Daily Stormer The Most Censored Publication in History
Sven Longshanks
Daily Stormer
December 27, 2014
A repulsive fashion-promoting website has produced an article designed to encourage parents to deliberately confuse their children and reward them for behaving like an adult transsexual.
Brad Pitt and Angelina Jolie have been used as the parenting model because they believe they have a he/she for a child.
Angelina Jolie’s entire family recently stepped out on the red carpet to support their mother’s new movie, Unbroken. The couple’s oldest biological child, who was assigned female at birth, joined brothers Maddox and Pax wearing sharp suits and short haircuts.
‘Was assigned female at birth’ – Did she have no gender before then? If so, then why do the ultra-sound nurses ask you if you wish to know the gender of your child when they scan them at 20 weeks? Do Y chromosomes only appear at birth? The idea that gender is assigned at birth is insane. From the moment the egg is fertilized, it either produces XX chromosomes which are female, or XY which are male. Anything different to this and the fetus has a genetic disorder.
Pitt and Jolie have been fairly open over the years about Shiloh’s interest in all things considered masculine. In an interview with Oprah in 2008, Brad Pitt discussed how Shiloh wanted to be called John.
Shiloh obviously has older brothers and naturally thinks the world of them and imitates them. This does not mean the girl is a degenerate however – it is the parents that are degenerate in this case.
Girls usually go through a tomboy phase and until recently, nobody ever thought anything of it. They certainly would never have encouraged it and told the child they could magically change into a boy just by dressing like one.
Girls are naturally the weaker sex, so the desire to be the stronger sex is going to be a stage that they encounter before they realize their own strengths, which are different from the male ones. Instead of allowing this to happen naturally, these brainwashed celebrity liberals will start telling the child that they are extra special and a different gender all of their own. Then, in an attempt to make out that the gender disorder is normal, they will start rewarding and praising the types of behaviour that would definitely have been considered abnormal by all our previous generations.
The eight-year-old’s family fully supports their decision to self-identify — from an affinity for suits and ties to shorter hair to the name change. (Editor’s Note: We have followed the Advocate‘s lead, and referred to John Jolie-Pitt as “they” as a gender-neutral pronoun to respect John’s decision, whatever gender they may end up being.)
This is the type of behavior that should be discouraged. It is all very well her playing with her brother’s toys, but encouraging her to change her name and cut her hair in a boys haircut is just sick. This is child abuse and neglect. A child is named by the parents because the child belongs to the parents, something which a child needs to feel and know in order to be secure. Besides confusing them by saying they can be a different gender, they are also isolating them and treating them as if they have a fully formed adult personality, capable of making informed decisions. On top of this, the child sees that they are given more attention by the media and paparazzi by pretending to be a different gender.
Jolie told Vanity Fair in a 2010 interview that John has been exploring their identity since the age of three. “She wants to be a boy,” Jolie said. “So we had to cut her hair. She likes to wear boys’ everything. She thinks she’s one of the brothers.”
The actress has been encouraging this deviant behavior and treating the child as if she were a sexually aware adult from the age of three. Three-year-olds do not make decisions like that, their parents dress them and cut their hair and the child seeks to please the parents. Because they have rewarded her behaviour, the child now thinks that identifying with a boy will make her parents happy. On top of this they have told her she is male, that is the only way she would think she was ‘one of the brothers.’
The Telegraph used the Pitt-Jolie story as an opportunity to educate adults on how to handle a child’s cross-gender explorations. It’s easy to dismiss a child’s tendency to gravitate toward toys and clothing generally assigned to its opposite gender as a phase.
Now these criminally negligent parents have the audacity to lecture other parents on how to handle a child being a tomboy! The last thing any decent parents want is for the tomboy phase to be perverted into a gender disorder! These twisted excuses for humanity even admit that they are actively working to prevent it from just being a phase. This is so sick.
Predictably, the psychologist comes out with conflicting double-speak at the end of the article, so as not to risk being politically incorrect and contradicting the tone of it. She says parents should not jump to the conclusion that their child has a gender disorder, (or start celebrating as in the case of Jolie) but then says that they should follow the celebrities example.
The child is obviously going to turn out messed up as an adult, as she has celebrities for parents, but instead of doing their best to prevent that, the Pitts are doing all they can to make it a certainty. On top of that, you then have all the gullible fashion-conscious parents that will read an article like this and then do the best they can to turn their own children into messed up, gender confused wrecks, just so they can use their child as a fashion accessory and claim to be just like the Pitts.
This is what happens when you tolerate deviancy in society. Toleration means acceptance and acceptance means allowing it to be promoted. What sort of a people have we become that thinks it is good to do this to our children?
