Bibi Visting Against Barry’s Will Continues to Cause Chaos in Congress

Andrew Anglin
Daily Stormer
February 7, 2015

Bibi doesn't need invited into your base by the boss of your base.  He just goes inside of your base as he pleases.
Bibi doesn’t need invited into your base by the boss of your base. He just goes inside of your base as he pleases.

I’m loving this Jew breakdown re: Bibi visiting without Bongo’s permission.

I honestly don’t really see that there is anything going on here beyond what appears to be going on: Obama and Netanyahu genuinely don’t like each other, and both perceive that they possess more power than they actually possess.

AP:

Democrats simmered in frustration last week as they faced a thankless choice between defending their president and defending the Jewish state they consider a crucial ally.

Some gleeful Republicans predicted Democrats’ complaints about Benjamin Netanyahu’s March 3 speech will drive Jewish voters to the GOP. Rep. Joe Wilson, R-S.C., a member of the House Armed Services Committee, said Democrats are making a “catastrophic mistake” by protesting Netanyahu’s plans.

“Traditionally, supporters of Israel have been really even-handed in supporting candidates of both parties,” Wilson said, but now “Democrats are slapping the friends of Israel in the face.”

Democrats reject such talk, saying Republicans have repeatedly overstated their appeal to Jewish voters. Obama got 78 percent of the Jewish vote in 2008, and 69 percent in 2012, according to exit polls. Congressional Democrats won two-thirds of Jewish votes in last fall’s midterm elections, an especially bad year for their party.

Republicans want to portray Democrats as less supportive of Israel, “but no matter how much they try, they can’t move Jewish voters on this issue,” said Jeremy Ben-Ami, president of the liberal pro-Israel group J Street.

House Democrats say Speaker John Boehner, R-Ohio, showed disrespect to the president — and perhaps cynical political goals — when he invited Netanyahu to address a House-Senate gathering next month. Presidents can’t veto congressional speakers, but they usually are consulted.

Many Democrats object for three reasons: The invitation rebukes Obama; the speech, scheduled three weeks before Israel’s elections, might be designed to boost Netanyahu’s re-election hopes; and Netanyahu is certain to back new sanctions on Iran that the administration and Western powers argue could scuttle sensitive negotiations over Iran’s nuclear program.

The speech comes three weeks before the deadline for the U.S. and its international partners to reach a framework nuclear agreement with Iran, one that could provide an outline for a more comprehensive deal to be finalized by late June.

Netanyahu says an accord could make it easier for Iran eventually to develop nuclear weapons. Iran says its nuclear program is for peaceful purposes only. Obama says he will reject any deal that doesn’t safeguard Israel and other countries.

Nonetheless, some congressional Democrats want tougher sanctions against Iran. But they weren’t pleased by Netanyahu’s acceptance of Boehner’s invitation. Soon after its announcement, several Democratic senators postponed their push for new sanctions against Iran, giving Obama and the negotiators more time.

Obama’s chief concern about the break in protocol, his spokesman Josh Earnest said, “is to ensure that the strong relationship between the United States and Israel is protected from partisan politics.”

In the House, some Democrats say they won’t attend Netanyahu’s address. The way it was scheduled was “an affront to the president and the State Department,” said Rep. John Lewis of Georgia.

Rep. G.K. Butterfield of North Carolina called Boehner’s actions unprecedented, and said Netanyahu has “politicized” his U.S. visit.

House Democratic leader Nancy Pelosi, another critic of the speech’s arrangements, says she will attend. Lawmakers often skip such addresses for different reasons, she said, so even if some seats are empty, “don’t even think in terms of the word ‘boycott.’ Members will go or they won’t go, as they usually go or don’t go.”

Obama has no plans to meet with Netanyahu during his U.S. trip.

What is interesting is the way the American Jews are backing Obama rather than Bibi, perhaps indicating he is losing favor in their eyes due to his baby-killing, which has made most people in the world hate the Jews. American Jews typically tend to be much more liberal than Israeli Jews, and this is hopefully a divide which will grow and cause confusion among the ranks of the rats.

What is incredible is that the with as huge of a deal as this is in congress, the American people could care less about this baby-killing Jew and his #JewPeopleProblems.

As much as people in Europe like to play up the “American Zionist Christians have an undying love of Israel” angle, the fact is that most of those with this undying love are dying. Giving the Jews money to steal people’s homes and kill their kids was baby-boomer fad, and half of these people are already too senile to call their congressmen and tell them to help Bibi start a war with Iran. The majority of still sentient conservative people are focused on domestic issues, fed up with these endless wars for Jews.

On the other end of the spectrum, whatever love liberals had for that “only democracy in the Middle East” has surely dissipated, following that mass-murder situation in Gaza.

So the fact that Israel is still such a focal point of congress and American foreign policy in general demonstrates clearly what was already obvious to most: The American system is completely dominated by Jews.