Featured Stories – Daily Stormer https://dailystormer.in The Most Censored Publication in History Fri, 11 Jul 2025 08:13:31 +0000 en-US hourly 1 https://wordpress.org/?v=5.8.4 Dear MAGA: If You Think Masked ICE Thugs Wouldn’t Do the Same to You, You’re Even Dumber Than You Look https://dailystormer.in/dear-maga-if-you-think-masked-ice-thugs-wouldnt-do-the-same-to-you-youre-dumber-than-you-look/ Fri, 11 Jul 2025 03:38:55 +0000 https://dailystormer.in/?p=687818

It’s NEVER a good idea to resist ICE agents.

Can you say FAFO? pic.twitter.com/3zArK2T25y

— AmericanPapaBear (@AmericaPapaBear) June 29, 2025

A lot of people on the internet are celebrating and cheering on some pretty brutal videos of ICE grabbing Mexicans out of parking lots, out of Walmarts, wherever. It’s understandable. I understand, and my instinct is to celebrate it as well. And I would be celebrating it if I knew less about the situation than I do.

Please, allow me to explain why I’m not celebrating it.

Let’s start with just how uncomfortable I am with the cops. The Big Beautiful Bill is turning ICE into the biggest federal cop group in American history. Their budget is going to go from $10 billion to $100 billion, which surpasses the combined budgets of the FBI, DEA, ATF, Bureau of Prisons, and the Marshals Service.

Note that there has never been a case of a federal cop group shrinking. In theory, ICE should have a temporary mission, correct? They should be rounding up the immigrants, processing them in holding centers near the border, then shipping them back to wherever they came from. (In certain cases, sending them to some third country might make sense, but because they all came through Mexico, that third country should be Mexico. It was Mexico that made the decision to let these people walk through their country into our country, and while I understand that this was under pressure from the Biden administration, all that really means is that the US is capable of asserting enormous pressure on Mexico.)

But there is no “once the mission is complete, ICE’s staffing and funding will be drastically downsized” clause in the BBB or anywhere else. This is a standing army, trained to run around the country throwing people into vans, without warrants. If you think “JD Vance” is going to win the 2028 election, you have no understanding of what is happening in this country. Apparently, the reasons Democrats will take over in 2028 are something that need to be explained in some detail, something that is beyond our scope today. But Democrats will control the federal government in 2028, SCOTUS will not get in their way, and they are not going to disband a massive federal cop organization, but instead use it for their own purposes. If we want to get an idea of what they will do with these cops, perhaps we should recall Waco and Ruby Ridge, then imagine that sort of thing happening everywhere, all the time.

Another fact that is rather important in my view is that most of these people we see being arrested are not being deported at all. The BBB does nothing to address the laws that make it virtually impossible to deport 98% of illegal immigrants. Getting rid of the laws that prevent deportations should and would be the first move of anyone who was even remotely serious about deporting tens of millions of people. Among other things, you would expand expedited removals, end “credible fear” interviews for “asylum seekers,” and defund immigration courts. This could all be done by Congress.

Of course, the idea of tens of millions of people via mass roundups is completely nonsensical on its face. No one knows the actual numbers, but after the 20+ million who likely came in under Biden, we are definitely talking about somewhere in the range of fifty million illegal immigrants we want to remove. You are not going to pick them up one at a time in the Walmart parking lot. You don’t need to be a math genius to understand this, and I don’t need to tell you “how many football stadiums is 50 million people?”

What you would do is start seriously punishing people who hire or rent to illegal immigrants. You would fully implement E-verify, to ensure people who work and rent are legal residents, then you would send ICE to round up the tens of thousands of people who are employing and renting to illegals and charging them with ten years in prison for each instance. You would then set up ICE-run “no questions asked, just sign the form and we’ll give you $1,000 in cash and put you on a bus back to Mexico or on a flight to wherever” voluntary deportation centers in every major American city and provide a hotline for the immigrants to call explaining how they can make their way out.

If they can’t legally work and they can’t legally live anywhere, all of a sudden you have an exodus. What can they do? They have to leave. Then, instead of endless videos of masked men grabbing screaming women in church parking lots and throwing them into vans, you’d have endless videos of immigrants lining up and boarding single-file onto buses bound for Mexico.

Im sure it’s possible to argue that some of the immigrants would refuse to leave even if they could not work and had to live on the streets. But it’s not going to be very many of them, and those ones could be thrown in vans. They’re not going to be hard to find.

Tens of millions of people have been relocated before. The most obvious example to point to is the partitioning of Pakistan. That project used carrots and sticks, but it did not round millions of people up, throwing them in cars one at a time, sending three officers to arrest a single individual.

How long does the arrest take, if we include drive time and paperwork? How much are these ICE people being paid per hour? This all starts to become reminiscent of “Holocaust math,” no?

Far from moving to arrest the employers and landlords of illegals, which I suspect many in the Trump administration would view as antisemitic, Trump has not even managed to cut off illegal immigrant access to all of the free social services.

Even if you are not big on math and are a true believer in the “one arrest at a time” strategy, the problem now is that ICE has already cleaned out the “100 miles from the border” immigrants who have been here less than two weeks (those are the only people eligible for expedited removal), and now these people are just being interned indefinitely as the courts prevent deportation. Yes, the Trump administration is making a big show pushing back on the courts, Stephen Miller is saying they don’t have the authority, but whatever the details of that battle might be, most of these people being detained by ICE are no longer being deported and are instead being sent to detainment facilities. Meanwhile, there is not even a discussion of using the Congress to pass laws stripping courts of their ability to prevent deportations. The United States federal court system is still able to enforce international refugee treaties (HIAS and others successfully challenged Trump’s EO on the matter in court), and instead of using the Congress to get rid of these treaties, Trump sends Miller to argue with the courts about what they mean.

Just Send Them to Black Sites, Indefinitely?

This “Alligator Alcatraz,” where MAGA patriots plan to eat delicious bread while watching Mexicans being eaten alive by large lizards, is a “black site.” That is, it is a prison camp where people are held indefinitely without access to due process. Just to be clear, no, it does not have to be secret to be a “black site.” Guantanamo Bay, where Trump is also sending immigrants instead of deporting them (he’s allowed to do this because Gitmo is technically US soil), is the world’s most famous prison and is also, definitionally, a “black site.” That said, it is certainly often a feature of a black site that you do not know where it is, and if you imagine that the federal government is not using this current circus atmosphere to build these sites across the country, you are as innocent as a babe or as stupid as an ox who’s suffered severe head trauma.

If the illegals could simply be deported in an efficient manner, you would not have any reason to build new black sites. So there is one more reason the state has for not successfully deporting illegal immigrants. That’s on top of the fact that all wealthy donors are against mass deportation of illegals.

Along with a brand new army of fully militarized federal cops trained to drive around the country and disappear people into vans in broad daylight, these black sites are another thing that the Trump Administration will be gifting to the AOC administration when James “JD Vance” Bowman loses the 2028 election.

I’m sure the Democrats will campaign on abolishing (or at least restricting) ICE and closing the black sites. And I’m sure people will believe it because of the long established Democrat tradition of telling the truth and never using federal cops for immoral purposes.

The most important gift Trump will give to AOC will be an AI police state control grid run by Palantir, so that the government will be able to keep close tabs on racists, sexists, homophobes, transphobes, and most importantly of all, antisemites.

Will the Democrats use this series of gifts to identify, arrest, and detain all the people viewed as a threat to democracy? Of course, I have no way of predicting such a thing, all I can do is say that it would be very easy to do, given these incredible gifts Trump will be giving them, and could be done legally with a simple emergency declaration which could be declared for more or less any reason.

Here’s an interesting question: how many people would need to be disappeared into some cage in a swamp to crush a meaningful American resistance movement? We know that the Palantir system will be able to identify them, and I would suspect the number is lower than 2,500. It could in fact be much lower than that, given that a fully functioning controlled opposition movement already exists, and most people would prefer to follow a Pied Piper offering them some joyful fantasy than look upon the dark realty of what is actually happening in front of their eyes. A quick perusal of the ridiculous popularity of the QAnon movement should be enough to demonstrate the ability of people to put their faith in nonsense, and most of the controlled opposition movements are nowhere near as ridiculous as QAnon.

Personally, I think these street scenes of ICE agents grabbing people are being created to desensitize people to seeing this sort of thing, and I think it is only a matter of time before these methods are used against those viewed as “dissidents” in America. But, hey – maybe I’m wrong? Maybe I’m just paranoid and it’s just that everyone in the government is really bad at math?

Bonus Trump Gift to Democrats: A Browner America


Along with the “elite police state package,” there are a lot of bonus gifts Trump is giving the Democrats. For example, Trump has decided to make it look like he’s implicated in the Epstein documents by claiming they don’t exist, and Democrats can now claim he destroyed them all. This is fantastic news for a lot of Democrat politicians and donors. You could come up with a big list of all sorts of little presents like this Trump will be giving the Democrats in the 2028 handoff.

But given today’s topic of discussion, the most relevant of the bonus gifts Trump will be giving the Democrats is a browner America. Homeland Security claims that virtually no one is crossing the border illegally currently. That seems unlikely, but okay. DHS also claims that as of June, so in Trump’s first six months, they had deported 207,000 people. The goal the administration had set was to deport a million per year, and it looks like in 2025 they might get close to 500,000, half of their 1 million goal. For reference, the Biden administration was probably allowing about 5 million people a year to enter the country, while in 2024, that administration deported only 270,000.

Given that Trump is going for all of the low-hanging fruit in his first months in office – new arrivals who are near the border – and given that there has been no interest shown in using Congress to change any of the laws, and especially given that there is no interest in putting the onus of responsibility on the people hiring and renting to the illegals, it is unlikely that by their 4th year, they will be deporting more than Biden was in his fourth year.

So just to be clear: Biden allowed in 20 millionish, Trump says the goal is to deport 4 millionish, he will probably end up deporting 1.5 millionish. Even after building and arming the biggest federal police agency in history, there is no way he is going to get near Obama’s deportation numbers.

Again, no need for a math whiz to see that just with white deaths and brown births alone, the 2028 America Trump hands off is going to be significantly browner than the 2024 America Biden handed him. But we haven’t added the legal immigrants. That’s about 1 million new people per year, virtually all of them brown. Further, Trump is at least flirting with the idea of removing caps on H-1B visas for Indians, which could mean multi-millions more per year.

Any way you cut it, 2028 America is going to be significantly browner than 2024 America, and it could be a lot browner.

But hey, I heard on Fox News that brown people are leaving the Democrat plantation because of the woke agenda. So maybe it will all work out? Maybe brown folks will get sick of paying these high taxes to people who want to turn their kids gay, and we’ll have a… multiracial working class uprising against the… the woke mob.

Or whatever.

But Hey, Whatever

Many in the internet will claim that a person has no right to identify a problem unless he has already prepared a solution for it. It is difficult to imagine a more infantile mindset for a grown adult man to embrace. But who am I to judge? I simply do my best to look at the world, to examine the facts, and try to explain what is going on to those interested in listening. I would never want to force anyone to listen. You are an adult, and you have a basic right as a human being to believe whatever it is you feel like believing.

I do not have a solution to the very serious problems I am identifying here, and will not even suggest that any such solution exists. I’m just exhausted by this goofy fantasy bullshit. In 2016, Trump said tens of millions of people needed to be deported. He “lost” in 2020, and tens of millions more were brought in before he “won” in 2024, and now he’s aiming to deport 4 million by 2028, and it seems that number is impossible, but you are going to get a massive police state, both digital and physical, in exchange for removing maybe 1.5-2 million illegal immigrants.

Okay?

That’s what’s happening. Happening alongside the endless wars, the biggest budget ever, the entire Epstein case being thrown into a black hole, and whatever other cute little surprises the Trump administration has up its sleeve over the next 3.5 years. It’s all bad news. So if you want, pretend it’s not happening. No one forced you to read this. At least, I hope they didn’t. If someone did force you to read this, I’m sorry. If it was a Mexican who forced you to read it, you should call ICE, and they will come feed him to an alligator.

When analyzing the American empire, and the evils it is currently in the process of spreading, I’ve determined that a man can either hope that the American empire falls sooner rather than later, or that he dies before things get really bad.

The other thing one can do is pray for incompetence on the part of the evil forces implementing this agenda, but I suppose that falls under the “hoping for collapse” category.

When Trump was allegedly shot in the ear in Butler, I identified this as part of a program to set him up as an overwhelmingly popular leader, who would come into office as a kind of Caesar figure, and be able to do whatever he wanted to do. Unfortunately or fortunately, most of that good will has already been burned through. The Epstein thing was incredible. To actually start yelling about how people need to stop talking about Epstein was beyond my comprehension.

That was just so completely nuts. When I first saw it, I had to confirm it wasn’t AI.

And then this?

As I always note, we live in a democracy. Please don’t say “oh no, we live in a Republic.” Some of you people are just such retards, I really feel like you deserve all of this. Sometimes, I think the Jews are right about the goyim. We do live in a democracy, a representative democratic republic, and this means that you do not have a way to petition grievances. So the government can do whatever they want to you.

However, at some point, any population facing a certain amount of abuse will engage in a violent uprising, so the system is able to move much more smoothly when they have high levels of support. The fact that Trump has burned up so much good will so quickly is confusing and can only really be explained by incompetence on his part and on the part of his cadre. He doesn’t actually have to do anything. He can just pretend he’s trying to do something. But coming out and saying “we must defeat Putin and actually Epstein didn’t even do anything” is really wild.

So sure. Hope their incompetence screws everything up and leads to a collapse. That’s my best advice.

My best advice is actually to leave the United States, and forget the place exists. But most people are not going to do that.

]]> “Political Loyalty” is a Nonsensical Concept https://dailystormer.in/political-loyalty-is-a-nonsensical-concept/ Wed, 09 Jul 2025 11:43:00 +0000 https://dailystormer.in/?p=687799

Since the beginning of Donald Trump’s political career in 2015, “Make America Great Again” (MAGA) has been more than a slogan, and instead a concept that embodies a series of simple and easily understood principles about the problems facing America and the solutions to these problems. MAGA was never a specific series of policy proposals, as it was intended to be something bigger than any specific policy. It was a vision of a new America. While short on specifics, the vision was clear: the current establishment had wasted America’s wealth on foreign wars and domestic social engineering agendas that had hollowed out the nation. Though it was not theocratic or puritanical or otherwise moralizing, it was opposed to “weird stuff” which sought to undermine what were traditionally considered “American values,” and it was anti-immigration and anti-war. Again, it was never specific, but everyone definitely understood those three major cornerstones of the program. (It was also “anti-corruption,” though as no one is publicly “pro-corruption,” that is not a particularly meaningful position to take.)

During his first term, Trump failed to do much MAGA, but it was generally understood that he was trying to, but that the president simply doesn’t really have very much power in America. However, in these early months of his second term, Trump is not simply failing to live up to the ideals of MAGA, but is attempting to completely confuse the meaning of the term, attempting to convince his own followers that “MAGA” was never really what they thought it was.

In a series of statements reminiscent of Anthony Fauci’s infamous pronunciation that “I am The Science,” Trump has recently claimed “I am MAGA,” and that he is the decider of what is or isn’t MAGA, and whatever new policies he decides on do not necessarily need to have any relationship to what was previously understood to be the MAGA political platform.

What he is effectively saying is that his political movement was always just about him as a person, and that anyone who ever supported MAGA was supporting him as a person. Therefore, anyone who disagrees with his totally new series of policies he has developed in recent weeks, most of which are the opposite of how MAGA had previously been defined, is not actually a believer in MAGA, because MAGA was never a series of policies, but instead an expression of loyalty to Donald Trump personally, and a pledge to support whatever it is he decides to do at any moment.

