Andrew Anglin
Daily Stormer
May 6, 2017
I just want to address the issue of the claim made by Hollywood Jews, which is now accepted as history, that we white Americans used to abuse black slaves and then abused the blacks during Jim Crow.
This is just completely revisionist history, which is based on absolutely nothing other than films and silly novels.
This is no more real…
…than this.
Several years ago, I wrote a very important article entitled “Blacks Loved Slavery and Regretted Its End” about accounts of the last generation of slaves, and they almost universally stated that they thought slavery was a better system for blacks than freedom.
This is just the historical record, it isn’t debated. Jews have just created an entirely new fantasy history of fake oppression.
Also, though I am able to accept that the word “nigger” now does have a negative connotation, it never did before. It was just what black people were call, and they called themselves that.
I’m not going to say that there was never a situation where a slave was abused, but it certainly was not the norm by any means whatsoever. It’s a bit like white men raping women – I’m not going to say that it has literally never happened before, but it is statistically irrelevant.
The only real “abuse” that was widespread – and this isn’t really an “abuse,” but just part of the nature of the situation – is that families were sometimes broken up. However, these slave owners were Christian men, and they cared about the families of the blacks, and they are on record in many, many letters from the time (which are in books no longer in print, but which I’m sure someone can find for us – I’ve personally read them and sections of them in pre-1950s books on the topic) attempting to keep families together as best as they could. I have never heard of husbands and wives being sold away from each other, though of course, sometimes children were sold away from their parents and siblings.
Yes, this happened, and yes, it was sad. But all types of things in life are sad but do not amount to “cruelty” and “abuse.”
But hey – it’s a regular occurrence in modern times for corporations to require employees to relocate away from their parents. I understand that’s not the exact same thing – but is it that much different?
As far as the white-on-black rape atrocity lie – this is objectively retarded.
Women in general judge the sexual appeal of a man pretty well exclusively by his status (as much as men judge women by their physical appearance, so not technically exclusively, but pretty much). Also, black women are not attractive. On top of that, black women have testosterone levels almost on the level of white men (speaking figuratively here, but barely). All of this is to say, any sexual relationships between female slaves and slave owners would have been initiated by the female, and they certainly would not have been “rape” by any definition (except I guess by on of the new definitions, where anyone more powerful than you – if you’re a woman and he’s a man – having sex with you is rape).
So Basically
Basically, he’s what you need to understand when people tell you your ancestors were evil: your ancestors had the exact same DNA that you have. So that means they thought more or less the same way you think. They had the same emotions, at least, and felt guilty for the same things you would feel guilty for.
If you owned slaves, would you abuse them for no reason?
Because I wouldn’t.
I would reprimand them if they did something wrong, but I would generally try to treat them well, and give them a good life.
Our ancestors would have done the same thing.
I think old “Ten Little Niggers” art helps to demonstrate this reality. Sure, we thought they were goofy and silly, but we also had some affection for them – kind of like a parent with a retarded child.
It’s important to point stuff like this out sometimes, because the “pure evil” narrative is still strong amongst young people. But we were not pure evil, and we are not now pure evil. We are good and we have always been good.
The reason we have a problem with blacks now is that their behavior has changed, due to Jewish influence on them. Period. That is the long and short of the story.
Once upon a time, they were just a silly mix between a human and a monkey, and though they did bad things some times, they respect us as their superiors are were grateful for what we did for them.
And we did a whole helluva lot for them.
Regrettably
Sadly, we can’t ever go back to the symbiotic relationship we had with the niggers.
And it is kinda sad.
I’m sure some of them were very good back then, and that we felt good taking care of them, they felt good serving us.
But at this point, there is no way you could re-enslave them.
And really, since the invention of the cotton gin, they have been obsolete. They are certainly well beyond obsolete now. The fact that they can’t even properly run a McDonald’s (which is going to be run by robots in the next decade anyway), proves that they have zero place in our society, even if they were well-behaved. And they aren’t. And never will be again.
However, it is important to understand that we never did anything wrong. we never hurt these people. We never abused them.
Everything we did that ended up harming the lower races – trying to bring them civilization has objectively harmed them – we did with only the best intentions.
Throughout history, the white man has maintained absolute moral authority, and if someone tells you otherwise, they are a Jew, or a woman or low-testosterone male who is serving the Jew due to the chemical make-up of their brains, which allows emotion to override logic.
White guilt is pathological mind virus.
Final Notes
I want to finish by saying that “pathological altruism” isn’t real. I mean, there is a little something to it, but it in no way compares the influence of the Jew.
You don’t destroy your own civilization and race on purpose because of high levels of altruism anymore than you create and distribute hardcore ass-to-mouth pornography to 11-year-olds because you have a natural sex drive.
Also, the reason I didn’t focus too much on Jews here is because I don’t think slavery was wrong. The Jews played a role in the trading of slaves, and some of the abuses of the Negroes were wrong by my moral standards. But the concept of owning black people is not, in my opinion, morally wrong, assuming you treat them with dignity, as the historical record shows the overwhelming majority of white Christian slave owners did.