“Blame Russia” Stratagem Gets Weirder and More Intense – Setting Up to Blame Them for Trump Win

Andrew Anglin
Daily Stormer
September 5, 2016

red-rape

New Clinton campaign ad

The Democrat strategy to demonize Russia – the last White country – by blaming them for everything continues to get more extreme and bizarre by the day, despite the fact that it is gaining little to no traction among the majority of Americans.

Part of the problem is that no one really pays much attention to the media anymore and part of the problem is the Cold War ended twenty-five years ago and no one even thinks about Russia.

I ask American people what they think about Russia, and the typical answer is “you mean that country from the 80’s? I don’t really know anything about them.”

That includes both left and right-leaning people. No one is sitting around worrying about Russia in the way people are sitting around worrying about ISIS.

But the government/media apparatus has lost its ability to do effective propaganda. Probably because intelligent people who are not Jewish refuse to be a part of such a slimy scam at this point.

Washington Post:

U.S. intelligence and law enforcement agencies are probing what they see as a broad covert Russian operation in the United States to sow public distrust in the upcoming presidential election and in U.S. political institutions, intelligence and congressional officials said.

The aim is to understand the scope and intent of the Russian campaign, which incorporates cyber-tools to hack systems used in the political process, enhancing Russia’s ability to spread disinformation.

The effort to better understand Russia’s covert influence operations is being spearheaded by James R. Clapper Jr., the director of national intelligence. “This is something of concern for the DNI,” said Charles Allen, a former longtime CIA officer who has been briefed on some of these issues. “It is being addressed.”

A Russian influence operation in the United States “is something we’re looking very closely at,” said one senior intelligence official who, as others interviewed, spoke on the condition of anonymity to discuss a sensitive matter. Officials are also examining potential disruptions to the election process, and the FBI has alerted state and local officials to potential cyberthreats.

The official cautioned that the intelligence community is not saying it has “definitive proof” of such tampering, or any Russian plans to do so. “But even the hint of something impacting the security of our election system would be of significant concern,” the official said. “It’s the key to our democracy, that people have confidence in the election system.”

See.

The (((Washington Post))) cares a lot more about this than the intelligence community.

WaPo is all like “so Russia is trying to infiltrate and take over the United States and elect Donald Trump through a network of email phishing scams?”

And the spies are just like “look bro – I dunno, maybe.”

The plan here is apparently that if Trump wins, they are going to say it was due to Russian manipulation.

You would pretty much have to be on a meth binge to even think that up.

The Kremlin’s intent may not be to sway the election in one direction or another, officials said, but to cause chaos and provide propaganda fodder to attack U.S. democracy-building policies around the world, particularly in the countries of the former Soviet Union.

U.S. intelligence officials described the covert influence campaign here as “ambitious” and said it is also designed to counter U.S. leadership and influence in international affairs.

One congressional official, who has been briefed recently on the matter, said “Russian ‘active measures’ or covert influence or ma­nipu­la­tion efforts, whether it’s in Eastern Europe or in the United States” are worrisome.

It “seems to be a global campaign,” the aide said. As a result, the issue has “moved up as a priority” for the intelligence agencies, which include the FBI and Department of Homeland Security as well as the CIA and the National Security Agency.

Yeah but what is it though?

1337 russian haxor adWhat are we even talking about here?

Specifically?

Some congressional leaders briefed recently by the intelligence agencies on Russian influence operations in Europe, and how they may serve as a template for activities here, have been disturbed by what they heard.

After Senate Minority Leader Harry M. Reid (D-Nev.) ended a secure, 30-minute phone briefing by a top intelligence official recently, he was “deeply shaken,” according to an aide who was with Reid when he left the secure room at the FBI’s Las Vegas headquarters.

The Russian government hack of the Democratic National Committee, disclosed by the DNC in June but not yet officially ascribed by the U.S. government to Russia, and the subsequent release of 20,000 hacked DNC emails by WikiLeaks, shocked officials. Cyber-analysts traced its digital markings to known Russian government hacking groups.

They are claiming that Russia is the only entity capable of sending phishing emails. Apparently.

“We’ve seen an unprecedented intrusion and an attempt to influence or disrupt our political process,” said Rep. Adam B. Schiff (Calif.), the ranking Democrat of the House Intelligence Committee, speaking about the DNC hack and the WikiLeaks release on the eve of the Democratic convention. The disclosures, which included a number of embarrassing internal emails, forced the resignation of DNC Chairwoman Debbie Wasserman Schultz.

(((Adam B. Schiff))) is concerned that Russia forced the resignation of (((Debbie Wasserman Schultz))).

No wonder so many people hate America – it’s totally run by Jews.

