Anti-Terrorist Moslem Suing SPLC for Defamation After Being Put on Their Hit List!

Andrew Anglin June 24, 2017

Andrew Anglin
Daily Stormer
June 24, 2017

You know, sometimes things work out so brilliantly, that it becomes absurd to not believe in some type of higher power or at least a higher spiritual order to the universe.

As the SPLC is involved in some very fishy legal action against a certain good-natured nationalist, satirist and free speech activist, a certain brown-skinned gentleman who is very good at wearing a plaid suit has decided to sue them for defamation.

Maajid Nawaz, yet another victim of the Jewish terrorist cabal, the SPLC

Maajid Nawaz, a Moslem who is opposed to terrorism, announced yesterday on the Bill Maher show that he is suing the harassment and defamation cartel for defamation.

Starts at 2:50.

He says “white people” approximately 27 times in reference to the Jews of the SPLC – but I ain’t even mad.

This is going to be making the rounds as a major news story.

This guy is a Moslem, but he’s against terrorism, so the SPLC has put him on their hate list. This isn’t simply defamation, as the hate list is also a harassment list and a hit list. If you are on that hate list, you and anyone associated with you get targeted by – ironically – a global machine of hate and violence.

Why they put a moderate Moslem against terrorism on that list, I in fact have no idea.

But I know the reasons Mark Potok gave, because I just looked it up on their website.

They are four-fold:

  1. He posted a cartoon of Muhammad on Twitter
  2. He went to a strip club in London one time
  3. He wrote a Daily Mail op-ed saying the niqab – the full face veil worn by Islamic women – should be banned in some public places
  4. He made a list of extreme Islamic groups operating in Britain and gave it to that government

Go read the report.

That’s what it actually says.

It was published on October 25th of last year, and even the Jew media was like “lolwut.”

This is a Hit List

The Atlantic interviewed him after he was first put on the hate list – and though I disagree with Nawaz completely on basically everything with regards to his politics, I agree 100% about what he says with regards to these Jews and their goddamned lists.

When I spoke to Nawaz on Thursday, he was both baffled and furious.

“They put a target on my head. The kind of work that I do, if you tell the wrong kind of Muslims that I’m an extremist, then that means I’m an target,” he said. “They don’t have to deal with any of this. I don’t have any protection. I don’t have any state protection. These people are putting me on what I believe is a hit list.”

Yep.

Welcome to my world, buddy.

They have been able to put us on hit lists and solicit violence against us for decades. A member of this hit list, Steve Scalise, was recently targeted for assassination by a fan of theirs. Another hit list member, the Family Research Council, a Christian group, was targeted by a terrorist mass shooter who explicitly stated that he got their location from the SPLC hit list.

I have yet to be targeted for assassination, because I make sure to keep my address private. However, the SPLC has been linked to two journalists who have harassed my mother, one of them showing her home on television, which forced her to move. Which in virtually any situation would be considered extremely unethical, but hey – Nazi mothers? Might as well subtly solicit violence against them. No one is going to say anything, right?

Presumably because the hit list did not result in a sniper attack as it did with Scalise, the SPLC has settled on suing me for blogging.

Nawaz also questioned the concept of hate lists/harassment lists/hit lists in general.

Nawaz … accused SPLC of “McCarthyism” for compiling the guide. “Who compiles lists of individuals these days?” he said. “Even if someone was an anti-Muslim bigot, there shouldn’t be lists of names of individuals.”

What the hell is the supposed purpose of these lists?

I am supposed to be the “hate group,” and I don’t compile lists. The only reason you would compile names of individuals on an actual list is that you are purposefully attempting to physically harm them and/or intimidate them with the threat of physical harm. Also, you would perhaps be intending to create a climate of fear – what is called a “chilling effect” – so that other individuals would be afraid to speak freely, fearing being put on a hit list.

The Atlantic also contacted Potok for the article, and he felt the need to state explicitly that the purpose is not to solicit violence against people, given that is just what anyone would automatically assume the purpose of such a list was – and because that is what it is used for in real life.

Potok rejected the argument out of hand. “If criticizing any number of people is McCarthyism, then I guess the only answer to never criticize anyone. One can disagree or agree with a particular listing that we’ve made. … In some sense, to make a statement like that is to say that we shouldn’t criticize.” He noted that SPLC was careful never to list addresses or contact information for those it labeled extremists. “Our point is not to make these people targets for violence, Potok said. “The point is to tamp down the really baseless targeting.”

See, he equates criticism with list-making.

The purpose of criticism of an individual or a group, I hope, is to make a logical, moving argument in order to sway opinion against their position. Everyone knows that. That’s not what we’re talking about. We’re talking about lists of the names of individuals and their locations.

Look, I criticize people all the time.

I use a lot of polemics. I pick apart people’s arguments.

I have never considered compiling a hate list.

And then he says “oh but we don’t list their addresses.”

