Andrew Anglin
Daily Stormer
July 30, 2015
The biggest lie next to the Holocaust is that colonialism was evil. In fact, this lie might be even bigger than the Holocaust – it definitely involves more people and a longer period of history. But effectively, both the Holocaust hoax and the colonialism lie work together for the same purpose – to demonize Whites – and are forwarded by the same people – Christ-killing Jewish parasites.
The BBC recently went full-retard, and demanded that the British pay “reparations” to India for having colonized them.
At the end of May, the Oxford Union held a debate on the motion “This house believes Britain owes reparations to her former colonies”. Speakers included former Conservative MP Sir Richard Ottaway, Indian politician and writer Shashi Tharoor and British historian John Mackenzie. Shashi Tharoor’s argument in support of the motion, went viral in India after he tweeted it out from his personal account. The argument has found favour among Indians, where the subject of colonial exploitation remains a sore topic. Here he gives a summary of his views:
The thing here is, India has already been paid for whatever we got from them. They were paid with the gift of Western civilization, which is worth a lot more than tea leaves and silk. If it were not for the British, Indians would still be living in huts (well, a lot of them still are, but you get the point – all of them would be).
Colonialism, like modern UN globalism-feminism, was a misguided attempt to bring civilization to savages. It was Christian in nature, rather than secular humanist as is the modern globalist-feminist agenda, but the same stated principles applied, the same stated goals existed.
The biggest difference is that the Christian colonialists didn’t know that it was impossible to civilize Brown savages. So they were acting both genuinely and out of ignorance. Right now, we have the history of colonialism to prove the fact that the Brown savages cannot be civilized, so the modern globalist-feminist attempt to do so cannot possibly be considered genuine.
Another difference is that it is much less compassionate and significantly more brutal in nature. What the World Bank and the IMF do to these people is leagues beyond anything the Dutch East India Company ever did. They send UNESCO in to say “look, we built you a school and put a sign next to that tree” and claim that this makes up for forcing them into eternal servitude to Jew bankers.
Well, colonist empires also built schools, and in every former colony, these schools built by the British, Spanish, Dutch, Portuguese, French and Americans are considered the best schools in these territories which are now countries.
A Logical Demand from Brown People
There is only one form of blame Brown people can lay on White people: they can complain about the fact that we brought them civilization and caused their populations to explode, caused them to produce toxic waste and to destroy their forests and other nature.
It would be logical for Indians to say “if you wouldn’t have brought us antibiotics and industrial machinery, we would still be living peacefully in village huts and we wouldn’t have billions of people climbing all over each other in filth-ridden cities.”
I wouldn’t disagree with that complaint.
But what then would they be demanding as reparations? Certainly not cash, which will only lead to more development. No, they would instead be demanding that we enact a program to return them to their natural state, through mass-sterilizations, removal of advanced Western technologies and by cutting them off from the system of international trade.
And if that was what they were demanding, I would say “whatever it costs, it is the just and righteous thing that Britain pay for this to happen.”
This would not only bring justice to the Indians, who were pulled into civilization in a massive mistake of human history, but would also do justice to the environment of the planet earth, which Indians and other Brown people are too stupid not to destroy by misusing Western technology.