This situation is most brightly highlighted in the way Trump has dealt with Congressman Thomas Massie, who is, I would argue, the standard-bearer of the MAGA platform as it was initially introduced by Trump in 2015. Trump has claimed Massie is a traitor and vowed to destroy him. It is very obvious to everyone that Massie has not changed any of his positions on anything.

In the most recent betrayal of the ideals that were sold as representing MAGA, Donald Trump has decided that he wants to continue the endless war in the Ukraine. While meeting with his handler and earthly master Bibi Netanyahu this week, Trump declared that there is no plan to cut any funding to the Ukraine, and he actually plans to increase weapons shipments.

Although it’s not totally clear what happened, it appears that last week, Pete Hegseth halted shipments of weapons to the Ukraine. During the questioning in front of his boss, Trump claimed he didn’t know who was responsible for canceling these weapons shipments, and asked the media to tell him who did it. (Hegseth was sitting directly to his left.) He then declared a planned increase in weapons.

Following these statements, The Washington Post Editorial Board rushed to support Trump, publishing an op-ed praising his support for the Ukraine.

I would not suppose that anyone who voted for Trump in any of his three elections ever expected that the WaPo Editorial Board would become the standard bearer of MAGA, but that is apparently precisely what has taken place.

Trump had previously claimed that involving the US in Israel’s war with Iran actually was in-line with MAGA policy, which was explicitly anti-war, because he wasn’t really doing a war, he was just doing a bombing.

In another betrayal, Trump’s AG, Pam Bimbo, has claimed that there isn’t actually an Epstein client list. I don’t know what that means and no one has explained it, but the implication apparently is that Epstein did not have any clients, and either no women were trafficked, or they were trafficked to no one.

Though it is perhaps a slightly lesser offense to the MAGA agenda, which has never been particularly focused on fiscal responsibility, Trump has also this week moved to explode the national debt with the biggest spending bill in American history. What is most notable about this is that he vastly expanded military spending to the highest levels ever just weeks after claiming he was going to attempt to halve the military budget.

While “fiscal responsibility” might be slightly beyond the intellectual scope of MAGA, which has never been particularly sophisticated, “we’re going to stop wasting money on foreign wars and spend that money here at home where our country is falling apart” is definitely something we all understood to be core to the MAGA doctrine. Now, because MAGA has been redefined from a series of principles about how America should be run into “whatever Donald Trump says at whichever time he happens to be speaking,” the continuation of the Ukraine war, bombing countries for Israel, and spending the most money ever on war, all fall under the definition of “MAGA.”

A Test of the Limits of “Political Loyalty”

“Loyalty” is a quality that should be explicitly reserved for personal relationships. A man should be loyal to his family. Loyalty to a political figure or a political movement should not be possible, as it serves no purpose.

To be loyal to someone means that you will stick by them whether they are right or wrong. The reason we are loyal to our families is that we need them to be loyal to us, because this is how humans survive. If people abandoned family members because they were wrong about something, we would all be completely alone. We have to take the good and the bad with family members, because we need them.

Loyalty also makes sense in military units. It could make sense in the context of various business relationships. And there are, I’m certain, other examples of where the behavioral quality of loyalty would or could be appropriate.

One place where loyalty is not appropriate is in politics. Being “loyal” to a political figure is nonsensical. The only reason any person would support any political figure is that that political figure is doing political things they agree with and that helps them and their personal agenda. There is no place at all for loyalty to a political figure, as you do not personally know the political figure, and therefore you do not owe personal allegiance. There is no mutuality at all. Either the political figure is promoting an agenda you agree with, and therefore you rally for them and defend them because you benefit, or they are doing something different, which you do not benefit from, in which case you owe them nothing.

What Trump has done with intention is form a kind of personality cult, where people feel that they know him, and therefore owe him some kind of personal loyalty outside of his role as a policy maker. This is something that is only really possible in the age of electronic media. Most people see Donald Trump speaking nearly every day, and their subconscious mind, which is not familiar with the nature of video screens, registers him as someone they know personally, and are regularly hanging out with socially. Such a person would be the kind of person you would owe a personal loyalty to, and whose mistakes you would overlook, at least until the point where they got completely out of control.

We are going to see the limits of the “loyalty” personality cult tested.

Clearly, the personality cult is not considered ironclad, in the way it would be with someone like Jim Jones, as there is understood to be a need for distractions. This week, Trump is covering up the series of betrayals with a Romanesque “cruelty circus,” sending immigrants to cages in an alligator swamp. The media that supports Trump will say “yeah so, I guess there never was an Epstein list, and yeah we’re just going to keep doing that Ukraine war forever apparently – now let’s go back to the scene of the alligator pit, where your tribal enemies, the immigrants, are going to be fed to large, nasty lizards.”

They will keep the circus distractions coming, I’m sure. But ultimately, there is going to be a strict math equation regarding how many people are willing to ignore the fact that Trump is abandoning most of the core of his platform, not only failing to do the things he promised to do, but telling people he never really cared about those things anyway.

It’s worth mentioning that people will continue supporting a political figure that fails if they feel he is trying his best, which is why Trump remained so popular after not doing very much the first time he was president. But this time, it seems he is attempting to completely shift his stated priorities. This week he said “we have to defend the Ukraine.” This is very much the diametric opposite of what he campaigned on when he said “it’s not our responsibility to defend the Ukraine.” That is different than “sorry, I can’t figure out how to get Congress to stop funding the Ukraine” or “I can’t figure out what I’m supposed to do to end this war, this whole thing is really confusing and I don’t know what to do.” What I mean to say is: failure is different than betrayal, and while failure is tolerable, betrayal should not be tolerable.

In the case of “actually, there never was an Epstein client list,” that is just obvious lying, which would fall under the “betrayal” category, unless a person is stupid enough to believe that Ghislaine Maxwell was convicted of sex trafficking underage girls to no one, which some Trump supporters are probably stupid enough to believe, though I can’t say for certain.

Unfortunately: Democracy

Fortunately for Donald Trump and his cadre, and unfortunately for all the people in America, we live in a democracy, and therefore it is possible for zero people to support Donald Trump, and for him to remain president, and continue to do whatever it is he feels like doing at any given time.

There are probably some reasons that political support is important in a democracy, but I can’t think of what they might be. Trump appears to care personally about people supporting him, as it appears he has a rather fragile ego that feeds on popular support, and if people are booing him, it appears to hurt his ego. But ultimately, because this is a democracy and there is therefore no mechanism through which the public can petition grievances, he can do whatever he wants while he remains in office, and no one’s opinion about what he does means anything.

That said, Trump probably will maintain some fanatical base of morons who don’t really know much about what is going on but are very excited by alligators. And of course, the polls published can say whatever.

Then, after he does whatever it is he is going to do, he can turn over the government to Gavin Newsom or AOC, and they can be popular for a while after claiming they are going to do something or other, and then become unpopular after they do something different than what they claimed they would do. And we will just keep going on like that until eventually, something gives out, and the American empire falls into disarray, and something finally happens.

]]> If You “Don’t Pick a Side” in the Israel vs. Islam Conflict, You’re Siding with the Jews https://dailystormer.in/if-you-dont-pick-a-side-in-the-israel-vs-islam-conflict-youre-siding-with-the-jews/ Wed, 09 Jul 2025 02:21:51 +0000 https://dailystormer.in/?p=687807
This meme was made by a Jew. Anyone stupid enough to believe this is too stupid to be capable of making a simple meme. Any of these format memes saying you’re an alpha chad if you don’t support Palestine are made by Jews, and if you fall for it, you’re so fucking stupid you deserve to be drafted to go fight in this war “that has nothing to do with us.” You can explain how it’s nothing to do with you to the recruitment officer who is grabbing you like you’re an immigrant getting got by ICE, then explain it again to the bullets flying at your head when you’re stationed somewhere in the Zagros Mountains. You fucking monkey. Seriously. If you ever say that “Israel-Palestine is not my problem,” you deserve to have a very large head put through your hole when Trump sends you to this “totally not related to America” war. You stupid animal. It is impoverished and grotesque, your moronism. 

There is a supposedly edgy take on the whole Middle East conflict that goes something like: “it doesn’t involve me and so I don’t care.”

Here’s the problem: if you are living in a Western country, it does involve you, because it is your tax money that is paying for the Jews to kill all these people.

I am personally sympathetic to the “it doesn’t involve me” perspective, if it’s in a vacuum. I don’t think people should care about conflicts that don’t involve them. Most people on the internet seem to care a lot about every conflict, so it’s a bit suspect that the one where people say “it’s not my problem” is the one with the Jews. But sure, if there was no connection to the West in the Middle Eastern conflict, then okay.

Here’s the thing: Israel would not even exist at all without the support of the West and the tax dollars of the very edgy and clever people who claim they don’t need to pick a side. If you don’t stand against Israel, you are standing with Israel, because it is only through huge numbers of Westerners standing against Israel that there is ever going to be a possibility for the West to stop funding this terrorist state.

Anyone claiming “it doesn’t involve me so I’m not picking a side” is either simply dumb, or is a Jewish shill. Obviously, anyone who looks at the situation at all is going to side against the Jews, so saying “just don’t look, don’t think about it at all,” is a pro-Jewish position.

Cut all Western support for Israel. Once that’s done, I won’t be interested in picking a side either. I will just sit back and watch the clips of jihadists Zerg-rushing a defenseless Israel, and smirk smugly about how glad I am not to be involved in that situation.

]]> Memetic Monday: The Real Deal https://dailystormer.in/memetic-monday-the-real-deal/ Tue, 08 Jul 2025 05:22:16 +0000 https://dailystormer.in/?p=687692

I wrote something on Sunday about the fact we are now combining renditions and black sites with an AI police state digital control grid in the name of fighting illegal immigration and somehow no one really seems to be getting deported.

I might go more into this, as it’s a pretty important issue that not many people seem to be talking about. People are cheering the PT Barnum meets Wile E. Coyote meets Half-Life 2 show that Trump is putting on completely mindlessly while the Democrats just whine about how it’s sad for the immigrants without pointing out that the groundwork is being laid for something very dark to be used against people other than Mexican field people and Haitian dog-eaters.

If I were the Democrats, I’d be quiet about this too, because I’d really want President AOC to get the reins of the Palantir black site rendition system that Trump is building to hand over to the Democrats when James Bowman inevitably flops like a floppy bird in 2028.

Anyway, I’m thinking about getting deep into it, because I’m not really seeing many people put these pieces together, but I’m also considering switching the focus of the site towards artisanal cheeses, as I really don’t think there are very many intelligent writers in that field either. I mean the people who make it are geniuses, but a lot of them are from places like France and Denmark and are completely illiterate. Most people don’t know this, but the Danish literacy rate is actually lower than that of niggers.

The Danes actually use cartoons to promote anti-white hatred to elderly Danish people at community centers because they know there is an 85% chance a Dane cannot read and can only understand concepts if explained with children’s cartoons:

Danish see those posters and they just crack like eggs.

But they can cheese it up, boy. Damn, son. They’ll cheese you like an mf.

Anyway, I don’t really care about anything anymore other than those two things: a) scaremongering people about how Trump is setting their shit up so president AOC and her gang of kikes can send you to get eaten to death by alligators, and b) elite cheeses.

Oh and this:

Seriously, if he wanted to mock some imaginary stereotype of Central Asians, why didn’t he just invent the name of a country?

Why completely destroy the international reputation of a country of twenty million people, who are some of the most chilled out people you will find anywhere in the world?

I mean, I get that Cohen is a Jew who hates all sorts of different categories of people, as he thinks everyone in the world is trying to gas him in a fake shower room for no reason. But why didn’t he say “Uzbekistan,” where they actually did a pogrom of Jews and where the people are about 1% as sympathetic as Kazakhs?

Or why not just make up a name??? To represent all of the Central Asian Turkic peoples he hates????

After completely destroying the international reputation of an entire country for literally no reason, this Jew went on a media campaign demanding the entire internet be shut down to prevent people from criticizing him. It’s a real shame there is no “Kazakh Defamation League.”

I guarantee this rat would tell you with a straight face Kazakh people hate him for literally no reason.

What’s almost more unbelievable than the seemingly limitless seething hatred of the Jews is their total lack of any self-awareness.

They are actually worse than women.

Oh and actually the fourth thing I cared about was freeing Diddy, but that one solved itself.

Maybe the rest of this shit will too?

Anyway.

Editor’s Pick of the Week:

And the Runner-Up:

Followed by the Artisanal Collection:

]]> Are We Sure We Want Black Sites in America? Alongside the Palantir AI Police State Control Grid? https://dailystormer.in/are-we-sure-we-want-black-sites-in-america-alongside-the-palantir-ai-police-state-control-grid/ Sun, 06 Jul 2025 09:48:06 +0000 https://dailystormer.in/?p=687684

The topic of the day is the fact that Donald Trump and his people have built a half billion dollar detention facility in a nature preserve in Florida. They are calling it “Alligator Alcatraz,” because I guess there are alligators in the swamp and you know, alliteration (the kids love it).

It’s funny to put immigrants in a swamp full of alligators.

But… are we talking about an American black site?

To be clear, a “black site” is defined as “a clandestine detention center operated by a state where prisoners who have not been charged with a crime are incarcerated without due process or court order.”

Is that something we really want to be doing? Building these types of sites in remote and potentially secret locations?

Please note that the Trump administration is also sending immigrants to Gitmo, the infamous black site in Cuba where the US spent decades torturing people it had kidnapped from various countries. Trump says he wants to hold 30,000 people there. Again, no one is explaining why they are not just sent back to their home countries. The US has an absolute ability to exert pressure on countries to accept the return of their people.

What exactly is even the purpose? We have jails. We have all of the leverage to deport people. We can make some concentration camp type holding facilities, just with modular homes and fences, and put them near the border. Wouldn’t that make more sense?

I’m not against putting immigrants in camps or cages or whatever. But another issue with this is that it only holds 5,000 people, which isn’t really a very relevant number when we are talking about at least 50 million people who are eligible for deportation.

Further, the costs of flying people to this remote location, and holding them there – that doesn’t make any sense at all to me. Again, you can quickly construct concentration camps in areas where immigrants can just be bussed in and processed. We can figure out where they’re going and send them there.

I don’t want to sound like a conspiracy theorist, but what this looks like to me is that we are normalizing the idea of black sites in America. Because this place, this Alligator Alcatraz, would make a lot more sense as a secret prison for Americans than as an immigrant detention facility. As an immigrant detention facility, it is incredibly expensive, elaborate, inefficient, and generally confusing.

I’ve written some about the Trump administration’s relationship with Palantir. Thankfully, others are writing and podcasting about this issue as well. Basically, the administration is contracting this intelligence and military tech company to design a control grid in America, and when asked about it, the Trump people just claim it is for immigrants. But no one is even claiming that only immigrants will be included in these AI databases that are going to monitor everyone. Palantir is building and has basically already built and is now just implementing a surveillance grid run by AI that compiles all information on you, both from the government and from private companies (i.e., Google and Facebook, and the banks), which is set up to build a profile on you that knows everything about you. It’s a total science fiction dystopian nightmare plan that few people are even bothering to talk about.

This Glenn Greenwald video is a good overview.

Palantir is a totally Jewish company which is involved heavily in the genocide in Gaza. The company’s Jewish CEO, Alex Karp, makes very edgy jokes about how he wants to kill the families of antisemites.

