No one is really saying anything meaningful about Facebook’s transition into a platform for virtual reality.
Namely, we should be discussing the fact that this “Metaverse” plan is clearly a design for a future where people have brain implants and live most of their lives in virtual reality. Moreover, both the government and the corporations want this future for a peasant population which is now viewed as useless due to the coming age of AI and automation.
On Friday, Mark Zuckerberg held an hour-long event called “Connect 2021.” He officially announced the rebranding, and showed a dream world for trannies, fatties, pick-up artists, atheists, and others looking to escape this physical reality.
Zuck described “Meta” as “the next evolution of social connection.”
As most of our gamers are probably aware, the type of virtual reality that this implies doesn’t really work very well. Most people can only play with an Oculus Rift or a Steam Index for 15-20 minutes without vomiting. It’s simply an obvious fact that these people are planning to put computer chips into the brains of the peasantry, and this new manifestation of Facebook is intended to be an advertisement for the world that people can escape to if they are willing to take the chip.
In a future that the Silicon Valley transhumanists view as not-too-distant, Facebook can even use your body to perform various menial tasks while your consciousness has escaped to a virtual world. But that’s mostly where the Matrix analogies end. Human beings would not really make good batteries, as they did in the Matrix films. For the most part, the elite is currently in the process of figuring out how to wipe us out, rather than use us for any purpose at all.
Meta is not going to replace Facebook, but will be a new parent company for Facebook, Instagram and WhatsApp, in the way that Alphabet is a parent company for Google and their other properties.
Sadly, the remaining commentariat on Twitter is so benign that they cannot offer any meaningful comment on this subject. What I am learning however is just how hostile the Democrats have become to Facebook, following their narrative assertion that Facebook doesn’t censor enough.
I think Meta is a perfectly fine name for one of the dozen social networks that will be leftover after the break up.
In the meantime, I don't know if Zuckerberg knows but changing your name doesn't help avoid legal culpability.
— Zephyr Teachout (@ZephyrTeachout) October 28, 2021
Meta as in “we are a cancer to democracy metastasizing into a global surveillance and propaganda machine for boosting authoritarian regimes and destroying civil society… for profit!” https://t.co/jzOcCFaWkJ
— Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (@AOC) October 28, 2021
This entire Facebook Meta shitshow has real signs of a company where no one has the guts or cache to tell Mark Zuckerberg his ideas are embarrassingly stupid
— Dan Pfeiffer (@danpfeiffer) October 28, 2021
For context, the current demand of the Democrats is that all Trump supporters (or former Trump supporters, in the case of most of us) be completely silenced. That is, they are asking Zuck to ban more than half of the American population.
Jack as always was looking for a place to seem cool without being an absolute tool.
meta: referring to itself or to the conventions of its genre; self-referential.
— jack⚡️ (@jack) October 28, 2021
the only #META we acknowledge is this:https://t.co/HalSMZt8L5
— Twitter Safety (@TwitterSafety) October 28, 2021
I don’t really understand who his narrative that “I’m not an evil corporation” is designed to serve. Anyone who would support that narrative has already been banned by his company’s pink-hairs and ADL appointees.
Democrats like the idea of mega-corporations in principle, they just want them to do more censorship. If there’s one thing that cannot be posted enough with regards to this topic, it’s AOC’s Open Secrets page. In 2020, her top corporate donors were Google and Amazon.
That hasn’t changed much during the current cycle (updated as of the end of September).
Woke progressivism is as much a product of the corporations as it is of the media. Traditionally, the left would be the ones questioning corporate power. That tendency is completely neutered by this transformation of the left from being about economic policies to focusing on bizarre and deranged social crusades. It costs Silicon Valley corporations nothing to throw up rainbow flags and black power fists.
Meanwhile, the right is too stupid to question corporate power, even when it is aligned against them. They’ve been totally brainwashed with the idea that any form of government regulation on corporations is a form of communism, even while they’ve been completely incapable of getting any corporation to apply these values of “deregulation” to small businesses. This dichotomy was on full display during the height of the 2020 virus hoax, when all small businesses were closed by government decree, but Amazon’s business was unimpeded.
Tucker Carlson took issue with this situation, pointing out that the Amazon Washington Post was one of the key entities pushing for the virus restrictions, which was destroying Amazon’s competition, and really completely destroying any remaining notion of free enterprise in America.
Famously, Sean Hannity attacked Tucker, defending this operation by Bezos as morally justifiable according to “our values” and “who we are” principles.
That came after Tucker, in 2017, had brought on a critic of his anti-Amazon statements, an our values objectivist conservative law professor named Amy Peikoff.
Irony of ironies, Peikoff became the Chief Policy Officer at Parler, which was of course kicked off the internet by Amazon Web Services.
It’s almost as if libertarianism is incompatible with the Bill of Rights and the most basic individual freedoms! That’s of course a much longer conversation, but the point is: the American right-wing has been mired in libertarian gibberish since the 1980s, and they’re not going to be able to reverse course on that in time to push back against these tech corporations. So it was just basic business logic for these corporations to embrace woke politics, thereby ensuring that any movement against them is impossible.
Dave Rubin, a homosexual Jew who is serving as controlled opposition for the right-wingers who are opposed to corporate domination (all legitimate opposition has already been banned by the corporations, of course), almost said something that mattered.
They’re trying to destroy the physical world so they can keep you locked in a room while eating bugs and pretending to be a space man.
It’s the Matrix. We are the batteries… pic.twitter.com/N8PwQSOWpF
— Dave Rubin (@RubinReport) October 28, 2021
But the Matrix analogy doesn’t work. They want us locked in our rooms eating bugs before we die off from the vax program. They don’t want us to be batteries. They are building a world where they will need much less energy, because there will be many fewer people.
The current leftist opposition against Facebook will be resolved peacefully. What they are demanding is more censorship. Censorship is bad for Facebook’s business model, but they’ve already done so much of it that a little more won’t mean much.
The one fatal flaw of the Silicon Valley transhumanist agenda is that they are allowing the Washington crazies to manage the war with the Chinese. China makes this entire future that they’ve planned so meticulously nonviable.
For the Lord will send a Great Dragon to breathe fire and incinerate all of their demented schemes.
From the ashes, a new order will arise, based on the core values of True Sino-Friendship.
At some point, I’m going to have to write a long article explaining what the Fourth Industrial Revolution is, and documenting the fact that Transhumanism is a religion in Silicon Valley.