“Being Against Feminism Makes You No Better Than the Moslems”

Andrew Anglin
Daily Stormer
April 3, 2017

Last week I wrote an article about the scourge of feminism on our society, wherein I presented an argument that the abolition of traditional gender norms has had an overwhelmingly negative effect on our civilization.

Once again, a weird, desperate white knight white nationalist meme reared it’s head: that if you are against feminism, you are no better than the Moslems.

This is not an argument.

“People we don’t like do something so we shouldn’t do it” is not even close to being an argument.

This can be applied to all sorts of other things and not make sense.

Examples:

• “If you are against homosexuals, you are no better than the Moslems.”
• “If you are against the Jews, you are no better than the Moslems.”

You could even take it to even more ridiculous levels:

• “If you eat fruit, you are no better than the Moslems.”
• “If you have a beard, you are no better than the Moslems.”

You see?

Not an argument.

If people want to support feminism, they need to present real arguments.

The apparent argument is: “Moslems are our enemies, therefore they are bad people, therefore we should not do things that they do.” This is on the same level as “you have a personal issue.” It exists outside of any relevant data or logic.

Saying that anyone who has an issue with feminism is a pathetic loser who fails with women is not an argument, as nothing about the individual making a statement necessarily relates to the truth or falsity of a statement. It is simply an insult. These types of non-arguments have been promoted by the Jews to silence critics of their agenda.

Other examples:

• “You are against race-mixing because you fear the sexual virility of black men because of their huge dicks.”
• “You are against homosexuality because you are secretly gay.”

This bypasses data and logic completely, and is effectively a threat to defame you if you don’t go along with the narrative.

It is also not an argument to suggest that anyone who is opposed to the liberation of women is going to treat them in the more extreme ways that Moslems treat them. There is a dialectic.

The real “like the Moslems” argument, if it existed, would be: “If we became more like the Moslems in the way we treat women, our society would become weaker, because the Islamic treatment of women has weakened their society.” The inverse of that then, which is implied by the original statement, is: “Liberating women has strengthened our society, making it more stable than Islamic society.”

This is an actual argument, in that there is an explanation for it, but it is untrue as there is no data to support it.

The adoption of feminism has objectively harmed our society, and traditional sex roles have objectively given Moslems an advantage in this clash of civilizations we are involved in.

The fact that none of the supporters of feminism have an argument that amounts to anything other than an insult is extremely telling, and should be a red flag to anyone who is looking at this situation.

Where is the pro-feminist argument?