I don’t personally have very much faith in any speech guarantees provided by the US government. The Biden administration violated the First Amendment by ordering “private” tech companies to censor speech, and the Trump administration has done things much more illegal than that, passing all of these laws against “antisemitism.” Trump arrested and attempted to deport a green card holder for not supporting Israel. He says he’s going to deport anyone who doesn’t support Israel, regardless if they have a green card or not. Thus far, no one has been able to explain to me how a green card holder’s constitutional rights vary from those of a US citizen.

There is a lot of legal precedent for this you can look up. The Supreme Court ruled previously that an Australian communist with a green card couldn’t be deported for being a communist because a green card holder is protected by the Bill of Rights.

Listen, I’m the most anti-immigration person of all. If Trump said “we’re stripping all green card holders of their green cards and deporting them all tomorrow,” I would support that completely. But when you start claiming that you are taking specific rights from people who have rights under the US Constitution, you’re creating a very confusing legal situation.

He has also effectively seized federal control of universities in order to prevent students or faculty from criticizing Jews. He’s attempting to equate protesting against Israel with “material support for terrorism.” It’s all the exact same “safe spaces” and “speech is violence” language that was used by the Democrats in support of BLM and trannies, but Trump is taking it much further than Democrats ever did.

Further, the Biden administration was mocked relentlessly for their “Disinformation Governance Board,” a government board designed to monitor supposed “disinformation” on the internet, run by Nina Jankowicz. They ended up abolishing the organization after a couple months. Yet “monitoring disinformation online” is six million times less scary than “monitoring literally everything you do or say all the time for your entire life,” which is what Trump has contracted Palantir to do.

If you ask any questions about any of this, you’re either called an antisemite, a far-left open borders supporter, or both.

We should be deporting immigrants, but we should be doing so without threatening the freedom of speech or creating AI police state control grids. We should also do so, I think, without creating remote black sites, which really adds a whole other layer to this which I hadn’t really thought much about until the announcement of this “Alligator Alcatraz.”

I suppose it is obvious that if you’re going to create a total control grid and monitor everyone’s speech and behavior, and use AI to modify behavior on a society-wide scale, the social engineering won’t work on everyone so some people are going to have to disappear. And immigrants are so unpopular that the government has a chance to normalize – and get people to celebrate – this idea of people just disappearing and being hauled off to some secret prison. Doing a big fun publicity push with alligators is exactly what I would do if I wanted to normalize the idea of American black sites.

It’s all looking kinda dark, frankly.

The most frustrating part is just how well the social engineering campaigns already work. Granted, they are running into some issues getting people to go along with the whole antisemitism thing. Even a lot of right-wingers are very uncomfortable with the Trump administration’s push for these “hate speech” laws. But with Palantir AI surveillance grids or remote prisons with no due process, if you start asking really any right-winger about it, they’re going to call you an immigrant lover and start telling you that they don’t care if alligators eat the immigrants. If you follow-up with “okay, but can’t we just deport them instead of spending hundreds of millions of dollars to try to feed them to alligators?”, they will just get confused.

The answer as to “why not just deport them immediately?” is some garbled gibberish about courts. But with the way the Trump administration is steamrolling the complaints of judges about the way immigrants are being handled, the idea that they are really concerned about “asylum claims” and an infinite appeals process is not really believable. “We will feed them to alligators but if they survive they can live in this cage for decades and keep filing asylum appeals.” Further, all of those laws about asylum could just be changed. Trump is ramming the most expensive and unpopular bill in history through Congress, so the idea he can’t get rid of these idiotic asylum laws is dumb.

For the record, though I did not read the whole “Big Beautiful Bill,” my AI did, and the only change to asylum law the current version makes is that you have to pay $100 to apply for asylum. The fee, of course, can be waived if a judge says so. It appears very much like the goal here is to create a gigantic federal standing army in the form of ICE, that is able to round up immigrants and keep some fraction of a percentage of them in various cages rather than actually deport anyone back to their home country.

This is at the same time we are normalizing deploying the military onto the streets of American cities. I’m not pro-riot, and I’m not against sending the National Guard to deal with riots, but sending in the Marines? Does that really seem like something we want to be normalizing?

Sadly, like with everything else in a democracy, there isn’t anything you can do to change anything. But you should be aware that we are really not that far away from Palantir AI identifying you as an antisemite, and a private paramilitary group with no insignias on their gear throwing you in a van and flying you off to some secret prison. The Palantir control grid is really already here, they are in the process of combining all of these databases on you and using the AI to build profiles. So it’s just a matter of when they decide to start using it and for what purposes.

The way the deportation thing is currently being handled, which is by grabbing random people and doing so in a kind of public way (while also not doing any kind of relevant numbers, just to be clear), very much looks to me like it is designed to normalize scenes of people being randomly grabbed off the streets. If/when they start doing it to white Americans, “hey wait, isn’t that a white guy?” might go through someone’s head, but it isn’t going to matter. And most people won’t register that it is no longer just brown people who are getting picked up, after they’ve witnessed enough of these scenes.

You don’t have to be particularly creative to imagine a situation where ICE becomes Palantir’s NKVD.

I know this might sound a bit far-fetched. But all I’m doing is the only thing I ever do: I’m looking at the data, and doing my best to draw conclusions about what it means.

It’s also probably worth reminding people that if you simply made it a serious felony to hire or rent homes to illegal immigrants, and started putting the people who do that in prison (just normal prison, no need for alligators or any Looney Tunes shit), virtually all of the illegal immigrants would just leave.

It might also be worth reminding people that “illegal” immigrants have never caused even a fraction of the social, economic, and cultural damage that “legal” immigrants cause, and Trump is currently supporting moves to allow basically infinite numbers of “legal” immigrants.

It is very reasonable to suspect that maybe things are not exactly as they appear, and that maybe the government and media are not being perfectly frank with us about where all of this is headed.

]]> President Celebrates Daily Stormer 12-Year Anniversary by Dropping Antisemitic Slur https://dailystormer.in/president-celebrates-daily-stormer-12-year-anniversary-by-dropping-antisemitic-slur/ Sat, 05 Jul 2025 08:22:06 +0000 https://dailystormer.in/?p=687669

The Big Man Donald might be going to fuck us worse than anyone has ever been fucked. It’s not totally clear yet. I don’t really see a way it won’t happen. I mean he’s got us on third base on the Iran war. The Big Bad Best Country on Earth is about to pull that bitch’s panties off and operate an insertion.

I don’t think Trump wants to. Honestly, I think he actually thought just dropping a few bombs would be the end of it. But… there is no chance the nuclear material was in any of these sites, and now Iran is definitely going to start working to build a bomb, which they weren’t doing before, so like, from Israel’s perspective – and the perspective of anyone else who doesn’t think Iran should have a nuclear bomb (I personally don’t care and actually support it as it would stabilize the Middle East) – the situation was made way worse by the Israeli and US bombings.

And there is no chance Iran is negotiating after this shit.

So unless something… I don’t know, honestly, I can’t picture any situation here where this doesn’t escalate. I’ve listened to all of the experts, and none of them know what escalation will look like. So I’m in no position to speculate. Israel thinks carpet bombing can work, but Iran has too many missiles and drones and it takes so many of these very expensive “Iron Dome” missiles to stop these cheap Iranian missiles.

Let’s just look at a bit of this math.

Iran’s stuff:

Short-range ballistic missiles (e.g., Fateh-110):

  • $10,000–$50,000 per missile

Cruise missiles (e.g., Ya Ali or Paveh):

  • $100,000–$500,000 per missile

Drones (e.g., Shahed-136 “kamikaze” drones):

  • $20,000–$50,000 per drone

Israel’s stuff:

Tamir interceptor missile (Iron Dome):

  • $40,000–$50,000 per interceptor

David’s Sling (for medium-range threats, more advanced missiles):

  • $1 million+ per interceptor

So, for example, if Iran fires 100 drones for $2 million, and Israel needs 2 interceptors per, they’re spending $4-10 million.

That’s without considering the hundreds of millions in maintenance on the Iron Dome, and the fact that Israel simply doesn’t have infinite interceptor missiles, whereas Iran in the long run can just keep sending these cheap drones to deplete their stocks and then sending more serious missiles. (Of course, the more expensive launching systems are being effectively destroyed by Israel.)

It ends up being a minimum of 5 times more expensive for Israel to defend than for Iran to launch, and up to 20 times or more. That is of course not nearly as bad as what Hezbollah and Hamas were doing, where Israel was spending 100 times the cost of the militias.

What’s more, although Israel has a total media lockdown, it does appear that Iran is hitting some high value targets. I am not going to pretend to see through the fog of war. But there are people more serious than Scott Ritter saying that some serious military shit has been hit.

But it doesn’t matter what’s getting hit, because Israel is going to run out of missiles. They can’t be produced fast enough.

And even if that wasn’t true, Israel is going to say that, and say that the US has to stop it, and the US will do it.

So… I just don’t see any way out of this. Frankly, I didn’t see a way out of it after the middle of October of 2023. You people who don’t remember can all go back and look at where I said that this whole thing, starting with allowing October 7th to happen, was about getting the US into a real war with Iran.

If Israel was willing to do the Art of the Deal, they would have done it decades ago. I just really don’t see anything anyone can do to stop this now. Obviously it would have happened the same under Kamala, and worse, and at least Trump is pumping our bags.

But you know what else he’s doing?

Dropping antisemitic slurs for the Daily Stormer anniversary (our 12th anniversary was yesterday).

He called Jew bankers “shylocks.”

He later said, without apologizing, that he didn’t know it was a slur. Then he just described Jews.

For those of you not big on literature, “Shylock Holmes” was a character created by Edgar Rice Burroughs and appeared in many of his “Land Before Time” novels. He was a sneaky Jewish investigator who would say he was investigating missing toys so he could get into orphanages to molest children.

Yids are flipping their lids.

So, hey dude.

Say what you want.

He couldn’t ever have overpowered Israel. And at least he’s going to send us a signal that he knows what’s up.

It doesn’t really mean much. In fact, it doesn’t mean anything.

But it is funny.

I don’t know man, I find the whole “BUT WHAT ARE TRUMP’S REAL VIEWS PERSONALLY THO???” discussions to be so stupid and tedious. I’m so sick of it. Whenever I see someone saying “TRUMP LOVES THE JEWS HE’S BEEN A JEW SHILL FROM THE BEGINNING” I immediately peg them as being in the same IQ category as the QAnon people.

Seriously.

Why do you even care? It has literally no effect on your life whether he’s a big time real Jew-lover or if he’s playing 5-D chess in his mind to stop the pedophile tunnels.

It doesn’t matter what his personal views are, the only thing that matters are his actions, and his actions are going to be the same no matter what his views are. He never really had any choice.

The one time he had a choice was during the 2020 election theft, he could have declared martial law and told his supporters to you know. Do the thing.

But I mean it’s not like you’re going to vote your way out of being controlled by the Jews. Even if the elections were totally on the up and up, Palantir would just drone strike you and then James Bowman would say “well, the thing about that is, what I’m really worried about is the increasing fees on DoorDash.”

But hey, the wink-wink from Trump about being sick of these kikes made me laugh. It doesn’t do anything and I’m not going to say some stupid shit like “he’s gonna turn against Israel.” But yeah, at this point, a wink is a wink and I’ll take it.

It’s sort of like… a cigarette with your blindfold.

You know?

Just… try to look on the bright side sometimes, okay guys?

Like, I just realized yesterday that I haven’t seen Paul Joseph Watson in like, two years. I danced a little jig.

Also, the Big Beautiful Bill is going to cut medicaid for poor people, and they might just start dying. If we could do something that would result in the death of large numbers of poor people, we’d have a lot fewer problems. If all poor people and boomers died, democracy might start working? I guess you’d also have to get rid of women as well though, which wouldn’t really work, because, you know, the birthing thing.

So yeah, I mean, forget about the democracy thing, and just focus on the image of fat poor people dying because Donald Trump took their money for their fat pills and gave it to Shylock.

]]> I Hadn’t Seen This Ronald Reagan “Diversity is Our Greatest Strength” Speech https://dailystormer.in/i-hadnt-seen-this-ronald-reagan-diversity-is-our-greatest-strength-speech/ Sat, 05 Jul 2025 01:26:00 +0000 https://dailystormer.in/?p=687677

Ronald Reagan on why immigrants make America great: “You can go to live in France, but you cannot become a Frenchman. You can go to live in Germany or Turkey or Japan, but you cannot become a German, a Turk, or a Japanese. But anyone, from any corner of the Earth, can come to… pic.twitter.com/sp4TlvHvsp

— Republicans against Trump (@RpsAgainstTrump) December 26, 2024

It doesn’t surprise me, but I hadn’t seen it. Ronald Reagan gave a speech about how diversity is our greatest strength and how anyone in the world can become an American.

Reagan is seen as the avatar of conservatism. Every single one of these people references Reagan. He was actually a horrible persona and a horrible president.

So I’m not surprised he did the “anyone can be an American” thing.

The requirement to become an American?

To believe in freedom.

Have you ever heard of a person who is “against freedom”?

Even in North Korea, Kim gives speeches about the importance of freedom.

Everyone on earth is pro-freedom, in the same way everyone on earth is pro-food.

If believing in freedom means you’re an American in waiting, then everyone on earth is already an American, they are just waiting to get their papers.

That means America is not actually a country. I don’t think it’s right to say it’s “an idea” either, because that doesn’t even make sense. It’s not an idea, it’s a place. Ideas are not physical objects in the way a mass of land is. But if everyone on earth has a right to become an American, and therefore de facto already is an American, there is no such thing as an American.

What they will try to say when you say a country can’t be an idea is that members of the nation hold a set of ideas and that’s what defines them as part of the same nation. It’s nothing to do with race. And it’s not ideas around religion. Or any kind of politics.

These same people will say “Americans can disagree with one another.”

You just have to believe in freedom, and you can define that freedom however you want.

I don’t know why Reagan was a saint to the boomers. I read a short book about him years ago, but it was written by a leftist. I know he deregulated everything and there were some good things about that along with all of the overwhelmingly negative things about that. Like, sometimes when I’m depressed, I watch 1980s cartoons, and before Reagan, most of these cartoons were illegal because they were advertisements for toys and advertising to kids was regulated.

I think mainly it was just an incredibly wealthy period in American history which happened to coincide with the collapse of communism. It was the beginning of the boomers lighting everything on fire and just burning it all down.

And the poison ideology that “everyone on earth is an American in waiting” is really at the core of boomerism. The boomers were a very selfish people, and they really liked goofy, saccharine feel-good gibberish like “America is the greatest country on earth.”

]]> Anyone Who Doesn’t Celebrate July 4 Because the US is Gay and Jewish is a Fag https://dailystormer.in/anyone-who-doesnt-celebrate-july-4-because-the-us-is-gay-and-jewish-is-a-fag/ Thu, 03 Jul 2025 18:58:54 +0000 https://dailystormer.in/?p=687661

I’ve been seeing some chitter-chatter about how “maybe we shouldn’t celebrate Independence Day anymore because the US is a gay country run by Jews.” I am totally opposed to this thinking, and think anyone following through on this kind of threat is a complete fag.

Firstly, you’re celebrating the nation as it was, not as it is now. And it was once a great nation. I’m a bit allergic to this “greatest country on earth” business, because it sounds insane and I don’t really see any basis for it, but it is the country of my ancestors and they celebrated it and I will celebrate it for the same reasons they did. Well, sort of. When they were celebrating it, the nation actually was great, and now it really is just a completely Jewed up shithole filled with niggers, homos, and junkies. But we celebrate the great men who made this country great before the boomers burned it down.

And we can celebrate the great things that remain: our families, cheeseburgers, hotdogs… umm… I don’t think RimWorld is American, and John Wick is pretty much Russian… Legos are Danish… but I’m sure there are still some other good things about America. Hey – there are some great vape shops and some great American made juice. I think all the good mods are made in China, but America has great high quality juice. And with the cheeseburgers, we are talking about the cows too. We’ve got some great cows.

