Andrew Anglin
Daily Stormer
April 14, 2018
While this act was by far Trump’s most popular with the government, at least a few people in the government are against starting WWIII.
At least a few.
RT:
Not all US lawmakers have welcomed the “illegal” strike on Syria ordered by President Donald Trump that was allegedly in retaliation for a staged chemical attack in the suburb of Damascus last week.
Without having the mandate from the United Nations, Washington and two of its European allies have launched strikes against Syrian targets, seeking to retaliate against President Bashar Assad for a suspected chemical attack near Damascus on April 7, which, according to unconfirmed reports, killed dozens of people.
…
The US actions on foreign soil were taken by the president without the direct approval of lawmakers on Capitol Hill. Following Trump’s announcement, a number of them have condemned the move.
Here are some of the tweets.
Rep. John Garamendi (D-California):
This military action against Syria is a strike against a foreign government. Such an act requires a Congressional authorization to use force, and we have not provided one.
— John Garamendi (@RepGaramendi) April 14, 2018
Rep. Barbara Lee (D-California):
By illegally bombing Syria, President Trump has once again denied the American people any oversight or accountability in this endless war. Congress, not the president, has the power to authorize military action. https://t.co/9P25HQ8zq6
— Rep. Barbara Lee (@RepBarbaraLee) April 14, 2018
Senator Tim Kaine (D-Virginia):
Trump’s decision to launch airstrikes against Syria without Congress’s approval is illegal. We need to stop giving presidents a blank check to wage war. Today it’s Syria, but what’s going to stop him from bombing Iran or North Korea next?
— Tim Kaine (@timkaine) April 14, 2018
Senator Jeff Merkley (D-Oregon):
We have learned in Afghanistan and Iraq the dangers of launching military actions without clearly articulated objectives and exit strategies. If the President wants to wage war, the American people and Congress need to be part of that decision.
— Senator Jeff Merkley (@SenJeffMerkley) April 14, 2018
Rep. Thomas Massie (R-Kentucky):
I haven’t read France’s or Britain’s “Constitution,” but I’ve read ours and no where in it is Presidential authority to strike Syria.
— Thomas Massie (@RepThomasMassie) April 14, 2018
Rep. Lucille Roybal-Allard (D-California):
I believe that America must respond to the vile chemical attack in Syria, but that response must come through congressional approval. Instead, President Trump has once again struck Syria on his own. https://t.co/zJs9R2FE4l
— Rep. Lucille Roybal-Allard (@RepRoybalAllard) April 14, 2018
Rep. Tulsi Gabbard (D-Hawaii):
… so refugees can return home & begin to rebuild their lives, then we should work for peace, end our policy of interventionist regime change wars and stop trying to be the policeman of the world. (2/2)
— Tulsi Gabbard (@TulsiGabbard) April 14, 2018
Of course, the Jews themselves will create an anti-war movement against Trump. I’m sure they have something planned already. Just to come at him from that angle too. And these figures are a part of that I’m sure
Maybe Bernie will lead it. I don’t know.