Fuentes is controlled, at the very least people who are kooky and repulsive, angry and whiny, with terrible posture)
  • Who will replace Nick Fuentes? Totally sick of arguing about the fed thing. Yeah sure dude, maybe he just hangs out with CIs and CI recruiters, does shows with them, gets secret tips about sting operations from the Bureau from them, but isn’t a fed himself. This mf leaked a text of MILO telling him his FBI contacts told him J6 was a setup. He of course showed up knowing this, without telling his followers, who he then ordered to breach the Capitol. But maybe that’s just a coincidence. Whatever. Regardless, Fuentes is being offered a situation with a seven figure salary. He’s going to do what he’s supposed to do, and you’re going to see a shift. That is what the “Jackson Hinkle’s pro-Russia Twitter account is really the same thing as AIPAC if you think about it” and the above seen “anchor baby nationalism” is obviously about: he’s mainstreaming. This will leave an opening for the role of “CEO of Antisemitism,” and it is mildly interesting to imagine who will fill the role. I’m sure they’ve got someone lined up for you, so just get ready to follow him and do everything he says, including and especially showing up at rallies that are very legit. Maybe this time around, people, including my own retarded self, will understand that political dissidence is no more viable in America than it is in North Korea. I, the exile who lives in the backwaters of the internet, am the closest thing you’re going to get to legit dissidence. And this is all just words. The value of the site, at least when it isn’t complete shit like it is right now, is in affirming to people that no, they are not insane, everyone else is. But yeah there will be some new “white nationalist” leader guy. I’ve seen several being prepped on Twitter. They’re testing out candidates, seeing who gets bites and who gets ripped apart for having made porno or been the leader of a satanic cult or whatever.
  • What is Antisemitism? Everyone has to keep saying “but I’m not an antisemite,” and I don’t know what that is. Obviously you have these crazy definitions, where any criticism of Israel and like, 40% of the New Testament is “antisemitic.” (Most notably the IHRA definition, though there are several of these lists of things that make you an antisemite, some less extreme than IHRA but still nonsensical.) But the people saying “but I’m not an antisemite” obviously reject those definitions. The only definition I can understand is: “people who hate every single Jew on earth for no reason.” But I simply do not think this is a real person. I don’t think there is even one person who meets this definition. I am definitely a lot more “antisemitic” than Fuentes, who says his best friend and his assistant (maybe the same person) are Jewish. But I do not hate every single Jew, let alone for no reason. However, Judaism is first and foremost a cult based on hatred of Christ, and this cult includes many “atheist Jews” who eat pork and whatever. So it is reasonable, as a Christian, to be opposed to people who identify that way. Not because of how they were born, but beca – hey now I’m writing this article, this is supposed to be a list of potential articles, what the heck? Okay next.
  • The Republican Party is attempting to integrate people who are openly hostile toward Jews into their coalition in some semi-official manner. This one is fascinating. People opposed to Jews have always been a part of the coalition. I think I was the first big internet person to endorse him. I paused his escalator speech at “and some, I assume, are good people,” and wrote an official endorsement. (I’ll find that link for the article, interesting historical relic I’m sure.) But with Fuentes as the point man, they are attempting to bring these people in. Tucker’s sitrep with Dave Smith on the backlash over the Fuentes interview, one of the ones I listened to between the parts of this thing you are reading, made this crystal clear. There is really a lot to say about that. I would assume it was JD Vance’s idea, leading us to…
  • Tucker is currently working with and supporting JD Vance, but I am personally 100% sure he is planning to drive a knife into his back come 2027. See, that has basically nothing to do with Fuentes, except that I can basically guarantee Vance is the one working with Tucker on this Fuentes project. Vance could be running the whole thing, in fact. The problem, obviously, is that Vance is going to have to start distancing himself from Trump’s Israel policies while he is still VP. Along with most of his other policies. I don’t think Vance can run on Trump’s legacy of endless war and kikesucking. Or any of these economic policies. (Did you niggas see what just happened to dem coins?) Or really anything other than anti-immigrant stuff, which is the only thing Trump has left as a rallying point. He’s jettisoned the entire 2024 campaign platform like shedding off the stages of a rocket (the rocket is Israel in this slightly strained metaphor, as he actually did campaign on Israel as well). The immigration shit is a joke, zero talk of simply imprisoning anyone who hires or rents to illegals which according to several different chatbots would necessarily mean 60-90% of illegals would self-deport. And I guarantee if one landlord gets a ten-year federal prison sentence, no illegal immigrant has a place to sleep 24 hours later. Easiest thing in the world. But of course there is no goal to actually remove these people, so you just get this weird cruelty theater of the ICE raids, with the Trump administration claiming that at most this will lead to 4% of illegals being deported under his term. But seriously, this nigga hasn’t even done a law banning child tranny mutilations. 