One of the things about my job is rich people want to take me to fancy places, and I’ve had $400 Japanese steaks, and I still prefer US Angus. On July 4th, I want it ground up and grilled and I want a toasty bun and AMERICAN melty cheese and pickles and onions and ketchup and FRENCH’S mustard (which I’m pretty sure is American, despite the name which perhaps implies something different).

Here’s the thing: not celebrating traditional national holidays because of political things is gay. I’m still out there celebrating James Earl Ray Day, despite the fact he failed to stop the nigger uprising.

I’m thinking about burning a US flag at the BBQ. Just because that big Israel guy on TV is trying to tell me I can’t.

It seems like what Thomas Jefferson would have done, you know?

You know:

Although this is the great nation of my birth, the nation I love, with a flag intended to symbolize the freedoms that men died for, the current tyranny is burning the freedoms the flag once represented, and so with a heavy heart, I will set flame to the symbol of freedom so that I might light a fire of freedom in the hearts of my countrymen. If the freedoms the flag stands for no longer stand, than the flag no longer means anything, so it is in effigy that we allow the wind to scatter the ashes of the memory of a once free people.

But I don’t have any flags that aren’t polyester, and I’m not trying to burn plastic.

This nightmerica situation has me just as down as anyone. Maybe more so. But long after America burns down, I’m going to celebrate Independence Day, in remembrance of greater men and better days. And because I like grilling. And everyone is very happy with my grilling. People are coming back for seconds. I hardly even get to eat one, but what I enjoy is making other people happy.

I live in Nigeria, where people don’t really know much about American history, so I tell people that George Washington killed the King of England in a Japanese sword fight because the King of England tried to ban burgers.

I think we can probably alter our stories in the future in this way. I don’t really see any reason not to. I mean it doesn’t have to be that silly, but it could be sort of silly like that. I don’t really think these stories about the foundations of America that we hear now are really that good, the whole democracy thing is pretty gay, and I also don’t think they’re really very good, so George Washington being a kind of John Wick figure on a mission to stop the British from banning burgers is something I think is a real option for future history books.

But seriously man, have fun.

Everything isn’t political.

I mean, sort of everything is political, but a holiday with your family isn’t, and burgers and fireworks are not.

I should have posted a few days ago and instructed on how to make real charcoal. Real niggas know that it’s a whole lot different than that shit you buy in the bag. But it’s a little late for that now. It’s the norm here in my neck of the woods, of course, ain’t nobody buying bagged charcoal, but I did learn how to make it, my own special brew, and it really makes a world of difference. You get that real wood charcoal and then you just smoke them bitches out. Smoke up them buns too.

(Hilarious, considering that since the end of the Transatlantic slave trade, charcoal is like, one of the only profitable exports from Nigeria.)

But buddy, you’ll do fine with the bagged charcoal. You made it this far in your life with that. But next year, we’ll do a “how to make real charcoal” class in June, and all your people will be like “bro, what the hell did you do, this is amazing!”

I’ve also got a 15% pork mix, which prevents that faggot Zorhan from showing up at your BBQ and doing his friendly smily schtick and wooing everyone with his Islamo-communism. I spice the meat up pretty good too. Not too much, because you’ve gotta hold the shape, but pig fat helps with that. I also grind all my meat. I mean the butcher does, I unfortunately don’t have a grinder. But when that shit has been sitting there ground up and in the cold for days… not ideal.

Here’s the biggest thing though: do not cheap out on the buns. Get the good buns. Cut them and then flash the inner (cut) part in some melted butter, then put them on the grill for just a wee bit. Just to brown them up, and get it a bit crispy on the inside.

I’ll try to post some pics of my burgers.

And hey – throw some dogs on there too. Same protocol with the bun, slice the hotdog down the middle, and when it opens up, it’s done. Have some chopped onions and some chopped pickles with the mustard. None of that weird stuff that comes in cans. And these are hotdogs, not sausages, so no sauerkraut, okay? Let’s not get weird. Tell people if they want weird shit, bring it themselves.

By the way, I have the lettuce there, but I never recommend lettuce on burgers. It’s not my thing, and I’m the grill master, and though I’m not completely outraged by lettuce, I don’t believe in it, and I only discourage people from using it because my burgers are designed to not have lettuce. And there is no mayonnaise available at all in my BBQ, and if someone asks for it, I punch them in the stomach (and yes, before you ask, that rule does apply to pregnant women).

But have fun, boys.

Think of the good things for a day.

This is not a celebration of modern America, it’s a celebration of American mythology, it’s a celebration of our homeland and the homeland of our fathers, and this land that belongs to us and them, not to any of the others.

And most importantly of all: if you get blackout drunk, DO NOT grab your sister-in-law’s tits. Cousin’s? Not as bad, but avoid that as well. This is the one day of the year I drink beer, and I’d advise you to do the same. I’m thinking of applying this rule to all holidays, because a few Christmases ago, Santa maybe had a bit too much Grey Goose and was maybe a bit meaner to the African children than Santa should be. Beer is poison, total liquid estrogen, but it does prevent things from getting out of hand.

I mean, I’m a pro. I haven’t been blackout drunk in like, over 15 years. I was at a party a few weeks ago and people kept telling me to do shots after I knew I was at my limit and I watched these people vomiting and passing out while I was sitting there shaking my damn head and could have passed any DUI test (other than the breathalyzer, which is unconstitutional and a Jewish conspiracy literally supported by Palantir and James Bowman). But you know, I am a lot more likely to get a bit more… socially inappropriate with celebratory levels of liquor, whereas with beer that is totally impossible, and I think that goes for everyone, even us big time pros.

Especially if you’re the cook, bro, you gotta keep your shit tight. You start flipping out shitty burgers and it will make grabbing your sister-in-law’s tits look like an innocent foible.

]]> Memetic Monday: You Can Thank the Man Who Invented Memes for This https://dailystormer.in/memetic-monday-you-can-thank-the-man-who-invented-memes-for-this/ Tue, 01 Jul 2025 03:51:51 +0000 https://dailystormer.in/?p=687488

NOTE: DO NOT COMPLAIN ABOUT ME WRITING A SEMI-COHERENT RAMBLING ESSAY BEFORE THE MEMES. IF YOU DON’T WANT TO READ THE ESSAY, NIGGA, SCROLL DOWN. I’M NOT ASKING YOU TO READ THIS SHIT. I’M JUST PUTTING IT HERE IN CASE YOU WANT TO READ IT. THE MEMES ARE DOWN THERE AND IT WILL TAKE YOU LESS THAN ONE SECOND TO PUSH THE “PAGE DOWN” BUTTON TWICE OR I GUESS MAYBE THRICE.

I’m doing Memetic Monday. It’s probably going to be posted late. I was collecting the memes earlier, then I fell asleep at the desk, then I rolled onto the floor and the tile was really nice and cool so I slept there for some unclear number of hours.

As you know, I had stopped doing Memetic Monday. I’ve stopped doing most things related to the Daily Stormer. I still get up and work on my computer for six or ten hours a day most of the time. Some of the stuff you’ll never read. Maybe some of it you’ll read it and won’t know you read it. A lot of it no one will ever read because I think it sucks. I hope some of it you do read.

It seems important you should know this. I didn’t play Oblivion and I definitely didn’t play Expedition 33. I’m not like, hanging out. My work day is the same really as it always was. I’m just typing and trying to figure out the best way forward here.

As I’ve said, it is really fucked up to still be locked out. They let everyone else back in. I’m the only one still locked out. If you’re allowed on Twitter, you’re allowed in, that’s the way this works now. Like, if I was allowed on Twitter, I’d be able to have a Substack and publish more serious types of stuff there. And I’d be able to link this site. And I would be overwhelmingly influential, like I always am whenever I’m allowed in anywhere, allowed to be involved in anything on the internet.

I had never watched Once Upon a Time in Hollywood before. I don’t really know how I feel about the alternate history ending. I really didn’t see it coming. If Tex never killed Tate, would John Lennon still be alive? He’d only be 84. And I’d bet a whole lot of money he’d be talking about Jews. Not just “Zionists,” but “Jews, in general.” Anyway, the Leo midlife crisis arc was interesting, and kind of resonated in some way. But it really isn’t a parallel. I am at the top of my game. My game hasn’t even gotten started yet. I’m not passed my prime, I’m not becoming more useless.

I think if that was my situation, I’d be kinda okay with it. As long as I wasn’t broke (he wasn’t broke). I would just like, you know, chill. If I was passed my prime. But I could be writing shit better than anything I ever wrote before. Someone is going to say “well, quality on DS had dropped a lot before you partially retired,” and yeah, obviously I know that, but that’s because I’d stopped putting the effort in. I was doing other shit for money. Sometimes only working on the site for like an hour and a half a day. Because there was no growth model, no way to get back into the conversation where I can say something and people are compelled to respond.

Sorry, I just ate some weird Mexican rice and it feels like I’m having a heart attack. Sorry. Just hold on please.

Okay I think I’m good now.

Anyway, yeah, the midlife crisis thing could have been a ruse this whole time. It’s being out of the game that is killing me. For a minute there, when they were letting everyone back on, I had a little bit of hope. But kinda not really. Please boomer, don’t shake your head at the incomplete sentence before this one. I wrote it that way on purpose, you subhuman filth. They aren’t going to let me back on, ever, for the same reason that I was nuked off of the internet in a way that to this day, they’ve not come close to doing to a single other individual: it’s because if I have access, I can blow the whole fucking thing up. In 2017, before they shut me off, Daily Stormer traffic was almost doubling every month. I barely had a staff, and I was on a trajectory to being a top 20 global news site. These are facts anyone can go look up. I invented modern antisemitism and I made it very popular very quickly and if they would not have nuked me from orbit, everything in the world would be different right now. I’m the man. Go look at the current alternative media landscape, and try to come up with an estimate of how much of it was taken from me. When it comes to the things that matter, it’s basically all of it. Not just the antisemitism, but the misogyny, the racism, the nationalism, all of it.

NB4 “yes, Anglin, you’ve said this same thing like six million times in the last six months.” Yeah. I know. I know I’ve done that and I’m saying it again. I’m going to skip the part where I whine about money, because honestly, I did good with some meme coins, and I’ve got some ghostwriting jobs that pay pretty well right now. Don’t get me wrong, I’m still mad people don’t donate, and yeah probably if people were donating I would write a lot more. But I’m not whining about that again. Instead, I’m going to whine about what it seems to imply: I’m the only guy who actually even gives a shit. The people who copy my stuff make millions of dollars. And I look at the right-wing movement, and I don’t see anyone who is actually risking anything at all. People are cooperating with feds. I’m just going to tell you, basically everyone is cooperating with the feds. Some of them don’t even know it, which obviously makes them better than the ones who do know it. Then some of them are not stupid enough to get tied up in the fed shit, but will keep their talking points away from the most important things so the money keeps rolling in, and then they will justify their behavior.

I wrote something the other day like: “the human mind is a machine that creates justifications to protect the soul from being forced to look upon the immorality of the human’s behavior.” I think I maybe said it better last time. But the point is: there is no difference between Tucker Carlson refusing to talk about the Holocaust or the Talmud “because people aren’t ready to hear it” and a mother who drowns her children “because she loves them and wanted to protect them.” No one views himself as a bad person. Everyone has to be the hero of their own story or they’re just going to be depressed and useless and probably suicidal.

Every soul is good. Everyone was a baby at some point. And nothing about the soul changes. You have the same soul you had when you were conceived, and it is fundamentally good, so to protect that fundamentally good soul, the mind has to cover up the evil nature of evil behavior. Is it evil for Tucker Carlson (because he is our example) to not figure out a way to talk about the Holocaust and the Talmud? I actually think the answer is yes. Tucker is not an evil person, and he does a lot of good things, but he could be the man to really remind the masses of people what they knew for over a thousand years about the Jews, and forgot a hundred or so years ago, and choosing not to do that is an evil action.

Note: I know a lot of you are going to be asking if Jews are born with good souls, as I say all people are, and I have to confess that I honestly do not know. There is definitely a part of me that believes that Jews are actually not humans, but some kind of demonic race masquerading as humans. But then you have examples of Jews abandoning Jewishness, becoming Christians, and becoming good people. There aren’t that many examples of that. But there are examples. You also have the fact that a Jew can have reproductive sex with a non-Jew, and half-Jews are less prone to evil, while quarter Jews are (usually) just like normal people. I think it is possible that Jews do just have normal souls, but that they are so abused as children, systematically by their culture, that they become much more capable of evil. And this is combined with two thousand years of breeding for genetic character traits that make this process easier. Further, the Jewish religion is satanic, and Jews appear to engage in various practices designed to invite demonic possession. Anyway, “are Jews humans with souls or are they some kind of satanic demon creatures descended from angels who rebelled with Lucifer or something like that?” is an interesting question. The Bible, in Genesis 6, talks about “sons of God” (often interpreted to mean fallen angels) impregnating the “daughters of men” (normal human women) and creating some kind of new evil race of creatures, and it could be that’s what the Jews are. I would not be surprised.

But I also wouldn’t be surprised if they are humans who simply have genetics and traditions that make them more prone to being evil.

By the way, let me just put this one here:

Judaism is not “people who practice the religion of the Israelites in the way they did before Jesus came.” That is a lie and a stupid lie. That religion can’t be practiced anymore because the Romans – shoutout to my Romans – burned the Jew temple in the first century. Also, even if you didn’t know that, because you’re a boomer and you basically don’t know shit, why would you believe people were special for rejecting Christ? But it isn’t even about the religion for the Christian Zionists, it’s a bloodline thing, and that has all kinds of problems, because most of the decedents of the Abrahamic tribes became Christians (and later some of them Moslems). If it’s about a bloodline thing, we should really be sending infinity money and weapons to the Lebanese Christians, who, due to high levels of endogamy, have something like over a 90% genetic overlap with the people of the Old Testament.

Aside from the Mizrahi Jews (who are nowhere near as genetically similar to ancient Levantine peoples as Lebanese and Syrian Christians, having well over 50% Arab/Turkic DNA), the Jews of the state of Israel have only minor trace DNA connections to the people of the Old Testament.

This is without even mentioning the fact that Saint Paul said, explicitly, that the “Old Covenant” doesn’t exist anymore, and that the Jews are the enemies of all mankind, meaning that any form of Christian support for the State of Israel is a heresy.

During the Ted Cruz vs. Tucker Carlson debate, Ted didn’t know the verse, but knew that the Bible said that we should “bless Israel.” Tucker asked what he believed was meant by Israel, and he said that it’s the current political state of Israel. He explained it was because it’s the same word. But that would be like if I went down to the court and legally changed my name to “Jesus Christ” and then told Christians they have to worship me “because I am Jesus Christ.” And when people protested, I pulled out my driver’s license that said “Jesus Christ” on it.

I think if I did this then sent Ted Cruz like, $150,000, he would go on Fox News and talk about me and say “as a Christian, I was taught in Sunday school to worship Jesus Christ, and this man, a gentleman from Columbus, Ohio, is Jesus Christ. I have seen it on his driver’s license. Printed right there in black and white, as clear as day, that driver’s license says ‘Jesus Christ.’ And when I call him up on WhatsApp to worship him, he speaks to me, and guides me on the true path that he’s laid out for me, and that is why I’ve introduced this bill to abolish the age of consent.”

But wait.

This isn’t the topic today.

