Sven Longshanks
Daily Stormer
February 9, 2015
Who would have thought that one day, loving your own race would see you labelled as worse than a sex offender?
It has been obvious for quite some time now that it is more socially acceptable to be called a rapist than a racist and now the UK government have confirmed this, by seeking to implement the same powers used to prevent perverts from going online, against truth-tellers.
Thanks to the authorities fear of being called ‘racist’ thousands of young White girls have been groomed and then raped by filthy Pakis and Negro beasts and the government’s response is to ban the people that expose this sort of thing from using the internet?
Although it was not Jews raping our children in that instance, it certainly was mainly Jews that were calling the people trying to expose it ‘racists’ and ‘anti-Semites’ and it is also Jews that keep calling for more immigration and stronger laws to silence anyone criticising them.
Social media users who spread racial hatred should be banned from sites such as Twitter and Facebook, MPs say.
The All-Party Parliamentary Inquiry into anti-Semitism wants prosecutors to examine whether prevention orders like those used to restrict sex offenders’ internet access could be used.
The cross-party group also highlighted the use of anti-Semitic terms online.
Last week, a Community Security Trust report said UK anti-Semitic incidents more than doubled to 1,168 in 2014.
The trust – which monitors anti-Semitism in Britain – says this was its highest figure recorded since it began work in 1984.
The Parliamentary inquiry was set up following a rise in incidents in July and August last year during fighting between Gaza and Israel.
Although the primary focus of the inquiry was anti-Semitism, one recommendation it made was that those who carry out any kind of hate crime should be prevented from using social media.
Hate crimes are defined in England and Wales as offences carried against someone because of their disability, gender identity, race, religion or belief or sexual orientation and can include harassment.
The MPs said social media platforms had “increasingly been used for the spread of anti-Semitism”.
Their report said the terms “Hitler” and “Holocaust” were among the top 35 phrases relating to Jews during the conflict.
The hashtags “Hitler” and “genocide” featured with “high frequency”, it added. The “Hitler Was Right” hashtag trended worldwide in July 2014.
Notice the way they slip in a recommendation that anyone who carries out a hate crime should be banned from using the internet, then go on to give the impression that these ‘hate crimes’ are actual physical offenses against people.
Since the Jews took over our justice system it is an offence just to criticise them or any of their chosen pets, such as queers, Moslems, Negroes or Pakis. No longer does there have to be any actual physical harm for an offence to be committed. It is enough for somebody else to think that one of the privileged minority groups MIGHT be offended by a mean word, to convict someone of an offense.
This doubling of ‘anti-Semitic incidents’ is really just an increase in the criticism that these subversive Jews are receiving online and elsewhere, it has nothing at all to do with any physical harm being done to them.
The idea of punishing people and treating them like sex offenders for criticizing the hostile forces which are wrecking our nations is abhorrent, but at the same time it is hugely encouraging to see that they are so terrified of the truth getting out. And it is getting out, for that doubling of anti-Semitic incidents means our people are swelling in numbers and the more these rodents clamp down on free speech like this, the more they expose themselves for what they truly are and the more the general public moves to our side.