100% of Republican voters support that, as do a fair amount of Democrats at this point (Democrats have seen the suicides and insanity and so on, the repulsive freak shows, so even if they won’t say they’re against it, few of them still talk of supporting it). But yeah, Tucker is hungry like the wolf, stalking his prey in the dead of the night, lurking in the shadows, waiting for the right moment to strike. And I don’t think he wants to be Vance’s VP. Although I assume that is what he is telling him. He will likely keep telling him this after he announces he’s running, and they will make a deal not to go after each other too hard, then Tucker will spring the trap. Which brings us to…
  • Something even further from Fuentes directly, but coming to the surface surrounding these dynamics that are being revealed: The real question regarding 2028 is what the Democrats are able to come up with, because voting is fake and Jews just pick a candidate. I mean obviously Trump got the most votes, but they could have rigged it. Nothing would have happened. No one was going to try another January 6th, I can tell you that much. With Trump’s current and increasing levels of executive power, he could do some federal thing to mandate real voting on a national scale, maybe. I have no idea. It’s not really clear how laws work in this country anymore. He’s now going after the filibuster, which is a flip-flop that I don’t give a shit about, but he could probably ram through a law federalizing voting. I don’t know if he would need to change the Constitution (which gives states full control of elections), or if it would be possible to create regulations which amount to federal oversight but with Jewed-up language that makes it legal. I don’t know if Bibi would tell him he’s not allowed to do that or not. Bibi has always been more opposed to leftist antisemitism than rightist, and come election time, there’s going to be equal amounts in both parties, which brings us to…
  • The possibility of a new party centered on the issue of not being controlled by Israel. At this point, the Israel thing has gotten so extreme that I simply do not think you can divide people with abortion, gay stuff, taxes, or whatever other thing. The US is going to be in a weakened and completely messy state by 2027. Trying to make these shorter. But basically, there is a level of incompetence in this administration that is somehow higher than the level of corruption. Watch some of Pam Bondi’s Congressional testimony if you haven’t seen it. At an hour and twenty minutes, the supercut is a quarter of the length of the entire hearing. Just flip through. Everything she said was surreal. Like it doesn’t seem real. Then imagine that this is the level everyone at the White House is operating on, unless they are direct Israel agents. Which obviously makes perfect sense. It’s not as though intelligent people would be likely to get in the way of whatever Israel was doing, but it’s possible that they could. As Israel has full control, and no concern at all about the future of the US, they enacted some kind of “retards only (plus guys reporting directly to us)” policy. Frankly, although the police state stuff is scary in theory, with Palantir and the normalization of military on the streets doing warrantless arrests, the reality is that it is unlikely to come to fruition in the extreme nightmare form. So a third party that is literally just only about the issue of Israeli influence in the US would win an election tomorrow against Trump, Vance, or any Democrat, all things being equal. And…
  • There are clearly factions struggling in the background, in a real power struggle, because this is all so chaotic and corrupt after four years of Biden and then this mess. I think it’s safe to say that some of these people legitimately do not like Israel controlling everything and sucking the country dry. I mean really any random person would want to seize control of a government, so the idea that there aren’t organized groups trying to do this is silly. Obviously, the Silicon Valley people want control, and are currently tied to Israel in a lot of different ways, but that doesn’t necessarily mean they agree with torching the entire wealth of this country and shoving it into the mouth of the beast that is Israel. People are forging alliances and there will be betrayals and new alliances and all the sorts of things you read about during the decline and fall of the Roman Empire. I mean I never read the book by that title. I had it and read parts. I think everyone has it on their list but probably more people have made it through Gravity’s Rainbow (which has been off my list forever for over a decade). Maybe I’ll get the book on tape.