I mean, there probably should be a big article about this, going through:

  • It’s not the religion of the OT
  • It’s not the blood of the OT
  • The Old Covenant was literally abolished, explicitly, in the NT, so it doesn’t even matter anyway

Since we’re apparently back in Christian Zionism world with Donald Trump talking about how God is sending him messages to murder people, I guess we need to go through and explain this in some more detail? I guess? Is it even worth it? Can anyone dumb enough to believe this bullshit be convinced by Jewish religious history (as documented by the rabbis themselves along with the Romans), DNA records, and very plainly stated verses from the New Testament?

It feels sort of like writing an essay for my dog about why he shouldn’t eat his own shit. I don’t think the dog will read the essay, and if he does he won’t accept the conclusions, regardless of the sources I cite.

And basically, if you’ve seen these videos from Gaza and you can say with a straight face “this is what Jesus would want” you are so evil and retarded that there really isn’t anything I can do for you.

And anyway, in terms of “you know, I should write X thing…” – a lot of stuff doesn’t get done around here, frankly. You should see the schedule now that I don’t have the Stormer schedule. I’ve written between 20% and 85% of approximately 22 books.

What is the topic today? Wait, isn’t it supposed to be memes? Is this Meme Monday? What?

Just hold your horses.

What I was attempting to communicate was that while communicating what comes across as whining about how everyone copied my material and made millions and I can’t hardly make enough from donations to pay for the monthly website bills, what I’m really wanting to communicate is how difficult it is is to deal with the fact that no one gives a shit. Despite the poor finances of the site, I’m not personally broke, I’m good at gambling and I’ve got a decent side gig. What causes me to glitch out is that there is no one out there willing to actually take risks. When they unpersoned me, they said “let that serve as a warning to you,” and everyone heeded the warning. Not literally everyone, of course. There are some good guys on the internet, and I know a lot of you readers are good guys who would be willing to take the risk, you’re just not in a position to do so. But what it looks like is if you make someone comfortable, get them a couple milly so they can live it up, doing the right thing just doesn’t matter to them anymore.

I guess it’s like that thing Jesus said.

Everyone’s gotta get paid and I’ve never begrudged someone for it. I have begrudged Tucker Carlson for doing ad reads, even like, during that Ted Cruz interview. I think that was one of the most important interviews in modern American history, and I think Tucker has enough money.

He tweeted out an ad for a crypto gambling site underneath the interview and I also don’t think he should have done that.

Now he’s advertising a documentary about the Chinese mafia running drugs in America (which is true, Chinese criminals entered under Biden’s open borders policy). But the ad claims that the drug gangs are linked to “Chinese communism,” which is just a dirty fucking lie.

There is no Chinese mafia in China because crime is illegal in China and if Trump deported these drug dealers to China, and presented evidence of their crimes, they’d be executed by the “communist” government of China. Malaysia had a problem with Chinese drug gangs, and they requested China come deal with it. The Chinese sent special police and arrested all of the leaders then sent them back to China to face execution. The idea that the Chinese government is working with ethnic Chinese criminals in America is absolute bullshit, and I guarantee you that there will not be a single piece of evidence connecting any Chinese criminal operating in America to the Chinese government.

But hey, you know what? There is an ethnic mafia operating in this country which is doing a lot worse things than dealing drugs, and they are doing so with 100% backing of their home country. I don’t want to say the name of this ethnic group or their country, because that would be politically incorrect and could hurt someone’s feelings. However, this other ethnic group and their crimes, and the connection of criminals from this ethnic group operating in the United States with the full knowledge and with the cooperation of their country of origin, is who I would want to make a documentary about. I would think that would be a lot more helpful than more propaganda pushing for war with the Chinese.

I’ve singled out Tucker. I did it several times. I do it because I think he’s the one that might actually listen. And he’s the biggest. Joe Rogan might technically be bigger, but Tucker is more influential.

By the way, does anyone else think Joe Rogan looks like shit? That’s the real red pill, let me tell you. He is always talking about all of this health stuff, and a lot of it or most of it I agree with, but he just really does not look very good. I think a big part of it is the steroids, which I don’t totally understand the reasoning behind. I guess we’re supposed to believe that this “look” he has is in some way related to martial arts, but no martial artist takes that amount of steroids to get big useless arms. Honestly, I think with Joe you’ve got yet another sad case of a short guy thinking muscles will make him taller. It doesn’t work that way, guys. I wish it did. I might well be all geared up myself if it did. But it doesn’t. A woman will pick the 6’2″ skinny fat guy over the 5’5″ max roided guy every time, despite whatever redpill logic about how women are attracted to strength. Women aren’t and never were attracted to strength for its own sake, they were attracted to status, and women are hardwired to believe height is the ultimate male status marker. But Joe Rogan is rich and famous and has basically the highest possible status and even if he really is 5’3″ or whatever, he can have sex with any woman he wants. I’m pretty sure he’s also married with kids and makes a thing of his fidelity? He’s definitely never been accused of a sex scandal, and you’d definitely think he would have been.

The roids are doing something horrible to his face, I think. Making him look all puffy and leathery like. It’s really not a good look he’s got going. He doesn’t look healthy.

But I wouldn’t expect Joe Rogan to put anything on the line. He’s not a Christian, he believes humans are invented by aliens or we’re in a simulation or some other retarded weed shit. If I didn’t believe in God, I wouldn’t risk anything to do the right thing. Frankly, if I didn’t believe in God, I would act like Lenin or Pol Pot, and I don’t think there is anything wackier than “Jew atheists” like Sam Harris and the “Weinstein brothers” saying “even though God doesn’t exist we should all act like he does.” If I didn’t believe in God, there would be rape and murder and a lot worse, because it is just basic common sense that if you don’t believe in God, the only thing that matters is power. Full stop. Instead, every atheist is like, obsessed with signaling how moral they are because they love niggers so much. Weird, huh? Doesn’t make sense!

But just as I can’t imagine not believing in God and not going full Pol Pot, I can’t imagine believing in God and putting money and comfort before doing the right thing.

I could not imagine standing in front of Christ on his throne, with all of the Saints behind him, and being asked: “So, while the Jews were running America into the ground, doing abortion and trannies, financially looting the entire place, the whole thing, while also committing a genocide in Gaza and dragging Christians into wars for them, you had a couple mill to make a documentary, and you decided to do one about the Chinese? Instead of the Jews? And this is while you were well aware of various State Department plans to drum up a war with China. Can you go ahead and walk me through exactly what your thinking there was?”

I loath the reality I’m going to have to answer for all my sex sins. But I also know that like, pretty much all of us are going to be having to answer for those sorts of things. I’ll be answering for sex sins next to some very great men of God. And I’m going to be able to say “My Lord, I put it all on the line to try to stop these Jews, and you know what it cost me.”

Tucker Carlson is going to be a man who had a unique power to do immense good in the world, and while doing some good (he does do quite a bit of good), decided to push for a war with the Chinese instead of taking the Jews head-on, because one thing made a lot of money and the other could result in losing everything.

“There’s no reward without risk” is an eternal rule of the universe, and it will be true at the Final Judgement as well. Those who risked are going to be rewarded. Those who took the path of least resistance, which was also the path lined with gold, are not going to be rewarded.

The only thing I think about anymore is death and the life to come.

I don’t know what Tucker is thinking. I guess it just goes back to the whole thing about how the mind creates all of these justifications for you. I guess that’s all it is. But we do have free will and we do have choices and obviously, Tucker Carlson is reading this right now. The New York Times reported (with a named source) that he used me as a source for stories, and he never denied it.

Anyway, the reason I am writing all of this is that I promised to do memes today, and then I thought “I’d better write something with the memes.” I’m sorry if it was not much new. But I think I’m moving forward. And I think I’m gonna have a comeback. It might be another year or two. But assuming this one little health issue I have doesn’t become a bigger problem, I’m going to be around for a while, and I’m going to make a comeback. It’s what I pray for. When people ask me if there is anything they can pray for me, I tell them to ask God to let me serve Him by doing what I am best at.

All of the credit for the fact we are doing memes today goes, fittingly, to the man who invented memes, A. Wyatt Mann. He’s been a friend and a supporter for well over a decade, and recently he started posting stuff like this:

So I promised him I’d bring the memes back today.

For those who don’t recognize the name A. Wyatt Mann, he’s the guy who drew this:

Among many, many other important and influential characters. So it is literally not any kind of exaggeration to describe him as “the man who invented memes.”

There is still no more important meme than Le Happy Merchant (a name given by 4chan, by the way, not by Mr. Mann himself), and there is nothing I can think of that is more relevant, as we stand on the edge of war with Iran, than this:

He still makes memes and pretty much every week they would pop up in our Memetic Mondays. So that is the reference above to him fleeing the wreckage of Memetic Monday with his dank memes. Just in case someone somehow didn’t get that.

A few years ago, he did a now-classic digital collection of new merchant memes (many of which were based on edits of his original). For example:

One of the great honors of this life God has blessed me with has been being featured in some of his memes.

Also, I love the Merchant Anglin meme.

By the way, I think I’m the only non-politician to have been featured in art by both A. Wyatt Mann and Ben Garrison, the latter having produced art to help me promote my pro-pedophile activism.

Wait, no, Ben Garrison didn’t draw that. That is signed by someone named “Lewis C. Anon,” and, unfortunately, like most pro-pedophile memes, is not particularly good. I mean, for one thing, I’m as against thong flip-flops as I am against age of consent laws. I’m a slides man, til the day I die. I want that on my tombstone: “slides man.”

Ben did several memes to help me promote hate, bullying, Hitler, copyright infringement, impersonation, and killing.

It’s still technically Monday as I write, so I hope these memes upload fast, and it will be Monday when it’s posted.

Wait, wait, wait. I have to do something not funny. I need to say that Ben is – no, no, wait, that’s not the not funny thing. The not funny thing is that although I do identify as a pedophile activist, and support forced child marriage, I have not actually ever violated an age of consent law. Given my personal situation, I don’t violate any laws, ever. I don’t even do cocaine. I mean, not now that I’m scared to go to Brazil because they’ve gone insane with the hate speech stuff.

Can I post another scene from “Once Upon a Time…”? Is that allowed? Two scenes from the same “sort of kinda fun” film in one article?

(Honestly, the film is probably better than “sort of kinda fun,” I just frankly didn’t think it had enough feet in it to be considered “great.”)

He says to that bitch: “Prison tried to get me all my life, ain’t got me yet and the day it does, it won’t be because of you.” That’s what I’ve always said to any hooker that couldn’t show me an ID. Those exact words.

It’s funny prison has been trying to get me all my life for… jokes I made on the internet. So I guess that is going back to funniness, after having had to take this time to say something totally unfunny?

But I say it for the bros: they destroyed Cody Wilson, hero inventor of the 3D printed gun, on some trumped-up age of consent bullshit. This is like, the easiest way to get screwed by the feds. Most of us at this point know that if some neighbor comes over and asks you to saw the barrel of his shotgun because he lost his shotgun-shortening saw that you don’t do it, but young men are often powerless when it comes to pussy, so please, bros, be careful.

Anyway, to let the unfunny continue to flow, when they did up Cody, he actually did ask for an ID and she produced a fake one that the feds made for her (like, they used a real ID making machine to make a fake ID). So, seriously. If you’re out there doing activism type stuff (even if it’s an anon Twitter account that you kinda think or at least hope the feds don’t know is you), you really gotta assume that any girl who shows up in your orbit is part of some kind of plot against you.

Someday, the revolution will happen, and we will have forced child marriages to be consummated after first menstruation as God intended. But that day is not today. And while the “get the hell away from anyone who starts talking about violence” rule is well understood, the old-fashioned honey pot probably doesn’t get discussed enough. I think it’s likely, given the current dynamics, the feds are about to start a wave of shenanigans against right-wingers. I’ve published several guides on how to avoid such shenanigans in the past, though it might be time for an updated version. Although I’m somehow in an even worse position than I was in 2017 in terms of censorship, the landscape in general does include a lot more of the kind of speech Jews do not like, and it doesn’t really seem possible that this is going to be allowed to go on indefinitely without some kind of pushback.

It could be that there actually will be a serious war with Iran and they will just pass laws restricting speech. The US has done that during every major war in the past. This time, Palantir might just drone bomb you for posting a meme that hurts a Jew’s feelings (as you hear the drone screeching through the sky headed for your residence, that illegal “bald JD Vance” meme appears on all your devices). Or maybe there will be a big false flag. I don’t know. Regardless, they will be seeking to make examples of people. Speaking of making examples, Candace needs to be careful with her Harvey Weinstein thing, because if she accuses women who won in court of lying, that is a dream defamation lawsuit for Jew lawyers that they could turn into some kind of Alex Jones type situation.

Anyway, serious stuff is garbage and I hate it.

Hopefully the memes bring us back to Fun Land.

Re: Fun Land, here’s the Editor’s Pick of the Week:

And the Official Runner-Up:

Followed by: the primo collection.

Final Message/Warning:

I’m pushing “Publish” at 23:49. Monday.

Memetic Monday is back, and it is never late.

]]> How Can You Believe the “Nazi Holocaust” After Having Seen the Jewish Lies About October 7th? https://dailystormer.in/how-can-you-believe-the-nazi-holocaust-after-having-seen-the-jewish-lies-about-october-7th/ Sun, 29 Jun 2025 12:37:05 +0000 https://dailystormer.in/?p=687482
If you can’t trust his honest face, trust him because Hitler put his shoes in a big pile. And also, he’s god’s chosen, so why would he lie?

Massive lies were told about the events of October 7, 2023, and what Hamas allegedly did to the Jews, and this has led me to wonder how it is possible that people can continue to believe the lies that were told about what the Germans did to the Jews during World War II.

Let’s go through some of the big lies that Jews in the Israeli and US governments, as well as the US media, told about October 7th.

1) “40 Beheaded Babies”

Claim

On the day of the event, reports that appear to have originated from i24 News, as well as direct statements from Bibi Netanyahu’s office, claimed that Hamas “terrorists” beheaded 40 babies. (Note: Hamas does not actually fit the definition of terrorists, as there is such a thing as a legitimate resistance group that uses violence, and simply being Islamic doesn’t mean your group is “terrorist.”)

The claim was repeated not just by tabloids, but the likes of Fox News and CNN.

Debunking

In this case, the Israeli government itself later admitted that there was no evidence of 40 beheaded babies. The White House also walked back Joe Biden’s use of the claim.

There was no evidence, despite the fact that the site of the Hamas attack was filmed as much as any place ever, so there was no need for an official debunking. After reporters kept asking about evidence, the US and Israeli governments just admitted it was fake.

2) Mass Rape and Sexual Violence

Claim

The entire Israeli government organized to claim that during the October 7th raid, Hamas engaged in “systematic rape” and “sexual mutilation.”

This rape claim always seemed ridiculous on its face, as while Hamas was across the border for up to 6-7 hours, the actual operation was between 3-5 hours long. These people were in gun fights with the IDF, they were dodging airstrikes, they were taking hostages, all while navigating unfamiliar terrain (and often getting lost, as is seen in Hamas’ own videos and was admitted during interrogations). “Okay boys, let’s take a quick break for rape” always sounded very silly.

Furthermore, as the Jews and their media constantly repeat, Hamas is a strict Islamic group, and based on that, any soldier caught engaging in rape during a military operation would be executed on the spot. If they were doing “systematic rape,” they are not an Islamic group at all, but an irreligious bandit gang, and that is not a claim anyone is making. The media obviously relied on the lack of information the public has about Islamic law, knowing they would not be aware that rape during war is totally banned.

The Koran bans all rape, including of slave girls. Here are specific Hadith that mention sexual violence during war:

  • Hadith (Sunan Abu Dawud 2158): “The Messenger of Allah (ﷺ) prohibited taking women as captives solely for the purpose of sexual relations.”
  • Hadith (Sahih Muslim 3371): “Do not kill women, children, or the elderly, and do not commit treachery or rape.”

