Study Finds Virtually No Differences Between People Who Suffer from “Long COVID” and Those Who Don’t

The Anglin Assertion was always that “Covid-19” did not actually exist, that the government had simply renamed the flu as a new disease. In March of this year, the government announced that at least in effect, Anglin was correct.

They did not say “Covid-19 was always just the same thing as the flu and we just renamed the flu so we could do a massive global psychological operation for social engineering purposes,” but they said it should just be treated like the flu because it is effectively the same as the flu.

This “Long Covid” nonsense is just totally made up. It’s women who are developing psychosomatic symptoms, or who have other health problems from all of the various drugs women take (most women take birth control, SSRIs, and tranquilizers).

It could also be a side effect of the vaccine, if it is real at all. That vaccine seems to have caused every possible health problem in various people. Although if it was from the vaccine, there would probably be health problems you could find on a test.

The Guardian:

A new study by the National Institutes of Health (NIH) highlights the difficulty of finding a lab test for long Covid – a novel condition that encompasses dozens of symptoms and is currently considered a “diagnosis of exclusion”.

Long Covid’s most common symptoms include brain fog, fatigue and heart palpitations, which can change over time and be disabling when severe. Approximately one in 20 adults reported persistent symptoms of Covid, as of June 2024.

The study followed patients for four years and included a battery of standard lab tests, but found “markedly few” differences between people who had long Covid and those who did not.

The research, published in the Annals of Internal Medicine, looked at more than 10,000 adults across 83 clinical sites in the US between 2021 and 2023. About 1,800 participants met researchers’ definition for long Covid.

Participants received a panel of 25 standard blood and urine tests in the study beginning either six months after infection or when they enrolled. They were followed for four years. Like other long Covid studies, the majority of participants were middle-aged women. The group was considered racially diverse.

Scientists found few differences between people diagnosed with long Covid and those who did not meet the criteria. Researchers found a modest association with HbA1c, a measure of average blood sugar over two to three months, but the association disappeared when they controlled for pre-existing diabetes.

Similarly, they considered a test that showed slightly lower kidney function for some participants, but the metric appeared in only a minority of patients and may have resulted from initial Covid-19 infection.

So it’s not even that there were few differences, it’s that there was literally no difference at all, once they added the controls.

What a stupid hoax.

It sure is surreal looking back on that whole coronavirus debacle. It hardly even seems real now, but everyone was affected so deeply by it. Sometimes it feels like most people are permanently damaged, and barely holding onto sanity.