MEMES:

Now, Back to This Nick Fuentes Thing…

Firstly, or eleventhly or whatever this is, during the Dave Smith interview, Tucker claimed “Nick Fuentes can’t be canceled.” This is obviously bullshit, because I was canceled. And before Fuentes was allowed back on Twitter, he had fewer than 20k average viewers. That is a successful canceling. Note that being seen with Kanye West and meeting with Trump, being a big media story, his “sex with women is gay” clip getting spammed on liberal “comedy” shows, etc. did not result in improved numbers. This was while he was able to host websites, to use CloudFlare, to have bank accounts, to appear on search engines, to process and ship objects, and on and on (things that were taken from me).

It’s not about me being me. Okay? Mugus get confused. Yes, I am me, and I am the one writing about this. But if I were someone else, or if someone else were me, me or him would still be writing about me. Surely people can understand that. I have to talk about myself when talking about cancelation because I am canceled. I am working on a new project now, of course, but my basic hope is that it can pay for itself, and maybe give me a $30k a year salary. That’s all. I just want to be able to do something fun that maybe educates some people. I have accepted my fate as the canceled man. But Glenn Greenwald also said Fuentes was most canceled. This is just a lie. And I am not a random person. In 2017, I was neck-in-neck with Breitbart in terms of traffic. I was on the cover of The Atlantic for an article I refused to do an interview for. I’d been on the front page of the New York Times multiple times. If the thing would not have happened, I would be the size of the New York Times by now. I had not reached a plateau. I was still experiencing exponential growth.  This is not me whining. I have whined before, I’m sure. We are going on ten years of me being in this hole. Of course I don’t like it. But this is not about that. This is about the fact that you can most assuredly cancel people, and Tucker and all of these other people are getting away with the absolute lie that some people can’t be canceled in order to promote this myth of Nick Fuentes.

If there was some other person as canceled as me, trust me, I would use them as the example. The only sites ever in the same range of cancelation were 8chan and Kiwi Farms. Why are these people lying about that? The New York Times quoted a Fox producer saying Tucker’s writing staff was using me as a source, and it’s not breaking any confidence to just say “yes, I can confirm that is true.” He was asked about me repeatedly after that article, he knows who I am. Further, Darren Beattie has said on multiple platforms that I am the most canceled. Tucker is friends with him, everyone knows him, everyone knows about me, no one will say it, they make these fake narratives. Remember when Alex Jones was “most canceled” while making $50 million a year on snake oil? So this is a lie and it is not an insignificant lie and it is a lie designed to promote a myth of Nick Fuentes.

Now, let us get back to my list. Many of the items on my list did not relate to Nick Fuentes at all. In fact, they floated further from him. The more I think about that list, the more it troubles me. The list lost its luster, and with that dimming a queer conviction crept upon me — I began to believe the list was bullet‑pointing me, each terse clause a little spear aimed at my being; each new item seemed to draw me deeper into the darkest pit of lists, that abyss where order becomes accusation and neatness a tribunal. Memory, regret, a child’s laugh, the hollow echo of all unfinished sentences — names set down as if upon a surgeon’s slate. 記憶、悔恨、孩童的笑聲、所有未竟句子的空洞迴響——名字像在外科醫生的書寫板上一樣被記下。 The items in my mind took wing and became like birds, disparate species: some small and harmless as sparrows, some brilliant as kingfishers, but many circling like vultures over my soul, patient, precise, their shadows counting me even as they deferred the final descent. I watched them catalogue me with beaks and ledger, noting faults and favours, folding my days into margins, and the more I observed the more the cataloguing observed me 我目睹它們用喙與帳簿為我編目，記下過失與恩惠，將我的日子摺入頁邊，而我越是觀察，編目越是觀察我。 Yet in that terrible taxonomy there was a ghastly, seductive clarity — a clarity that shone coldly, as moonlight on a tomb, and compelled me to continue, pen trembling, to itemize the very hand that wrote. 筆顫抖，將書寫之手逐項列出。