Members of both parties are urging the president to take the Russians to task publicly.

Sen. Ben Sasse (R-Neb.) in a statement urged President Obama to publicly name Russia as responsible for the DNC hack and apparent meddling in the electoral process. “Free and legitimate elections are non-negotiable. It’s clear that Russia thinks the reward outweighs any consequences,” he wrote. “That calculation must be changed. . . . This is going to take a cross-domain response — diplomatic, political and economic — that turns the screws on [Russian President Vladimir] Putin and his cronies.”

Yeah but there’s no evidence though?

Administration officials said they are still weighing their response.

Russia has denied that it carried out any cyber-intrusions in the United States. Putin called the accusations against Russia by U.S. officials and politicians an attempt to “distract the public’s attention.”

“It doesn’t really matter who hacked this data from Mrs. Clinton’s campaign headquarters,” Putin said, referring to Democratic presidential nominee Hillary Clinton, in an interview with Bloomberg News. “The important thing is the content was given to the public.”

The Department of Homeland Security has offered local and state election officials help to prevent or deal with Election Day cyber-disruptions, including vulnerability scans, regular actionable information and alerts, and access to other tools for improving cybersecurity at the local level. It will also have a cyber-team ready at the National Cybersecurity and Communications Integration Center to alert jurisdictions if attacks are detected.

Last month, the FBI issued an unprecedented warning to state election officials urging them to be on the lookout for intrusions into their election systems and to take steps to upgrade security measures across the voting process, including voter registration, voter roles and election-related websites. The confidential “flash” alert said investigators had detected attempts to penetrate election systems in several states.

Arizona, Illinois and both the Democratic and Republican parties, as well as the DNC, have been the victims of either attempted or successful cyberattacks that FBI agents with expertise in Russian government hacking are investigating.

There was one password stolen. Allegedly.

Now it’s a Russian plot to take down the American electoral system.

redscare-H

The level of disdain that WaPo has for its own readership is truly staggering.

Federal law enforcement and local election officials say the decentralized nature of the voting process, which is run by states and counties, makes it impossible to ensure a high level of security in each district.

“I have a lot of concern” about this year’s election, said Ion Sancho, the longtime supervisor of elections in Leon County, Fla. “America doesn’t have its act together,” said Sancho, who has authorized red team attacks on his voting system to identify its vulnerabilities. “We need a plan.”

Recently, Homeland Security Secretary Jeh Johnson said he favors designating the various voting systems used in the country’s 9,000 polling places as “critical infrastructure” — in other words as vital to the nation’s safe functioning as nuclear power plants and electrical power grids.

A Federal seizure of the electoral system is what he is proposing.

But here’s the interesting part.

Russia has been in the vanguard of a growing global movement to use propaganda on the Internet to influence people and political events, especially since the political revolt in Ukraine, the subsequent annexation of Crimea by Russia, and the imposition of sanctions on Russia by the United States and the European Union.

The Baltic states, Georgia and Ukraine have been subject to Russian cyberattacks and other hidden influence operations meant to disrupt those countries, officials said.

“Our studies show that it is very likely that [the influence] operations are centrally run,” said Janis Sarts, director of the NATO Strategic Communications Center of Excellence, a Riga, Latvia-based research organization.

He also said there is “a coordinated effort involving [groups using] Twitter and Facebook and networks of bots to amplify their message. The main themes seem to be orchestrated rather high up in the hierarchy of the Russian state, and then there are individual endeavors by people to exploit specific themes.”

Sarts said the Russian propaganda effort has been “successful in exploiting the vulnerabilities within societies.” In Western Europe, for instance, such Russian information operations have focused on the politically divisive refugee crisis.

Talk about paranoid delusion.

This is like that movie “The Thing.”

hero_EB19820101REVIEWS201010349AR

“People are against the mass Islamic invasion of Europe because of a Russian campaign on twitter using bots.”

The fact is that people like Russia and don’t like the West. Because this conflict isn’t really economic. It is ideological. One might even dare say “spiritual.”

People like Russia for the same reason they like Donald Trump. Because they are opposing what people hate, which is the current Jewish system of multiculturalism and no freedom.

It is interesting though that by taking the approach of blaming Russia for people disliking multiculturalism, they are effectively admitting that this is an ideological war and they are attempting to sway people to believe in their mass-invasion agenda, while also admitting that Russia represents – or at least is perceived to represent – opposition to this.

For my part, I have no idea what Russia’s long-term global agenda is. By all appearances, they are simply defending themselves as they are attacked on every front, while being accused of doing things they aren’t doing.

What I do know is that in Russia, they have a value system which is very close to my own, and very far from that of the Jewish globalists. From this point of understanding, it isn’t difficult to see who the good guys are.