There is no serious Islamic group that allows rape during war. Even ISIS banned this. You’ll remember that all of the talk about sexual abuse by ISIS was around forced marriage (which is allowed in certain contexts in certain forms of Islam). And Hamas is a much more serious Islamic group than ISIS, which is a CIA- and Israel-backed terror group.

Debunking

An official UN investigation (UN Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights), which was (quite ridiculously) not released until March 2024 even though it could have been completed and released in a couple weeks, found no evidence of “widespread rape.”

Further, forensic experts from various international rights groups found nothing, while independent investigators from The Grayzone and Mondoweiss (both primarily Jewish outlets) found no evidence supporting the rape claims.

Finally, specific claims were later proven false. The Israeli government had claimed there existed a “Hamas rape manual” which was proved to be totally made up out of nothing.

3) Hamas Burned Families Alive, Purposefully Murdered Civilians

Claim

The entire media was claiming that Hamas “burned families alive” by setting their houses on fire. There was no evidence ever presented.

Debunking

An investigation by Israel publications +972 Magazine and Local Call found that most (not all, but most) civilian deaths in homes were due to Israeli helicopter fire.

Israeli helicopters (actually US helicopters supplied to Israel) also gunned down hostages on Hamas motorcycles, the investigation found.

The IDF later admitted to using the “Hannibal Directive,” which involves using heavy fire to prevent hostages from being taken, and allows for the death of Israelis. The preference, in the doctrine, is that a civilian die rather than be taken hostage.

4) Hamas “Targeted” a Music Festival

Claim

It was claimed that the Nova music festival was a specific target of Hamas and that they started mass executing people there.

Debunking

It was later shown that the music festival was coincidentally going on when Hamas attacked. Investigations by Jewish outlets (Yedioth Ahronoth, Haaretz) showed that many of the festival goers who died were not killed by Hamas (at least not on purpose in “executions”), but rather in crossfire in the fighting with the IDF, as well as by Israeli helicopter strikes.

5) Hamas Used Human Shields While Fighting from Civilian Homes

Claim

The Jewish state claimed Hamas fighters were hiding in the Kibbutzim and shooting from behind families, from inside of family homes.

Debunking

Testimonies from survivors published by The Electronic Intifada and Middle East Eye among others showed that the Hamas fighters were directly engaging in shootouts with the IDF, not hiding in civilian homes.

6) The Attack was Part of a Planned Genocide

Claim

Almost unbelievably, the Jews claimed that this small operation on October 7th was a plan to genocide all of the Jews, and that the goal of the attack was random killing.

Debunking

Leaked Israeli intelligence from +972 showed that the Israelis understood that Hamas expected a prisoner swap and had no goal of mass killing civilians.

Before October 7th, Israel was holding over 5,000 Palestinian hostages (since October 7th, that number has more than doubled), so it is pretty rational that Hamas would want to take their own hostages as a way to get back their own people through swaps, and this is in fact what Israeli intelligence said the purpose of the operation was.

When Did Jews Start Lying Like This Then?

Jews lie compulsively in order to make themselves out to be victims. Certainly, there were Jewish innocent victims on October 7th, as there are always victims in war, but the fact is, most of the innocents were killed by the Jews themselves, and the Hamas operation was a legitimate military operation.

It is shocking to me personally that the same people who will say the Jews lied about really everything they could possibly lie about with relation to October 7th are not willing to question the stories Jews tell about what supposedly happened to them during World War II.

My hope is that there is simply a delay on this, and at some point in the future, people will ask: “well, what else have the Jews been lying about?”

There has been, since the October 7 event and the subsequent genocide Israel began committing in Gaza, some interest in understanding the foundation of Israel. For example, the story of the Palestinian model Gigi Hadid’s family has come up a lot. Her father was a child at the time of the establishment of the state of Israel, when, following the war, Jews went to Palestine to claim refugee status. His family invited a family of Jew refugees from Europe into their home, and one day they returned home to find that the locks had been changed and the Jews who they had welcomed into their home yelled out the window that if they didn’t leave the premises, men would come and kill them. So they moved to a refugee camp in Syria.

Here’s a short video of Mohamed Hadid telling this story:

What happened to Hadid’s family happened to millions of Palestinians. It’s called the “Nakba,” and it is the story of the foundation of Israel, and it is great that more and more people are finding out that Israelis didn’t all of a sudden become genocidal barbarians after October 7th, but that in fact, the entire existence of their state is based on genocide and evil.

If we get back to the point where we are talking about the foundations of Israel, then it is just one step back to what happened to the Jews in Europe during World War II. We can learn why the Germans wanted to put them in camps, and what happened in those camps. I am not going to go through the whole “Holohoax” story here today, but a lot of Jews did die during the war, because it is a war that killed 70 million people. Jews died in the camps too, because the Allies bombed the supply lines to the camps which were in rural Poland, which led to disease and starvation. The Red Cross at the time estimated that 280,000 people died in these camps. Not six million. And none of them died in gas chambers or by any of the other Looney Tunes type methods Jews claim the Germans used against them.

Conclusion

It is my sincere hope that as the Jews come under more scrutiny for these lies they’ve told, as we unravel the history of the state of Israel, a state founded on ethnic cleansing, terrorism, banditry, and mass murder, we will continue to go back through the history of the Jews, and specifically to unravel this “Holocaust” myth, which currently serves as the foundation for the entirety of Western secular ideology, which has itself become the framework of what now passes as “Western civilization” itself.

Since I began writing on these issues nearly 15 years ago, I have argued that in order for the liberal order to fall, and for a righteous, Christian society to be restored in the West, the truth about the Jews and their lies must be confronted. The “Holocaust” is the biggest and most powerful lie of all, and if this falls apart, and I truly believe we are witnessing the beginnings of its collapse, everything will change.

Ultimately, the truth will out. In a thousand years, people are not going to be believing in “Nazi gas chambers,” I can promise you that. The real question is how many people have to die, how much human suffering has to take place, before this lie is exposed.

]]> New Yorkers Don’t Want More Black Crime and Immigrants or Communist Grocery Stores – Zohran is a Referendum on Zionism https://dailystormer.in/new-yorkers-dont-want-more-black-crime-and-immigrants-or-communist-grocery-stores-zohran-is-a-referendum-on-zionism/ Sun, 29 Jun 2025 03:08:34 +0000 https://dailystormer.in/?p=687471

Once again, I am here for a 3,500-word satire about handjobs that would make Jonathan Swift do the Wayne’s World “we are not worthy” bit for me.

No, no.

I won’t do that again today.

Though that piece will be included in Lit 101 readers long after I’m dead. And that is just a fact. Sorry to the haters. But that is just life and you’re going to have to deal with it.

But today, in real life, I want to offer something about Zohran’s supposedly stunning victory in the New York democratic mayoral primary. Firstly, people should know I won money on that. I should have written about this before and said “I’m betting money on this just you watch.”

But here’s the thing. Everyone is talking about how this proves that the Democrat base is really into communism and they want to unleash the blacks and the immigrants like an army of orcs to rob and kill everyone. And they want Venezuela-style communist grocery stores. And they haven’t figured out rent control is a gigantic Jewish scam.

The polls of the views of New Yorkers showed that they don’t want no cash bail and unlimited immigrants or any of the things Zohran is promoting as domestic policy.

Newsweek, June 21, 2021:

A new poll shows seven in 10 Democratic voters in New York City favor an increased police presence throughout the city. The same survey also found 77 percent of Black Democrats said they favor more cops in the subways.

New York Post, March 28, 2022:

An overwhelming majority of New Yorkers say the no-cash bail law has contributed to the spike in crime and should be overhauled, according to a study released Monday.

A total of 56 percent of voters in the Empire State believe the 2019 bail reform has been bad for New York compared to 30 percent who said it was good policy, the Siena College survey found.

Nearly two-thirds of voters — 64 percent — think the law has resulted in an increase in crime, compared to 24 percent who said it hasn’t.

Newsweek, May 20, 2024:

On Friday, the poll, conducted exclusively for Newsweek by Redfield & Wilton Strategies of 974 eligible voters in New York City, asked an array of questions about issues facing the city and the nation overall, including how they feel about the current crime rate and if they feel the influx of migrants is having an impact.

According to the poll, over 70 percent blamed migrants in the city for the current crime rate, with 41 percent saying immigration is having a “significant” impact and 31 percent saying a “fair amount” of impact. The poll found that 18 percent said immigration is having a “small” impact and 10 percent said it is having no impact at all.

And it goes on and on. I don’t think there are any polls on Venezuela-style government grocery stores, because no one was really thinking about that. But none of Zohran’s domestic policies are popular in New York among anything close to a majority. These are all fringe policies.

What is not a fringe policy are Zohran’s views on Palestine and Israel. These policies are overwhelmingly popular on the left and are increasingly popular on the right. In March of this year (obviously, before Israel started a war with Iran and dragged the US into it), in the nation as a whole, 55% disapproved of Israel’s actions in Gaza, while only 36% approved. Democrats are only slightly more supportive of Palestine, with a 59% approval of Palestine.

That was what won Zohran the primary. Period. It is not this commie lunacy. Very few people want that.

(Part of it is also that he’s young, relatively handsome, well-spoken, but mostly it is the Israel thing.)

It’s possible that Zohran will still lose the election, because of this communist stuff, particularly the crime and the immigrants. I’m not betting on it. If Cuomo runs as an independent, I think it’s more likely than not he will win, because people do not want this crime and chaos.

But all of the people who are saying that this is about how people support communism are full of shit. If Cuomo would have been out there supporting Palestine, he would have won by a landslide.

But he wasn’t.

He was being constantly endorsed by the ADL.

Look at the donor list.

In this primary, New York voters put their support for Palestine and their animosity towards Jews above their own personal safety.

Let this be a lesson for Matt Gaetz.

Editor’s Note (update): The above sort of reads like the ADL endorsed him for mayor this time around, and I have not found that they actually officially did that. What I meant by the phrase “constantly endorsed by the ADL” is that throughout his 40+ year political career, he’s been a darling of the ADL, and has constantly been praised by them. I think that given the dynamics of this election, ADL head Jonathan Greenblatt was smart enough to know that an official endorsement of Cuomo’s run would have been a kiss of death. However, above I linked his donors, who are almost all Jewish, and are all linked not just to the ADL, but worse, to AIPAC. 

]]> New Culture War Front Erupts Over Handjobs https://dailystormer.in/new-culture-war-front-erupts-over-handjobs/ Thu, 26 Jun 2025 18:20:19 +0000 https://dailystormer.in/?p=687439

Earlier this month, a new major study on sexual dynamics in committed long-term relationships conducted by the Pew Research Institute was released and has shone light on just how little interest heterosexual American men have in receiving manual sex, commonly known as a “handjob,” from their significant other, opening up an aggressive new front on the culture wars.

A full 98% of heterosexual American men in committed relationships (either marriage or a civil partnership) polled in the wide-ranging survey said that they would prefer to watch black and white CCTV footage of raccoons raiding a dumpster behind a 7/11 than receive a handjob from their significant other. The results have stirred debate and in some cases outrage, with some claiming that “the handjob question” speaks to a core power dynamic between men and women in relationships, while others claim the opposite.

It was noted by researchers that the 2% who preferred a handjob to CCTV raccoon footage are in relationships with trans women.

While the rate of men who prefer raccoon videos to handjobs was shocking to some, perhaps even more disturbing is that a full 9% of men said that they would rather have “demonic cyborgs, like from the DOOM video game series,” shove poison-laced needles into their eyeballs than get a handjob from their partner.

“Many women do not want to have sex with their partner because they have a headache or they had a stressful day, and they will try to use a handjob as a way to satiate their partner without needing to provide him with vaginal sex,” said Harvard science professor and chair of Aboriginal Interactive Art Installations and Native American Escape Room Design Theory Leonard Berkowitz. “The fact is, manual sex can lead to ejaculation in the same way as vaginal sex, the semen will squirt out just the same, and therefore the stated male preference for vaginal or oral intercourse in place of manual sex demonstrates that even with all of the talk of progress, the average American male is still deeply sexist, and believes he should have a right to insert his penis into the vagina of his partner at will, ignoring the headaches and stress his female partner may be experiencing.”

However, many on the American right are framing this handjob issue in terms of the “woke” cultural discourse, with several popular figures on the right, including the president of the United States, claiming that men have a right to “smash the gash.”

During an interview with Rick “The Rattlesnake” O’Henry, the world’s most infamous bear wrestler, controversial podcast host Joe Rogan asked his guest if he’d been following what he called “handjobgate.”

“Have you seen this?” Rogan asked, and before waiting for an answer, continued: “they’re trying to say now that women get headaches all the time and don’t feel like having sex with their husbands so instead of having sex women should be able to just give them handjobs.”

Rogan asked his assistant Jamie to pull up the Pew study, and Jamie confirmed that 98% of men would prefer to watch the raccoon dumpster raid. Jamie then offered that the 2% who preferred the handjob were dating or married to trans women.

“Yeah, so, it’s not just swimming where trans have an advantage,” Rogan, who has been repeatedly accused of transphobia, noted. He went on: “maybe sometimes she does have a headache, and men can understand that, but if every single time the man wants to snuggle, the bitch is saying she’s got a headache and is acting like that pawn shop meme, saying ‘the best I can do is a handy,’ I think a man has a right to be upset about that.”

O’Henry seemed largely disinterested, but replied, “I can see that.”

“These are the same people who locked us down during Covid, then told everyone not to take ivermectin or they were a kook, despite the fact that ivermectin has been proven in clinical studies for decades to be effective against these same types of viruses and other countries prescribe it. And even if it didn’t help with Covid, it wasn’t going to hurt anything, it’s a totally safe drug. But they told people it was horse paste and you were a kook if you wanted to try it and Pfizer was the only one with the solution. That’s what the experts said. They said don’t even try anything else, just do what we tell you. And now we’re supposed to believe these same experts who are telling us that you can have a marriage with no sex, where your wife has a headache 24/7 and just gives you handjobs.”

O’Henry vaguely nodded in response.

“Man, they told us whatever crashed at Roswell was a weather balloon. They’re still saying that. To this day, the CIA will still claim that whatever that was, which every witness said looked like a flying saucer, was a weather balloon. Not even Trump can get all the JFK files released. In the Amazon jungle, there are fungal parasites that can take control of the brains of ants, take control of their entire bodies and force them to walk to a place where they can feed the mycelium’s host, and it’s like the woke media really is this kind of fungal mind virus, and people just go along with it, and no one wants to speak out because they’re afraid they’ll get destroyed. Shane Gillis, one of the funniest people, banned from SNL before he was even hired because of some bullshit throwaway joke on a podcast 15 years ago that some woke Karen decided could hurt someone’s feelings.”

O’Henry said nothing, perhaps hoping that the conversation would at some point steer back to his bear wrestling career.

“Even if a man is on estrogen, he spent his entire life developing his bone density and muscle mass as a male individual. And I don’t have any problem with how anyone wants to live their life. When I was back in LA before I moved here to Austin, greatest city in the world by the way, when I lived in LA I would sometimes run into Caitlyn Jenner. She is a great woman. Totally kind, very engaging, she will ask you questions about what is happening in your life and not just talk about herself, but you know what she says about trans women in women’s sports?” Without waiting for a response from the world’s most famous bear wrestler, Rogan answered his own question: “she says it’s not fair. She says give them their own league if they want to compete, because whatever your ideology is, it’s not right to have their male bodies competing with female bodies. Even Gavin Newsom is saying this now and acting like he was always saying it.”

