Russia Asks for an Explanation of Vault 7

Andrew Anglin
Daily Stormer
March 11, 2017

The CIA hacked the entire world.

Recorded absolutely everything.

Besides being devious, it was absolutely irresponsible on an unimaginable scale – this stuff got let out on the open internet, and they have known for at least a while that all types of people had access to it, and they did nothing to fix the situation.

Why is Russia the only country complaining about it?

RT:

Moscow has urged US intelligence services to provide a detailed and open response to WikiLeaks’ accusations of CIA hacking activities as #Vault7 constitutes a serious threat to international security, Foreign Ministry spokeswoman Maria Zakharova said.

“We’d really like the security services in Washington to respond fully and openly to the released documents with specific facts, and if this information is confirmed then it poses a great threat to the world and international security,” Zakharova said at a briefing in the Russian capital.

Moscow “occasionally” receives information about the activities of the American special services, she pointed out.

Previously, such reports “were always confirmed, but also there always attempts to retouch this information and remove it from the front pages,” Zakharova said.

“In any case, almost every time this information was confirmed,” the ministry’s spokeswoman said.

On Tuesday, WikiLeaks released the first installment of the #Vault7 leak, revealing the scope of the CIA’s hacking capabilities.

According to the whistleblower group, the batch of 8,761 documents accounts for only 1 percent of the total files to be released.

This sure was a great leak for Russia though, as it pretty much ends the debate about them “hacking our elections.”

That was the most important takeaway – the only one that really matters: the CIA hacking division has the ability to hack people and make it look like someone else did it.

And of course, these tools were released on the open internet some time ago.

So the fact that a security analyst finds “indications” that Russia hacked the DNC (or even phished Podesta, lol) now means absolutely nothing. In fact, it means that any “proof” they may discover in the future means nothing.

Short of Putin going on TV and confessing, there is literally no possible way “Russian election hacking” can ever be proven or even argued as a convincing possibility.

So hey media – how about we quit talking about it, huh?