Well, they have a “hate map” – a literal map of groups that they believe should be – that they believe should be what?

Criticized?

They have the specific suburb where the home address on my driver’s license is listed – listing my website as a “hate group.” Please note that this website is not a group. It’s a website. It’s “headquarters” is my room. And sometimes coffee shops and cafes that have wifi.

Who is kidding who here?

Obviously, if I was not taking precautions against it – precautions I have taken specifically because of this hit list – any psychotic in the central Ohio region could go find this list and look up my address on Google.

How is this detailed map of where individuals live a form of “criticism”?

Oh, and here’s an interesting little tid-bit – there are 917 “hate groups” on that list, and they certainly haven’t written criticisms of each of those 917 groups. So an individual criticism is not required for get your name and address – oh, sorry, the suburb where you live – on the list.

So just being listed and mapped is in itself a form of criticism?

What exactly is the argument here?

What point can this have other than the solicitation of violence against individuals?

This is what Potok says the point is:

“The point is to tamp down the really baseless targeting.”

So then, the point is to use the thinly veiled threat of potential violence to silence speech.

Am I missing something?

Obviously, the term “tamp down” is a very obscure way of saying “silence” and “baseless targeting” is a very obscure way of saying “speech we don’t agree with” – this sort of obscure terminology is meticulously premeditated.

What he is saying, in so many words, is: “we put people on lists, then put the general area where they live to make it easy for people to locate individuals in their region, because we want to silence their speech – but this has nothing to do with soliciting of violence.”

To be Clear

I’m not even saying that the SPLC hit list should be illegal.

It does fall within the bounds of protected speech.

What I am saying is that it is absolute insanity that the media refuses to call this out as what it is – a hit list – and will only print someone saying that when the SPLC decides to extend their hit list to Moslems who oppose terrorism.

This list has been used at least twice that we know of for gun violence, and who knows how many times for intimidation and other forms of attacks on individuals listed as “haters” based on a totally subjective standard of political correctness.

I mean, just imagine if I had a list of Jews and an interactive map showing where they live.

What would happen to me, do you think?

The SPLC tried to link me to the Dylann Roof shooting because they decided that maybe one of our commenters had a similar writing style (they never proved this – they repeated it several times explaining their writing analysis, then just started saying it as though it was a fact that he was a “contributor” to the site; this site was never mentioned in Roof’s trial).

Well: what if I had had an interactive map with the Emanuel African Methodist Episcopal Church listed as a “black hate church” (which is what it actually is)?

What would have happened then?

Nawaz’ Fund

As I say, the hate list is protected speech. So although Nawaz’ main concern is presumably his personal safety and that of his family, there’s nothing he can do about the hate list.

So he’s going after defamation. Which is always hard to prove as a public figure, although this is pretty clear-cut – he’s a practicing Moslem that they are accusing of being an anti-Moslem hater because he’s against terrorism.

Funnily enough, he also mentions people being called “Nazis” on his donation page, saying he wants to set a precedent that people won’t be allowed to do this.

He’s soliciting recurring monthly donations, which is a bit irregular. I guess he plans for this to be an ongoing jihad. As far as I can tell, he hasn’t actually filed the case yet. We will of course keep people updated on this, as I’m sure there are many readers who want to support his efforts against the SPLC, regardless of his Islamic nature.

I’m not sure that the goal here is to win the case, but rather to bring attention to the way the SPLC has a way of systematically intimidating individuals they disagree with. Which I of course support fully. Many good people are being threatened by these Jewish terrorists simply because they dare question the politically correct system.

As you can see here with Nawaz, this definition is ever-expanding. Eventually, everyone who is not a mixed-race transsexual communist Jew rioting in the streets calling for the murder of white men will be considered a “hater.”

They’ve chosen to use a projected emotion – “hate” – to define their opposition, which means it can be whoever they want it to be. I have never seen anyone as hate-filled as the Jews.

Well Gee Wiz, Mr. Cohen

There’s been a whole lot of bad publicity for the SPLC lately.

Beyond the Scalise shooting and this lawsuit, they are also being sued by an anti-invasion group for interfering with the 2016 elections by constantly implying Trump is the leader of a Klan-oriented hate group throughout the campaign. This violates their 501c3 tax-exempt status.

As the organization is almost entirely made-up of Jews, headed by the top Jew Richard Cohen, and as every Jew has de facto citizenship in Israel, they could also realistically be charged with interfering with the election on behalf of a foreign power, based on the standard that has now been set by the anti-Trump Sanhedrin, which is currently claiming that RT – a Russian owned media company – interfered with the election by publishing pro-Trump news.

This much bad publicity certainly isn’t good when you’re in the middle of an operation to abolish the First Amendment.

Tough times, Mr. Cohen.

Tough times.

© Copyright Daily Stormer 2023, All Rights Reserved -- Join the Daily Stormer site chat for future updates in case of further domain seizure.