A teenager from West Philadelphia grew up on sun-baked streets and amidst the turbulent environment of his neighborhood. One afternoon, while sitting on his porch, a children’s quarrel unexpectedly drew him into a conflict, attracting the attention of the town’s police. Concerned for her son’s safety and anxious about his future, his mother carefully wrote a letter to a wealthy distant relative living in Bel-Air, pleading with them to take her son in and remove him from the endless conflict. He then left his home by carriage and other means of transportation, and soon, the boy found himself transported from a grimy, bustling environment to the manicured lawns and stately marble steps of a quiet suburb, observing his new home with keen curiosity. He was welcomed into an elegant and expectant family. With his straightforward personality and youthful wit, he navigated various social situations, learning different customs and manners, his natural sense of humor adding an unexpected lightness to these formal occasions. Between the roughness of the old world and the refined elegance of the new, he moved like a comet between two worlds—both out of place and dazzling—and it was this sense of being out of place that created a vibrant comedy, as he and his adoptive parents learned from each other through jokes and occasional awkwardness, experiencing the unique etiquette of family life.

After all that, this:

People kept saying “Islamic communist” and I was thinking of some kind of cross between Mao Zedong and Hamas, and instead I get this?

After Charlottesville and all those fat people in costumes, I had to quickly distance myself from the “neo-Nazi” bit. People were like, “so if you’re not a neo-Nazi, then what are you?” and I would say “basically, picture a cross between Mao Zedong and Hamas” and they would say “I’m having a hard time picturing that” and I would say “basically, picture the diametric opposite of a tranny rabbi.”

But this is what I get.

Every single fricking time.

But yeah, I have the memes. I was a bit rushed. Needed time to write all that worthless bullshit up there.

In future, I’m going to seriously try for Monday, not late Tuesday, but maybe… check Wednesday if it’s really that big of a deal. Also there’s an RSS feed, you know. That should actually be more prominent given the irregular output. Not really sure anyone knows how to use it anyway. We’re banned from all email lists of course, roflmao.

Editor’s Pick of the Week:

Runner-Up:

Special Separate Award:

That one is A. Wyatt Mann, the guy who invented internet memes, using AI. He’s never done absurdist humor before that I’ve ever seen. It’s a fun meme in itself, but the guy who made Le Happy Merchant branching out into a totally new form of meme humor as a result of AI makes it worth the Special Separate Award, which has only been granted once before for a meme Ben Garrison made about me making memes of him.

I’m big on absurdism these days. I mean in humor, not the nihilistic philosophical concept. We’ll see how it plays on my upcoming TV show.

The Primo Collection:

≈

And we end on a classic Fuentes.

He’s taken over the universe but I swore he wouldn’t take over this website. So much for that. He is literally like the coronavirus now. Everyone in the world is required to think about him all day, every day.

At first everyone probably thought it was just their feeds. But it’s not. He’s everywhere all the time.

Why is the NYT using AI to make him look like a Calvin Klein model when in reality he is the worst skinny-fat with a disgusting Mexiface and advanced scoliosis?

You tell me, friend.

Maybe make a list of possible reasons, then choose the one most likely.

Anyway, I’ll be back on Wednesday. No, sorry. I’ll be back on Friday for Wednesday memes.

I’ve got extra memes. I know these pages can load slow. Plus we need more regular posts. Check back tomorrow to see if you like this other guy we’ve got. He’s sort of an autistic genius with the research stuff. Mind like a steel vice grip. I think you’ll dig it.

If not then fuck off, I don’t care.

I don’t care about anything anymore except Star Wars Legends. I’m reading like four of these novels a week. Well, that makes it sound like a pattern. I did read the first five in ten days. Kinda had a sort of break thing happening because of a thing with the thing and bad internet.

Trying to get a new e-reader. I love my Kobo 7″, but it’s about shot after three years of daily use (buttons all clingy, have to use touch screen which is annoying and not the way it’s designed), and they only sell the “color” version now, which means there is blue light, which defeats the purpose of a device that looks like a Texas Instruments screen in the first place.

This is what robots and alleged humans are recommending:

It’s expensive but it’s sold out on Amazon so it must be good, right? Trying to find one. I don’t need any of those features. Well, I guess scratch protection is good. But it’s supposedly got much crisper text than my current piece, and I think I’ll get used to the extra 0.8 inches.

The hilarious thing is I lost most of my sight during my illness two years ago. But because I haven’t used a real book (or a cellphone) in many, many years, I can just blow up text instead of getting glasses. That’s what killed the buttons on my Kobo. I’m only putting one paragraph on a page. Funny right? I have a brain tumor.