Andrew Anglin
Daily Stormer
November 10, 2016
Maybe it would make sense to just put White people back in charge of South Africa?
It seems like that worked a lot better, no?
BBC:
South Africa’s parliament is debating a vote of no confidence in President Jacob Zuma amid growing calls for him to resign.
An anti-corruption probe last week raised allegations of misconduct against Mr Zuma.
But the ruling African National Congress (ANC) has said the motion “has no chance of succeeding”.
This is the third time in less a year the president is facing a no confidence vote.
An investigation by the country’s anti-corruption watchdog said a judicial inquiry should be set up to further investigate allegations of criminal activity in Mr Zuma’s government.
The investigation found evidence that the Guptas, a business family with links to Mr Zuma, may have wielded undue political influence over the appointment of ministers.
Both Mr Zuma and the Guptas have denied any wrongdoing.
There have been a number of recent attempts by opposition parties to have Mr Zuma removed from the highest office – from protests to votes in parliament – but all have failed.
Several ANC stalwarts and members of Mr Zuma’s government have called on him to resign following the release of a report by former public protector Thuli Mandosela into allegations of corrupt relations between his loyalists and the wealthy Gupta family.
But why does he continue to survive? Simply, the people who want him to go do not have the numbers to push him out of parliament.
That translates to “there aren’t enough White people to make this thriving multiracial democracy work.”
All the protesters are White.
As we see in Detroit and the rest of Africa, Blacks are especially bothered by corruption.