Rogan then took a long drag off of what appeared to be a marijuana cigar, and continued: “so if it’s these people who are telling us ‘handjob, handjob, handjob,’ I just don’t know how anyone can take them seriously. The whole pro-handjob movement is just more woke nonsense. They are out there claiming people want to exterminate handjobs. Who is saying that?”

O’Henry appeared to struggle to try to force a laugh, clearly uncomfortable and not sure how or if he was supposed to be responding to these statements.

“You think it’s funny,” said Joe, “and I’m sure a lot of these women think it’s funny when their husband is trying to fuck and they’re rubbing his dickskin raw, but pretty soon AI is going to be so advanced that it is the one designing the robots. Have you seen the Optimus that Elon is working on? That guy is a legitimate fucking genius and he says that the AI is now doing the majority of the work on programming and designing, doing the design, for the physical humanoid robots. So AI is building itself, it’s building its own bodies in the form of these robots. So how long until the humanoid robots are going to have better pussies than any of these bitches out here? They will have nano-machines inside of their robot pussies. Just pure dick Heaven. Then men aren’t even going to be asking their wives for sex anymore, they’re just going to go to the laundry room and fuck the robot assistant. Am I right? I mean wouldn’t you rather fuck some magic nano pussy than get your dickskin rubbed raw by a handy?”

O’Henry struggled to answer, “that’s, you know, man, a lot of this stuff is scary, the technology…”

“Damn right it’s scary,” Rogan replied. “It is scary as fuck. Because forget about what is going to happen to your marriage when your wife finds you fucking the robot assistant because she just wanted to give you a handy and you wanted something to smash, but if that robot pussy has nanomachines inside of it, then it could be transferring data into your DNA while you are fucking it.” Joe then paused, apparently for dramatic effect. “I know Elon, he’s a good friend of mine, and he is making these robots, or I should say he’s making the AI that is making the robots because it’s doing most of the work now, and I don’t think he has any bad intentions, but he will tell you that this technology scares the fuck out of him, even though he’s the one making the money off of it, and he’s calling for Congress to regulate it. Because everything gets hacked, man. You look around this room, every piece of electronic equipment in this room is being hacked by someone. There’s some Russian or some Chinese hacking that headset you’re wearing right now, guaranteed. They’re hacking our phones, there was a story a while back where someone hacked a water fountain and made it spill over, flooded the building. So if you’ve got nanobots in a robot pussy, the Chinese can hack them and get into your DNA and make you start wanting to support a Chinese invasion of Taiwan or the social credit system. You go fuck that robot and then all of a sudden you start telling people ‘nothing happened at Tiananmen Square,’ and you don’t even know why you’re saying it, because it’s in your DNA.”

Also this week, Donald Trump took to Truth Social to write in all caps “SMASH THE GASH!”, a newly popular slogan which critics say is an argument in defense of rape.

After CNN’s Jake Tapper did a segment on the Trump “truth,” noting that “smash the gash” is a slogan used by radical campus pro-rape protesters who want all women raped and plan to exterminate handjobs, Trump called for CNN’s entire staff to be fired, which many fear is a direct attack on the Second Amendment.

Congress is now calling for special hearings to interview heads of top universities that are allowing “smash the gash” to be chanted on campuses across America. Defenders of the slogan claim that it is simply a slogan in defense of vaginal intercourse, and not a call to rape or a call to exterminate handjobs, and argue that the fact that pro-rape advocates use the slogan does not mean that everyone who chants “smash the gash” is pro-rape.

During an interview with CNN, a masked campus protester stationed at an encampment on Harvard’s campus supporting the movement said that “smash the gash” is a slogan with a long history that simply means vaginal sex has a right to exist. He also claimed that being pro-vaginal sex does not mean you are anti-handjob or that you are trying to exterminate handjobs. The protester also claimed that another slogan, “globalize gash smashing,” was not a call for a global mass rape or wiping out handjobs, but rather a rallying cry for people all over the world who support vaginal sex to come together in defense of “normal penetrative sex, something that all men have a right to.”

Later in the day, the “smash the gash” encampment was broken up by the National Guard and several students were reported injured. In a tearful statement, Harvard president Alan M. Garber said that while Harvard supports the rights of students to freedom of speech, calls to exterminate handjobs do not fall under the banner of freedom of speech. However, Garber is still being called before Congress to testify as to why it took over 27 minutes for the “smash the gash” protest to be broken up by the National Guard.

Towards the end of part 837 of a 1500-part podcast series about how French President Emmanuel Macron is married to his own father, popular African American female podcast host Candace Owens, who has been accused of “rabid anti-handjobism” by her former boss and male feminist Ben Shapiro, weighed in on the issue.

“Men should smash that gash,” Owens said. “And you know what, as a woman who loves her husband and understands he has sexual needs, even if I do have a headache, I’m not going to try to give him some uncomfortable and unsatisfying handjob. I don’t need to tell men this, but the skin on the penis is very soft and sensitive, and rubbing that with your hand can cause chaffing that can be painful for a man for days. So yes, even if I have a headache, I’m going to let my husband smash that gash, and that does not make me anti-handjob, and at this point, I don’t even care if people call me an anti-handjobite. I have a lot of friends who give their husbands handjobs and they agree with me that he should smash that gash, but if believing in smashing the gash makes me anti-handjob, then you know what, fine. I’m a radical vaginal-sexer who believes in exterminating handjobs. Whatever. I don’t care anymore. I’ll tell you who’s not smashing a gash and that is Emmanuel Macron, because his ‘wife’ doesn’t have a gash to smash and I challenge anyone to prove to me that Brigitte Macron has a gash.”

To pour fuel on the fire, 32-year-old contrarian Tomi Lahren appeared on Piers Morgan to scream about how men should be thankful for handjobs, and that demanding vaginal sex just demonstrates how “manosphere” activists are even more whiny and entitled than the feminists they oppose.

“It’s my body, my choice, and no man has any right to vaginal sex simply because I’m married to him,” Lahren claimed very aggressively. “I was taught to treat myself as a princess, and to insist that men do the same, and if the princess has a headache, you’re lucky to even get the handjob.”

Pushing back on Lahren’s aggressive claims, Morgan noted that he often gets angry responses from viewers when he has her on the show due to what he claims many view as her belligerence. He read what he claimed was a tweet from a user on X, formerly Twitter, about her last appearance on the show: “one viewer writes on X, ‘Tomi is much too old to be doing the entitled 19-year-old party girl bit. She is in her thirties and lives in a fantasy where all men should worship her. I have not masturbated to any of her news segments in over five years. No one who has seen the recent photos of her Christmas ham thighs is interested in smashing that gash in the first place. I also don’t like her feet.’ So, what do you say to that?”

“Piers, I have worked in media for 15 years and this is the most unprofessional thing I have ever seen a supposedly serious news host do. I do not have Christmas ham thighs, I am in very good shape, and all day long I get nothing but dick pics on my Instagram account, and I will tell you, there is no shortage of people asking for feet pics either. I am repulsed that you would say this kind of slander.” Lahren then demanded that the camera be moved to show her thighs and feet.

“No, no,” Piers replied, “we can’t do that with the camera, we’re just having a discussion here. But it’s not me that’s saying this, I’m simply reading something that someone wrote on X, which I think is a legitimate criticism. You seem to think very highly of yourself, and think that a lot of men owe you a lot of things, but you don’t really seem interested in self-reflection, so what I was hoping is that maybe we could get a little bit of self reflection.”

“Piers, if I want to reflect on myself, I can go read the replies on any Instagram post, where I promise you, there are a lot of men who want to smash this gash.”

“Okay, okay, well now, hold on, calm down. A lot of people might note that many or maybe all of those Instagram replies are from India, and not from Westerners where we are really having the debate over whether or not ‘smash the gash’ is really a call to exterminate handjobs.”

Lahren then began accusing Piers of racism, and the conversation degraded much further, proving just how toxic the discussion around gashes and handjobs has become.

Donald Trump apparently viewed the segment on Piers Morgan and commented on it with a “truth” on his Truth Social website.

In a highly surprising and unorthodox move, Ted Cruz agreed to sit down with Tucker Carlson for a two-hour unedited interview defending handjobs. At time of writing, the full interview has not been published, but Carlson released some clips which appear to show Cruz struggling to defend his pro-handjob position, and coming across as though he is opposed to vaginal sex entirely, and understands very little about mammalian reproduction generally.

In one of the clips, Cruz says: “Listen, I got married 25 years ago with the stated intention of getting handjobs. I’ve worked every day to do that. A lot of times I wish handjobs were much more effective. Like sometimes I don’t even ejaculate at all.”

Cruz claims the clip was taken out of context and we will get the full story when the interview is released tomorrow, but many have a hard time imagining what that statement could possibly mean.

This exchange was also released in clip form and is being viewed as equally confusing:

TUCKER CARLSON: Okay, so you get married because you want to have a family. How often do handjobs result in pregnancy by the way?

SENATOR TED CRUZ: I don’t know the specific number. No, I don’t know.

TUCKER CARLSON: You don’t know the number of pregnancies that are the result of handjobs?

SENATOR TED CRUZ: How many handjobs result in pregnancy?

TUCKER CARLSON: Zero.

SENATOR TED CRUZ: Okay, yeah.

TUCKER CARLSON: How could you not know that?

SENATOR TED CRUZ: I don’t sit around memorizing insemination tables.

TUCKER CARLSON: Well, it’s kind of relevant because you’re calling for women to have headaches every day and refuse their husbands vaginal sex.

SENATOR TED CRUZ: Why is it relevant? Whether it’s zero or one or two, why is it relevant?

TUCKER CARLSON: Because  you don’t know anything about insemination and yet your arguing for handjobs over vaginal intercourse.

SENATOR TED CRUZ: I didn’t say I don’t know anything about insemination.

TUCKER CARLSON: Okay. What’s the average size of an ejaculation load in milliliters?

SENATOR TED CRUZ: There are sperms, and it’s got potassium.

TUCKER CARLSON: Okay, you don’t know anything about semen. So…

SENATOR TED CRUZ: Okay. I am not the Tucker Carlson expert on blowing loads.

TUCKER CARLSON: You’re a senator who’s calling to arrest people for chanting “smash the gash.”

SENATOR TED CRUZ: You’re the one who doesn’t know anything about blowing loads. No, you don’t know anything about the semen. You’re the one who claims you should rape your wife if she has a headache.

TUCKER CARLSON: I’m not saying that.

It’s clear that the discussion about handjobs, vaginal sex, and the legality and meaning of the slogan “smash the gash” is far from over, and it appears that this debate may become a permanent fixture in American politics.

There are some in the middle of the road, who are hoping that Americans can come together “in the name of common sense” and find “common ground.” High level scientist and respected cultural commentator Eric Weinstein, for instance, released a statement saying: “There are extremists on the handjobber side and hardliners in the ‘smash the gash’ crowd. But we are all Americans and we all believe in ejaculation, and we need to turn down the temperature and come together to honor the rules of common sense and find consensus in some places and agree to disagree in other places. We cannot let handjobs and gash-smashing tear this country in two when we are facing such heavy threats from China in the AI race.”

Unfortunately for the country, which experts on both sides agree is in an AI race with the Chinese, but perhaps fortunately for the podcasters and social media personalities who make a living off of fomenting cultural tension, there is no reason to believe the temperature is going to be turned down on the handjob debate any time soon.

]]> Trump Hedges Bets with Conflicting Tweets Against Thomas Massie https://dailystormer.in/trump-hedges-bets-with-conflicting-tweets-against-thomas-massie/ Thu, 26 Jun 2025 06:55:25 +0000 https://dailystormer.in/?p=687460

Donald Trump has turned against Thomas Massie for some reason. Very cleverly, however, he is tweeting opposite messages about him and then using Palantir AI to make sure different parts of the voter base see the tweets.

First, he tweeted – or “truthed” – out this one:

Then, realizing that many in the base would not like that tweet, he posted a second tweet and then used AI to show it to other people who are against the Jews:

Obviously, I agree with the second tweet, but I think it is very cynical to use AI to make sure different groups see different tweets with opposite messages.

I thought we were for transparency in MAGA??

Massie appeared on Theo Von this week (Theo is the realest). You can see his own views.

Personally, I would rather primary Trump than Massie, and I think when Trump fails to primary Massie, and when there is huge support against Trump and for Massie, it will be a big wakeup call as to just how much the base hates Trump’s insane allegiance to the Jews.

I think we’re going to see it long before that, in fact.

The midterms are going to be a complete disaster and probably everyone is just going to vote for Hamas agents like Zohran. I would vote today for any Hamas candidate over Donald Trump.

By the way, just so you understand: that second Trump tweet is a joke I made up for humor purposes. The first tweet is real. Trump is really saying Massie is not America First because he’s not Israel First and according to Trump, it’s the same thing and anyone who questions that is against him.

We’ll see how that goes for him.

I suspect it won’t go great.

]]> Frankly, I’d be Fine If ICE Deported Me to Ireland https://dailystormer.in/frankly-id-be-fine-if-ice-deported-me-to-ireland/ Sun, 22 Jun 2025 09:16:08 +0000 https://dailystormer.in/?p=687408
The pipes are calling

I was watching a Theo Von interview with “Indian-American” Ro Khanna. He said some silly leftist nonsense, like that he’s going to teach blacks in the South to program AI. He promoted the “Chinese social credit score” hoax, which is exhaustingly stupid (and when it comes from an Indian, it seems racially motivated). But he said a lot of populist stuff, a lot of pro-internet stuff, and I was thinking, as I imagine most people would think: “this guy is alright.”

As part of my investigation of “alternative media,” I’ve also been watching Breaking Points, which features “Indian-American” Saagar Enjeti. No one is going to say that guy isn’t alright. You could put various caveats on that, I’m sure he says some dumb shit like most of these people do, but he’s totally alright.

So, as I do (most people don’t but I do), I’m thinking about them and I circled back to my long-held belief system that “all these people need to go back,” and asked if that was a nasty thing. Frankly, even if I thought it was nasty, I would continue to support everyone going back, but I wanted to ask myself: is it nasty to want to send back guys who were born here, who seem like alright dudes, on the basis of the fact that they have the incorrect genetics for this country? Or is it bad in some other way?

I’m not emotionally bothered by the ICE videos of children getting grabbed in parking lots, by the way. Just for the record. I think it’s really stupid to be grabbing kids when you don’t have the resources to grab all the adults, or even all of the criminals, because the optics are bad. But my view is that they all need to go back and I’ve seen the Democrats justify a genocide of children in Gaza so they’re not going to emotionally manipulate me with a kid getting thrown in a van because he’s “separated from his mother” for however long it takes to process them before they can go together back to Mexico. If I was running this, I would definitely deport the most sympathetic people (women and kids and non-criminals in general) last. Given that everyone is not being deported, and in fact only a tiny fraction of people are being deported, I think it’s insane to do these optics of screaming kids being thrown in vans, but it doesn’t bother me emotionally because I’m an adult and being separated from your mother for a few hours or a few days before you can meet back up in Mexico is not a big deal. Again, please compare that to bipartisan support for dropping 2,000-pound bombs on refugee camps filled with kids in Gaza. It’s not serious to make this “kids being briefly separated from their parents” thing into a big emotional fit, and it is frankly being done by the same people telling you to ignore the genocide in Gaza (note: specifically, I mean “the Jews”).

Much more than kids (who don’t even know the difference) being sent back, I would be concerned about one of the only Congressmen that is against the Gaza genocide and defends the internet or a guy who does okay podcasts being sent back.

So I ask myself: is this nasty or bad in some other way?

