Daily Stormer The Most Censored Publication in History
Andrew Anglin
Daily Stormer
October 30, 2016
Australia has basically been better than any other White country on dealing with the non-White invasion.
Though that isn’t really saying very much.
CNN:
Refugees who make the harrowing journey by sea to Australia might want to think twice about that perilous voyage.
They won’t be allowed to settle if a new law gets passed. Australian Prime Minister Malcolm Turnbull has introduced a new piece of legislation that would prevent refugees and asylum-seekers from ever settling in the country if they came by boat.
The announcement, which has come three years after the prime minister vowed to close the door to refugees who were smuggled by boat, has been blasted as a “severe and entirely unnecessary step” by one humanitarian group.
At a press conference Sunday, Turnbull decided to send an “absolutely unflinching, unequivocal message” by proposing a ban on refugee settlements should they arrive by boat. He said the law would be fairer to refugees going through the visa application process.
“A generous humanitarian program, a harmonious multicultural society, depends on the Australian government being in control of its borders,” he said. ” And it depends on us sending a united and concerted answer to the people smugglers, that if they seek to bring people to Australia, those passengers will never settle in this country.”
Well, that “harmonious multicultural society” part is gay.
And also an oxymoron.
Any excuse to post this meme.
Turnbull, who said his country already accepted thousands of refugees, said the policy would affect any asylum seekers taken to a regional processing facility in Nauru or Papua New Guinea since July 19, 2013. Asylum-seekers who tried to make it by boat to Australia under the age of 18 would be exempt from the policy.
Since 2012, refugees arriving in Australia by boat have been transferred to offshore centers in small Pacific nations such as Nauru and Papua New Guinea’s Manus Island, to make it clear they would not be settling in Australia.
Australian leaders have in the past defended the policy as necessary to stop people drowning at sea, despite multiple reports of abuses at the country’s offshore camps.
And who even are these “asylum seekers” in Australia?
What are Southeast Asian Moslems seeking asylum from?
Being poor?
Even if you decide that poverty is something that you need to “seek asylum” from, surely you’d have to be starving. And I’ve pack-backed all through Southeast Asia and never seen any of those swollen-belly African baby-looking people anywhere. Nor have I even seen any pictures of it in any of those countries.
That isn’t even happening in Africa anymore. It hasn’t for ten or fifteen years. Which is why you don’t see any recent photos of it, ever. I can guarantee you, White women and Jews would be going there to take pictures of it if it was happening. It’s just too cheap to mass-produced soy-based foods now. No one anywhere is starving, unless someone is using a militia or government army to block their food supply to starve them on purpose. And that’s really hard to do now because the UN will just airdrop them food.
I’m not really even sure it ever was happening on any sort of large scale. We always just see that same photograph, along with a couple others to support this “starving African children” meme.
Even if they are all starving, it seems to me that’s their own problem.
