Daily Stormer The Most Censored Publication in History
Andrew Anglin
Daily Stormer
July 2, 2016
Bernie, pictured feeling the burn in his left arm.
Basically, here’s the deal:
The DNC did Jew-over Bernie Sanders. However, it turned out not to be necessary. Even without all of this Jewing of Bernie, he still would have lost because the colored people all vote as a bloc, and they voted for Hillary.
The DNC didn’t know how it would turn out, so they had an insurance policy set-up, making it certain that Bernie couldn’t win. So technically, they could lose this case, I guess.
Though I’m pretty sure they couldn’t lose it, because they were following their own rules, which were set-up to make sure that no outsider candidate like Bernie could ever have a chance of getting the nomination.
What will most likely happen is that Bernie will come out against the case.
RT:
Supporters of Democratic presidential candidate Bernie Sanders are in fight back mode after their candidate was unable to pass his opponent Hillary Clinton during the primary, by suing Democratic National Committee Chair Debbie Wasserman Schultz (DWS) for fraud and negligence.
In other words, they’re suing her for being Jewish, which may be some sort of hate crime.
Probably is.
Proving that they aren’t just poor losers, the 104 Bernie backers are joined in the class-action lawsuit by 17 others who claim the system of choosing a nominee for the party was rigged and its chair, long-time Clinton insider DWS, is to blame.
Filed by a Miami-based law firm in the Southern District Court of Florida this week, it claims DSW lied to both the DNC and Bernie Sanders supporters over her “neutrality,” instead favoring Clinton.
Citing the DNC charter, the suit notes how the party’s chair is meant to exercise and maintain “impartiality and evenhandedness” during the presidential nominating process.
Primarily basing their case on information leaked by “Guccifer 2.0” in June, which was allegedly lifted from DNC servers, claimants state that in reality, “the DNC was biased in favor of one candidate – Hillary Clinton – from the beginning and throughout the process.”
Lawyers say the DNC, through DWS, “devoted its considerable resources to supporting Clinton above any of the other Democratic candidates” and that it “actively concealed its bias” from its own donors as well as donors to the campaigns of Clinton’s rivals, including Sanders.
It’s argued that the “truth of the DNC’s deception” can be found in the Guccifer documents, pointing to one leaked DNC memo from 2015 which showed there was “a suggested strategy for positioning and public messaging around the 2016 Republican presidential field” and the importance of providing “a contrast between the GOP field and HRC [Hillary Rodham Clinton],” long before any Democrats cast their votes in the primary or caucuses.
The same memo also advised to “muddy the water” around “ethics, transparency and campaign finance attacks on HRC” by planting stories in the media “with no fingerprints.”
…Lawyers are bringing a total of six counts against DWS and the DNC including fraud on the basis that “defendants knowingly made false statements and omissions” and that such conduct was “intentional, willful, wanton, and malicious.”
Yeah, I mean, it is a sneaky conspiracy.
But again, private communications which indicate a strategy to support one candidate over another probably don’t violate the DNC’s own charter when you get down to lawyer-speak. The “neutrality” part would just involve specific official procedures, rather than anything behind the scenes.
Or so I would assume.
But who knows.