Again, even if it is nasty or bad, my strongly held belief is that America should be an overwhelmingly white country. But in order to understand your own beliefs, you have to be able to interrogate them yourself and allow others to interrogate them. That should be obvious. The core of my problem with the left and the “Ben Shapiro right” is that they won’t allow their beliefs to be interrogated. They just censor people or completely destroy their lives. I think my beliefs should be open to interrogation, and “is it nasty to deport some brown people who seem like cool dudes who aren’t doing anything wrong?” is a totally valid interrogation of my belief system.

But here’s the thing: it really isn’t nasty. All of the cool dudes, who you might think could provide something to America, would do very well in their own countries. Relatively, they will do better than they do here. Intelligent brown people will be more than fine back in their own countries. They’ll get money and pussy and whatever. They will be totally fine.

It’s actually a better argument that we should bring poor people here from all over the world to live on welfare because it’s sad that they’re poor. And that is a completely nonsensical argument. You can’t really even respond to it, it’s so dumb.

And come on. We’ve all seen the marbles video.

Sorry, it was gumballs. Not marbles.

Don’t let the kids eat gumballs, guys. Red 40, titanium dioxide, literal polyethylene. Come on, guys.

Anyway, yeah, solving global poverty through mass immigration is not something I think you could find any man arguing for. It’s a purely emotional argument for women. And yet, I think it actually is better than the argument that it’s wrong to deport middle class people who were born here.

Yes, I get that the ones born here are “legal,” but please go check on how much “the law” has an effect on American society. It’s irrelevant. This is not a society based on an ordered system of laws. We’re not living in China or some Islamic Sharia country. “The law” is just whatever. There is no reason you can’t just say that every person who came here after the (Jewish!) 1965 Hart-Celler Act is no longer a citizen. You can just say “it’s the law now that you’re not a citizen anymore and now you have to go back to India, lol.” You could also just say there’s a law that you have to be white or you’re not a citizen anymore. Laws can say whatever. There isn’t an ordered system here. We do not have a theocracy or some other objective metric to measure the validity of laws. We have “The Constitution,” which doesn’t even mean anything. This is a country where the government can 100% do whatever. So there is no point in babbling about legalisms. Literally no one cares about the Constitution unless they can use it for their own agenda. It’s like that atheism meme.

Except all sides do it to each other.

I’m not even insulting the Constitution in theory. I mean, I probably would insult it in theory. I believe in Jesus and don’t really care about goofy secular government gobbledygook. But I’m not insulting it in theory right now. Right now, I’m simply going to say that “the right to free association” is so fundamental to the Constitution, so deeply hardwired into it, that literally no one can claim the Constitution is in effect after “civil rights” were enacted as “law” in the US.

The only thing that you could say is nasty about any mass deportation program is if it is sadistic or cruel in some way. Unlike Trump’s “just grab whoever out of the parking lot lol” program (which in the absolute best case scenario, won’t even get rid of 2% of illegals, and Trump has endorsed more legals, who are actually much worse), a serious mass deportation program aimed at reestablishing a white America, which would necessarily target both “illegal” and “legal” immigrants (primarily the latter, as there are many more of them and they are a much larger existential threat) would give people timelines, deadlines, a process to apply for extended deadlines, and so on. You’d allow people to sell their property, and if they couldn’t sell it, pay them market value. You’d give them severance checks. You’d use American soft power to ensure their arrival in their home countries was nice. You’d be reasonable and friendly about the whole thing. You’d just make it clear: this isn’t about emotions, it’s not about hate or pity or anything else, this is a matter that we’ve decided on based on the desire to maintain a cohesive society where we preserve our genetic heritage, our racial identity, for future generations.

Some people would get violent, of course, but if you put it on a time frame and say you’re going to pay people and do a bunch of TikTok propaganda showing people loving returning to their home countries, you could avoid a lot of the violence and get a lot of people to leave voluntarily. Then for people who overstayed the deadline, you would have to systematically break down who to target in what order. Few are going to riot on the announcement of a five-year deadline for self-deportation.

Or you could just use Palantir’s government-controlled AI to take control of every electronic device in the country and blast Metallica’s “And Justice for All” while you unleash the police and military to just hunt down and kill anyone who isn’t white.

By the way, Metallica is on tour. Hetfield looks fantastic.

Along with thinking constantly about death and how you are a complete failure and everything you’ve ever done was trite and cheap and how you’re a complete asshole who should have treated people better and how death is just right there, looking at you, the other thing you do when you hit middle age is start looking at guys in their fifties and sixties and asking yourself if you’re going to be a Marlon Brando or a James Hetfield.

With Metallica doing so well in their sunset years, you could actually just pass a law that says they have to keep playing the entire “And Justice for All” album over and over again until every brown person in America is dead.

When Metallica is like “but it could take days for the military to kill all these niggers,” you would just have to be like “yeah, bro, I get it, but it’s the law, because of the Constitution. You just have to keep playing until they’re all dead. Then you actually have to keep playing for seventeen more hours as part of the celebration ceremony.”

So anyway, I was thinking: if ICE showed up at my door and was like “you and your family have to go back to Ireland,” what would I do?

I decided that I would:

  • Squint
  • Look down at the ground
  • Scratch my eyebrow
  • And then be like
  • “Alright”

Ireland is definitely poorer than America. It’s getting way shittier with the number of niggers from wherever flooding in. But in this scenario I’m forwarding, Ireland would also be deporting people (otherwise I would probably be disappointed about having to go back as in America there is more space and thus for the time being at least, more chance to avoid colorful people). It’s also a scenario in which I’m allowed to live in America, which isn’t the current situation.

Frankly, I’ve been out of America so long, and it’s now become so clear that I won’t ever be allowed back, that it is becoming more and more difficult to care. I don’t think the people who are there care very much. If they did, they would be… you know. They’d be doing something or other. I look at the unwillingness to actually address the Jewish problem, and see that the reason is that people don’t want to seem mean for not caring about a pile of shoes, and I’m like: why did I ever destroy my life to try to help save this country? I know why and I would do it again: I thought people would stand up with me. They didn’t. And they still aren’t. Tucker Carlson (et al.) won’t do an analysis of the Talmud. He knows the Talmud exists, he knows it says Mother Mary was a whore and that Jesus Christ was a wizard who is in hell boiling in a vat of feces, he knows it says all non-Jews are “goyim” animals, he knows there are hundreds of other verses that demonstrate that it is the Jewish tribe as a group that is responsible for the crisis of modernity, not a few bad apples. He knows the Holocaust is a hoax. Yet he says he’s not against Jews, just Israel. I’m sure his reasoning is “the people aren’t ready for it, they are still traumatized by the pile of shoes.” People can rationalize anything. But unlike Joe Rogan, who is a goofy dope who believes inter-dimensional aliens created humans so that humans would create AI, Tucker Carlson I think really does believe in God and Jesus Christ and could blow this whole thing up. But he won’t. He’ll post ExpressVPN ads on Twitter, but he won’t talk about the content of the Talmud. The human mind is a justification machine. It’s a machine that justifies our behavior against the protests of our souls.

To Tucker, and all of the rest of you (you’re all reading this, I know you all read this, everyone knows you all read this): the people are ready to hear an explanation as to what these Jews are up to. And if you don’t do it, no one else will. I can’t do it. And this is what is actually happening: the Jews are a satanic, alien group that murdered Our Jesus and then proceeded to spend 2,000 years attempting to kill or morally crush all of Christ’s followers. In the 20th century, they faked a genocide of themselves to justify a complete silencing of criticism in order to allow for a total takeover of every institution of power in the Western world in order to sadistically kill or destroy every human soul.

In order to be “against Israel but not the Jews,” you would have to believe the mass murder of children in Gaza is not related to the fact that OnlyFans, Tinder, and PornHub are all run by Jews. They’re not run by Israel.

The genocide in Gaza has pulled back the veil, it’s shown the world what the Jews are. And the people are ready to hear it. It’s now or never. There has never been a better time for saying this aloud, and the time to do it is running out. This whole Palantir thing is real, and it’s not “ten years down the line” you’re going to be locked into a biometric slave grid with every action tracked and individual and society-wide behavior directed by AI. It’s basically tomorrow.

The CEO of Palantir, Alex Karp, is of course the most Jewish person you’ve ever seen.

Millions are shocked he’s not a Chinese communist, given that he’s trying to do a social credit system against people. Right Tucker?

It’s just a coincidence. He’s a random individual, like the inventor of transgenderism and the purveyors of usury and the CEO of Pfizer are random individuals. It’s a funny thing about the Holocaust: in death, six million random individuals became Jews.

Interesting fact: although exactly six million Jews died in the Holocaust, the shoe pile only has 11.8 million shoes. This is due to the fact that some Jews were one-legged, and other Jews had one of their shoes stolen from them by a wily German when they were entering the death camp. Also, when mothers with infants came to Auschwitz, Germans would drown the babies in buckets. Right there in front of everyone. An organized military force, made up of Germans, running a concentration camp, would, right in front of everyone, take Jewish babies and drown them in buckets. True story.

Nearly ten years ago, I made this meme about it to create awareness:

I did that line-work by hand. It took me like twenty minutes. At least. I thought it was that important to bring attention to the fact that German Nazis would grab Jewish babies from their mothers and drown them in buckets. Still, to this day, few know that during the Holocaust, Germans would grab Jewish babies and drown them in buckets in front of their mothers.

Meanwhile, this is a coincidence:

Any religion could claim abortion is a core part of their value system. Only one does. But it’s just a coincidence that it’s Jews. No relationship at all with what is happening in Gaza, which is really just a crime by a government that just happens, by coincidence again, to be Jewish. It could be any state. Many states have gone on 18-month campaigns bombing refugee camps. Well, actually, no state has ever done anything even remotely like that, ever in human history, but any state could have, and it’s just a coincidence it’s the Jewish one.

Sigh.

It’s not just Tucker. Obviously. It’s everyone. It’s everyone but me and you, dearest reader and true parasocial friend. Everyone knows and everyone knows everyone else knows and everyone knows that everyone knows that the peasants don’t know. But the peasants would listen to their leaders. And if you’re the media, you are their leaders. That’s just the way the digital world works. The magic of electricity.

The reason I would do it all again is not that I’m retarded or a masochist, it’s because it was the right thing to do, and I actually believe in God and Judgement Day and all of this stuff. Like, I believe it as much as I believe I am right now sitting here typing on a computer and smoking a cigarette. I’ve done a lot of sinful things. I’ve done many mortal sins and I will probably do many more. And I know I am going to have to answer for those sins. I cry sometimes thinking about how Jesus Christ was tortured to death so I could get a blowjob (it’s a very funny statement but it’s true, I am not saying it as a joke). But I will tell you this: I sure as hell wouldn’t want to be the guy standing there before God trying to explain how I knew all about the Jews and had the ability to tell the entire world and yet somehow decided not to do so.

[Note to Editor: Rather than bothering you with a message, I’m just going to leave this here: keep the bullet points like that. You can delete this note. Or don’t delete it if you think it’s funnier not to. I’ll leave that to your discretion. It’s probably better to delete it when you edit, because this is off schedule, and you’re not going to edit this until like 4 hours after it’s up, so the people who saw it will be in on a public/secret joke that disappears forever. But it’s your call. I give you full authority to act as you see fit in this matter. UDPATE: Wait no, just leave it, because something goofy like this sort of softens the buzzkill ending of the article. Yeah, for sure, I retract your rights to personal choice in the matter. Just leave this entire note to editor here like this.]

]]> Trump Bombs Iran, Says It was Just a Quickie https://dailystormer.in/trump-bombs-iran-says-it-was-just-a-quickie/ Sun, 22 Jun 2025 07:27:54 +0000 https://dailystormer.in/?p=687418

‘Tonight I can report to the world that the strikes were a spectacular military success. Iran’s key nuclear enrichment facilities have been completely and totally obliterated’

President Trump addresses the nation following US strikes on Iran.

Latest: https://t.co/je3LeESEFs pic.twitter.com/BFjyiJhk5X

— Sky News (@SkyNews) June 22, 2025

He should have brought the “Mission Accomplished” sign

This is more of an analysis site than a news site these days. Sometimes it’s a self-analysis site. I’m thinking about focusing full-time on psychoanalyzing Jordan Peterson and his whore daughter.

But it’s hard not to post the news that Trump bombed Iran.

I just wrote a long article about like, Ireland or the Jews or something, or whatever. I don’t have much analysis here.

Emmmm…

Seymour Hersh is trending on Twitter. And yeah, serious business to call it. But he said they were planning on bombing more than the nuke sites. He said “all-out bombing campaign.”

Maybe Trump is lying and they bombed more than the three nuke sites? No one seems to know anything right now. I guess we’ll have to wait for an update from Sy.

Meanwhile, Scott Ritter is reporting that his sources say Iran’s nuclear sites were a ruse and they were actually building a Metal Gear at a secret site in a secret location and that they will launch it on Wednesday at 1:34 PM local time and it will level Tel Aviv. “Excuse my language, but Netanyahu and Smotrich and that gang are shitting in their boots because they know they don’t have a weapon to rival Metal Gear,” Ritter reported. “You know when the button on the toaster gets stuck and you don’t notice it until you start to smell the burning and see the smoke and then you pop the Pop-Tart out and it’s pure black with bubbles? Well, excuse my language, but that is what all of Israel is going to look like, daddy-o.”

The True Conservative MAGA originalists are making some fire memes.

That shit is literally Musk-tier.

I don’t really… let me think…

That’s the best I’ve got for that format. Aya-COAL-ah, we can call it.

It’s leftist style too long. Really only needs four panels.

And uh…

I can’t into it. Boring.

But if I was in MAGA world trying to somehow prop it up right now, that’s the sort of shit I would be posting. But you’re not seeing anything like that because no one who isn’t the kind of Elon-tier retard who makes that original meme is trying to prop it up.

Anyway, the argument that it’s a quickie is… who knows. I don’t know. I guess I hope that’s true? Or I would hope that if I cared. I sort of just kinda don’t really even care very much, to be honest with you. Anyone else sort of feeling that?

I guess I do care. It’s just that I can’t really feel outraged, since I’ve been telegraphing this since like, October 10, 2023.

The logic:

  • October 7th couldn’t happen unless Israel allowed it
  • Israel knew they couldn’t beat Hamas
  • Gaza was designed to create a pretext to take out all of Israel’s more important enemies
  • Trump would be better at getting Americans to go all-in for Israel
  • Trump took all that money from Miriam Adelson
  • Trump was praised as a messiah after the ear scratching heard round the world
  • Trump was always going to attack Iran after being “elected” in a fake US election

It’s boring and I’m bored.

I guess if Iran backs down now then Israel stops bombing and it’s supposed to be over just like that? That’s clearly what is being sold here. I don’t know if that is possible or not. I think it’s possible Iran would just stand down and take it, but if they do that they’re going to then actually build a bomb or just like, buy one from North Korea (couldn’t they have always done that? Why don’t people ever mention that?). And I think it’s impossible Israel will settle for something less than regime change. And it is impossible that there will be a youth/slut revolution in Iran after the Israeli bombing.

Then regime change is complicated because… well, a lot of reasons, but if you kill the Ayatollah they just appoint a new Ayatollah. There is no path to really anything. Fox News is pushing the son of the Shah being made king. They’re literally calling him “His Royal Highness.”

So I guess he’s um, already the king?

I guess you can send the US military to invade and occupy Tehran for decades and say this guy is the king and then just hope the people eventually accept it? Is that the plan?

I don’t understand what the plan is here like at all.

Trump “standing up to Bibi” and saying he was only in for the nuke sites and not the regime change would just mean Israel false flags a US installation in Iran. But it also doesn’t make sense from Trump’s position that blowing up these sites stopped the development of a bomb. It actually does the opposite?

Anyway, whatever.

Who cares.

I don’t care anymore.

]]>